in some other way yet we ought not to neglect our Duty Because I have obtained Faith in some other than God's usual way for the begetting it shall I not hear the Word preached for the further increasing it in my Heart Again because I have remission of Sins and other Blessings promised in Baptism before baptized shall I reject that Ordinance Sure Cornelius did not do so Acts 10. 45 47. And again I feed by Faith on Jesus Christ and receive his Flesh which is Meat indeed and his Blood which is Drink indeed shall I therefore refuse the Ordinance of the Lord's Supper which is appointed as the Ministry of his Body and Blood God forbid Even so let none neglect this Appointment nothwithstanding any Gift or Measure of the Holy Spirit they have received since it has pleased God to direct to it and left it in his House as a perpetual Ministration Destroy it not for a Blessing that is in it Isa 65.8 Motive 5. Consider the great need thou hast of the Holy Spirit yea and of a further increase thereof tho I should grant thou hast received it already for without it none can savingly believe nor call Jesus Lord. Yet there is a further Promise made to thee as thou art a Believer in Jesus Christ and what can a poor Saint do without the Spirit what Temptations dost thou meet with what Lusts and Corruptions still hast thou to mortify and what outward Tribulations art thou who professest the Gospel exposed to O therefore use all means and particularly this which God injoins thee that thou mayst obtain a further measure and increase of the Spirit of God Motive 6. Lastly Consider the excellent and unspeakable worth and usefulness of the Holy Spirit O what spiritual Profit and Advantage do the Saints of God receive hereby 1. 'T is the Holy Spirit that enlightens the eyes of our Vnderstandings 1 Cor. 2. 10 11 12 13. Eph. 1.17 we cannot see afar off without our Eyes are anointed with this Eye-salve And O what Beauty do we hereby behold in Jesus Christ how are our Souls taken with invisible Objects and what an empty and nothing-World is this when we look through the Prospect-glass of the Spirit of God upon it 2. 'T is the Holy Spirit that revives and quickens us and makes us lively in the Paths of Righteousness Joh. 6.63 Col. 2.13 3. 'T is the Spirit that leads us in the way we should walk Rom. 8.14 yea and makes them Paths of peace and pleasantness unto our Souls Prov. 3.17 't is he that guides us into all Truth and brings Christ's Words to our remembrance Joh. 14.26 4. 'T is the Holy Spirit that comforts us when cast down 't is from hence we receive all Heavenly Consolation Joh. 14. 16 26. 5. 'T is the Holy Spirit that makes us profit under the Word and means of Grace 't is that which maketh our Souls to grow and flourish in the Courts of the Lord's House Heb. 4.2 1 Cor. 3.6 6. 'T is the Spirit that helps us to pray helps our Infirmities and teacheth us what to pray for and gives us access at the Throne of Grace yea makes Intercession for us with groanings that cannot be uttered Rom. 8.26 7. 'T is by the Spirit we cry Abba Father 't is that which bears witness with our Spirits that we are the Children of God Rom. 8. 13 15 16. 8. 'T is by the Holy Spirit we mortify the Deeds of the body Gal. 5.22 't is by that we live and stand and are confirmed in Christ Jesus and sanctified throughout 9. 'T is from the Holy Spirit that all heavenly Grace and spiritual Gifts flow 't is he that divides to every man severally as he will 1 Cor. 12. 5 8 9. 10. 'T is the Holy Spirit which is the Earnest of our Inheritance and which gives an Assurance of the purchased Possession unto our Souls Eph. 1. 10 14. 11. 'T is the Holy Spirit by which we are sealed to the day of Redemption Eph. 1.13 12. 'T is by the Spirit we are made strong and enabled to overcome all Enemies and helped to triumph over Death 1 Cor. 15. 55 57. 't is by the Spirit we know that when our earthly House is dissolved we have a Building of God a House not made with hands eternal in the Heavens 2 Cor. 5.1 These things considered let none blame us that we so earnestly contend for the Holy Ordinance of Prayer with Imposition of Hands in which God has promised and so sweetly communicated as through a Conduit-Pipe such blessed Water of Life to our Souls Shall it not trouble our Spirits when Persons labour to take away the Childrens Bread or spill any of their sweet and heavenly Milk upon the ground CHAP. IX In answer to the Conclusion of Mr. Danvers's Book Mr. Danvers's Conclusion THus you have had a candid Account of the rise growth and progress of this Rite of Confirmation or Laying on of hands from the beginning to this day amongst all that have owned it with the Authorities on which it hath been found and imposed together with a genuine Examination of the Grounds and Reasons each Party have given to justify the same And may we not upon the whole fairly come to the following Conclusions viz. 1. That there doth not appear to be the least Scripture precept or Practice for any such Ordinance of Confirmation or an imposing of hands upon all the Baptized before they break bread or are admitted into Church-communion 2. That the Instances produced to prove it an Apostolical Tradition are impious Lies and Forgeries 3. That the Authorities by which it hath been heretofore enjoined were nothing but Antichristian Can. Decrees 4. That the most eminent Witnesses and Confessors that opposed the Antichristian Vsurpations and Innovations have all along witnessed against and impugned this of Confirmation viz. the Novations Donatists Waldenses Greek Churches Wicklissians All which are worthy the serious consideration of all sober and judicious Christians and especially recommended to them who having rejected Infants and imbraced Believers Baptism do yet cleave to this Practice with these following Observations viz. 1. It is most manifest that those Popes Councils and Fathers that have enjoined and imposed Infants sprinkling for a Sacrament or an Ordinance of Christ have enjoined this also as such 2. That the principal Arguments pretended for the one have been urged and pleaded for the other also viz. Apostolical Tradition and pretended Inferences and Consequences from Scripture 3. That the famous Churches and Confessors that have opposed Infants sprinkling as superstitious Popish and Antichristian have upon the same account opposed this also 4. That it doth not appear that any baptized Church or People did ever in any Age or Country own such a Principle or Practice to this day except some in this Nation in these late times CHAP. IX In answer to the Conclusion of Mr. Danvers's Book The Conclusion of this Treatise in opposition to his
it whose Authority he labours to disprove calling them suborned Witnesses and Knights of the Post CHAP. III Shewing who the Antients are and of their Credit and Authority who have born witness to Laying on of Hands ADmit we grant what Mr. Danvers speaks concerning Dionysius the Areopagite and the Decretal Epistles of the first Popes to be impious Lies and Forgeries shall we therefore conclude they are all suborned Witnesses viz. the Antients who have written concerning Laying on of Hands Surely many of the Fathers who have born witness thereunto are generally received and their Authority approved as the best of human Writers What say you to Tertullian shall we call him a Knight of the Post Take his Testimony A.D. 200. de Bapt. c. 6. Manus imponitur per benedictionem advocans invitans Spiritum Sanctum tunc ille Sanctissimus Spiritus super emundata benedicta Corpora libens à Patre descendit After Baptism the Hand is imposed by Blessing and calling and inviting of the Holy Spirit who willingly descends from the Father on the Bodies that are cleansed and blessed Moreover he saith It is the fleshly or outward act of Baptism that we are dipt in water the spiritual effects that we are freed from our Sins Then follows Laying on of hands the Dispenser inviting the Spirit of God by Prayer And being cleansed by Baptismal Water saith he we are disposed for the Holy Spirit under the Hands of the Angel of the Church And further speaking concerning the happy state of the Church in this day he saith de Script cap. 36. She believeth in God she signs with Water that is baptizeth she clothes with the Spirit viz. by Imposition of hands she feeds with the Eucharist and exhorts to Martyrdom and against this Order or Institution she receives no Man Another Witness I shall call in shall be Eusebius not the Pope of that Name but Eusebius Pamphilus who lived in the time of Constantinus Magnus the Emperor about three hundred Years after Christ he certifies fully to our purpose lib. 7. c. 2. that the antient manner of receiving Members into the Church was with Prayer and Laying on of hands Doubtless by calling it the antient manner he must needs refer to the Apostles time Again Eusebius declareth lib. 6. c. 26. That one Novatus being sick was baptized if it may be called a Baptism saith he which he received for he obtained not after his recovery that which he should have done by the Canon of the Church to wit Confirmation by the Hands of the Bishop which having not obtained how can he be supposed to have received the Holy Spirit This was about the Year 260. 'T is also to be noted that in neither of those places nor any where else in Eusebius is the least mention made of Crossing or Chrysm in the administration of this Ordinance Cyprian shall be the next whom none I suppose take for a suborned Witness having urged that of the Apostles going to Samaria to impose Hands on those that Philip had baptized saith he which Custom is also descended to us that they who are baptized might be brought by the Rulers of the Church and by Prayer and Imposition of Hands obtain the Holy Ghost Again saith St. Cyprian Ep. ad Steph. de Haereticis Ep. 72. It is of no purpose to lay Hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit unless they receive the Baptism of the Church I might produce Origen in his 7th Homily upon Ezekiel who speaks concerning it Also Hierom who answers this Question viz. Why he that is baptized in the Church doth not receive the Holy Ghost but by Imposition of hands saith he Dial. ad Lucifer This Observation for the honour of the Priesthood did descend from the Scriptures If you ask me where it is written 't is answered in Actibus Apostolorum in the Acts of the Apostles Ambrose is cited by Mr. Danvers himself with Augustin and others whose Authority is not questioned To which I might add Chrysostom Theodoret c. Several others yea many might be produced besides those he calls suborned Witnesses and yet have we far better Authors and Witnesses to defend this sacred Truth for we have the Authority of our Lord Jesus Christ 't is left on record amongst the first Principles of his Doctrine we have the Testimony of the Apostles Peter and John and one not inferior to them viz. blessed St. Paul Heb. 5. 12. and 6. 1 2. as hath and shall God assisting be made further evident And upon no better Authority I must confess is this sacred Ordinance imposed upon us But now to speak more directly to Mr. Danvers what he insists on in pag. 33. about the Rite of Confirmation as practised in the Church of Rome and as corrupted from the pure Institution we readily grant it is of no better Authority than Infants Baptism And as touching what he speaks of Rivet Controv. Tom. 2. Exercit. p. 44. that it was neither instituted by Christ nor his Apostles 't is spoken with respect of the Popish manner with Chrysm and other ridiculous Ceremonies which was before done with Prayer and Imposition of hands without Chrysm They did saith Mr. Baxter make haste to corrupt it they quickly introduced the Crosses and Chrysm but from the beginning it was not so And as to what he says concerning Ambrose Jerom Augustin and some others it is granted they lived in those times when the Church was adulterated and the holy Appointments of Christ corrupted and changed from their primitive purity yet this makes no more against the holy Ordinance of Laying on of hands than it doth against Baptism and the Supper of our Lord c. as I have already shewed All that Mr. Danvers hath said hitherto of Tradition and Fathers makes only against the Church of Rome and England and others who have drunk of the Whores Cup those things which they cry up for Apostolical Traditions are nought else save meer human Innovations and cursed Inventions of corrupt Men. I shall close this with a passage of Dr. Jer. Taylor who treating about Laying on of hands upon baptized Persons as such saith This was antient and long before Popery entred into the World and that this Rite has been more abused by Popery than by any thing As to what Mr. Danvers speaks of the Waldenses that the true ones were against Imposition of hands if that be true yet it must be understood of the Popish Confirmation which they disowned as a Sacrament accompanied with Ceremonies for so I find they express themselves Such a Confirmation I grant they witness against as being none of Christ's Institution but introduced by the Devil's Instigation 't was the corruption of it and not the thing it self doubtless they witness against but that they owned not Laying on of hands at all after Baptism before admission was granted to the Lord's Table I judg too hard for any to make appear But if they were ignorant of
is just nothing that is asserted But is it in Mat. 28.19 or Acts 10.48 said in so many plain words Let all Believers be baptized 't is not so read in my Bible Nay and I affirm that from Mat. 28.19 20. none can prove that all Believers ought to be baptized in Water without making use of some Inference or some other Text of Scripture to prove it for as much as Water is not exprest or mentioned there Suppose a Quaker should tell you the Apostles had power given them to baptize with the Holy Ghost and that Christ commanded them to baptize all those that were taught or discipled with the Spirit and that it intends not Water in the least what would you say or do to refute him Do you think you should not need some Consequence or other or help from some other Scripture to prove 't is Water which is intended there But again secondly Is it said in 1 Cor. 11.24 in so many plain words Let all Believers eat the Lord's Supper or in Acts 2.41 42 The Pedobaptists say how can you prove by so many plain words that Women received the Lord's Supper I grant 't is easy to prove they did yet when they demand such plain Texts for it how do you answer them is it not by Inferences And I see not how such Answers do in the least betray the truth or the justice of our Cause as do not our Answers to such Queries so usually brought by those that assert Pedobaptism confute us as you are pleased to say p. 54. for we are not in the least against drawing of Inferences or natural Consequences from the Scripture And would not you allow any Pedobaptist to urge a Text of Scripture and infer what he will from it for his Practice provided it may naturally be infer'd or drawn from the Premises or Text he brings surely you as well as we will readily give him that liberty But when Men shall mention Scriptures to prove their Principles or Practice by and infer this or that from them to the palpable wronging and wresting of the Text it being as far from the intent of the Spirit of God therein as the East is from the West as the Consequences and Inferences brought from Circumcision and federal Holiness to prove Infants Baptism they are such kind of Inferences we declare against But we need not trouble our selves with things of this nature having the holy Scriptures so plain for our Practice as Acts 8.17 Acts 19.6 and Heb. 6.1 2. where it is called a Foundation-Principle of the Doctrine of Christ To this he says in p. 42. by way of Concession That Laying on of hands is a Principle of the Doctrine of Christ But then he says It must be such a Laying on of hands as is somewhere taught or practised but such a Laying on of hands upon all baptized Believers we find no where taught or practised Jesus Christ had no hands laid upon him by John Baptist after he baptized him neither did he give one word of it in his Commission upon his Ascension neither do we read that the Church of the Hebrews practised any such thing for there is no mention that the 120 had Hands laid on them nor the 3000 in Acts 2. or 5000 in Acts 4. after their Baptism before they broke Bread neither do we find the least of it in any other Churches in the New Testament neither in Samaria by Philip nor Corinth Philippi Colossia Thessalonica Rome the Churches of Galatia the Churches in Asia Smyrna Thyatira Pergamos Sardis Philadelphia no nor in Ephesus It is true Paul laid his hands upon twelve of their number upon another occasion as Peter and John did in Samaria c. Answ He has said here a great deal and refuted us with as good Arguments as the Scots-man refuted Bellarmin what is here more than meer Affirmations he acknowledges there is a Laying on of hands which is called a Principle of Christ's Doctrine but he says it must be such a one as is somewhere taught and practised but he is bold to say this never was Answ Where is that Laying on of hands taught which he affirms to be a Principle of Christ's Doctrine Not that I question it I believe it was taught tho not as one of the first Oracles of God or beginning Principles of Christ's Doctrine yet where does he find Laying on of hands on Officers taught let him not be too confident for that Scripture affirmed by him to be a full Precept for it 1 Tim. 5.22 is very doubtful what Laying on of hands is mentioned there Mr. Baxter saith Some think by it is meant Imposition of hands in Confirmation some in Ordination and some for Absolution Let all Men here consider his partiality Is this a Precept in so many words Lay hands on all Officers whereas the word Officer or Elder is not mentioned in the Text or Verse before nor after nor elsewhere throughout that fifth Chapter we must therefore have recourse to other Scriptures in the case of Officers which are full Precedents for it as Acts 13.3 and 6.6 as we compare Heb. 6.2 Acts 8.15 17. and 19.6 for the clearing the Truth we contend for comparing Scripture with Scripture But secondly The words are rather in themselves a Caution or Prohibition than otherwise will he call this a full Precept the most he can assert from hence is this that the words do imply that Timothy was to lay hands on some body otherwise no room for those Expressions but then what kind of Laying on of hands he intends is the question whether it be only one sort or more from hence it may be hard to decide May we not conclude Paul's Counsel to Timothy thus far comprehensive viz. do not lay hands suddenly on any Man neither to Office let them first be proved 1 Tim. 3.10 nor upon Persons baptized as such they must first be taught or instructed in the Truth they are about to practise which may be gathered from Mat. 28.20 Heb. 5.12 they must be so taught and the Truth so explained that Persons may obey the same in Faith and with understanding Thirdly This must needs be granted on all hands that without some Inference or help of other Scripture Laying on of hands for Ordination cannot be proved from this Text which Mr. Danvers will not admit us to do we must have every Principle of Christ's Doctrine in so many plain words and from Christ's own mouth too or else 't is no Institution Object But may be some will say he urges other Scriptures to prove Laying on of hands on Officers pag. 54. Acts 6.6 13.3 c. Answ Granted yet those are only brought as Examples for so indeed they are and not Precepts and there is none urged by him to prove it commanded save that we have spoken to 1 Tim. 5.22 and what can be produced save clear Precedents on that account I know not But now as to Imposition of hands
and have need of it as well as others besides this sort concerns not all no only sick Persons and may be practised again and again as oft as Persons may be sick or under bodily infirmities but that Principle that is one of the beginning words of Christ's Doctrine is only to be laid or practised once Heb. 6.1 Not Laying again c. 2ly Unbelievers had hands laid upon them for healing and therefore I might also argue it appertains not unto Babes as such Moreover anointing with Oil is left as the Ordinance for healing in the Church 3. Mr. Danvers should make a difference between what Christ taught as a Promise or Gift to some particular Persons and what he taught as a general Practice that which is minded in Mark 16. is laid down promissory-wise to such as should have the gift of Faith or the Faith of Miracles and is therefore nothing to the purpose 4. They distinguish not between the Word or Doctrine of Christ and Miracles which were for the confirmation thereof which in Mark 16.20 the Spirit doth which causeth their mistake But do they not confute themselves by thus arguing they own the Doctrine of Laying on of hands to be a Foundation-principle of Christ but this they speak of here must needs be granted to be temporary being for the confirmation of the Word as he himself confesseth and every Word or Ordinance of Christ as I have shewed was more or less confirmed with Signs and Wonders according to this Promise of Christ I shall say no more to this but proceed to his next Objection 2. Object Page 44. If every one of these Principles in Heb. 6.2 are so absolutely to be taken in by Babes and without which we are not to esteem them communicable what do you say to the Doctrine of Baptisms in the Text one of the Principles must all be baptized with the Baptism of the Spirit and of Sufferings c. Answ We answer by distinguishing between that Baptism that is a practical Duty and that which is taught or laid down by our Lord Jesus to be believed that that is commanded ought absolutely to be obeyed by every Babe and 't is as necessary for every Babe to believe the Doctrine of Sufferings which Jesus Christ preached to all that would follow him and be his Disciples this was that which he taught Mat. 20.22 23. to the two Sons of Zebedee that they and consequently all God's Children should more or less be baptized with In the World saith Christ you shall have tribulation John 16.33 'T is necessary every Saint should be instructed into this and believe this that through much Tribulation we must enter into the Kingdom of God Acts 14.22 and all those who will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution 2 Tim. 3.12 We say not that every one must actually forsake House and Lands and Life for Christ's sake and the Gospel or else be none of his Disciples but be ready in holy disposition so to do when call'd to it And as to the Baptism of the Spirit that the Spirit is promised to every true Believer see Joel 2.28 29. which Peter Acts 2.17 compared with vers 38 39. applies indefinitely to all penitent baptized Persons whether Jews or Gentiles as their Right by promise of the Father to receive and not to them of that Generation only but also to such as should repent and be baptized in all succeeding Ages this Promise is one and the same with that in John 7.38 called Rivers of Water implying fillings with the Spirit In Acts 2.38 't is said to be the Gift of the Holy Spirit In Acts 11.17 like Gifts In Acts 8.15 the Holy Spirit which the Apostles in the belief of the promise Joel 2. and Joh. 14.16 Acts 2.38 prayed for From which Scriptures it appears that all Believers are under the like Promises of the Holy Ghost on like terms of Repentance Faith c. And according to the measure of Faith given us by Christ may our fillings with the Holy Spirit be And thus it is the duty of every Disciple to believe he shall receive or be baptized with the Spirit according as the Will of the same Spirit is that divides to every Man the particular measures thereof having the Promise of a faithful and never-failing God to rely upon provided he go on in his Obedience as directed in the blessed Word for the attaining of it Object But if it be objected none are baptized with the Holy Spirit but such as receive it visibly and in its extraordinary Gifts Answ 1. Suppose none are so baptized now yet all the Saints are to believe the Promise of the Spirit and do receive it too and doth not God perform his Promise because none so receive the Spirit viz. to be baptiz'd therewith 1 Cor. 12.13 2. All are to believe the Baptism of the Spirit was given in the Apostles days to confirm the Gospel or Word of Christ And 't is to be observed that Paul to the Ephesians on whom he had imposed hands Acts 19.6 and the spake with Tongues and prophesied takes no notice of those visible Gifts but saith In whom also after ye believed ye were sealed with the Holy Spirit of Promise Eph. 1.13 plainly shewing 'tis the great Benefit received and enjoyed by Believers to be sealed by the Spirit 't is not matter of rejoicing to work Miracles as 't is to know our Names are written in Heaven And thus we have explained the Doctrine of Baptisms Now to what he says in the 3d place p. 45 That the Laying on of hands Heb. 6.2 may respect the Laying on of hands upon the Ministry for their solemn Investiture into their Office whether Deacons Elders or Messengers which he says is necessary to be taught known and understood by all tho all are not commanded into the personal practice of it for all are not Prophets Apostles Teachers and 't is most remarkable that the Doctrine or teaching of Laying on of hands is all that is mentioned in this Scripture all baptized Believers must be taught it that 's plain but that they are obliged therefore to practise it is not here or elsewhere to be found Answ Before I give a further Answer to this grand Objection I can't but observe how he mistakes the Text i. e. than the Doctrine or teaching of Laying on of hands only is mentioned in this Scripture why does he speak thus of Imposition of hands only may he not as well speak so concerning Repentance Faith and Baptism as of this Principle i. e. they also are necessary only to be taught and known by all and none concern'd in the personal practice of them Would any judg this Good Divinity What reason can he give seeing all the four are practical Ordinances that the three first should be taught so as to be personally practis'd by all and the other only to be believ'd Tho what he says here has already been fully answer'd yet I shall