Selected quad for the lemma: water_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
water_n bread_n lord_n wine_n 3,679 5 7.3104 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A43715 Historia quinq-articularis exarticulata, or, Animadversions on Doctor Heylin's quintquarticular history by Henry Hickman. Hickman, Henry, d. 1692. 1674 (1674) Wing H1910; ESTC R23973 197,145 271

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

meritoriousness which the Papists ascribed to the observation of Fasts and Feasts it is true and tends to the commendation of Zuinglius but that he decryed every established Fast or appointed Festival is a most notorious slander So is it also that his Reformation began in the abolishing of set Forms of Worship unless the meaning be that he procured the abolition of some forms of worship set by the Papists as Papists And if an Historian after he hath told us that a man abolished set forms of Worship may be allowed to interpret himself of Popish Idolatrous forms of Worship then may we think he hath no mind to be understood and without any blame at all neglect him It follows the Zuinglian Reformation began in the denying of the old Catholick Doctrine of a Real Presence This charge must be intended of Zuinglius his denying the Real Presen●e of Christ in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and if it be so intended it is as false as what is most false Zuinglius had been at Zurick five years and reformed many things before he let any one know his mind about the Sacrament and perhaps before he knew his own mind as to the manner of Christs presence in or with the Sacramental Elements When he after long study discovered his mind about this matter he never denyed a Real Presence unless by Real Presence be understood a Corporal Presence He expounded Hoc est Corpus meum by a Trope so did our Reformers in England He thought the Bread was the ●ody of Christ Representatively And as our King may be and is said to be really present where there is any one who by his own Authority is appointed to represent him so the Body of Christ may be said to be really present where there is an Element appointed by himself to represent his Body And if Dr. Heylin did opine that the Body which our Lord Iesus united to his Divine Nature and with which he ascended into Heaven is any other way present in the Eucharist he both erred and dissented from that Church in which he was bred up For a conclusion the Historian tells us that the Zuinglian Reformation began in denying all Exte●nal Reverence in the participation of the Blessed Sacrament Words more strange than any that we had before For what is meant by the Blessed Sacrament Sure the Dr. was so much a Christian as to acknowledge at least two Blessed Sacraments If so which of these two would he have us to understand by the Blessed Sacrament Baptism or the Lords Supper I know not why the later should rather be called the Blessed Sacrament than the former nor why more External Reverence is necessary in the participation of this than of that supposing the Recipient to be adult If a converted Jew should come to be Baptised why is he not as well bound to kneel when he is sprinkled with water as when he takes the Bread and Wine As for Zuinglius he never denied External Reverence in the Participation of the Blessed Sacrament of the Lords Supper The mode and form in the which he first administred it is recited in Melchior Adam and in the Historia Sacramentaria de Coena Domini and in it all needful Reverence was used But perhaps not to make the Communicants receive the Sacred Elements on their knees is to deny all External Reverence in the participation of the Eucharist If so Christ and all his Churches for some Centuries must also be affirmed to have denied all External Reverence By this it appears what false witness the Dr. hath born against Zuinglius Doth he bear a truer witness concerning Luther Of him these words are used which Luther seriously laboured to preserve in the same estate in which he found them at the present Words that either are senseless or very untrue If they have any sense it must be this that Luther seriously endeavoured to preserve the things before mentioned in the same estate in which he found them in the Papacy This sense the words do scarse afford But if we suppose that this sense was intended I then say Nothing more false could have been written Luther did not seriously endeavour to preserve any one thing before-mentioned in the condition in which he found it 1. For Images He was indeed angry that they were taken down not because he desired or endeavored to have them kept up but because he would have had the honor of pulling them down and could not endure that Carolastadius should adventure to make any alteration in his absence Yet Carolastadius created Luther Doctor and made not the alteration on his own head but with the consent and advice of Melancthon and others 2. As to Fasts and Festivals set and constant Luther had as little fondness for them as Zuinglius could have Might he have ruled the rost no Holy days had been kept but the Lords day To be sure he endeavoured not after he thought of Reformation to keep either Fasts or Festivals in the same state in which he found them He looked not on them as parts of Worship 3. He defended a not only Real but also a Corporal Presence of Christ in th● Eucharist but not the Antient Catholick Doctrine of Real Presence nor yet the new Roman Catholick Doctrine of Real Presence Finding in an eminent Schoolman that were it not for the Authority of the Church he should more encline to Consubstantiation than Transubstantiation Luther bethought himself that he had abandoned the Authority of that Church which kept Cameracensis in awe and so boldly maintained Consubstantiation though not to his dying day as some think Happy had it been for his Followers if so absurd an opinion had never been published by him for they counting themselves concerned to maintain whatsoever he in his fierce oppositions to Zuinglius delivered are fallen into the most monstrous tenent of Ubiquity which whoever believeth with all the necessary consequences cannot believe one quarter of the Apostles Creed But what is the External Reverence in the use of the Lords Supper affirmed by Lutherans and denied by Zuinglianists Adoration is by the Lutherans condemned as well as by the Zuinglianists So is Asservation and Circumgestation Luther himself somewhere if Wendelin abuse him not advised Christians to Receive in one Kind or Element where they could not Receive in both but the Lutherans stifly contend for the necessity of Receiving sub utraque Specie The differences not already taken notice of are 1. The Lutherans think more favourably of Stone Altars than do the Zuinglianists 2. The Lutherans at least many of them better approve of lighting Candles in the Administration than do the Zuinglianists We in England in many places set Candles and Candlesticks on the Tables but do not light the Candles 3. The Lutherans use for one Element a placenta orbicularis of which it may be questioned whether it can properly be called bread So do not the Zuinglianists 4. The Lutherans use no breaking of