of the blessed Sacrament as well Bread as Wine according to Christes owne institution This inducement amongst many hath not beene the least which hath as comfortably drawne mee to the Church of England as the starre which appeared to the three Sages in the East guided them in a short space to the presence of Christ swadled in clothes and lying in a Crib at Bethlem hauing in imitation of them now offered vp my three gifts vnto Christ to be emploied wholly in his seruice my Vnderstanding my Memorie and my Will with all my faculties of body and soule depending or subiect vnto them for the propagation of his Gospell for the demolition of Romish nouelties and for the manifestation of his vnspeakable mercies shewed vnto me and the reformed Churches in freeing vs from those damnable errors and wicked waies wherein the Church of Rome leadeth her blinded followers which fondly shut their eies from the Sunne-shine of truth appearing in the holy Scriptures and from the Prophets and Apostles who like shining starres by their doctrine recorded in the booke of Gods secrets would both comfort and direct their soules in the right way to heauen if flying with humilitie to Christ and acknowledging their owne blindnesse they would crie out with deuotion vnto him like the poore blinde man in the Gospell Domine fac vt videam O Lord make me to see 2. Howsoeuer the aduersaries in the Supper of the Lord make no reckoning of the wine Both formes must be in the Eucharist which is essentiall to the Sacrament yet the true faithfull knowing the dignitie and excellent value thereof will not be so vnmannerly being inuited thereunto as to neglect that which Christ prouideth for them For being rightly enformed that as in the great and pompous supper which Cleopatra Queene of Aegypt set before Antonius there were two pretious iewells and gemmes brought to Antonius which were esteemed to bee worth two hundred and fiftie thousand Crownes Euen so in the supper of the Lord in the blessed Eucharist which is the great supper prouded in the Church of God for his faithfull friends there are two iewells of inestimable price that is the bread and wine by meanes whereof the flesh and bloud of Christ the rich price of our redemption is conueyed vnto our soules therefore there is no iust cause why the Church of Rome pretending to bee the chast Spouse of Christ should be so scornefull of the rich gift of her heauenly Spouse who liberally offereth her both these iewels as most discourteously to suffer and permit that the lay people should be depriued of the one of them since Christ hath appointed both for them The practise to be so is sufficiently knowne to all and that the doctrine of the Church of Rome is so also appeareth by the Councell of Trent saying Concil Trident. ses 21. anno 1. If any shall say that by Gods Precept or vpon necessitie of saluation all and euery faithfull of Christ ought to take both formes of the most blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist let him be accursed And agine If any shall say Cap. 2. that the holy Catholike Church was not led vpon iust causes and reasons to communicate lay men and Clerkes also not consecrating onely vnder the forme of bread or therein to haue erred let him be Anathema By which it is most apparant how the Church of Rome doth not onely crosse Christs institution and disobey his commaundement but also ouerthroweth the very essentiall part of the Sacrament 3 For first The ministration of the Sacrament vnder one forme is repugnant to the essence of the Sacrament there is nothing more essentiall in a Sacrament than the matter and forme thereof as in Baptisme the water and wordes so in the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist the essentiall parts thereof are the Bread and Wine coniunctim ioyntly and the words of consecration of either of them ioyntly and not diuided for the Catechisme of the Councell of Trent defineth a Sacrament thus Cathe ad Parachos A Sacrament is a thing subiect to our senses which by Gods institution hath power as well to signifie as to effect holinesse and righteousnesse Whereby it appeareth that the sensible signe instituted by God is a thing essentiall to euerie Sacrament Which appeares also b Iohan Viguerius saying De sacra in Gene c. 16. v. 3 It is necessarie that the things which are assumed for the Sacraments be determined by Gods institution because that things by their naturall vertue haue no power of sanctifying Now therefore if we consider the matter and sensible signes instituted by Christ for the Sacrament of the Eucharist Jnstit c. 16. ff 3. vers 1. Thom. 3. p. q. 74. art 1. Iohannes Viguerius telleth vs That the matter of this Sacrament before consecration is bread and wine because Christ tooke bread and wine and Melchisedech who in his sacrifice figured Christ offered bread and wine so Christ did institute it vnder the formes of bread and wine and very conueniently First for the vse of the Sacrament which is eating for as water is taken in the Sacrament of Baptisme for the vse of spirituall ablution because corporall ablution is commonly done by water so bread and wine for spirituall refection because most commonly men are corporally refreshed therewith Secondly for signification because this Sacrament is a memoriall of the Lords Passion in the which the bloud was spearated from the bodie so distinctly the bread as a Sacrament of the bodie and wine as a Sacrament of the bloud Thirdly for the effect in respect of the whole Church which consisteth of diuers beleeuers so the bread is made of diuers cornes and the wine of diuers grapes Out of this ground it seemeth that the Iesuit in Rome deliuered in the Schoole the definition of this Sacrament in this manner which I tooke from his mouth with mine owne penne which is De sacramentis tract 4. c. 1. dico 3. That the Eucharist is a Sacrament which vnder the formes of bread and wine containeth the bodie and bloud of Christ for the nourishment of spirituall life giuen by Baptisme From all which doctrine I most clearely gather that bread and wine iointly ministred belongeth to this Sacrament and that without ouerthrowing the essence of this Sacrament according to our aduersaries owne Teachers it cannot be giuen vnder one kind to the lay people for it is to be giuen to lay people according to the essentiall parts thereof instituted by Christ but according to these Writers the essentiall parts thereof are bread and wine iointly as the matter the forme being the wordes of consecration iointly pronounced ouer either forme ergo the bread and wine coniunctim are to be ministred to ther people for the integritie of the Sacrament Whence it followeth that the Church of Rome by the amputation of one forme vtterly crosseth and ouerthroweth the nature of the Sacrament and so maketh it no Sacrament at all
be another not this Damasus In Appar pag. 378. Tom. 1. pag. 573. Bar to 4. pag. 428. which Baronius saith containeth many things repugnant vnto themselues almost in euery Pope and therefore he thinketh it to be collected out of diuers authors Master Doctor Heskins in his Parliament of Christ to proue the sacrifice of the Masse alleageth Amphilochius who liued in the yeare 390. as the author of the life of Saint Basil Pag. 157. Bar Mart. Ian. 1. pag. 6. Spurius Posseuin in Appar pag. 77. yet Baronius saith That in the iudgement of all the wiser sort it is thought to be some bodies else And Posseuine saith The bastard Amphilochius cannot be his vnder whose name it is carried about Glicas in the fourth part of his Annals hath taught vs. By all which examples of the Papists alle aging such counterseit Fathers for the confirmation of this doctrine of the Masse as also many other points I can by no meanes thinke but that many of them do teach this doctrine most wittingly and maliciously against their owne conscience and therefore sinne deadly against the holy Ghost heaping Gods iudgements vpon them against the day of his wrath and also I assure my selfe that their doctrine cannot be good which is vpheld by such counterfeit and weake props as are the writings of bastard teachers and counterfeit bookes But besides the former obseruations The pretended priuiledges of the Masse most fond Ioannes de Comb. compend Theol. verit li. 6. cap. 18. which doe sufficiently discouer the erroneous doctrine taught by the Church of Rome concerning the Masse the great and maine excellent priuiledges which she pretendeth to waite vpon this sacrifice is not to be omitted whereof Ioannes de Combis alleageth diuers saying The Masse hath many prerogatiues First because it is celebrated by one that is fasting Secondly because only in a Church and vpon an altar vnlesse sometimes of necessitie vnder a Tent or in some other honest place Thirdly because it is behouefull that he that celebrateth bee a Priest Fourthly because it is behouefull that hee be clad in sacred vestments Fifthly because only it is done in the day and not in the night vnlesse in the Natiuity of the Lord. Sixtly because it is celebrated with a lighted candle yea though a thousand Sunnes should shine vpon the earth Seuenthly because there words doe sound which are Diuine Angelicall and humane Diuine words when the Pater noster is said or sung and when the words of the Lord are read in the Gospell Angelicall words when Glorie be to God in the highest but humane words in the Collects and the like Eighthly because there are heard three of the noblest tongues viz. Hebrew as Saboath and Osanna Greeke as Kyrie eleison Latine as in others which are there Ninthly because the Masse in his kind is as full of mysteries as the sea of drops as the Sunne of beames as the firmament of Starres as the imperiall heauen of Angels Tenthly because Priests in solemne Churches haue in their Masse many Ministers the Deacon Subdeacon and Acolytes Eleuenthly because the Angels being there in the presence of such maiestie it sufficeth vs to be schollers Twelfthly because there is the Lord of heauen and earth I might vnto these twelue adde the effects of the sacrifice of the Masse also taught by Bernardinus de Busto who amongst many others very ridiculous putteth for one this prerogatiue Bern. de Bust. in ser de Sacrif Mis viz. quamdin quis audit sacrum not senescit man waxeth not old so long as hee heares Masse When I read these priuiledges after it had pleased God to giue me a true vnderstanding of the Masses idolatries I could not but grieue that men should be thus deceiued by the diuels suggestions as to giue credit vnto such idle deuises for the maintenance of Gods dishonor and the diuels seruice Is it not a great prerogatiue thinke you of the Masse that the Priest must be fasting before he go to take a peece of wafer and a prertie quantitie of good Maligo rich Canarie or other strange wine I trow it is a prettie breakfast to take three draughts of such wine although there be a few drops of water in the last This priuiledge I haue obserued pleaseth the Iesuites best of all who scorne to haue weake wine as Clarret but commonly make prouision of the best comfortable Sackes for that purpose and will lightly take more into the Challice then any other Priests out of a greater care they haue that no particles of Christs sacred flesh should stay about the sides of the Chalice which religious care is a good faire cloake for them to warme their fasting stomackes with the more beartie and full draught so that in truth this fasting priuiledge of the Masse serues but for a colour to haue a good breakfast and so to comfort the Priests stomacke that many a Lay man would be full glad of the like The other prerogatiues as weakly grounded vpon mans inuentions not on Scriptures or Apostolicall traditions in truth are as meane but especially that great prerogatiue of the Masse viz. that a man groweth not old so long as he heareth Masse is one of the foolishest conceits of a Franciscan Frier that euer I heard or read For if it were true there is no Doctor Steuens water could so preserue a mans life or prolong it as the hearing of a Masse and I thinke many would heare more Masses then they doe if this were sound Diuinitie but by this it is easie to discouer the Masse not to be as the Church of Rome teacheth a principall act of religion and a worke that surpasseth all the workes that euer God wrought as the worke of creation and redemption more miracles appearing in the Sacrament then in either of them as may be obserued in Ioannes de Combis Lib 6. de cap. 14. and noted by Master Perkins in his Reformed Catholike and not any whit touched as farre as I could perceiue in master Doctor Bishop against him but rather a most diabolicall illusion of the world drawing men to serue the creature in stead of the Creator and the diuell in stead of God And this in very truth appeareth most plainely The Masse confirmed by false miracles a palpable marke of false doctrine if wee consider diligently how the Pseudochrists and false prophets of the Church of Rome endeuor as it were seeing the weaknes of their cause to establish and make good their doctrine of the Masse with the signes wonders and prodigies which Christ himselfe the Sauiour of our soules willeth vs not to beleeue which are so ridiculous that no man of sound iudgement reading them can chuse but laugh and smile at them howsoeuer out of true charitie and a right religious zeale he haue greater cause to commiserate the poore blinded soules that are most miserably seduced by them I will therefore for the fuller manifestation hereof set downe some few
is a Sacrament since neither hee nor any other can shew any such institution But it followeth by him notwithstanding that as I my selfe haue cited the afore said place of Genesis it well prooueth the state of marriage to haue beene ordayned by GOD. For which as the Scripture saith a man shall forsake his father and mother Verse 29 and hee shall cleaue vnto his wife and they shall bee two in one flesh 3 Which first institution was renued by Christ when he said Haue yee not read Diuers reasons grounded vppon the Scriptures for the approbation of priests marriages Matth 19. Hebr. 13.14 that hee which did make from the beginning made them male and female and hee said for this cause man shall leaue father and mother and shall cleaue to his wife and they two shall be in one flesh That therefore which God hath ioyned together let no man separate And the same Institution is Declared to be honourable among all men and their bodies vndefiled if therefore among all men then also among Priests if it were honourable for respect of the Author that ordained it which was GOD himselfe why shall it not also bee honourable for his Priests If it were honorable in the time of innocencie before it was decayed why should it not be honorable in the time of grace wherein man is repaired as wel for Priests as others if it were honourable because it was ordained in Paradise the happiest place of the world why shall it not also be honourable in the Church of Christ amongest Church-men who honour God in the happiest places that is in the Churches ordayned to Gods honour besides since God the Sonne honoured the state of mariage with his presence at Canaan of Galilee where hee wrought the first miracle that euer he did turning water into wine with his praiers comparing the kingdome of God to a wedding and holinesse to a wedding garment why should wee thinke that Christ will not be well pleased that his Priests should honor that state with their owne persons is not increase multiplication of children which is one principall end of marriage as honorable a blessing in Priests as in others or is not the inconuenience of solitarinesse signified in these words It is not good for man to bee alone that is without a helpe and comfort which is an other end of marriage as fit for Priests as for Lay peopleâ— or is it not as fit that Priests should haue a remedy for fornication aswel as other men taketh their preshood from them the nature of men or can their dignities in the Church of God giue them leaue to liue lasciuiously in a single life are all Priests assured that during their liues they shall alwayes enioy the gift of continencie or is it absolutely in mans power to haue it or not to haue it why then doth S. Paul say Quipotest capere capiat he that can take it let him take it no no they haue as much neede of such a helpe as any other How comes it that many yea most of the Clergy in the country of Liege and diuers other places keep concubines what is the cause that most of the Priests of Brittaine haue also their bedfellows liuing in the house with them in the state of whoredome but their want of mariage whence so many deâ—â—ourings of virgins so many fornicatioÌ„s so many adulteries so many bestialities recorded by diuers authors amoÌ„g Clergy men in the church of Rome but the want of this remedie instituted by God practised in the old Lawe by the holiest as Henoch Noah Abraham Dauid Ezechiel Aaron and other high Priests approoued by Christ called honourable by S. Paul amongest all men What is not the doctrine of S. Paul to be approoued who alloweth the marriage and the bed vndefiled to all men excluding none when he saith 1. Cor. 7.2 Because of fornication let euerie man haue his owne wife Here we see marriage is prescribed a remedy for euerie man 4 And if wee looke into the practise of the Primitiue Church The new Testament maketh for the marriage of Priests we shall find the same remedy to haue beene vsed without checke or controule May we thinke that S. Paul excluded Priests when hee said 1. Cor. 9. It is better to marry than to burne Doth his Doctrine debarre Priests of marriage when hee saieth If thou takest a wife thou sinnest not 1. Cor. 28. Doth not Saint Paul sharpely reprooue them that shall forbid marriages when hee saieth In the latter dayes some shall depart from the faith and shall giue heede vnto spirites of errour Note this and doctrines of diuells which speake lies through hypocrisie and haue their consciences burned with a hot yron forbidding to marrie 1. Tim. 4.1.2 3. By diuers of my former Chapters I haue shewed the Church of Rome to haue departed from her former faith now it is apparent they teach doctrine of diuells because they forbid Priests to marrie and teach the Doctrine to bee good Is it to bee thought that Saint Paul did not allow Priests to marrie when hee said A Bishoppe must be vnreprooueable the husband of one wife hauing children vnder obedience with all honest 1. Timoth 3.2.4 And when hee said Let Deacons be the husbands of one wife and such as can rule their children well and their owne housholde 1. Timothy 3.12 Can it bee said that Saint Paul doeth not approoue marriage in Priests and Deacons when he alloweth them one wife children and housholde to haue care of What may bee probably inferred vpon the wordes of Saint Paul to the Philippians the last chapter translated by the Rhemists thus I beseech thee my sincere companion By occasion of which words Cardinall Bellarmine saith that it is more probable Saint Paul had no wife Clem. Alexand. 3 stromat Ignatius epist ad Philadelph against Clemens Alexandrinus and Ignatius in some Editions who holde he had a wife which standeth well with the translation of the Church of England saying My faithfull yoake fellow I will not stand much vpon this place leauing the probabilitie thereof to the Reader But sure I am that Saint Peter had a wife for Saint Matthew saith Matth. 8.14 That our Sauiour entred into Saint Peters house and sawe his wifes mother I trow this is plaine enough that he had a wife It is left also recorded That Philip the Euangelist which was one of the sâ—auen Deacons had foure daughters virgins which did prophesie Acts 21.8 9. Ignatius the disciple of Saint Iohn Euangelist writing to the Philadelphians Ignat. ad Philadelph maketh report That Peter Paul and other Apostles were married Clemens Alexandrinus writing against those that reprooued marriage Ecclesiast hist libr. 3 cap. 3â— amongst other things speaketh thus What doe they reprooue the Apostles Peter and Philip had wiues and they gaue also their daughters in marriage to men Neyther doth Saint Paul the Apostle thinke