forgiuenesse of sinnes and of eternall life b Mat. 21.32 Gen. 7.7 Exod. 20.6 the which beeing now apprehended of the Parents by faith doth not onely comprehend a spirituall and allegoricall issue but also the children which they shall beget to a thousand generationsb. The which surely doth no lesse appertaine to Christians then in times past to the people of the Iewes And Act. 2 38 Peter saide Let euery one of you be baptized for to you and your children is the promise made And Christ commandeth little children to be brought vnto him that hee might touch them not such as were of riper yeares and able to goe but tender ones children which did yet suck which many brought vnto him and did not lead them And it is said that hee tooke them in his armes and embraced them c Luk. 18.15 and commended them vnto his father by his prayer and blessing and sanctified them by the laying on of his hands which cannot bee taken otherwise but that he receiued them into fauour d Mark 18 16 And last of all most clearely hee speaketh of Infants inuiting them to his fellowship and society Math. 19 13. Suffer little children to come vnto mee and forbid them not because to such that is aswell Infants in age as those which are like them appertaineth the kingdome of heauen whom Peter calleth 1. Pet. 2.2 spirituall children such as by the word of God are regenerated to immortall life like as Math. 18.4 Whosoeuer shall humble himselfe as this child hee is the greatest in the kingdome of heauen And in the 14. verse It is not the pleasure of your heauenly father that one of these little ones should perish For it is manifest that Christ approueth and receiueth little children otherwise he would not allow those which were like them And the Euangelist signifieth that the kingdome of GOD appertained to those children which were slaine by Herod reciting the place Ier. 31.15 of the holy Martyres the children of Rachel or of their posteritie Mat. 2.16.17 Now vnto whom appertaineth the promise of the Communion with Christ and of eternall life which is signified in the word of Baptisme To the same appertaineth also the signe according to the diuine determination proper to euery Sacrament And there can bee no other meanes to bring them vnto Christ but that they by baptisme bee ingrafted into the Church which is the bodie of Christ seeing they are not yet capable of Doctrine 3 Because although hearing is an ordinarie beginning of faith a Ro◠10.17 yet because it is impossible that any should please God without faith Hebr. 11.6 Infants must needes haue in the place of faith the seed or budding of faith or the renewing of the spirit although they are not yet endued with the knowedge of good or euill for b Deut. 1.39 God holdeth them not for vncleane but adopteth them for his children and sanctifyeth them from the wombe as it is said 1. Cor. 7.14 Your children are holy that is to say by an hidden operation and enlightening of the spirit which maketh in them new motions and new inclinations to Godward according to their capacitie as farre as we can gesse without the word which is the onely seed of regeneration to them which are able to be taught 1. Pet. 1.23 c Rom. 8.16 for the Lord gaue a taste in Iohn Baptist whom he sanctified in his mothers wombe what he is able to doe in the rest d Luk. 1.15 41 And yet must the secret workes and iudgements of God be left vnto himselfe because the Church iudgeth not of hidden things e 1 Peter 23 Neyther are the prayers of the Church for the Infantes of the beleeuers which are baptised in vaine ouer whom the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost is called vpon but they obtaine that which they aske Mat. 18.19 If not in each singular person yet in the species or kinde of each Whereupon it followeth that they are receiued into fauour and are endued with the holy Ghost and therefore are to bee baptized f Act. 10.47 4. Because though Infants haue not sinned actually as Adam did Rom. 5.14 yet they haue sinned Originally in Adam as included in his loynes vers 12. and are dead in him g 1 Cor. 15.22 Secondly being conceiued in sinne h Psal 51.7 contrarie to the Pelagians opinion they are by nature the children of wrath i Ioh. 3.6 and doe daily die no lesse then men of riper yeares k Eph. 2.3 wherefore that they may please God and may bee admitted into his kingdome where no polluted thing entereth 1. Cor. 15.30 they haue neede of the sparke of some regeneration the abundance whereof they may afterward enioy which is sealed vnto them by Baptisme l Apo◠21.27 And therfore it is not to be denyed them for except a man bee borne againe of water and the spirit hee cannot enter into the Kingdome of heauen Iohn 3.3.5 5. Because the commandement concerning baptisme is vniuersall and comprehendeth the whole Church whereof Infants are members a great part for Paule includeth the whole Church where he saith that it is clensed by the washing of water in the word Ephes 5.26 and Math. 28.19 Preach the Gospell to euery creature and baptise them It is not therefore particularly to be applied to those of discretion onely but also to the children of the faithfull 6 Because though by reason of their yeares they vnderstand not Gods word nor can beleeue in action and professe their faith and repentance whereof Baptisme is a Sacrament as circumcision was in times past and enter into mutuall obligation betwixt God and them which belongeth onely to them of discretion notwithstanding it is vnto thē in steed of a Act. 2.41 8.12.37 professing of faith for that they are borne within the Church of the people of God and are not onely within the couenant but also are presented by them which beleeue and doe promise and make answere for them And therefore Saint Augustine saith the Sacrament of faith maketh children faithfull though they haue not yet that faith which consisteth in the will of beleeuers to make them faithfull Euen as they doe not know that they haue the holy Ghost though it be in them or a minde and life though it cannot be denied that they haue both And to conclude it sufficeth that they are baptised and bound vnto a repentance and faith to come Euen as the infants of the Israelites were circumcised into a faith and repentance that was to follow although they neyther vnderstood the word of God nor the mysterie of circumcision and Christ blessed little children and prayed for them though they vndestood not what he did for them 7 Because that which the institution of Baptisme commaundeth that they which are to be baptised should first be taught b Mat. 2.19 as Iohn is said to haue preached the baptisme of
to him which is not yet baptised and if it may not be giuen yet at least it ought to be required and procured by all meanes possible Dâ— nupt et Concu l 2. c. 17 18 yet is it not so simply precisely absolutely necessarie that those which depart out of this life without it especially the Infants of Christians cannot be saued as Augustine beleeued and those also which make baptisme the first steppe of saluation and therefore exclude from saluation all those which want baptisme yea although there bee no contempt of Baptisme But we verie openly confesse that this is not our opinion Because so there is great iniurie done vnto the grace of God and to the power of his couenant in which hee promiseth that he will be the GOD of the faithfull and of their issue and that he will shew his mercie euen vnto a thousand generations Exod. 20.6 Secondly because it would be absurd that these Infants which in times past died in great numbers before the eight day of circumcision before which they might not bee circumcised according to the law of God or those which were not circumcised by the space of fortie yeares in the wildernesse Or the Christian Infants which died in times past before the feastes of Easter and Pentecost without the baptisme of water by no fault of theirs for at those Feastes Baptisme was administred in times past both these and the other being vnder the couenant it would I say bee absurd to thinke them depriued of saluation which cannot but be a great crosse to the conscience of the parents 3 Part. 9.68.4.2 if death should preuent their children baptisme Againe why should the children beare the punishment of anothers fault but this is the doctrine of Thomas Aquinas That children are neuerthelesse baptised vvith the baptisme of the spirit though they vvant the outvvard signe Thirdly Sacraments are not the cause but the Testimonies and seales of our saluation and doe not of themselues conferre grace Nor doth the priuation of the holy signe defraude the childe but the parents contempt or negligence of the same a Exod. 412 Iosu 5.3 Fourthly The conuerted thiefe wanted the visible Baptisme but not the thing signified which may likewise be said of Infants vnbaptised For that in the 17. of Genesis Let him that is not Circumcised be cut of from the people of God Was spoken of them of yeares and the meaning was hee that would not be circumcised the same is also to bee meant of the vnbaptised Likewise that in the third of Iohn Except a man bee borne againe of water and the Spirit hee cannot enter into the kingdome of heauen Is not meant of Infants which could not receiue it as being preuented by death onely and not by any other fault but eyther of the ordinarie meanes which may not bee neglected when it may bee had or of Baptisme which if it bee not receiued indeede is yet receiued in desire as Thomas expoundeth it And as Ambrose saith of Valentinian that hee was baptised in desire and will though hee had neuer the outward ceremonie For as hee was comming to Ambrose to bee baptised hee died in the way Or else it is to bee vnderstood of the liuing water which is the Spirit that is of the vertue and efficacie of the holy Spirit which worketh that in the soule that water doth in the bodie And so the names of water and the Spirit may meane one thing as it in the third of Mathew Hee that followeth mee it is hee that baptiseth with the holy Ghost and with fire That is with the spirit which hath the office and nature of fire in regeneration the Baptisme of which spirit is absolutely necessarie to saluation And thus Augustine expoundeth this place Is Baptisme to be administred without exorcisme or coniuring out of the Diuell or blowing To exorcise is to adiure a man by holy things as by God or by Christ to doe a thing which men commonly call to coniure as the 26. Math. The high Priest saith vnto Christ I Coniure the by the liuing God to tell vs if thou bee Christ And the sonnes of Sceua in the 19. of Act. coniured the diuell by Iesus whom Paule preached Hence come Exorcistes and true Exorcisme which gift was peculiar to the holy Ghost by which the Apostles at the first and other faithfull draue diuels out of the possessed as we read in the Acts and Christ saith They shall cast out Diuels Mark 16. But yet without baptisme as Tertullian obserueth Therefore it is not to be retained first because when Christ instituted baptisme he did not command any to exorcise secondly for that the diuell is driuen out by Christ euen in baptisme for as Cyprian saith like as Scorpions and Serpents which are of force on drie land can do no hurt being flung into the water so an euil spirit can inhabit no longer in whom the spirit of God beginneth to dwell after baptisme and sanctifycation Thirdly for that the Apostles administred it without exorcisme Fourthly neither those that are possessed or the heathen worshippers of diuels are to be baptised but only they who are holy and partakers of the couenant of grace the members of Christ and to say that such are subiect to the diuels destroying power were verie absurd Fifthly that gift of exorcising ioyned with the gift of miracles was but for a time as that also was when many sicke people were healed by the annointing of the ministers of the Church and by inuocation of the name of Christ a Iam. 5.14 till such time as Christian religion was spred ouer all the world Sixtly for that exorcisme was neuer vsed at the circumcising of Infants But whereas the heathen did bring testimonie vnto the Church before their baptising as Tertullian witnesseth that they renounced the diuell and his Angels this was a publike testimony of repentance in them of yeares as also that blowing with clapped hands which he that was to be baptised performed did giue the Church thereby to vnderstand that hee renounced Sathan and his kingdome But in the Papacy it is done by the baptizer euen the face of Infant to be baptised and is therefore friuolous and to be reiected May Godfathers and Godmothers be vsed They may 1 Because the originall of it sprung from the Imitation of the baptising of those which were young in faith in the Primitiue Church who before their baptisme did not onely yeeld a reason of their faith but also produced Testators and witnesses of the same 2 The Scripture is not against it 3 It is a most ancient Ecclesiasticall custome 4 There is nothing in it that is euill or dishonest 5 It proceeds from charitie 6 It tendeth so farre to the Infants profit and saluation that no man is the worse for it 7 It maketh wholly for the edification of the Church 8 As a midwife is vsed to make the birth easie in child-bearing so in this spirituall
Math. 9.36 Iohn 2.17 Ioh. 11.33.35 Mat. 26.37.38 that he ascended visibly and locally into heauen and thence that he shall come againe to iudgement l Act. 1.9.11 Why must Christ needes be true man 1. The iustice of God required it should be so that the disobedience committed in our flesh might in the same be repaired m Rom. 5.17.18.19 Hebr. 2.14 2. The reason of our adoption for it pleased the Sonne of God to take the nature of man vpon him and to become our brother and by that means to become our nearest kinsman and most neare allied vnto vs that we being made his members might be made the sons of God Gal. 3.26 and that he might haue right to redeeme and ransome vs n Ier. 32.8 Ruth 3.12.13 Hence is matter of comfort in euery kind of temptation Therfore the Apostle to the Hebrewes 2.17 4.5 saith He tooke not vpon him the nature of the Angels but the seed of Abraham and in all things became like to his brethren that he might haue compassion of his brethren 3. For the confirmation of our resurrection for in that Christ tooke on him our nature and hath raised it vp and giuen vnto it immortalitie and hath exalted it in the heauen by vertue of that communion which we haue with him shall we be raised vp at the last day and this our vile bodie shall be made conformable to the glorious bodie of Christ Phil. 3.21 1. Cor. 15.22 As in Adam all are dead so in Christ shall all be made aliue Why was neither the Father nor the holy Ghost incarnate but the Sonne 1. Because it was meet that the world should be redeemed and all things restored by him by whom all things were created or that man should be redeemed from death by him by whom he was first created and should haue bene brought vnto life eternall if he had not sinned 2. It would haue bene vnconuenient that there should be two Sonnes one in the diuine nature another in the humane nature 3. It was the eternall decree of the Father whereby he purposed to saue mankind by the Sonne a Heb. 2.10 Whether is Christ God and man diuided or ioyned together Ioyned and vnited but not diuided By what kind of vnion Not by inhabitation onely as God dwelleth in the Saints not by consent onely b Ioh. 17.21 as the faithfull are one in the Father and the Son not by mixture as when water is mingled with wine not by combination as two boords be ioyned together lastly not by composition whereby of the mixture of two things there ariseth a third but by personall vnion which the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incorporation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because neither the whole Deitie nor any part of it is subiectiuely communicated to the humanitie of Christ but onely the humane nature was assumed of the Sonne of God into the same person Leu. 2.16 What is the personall vnion in Christ It is that whereby the person of the Sonne of God being a person from all eternitie existing did assume the most pure nature of man wanting all personall existing of it owne into the vnitie of his person and made it his owne the proprieties of each nature being preserued Or as Paul defines it Colos 2.9 Whereby in Christ doth dwell all the fulnesse of the godhead bodily Whereof we haue a manifest resemblance in the vnion of the soule and the bodie but that it doth not fit in euery point For in man from the nature of the soule and the nature of the bodie there ariseth a third nature compounded of two which is called the nature of man But in Christ there is not made a frame of one third nature of the diuine and humane but each remaines pure and vnconfounded Neither doth that similitude of the iron red hote agree in euery point because the heate and the light in the iron being hote are but qualities not the very substance of the fire And therefore the Apostle doth well call it a great mysterie of godlinesse 1. Tim. 3.16 How is this vnion made Without all confusion without all conuersion of one nature into the other indiuisibly inseparably The difference of the natures by no meanes being taken away by the vnion but rather the proprietie of either nature being saued and ioyned together or concurring into one person and one subsisting as the Calcedon Synode speaketh in the historie of Euagrius lib. 2. cap. 4. And from that time that the Word did assume our humane nature he neuer left it no not in his death And to this purpose make those verses Sum quod eram nec eram quod sum nunc dicor vtrumque Ignoras nisime stirpe ab vtraque tenes I am that I was nor I was that I am now both am I called Thou knowest me not except thou know me subsisting of both natures By what testimonies will you proue that the diuine and humane nature in Christ did ioyne together into one and the same person Esa 7.14 9.6 Luk. 1.35 That which shall be borne of thee shall be called the Sonne of God Ioh. 1.4 And the word was made flesh not by sacramentall vnion in which respect Christ was said to be a rocke not by confusion of the natures not by commutation as water is turned into wine Ioh. 2.14 but by assuming the flesh into the vnitie of the person The voice of God speaketh thus of Iesus the sonne of Marie This is my welbeloued Sonne Mat. 3.17 He that descendeth is euen the selfe same that ascended aboue all heauens that he might fulfill all things Ephes 4.10 God sent his Sonne borne of a woman Gal. 4.4 But what meanes this that the flesh of Christ is said by Damascene and Gregorius Nyssenus to be deified Not because it is turned into the diuine nature but because it is ioyned vnto it into one person and we must vnderstand it of the bestowing of gifts vpon it whereby the humane nature of Christ doth excell all creatures yet so as they do not abolish his nature Why is it necessarie that Christ should be both God and man in one and the same person 1. To the end he might reconcile God and man or that he might make God and man one 2. That he might be a fit Mediator betweene God and men by reason of his participation and affinitie with them both a 1. Tim. 2.5 Heb. 8.6 3. That he might reconcile God vnto vs by his death which if he had bene God alone he could neuer haue suffered if onely man he could neuer haue ouercome 4. That the workes of redemption performed in the flesh of the Sonne might become a sufficient price for sinne whereby God that infinite good was offended For although certaine actions do properly proceed from the diuine nature and some are done by the humane nature yet all of them do equally receiue their price and worthinesse from the diuine nature So the
the Lord doth manifest his power by him h Exo. 18.17 2. Againe he is called water Iohn 3.5 Vnlesse a man be borne a new of water and the spirit he shall not enter into the kingdome of God And 7.18 He that beleeueth in me as saith the Scripture riuers of water of eternall life shall flow out of his belly Now this he spake of the spirit because it cooleth vs it quencheth our spirituall thirst i Ioh. 4.14 it watereth vs being emptie of all the iuice of life and maketh vs fruitfull it washeth away all the filthinesse of our hearts and like water is poured into the beleeuers as it is said I will poure out of my Spirit Ioel 2.28 and Esa 44.3 3. He is called fire as Math. 3.11 He that shall come after me he shall baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire From the effect because he purgeth out all the drosse inflameth vs to the feare of God to loue and kindnesse both of God and our neighbour and hath other effects like vnto fire 4. He is called Seed 1. Iohn 3.9 He which is borne of God hath his seed in himselfe because by his power as it were by seed the faithfull are renewed and are made new men that being dead to sinne they may liue to God 5. He is called the annointing b 1. Ioh. 2.27 Psal 45.8 and the Oile of gladnesse the speech being borrowed from the custome of annointing which was vsed in time of the law to signifie the fragrant smell and spirituall sweetnesse of the gifts of the spirit What doth the holy Ghost dwell in the hearts of the beleeuers onely by his gifts or also by his Essence Yea euen by his Essence yet not extensiuely or as it were a part of the essence of things as the Manichees and others dreamed but intensiuely so farre forth as he is euery where present as he is God and in the efficacie of his presence Rom. 8.11 The Spirit of him that raised vp Iesus from the dead dwelleth in you And Ioh. 14.23 Christ saith We shall come vnto him and make our abode with him For we may not thinke that he bestowes his gifts so vpon vs that he himselfe should be in another place but he is present with his gifts both to the whole Church and euery particular elect gouerning and quickning them both within and without 1. Câ—â—int 6.19 Your body is the temple of the holy Ghost which is in you And â— Cor. 13.13 The communion of the holy Ghost be with you all What doctrines are contrary to this 1. The heresie of the Pneumatomachoi who denie the holy Ghost who do of set purpose oppose themselues and impugne the holy Ghost of which stamp was Samosatenus who called the holy Ghost the power of God hauing no person and the simple action of God in the hearts of men 2. Macedonius who affirmed the holy Ghost to be not a Lord but a seruant and a Minister and that he was not the Creator but a creature and by the name of Spirit was onely signified those new motions which God stirreth vp in the regenerate abusing that place Psal 51.12 Create a new heart in me O God and renue a right spirit in my bowels Where the name of Spirit is vsed for the created gifts of the Spirit 3. Seruetus who imagined that the holy Ghost was nothing else but the power of God infused into euery creature whereby they moue and liue which Philosophers call Nature 4. The errour of the latter Grecians who denied that the holy Ghost proceedeth from the Sonne 5. The blasphemie of Campanus and certaine other Anabaptists who cried out that the holy Ghost tooke his beginning as soone as Christ was glorified abusing that testimonie Iohn 7.39 As yet the holy Ghost was not giuen because Iesus was not yet glorified Where it is manifest that the Euangelist speaketh not of the person but of those admirable gifts which were powred out vpon the Apostles in the day of Pentecost as also in that saying of the Disciples of Iohn Act. 19.2 Yea we haue not so much as heard whether there be any holy Ghost or not 6. The errour of those who denied him to be adored with one and the same faith and inuocation with the Father and the Sonne The fourth common Place of the holy Scripture What is the holy Scripture called THe Scripture putting one name for another is vsed for the writings of the Prophets and Apostles which the companie of the faithfull doth religiously vse for the instruction in godlinesse And it is called holy because being deliuered of God it containeth holy things necessary vnto eternall life And in the same sense it is called the written word of God and the vnappealable Iudge of all controuersies in religion a Esa 8.20 Luk. 16.29.31 Who is the Author of it God himselfe who did commit his will vnto writing by men called immediatly of himselfe and inspired by the holy Ghost as * As his penmen and publike notaries his seruants at hand 2. Pet. 1.21 For the Prophesie was not at any time brought by the will of man but the holy men of God spake as they were moued by the holy Ghost Hereupon all the Prophets do with one accord repeate this The mouth of the Lord hath spoken it Esa 58.14 These things saith the Lord Ezec. 12.25.28 2. Tim. 3.16 The whole scripture was giuen of God by inspiration 1. Cor. 2.13 Which things we speake not in the words which mans wisedome teacheth but which the holy Ghost teacheth Wherupon depend the adiuncts of the Scripture as the authority the excellency the truth and fulfilling of them which is as necessary as it must needs be that God is true Whence also it comes to passe that the Scripture alone is to be beleeued for it selfe of it selfe is worthy to be beleeued neither is it subiect to the censure addition diminution or alteration of Angels or men a Deut. 12.32 Reu. 22.18 It alone is without all error b Mar. 16.24 and we are bound to beleeue it alone vpon the bare affirmation thereof by it alone all opinions which all men shall reade c Deu. 17.9.10 Esa 8.20 Mal 2.7 Act. 17.2 are to be confirmed and to be decided d Iosu 1.8 Iob. 5.39 Act. 17.11 This alone is perfect and containeth all things necessary vnto life eternall e Psal 19.8 Luke 16.29 Ioh. 15.15 Act. 20.20.27 2. Tim. 3.16 17 Lastly it is firme and constant f 2. Pet. 1.19 How manifold is it Two-fold for it is deuided into the old and new Testament or into the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which is contained in the Canonicall bookes Which bookes be called Canonicall All those which being indited by the holy Ghost were either written or allowed by the Prophets and Apostles that these alone might be the rule and direction of faith and good workes by which all other doctrines are to be weighed
158.5 He spake and they were made he commanded and they were created that is God but spake the word or commaunded and the things which were not before now haue their being And that God created all things the Apostle sheweth Heb. 11.3 of things which did not appeare that is of no matter that appeared before Also this particle of nothing is thus described 1. Machab. 7.28 Behold the heauen and the earth and vnderstand that God made them of nothing where the Greeke Interpreter reades it thus that he made them of things which had no being And so Paule speaketh Rom. 4.17 He calleth those things which are not as though they were and Prou. 8.24 When the deepes were nothing I was begotten saith Wisedome 3. When as it was Moses his purpose to describe the first originall of all things And the beginning of things is the bringing of them from no being to a being it followeth that all things were created of nothing or of those things which were not What can the creation of the world be proued certainely by humane reasons The eternitie of the world may clearely be confuted because that if the world should want both beginning and ending the world should be euen God himselfe then there should be many things infinite in act all the parts of the world should be eternall and immutable For as Damascene saith Whatsoeuer is created is mutable and that onely which is vncreated is immutable A man may also know euen by the testimonie of nature it selfe that the world had a beginning But yet by faith alone we do certainely know that the world was made of nothing Heb. 11.3 or that it was so made in sixe dayes as it was as also by the same we know that one day it shall haue an end Therefore Moses doth not vse philosophicall demonstrations but simply reporteth the matter as he had receiued it by the faithfull tradition of the Fathers but especially by the instinction of the holy Ghost Now what was created 1. The heauen and the earth in which two as in a generall proposition Moses doth comprehend all things both visible and inuisible a Col. 1.16 because b Gen. 1.1 these two be the first and most principall parts of the whole world For first vnder the name of heauen he vnderstandeth all that space which is betweene the earth and the circle of the Moone which naturall Philosophers call the region of the elements As Gen. 7.17 The windowes of heauen were opened that is of the ayre and hereupon we reade the foules of heauen c Gen. 1.30 6.7 2. All those celestiall spheres together with their starres both fixed and wandring which make that firmament which the Philosophers call the skie or celestiall region being the distance from the Moone to the skie or the new sphere inuented by Astrologers 3. The place of the Blessed or Paradise or that heauen into which Christ ascended and by a Metonymie also the Angels themselues All these three heauens the Apostle comprehendeth 2. Cor. 12.2 when he saith that he was taken vp into the third heauen that is into the place of the Blessed which place is aboue all those heauens which we see In which God is said to haue prepared his throne for himselfe and in way of excellencie to haue his dwelling and which is called the seate of God Psal 103.9 And is called of Deuines * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quasi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Olympus as it were altogether shining and * Empyreū fierie in regard of the qualitie because it is altogether light and shining Which heauen it selfe God did also create of nothing as the Apostle teacheth Heb. 11.10 of which citie the maker and framer is God Now vnder the name of the earth he vnderstandeth the Earth the waters and all those things which are contained in them Whereupon Aristotle thus defineth the world by the parts of it lib. de mundo The world is a frame consisting of heauen and of earth and of the natures which are cōprehended in them And then by causes The world is called this order of the whole the frame preserued of God by God How was the creation of the world brought to passe 1. By bringing foorth of the matter or of the seminarie of the whole world made of nothing the first day which is properly called Creation 2. By giuing a forme vnto the same and all this was done by the very commandement of God in a moment of time For he did but say a Gen. 1.3.6.9 Be there or Let there be this or that and as soone as he had spoken this or that was made What kind of matter was that which God brought foorth of nothing in the beginning 1. It was in regard of substance partly earthie partly watrie and partly slimie which is expressed by the name of Earth and Slime and Waters 2. In regard of the quantitie it was exceeding great and as it were a Chaos without a bottome For it was a rude vnformed and indigested heape in respect of the formes after following or as Moses calleth it Tohu and Bohu that is emptie and voide rawe and impolished which the seuentie Greeke Interpreters of the old Testament call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Philosophers called Chaos 3. In regard of the qualitie it was darke and obscure that is void of all light vertue and efficacie ouer which houered not any wind or ayre which as yet were not made but the spirit of the Lord of the which the Angell speaketh to Marie Luk. 1.35 euen like vnto an henne when she sitteth vpon her egges and sustained all that whole masse and cherished it and prepared it to receiue all formes out of which the visible heauens and all the elements were produced and framed by the power of the word of God But those things which are not seene were made immediatly of nothing out of which also the light was brought the first day as the Apostle speaketh God who commaunded the light to shine out of darknesse 2. Cor. 4.6 But what was the information or framing of the world That whereby God fitted a fit and conuenient forme for that matter which was made of nothing by means of which the world did truly and indeed begin to be and to be called the world By what meanes did God giue that matter a forme By distinguishing and adorning of it By distinguishing when as God separated the light from the darknesse whereupon came the making and course of the day by the presence of that light and of the night by the absence of that light And the first naturall day was the space of foure and twentie houres or a night and a day consisting of a day artificiall and a night and tooke his beginning from the euening or the night going before Whereas the artificial day beginneth at Sunne rising vnto Sunne setting Now that light seemeth to haue
bene in some bodie like vnto a little cloud made of the waters which by his circular motion made the day and the night whereupon the Sunne came foorth and was framed with a most perfect light 2. When as he stretched foorth like a curtaine a Ps 104.2.3 that part of the waters wherewith the earth was ouerflowed being rarified and made thinne by which meanes that spreading abroad is called Rachiang which word the Greekes interprete but not so fitly * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Firmament especially to signifie the stabilitie and soliditie of the heauenly Circles not for the hardnesse but onely in respect of the firmenesse thereof For Moses by that word which he vseth meaneth not onely the Firmament and the celestiall Circles but also the region of the fire and of the ayre which were made in the second day b Gen. 1.6.7.8 But where it is said that the firmament or spreading abroad doth separate the waters aboue from them beneath it is to be vnderstood of the ayre which diuided the waters aboue that is the cloudes which are the cause of raines snowes dew haile and such other Meteors from c Psal 104.3 the waters of the riuers and fountaines which are beneath 3 When as the greatest part of the waters wherewith the earth was before ouerflowed and couered as it were with a garment d Psa 124.6.7 was gathered into the channels of the earth whereby the earth appeared aboue the waters and the waters being gathered into one place were called the Sea e Psal 33.7 Ier. 5.22 Job 28.9 10.11 And although there be but one sea which for the swiftnesse of it is called the Ocean which doth continually ebbe and flow and that either naturally from the North where it is deeper by reason of the cold wherby the waters are not so much dried vp but rather increased because much aire is turned into water vnto the South where because of the great heate the waters are diminished or else by some externall cause to wit by the changeable light and effectuall motion of the Moone which by the great prouidence of God doth rule waters and all moist things else by her ascending and descending in the day time doth speedily eb and flow that so the waters in the sea might be kept pure and might not putrifie yet in regard of diuers places whereby it passeth it is called by diuers names and from this there flow other seas along in the midst of the earth which also are called the Mediterranean seas and creekes besides certaine lakes and gulfes are called Seas in the Scriptures a Mat. 4.18 Ioh. 6.1 of which Eccles 1.7 All riuers either mediatly or immediatly flow from the sea and runne againe into the sea namely by certaine secret passages of the earth which also men cal veines whereby it commeth to passe that by dayly addition of so many riuers the seas neuer increase nor passe their bounds And though the waters by reason of the diuers qualities of the veines of the earth thorough which they runne are affected and some are of the nature of brimstone other sweete some salt b Exod. 35.23 some be hote and some colde some wholesome some noisome some coloured some without colour for the great and manifold vse of men yet the waters in the sea are salt and for that cause they are called Mare Mare ab amaritudine the sea because either by creation they be so or by the force of the Sunne alwayes working vpon it the more thinne and sweeter part of them is taken vp out of them but in fountaines and riuers they be sweete because as they passe through the pores of the earth they are purged of the saltnesse neither do they lie open to the continual beames of the Sun Now that part of the earth which is aboue the waters although it be beneath the sea is called drie land because it is dried from the waters wherewith before it was ouerspread and couered to the end that it may be seene planted troden vpon and inhabited for which cause the Greekes call it by a word that signifieth Habitable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Latines by a word which signifieth that it is worne of mens feete and other liuing creatures Terra a terēdo And that is also called Habitable or Continent which containeth the Ilands of the sea which distinction was made the third day d Gen. 1 9 10. Psal 105.7.8.9.10 Into how many parts is the earth deuided Into two for the Ocean sea as it were a most large girdle or band deuideth it from the North to the South into the vpper part in which we liue and the nether part wherein liue the Antipodes or those which go with their feete against ours and which doth answer directly to ours so as when the Sunne sets with vs it riseth with them and so on the contrary For if in our time there be some found who haue trauelled thither then some also might do so before them at other times and to propagate mankind there Yea this must needs be so seeing there are found there so many millions of men although Moses maketh no mention of them What is the vse and what is the nature of the earth It is the common mother of all things a Eccles 40.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gigno and therefore she is called by a name that signifieth to bring forth because she is most fruitfull For she begetteth within as in a wombe mettals stones gummes liuing creatures that liue vnder the earth and winds she bringeth forth all kind of fruites she 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nourisheth and cherisheth al and preserueth all whatsoeuer good thing she hath she imparteth it vnto vs she is content to suffer all wrongs neither doth she cease to do good and to profit all men Whatsoeuer seede is cast into her she doth restore the same faithfully and liberally againe vnto vs to some an hundred fold to some sixtie fold to some thirtie fold b Mat. 17.8 Gen. 26.12 therefore she is well called the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tribute payer Besides she doth entertaine our dead bodies into her bosome that one day she may render them againe aliue and incorruptible yet she doth all this not of her selfe or by her selfe but by the commaundemet of God and by his power Thus much of the distinction What was the adorning of the world It is that whereby the earth is adorned with the bringing forth of herbes and plants the firmament is adorned by the creation of the two greater lights the Sun and the Moone and the fixed stars c Gen. 15.5 as also of fiue wandring starres being made of the matter of their orbes which are as it were goodly shining pearles in their rings the sea with the framing of creatures liuing in the waters the aire with fowles the earth with beasts and men inhabiting of it What are
c. To all which he gaue power to beget their like in kind by the coniunction of the male and female of the same kind which were created the sixt day f Gen. 1.24.24 And the same day was man created distinctly from them all of whom we will speake in a speciall place How manifold is the procreation of liuing creatures Twofold Extraordinarie and diuine with perfect bodie and soule without male or female without egges or seed whereof God speaketh Let the waters bring foorth Let the earth bring foorth The other is naturall and ordinarie which hath God for the principall cause for Christ saith of himselfe and his Father my Father worketh hitherto and I worke Ioh. 5.17 and the second cause not so much the water or the earth as the liuing creatures going before by their seeds through the coniunction of the male and female for the knitting together of greater loue betweene the liuing creatures either by the egges as those which lay egges or else by the fruite as those which bring foorth young that be aliue by the blessing of God whereof Moses speaketh vers 22. And he blessed them saying Increase and multiply What is the end and vse of fishes and birds For meate medicine and delight and many other vses which no man can vtter as also for the example of vertues which we should follow and of vices which we should shunne being set before our eyes in their natures As namely of humnnitie and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loue to man in the Dolphine of flatterie in the fish Polypus of the resurrection in the Phoenix of pietie and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remuneration in the Storkes of simplicitie and matrimoniall fidelitie in the Turtles of * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vnnaturall affection in the Rauens and of crying vnto God And therefore it is well said Aske the beast and he shall tell thee and the bird of the ayre and she will declare vnto thee b Ier. 8 7. Mat. 10.16 Iob 39.3 Psal 147.9 Luk. 12.24 Iob 12.7.8 And what is the vse of those liuing creatures which liue vpon the earth They are profitable to cloth nourish and to carrie men and for sundrie other vses yea to till the ground moreouer also they may serue for to direct the life of men in manners Psal 32.9 Be ye not like the horse and mule in whom there is no vnderstanding Prou. 6.6 Go vnto the Pismire ô sluggard Mat. 10.16 Be ye wise as serpents Ioh. 10.3.4 The sheepe heare the voice of the shepheard and follow it For which respect it is very behoouefull to know the natures of beasts For what cause were those beasts that liue vpon the earth created the sixt day Because they differ in kind from the former and were to dwell with man and were more like to man as wel in bodie as in wit then either fishes or birds and because many of them should be an helpe for man and that there might be an order kept beginning with those which are more imperfect and after with them which be more perfect Seeing that it is written God saw all that he had made and they were exceeding good how commeth it to passe that there be hurtfull things as Scorpions venimous Serpents death sicknesse and such like 1. We must put a difference betweene the euill of the fault and the euill of the punishment for the diuell is the author of the former but God of the latter c Esa 45.7 2. Some things after the fall and therefore by accident by reason of mans sinne began to be hurtfull Gen. 3.17 Cursed is the earth in thy labour thornes and thistles shall it bring foorth vnto thee And Rom. 8.20 Euery creature is now subiect vnto vanitie But as for death and sicknesses although they were not created of God at the beginning yet they are ordained of God as of a righteous Iudge as things that must go before death a VVis 1.13 2.24 1. Cor. 15.21 Ro. 5..12 Iam. 1.15 3. All things are good and profitable for the whole and the conseruation of the world and the adorning thereof and that which is hurtfull for one it is b Gen. 2.17 Amos 3.6 Eccles 11.14 profitable for another and one poyson is cured by another What is the difference betweene the producing of the soule of brute beasts and of man Because that although both be and are tearmed spirits yet the soules of beasts are brought foorth by God partly of the waters and partly of the earth but now in the ordinarie procreation of the substance of their Sires as Moses teacheth when he saith that God created euery liuing soule speaking of the whole liuing creature which the waters brought foorth and therefore are mortall But touching the soules of men he sheweth that they were breathed into vs by God immediatly and therefore are incorruptible and immortall and for that cause they returne to God againe who gaue them Eccles 12.7 and are called a breath not of life as beasts haue but of * Nephesh Hachaijm liues in the plurall number Gen. 2.7 Haue brute beasts the facultie of vnderstanding and reason We do easily grant that they haue indeed sense not so much the externall as sight hearing smelling tasting touching as also the inward namely phantasie imagination memorie a certaine naturall wittinesse and prudence in some more in some lesse Moreouer some birds do well perceiue of whom they are brought vp and nourished yea they can learne certaine words of men and can tell how to imitate them as the Parrat and the Thrush And Bees do declare a singular skill in making of hony But we denie that they haue the true facultie of vnderstanding and reason For Dauid saith Psal 32.9 that there is no vnderstanding in the horse and the mule both which are seene to go farre in imitation c Gen. 2.23 Why is God said to rest the seuenth day from all his workes To wit of Creation because in the seuenth day he ceassed to create new creatures For he made not any thing afterward which in some manner did not go before in his former workes for after his workes finished he rested in himselfe because he satisfieth himselfe and fulfilleth his owne desire Againe he worketh still by conseruing sustaining and vpholding the things made without any labour by his meere prouidence alone a Ioh. 5.17 But whence come those things which haue their beginning of putrifaction or which be altogether vnprofitable or are onely hurtfull as Flies Waspes and such like They proceed of putrifaction by vertue of the Sunne or heate but yet after the fall of man as testimonies of Gods anger but yet euer by vertue of that word of God which still continueth Let the waters bring foorth Let the earth bring foorth Neither are they thought to belong vnto the workes of Creation within the compasse of the sixe dayes whereof we speake here What things are we principally
actuall sinne that is a fruit of the same nature and qualitie How is it deuided Into two parts 1. As it is considered in it selfe without anie relation for of the sinnes produced and arising from Originall sinne some are onely inward namely doubtings of God the inflaming and kindling of euill affections euill thoughtes wicked wils whether those willes be informes without forme or full and resolute as the Schoole-men speake Other are externall which shew and manifest themselues by their outward workes and vse in their committing some outward helpe and seruice of the bodie 2 As it is considered before or after the Doctrine of the Gospell was deliuered concerning Christ Iustification and Regeneration Of how many kindes is sinne considered in it selfe before or without the doctrine of Christ Of two kindes Of omission and Commission a Iacob 4.17 The first is when wee doe not euill but omit that good which God commaunds vs to doe The second when we commit that euill which he forbids vs to doe The first proceedeth from thence for that wee are vnfitt for good things the latter from this ground because we are prone to all euill 2 In respect also of the obiect some sinne is said to be committed against God some against our neighbour 3 In respect of the law some sinne is dead some liuing The dead sinne is which though it be in vs yet is not acknowledged for sinne neyther doth it so rage as it vseth after the knowledge of the lawe a Rom. 7.9 The liuing sinne is that which is acknowledged to be such and outrageth in vs after the knowledge of the law 4 In respect of the inward beginning or originall of sinne some sinne is of infirmitie which through our weaknesse stealeth vpon vs against our wils and conceits as sodaine anger vaine thoughts desire of things vnlawfull Another sinne is of ignorance of which it is spoken Psal 19.13 Leuit. 5.27 And Christ sayeth Luc. 23.34 Father forgiue them for they know not what they doe Another sinne is of Malice which is of two sortes one directly opposing grace is blasphemie against the holy Ghost of which we will speake in proper place the other not directly resisting grace and the holy Ghost such are the particular fals against the precepts of the ten commaundements as Idolatry adultery c. In respect of the complement of Christs redemption those sinnes are called past which were done in all that time before he suffered and present committed since the manifestation of the Gospell by which through the bloud of Christ free pardon of all sinnes both past and present is offered to mankind Rom. 3.24 How is sinne deuided being considered after the Doctrine deliuered by Christ Three waies The first wherby one sinne is called the sinne which reigneth or the sin which sinneth another kind of sin which reigneth not or sinneth not The sin reigning is when a man not regenerate serueth as it were looseth the bridle to sinne and with whole hart and determinate purpose is caried and rusheth forward to sinne This also is called voluntarie because it is done of set purpose and entent wittingly with the whole will and against the conscience to which sinne he is said to liue whosoeuer is in the flesh and is said also to be dead in his sinnes b Eph. 2.5 Col. 2.13 who is entangled more in his sinnes is drowned and dead in them The Sinne which raigneth nâ—t is when a man regenerate being drawne backe and reclaymed by Gods spirit is not caried with all his force to sinne and it is called Inuoluntarium that which is not with the will because the godly doe wrestle against it Rom. 7.19 That euill which I would not that I doe To which also they d Rom. 6.2 are said to be dead in which the vigor and power of sinne which by a borrowed speech is called the life of sinne is extinguished by the power of Christ with whom they are vnited and incoporated by faith and contrarily they are said to liue to God or to righteousnes or to Christ who labour to attaine innocency and righteousnes e Rom. 6.10.11 1. pet 2 24. Whence is their diuision taken From the Epistle to the Romans 6.12 Let not sinne raigne in your mortall bodie that you should obey sinne in the lusts of the bodie AndVerse 14. Let not sinne raigne ouer you for you are not vnder the law but vnder grace and out of 1. Iohn 3 6. Whosoeuer remaineth in him sinneth not Whosoeuer sinneth hath not seene him nor knowen him and vers 9. Whosoeuer is borne of God committeth not sinne because his seed remaineth in him And yet notwithstanding in the same Epistle cap. 1.8 If we say that we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs. VVhat is the second diuision Sinne eyther Mortall or Veniall VVhat doe the Papists say eyther of these to be They say that Mortall sinne is the works of the flesh reigning But Veniall sinne say they is the concupiscence or desire of the flesh which doth not long tarie in the heart And therefore they scarce acknowledge originall sinne to be a sinne which they will haue to be washed away with light sprinkling of water ex opere operato as they say by the worke wrought Is this diuision to be receiued Not simply 1. Because euerie sinne whether great or little maketh a man guiltie of eternall death a Rom. 5.14 6.13 2 Because Concupiscence it selfe is by the nature thereof a sinne for it is against the law of God Thou shalt not couet Exod. 20 17. And Gen. 6.5 8.21 Euerie thought of mans heart from his childhood is onely euill 3 Because Iames. 2.10 saith Whosoeuer shall keepe all the law and shall offend in one is become guiltie of all Namely because though he hath not broken totum legis the whole entire law in euerie part yet he hath broken totam legem the whole lawe and the effect thereof by violating the Maiestie of the Lawgiuer 4 This is also manifest both by the consideration of the nature of God and also of the nature of sinne for no man can violate the infinite Maiesty of God venially but he shall be guiltie of infinite punishment and that infinite puritie of God cannot endure so much as the least spot or stayne in a sinner Therefore he is deceiued who thinketh there is any sinne before God Which draweth not with it the weight of his eternall anger Are therefore all sinnes equall Thus farre they are equall that euen the least thought of the least sinne doth a thousand times deserue eternall death according to that saying Gal. 3.10 Cursed is euerie one that abideth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law that he may doe them And Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death Yet notwithstanding in comparison of one with another some sinnes are more grieuous then other as they goe astray more
of vs and of the things signified the coniunction is not in trueth essentiall and personall but mysticall and yet in its kinde reall to wit spirituall by the power of the holy Ghost alone who bringeth to passe that Iesus Christ who now as he is man hath his being in heauen and yet is no lesse truely giuen to vs which are in earth then the signes themselues namely so farre forth as our faith beholding him in the Sacraments doth clime vp into the heauens that we may more and more truely imbrace him and he may liue and abide in vs. For the holy Ghost knoweth to ioyne most nearely together by the bond of faith those things which if you respect the distance of the place are farthest asunder which is done after a heauenly and spirituall manner and not naturally not by the ioyning touching of substances after which manner the beleeuers are most nerely ioyned together one with another as also the husband and the wife are knit together by the bond of mariage although they bee farre asunder in regard of the distance of places Whether are both the things and the signes offered vnto vs of God ioyntly together Yes ioyntly together in respect of God that promiseth truely and without all deceipt but yet distinctly notwithstanding so as oftentimes hee that taketh the signes receiueth nothing lesse then the thing it selfe Whereupon Augustine saith vpon Leuit 7 quest 84 It nothing auaileth Simon Magus to haue the visible Baptisme who wanted the inuisible sanctification What is the manner of receiuing the signes and the things signified The manner of receiuing the signes is naturall or bodilie and the signes are receiued both of the beleeuers and also of the vnbeleeuers after a naturall manner although with contrarie successe But the things themselues signified are communicated in respect of God that giueth them by the holy Ghost and in respect of vs by faith whereby alone Christ with all his benefits is apprehended of vs a Eph. 3.17 For a thing intelligible spiritually propounded cannot bee perceiued vnlesse it be after a spirituall manner that spirituall things might answer to spirituall things corporall and visible to corporall and visible b 1 Cor. 1.13 In this Treatise what doe these things signifie Really Substantially corporally Sacramentally Spiritually Really signifies properly that the verie thing it selfe is truely receiued to which these words substantially and essentially are equiualent So the beleeuers in the right vse of the Sacrament are said to receiue Christ really substantially or essentially also to take the holy elements really substantially essentially But corporally spiritually signifie the manner of receiuing only the signes are receiued corporally but Christ spiritually And to receiue Sacramentally is to receiue the signes of the bodie and bloud of Christ Whether do all they inioy the matter of the Sacraments which vse visible signes No but only the beleeuers vnto whom the promise of grace doth belong and for whose sake the same is ratified by certaine seales For what part or fellowshippe hath the beleeuer with the vnbeleeuer 2. Cor. 6.15 Is it possible for a man to be guiltie by meanes of the thing signified who is not partaker of the same Yes hee may for the abusing of the signes and for the contumelious reproach against the thing signified none otherwise then hee which despiseth the seruants of Christ is guiltie of the contempt of our Lord Iesus Christ and of his Father also a Luk. 10.16 Is faith of the Substance and essence of the Sacraments No because faith maketh not a Sacrament to bee a Sacrament but the institution of God Indeede faith is necessary that wee may receiue the matter of the Sacrament for by faith Christ dwelleth in our hearts b Eph. 3.17 But whether a man beleeue or whether hee beleeue not if the Sacrament be rightly administred hee receiueth the true Sacrament namely in respect of God Yet in respect of the Communicant if a man beleeue not he receiueth the bare signe because without faith neither the word nor the Sacrament can do vs any good Whence is the consecration or the sanctification and blessing of the Sacraments Not by making the signe of the Crosse the repeating and secret murmuring of any words as Iuglers Coniurers do repeat their charmes in conceiued words namely for example of Iupiter that sends the thunder or of bringing the Moone out of Heauen to wit by the force and vertue of letters and syllables if they be repeated and vttered after a certaine manner But from the holy and good will choise institution or ordinance blessing consecration worke commaundement the ratification of the word and the promise of God himselfe who for the good of men hath made choyce of water bread and wine and hath instituted by his ordinance set thē apart for some special purpose and because he hath shewed that it is his pleasure to haue them for Sacraments and how he will haue them celebrated Further by the holy vse which is performed by prayers by the commemoration of the benefits and promises of God and giuing of thanks VVhen is such consecration made First indeede the Lord himselfe made it once and together by himselfe in that first institution namely in that last Supper and this being once made doth consecrate sanctifie the Sacraments to the Church vntill the end of the world as that word once spoken Increase and multiply is perpetually effectuall Gen. 1.28 But now he doth repeat the same by prayers and the word whereby the whole Institution and vse of the externall things is clearely vnfolded by men and those not any whomsoeuer but such as bee lawfully called that is to say by his Pastors and Ministers For otherwise it is no Sacrament but a prophanation of the Sacrament VVhether is there any change of the signes in the Sacraments Truely there is not in the nature or substance the naturall qualitie or quantitie of the Elements the change I say is not of the essence nature as saith Theodoret But only in respect of the end office condition vse for which they bee propounded in the Church namely because they begin to signifie to vs in trueth things altogether heauenly and diuine and that not of their owne nature but by the appointment of the sonne of God As namely for example sake when water btead wine are remoued from the common vse and by the commaundement of God are made the signes of the body and bloud of the Lord which thing certainly they haue not by nature For then euery water should bee the signe of Christs bloud but by the institution of the Lord himself Also the name of the signes are indeed changed but not the matter namely to the intent that we might haue a greater regard of the things signified then of the signes and that the minde might mount vp from the Elements vnto Christ Therefore Theodoret in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith that
of other men b 1 Thes 5 12. c. 1 Tim. 1.22 3. Because whatsoeuer we take in hand euen in things indifferent that is in things mean indifferent least matters as meate and drink with a doubting conscience not being assured of the lawfulnesse therof by the word of God it is sin Ro. 14.5.23 Wee must not do euill that good may ensue therof Rom. 3.8 And it becōmeth vs to to professe Christ not alwaies to flatter our owne weaknesse too much 4. Because we are bidden to fly from the Temple of Idols and to take heed of Idols c Isa 52.11 2 Cor. 6 14 15.16 to hold accursed whosoeuer teach any other Gospel Gal. 1.8 to heare the voice of Christ not to heare a strangers voice but to fly from it Ioh. 10.3.4.5.27 d 1 Ioh. 5.23 and finally to beware of the leauen that is the pestilent Doctrin of the Pharises Sadduces Mat. 16.6.11.12 The Galathians ioyning the obseruation of ceremones to their profession of the Gospel are said by the Apostle to haue forsaken the gospel to haue reiected Christ and to haue receiued his grace in vaine although they acknowledge him for their Sauiour 5. Because that the administration of pure baptisme should be of such excellēt estimation amongst godly men that they should spare no labour nor cost to obtain the same for their dear children and ofsping 6. Because that if by reason of this godly purpose baptisme being deferred which indeede ought to bee done the children in the meane time dye yet notwithstanding they are partakers of Gods couenant and are heires of eternall saluation For not the priuation but the contempt of the Sacrament doth condemne What is the matter of Baptisme It is twofold externall and internall or sensible and intelligible externall or sensible is first of all as well a signe which is of water true pure cleane and naturall and without difference simple vsuall and common not first consecrated with peculiar exorcismes not mixt mingled nor made or distilled nor any simple or vulgar liquor not oyle nor bloud nor fire nor grauell or any other element For by the word of Institution in the verie action comming to the Element of Water Baptisme is consecrated and sanctified to be the lauer of regeneration of the holy Ghost a Mat. 3.11 Eph. 5.26 Heb 10 13 As also the ceremonie or action it selfe namely the externall washing performed by the minister of the Church with water which consisteth of dipping abiding vnder the water and as it were swimming of the bodie out of the water or sprinckling at least and especially of the head and each of them either Trinall to signifie that Baptisme is made in the name of the three singular persons of the Trinitie or in one to note the vnitie of the essence in three persons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For it is all one whether hee that is to be baptized be dipped all ouer in the water as the ancient manner of old was in riuers and fountaines whereof came the lauer or fountaine that is a great vessel ful of water vsed in the Churches of the Christians and the Apostle alludeth Ioh. 3.13 Act. 1.31.19 to the rite of Baptizing in the ancient Church which was not a bare aspersion but as I may say an immersion of the naked bodie which after was cloathed with new garments to put such in minde of newenesse of life in these phrases Gal. 3.27 All yee that haue beene baptized into Christ haue put on Christ And Col. 5 6.9 Ye haue put off the old man with his workes or whether he be dipped or sprinkled with water as appeareth Act. 2.41 as now the manner is for to baptize signifieth not only to drench but properly to dippe and moysten So that the manner of wetting Christ hath leaft free to the Church notwithstanding the sprinkling of water is most agreeable and correspondent to the true signification For Peter saith we are elected vnto sāctification by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the sprinkling of the bloud of Christ 1. Pet. 1.2 which is signified by externall baptisme Heb. 9.29 and was figured and shadowed forth by the sprinkling of bloud in the Lawe neither doth the vertue and force of baptisme depend vpon the quantitie of water vsed therein 2. The cleere and intelligible rehearsall of the words of Institution and the promise but especially inuocation on the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost Therefore these three namely water sprinkling the word are the externall essential parts of baptisme although sprinkling and inuocation in the lawfull vse may be called also the formal cause but the external or outwards of Baptime Whether besides the Symbol of water is it lawfull to vse in Baptisme any other visible signe and Element as Salt which is put into the mouth of the baptized Spittle wherewith the eares and nose are touched together with the pronouncing of the word Ephata that is bee opened Milk and honie whereby is signified a right or title to eternall life a figure whereof was the land of Canaan flowing with milke and hony Chrisme or holy oyle wherewith the brest shoulders and forehead are annointed to shewe that hee is annointed or Christened and armed with the oyle of the spirit like a Champion an hallowed burning wax candle Wherby is meant that he is translated out of the Kingdome of darknesse into the Kingdome of light Exsufflation or breathing on the face of the body to be baptized a white garment c. No for in Baptisme being instituted by God of no lesse force than in the rest of Gods commaundements should bee that Deut. 12.32 Whatsoeuer I commaund you keepe the same to do it you shall not adde thereto nor diminish therefrom For whereas those things being of themselues not ill and some of them brought in by the antients as milke honie breathing and white garments as may appeare in Tertullian without warrant of the word of God instituted by men D. Corona Militis being now full of superstition are held as things necessarie they do rather defile than adorne baptisme and therefore are to be taken away by the example of Ezeckias who brake in sunder the brasen Serpent notwithstanding it had beene fore-appointed by God because that the Israelites began now to abuse the same against the honour of God a 2. Kings 18 4 And whereas it is pretended that many profitable things are signified and taught by those rites and traditions of men It may bee answered that wee should not make our selues wiser then Iesus Christ that types and figures belong to the old Testament but such things as Christ would haue vs learne in the New Testament he would that it should bee declared by the light of his word and not by figures And such rites as hee would haue to bee vsed with his word himselfe hath instituted 2. The beautie and dignitie of the Sacraments is to bee gathered from the
meanes they might be brought back to a more high thought and vnderstanding neither doe we read that the Apostles obserued that washing of feete but that these parts of washing of feet in those hot countries wherein they goe not so well shod as wee appertained to women rather then to men 1. Tim. 5.9.10 VVho are the fellow helpers or administers or seruice able causes of the Supper of the Lord Only the ministers of the word lawfully called to whom the keyes of the Church are giuen whiles that they do rightly execute their office in the administration dispensation of the word of the holy Supper for no man taketh this honour vnto himsef 1 Cor. 3.9 â—â— 1 Math. 28.19 but he that is called of God as was Aaron Heb. 5.4 But the son of God who is present at hand with his Church not with a bodily presence but yet with a spiritual wholsom preseÌ„ce for vs as being the master of the feast doth so celebrate the same by the meanes of his ministers that he alone doth as truly exhibite vnto vs bread and drink of life that is to say himselfe to be enioyed by faith as he doth euidently exhibit vnto vs by the hand of his seruants the signes therof that is to say bread to be chewed in the mouth and wine to be drunk Ioh 6.51 the bread that I will giue is my flesh which I will giue for the life of the world For whom is the the Supper of the Lord instituted Ioh 16.7 Not for all confusedly mixt one with another without exception for Mat. 7.6 he forbiddeth that which is holy to be giuen to the profane to dogs and to strangers from Christ but to theÌ„ which are borne again of water of the spirit that is to the disciples of Christ a Math. 26 26. Luke 22.14 1 Cor. 11.23 because he promised to these only as also he doth giue the sustenance of his quickning flesh and of his bloud And the Sacrament doth belong vnto them to whom the promise doth belong from whence in time past they which were comming on and learned the Catechisme which were not yet baptized they which were accursed out of the Church and the penitentiaries the Sermon being ended were commanded to goe out the Deacon crying let the Catechumeni that is such as learned the Chatechisme and the excommunicated goe out from thence was said the Masse that is the dimission of the Catechumeni And the Grecians did say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say holy things for holy men like as Apulcius in his second booke doth report that the Priest was wont when he was about to begin the Sacrifices to say thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is who is here to whom answere was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as if it should be said honest good men when as the polluted and vnworthy went away Of how many parts doth the institution of the Lords Supper consist Of three 1. Of the institution of Christ whereby he ordained the outward matter of this Sacrament 2. Of his words both preceptiue and also determinatiue annexed to the institution wherby he doth declare the inward matter and forme moreouer the end 3. Both of a lawful administration also of the receiuing of the Lords Supper it selfe What did Christ when he instituted his Supper He sat downe at the table with the disciples but stoode not at the Altar because he instituted a holy banquet not a sacrifice b Mat. 26 20 Mark 14 18 Luk. 22.14 wherupon againe it ought not to be tearmed the Sacrament of the Altar but the Lords Supper or the Lords Table euen as it is named by Paule 1. Cor. 11. Moreouer hee tooke and instituted the matter namely outward signes two only no more nor fewer that is to say bread the cup or wine in the cup. In like manner he added thereunto holy ceremoniall actions For as he was about both signes 1. He gaue thanks to the Father 2 Hauing taken the bread he brake it 3. He gaue it to the Disciples so also he gaue the cup or wine Iâ— not the holy Supper a double Sacrament seing that the signe thereof is double No. 1. Because euery signe seuerally by it selfe is not a SacrameÌ„t but both of them ioyned together 2 Because amongest vs it is one banquet alone not diuers where notwithstanding many meats and drinkes are set on For those two signes doe declare one action of Christ that is to say our whole spirituall nourishment For that is said to be one not onely which is simple and indiuisible or continuall but that which is perfect that is one in perfection to whose integritie all things doe concurre which are required to the end of the same as one man consisting of the essentiall parts Therefore this Sacrament is many things materially but one thing formally and perfectly in as much as in them one refection is perfected saith Thomas Part. 3. qu. 73. Artic. 20. But why would Christ haue vs vse a twofold Signe That by distinct symboles or signes he might as it were set before our eyes and imprint in our mindes his cruell and bloudie death and truly note out both the giuing of his bodie seuerally and the shedding of his bloud out of his bodie for our sinnes For as Bellarmine doth confesse in his booke of the Sacrament of the Eucharist 4. booke chap. 22. The forme alone of bread doth not exactly represent Christ as dead vnlesse the bloud also be seene on the other part as shed and the forme of wine alone doth not sufficieÌ„tly represeÌ„t Christ as offered in sacrifice for bloud alone is not a sacrifice 2 Like as in this life as Augustine saith in the 26. Tractate vpon Iohn the whole refreshing or nourishing of bodies doth consist of meate which is a due nourishment and of drinke which is a moist nourishment so let vs know that Christ is set forth vnto vs in the Eucharist distinctly as meate and drinke neyther let vs thinke any thing to be wanting vnto vs which may appertaine to our whole spirituall sustenance or nourishment and so let vs by faith apply vnto our selues the bodie and bloud of Christ and the benefit obtained by the deliuerie of his bodie and shedding of his bloud and so as it were by faith let vs eate and drinke Christ himselfe whole Iohn 6.55 My flesh is meat indeed and my bloud is drinke indeed Therefote they doe scarce leaue vnto vs halfe full satisfaction for our sinnes but a lame or halfed matter of nourishment in Christ and do take away the integritie or perfection of this Sacrament whosoeuer doe sunder the cup from the Eucharisticall bread against the precept Math. 19.6 That which God hath coupled together let no man put asunder Whether therefore doe they sinne which take away the cup from the Eucharisticall bread Yea greatly because they goe from the ordinance of Christ and do
this that he should take a double portion and the people one kinde onely but in those properties which Paule describeth 1. Tim. 3.2 and 5.17 where hee saith that the Elders are worthie os double honour when they rule well and labour in the word of God Hom. 18 vpoÌ„ 2 Cor. Gratiam Cau. compernu de consecrat distinction 2 and excellent is the sentence of Chrysostome There is a time when a priest differeth nothing from an inferiour as when they must vse the mysteries for we are accounted worthie all alike that we may pertake of them And Ignatius in the Epistle to the Philadelphians One bread broken to all and one cup deliuered to all And Gelasius The diuision of one and the same mysterie cannot come to passe without great sacriledge 11 Because whatsoeuer pretence is brought Christ not only instituted the supper with a twofold signe but commaunded his Disciples to take it and vse it vnder a twofold signe Take eate drinke and do this And the doctrine of the Lords Supper which is handled 1. Corinth 11. vers 23. and so following is common to all the faithfull Finally because the Sacrament ought to be whole and to be taken wholy Wherefore did Christ take bread not breads To signifie the mysterie of one and the same bodie from whence the communicants do partake of one bread What manner of bread vsed Christ vnleauened bread or leuened Such as they vsed with meat true and common bread but yet valeauened because of the circumstance of time to wit the feast day of vnleauened bread wherin after the eating of the paschall Lambe Christ celebrated the supper b Mat. 26 17 and also because the vse thereof was common on those feastiuall daies of Easter wherein it was not lawfull to vse leauened bread c Exod. 12.15 And the Apostle speaking of the holy supper doth terme it simplie bread meaning vndoubtedly common and vsuall bread among the Corinthians such bread as the churches of the Graecians do vse and which the Corinthians did eat of Wherefore ordained he bread to be the sacrament of his bodie For the Analogie or similitude of the properties and effects of the signe and of the thing signified For as of the graine of wheat is made corporall bread so of the bodie of Christ is made spirituall bread 2 As bread in the ouen is baked with the heat of the fire so the bodie of Christ was baked with the fire of the crosse and prepared to be meat of life 3 As corporall life is susteined with bread so by Iesus Christ the bread of life the soule is nourished vnto spirituall eternall life 4 As the heart of man is vpholden strengthned with bread d Psal 104 15 so the vertue and merit of the body of Christ doth comfort the soule to life eternall 5 As bread doth driue away the hunger of the body so the merit of the body of Christ doth asswage the hunger of the soule 6 As bread doth profit the hungry not the full fed so also the vertue or merit of the bodie of Christ doth not profit any but them who hunger after righteousnes and them which are puffed vp swelling with their owne righteousnes and for such as are full truly nothing doth it profit them at all 7 As bread distributed among manie is a signe of concorde or agreement so also the bodie of Christ offered for manie is a pledge of the good will of Christ of mutuall loue amongst our selues 8 As one bread is made of manie graines so we being manie are one mysticall bodie of Christ which doe pertake of one bread one I say by a common notion of the sacrament but not in nomber and because it is taken to one end as we may see 1. Corinth 10.17 For wee that are many are one bread and one bodie because wee all are partakers of one bread Why did Christ take bread rather then flesh or other meat to institute his Supper Because he had not regard to the colour and outward forme for the which flesh is more like to flesh but to the vertue of nourishing which is greater in bread then in the flesh of any beast Theodoret. Dialogo 1 What maner of wine vsed Christ taught by his exaÌ„ple to be vsed Not tempered which the ancient Graecians called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is mixt of water and wine which they vsed as a thing free and indifferent neither necessarie to the Sacrament occasion being taken from that because water flowed out of the rocke to the thirstie Israelites which rocke was Christ a Numb 20 10 1 Cor. 10 4â— and because water and bloud came out of the Lords side b Ioh. 19.34 Amb. of the scaraments 5 or because in olde time celebrating the Lords Supper they did drinke more largely so that some were drunken in the loue feasts c â—p 1 18. booke Chap. 53 Tractate 120 vpon Ioh. and therefore that wine being of it selfe strong might do the lesse hurt water should be put thereunto or to signifie the vnion of Christ with the Church as though the waters should figure out the people as Cyprian will haue it or to signifie the vnion of natures in Christ as Nicephorus will haue it But these arguments are not necessarie and as Augustine will haue it that powring out of water bloud did signifie two sacraments baptisme and the Eucharist Moreouer we drinke not in so great plentie or so strong wine in the Supper and our communion with Christ is signified after another maner but it is better concluded that Christ vsed wine without water For the scriptture doth not speake of any water mixt with wine as neyther of red or white colour but of the fruit of the Vine Math. 26.29 Verily I say vnto you that I will not drinke henceforth of this fruit of the vine vntill that day when I shall drinke it new with you in my Fathers kingdome Which words Mathew and Marke doe apply to the narration of the mystical cup but in Luke they seeme to be transposed Luk. 22.18 as Augustine teacheth 3. booke of the agreement of the Euangelist and they are not extant in the Syrian interpreter And Chrisost Hom. 83. vpon Mat. 26. cha Of the fruit saith he of the vine which truly bringeth forth wine not water Yea if a maÌ„ listed to play with Allegories that might be expounded of the adulterating of the Lords supper Esa 1.22 Thy vintners do mixe wine with water Wherefore instituted he the Sacramenâ— of his bloud with vvine In like mannner for the likenesse properties and effects of wine and of the bloud of Christ For as wine is the most sweet liquor flowing out of the Vine so the bloud of Christ is the most sweet drinke of the soule powred out for vs out of the side of Christ which is that true Vine a Ioh. 15.1.5 2 As wine doth asswage the thirst of the bodie so the merit of
to obserue in generall in the creation of all things Fiue things the great varietie of things the power and facultie which God gaue to euery thing the order the perpetuall continuance of the kinds lastly the end of the creation of things Lay open these distinctly The varietie of things so excellently distinguished in their kinds doth commend vnto vs the power and wisedome of the workman The natural power and propertie of the creatures put into them doth set forth the goodnes of God who hath appointed euery thing for so necessarie and profitable vses The twofold order that is of creation because that before God did create Adam he furnished the world with plentie of all good things doth commend his fatherly prouidence and care towards vs who before we were borne tooke care to prouide all things needfull for vs. The disposing of them whereby it comes to passe that the inferiour creatures serue for the superior may admonish man that he should serue God The perpetuitie which is perceiued in the preseruation of euery kind whereas he maintaineth some by secret meanes to others he giueth power to propagate doth proue vnto vs his wisedome and power For which cause this world is called the cleare looking glasse and most beautifull Theater of the vertues of God And what is the end of the creation of all things It is twofold The nearest end is man himselfe for God created this world to the end that man might both dwell in it and be a fit Lord of it a Gen. 2.15.19 20. Psal 8.27 But the chiefe end is the glorie of God as Salomon teacheth Prou. 16.4 Iehouah made all things for himselfe to wit that his goodnesse wisedome power and eternitie might clearly be seene b Rom. 1.20 His goodnesse in that it pleased him to communicate some part of his happinesse to them which had no being c Reu. 4.11 His manifold wisedome in that he made so many kindes of things in so excellent an order and for so good an vse d Ephes 3.10 His power in that he made all things of nothing and doth perpetually preserue them His eternitie because he was before all things because he brought them forth to this end that they might acknowledge praise and glorifie him and that men might therby take occasion to place their confidence in God to call vpon him to loue him to praise and for euer to celebrate him But why did not God create the world sooner Because he would not for God is a most free and voluntarie Agent But what did he before he made the world It is a curious question and therefore Augustine in the 11. book of his Confess cap. 12. writeth that a certaine old man made a wittie answer to one that moued such a question namely that he was making of hell for such curious fellowes We answer that God was sufficient and blessed in himselfe and stood in need of nothing and that he did delight himselfe in that his eternitie together with his wisedome that is the Sonne and the Spirit being consubstantiall with himselfe For the Word was with God Ioh. 1.1 And Christ saith of the holy Ghost All things which he heareth he shall speake vnto you Ioh. 16.3 What things make against the doctrine of Creation The heresie of Basilides who affirmed that God made the world by the helpe of Angels 2 Of Manichaeus who set downe two beginnings and ascribed the beginning of good things to God and of euill things to the diuell Is this opinion to be admitted God forbid seeing it is blasphemie against God for it attributeth diuinitie to the diuels Besides it is contrary to the expresse testimonie of Moses Gen. 1.31 who saith All things which God made at the beginning were good Therefore euill came in by accident and by the corruption of nature or else was brought in by the malice and enuie of the diuell Which are the errors of the Philosophers 1 Aristoteles errour who affirmed that the world was without beginning eternall That the kindes of all liuing creatures were eternall laying this foundation Nothing is made of nothing Which principall is true in that order of things which is now appointed but in Diuinitie concerning things not yet made it is false or else if you will it is true in naturall and phisicall generation but not in diuine creation for of this it is said Do not enquire for the matter because there was none 2 The error of Democritus Leucippus and Epicurus who dreamed that the world was made of the moates concurring together by fortune which opinion is confuted by the order of things created by the orderly motion of the heauenly circles and lastly by the certaine enâ—â— for which all things were made For it cannot be that this order those orderly motions and so great profites should proceed from a thing ruled by meere fortune 3 The errrour of the same Democritus who affirmed that there were many yea infinite worlds whereas the word of God maketh mention but of one Creator and gouernor of the world Act. 17.24 not of many worlds and saith that the Sonne was sent into the world Ioh. 3.17 not into the worlds 4 The Stoickes error who fained two eternall beginnings to wit the mind and the matter which cannot possibly stand together The same is the errour of Anaxagoras who sets downe an eternall Chaos to which came an eternal mind which seuered all kindes of creatures from that commixture 5 The madnes of Plinie who thought that this world was God eternall infinite without beginning and also shall neuer haue end all in all yea the very whole it selfe 6 Of Auerroes who falsly auouched that the heauen was without matter Adde to these Galens opinion who hauing read the first chapter of Genesis said that Moses spake many things but proued few things The sixth common Place of Angels What is signified by this word Angell THe word Angell being a name of office is a Greeke word deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to declare and signifieth a messenger an ambassador or one sent of a message First in way of excellency it is attributed to the Sonne of God who was sent into the world by his Father to the end that being made man and a sacrifice he might redeeme mankind He is so called Gen. 48.16 The Angell who hath deliuered me from all euils and the eternall Angell who was the leader of the Israelites who is sometimes called the Angell of Iehouâ—â— and sometimes Iehouah himselfe a Exod. 14.19 33.20 1. Cor. 10. and he is called the Angell of the Couenant b Mal. 3.1 2 It is giuen to Iohn Baptist Mal. 3.1 Behold I send mine Angell or messenger 3 Chap. 2.7 it is giuen to the Church The Priests lips shall preserue knowledge and they shall seeke the law at his mouth because he is the Angell or messenger of the Lord of hoasts 4 To those ministring spirits whereof mention is