f Quo significat Dominum voluisse aptare suum sermonem ad captum auditorum ob id locutum in parabolis quod nudi sermonis nondum essent capaces at parabolas suas desumsiffe a rebus vulgaribus per quas idiotae utcunque induci parari possunt ad mysteriorum captum Hereby he signifies that Christ would fit his speech to the capacity of the hearers because they were not capable of naked truthes and he borrowed his speeches from vulgar things by which the most unlearned might be fitted for the mysteries of the kingdome of heaven Though some understand the words as they were worthy to hear and not to understand parables being above the common capacities and put for hard and difficult speeches As Matth. 13.10 Christ being demanded Why speakest thou in parables he answers ver 11 12 13 14 15. Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the Kingdome of heaven but to them it is not given for whosoever hath to him it shall be given and he shall have more abundance but whosoever hath not from him shall be taken away even that he hath Therefore speake I to them in parables because they seeing see not and hearing they hear not neither do they understand And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah which saith By hearing ye shall hear and not understand and seeing ye shall see and not perceive For this peoples heart is waxed grosse and their ears are dull of hearing and their eyes they have closed lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their eares and should understand with their heart and should be converted and I should heal them But blessed are your eyes for they see and your eares for they heare But these texts may be reconciled A parable or Similitude when men stay in the outward bark of it is as a riddle nothing can be more obscure Some mystery men know is hid under it but they know not what Therefore Christ having uttered a parable to the multitude Matth. 15.11 and Peter requesting Declare unto us this parable ver 15. saith Are ye also yet without understanding Parables explained are the plainest way of teaching shewing the face of heavenly things in earthly glasses and therefore the Lord to set out his dealing with his own people faith I have also spoken by the Prophets and I have multiplyed visions and used similitudes by the Ministery of the Prophets Hos 12.10 But the scope be not discerned onely that which is said of earthly things and no more is known Now what words are to the eares in similitudes and comparisons that Sacramentall signes are to the eyes by both the understanding is holpen the memory refresht and as may God willing be unfolded faith strengthened The cleansing from sin we find in Scripture held forth under the metaphor of pouring out water Ezek. 36.25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you and ye shall be clean from all your filthinesse and from all your Idols will I cleanse you To which the Apostle alludes Ephes 5.26 where he saith Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it that he might sanctifie and cleanse it by the washing of water by the word Which was typified also in those divers washings mentioned by the Apostle Heb. 9.10 which the blood of Christ doth really work Purging our consciences from dead works to serve the living God cleansing us from all sin 1 John 1.7 and therefore it is called the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus 1 Pet. 1.2 In Baptisme in a standing Ordinance this is held out The party interessed in Covenant is dipped in or washed with water and the reason of it given Acts 22.16 Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the Name of the Lord. Christ promises to his Church living bread and water whereof whosoever drinketh shall never thirst He further explaines himself The bread which I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world Joh. 6.51 My flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed Joh. 6.55 Christ being to dye holds this out in outward signes and with his own Comment upon them Taking and breaking bread he saith This is my body Taking the cup he saith This is the cup in the New Testament in my blood shed for them and for many for the remission of sinnes In elements of frequent use ordinary easy to be compassed these high mysteries and singular mercies are shadowed SECT IV. A further Corollary drawn from the same Doctrine The necessity of explanation of Sacramental signes FOurthly Then there is a necessity that these Sacramental signes be opened explained the mystery cleared the thing signified held out and the Analogy and proportion made known otherwise the soul is still left in the dark and no benefit reaped either for the help of our faith or clearing of our understanding There is no Sacrament as Calvin well observes without a promise preceding The Sacrament is an appendant to the promise as a seal among men is to a Covenant an earnest to a bargain or a ring hath been to a marriage were there no promise there were nothing in those signes As where there is no Covenant there is nothing confirmed by a seal where there is no bargain nothing is ratified by earnest given where there is no matrimoniall consent the ring would be but an imposture the Word of promise gives being to the Sacrament according to that received speech g Accedit verbum ad elementum fit Sacramentum The Word to added to the Element and it is made a Sacrament And there can be no improvement of the Sacrament to any spirituall advantage without understanding of the promise Were the signes such as did proclaime their own signification as a footstep the foot that made the impression or a shadow the body then the signes might stand alone and speak their own intentions But being creatures for civill uses and having only an aptnesse in them to hold out the thing that they signifie and as hath been said equally apt to other significations a further explanation is necessary Signes among men must have their significations known as well as founds in musical and military instruments otherwise as none could know in the one what is piped or harped nor upon sound could prepare themselves to battell 1 Cor. 14.7 8. so in the other none can know what is shadowed out or resembled There was a custome to ratifie Covenants by killing a calfe and the Covenanters passage between the parts of it as you may see Jerem. 34. He that understood not the meaning of that ceremony could know nothing of a Covenant by that means between parties to be solemnized none understand any more then by sight then many of us do now by the reading of it A garland at the door if custome did not give us a reason of it would speak no more to a passenger without
then a flower in the window within To see Baptisme and the Lords Supper acted in the highest way of decency and reverence may possesse with wonder but not at all edifie the ignorant beholder Here as almost every where we have those of the Church of Rome our adversaries And there hath been no small contest whether this word which gives being to Sacraments be Concionatorium or Consecratorium whether it be a word for communicants instruction or the elements consecration He that pleases may read Bellar. de Sacramentis in genere lib. 1. Cap. 19 20. Suarez de Sacramentis disput 2. quaest Sexages art 8. on the one part Chamier de Sacramentis in genere Cap. 15. Whitaker praelect de Sacram. Cap. 6. on the other part All of which was occasioned as Chamier observes by a speech of Calvin lib. 4. Institut Cap. 14. Sect. 4. who speaking to that common saying that a Sacrament doth consist of a word and outward signe saith h Verbum enim intelligere debemus non quod sine sensu fide insusurratum solo strepitu velut magica incantatione consecrandi elementi vim habeat Sed quod praedicatum intelligere nos faciat quid visibile signum sibi velit Quod ergo sub Papae Tyrannide factitatum est non caruit ingenti mysteriorum profanatione Putarunt enim satis esse si Sacerdos populo sine intelligentia obstupente consecrationis formulam obmurmuraret Imo id data opera caverunt ne quid doctrinae inde ad plebem proveniret om nia enim Latine pronunciarunt aput homines illiteratos Post ea eousque erupit Superstitio ut consecrationem non nisi rauco murmure quod a paucis exaudiretur rite peragi crederent We are to understand such a word that hath not power of consecration of the element barely with a noise whispered without sense or faith as by a magicall spell But such as being preached or published gives us to understand what the visible sign meanes Therefore that which is done saith he under the Tyranny of the Pope is not without a notable prophanation of the mysteries for they have thought it enough for the Priest to mutter the forme of consecration while the people stand amazed and without understanding yea they puposely provide that no help in knowledge should come to the people pronouncing all in Latine among illiterate men yea afterward superstition so farre prevailed that they beleeved consecration to be done aright when it was done with a low muttering sound which few could hear A notable character worthy of his penne setting out to the life their art to hold the world in blindnesse In stead of giving an account what hath been on both parts handled in this Controversy I shall lay down that which I will judge to be truth in severall propositions Explicatory Propositions A word of institution neâ—essary First That an institution from God and words from his mouth that hold out such an institution of every Sacrament is of absolute necessity even to the very being of a Sacrament It were a dumbe element and a superstitious Ceremonious observation without it if we can find no institution for water-Baptisme our men that stand for a pure spirit-Baptisme will have the upper hand in that particular But here our adversaries and we are at an agreement Consecration respects not the elements but participants Secondly That consecration if we may so call it that is used in the publique solemnization of any Sacrament is not in respect of the elements or outward signes themselves whose essence remaines entire and unchanged But it is for their sakes that use these signes and unto whom in their use onely they suffer a change from common to sacred And therefore being not for the elements Nam Catholici omnes docent verbum Sacramenti esse pauca quaedum verba â Deo praescripta quae super materiam a ministro pronuntianda sunt but for believers sakes a magical incantation is not of use but verbal instruction Therefore that of Bellarmine in the name of all the Catholicks as he calls them i That the word which makes a Sacrament is only a few words prescribed of God to be pronounced by the Priest over the matter of the Sacrament is not to be suffered Those words might as well be concealed as thus muttered the elements do not heare them neither do they suffer any change by them That speech of Austin we willingly grant that the word is added to the element and it is made a Sacrament But not with a Romish Glosse upon it that by the word there should be understood barely the uttering or as they would rather have it the muttering of a few words But the word of institution holding forth a Divine designation of it to that end and use which is not to be concealed from those for whose use it is ordained as though it did work by way of a secret change but in the plainest way to be made known to them So that those bare words in Baptisme I baptize thee in the Name of the Father c. are not that which makes it up into a Sacrament But the command of Jesus Christ by the application of water to baptize in that Name Neither is the uttering of those words This is my body This Cup in the New Testament is my blood sufficient but the whole series of the institution in the words and actions of Christ Jesus Thirdly For an orderly administration of the Sacrament Repetition and explanation of the words of institution singularly useful it is of singular use that the institution be repeated and that in Scripture-language which Bellarmine confesses we do alwayes in Baptisme and many of us at least out of 1 Cor. 11. at the Lords Supper and much for edification to have them briefly explained This addes authority and honour to the administration and the understanding of many deploredly ignorant is hereby benefited If Parents must teach their children when they saw the rite of the Passeover a reason of it Exod. 12. then much more should Ministers of the Gospel teach it their people Christians should act nothing in way of worship of God but they should see and know reason for their actings Fourthly It is not essential to a Sacrament A precise forme of wo ds not essentiall in a Sacrament that a precise forme of words be observed in the administration of it so that the being of a Sacrament is lost if a word be changed But it is sufficient that the summe and substance of the institution be held out and repeated and the signs accordingly in the administration applyed to the end for which they are ordained to illustrate and seal the thing signified to those that partake of it though a licentious freedom of variation of the words is to be avoyded so the sense and meaning of the institution may be if not lost yet at least obscured there being no secret force in
faith is not Sanctification Sanctification is inherent the righteousnesse of faith is imputed but circumcision is a sign and seal of the righteousnesse of faith And that Baptisme signifies and seals the same thing we find expressely in Peters words Ast. 2.38 Be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins Remission of sins is by blood Heb. 9.22 Without shedding of blood there is no remission Baptisme is for remission of sins and therefore the water in Baptisme holds out the blood of Christ And I doubt not but Ananias had respect to this in his speech to Paul Act. 22.16 Rise and be baptized and wash away thy sins Somewhat it is to which these signs engage and that is all unto which a Christian in duty as duty stands engaged whether for his change in heart or life or in order to the pardon of his sin Baptisme engages to the first work of regeneration and to the first work of making all new within To this circumcision did tye as it signified it so it engaged to it Deut. 10.16 Circumcise the foreskin of your hearts and be no more stiffenecked If by vertue of their circumcision in the flesh God did not require it why is the want of it charged on Judah as their sin or how could it lay them open with other Nations to punishment Jer. 9.25 26. Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that I will punish all them that are circumcised with the uncircumcised Egypt and Judah and Edom and the children of Ammon and Moab and all that are in the uttermost corners that dwell in the wildernesse for all these Nations are uncircumcised and all the house of Israel are uncicumcised in the heart And that the first work is required as well as a further degree and progresse both in circumcision and baptisme is clear In baptisme we are explicitly dedicated as the Jewes were implicitly in circumcision to Father Son and holy Ghost and therefore engaged to be sincerely his in Covenant But this cannot be till a change be wrought and we be born again from above To this therefore we are engaged We are engaged to love the Lord with all our heart with all our strength but this cannot be while our hearts are in an unchanged condition and therefore the circumcision of the heart Deut. 30.6 is mentioned in order to this of the love of the Lord The Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart and the heart of thy seed to love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul what is it but the first work that is called for in that of the Prophet Make ye a new heart and a new spirit Ezek. 10.31 And in those texts of the Apostle Awake thou that sleepest and stand up from the dead Ephes 5.14 Be ye transformed by the renewing of your minds Rom. 12.2 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man And be renewed in the spirit of your minds Ephes 4.22 23. Howsoever some of these Scriptures may be conceived to be directed to men in a state of Regeneration and therefore that they call not for the first work but for a further progresse in grace yet all of them cannot be so Interpreted And there is not any of them but implyes that where the first work is not done it must be done where the old man is not put off it must be put off and where the new man is not put on it must be put on where the spirit is not renewed it must be renewed Neither is it of force against this to say that the first work is out of our power and that in it we are wholly passive and therefore we do not in baptisme engage to it but God rather engages for it To which I answer Though it be out of our power yet it is within the command of God and is matter of our duty Gods command is no rule of our strength neither is it brought down to answer our weaknesse so a carnall man should be under no spiritual command but it is a rule of our duty what we once were and still ought to be it commands us for to be And though we be passive in the first work yet we are alwaies concerned to be active and assoon as we do receive power we are to act Dead Lazarus was commanded to rise and having power communicated from God he did actually rise and come out of the grave There is not any promise of God for inherent Grace nor any work of Grace but it comes within our duty and a command lies on us as instance might be given and consequently there is an obligation and engagement to it Gods command and his promises stand not in opposition but in subordination and to say that God is engaged and not man is dangerous then all that are baptized must be regenerate or else God fails in his engagement Somewhat it is that these signs seal and in sealing ratify and confirm and that is as the text shewes the righteousnesse of Faith and consequently all other priviledges whatsoever of like nature that are annexed to it Remission Justification Adoption Glorification Sacraments as seals have not as I conceive at least immediately and directly reference to graces or inherent habits but priviledges They are as Mr. Baxter hath well observed seales of the conditional Covenant and so they must seal whatsoever they do seal on Gods terms and conditions they ratifie mercies promised on those termes that the Covenant doth promise now graces are the conditions and termes of the Covenant and mercies are promised upon those termes and therefore the Covenant requires them but the Sacraments do not ratifie and seal them The Sacraments as signs shew us our wants of or wants in grace by the help of the Word and light received from it they point us out where supply may be found they engage us to this change to the whole of duty required from the people of God and upon answer of our conscience in this work they seal and confirm all promised priviledges to us The nature efficacy and operation of Sacraments would be better understood if that which is proper to each part or the particular office in each relation were better known The seal in a Lease as from the Lessor doth not ratifie the homage that is to be done by the Lessee or the service from him due but the inheritance or benefit whatsoever which upon condition of such homage or service is conveyed Graces are the homage and priviledges are the benefit or the inheritance the priviledges then and not the graces are directly in Sacraments sealed to us It is not sealed up to us either in Baptisme or the Lords Supper that we do believe or repent but that believing and repenting we have forgivenesse of sin and salvation But some say that the Sacraments seal all that the Covenant promises but the Covenant promises Grace and therefore the Sacraments
it seems was the taking quality the other trees were good for food and doubtless lovely to the eye but this alone answerable to the name with the Devils comment upon it was a tree to be desired for this end but she found the contrary light was not only not encreased but put out so that man now is a beast by his own knowledge others therefore conclude that it had name not from any such effect that in nature it was apt to produce but by reason of the event that followed and upon the taste of it must of necessity follow now they experimentally know the good which they had by sin lost and the evil which they had incurred k Quemadmodum qui medicus est theoretice vim morbi sanitatis bonum cognoscit in morbum delapsus amissa sanitate nova quadam ratione per experientiam bonum sanitatis malum morbi cognoscit As a Physician faith Ri vet that hath the theory of health and sicknesse understanding what health is to desire it and what sicknesse is to shun it yet falling into sicknesse he hath another manner of knowledge out of his own experience Pererius the Jesuit dislikes this Interpretation he that pleaseth may read his reason on these words and Rivets vindication Exer. 18. in Gen. He fixes upon a third that this name was given to this tree upon occasion of the speech of Satan bearing Eve in hand that in eating of it she should gain the wisdom of God to know both good and evil And therefore it had the name of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil But whosoever gave the name whether God himself who placed the tree in the garden or Adam who to his cost knew it or Moses that wrote of it it is not probable they would borrow a name from Satans delusion The former therefore which the Jesuit confessed to be an opinion most received I judge to be most probable and till I see more shall not recede from it SECT II. Corollaries from the former assertion FIrst hence we see the necessity of the use of means Necessity of the use of means for our help and strengâ—h in the way of fai h and obedience for our help and strength in wayes of faith and obedience in all the wayes prescribed and appointed by God In case our first Parents in their integrity were to make use of a Sabbath to give God a time in a more solemn way as we see Gen. 2.2,3 and also of Sacraments who are we that we should cast off Sabbath and Sacraments that our faith and obedience should be risen to that growth and arrived at that height that all helps should be laid aside It is no marvel that upon this account so many that seemed to be somewhat refusing the assistance of God provided wholly degenerate and come to nothing In case it be replyed that Adam was left to his own keeping carried his life in his own hands but we have another manner of support and defence We are kept by the mighty power of God through faith unto Salvation 1 Pet. 1.5 and so we need not to be so sollicitous of our selves I answer though there be truth in that which is objected yet the objection is to no purpose as easily may be manifested Jesus Christ would not have provided Ordinances in New-Testament-times for the perfecting of the Saints for the edifying of the body of Christ in case he would not have his to make use of them and had not seen that they stand in need of them we are not so kept that we should sit still no more then Israel was in the conquest of the promised Land Gods power in oâ—r preservation and our diligent though not diffident and anxious care very well stands together Else Peter had not from thence inferred wherefore gird up the loynes of your mind be sober and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 1.13 Nor yet having set out Satans vigilancy annext that exhortation Whom resist stedfast in the faith 1 Pet. 5.9 nor yet had the Apostle John told us that He that is begotten of God keepeth himself and the evil one toucheth him not 1 Joh. 1.18 Souldiers are taught to go out and fight in the Name of the Lord and that he covers their head in the day of battel yet this doth not abate any thing of their watchfulness or diligence they do not cast off weapons either offensive or defensive This is an artifice of Satan to lay mens throats open to him for slaughter and destruction under pretence of Divine protection Sacraments are without Spiritual profit to those that live in breach of Covenaâ—t Secondly Know that there is no saving benefit received by any Sacraments which are seales of the Covenant longer then men in Covenant make it their business to keep up to the tearms of it Adam was in a Covenant of life from God upon tearmes of preserving himself from sin and had it by a Sacrament confirmed to him he wilfully runs upon sin the tree of life now can no more give life to him Satan then perswades to believe that in eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil they should as gods know both good and evil He now perswades that being baptized in water which holds forth the Spirit and blood of Christ if they understand any such symbolical representation they partake of the Spirit and blood of Christ And that taking the Bread and Cup they enjoy all that they signifie and hold forth That no more then a Sacrament needs to make up a Christian compleat This is an outward work that may be done and all lust alive within An easie work to go through and here man would fain rest but look further to the duty to which these engage otherwise thou wilt find no more of Christ in the Sacrament then Adam found of life in the tree of life See Mr. Burges Spiritual Refining Ser. 19. Covenant failing all Sacraments relating to it necessarily fall with 〈◊〉 Thirdly It yet further followes That a Covenant falling to which Sacraments are annext as signes and seals the Srcraments fall together with it The Covenant of works being no longer of use to the attainment of Salvation the Sacraments which under that Covenant were appointed are taken out of the way and no use of them remaint I know that it is asserted by as learned hand that Christ doth not absolutely make null or repeal the Covenant of works but that it still continueth to command prohibit promise and threaten yet confessing this assertion to be difficult and disputable to which I readily yeeld and therefore in a business of no greater moment then this is I had rather suspend then either subscribe or oppose He and I are wholly agreed as to that for which it is here produced seeing he saith We must neither take that Covenant as
to do the duty that we owe. What the name of Christian or servant or people of God speaks the same these signs call for As the Altar set up Josh 22.24 did witness that those two Tribes and a half did belong with the other Tribes to the God of Israel so these Sacramental signes witness the same thing likewise 8. Remembrancing Eighthly They ace remonstrative and remembrancing signes sometimes of mercy conferred The Passeover was a sign of Israels freedom out of the land of Egypt Exod. 12.26 27. The Lords Supper shewes forth the Lords death untill he come 1 Cor. 11.26 being appointed to be done in remembrance of Christ Matth. 26.26 Mar. 14 20. Luk. 22.29 1 Cor. 11.24 of Christ dying giving his body and blood for us As those twelve stones taken out of Jordan by twelve men out of every Tribe a man were for a sign in ages following a memorial unto the children of Israel for ever that the waters of Jordan were cut off before the Arke of the Covenant of the Lord when it passed over Jordan Josh 4.6 7. So these Sacramental signs are memorials of the mercy mentioned They are alwayes memorials of the Covenant that we have entred the duty in which we stand engaged The Apostle having shewed that Baptisme doth signifie a death to sin and a life in righteousness Rom. 6.4 presently thence gives warning he that is dead is free from sin vers 6. Ninethly I might shew that they are ratifying and confirming signes but this is distinctly mentioned 9 Ratifying They are seals as well as signes which remaines to be handled SECT III. Corollaries from the former Doctrine SEveral consectaries follow from this observation which containes one part of the definition of a Sacrament First The sign and thing signified are analogically one That the sign and the thing signified in every Sacrament are one not properly and really one but in that manner one as all those things that remain distinct in nature one from other yet bear proportion and resemblance one with other are one One as Christ and a door Christ and a vine are one They are so one that one may be said to be the other when yet one distinct thing from other cannot be said to be the other in a sense that is proper my hand is not my writing my writing is not my hand but my hand is that which writes and writing is written with my hand and so my writing is usually called my hand and these speeches are in all mouthes vulgar common and are so far from being hard to understand that indeed they help the understanding A woman shewes a written peece of parchment and sayes Here is my Dower or Joynture when Dower or Joynture is in Lands not in Papers Every one knows that this speech means that it is that which vests her in it we shew a paper and say This is my will not meaning that faculty of the soul it self but a manifestation of what our desire is should be done with our estate after our decease such a man lives on my trencher that is on the meat which is laid on the trencher at my table so that men should blesse God for that he condescends to speak in such perspicuity and not complain in such speeches of difficulty Upon account of this oneness between the sign and the thing signified sometimes the sign is said to be the thing signified as that Bread is the body of Christ and the Cup the blood of Christ Matth. 26.26 27 So that that of Austin is famous that Christ said This is my body when he gave the sign of his body Circumcision is called the Covenant Gen. 17.9 10 11. Ast. 7.8 The Lambe is called the Passeover Exod. 12.11 21. Matth. 26.28 And the trees before spoken to are called the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and evil see Ezek. 5.5 1 Cor. 10.4 In all of these places the signe hath the name of the thing signified by reason of Analogy and representation and all by institution sometimes on the other hand the thing signified is called by the name of and is said to be the sign as 1 Cor. 5.7 Christ our Passeover is sacrificed for us so Joh. 6.55 My flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed fitly resembled by meat and drink Joh. 15.1 I am the true vine fitly resembled by a vine see Joh. 10.10 11. Sometimes the effect which the thing signified doth produce is called by the name of the sign so in that speech of Ananias related by Paul Act. 22.16 Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the Name of the Lord when it was not the water that he was then to use but the blood of Christ that could take away sin 1 Joh. 1.7 so Baptisme saves 1 Pet. 3.21 when as the Apostle there as may be further shewen explains his own meaning so the putting off the sins of the flesh is called by the name of Circumcision and of Baptisme Colos 2.11 12. Sometimes that which is the proper work of the sign is attributed to the thing signified Deut. 10.16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart and be not stiffe necked These and such like speeches as these would be familiar with us and we should be able to give an account of them in case we understood Sacramental relations and other resemblances frequent in Scriptures Secondly Then it further followes There is no such things as transubstantiation that there can be no such thing as transubstantiation The sign and the thing signified remain distinct and cannot properly be the same in any Sacraments Of all Scripture-Sacraments and all those additional forged Sacraments of the Church of Rome one onely is by them thus honoured The Paschal Lambe was not turned into the body of Christ nor is water turned into the blood of Christ in Baptisme Nor do any other of their supposed signes lose their nature onely in the Lords Supper bread is not bread though it be still called bread but flesh wine is not wine though called the fruit of the vine but blood we see bread we taste bread we handle bread and yet we must not give credit either to our eyes ears taste or touch but we must believe it is no bread It hath the natural properties of bread and wine it gives natural nourishment as bread and wine the bread if eaten in excesse and the wine drunken will cause surfeit and intoxicate as bread and wine As the natural force so the natural defects of bread and wine still remain after consecration The bread breeds wormes and the wine turnes to vineger yet we must believe that God by miracle hath taken away bread and wine given blood and flesh turned bread into flesh wine into blood and yet still by miracles keeps up the natural shape properties and defects of these outward Elements When God in Scripture wrought miracles the miracles were seen and
that God himself and not John was the Author of it Let John himself speak whether he went on his owne head on this work He that sent me to baptize with water the same said unto me Vpon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending and remaining on him the same is he which baptizeth with the holy Ghost Joh. 1.33 The people of the Jewes certainly had another opinion of his Baptisme as appears by their reasoning when Christ demanded The Baptisme of John whence was it from heaven or of men and they reasoned with themselves saying If we shall say from heaven he will say unto us Why did ye not then beleeve him But if we shall say of men we fear the people for all hold John as a Prophet Matth. 21.25.26 When the opinion among the people was so generall that the Chief Priests and Elders were afraid to oppose it had it been an errour doubtlesse Christ would not in that way have nourished them in it And to say with Bellarmine that Deus solum in genere inspiravit inspiratione illa mandavit ut baptizaret sed ritum in particulari quo baptizandum esset ipse Johannes instituit non a Deo prae scriptum accepit God did command him to baptize but the particular rite was left unto John himself is nothing When Christ demanded of the Baptisme of John whether it were from heaven or of men the Priests and Elders to whom he spake understood the whole work and to conceit that the work was commanded and the way of doing concealed is an ungrounded fancy All that are confest to be Sacraments are we see yeelded to be of Divine institution which is further plain in reason First Sacraments are parts of worship a piece of the homage that is due from man to God And it is God and not man that is to prescribe in his own worship here God hath declared himself to be jealous Exod. 20.5 that not any thing of the invention of man come within that worship that is Divine And if Nadab and Abihu fell for adulterating the worship of God bringing in strange fire when fire from heaven was provided to their hands How shall they stand that coin a worship it self as do our adversaries or put a new stamp upon it when it is set up of God which is their way likewise Marriage which is an Ordinance without the Church they make a Sacrament in the Church Of duties they make ordination and repentance Sacraments and in case Pharisees made the Commandements of God void by their tradition when they imposed a necessity of washing of hands before meat when yet they did not raise it to the honour of a Sacrament How much more had John offended if out of his own fancy he had set up such an Ordinance as Baptisme David hath been charged that he appointed singers and other officers in the house of God without any command or direction from heaven but the contrary to this appeares 2 Chron. 29.25 where in the life of Hezekiah it is said He set the Levites in the house of the Lord with Cymbals with Psalteries and with harpes according to the commandement of David and of Gad the Kings Seer and Nathan the Prophet for so was the Commandement of the Lord by his Prophets Secondly Sacraments are notes of distinction between the people of God and others that beare not that relation to him as we have heard Circumcision and uncircumcision divided the world The Circumcised were a people of God when all others were children of a strange god so we may say of all Sacraments And as men of place alone have power to give liveries to their own servants to distinguish them from those that have their dependance on others so God hath alone power to give differencing Cognizances to his servants likewise Thirdly God onely can give strength and efficacy to the Sacraments what that is rests to be enquired and is not a little controverted but whatsoever it is that it is wholly of God was never doubted and he onely that can give efficacy to them is to ordaine them This is Thomas Aquinas his reason in the place mentioned Fourthly Sacraments are teaching signes visible words whereby man is instructed in Divine mysteries but God alone is the author of the Word It is given by inspiration of God 1 Timothy 3.15 God alone therefore is the author of Sacraments Fifthly Sacraments are seales put to promise annext for confirmation of Covenants as shall be further shewen But he onely that makes the promise and appoints the Covenant can give the seal The Schoolman then quoted by Bullinger de Sacr. Decad. 5. Ser. 6. hath well minded the Church that she is no Lady over the Sacraments but barely a servant and can no more appoint a Sacrament then abrogate a Divine Commandement And Bellarmine puts this for the first reason that Ministers are Stewards of the Mysteries of God therefore they are not to institute them but being instituted of God are onely to administer them This holds true not onely of Sacraments in their essence that none may adde any to the number of those that God hath instituted But of all that is of the integrality of Sacraments likewise there is not the least Sacramental rite that is to be of humane but all of Divine institution There is the same reason of the whole and of every part He that may not appoint a Sacrament may appoint no piece of a Sacrament A worship made up of Divine and humane Commandements stands in the Church like Nebuchadnezzars image the head of Gold but the feet of earth The Poets device of a mans neck joyned to a horses head is not so great a soloecisme Thomas Aquinas saw that this might be objected against much in the Sacraments in the Church of Rome and therefore when he had put the question Whether Sacraments have their institution from God in the first place objecteth c Ea quae sunt divinitus instituta t aduntur nobis in sacra Scriptura sed quaedam aguntur in Sacramentis de quibus nulla fit mentio in sacra Scriptura puta de Chrismate quo homines confirmantur oleo quo Sacerdotes inunguntur de multis aliis tam verbis quam factis quibus utimur in Sacramentis Illa quae aguntur in Sacramentis per homines instituta non sunt de necessitate Sacramenti sed ad quandam solennitatem quae adhibetur Sacramentis ad excitandam devotionem reverentiam in his qui Sacramenta suscipiunt Ea vero quae sunt de necessitate Sacramenti ab ipso Christo instituta sunt qui est Deus homo that there are some things done in the Church of which there is no mention in Scripture as Chrisme wherewith men are confirmed and oyl wherewith Priests are ordained and much else as well words as actions saith he which we use in Sacraments and answeres that those things which are done in Sacraments instituted by
but then it would have been as arrogant Sixthly That he make some provision for tender and scrupulous consciences that shall admit his principles 1. In taking in of members into Church-fellowship as it is called A man without grace in a visible Church according to him is as a wooden leg in the body how great a deformity this is and how great a trouble to have such instead of those that are of flesh and bone it is easy to judge and yet how many of these necessarily will and must be received 2. In baptisme of Infants To baptize an Infant is with him not onely to espouse but to solemnize a full and actual marriage with Christ Jesus and that in words not de futuro but de praesenti and what further glory then they may expect from his hand I scarce can tell An illustrious Prince will have none but of noble and Royal blood and Christ will have none to be thus in marriage relation given to him but the seed of regenerate and graciously qualified persons How shall I get intelligence that this or that infant is descended of such a race where shall I learn his or her pedigree that I may thus give to Christ Iesus And in case probabilities must lead us we have need of further help then yet we see to judge of such probability Must we find those qualifications in the man who himself is for Baptisme or his child that may move us to conclude that in all reason and possible apparance here is a child of God or an Infant of a regenerate person Or will it serve our turn and satisfie our consciences that we cannot certainly conclude the contrary If the first be required it will put all the Ministers of Christ hard to it and prove such a snare that I know not how they will extricate themselves If the latter be that which we must receive here is then a loose rule for to lead in so high proceedings For men will be so laxe in their own marriage choice as for to take any into that society if they be not able to conclude her a strumpet or desperately wicked we have hitherto believed that Jesus Christ is pleased to receive in a greater latitude into visible relation Seventhly I desire Mr. Baxter to tell us how he hath mended the matter and provided for the honour and lustre of the Christian name or made up at all that gappe of which he speaks He saies the Church is bound to baptize as largely as I say men have right to Baptisme I think here he will find little or no difference and when he refuses none that I receive and where I say they have right he saies we are bound to baptize without right how will this make Christianity to look with any better face how much will Worcestershire Congregations where this is received exceed other Congregations where unanimously it is denyed I would have him to reflect on his 18th Argument and see whether the force of it be not evidently as much against hinself as it is against me against whom it is brought It is thus framed That doctrine which makes it the regular way in Baptisme for all men to promise that which they can neither sincerely promise nor perform is unsound But such is Mr. Blakes Ergo. And after much work to explain himself it comes to this that unregenerate men cannot resolve or sincerely promise to love believe or obey and therefore upon that account are without right to baptisme Let it be taken into consideration that when I say these men that in their present state are thus unable to love believe and obey have notwithstanding right to Baptisme and he saies that this inability notwithstanding they ought to be baptized how is the matter mended If my Doctrine upon this account be unsound his doctrine and practice will be found unsound likwise Mr. Baxter saith Vocation which is effectual onely to bring men to an outward profession of faith is larger then election and makes men such whom we are bound to baptize Eighthly I shall desire some Scripture text or cogent reason to make it appear that we are bound to baptize those that in the sight of God have no right to Baptisme the command given will argue with me their right unlesse I hear an injunction from heaven that notwithstanding their want of right we are to baptize them Peter argues the right of those Acts 10.47 for their admission to Baptisme which had been more then needed in case without any such right the water in Baptisme might have been applied unto them and I marvel that Mr. Baxter should so tenaciously hold to Philips speech to the Eunuch If thou believest with all thy heart thou mayest seeing he believes as well as I that faith short of this which he saies these words necessarily imply might have admitted him and put a necessity on Philip to have baptized him though it would not have given him right to Baptisme His actual admission and not his right is there put to the question If these things be well considered Mr. Baxter may see cause to begin with a confutation of Mr. F. before he undertakes a defence and I suppose the Reader will see that he had small cause to censure my Arguments to be so dilute unlesse he himself had brought some of greater strength Lastly I would have Mr. Baxter seriously consider whether that which we have observed already out of him and might yet further be gathered may not make up a forcible Argument and conclusive of this title to Baptisme in those who yet rise not up to the Faith that is justifying when they are separate from Paganisme into fellowship with the visible Church as he asserts Saints Rest Part 4. Sect. 3. pag. 105. and with them their issue as he hath concluded from 1 Cor. 7.14 when they attain to graces real and true as we have seen from him I am sure the Apostle as hath been said Act. 10.47 argues from such qualifications to an interest in Baptisme when they have their interest in the Covenant of grace as a fruit of Christs death as he saith doubtlesse reprobates have Treatise of Infant-Baptisme pag. 224. when their Baptisme hath all that is essential to Gods sealing as he asserts it hath pag. 222. All of this laid together with more that may be taken up will in all indifferent Readers eyes conclude a title And further whether he have not spoken as much in plain words terminis terminantibus for the interest of unregenerate men or men of a meer visible profession in Baptisme let his words be considered Saints Rest Part 4. Sect. 3. pag. 104 105. Where giving holy and seasonable advice to beware the company of sensual and ungodly men he limits it with Cautions least it should be thought that he perswades as he rightly stiles it unto an ungodly separation he addes As I never found one word in Scripture where either Christ or his Apostles denyed admittance to
in whom by faith remission of sins may be obtained I know but that it is a signe either that we do believe or that we have remission of sin otherwise then upon our believing to which this engages but not presupposes I know not Simon Magus had not Baptisme to signifie that all his sins were forgiven but that by faith in the Name of Christ he might be forgiven Mr. Cobbet sayes well Vindication pag. 54. The initiatory seal which holds true of the other seal is not primarily and properly the seal of mans faith or repentance or obedience but of Gods Covenant rather the seal is to the Covenant even Abrahams Circumsion was not primarily a seal to Abrahams faith of righteousnesse but to the righteousnesse of faith exhibited and effected in the Covenant yea to the Crvenant it self or promise which had believed unto righteousnesse hence the Covenant of grace is called the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 10. I confesse it is a symbole of our profession of faith but this is not the faith spoken to neither is remission of sins annext unto it Secondly That which necessarily supposeth conversion and faith doth not work conversion and faith But the Sacrament of the Lords Supper supposeth conversion and faith The Minor is proved Mar. 16.16 Act. 2.38 Act. 8.36 37. ver 41. Act. 10.4.7 All which texts are spoken of Baptisme and not of the Lords Supper To that text Mar. 16.16 I have spoken fully Treatise of the Covenant pag. 243. To that Act. 8.36 37. I have spoken pag. 244. To that of Act. 2.38 I have spoken pag. 396. and ther is no need that I should repeat what I have said For Act. 2.41 They that gladly received his Word were baptized It speaks no more then ready acceptation of the tender of the Gospel and whether this necessarily implyes saving faith let Ezek. 33.31 Matth. 13.20 21. Gal. 4.15 be consulted For Act. 10.47 Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized who have received the holy Ghost as well as we it proves that men of gifts from the Spirit have title such gifts gave Judas a title not onely to baptisme but Apostleship such a faith may be had and sanctification wanting Thirdly That which gives us new food supposeth that we have the new birth and Spiritul life and that we are not still dead in trespasses and sins But the Sacrament of the Lords Supper gives us new food Ergo. Ans 1. Metaphors are ill materials to make up into syllogismes 2. A difference may be put between ordinary food and living and quickening food It may be true of the former but not of the latter 3. The Word as well as the Sacrament gives us new food 1. Pet. 2.2 and yet presupposeth not new life If any reply that the Word is more then food it is seed as well as food and it gives not new life as food but as seed I answer that the Sacrament is more then food There is a Sacramental work preceding our taking and eating which some say may be done to edification and profit by those that are not admitted to be partakers where they divide I may distinguish and there Christ is set forth to the aggravation of sin to carry on the work of contrition and compunction Fourthly That Ordinance which is instituted onely for believers and justified persons is no converting but a sealing Ordinance But this Sacrament is instituted onely for believers and justified persons The Minor is proved Circumcision was a seal of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.17 much more then Baptisme and if Baptisme much more the Lords Supper Ans Upon this account it must needs follow that as Abraham was a justified man so Ishmael was justified also who according to the mind of God and in obedience to his commands was circumcised Gen. 17.23 yea every Proselyte that joyned himself to Israel and every male in Israel according to this Interpretation must be justified 2. Howsoever Abraham was a justified person yet his Circumcision in that place is not made a proof of his justification but a distinct text of Scripture Gen. 15.16 quoted by the Apostle ver 3. And that Scripture setting out his justification to be by faith and not by works the Apostles words onely shew that the Sacrament of Circumcision sealed the Covenant not of works but of faith so that Mr. Cobbets words quoted in answer to the first argument are a full answer here Fifthly The Apostle argues that Abraham the Father of the faithful and whose justification is a pattern of ours was not justified by Circumcision Circumcision was not the cause but the sign of his justification Therefore no Sacrament is a cause of our justication Ans Though animadversions might be made on these words yet if any will put them into form I shall grant the conclusion when I say the Sacrament as an Appendix to the Word may have its influence with the word upon a professor offaith to work him to the truth of faith I am far from saying it is any cause of justification I look on faith no otherwise then as an instrument in the work and the Sacrament as an help and not the principal to the work of faith Sixthly There is an argument drawn from the necessity of examination which before hath received an answer Seventhly That Ordinance unto which none may come without a wedding garment is no converting Ordinance But the Supper of the Lord the marriage feast of the Kings Son is an Ordinance unto which a man may not come without a wedding argument Ans 1. Arguments drawn from parables must be used with all tendernesse But in this Argument here is much boldnesse to make this Ordinance that marriage-feast 2. We shall find if we look to the scope of it that this feast is the fruition of Christ in his Kingdom as appears by those words that give occasion to the Parable of the Supper Luk. 14.15 And when one of them that sate at meat with him heard these things he said unto him Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the kingdom of God Now those that pretend a forwardnesse towards it and are not prepared and fitted for it according to the scope of the Parable shall be cast out from it This therefore may fairly prove that none that appear in Ordinances and yet remaine in their sins shall come to heaven But it no more proves that a man cannot get saving good by this Ordinance then it proves that a man cannot get saving good by the Word The VVord may lay as fair a claime to this wedding feast as the Lords Supper Eighthly That Ordinance which is not appointed to work faith is no converting Ordinance But the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is not appointed to work faith Ergo. The Assumption is proved Rom. 10.14 Faith cometh by hearing hearing by the Word of God then not by seeing if by the Word then not by the Sacrament Ans If faith comes by hearing will
the day that he was to dye he held a passeover In New Testament-times not onely through the Apostles times but to this time Baptisme and the Lords Supper have continued Reasons may also enforce this as to Sacraments in general so to Baptisme and the Lords Supper in particular 1. The Covenant is to be kept for ever there is no dispensation at any time for the breach of it The seals then which by Divine institution are appointed as appendants to it must be continued As reason it self may speak enough for the validity of this consequence so the Text of Scripture likewise confirms it Gen. 17.7 13. compared I will establish my Covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting Covenant to be a God unto thee and unto thy seed after thee He that is born in thy house and he that is bought with thy money must needs be circumcised and my Covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting Covenant 2. We have as much need as ever this generation as any other generation to have our weaknesses supported our faith strengthened there is not any benefit ever gained by a Sacrament but as primitive times did so we may reap spiritual advantage by it For reasons for the perpetuity of Baptisme Mr. Baxter pag. 341 342. of his Treatise of Infants Church-membership and Baptisme hath furnished the Reader with plenty of ten that he urges I judg nine at least to be unquestionable to which I shall adde onely one and that is such a one that with weaknesse enough hath been brought by some for warranty of the disuse of it If the gift of the Spirit be lasting and continuing in the Church then the use of Baptisme is lasting and continuing likewise But the gift of the Spirit is lasting and continuing Ergo. The assumption that the Spirit is a lasting gift I suppose none will question The major Proposition is grounded on the Apostles words Act. 10.47 Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we When others do reason from the having of the Spirit to the needlenesse of Baptisme the Apostle disputes in the direct opposite manner where the Spirit is there Baptisme is not to be denyed For the Sacrament of the Lords Supper we may likewise evince the constant standing necessity of it 1. The death of Christ is to be shewed forth constantly and every way preached This is a shewing forth of the death of Christ a means of declaring of him crucified 1 Cor. 11.26 2. The memorial of Christ is to be preserved and endeared This is for his memorial done in remembrance of him Matth 26. Luke 22. 1 Cor. 11. If the deliverance from Egypt must be kept as a memorial for ever in that Ordinance of the Passeover then much more the remembrance of Christ in his Supper 3. Every way of Communion with Christ is to be preserved and upheld This is a way of Communion with Christ 1 Cor. 10.16 4. Union with the Members of Christ is to be studied This is the way of our union with the Members of Christ and therefore this is to be continued I shall not enlarge much for refutation of Objections of those that in our times are contrarily minded seeing I have read little of any thing that they have to say a noise is abroad of such with whom I have had small converse that cry down rebaptisme by the denyal of Baptisme as Lucian made it his businesse to confute Polytheisme by bringing in of Atheisme made himself merry with the Pagans rabble of gods by believing no God Opposition of errour ordinarily leads men into opposite errors but a better way may be found for the overthrow of a double Baptisme then by the nullifying of all baptisme One God asserted by the Apostle will overthrow Atheisme and Polytheisme and one Baptisme asserted by him in the same place will overthrow Anabaptisme But these are not the first founders of this opinion Austin speaking of the Manichees Heres 46. saith e Baptismum in aqua nihil cuiquam perhibent salutis adferre nec quenquam eorum baptizandum putant That they hold that Baptism with water not at all usefull for salvation neither do they think it meet to baptize any that they deceive and speaking of other Hereticks Heres 49. Seleuciani and Hermiani he saith f Baptismum in aquâ non accipiunt They do not hold any baptisme with water And Philastrius who as Bellarmine witnesses de Scriptor Ecclesiasticis pag. 93. wrote before Austin of Heresies and is quoted by Austin saith g Seleucus Hermius haeretici animas hominum de igne Spiritu esse existimantes isti baptismo non utuntur propter verbum hoc quod dixit Johannes Baptista ipse vos baptizabit in Spiritu igne Seleucus and Hermius the hereticks hold that the soul consists of fire and the Spirit These use not Baptisme by reason of John Baptists words He shall baptize you with the Spirit and fire Socinus in this last age hath revived this opinion and saith h Baptismum aquae habere praeceptum Christi aut saltem non perpetuum universale That Baptisme with water hath no command from Christ or at least no perpetual and universal command The Reader if he please may see the Scriptures by him wrested and Reasons by him brought Refert Vossius vindicated and answered by Vossius de necessitate Baptismi pag 381. to pag. 388. Rule 2 Secondly There appears a greater degree of necessity of the initiatory leading Sacrament Initiatory Sacraments are of greater necessity then those that follow which serves for our first admission whether in the dayes of the Old or New Testament into the Church of God then of the other that succeeds for our further strength and growth Both of them are necessary neither of them are arbitrary but in case we may enter comparison the greater weight lyes on the former as may several wayes appear unto us Arguments evincing this necessity First There was a leading Sacrament for initiation many years in the Church before any was ordained to follow after it Circumcision was given in charge 400 years before the Passeover that of Circumcision was not long after Abrahams call and the promise of the land of Canaan being before Isaac's birth which was onely 25 years distant from his first removal out of Haran for Canaan as appears Gen. 12.4 21.5 compared The Passeover was given in charge upon Israels departure out of Egypt Exod. 12. one year before the Law was given which was 430 yeares after the promise to Abraham Gal. 3.17 All this time the seed of Abraham entred into the Church by Circumcision and enjoyed no other Sacrament properly so called Secondly Gods displeasure never shewed it self so high upon the neglect of the Passeover as upon the neglect of Circumcision though the penalty threatned
another will by no means excuse neglect of it this were to sin because another sins to despise an Ordinance because another prophanes it when one came without a wedding garment no invited guest for his sake did keep from the wedding Fourthly No one Communicant is bound to examine what all are that are his fellow-Communicants there is neither expresse command for it nor yet reason to evince it each man is bound to see himself arrayed as he ought and not to find fault in others addresses Let a man examine himself and so let him eat though he be to admonish as his brothers visible sin gives him occasion Fifthly The penalty of him that comes unworthily reaches his own self that comes in his unworthinesse and extends no further Legal uncleannesse defiled the man that was personally unclean and not his neighbour so it is here He that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh judgment to himself c. Sixthly If one mans sin this way do defile another the sin of one Communicant doth defile all other Communicants then it must be either from the nature of sin thus to defile all in so near Communion or from the nature of the Ordinance thus to be defiled to all when one in defilement comes to it or from some positive precept forbidding all to come when any that is unclean is there I doubt not but this is a sufficient enumeration But 1. It is not of the nature of sin thus to defile all in such communion then it would every where thus defile wheresoever any have society or do accompany together Then the chief Priests had done well to keep out of the Judgment-Hall that they might be clean to keep the Passeover John 18.28 and the Pharisees to wash when they came from Market 2. It is not of the nature of the Ordinance to be thus defiled to all It is not so in other Ordinances Cain's offering defiled not Abels nor did Hophni and Phinehas in their offerings defile Elkanah and Hannah when they offered 3. Nor yet is there any positive precept forbidding a cleansed soul upon the account of the uncleannesse of another to come to this Table Seventhly If one mans presence in this way defile another then it is either his simple presence such a ones being there in his infection or else a willing and witting presence with such a one If simple presence do defile then there is no man that can be secure The closest hypocrite that creeps in unawares would be the undoing of all when Christ said Ye are clean but not all Joh 13.10 according to this opinion it had been a contradiction the uncleannesse of one had been the defilement of all Neither is it willing or witting presence that can in this way defile then it must be in every single mans power to determine him to be such and exclude him thence or else of necessity exclude himself When the Eldership hath judged and received according to the general way of Reformed Churches or the plurality of votes of believers as it is with men of the Congregational way he must make an after-search a further scrutiny he that one judges fit that most judge fit some will judge unworthy and upon that account must shut themselves out of Communion Men of such principles must everlastingly avoid all Church-fellowship or act against their principles and we need not to speak it it is too plainly visible what manner of persons men of such high pretences have in their Congregations There are multitudes of Arguments heaped to nourish this scruple but I shall not further trouble the Reader there is nothing I think can be said but that which here hath been spoke will afford a sufficient answer CHAP. IX The being of Sacraments depends upon their use Another Position yet followes from the words The being of Sacraments depends upon their use they are no Sacraments to those that do not partake of them This is grounded upon this act of Abraham appointed of God and accordingly done by him The being of Sacraments consists in their use He received the sign of Circumcision All that he did was in obedience of the Divine Commandment Gen. 17.11 And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin and it shall be a token of the Covenant betwixt me and you It was not the foreskin but the foreskin cut off that was the token of the Covenant So also in that of the Passeover Israel had a command from God to take every man a lamb and to eat the flesh rost with fire and unleavened bread and with bitter herbs ye shall eat it Exod. 12.3 8. It is not barely the Lamb but eaten in the way that God prescribed that made the Sacrament In Baptisme the command is Baptize them in the Name of the Father of the Son and of the Holy Ghost It is not water that makes up Baptisme but water applyed to the subject or the subject to the water In the Lords Supper there is bread and wine in their significancy held out not for bare sight but a Command is added Take eat drink ye all of this bread and wine makes not up the Sacrament without breaking giving taking and eating In those Sacraments extraordinary The Sea was no Sacrament but Israels passage through it The Cloud was no Sacrament but Israels guidance by it or the cloud guiding Israel and Israel following after it Neither was the Manna a Sacrament or the rock considered in themselves but the Manna eaten the water of the rock drunk by the Israelites Even the fictious Sacraments of the Church of Rome consist in their use Their Order is no Sacrament where there is none Ordained and Marriage is no Sacrament where none are married Their Chrisme in confirmation oyl in extream unction not applyed are of no use or efficacy This is plain in Reason Arguments to â—vince it First The being of Sacraments depends on their institution Take away their institution and they have no being at all But the institution leads us not barely to an element but prescribes the use not onely to a sign but the application of it not onely to water but to be baptized with water not onely to bread and wine but the eating of bread drinking of wine and the beholding of both Secondly the being of Sacraments depends upon the relation of the sign to the thing signified with the analogy and proportion that is held between them This is plain Take away such relation and the element is a common element and not a Sacrament set aside the consideration of the blood and Spirit of Christ and water is an element for common use to take away the filth of the flesh but for removal neither of the guilt nor filth of sin Take away the consideration of the body and blood of Christ and bread may strengthen nature but not nourish the soul But the relation is not barely in the signs or elements but in their applications to the subject water
beares no relation to the cleansing of sin but washing with water and bread and wine no relation to the setting forth of the Lords death remembrance of him or life by him but the breaking eating and drinking Thirdly That which being removed nulls a Sacrament that is necessary to the being of Sacraments This is plain Nothing can destroy being but the want of that which is necessary to being But the removal or taking away of the use nulls and destroyes the bring of Sacraments Let not the foreskin be cut off nor the Lamb rosted and eaten the water not be applyed to the person nor bread and wine eaten and drunken there is no Sacrament therefore the use of Sacraments gives being to them Fourthly All benefit of and in the thing signified consists in the application therefore the Sacraments for their being use and benefit consist in their application likewise The consequence is grounded upon the analogy that is between the sign and the thing signified The antecedent is clear the blood of Christ the sufferings of Christ not brought home to the soul and interest obtained by application doth not benefit or profit Fifthly That which enters the definition of a Sacrament is of the being of it This none can deny But the use or office of a Sacrament enters the definition of it Ergo. The Apostle defines it to be a sign and seal which plainly speaks not the nature but the use of Sacramental elements Here is no Conroversie in this thing among parties save with the Church of Rome neither is there any with them save in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper They confesse that the being of Baptisme doth so consist in the use that without it it is no Sacrament Onely the Lords Supper for Transubstantiations sake though never used is still a Sacrament when they reserve it in a box carry it about for pomp hold it up for worship it is still a Sacrament The body of Christ is still there and if a mouse falls upon it the mouse receives a Sacrament knawes upon Christs flesh But when worms breed in it as they may by their own confession they are hard put to it They cannot breed upon accidents the shape the colour of bread cannot give being to worms And to say that the substance which remains there which is the flesh of Christ breeds them is no low blasphemy The generation of one is the corruption of another and God will not suffer his holy One to see corruption I remember an answer to this great difficulty when I first read Philosophy out of Conimbricenses Physicks That learned Society did determine that God by miracle did create matter and laid it by the consecrate host and that did putrifie and not the consecrated bread and so Worms were generated They sure believe that it is an easie thing to put God upon miracles Against this permanency of this Sacrament out of the use of it we say First If the use of this be instituted The Sacrament of the Lords Supper equally transient with Baptisme as well as the use of Baptisme and given in command then this Sacrament consists in the use as well as Baptisme This cannot be denyed for the institution and Comman of Christ must equally lead us in both But in the Lords Supper as well as in Baptisme the use is within the institution and given in Command by Christ Therefore this Sacrament of the Lords Supper consists in the use as well as that of Baptisme Whereas Bellarmine replyes to this that Christ commanded the bread to be eaten but not presently after consecration therefore to delay eating is not against the institution To this we answer 1. Neither did he command water as soon as set apart for Baptisme to be applyed to the party to be baptized yet till it be applyed the party is not baptized water is no Sacrament and so the bread and wine in that interim still applyed still wants the nature of a Sacrament 2. He did command it then to be eaten by Bellarmin's confession though not instantly to be eaten and he gave the like command of the cup as of the bread yea with more exactnesse a note of universality added Drink ye all of it yet their Laity have a Sacrament and never drink of it 3. That which the Apostles did that Christ enjoyned as Amesius well replyes they understood Christs intimation as well as the most nimble-headed Jesuites but they did not reserve it but did eat it Secondly If there be no footsteps in all the holy Scriptures of any other way of dealing with the elements of the Lords Supper then the eating and drinking of them then according to the institution they must be eaten and drunken But there is no footstep there of any other dealing with the Sacrament then eating and drinking Therefore according to the institution it is not to be reserved but to be eaten and drunk Indeed Chamier quotes Croquet replying that some of the Ancient have said that Judas took one part of the Sacrament and reserved the other for scorn but this may be well reckoned among others of like nature in their Legends And I would advise all those that believe it if they be ambitious to be disciples of Judas to follow it Thirdly The promise in this Sacrament is not to be divided from the precept by any that will expect a blessing But where the promise is This is my body this is my blood in the New Testament in the institution There is a precept Take eat Drinke ye all of this therefore they must eat and drink that will have benefit in the promise It would little I suppose please the Reader to hear Bellarmine Suarez and other Jesuits to exempt this Sacrament from the common nature of Sacraments and to make it permanent when the other as they speak are transeunt Thomas Aquinas Part 3. Quaest 73. art 1. resp ad 3. makes this difference between the Eucharist and other Sacraments This Sacrament is perfected saith he in the consecration of the matter other Sacraments are perfected in the application of the matter to the person to be sanctified Suarez disp 42. Sect. 4. quotes it with approbation and Scotus in quanto Dist 8. quaest 1. as he is quoted by Amesius All the Sacraments except the Eucharist consist in their use so that in them the Sacrament and the receiving of the Sacrament is the same He that pleases may read Bellar. Arguments lib. 4. de Eucharistia Cap. 2 3 4. Suarez in the place named with Whitakers Amesius Vorstius in 3. Tom. Bellar. Thes 9. pag. 406. Chamier against them both with others of that party de Eucharistia lib. 7. cap. 4 c. I shall desire to take up the Reader with that which I judge more necessary Gerard in his Common places Cap. 4. de Sacramentis makes it his businesse to find out the Genus in the definition of a Sacrament in which the general form of Sacraments he sayes is to be
of men of years may rather be defined by passion then action And passion may as well challenge the seat of Sacraments as action where he placeth it He concludes that ancient and modern Writers yea Calvins followers call them by the name of rites and Ceremonies which we know to consist in action Here is a manifest mistake rites and Ceremonies are not alwaies actions neither humane nor divine Ceremonies The high Priests Ephod with the rest of those holy garments prescribed were Ceremonies and so was the surplice while in use in England and yet these were in the predicament of Habitus and not of Actio It is true that the putting them on was an action but that was not the Ceremony but the wearing of them in the work of worship and the putting it on was no act of him that wore it but his that waited upon him And kneeling at the Sacrament was esteemed a Ceremony with us yet no action but a gesture or posture of the body and in the predicament of Situs Dr. Burges indeed in his rejoynder defines a Ceremony to be an action pag. 29. But presently he explaines himself and saies I call it an action because nothing is or can be a Ceremony in respect of existence or being but onely in respect of acting or usage thereof as a ceremony so that he takes action abusive for any manner of usage whatsoever upon the publishing of the book I spake with the author of this thing and he acknowledged action strictly taken was too narrow to be the Genus of a Ceremony and that it was holpen by the word usage So Dr. Sanderson that renouned Logician speaking of the execution done by Phinehas in the division of his text calls his standing up an action but presently addes Though I call it an action yet it is a gesture properly and not an action so that when rites and Ceremonies may be postures or habits it cannot be said that they consist in action so that it is clear that Sacraments consist in their use and though actions be seen in every Sacrament either done by the dispenser or receiver or both yet those actions being upon and about some visible element and the Elements themselves with the actions being all significant Sacraments are yet rightly defined to be signes and not actions Then it must necessarily follow by way of Corollary that there is no holinesse remaining in the elements There is no continued holinesse in Sacramental elements no relative holinesse abiding upon them further then according to the institution they are applyed and received The water in the vessel that containes it is no further as I may say consecrate then as it is applyed to the person baptized The river of Jordan nor yet the waters near Aenon in Salem had no more holinesse then other waters in Jury The reliques of bread and wine in the Lords Supper have no more of holinesse when they are taken from thence then they had when they were brought thither Tipling off of the wine in the place where it was immediately before received as a Sacrament of which I have heard is undecent and unsuitable to the work that they have been upon yet it is no other then common wine that then is taken Care should be taken not to defile the person who remaines consecrate to God and in participation of these elements makes profession of it no such fear of prophaning the elements themselves But for a great part these are well contented to be prophane provided that the elements may be esteemed and honoured as holy This high opinion of holinesse in the consecrated wine robbed the people of it Many of the Laity have beards that may lick some drops of it up and the number encreasing it must passe through so many hands or be put to so many mouthes that some may be spilt and those fears here so wrought that they may not meddle at all with it And how great disputes there have been what shall be done with it if a weak stomack vomit it up while the species of it doth remain unchanged they that are verst in Popish Casuists well know And all this from that monster of Transubstantiation But when a right use of the Sacraments is understood all these superstitious conceits will vanish and come to nothing when a sealed indenture hath done its office we no longer look much after the wax and parchment Secondly Their touch or abode upon any thing or utensil does not make it holy If their Sacramental nature remain no longer then their use so that themselves are no further holy then their touch or former abodes cannot make any place or utensil holy it cannot leave any such remaining holinesse as some conceit behind So it would follow that in case the words of consecration be pronounced over all the bread in the greatest pantry or to be sold in the market place which men of that opinion say may be done then not onely every bit of that bread is turned into Christ but all the binges or panniers that receive the bread in them must have an holinesse remaining and abiding upon them and so in like case all the Wine in the cellar yea all the earth of the Land of Canaan would remain holy by reason of the Manna falling upon it which was spiritual meat therefore a prophaning of it to tread with the foot upon it much more for beasts to dung and graze it As much is said to prove that the rock was Christ as there is to prove that the cup is Christs blood If that had such a sanctifying power then all the ground on which the water ran yea every beast that drank of it was made holy The thought of this might have silenced that talk of bowing to the place of Gods special residence by which they meant the place where the Sacrament hath been celebrated which of a Table they made an Altar which then according to our Saviour Christ must make holy the body and blood of Christ offered upon it and the body and blood of Christ must not make it holy Ye fooles and blind whether is greater the gift or the altar that sanctifieth the gift Matth. 23.19 But with us the gift did put the sanctification upon the Altar that from the time that the gift had been upon it men must upon sight still worship ad versus coram amazing those that were offended at it with their distinction of inhesive and abstractive holinesse CHAP. X. SECT I. Sacraments are seales HEre followes a second use and office of Sacraments which being added to the former makes up the whole for which they serve As they are signes so they are seales from whence a double Observation followes Sacraments are seales All that the Sacraments work on the soules of receivers is by way of sign and seal First Sacraments are seales Sacraments are seales Before this can be proved by reason of the ambiguity of the word it is to be
the mercies of the Covenant No opinion that they hold party that they take name that they think they have got supposed interest that they have in Christ can acquit them They may be denominated unsanctified or unholy men having not obtained that which the Apostle sought in prayer in behalf of the Thessalonians that they might be sanctified throughout in spirit soul and body sanctification purifies all the unclean and heales all the diseased parts And no unclean person can inherit the Kingdome of God Eph. 5.5 They are truely styled impenitent ones Repentance is a return to God in the same latitude as our departure by sin was from him In every sin of all these and of the like kind we depart from God In repentance therefore we are to return from every sin to God The Prophet tells us upon what terms our souls may be freed from ruine by sin Ezek. 18.30 Repent and turn your selves from all your transgressions so iniquity shall not be your ruine and unlesse we repent we shall all perish Luk. 13.3 5. They are justly pronounced to be void of grace there being that contrariety between grace and sin that they cannot rest in the same subject or lodge continually in the same heart without opposiition Where grace is prevalent sin falls and where sin prevails grace is excluded and it is the grace of God that brings salvation Tit. 2.11 They are void of the Spirit of regeneration As our birth-corruption hath in it the spawn of all sin so regeneration hath the seed of all grace And Except we be born again we cannot see the Kingdome of God John 3.3 These are the men which by their claime of Baptisme The uselessenesse of Sacraments to these persons and offer of themselves to the Lords Table subscribe the equity of their own condemnation and justifie the sentence of death pronounced against themselves They accept the Covenant on those terms on which it is tendered in the Gospel and upon these terms they are under the wrath of God and lyable to the sentence of eternal death Yet not remedilessely helplessely hopelessely as it is with those oftentimes that upon forfeitures of Covenant fall into the hands of man the forfeiture being once made advantages are taken by many to the uttermost The prodigal is an instance of the Fathers readinesse to receive to mercy those that have gone away from him in wayes of sin And the Prophet tells us Ezek. 18.21 22. If the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed and keep all my statutes and do that which is lawful and right he shall surely live he shall not dye All his transgressions that he hath committed they shall not be mentioned unto him in his righteousnesse that he hath done he shall live And though it be a wickednesse that reaches to the highest violation of Covenant yet this shall not hinder Jer. 3.1 They say If a man put away his wife and she go from him and become another mans shall he return unto her again Shall not that land be greatly polluted But thou hast played the harlot with many lovers yet returne again to me saith the Lord. He that hath hitherto come in the highest degree of unworthinesse to the Lords Table as oft as he hath come to it yet casting that off which was his unworthinesse and coming up to Gods terms he is now received and accepted SECT VII A further Corollary from the former Doctrine THen let all take heed that they look for no more from Sacraments then God hath put into them We are to look for no more from Sacraments then God hath put into them and promised to do by them and hath promised to work by them least looking unto them and waiting for them as the troops of Tema and companies of Sheba for the stream of Brooks which vanish when they wax warm and are consumed out of their place they be confounded and coming thither be ashamed And this caveat is no more then needs seeing men in all times have been wonderfully apt to delude themselves upon account of their fruition of outward Church-priviledges Mens aptnesse to delude themselves in Sacramental priviledges and in particular Sacrament-priviledges And to this they are induced by divers reasons 1. Because Sacraments are an honour which God hath vouchsaf'd to his people and denyed to others that stand not in that relation and they cannot think that it is in vain that such an honour is conferred upon them 2. There are great promises annext to them and made to those that make right improvement of them The bread is the Communion of the body and the wine in the Lords Supper the Communion of the blood of Christ 1 Cor 10.16 It is the New Testament in Christs blood shed for many for the remission of sins Matth. 26.28 Baptisme saves through the resurrection of Christ 1 Pet. 3.21 As many as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ Gal. 3.27 Insomuch that we have been taught that in Baptisme we are made children of God members of Christ and inheriters of the Kingdom of heaven These promises are streight applied without any eye had to the terms and Propositions annext to them like unto men that look at dignities in offices and never regard the burthens 3. Interest in Sacraments is not onely a priviledge but a duty not onely an honour but a work of obedience in them that partake of them To be baptized with water and to eat of the Bread and drink of the Cup in the Lords Supper is a duty as it was to be circumcised in the flesh of the foreskin and to eat the Paschal Lambe at the time appointed and there is danger in neglect of these This gives some ease and speaks some peace to the conscience that they have done the Command of the Lord. 4. They are yet matters of ease especially New-Testament-Sacraments Here is no mortification of the members no crucifying of the flesh no cutting off the right hand or plucking out the right eye and therefore no marvel that men could wish that all Religion were in them and hope that salvation may be gained by them Lastly Those of these conceits have alwayes met with teachers to sooth them up in them In all Ages some have over-highly advanced Sacramental priviledges and carry on their delusion How high was Circumcision set up in the Apostles times as in regard of the necessity of it Acts 15.1 Certain men which came down from Judea taught the brethren and said Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses ye cannot be saved So also in regard of the power and efficacy of it and therefore the Apostle was put to it to warn men in that way of the delusion and to give that undervaluing term of concision to it Phil. 3.2 After-age produced Schoolmen and Popish Writers to magnifie them affixing and limiting salvation except in some cases extraordinary to the water in Baptisme and
these that they cannot cast them out of themselves 2. Faith makes that resolute choyce of Christ that it suffers all manner of afflictions rather than to be driven and divided from him After ye were illuminated saith the Apostle to the believing Hebrewes ye suffered a great fight of afflictions Heb. 10.32 To save the labour of turning over large Volumes of Martyrologies read over that little book of Martyrs as some have called Heb. 11. especially ver 35 36 37 38. Faith kindles that flame that many waters cannot quench Christ upon earth was a man of sorrowes and acquainted with griefs yet he had those disciples that never left him till he came to the Crosse and then sollicitously enquired after him Where Christ dwells by faith there the Spirit strengthens for sufferings Ephes 3.16 17. If men now look into their hearts and see themselves willing to follow Christ in fair weather and to own his cause whilest it costs them nothing but in worldly respects rather gain by the bargain but when trouble ariseth they are gone These may look into the Parable of the sower whether this be not an evidence of a rocky and stony heart A strong wind is the tryal of the root of the tree of the foundation of the house an hot scorching fire of the truth of the mettal It is true that self-ends sometimes put a man upon sufferings But it is alwayes true that self-ends onely put a man upon profession when he will not stand out in sufferings They whose Religion is the States Religion the Times Religion will not lose an hair by any profession they make Self and not Faith carries on that profession 3. As faith carries the soul up to Christ to be one with him so also it carries it on in every affection and office of love to his brethren In Jesus Christ neither Circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but faith which worketh by love Gal. 5.6 It is not to be of this opinion or of that which men call their faith nor of this Nation nor of that which too oft prescribes all that men in their way of faith believe But to be possest of that faith which works by love which commends us unto God A man may be of this or that faith according to pleasure and yet his faith utterly destitute of that grace Faith carries a man not any further at all towards Christ then his love carries him on towards his brethren An idle faith is a dead faith and a dead faith never reacheth righteousnesse to Justification and life James never disputed against Paul's assertion of Justification by faith onely Writing after him as is generally confest he did not write to contradict any doctrine or correct any errours delivered by him When Paul concludes Justification by faith James concludes that it is by a working faith Where it works not it doth not then justifie and where it works to acceptation it works by love CHAP. XIII SECT I. Of the number of Sacraments AS a result from all that hath been said of the nature and use of Sacraments we may conclude the definite and distinct number of them So many Ordinances that we can find in Old or New Testament-Scriptures that are signs and seales of this nature as here hath been set out from the Apostles words so many Sacraments there are truly so called equally worthy of that honour of Sacraments with this of Circumcision being every way of the same nature and use they are deservedly to have the same esteem But falling short of such they are to have esteem as they are and their dignity may challenge but not to be put into this number The way to find out the number of Sacraments And I know no other way then this to find out the set and definite number of them Those trifling arguments made use of by some that the matter of New Testament-Sacraments viz. Water and Blood came out of the side of Christ and that blood and water as John affirms bear witnesse on earth are not worthy to be mentioned save onely that they are used by some of eminent name And upon diligent search we shall find onely two stated standing Ordinances in Old Testament-Scriptures and onely two in New Testament-Scriptures that are to be thus received We have not indeed any distinct Text in either of both Testaments expresly testifying that there are two and two onely Sacraments as we find it ordinarily in Catechismes Neither is there any distinct Text in the Law or Prophets that as we would that men should do to us so we should do to them Yet our Saviour Matth. 7.12 tells us that that rule is both in the Law and in the Prophets being a clear result from that which the Law and the Prophets have delivered The like may we say concerning the number of Sacraments It is as clear a result from that which is delivered to us both from Old and New Testament-Scriptures so that the conclusion is twofold drawn by way of deduction of this nature 1. Two onely standing Ordinances in the Old Testament of the nature of Sacraments Two onely Sacraments in the New Testament There were in Old Testament-times onely two standing Ordinances of the nature of Sacraments viz. Circumcision and the Passeover 2. There are in New Testament-times onely two Sacraments viz. Baptisme and the Lords Supper We shall begin with Old Testament-times and here our way of discovery is First To find out all those Signes or Ordinances that are set up in competition as Sacraments Secondly To enquire into the nature and use of them Thirdly To find out how nigh they come to the nature of Sacraments and what agreement they have with them Fourthly where it is that they are defective and fall short of Sacraments truly so called SECT II. Rainbowe no Sacrament THe first that offers it self is the Rainbowe of which we might speak First as it is in nature for discovery of the physical being of it Secondly as a sign appointed of God But the first consideration of it is not my businesse but the work of Philosophers who out of Aristotle have defined it to be A Bowe of many colours seated in an hollow and duskish cloud The definition of a Rainbow appearing upon the reflection of the Sun in opposition against it He that pleaseth may read further in Magirus physiol peripat lib. 4. cap. 5. Keckerman Syst Phys lib. 6. ad finem Zanch. de oper Dei lib. 3. cap. 3. Valesius de Sacrâ Philosoph cap. 9. So that the efficient cause is the Sun The subject in which it appeares is a cloud standing in Diametrical opposition The thing it self is the reflex of the Sun The form and shape is a bowe of variety of colours Whereupon it is generally concluded that there were bowes of this nature before the flood the Sun being then in equal vigour to produce it and clouds in which the reflex might be apparent And the cause being then as