repentance and the faith of Christ but seing they were as Luke reporteth onely baptized into Iohns baptisme which notwithstanding they knew not what it was and were altogether ignorant of the baptisme of Christ that is of the spirit he baptized them shewing vnto thē what Iohns baptisme was and how he baptized into Christ not into his owne sprinkling or dipping of the water as though that could be any profite vnto them He therefore baptized them with this baptisme of Iohn that is as Iohn vsed to do into the name of the Lord Iesus and by by after laying on his hands he baptized thē with the baptisme also of Christ that is with the spirit For immediatly the holy ghost came on them as it is there read This there And vpon the epistle to the Ephes chap. 4. the same Bucer writeth thus Hereby it is also manifest that the twelue men at Ephesus which knew not whether there were an holie ghost or no whome Paule baptized were not baptized with the baptisme of Iohn that is with that which he administred but as they witnessed themselues they were baptized into Iohns baptisme For Iohn preached vnto all whome hee baptized that Christ should baptize them with the holy ghost and exhorted them that they would beleeue in him and that of him they might receiue the holy ghost And therefore these Ephesiās could not haue beene ignorant of the holy ghost if they had bin washed with that baptisme which might truely be called Iohns which also the Apostles words to those men doth sufficiently declare Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repētance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ For by these wordes he would teach vs that they neuer receiued Iohns baptisme who as yet knew not Iohns preaching of Christ and the promise Thus farre Bucer Seing then the fathers expound this place in Act. 19. as wee haue nowe declared who I pray am I that I should dare or that I ought to gaine-say so many and so learned men in such an exposition of this scripture which neither doth any whitt wrest the text nor contrarieth any other scriptures nor is against the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities For if any man shall obiect out of the text that same truely and but it prooueth nothing against the fathers exposition seing it is no vnusuall thing with the Apostle where hee saieth first truely not alwaies to ioyne the aduersatiue particle but Rom. 3. ver 2. Coll. 2. ver 23. and in other places And vnto this truely another but which Luke for breuitie sake left out might bee vnderstood verie fittly as hereafter we will shew so that it is no necessitie with this truely to ioyne that but which followeth in the 5. verse in which verse the fathers will haue not Paules speach but Lukes to be continued Therefore the fathers exposition is not repugnant to the text nor yet with any other scripture For if any man say Paule writeth to the Corinthians that he is gladd he baptized none but the house of Stephana it may be answered it is true namely at Corinth but these twelue were baptized at Ephesus and besides he speaketh of such as were baptized with his owne hand but these twelue he might baptise by some other to dispute no longer about the circumstance of the time And it is most certaine it is not repugnant to the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities because the fathers do not speake of a baptisme rightly administred as though Paule had repeated that again This expositiō therefore of the fathers in my iudgement cannot easily be refelled And this therfore is the chiefest cause why I haue euer thus thought and yet thinke of this action of Paule although indeed I cannot consent vnto them all in the cause why Paule baptized them but onely to Ambrose and Hierome That Iohns Baptisme Christs Baptisme did differ the fathers teach both by this that Iohn saide how he baptized onely with vvater but Christ should baptize with the holy ghost with fire and also by this that the baptisme of Iohn is called the baptisme of repentance but Christes baptisme is said to bee giuen for the remission of sinnes And because that he prepared the waye to this as Tertull. speaketh that baptisme of repentance was as it were a sueing for the remission of sinnes and sanctificatiō in Christ which was to follow after Read Tertul. of bap pag. 707. So Cyprian also in his sermon of the baptisme of Christ and of the manifestation of the Trinitie pag. 430. So August To. 7. against Petil cap. 7. But all of vs doe not knowe what the father 's mēt by this differēce of the baptisme For they ment not that the one diffred from the other in the matter or in the signe or in the doctrine and forme of baptisine but onely in efficacie that namely although remission of sinnes was giuen to them which were washed with Iohns baptisme yet the same was not of Iohns baptisme that is of water but by the baptisme of Christ which is the baptisme of the spirite whereunto that belongeth I baptize with water but he with the holy ghost And with this baptisme of the spirit were they only baptized which beleeued in Christ whome Iohn saide was then come though all knewe him not Therefore Iohn in his baptisme did inculcate and often repeate this faith as Paule witnesseth in that place of the 19 of the Actes They therefore are deceiued who for this diuersitie did thinke the baptisme of water was to be repeated August against Petil. as we touched a little before sheweth how some held opinion that the 12 did lye vnto the Apostle when being asked vnto what they were baptized they answered vnto Iohns baptisme So by this that first those Ephesians saide vnto him that they had not yet heard whether there were that is whether that holy ghost did exist or not namely the giuer of those giftes whereof the speach was the Apostle might be said to conuince thē of a lye by this argument Whosoeuer haue bin baptized they haue professed faith in Christ as the sonne of God and consequently in the father and in the spirite of them both For Iohn did require this faith according to the same he baptized men and in baptizing he alwayes vrged that Iesus Christ was he which should baptize in the spirit But you by your owne cōfession do not know this spirite c. and so beleeue not rightly in Iesus Christ Therefore c. But surely to saye that these twelue did lye vnto the church and to the Apostle it seemes to me to be to hard and vile a thing in mē which professed Christ And for this cause we did euer better allow of the opiniō of Ambrose Hierome that the 12 did say truely whē they said they were baptized vnto Iohns baptisme but yet not by
baptized For no mā is baptized vnto the giftes of the holie ghost but vnto the holie ghost it selfe as also vnto the father and the sonne And the Apostles held it for certaine beyond all doubt that whosoeuer were baptized either of Iohn his true disciples or of Christs disciples they were surelie baptized with instruction of the true doctrine of the holie ghost also according to Christs institution Hereupon was that admiratiō Vnto what were ye then baptized They answered him vnto Iohns baptisme For Paule thought this could not stād together that they should bee baptized with Iohns lawfull baptisme and yet should not knowe nay not so much as heare whether there were and whether there did exist an holie ghost whom Iohn both knewe and preached vnto all that came to his baptisme neither did he preach Christ without this holie ghost For he said that he baptized in water but Christ Iesus should baptize in the holie ghost Hereupon was it that meaning to cōuince them that they were not baptized of Iohn nor of his true disciples he added saying Iohn indeed c. This truely or verely is an aduersatiue particle wherby he would shew how it could not agree with the lawfull baptisme of Iohn that they said they had not so much as heard namelie when they were baptized whether there be an holie ghost or no Sith Iohn baptized none without mentioning the same And to this truely here expressed doeth a but closelie vnderstood make aunswer so that the argumēt is such as before we set downe Iohn indeed baptized c as though he had said Iohn preached both repentance and faith in Iesus Christ such as he is namely the sonne of god from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holy ghost and who baptizeth in the holie ghost and into the confession of this doctrine he baptizeth men The minor was to be added which Luke expressed not because it is contained in the twelues owne confession but vvee haue not so much as heard c. what is plainer then this text That therefore which followeth in the fift verse But when they heard it c is Lukes owne words shewing truelie and brieflie what followed vpon Paules argumentation But when they heard c namely these 12 whē they heard what what it is truelie to beleeue in Christ that he baptized men according to the confession of this doctrine concerning Christ his father and the holie ghost and that Christ alone as the onely Sauiour baptized men into the holie ghost when they heard I saye these things not onely with the eares of their bodies but also of their mindes and so beleeued and confessed the same They vvere baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus that is into Iesus as he is called and described in the Scriptures not onelie man but also the sonne of God God from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and therefore as a true and onelie Sauiour baptizeth vs with his holy spirite Add this also that by the new interpretation there is admitted in a little narration no smale Battologie or superfluitie of words For when Paule said Iohn verily baptized vvith the baptisme of repentance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ Iesus to what ende should the Apostles haue added this concerning thē whom Iohn baptized but whē they heard namely that companie or those men were baptized For who could not vnderstand by the wordes going before if Iohn baptized they therefore which had heard professed his doctrine concerning repentance and faith in Christ were by Iohn baptized To conclude if I should allow that interpretation I see not what Paule could els proue by this whole narration but that those Ephesians had beene rightlie baptized and therefore that nothing else remained but that by laying on of hands they might receiue the holy ghost But this conclusion I doe not thinke to agree with that which goeth before it but to bee needelesse I haue to my power declared the exposition of the fathers vpon this place and that modestlie and without preiudice to anie to no other end but that I may by such reasons as I am able declare vnto the brethren which perhaps haue tooke offence at that particle in my confession That Paule did baptize those twelue againe vvhich had not bin rightly baptized that I did not put those words rashlie in my confession By the way as I said we condemne no other mens interpretation And this also I freely professe that my cōscience is such that I cannot be easily drawne to dissent frō the auncient fathers either in their assertions or in their interpretations of scriptures Vnlesse I be cōuinced enforced by manifest testimonies of holy scriptures by necessary consequences plaine demonstrations For so doeth my conscience rest and in this setled stay of minde I desire to die And therefore I humbly desire of all the brethren that if in this behalfe my opinion be not altogeather as theirs is they will by no meanes take offēce especially seeing that in all the principall points of Christian faith we haue a sound agreement Vpon the 16. chapter The 9. aphorisme The place of the 1. to the Corinth 6. beeing diligently marked as also we noted before in the 15. chap. and 14. Apho. may well decide the controversie about the wicked mens Eating that is the Hypocrites and of the sacramentall eating We say that hypocrites doe not eate the tru body of Christ sith they are void of faith namely they eare it not truely and indeede sith it is not indeede eaten but onely by true faith which they want but onely sacramentally that is they eate indeede the sacrament and the signe it felfe The Adversaries say also that hypocrites doe eate the true body of Christ onely sacramentally but by this word they meane that they receiue not onely the sacrament that is the signe but all the thing it selfe though not vnto salvation If they mean this in the same sence that the Apostle doth when he said The Corinthians were all sanctified iustified c. namely that by receiuing baptisme the sacrament of true Regeneration and sanctification they were reckoned to haue receiued the thing also sith the very sacrament hindred not but they might also be pertakers of the true sanctification although all of them did not indeede obtaine the same by reason of their hypocriticall faith thē doubtlesse I see not but such a manner of speaking may be well allowed so it be declared as it ought after the Apostles meaning This I only alleadge that the brethren may bethinke them of some good meanes of agreement that so great an offence and scandale may be rooted out of the Church We must all stand before Christs Tribunall seate Vpon the 16. chap. Apho. 10. Here should a subdistinction haue beene added of the godly because some doe come worthely some vnworthely yea one and the
words of the insutution are not so rehearsed that they may be heard and vnderstood whereby faith may be stirred vp there we denie it to be a ttue sacrament and therefore we affirme that the signes without the lawfull vse bee not Sacraments but onely the same thinges which they are of their owne nature and nothing else For the signes are translated onely by the word from their common vse to the holy vse that which many call to be consecrated hallowed and thereby is made a sacrament euen as Augustine said The word commeth to the element and the sacrament is made it commeth indeede that it may be vnderstood and beleeued VI. That Sacraments be not simple markes or bare signes Therfore we beleeue that these sacramentall signes be not simple markes which onely do seuer vs from other people that are not of the true church or meere tokēs vnto vs of our christian societie or whereby we should professe our faith openly and giue thanks to god for our redemption but that they are the instruments by which while the actions benefits of Christ are represented vnto vs they are called to our remembrance his promises are sealed and our faith stirred vp the holy ghost also doth ingraft vs to Christ doth keepe vs beeing ingrafted and makes vs daily to growe vp more and more into one with him that beeing indued with a greater faith towards God and earnester loue towards our neighbour and a mortification of our selues we might lead a life euen like so far as might bee to the life of Christ in spirituall ioye and gladnesse till the time when we shall liue with him in heauen most holily and blessedlie for euer VII The sacraments of the newe conenant of what sorte Wee also confesse with Augustine De doct chr lib. 3. cap. 9 that the sacraments deliuered by Christ are in number few easie to be done and most worthie to bee vnderstood Few in number because they are onely two Baptisme and the Lords Supper easie to be done for there is nothing either in Baptisme or the Lordes supper which may not easily be performed receiued nothing troublesome nothing vnpleasant or straunge vnto a man Lastly most worthie to be vnderstood because although the things which are seene are of no value yet those things which are signified which are set downe to be thought on considered and vnderstood in the minde are most reuerend heauenly diuine pertaining to eternall saluation VIII To the worthy receiuing of the sacraments there is need of vnderstanding and faith And thereby also we know that the sacraments to the worthie receiuing of them doe require an action and attention of the minde a faith in vs whereby wee vnderstand what is signified and offered to vs by them and apprehend it with a minde setled in faith euen as Christ teacheth Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 where he saieth of his supper doe this in remembrance of me And the Apostles waighing and cōsidering these words of Christ doth largely expoūd them To which purpose is also that Lift vp your hearts For there be set before vs matters most reuerend heauenly and diuine to be vnderstood in the minde and receiued by faith IX That the matter of the Sacrament is seriously offred to all men though all do not truely receiue the same but only the chosen faithfull And although all men come not to the receiuing of the sacraments with faith and true vnderstanding yet as the signes are giuen to all that professe Christ so also we beleeue that the things signified by the sacraments are seriously offred vnto all by Christ and therefore that nothing is diminished of the substance or soundnes of the sacrament by the vnbeleefe of them that receiue the signes only for it dependeth wholy vpon the institution of Christ and the trueth of his wordes X. VVhile the sacraments are ministred the spirit of Christ is powerfull in the faithfull therefore they not only receiue the signes but also participate in the things signified But albeit the spirit of Christ be not powerfull in all men on whome the Sacraments are bestowed as it is neither to all vnto whome the word is preached and that by their owne fault because they haue not vnderstanding faith yet wee beleeue that in the faithfull elect of God he is powerful in as much as they being indued with faith by the hearing of the word and confirmed more and more in the same by the receiuing of the sacraments are brought by the same spirit into the communion of Christ and made to ioyne and growe together with him therein and therefore we cōfesse that these men in Baptisme are truely washed and purged from sinne by vertue of Christs blood and in the Lords supper they eate of Christs true flesh and drink of his true blood XI That Christ is both author and true disposer of the sacraments And wee acknowledge as one author so one true disposer of the sacraments euen our Lord Iesus Christ which giueth the outward signes by men his ministers but he himselfe properly and truely imparteth vnto them the matter of the sacramentes effectually by himselfe or by his holy spirit like as Iohn the Baptist said J baptize vvith water but Christ will baptize with the spirit And therefore as it is lawfull for no man to institute new sacraments so also can no man boast that he truely and properlie cleanseth consciences of sinne or that he feedeth men with the true bodie and bloode of Christ but onely as they say ministerially or as a minister XII The sacraments are not polluted to the faithfull by the vices of the ministers Now if Christ alone be not onely the true author of sacraments but the disposer also we easily gather that the sacraments are not polluted to others that be faithfull by the vices of the ministers whose labour he vseth Tit. 1.15 but that notwithstanding they may receiue them worthily and be made partakers of the thing signified and offered by the sacraments For to the cleane all things are cleane Eph. 3.17 and Christ with all his riches dwelleth in the heartes of the faithfull XIII That grace is not tied to the Sacraments By these foundations are we confirmed in the opinion receiued among all godlye men that the grace of God is not tied to the sacraments so that who so receiueth them must needs receiue also grace that is the thing signified and offred by the sacraments although he want faith as though a man could obtaine the matter of the sacrament by the vvorke wrought as they call it Mar. 16.16 Act. 8.13 For Christ saide not simplie whosoeuer shal bee baptized he shal be saued but he first addeth vvhosoeuer beleeueth And Simon Magus he receiued the sacramēt of Baptisme but he obtained not the matter of Baptisme when as yet as Peter witnesseth hee was wrapped in the most bitter gaule of sinne and in the bond of iniquitie and diuelish
this signe of the new couenant consecrated vnto Christ in the sight of the congregation sealed for to hold fast the faith in him and to performe obedience to his commaundements and to bee ingrafted into the bodie of his church and receiued into the communion of Saintes and to a perpetuall amendment of life and to a continuance of faith in Iesus Christ to their liues end For the whole church and euery of the faithful are baptized into the death of Christ and buried with him whereof the signe is the very dipping into the water that thereby we may learne that throughout our whole life we must die vnto sinne and liue vnto righteousnesse which is to be truely baptized into the name of Christ who died and was buried for vs. The fourth aphorisme The substance also of the law yea the canonicall law is perpetual and for euer to be holden For Christ came not to destroy the law or the Prophets touching the substance of doctrine And it belongeth to the substance of the law of circumcision that they which are the couenant should be sealed vnto god with the signe of the couenant But now the signe of the couenant is baptisme which succeeded circumcision Coll. 2. Add the place of Peter out of the Acts. 2. ver 38. Repent ye and be baptized euerie one of you in the name of Iesus Christ for remission of sinnes and yee shall receiue the gift of the holte ghost For the promise is made vnto you and to your children to all that are a farre of euen as many as the Lord our God shall call To whomsoeuer therefore the promise of saluation by Christ belongeth to them also belongeth baptisme But Peter teacheth that the promise belongeth to the yong children of the faithfull therefore yong children are to be baptized Aphorisme 6. Whereas wee saide that Paule baptized againe those of whome it is spoken in the 19. of the acts as being not rightly baptized we said it without preiudice to any learned interpretor for we condemne none Onely we desire the reader to conster fauourably of that word rebaptize For we meant not that they which were rightly baptized were afterwards baptized againe but they which were not baptized with true baptisme where the true doctrine of God the father the sonne and the holie ghost went before it they after Paule had taught them the true and sound doctrine of Christ then they tooke true baptisme and after baptisme by the laying on of handes receiued the holy ghost and the gifts thereof this to speake properly was indeed not to be rebaptized but to be truely baptized Now why I thought so and do yet thinke I was induced by the authoritie both of the fathers and especially Ambrose and Hierome so expounding that place and also by a reason drawne from the text it selfe Touching the authoritie first neuer any of the fathers did teach that these words and when they heard it they vvere baptized were the words of Paule spoken of them which heard Iohn Baptist but expoūded them as the words of Luke spoken of them which heard Paule So Chrysostome Tom. 3. in act hom 40. So Occum in act ca. 19. So Augustine Tom. 7. cont Petil. ca. 7. So Gregory Tom. 1. in euang hom 20. So Bede in act ca. 19. So all the rest Moreouer most of them do in plaine tearms write that these twelue disciples were baptized by Paule or at least by Paules commandement as hauing not bin rightly baptized before because they heard not the doctrine of the holie ghost nor were baptized into his name Ambrosius Tom. 2. de spi san ad Theo. imp ca. 3. Lastly they themselues also which said wee haue not so much as heard whether there be an holy ghost were afterwards baptized in the name of the Lord Iesus Christ And this abounded vnto grace because they then by Paules preaching knew the holy ghost neither must it be thought a contrarietie because although afterwardes no mention is made of the holy ghost yet it is beleeued and that which is omitted in wordes is expressed in faith For when it is saide in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ by the vnity of the name is fullfilled the whole misterie neither is the holy ghost separated from the baptisme of Christ because Iohn baptized to repentance Christ in the holy ghost Thus farre Ambrose Hierome Tom. 6. in Ioel. ca. 2. pa. 66. Therefore saith he the sauing health of God cānot bee seene except the holy ghost bee powred downe and who so saith that he beleeueth in Christ and beleeueth not in the holy ghost he hath not the eyes of perfect faith Whereon also in the Actes of the Apostles they which were baptized by Iohns baptisme into him that was to come that is in the name of the Lord Iesus because when Paule asked them they aunswered wee know not whether there be an holy ghost they were baptized againe yea they receiued true baptisme because without the holie ghost and the misterie of the trinitie whatsoeuer is receiued in the name of the one or the other person is vnperfect c. Augustine cont Petil. cap. 7. coll 498. saieth Paule baptized those twelue either because they had not receiued Iohns baptisme but lyed or else if they had receiued it yet they had not receiued Christs baptisme For he thought with Cyprian and Tertullian and other fathers that Iohns baptisme and Christs did differ of which matter more hereafter Of our owne writers also that learned man Wolff Musculus about the place of the Act. 19. thinketh as Ambrose doth in his cōmon place the place of baptisme whose words because he hādleth that place very largely we wil not repeat and before Musculus Bucer both on the third of Matth. and on the fourth of the epist to the Ephes vpon Math. he hath these words To those Ephesians which had beene baptized with Iohns baptisme not knowing what it was because as then they knewe not the holy gnost wherewith Paule had preached that Christ should baptize them wee reade that he said Act. 19. Iohn baptized indeed with the baptisme of repentance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ Iesus Nowe what do we else or ought we to do in baptizing For ours is also the baptisme of repentance so long as those whome we baptize we also burie into the death of Christ that is we ascribe them into that nūber which throughout all there life must die vnto sinne and liue vnto righteousnesse and yet shall not receiue that neither but by the gift of Christ Therefore of such as be of years of discretion whom we baptize we require their faith in Christ the infants we commit vnto the church to be brought vp to the same faith Therefore Paule would neuer haue rebaptized those Ephesiās if they had beene baptized with Iohns baptisme that is with that baptisme wherewith he vsed to baptize into
as the sacramentall signe whenas the matter of the sacrament is that which the signe that is obiect to our senses makes to come into our thought not to fall into our hands or mouth neither those likewise which do consider nothing in the sacraments but what they see with their eyes or which will haue them onely tokens or badges by which we are discerned from other people or bare signes and not the instrumeÌ„ts of the holy ghost by which he worketh mightily in vs and confirmeth vs in the communion of Christ And we condemne them which institute new sacraments other then them which Christ instituted and those which tye the grace of God and the things signified by the sacraments to the sacraments so that euerie one which receiueth the signe should be said euer to receiue truely the thing it selfe CHAP. XV. Of Baptisme BEsides that which we haue spoken of the sacraments in generall we also especially beleeue and confesse of Baptisme thus I. Baptisme what it is and vvhat are the effects of it Baptisme Mâ—t. 28 1â— first is a sacrament of the new couenant wherewith all men which either hauing professed true repentance of their finnes doe also professe faith in Iesus Christ and so in God the father Cor. 7.14 the sonne and the holie ghost or at least are beleeued to appertaine vnto the couenant Act. 19.5 1. Cor. 6.19 through the faith of their parents but especially they which truely doe belong vnto the couenant as beeing now incorporated into Christ are sealed by him that they should be no longer their owne men but his by whome they are called into the societie of the couenant and consequently into one bodie with him and all the Saintes and into participation of all spiritual heauenly good things Eph. 1.12 Eph. 5.26 Apoc. 5 Tit. 3.5 Rom. 6.4 Mar. 1.4 and are cleansed by this Baptisme as the water of regeneration from al their sinns by vertue of Christs blood and buried into the death with Christ that as he rose froÌ„ death by the fauour of the Father so wee should walke in newnesse of life whereupon it hath bin vsually called the sacrament of repentaÌ„ce for the remission of sinnes the sacrament of faith the seale of the couenant the water of regeneration the washing away of sinnes the sacrament of new life II. The vertue of Baptisme takes place only in the elect and they onely are baptized vvith water and with the holy ghost But though all these things are said of baptisme and are truely attributed vnto it as to the holy ghostes instrument to worke these things and that therefore all which are baptized are truely said to be made and to be such sacramentally yet we beleeue that it is not indeed and really performed but only in the elect which are indued with Christs spirit sith they onely doe beleeue rightly and do truely belong vnto Christ and to his misticall body And therefore that all are baptized indeede with water but the elect onely with the spirit and all doe receiue the signe but not all are made partakers of the thing signified offred by baptisme but onely the elect III. Of what parts the whole sacrament of Baptisme consisteth And we beleeue that vnto the making of the whole sacrament of Baptisme those two thinges are sufficient which Christ instituted namely the simple element of water wherewith the parties are washed either by dipping in or by sprinkling vpon and that forme of words wherewith Christ taught them to baptize that is In the name of the father the sonne and the holy ghost nether did the Apostles as we are perswaded vse any forme of words or added any thing else vnto the water IV. The yong infants of the faithfull are to bee baptized We beleeue with the whole ancieÌ„t church that vnto the sacrament of Baptisme are to be admitted not onely they that are of discretion which hauing professed repentaunce of their sinnes doe also professe faith in Christ but also the yong children of such sith they are to bee accompted to belong to the couenant 1. Cor. 7.14 as the Apostle saieth The children of the faithfull are holie especially seing God hath no where altered that commandement which he gaue to Abraham for the marking of all with the figne of the couenant euen the children of the faithfull Mat. 19.14 nay he said Suffer litle children to come vnto me for of such is the kingdome of heauen V. How farre forth Baptisme is necessarie in the Church and how needfull to euery one to saluation Wee beleeue that Baptisme is altogether necessarie in the church as a sacrament instituted of Christ and which the church cannot be without so that where it is not vsed if it may bee vsed there wee acknowledge no church And we thinke it so necessarie vnto euerie one to saluation that yet notwithstanding if one dye not washed with the water for defect or want of a minister and not vpon contempt we beleeue he is not therefore coÌ„demned or wrapped in eternall destruction For the children of the faithfull are therefore saued because they are holy and vnder the couenant of God and men growen are saued because they beleeue in Christ with a true faith which indeed can suffer no contempt of the commaundements of Christ VI. Baptisme once rightly receiued ought not to be taken againe Furthermore we beleeue that as circumcision was done onely once in the flesh so the Baptisme of water which succeeded circumcision Col. 2. being once rightlie and lawfully receiued ought not againe to be repeated VVee say that it is rightly and lawfully administred when first the doctrine of the gospell concerning the true God Christ and his office goeth before according to Christs institution and then the parties are baptized with water and that of a lawfull minister in the name of the father the sonne the holie ghost Rom. 6.4 For Christ also once died and was buried and wee are baptized into his death and are buried with him by Baptisme Act. 19.5 neither doe wee reade that the Apostles euer did rebaptize anie except those which Paule did baptize who had not bin rightlie baptized VII The vertue of Baptisme is perpetuall Now although wee come but once to the sacrament of baptisme yet wee hold that the matter of this sacrament and the vertue thereof is perpetuall which vertue is nothing else but the verie planting into Christ and so the participation of his benefites the washing away of sinnes and regeneration which dailie more and more is made perfect by the holie ghost For the Apostle saith Eph. 5.26.27 that he cleanseth the church by washing of vvater through the worde that he might make it vnto himselfe a glorious church without spott or wrinkle 1. Ioh. 1.7 And his blood cleÌ„seth daily froÌ„ all sinne And therfore we thinke beleeue that the faithful being content with once receiuing of the sacrament ought daily to bee occupied in
in the bread reallie and properly For in sacraments the thinges whereof they bee sacraments are not really included although they borrowe their names of the things as in baptisme the matter is apparent and out of all question in which no man saith that the blood of Christ by which we are washed from sinne or the verie regeneration it selfe is included as also in the worde of the gospell the thinges are not therein really included which by it be declared Nowe sacraments be visible words And Christ said not my bodie is in this that is in the bread but in a farre other manner of speach as This that is this bread is my bodie Now if any wil say that this is all one in sense it will follow if the bodie of Christ bee really in the bread then the bread is really properly and substantially the bodie of Christ And if this be impious to bee spoken neither do wee thinke that the other can godlily be affirmed Yet we denie not but it is in it sacramentally in that sense that wee say remission of sinnes and saluation and life is in the worde of the gospell which it declareth and offereth But sith the common sorte haue vsed to drawe such manner of speaches to superstition wee iudge that those speaches are altogether to bee foreborne and auoided and the simple plaine phrases of the scriptures to be vsed VII In the supper are giuen not onely the signes but also the things signified by them Now this is setled in vs without all controuersie that although the bodie and blood of the Lord are not that is do not existe in their owne substance and in verie deede and properly in the bread and wine but are in heauē yet notwithstanding with the verie distribution or giuing of the bread and wine there is truely offered vnto all men the true flesh of Christ to be eaten and his blood to be drunk not simplie but in as much as his flesh was betraied vnto death for vs his blood shedd for the remission of our sinnes For the words are manifest which Christ speaketh in Iohn of the eating his flesh Ioh. 6.53 and drinking his blood if any man will haue life in him and that which the Apostle saieth euē iumping with the words of Christ He which eateth the bread and drinketh the Lords cupp vnworthilie he is made guiltie of the true bodie and blood of the Lord. Neither doubt we but Christ as he plainely commaunded the bread to bee eaten so also by adding immediatly This is my bodie he closely commaunded tha to bee eaten aswell as the bread but yet each of them in a diuerse manneri VIII None but the faithfull doe truely eate Christs true flesh But albeit the flesh of Christ be offred vnto all in the supper to be eaten yet we beleeue that it is truely eaten of the faithfull only both because they alone haue communion with Christ and with his flesh and blood and others haue not neither by receiuing the bread are made partakers of him and also because they alone haue the spirite of Christ by vertue of whom onely the flesh of Christ is truely communicated yea and also because they alone doe bring true faith without which the same cannot bee truely receiued and eaten For Christ giueth not his true bodie to bee truely and indeed eaten but only to them which do aswell beleeue that the same was betraied for them vnto death and his blood shedd for remission of their sinnes as those wordes to bee true This is my bodie IX That hypocrites eate Christs bodie sacramentallie By the way we denie not but hypocrits also lacking the true and iustifying faith in receiuing and eating the breade as a sacrament of the Lords bodie may be said to eate the very true bodie of Christ also namely sacramentally not truely and indeed Euen as the Apostle saith al the Corinthians 1. Cor. 6.11 which were baptized with water were sanctified iustified namely sacramentally as is aboue said though not all of them were truely made such X. There bee three kinds of men that eate and therefore diuerse sorts of eating Thence also we learne that there are three kindes of men which may be called into question whether they eate the flesh of Christ or eate it not The first is of such as receiue the bread as common meate and not as a sacrament They eate not the true bodie of Christ in any respect and are the true Capernaites their eating is meere carnall And others of the contrarie side receiue not the bread yet not vpon contempt but onely beleeue in the gospell and their eating is meere spirituall Lastly there are others who not contenting themselues onely with faith in the gospell do also receiue the bread not simplie as the first sorte as bare bread but as a sacrament of the Lords bodie Whereuppon it comes to passe that they are said to take and eate sacramentally But sith this may bee done aswell of the the godly and faithfull as also of vngodly hypocrites yet in a diuerse manner of the one sort by faith of the other without true faith therefore we also say that the vngodly hypocrites do eate it onely sacramentally but the faithful do eate it both sacramētally truely and spiritually and therefore to saluation XI The true body of Christ is eaten onely by faith Seing then wee say that the true bodie of Christ is reccaued onely of the faithfull both sacramentally and also truely we meane that it is eaten not with the mouth of the body but the mouth of the minde and with a heart indued with faith that by meanes of the holie ghost which worketh in vs and applieth whole Christ vnto vs. For it is the meate of the minde saith Cyprian not of the bellie And Ser. de caen 1. Cor. 12.13 The flesh profiteth nothing as Christ saith and Augustine expoundeth but it is the spirit which quickneth And the Apostle teacheth Ioh. 6.63 By one spirit we are all baptized into one bodie and haue bin all made to drinke into one spirite And if that all true coniūction with Christ be through the holy ghost though he with his bodie do remaine in heauen and we vpon the earth it followeth that this eating must bee after the same sorte For what else is it to eate then to receiue vnite vnto thee meate for the nourishment of that part to which it is ordained after a due sort But the flesh of Christ as hath beene said is food of the minde not of the bellie Neither vndoubtedly is the flesh of Christ otherwise eaten then in respect that it was killed for vs and made bloodlesse as the words do sound and the breaking of the bread doth represent and that truely also euen as the passeouer and all the sacrifices were eaten But now his body liueth and can not bee without blood as at the first supper it was neither without blood nor dead And