doe First their prerogatiues they giue to Peter are blasphemous Secondly their allegations to proue that their Popes succeede as full heires to all Peters prerogatiues are ridiculous Whence it must needes follow that their faith is but a compost of folly blasphemy This pretended perpetuity of tradition or suspitious tale of succession from Peter is the best warrant they haue the Church doth not erre in expounding the places alleadged for her infallability and their beliefe of their infallibility in such expositions the onely security their soules can haue that obeying the former decree of worshipping the consecrate host of cōmunicating vnder one kind they doe not contemptuously disobey Gods principall lawes mangle Christs last Will and Testament vilifie his pretious body and bloud Seeing then they themselues confesse the places brought by vs against their decrees to be diuine and we haue demonstrated that mens beliefe of that infallible authority in making such decrees to bee merely humane the former conclusion is most firme that whilest men obey these decrees against that naturall sense and meaning which the former passages of scripture suggest so plainly to euery mans conscience that the Churches pretended authority set aside none would euer question whether they could admit any restraint they obey men more then God humane lawes more then diuine and much better belieue the traditions of humane fancy of whose forgery for others worldly gaine there bee strong presumptions then the expresse written testimony of the holy spirit in the especiall points of their owne saluation 12 Or if vnto the testimony of Gods spirit recorded in Scriptures wee adde history tradition Councels or former Popes decrees or whatsoeuer possibly may be pretended to proue the present Popes authority it must still bee supposed greater better knowne then all that can be brought for it or against it as will appeare if we apply our argument vsed before That authority is alwayes greater which may trie all others and must bee tried by none but such is the Popes declaration or determination of all points in controuersie whether about the canon or sence of Scriptures ouer those which are brought for it whether about the truth true meaning or authority or vnwrittē traditions whether about the lawfulnes of councels or their authentique interpretations in one word his determinations are monarchical may not be examined as S. Austen or others of the ancient fathers writings may by any law written or vnwritten So Bellarmine suteable to the Trent Councell expresly auoucheth The Fathers were onely Doctors or expositors the Pope is a iudge What then is the difference betweene a Iudge and an expositor To explane as a Iudge there is required authority to explane as a Doctor or expositor onely learning is requisite For a Doctor doth not propose his sentence as necessary to bee followed but onely so farre as reason shal councell vs but a Iudge proposeth his sentence to bee followed of necessity Whereof then will the Pope bee Iudge Of expounding Scriptures these places of Scripture which make for his pretended authority Must his sentence herein of necessity be followed By Bellarmine it must albeit wee see no reason for it either out of Scripture or nature It is for Doctors to bring reasons for their expositions but the Pope needs not except hee will nor may wee exact it of a Iudge So hee addes more expresly We admit not of Bartolus or Baldus glosses as wee doe of Empecours declarations Austine and other Fathers in their Commentaries supply the places of Teachers but the Councell and Popes exercise the function of Iudges whereunto God hath designed them But how shall we know that God hath committed all iudgement vnto them seeing wee haue beene taught by his word that hee hath committed all iudgement vnto his sonne Because all men should honour the sonne as they honour the father We reade not of any other to whom the like authority is giuen by God or his sonne yet of one whose very name shall import the vsurpation of like authority that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christs Vicar generall vnto whom the Sonne as must bee supposed doth deligate the same iudiciary power the Father deligated vnto him 13. But may a Princes declaration in no case be examined by his subiects Yes though in ciuill matters it may so farre as it concernes their consciences as whether it be consonant to Gods word or no whether it make more for the health of their soules to suffer what it inflicts vpon the refusers or to act what it commands To controle contermaund or hinder the execution of it by opposition of violence or contrary ciuill power subiects may not But for any but man to vsurpe such dominion ouer his fellow creatures soules as earthly Princes haue ouer their subiects goods lands or bodies is more then Monarchicall more then tyrannical the very Idea of Antichristianisme And what I would commend vnto the Reader as a point of especiall consideration this assertion of Bellarmine concerning the Popes absolute authoritie directly proues him as was auouched before to be a supreame head or foundation of the selfe same ranke and order with Christ no way inferiour to him in the intensiue perfection but onely in the extent of absolute soueraigntie For greater soueraignty cannot be conceiued then this That no man may examine the truth or equity of commands or consequences immediately deriued from it though immediatly concerning their eternall ioy or miserie No Prince did euer deligate such soueraigne power to his Vice gerent or deputy nor could he vnlesse for the time being at least he did vtterly relinquish his owne supreame authority or admit a full compere in his kingdome Bellarmines distinctions of a primary and secondary foundation of a ministeriall and principall head of the Church may hence he described to be but meere stales set to catch guls Their conceit of the Popes copartnership with Christ is much better resembled and more truly expressed by the Poets imaginations of Iupiter and Augustus Caesars fraternity Diuisum imperium cum Iove Caesar habet Ioue and Caesar are Kings and Gods But Ioue of heauen that 's the onely ods That Christ should retaine the title of the supreame head ouer the Church militant and the realitie of supremacie ouer the Church triumphant ouer aduersaries are not offended Because there is small hope of raising any new tribute from the Angels and Saints in heauen to the Romish churches vse and as little feare that Christ should take any secular commodity from it which aunciently it hath enioyed 14. But though it were true that we were absolutely bound to obey an absolute Monarchie of whose right none doubts yet may we examine whether euery Potentate that challengeth Monarchicall iurisdiction ouer others or giues forth such insolent edicts in ciuill matters as the Pope doth in spirituall do not goe beyond his authority in these particulars albeit his lawfull prerogatiues in respect of others be
this Apostasie of the Iesuites is the most abhominable and contumelious against the blessed Trinitie pag. 300. THE TRIPLICITIE OF ROMISH BLASPHEMIE OR THE THREE DEGREES OF ANTICHRISTS EXALTATION Against all that is called GOD. THE THIRD BOOKE SECT I. Contayning the assertions of the Romish Church whence her threefold blasphemie springs HAuing in the former dispute clearly acquitted as well Gods word from breeding as our Church from nursing contentions schismes and heresies wee may in this by course of common equitie more freely accuse their iniurious calumniators And because our purpose is not to charge them with forgerie of any particular though grossest heresies or blasphemies though most hideous but for erecting an intire frame capacioâ—s of all villanies imaginable farre surpassing the hugest mathematicall forme humane fancie could haue conceiued of such matters but only from inspection of this reall and materiall patterne which by degrees insensible hath growne vp with the mysterie of iniquitie as the barke doth with the tree such inconsiderate passionate speeches as heat of contention in personall quarrells hath exstracted from some one or few of their priuate Writers shall not be produced to giue euidence against the Church their Mother whose triall shall be as farre as may be by her Peeres either by her owne publike determinations in this controuersie or ioynt consent of her authorized best approued Advocates in opening the title or vnfolding the contents of that prerogatiue which they challenge for her 2 Our accusations are grounded vpon their Positions before set downe when wee explicated the differences betwixt vs. The position in briefe is this That the infallible authoritie of the present Church is the most sure most safe vndoubted rule in all doubts or controuersies of faith or in all points concerning the Oracles of God by which we may certainely know both without which wee cannot possibly know either which are the Oracles of God which not or what is the true sense and meaning of such as are receiued for his Oracles whether written or vnwritten 3 The extent of diuine Oracles or number of Canonicall bookes hath beene as our Aduersaries pretend very questionable amongst the ancient though such of the Fathers as for their skill in antiquitie were in all vnpartiall iudgements most competent Iudges in this cause were altogether for vs against the Romanists and such as were for their opinion were but for it vpon an error as thinking the Iewes had acknowledged all those bookes of the old Testament for Canonicall Scripture which the Churches wherin they liued receiued for such or that the Christian Church did acknowledge all for Canonical which they allowed to be publikely read Safe it was our aduersaries cannot denie for the Ancient to dissent one from an other in this question or to suspend their assent till new probabilities might sway them one way or other No reasons haue beene produced since sufficient to moue any ingenious mind vnto more peremptorie resolutions yet doth the Councell of Trent binde all to an absolute acknowledgement of those Bookes for Canonicall which by their owne confession were reiected by S. Hierome and other Fathers If any shall not receiue the whole Bookes with all their parts vsually read in the Church and as they are extent in the old vulgar for sacred and Canonicall let him be accuâ—sed So are all by the same decree that will not acknowledge such vnwritten traditions as the Romish Church pretends to haue come from Christ and his Apostles for diuine and of authoritie equall with the written word 4 So generally is this opinion receiued so fully beleeued in that Church That many of her Sonnes euen whilest they write against vs forgetting with whom they haue to deale take it as granted That the Scriptures cannot be known to be Gods word but by the infallible authoritie of the present Church And from this supposition as from a truth sufficiently knowne though neuer proued they labour in the next place to inferre That without submission of our faith to the Churches publike spirit wee cannot infallibly distinguish the orthodoxall or diuine sense of Gods Oracles whether written or vnwritten from hereticall or humane 5 Should we admit vnwritten Traditions and the Church withall as absolute Iudge to determine which were Apostolicall which not little would it boote vs to question with them about their meaning For when the point should come to triall wee might be sure to haue the very words framed to whatsoeuer sense should bee most fauourable for iustifying Romish practises And euen of Gods written Oracles whose words or characters as hee in his wisedome hath prouided cannot now be altered by an Index Expurgatorius at their pleasure That such a sense as shall bee most seruiceable for their turne may as time shall minister occasion bee more commodiously gathered the Trent Fathers immediately after the former decree for establishing vnwritten Traditions and amplifying the extent of diuine written Oracles haue in great wisedome authorized the old and vulgar translation of the whole Canon Which though it were not purposely framed to maintayne Poperie as some of our writers say they haue as friuolously as maliciously obiected yet certainely aswell the escapes and errors of those vnskilfull or ill-furnished interpretors as the negligence of transcribers or other defects incident to that worke from the simplicitie of most ancient the iniuries or calamities of insuing times were amongst others as the first heads or pettie springs of that raging floud of impietie which had well nigh drowned the whole Christian world in perdition by continually receiuing into it channell once thus wrought the dregs and filth of euery other error vnder heauen with the corrupt remainder of former heresies for these thousand yeares and more And vnto many grosse errors in Romish religion which this imperfect translation did not first occasion it yet affords that countenance which the pure Fountaines of the Greeke and Hebrew doe not but rather would scoure and wipe away were they current in that Church Finally though it yeld not nutriment to enlarge or feed yet it serues as a cloake to hide or couer most parts of the great mysterie of iniquitie 6 Yet besides the fauourable construction that may be made for that religion out of the plaine and literall sense of this erroneous translation the Church will bee absolute Iudge of all controuersies concerning the right interpretation thereof So as not what our consciences vpon diligent search and iust examination shall witnesse to vs but what the Church shall declare to them must be absolutely acknowledged for the true intent and meaning of Gods word as it is rendred by the vulgar interpretor To this purpose is the very next decree 7 Moreouer for brideling petulant dispositions it is decreed That no man in confidence of his owne wisdome or skill in matters of faith and manners making for the edification of Christian doctrine shall dare to interpret Scriptures wresting them to his
recordes and declarations written or vnwritten to be most authentique they cannot be certaine whether euer there had beene such an Emperour as they plead succession from or at least how farre his Dominions extended or where they lay This manner of plea in secular controuersies would be a meane to defeate him that made it For albeit the Christian World did acknowledge there had beene such an Emperour and that many parts of Europe of right belonged vnto his lawfull heire Yet if it were otherwise vnknowne what parts these were or who this heire should bee no Iudge would be so mad as finally to determine of eyther vpon such motiues Or if the Plaintiffe could by such courses as the World knowes oft preuaile in iudgement or other gracious respects effect his purpose hee were worse then madde that could thinke the finall resolution of his right were into the Emperours last will and testament which by his owne confession no man knowes besides himselfe and not rather into his owne presumed fidelitie or the Iudges apparant partialitie So in this controuersie whatsoeuer the Pope may pretend from Christ all in the end comes to his owne authority which wee may safely beleeue herein to bee most infallible that it will neuer prooue partiall against it selfe or define ought to his Holinesse disaduantage 10 Here againe it shall not be amisse to admonish yonger Students of another gull which the Iesuite would put vpon vs to make their Churches doctrine seeme lesse abominable in this point lest you should thinke they did aequalize the authority of the Church with diuine reuelations Valentian would perswade you it were no part of the formall obiect of faith It is true indeed that the Churches authority by their doctrine is not comprehended in the obiect of belieefe whilest it onely proposeth other Articles to bee beleeued No more is the Sunne comprehended vnder the obiects of our actuall sight whilest we behold colours or other visibles by the vertue of it But yet as it could not make colours or other things become more visible vnto vs vnlesse it selfe were the first and principall visible that is vnlesse it might bee seene more clearely then those things which wee see by it so wee would direct our sight vnto it so would it bee impossible the Churches infallible proposal could make a Romane Catholikes beliefe of Scriptures or their orthodoxal sense the stronger vnlesse it were the first and principall credible or primary obiect of his beliefe or that which must bee most clearely most certainely and most sted fastly belieued so as all other Articles besides must be belieued by the beliefe or credibility of it This is most euident out of Sacroboscus and Bellarmines resolution or explication of that point how the Churches proposall confirmes a Roman Catholiques beliefe To giue this doctrine of their Churches infallibility the right title according to the truth it is not an Article of Catholike beleefe but a Catholike Axiome of Antichristian vnbeliefe which from the necessary consequences of their assertions more strictly to be examined will easily appeare CHAP. IIII. What maner of causall dependance Romish beleefe hath on the Church that the Romanist truly and properly beleeues the Church onely not God or his word 1 THe 2. main assertions of our aduersaries whence our intended conclusion must be proued are these often mentioned heretofore First that wee cannot be infallibly perswaded of the truth of Scriptures but by the Churches proposall Secondly that without the same wee cannot bee infallibly perswaded of the true sense or meaning of these scriptures which that Church and we both belieue to be Gods word How wee should know the Scriptures to be Gods word is a probleme in Diuinity which in their iudgement cannot be assoiled without admission of Traditions or diuine vnwritten verities of whose extent and meaning the Church must be infallible Iudge It is necessary to saluation saith Bellarmine that wee know there bee some bookes diuine which questionlesse cannot by any meanes be knowne by Scriptures For albeit the Scriptures say that the Books of the Prophets or Apostles are diuine yet this I shall not certainely belieue vnlesse I first belieue that Scripture which saith thus is diuine For so wee may read euery where in Mahomets Alcoran that the Alcoran it selfe was sent from heauen but wee belieue it not Therefore this necessary point that some Scripture is diuine cannot sufficiently be gathered out of Scriptures alone Consequently seeing faith must rely vpon Gods word vnlesse wee haue God word vnwritten we can haue no faith His meaning is wee cannot know the Scriptures to be diuine but by Traditions and what Traditions are diuine what not wee cannot know but by the present visible Church as was expresly taught by the same Author before And the finall resolution of our belieuing what God hath said or not said must bee the Churches authority To this collection Sacroboseus thus farre accords Some Catholiques reiected diuers Canonicall Books without any danger and if they had wanted the Churches proposall for others as well as them they might without sinne haue doubted of the whole Canon This he thinks consonant to that of Saint Austin I would not belieue the Gospell vnlesse the Churches authority did thereto moue me He addes that we of reformed Churches making the visible Churches authority in defining points of faith vnsufficient might disclaime all without any greater sinne or danger to our soules then wee incurre by disobeying some parts of Scripture to wit the Apocryphall books canonized by the Romish church The Reader I hope obserues by these passages How Bellarmine ascribes that to Tradition which is peculiar to Gods prouidence Sacroboscus that to blind beliefe which belongs vnto the holy Spirit working faith vnto the former points by the ordinary obseruation of Gods prouidence and experiments answerable to the rules of Scriptures 2 Consequently to the Trent Councels decree concerning the second assertion Bellarmine thus collects It is necessary not onely to bee able to read Scriptures but to vnderstand them but the Scripture is often so ambiguous and intricate that it cannot bee vnderstood without the exposition of some that cannot erre therefore it alone is not sufficient Examples there be many For the equality of the diuine persons the Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Sonne as from one ioint originall Originall sinne Christes descension into Hell nd many like may indeed be deduced out of scriptures but not so plainely as to end controuersies with contentious spirits if we should produce onely testimonies of Scriptures And wee are to note there bee two things in Scripture the Characters or the written words and the sense included in them The Character is as the sheath but the sense is the very sword of the spirite Of the first of these two all are partakers for whosoeuer knowes the Character may reade the Scripture but of the sense all men are not capable nor can wee in
in Christ the improbability had beene much lesse then now it is in Peters case that the Bishoppe of Rome if any should haue succeeded him But when that people beganne to grow out of loue with the truth fashioning themselues vnto this present world the disease whereof Saint Paul forewarned them it was Sathans policy to present vnto them longing after such a Monarchicall state as their heathenish Predecessors had such shewes of Peters Supremacy and residencie at Rome as by the diuine permission had either crept into some of the Ancients religious cogitations or else in time of darkenesse haue been shufled by the predecessors of these cheating mates late discouered into their writings as fitte baites to entice them vnto this deriuation of that absolute power from Peter to their greater condemnation and our good For God no doubt in his prouidence ordered this their blindnesse to illuminate vs as he did the fall of the Iewes to confirme the Gentiles in faith seeing of al the Apostles Peters prerogatiues as hath beene shewed were most euidently personall all to determine with himselfe vnto which obseruation his owne writings also giue testimony Euen a little before hee was to leaue the world where hee most manifested his earnest desire of preseruing his flocke sound in faith after his death he giues no intimation as shall bee shewed more at large hereafter of any Successor vnto whom they were to repaire His present Epistle he foresaw would bee more auaileable to this purpose then any tradition from him I will not bee negligent to put you alwayes in remembrance of these things though that yee haue knowledge and be established in the present truth For I thinke it meet as long as I am in this Tabernacle to stirre you vp by putting you in remembrance seeing I know that the time is at hand that I must lay downe this my Tabernacle euen as our Lord Iesus Christ hath shewed me I will endeauour therefore alwayes that yee also may bee able to haue remembrauce of these things after my departing 4 As for peculiar direction of later times whence perpetuall infallibility must bee deriued it cannot bee gathered from his writings that hee knew so much as his brother Paul did Albeit in this point these two great pillars of Christs Church more famous then all their fellow Apostles besides for present efficacy of their personall ministery come farre behind the Disciple whom Iesus loued whose written Ambassage was in a peculiar sence to tarry till Christs last comming vnto iudgement as hee himselfe did vnto Christs first comming to destroy Ierusalem and forwarne the nations Besides the doctrine of common saluation necessary for all to know plentifully set downe in this Disciples Epistle his Reuelations containe infallible directions peculiar to euery age And as in some one gift or other euery Apostle almost exceeds his fellowes so if amongst all any one was to haue this prerogatiue of beeing the ordinary Pastor or to haue ordinary successors as Aaron thogh inferior to Moses in personal prerogatiues during his life had after his death this doubtlesse was Saint Iohn who ascribes that vnto the diligent expositors hearers or Readers of his bookes which the Romanist appropriate to such as rely vpon the visible Churches determinations neuer questioning whether it bee that Babylon which Saint Iohn deciphers or no Blessed is he saith Saint Iohn that readeth and they that heare the words of this prophesie and keep those things which are written therein for the time is at hand Blessed they are that reade it with feare and reuerence or so affected as this Disciple was for vnto such the Lord will by meanes ordinary by sober obseruation of the euent reueale his secret entent as he did it vnto him by the extraordinary gift of Prophesie for the testimony of Iesus is the spirit of Prophesie 5 It is euident the spirit of God entended to shew Iohn and Iohn to shew the faithfull all the Eclipses that should befall the Church vntil the worlds end His prophesies since his death were so to instruct the world of all principal euents present or to come as hystories do of matters forepast Now as he in our times wherin God inspires not men with Moses spirit is accounted the best Antiquary that is most conuersant and best seen in the faithfull cords of time not hee that can take vpon him to diuine as Moses did of the worlds state in former ages so since the gift of prophesie ceased hee is to bee esteemed the most infallible teacher the safest guide to conduct others against the forces of hell chiefly heresies or doctrines of Diuels that can best interprete him who first descried them and in his life time forewarned the Churches of Asia planted by Saint Paul and watered by him of the abhominations that threatned shortly to ouerspread them and after them the whole visible Church vntill these latter times doth the Pope then professe more skill in Saint Iohns Reuelations then any other If hee doe let him make proofe of his profession by the euidence of his expositions But from this Apostle hee pretends none at al and we demand but any tollerable proofe of succession from S. Peter 6 A supreme oecumenicall head say the Parasites to the See Apostolique is as necessarie now as in Saint Peters time therefore hee must iure diuino haue a Successour But neither doth Scripture or Reason admit any such head as they haue molded in their braines either then or now As hath beene abundantly proued and their owne instances brought to illustrate the probabilitie of such a deuice contradict them For admit that Christ and earthly Princes stood in like neede of Deputie-Gouernors in their absence would the King of Spaine were he to goe on Pilgrimage vnto his Kingdome of Ierusalem leaue but one Deputie ouer all the Dominions of Spaine and Portugal the West Indies Sicilie Naples and Millaine Or leauing but one would indue him with such absolute power ouer all his Subiects in these Nations as they imagine Christ doth the Pope ouer euery Christian soule throughout the whole world what spirit then may wee think did possesse Bellarmine when he auouched that the church and common weales are different in this case let vs heare the difference The Church Catholike must bee one by communion with one head so must the Liege people of euery Monarch be one by subordination to one Soueraigne whether resident amongst them or farre absent Why may not Christ then though absent be that only supreme head whence vniuersally the Church receiueth vnitie or why may not hee rule in it though dispersed through many Nations as effectually by his Angels and ordinarie Ministers of the Gospell as the Pope doth by his Nuncioes fallible Legates or other inferiour Prelates 7 But though reason and Scripture faile them yet Councels Histories and Traditions may be mustered to their aide These are the first Springes of these many
Waters whereon the great Whoore sits From what historie therefore doe they beleeue the Pope is Peters successour from historie canonicall or diuine no Secular Monkish or Ecclesiasticall at the best vpon which the best faith that can be founded is but humane and their professed villanie in putting in and out whatsoeuer they please into what writing soeuer Gods word only excepted makes it more then doubtfull whether many ancient Writers did euer intimate any such estimate of the Romish Church as is now fathered vpon them or rather this foule iniquitie late reuealed whilest some haue beene taken in the manner hath beene long time concealed as a mysterie of the Romish state But they beleeue not this succession from expresse written historie but from Tradition partly From Tradition of whom Of men what men Men obnoxious to error and parties in this present controuersie yet neither partiall nor erroneous while they speake ex Cathedra saith the Iesuit But who shall assure vs what they haue spoken ex Cathedra concerning this point The Councels What Councels Councels assembled by the Pope Councels of men for the most part as ill qualified as carnally minded and so palpably carried away with faction that to attribute any diuine authoritie vnto them were to blaspheme the holy Spirit Councels which the Papists themselues acknowledge not of sufficient authoritie vnlesse they follow the Popes instructions from whom likewise they must receiue their approbation The Pope must assure vs the Councell which perhaps elected him reiecting a Competitor euery way more sufficient doth not erre But that the Pope is lawfully elected that so elected he cannot erre in this assertion who shall assure vs hee himselfe or hâ—s Predecessors This then is the last resolution of our faith if it relie vpon the Church 8 We must absolutely beleeue euery Pope in his owne cause First that he himselfe is secondly that all his Predecessors vp to Saint Peter were infallible When as many of them within these few hundred years late past by their owne followers confession were such as whatsoeuer must deriue it pedigree from them may iustly be suspected to haue first descended from the father of lies such as not speaking ex Cathedra were so far from the esteeme of absolute infallibility that such as knew them best did trust them least in matters of saecular commodity and if they were found vnfaithfull in the wicked Mammon who will trust them in the true Not Papists themselues vnlesse they speake ex Cathedra Then belike our Sauiour did not foresee this exception from his generall râ—ie or Iudas by this knacke might haue proued himselfe or any other knaue as faithfull a Pastor as S. Peter 9 But if a Pope shall teach ex Cathedra that he is Peters lawfull successor and therefore of diuine infallible authority in expounding all the former places wee must notwithstanding our Sauiours caueat belieue him Why Because it must bee supposed he hath diuine testimony for this assertion As what either diuine history diuine tradition or diuine reuelation Diuine history thy disclaime nor can impudency it selfe pretend it It may bee hee hath the perpetuall traditions of his predecessors But here againe wee demaund what diuine assurance they can bring forth that euery Pope from Saint Peter downewards did giue expresse cathedrall testimony to this perpetuall succession in like authority Suppose what no Iesuite dare auouch vnlesse hee first consult his superiours whether hee must not of necessity say so for maintenance of the Popes dignity that this assertion had beene expresly conueyed from Saint Peter to the present Pope without interruption yet if any one of them did receiue it from his predecessor hauing it but as a priuate man or vpon his honesty hee might erre in deliuering it to his successor so might the third in belieuing him For no beliefe can bee more certain then it proper obiect or immediate ground If That bee fallible the beliefe must needs be vncertaine obnoxious to error and at the best humane No better is the Popes testimony vnles giuen ex Cathedra and no better is the ground of his owne beliefe of what his Predecessors told him vnlesse they tolde it him so speaking Wherfore though this present Pope should teach ex Cathedra viua voce that hee is Peters lawfull successor yet vnlesse hee can proue that none of his predecessors did euer neglect so to auouch the same truth it is euident that hee speakes more then hee can possibly know by any diuine testimony either of history or vnwritten tradition It is euident againe hee bindes vs to beleeue that by diuine faith which hee cannot possibly know himselfe but onely by faith humane For the onely ground of his assertion is this supposed perpetuall tradition and this is but humane vnlesse it bee perpetually deliuered ex Cathedra No is there any other meanes possible vnder the sunne nay either in heauen or earth for to know matters of this nature forepast but either the testimonie of others that haue gone before vs who either were themselues or tooke their relations vpon trust from such as were present when the things related were acted or else by reuelation from him who was before all times and is a present spectatour an eye witnesse of euery action 10 Our knowledge of matters forepast by the former means though Popes themselues be the relators vnlesse their relation bee cathedrall as hath been proued are but humane and fallible Things known by immediate reuelation from God are most certaine because the immediate Relator is most infallible Doth the Pope by this meanes know what his Predecessors or Saint Peter thought concerning this perpetuall succession or generally all matters concerning this point long since forepast He may as easily tell vs what any of his successors shall doe or say an hundred yeers hence And thus much if this present Pope will vndertake the Christian people then liuing may safely belieue what the Pope then being shall say of this or both of their predecessors But to belieue man as an infallible prophet of things past which cannot approue himselfe a true foreteller of things to come were to inuert Gods ordinance and mocke his word For it hath been a perpetuall law of God that no maÌ„ should euer be belieued more then man or by any faith more then humane though in matters present whereof hee might haue beene an eye witnesse vnlesse he shewed his participation of the diuine spirit by infallible praediction of things to come or euidencie of miracles fully answering to the prediction of Gods word already written as shall bee shewed at large in the next section 11 If wee put together the first elements of Romish faith as they haue beene sounded apart they make no such compound as the simple and ignorant Papists who in policy are taught to read this lesson as little children vntaught will by gessing at the whole in grosse without spelling the parts belieue they
continuall faithfulnesse in that seruice whereunto they knew him appointed Albeit after all the mighty workes before-mentioned wrought in their presence they had beene bound thereunto the meanest handmaid in that multitude had infallible pledges plenty of his extraordinary calling lockt vp in her own vnerring senses But from the strange yet frequent manifestation of Moses power and fauour with God so great as none besides the great Prophet whom hee prefigured might challenge the like the Lord in his all â—acing wisdome tooke fiâ—te occasion to allure his people unto strict obseruance of what he afterwards solemnly enacted as also in theâ— to forwarne all future generations without expresse warrant of his word not absolutely to belieue any gouernour whomsoeuer in all though of â—ried skill and fidelity in many principal points of his seruice That passage of Scripture wherin the manner of this peoples stipulation is registred well deserues an exact 〈◊〉 of all especially of these circumstances How the Lord by rehearsall of his mighty workes forepassed extorts their promise to doe whatsoeuer should by Moses be commanded them yet will not accept it offered vntill hee haue made them eare-witnesses of his familiarity and communication with him First out of the Mount he called Moses vnto him to deliuer this solemn message vnto the house of Iacob Yee haue seene what I did to the Egyptians and how I carried you vpon Eagles wings and haue brought you vnto mee Now therefore if you will heare my voice indeed and keepe my couenant then yee shall bee my chiefe â—easure aboue all people though all the earth be mine After Moses had reported vnto God this answere freely vttered with ioint consent of all the people solemnly assembled before their Elders All that the Lord commanded we will doe was the whole businesse betwixt God and them fully transacted by this Agent in their absence No hee is sent backe to sanctifie the people that they might expect Gods glorious appearance in Mount Sinai to ratifie what he had said vpon the returne of their answere Loâ— I come vnto thee in a thicke cloud that the people may heare whilst I talke with thee and that they may also belieue thee for euer They did not belieue that God had reuealed his word to Moses for the wonders hee had wrought but rather that his wonders were from God because they heard God speake to him yea to themselues For their principall and fundamentall lawes were vttered by God himselfe in their hearing as Moses expresseth These words to wit the Decalogue the Lord spake vnto all your multitude in the mount out of the midst of the fire the cloud and the darkenesse with a great voice and added no more And lest the words which they had heard might soone bee smoothered in fleshly hearts or quickly slide out of their brittle memories the Lord wrote them in two Tables of stone and at their â—ranscription not Moses onely but Aaron Nadab and Abihu with the seuenty Elders of Israel are made spectators of the diuine glory rauished with the sweetnesse of his presence They saw saieth the Text the God of Israel and vnder his feet as it were a worke of a Saphire stone and as the very heauen when it is cleare And vpon the Nobles of the children of Israel he laid not his hand also they saw God and did eate and drinke After these Tables through Moses anger at the peoples folly and impiety were broken God writes the same words againe and renewes his Couenant before all the people promising vndoubted experience of his diuine assistance 8 Doth Moses after all this call fire from heauen vpon all such as distrust his words Aaron and Miriam openly derogate from his authority which the Lord confirmes againe viua voce descending in the pillar of the cloud conuenting these detractors in the dore of the Tabernacle Wherefore were you not afraid to speake against my seruant euen against Moses Thus the Lord was very angry and departed leauing his marke vpon Miriam cured of her leprosie by Moses instant prayers No maruell if Korah Dathan and Abirams iudgements were so grieuous when their sinne against Moses after so many documents of his high calling could not but bee wilfull as their perseuerance in it after so many admonitions to desist most malitious and obstinate Yet was Moses further countenanced by the appearance of Gods glory vnto all the congregation and his authority further ratified by the strange and fearefull end of these chief malefactors foretold by him and by fire issuing from the Lord to consume their confederates in offering incense vngratefull to their God Tantae molis erat Iudaeam condere gentem So long and great a worke it was to edifie Israel in true faith but without any like miracle or prediction such as neuer saw him neuer heard good of him must belieue the Pope as well as Israel did their Law-giuer that could make the sea to grant him passage the cloudes send bread the windes bring flesh and the hard rocke yeeld drink sufficient for him and all his mighty hoast that could thus call the heauens as witnesses to condemne appoint the earth as executioner of his iudgements vpon the obstinate and rebellious yet after all this hee inflicts no such punishments vpon the doubtfull in faith as the Romish Church doth but rather as is euident out of the places before alleadged confirmes them by commemoration of these late cited and like experiments making Gods fauours past the surest pledges of his assistance in greatest difficulties that could beset them To conclude this people belieued Moses for Gods testimony of him wee may not belieue Gods word without the Popes testimony of it Hee must bee to God as Aaron was to Moses his mouth whereby hee onely speakes distinctly or intelligibly to his people CHAP. VII That the Churches authority was no part of the rule of faith vnto the people after Moses death That by experiments answerable to his precepts and predictions the faithfull without relying vpon the Priests infallible proposals were as certaine both of the diuine truth and true meaning of the law as their forefathers had beene that liued with Moses and saw his miracles 1 TO proceed vnto the ages following Moses How did they know Moses law either indeed to bee Gods word or the true sence and meaning of it being indefinitely knowne for such By tradition Yes By tradition onely No But how at all by tradition As by a ioint part of that rule on which they were finally to relie Rather it was a meane to bring them vnto the due consideration or right application of the written rule which Moses had left them So hard were their hearts with whom this great Law-giuer had first to deale that faith could not take roote in them vnlesse first wrought and subacted by extraordinary signes and wonders but once thus created in them
word in generall for the miracles related by Moses he had in perfect memory What then want of sufficient authority to propose vnto him these particular reuelations or their true meaning This is all the Romanist can pretend Yet what greater authority could he require then that Angell had which spake vnto Gideon Our Apostle supposeth any Angels proposall of diuine doctrines to be at the least equiualent to Apostolicall Though wee sayeth he whether Paul or Cephas or which he supposeth to be more an Angell from heauen preach vnto you otherwise then wee haue preached vnto you let him be accursed Or if wee respect not onely the personal authority of the proposer but with it the manner of proposing Gods word What proposall can wee imagine more effectuall then this great Angel of the couenants reply vnto Gideons distrustfull answere and the Lord looked vpon him and said Goe in this thy might and thou shalt saue Israel out of the hands of the Midianites haue I not sent thee 8 Whether Gideons diffidence after all this were a sinne I leaue it to bee disputed by the Iesuites A defect or dulnesse no doubt it was and onely in respect of the like in vs they hold a necessity of the visible Churches infallibility vnto whose sentence whosoeuer fully accords not is by their positions vncapable of all other infallible means of diuine faith To pretend doubt or distrust of Gods word once proposed by it yea to seeke further satisfaction or resolution of doubts then it shall vouchsafe to giue is more then a sinne extreame impiety Yet had this great Angell stood vpon his authority in such peremptory tearms Gideon had died in his distrust For after a second reply made by Gideon Ah my Lord whereby shall I saue Israel behold my familie is poore in Manasseh and I am the least in my fathers house and a further promise of the Angels assistance not like the former haue I not sent thee but I will therefore be with thee and thou shalt smite the Madianites as one man hee yet prefers this petition I pray thee if I haue found fauour in thy sight then shew mee a signe that thou talkest with me Depart not hence I pray thee vntill I come vnto thee and bring mine offering and lay it before thee After he had by more euident documents fully perceiued it was an Angell of the Lord that had parlied with him all this time erecting his deiected heart with these comfortable words Peace bee with thee feare not thou shalt not die He yet demands two other signes before hee aduentures vpon the Angels word But after it is once confirmed vnto him by experience of his power in keeping his fleece drie in the middle of moisture and moistning it where was nothing but drinesse about it hee is more confident vpon a Souldiers dreame then a Iesuite in like case would bee vpon the Popes sentence or blessing giuen ex Cathedra When Gadeon heard the dreame told the interpretation of the same he worshipped and returned to the hoast of Israel and said Vp for the Lord hath deliuered into your hand the hoast of Midian 9 Nor hee nor his people could at any time haue wanted like assurance of Gods might and deliuerances had they according to the rule which Moses set them turned vnto him with all their heart and with all their soule but as far were they as the Papists from admitting his words for their rule of faith The vnwritten traditions of Baal were at the least of equall or ioint authority with his writings and in deed and action though not in word and profession preferred before them Longer then their assent was by such miraculous victories as Gideon had now gotted ouer the Midianites and as it were tied and fastned to the blessings and cursings of Moses law this stiffe-necked generation did neither cleaue to it nor to their God But when Gideon was dead they turned away and went a whoring after Baalim and made Baal-Berith their God and remembred not the Lord their God which had deliuered them out of the hands of all their enemies on euery side Miracles after the Law-giuen were vsually either tokens of precedent vnbeliefe or for signes to vnbelieuers seruing especially to put them in mind of what Moses had foretold the attentiue consideration of whose predictions wrought greater faith and confidency in such as without miracles laid this law in their harts then this people conceiued vpon the fresh memory of Gideons extraordinary signes and glorious victory 10 The like occasions of such distrust as were obserued in Gideon were frequent in those times wherein the foure and fortieth Psalme was written yet the author of it is not so daunted with the oppression of his people as Gideon was The manifestation of such reproach contempt and scorne as Moses said should befall them did alwayes animate such as indeed had vsed the Law as a perpetuall rule to notifie the diuersity of all successe good or bad by the degrees of their declining from it or approach vnto it The greater calamities they suffered the more vndoubted experience they had of diuine truth contained in Mosaicalthreats the more vndoubted their experience of their truth vpon consciousnesse of their owne transgressions the greater motiues they had vpon sincere and hearty repentance to apprehend the stability of his sweetest promises for their good No depression of this people but serued as a contersway to accelerate intend or enlarge the measure of their wonted exaltation so long as they rightly weighed all their actions and proceedings in Moses ballances equalizing their permanent sorrow for sins past vnto their wonted delight in transient pleasures 11 Thus when Ieremie more admired then distrusted Gods mercies in rendering the purchase of his kinsmans field to him close prisoner for denouncing the whole desolation of his country when the Kings and Princes of Iudah had no assurance of so much possession in the promised land as to inherite the sepulchres of their fathers the Lord expels not his suspensiue rather then dissident admiration with signes and wonders as he had done Gideons doubt or his stiffe-necked forefathers distrust By what meanes then by the present calamities which had seized vppon the Cities of Iudah and that very place wherein his late purchased inheritance lay when hee cast these and the like doubts in his mind Behold the Mounts they are come into the City to take it and the Citie is giuen into the hand of the Caldeans that fight against it by meanes of the sword and of the famine and of the pestilence and what thou hast spoken is come to passe and behold thou seest it And thou hast said vnto me O Lord God Buy vnto thee the field for siluer and take witnesses for the City shall be giuen in to the hand of the Caldeans Then came the word of the Lord vnto Ieremiah saying Behold I am the Lord God of all flesh is
of whose precepts they solemnely bound themselues as was lately obserued euer whilest the former was established That which moues me to embrace this interpretation is Balaams Prophesie vttered of Israel considered in the abstract as he might haue beene not as he proued as Malachie speakes of Leuy or according to the excellency of his calling in Moses and in Christ or Gods promise which he for his part was ready to performe God brought them saith hee out of Egypt their strength is as an Vnicorne For there is no sorcery in Iacob nor soothsaying in Israel according to this time it shall be said of Iacob What hath God wrought And in the Chapter following he ioines Israels deliuerance from Aegypt as the foundation or beginning and his victory in Christ as the accomplishment or finishing of his glory Of that Iacob meant by Balaam euen wee Gentiles are a part euery way as strictly bound by Moses law as Israel was to abandon soothsaying and sorcery but especially bound to abhorre these and like works of darkenesse from that light the starre of Iacob hath afforded vs. These two great Prophets then Christ and Moses appointed successiuely to declare Gods will vnto his people were the maine supporters of true religion in Israell by whose doctrine all curious and superstitious arts weer to vanish And if my obseruation faile not Israell was much lesse giuen to sorcerie after ordinary Prophets ceased then before because this great Prophet the Hope of Israell was at hand 20 The apprehension of what we now by long search hardly find was more facile to the ancient Iewes from the knowen conceipts or receiued traditions thereto pertinent Before the Law was written one they had heard should be sent from God a mightie deliuerer of his people vnto whome Moses thought himselfe much inferiour as appeares by his reply to God when he was first sent to visit his brethren Mitte quaeso quem missurus es Send I pray thee whom thou wilt send as if he had said One thou hast appointed from euerlasting to declare thy name vnto his brethren to shew mercie to thy people and thy power vpon thine enemies and I beseech thee send him now for this is worke befitting his strength not my weaknesse From the like notions or receiued opinions did the Pharisees vnderstand this place as meant of the Prophet that was to come albeit it may be doubted whether they tooke him to be the same with the Messiah For so they demaund of Iohn seuerallie Art thou the Christ Art thou Eliah Art thou the Prophet Eliah was plainly distinguished from the Messias by Isaiah or perhappes they knew the Messias and the Prophet to bee the same yet like strict examiners proposed these two seuerall names to leaue Iohn no euasion It was likewise a truth presupposed and knowne at least amongst the Pharisees that Eliah Messias the Prophet one or all should baptise Hence they further question the Baptist Why baptizest thou then if thou be not the Christ neither Elias nor the Prophet And of himselfe he saith because He to wit the Christ should be declared to Israell therefore am I come baptizing with water This answere with his practise permitted by the Pharisees and approoued by the people so fullie concurring with the former notion but especially his praediction of Christs baptizing with the holie Ghost and as Saint Mathew addes with fire were most pregnant testimonies against vnbelieuers after they had notice of the Holy Ghosts descending vpon the same day their Law was giuen from heauen for the plentifull manner of effusion and placide illapse into the soules of euery sort resembling water powred out as the Prophets phrase imports but for outward appearance and inward effects of ardent zeale like vnto fire And likely it is as well the pillar of fire which enlightened Israell by night as the cloud that rested vpon the tabernacle vnder which S. Paul saith the Fathers being were baptized in it were such praeluding types of baptisme by water and the Holy Ghost as the Rocke was of Chrik or the waters thence flowing of those springs of life which issue from him to the refreshing of euery faithfull thirstie soule The misticall significations of such shadowes of good things to come were sufficiently knowne to the Iewes liuing in our Sauiours time Whence as the two iudicious Commentatours Bucer and Martyr obserue his aduersaries mouths were instantly stopt at the first allegation of those places the moderne Iewes barke most against as not inferring what the Euangelists report their forefathers granted because these had a peculiar manner of interpreting scriptures not acknowledged by the later grown out of vse for the most part amongst Christians or rather ouergrowen with the abuse of luxuriant aâ—legories and misticall sencelesse sences framed by Monkish or rather Apish imitation of orthodoxall antiquity The weeding out of such tares as through these bad husbands sloath and negligence haue abounded in Gods haruest will not we trust be either difficult or dangerous to the good seed primitiue antiquitie hath sowen whose generall methode and manner of interpreting prophecies though in particulars it often faile partly thâ—ough aduenturous imitation of some Philosophers in vnfolding heathenish misteries partly through want of skill in the originall tongâ—es holds the iust meanes betweene barbarous Postillers and some late preachers worthily famous yet too nice and scrupulous in this subiect as shall appeare when we come to handle it 21 But to finish what we had last in hand the most remarkeable most publique document our Sauiour gaue to vnbelieuers of his designment to that great office foretold by Moses was the constant auouchment of his death and resurrection vnto such as so well obserued his words that after they had taken away his life procured a strong watch to be set about his sepulcher least his Disciples should take his body thence and by emptying it seeme to fulfill his prophecie Nor did he once onely but twise foretell not barely hee would rise againe but that thus much was presignified by the Prophet Ionahs three daies imprisonment in the Whales bellie thus inuiting them to obserue all congruitie of circumstance betweene the historicall type already exhibited and the substance prophecied which methode as hereafter God willing will appeare is of all the best for insinuating faith into superstitious peruerse and crooked hearts otherwise most vnapt to recieue truths late reuealed Since Christs glorification sundry impostors haue done many works hardly distinguishable by spectators from true miracles but the end of all their purposes which they sought thence to perswade was alwaies so dissonant to the vncorrupt notions praecedent types or prophecies of the Messiah as vnto hearts well setled and surely grounded vpon scriptures formerly established and confirmed their greatest wonders seemed but apish toyes howsoeuer difficiles nugae And some of these iuglers either out of the strength of their owne illusions
meanes is where hee disputes whether the Pope be bound to consult other authoritie besides his owne or vse any meanes to search the truth before hee passe sentence ex cathedra that is before he charge the whole Christian World to beleeue his decision This he thinkes expedient but so farre forth onely as if it please his Holinesse to enioyne the beleefe of some particular point vpon the whole World all must beleeue that he hath consulted Scripture and antiquitie as farre as was requisite for that point as you shall after heare 2 That in such controuersies he includes the meanes of knowing Scriptures to bee the word of God is euident out of his owne words in the forecited place For the knowledge of Scriptures he would haue to be an especiall point of faith yet such as cannot be proued by Scripture but by this liuing and speaking authoritie as he expressely contends in the eleuenth paragraph of the same question His conclusion is If it bee necessarie there should be some authoritie though humane yet by diuine assistance infallible to sit as mistresse and Iudge in all controuersies of faith and not to be appropriated to any deceased as is alreadie proued it remaines that it be alwaies liuing in the Church alwayes present amongst the faithfull by succession hee meanes of Popes Thus you see the present Pope must be Iudge and Christ his Apostles must be brought in as witnesses And yet whether there were such a Christ as Saint Mathew Luke Marke and Iohn tell vs there was or whether the Gospels which goe vnder their names be Apocryphall and that of Bartholmewes onely Canonicall we cannot know but by the Popes testimonie so that in the end he is the onely Iudge and onely witnesse both of Christ the Apostles and their writings yea of all diuine truthes at least assisted with his Bishops and Cardinals Which Bellarmine though otherwise a great deale more wary then Valentian hath plainly vttered Vnlesse saith he it were for the authoritie of the present Church of Rome he meanes the Trent Councell the whole Christian faith might be called in question so might all the acts and decrees of former Councels his reason was because wee cannot know these antiquities but onely by tradition and historicall relation which are not able to produce diuine firme infallible faith 3 Thus whilest this great Clerke would digge a pit for the blinde for he could not hope I thinke this blocke should stumble any that hath eyes in his head he is fallen into the middest of it himselfe by seeking to vndermine vs he hath smothered himselfe and buried the cause he was to maintaine For if without the Trent Councels testification wee cannot by diuine faith beleeue the Scriptures or former Councels to bee of diuine authoritie How can such as were borne within these thirty yeares beleeue that Councell it selfe which ended aboue fortie yeares agoe Few this day liuing were auditors of the Cardinals and Bishops decisions there assembled not hearing them their faith must needs be grounded vpon heare sayes Againe if it bee true the Scriptures cannot be knowne to be diuine but by the authoritie of the present visible Church if this Church doe not viua voce confirme all Christians in this fundamentall truth their faith can not be diuine but humane VVhat the Pope or his Cardinals thinke of these pointes is more then any liuing knowes vnlesse they heare them speake and then it may be a great question whether they speake as they thinke Pope Alexander the sixts decisions should haue beene negatiue like the fooles boult in the Psalme There is no God No Christ No Gospell for so his meaning might haue beene interpreted as they say dreames are by contraries seeing hee neuer spake as hee thought Lastly if the Trent Councel were so necessary for the confirmation of Scriptures and other Orthodoxall writings how detestable was your Cleargies backwardnesse to affoord the Christian World this spirituall cōfort For whether feare it were the Popes authoritie should bee curbed or meere slouth and neglect of matters diuine that did detaine them their shifts to put the Emperour off the Reader may sufficiently coniecture from Sepulueda at that time Chronicler to the Emperour in his Epistle to Cardinall Contarene one of the Popes Legates in that Councell That my intermission of writing and silence in that question concerning the correction of the yeare hath beene so long I wish the fault had laid in my slouth or forgetfulnesse that I might haue beene hence occasioned to acknowledge and deprecate the blame rather then as now I freely must impute the true cause to the negligence of you Romane Priestes whome I perceiue to wax cold and to thinke of nothing lesse then of calling the Councell with hope whereof as heretofore I was excited so now despaire hath made me dull For I see well that such as are most bound to haue a vigilant care of the Churches publique welfare and not to foreslow any opportunitie of increasing her dignitie neuer so much as mention the Councell at this time as necessarie as alwayes vsefull but when Christians eyther are alreadie or are likely to be at variance In one word neuer but them when there is sure hope it may bee hindered by their discord For when peace gets it turne and all is quiet not a word of the Councell So as what they aime at by these vnseasonable edicts is so manifest as will not suffer the slowest capacitie to liue in doubt or suspition 4 This great Learned Antiquaries Learned aduice in another Epistle sent to the same Cardinall then imployed by the Pope in the Councell was not to suffer matters decreed in any former Councell lawfully assembled together to bee disputed or called in question Sufferance hereof was in his iudgment no lesse preiudiciall to the State Ecclesiastique then vnto the temporall it would be to permit malefactors trauerse the equitie of publique lawes established and knowne after sufficient proofe or confession made of Capitall offences committed against them The marginall quotations of the Trent Councell compared with this graue admonition which had antiquitie-customes Canonicall as the Author vrgeth to giue it countenance may serue as a perfect index for our instruction with what preiudice the Bishops there assembled came to determine by whose manuduction or set rules they drew their supposed inerrable lines of life Now it is impossible any determination that takes it force from multitude of voyces shoud be eyther in it selfe more certaine or more forcible to perswade others thē are the motiues or inducements that swayed the suffragants so to determine and these in this case could by Bellarmines reason be but historicall perswasions or presumptions For no Iesuite I thinke will say these Bishops had the Popes sentence ex Cathedra to assure them before hand what Councels had beene lawfully called and fully confirmed or whether all the ancient Canons they afterwardes reestablished were alreadie as authentique and certaine as
existence necessary Whatsoeuer is besides is but a shadow or picture borrowed from his infinite being Amongst created entities all essentially depending on Him Accidents haue a kind of existence peculiar to themselues yet cannot so properly bee saide to exist as their subiects on whom they haue such double dependance Nor can the Moone so truely say my beauty is mine owne as may the Sunne which lends light and splendor to this his sister as it were vpon condtion shee neuer vse it but in his sight For the same reason that for which wee belieue another thing is alwayes more truely more really and more properly belieued then that which is belieued for it if the one beliefe necessarily depend vpon the other tam in facto esse quam in fieri from the first beginning to the latter end For of beliefes thus mutually affected the one is reall and radicall the other nominall or at the most by participation onely reall This consequence is vnsound Intellectiue knowledge depends on sensitiue therefore sensitiue is of these two the surer The reason is because intellectiue knowledge depends on sensitiue onely in the acquisition not after it is acquired But this inference is most vndoubted Wee belieue the conclusion for the premisses therefore we belieue the premisses the better because beliefe of the Conclusion absolutely depends vpon the premisses during the whole continuance of it This is the great Philosophers rule and a branch of the former Axiome And some iustly question whether in Scholastique propriety of speech wee can truely say there is a beliefe of the conclusion distinct from the beleefe of the premisses or rather the beliefe of the premisses is by extrinsical denomination attributed vnto the conclusion This latter opinion at least in many Syllogismes is the truer most necessarily true in all wherein the conclusion is a particulall essentialâ—y subordinate to an vniuersall of truth vnquestionable As hee that infallibly belieues euery man is a reasonable creature infallibly belieues Socrates is such Nor can wee say there be two dictint beliefes one of the vniversall another of this particular for he that sayeth All excepteth none If Socrates then make one in the Catalogue of men hee that formerly knew all knew him to bee a reasonable Creature all he had to learne was what was meant by this name Socrates a man or a beast After he knowes him to be a man in knowing him to bee a reasonable creature hee knowes no more then he did before in that vniuersall Euery man is a reasonable Creature The like consequence holdes as firme in our present argument He that beleeues this vniuersall Whatsoeuer the Church proposeth concerning Scriptures is most true hath no more to learne but onely what particulars the church proposeth These being knowne we cannot imagine there should bee two distinct beleefes one of the churches generall infallibility another of the particular Truthes or points of faith contained in the Scripture proposed by it For as in the former case so in this He that from the churches proposall beleeues or knowes this particular The Booke of Reuelations was from God receiues no increase of former beleefe for before hee beleeued all the church did propose and therefore this particular because one of all 4 The truth of this conclusion may againe from a maine pinciple of Romish faith be thus demonstrated Whatsoeuer vnwritten traditions the Church shall propose though yet vnheard of or vnpossible otherwise to be knowne then onely by the Churches asseueration all Romanists are bound as certainly to beleeue as deuoutly to embrace as any truths contayned in the written word acknowledged by vs the Iewes and them for diuine Now if eyther from their owne experience the ioynt consent of sincere antiquitie or testimonie of Gods spirit speaking to them in priuate or what meanes soeuer else possible or imaginable they gaue any absolute credence vnto the written word or matters contained in it besides that they giue vnto the churches generall veracitie the Scriptures by addition of this credence were it great or little arising from these grounds peculiar to them must needs be more firmely beleeued and embraced then such vnwritten traditions as are in themselues suspitious vncapable of other credit then what they borrow from the Church For in respect of the Churches proposall Which is one and the same alike peremptory in both Scriptures and traditions of what kinde soeuer must be equally beleeued And if such traditions as can haue no assurance besides the Churches testimony must be as well beleeued as Scriptures or diuine truthes contained in them the former conclusion is euidently necessary that they neyther beleeue the Scriptures nor the Truthes contained in them but the Churches proposall of them onely For the least beleefe of any Diuine truth added to beleefe of the Churches proposall which equally concernes written and vnwritten verities would dissolue the former equalitie But that by the Trent Councell may not bee dissolued Therefore our aduersaries in deede and verity beleeue no Scriptures nor Diuine written Truth but the Churches proposall onely concerning them And Sacroboscus bewrayes his readinesse to beleeue the Church as absolutely as any Christian can doe God or Christ though no title of the New-testament were extant For that the Church cannot erre was an Oracle reuealed by God proposed by the Church and beleiued by the faithfull before any part of the New testament was written Now hee that without the Gospel of Iesus Christ would beleeue the Doctrines of faith as firmely as with it beleeues not the Gospel which now he hath but their authorities onely vpon which though wee had it not he would as absolute rely for all matters of doctrine supposed to be contained in it 5 Or further to illustrate the truth of our conclusion with this Iesuits former comparison which hath best illustrated the Romish churches tenent That Church in respect of the Canon of Scriptures or any part thereof is as the light is to colours As no colour can be seene of vs but by the light so by his doctrine neyther the Canon of Scriptures or any part thereof can be known without the Churches testimonie Againe as remoueall of light presently makes vs loose the sight of colours so doubt oâ— deniall of the Churches authoritie depriues vs of all true and stedfast beleefe concerning Gods Word or any matter contained in it God as they plead hath reuealed his will obscurely and vnto a distinct or cleare apprehension of what is obscurely reuealed the visible churches declaration is no lesse necessary then light to discernment of colours The reason is one in both and is this As the actuall visibilitie of colours wholly depends vpon the light as well for existence as duration so by Iesuiticall Doctrine true beleefe of Scriptures wholly depends on the visible Churches declaration as well during the whole continuance as the first producing of it By the same reason as we gather that light in it selfe is more
dicuntui Petro in triphci sunt differeÌ„tia quaed im enim dicuntur ei pro se tantum quaedam pro se omnibus â—oâ—istianis quaedam pro se successoribus id quod euidenter colligitur ex ratione diuersa qua ei dicuntur Nam quae dicuntur ei vt vni ex fidelibus certe omnibê° fidelibus dicta intelliguntur Vt Mat. 18. Si peccauerit inte â—rater tâ—us c. Quae dicuntur ei ratione aliquà propria personae ipsius ei soli dicuntur vt vade post me Satana Et Terme neâ—abis ista enim dicuntur ei ratione propriâ— imbe cillitatis et ignorantiae Quadam dicuntur ei ratione officij pastoralis quae proinde dicta intelliguntur omnibus sucessoribus vt pasâ—e oues meas et Bellar lib. 2. cap. 12. §. vltimo The Romanist makes the Pope his God in that he makes him the Rock on which the Church is built Compare Exod. 17. 1. Cor. 10. 4. The Hebr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken in the same sense Psal 18. 3. Isa 31. 9. * This obseruation will easily approoue it self to any that will reade the booke of Deuteronomium and the Psalmes * This obseruation will easily approoue it selfe to any that will reade the booke of Deuteronomium and the Psalmes * This obseuation will easily approoue it selfe to any that will reade the booke of Deuteronomium and the Psalmes How Romish ReligioÌ„ denies the virtue and power of Christ come in the flesh That Romish faith is that faith by which S. Peter confessed Christ That the Romish Church is neither that Rocke nor built vpon that Rocke against which the gates of hell cannot preuaile because their faith is vnsouÌ„d Mat. 4. 23. Math. 7. 26. Praeterea Ecclesia congregata siue consilium proprijssime est Ecclesia Christi vt etiam aduersarij concedunt nam Ecclesi a est congregatio fidelium ergo quo magis fideles suÌ„t congregati vniti eo magis proprie sunt Ecclesia at stultu est cum aliquid de alio absolute pronunciatur excipere id quod proprijssimè per illud significatur ergo cum Christus dicit Super hanc Petram aedisicabo Ecclesiam meam slultè excipitur Ecclesia vniuersalis congregata cum ea proprijssimè sit Ecclesia Bellar. lib. 2. de Con. Auc cap. 15. Of this Church the Pope is the foundation as hee auoucheth in the words going before Quod est in domo fundamentum est in corpore caput in grege Postor Vt. n. fundamentuÌ„ non pendet à domo sed domus à fundamento ita ellam caput non pendet à corpore seâ— corpus à capite pastor non pendet à grege sed grex à pastore His conclusion is Papa praest omnibus loco Christi quibus Christus ipse inuisibiliter praeest quibus etiam praeesset visâ—â—ilâ—er si visibiliter adesset Christus aut cum praeest praeesset inuisibiliter si adesset visibiliter non solem Ecclesus particularibus sed etiam toti Ecclesue vniuersall generalibus concilijs igitur etiam Papa preest Ecclesie vniuersali Either is not the Romish Church representatiue that Church spoken of Mat. 10. or else Christs promise hath sailed * Caput Ecclesiae non potest quidem errare docendo falsam doctrinem tamen potest errare male vâ—uendo malè etiam sentiendo vt prâ—uatus humo atque hoc tantuÌ„ videmus accidisse Adamo malè enim aliquando vixit sortè etiam malè de Deo sentit tamen non malè docuit Bellarminus de Ecclesia militante lib. 111. cap. 16. Some of their Popes by their owne writers confession haue beene strangely cut off in the very acts of adultery or other sinnes by them accounted mortall Christs promise vnto S. Peter but a meere mockery by the Iesuits constructioÌ„ The Romish Church of all Idols that are or haue beene the most vaine and foolish 2 Peter c. 3. v. 4. A Parallile of Atheisticall and Papisticall mockerie The Iew and the Iesuite are alike bewitched the one in expecting Messias already come and crucified by his fathers the other in looking for Antichrist already reuealed and adored by him as his God The aduersaries 〈◊〉 in deriuing oecumenicall authority perpetually infallible from Saint Peter * Rom. 12. 2. Sect. 3. cap. 13. * 2. Pe. 1. 12. c. S. Peter knew not his successors should bee infallible There be greater probabilities that S. Ioha should haue had infallible successors then S. Peter Reuel 1. ver 3. * Reu. 19. 10. Vide lib. 2. Sect. 4. cap. 4. RESPONDEO non esse eandem rationem Politici Ecclesiastici regiminis Siquidem orbis terrarum non necessario debet esse vnum regnum proinde noÌ„ necessario postulat vnum qui omnibus praesit at Ecclesia tota vnum est regnum vna ciuitas vna domus ideo ab vno tota regi debet Cuius differentiae illa est ratio quòd ad conuersationem Poliâ—â—â—orum regnoâ—um non necessariò requiratur vt omnes Prouinciae seruent easdem leges ciuiles eâ—sdens vitus Possunt enim 〈◊〉 personarum varietate diuersis vti legibus institutis dâ—irco non requiritur vnus qui omnes in vâ—itate contineat Ad conâ—eruationem verò Ecclesiae necessè est vt omnes conueniant in eadem fide â—sdem Sacramentis â—sdemque praeceptis diuinitus traditis quod sanè sierinon potest nisi sint vnus popuâ—â—s ab vno in vnitate contineantur Bellar. l. r. de Rom. Pont. c. 9. sub sinem He acknowledgeth it were conuenient the whole world should be gouerned by one ciuill Monarch Were it possible to create surely one without bloud-shed of wrong it were requisite he or any in his behalfe should resolue vs why the whole Church might not as truly be one people by coÌ„munion with Christ their head as the Tartars and Spaniards by subordination to one Lord to wit the King of Spaine suppose he were Lord of both they as far distant each from other as they are The vncertaintie of Popish councells or traditions * Luke 16. v. 11 * He that is vniust in the least is vniust also in much saieth our Sauiour in the same place v. 10. A Popes testimony of himselfe or his predecessors is authenticke Popes bind vs to belieue by diuine faith their reports of matters forepast which they cannot belieue by any other faith but humane and fallible He that will be reputed a Prophet of times forepast must shew himselfe a prophet of things to come The present Popes authority is greater then history traditions or councels or ought that can be pretended for it * Aliud est interpretari legem more doctoris aluid more iudicis id explicationem more doctoris requiritur eâ—uditio ad explicationem more iudicis requiritur authoritas Doctor enim non proponit sententiam suam vt necessario sequendâ—m sed solum quatenus ratio suadet at
Sancto dictante quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerunt orthodoxorum Patrum exempla secuta omnes libros tam veteris quam noui Testamenti cum vtriusque vnus Deus sit auctor nec non traditiones ipsas tùm ad fidem tùm ad mòâ—es perimentes tanquam vel ore tenus à Christo vel à Spiritu Sancto dictatas continua successione in Ecclesia Catholica conseruatas paripietatis affectu ac reuerentia suscipit veneratur Concil Trident. Sess 4. Decret de Canonicis Scripturis And a little after hauing reckoned vp the Apoctyphall Bookes with the Canonicall they thus conclude Si quis autem libros ipsos integros cum omnibus suis partibus prout in Ecclesia Catholica legi consueuerunt in veteri vulgata Latina editione habentur pro Sacris Canonicis non susceperit traditiones praedictas sciens prudens contempserit anathema sit Omnes itaque intelligant quo ordine via ipsa Synodus post iactum fidei confessionis fundamentum sit progressâ—ra quibijs potissinum testimonijs ac praesidijs in confirmandis dogmatibus instaurandis in Ecclesia moribus sit vsura The Councell was very wise in not expressing as well what vnwritten traditions as written bookes they meant to follow * Respondeo orthodoxos omnes certos esse Ecclesiam circa fidem non posse errare proindeque nec dubitare eius sententiae acquiescere Hoc enim inter caetera reuelata tanquam à Deo dictum ab ipsa matre Ecclesia acceperuÌ„t quae quidem veritas ante scriptam vllam noui testamenti parteÌ„ dicta à Deo ab Ecclesia proposita à fidelibus credita fuit hodie quoque crederetur etiamsi noui testamenti ne vnus quidem apex scriptus extaret quemadmodium reuelatae veritates à fidelibus credebaÌ„tur per annos bis mille in statu legis naturae ante exaratuÌ„ à Mose Pentateuchum Sacrob def Decr. Trid. Sent. Bell. C. 6. Par. 1. pa. 109. The two main branches of Romish infidelity springing from her former two positions Math. 4. v. 5. * Luke 12. 48. An obiection which might bee made in fauour of the Romanists answered and retorted Vide Sect. 2. cap. 1. Sect. 4. c. 4. * Nihil igitur efferunt qui Ecclesiae authoritatem non absolute sed ex conditione ponuÌ„t Si namque ad cum modâ— res habet mihi quoque fides habenda est quando pronunciauero secundum Scripturas rectè intellectas Id enim est noÌ„ mihi sed Scripturae credere Canus lib. 4. cap. 4. Vide lib. 4. sec 2. chap. 5. The greater morall or historicall beliefe the Romanist hath of the truth or true meaning of Scriptures the greater his condemnation by subscription to this doctrine of the Churches absolute infallibilitie * This argument holds as we say à fortiori of faith infused for no man can be so fully persuaded that he hath diuine faith infused of any point but must renounce his perswasion wheÌ„ the church defines the coÌ„trary whose definition or asseueration be it a cause or condition of beleeuing wil fully perswade the Romanist that hee nowe hath diuine infused saith of the contrari◠〈◊〉 that hee beleeued before For his divine infused saith his habit of Theologie may not disagree and yet in this case his habit of Theologie may not yeeld vnto the other because it hath the Churches testimonie which it is supposed the other wanteth Sect. 2. Chap. 2â— Porag 9. Annot. That this doctrine emboldens such as embrace it to glory in villany Quotiescunque Romanus Pontifex in sidei quaestionibus definiendis illa qua est praeditus authoritate vtitur ab omnibus fidelibus tanquam doctrina fidei recipi diuino prâ—cepto debet eu sententia quam ille decernâ—t esse sententiam fidei Totiâ—s autem eum ipsa authoritate vti credendum est quoties in controuersia fidei sic alterutram sententiam determinat vt ad eam recipiendam obligare velit vniuersam Ecclesiam Valent. tom 3. in Aquinat Disp 1. Quaest 1. De obiect fidei Punct 7. §. 39. * Distinguendi sunt modi quibus potest contingere Pontificem aliquid asserere Primo enim potest sibi persuadere aut asrere aliquid vt priuata persona quaedam vel doctor alius quispiam vt si nollet Ecclèsiam vniuersam ad recipiendam suam assertionem obligare sed tantum sententiam ipse suam reputaret veram Hoc modo Innocentius 3. nonnulli alij Pontifices opuscula varia ediderunt Ac illa quidem quae sic Pontifex asseuerat communis sententia omnium Theologorum est non oportere esse omnia vera infallibilia quasi à Pontificia authorità te profecta Quin imo à plerisque authoribus conceditur sieri posse vt Pontifex tanquam quaedam priuata persona in haeresim labatur Ibidem * Secundo modo potest Pontifex aliquid asserere obligando vniuersam Ecclesià vt illud recipiat nec quisquam audeat sibi persuadere contrarium Et quaecunque Pontifex aliqua de religione controuersia sic asserit certa side credendum est illum infailibil ter ac preinde ex authoritate Pontificia hoc est ex diuina assisseÌ„tia id asserere Ibidem * Itaque quod ad Canonizati onem Sanctorum attinet amiâ—ino nego id quod communiter doctores Catholici iure optimo negant videâ—â—â—et posse Pontificem hac in parte errare Quamuis enim testimonia quae pro aliâ—uius hominis sanctitate esseruntur siut humana idâ—oque natura sua faltibilia tamen posito quod Pontifex illis inducatiâ— tendem ad pronunciandum quempiam sanctum at que beatum iam essè certa fide credendùm est testimoniâ—â—lla quatenus in genere saltem probant piè atque sanctè quenquaÌ„ ex hac vâ—ta excessesse vera esse et hommeÌ„ eiâ—smodi ex eorum esse numcro quos per revelationes Scripturae generales in communi constat diuinae gratiae beneficio conseqâ—â— aeternae vitae beatitudinem Quae saâ—â— certituÌ„do issdem illis Dei promissionibus nititur ex quibus compertum habemus nunquam esse futurum vt vniuersa Ecclesia in rebus religionis fallatur â—â—â—loretur autem 〈…〉 si sen sum reputaret ac pro tali veneraetur eum qui sanctus non est Hic autem illud quuÌ„d 〈…〉 ab orthodoxis probatum atque defensum est tanquam ex fide certum pono nemperem esse amnino quae ad Ecclesie aedificationem adenque ad off tium Pontificis pertineat vt Sancti quidam aliquando canoniâ—â—ntur ac 〈…〉 Ecclesiam debere vt sanctum venerari illum quem samâ—us Pontifex num no sanctorum adseribit sicut etiam vsus ipse perpetuus atque traditio Ecclesiae confirmat Valent. ibidem § 40. * Psal 14. v. 1. The fearefull manner of Iesuites tempting God in maintaining this argument *
the incorruptible seed therof might by meanes ordinary easily be propagated vnto posterity with whom it was to grow vp and ripen not by bare credence to their ancestors traditions nor by such miraculous sights as they had seene but by assiduous and serious obseruation of Gods prouidence in their owne times For all his wayes to such as marke them are euer paralell to some one or other rule contained in this booke of life The Israelites in euery age might haue discerned the truth of his threates or promises alwayes fulfilled according to the diuersity of their wayes though thus much the best amongst them would seldome haue obserued perhaps not so much as once haue compared their course of life with either part of Gods couenant of life and death vnlesse thus forwarned by their Ancestors The tradition then of former was of like vse for begetting true beliefe in latter generations as the exhortations of tutors who haue already tasted the sweet of helicon are vnto their pupils for attaining true knowledge in good arts of whose pleasantnesse they neuer conceiue aright vntill they taste it themselues though taste it but vpon the others commendation they would not without their direction ordinarily they could not 2 This Methode Moses himselfe prescribes Consider this day for I speake not vnto your children which neither haue known nor seen the chastisement of the Lord your God his greatnesse his mighty hand and his stretched-out arme and his signes and his acts which he did in the midst of Egypt vnto Pharaoh the King of Egypt and all his land For your eyes haue seene all the great acts of the Lord which he did Therefore shall yee keepe all the commandements which I command you this day that yee may be strong and goe in and possesse the land wither ye go to possesse it Gods wonders past they were to consider to what end That they might lay vp their Law-giuers words in their hearts and in their soules bind them as remembrances vpon their hands that they might bee as frontlets betweene their eyes or sights whereby to leuell their steps lest they trode awry Gods word so rooted in the fathers as thus to fructifie in their carriage gesture speech and action the seed of it was to bee sowne in the tender supple hearts of children as Moses in the next words ads And yee shall teach them your children speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house and when thou walkest by the way and when thou lyest down and when thou risest vp And thou shalt write them vpon the posts of thine house and vpon thy gates Thus was Gods couenant with his people first briefly drawne in signes and wonders and vttered by a mighty voyce in mount Horeb as it had beene a demise Paroll afterwards conceiued in more ample sort and written in more speciall tearmes by Moses but was to bee sealed to euery generation by their sure experience of Gods mercy and iustice the one infallibly accomplishing their prosperity for obeying the other their calamities for transgressing it as in the same place followeth For if ye keepe diligently all these commandements which I command you toe doe that is to loue the Lord your God to walke in all his wayes and to cleane vnto him then will the Lord cast out all these nations before you and yee shall possesse great nations mightier then you All the places whereon the soles of your feet shall tread shall be yours your coast shall be from the wildernesse and from Lebanon and from the riuer euen the riuer Perah vnto the vttermost Sea No man shall stand against you for the Lord your God shall cast the feare of you vpon all the land that yee shall tread vpon as hee hath said vnto you 3 Euery light or formall obseruation of this couenant suffised not to auert Gods threates or make them capable of those bounteous promises which hee neuer failed to fulfill as long as in heart and deed they vsed Moses writings for their rule nor weighing the foolish traditions of the Elders When he slew them sayth the Psalmist they sought him and they returned and sought God earely And they remembred that God was their strength and the most high God their redeemer Proportially to their repentance but far aboue or rather without all proportion of deserts did the Lord deale with them For as their hearts though in some sort turned vnto him were not vpright with him neither were they faithfull in his couenant so hee being mercifull thus farre forgaue their iniquite that hee destroyed them not but oftimes called backe his anger and suffered not his whole displeasure to arise 4 The whole historicall part of the old Testament vntill Dauids time epitomized by this Psalmist witnesseth what way soeuer this people went either the blessing or the curse which Moses there sets sets before them did alwayes surely meet them Behold I set before you this day a blessing and a curse the blessing if yee obey the commandements of the Lord your God which I command you this day and the curse if yee will not obey the commandements of the Lord your God but turne out of the way which I command you this day to goe after other Gods yee haue not knowne In these terms of blessings and cursings hee enstiles the former disâ—unctiue couenant If yee shal hearken therfore to my commandements which I shall command you this day that you loue the Lord your God and serue him with all your heart and with all your soule I also will giue raine vnto your land in due time the first raine and the latter that thou mayest gather in thy wheate and thy wine and thine oyle Also I will send grasse in thy fields for thy cattell that thou mayest eate and haue enough But beware lest your heart deceiue you and lest yee turne aside and serue other Gods and worship them and so the anger of the Lord be kindled against you and hee shut vp the heauen that there be no raine and that your land yeeld not her fruit and yee perish quickly from the good land which the Lord giueth you To stirre them vp to more strict obseruance of the former couenant the blessinges and cursings here mentioned were to be pronounced with great solemnity at their first entraÌ„ce into the land of Cannan When the Lord thy God therfore hath brought thee into the land whither thou goest to possesse it then shalt thou put the blessing vpon Mount Gerizim and the 〈◊〉 Mount Eball And elsewhere Moses chargeth the people saying These all sonnes of the free-woman shall stand vpon Mount Gerizim to blesse the people when yee passe ouer Iordan Simeon and Leui and Iudah Issachar and Ioseph and Beniamin and these sonnes of the bond-woman shall stand vpon Mount Ebal to curse Ruben Gad and Asher and Zebulon Dan and Nephtali and the Leuits shall answere and say vnto all the men
grace it selfe would rather haue held the Negatiue For if wee beleeue as the Papists generally instruct vs that wee our selues all priuate spirites may erre in euery perswasion of faith but the Church which onely is assisted by a publike spirite cannot possibly teach amisse in any Wee must vpon termes as peremptory and in equall degree beleeue euery particular point of faith because the Church so teacheth vs not because wee certainely apprehend the truth of it in it selfe For wee may erre but this publike spirite cannot And consequently wee must infallibly belieue these propositions Christ is the Redeemer of the world not Mahomet There is a Trinity of persons in the diuine nature for this reason only that the Church commends them vnto vs for diuine reuelations seeing by their arguments brought to disproue the sufficiency of Scriptures or certainety of priuate spirites no other means possible is left vs. Nay were they true wee should be onely certain that without the Churches proposall wee still must be most vncertain in these and all other points because the sonnes are perpetually obnoxious to error from which the mother is euerlastingly priuiledged The same propositions and conclusions we might condicionally belieue to be absolutely authentike vppon supposall they were Gods word but that they are his word or reuelations truly diuine wee cannot firmely belieue but onely by firme adherence to the Churches infallible authority as was in the second Section deduced out of the Aduersaries principles Hence it followes that euery particular proposition of faith hath such a proper causall dependance vpon the Churches proposall as the conclusion hath vpon the premisses or any particular vpon it vniuersall Thus much Sacroboseus grants 3 Suppose God should speake vnto vs face to face what reason had wee absolutely and infallibly to belieue him but because wee know his words to bee infallible his infallibility then should be the proper cause of our beliefe For the same reason seeing he doth not speake vnto vs face to face as hee did to Moses but as our aduersaries say reueales his will obscurely so as the Reuealer is not manifested vnto vs but his meaning is by the visible Church which is to vs in stead of Prophetes Apostles and Christ himselfe and all the seuerall manners God vsed to speake vnto the world before he spake to it by his onely sonne this Pantheas infallibility must bee the true and proper cause of our beliefe And Valentian himselfe thinks that Sara and others of the old world to whom God spake in priuate eyther by the mouth of Angels his sonne or holy spirit or by what meanes soeuer did not sinne against the doctrine of faith or through vnbeliefe when they did not belieue Gods promises They did herein vnaduisedly not vnbelieuingly Why not vnbelieuingly because the visible Church did not propose these promises vnto them 4 If not to belieue the visible Churches proposals be that which makes distrust or diffidence to Gods promises infidelity then to belieue them is the true cause of belieuing Gods promises or if Sara and others did as Valentian sayth vnaduisedly or imprudently in not assenting to diuine truthes proposed by Angels surely they had done only prudently and aduisedly in assenting to them their assent had not beene truely and properly beleefe So that by this assertion the Churches proposall hath the very remonstratiue roote character of the immediat and prime cause whereby wee beleeue and know matters of faith For whatsoeuer else can concurre without this our assent to diuine truthes proposed is not true Catholike beliefe but firmely beleeuing this infallibility we cannot erre in any other point of faith 5 This truth Valentian elsewhere could not dissemble howsoeuer in his professed resolution of faith hee sought to couer it by change of apparrell Inuesting the Churches proposall onely with the title of a condition requisite yet withall so dissonant is falsity to it selfe making it the reason of beleeuing diuine Reuelations If a reason it be why wee should belieue them needs must it sway any reasonable mind to embrace their truth And whatsoeuer inclines our minds to the embracement of any truth is the proper efficient cause of beliefe or assent vnto the same Yea efficiency or causality it selfe doth formally consist in this inclination of the mind Nor is it possible this proposall of the Church should moue our minds to embrace diuine Reuelations by any other meanes then by belieeuing it And beliefe it selfe being an inclination or motion of the mind our minds must first be moued by the Churches proposall ere it can moue them at all to assent vnto other diuine truthes Againe Valentian grants that the orthodoxall or catechisticall answere to this interrogation Why doe you belieue the doctrine of the Trinity to be a diuine reuelation is because the Church proposeth it to me for such Hee that admits this answere for sound and Catholike and yet denies the Churches proposall to bee the true and proper cause of his beliefe in the former point hath smothered doubtlesse the light of nature by admitting too much artificiall subtlety into his braines For if a man should aske why do you belieue there is a fire in yonder house and answere were made Because I see the smoake go out of the Chimney should the party thus answering in good earnest peremptorily deny the sight of the smoake to bee the cause of his beleefe there was a fire hee deserued very well to haue eyther his tongue scorched with the one or his eyes put out with the other Albeit if wee speake of the things themselues not of his beliefe concerning them the fire was the true cause of the smoake not the smoake of the fire But whatsoeuer it be Cause Condition Circumstance or Effect that truly satisficeth this demand Why doe you belieue this or that it is a true and proper cause of our beleefe though not of the thing beleeued If then we admit the Churches proposall to bee but a condition annexed to diuine reuelations yet if it bee an infallible medium or meane or as our aduersaries all agree the only mean infallible whereby we can rightly beleeue this or that to be a diuine reuelation it is the true and only infallible cause of our beleefe That speech of Valentian which to any ordinary mans capacity includes as much as we now say was before alleadged That Scripture which is commended and expounded vnto vs by the Church is eo ipso euen for this reason most authentike and cleare He could not more emphatically haue expressed the Churches proposall to be the true and prime cause why particular or determinate diuine reuelations become so credible vnto vs. His second Sacroboscus hath many speeches to be inserted hereafter to the same effect Amongst others where Doctor Whittaker obiects that the principall cause of faith is by Papists ascribed vnto the Church he denyes it onely thus far What we beleeue
for the Churches proposall we iointly beleeue for God speaking eyther in his written word or by tradition Yet if a man should haue asked him why he did or how possibly hee could infallibly beleeue that God did speake all the words eyther contayned in the Bible or in their traditions he must haue giuen eyther a womans answere because God spâ—ke them or this because our holy mother the Church doth say so For elsewhere he plainly auowes the Bookes of Canonicall Scripture need not be beleeued without the Churches proposall whose infallible authority was sufficiently knowne before one title of the New Testament was written and were to be acknowledged though it had neuer beene hee plainly confesseth withall that hee could not beleeue the Scriptures taught some principall Articles of faith most firmely beleeued by him vnlesse the churches authoritie did thereto moue him against the light of naturall reason Now if for the churches proposall hee beleeue that which otherwise to beleeue he had no reason at al but rather strong inducements to the contrarie as stedfastly as any other truth the Churches infallibilitie must be the true and only cause both why he beleeues the mystery proposed and distrusts the naturall dictates of his conscience to the contrary In fine hee doth not beleeue there is a Trinitie for in that Article is his instance because God hath said it but hee beleeues that God hath said it because his infallible Mother the Church doth teach it This is the misery of miseries that these Apostates should so bewitch the World as to make it thinke they beleeue the Church because God speakes by it when it is euident they doe not beleeue God but for the Churches testimonie well content to pretend his authority that her own may seeme more soueraigne Thus make they their superstitious groundlesse magical faith but as a wrench to wrest that principle of nature Whatsoeuer God saith is true to countenance any villany they can imagine as will better appeare hereafter But first the Reader must be content to be informed that by some of their tenents the same Diuine reuelations may be assented vnto by the Habite either of Theologie or of faith both which are most certaine but herein different That the former is discursiue and resembles science properly so called the latter not so but rather like vnto that habite or faculty by which we perceiue the truth of generall Maximes or vnto our bodily sight which sees diuers visibles all immediately not one after or by another Whilst some of them dispute against the certainty of priuate spirits their aguments suppose Diuine reuelations must be beleeued by the Habite of Theology which is as a sword to offend vs. Whiles we assault them and vrge the vnstabilitie of their resolutions they fly vnto the non discursiue Habite of faith infused as their best buckler to ward such blowes as the Habite of Theologie cannot beare off 6 Not heere to dispute eyther how truly or pertinently they denie faith infused to be a discursiue habite the Logicall Reader need not I hope my admonition to obserue that faith or beleefe whether habituall or actuall vnlesse discursiue cannot possibly bee resolued into any praeexistent Maxime or principle From which grant this emolument will arise vnto our cause that the Churches authoritie cannot be proued by any diuine reuelation or portion of Scripture seeing it is an Article of faith and must be beleeued eodem intuitu with that Scripture or part of Gods word whether written or vnwritten that teacheth it as light and colours are perceiued by one and the same intuition in the same instant And by this assertion we could not so properly say wee beleeue the diuine reuelation because we beleeue the church nor doe we see colours because we see the light but wee may truly say that the obiects of our faith diuine reuelations are therefore actually credible or worthy of beleefe because the infallible Church doth illustrate or propose them as the light doth make colours though invisible by night visible by day This similitude of the light and colours is not mine but Sacroboscus whom in the point in hand I most mention because Doctor Whittakers Obiections against their Churches Doctrine as it hath beene deliuered by Bellarmine and other late controuersers hath enforced him clearely to vnfold what Bellarmine Stapelton and Valentian left vnexpressed but is implicitely included in all their writings But ere we come to examine the ful incoÌ„ueniences of their opinions I must request the Reader to obserue that as oft as they mention resolution of faith they meane the discursiue habite of Theologie For al resolution of beleefe or knowledge essentially includes discourse And Bellarmine directly makes Sacroboscus expressely auoucheth the Churches authority the medius terminus or true cause whence determinate conclusions of faith are gathered From which and other equiualent assertions acknowledged by all the Romanists this day liuing it will appeare that Valentian was eyther very ignorant himselfe or presumed hee had to deale with very ignorant aduersaries when he denyed that the last resolution of Catholique faith was into the Churches authoritie which comes next in place to be examined CHAP. III. Discouering eyther the grosse ignorance or notorious craft of the Iesuite in denying his faith is finally resolued into the Churches veracity or infallibility that possibly it cannot bee resolued into any branch of the first truth 1 IT were a foolish question as Caietan sayeth Valentian hath well obserued if one should aske another why he beleeues the first truth reuealing For the assent of faith is finally resolued into the first truth It may bee Caietan was better minded towardes Truth it selfe first or secondary then this Iesuite was which vsed his authority to colour his former rotten position That the Churches proposall by their doctrine is not the cause of faith but our former distinction betweene belief it selfe it obiect often confounded or between Gods word indefinitely and determinately taken if well obserued will euince this last reason to be as foolish as the former assertion was false No man sayeth he can giue any reason besides the infallibility of the Reuealer why hee beleeues a diuine Reuelation It is true no man can giue nor would any aske why wee beleeue that which wee are fully perswaded as a diuine Reuelation But yet a reason by their positions must bee giuen why we beleeue eyther this or that truth any particular or determinat portion of Scripture to be a diuine reuelation Wherefore seeing Christian faith is alwayes of definite and particular propositions or conclusions and as Bellarmine sayeth and all the Papists must say these cannot be known but by the Church As her infallible proposall is the true and proper cause why wee belieue them to bee infallibly true because the onely cause whereby wee can belieue them to bee diuine reuelations so must it bee the essentiall principle into which our assent or