Selected quad for the lemma: tradition_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
tradition_n	faith_n	scripture_n	write_v	3,423	5	6.0492	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09434	A godlie and learned exposition upon the whole epistle of Iude, containing threescore and sixe sermons preached in Cambridge by that reverend and faithfull man of God, Master William Perkins, and now at the request of his executors, published by Thomas Taylor, preacher of Gods word ; whereunto is prefixed a large analysis, containing the summe and order of the whole booke, according to the authors owne method, to which are further added, foure briefe tables to direct the reader ...	Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Taylor, Thomas.	1606 (1606)	STC 19724.3; ESTC S100865	274,393	200

was the seuenth from Adam Here two questions are to bee answered first whence had Iude this historie seeing it is no where recorded in the Scriptures and how knew he it to be Enochs I answere two waies first he either had it and learned it to bee his by some tradition which went from hand to hand or else written by some Iew or secondly he learned it out of some booke which went vnder Enochs name then extant in the daies of the Apostles though now lost it is certaine that one of these waies hee had it Hence the Papists gather that the Iewes had vnwritten traditions and consequently all their traditions are to be obserued Ans. We denie not all vnwritten traditions of which some are true and profitable but wee renounce and denie all those traditions which are made articles of faith rules of Gods worship necessarie to saluation for all such doctrines are written in the books of the Prophets and Apostles which containe perfect direction and rules concerning faith manners of which kind the Romane Church holdeth their traditions to be this is of another kind it being no article of faith nor necessary to saluation to knowe whether Enoch writ this prophecie or no. Againe from the second answere others who are no Papists conclude that some bookes of Canonicall Scripture are perished and lost But this is vntrue for then first the fidelitie of the Church which is the keeper of these Oracles should be called in question and secondly in the bookes Canonicall extant not one sentence or tittle no not the sense of any sentence is lost how then should whole bookes come to be lost It is alleaged that the books of Salomon are most of them lost Answ. The bookes of Salomon which were lost were bookes of humanitie and Philosophie for hee writ of all beasts birds trees euen from the Cedar in Libanus to the hyssop vpon the wall the books of humane truth might faile but no part of Canonicall Scripture Ob. Mention is made in the Scripture of the bookes of the Chronicles of the Iewes or Kings of Iudah but these are perished Ans. They were politique histories as are the Chronicles of England or other Countries Ob. The bookes of Nathan Gad Idd● Shemaiah and other Prophets are perished Ans. All these as is though by the learned are contained in the bookes of the Kings Chronicles and Samuel Ob. This book of Enoch is lost Ans. First it is doubted whether it was a booke or no or went by a tradition Secondly if it was a booke it was no part of Scripture for Moses was the first penman of Scripture who liued long after Enoch The second question why doth the Apostle make choise of this testimonie of Enoch rather than some other Prophet Answ. Himselfe giueth two reasons First he was the seuenth from Adam it is therefore an ancient testimonie to be receiued and reuerenced for the antiquitie but withall it sheweth what is true antiquitie namely when a doctrine of religion can bee prooued from some Prophet or Apostle for this testimonie was a prophecie and therefore that antiquitie which the Church of Rome challengeth to her religion and doctrine is but counterfeit because they are not able to iustifie the maine pointes thereof from any Prophet or Apostle yea in these wherein they dissent from vs they cannot bring their proofe and descent from within the first hundred yeeres after Christ. It is then a vaine plea and false pretence of them to boast of the antiquitie of their religion The second reason is in the word prophecied for Enoch spoke not this of his owne head or motion but from God for no creature Angell or man can foretell things to come it being a prerogatiue properly belonging vnto God Ob. Yes but the learned Physition can truely foretell the death of the patient to come Ans. He doth not properly herein foretell a thing to come for the death of the partie is present in the signes and causes of it Ob. But the Diuell could foretell Sauls death 1. Sam. 28.19 To morow shalt thou be with me and thy sonnes Ans. The Diuell could not properly foretell it but might see it in the causes and signes Againe hee might speake so to Saule because God had made him an instrument for the execution of that iudgement and destruction so as God only properly foretelleth that which is simply to come and no man or Angell The second point is the testimonie it selfe Behold the Lord commeth c. In which obserue three points first the comming of the Lord secondly the iudgement of the Lord thirdly the cause of it in the 15. verse To giue iudgement against al men c. First of the party comming Behold the Lord commeth Where the Apostle speaketh in the time present which is put for the time to come which forme of speech sheweth the certaintie of Christs comming to iudgement who shall as certeinly come as if he were now alreadie comming Concerning which certaintie it may be demaunded first whence commeth this comming of Christ to be so certaine Ans. From the vnchangeable will of God which hath certainly decreed the same For he hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnes And thus are all other the articles of our faith most certaine in that they are grounded on the vnchangeable will and word of God Secondly how or from whence may we know this will of God to be so certaine Ans. From the manner of propounding the doctrine of it wherein the euidence of the spirit plainly appeareth saying peremptorily the Lord commeth euidently expressing the certaintie as if it were now present And the same may be spoken of the whole scripture which in it selfe is most sure and certain because it is the most vnchangeable will of God but how do we know it so to be will some say I answere by the euidence of the spirit the authoritie puritie maiestie effect and ends of the doctrine it neede not seeke euidence elsewhere than from it selfe not from man or the Church it selfe The Romish Church confesseth it is of it selfe and in it selfe sufficiently certaine but not to me or thee except the Church say so but this is a false position The Scripture is certaine both in it selfe and vnto vs and we know it so to be though neuer a man would acknowledge it the heart seasoned with grace will make the mouth confesse it Secondly the Apostle speaking in this forme he commeth for he will come wee learne to set before our eyes the comming of the Lord Iesus to iudgement and to make account of euery present day as the day of his comming the Scriptures euery where commend watchfulnes vnto vs which is to do nothing else but to make reckoning continually of this day But some will say we cannot make account daily of it for we see it commeth not neither may we enquire into the time of it Answ. Although wee cannot exactly

him such princely gifts as it is said God gaue him another heart his heart was changed in regard of other gifts than formerly he had so when Dauid was annoynted King and when Samuel had powred the horne of oyle vpon his head it is said 1. Sam. 16.13 that the spirit of the Lord came vpon him which furnished him with gifts and graces both of regeneration and regiment also In like manner the Lord tooke of the spirit of Moses and put it on the seuenty Elders Numb 11.17 whereby they were furnished with gifts of gouernment and enabled to beare rule and iudge iustly as Moses was such titles therefore as these are not ascribed vnto them without iust cause Yea how can they be fitlier called than Glories seeing there is no greater glorie in earth than to supplie Gods roome and to bee enabled with gifts for the sufficient discharge of it Hence learne that it is lawfull for Princes to beare an outward pompe in diet buildings costly apparell and troopes of men for they are dignities and their dignitie being outward in regard of men they may maintaine it by outward pompe to procure more reuerence and awe of men thereunto So Agrippa and Bernice came with great pompe and entred into the common hall which pompe is not there discommended but rather approued as by the circumstances of the text appeareth Secondly Magistrates ought especially to honour God because he especially honoureth them this must they doe by discountenancing and punishing vice and by setting vp and maintaining true religion and vertue Thirdly being in Gods place they are to execute iustice without corruption or partialitie in the face and feare of God 2. Chro. 9.7 Seeing the iudgement is the Lords let the feare of God bee vpon you take heede and doe it Deut. 1.17 Ye shall haue no respect of persons in iudgement but shall heare the small as well as the great ye shall not feare the face of man for the iudgement is Gods and herein stands a great part of their glorie Fourthly we are in all lawfull things to yeeld free subiection and obedience vnto our Magistrates and gouernours euen as vnto God himselfe whose roome they are in which duty the child oweth also to his father the seruant to his Master because they also are set ouer them in Gods stead Fifthly hence also is it lawfull for vs to giue to Princes the titles of Maiestie and Grace because it hath pleased the holy Ghost to ascribe them vnto them and by their titles to commend their persons and places vnto vs yea and to furnish them with such gifts of Magistracie as that they become not onely naked titles but iust significations of the true honour which God hath graced them withall Vers. 9. Yet Michael the Archangell when he stroue against the Diuell and disputed about the bodie of Moses durst not blame him with cursed speaking but said The Lord rebuke thee IN this verse is laid downe another reason amplifying their sin of these seducers by a comparison from the greater to the lesse and thus it standeth Michael the Archangell durst not so much as raile on the Diuell himselfe much lesse may these vpon Magistrates who are Gods and consequently their sinne is hainous who dare open their mouthes to reuile Princes and Magistrates Here one question is mooued namely whence the Apostle had this historie of the disputation betweene Michael and the Diuell concerning the bodie of Moses seeing it is not to bee found in the Scriptures I answere the substance of it is in the Scripture although though not the circumstances For in Deut. 34.6 is said that the Lord buried Moses but no man knoweth of his sepulchre till this day There is the ground of the historie the other particular concerning the contention of the Archangell and the Diuell wi●h this manner of rebuking is not found in the old Testament Quest. Where then had he this Ans. Either from some booke then extant among the Iewes which is not now to bee found or else from some tradition which passed amōg the Iewes from hand to hand as many things did as that 2. Timot. 3.8 where the Apostle saith that Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses the historie of which is not found in the old Testament Hence the Papists conclude that the word written is not sufficient and perfect in and of it selfe vnlesse the vnwritten word be added vnto it that is that word which is giuen by tradition both which say they make a perfect word but neither is perfect or sufficient alone grounding their opinion hence that Iude alleageth an example out of a tradition which is not found in Scripture But that is an hereticall doctrine and vntrue seeing the perfection of a thing is not to bee measured by euery thing that is wanting vnto it but by the perfect end of it for perfection is taken from the end Whence I reason thus If the written word be perfect and sufficient to the end to which it is ordained it is euery way perfect But it is perfect and sufficient to that end namely to the glorie of God in working out perfectly the faith saluation of man and is in nothing wanting for the atchieuing of this end but sufficiently teacheth all things to be beleeued and done and giueth perfect direction concerning faith and manners Ioh. 20.31 These things are written that they might beleeue and beleeuing might haue life thorough his name Rom. 15.4 Whatsoeuer things are written are written for our learning that wee through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope and therefore the word written is euery way most sufficient and absolutely perfect and neede no addition or tradition to helpe forward this end Ob. This place is a tradition and not written and many other true traditions were neuer written besides that the Church may make traditions Ans. We grant many true traditions are not in Scripture but such they are as a man may be ignorant of and not preiudice his saluation Againe the Church hath a power and hath had priuiledge to make constitutions and lawes which were to be knowne and receiued but these are such as only concerne the orderly gouernment of the Church and are not necessarie to saluation Ob. But some traditions are necessarie to saluation which are not contained in the written word and they alleage two first in Rom. 12.6 that Gods word must be tried by the rule of faith and so also by the same rule expounded This rule of faith is nothing else by their exposition but a general consent in the hearts of all true Catholikes together with the Pope assenting with them which of necessitie wee must beleeue and yet say they it is not in the Scripture and therefore some things must of necessitie bee beleeued which are not in the Scripture Ans. The rule of faith is not such a crooked rule as they would thrust vpon the world by their wicked exposition but the right rule of faith

is the plaine word of God euery way absolutely directing in all points of faith and loue 2. Tim. ● 5 Paul wisheth Timothy to keepe the true patterne of wholesome words in faith and loue which is nothing else but the testimonie of Scripture in points of faith and loue comprised in the Decalogue and Apostles Creede The rule of faith therefore in expounding Scripture is Scripture it selfe The second thing necessarie by their doctrine to be beleeued not contained in Scripture is that the Canonical Scripture is Gods word which truth is absolutely necessarie to saluation to be beleeued but cannot otherwise bee knowne or beleeued but onely by the tradition of the Church Ans. As euery other Arte and Science hath certaine principles of truth to proue all other precepts by but themselues are to bee prooued by none so also hath Diuinity the chiefe of al other Sciences of which kinde this is one principle that Canonicall Scripture is Gods word which not granted inferreth a destruction of all other diuine rules this is a truth therefore confirmed not a thing testified from some other but as a ground of it selfe Secondly in diuine matters saith goeth before knowledge which in humane things is cleane contrarie for if a man would know whether fire bee hot let him put his hand vnto it he shall haue experience of it and then he shall beleeue it but in diuine things first a man giueth credit and yeeldeth consent to the word and then hath experimentall knowledge for although faith hath his knowledge yet experimentall knowledge followeth faith Abraham beleeued aboue hope here faith went before knowledge Ioh. 7.27 If ye do the will of my Father yee shall know whether the doctrine bee of God nor no. Thus then we may conceiue it the tenour of the word of God is this Thus saith the Lord. If the question now be whether the Lord said thus or no I answere to beleeue the Church herein before God is sacriledge but herein we are first to yeeld assent vnto God and then after this experimentall knowledge will follow that Canonicall Scripture is the word of God Thirdly wee know that Scripture is Gods word by Scripture and not by the Church out of which being in humilitie taught and acquainted with the excellent matter of it and manner of writing the end the glorie of God and our owne saluation wee cannot but haue sufficient perswasion of the author of it and that it can proceede from none other but God himselfe Thus notwithstanding the allegations of the aduersaries the written word retaineth that perfection which needeth no tradition to strengthen or further it in that end to which it is appointed Now to the reason it selfe amplifying this sinne in this verse which containeth three points to be considered First the person that durst not raile Secondly the goodnes of his cause which was very iust and yet he durst not raile vpon the Diuell himselfe Thirdly the manner of his speech The Lord rebuke thee The person that durst not raile was Michael the Archangell whom some affirme to bee Christ himselfe others that he is some chiefe arch and principall Angel which opinion is more probable For first the Apostle speaketh of him as one in subiection and standing in awe not daring to breake the law of God for he durst not reuile the Diuell Secondly in 1. Thess. 4.16 The Lord Christ shall come to iudgement with the sound of a Trumpet and the voyce of an Archangell where is a plaine distinction betweene Christ who should come in the clowdes and the Archangell Thirdly Peter explaineth it speaking the same thing and saith The Angels giue not railing iudgement against them 2. Pet. 2.11 It is more probable then that by Michael was meant a principall Angell rather than Christ. Doctr. First from the person wee learne that there be distinctions and degrees of Angels there bee Angels and an Archangell Quest. Is there but one Archangell Ans. The Scripture speaking of Archangels vseth alwaies the singular number neuer mentioning more than one and where the Scripture resolueth not we are not to determine yet I condemne not those who haue probably held that there are more than one Secondly wee haue here an example of Angelicall meeknes and modestie Tit. 3.1 Put them in remembrance that they bee subiect to principalitie and speake euill of no man but shew all meeknes vnto all 〈◊〉 the contrarie practise of railing slandering and obtrecting is a propertie of the Diuell whence he hath his name Reu. 12.10 the Accuser of the brethren and the Aduersarie 2. Pet. 5 8. who is euer readie with one accusation or other to stand vp against euery man the malitious man whose malice caused him to stand vp against Iob and falsely accuse him of hypocrisie vnto Gods own face Let slanderers and backbiters of their brethren see hence whom they imitate and most liuely resemble Secondly consider the goodnesse of Michaels cause which was this It was the wil of God that Moses body should be buried in a secret place vnknown to any man to preuent and auoid al occasion of superstition and Idolatrie amōg the Iewes The Diuell on the contrarie would discouer it that so the Israelites might fall to Idolatrie before it herein the Archangell resisted him and stroue with him for the performance of the will of God and the maintenance of his true worship and yet in this good cause Michael durst not reuile the Diuel himselfe In this cause consider two things First the fight and contention betweene Michael and the Diuell Secondly the cause and occasion of it about Moses bodie In the former wee may obserue that there is a sharp and serious contention betweene good and bad Angels in which the good Angels labour to defend all that are in Christ against the rage and furie of the Diuell and his angels As Psal. 34.8 The Angels of the Lord pitch their tents round about those that feare him And on the contrarie the Diuell and wicked spirits cast about how to destroy the bodies and soules of men 1. Pet. 5. Our aduersarie the Diuell goeth about continually seeking whom he can deuoure This combat concerneth and is conuersant about either first the persons or secondly the societies of men The fight about the persons concerneth either infants or men of yeres First for infants the Diuell seeketh how to spoyle and destroy them especially those of elect and faithfull parents in regard of their weaknes and tendernes both of minde and bodie but the Angels of the Lord haue charge giuen thē to defend them against this malice of Satan As Psal. 91.12 They shall beare thee vp in their armes that is they shall bee as nurces to beare them in their armes preseruing them from danger Mat. 18.10 Despise not one of these little ones for their Angels alwaies behold the face of my father which is in heauen Secondly concerning men of yeeres the diuell and his angels striue to driue them out

the same Cant. 3. ● 〈◊〉 Christ where she shal be sure of him and not mi●●e of finding him in her necessitie he maketh answere she shall be sure of him in the Te●●s of shepheards Whence may bee truly concluded that neither are the assemblies of Turkes nor Heretikes the Churches of God because they fight against the truth neither is the Church of Rome a true Church of God because the truth of doctrine is for substance reuersed amongst them As also we may be confirmed that our Churches are the true Churches of Christ by this infallible note A Register is known by his Records so our Church is known to be Gods Register because it keepeth faithfully the records of the Prophets and Apostles Secondly that it stands vs in hand to whom this treasure is now committed so faithfully to keepe it that it be not taken from vs and giuen to others who will keepe it better which we shall do by making this vse of it that wee bring foorth the fruites of it in amendement of life else our vnthankfulnes shall iustly bereaue vs of it Concerning that circumstance in the text once giuen and not often it may b●are a double sense first it was giuen a● wee say once for all that is perfectly sufficiently as neuer after needing any alteration or addition Whence wee note first that all reuelations in matter of saluation and religion giuen since are friuolous and superstitious for there is but one edition of true faith and no 〈◊〉 edition of Reuelation besides or without the word such as the Papists haue deuised to confirme their Purgatorie prayer and almes for the dead Masse c. seeing all necessarie doctrine to saluation was once giuen perfectly Secondly that all Church traditions in matter of religion and doctrine of saluation are meere prophanations of true doctrine and argue it to bee vnperfect as those of the Masse of receiuing the Communion in one kind of the Popes supremacie of workes of satisfaction and many moe Secondly it may bee thus vnderstood Once giuen to the Saints that is not in writing but in the hearts of the Saints when they are truly enlightened and therefore if after enlightening it bee quite lost it is not giuen the second time and consequently cannot be recouered Heb. 6.4 If a man who hath bin once enlightened and tasted of the good word of God fall away it is impossible th●● he should be renewed againe by repentance From which wee must learne to beware of Apostasie and falling from the faith yea and of al steps and degrees leading thereunto as of declining from our grounds of religion for better 〈◊〉 it been for vs neuer to haue knowne the way of truth than after the knowledge of it to forsake the holy Commaundement 2. Pet. 2.22 Which is the more to bee remembred because religion hath been more cherished than now it is and the declining from it a great deale lesse If it be asked how may wee preuent Apostasie I answer neuer call any ground into question Here Cyprians rule is to be learned that diuine matters admit no deliberation The third point of the Exhortation is the office of the Church of God and euery member of it and that is to maintaine yea to fight for the maintenance of this ●reasure and this is not a bodilie fight by strength of arme or bow but a spirituall fight by spiritual duties which euery member of the Church must take vp and namely by foure duties First by doctrine for euery man in his place and calling must be a Prophet as Ioel 2.28 and must teach all vnder him the father must teach the children the Master his seruants and thus keepe out Satan and al Satani●●● doctrines Secondly by confession euery man being called must stand against the ga●es of hell by constant witnessing of the ●ruth ● Pet. 3.15 Sanctifie God in your hearts and be ready alwaies to giue an account of the 〈◊〉 that is in you Thirdly by example of a good life and vnblameable sutable to the doctrine Philip. 2.15 This maketh men shine as lights in the world Fourthly by prayer that the Lord would send forth labourers into his haruest to withstand al false doctrines and heresies that so the faith and religion wherewith hee hath honoured vs these many yeeres may bee maintained vnto vs and continued vnto ours for euer Vers. 4. For there are certain men crep● in which were of old before ordained to this condemnation vngodly men they are which turne the grace of our God into 〈…〉 and denie God the onely Lord and our Lord Iesus Christ. HEre the Apostle proceedeth to confirme his exhortation by a reason drawne from the state of the Church in his time and it is thus briefly framed There bee certaine men which secretly seeke to vndermine and ouerthrow the faith therefore you ought the more earnestly to contend for it And that these aduersaries lurking amōgst them might the better bee descried hee describeth them by fiue seuerall adiuncts first by their hypocrisie in creeping in Secondly by their estate before God they are of old ordained to this condemnatiō Thirdly by their religion vngodly men they are Fourthly by their doctrine they turne the grace of our God into wantonnes Fiftly by their liues they denie the onely Lord. For the first There are certaine men crept in That is there be men who secretly haue insinuated themselues into your societies professing themselues to be teachers of the true faith but are indeede the destroyers and disturbe●s of it In which words two sins are la●d to their charge first that they cunningly ioyned themselues vnto the Church pretending themselues to be the seruants of Christ and of the Church and yet were enemies to both Here marke the subtiltie of Satan who causeth prophane men to ioyne themselues to the societies of the Saints that by this meanes mingling his instruments with the members of the Church he may by degrees corrupt the faith and ouerthrow the Church The Parable Matth. 13. sheweth that wheresoeuer the good husbandman soweth his good seede this malicious man scattereth his tares In Abrahams house shal be an Ismael in Isaaks an Esau in the Arke a cursed Cham in Christs familie a Iudas In the Primitiue Church the diuell raised vp of all sorts of Heretikes great numbers In our owne Church the Diuell stirreth vp daily troopes of Atheists and Papists to the corrupting and deprauing of true faith and Religion Vse First wee must not take offence when we see vngodly men in the Church much lesse cut our selues from it by separation but rather conceiue of the policie of Satan who for the hindrance of the faith thrusteth them in When the Israelites entred into the land of Canaan they must not dwell alone but be mingled with the Cananites the enemies of the Church least y● land being too much dispeopled wild beasts should preuaile and deuoure the people of God So the Lord ordering the malice of Satan to