Selected quad for the lemma: tradition_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
tradition_n	faith_n	find_v	scripture_n	1,889	5	5.9425	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A53704	An enquiry into the original, nature, institution, power, order and communion of evangelical churches. The first part with an answer to the discourse of the unreasonableness of separation written by Dr. Edward Stillingfleet, Dean of Pauls, and in defence of the vindication of non-conformists from the guilt of schisme / by John Owen.	Owen, John, 1616-1683.	1681 (1681)	Wing O764; ESTC R4153	262,205	445

Instance in the Primitive Churches That which is first in any kind gives the Measure of what follows in the same kind and Light into the Nature of them Whereas therefore the Schisme that was among the Churches about the Observation of Easter was the first that fell out unto the Disturbance of their Communion I shall give a breif account of it as far as the Question in hand is concerned in it It is evident that the Apostles did with care and diligence teach the Doctrine of Christian Liberty warning the Disciples to stand fast in it and not submit their Necks unto any Yoke of Bondage in the things of the Worship of God especially the Apostle Paul had frequent Occasions to treat of this subject And what they taught in Doctrine they established and confirmed in their Practice For they enjoyned nothing to be observed in the Church but what was necessary and what they had the Command of Christ for leaving the Observation of things indifferent unto their Original Indifferency But whereas they had decreed by the Direction of the Holy Ghost some necessary Condescensions in the Gentile Believers towards the Jews in case of Offence or Scandal they did themselves make use of their Liberty to comply with the same Jews in some of their Observances not yet unlawful Hereon there ensued in several Churches different Observations of some Rites and Customes which they apprehended were countenanced by the Practise of the Apostles at least as it had been reported unto them For immediately after the Decease of the Apostles very many Mistakes and Vntruths were reported concerning what they said did and practised which some diligently collected from Old Men it may be almost delirant as Eusebius gives an Instance in Papias lib. 3. cap. 36. And even the great Irenaeus himself was imposed upon in a Matter directly contrary to the Scripture under a Pretence of Apostolical Tradition Among those Reports was that of the Observation of Easter And for a while the Churches continued in these different Observances without the least disturbance of their Communion each one following that which it thought the most probable Tradition for Rule of Scripture they pretended not unto But after a while they began to fall into a Contest about these things which began at Laodicea which Church was as likely to strive about such things as any other For Eusebius tells us that Melito the Bishop of Sardis wrote two Books about Easter beginning the first with an Account that he wrote them when Servilius Paulus was Proconsul there being then a great stir about it at Laodicea Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 25. But as it falls out on such Occasions much talk and disputing ensuing thereon the differences were encreased until one side or Party at Variance would make their Opinion and Practise the Rule and Terms of Communion unto all other Churches But this was quickly condemned by those who were Wise and Sober For as Zozoman affirmes they accounted it a frivolous or foolish thing to differ about a Custom whereas they agreed in all the principal Heads of Religion And thereon he gives a large Account of different Rites and Observances in many Churches without any breach of Communion among them adding that besides those enumerated by him there were many others in Cities and Villages which they did in a different manner adhere unto Hist. lib. 7. cap. 19. At length this Matter fell into the handling of Victor Bishop of Rome And his Judgment was that the Observation of Easter on the Lords Day and not on the fourteenth day of the first Month precisely according to the Computation of the Jews in the Observation of the Passover was to be imposed on all the Churches of Christ every where It had all along until his time been judged a thing indifferent wherein the Churches and all Believers were left unto the use of their own Liberty He had no pretence of any Divine Institution making it necessary the Writers of those days constantly affirming that the Apostles made no Canons Rules or Laws about such things He had Persons of as great Worth as any in the World as Melito Polycrates Polycarpus that opposed him not only as unto the Imposition of his Practice on others but as unto his Error as they judged in the Matter of Fact and Right Yet all this could not hinder but that he would needs have the Reputation of the Father of Schismes among the Churches of Christ by his Impositions and cut off all the Asian Churches from Communion declaring them and their Members Excommunicate Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 23. The Noise hereof coming abroad unto other Churches great Offence was taken at it by many of them and Victor was roundly dealt withal by sundry of them who agreed with him in Practise but abhorred his Imposition of it and making it a Condition of Church Communion Among those who so opposed and rebuked him Irenaeus was the most Eminent And I shall observe some few things out of the Fragment of his Epistle as it is recorded by Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 23. And 1. He tells us that he wrote unto Victor in the name of those Brethren in France whom he did preside amongst The Custom of considering things of this Nature with all the Brethren of the Church and writing their Determination in their Name was not yet grown out of use though the Practise of it now would be esteemed Novel and Schismatical 2. He tells Victor that there were great varieties in this thing as also in the Times and Seasons of Fasting which did not saith he begin or arise in our days but long before was introduced by such who being in Places of Rule rejected and changed the common and simple Customs which the Church had before The Dr. therefore need not think it so strange that an Alteration in Church Order and Rule should fall out in after Ages when long before Irenaeus's time such Changes were begun 3. He gives hereon that excellent Rule 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Difference of Fastings and consequently things of an alike Nature commends the Concord or Agreement of Faith This was the first Effect of a Departure from the only Rule of Unity and Communion among the Churches which was given by Christ himself and his Apostles As hereby great Confusion and Disorder was brought upon the Churches so it was the first publick inroad that was made on the Doctrine of the Scripture concerning Christian Liberty And as it was also the first Instance of rejecting Men otherwise found in the Faith from Communion for Non-Conformity or the Non-Observance of Humane Institutions or Traditions which had therein an unhappy Consecration unto the use of future Ages so it was the first notorious Entrance into that Usurpation of Power in the Roman Bishops which they carried on by degrees unto an absolute Tyranny Neither was there ever a more pernitious Maxime broached in the Primitive Times nor which had a more effectual Influence into the Ruine