not distinguished in the same manner as the two Books of Kings and of Chronicles are and it is no wonder that a Book begun by Samuel and continued by other Prophets should bear the Name only of Samuel From 1 Chron. xxix 29. we may likewise learn that the beginning of the First Book of Kings must be written by one of these Prophets Both the Books of Kings as far as Hezekiah's Reign were written before Josiah's time for 2 Kin. 18.5 it is said of Hezekiah That he trusted in the Lord God of Israel so that after him was none like him of all the kings of Judah nor any that were before him And of Josiah it is said 2 King xxiii 25. That like unto him was there no king before him that turned to the Lord with all his heart c. For it is evident that Josiah in his Reformation exceeded Hezekiah and from hence it appears that the History of Hezekiah must be written before Josiah's time or else it could not have been with truth said of Hezekiah That there was no King after him who was like him or equalled him of all the Kings of Judah From 1 Chron. iv 43. it appears that it was written before the Captivity though the Genealogies were transcribed afterwards out of the Records as we learn from 1 Chron. ix 1. That the Second Book of Chronicles as well as the First Book of Kings was written before the Captivity we may conclude from 2 Chron. v. 9. 1 King viii 8. for the Ark was not remaining after the Captivity The last Chapter of the Second Book of Kings gives so particular an account of the manner of carrying them away Captive in every material circumstance that it seems to have been written at that very time and is an argument that Memorirs were constantly taken and preserved of all that happened The Second Book of Chronicles concludes with the First Year of Cyrus in the same words with which the Book of Ezra begins being added by him at the time when Cyrus gave out his Proclamation for the Prophets from time to time made Continuations to the Histories of their Predecessors by inserting what related to their own Times and it was no unusual thing among the Ancients as Grotius observes to begin one Book with the Conclusion of another The Psalms are quoted under the Title of the Prophets Mat. xiii 35 xxvii 35. and from the first penning they were used in the Publick Service of God 1 Chron. xvi 7. 2 Chron. v. 13. vii 6. xx 21. Jer. xxxiii 11. Ezra iii. 10 11. This was known even to their Enemies in their Captivity Psal cxxxvii 3. and some of them were written by the Prophets under it And Lessons out of the Law and the Prophets with Hymns out of the Psalms and Prayers made up the Jewish Form of Worship Moses and the Prophets are put for the whole Old Testament Luke xvi 29. Acts xiii 15. And if both the Law and the Prophets comprehending all the Books of Scripture written before the Captivity were still extant and well known and made use of by Pious Men during all that time and the People had Copies of them or had means and opportunities of being acquainted with them as the Prophet Zechariah supposes Zech. vii 7. there is no reason to imagine that they had not sufficient knowledge of the Hebrew Tongue at their Restoration many being still alive who were first carried away Captive and the Writings of the Prophets during the Captivity shew that the People did understand it for they all wrote in the Hebrew Language except upon some particular occasions where their Prophecies more immediately concerned the Babylonian Affairs Both Men and Women could understand Ezra when he read the Law And the ears of all the people were attentive unto the book of the law Neh. viii 3. And it was not the Language unless in some Particulars which in all Languages will want explication to the Vulgar who are Natives but the Sence and Meaning that was interpreted ver 7 8. And in the same manner the Letter of Artaxerxes was both written in the Syrian tongue and interpreted in the Syrian tongue Ezra iv 7. Nehemiah particularly complains that the Children of those who had married strange Wives could not speak in the Jews language which supposes that the Children of other Parents as well as the Parents themselves were taught to speak the Hebrew Tongue Neh. xiii 24. And the Decree of Ahasuerus in favour of the Jews was written unto every province according unto the writing thereof and unto every people after their language and unto the Jews according to their writing and according to their language Est viii 9. which seems to imply that the Jews still retained not only their Language but their manner of Writing it or the form and fashion of their Letters under the Captivity Not long after the Captivity the Scriptures were translated into the Greek Tongue and were dispersed into so many hands among the Jews and Proselytes that the Copies could not be destroyed either in the time of Antiochus Epiphanes or at any other time by the malice of Perscutors or any other accident And though the Jews were so fond of their Traditions as to make the Word of God of none effect by them yet they never added any Books to the Canon of Scripture in favour of those Traditions which they were so zealous for but when they had no longer any Prophets among them they durst not place any other Books in the same Rank and Authority with those which the Prophets had left behind them All the Canonical Books were written by Inspired Authors and have been in constant use among the People of the Jews in their private Houses and publick Assemblies even from the first writing them for they were preserved during the Captivity and both understood and used by the People but their other Books written under the Second Temple though never so useful and pious were never received with the like esteem and veneration they pretended to no more than Humane Composition and were never ranked with those of Divine Authority CHAP. X. Of the Prophecies and Miracles of the Prophets THe False Prophets prophesied in the Name of Jehovah 1 King xxii which supposes that True Prophecies were wont to be deliver'd in his Name or else they could never have hoped to deceive by it And in the Historical Books of the Old Testament in which the Prophecies and Miracles of the Prophets are related reference is frequently made to the Records then extant in the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah and Israel most of the Prophecies and Miracles being of that Publick Nature and so intermix'd with the Affairs of State that they must be recorded together with them Josiah (a) Joseph Antiquit. l. 10. c. 5. was prophesied of by Name Three hundred sixty one Years before he was born Behold a child shall be born unto the house of David Josiah by name
character of a Book of the Scriptures The modern Jews in like manner never dared to pretend to new Books of Revelation but have constantly adhered to the old And what inducement could the Jews have to receive these Books into their Canon of which it consists rather than the Apocryphal Books but the evidence of their Divine Authority which is a thing more especially remarkable in some Books Why should they receive certain Books under the Names of Solomon Esther Daniel and Ezra but not admit into the Canon others going under the same names but because of the difference in their Authority Why should they receive the Books of those whom their fore-fathers had slain and those very Books for which they slew them but upon the clearest evidence It is certain they could be possest with no prejudice in their favour but with very many against the Books of such Authors To give another instance The Book of Ruth contains the affairs and transactions of a particular Family of no great consequence as one might imagine at first view and yet it has been preserved with as much â—are and as constantly received as the rest There is little reason upon human considerations why a relation concerning that Family should be inserted into the Canon of Scripture rather than one concerning any other But the lineage of the Messias is set forth in it and that was a sufficient reason why it should be inserted and therefore by the Divine Wisdom and Providence neither the emulation and envy of other Families nor any other cause or accident hindred its reception and preservation amongst the other inspired Books And in that History there is an account not very honourable for David's Family in deriving his descent from Phares of Thamar and shewing that his Great Grandmother was a Moabitess the Moabites being a people who had an indelible mark of intamy sixt upon them by the Law of Moses Dentr xxiii 3. II. As the Pentateuch was ever acknowledged by the People of Israel after their separation from the Tribe Judah so if they rejected the writings of the Prophets it must have been because all or most of them were written by Prophets who were of the two Tribes and all the Prophets of Israel owning the Temple of Jerasalem to be the true place of Worship the Isâ—aelites and Samaritans must have great prejudices against them upon that account and it cannot be expected that they should receive the Books of any of the Prophets in the same manner as they did those of Moses The Books of Samuel David and Solomon had less regard paid to them upon Reasons of State by the Tribes who followed the Revolt of Jeroboam yet when * Antiqu. Orient Eccl. pist 1. Joseph Scaliger sent to the Samaritans for the Canticles of the Book of Psalms in their Language as well as for the Book of the Law and of Joshua they promised to send him them And it is proved sufficiently by Dr †Hebr. Talmud exercit on Joh. iv 25. Lightfoot that neither the Samaritans nor the Sadducees rejected the Books of the Old Testament tho they did not admit the rest into the same veneration and authority with the Books of Moses nor read them in their Synagogues This is also proved by F. Simon * Crit. Hist V. T. lib. 1. c. 16. 29. Disquisit Crit c. 12. both of the Sadducees and the Karaei and †Epist 70. inter Antiqu Eccl. Orient Morinus likewise proves it of the Karaei who are generally taken for Sadducees F. Simon maintains the contrary and that they have wrong done them in being charged with the opinions of the Sadducces However this is not material to our present purpose since he shews that both the Sadducees and the Karaei or Caraites and all the Jews besides received the entire Volume of the Scriptures without any contradiction * Praefat. de Lipmanno Hackspan likewise has shewed that the Sadducees denied not the Authority of the Books of the Prophets III Concerning the Books whereof we we find mention made in the Old Testament either 1. They are not different from those which are now in the Canon but the same Books under divers Names Or 2. They were not written by Inspiration tho written by Prophets For we are not to suppose that the Prophets were inspired in every thing that they wrote any more than in all they spoke And this shews the care and integrity of the Jews in compiling their Canon that they would not take into it all the Writings even of the Prophets themselves but only such as they knew to be written by them as Prophets that is by Inspiration the Prophets themselves no doubt making a distinction as we find St Paul did between what they had written by the Spirit of God and that in which they had not his immediate and extraordinary direction and infallible assistance Or 3. They might not be written by Prophets For the office of Recorder or Remembrancer or Writer of Chronicles as it is explained in the Margin is mentioned as â—n office of great Honour and Trust and was distinct from that of the Prophets 2 Sam. viii â—6 2 Kings xviii 18. 2 Chron. xxxiv 8. Isaiah xxxvi 3 22. Besides the Hebrews called every small Writing a Book Thus Deut. xxiv 1. â—hat which we render a Bill of Divorcement â—s in the Original a Book of Divorcement the word being the same which Josh x. 13. and 〈◊〉 Sam. i. 18. is translated the Book of Jasher â—o Matt. xix 7. and Mark x. 4. it is in the Greek a Book of Divorcement the word is the same which the Septuagint had used it indeed may signifie a little Book but it often signifies a Book without that distinction and so it is rendered 2 Tim. iv 13. David's Letter to Joab is a Book in the Hebrew and in the Greek 2 Sam. xi 14 15. and Lettets are stiled Books by * Herod lib. 1. c. 124. lib. 6. c. 4. Herodotus Or 4. Tho it should be granted that some Books which were written by Inspiration are now lost it is no absurdity to suppose that God should suffer Writings to be lost thro the fault and negligence of men which were dictated by his Spirit Several things might by the Prophets be delivered by Revelation to the persons whom they concerned which were never committed to writing and others which were written but which were not necessary to the ends of Revelation in general but rather concerned particular times and places and the substance whereof as far as the world in general is concerned is to be found in the other Scriptures might by the carelesness of men never come to the sight and knowledge of Posterity And here I shall observe that the Books of Prophecy have always the Names of the Authors exprest and commonly they are often repeated in the Books themselves but in the Historical Books there was not the same reason for it because in matters
were kept of every Family made them have a more separate and distinct Interest in every Tribe and a more exact Account of Times and perfect Knowledge of things in every Family and therefore they were not so capable of being imposed upon in things of this nature as the People of other Nations might be where Marriages and Inheritances are promiscuous and no occasion is given for the like emulation and watchfulness over one another and where no such Remembrances and Notices of the Transactions of Affairs are to be consulted by any one of every private Family In the wilderness of Sinai on the first day of the second month in the second year after they were come out of the land of Aegypt Moses and Aaron assembled all the congregations together and they declared their pedigrees after their families by the house of their fathers according to the number of their names from twenty years old and upward by their poll Num. i. 1 18. and this was done again in the Plains of Moab at the end of Forty Years chap. xxvi And these Genealogies we preserved not only during the Captivity Ezra vii and down to the Reign of Herod but even to the time of Josephus who in his First Book against Apion says That they had the Genealogies of their Priests then still extant for two thousand Years By which means it came to pass that every Tribe had a kind of separate Interest which was the occasion of Korah's Sedition against Moses And every Man amongst their Tribes might certainly hereby know how many Generations he was removed from those who first took possession of the Land of Promise and might find the Names of his Ancestors registred who were in the Wilderness with Moses or came with Joshua over Jordan And this must make the memory of their Ancestors more dear and familiar to them and it must make them have a greater regard for any thing they had left behind them especially for a Book upon which their Rights of Inheritance and the Title they had to all they enjoyed depended This was the Deed by which they held their Estates and the Last Will and Testament as it were of their Ancestors amongst whom the Land was divided But it is certain Men are more careful of nothing than of the Writings by which they enjoy their Estates and there is no great dauger when a will is once come to the hands of the right Heir that it will be lost or salsified to his prejudice but if the Books of Moses were altered it must be upon the account of some advantage to such as must be supposed to make the Alterations and consequently to the disadvantage of others who therefore would have found themselves concerned to oppose such Alterations But as the Books of Moses were in the nature of a Deed of Settlement to every Tribe and Family so they were a Law too which all were obliged to know and observe under the severest Penalties And being so generally known and universally practised it could no more be falsified at any time since its first Promulgation than it could be now at this day For 2. Another thing which made the People of Israel less capable of being imposed upon in this matter was That they were by their Laws themselves obliged to the constant study of them they were to teach them their Children and to be continually discoursing and meditating on them to bind them for a sign upon their hand that they might be as frontlets between their eyes to teach them their children speaking of them when they sate in their houses and when they walked by the way when they lay down and when they rose up to write them upon the door-posts of their houses and upon their gates Deut. xi 18 19 20. Nothing was to be more notorious and familiar to them and accordingly they were perfectly acquainted with them and as Josephus says knew them as well as they did their own Names they had them constantly in their mouths and thousands have died in defence of them and could by no Menaces or Torments be brought to forsake or renounce them And to this end One Day in Seven was by Moses's his Law set apart for the learning and understanding of it The Jews have a Tradition That Moses appointed the Law to be read therice every Year in their publick Assemblies And Grotius (q) Grot. ad Matth. xv 2. is of this opinion However the Scripture informs us that Moses of old time had in every city them that preached him being read in the synagogues every sabbath-day Act. xv 21. It is indeed the common opinion That there were no Synagogues before the Captivity But then by Synagogues must be understood Places of Judicature rather than of Divine Worship for there is no reason to question but the Jews had their Proseuchas or Places of Prayer from the Beginning since it is incredible that those who lived at a great distance and could not come to Jerusalem on the Sabbath-days and other time of Divine Worship besides the three great Festivals when all their Males were bound to be at Jerusalem should not assemble for the Worship of God in the places where they dwelt nay they were by an express Law obliged to it on the Sabbaths The seventh day is the sabbath of rest an holy convocation ye shall do no work therein it is the sabbath of the Lord in all your dwellings Lev. xxiii 3. They must therefore have places in all their Dwellings to resort to where they held their Convocations or Assemblies and these they went to on the New Moons as well as on the sabbaths 2 King iv 23. which made the Psalmist lament that the Enemy had burnt up all the synagogues of God in the land Psal lxxiv. 8. And being met together there is as little doubt to be made but that they read the Law which was to be read by them in their Families and much more in their Publick Assemblies on their solemn Days of Divine Worship The Books of Moses therefore were â—ead in their Synagogues in every City 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from ancient Generations or from the first settlement of the Children of Israel in the Land of Canaan And then at the end of every Seven Years the Law was read in the most publick and solemn manner in the Solemnity of the Year of Release in the Feast of Tabernacles Moses wrote a Book of the Law and commanded it to be put in the side of the Ark Deut. xxxi 29. as the Two Tables of Stone were put into the Ark it self chap. x. 5. and this he delivered to the Priests and to all the Elders of Israel and commanded them saying At the end of every seven years in the solemnity of the year of release in the feast of tabernacles when all Israel is come to appear before the Lord thy God in the place which he shall choose thou shalt read this law before all Israel in their
Divine Inspiration and Authority that they wholly depended and relyed upon them and lived in an uncomfortable Exile upon the sole Hopes and Expectations of seeing the rest of their Prophecies fulfilled And theirfore the Posterity of those who had slain the Prophets had the Highest veneration for the Memory of these Prophets whom their Forefathers had killed they built and adorned their Sepulchres and chose to die any Death rather than renounce the Authority of their Books or part with them even when they had forsaken their Doctrine and changed their Religion for vain Traditions and superstitious Observances and when it was so reproachful to them to erect Monuments of perpetual acknowledgment That they were the the Children of them which killed the Prophets Matth. xxiii 31. they referred themselves to these Prophets for the Authority of their Religion and acknowledged that they had neither Prophecies nor Miracles after the Captivity CHAP. XI Of the Dependance of the several Parts of the Scriptures upon each other and that the Old Testament prove the New and the New again proves the Old as the Cause and the Effect IT is a thing altogether incredible that the Inhabitants of so small a part of the World as Judaea is should lay a Design of imposing upon the rest of Mankind which could prove so successful for so many thousand Years together and that they should be such Masters of Deceit and the World so fond of receiving Revelations from them that at last though the greatest part of that People disclaimed the Books which some few and those the most unlearned among them would impose for Inspired Writings yet the Authority of these Books should be more acknowledged in all Parts of the World than those had ever been in which they all unanimously agreed and the rest should be received for the sake of these more than ever they had been upon their own account which is the case of the Books of the Old and New Testament If the Jews even the meanest and most ignorant of them could do this merely by their own Wit and Device they must have a Genius superiour to that of all Mankind besides For what imaginable Reason is there why the Oracles of all the Heathen Nations should never be much regarded and now in a manner utterly lost and that the Books of the Jews should still be preserved in their full Authority but the power and Advantage of Truth in these and the want of it in them And the Evidence of this Truth is most observable in the mutual Dependence which all the Parts of the Scriptures have one upon another They were penn'd by Men of different Countreys different Ages different Conditions and Callings and Interests from the King to the poor Fisherman and yet all carry on the same Design They are not like the Oracles of the Heathen Gods which must stand or fall by themselves but there is an admirable Series and Connexion between all the Writings of the Holy Scriptures by which the several Parts of them give a mutual support and attestation to each other The Pentateuch and Moses contains the first Lineaments and evident Types and Prophecies of all that is contained in the rest He foretold That a succession of Prophets should arise and that at last the Great Prophet should be sent who is Christ and he foretold all that was to befall the Jews from his own time to the Destruction of Jerusalem And as Moses has given us the general State of the Jews for all Generations so the several Prophets who were sent from time to time according to his Predictions foretold particular Events and more-especially they foretold and described the Times of the Gospel This was the great Design of all Prophecies and the thing that God had spoken by the Prophets which have been since the world bigan Luk. i. 70. For in Christ was the Accomplishment of all the Types and Prophecies in the Old Testament And this Dependance and Coherence between all the Parts of the Scriptures in the Matter and Design of them which is as great as the dependance of one part of any Book written by the same Author can be upon another gives great strength and confirmation to the whole since it is an Evidence that it was all Inspired by the same Infallible Spirit and if one part of Scripture be proved to be true all must be so for besides the particular Evidence which may be brought for any part separately we must consider the Connexion which it has with the rest and the Evidence which is derived upon it by this Connexion if the Pentateuch be once proved to be of Divine Authority than the Prophets who succeeded Moses must be Divinely Inspired because he foretold the succession of such Prophets And if the Prophecies and Miracles of the Prophets were Divine the Pentateuch must be so because they all along acknowledged and appealed to it as containing God's Covenant with his People the Jews and being therefore the ground and foundation of their own Mission if Moses and the Prophets be from God the Gospel must be from him if that be foretold by them And if the Prophecies and Miracles of our Saviour and his Disciples prove their Divine Authority the Writings of Moses and the Prophets must be likewise of the same Authority because they acknowledge them for such and prove their own Authority from them as well as from the Miracles that they themselves wrought And if the Prophecies and Miracles either of Moses or of the Prophets or of our Saviour and his Apostles taken by themselves and apart from the rest be sufficient they must needs be more convincing when they are considered together in their united Force and Light I might further observe That Miracles without Prophecies or Prophecies without Miracles or that one evident Miracle or one evident Prophecy at least That either the Miracles or prophecies of some one Person in the several Ages in which so many Prophets lived would have been a sufficient ground of Faith and that therefore they must all be much rather so in conjunction But I shall only desire it may be remembred That whatever Evidence has been brought in proof of the Divine Authority of the Books of Moses and of the Prophets doth reciprocally prove both the one and the other and that therefore whatever is brought from either of them in Proof of the Gospel has the Evidence of the whole and that the Gospel in different respects doth prove them and is proved by them both deriving Authority from the Books of the Old Testament and communicating its own Authority to them For as the Cause may be proved by its Effect and the Effect by its Cause so both Predictions prove the Things foretold and the accomplishment of the Things foretold verifie the Predictions and Miracles wrought in consequence of Prophecies concerning them have doubly the Divine Seal and Attestation Now the Messias is the Scope and Centre of the whole Old Testament
others it seems probable that the highest degree of Excommunication among the Jews being styled Shammatha which is the same with Maran Atha Sham signifying Lord as †Vid. Grot. Ham. ad 1 Cor. xvi 22. Maran also doth in the Syriac and other Languages and Atha signifying cometh Atha might either Ignorantly or Maliciously be mistaken for Athon which signifies an Ass And it is likely that this Calumny might be first raised by some Body who had been Excommunicated and turned Apostate It would be a very wrong inference from what has been said to conclude that there is no certainty in the Greek and Latin and other Heathen Historians For the Circumstances of the Relation and the Consent of divers Authors may put most parts of History past doubt But it ought to be considered that those which have been mentioned are exceptions to which the Sacred Historians are by no means liable they do not charge one another with Falshood nothing can be discovered of Partiality in their Writings but they tell the most disgraceful Truths of their Ancestors and of themselves and the History it self has so many publick Circumstances that they clear it beyond all suspicion of Deceit If the Names of some Men be omitted upon particular occasions in the Scriptures we find them mentioned there upon others And there is evident Reason that the Names of infamous Men should in some Cases be omitted and should not be inserted in Genealogies and enrolled in the Registers of Honour But when the Memory of Persons and Actions is totally supprest this must extreamly abate the Credit of any History The Jews are the only People in the World that have had their Antiquities by an uninterrupted Tradition delivered down and preserved in an Authentick Book unanimously asserted by the whole Nation in all Ages which they have never changed nor altered but have in great numbers sacrificed their Lives in Testimony of it If the Heathens in divers things contradict the History of the Jews they contradict one another as much in the Accounts of their own Antiquities and what they relate of the Jews is upon uncertain and contrary Reports If they conceal what concerns the Jews it was their Custom to stifle that which did not please them The Histories as well as the Religion of most other Nations were kept secret and not communicated to the People no Book of History among them was ever put into the hands of a whole Nation with a strict Charge to every one to read and study it as the Books of Moses were when the Principal and most Memorable things related were within the knowledge and Memory of all that read them The Jews were under a necessity of preserving their Genealogies with all imaginable Care and Exactness if they would make good the Claim and Title to their Inheritances so that the meanest among them could with the greatest certainty derive his Line from Adam whereas the Persian Kings as we learn from (r) Herod lib. vii c. 11. Herodotus could boast but of a short Descent and the Kings and Emperours of the Romans and of other Nations to advance their Pedigrees were forced to have recourse to fabulous Reports And the Heathen Accounts of the Original not only of particular Families but of the several Nations of the World are acknowledged to be Fabulous or at the best but very uncertain by the most accurate Historians The Account of the Prophecies and Miracles contained in the Scriptures was impossible to be mistaken at first and it has been transmitted with all the certainty that any History is capable of to Posterity And the Writers of the Old and New Testament all agree in the Account of the Creation of the Deluge of Abraham and the other Patriarchs of the Bondage of the Israelites in Aegypt their Miraculous Deliverance from thence and their Journying into the Land of Canaan they all frequently assert suppose or imply the Truth of these things there is a continued Series and Line of Truth observable throughout the whole Scriptures But among Heathen Writers it is otherwise they contradict one another in Matters of any considerable Antiquity if they agree in some material Passages it is commonly with much variation in the Circumstances and with great Uncertainty and Doubtfulness and the things in which they most agree are such as have been taken from the Scriptures which compose a Book that if it were but for the Antiquity and Learning of it is the most valuable of any Book in the World and nothing but Vice and Ignorance and that which is the worst sort of Ignorance a Pretence to Learning could make it so much despised II. If the Histories of Heathen Nations be so little to be relied upon their Philosophy will appear to be worthy of no more Regard which for any thing of Truth and Usefulness there is to be found in it depends so much upon Historical Traditions That Poetry is the most antient way of Writing is not only asserted by Heathen Authors but may with great probability be made out from the Scripture it self Poets were the Chief upholders of the Religion and the Philosophy in use among the Heathens both these were at the first taught in short Maxims which that they might be the better received and the more easily retain'd in Memory were put into Verse without any farther Ornament than just what was necessary to give a clear and full Expression to their Notions and Precepts (s) Xenoph. Conviv Memorab lib. 1. Socrates and the Philosophers of his time had a value for the Verses of Theognis and those which go under the Name of Pythagoras are at least as antient as (t) Apuâ— A Gell. lib. vi c. 2. Chrysippus who alleg'd their Authority Solon himself wrote Elegies whereof some Remains are still preserv'd This gave the Poets a mighty Reputation and we find not only Solon but others of them quoted and appeal'd to by Demosthenes and Aeschines in the Courts of Judicature as well as by Philosophers in their Discourses But the Poets for the more delightful Entertainment of the People not only indulged themselves in that antient and useful way of Instruction by Fables for he (u) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Plat. Plâ—et was hardly esteem'd a Poet who had been the Authors of none but they became the Promoters of all manner of Superstitions and Idolatrous Worship the Oracles were delivered in Verse every Poet wrote something in Honour of the false Gods and (w) Plat. â—b Socrates himself during his Imprisonment made a Hymn in praise of Apollo By which means the Original Notions of Religion and Vertue were so obscured and corrupted that it was impossible in any Humane way to provide a sufficient Remedy Plato complain'd of the Fictions of Poets but when he set himself to recover Men to a true Sense and Notion of things by the help of some antient Traditions which he had met withal he fell into very absurd and sinful
astray thou shalt surely bring it back to him again If thou see the Ass of him that hateth thee lying under his burthen and wouldest forbear to help him thou shalt surely help with him And in divers other places of the Old Testament Charity towards Enemies is highly recommended and earnestly inculcated Job xxxi 29. Prov. xx 22. xxiv 29. Malach. ii 10. Thou shalt love thy Neighbour as thy self we read Lev. xix 18. but thou shalt hate thine Enemy is no where to be found in the Old Testament and therefore Matt. v. 43. it is to be taken as a false gloss of the Interpreters of the Law which our Saviour rejects unless it be to be meant as Grotius understands it of that enmity which the Jews were to shew in all acts of Hostility towards the seven Nations of Canaan and the Amalekites Exod. xvii 16. xxxiv 11. Deut. vii 1. xxv 19. yet these very Nations were not utterly excluded from becoming Proselites and to me it seems very remarkable that tho' the Children of Israel had receiv'd such hard and cruel usage in Aegypt which is so often mention'd in the Law of Moses they were nevertheless by the same Law commanded not to abhor an Aegyptian but to admit the Children of Aegyptian Parents into the Congregation of the Lord in the third Generation Thou shalt not abhor an Aegyptian because thou wast a Stranger in his Land Deut. xxiii 7. Thou shalt not abhor him that is thou shalt not revenge upon him the injuries done thee but shalt relieve him in time of distress which (q) Lightf Hebr. Talmud Exercit. on Matt. vi 2. Charity the Jews ever held themselves oblig'd to extend to the Gentiles and there is reason to suspect that they have been wrong'd in the reports of their uncharitableness to all of other Nations but any thing is easily believ'd of a hated and despised People And I am not to vindicate their Practice but their Law (r) Philo Jud. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Philo Judoeus has an excellent Treatise in which he discourseth at large upon this Subject and shews to how great Humanity and Charity the Jews were oblig'd by the Law of Moses CHAP. XIX Of the Texts of the Old Testament cited in the New THO' the Apostles having prov'd their Divine Commission by so many and so undeniable Miracles had an infallible Authority to interpret and apply the Texts of the Old Testament in confirmation of the Gospel yet it is not to be doubted but that the Citations which seem to have most difficulty in them are such as that the Jews of that time against whom they were urged could not but acknowledge that the Apostles gave the true Exposition of them tho' they deny'd that they were truly apply'd to our Saviour and his Gospel For unless the Apostles had either made out their Citations from the Old Testament by Maximes and Principles then known and receiv'd among the Jews or had alledg'd them in such a sense as was then generally acknowledg'd it had been to no purpose to alledge them at all against them It is known likewise and observable upon this occasion that after the Captivity in Babylon tho' the Bible was read in the Synagogues in the Original Hebrew yet it was also Interpreted into the vulgar Language and the Interpreter did not always Translate the Text verbatim but often gave the sense of it in different words and with some latitude to render it the more intelligible This way of Interpretation was at length improv'd into a Chaldee Paraphrase containing with the Text a short explication of it according to the sense of the most Learned among the Jews tho' there must be supposed to have been many Notions current among them which would not be brought within the compass of that Exposition The Writers therefore of the New Testament might sometimes give such an Interpretation of the Texts of the Old Testament as was as well or better known among them for whom they wrote than the Greek or Hebrew Text was or they might take upon themselves the liberty of Interpreters the better to explain the Texts alledged and enforce their Arguments Thus for instance St. Stephen Acts vii would never have produc'd any thing out of the Old Testament before the Sanhedrim nor would St. Luke have Recorded it soon after if it had been capable of any disproof or confutation whatever difficulties at this distance of time there may appear to us to be in it And so in all other Cases we may depend upon it that the Apostles and other Disciples who had such demonstrative Evidence for the conviction of Unbelievers by a constant power of Miracles would never make use of any Arguments to the Jews from the Old Testament but such as they well knew their Adversaries could never be able to disprove or deny For there were then certain Methods of Interpretation as we learn from (s) Joseph Bell. Jadaic lib. iii. c. 14. Josephus which are now lost and they disputed from acknowledg'd Maxims and Rules the only difference and matter of dispute was in the application of them to their particular case however our ignorance of things then generally known may now make it difficult to reconcile some Texts of the New Testament with those of the Old from whence they were cited F. Simon (t) Sim. Crit. Hist of the N. T. Part I. C. xxi in his Critical History has a remarkable Passage upon this Subject The Book says he where the most of that sort of Citations are found is the Epistle of St. Paul to the Hebrews where we find nothing else but passages of the Old Testament explain'd in a manner that is altogether Allegorical and foreign to the Letter which has also given an occasion to some Writers to suspect that St. Paul was not the Author But it seems on the contrary that if we reflect upon the Pharisees Method in their expounding Scripture it cannot be attributed to any other than to that holy Apostle who having studied in Jerusalem under the Doctor Gamaliel did penetrate into all the most refined points of their secret and mystical Interpretations of the Bible And indeed after I had recommended the reading of this Epistle to a Jew who was well read in his own ancient Authors he having perused it freely declar'd that it must needs have been written by some great (u) A Man of Tradition Mekubal of his own Nation And he was so far from telling me that St. Paul had wrested the true sense of Scripture with his Allegories at pleasure that he extolled his profound Skill in the sublime sense of the Bible and always return'd to his great Mekubal of whom he never spake but with admiration Hoc in omnibus scripturis sanctis observandum est Apostolos Apostolicos viros in ponendis Testimoniis de veteri Testamento non verba considerare sed sensum nec eadem Sermonum culcare vestigia dummodò à senteniis non
question were not only dubious but certainly spurious the remaining Books which were never doubted of are sufficient for all the necessary ends and purposes of a Revelation and therefore this ought to be no objection against the Authority of the Scriptures that the Authority of some Books has been formerly matter of controversy I shall enter upon no discourse concerning the Apocryphal Books the authority whereof has been so often and so effectually disâ—roved by Protestants that the most learned Papists have now little to say for them but â—re forced only to fly to the authority of their Church which is in effect to beg the thing in question or to beg something as hard to be granted viz. the infallibility of the Church of Rome But I shall here engage in no controversy of that nature Both Protestants and Papists are generally speaking agreed that the Books of Moses and the Prophets in the Old Testament and the Writings of the Evangelists and the Apostles in the New are of Divine Authority and if this be so the Christian Religion must be true whether there be or be not others of the same nature and of equal authority These Books in the main have already been proved to be genuine and without any material corruption or alteration I shall now only propose such general considerations as may be sufficient to obviate objections The agreement between the Jews and Samaritans in the Pentateuch is a clear evidence for its Authority And tho there were many and great Idolatries committed in the Kingdom of Judah yet by the good providence of God there never was such a total Apostacy in the people nor so long a succession of Idolatrous Kings as that the Books either of the Law or the Prophets can be supposed to have been supprest or altered For three years under Rehoboam they walked in the way of David and Solomon 2 Chron. 11.17.12.1 and tho afterwards he forsook the Law of the Lord and all Israel with him his Reign was in all but seventeen years Abijam was a wicked King but he reigned no longer than three years 1 Kings xv 2. Asa the third from Solomon and Jehoshaphat his Son were great Reformers and Asa reigned one and forty years and Jehoshaphat five and twenty years 2 Chron. xvi 13. xx 31. The two next Kings in succession did evil in the sight of the Lord but their Reigns were short Jehoram reigned eight years and Ahaziah but one 2 Chron. xxi 20. xxii 2. During the interval of six years under the usurpation of Athaliah the people could not be greatly corrupted for she was hateful to them as Jehoram her husband had been before her and they readily joyned with Jehoiada in slaying her and in restoring the worship of God 2 Chron. xxii Joash the son of Ahaziah did that which was right in the sight of the Lord all the days of Jehoiada 2 Chron. xxiv 2. We are sure that he reigned well three and twenty years 2 Kings xii 6. and probably much longer for Jehoiada lived to a very great age 2 Chron. xxiv 15. Amaziah his son has the same character and with the same abatement that he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord but not with a perfect heart 2 Chron. xxv 2. or yet not like David his Father he did according to all things as Joash his Father did 2 Kings xiv 3. Vzziah son to Amaziah reigned well and sought God in the days of Zachariah 2 Chron. xxvi 5. and after he was seized with the Leprosie for invading the Priests office the administration of affairs was in the hands of his Son Jotham vers 21. who imitated the good part of his fathers Reign Chap. xxvii 2. Ahaz was wicked and an Idolater but he reigned only sixteen years Chap. xxviii 1. and his son Hezekiah wrought a great Reformation who reigned twenty nine years Chap. xxix 1. Manasses was much given to Idolatry in the former part of his Reign but after his captivity in Babylon he was very zealous against it Chap. xxxiii 15 16. Amon imitated the ill part of his Father's Reign but his own continued no longer than two years Chap. xxxiii 21. The next was Josiah in whose time the Book of the Law was found in the Temple which must be the Book of Moses's own hand-writing for it is evident that a Book of the Law could be no such rare thing at that time in Jerusalem as to be taken so much notice of unless it had been that Book which was laid up in the side of the Ark and was to be transcribed by every King It seems that Book of the Law had been purposely hid to preserve it from the attempts of Idolaters who it was feared might have a design to destroy it for if it had only lain by neglected the finding of it could have been no such surprizing thing because the place in the Temple was well known where it was wont to be kept in the side of the Ark and where they might have sought for it but it was probably at that time supposed to have been utterly lost and its being found in the Ruines of the Temple which was built for the observation of it and where it ought to have been kept with the greatest care as a most inestimable treasure the veneration which Josiah had for so sacred a Writing and the happy and unexpected recovery of it when it had been disregarded and almost lost through the iniquity of his Predecessors these considerations could not but exceedingly move a mind so tender and affectionately pious as that Kings when he received the Law under Moses's own hand sent him as he believed by God himself and delivered to him as it were anew from Heaven Not long after his time was the Captivity in Babylon till which there were always Prophets frequent Reformations and never any succession of Idolatrous Kings which continued for a long time together very few Kings were Idolatrous throughout their whole Reigns and those that were reigned but a short time * Book 1. Part 2. c. 6. 9. It has been proved that the Pentateuch and the Books of the Prophets written before the Captivity were preserved amongst the Jews till their return and it is acknowledg'd by those who are of another opinion that Ezra who composed the Canon did it by a Prophetick spirit or had the assistance of Prophets in the doing it * Joseph Câ—nt Apion lib. 1. Josephus says that their Books after the time of Artaxerxes are not of equal authority with those before his time for want of a certain succession of Prophets And since the Jews admitted no writings as inspired into the Canon after Malachi's Prophecy this shews their sincerity and exactness in examining the truth and authority of such Writings as they admitted into their Canon of Scripture The Pharisees made the commandment of God of no effect by their Traditions but never durst presume to impose them under the notion and