Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
spirit_n ghost_n holy_a part_n 5,261 5 4.5208 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A66352 Man made righteous by Christ's obedience being two sermons at Pinners-Hall : with enlargements, &c. : also some remarks on Mr. Mather's postscript, &c. / by Daniel Williams. Williams, Daniel, 1643?-1716. 1694 (1694) Wing W2653; ESTC R38938 138,879 256

There are 9 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Law which we had frustrated But this will not make him such a Surety in this broken Bond as shall make us legally accounted to do all and suffer and answer all and be as righteous as he that did it though it be in his very Righteousness that we are saved notwithstanding we have failed in all this For I ask when he put his Name in this broken Bond Sure not before it was broken then he was Surety before Again when he did put his Name did he do it to the same very purpose as we were originally bound viz. that we might live by our Innocency and Obedience as our Righteousness No it was to redeem us from the Effects of our own Disobedience Did he engage that we should do and suffer what would be a Price of our Redemption and Salvation No he was to do it himself in his own legal Person I say legal because the divine Dignity of his Person gave the legal yea supralegal Value in God's Account to what he did and suffered for one meer Man's doing and suffering what the meer Law injoined would not have satisfied for Millions and the broken Bond it self did not require a divine Person 's obeying any more than the whole Bond did though the Attainment of its Ends did so Again if Christ's Suretiship was so limited within this broken Bond than as he was bound to do and suffer no more than it required so neither he nor we are entitled by that Obedience to any more than this broken Bond at first covenanted to give Yea further Mr. M. faith P. 57. The elect were constituted at first under another Head and under another Covenant which had nothing in it of Christ and his Righteousness either to be brought in for them or to be applied to them Reply But if Christ's Righteousness be no higher than that Covenant did require before it was broken the Righteousness of perfect Adam had been as great as Christ's And if the unbroken Covenant was the same as the broken Bond How should the unbroken Covenant neither have nor require any Righteousness of Christs and yet the broken Bond measure and limit Christ's Righteousness and Sentence us legally Righteous for it But if as Mr. M. saith the Covenant with Adam and the Elect was another Covenant from the broken-Bond then we are not under the Covenant requiring what at first it injoyned and being federating Parties only in the first and subjected to Penalty only by it as it 's broken Here 's no Obedience-work for a Surety nor place for a proper Surety in bearing the Penalties But I have elsewhere enlarged and therefore conclude That such Confusion about the Suretiship should abate Mens regard to his Censures against such as will not own he himself knows not what and proveth none sees how 6. I find after all that this Equality of Righteousness between Christ and us is not so much from Legal Union or Judicial Imputation but from a Coalescence of Believers into one mystical Person with Christ by Vital Union Thus p. 55. Between our believing and our being justified there comes in our Coalescing into one mystical Person with Christ by this Vital Vnion and our having his Righteousness upon us unto the Iustification of Life and so our being justified is not the next or immediate effect of our Believing c. Here indeed if I understand what one person is he may well argue we are as Righteous as Christ for we are Christified with Christ not in Name or on Account of his undertaking or his being the Head of the Church as his mystical Body But as being one mystical Person opposed to a Legal Person than by pointing at any Believer you may avoid the danger of Ioh. 8.24 If you believe not that I am he you shall die in your sins Mr. M. may rise higher than that we are as Right●●us as Christ and say we are as Holy as Christ as Honorable as Christ as Wise as Christ and so interpret his proof 1 Cor. 1.30 Nay are we not assumed into a Personal Union with the Eternal Word as the Humane Nature of Christ is which I think is unavoidable unless Christ hath more Persons than one Besides his being a legal Person which he opposeth this mystical Person to And that he means something like this hear him p. 60. It 's called a Vital Vnion because in effecting it there is a Vital Touch as I may say between Christ and us and a clasping each on other Compare this with P. 63. The Humane Nature of Christ leans on the Godhead in the Son and hath the Eternal Power of the Deity clasping about it and holding it in that Vnion c. The Eternal Power of the Godhead in Christ and not so much the strength of any created Principle of Grace in us holding our Hearts unto him and causing them for ever to live upon him Can you find much difference though he pretend a Disproportion The Awfulness of the Subject restrains me from exposing this affected Cant which is the only Gospel with these Men because its Mystery i. e. unintelligible Nonsence fitted to a Rosocrucian or Behemist It is not enough that Christ is the Author of all in us and the Securer of all promised Good to us and that he condescended to confirm this and comfort our Souls by such gracious Instances of a Mystical Union as that between Vine and Branches Head and Members Husband and Wife yea that the same Spirit dwells in Christ and us each of which inform and assure to us the Blessing designed to be signified thereby but not whatever our Profane Fancies may wrest a Metaphor or force an Expression to Must Men strain it to one Person whereby Christ's Prerogatives and our Vile Defects are in common to Christ and us Is this to let Christ in all things have the Preheminence Col. 1. 18. The Scriptures needed not so many Metaphors to represent to us the several Benefits we have by Union with Christ This one would have served for all yea far exceeded all only that one Person would consist but with few of them nay with none Head and Members do not make one Person but one Body yea one Spirit in Christ and us doth not make one Person unless you 'll make the Holy Ghost to be an animating Soul to the Body and so be the chief constitive part of the whole Person What will a deluded vain Fancy expose Men to at last Exceptions against some more Passages in Mr. M's Book I Have been already engaged to hint at some yet among many obnoxious enough let 's consider some more of his Stamina 1. That God hath ordained Christ to do all with God for the Elect and that he shall be a●● from God to them c. All I say that in this ruined Condition they need to bring them to that heighth of Happiness c. P. 56 58. Reply If he had meant only that Christ was to do all with God in
Obedience as the Security of his Pardon and Glory and he hath the Gospel to plead as what gives him upon his believing a Right to use that Plea What Christ hath done answers all the Benefits Christ's Gospel applies what Christ hath so done and gives the Benefits for it Faith is the Condition of the Person to whom the Gospel applies Christ's Righteousness and gives the Benefits But is not that for which any thing is given or by which it 's purchased It determineth the Legatees in Christ's Testamentary Absolution and Gifts which he bequeaths to Believers and confines to them therein Exh. 1. Be watchful that you set no Grace Duty or Work of yours into the Place of Christ's Righteousness Do not think any thing you do answers the LAw of Works or any way proportioned to governing Justice Dread a Thought that any thing is due to thy best Duty as of Debt Rom. 4.4 5. Whatever seem to be good Works are wholly vain highly provoking to God affronting to Christ and Snares to your selves if you think they are a Christ or instead of a Christ to you And this you are guilty of if you think you hereby attone for your Sins or merit Glory at the Hand of governing Justice will you rob Christ of his Glory who satisfied for all your Sins and purchased all Blessings alone and who freely gives you but the Fruits of his own Purchase whatever Terms he insists on for the dispensing of his Gifts in a Way most honourable to himself and profitable to you Exh. 2. Yet do not thrust your Graces or Duties out of the Place where Christ by the Gospel Promises hath set them He knew what was consistent with his Honour and that it would not be injurious thereto to insist upon Terms of the Application of his Righteousness and the Communication of the Fruits thereof in a way of governing Grace though as Sovereign Proprietor he gave the Power to perform those Terms He thinks not himself debased by giving out his Acquests as a Priest upon his Throne or erecting a Gospel Kingdom as a Redeemer of lost Man which the Gospel Dispensation is generally called as if of purpose to secure the Gospel Law Mat. 4.23 1 Cor. 15.24 Search carefully whether the Spirit of God hath wrought in you the Conditions of the Benefits of the Gospel Covenant These are necessary to your actual obtaining of any Benefit promised to them respectively and you expect those Benefits without God's Promise yea against God's Word if you neglect to act the Grace the Promise is made to On the other hand you distrust God's Promise in not assuredly expecting the Benefit for Christ's Sake when you have the Graces to which the Promise is made The Gospel doth not deceive us when it encourageth to Duty by Benefits as Rev. 22.14 Blessed are they that do his Commandments that they may have Right to the Tree of Life Rom. 10.9 If thou confess with thy Mouth and believe with thy Heart thou shalt be saved Be thou faithful unto Death and I will give thee a Crown of Life Will Christ fail to do what his Mouth hath uttered though he display his Grace in giving us that Assurance upon such Duties Christ's Righteousness will be applied in making good every Gospel Promise How unsavory then is it for any one to say that all your Obedience avails no more to justifie you than your worst Sins It 's true no Duty is our Righteousness for which we are justified but it 's as true that the Obedience and great Duty of Faith signifies more to our Justification than that worst Sin of Unbelief for Christ's Righteousness will never be applied to us for our Justification unless we believe and if we believe we shall certainly be justified by Christ's Righteousness Oh Sirs Woe to us at the last Day if we are found to have nothing but the vilest Sins and no Graces or Duties for then will God judge us by the Gospel whether we are believers or unbelievers Obedient or Disobedient to the Gospel Godly or Wicked Precious or Vile see Rom. 2.6 to 13. And Be not deceived God is not mocked whatsoever a Man soweth that shall he reap Gal. 6.7 We may have Boldness in the Day of Iudgment because as he is so are we in this World 1 Joh. 4.17 Little Children let no Man deceive you He that doth Righteousness is Righteous 1 Joh. 3.7 whatever Christ by his Gospel promiseth upon any Duty we follow after that in being earnest with God in Christ for Ability to do that Duty and if by Grace we are enabled thereto we may rejoyce in God's Truth and be sure that in the Righteousness of Christ he will perform that Promise to us whereas if we neglect the Duty we wickedly presume to expect that Blessing and abuse and prophane the Name of Christ and his Righteousness in thinking that we may have that Blessing by his Righteousness though we impenitently persist in our Neglects The Reason is this Christ in his Gospel-promises hath declared how the Effects of his Righteousness shall be dispensed to Men and designeth thereby to govern our Hopes and Fears now and to judge us at the last Day 2. The second Sense wherein we are made Righteous by Christ's Obedience I should now insist on but I have already declared what may inform you somewhat thereof nor have I room to pursue it only let me hint 1. That Faith Repentance Holiness c. are a Real Righteousness they are oft called so by the Holy Ghost and Men are denominated Righteous thereby Nay these are called Righteousness and Men said to be Righteous with respect to those abundantly oftner than on the account of the imputed Righteousness of Christ 1 Iohn 3.7 1 Tim. 1.9 1 Pet. 4.18 Rom. 6.13 16 c. 2. All our Inherent Righteousness is owing to Christ's Obedience and to effect it was one of the Principal Designs of Redemption The Impunity of Sinners is a lower Design than the Restoration of the Divine Image to depraved Man Tit. 2.14 Eph. 4.20.24.13 He purchased our Graces and mainly attends to the Mortifying of Sin and perfecting the Holiness of his Members and will at last present them to the Father fit for his delight Eph. 5.27 3. The Oeconomy of Redemption is such that the Holy Ghost is to have a great hand in Saving Sinners especially in applying Christ's Righteousness to Men and communicating the Effects thereof Hence 1 Cor. 6.11 We are justified in the Name of the Lord Iesus and by the Spirit of our God The Father gives the Redeemer the Redeemer pays the Price of Redemption the Holy Spirit applies the Price The Father gives his Son to obey for Righteousness the Son by Obeying acquireth the Righteousness the Spirit quickens and works Faith in the Sinner whereby he becomes the Person Justified by his Righteousness according to the Gospel-rule of its Application which Rule was joyntly enacted by Father Son and Spirit It 's as
dangerous to exclude the Holy Ghost from an Efficiency in framing Sinners for the participating of Blessings in Christ's Right as it is to exclude Christ from the sole Impetration Many little think what a Dishonour and Offence they are to the Holy Ghost in denying an Authoritative Connexion between Duties and Benefits and allowing him no hand in making them the Objects to whom Gospel Benefits are appropriated by its Sanction The Language of such to the Spirit is We are without any Operation of thine on us the Persons entitled to all Benefits Christ hath not only a Right to all these Blessings but we also are fully and constantly invested in that Right without any dependance on thee or Obligation to thee though we own thou workest some of those things after we have a full Right to them and because we have that full Right yet we are at no time indebted to thee for any ways rendring us the Persons to whom that Right is applied or belongs the vilest Wretch in Hell oweth thee as much Thanks on that account I would tremble to hold a Principle whereof this is the Native Language when I see that though the Promises are made in Christ's Right and the Benefits contained in them are his Purchase yet as they require Conditions in such as shall be Partakers of Christ's Right to those Benefits to the Glory of the Son and of the Father who gave his Son so there is a wise Contrivance for the Honour of the Holy Ghost also as it is he who enableth Men to perform those Conditions for a Gospel-Interest in those Benefits A REPLY TO Mr. Mather's Postscript I Shall first consider the Errors Mr. M. chargeth me with and then his Defence of his own The Errors he loads with no lighter Epithets than Damning and Blasphemou● Terms agreeable to his long known Temper and Charity He introduceth his Charge with an Ecee This is he he is the Man Would he infer that I am the only Man No the body of Divines except Antinomians affirm as I do And in his Preface it 's his Moan the Number is so great Is it that I am the Man that eminently defend these Alas I can shew him Volumes of the Dead and many are yet Alive whose Defence of my Positions is so Nervous as renders mine truly Inconsiderable as his Opposition thereto Contemptible Sure then it 's either to leave a Mark that his Factious Design may more succeed or to point me the Person designed by him in his Sermons Page 22.64 in words indeed too blunt for a Man of his own Sagacity to need another Comment Yet after all his labour to make the Man sure he hath assigned the Charge so falsly that an Ingenuous Reader will sooner charge him for a base Trick in his Insinuations than me the Patron of the Opinions he would ascribe 1 Charge He is one that makes Vnion to Christ our having this Righteousness upon us and our being Iustified by it to be given us in way of Reward of something done by us Reply My words which he refers to here and Page 46. are these Gospel-Benefits are no Reward of Debt and yet they are given in a way of Reward The Benefits are given not for our Faith yet upon Believing not upon it as a Meriting Consideration yet upon it as that the Presence whereof is made necessary by the Gospel this having required Faith and confined the Benefit to him that believes If a Man saith I 'll give you a Thousand Pounds if you will come to my House and fetch it It is not a Free Gift though the Poor Man must come if he will have it and the Giver is yet bound by his Promise to give it if he come and not bound to give it if he refuse to come Defence of Gospel-Truth P. 25. These are my very words he pretends to mention and no where in my Books can he find the least shadow for more You see 1. I mention only Gospel-Benefits and not Union with Christ or Justification 2. It 's Faith only which I mention and not something done by us by which he would insinuate that other good Works are meant 3. I say it 's upon Believing and not for Faith upon it not as a Meriting Consideration but upon it as that the Presence whereof is made necessary by the Gospel Doth not this sound lower than his Reward of something done by us Vpon it as a thing present and of it as a thing Meriting are very different 4. The occasion of my using these words was this to prove that God by the Gospel injoyns Faith as a Condition of our having those good things which yet he freely gives and that Christ shews his governing Authority in his displays of Grace and excites to Duties by Motives from Benefits freely given and that Gospel-Conditions have no Merit of Condignity or Congruity And 5. I laid the Vmbrage of the way of Reward wholly on the Gospel-Promise and not upon the least Dignity of the Act done God who is our Ruler commands Faith and promiseth as a Motive to Faith the Benefits purchased by Christ as good things Here 's the whole of this Damning Error as far as he could justly call it mine And by this time you 'll discern as little Danger to me by my Opinion as to him by his False and Malicious Attempt to expose my Ministry and Person not to say truth it self yea and the generality of Ministers and Christians who will not stoop to him as Dictator 2. I shall descend into the Merit of the Cause truly stated which is resolved into two Questions 1 Q. When may a Benefit be said to be given in a way of Reward when yet it is not in a way of Debt or Merit or a Reward for the thing done Ans. A thing is thus given in a way of Reward when a Benefit is given in a way of Encouragement of something required yea or desired to be done however small or unvaluable the thing done is or however great the Benefit is If you say to your Child If you 'll make a Bow and Thank me I 'll give you such an Estate When you give him such an Estate upon his so Bowing and Thanking you do give it him in a way of Reward It 's a Gift because that Bow and Thanks deserve not that Estate it 's yet given in a way of Reward since you promised it in a way of Encouragement to his Bow and Thanks Indeed all Gospel-Conditions are but a meet receiving of the Benefits 2 Quest. Whether God doth give Gospel-Benefits in a way of Encouragement to our performing of any Gospel-Duties Ans. Can any one read the Bible and not cease to doubt that the Scope of it were vain in its Proposals and Promises if the thing be otherwise For 1. Are not the Promises of the Gospel Motives to Duty Acts 13.19 Repent and be converted that your Iniquities may be blotted out Matt. 11.28 Come unto me and I
their Happiness as if themselves had done and suffered what Christ did Reader were these Men duly tender or honest when they pervert Words ●o plain and ascribe to me what is as directly contrary to my Words as yea and no. They say I affirmed what I do deny and that I denied the very thing I affirmed But the Turn could not be served without these Methods 3. The Ground of Jealousie I 'll give and judge you how just it is 1. I did affirm that Christ did bear the Punishment of our Sins yea and he bare the Guilt of our Sins which is that respect of Sin to the threatning of the Law whereby there is an Obligation to bear the Punishment of Sin But I denied that Sin it self as to its Filth and Fault was transacted on Christ and that Christ was made and accounted by the Father the very Transgressor the Adulterer and Blasphemer Gospel-Truth p. 10 11. Here 's my Crime for Mr. M. hath oft preached up the later 2. I affirm as thou seest of the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness but my Fault is that I deny that God accounts that we legally died and obeyed that we made Satisfaction to God though I grant that Christ died for us yea in our Place and stead 3. I have through the Goodness of God lived to declare in this Book enough to confute his Prophesie and his Opinion too though I think he should pray for a more calm and charitable Spirit before he pr●tend to Predictions concerning his Brethren 4. Will he repent of his rigid censorious Slander For I 'll here declare that I assent to his own Words p. 18. By imputed I mean that it Christ's Righteousness is looked on by God as belonging to us in order to our being judicially dealt with according to the Merit thereof This I have oft affirmed but it 's far short of what elsewhere he strains it too 4 Charge The Son of God was united to an Embrio which is a Piece of ignorant Blasphemy Repl. My Words were Oh! For God-Man to be at any time unactive as an Embrio or Child in the Womb for him to be born of a Woman I said not that the Son of God was united to an Embrio unactive as an Embrio is another thing And I 'll ●●ing him twice Ten to oppose his two Witnesses But had I said it where is the Blasphemy when the divine Nature I hope was united to Christ's dead Body in the Grave as all grant And very many say that the divine Nature was united to the Flesh before it was organized or animated of whom Turretin's Instit. Theol. p. 372. Etsi anima infundi non potuit in Corpus nisi jam organizatum c. Non sequiter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non potuisse carnem statim sibi unire cum Opus ejus non possit aut praesente aut absente anima sibi coarctari Pierson and Multitudes are Blasphemers with this bold Man But supposing that though the Virgin conceived by the Power of the Holy Ghost and went her usual Time and that Christ was like other Children and the Faetus had Matter and Nourishment ministred thereto by the Virgin who conceived by the Power of the Spirit Yet that the Divine Person was not united to the Flesh before it was animated But are not many Phisicians so ignorant as to judge the Soul is united to the Body unorganized and if so either the humane Nature of Christ had a separate Subsistence from the Divine Person which is false or the Divine Person assumed it when the Body was unorganized But it 's a Theme not fit for me to pursue who must confess my Ignorance therein in Comparison of Mr. M. who can tell us how the humane Nature of Christ leans on the God-head in the Son and hath the eternal Power of the Deity clasping about it and holding it in that Vnion p. 63. May not this seraphical yet very dull Author call what he please in this Point a Piece of ignorant Blasphemy whatever greater Divines or skilful Phisicans say to the contrary 5 Charge Because I would wash off all his Dirt at once I 'll give you one Charge out of his Book that he forgets in his Postscript though it hath been their best Tool viz. That I lick up Bellarmin's Vomit in my Exposition of Phil. 3.8 9. Repl. This is as true as the rest for when I expounded that Text I plainly affirmed tha● 1. We are justified by Christ's imputed Righteousness only 2. That all Holiness compared with winning Christ is to be esteemed as Dung 3. The best thing in us is vile compared with Christ's Righteousness And indeed if that Text speaks only of Justification and that the Apostle designes to oppose his own Righteousness to Christ's then his own and ours are as unfit as Dung to be found in 4. But I then judged and still do that the Apostle there designed to proclaim the Preferrableness of Christianity to Judaism and what was Pharasaical yea or self-invented And therefore as he enumerates all the Dignities of Judaism so he ascribes to Christ the whole Glory of his entire redeemed State shewing that not only his Justification but his Sanctification too came from and by Christ both which were of a diviner Nature as well as appointment than what he arrived to whiles he was a Stranger to Christ and therefore expected and pressed after a Perfection therein whiles he despised all Things Priviledges and Attainments which stood in Competition with Christ Yea was glad he had lost them all for Union with him a Perseverance in whom with higher Communications from him was the very main Aim of his Life and Endeavours I am sure this Sense best agrees with the Context and is far enough from Bellarmin's Sense neither want I Reasons sufficient to prove it had I room yea my Exposition of that Text is so far from militating against Justification by Christ's Righteousness that it proves it strongly 2. I come now to consider Mr. M's Defence of his own Errors He confines them to two Saying I kept Silence as to more When others read this Book they 'll see a greater Number though it seems he could not perceive them when he read my Notes and hath left out of his printed Sermons many obnoxious Passages yet he 'll meet with his Suretiship Righteousness the Debtor being as clear as the Surety P. 24. With his limiting so far Christ's Merit to his active Obedience p. 13. With his Position that all Graces of the Spirit are Effects of our being justified and not at all the Means thereof p. 32. That all our Obedience avails no more to our Justification than our worst Sins p. 71. Though he ascribes a Causality to Faith that the Crown of Glory is due to us in Justice p. 12. Even a remunerative Justice is exerted to us p. 15. c. But let us take what he thinks most concerns him the first whereof is that Christ's Incarnation was no
〈◊〉 t●●● all h●ve 〈…〉 4 Pro. That the Glory of Governing Justice might not suffer by the saving of Sinners there must be a Satisfaction for the Offence they committed and a Meritorious Price for the good to be dispensed to them Gods Government must not be Arraigned before Angels or Men as weak Nor would the Justice of God seem an approver of Rebellion by admitting Sin to pass unpunished nor admit such an occasion of Disobedience to his Government By Satisfaction I mean that which fully vindicates the Reputative Glory of Justice so injur'd by Sin and secures the ends of Government By Merit I intend that which Governing Justice adjudged proportionable to the Benefit to be conferred on the Sinners 5 Pro. Sinners being utterly incapable for this God our Lawgiver did Ordain and Admit Christ with his Consent to be the Redeemer and Saviour of lost Sinners by making Satisfaction for Sin and Meriting the forfeited Blessings and much greater for them H●b 3.2 he was appointed This was an act of the Lawgiver as above the Law but it was not by the Law of Works Yea God dispensed with the Law of Works in admitti●g Christs Sufferings and Obedience to be Satisfactory and Meritorious for Offendors That Law knew no vicarious Obedience or Punishment The Soul that Sins must Di● ●●d n●● another for it was the Language of the Law Divine Grace and Sovereignty ●er● exert themselves to answer the E●ds of the Law by substituting a Saviour of lost Souls 6 Pro. It was in the Covenant of Redemption wherein it was adjusted and agreed what should be thus Satisfactory and Meritorious and so effectual to save Sinners Is. 53.10 11 12. Ps. 40.6 7 8. Ze●h 6.13 Ioh. 17.4 The Parties in this Covenant are the Father and Spirit on the one part and the Son on the other Whatever Christ suffered in time and all the Obedience he yielded were terms proposed to him and accepted by him In that Volume were Recorded what his Work and Rewards were to be and of the later the Salvation of his Members is a part What he herein submitted to he became obliged as an act of Faithfulness to perform Whatever was herein promised him he had a right to receive and did accordingly Claim By this Compact he agreed to be a Subject and Servant and hence the Law of Mediation did Commence as Binding By this Compact his Obedience and Sufferings became a Satisfaction that otherwise had been Uneffectual Satisfaction imports a Refuseableness antecedently to an Agreement And hence we may perceive that though what Christ paid was a ●ull equivalent yet it was not in all things the same in kind as Man was obliged to True Justice took care that all was inserted into this Covenant as Christs Work which was necessary to the Reparation of its Glory And hence the great Essentials of the Law of Works were inserted as Articles to be performed by Christ viz. Sinless Obedience a● a Man which is the Sum of the Precept and Death the substance of the Threatning and these to be done and suffered in the Human Nature Nevertheless some things in the Threat were incompetent to him as Spiritual Death the Hatred of God c. Many Precepts were not agreeable to his Circumstances all which were omitted Nay many things which the Law of Works never injoyn'd on Men were necessary to be done by the Redeemer and therefore were superadded From this Covenant ariseth the immediate Obligation of Christ to all his Obedience as well as the Rule and Measure of it And from this his Title to all the Reward much of which the premiant Sanction of the Law of Works never contained and could never give a right to No doubt that in this Covenant were adjusted the terms of the application of Redemption to Men which the Gospel Covenant doth enjoyn which I suppose the Assembly mean when they join the Covenant of Redemption and the Gospel Covenant together and say it was made with Christ as the second Adam But they cannot intend that Christ obliged himself to perform Personally all the Terms of the application of his purchased Benefits to us as he did the Terms of the Impetration of those Benefits He bound not himself to Repent and Believe for us tho' he did to Die for us yea and as Surety of the Gospel Covenant he engaged that the Elect should Repent Believe and Persevere But yet the Benefits should be applied to Men upon their Personal Believing and they are required by the Gospel so to Believe and become themselves federating parties in the Gospel Covenant This runs throughout the Assemblies Confession and Catechisms As when they say Faith is required by the Covenant as a Condition to Interest us in Christ large Catechism Q. 32. And they say Q. 153. That we may escape the Wrath and Curse of God due to us by reason of the Transgression of the Law God requireth of us Repentance towards God and Faith towards our Lord Jesus and the diligent use of outward means whereby Christ communicates to us the Benefits of his Mediation You have the same in the lesser Catechism And they oft tell us of Promises made to Graces c. by which and much more its plain that Conditions are required of Men. 7 Pro. Satisfaction being to be made for innumerable Sins committed and not only forfeited ●●essings but even greater to be Merited and that for many the Obedience of Christ must exceed what the Law of Works injoyned on Mankind as the condition of its Reward What was necessary from every single Man for himself could not by Legal Justice be sufficient from one Man for all others that omitted it Now the Law required Obedience to its Precepts from every single Man That could not Merit the Reward for Sinners which was but necessary to an Innocent Mans Title to the Reward But what the Law requir'd was necessary to Innocent Mans obtaining the Reward though he had not Sinned before That which was by Governing Justice adjudged but proportionable to a less Reward could not Merie a greater Reward But whatever the Law of Works required was but proportioned to its lesser Rewards Lesser I call them though I allow them to be an Eternal Felicity in another World yet these were not Union with Christ nor such a degree of Conformity to his Glory c. much less did they include the Rewards promised to Christ for his Obedience as a Name above every Name all Iudgment and Authority with many more all which are the Reward of Christs Obedience As to Expiation of Sin by Punishment for Reconciliation with the offended God the Law enjoins no such Duty nor hinted such a thing It s Threatning was Eternal Death As Eternal Eternity was an ingredient into the Misery of every Sinner and can be removed by nothing but the Law-givers dispensing therewith upon Considerations equally Vindicating the Glory of Justice as this Eternity of Sinners Torments would do And it must be equivalent
to Justifie as described by any Personal Character such as a Believer c. whatever God promiseth Pardon to as Repentance whatever is contrary to that for which he declareth that he will notwithstanding Gospel-Grace continue the Sentence of Condemnation on Sinners and deny them Mercy As when he saith If the Wicked turn not he shall die thereby Conversion is necessary By these Rules we may know what kind of Person he must be whom God by his Gospel doth Justifie God will not deny it to whom the Gospel promiseth it he cannot by the Gospel grant it to him whom he declares he will deny it to yea on whom he still more binds Condemnation 7. Faith in Christ hath a peculiar Aptness and is more especially honoured in the first Application of God's Justifying Act upon a Christian though nothing can be wanting which God hath made necessary in him whom he will Justifie This acknowledgeth Christ and his Righteousness and by it we return to him as the way to the Father Heb. 7.25 and own his Authority which is the Reward of his Mediation Iohn 5.23 This is our conjugal Consent and Band of Union on our part with Christ as our Husband Head and entire Saviour 2 Cor. 11.2 it includes all of that regard which is appropriated to Christ as Redeemer and therefore we are said to be Justified by Faith and not by any other Grace as I remember Rom. 5.1 But yet Forgiveness and pardoning Mercy is promised to other things especially to Repentance and we are called to repent with this Promise That our Sins shall be forgiven upon it and we turn to God that we may receive Remission of Sin Acts 26.18 Luke 13.3 When I have considered that we are said still to be Justified by Faith and yet Repentance is so absolutely required to the Pardon of Sin I have been apt to think that the Spirit of God seems to instruct us that Justification in the first part of it viz. The Imput●●● Christ's Righteousness and investing us in his right to Pardon and other Blessings is especially applied to Faith and yet our enjoying actual Pardon upon our Investiture in Christ's right is promised to Repentance As if God would ascribe the first Application of Christ's Righteousness to that Grace which more especially acknowledgeth the Redeemer whose Righteousness it is by which we are Justified and yet that Sin which is Treason against God should not be forgiven even for Christ's sake without Repentance wherein God is more especially acknowledged as our God and rightful Law-giver whence the Sum of our Ministry is made Repentance towards God and Faith towards the Lord Jesus Acts 20.21 If there be any weight in this which I only offer to Consideration then Faith is more especially made the Condition of the first part of Justification viz. The Application of Christ's Righteousness And yet Repentance also made the express Condition of the second part of Justification viz. Actual Pardon that great Privilege possessed by us with a right to what this Pardon entitleth to Hereby the Dignity of the Law-giver and the Honour of the Redeemer are distinctly provided for in the Justification of a Sinner yea the Gospel-order is preserved for by Christ we come and return unto God whom we had by Sin forsaken Yet remember that Repentance is still a Concomitant of Faith whatever Priority as an exprest Condition I assign to it for no utterly Impenitent Person can put forth an Act. of Saving 〈◊〉 Justifying Faith 8. Our Blessed Lord exerts a Governing Authority in a way of Grace or Grace in a way of Governing Authority in the appointing and requiring what he makes necessary in the Person to be Justified He commands Men to believe with a Promise that they shall be Justified if they do believe which is the Scope of the Gospel He plainly threatens all that will not believe that they shall not be Justified if they continue in Unbelief Iohn 3.18 36. He hath appointed Ministers to use the Blessing of a Justified Estate as a Motive to Mens Believing or coming to Christ. Thus it is as to Repentance in order to Pardon c. here 's the Authority of a Law-giver yet the Grace of a Redeemer here 's a Law in the obliging Power of the Command and the certain Connexion between the Duty and the promised Benefit and yet here is Grace meer Grace in the Adjustment of the Sanction as to the Matter it contains and Merit it refers to This as to us is Governing Grace and not Governing Iustice it 's not Justice that adjusts the Benefit with respect to the Duty as Meritorious thereof here 's nothing as of Debt to us for Believing yet a certainty of being Justified upon Believing here 's no Pardon as a Debt for repenting yet a Pardon sure upon repenting Divine Justice was honoured in Christ's fulfilling the Law of Works where God displayed Justice in Government yea it 's honoured with respect to Christ in God's giving all Benefits in Christ's right and as Christ's proper Reward But as to us it 's of Grace that a Believer should be thus sure to be Justified But though Grace be thus advanced in the Matter given yet here 's Authority expressed in the manner of giving and Divine Government maintained according to the present State of redeemed Sinners Some Obedience shall be yielded though perfect Obedience is become impossible there shall be the Reins of a Sanction on our Necks though the Sanction of the Law of Works hath and must condemn us if Christ relieves not from it Fear and Hope in us shall not be useless to us though we were by the Fall in a Case as to our selves utterly desperate and as to Election and Christ's Undertaking eventually Safe There shall be a Law of Faith to Judge and Save us by though we daily Transgress the Law of Works and by every Transgression are liable to the Curse Rom. 3.27 Gal. 3.10 I might had I time easily prove what I have asserted and give you the great Usefulness of this Point that the Gospel by which the Blessings of Christ are dispensed is a Law or a Display of Grace in a way of Authority and Government but I 'll only glance 1. Hereby the Gospel is said to be obeyed and disobeyed Rom. 10.16 2 Thess. 1.8 2 Cor. 9.13 2. Men become culpable as Rejecters of its Benefits Acts 13.38 41 48. 3. All Gospel-Benefits become fit and strong Motives in Gospel-Duty Acts 2.38 4. The Benefits are Suspended Infallibly till the Conditions be performed Luke 13.3 5. They that obey the Gospel may be sure of the promised Benefits and know how to try their Interest and conclude it Heb. 5.9 6. The Gospel-Blessings may be truly offered to all and all charged to accept of them by complying with the Conditions Acts 13.38 7. The Conditions hereby are described stated urged and not left uncertain 1 Cor. 13.2 8. A Rule of Judgment is hereby fixed whereby God is justified in
do his Commands that they may have right to the Tree of Life Mr. M. saith you are gone if you expect it Christ saith Luke 21.36 Watch and Pray always that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass and to stand before the Son of Man Mr. M. tells you he thinks it Inconsistent with Faith to do so 11. They effectually strike at Christ's Government in one of the Principal Means he hath pitched on to administer it by in our present State for with them it 's Damnable to be excited to Duty by hope of any good upon Obedience or by fear of missing that Good if we obey not And so in Truth Promises and Threats are Nullities as to God's Government Hence Mr. M. resolves all the Reasons of Obedience into Motives of what God hath done for us Page 70. Indeed they are Motives but they are not the only Motives nor the chief Motives that God makes use of nor what are fittest to impress Mankind yea or Christians whilst they be so Imperfect and encompassed with S●ares We see they restrain not Wrath Malice Faction c. in too many How dare Men say Is it Damning to submit to such Arguments which God so often useth from future Rewards and Punishments because he sometimes moves us from past Privileges or present Decencies Yea though you should add the Authority of the Precepts whilst you divest them of all Promises and Threatnings to invigorate Mens Compliances therewith We say Frustra est praecipere quod impune potest negligi Christ saith Iohn 13.17 If you know these things happy are you if you do them John 12 48 He that rejecteth me and receives not my words hath one that judgeth him the word that I have spoken that shall judge him Gal. 6.7 8. Be not deceived God is not mocked what a Man soweth that shall he reap For he that soweth to the Flesh shall of the Flesh reap Corruption but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap Life Everlasting I might transcribe the greatest part of the Bible to prove this 12. They dreadfully Contradict themselves in all the profitable Sermons they preach Mr. M. saith it 's a Damnable Error in me to say that God gives any Benefit in a way of Reward or Encouragement upon Believing though not as a Debt or as if Faith merited ought yea and it 's in and for Christ's Righteousness that it is given Yet hear himself Page 68. Oh get Faith see that you Believe for in this way it will come to pass that the Righteousness of Christ shall be upon you If a Man should ask him Doth God command me to believe Ans. Yes But doth God by you perswade me to believe by this Argument That Christ's Righteousness shall be upon me Ans. Yes sure or it 's a meer Delusion Q. Well but shall I have it upon my Believing A. Yes it is in this way But will it be upon me if I believe not Ans. No I have told you Page 66. Your Souls shall go down into Hell Qu. Do you intend that I may tell my own backward Heart If thou wilt believe thou shalt have an Interest in this Blessed Righteousness and so urge the Worth of this and the Necessity of Believing upon my Soul I suppose Mr. M. must here suspend But if I ask may I expect assuredly when I am through Grace enabled to believe that upon this God will put the Righteousness of Christ upon me and make good the word wherein he caused me to hope viz. That if I did Believe the Righteousness of Christ should be upon me Here Mr. M. by his Principle must cry out O No this is to follow a Soul-destroying Error if there be any in the World Page 46. But Sir I will not plead my Faith as any Merit but only plead the Promise God is pleased to make to my Faith and rely on that word now that I have Faith Mr. M. yet that 's Damnable for then it comes in a way of Reward Then I ask again If that be Damnable Pray why did you use this Motive in the name of Christ to perswade me to believe How could it be a Motive to Faith if I was not to expect it upon believing And if I was to expect it before I believed in case that I would believe Why may not I expect it now that I do believe I know not what Answer Mr. M. will make unless 1. It 's something done by Man Or 2. God will be still at liberty to perform or not perform the Benefit though he did promise it Or 3. He will not perform it in the way he promised it that is He promised it as an Encouragement to you if you would believe but he will not accomplish it as an Encouragement now tha● you do believe nor seem so much to approve of your Faith The first were Silly because it was a Man was perswaded to do this eve● to believe for I hope it 's a Humane Act though by the Spirits Power The second is to impeach the Truth of God's Word The third is a weak Foppery as if it were a Dishonour to God to give the Benefit in the way he chose to use it as a Motive to the Duty especially when as Mr. M. owneth it 's by the Gospel-word that God puts this Righteousness on us which is the very same Word whereby he urgeth this Benefit as a Motive to Man's Believing If I again ask Why Mr. M. would by this Motive thus perswade Sinners to Believe He would I hope say This is the way God hath ordained to convert them to the Faith But why dare he Preach thus when it implies what he calls a Damning Error or else it 's a meer Mockery I 'll answer for him He had a mind to venture a Contradiction rather than be wholly useless to those People whom he designed to frighten from the Ministry of others as Damnable that he and his Party might be more considerable Reader Would'st thou know whence comes this Confusion I 'll tell thee it is Because they consider not 1. That though the Gospel be not a Law wherein Governing Justice displays it self in the Adjustment of Benefits to the Duty yet therein there is a Governing Authority in a way of Grace suitable to the State of Men in the dispensing of the Fruits of Christ's Death 2. That a Reward of Grace is quite another thing than a Reward of Debt 3. That all Gospel-Benefits are given in Christ's Right and are the Effects of his Righteousness applied to all that partake of them 4. That all Gospel-Precepts and Promises do Authoritatively appoint and describe the Persons that are Par●●kers of Benefits for the sake of Christ's Righteousness but not their own and not put Men on purchasing these Benefits 5. Yet these do fully distinguish them that shall partake of the Benefits from others that shall not partake of them The Gospel doth hereby fix a
the Heart of Stone and gives a heart of Flesh renewing their Wills and by his power determining them to that which is good and effectually drawing them to Jesus Christ Conf. Cap. 10. A. 1. Q. 2. Man is altogether Passive therein until being quickned by the holy Spirit he is thereby enabled to answer this Call and to embrace the Grace offered and conveyed in it Large Cat. A. 73. Faith justifies a sinner in the sight of God not because of those other Graces which do always accompany it or of good Works that are the fruit of it Here we see that there is a quickning regenerating Work and Change on the Heart and Will in order to the Act of Faith and that there is no Faith unaccompanied at any time by other Graces and that by good works they intend not such Graces c. Did not Mr. M. tell us p. 60. that in effecting our Vital Vnion there is a Vital touch as I may say between Christ and us and a Clasping on each other Is there a Vital Touch before Life or a Clasping while we are Dead Doth the Mind see Christ whilst it 's Blind or the Will embrace him whilst it 's morally dead impotent unperswaded and averse Do we consent to Christ and Covenant with him whilst Satan Sin and Enmity Reign in our Faculties or open the Door to Christ whilst these keep the Keys God saith the natural Man receiveth not the things of God because they are spiritually discerned 1 Cor. 2.14 but Mr. M. saith yea it 's while they are natural that they see Christ and close with him Here 's a knowledg of an ignorant Mind here 's a coming and receiving without Life Here 's a Faith the Gospel Covenant never promiseth for it 's not included in God's Writing his Laws in the Heart The whole stress of Salvation is laid by him on an Act of a dead unregenerate sinner and Men are justified while the Soul is not turned from darkness to life nor from the power of Satan unto God Acts 26. 18. it were worth asking h●m whose Act this Act of Faith is It 's not a Humane Act unless you can suppose the Mind and Will can Act without any Vital Principle yea against it's own prevailing Principle Here then must be a force and unactiveness too in our very acting and it 's a strange Clasping of what we hate and abhor I doubt here may come in again Christ's believing for us However he must think 1. That our Faith after we are alive is either a Faith specifically distinct from that which justified us or it 's still an Act not effected by a regenerate Principle but is somewhat either below Life or above Man even when he is spiritualized he seems to bid at both His Simile is for the first the Spirits which he saith are Corporeal Clasp about the Soul for Life so it seems our Faith is a dead thing always never made Life or Living any more than those Spirits are made Soul otherwise it loseth its Clasping meetness as they would do in ceasing to be Corporeal Yet other times he makes it look like a Divinity Clasp about us 2. I do now see a little why the Man is so against God's giving us any saving Benefit in any way of Reward though not of Debt It 's because Faith is the only thing ordained not required as a Physical means on our part and this is so low a thing that a dead sinner may act or so sublime as not to be a Humane Act. 3. Again I see why he doth still confine our Justification to the end to the first Act of Faith yea and deny the immediate influence of Faith on our Justification for if you should bring it among Duties or to be under the Notion of a Duty all is spoiled No it must be a meer Physical Band of Union not enjoined by God as our Ruler but appointed as the Corporeal Spirits for Ligaments I dare not touch the Philosophy part of that lest if I name Embrio he should Curse me anew 4. I know now at last why he thought me a Pelegian the selfish reason why he writ it to London I knew long since because I in a Printed Sermon put the Act of Faith after spiritual Life it seems I should have said with him That in Vnion with Christ as one mystical Person which is by the efficient causality of Faith we are brought into a state of Spiritual Life Relative in our Iustification and Adoption and then and thereupon Qualitative c. p. 60. His Proofs for Faith before Life because Christ promiseth Life upon believing are contemptible as if further spiritual Life and Pardon and Eternal Glory be not Life as well as Hell is Death ' and some sinners twice dead 4. The Faith he so much insists on hath not all the Essentials of a saving Faith I know many Worthy Men distinguish between Faith quae justificat and qua justificat and no doubt the Soul hath an especial respect to Christ as Priest and his Righteousness in order to Justification But our Discourse is of the Faith quae justificat What that Faith is he tells us p. 62. Faith is a going out of our selves unto Christ for all And p. 40. The Hearts acting towards this Object in its believing is most properly in a way of trust and dependance and affiance Rep. 1. We have just seen it wants a Vital Principle as it is the Act of an unregenerate dead Soul Now this brings it in the Judgment of most Divines to be no saving act at all no saving Faith because the Act of a Natural and Dead Sinner 2. I need not mention that it is no obediential Act And note That when our Divines deny that Faith is not Imputed as an Act of Believing or as an Evangelical Act of Obedience they say it 's not as such imputed as our justifying Righteousness which I grant But they positively affirm that the Faith by which Christ's Righteousness becomes imputed is an Act of evangelical Obedience Confess Chap. 11. A. 1. Again 3. I will not insist how far the Assent of this Faith is limited as to its Object as well as its Nature 4. I do grant That by Gospel-faith we trust in and depend on Christ as our only Saviour and that by it we go out of our selves to Christ for all Attonement Merit Causality of Acceptance of all we do and Strength and Grace to enable us to all 5. Yet see how much more the Assembly includes in saving Faith Confess Chap. 14. A. 2 By this Grace Faith a Christian believeth to be true whaever is revealed in the Word for the Authority of God himself speaking therein and acteth differently upon that which each particular Passage thereof containeth yielding Obedience to the Commands Trembling at the Threatnings and embracing the Promises of God for this Life and that which is to come but the principal Acts of saving Faith are accepting receiving and restin
render us the Persons whom it so entitleth thereto And is this nothing though it be not the Righteousness for which we are Justified as legal Obedience was to be 7. He ventures too far in making the Crown of Glory and Justification to be Effects of Remunerative strict Iustice as to us which is untrue notwithstanding Christ's Righteousness is imputed to us P. 12 13 15. Among many other Expressions of this kind he saith It is the Constitution of God that all the Saving Good and Blessing which shall be given us shall be given not only by Free Grace but by the Hand of Justice Reply If he mean only that the Consideration upon which all Saving Good was granted is a Righteousness that answered strict Justice I grant it But to say which he seems fully to intend that the Righteousness of Christ is so impured to us as that Benefits are actually conferred on us in a way of Remunerative Justice as to us I deny and say it is a Thousand Fold worse than they whom he Condemns durst ever have a thought of I own also it 's a Reward of Justice to Christ that Believers should be Justified and Glorified But Justification and Glory are given of meer Grace to those Believers though in a Gospel way of Government They cannot plead Now Lord I have Christ's Righteousness on me I have a Claim to these as a Debt or Reward due to me from Remunerative Justice For though Christ give the Crown in his own Right and his Right to secure that Crown yet he reserves the Claim of Justice to his own Person and we must accept of all even at God's Hand of Gift Sinners shall not have the Saviour's Plea in themselves though he will plead it for their Good There is more Spiritual Pride in this kind of Talk than many imagine ●he Gift of God is Eternal Life even when he gives it and not only as to antecedent Causes we look for the Mercy of Christ to Eternal Life Iude 21. and it 's still for Christ's sake we must intreat and expect and not for our own nor for any thing as it 's ours whatever be the Effect of the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness on us 8. That which he calls telling a Story to us of the deep Counsels of the Wisdom and Grace of God how this Righteousness is upon us from its first and highest Original is in several things an unsafe Account and greatly to the Dishonour of Father Son and Spirit Some parts of it I have already considered I now shall briefly observe these things 1. He strikes at the Essential Glory of the Son of God 2. He describes the Fall of Man very Dishonourable to God 3. He much mistakes what is most properly the Glory of God 4. He leaves out Man's Acknowledgment of the Holy Spirit in the Work of Salvation 1. Mr. M. strikes at the Essential Glory of the Son of God Before I prove this I would premise 1. The Son of God as second Person in the Trinity is equal to the Father in Essence and Glory though he be of the Father as to the Mode and Manner of Subsistence Hence he hath the same Divine Perfections and Glory 2. Whatever is ascribed to Christ before he assumed the Humane Nature must be such as is consistent with his Divine Nature as the Son of God and proper thereto 3. Nothing is added to the Divine Nature as in Christ by its Union to the Humane Nature besides relation to that Humane Nature 4. The Person of the Son of God was compleat before he assumed the Humane Nature and therefore the Humane Nature is no Constitutive part of the Second Person but as Dr. Ameswell saith is only as an Adjunct If Mr. M. mean more it 's horridly Dangerous when he saith P. 8. The Humane Nature belongs to the Constitution of Christ's Person as he now is And looks the worse for his words P. 7. Christ's dwelling in our Nature is no part of the Punishment of Sin for then the Divine Nature only is punished and not the Humane at all nor the Person As if what terminated on one Nature only did not terminate on Christ's Person and by the same Rule the Acts confined to one Nature as their Principle are not the Acts of his Person unless they be the Acts of both Natures 5. Since the Incarnation we frequently meet with a Personal Communication of Properties what is proper to either of the two Natures is ascribed to Christ as God-Man as Christ died c. 6. Yet there is neither a Transfusion or Communication of the Properties of one Nature to the other nor must we ascribe to his Person any thing in any manner that would tend to the Confusion of the two Natures 7. All the Glory or Humiliation that can be justly ascribed to the Son of God as such cannot infer any Change in or Addition to him and must be confined to what is Manifestative and Relative His Glory may appear more but cannot be added to it may be obscured but it cannot be really diminished 8. Hence whatever Addition of real Glory or Afflictive Suffering belongs to Christ it is with respect to his Humane Nature This was only capable of Rewards of being Exalted of being Deferred of God's hiding his Face and Dying I shall now evidence that Mr. M. strikes at the Essential Glory of Christ as the Eternal Son of God 1. He makes Christ as the Eternal Son of God capable of an Addition to his real Glory as God P. 56. God the Father from Eternity begat his Son the Second Person in the Trinity and loving him with an infinite Love designed a special Revenue of Glory and Honour and Praise unto him as from all his Creatures in their Kind and Way so more eminently from and in a certain Number of Mankind c. The End and Vpshot and last Issue that all his Counsels about them comes to is this That they may be brought to the Acknowledgment of the Son of God c. P. 61. You see how the grand Original Design of God to bring in a Revenue of singular Honour and Praise and Glory to his Son Christ is brought about c. I shall presently repeat more Let 's consider 1. It 's plain he intends the Son of God as such It 's he as begotten from Eternity he as the Second Person in the Trinity it 's he as loved with an infinite Love yea from being so infinitely beloved as God's Eternal Son the Contrivance had its Rise The Design in the Vpshot is That he might be acknowledged to be that Son of God It cannot be meant that this Additional Glory might be designed for him as foreseen Mediator or as in Flesh for this Design is the first step and this Glory of the Son is the Original of all the Contrivance He was pursuant to this purpose made a Mediator and legal Head and he tells us to confirm this That for this end of bringing a