Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
spirit_n body_n soul_n substance_n 8,320 5 8.4214 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A10250 Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.; Theses theologicae. English Bèze, Théodore de, 1519-1605.; La Faye, Antoine de, 1540-1615. aut; Penry, John, 1559-1593. 1591 (1591) STC 2053; ESTC S101754 189,778 296

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

sort doth appertain vnto the soule namelie in that respect that by the resurrection it was restored againe vnto the bodie that is vnto his proper instrument 5 Heere it is also gathered that the same verie bodie which was laid in the graue rose againe 6 The Resurrection did abolish none of the essentiall qualities of the bodie of which sort are to haue a quantitie and to bee finite whence followeth that it is also enclosed within the compasse of the members thereof and is contained in a place We do condemne therfore the Eutychians who held that he had a bodie that was not bodilie and the Valentinians who said that it was an aierie bodie and the Marcionites who turned his true bodie vnto a shadow both before and after the Resurrection 7 By the same reason also doth fall to the ground that inuented forgerie both of Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation as beeing altogether repugnant vnto the truth of the bodie of Christ 8 Christ was the first that rose hauing swallowed vp mortalitie and remooued at once all the infirmities of the naturall life from him selfe although that after his resurrection he did trulie eat and drinke that he might make vs fullie assured that he tooke vpon him again a true bodie 9 Christ which is proper to him alone rose againe by the power of his owne Deitie and not by any borrowed strength or by the force of anie creature Therefore his Resurrection is a most true demonstration that he was trulie God 10 There was great cause why Christ shoulde ryse the third day and not before least that if he had risen sooner his death should haue seemed to be but fained or if he had staied longer in the graue the faith of the elect might haue beene hazarded 11 The Resurrection of Christ was necessarie to the accomplishing of our saluation because that as it behooued him to suffer the death due vnto our sinnes so also it was needfull that death should bee ouercome by him that hee might bring vs vnto aeternall life beeing deliuered from mortalitie 12 It was agreable also vnto the justice of God that Christ should enioy aeternall glorie euen by the condition of the legall couenant which is do this and liue 13 The Resurrection of Christ is a sure pillar of our resurrection because the church is as it were the complement or filling vp of Christ and therefore taking away that head of Christian religion vaine were the preaching of the Gospell Therefore we detest from our harts the Saducees and all Philosophers that haue denied the resurrection of the flesh 14 The doctrine of the Resurrection hath beene continuallie held in the church of God the which also though it do depend vpon the omnipotencie of God onelie may yet in some sort by laying downe some sure grounds and principles bee probablie gathered by humaine reason 15 Our bodies shall not be two in nomber after the resurrection but the verie same bodie that lay downe in the graue shall rise againe The opinion therefore which IOHN the Bishop of Ierusalem held concerning the taking vp of an other body is worthelie condemned 16 The Resurrection of Christ doth properlie belong vnto the elect seeing the wicked are to ryse againe not by the vertue of his resurrection but by the just judgement of GOD vnto aeternall damnation euen by the force of that penaltie which GOD added vnto the commandement hee gaue to ADAM The day that thou shalt eate thou shalt die the death euen the first and the second death 17 It is no wonderfull case that Christ after his Resurrection did not openlie manifest himself vnto all men for as there is a time of mercie so is there a time of judgemēt with God 18 Christ proued his Resurrection vnto his disciples by all kinde of arguments as by the testimonies both of Angels of weomen and of men vnto whome he presented himselfe aliue euen in the same bodie that was marked with the scarres of the wounds adding thereunto also the testimonies of the Prophets 19 Vnto all these things he adjoined his conuersation which he had with them for the space of fourtie daies least either a shorter time should not suffice or if he had continued longer he might seeme to haue risen to such a life as he lead heere at the first 20 Hetherto also belongeth the manner of his appearing which was in some respect naturall that it might be manifest that neither his resurrection nor his glorie did take from him his true humanitie whereby he is and shall be our brother for euer and yet notwithstanding supernaturall that all might knowe him hauing laide downe this naturall life to be vnto vs the first fruits of a spirituall and an aeternall 21 Now seeing both this hystorie of the Resurrection and also testimonies of the Prophets which fore-tolde the same were published openlie and in the audience of as manie as would heare not onelie of the Iewes but of al other people and was also confirmed by all kinde of miracles it must needs be that neither the Iewes nor anie other people can complaine that Christ after hee had risen againe did not offer himself to be seene of them 22 And seing that Christ came to saue his elect wholly both soule and bodie and that his resurrection is his true and full victorie it followeth that that spirituall resurrection whereby it commeth to passe that our soules beeing spiritually vnited vnto Christ the old mā beginneth to die in vs being by little and little to be worne away is buried and the new man riseth again doth depend vpon the resurrection of Christ that euen as Christ after his resurrection not before as far as he is our head began to liue that aeternall life after he had ouercome all the infirmities of this naturall life which sinne excepted he had vndergone for our sakes so that qualitie of an vncorrupted life being begun in our soules while we liue heere and proceeding farther after the dissolation of this bodie is at the length to bee fullie perfected when the restitution of our bodies shall be accomplished and so the elect shall liue that aeternall life with Christ the type of which benefite is the Sacrament of Baptisme vnto vs. 23 Nowe euen as the Spirit of Christ passed from the Crosse into Paradise at the verie same moment that it departed out of the bodie thēce returned into the bodie that whole Christ in respect that he was man might be afterwards glorified so we do beleeue that their spirits who die in the Lord do straight way depart vnto God there to enjoy that measure of glory that is appointed for thē vntill that they beeing adjoined againe vnto the same bodies which will be the verie same in substance trulie corporal though in a far more excellent estate shal liue vnder Christ their head for euermore We do condemne therfore both that fable of Purgatory fire and also their doctrine who dreame that the soules of the departed
day which went before the Sabaoth lay in the graue the whole Sabboth according to the custome of the Iewes which account a naturall day from Euening to Euening and rose againe the beginning of the next which was the first daye of the weeke 13 Concerning this Article of the descension of Christ into Hell it is manifest that there is no mention made of either in the Nicene or in any other of the ancient creeds and RVFFINVS witnesseth that it was not read in the Church of Rome 14 No man therefore ought to wonder if some question be made of the meaning thereof 15 That the Creede which is called the Apostles was written by the Apostles themselues before they departed from Ierusalem euerie one of them bringing in his seueral Article it is a meere fabulous tale as the very number of these Articles do shew 16 Yet it is cleare that they were faithfullie and truely gathered out of the preaching of the Apostles acounted euen frō the most ancient time as a square a rule of faith 17 Now their opinion is verie probable who doe take these words he descended into Hel if this Article was at the first in the common creed expressed in so many words not for any distinct Article but for a summary comprehension of the last and lowest degree of Christes humiliation which should bee pointed out by the wordes of suffering crucifiyng death and burial as this kind of speach is somtimes in the Scriptures Metaphorically vsed for the lowest estate of anguish and dejection So that He suffered was dead buried and descended into Hell should be but one Article of faith 18 But who can beleeue that the Fathers of Nicene and so many Synods that afterward followed and the very Church of Rome it self would haue rashly blotted out this Article if it had bin written in so many words in the common Creed 19 Either of the two therefore must needs bee necessarie namelie that either this kinde of speach in that sense that wee haue spoken though familiar vnto the Hebrues was not yet receiued in all Churches as being ambiguous and not necessary seeing it was sufficiently vnderstood by the former and so by a little and a little grewe out of vse or that this Article also was then inserted into the common Creed when as their opinion which hath bene of ancient time had by degrees taken place who thought that the soule of our Sauiour Christ beeing separated from his bodie went into I know not what place where the Spirits of the beleeuing Fathers should haue their aboad 20 But this opinion though it hath bin of a long time receaued by a common and an olde growen error cannot bee confirmed any wise by any testimonie of the Euangelicall Historie but is manifestlie ouerthrown thereby seeing it is very apparant by the woordes of the Euangelists that the Spirite of Christ being departed out of his bodie was there receaued into whose hands hee committed it when hee gaue vppe the Ghost that is into the place of aeternall blessednes whereof speaking vnto the Theefe he said this day shalt thou be with me in Paradise 21 Nowe that there was any place allotted vnto the Spirits of the Fathers that departed before the incarnation of Christ whence afterward the Spirite of Christ comming thither indeed shuld bring them with him into heauen it can in no wise bee confirmed by any colourable testimonie of the Scriptures Neither would the Euangelists haue omitted any such thing in the storie of the passion of Christ But this opinion seemeth to arise partlie in that manye are written to haue risen either by Christ or with Christ partly out of the PSALME 16.8 which PETER citeth Act. 2.25 and out of two other places also of 1. PET. 3. wrongfullie interpreted 22 Out of this error arise two other that are more absurd the one of those who beeing ledde by the misvnderstanding of the words of PETER thought that the soule of Christ went indeed into Hell to the ende that as in bodie hee had preached the Gospell vpon earth vnto those that were liuing so also he should preach the said Gospel in his Spirit vnto the Spirites of those that were dead as though that after death there were any place left for preaching repentance 23 The other errour is of those who dreamed that the Spirite of Christ should goe vnto the soules of the damned that hee might there also suffer in his soule the paines ordained in hell for the damned as though that the soule of Christ whilest it was in his bodie did not beare those punishmentes for our sake as both that horrible agonie which hee sustained in the Garden and also that fearefull crie My God my God c. which vpon the Crosse made Heauen and earth to tremble doe beare witnesse or as though that speache It is finished wherein our whole hope consisteth were vntrue 24 But wee omitting the whole controuersie concerning the putting in or the blotting out of this Article do simplie vnderstand by the Descension of Christ into hell those things which Christ being made a curse for vs suffered in his soule for our sake in those torments especiallie which were so greeuous as nothing could be no not imagined more horrible 25 By the word DESCENSION therefore is not ment any remoouing from a higher place to a lower because that can properlie agree neither vnto the Deitie which is euery where nor vnto the bodie which of it selfe lay dead in the Graue neither vnto the soule which beeing commended vnto the Father was straight way in Paradise after it was separated from the body 26 Now the word HELL which in the Scripture is diuersly taken signifieth neither the Graue because that explanation should bee superfluous and obscure neither yet the place of the damned as it is cleare out of the former Principles 27 Therefore this Descension of Christ into Hel which had an ende at his death went before the Article of his buriall but yet it is placed after the same in the order of speach euen because it was thought meet to set downe in one tenor of speach whatsoeuer did belong to the humiliation of his body Defended by HILLARIE FANTRART an English-man of Guernzy PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE RESVRRECTION OF IESVS CHRIST XLV 1 HItherto wee haue heard Christes combate with death wherein he might seeme to be ouercome by death because it so far preuailed against him as it threw his dead bodie into the graue 2 Now we are to speake of Christs victorie ouer death the beginning whereof was the preseruation of his dead bodie in the graue vncorrupted and that without the help of anie art of the Apothicarie 3 His full victorie manifested it selfe in the resurrection of his bodie seeing that life is directlye opposite vnto death 4 Now that onlie is said to rise again which lay down and therefore neither the Deitie nor the soule of Christ rose againe Yet notwithstanding the resurrection after a
way vnto the gift of repentance 15 PAVLE therefore did not sinne against the holie Ghost who persecuted Christ and his members whome he knew not 1. TIM 1. 16 Although this sinne bee voluntary yet it followeth not that euery sinne which is voluntarie and committed against the conscience is irremissible 17 But contrariwise although these sins are horrible whether they be committed of infirmitie or of malice yet are they forgiuen vnto those that repent as they were vnto DAVID PETER and others 18 The counsel of God concerning the saluation of the elect cannot be dissanulled and therefore the elect cannot be guilty of this sinne 19 Neither doe all the reprobate necessarie fall vnto this sin seeing originall sin is sufficient to condemne them 20 This sinne is placed in the heart of man and therefore seeing God is the searcher of the heart diligent heed is to bee taken least that being carried away with a preposterous zeale we rashly passe sentence against any in judgeing them to be guilty of this sinne 21 Yet are they to be seriouslie admonished who continue to shewe themselues disobedient vnto the admonitions and judgements of God least that being at the length hardened by the Lords just judgement they run headlong vnto this downe-fall Defended by IOHN HALBERIVS CORTRACENVS PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE RESVRRECTION OF THE FLESH LXXX 1 THe rest of the Articles of our faith being hitherto sufficientlie handled two of them remaine yet to bee discussed namely the resurrection of the flesh and life euerlasting 2 Although the Sonne of God by taking vpon him our nature by dying and rising againe hath performed the parts of our saluation Although also he doth bestow that quickning Spirite of his vpon all those that trulie beleeue the Gospell It remaineth as yet notwithstanding that what hath bene performed in him who is our head be also performed in vs being his members 3 Hence must the faithfull learne both day and night to meditate vpon the marke and shutting vp of their happinesse and to bee continuallie desirous of the same in such sort as although they bee tossed in this worlde by diuers and daungerous stormes of temptation raised vp against them by the Deuill the Worlde and the Fleshe they may yet continue firme and immooue-able in faith and in the hope of the liuing GOD and of the Lord Iesus Christ 4 Euen as death entred into the world by the sinne of the first ADAM whence the necessitie of death did arise Euen so wee affirme that death is abollished in the saints and chaunged vnto aeternall life by the vertue of the latter ADAM that is Christ to the end that as Christ did first of all rise againe vnto that aeternall life So all the elect may rise by him vnto the same 5 Now death is by a naturall generation conuaied vnto all the posteritie of the first ADAM whereas aeternall life is by spirituall ingraffing into the second ADAM deriued vnto his members 6 In this respect is the name of ADAM attributed vnto Christ namely that as ADAM was the stocke of mankinde breathing out poison according vnto the deadlie nature So Christ is made by grace the root of all the Saints powring the juice of eternall life into his members Wee doe therefore condemne the Philosophers who drewe the cause of death not from sinne but from this Aixome in naturall Philosophie vz. whatsoeuer is compounded is subject vnto dissolution Much more doe wee detest the PELAGIANS who teach that sinne and therefore death did arise not from the deprauation of nature in ADAM but from the voluntarie imitation thereof the which errour PAVLE dooth ouerthrowe as by manie Argumentes so by this most clearelie in that Infants themselues also are subject vnto death 7 Although that all sinnes which are the cause of death are truly remitted vnto the beleeuers yet notwithstanding are they no lesse subject vnto death then the very wicked themselues and that for two causes First because that the roote of sinne which is called originall sinne is not vtterlie abollished in them in this life but is brought to an end by death For then doth the strife betweene the flesh and the Spirite cease Secondly because that vnlesse they did shake of this life they could neuer be partaker of that other life which they hope for 8 And therefore we holde that the faithfull are depriued of this life rather by the mercie of God calling them vnto that aeternall kingdom then because that death is the reward of sinne 9 And on the other side that the vnfaithful do not rise by vertue of the resurrection of Christ which is alwaies vnto saluation and is bestowed vpon his members but by the force of that curse of God whensoeuer thou shalt eat of the fruit hereof thou shalt die the death 10 For seeing this degree doth comprehend both the deathes but especially the second which is eternall it must needes be that the vnfaithfull also shall rise againe whereas otherwise their bodies except they should bee joyned again with their soules should escape eternal paines which is ment by the second death 11 The whole person of euery man wholie considered but not in part is said to rise again For as the body only is said to lie down so the same alone to speak properly shall rise againe Whereas the soule seeing by death it hath suffered no detriment in the essence thereof can bee sayd to rise again but metaphorically as when it is brought by the Spirite of Christ from the seruitude of sinne wherein it was dead and wherein it could not so much as thinke much lesse will or doe the things that are of God into that holie libertie which is the way vnto eternall life We do therfore condemne them who dream that the soules seperated from their bodies are a sleepe and that they shall arise togeather with the bodies And we doe also detest the opinion of HYMENEVS and PHILETVS who did not distinguishe the spirituall from the corporall resurrection 12 The Scripture declareth by manifest testimonies that the soules of the faithfull who die in the Lorde are receiued of christ into that eternal paradise situated aboue all heauens whervnto Christ did ascend and that they are there conuersant with Christ being partakers in their measure of blessednes and felicity wheras on the other side the word of GOD and the consideration of thinges that are contrary doe shew that the soules of the wicked are thrust into hell and there tormented in their manner 13 The same bodies that lay down shal rise but not in the same qualities as the verie same body of Christ which was crucified buried did arise but not hauing those qualities wherewith it was endued when it was crucified dead and buried Yet this is the difference in that the bodie of Christ felt no corruption and therefore did ouer-come the power and effect of death euen in the verie house of death But our bodies are deliuered from corruption which seemed
sort necessary And so AVGVSTINE saith that God was the Author of good and the ordainer of euill 10 Nowe seeing that Euill is not any thing that hath being in nature it followeth that there can be no extream soueraigne Euill saue onely as far as euill is altogether departed from that which is the chiefe and the soueraigne good which onelie is God alone blessed and mightie aboue all Wee doe therefore condemne the MARCIONITES the MANICHAEES and others who haue taught that there was two beginnings the one contrary vnto the other that is two Gods the one good of whome the inuisible spiritual and good Creatures haue had their beginning The other euill from whence all visible corporall and corrupt things haue issued whereas indeed all things are good in regard of their beeing and the euill that is in them hath proceeded from the corruption and defect of their being Defended by IOHN HENRIE SVVYTZER of Tygurine PRINCIPLES CONCERNING GOOD AND EVILL SPIRITS XIII CONCERNING THE CREATION OF AL things in generall we haue alreadie spoken now it followeth that we deale of the thinges created in particular and first of spirituall substaunces as beeing the Creatures that draw neerest vnto the nature of God 1 SPirits then are substances created of nothing without bodies and invisible yet finite in regard of the proprietie of their nature good indeed but so as they wer created by God of a changeable goodnes Of this sort are those which we call Angels and the soules of men 2 All Angels were at the first created good and endued with an vnderstanding of most surpassing excellencie and being of nature most simple next vnto God they were al at once created in the beginning not to take encrease by any propagation 3 The name of Angels is attributed to those Spirits to declare their office namelie that they are as it were the messengers and officers of God especiallie those of them that continued in the truth of whom we will speake in the first place 4 The names of those doe partlie shewe the excellencie of their nature as when they are called SERAPHIM and CHERVBIM and partlie declare the dignitie of their seruice wherevnto they are sent of which sort are the names of MICHAEL GABRIEL RAPHAEL spoken of in the Scriptures The like names of Angels mencioned in the bookes of CABALISTS and PAGANS wee holde to bee counterfeit 5 And as for the disputation cōcerning their degrees that of all other things is most vaine and so is the question concerning the time of their creation seeing that the lord hath not opened this misterie vnto vs. 6 Of these Angells some thorough Gods grace haue continued in the truth that is in that blessed and permanent state wherein they were created attending as diligent seruants vpon God that they might be readie to execute his commandements both for the furthering of the saluation of the Saints also for the execution of the just judgments of God 7 In the performing of these commaundements they haue often times appeared trulie visible and palpable by taking vpon them the shape of a man or some other form being for a set time clad with true bodies to bring to pas bodily actions It being the will of God that they should thus far frame themselues vnto the capacitie of men But whence they tooke these bodies and whether they fashioned them vnto themselues with all such like points as are laied vp onely in the secret counsell of God we hold it vnlawfull for vs to search 8 Now the rest of the Angels the number whereof are also exceedinglie manie wilfullie and willinglie changing themselues and departing from the truth hee being their guide and Captaine as it were who is peculiarlie named Sathan that is the aduersarie of God and the Deuill are by the just judgemēt of God of those that were most good become most euil but not bereaued of vnderstanding and judgement Wherefore also they are called by a Greeke name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is endued with knoweledge And for this their sinne they are justly adjudged by the Lord vnto aeternall torment without any hope of mercie 9 And although these wicked Angels do with all their might resist God yet are they wholie subject vnto his gouernement and power the Lord vsing their wickednes and malice partly to chastice his owne and partlie to execute his judgementes against the enemies of his name in such sort as hee turneth their wicked endeuours and purposes vnto the cleane contrarie part euen vnto the saluation of his children and to his own glory The Lord then in such sort doth vse them as instruments though euill that are at his commaundement but so as they can neuer be properly called the seruants of God because their worke is alwaies euil although he bringeth his good worke to passe by their meanes 10 These as also their Prince who from the beginning was a murtherer as far as in them lieth doe desire the destruction of men both bodie and soule 11 Their operations also are wonderfull when God giueth them power to hurt In so much that after a sort they may seeme to worke miracles 12 But if we cal those miracles which are done against all order of nature the Deuils can worke no such no nor yet anie of the good Angels Because this is onlie the proper power of God which can in no wise be communicated with any Creature The miracles therefore which seeme to be wrought by Deuils are either meere delusions or els wrought by the secret operation of nature which is better known vnto them being euill Spirits then to any men and therefore they haue but the shew of miracles 13 These euill Angels also seeme to foretell thinges to come in which respecte they haue long since bewitched men and depraued the true worship of God as farre as in them lay But to speake properlie they cannot foretel any thing to come because this also is the peculiar worke of God onely 14 Nowe howe they are able to worke in the hearts of men and to sturre vp their thoughts that is whether they alwaies do the same by the meanes of some thing laied before man or without anie object wee thinke it to be a curious question and it may be such as men cannot dissolue But our part is that wee bee very carefull to enarme our selues against these temptations with all our might by continuall praiers 15 But we affirme out of the word of God that the deuils are dispersed through all parts of the worlde both aboue and beneath doing all the euill they can euen vntill that Sathan and his Angels togeather with all cursed reprobates be cast into hel there to be tormented with eternall fire We doe therefore condemne the MANICHAES and the PRISCILLIANISTS who defended that the Diuels were euill by nature and created such at the first by a certaine euill God the SADVCES also who together with that HERMES TRESMEGISTVS
in regard of those things that appertain vnto the foundation of the gouernment of the Church as for the hard places that are in the word it interpreteth them both by conference of the scriptures and also according to analogie of faith 20 Nowe as touching those thinges which appertaine vnto outward order the Church in the feare of the Lord may therein consider what is most meete vnto time and place Wee doe condemne therefore those who dreame that euerie man whatsoeuer hee professe shall bee saued by his own Religion seeing out of the Catholicke Church there is no saluation And those who tie the Catholicke Church vnto one certaine place Those who bring vnto the Church the Academicall ●ncertainty Those who require a forme of perfection in the Militant Church Those who holde the personall succession absolutelie for an vndoubted note of the Church Those who haue by little and little transformed the Christian Presbyteries or Eldership that is the gouernment ordained by Christ the onely King and Monarch of his church into the image of the beast which was the olde Romaine Empire and that first by bringing in the dignity of Bishops next by apointing degrees amongst them and last of all by placing Antichrist at Rome vnder the title of the Ministeriall head Those who doe not measure the Church according to the word of God but the word according to the bare name of the Church Defended by DAVID PIOTAEVS of Geneua PRINCIPLES VPON THE ARTICLE I BELEEVE THAT THERE IS A COMMVNION OF SAINCTS LI. 1 CHrist can be fruitfull vnto none but by participation 2 This participation is partly of Christ and partlie of of his benefites which doe flow from the participation of him 3 That therefore whereof wee are made partakers is partly substantiall and partly a quality 4 The Substantial things are both Christ himselfe God and man and also all those corporall things which are bestowed vpon vs together with Christ beeing participated vnto vs. The qualities are all those gifts both of the bodie and the mind which in him we receaue in this life and obtaine in the life to come 5 Now wee are made partakers of the Deitie of Christ onely in force and operation but of his humanity in verie deed as far as he is our brother 6 Nowe this participation by reason of the most strait bād and the vnspeakable efficacie therof not that the one substance doth touch the other is expressed by the names of vnion engraffing incorporation and such like 7 The same is for three causes called spirituall first of all because the true and the soueraigne cause thereof is that power and vnspeakable force of the holy Ghost the which notwithstanding the distaunce of place doth most trulie and most effectually joyne the Saints though here as yet vpon earth in a spiritual marriage with Christ that they may be flesh of his flesh bone of his bones althogh according vnto this flesh they are not vpon earth but in heauen 8 Secondly because again this conjunction with Christ himself according to the flesh is in regard of vs a worke not of the bodie but of the minde which receiueth Christ by faith 9 Thirdly because the end and the scope of this mutuall Communion is not to the end that a kind of monstruous bodie should arise from the vniting of his substaunce with ours but that in this life we shuld be gouerned by his Spirit and that in the life to come we should liue an aeternall and a heauenly life with him 10 Yet may this vniting bee called a corporall vnion in a sound meaning so that all ambiguitie and newnes of wordes be auoyded namely if that especiall thing which in this mysterie as before hath bin said we spiritually receiue by faith and that is the verie humanitie of Christ be considered Next if respect be had to the external means which the holy Ghost vseth to beget and nourish faith in vs namely both the outward word sounding in our ears and also the Sacramentall elements and rites that affect the rest of our senses 11 Out of this spirituall vnion ariseth that mysticall bodie wherof Christ is the head both in respect of his preheminence ouer the same and also because he doth wholie giue sense and motion therevnto Nowe all those that beleeue and are sanctified are called members vnder this head in which sense is the Church called by PETER the Citie the spirituall temple of God built of liuely stones whose foundation and cheife corner stone is Christ who sustaineth and beareth vp the whole building It is no lesse absurd therefore to suppose that there is a kind of fastning and a cleauing of Christs bodie within ours or of ours within his then it were to say that the bodies of the Saints do subsist one within another Seeing that the band of the Communion of Saints is the very same that the vnion is which they haue both with themselues and with Christ 12 Some of those things wherof we are made partakers in this mysterie are altogeather proper to the elect namelie Christ himselfe of whome none can be a member except he be indued with true faith true faith which is inseparablie joyned with true hope charitie and last of all that aeternall kingdome prepared from all aeternity according to the free purpose of God vnto the elect onelie Some also are after a sort as the Lord thinketh good common to the hypocrites and prophane by reason that they seeme to bee ingraffed into Christ as are the gifts of Prophesie of tongues and of healing togeather with manie other notable gifts of the mind and excellent benefites of this life the which as by the elect they are consecrated to God who is the giuer of them so are they prophaned by the wicked 13 Againe these gifts though not alwaies in the same measure are partly common to all the Saints as beeing necessarie to the saluation of all of which sort are the participation of Christ himselfe liuelie faith steadfast hope loue vnfained remission of sinnes and sanctification by the holie Ghost with suche like and partlye proper to euerie seuerall beleeuer the which the same holie Spirite doth distribute according to the diuers consideration of the callings of men vnto whome and in what measure hee thinketh good 14 Euerie one of the Saints seuerallie considered haue their peculier giftes both in regarde of the possession of Christ himselfe and also of his benefits as it is expressed in the similitude of the talents But in asmuch as there is one GOD and Father of all one Christ the Lord one Spirite whereof all the Saints are endued one faith one hope of the same calling one baptisme one kingdome of heauen and also because whatsoeuer graces bestowed vpon anie is therefore giuen that the vse of them may bee common vnto them all and so that they should be the one and the selfe same bodie of Christ therefore all the gifts bestowed vppon any of the
whole analogie may be kept and also for the cause alledged in the 11 principle 16 This analogie doth depend vpon the diuine ordination institution or blessing by vertue wherof common things are drawne vnto a holie vse The signes therefore haue by the ordinance of God no consideration at all of a Sacrament saue onely in the action of their lawfull administration Neither are wee to imagine of any force that should bee engraffed in the signs themselues seing they differ from common things in regard of a Sacramentall signification onely and that in the very vse That carrying about an adoration of the signes is most horrible Idolatrie 17 As the whole force of the Supper and the Sacramentall formes of speach doe arise from this analogie so they are to be judged thereby These speaches therfore This is my body the cup is the new Testamēt in my blood are not to be expoūded according to the words but according to the meaning that is by a Sacramentall Metonymie or chaunge of the name whereby those things are said to be that wherof onely they are a signe 18 The proper and principall endes of the Suppcr are both the serious remembraunce joyned with thankes-giuing of the death of Christ to his glorie and our profite and also the neerer ingraffing of vs into the body of Christ by faith beeing strengthened and increased and our neerer vniting with God the Father by meanes of the Mediator who dwelleth in vs by his Spirite 19 The lesse principall endes are the mutuall communion and loue of the faithfull being members of the same body the outward witnessing of that mutuall consent and the preseruation of publicke meetings 20 The effects of the Supper doe differ from the ends but in respect onely For seeing it is ordained by Christ vnto these ends it cannot be but that they should ensue vppon the lawfull vse of the Supper yet so as the instrumentall signification is attributed vnto them as their worke whereas the whole efficacie is solie referred vnto the holie Ghost 21 The profit and efficacie of the Supper is not to bee tied vnto the verie moment of the action of receauing but doth extend it selfe vnto our whole life yet is not the action once celebrated to bee for this cause euer after neglected seeing no man hath such a perfection of faith in this life as he standeth not in need of this support Defended by IANES ARMINIVS of Holland PRINCIPLES TOVCHING THE POPISH MASSE LXI WEE HAVE SPOKEN IN THE FORMER Principles concerning the true vse of the Supper of the Lorde now wee are to shew in few wordes how the said vse hath bene diuerslie depraued by Sathan 1 OF all the errors that haue risen about the holie Supper of the Lord that inuention of Transubstantiation is the most ouglie which was brought in and confirmed especially by LANFRANKE about the yeare 1050. 2 For when as the words of Christ instituting this Supper ar to be vnderstood acording vnto his mind who speaketh them which alwaies ought to be regarded in all acts and especiallie in Testaments so that in this Sacrament the bodie and bloode of Christ are truelie but sacramentallie and by faith giuing credite without question vnto his woordes receaued The Transubstantiators contrary to all reason and vse of Sacraments haue so obstinatelie stooke to the woordes that manie absurdities haue risen thereof 3 First of all seeing all Sacraments do consist of signes and things signified they doe take away the nature of the signes For they teach that after the Consecration as they call it the signes do not remaine but that the thing it self onelie is presented vnto vs. 4 Secondlie the Sacramentall participation beeing thus abolished they make a kinde of imaginary receauing of the Lords bodie and blood whereby as they hold the bodie which is nowe in heauen is reallie and corporallie present in infinite places at the same time and is receaued at once in whole and in part by manie and by one which thing as it is most absurde so doth it ouerthrow the articles of the Ascension and sitting at the right hand of the Father 5 Thridlie they haue fained such a change as maketh that which is not to be and that which is not to be For they doe so spoile the bread and the wine of their essence as they desist to be bread and wine and begin to be some other thing and they dreame of accidences that are inhaerent in no subjectes against the first article of the beleife which teacheth that the Lord is the Creator and preseruer of the things which he made 6 And heere they doe verie foolishlie bring in the omnipotencie of God for wee are now to enquire not what God can but what hee will doe according to his written worde Moreouer it cannot be either that God can lie or that Christ can be contrarie to himself both which wil necessarilie come to passe if anie thing be said to haue beene ordained by Christ contrary to the articles of our faith 7 Hence haue risen two most greeuous errours the former touching the worshipping of the bread and the wine the which in a verie fearfull blasphemous sorte are thus commonlie saluted by the Papists ALL HAILE SAVIOVR OF THE VVORLD THE VVORD OF THE FATHER THE TRVE SACRIFICE LIVELIE FLESH THE VVHOLE DEITIE TRVE MAN c. The other touching the expiatorie and propitiatorie oblation for the sinnes of the quick and the dead which the Church of Rome doth properly call the Masse and wherein they place the somme of all Christianitie 8 For the Masse is not that mingle mangle patched vp as it were of the shreds of diuerse places gathered heere there out of the Scripture and other authours which are the reliques of the auncient Liturgie or common seruice booke of the Christians but it is that ordinarie propitiation and oblation called by them their vnbloodie Sacrifice which is offered vnto God the Father for the sinnes of the quick and the dead 9 Nowe they offend in this point first because they change the Sacrament into a sacrifice wheras Christ commaunding vs to receaue and not to offer ordained a Sacrament and not a Sacrifice 10 Next in that they falslie teach that in the Christian Church there remaineth after the death of Christ anie expiatorie Sacrifice besides the verie bodie of Christ which is endued with a true humaine nature and soule 11 Thridlie in that they closelie accuse that one and most perfect sacrifice of Christ of imperfection by iterating the same euerie hand while For iteration is a note of imperfection as the Apostle saith Heb. 7. 12 Christ indeed commanded all the faithfull to celebrate the memorie of his passion but hee gaue no commandement vnto anie that he should bee sacrificed For there ought to be no mention of the NAME and office of a PRIEST or of an ALTER at this day in the Church of Christ For Christ is now the onelie and the chief Priest who offered himself
once an onelie and a most perfect Sacrifice vnto God neither was there anie other that could can or shal be able to performe that work 13 For the Sacrifices that ought nowe to haue place among Christians are onelie of thankesgiuing that the faithfull may giue thankes vnto God for all his benefites and offering their prayers vnto him may perpetually consecrate themselues whollie a liuing and an acceptable sacrifice vnto his majestie An expiatorie or propitiatory sacrifice there is or can bee no other but that which Christ once made most perfectlie vppon the Alter of the crosse 14 Yet we do not denie but that the auncient writers did giue the name of Sacrifice vnto the Lords Supper but as in this point so in manie other thinges in a verie farre streatched signification and that partlie to the end that as they thought they might set foorth the dignitie of this high mysterie whereat the Angels doe admire and partlie that they might note out and retaine the custome vsed amongst the auncient Christians Who were wont in their holie feastes of loue to bestowe and offer guiftes and offerings of diuers thinges and euen of meat and drinke which beeing collected togeather into one were so disposed of by the Pastors of the Churches as first of all they were by praiers offered vnto God next some portion of them was taken wherby the holy Supper was administred lastlie that which was left was bestowed for the maintenance of the poore Out of which rites the Masse-mongers doe as yet retaine the names of OFFERTORI COLLECT and COMMVNION And hence it is thought that the name of the MASSE was deriued euen from the custome that the faithfull had to send those things vnto the publick assemblies of the Church which they would haue bestowed vpon holie vses 15 Now it is no lesse fabulous that the Popish Masse was celebrated by IAMES or anie other of the Apostles then it is most true that the same was coyned neither all at once nor yet by one and the selfe same man but was soldered together as now it is by manie Popes after manie yeares and after that it had bene eiked out with many patches which were added thereunto 16 Vnto the former errors there are adjoyned not a few others as that it is celebrated not by the congregation of the faithfull but by one Masse-monger alone that the Sacrament is after the holie action RESERVED as it were a preseruatiue against whatsoeuer inconuenience that the names of dead Saints are called vpon and their imaginary merits intermingled in the Masse that the one of the signs is in a kind of impudent and altogeather hellish boldnesse taken away from the lay people as they call them that the whole action is done in a strange tongue that the Masse-Priest alone is priuie vnto many things that are done therin that they vse the attire and gestures of stage-plaiers and many other things brought forth by this plant which the heauenly Father hath not planted and therefore shal one day be altogeather rooted out Therefore we detest this imaginary and blasphemous sacrifice of the Masse which is contrarie vnto Gods worde and ouerthroweth the force of Christes Passion and bringeth in almost innumerable errours and wee pray with al our hearts and soules that the Lord would graunt vnto all his Churches the pure and sound vse of his holie Supper Defended by THEOPHILVS HESPERIVS of Bearne PRINCIPLES TOVCHING CONSVBSTANTIATION LXII WEE HAVE ALREADIE DISPVTED concerning Transubstantiation Consubstantiation being the neerest error vnto it is now to be handled 1 COnsubstantiation consisteth in this that the bodie and blood of the Lord is said to bee corporally naturally and really present in vnder and with the bread and the wine 2 It hath this common with Transubstantiation that in both of them the wordes of the institution are in a preposterous sort stiflie maintained without any regard vnto the meaning Although that in verie deed the wordes are chaunged in both by the fained interpretations whereby they are expounded whence manie absurdities doe follow 3 First in that both of them doe take away the force nature of a Sacrament which consisteth in this that two thinges should bee in them namely earthly elementarie and signifiyng then heauenly inuisible and signified both which are seuerallie considered not as they are something absolutely and simply existing of their own nature but as there is a mutuall comparison and referrence between them whereby the signes do represent the things signified are represented 4 Next Transubstantiation maketh that the thing is not that which it is and that it is that which it is not but Consubstantiation maketh that two things indeed are become one 5 Thirdly this doctrine doth include contrarieties for it affirmeth that the same body is receiued both naturally and supernaturallie whereas the truth doth teach that the signes are naturally and the things signified supernaturallie participated 6 For the receiuing of the mouth and also the helpe of the other senses are heere required by the institution of Christ to the ende that that which is naturall and corporall may performe his owne office the operation also of the mind and faith is especiallie to be present that what is spirituall may be receiued by spirituall instruments 7 Yet wee confesse that the bodie and blood of Christ is offered bodilie that is corporallie in the holie Supper But after the same manner that PAVLE saith that all the God-head doth dwell in him corporally that is trulie and fullie the Lord performing without all doubt that which hee promised 8 And although the bodie of Christ be of it selfe a naturall substaunce and contained within the dimensions or limites thereof yet is it not materially but spiritually eaten of vs. For the fleshe would haue profited vs nothing but the Spirite and life yet we may say in some sense that the bread and the wine are the bodie and the blood and that the bodie and the blood are fed-vpon namely in a Sacramentall manner 9 This Doctrine also is directly contrary vnto that end of the institution whereby Christ commaunded vs to celebrate his memorie For if hee bee present his memorie cannot be called vnto our remembraunce except wee will speak very vnproperlie seeing things past and not present are called into memorie 10 Againe it doth abolish the nature of Christs bodie For if the same be thus receued by euery one in particuler it must needs be both present in infinit places at once and also be infinite of it selfe The which point is contrary vnto the Articles of our beliefe whereby we beleeue that hee was true man that hee was borne suffered dead risen againe ascended vp into heauen 11 Furthermore if the receiuing of Christ were corporall the ancient Church vnder the law had not bene partaker of his bodie because the same was not as yet borne which point is contrarie vnto the Apostle who saith that the Fathers did receiue the same spirituall meate and the same
to haue bene able vtterlie to haue abolished them Wee doe therefore condemne those who dream that the soules hauing lost their former bodies by corruption shall assume other bodies in their steede 14 This change shall bee done at a moment in those whome Christ shall finde aliue at his second comming 15 The Axiome of the Philosophers that the generation of one thing is the corruption of an other hath no place in this matter and the similitude of PAVLE drawne from the seed sowen in the ground is not to be drawn anie farther than vnto the change of the quality 16 Wee affirme that the one and the selfe same man in number shal arise both in respect of his bodie which is his matter and also in respect of his forme that is of his soule which shall quicken the one and the selfe same bodie although by the retaking againe of the forme the person might in a nice sort seeme to be an other in number than it was before 17 By reason of this change of the qualities and not because the very bodilie quantity and circumscription are taken away for they are perpetuall circumstances or adjuncts of a bodie PAVLE doth affirme that the natural bodie is changed into a spirituall Great therfore is their errour and meerelie contrary vnto the Resurrection of the bodies who teach that the bodies are essentiallie changed by Resurrection into a spirituall nature For by this meanes death should so abolish the nature of the bodie as the Resurrection cold not restore the same and the analogie also betweene Christs Resurrection the resurrection of his members should be destroied 18 By this means furthermore the threatning of the punishments of that aeternal fire and paine should be altogether Allegoricall yea and after the resurrection both the godlie and the wicked shuld become some third spirit compact or braied together as it were of the natural spirit and the bodie accidentallie transformed into the nature either of the same or of a diuers spirit 19 But they doe verie greeuouslie erre who imagine that the bodie of Christ after his glorification which ensued vpon his Resurrection became not onelie of a spirituall nature which though it were graunted not to bee circumscribed in regard of quantitie yet they must needs yeild that the same is bounded within the propriety of the nature of it but also of a diuine seeing the Deitie alone is euerie where by a proprietie altogether vncommunicable vnto anie thing els Neither hath the Resurrection abolished the true bodilie humaine nature of Christ but the infirmities of his naturall bodie beeing laid aside God hath endued the same humane nature with most excellent supernaturall guifts 20 The qualities of the bodies beeing glorified cannot be knowne vnto vs while we are in this life neither are we curiouslie to enquire of them Yet may it be gathered by the woordes of Christ comparing the Saincts vnto the brightnesse of the Sunne and affirming them to be aequall with the Angels by the storie of the Resurrection and Ascension of Christ also out of the first to the CORINTH and both the Epistles of PAVLE to the THESSALONIANS that besides their incorruption they shall bee also bright or shining and of a more refined quick substance than now they are 21 Of the contrarie side it may in some sort be gathered how horrible and fearefull the state shall be of those men who are to be adjudged vnto the secōd death which is the euerlasting curse of God Seeing their soules shall therefore neuer bee seperated from their bodies euen because that their vnspeakable torments may be aeternall Defended by ABEL BARRERIVS a Gascoigne PRINCIPLES CONCERNING ETERNALL LYFE LXXXI 1 THe Article concerning the Resurrection of the flesh being handled at large in the former principles we are now at the length come to the exposition of that which is touching Aeternall life 2 This Article is therefore set last in the belief because it is the end and shutting vp of all those things which are there propounded vnto vs to be beleeued 3 We make life in this place to be that power and facultie whereby the soule doth not onelie moue it self but doth also giue motion sense vnto the body and this latter effect thereof in this life doth PAVL cal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is naturall as being applied vnto the vse of this present life of which sort also was the life of ADAM before his fall although it was neither subject vnto mortalitie neither vnto those things which tend vnto death as he was after his fal But the soule being againe ioyned to the bodie shall both moue it self by a farre more excellent power and shall also quicken the bodie in a far diuers sort from that naturall life which shall be done away namelie by a spirituall life and aequall vnto the Angels as also the verie bodie shall rise again endued with far more excellent qualities whervpon it was called of PAVLE a spirituall bodie not in regard of the substance but of the qualities thereof 4 To liue therfore the etetnall life is to be in that state wherein the elect being after the blessed resurrection most fully joyned with Christ their head shal know God in heauen together with the Angels after a manner altogether vnknowne vnto vs at this day enjoy his prescence and glorifie him eternally We do therfore justlie condemne the error of the CHILIASTES 5 By the worde ETERNAL in this place we vnderstand that which hath a beginning but neuer shall haue an end 6 Touching curious and difficult questions as concerning the sight of God which we are to haue in the life to come and such like wee thinke meete to omitte them because it is sufficient for vs to knowe that God hath prepared for vs those thinges which neither eie hath seene eare hath heard nor enterd into the hart of man 7 The Author of that life is God who freely bestoweth the same vpon those whome of his meere mercie he hath chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world from whome as from the head this blessed immortallitie dooth flowe in a most full sorte into his members that are joyned vnto him 8 For the foundation both of our resurrection vnto life and also of that eternall life is that resurrection and glory of Christ our head because hee is the first fruites of the rising from the deade of those for whome hee prayed that they should be there where he is 9 That life therfore is not without respect generally bestowed vpon all men but only vpō the elect as being those who onelie are found in Christ according vnto that saying of PAVL ROM 11. The elect haue obtained it the rest are hardened and according vnto that voice of Christ Come yea blessed of my Father 10 This blessed immortallitie shal be common in deed vnto all the elect but not in the same measure as it may be probablie gathered by the consideration of the contrarie