as with safety the party as to the manner may be drowned again and again See the instance of Naaman who dipped himself seven times in Jordan 2 Kings 5.14 To this sense of the word at least in this place both the Greek Latine and English Churches agree as is affirmed by able Authors Thirdly In that the phrase in which there is mention made of such an appointment of Christ is affirmed doth necessarily import such a thing and therefore when mention is made of baptizing which is commonly translated in or into suits with Dipping and not that Preposition which signifies with and so suits with Sprinkling And therefore it may be as well rendred I baptize you in Water and he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit Mark 1.8 So it is rendred John did baptize in the Wilderness and in the River of Jordan ver 4 5. or that John was in the Spirit on the Lords day Rev. 1.10 And they were baptized in the Cloud and in the Sea 1 Corinth 10. and â— It may as well be rendred I baptize you or dip you into Water as it is rendred they were casting a Net into the Sea Mark 1.16 for which the words are affirmed to be the same and it would be too improper a Speech to say John did baptize with the Wilderness and they were casting a net with the Sea Fourthly That this appointment of Christ is by way of Dipping and not sprinkling appears In that for the resemblance and likeness hereunto the Israelites passing under the Cloud and in the Sea where the Egyptians that were their Lords and Commanders their Pursuers and Enemies that sought their destruction were drowned left behind and seen no more is by the Holy Spirit called a Baptism 1 Cor. 10.2 They were baptized in the Cloud Where observe It is not here rendred with the Cloud and with the Sea as in the other place Mark 1.8 with Water because it sutes with sprinkling although the word be the same But in the Cloud and in the Sea which sutes with Dipping or Over-whelming and so with the appointment of Christ they passing through the midst of the Red or bloody Sea on dry land which stood on both sides as a Wall and being under the Cloud as men in a carnal eye overwhelmed and drowned and yet truly saved and safe from their Enemies Fifthly That this appointment of Christ was not by sprinkling but by dipping or putting the person into or under Water appears by Philips baptizing the Eunuch It is said They went both down into the Water both Philip the baptizer and the Eunuch that was the person to be baptized and being there in the water Philip baptized or dipped him in that water as John did Jesus in the River of Jordan And it is said They descended or went down into the water so they ascended or went straight way up or out of the water see for this Acts 8.38 39. Mat. 3.16 Mark the expression And Jesus when he was baptized went up straightway out of the Water therefore he had been down in the water Sixthly That this appointment of Christ was not by sprinkling but by dipping or as it were a drowning appears in that John the Baptizer his work being to baptize remains in the Wilderness by the River of Jordan and afterwards in Enon near Salem and the reason that is rendred by the Spirit of the Lord why he abode there was because there was much water which need not have been if that appointment could have been performed by sprinkling and not by dipping See Luke 3.2 3. John 3. 23. Seventhly That this appointment of Christ was not to be performed by sprinkling but by dipping appears from the nature of the Ordinance it self for it is such an Ordinance as whereby the person that submitteth thereto doth visibly put on Christ Jesus the Lord and is hereby visibly planted into his Death holding forth therein a lively similitude and likeness unto his Death whereby only through faith he now professeth he hath escaped death and is in hopes to obtain life everlasting and so to have fellowship with him in his Death and to reckon himself dead with him to sin Sathan the Law and the Curse See Gal. 3.27 Rom. 6.2 3 5 7. 9. 1 Cor. 15.29 But the planting of a person into the likenesse of death is no way resembled by sprinkling but by dipping it is lively set forth and demonstrated Eighthly This appointment of Christs baptism is an Ordinance whereby the person that submitteth thereto doth hereby visibly and clearly resemble the burial of Christ and his being buried in respect of the old man the former Lusts and Corruptions like the Egyptians to be taken away and seen no more See Rom. 6.4 6. Col. 2.12 But sprinkling doth no way lively resemble the Burial of Christ or the person being buried with him as Dipping doth Ninthly This appointment of Christs baptism is an Ordinance whereby the person that submitteth thereto doth visibly and lively hold forth herein the Resurrection of Christ declares him whose life was taken away from the earth to be alive again who although he dyed and was buried yet was not left in the grave to see corruption but was raised again and behold he liveth for evermore And as hereby he holds forth the Resurrection of Christ so doth he also his own being planted in the likeness thereof so as to reckon himself to be in Soul and Spirit quickned and risen with Christ from henceforth to live unto God the Fountain of Life and Christ Jesus the Lord who dyed for him and rose again and so to walk in newness of life in this present world being also begot into a lively hope that in the world to come he shall be raised and quickned both in soul and body to a life everlasting See Rom. 6.4 5 8 11. Acts 8.33 35 36. Col. 2.12 1 Cor. 15.29 1 Pet. 1.3 But sprinkling doth no way lively resemble the resurrection of Christ or the Soul or bodies rising or being raised by him as the way of dipping doth Therefore this appointment of Christ was and still is to be performed by way of dipping or putting the person into or under the water and not by sprinkling Tenthly Dipping doth hold forth a conformity to Christ in his sufferings and afflictions as Christ saith I have a Baptism and how am I streightned until it be accomplished meaning his sufferings Now one end of Baptism is to represent Christs Sufferings and our Sufferings with him which is in a lively manner set out by dipping into water and therefore when the Saints do express their afflictions they do set them forth by being in the depths or in the deep waters as David in Psalm 130. Out of the depths have I cryed unto the Lord meaning deep afflictions and God saith in Isaiah 43.2 When thou passest through the Waters they shall not overflow thee meaning affliction and therefore a believer is to be dipped and plunged all
unbelieving Jews the true fleshly seed of Abraham that the Apostle Paul affirms the contrary Acts 19.9 But when divers were hardened and believed not but spake evil of that way before the multitude he departed from them and Acts 13.45 46. But when the Jews saw the multitude they were filled with envy and spake against those things that were spoken by Paul contradicting and blaspheming then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold and said it was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you but seeing ye put it from you and judge your selves unworthy of everlasting life Lo we turn to the Gentiles for so hath the Lord commanded us and v 50. the Iews stirred up the devout and honorable women and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas but they shook off the dust of their feet against them and therefore Paul is plain in Rom. 11. saying That God had a certain number that were of the eternal election among the Iews those obtained right to the remission of sins and the rest were blinded and hardened but it should seem to be the general understanding of those that urge this Text for a covenant in the flesh That if they were the seed of the Jews though they were not called nor did not believe but were hardned in their continuance in unbelief yet this promise of remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost belongs to them and this interpretation that this Text must have to defend a covenant in the flesh which I leave to any intelligent man to consider how greatly erroneous it is to affirm that the promise of the remission of sins belongs to the unbelieving and hardened children of the Iews that God hath nor nor doth call So that you may clearly see that the truth lyes in this text that the promise is to no more of Fathers nor children nor those afar off but such as God by his especial grace doth call to be the Sons of of God by faith An answer to that text 1 Cor. 7.14 Another Scripture made use of or rather abused and wrested to defend this error is 1 Cor. 7.14 The unbelieving husband is sanctified by the believing wife and the unbelieving wife is sanctifyed by the believing husband else were your children unclean but now are they holy whence is gathered by those of that opinion that this holiness is as they call it a federal holiness of a covenant holiness that is to say God having taken the believing parent with the child into covenant with himself the child is in this sense holy that is covenant-holy Now for the better understanding this Text I pray consider how and in what sense God takes persons into Covenant with himself and that as you have heard is two waies either he takes souls to himself in a typical covenant so he took Israel to himself in that covenant and in that sense they may be said to be separated from the rest of the World which separation of them from the rest of the World to himself is a holiness that the carnal Iew was only partaker of such a typical and legal holiness that people being separated from all other nations in the world to God in this covenant now the word holy signifies so much as separating or setting apart and in this sense the Vessels of the Temple were holy as also the Priests being by Law set apart from the rest of Israel to offer the bread of their God Now in the 2d. place there is also a new covenant or a covenant of life that God takes a people to himself which is to write his Law in their hearts in their minds to sanctify thē to justify them Now this internal holiness which God as an effect of that Covenant infuseth into the heart is only this new Covenant-holiness for there is no other holiness that relates to the new Covenant when the heart and the inward man shall be purified through faith And when the whole heart and affections are by the powerful work of Gods grace separated from sin and those vanities below to heaven and heavenly things this is the only holiness that the covenant of eternal life conveys to souls The Hypocrite may have this in appearance but the elect and chosen have this only in truth he puts no difference between us and them purifying their hearts by faith and he hath by one offering for ever perfected them that are sanctified Heb. 10. this sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the Truth goes alwaies together 2 Thes 2.13 Therefore it is impossible that this should be the meaning of the Text that all believers carnal seed are in a covenant of eternal life and so have their hearts purified and sanctified through the work of the Spirit and faith before they are born and in this sense are born holy I know no other sanctification the Scripture speaks of belonging to a covenant of grace and eternal life and for that external or typical holyness in an outward covenant it cannot be because that was abolished through Christs death as appears in Heb. 8.9 chapters therefore far be it from the Apostle to intend here the countenancing of any such erronious opinion as that every believers Child was by virtue of his first birth internally holy with that holiness of truth as the Apostle calls it Ephes 4.24 If you please therefore hearken to the true meaning of this text which is to this effect The Corinthians having sent several doubts and questions to the Apostle to resolve and answer as appears in the first verse of this chapter he answereth them particularly and it seems among the rest they had a Jewish question started grounded as we suppose upon Ezra 9. Deut. 7.2 where you find it was unlawful for a Jew to marry with a stranger therefore Ezra caused all those men that had taken them strange wives to put them away as not lawfully married because contrary and against the Law given to them therefore they were to put them away and the children born of them as illegitimate and unclean in an unlawful fellowship These Corinthians it seems did propound in writing to the Apostle this question whether such of them as had unbelieving husbands and wives yet reimaining in idolatry might lawfully abide with them in that fellowship in the marriage-bed and whether that fellowship were not unclean and unlawfull as in Ezra's time Unto this question the Apostle answers verse 12. To the rest speak I not the Lord. If any Brother hath a Wife that believeth not and she be pleased to dwell with thim let him not put her away and the woman which hath a husband which believeth not and if he be pleased to dwell with her let her not leave him But also might they say why is not our marriage fellowship unclean Therefore in ver 14. saith he The unbelieving wife is sanctifyed as the Geneva Translation hath it to the believing Husband or else were your children
over into the River or water to hold forth That now he must resolve to take up the Cross of Christ and suffer and not only so but this being raised and delivered out of the water again by the hands of the Minister doth hold forth that so shall such believing souls be saved and delivered from all their afflictions as in Psal 34.17 Many are the Afflictions of the righteous but God shall deliver them out of all And that this doth sign or signify our salvation appears in 1 Pet. 3.21 the like figure wherunto Baptism doth now save us and Mark 16.16 He that believes and is baptized shall be saved So that Baptism is to sign and confirm signally our Sufferings and Afflictions with Christ so Salvation or Deliverance from them all the one in dipping and plunging him in Water the other in Raising him out again Into whose name Baptism is administred The third thing that is essential in this Ordinance of Baptism which I shall speak to will be what is meant by name of Father Son and Holy Ghost The Command is That the Mininister must dip them into the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost the which the Lord Jesus commanding must be therefore essential to this Ordinance I shall therefore endeavour to shew you what is meant by name here That by which Father Son and Spirit are made known as a man is by his Name that is hereto be understood by the name Father Son and Holy Ghost we know the Gospel doth hold forth one God yet distinquished into Father Son and Holy Ghost the name here is to be understood that Gospel that doth so set forth God and describe him as the Subject Matter of our Faith Acts 9.15 But the Lord said unto Ananias Go thy way for he is a chosen Vessel unto me to bear my name before the Gentiles and Kings and Children of Israel for I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my names sake Now Name in this place and in the Commission is to be understood that heavenly mystery of the Gospel in which God is discovered and made known as a man by his name One part of the Gospel mystery consists of a Discovery of the name of the Father by which he is distinquishably made known from the Son and Spirit and that in these particulars First In ordaining the Son 1 Pet. 1.18 in choosing and electing the Son Isaiah 28.16 with 1 Pet. 2.5 in sending the Son Gal. 4.4 John 3.16 17 in sealing the Son John 6.27 in promising the Son Isaiah 9.6 in bruising the Son and putting him to grief Isaiah 53. and laying all our iniquities upon the Son and to justify and freely accept such as believe in the Son This I understand is the Name of the Father And by the Sons Name is to be understood that by which he makes known himself to the Sons and Daughters of men as to take Flesh Heb. 2.14 Rom. 9.5 1.3 He kept the Law in order to dy As that just one or as a Lamb without spot and his making his Soul an offering for sin as a perfect offering for the sins and transgressions of his people Heb. 10.12 14. Isa 53. and that he did not only dy for our Sins but rose again for our Justification Rom. 4.25 and ascended into Heaven and makes intercession for us Heb. 2.25 And pours down the Spirit and gives gifts unto men Zach. 12.10 Ephes 4.10 11 12. all this the Son makes himself known by as by a name distinguishably from the Father and the Spirit And in the last place the Spirit is made known in the Gospel as that which in the first place convinceth the world of sin John 16.8 and pricks men in their hearts with a sense of sin and the wrath of God due for sin Acts 2.37 29. And the work of the Spirit by which that is made known Is the revealing of the Father and the Son and those great Mysteries unto the soul of a poor convicted Sinner for as Christ saith the Spirit of God shall lead you into all truth it shall take of mine and shew it to you John 16. and so no man doth understand the things of a man but the Spirit of a man that is within him So none shall or can understand the things of God but by the Spirit of God for the Spirit of God searcheth out all things even the deep things of God 1 Cor. 2.9 10. The Spirit doth not only discover mans misery and his lost estate by reason of sin but discovers a remedy which lies in the great love of God in Christ as before mentioned and worketh in the heart true faith and repentance disposing the heart to obedience This is the proper work or office of the Spirit by which he is distinguishably known from the Father and the Son And now when the Soul shall come to the Preacher and make known to him that the Spirit hath experimentally made known unto him his lost and damnable estate by sin and that he same Spirit hath discovered unto him the great love of God the Father in the gift of Christ to be a propitiation for sin as one dying for the chief of Sinners and that the Spirit of God hath made known all this to him and hath wrought faith in his heart to believe it and hath changed his heart from a Course of sin to renewed obedience for no soul can declare to a Minister the true work of Conversion but he must in so doing discover his knowledge of the work of the Father Son and Spirit and into this doth the Minister baptize him as in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost And thus much for these three particulars In the fourth place The subâ—ect of Baptism we shall now come to the Subject that must be baptized and that as you have heard is one that is taught Teach all Nations baptizing them and as my Text saith Repent and be baptized every one of you which doth hold forth the person baptized to be a taught and repentant person But seeing the main thing in question hath alwaies seemed to be the Subject of Baptism who it is that is to be baptized this I shall therefore most insist upon wherein I shall endeavour to make plain to you first as I say that he is to be a believer a penitent person as appears Mark 16.16 Go preach the Gospel to every Creature he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved where observe That believing the Gospel is to go before baptizing and Matthew 28.19 Teach all Nations Faith and Repentance go before baptism baptizing or dipping them What them them that are taught or made Disciples by teaching and in my Text you find that Peter after Christ had poured down the Spirit upon them doth by that authority received from heaven when he had converted those Jews command every one of them to be baptized or dipped Repent and be baptized
every one of you into the name of the Lord Jesus for the remission of sins and so in like manner you shall find Cornelius his family by Peter commanded to be baptized Acts â—0 48 for saith he to the six brethren that were with him How shall we forbid water that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we And he by the great authority which as an extraordinary Apostle he had from Heaven commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus So we find Ananias in a special manner sent to the Apostle Paul at his first conversion to the faith as Acts 22.16 where he also by the authority received from Christ in verse the 16. saith And now Paul why tarriest thou Arise and be baptized for the washing away of thy sins in calling upon the name of the Lord where you see the express command of God enjoyning him upon his Conversion to be baptized And in the next place As God hath commanded his Ministers to baptize or dip Believers only and as his Ministers by virtue of that authority from him have left standing Laws and commands upon Disciples only to be baptized so we find that they did practice that way and that only of baptizing such as believed and repented Acts 2.40 41 42. So many as gladly received the word were baptized and the same day there were added to the Church three thousand souls And they continued in the Apostles Doctrine Fellowship Breaking of Bread and Prayer VVhence you may observe the practice of the Apostles that were guided by the infallible gifts of the Spirit that first they converted before they baptized In like manner you shlla find in Acts 8.12 13. where Philip was preaching to the people in Samaria But when they believed he preaching the things concerning the Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ they were baptized both Men and Women Then Simon himself believed also and when he was baptized he continued with Philip and wondered So that you see this was the continued course of Christs Messengers sent by him First They converted men by preaching and then baptized them In the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost or in the name of the Lord Jesus wherein the name of the Father and Spirit are included when his name is only mentioned In like manner you shall find in the same Chap. that Philip by the Spirit of the Lord being directed to the Eunuch that did belong to Candace the Queen of the Ethiopians who had the charge of all her Treasure and had been at Jerusalem for to worship was returning and reading Isaiah the Prophet then Philip joined himself to his Chariot and upon some discourse together he from the aforesaid Scripture preached unto him Jesus in Acts 8.32 c. And as they went on their way they came to a certain Water and the Eunuch said See here is Water what hindereth me to be baptized Philip said If thou believest with all thy heart it is lawful implying it was unlawful for a man not believing to be baptized And he answered and said I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and he commanded the Chariot o stand still and they went both down into the Water both Philip and the Eunuch and he baptized him and when they were come out of the water the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip that the Eunuch saw him no more and he went on his way rejoicing From all these words you may observe That Philip is said to preach Christ unto this man and upon his comming to the water he said What lets Believers should offer themselves to be baptized where you see It is the duty of such as believe to offer themselves to be baptized and that there is no let or hinderance to the Ordinance of Baptism but unbelief and therefore saith he If thou believest with all thy heart thou mayest or it is lawful as the word more properly may be read plainly holding forth that all both young and old that did not believe it was unlawful for them to be baptized And you shall find several families also baptized upon their being converted which many through ignorance and want of taking notice of what the Scripture speaks say it is probable they had some Infants in them But to prevent mistakes in the minds of any that so think I shall prove That these families were all converted Disciples so as to believe the Gospel as for instance First the Family of Lydia Acts 16.14 15. And a certain women named Lydia a Seller of Purple of the City Thiatyra which worshipped God heard us whose heart the Lord opened that she attended to the things which were spoken of Paul and when she was baptized and her houshold she besought us saying If ye judge me faithful to the Lord come into my house and abide and she constrained us Now here in this Text Lydia and her houshold together converted Lydia is only mentioned as to have been converted no mention made what her houshold was only that they were baptized but in the last verse viz. the 40. of that Chapter It is said That when Paul and Sylas were put out of the Gaolers house they went and entered into the house of Lydia and when they had seen the Brethren they comforted them and departed where you may clearly see That Lydia's house consisted of Brethren capable of being visited and comforted by Paul and Sylas as well as Lydia whose houshold they were And also in the same Chapter you have mention made of the Gaoler and his Houshold The Gaoler and his houshold together converted all which were baptized in the 31 32 33 and 34. Verses In which place you shall upon reading find this to be true that they spake unto him the word of the Lord and to all that were in his house and verse 34. He set meat before them and rejoiced believing in God with all his house Where it is plain That the whole houshold of the Gaoler heard the word of God and rejoiced and believed as well as the Gaoler and were all baptized Which is a clear proof that such hearing the word of God and believing ought and they only to be baptized And this will appear further by the house of Stephanus comparing the 1 Cor. 11 6. Stephanus and his houshold together converted with the 16. chap. and the 15. verse of the same Epistle where in the one place it is said that Paul baptized the houshold of Stephanus in the last place he speaketh thus I beseech you Brethren Ye know the House of Stephanus that it is the first fruits of Achaia and that they have addicted themselves to the Ministery of the Saints That you submit your selves unto such and to every one that helpeth with us and laboureth Where you see in one and the same Epistle as he saith he baptizeth this houshold so he affirms they
undertaken to perform and to work in the Creature as further appears in Ezekiel 16. latter end For thus saith the Lord God I will even deal with thee as thou hast done which hast dispised the oath in breaking the Covenant Notwithstanding I will remember my covenant with thee in the day of thy youth and I will establish unto thee an everlasting covenant and as he saith afterward not by thy covenant but by my covenant so that which he calls thy covenant was that which they broke and therein dispised the Oath as he saith plainly holding forth that it was a covenant of works answerable to that in Nehemiah 10.29 They clave to their Brethren the Nobles and entered into a curse and an oath to walk in Gods Law which was given by Moses the servant of God In which case you may discern here was two covenants the one that God calls his covenant and another that was their covenant a covenant of works which they broke And likewise you have further the covenant of eternal life opened in Ezekiel 36.25 26 27. Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you and you shall be clean from all your filthiness and from your Idols will I cleanse you A new heart also will I give you and a new Spirit will I put within you and I will take away the Stony heart out of your flesh and will give you a heart of flesh and I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walk in my Statutes and you shall keep my Judgements and do them Where you have as I said before this New covenant wholly lying on Gods part that he would first cleanse them from all their Idols and iniquities that he undertakes to give a new heart to take away the heart of Stone and to give them hearts of flesh And that he will give the soul his own Spirit and thereby came these to walk in his ways whom he calls to the obedience of his truth If they sin he binds himself to pardon their sins and to remember their sins and transgressions no more so that it is impossible that this covenant should be broke or that a soul shall ever miscarry that is once in this covenant as in respect of his everlasting estate And to this purpose David very eminently speaks in 2 Sam. 23. and 5. verse Although my house he not so with God yet he hath made with me an Everlasting Covenant ordered in all things and sure for this is all my salvation and all my desire although he make it not to grow Where you have David setting out the Covenant of Grace and the mercies in it to be in all points perfect and sure And to this purpose the Prophet in the 55. of Isaiah and the third verse inviting souls and perswading them to come to Christ saith Incline your ear and come unto me Hear and and your souls shall live and I will make an everlasting Covenant with you even the sure mercies of David that is he will give a Soul those New Covenant mercies which are most sure no way depending upon any condition to be performed in the Creature but wholly upon the Lord as appears in Psalm 89.28 to the 37. ver My mercy will I keep for him for evermore and my Covenant shall stand fast with him his seed also will I make to endure for ever and his throne as the days of Heaven If his children forsake my Law and walk not in my Judgements If they break my Statutes and keep not my Commandments then will I visit their transgressions with the Rod and their iniquities with Stripes Nevertheless my loving kindness will I not utterly take from him nor suffer my faithfulness to fail My Covenant will I not break nor alter the thing which is gone out of my lips Once have I sworn by my Holiness that I will not ly unto David His seed shall endure for ever His Throne as the â—un before me It shall be established for ever as the Moon and as a faithful Witness in Heaven Selah Now in these words you have the Covenant of eternal life made with Christ and his spiritual seed which David and his seed were types of which Covenant is a sure Covenant to all those to whom it is once made and to this doth the Author to the Hebrews allude when he saith in chap. 6.17 18. Wherein God willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his Counsel confirmed by an oath That by two immutable things in which it was impossible for God to ly we might have strong consolation who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us Now in this Covenant before spoken to you have both the promise and oath here spoken of and here in this Covenant must needs be discovered the immutability of his Counsel because this is as David saith a covenant that is in all points perfect and sure and James in his Epistle alluding to these New covenant blessings or gifts saith Every good and perfect gift is from above and cometh down from the Father of lights with whom there is no variableness nor shadow of turning and that he doth here speak of the New covenant gifts doth appear in the next words he saith Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth that we should be a kind of first fruits of his Creatures Now consider well that in this covenant there is nothing that he requires but he ingageth himself to enable us to accomplish If he command to pray he promiseth to give his Spirit to help our infirmities If he command to walk in all his waies as you have heard he promiseth that he will put his Spirit in them to cause them to walk in his waies But some may object and say That we find the Gospel is held out upon Condition of Faith and Repentance Answer It is true Why though the Covenant of Grace be absolute yet the promises are held forth under a condition the promise of salvation and remission of Sin is held out with a condition to the world because it is Gods free mercy to work that condition in the hearts of his Elect by means of preaching and tendering of the Gospel and in them only But we are not to think that this grace of Faith and Repentance are any Qualifications that persons are to attain by their own abilities unto which the Gospel is tendred But in the new covenant the Lord undertakes to work the condition and to give the salvation tendred upon that condition also for saith he I will be unto you a God and you shall be unto me a people and in particular he saith He will put his Law in their hearts and in their minds will he write them and he will teach them to know him Now doubtless the Law of Faith and Repentance are here included according to those Scriptures Ephes 2.8 For by grace are you saved through Faith and
saith he Ask the Antients and they will tell thee for we have those with us much more elder than thy Father which doth argue that there were very antient godly men fit to be inquired of as touching those heavenly mysteries that were much older than Jobs Father in that East Country And it is plain that neither they nor any of their children or families had right to Circumcision and the blessing of Canaan but most sure it is they had interest in the Covenant of life which plainly shews that Circumcision was but an earthly typical covenant such as good and godly men might nor have interest in and such as wicked men had an interest in Do not we find That all Davids sons were in this covenant but how many except Solomon had any right to the covenant of life yea Abraham himself had eight Sons and each of them a Generation but there was none of the other had the covenant of Circumcision made with them but only Isaac though the rest were as truly the Sons of believing Abraham as Isaac was for Ishmael and the six Sons that he had by Keturah with their generations were all the children of the same believing Abraham as Isaac was and yet this covenant ran not upon either of their Posterity but in Isaac saith the Text shall thy seed be called though we may not be so uncharitable but to think that many of the seed of those that went into the East Countrey might be the elect of God and in a covenant of Grace yet be sure they had not an Interest in this covenant of Circumcision and the Inheritance of Canaan And Isaiah tells us in Isaiah chapter 1. verse 9. That if God had not left him a very small Remnant Isâ—el had been as Sodom and Gomorah So that there was in the whole Nation of Israel that were in the covenant of Circumcision but a very small Remnant selected out from the rest into the covenant of life as in Romans 9. the Apostle so makes use of the words and in the Romans chap. 11. ver 5 7. the Apostle saith the election in and amongst Israel have obtained it and the rest were hardned or blinded The rest may some say what rest the rest of Israel in the covenant of Circumcision But it is plain that all Israel were elected one as much as another in the Covenant of Circumcision by which they were as I have said seperated to God from all other nations But it is plain That there was a Gospel Testament confirmed of God in Christ held out and tendred to the Jews by the Holy Prophets and Pen-men of God the election obtained that and the rest were hardned remaining still in the literal and old Covenant of Circumcision which they had only right to by generation But this none could have right to but by the regeneration and new birth and therefore saith Isaiah 8.28 I and the children that thou hast given me are as signs and wonders in Israel implying clearly that a little handful of Israel are given to Christ in the Covenant of grace out from amongst the body of Israel the rest of the multitude of Israel remained without being given to Christ making signs and wonders at such as were given to him by being admitted into a covenant of eternal life through faith which it appears the whole body of Israel were not admitted into but some few only So that you see Souls may be in this covenant of Circumcision and be damned and out of it and saved therefore this cannot be a covenant of eternal life but only a Typical covenant of Works The sixth ground to prove that the Covenant of Circumcision was but a covenant of Works 6. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of Works an outward Typical Covenant was this That this Covenant of Circumcision might be broken as the Lord saith in Gen. 17.14 And the uncircumcised man-child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised that soul shall be cut off from my people he hath broken my covenant Where observe though he were born of the Family and of the seed of Abraham and so had an interest in the Covenant yet he might forfeit his right and break this covenant so as to be cast off from Gods people This is therefore that old Covenant spoke of by Jeremy chap. 31. ver 31. I will make a new Covenant with the house of Israel not like that Covenant which I made with their Fathers which they broke and my soul had no pleasure in them For as I have shewed before it is impossible that the New covenant can be broken because it is an absolute covenant made on no condition to be fulfilled by the creature but the Lord works both to will and to do of his good pleasure in this covenant therefore it is not in him that willeth nor in him that runneth but in God that shews mercy Therefore the Lord speaking of the new covenant in Jer. 33.15 and so forward saith In those daies and at that time I will cause the branch of righteousness to grow up unto David he shall execute Judgement and Righteousness in the Land in those daies shall Judah be saved and Jerusalem shall dwell safely and this is the name wherewith he shall be called The Lord our righteousness for thus saith the Lord David shall never want a man to sit upon the Throne of the house of Israel Neither shall the Priest the Levite want a man before me to offer burnt offerings and to kindle meat offerings and to do sacrifice continually And the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah saying Thus saith the Lord If you can break my covenant of the day and my covenant of the night that there should not be day and night in their seasons then may also my covenant be broken with David my Servant that he should not have a Son to reign upon his Throne Where you see the spiritual covenant cannot be broken as Psalm 89.34 My Covenant will I not break nor alter the thing that is gone out of my mouth Therefore it must needs be a covenant of works that is conditional he made such a covenant with the Priest mentioned in the first of Sam. 2.30 where the Lord saith to this purpose Wherefore the God of Israel said I said indeed that thy house and the house of thy Fathers should walk before me for ever But now saith the Lord be it far from me for them that honor me I will honor and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed You must still mind those promises the Lord makes upon condition the creature not walking in the performance of the condition on his part God is set free or at liberty whether he will perform such conditional promises yea or no. But it is not so in absolute promises confirmed of God in Christ Gal. 3.17 those promises are all Yea and Amen as you see in 2 Cor. 1.20 But the covenant of Circumcision being a covenant
of works a poor creature truly interessed in that covenant might break it forfeit his interest and be cast out and rejected out of that covenant from amongst his people as is clearly confirmed in Isaiah 50.1 Thus saith the Lord where is the Bill of your Mothers Divorcement which I have put away or to which of my Creditors have I sold you behold for your iniquities have you sold your selves and for your transgressions is your Mother put away Now beloved a divorce argues a breach and forfeiting the covenant which the body of all Israel was in and we know all along the National covenant was that of Circumcision and they that know in the least measure the nature of the covenant of Grace cannot but know it to be such a covenant out of which a soul cannot be divorced from the Lord. But some may say There are many that are visibly in a covenant of Grace now under the Gospel and yet may be cast out from Gods people yet it followeth not but that it is a covenant of Grace and so then they might be visibly in a covenant of Grace and yet be rejected Answ Persons may now profess to be in Christ and so in a covenant of Grace by an outward profession but this being barely a profession and not in truth in them that profess the same they profess they were in that which in truth they never were For under the Gospel we have no infallible rule to know who is in the covenant of Grace and who not because we have only the confession of themselves who may deceive themselves and us But we have an infallible Rule to judge That Abraham Isaac and Jacob and the seed forward in their Loins or their generations were in this covenant of Circumcision and therefore it is a great mistake for any to evade what hath been said upon such a groundless objection Now consider That it is that great and faithful God that saith and professeth Abrabam his seed and family after him from Jacob forward were in this covenant with him But now it is only poor unfaithful Man hypocritical dissembling proud man that saith he is in the Covenant of life when it proves not so or when it visibly proves the contrary for Saints have a Rule to disown such But this is a most certain truth that God did never put a soul away and make a divorce between himself and any one Soul in a covenant of life and it is as certain that the whole Church of Israel were in reality and truth in the covenant of Circumcision as appears in Gen. 17.10 11. where Abraham and those born in his house are to be circumcised And so Psalm 105.9 10.11 which covenant he made with Abraham and his oath with Isaac and confirmed the same to Jacob by a Law and to Israel for an everlasting covenant saying Vnto thee have I given the Land of Canaan the Lot of your inheritance Now it would plentifully appear if further proof needed That God his own self testifyeth his making and entering into covenant with Abraham Isaac and Jacob and their seed forward therefore let no man please himself with such a poor groundless objection That the family of Israel were only visibly or in the judgement of Charity in the covenant of Circumcision as Hypocrites are now in the Covenant of Grace For there is nothing more clear than this that Israel were in truth and reality in the covenant of Circumcision expressed by the Mouth of God himself and nothing more certain that Israel were never all of them so much visibly in the covenant of grace For if it were necessary I could multiply places of Scripture to prove the most part of Israel visibly unbelievers living in those manifest fruits of the flesh as Drunkenness Swearing Lying Whoring Stealing Covetousness and palpable Ignorance without faith and knowledge shedding of blood All these notorious sins were constantly in the greatest part of the Church of Israel that they neighed as fed Horses after their Neighbours wives and were given to oppression and horrid Idolatrie All these sins being such manifest fruits of the flesh that such as live in them the Apostle saith cannot enter into the Kingdom of Christ and of God but are visibly the children of the Devil Therefore to say the whole body of Israel were visibly godly and so visibly in the covenant of Grace that is a most gross mistake they were really in the outward National covenant of Circumcision but not the generality so much as visibly in the Gospel covenant of life For it could not be denyed but that those Jews in the 8. chapter of John verse 30. and so forward were Abrahams children interessed in the covenant of works yet Christ is far from concluding their right to the covenant of Sonship the heavenly adoption but rather in that respect concludeth They are of their Father the Devil whose works they did they being Lyars as he was from the beginning and enemies to Christ as the Devil was therefore he excludes them from being the children of God so that the main mass of blindness and darkness lying upon mens minds is this they mix and confound the two covenants made to Abraham the one a spiritual heavenly covenant made to him as a Father of the faithful and to those only who walk in the steps of faithful Abraham and the temporal covenant of Circumcision to the seed according to the flesh frō Jacob forward and those joining themselves to that family So then in a word the covenant of Circumcision must needs be a covenant of works and not of eternal life because it might be broken which the covenant of eternal life cannot be 7. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of works The seventh ground to prove the covenant of Circumcision not to be a covenant of Grace is That if we maintain the covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of Grace to eternal life therein we overthrow many fundamental points of Religion which is a strong ground to prove it is not of Grace but an outward typical covenant For it is impossible that such understanding of Scripture which crosseth plain fundamental points of religion can be true Now for to give you some example for this First you must needs confess that the covenant of Circumcision was made to Abraham and his seed after him in their generations Gen. 17.7 from Isaac and Jacob forward So that being born in the house or Family of Israel or being bought with the money of one of the Israelites interessed a person in that covenant he coming forth of that line was born heir to that covenant and the privileges of the same Now consider To say that the covenant of Grace is entailed on the flesh overthroweth the main fundamental points of our Religion That the chief and precious privileges of the covenant of grace are adoption or Son-ship Justification and the inward work of sanctification all which privileges
that generation must needs be born heirs to if they were born heirs of a covenant of grace which if this should be asserted as it is by those who defend childrens baptism Then this fundamental point of Religion must needs be denyed that all mankind are by nature the children of wrath Ephes 2.2 and that all both Jews and Gentiles are charged under sin Rom. 3.9 And there is none righteous no not one But be it known to you this is a fundamental doctrine of truth generally acknowledged by all the godly That we are dead in sins and trespasses wherein in times past we walked according to the course of this world according to the Prince of the power of the air the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience among whom also we had our conversation in times past in the lust of the flesh and of the mind and were children of wrath by nature as well as others Now the Apostle Paul affirmeth this to be equally the state of himself who was born in the Church of Israel as well as the Gentiles and David doth affirm this of all in general Psalm 14.2 3. which the Apostle Paul urgeth in Rom. 3.9 forwards speaking of himself and the rest of the National Churches of the Jews What are we saith he better than they meaning than the Gentiles No in no wise for we have before proved that both Jews and Gentiles are all under sin as it written there is none righteous no not one there is none that understandeth there is none that seeketh after God they are all gone out of the way they are together become abominable there is none that doth good no not one And in Psalm 51. David saith I was conceived in sin and brought forth in iniquity who was a child of the Church of God as it is usually termed But beloved this doctrine is clear in Scripture and clearly experienced by every Godly Christian which truth must needs be overthrown if the whole body of Israel were born adopted Sons and heirs of a covenant of eternal life born heirs of Justification then they were never heirs of wrath nor in a state of damnation nor never proved nor charged under sin nor never all unrighteous because born heirs of a covenant of Grace aad of righteousness nor never born dead in sins and trespasses for that is inconsistent with being in a covenant of grace and life This opinion of holding the covenant of grace to be intailed in the flesh opposing it self so directly against this forementioned foundation of Religion must needs be a gross error so considered The second fundamental point of Religion that this error opposeth it self against is stability in a covenant of eternal life it cannot be imagined that I should much insist upon proving this Doctrine of stability in grace to be a fundamental truth I shall take that for granted from the nature of the new covenant in several Scriptures before recited as in Psalm 125. They that trust in the Lord shall be as Mount Zion which cannot be removed but as the Mountains are round about Jerusalem so shall the Lord be about them from this time forth and for ever And in Psal 89.33 If thy children sin I will afflict them with the rods of men but my loving kindness will I not utterly take from them nor suffer my faithfulness to fail My covenant will I not break nor alter the thing that is gone out of my mouth But taking this for granted to be a truth that all born in the Church of the Jews were born heirs of his stable Covenant and so were really and in truth in the covenant of grace then most of the Church of Israel that were in a covenant of grace were damned and not saved as Isaiah 10.22 23. Though Israel were as the sand of the Sea yet a Remnant of them were saved only And so Isaiah with Rom. 9.27 28 31. But Israel which followed after the Law of righteousness hath not obtained to the Law of righteousness Paul saith Rom. 11.5 There was a Remnant according to the election of grace and in verse 7. how they obtained it but the rest were hardened all but the remnant were blinded and hardened Therefore if such multitudes as the sand of the Sea were all really in a covenant of grace most of them must be understood to fall out of the covenant and so to fall out of the covenant of life This is another fundamental truth that this opinion is fully against defending that souls may be truly in a covenant of eternal life and yet perish and be damned The third foundation that this error overthrows is The necessity of Conversion or Regeneration which doctrine is eminently confirmed by Christ in the Gospel as a fundamental truth John 3.4 5. where Christ speaking to Nichodemus tells him th except a man be born again of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God And likewise in John 8.24 Except ye believe that I am he ye shall dy in your sins And John 3. two last verses He that believeth not the wrath of God abideth on him and he shall not see life The before mentioned errors that holds a covenant of life running in the flesh upon the carnal seed opposeth it self against this for might the carnal seed of Israel say to Christ why do you preach such a doctrine to us That except you be born again you cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven We affirm the contrary seeing by the first birth we have an interest in the covenant of grace and eternal life already without believing and being born again and so are entered into the Kingdom of God and the privileges thereof Whereas you say That except you believe that I am he you shall dy in your sins why doth Christ pronounce death without believing seeing we are acquainted with another way to enter into life than the way of believing which is to be begotten of one of the church or a believer We find the Holy Ghost in the 1 John 5. saith He that hath Christ hath life he that hath not Christ hath not life No saith this error there were thousands that were interessed in life without having Christ that is to say by carnal generation Saith the Apostle There is no other name under heaven by which we can be saved but by the name of Jesus Yea saith this error There is another name by which we may come into a covenant of eternal life and so to be saved so that here lies the case where Christ in the Gospel powerfully affirms no other way to life but by believing regeneration and coming to Jesus Christ This opinion destroys all these testimonies opening another door of entrance into the covenant of life besides this and that by fleshly generation though Christ saith to Nicodemus Joh. 3. That which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the Spirit is Spirit as if souls were
infatuated and had no ears to hear his plain word They of this opinion do defend the contrary to what purpose should any man seek the conversion of any of Believers children whether formerly of the nation of the Jews or now the nations of the believing Gentiles seeing they are born heirs of a covenant of eternal life and so are in as good a state without conversion and believing and being born again as any other soul by believing and by new birth can be brought into This doctrine tends to justify the Rebellious Jews against John Baptist and against Christ the Sadduces and Pharisees came to Johns Baptism Matthew 3. Saith John O ye Generation of Vipers who hath forwarned you to fly from the wrath to come bring for 〈◊〉 fruits meet for repentance and think not to say within your selves we have Abraham to our Father John you see would have this people to be converted to intitle them to this covenant of Grace and so to baptism which is an Ordinance of the same covenant and not so much as think so erroneously as if being children to Abraham according to the flesh should intitle them to the same therefore saith he think not within your selves we have Abraham to our Father and we are his children according to the flesh and therefore we need not a work of conversion or true Repentance to intitle us to the privileges of the covenant such as was baptism And also in John 8.31 and forwards saith Christ unto some Jews unto whom he spake If you abide in my words then are you my Disciples indeed and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free and then you shall be free indeed They answered him We be Abrahams children and never were in bondage to any How sayest thou then We shall be made free Where you may observe these wicked obstinate Jews were of the same opinion that they were in a state of happiness good enough by generation by being Abrahams seed according to the flesh Jesus answereth Who so committeth sin is the servant of sin and the Servant abideth not in the house for ever We find Christ afterwards tells these Sons of Abraham that they were so far from being the adopted sons of God in a covenant of life that they were of their Father the Devil and these same persons Christ speaks to in verse the 24. telling them Except they believed Christ was he they should dy in their sins Christ was far from this opinion as to think that covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of life but he doth throughly reprehend them for this groundless confidence which error was the main obstacle that hindered the Jews from faith and repentance because they thought it intituled them to happiness enough to be of the stock of Abraham and to be born heirs of the covenant of Circumcision This very rotten opinion was to them one of the Devils sleights to lull them asleep in a carnal and unconverted condition they thought that needed not which thought of theirs had been true enough provided all the children of Abraham had by generation interest in the covenant of life which other men could have no interest in without regeneration But Christ you see presseth a necessity of conversion to these children of Abraham that at the present were as fully interessed in the covenant of Circumcision as Abraham himself even to Nicodemus which was a Ruler of the Jews Christ presseth a necessity thereof to him and also labours by a parable in Luke 16. to convince those sottish Jews that one might be the seed of Abraham according to the flesh and yet be irrecoverably damned and therefore he brings in the rich man in Hell speaking thus Father Abraham I pray thee send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water to cool my tongue And Abraham is brought in owning him to be his Son speaking thus My Son remember that thou in thy life time receivedst thy good things Where you may observe That the man in Hell irrecoverably damned owns Abraham to be his Father and Abraham also doth acknowledge him to be his Son My Son saith Abraham where you clearly see man may be a Son of Abraham and yet damned thou hadst thy good things in this life but Lazarus his evil things Ezekiel 18.9 10. where a just man is presupposed to beget a son that is a Robber and a Shedder of blood and that goes out in all manner of wickedness and that in Israel Wherein observe Abraham owns no other privilege belonged to the rich man by virtue of being the Son of Abraham but what was in this life or in this world Hell was his best portion in the world to come which if he had been born heir to the covenant of life how then could Abrahams affirmation have been true Beloved Let all ingenuous Spirits that are not willing to walk blind-fold consider how contrary to the whole tenor of the Gospel this opinion is and how destructive to this fundamental principle of the Gospel the necessity of Christ of Regeneration and destroys all sense of the necessity of conversion and helps to harden men to destruction as it did the blind Jews who as it appears were fully blinded in the receipt of that opinion that being Abrahams seed according to the flesh interessed them in happiness and eternal life Fourthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of the new covenant and the nature of it and the manner of Gods making of it with the soul for to make a new covenant with the soul is to write the Law of God in a mans heart and in his mind and to infuse saving knowledge and faith by which God unites the soul to himself and so pardons all his sins and without any condition considered in the creature binds over himself to be their God freely in Christ and binds over himself to own them to be his people And only thus and no otherwise is God said to make his new covenant with a poor soul Whereas this dream would seem to bear you in hand that a whole nation may be in a new covenant and have it made with them and yet have none of all this work wrought in their hearts Fifthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of Justification by faith in Christ only seeing that it doth hold out another way than by faith to come to Justification which is by carnal birth of beleeving parents for if a soul be admitted into a Covenant of life I hope you are not ignorant that Justification is a great privilege in the new covenant and really the portion of all that are in that covenant Sixthly This opinion destroys the Doctrine and foundation of all Gospel Churches where it is held which will appear by two things First It destroys the matter of the Church you know that this is a fundamental truth that the matter of the Church ought now under the Gospel to be Saints by calling 1 Cor. 1.2 Spiritual
Worshippers John 4.23 Lively Stones 1 Pet. 2.5 Such as are redeemed from their vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 Such brought out of darkness into his marvellous light 1 Pet. 2.9 Now this error destroys the truth or opposeth it self against the truth of God lying in all these Scriptures it brings in the nation of believers all born of their body their seeds seed in their generation if you will be faithful to this principle whereon this seems to be grounded For the covenant of Circumcision was not only to the next generation immediately flowing from Abraham But to thy seed after thee in their generations And we see in that generation in Christs time they were as well called Abrahams seed as Isaac himself was and they did call Abraham their father Therefore if the covenant of Circumcision shall be mans patern we must necessarily have a Church that is national consisting of succeeding generations for many hundred years coming out of believing persons loins and so set up the partition-wall again between the natural branches and those that are wild by nature So that this tenet doth of necessity destroy the true matter of a Church because it unavoidably admits into the Church all the unconverted and unregenerate children born of the bodies of such persons that either are or have been accounted believers And as it destroys the matter of a Church in admitting such that are not made Disciples so it occasions such as do believe remaining in that opinion to live in that sin of neglect of the Lords Baptism contenting themselves with that counterfeit of Baptism which they had in their infancy So that this evil opinion occasions the constitution of a Church or Congregation of good and bad promiscuously and all these unbaptized both the good and the bad and what light in the Gospel have you to justifie such an Assembly to be the true Church of Christ that doth consist of some Religious people in the Judgement of Charity and a world of carnal children admitted and received in among them and all both the carnal and the religious never baptized with the Lords baptism I do deny such an Assembly can be owned an orderly Church of Christ Thus you see what a great error this is that opposeth it self against so many fundamental points of the Gospel But may some say though we receive in children by baptism into our Church we do not admit them unto the Supper The Question is when you will admit them See what an untroden path you are run into Do you own your children to be in a covenant of Grace and eternal life and inrighted into the privileges of the same and is Baptism the privilege of the new Covenant and not the Supper also if it be how dare you keep them from their right and privilege I pray you how long did the Apostles baptize their members before they admitted them to the Supper If you look in Acts 2.41 42. you shall find so many as gladly received the word of God were baptized and presently they continued in the Apostles doctrine Fellowship breaking of Bread and prayer as soon as they were baptized Therefore you have no ground at all upon any pretence to suspend such members that you own privileged in all the Ordinances of God from the Supper which you have received into your Church by your supposed baptism Thus you may see what horrible Consequences flow naturally from maintaining a Covenant of eternal life in the flesh Seventhly This opinion defends another gross error That persons may have right to a covenant of life without union or in-being in Christ by faith it is a sad thing that souls that profess knowledge In the Gospel and to be preachers of the same should be so blinded thus to mislead people in so weighty a point as this is and that should endeavour to leaven thousands of poor people with such a sad error that opposeth it self against the very substance of the Gospel in holding all the whole Nation of Israel to be in a covenant of eternal life and also the carnal children of believing parents among the Gentiles though they had no union by faith in Christ the greatest part of them I come to the third thing which is to prove that the covenant of eternal life The third general general head never was nor shall be made with any but such as believe or such as are in Christ and for the better clearing of that you must understand that as soon as the seed of the woman was promised to wit Christ Jesus which was the whole of the new covenant all promises being Yea and Amen Somewhat offered to prove that God presently upon the Fall made an outward carnal covenant entailed upon the flesh and spiritual and heavenly blessings being given in him this being one main point then to be made known to the Sons of men that he must come out of the woman You must I say understand that the Lord did presently make an outward covenant which was typical intailed upon the flesh out of which the Messiah should come But I must confess this is not held forth so clearly till the time of Abraham nor then so clear as it was afterwards by the hands of Moses But it is clear to me that in substance the same covenant of Ceremonial obedience which was given to Moses when the people came out of Aegypt the same was given to Adams generation upon the promise of Christ which was to go on in the fleshly line out of which Christ was to come and this to continue till he did come in the flesh and then to cease The reason that induceth me thus to judge is this I find Cain and Abel at the end of the year of daies bring their sacrifice and the one brought the first lings of the flock and the fat thereof Thus did God command the same things to Israel by Moses Exod. 34.19 13.12 13. And you see Cain brought the first fruits of the ground and we find this delivered by Moses as part of the covenant to the Jews in Deut. 18.4 26.2 for saith the Lord Thou shalt bring of all the first fruits of the Earth which thou shalt bring of thy Land that the Lord thy God gives thee Micah 7.1 Levit. 2.12 14. Pro. â— 19 Though ye do not here see from what rule Cain and Abel did thus do yet we must take for granted they had it from God how else could Abel have performed his worship acceptably if he had not a ground to do it by faith and it is certain he did it in faith therefore had he rule for the same as Hebrews 11.4 And we find that in that time there was a distinction of clean and unclean Beasts that went into the Ark. Now what cleanness or uncleanness is here meant is by virtue of a Law for certainly that Law which God gave to forbid such beasts and creatures was that which made one clean and not
was a National Election and a National rejection and he saith The Elder shall serve the younger this saying the Elder shall serve the younger is interpreted by Mal. 1. to be a loving of Jacob and a hating of Esau laying his Mountain wast that is his Church-power or privilege that he seemingly had expected to have been heir of and the loving of Jacob is meant the external electing Love into the covenant of Circumcision according to that in Deut. 7.7 Speaking thereof the whole Nation The Lord did not set his love upon you not chuse you because you were more in number than any people for you were the fewest of all people but because the Lord loved you This Election and this love is equal alike to the whole nation of Israel therefore so considered you must mind this is as I said before only an external election of Jacob and these in his lines into the National covenant of Circumcision as before in Genesis 18. he saith In Isaac shall thy seed be called the meaning as the 17. Chapter expounds is this that the seed in their Generations that God would continue the Covenant of Circumcision upon was that seed which was to come out of Isaac and not that which came out of Ishmael and the six Sons of Keturah none of them or their seed were to be of that great Nation which God promised to make of Abraham for the Lord saith to Abraham Gen. 18.18 I will make a mighty nation of thee Now by this Nation you must understand is meant the National Church taken into the Covenant of Circumcision whereas in the spiritual covenant all the Nations were to be blest in him and he is to be the Father of multitudes of Nations Gen. 12.3 17.4 5. but this Covenant of Circumcision must not relate to any but to those that came out of Isaac with his family and then those that came out of the Loins of Jacob with his Family though this be a true literal interpretation of these Texts and really the proper mind of God yet there is a mystical and spiritual sense pointed and driven at which Paul that infallible Apostle did clearly give out from those Texts in Romans 9. That as Isaac typed out Christ so this temporal seed elected in Isaac typed out this spiritual election in Christ the temporal seed in a temporal covenant elected in Jacob points out the choice of Christ and all his seed into a spiritual covenant So a spiritual election in these Texts was typed and figured out as the Apostle doth clearly maintain The Apostles not being the Ministers of the Letter but the Spirit 2 Cor. 3. but most true it is That Jacob and the whole Nation in him were elected into an outward Covenant and Esau and his seed were not but were refused and past by And consider now in the womb was Jacob and his posterity any more the seed of a Believer than Esau and his seed were Sure it is he was not Therefore away with that error taken for granted that the covenant of Circumcision was made to believers and their seed This covenant of Circumcision you may clearly see was not made to Abraham nor to his seed considered as a Believers but upon this ground or reason that the Messiah was to come of Abraham not of Lot the Messiah was to come out of Isaac and not of Ishmael nor of the six Sons of Keturah and Christ was to come out of Jacob and his posterity and not out of Esau Here you may nakedly see how greatly they mistake that think the covenant was made to Abraham and his seed considered as believers and believers seed If a National covenant was made with Abraham and his seed according to the flesh out of which flesh the Messiah was to come and that upon this reason then you cannot conclude that the covenant can belong to any Gentile and his seed but upon the same ground Therefore if you would tell where to find a Gentile now among many others that were to have Christ to come out of his loins according to the flesh then you would have the same ground to say that in like manner a Church covenant should run upon him and his seed untill Christ were come out of that flesh or line But when Christ was come and fully exhibited in the flesh then the ground upon which this Covenant was given being ceased To defend a Covenant of life entailed on the flesh is vertually to deny that Christ is come in the flesh the covenant also ceaseth Therefore for any man to go about to defend a covenant in the flesh it is a doctrine virtually denying that Christ is come and fully manifested in the flesh Therefore you may from all that hath been spoken draw this Conclusion That there was never a Covenant of eternal life made with any but with such as did and do believe all along till Christ not since Therefore see that objection answered that the spiritual privileges are not less under the Gospel than under the Law though we deny all the carnal Generation to have any right to the covenant of Grace or privileges thereof both then as well as now the offers and tenders of the Gospel we must confess were to that Nation and in that sense they were called the children of the Prophets and of the covenant Acts 3. and latter end and in that respect now the privileges are larger because all nations are in the same sense the children of the Prophets and of the covenant now since Christ came the Prophet and Minister of God having Commission now to publish the Gospel or new Covenant to all Nations None have right to the Covenant of Grace but such as are united to Christ by faith But further to prove that none have right to a covenant of Grace or life but such as had and have union with Christ by faith is most plain First Because as you have heard the new Covenant was confirmed of God in Christ only Gal. 3.17 And all the promises are in Christ Yea and Amen Therefore this Covenant cannot belong to any soul out of Christ because they are Yea and Amen in him 1 Cor. 11.25 This Cup is the New Testament in my blood saith Christ If the New Testament be in Christs blood then what hath any carnal or unbelieving wretch to do with this Testament that have not faith in his blood And further we do find in Matth. 3.17 the Lord saith This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased mark the words in whom then to be sure out of him he is not well pleased that is in respect to this especial well pleasedness or electing love in the covenant of life according to that in Ephesians 1.6 He hath made us accepted in the Beloved out of the beloved there can be no acceptation Therfore it is said God accepted Abel and his offering Gen. 4.4 The Author to the Hebrewe ch 11.4 tells you Abel by
Cain and his offering being not in faith God accepted not for all the thoughts of such a man are only evil and that continually till they believe as Gen. â— 5 and 8.21 All the imaginations of all believers till converted are evil and only evil continually Secondly their words are evil Matth. 12.34 O Generation of Vipers how can you being evil speak good word for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh an evil man out of the evil Treasure of his heart brings forth evil things and as their thoughts and words are evil so in like manner their actions are all evil natural actions as eating Job 20.23 When he is eating to fill his belly God shall cast the fury of his wrath upon him and shall rain it upon him while he is eating thus you see natural actions are evil such as eating and drinking for satisfying his hunger and also civil actions are evil as Prov. 21.4 an high look and a proud heart and the ploughing of the wicked is sin if plowing then all his civil actions and also his best duties of worship as his sacrifice is an abomination to God Prov. â—8 9 15.8 Isaiah 1. with 66.4 Upon this ground it must needs be that the Covenant of Grace and eternal life cannot belong to any such persons that do not believe for it is impossible to be in a covenant of Grace and yet not to have persons nor any of their best actions accepted Yea further all mankind are compared to beasts till they believe Job 11.11 Vain man would fain be wise but man is born like a wild Asses Colt with Jeremy 2.23 24. Yea the Lord saith in Revel 21.8 That the fearful and unbelieving and the abominable and murtherers and whoremongers and Sorcerers and Idolaters and all Lyars shall have their portion in the Lake which burneth with fire and brimstone which is the second death Beloved therefore if any have been so deluded as to believe such a notorious error as this is to think that any ever hath been in the Covenant of life but such as are in Christ by faith I desire God may give you repentance for maintaining such a fundamental error as this is And now in the fourth place Answers to such Scriptures as are alleged to prove the baptism of infants I shall endeavour to answer such Scripture allegations and those especially brought in from the New Testament to countenance this error wherein I shall endeavour to take off those false and corrupt Glosses that are usually put upon them wherein men pretend to prove the covenant of grace among the Gentiles to run in the flesh and line of believing parents under the Gospel which I am sure was never yet since the world began nor never shall be with any neither parents nor children but such individual persons that particularly believed in Christ with their own hearts And first let me speak to that in Acts 2.39 An answer to that text Act. 2 39. which is usually pretended to be a proof of the covenant in the flesh the words are these The promise is to you and to your children and to all that are afar off even as many as the Lord our God shall call Now I pray you take notice how evident this Text makes against this error For this Text affirms only the promises to belong to so many even as God shall call and that is a fundamental truth if by promise you understand the gift of the Holy Ghost or remission of sins or both to be promised in this text It is most true that so many as God shall call have an interest both to Christ and all the promises in him and only they for saith the Text Repent and be baptized every one of you for the remission of sins and ye shall receive the Holy Ghost So that remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost it is safe to understand here to be meant that promise that is said to belong to them to their children and to those afar off even so many of them and their children and of those afar off as the Lord our God should call agreeable to the words thus understood is Rom. 8.30 moreover whom he did predestinate them he also called whom he called them he also justified and whom he justified them he also glorified So that justification or remission of sins is here given only to called persons with these agreeth that of Heb. 9.15 For this cause he is the Mediator of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the transgression that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of the eternal Inheritance So here you see that those that are predestinated to have a covenant of life and the blessing given in that covenant are first called as 1 Pet. 2.9 He hath called us out of darkness into his marvellous light Now this text is plain to prove that those Jews and Proselytes that then heard him and their children and also the ten Tribes new afar off and also the Gentiles the promises did belong to so many of all these as God should call and except Souls be given up to a Spirit of Delusion will any dare to affirm that the promises of the Spirit remission of sins and eternal life do belong to any other Will any be so ignorant as to judge that those promises did belong to the Generation of the Jews whether they were called or not though they continued in unbelief and hardness of heart and impenitency Is not such a corrupt interpretation against Christs words to that very people John 8.24 Except you believe that I am he you shall dy in your sins speaking to these very Jews and doth not John the Baptist say to these John 3. last He that believeth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him directing this speech indeffinitely to the generation of the Jews the seed of Abraham such as were in the covenant of Circumcision But if by the children you understand so many of them as God should call whether then at that time or afterwards to the end of the world it is most true that to such of their children the promise of grace did belong But Beloved the Scripture is in nothing more full than in this that the promise of grace belonged not to any of those Iews seed but such as were called for God shuts them under unbelief and because of unbelief they were broken off Rom. 11. if unbelief excluded them from that external relation which before Christs death they then had in the Covenant intailed on the flesh and Christ coming in the flesh and fully exhibiting and putting an end to that covenant no other covenant standing in force in the Church of God but what Christ was the Mediator of these unbelieving Iews of necessity were broken off The promise of remission of sins was so far from running upon the
all the posterity of a believing person so many generations to come as Levy from Abraham did believe and repent in their believing parents then there is no ground to oppose that all the world at this day are believers because they were all in the line of believing Noah he being the father from whence all the world did proceed that are now living this day And again observe that if the Covenant of life belongs to all believers seed then we need not want for Church-members because all the world are the children and off-spring of believing Noah and this argument carries the right of Covenant to all the world being the children of a Believer viz. Noah An answer to that text Mat. 19.13 Further some bring that in Matthew 19.13 There were brought unto him little children that he should put his hand upon them and pray and the disciples rebuked them and Jesus said suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of God and he laid his hands on them and departed In Mark 10.13 thus And they brought young Children to him that he should touch them and his Disciples rebuked them that brought them but when Jesus saw it he was much displeased and said unto them Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not for of such is the kingdom of God verily I say unto you whosoever shall not receive the Kingdom of God as a little child shall not enter therein From hence would some maintain a covenant of eternal life in the flesh for that end they bring this Text but let us examine what the meaning of it may be First whose children they were that were brought to Christ doth not appear its probable they were the seed of Abraham but what their mediate parents whether believers or wicked persons doth not appear certainly but by the former discourse in the chapter it should seem they might be wicked and ungodly persons for there were such mentioned before that tempted Christ and asked him questions The next thing is for what did they bring these children unto Christ most certain not to baptize them because Christ it is said baptized not but the Disciples John 4.2 What then were they brought to Christ for One Evangelist saith He took them in his arms and blessed them another saith He laid his hands on them and prayed All which considered in my judgement it doth probably appear they were brought to him to be healed of some disease it being usual in those daies that by prayer and laying on of hands they did heal the sick But the main expression in the Text to be noted is this That of such are the Kingdom of God From these words some gather that all the children of believing parents do belong to the kingdom of God and if to the Kingdom of God then to all the privileges of that kingdom But as you have heard it will be very doubtfull whether these children had any believing parents to the fifth or sixth degree for of such is the Kingdom of God saith the Text the which we must understand thus That all the children born of the body of Believers and that when little ones in arms do belong to the kingdom of God if you will make this text to countenance that error of the covenant in the flesh the which is erroneous as appears in that the greatest number of believers children never belonged in that sense to the kingdom of God for Adam had a Cain as well as an Abel Noah had a Ham as well as a Sem Abraham had an Ishmael as well as an Isaac Isaac had an Esau as well as a Jacob. And so I might mention all the Scriptures wherein in like manner God doth as well bring forth the generation of the wicked out of the godly and the generation of the elect out of the line of the wicked indefinitely But if by Kingdom of God be meant that condition or state that men are interessed in by virtue of a Covenant of eternal life and that believers children should by birth and generation belong to it then this fully crosseth that doctrine of Christ to Nicodemus Joh. 3.5 as was formerly spoken to Object But some may say It s possible that such a little child may believe because in Matthew 18. 3 4 5 6. verses it is said We should not offend such little ones that believe If you grant that some children when little do believe and therefore belong to the kingdom of God to that I assent let them be whose children they will whether of Believers or Infidels If they believe they are in Christ and so interessed in the Kingdom of God But what makes this for the covenant in the flesh of carnal unbelieving seed Again If by Kingdom of God should be understood the Jewish state or Church and children here understood for children of that Jewish nation then in that sense it is true that all the children born in the Jewish Church by virtue of their birth in that family or nation belonged as members to that National Church being interessed in the Covenant of Circumcision which was the national covenant and the privileges of the same and were by natural birth interessed therein Answ But the true and proper meaning of the Text appears plain to be here in Mark 10.13 14 15. compared together for when he had in the 14. verse said Of such belongeth the Kingdom of God in verse the 15. he presently saith Verily I say unto you whosoever receiveth not the kingdom of God as a little child shall not enter therein this I say interprets these words before Of such as the kingdom of God that is of such like in grace as these be by nature such souls that are by Gods grace subdued and brought into a child-like frame of spirit they only are such as are of the kingdom of God as for example When the Disciples reasoned who should be greatest among them Christ set a little child as a patern of humility innocency and harmlesness And also saith the Apostle Be you children in malice and old men in understanding 1 Cor. 14. and saith Peter As new born babes desire the sincere Milk of the word that ye might grow thereby 1 Pet. 2. â— And so as there is a parity held forth between a man and his wife and Christ and his Church so in Scripture there is between a child in nature and a child in grace as the natural begetting the spiritual begetting alluding to that there is the natural birth and the spiritual birth held forth by that sucking of the Mothers breast and by sucking of the breast of Gods word A little babe we know in nature will trust to his parents so the new born babe will trust in Christ if the natural babe want any thing it will go to its parents and ask them for it so must a new born Babe make his request known to God in all
When Paul had received the holy Ghost Annanias saith And now Paul why tarriest thou Arise and be baptized for the washing away of thy sins calling upon the name of the Lord. Observe that Annanias had an immediate extraordinary commission from Christ by vision to come with the message to Paul and Christ in a vision bids Paul go to Annanias and he should tell him what he should do and Annanias according to that Commission of Christ upon his being filled with the holy Ghost commands him to be baptized And this agrees with the Covenant of grace in Ezekiel 36.27 where the Lord saith I will put my Spirit in them and cause them to walk in my way and Ezek. 11.19 I will give them one heart and will put my Spirit within them and will take the stony heart out of their flesh and will give them an heart of flesh that they may walk in my Statutes and keep mine Ordinances to do them and they shall be my people and I will be their God Where you may see that God is so far from giving his Spirit to the end that souls should plead thereby freedom from the practice of those commanded Ordinances of Christ that on the contrary it is the end why God gives his Spirit to enable and to cause them to walk in his way and in his Ordinances and in particular baptism And observe the Apostles have not left us a bare example only that they did baptize after that Christ powred out the Holy Ghost and that by the authority received from heaven but doth command it as you have heard to all that repent and believe and to all that receive the holy Ghost to submit to it But again the Baptism of the Holy Ghost and fire that John foretold of it is clear was extraordinarily given upon an especial ground and reason fulfilled in Act. 2. The Holy Ghost falling down in fiery Cloven tongues in the sight and view of the bodily eyes which was that outward sign and that clear light and fervent zeal and love they had in uttering the wonderful things of God in variety of strange tongues was the inward thing signified So that herein the baptism of the Holy Ghost was an outward sign and an inward thing signified but there is now no man in the world hath this baptism only it is true that the Spirit in the saving gifts of faith repentance and the like is held to be essential to the Ordinance of Baptism of water and must be joined together with it without which it cannot be said to be an Ordinance of God there must be the inward grace as well as the outward sign This Baptism that the Apostle according to Christs Commission hath left a standing Command for cannot be Johns baptism his holding forth Christ to come baptizing them in that doctrine But in this we baptize persons in Christ already come and fully exhibited And though it may be objected that the Apostles practiced some things that were abolished as the circumcising of Timothy and the like We also say that as they practised it among the Jews so the Apostle Paul to the Gentiles saith if they be circumcised Christ should profit them nothing but they were faln from grace and we never find that circumcision was practised among the Gentiles that were void of all Religion before they taught them It is evident in the new Tastament that Circumcision is abolished as part of the Mosaical Covenant and yoke of bondage Gal. 5.1 2 3. but the case in baptism is clean otherwise Whereas you hear the Apostle did press Cornelius his family to be baptized who was a Gentile never acquainted with Johns baptism nor wedded to such a doctrine as that whereby we should think that Peter did baptize them to condiscend to that error or weakness in their minds Again he doth not only simply baptize them as a Liberty that might be done or not done but commands them to be baptized and so doth as you heard before he did in Acts 2. and it cannot be said that the Apostles commanded any duty to be done with a promise of blessing to the right performance of the same after the Holy Ghost came down upon them but it must needs be a solemn standing Ordinance of God that every soul upon pain of the guilt and rebellion against Christ his head and King ought to be subject unto But this of Baptism hath as aforesaid many standing Laws left in holy Record speaking to all that believe and repent promising remission of sins and salvation to the right performance of the same which proves it to be a standing Ordinance of the new Testament And truly with the same reason Souls may affirm that Christ ceaseth to be a Mediator as to hold the Law of dipping believers ceaseth so much and no less is affirmed by the Soul that saith the Ordinance of baptism is an expired Ordinance he may as well say Christ is expired and abolished as a a fleshly form as some have had the confidence to say For as in the time of Moses Ministration till there was a change of the Priesthood there could not be a change of the Law no more now except there be another Christ and Saviour come or another Priesthood instead of this Priest and Minister of the New Testament assure your selves there can be no change of this Law as in Heb. 7.12 18. Therefore such as pretend to profess Christ to be their Saviour that came of the seed of David and the same persons deny and slight this fundamental Ordinance of Baptism they do therein testify that they reject Christ in their heart as abolished and have got some pretended fancy-Christ instead of him It is utterly inconsistent with the Faith of the Gospel and with true Religion to hold baptism and the Supper two solemn Ordinances and Symboles of the new Covenant to be abolished for in Ephes 4. the Apostle pressing there a visible Church-union layes down the main things wherein that union consists called saith he by one hope of their calling one Spirit one Lord one Faith one Baptism this one Baptism cannot be meant the Spirit because the Spirit is mentioned distinct but baptism here must needs be meant that standing solemn Ordinance of God commanded to every one that believes Now the Apostle pressing here a Church Union doth mention these particulars that are essential to a visi lâ— Church-union without which they could not walk together if not in these things agreed and where a people in all these particulars are one no other thing coming should make a breach of their union Object But some other souls will object and say That Believers baptism is an Ordinance of God and he thinks they do well that are drawn out to practise it by a power from God But saith the soul I want a divine power upon my heart drawing me out to the practice of the same and that is the let and hinderance in me Answ This objection
is grounded upon an error and a mistake taking for granted that a man may be a believer and in a state of grace and yet void of spiritual power to perform obedience to the Commands of God and that a man that is a Christian may know such a thing to be a Command of God and yet left without ability to perform obedience to the same I judge this is a dangerous error and contrary to Scripture For God doth at the very first conversion put his Law in the heart of his child as in Heb. 8.10 and as in Ezek. 36.26 27. God is said to put his Spirit in them to that end to cause them to walk in his waies therefore in some measure doubtless God doth give his people power to obey him as in Ezekiel 11.19 20. I will give them one heart and I will put a new Spirit within them and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh and I will give them an heart of flesh that they may walk in my Statutes and keep my Ordinances and do them and they shall be my people and I will be their God Whence you may observe That Gods main drift in making his Covenant and giving his Spirit into the hearts of his people is that they may keep his Ordinances and be able to walk in his waies Therefore at the first Conversion of Paul God puts in him a disposition to obedience for saith he Lord what wouldst thou have me to do in Acts 9. and so in Acts 2.37 when they through the belief of Peters Sermon were pricked at the heart they cryed out Men and Brethren what shall we do So you see there was a disposition of heart in their first Conversion to be doing what God should command and teach them to be his will So we find God gives them power to submit as soon as his will was revealed for if not so we should lay an aspersion upon God that he should enter into a covenant with a Soul by way of engagement and yet neglect to make good his promise which is to put his Spirit in him and to cause him to walk in his waies And again further God gives to every believer the power of believing by virtue of which he is enabled to fetch virtue from Christ his head to strengthen him to duty and to resist sin therefore the Apostle thus reasons in the 2 Cor. 7.1 â— Dearly Beloved seeing you have these promises let us cleanse our selves from all filthiness of flesh and spirit and perfecting holiness in the fear of God Whence observe the Apostle takes for granted the soul having great and precious promises and faith to draw virtue from them should thereby oppose sin and perfect holiness in the fear of God For though it is true God works to will and to do of his good pleasure yet it is constantly and unfailingly his good pleasure thus to work more or less in a soul that is in him thus by faith And a believer by faith ought to look at himself in a capacity to draw Water out of those Wells of salvation for else what difference between a child of God and a wicked man the form of godliness and the power if a child of God must be forced to live in a course of disobedience to the solemn worship of God for want of power to obey And by the same rule we must take for granted that a child of God may be in a state of Grace and want power to resist sin and upon this ground plead excuse for drunkenness and covetousness and theft or uncleanness and say though he is a believer yet he wants power to resist and conquer these sins Beloved thus for any to plead would be very absurd and contrary to the truth and the nature of a Christian in a state of grace And further observe the deceit lying in this objection Hath not God given thy soul power to hear the word of God and to read and to meditate and to pray and that some times earnestly and fervently to God and is it likely that there wants power to perform obedience to this Ordinance of baptism any more than thou doest perform prayer or other duties which require the same spiritual power upon due examination what enabling power is required in the one more than in the other Again consider thou dost in this walk by sense and not by faith contrary to the Apostle 2 Cor. 5. who saith We walk by faith not by sight it is a very childish thing in a Christian to walk by sense only when he feels strength and power sensibly then he thinks himself able to perform duty and resist sin but when he feels not ability and power then to neglect it Whereas contrary to this Christ saith to Paul in the 2 Cor. 12. My power shall be made perfect in your weakness my grace shall be sufficient for you and as after Paul expresseth himself When I am weak then am I strong When Paul was made most sensible of his own weakness in himself then was the time for Paul to be made most strong by Faith in the strength of another Therefore in Isaiah 45.24 In thee Lord have I righteousness and strength In him shall they boast And the Psalmist saith in Psalm 73 â—4 Though my heart fail and flesh fail yet God will never fail he is the strength of my life and my portion for ever So that when in a mans own sense his heart fails his flesh fails then is the only time for God strength to appear in his weakness this is the way of living by faith and the way which Gods believing children have been carryed therefore we find Jonah when in his own sense he was cast out of Gods sight then he resolved to look towards Gods holy Temple and cryed to God out of the belly of Hell as in Jonah 2. therefore surely this objection hath no weight in it Object But some other soul may say I grant the practice of baptism to be an Ordinance of God and the way of such Churches that walk under the baptism of believers to be that only justifiable practice in the Gospel and could willingly walk with them and be baptized were it not for their rigidness in that they will have no Communion with any though godly that are not baptized Answ To this I answer by way of distinction between Church-union and Communion and personal Union and Communion Now if we find a soul not baptized nor joined to any Church and happily ignorant of baptism yet if I have ground in my own heart to judge that soul to be godly and not an enemy to the truth and Gospel of Christ but a soul willing to hear and learn what truth God shall further reveal unto him and so having ground to judge such a soul to have union and personal communion with the Lord in such a case I ought to immitate the Lord in owning a Communion with such a Christian in
like manner as for Example Cornelius and his family having a personal union with the Lord and communion with him before Peter preached to him and he not being an obstinate professed enemy against any Law of Christ but contrarywise saying to Peter We are here to hear what soever is commanded thee of God Therefore the Spirit of God falling down upon them they spake with new tongues and glorified God and Peter and the six baptized Brethren being with them no question did join in Spirit and heart in that present Spiritual service which Cornelius and his family did perform to God they none of them at that interim of time being baptized nor convinced that baptism was an Ordinance of God For till Peter had consulted with the Brethren he did not press baptism upon them And therefore we find that he did instruct them after a consultation which he had with the Brethren saying How should we forbid water that these should not be baptized that have received the Holy Ghost as well as we And Paul in like manner between the time that Christ had converted him and his comming to Annanias prayed and we find God owns a personal Communion with him in that prayer for Christ speaking to Annanias saith That Paul was a chosen Vessel for behold he now prayeth manifesting that he owned Paul in that service Now he being in a teachable godly frame though ignorant of baptism in prayer God had Communion with him In like manner I judge from these Scripture examples it is lawful for a baptized person to have fellowship in prayer or speaking with any such soul which he is perswaded of to be godly and that is not a professed enemy to any command of God But God hath not as we find ever had any Church-union or Communion with any Soul that was unbaptized and it is clear that the Ordinance of the Supper is committed to a Church yea to a Ministerial Assembly gathered according to Christs Commission Mat. 28.19 20. where I understand the order there binding is this First the Ministers should teach the Nations or make them disciples by teaching and then the command is Baptizing them what them such that are made disciples by teaching Thirdly the Command is to teach them to observe whatsoever Christ hath commanded what them is here meant but such as are made disciples and baptized teaching them to observe whatsoever I have commanded you and I will be with you to the end of the world that is he will be with a people first converted secondly baptized thirdly walking in the practical observation of all other administrations of Gods house as these eleven did and those they converted I say this his promise is to be with his people to the end of the World And this order is binding that as a Minister is commanded to baptize one made a Disciple and not any other so he is commanded to put them upon the practical observation of all his Laws and they only and till they are baptized they are not nor cannot be admitted into a visible Church to partake of the Supper of the Lord. And that this is the true meaning of Christ in the Commission appears by his Apostles Ministry and practice who by the infallible gifts of the holy Ghost were guided unfailingly thus to preach and practice as in Acts 2.37 38. with 41 and 42. verses First he teacheth them the Doctrine of Jesus Christ they hearing that were pricked at the heart and inquiring of Peter and the rest of the Apostles what they should do he saith Repent and be baptized every one of you See how he presseth the same order here as Christ doth in the Commission and afterwards in the 41. verse it is said So many as gladly received the word of God were baptized and the same day there was added to the Church about three thousand souls by Faith and Baptism and they continued in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship in breaking of Bread and prayer Therefore the way that Christ hath ordained is That souls should be joined or added to the Church by Faith and Baptism according to that word in 1 Cor. 12.13 We are all baptized by one Spirit into one body Now though the Spirit as the inward thing signified be here spoken of yet the outward sign is also included as might be by other Scriptures cleared Thus Cornelius his Family were converted then baptized before they were constituted a Church So the Gaolers and Lydia's and the Church of Samaria in Acts 8. were all gathered by faith and dipping And for a Minister to gather a Church any other way is to go not only in an untroden path but cross and point-blank contrary to the doctrine and practice of the Apostles therby slighting the Rules of Christ in the Commission by which the Apostles Doctrine and practice was guided and which all the Ministers of the Gospel ought to be guided by Why the Ordinance of Baptism is administred but once the Ordinance of the Lords Supper often But yet further the Ordinance of baptism is to confirm our Regeneration New birth and Union with Christ in his death burial and resurrection Rom. 6.3 4 5. with Col. 2.12 Tit. 3.5 and therfore is to be received but once as a man is to be regenerated but once and born but once and changed from death to life but once but that ordinance of God viz. the Supper is for Christians growth and increase of grace and of constant use to shew forth Christs death till he come and therefore to be received often Now it must needs be a profâ—nation of this ordinance of God to divert and cross the order and so the special intendment of God in them and that is to admit persons to that Ordinance which is principally for Christian growth before you have admitted them to that Ordinance which is for planting them into Christ signifying the confirmation or washing of Regeneration and the new birth and Union with Christ the true stock and root from whence all spiritual growth is to be expected Therefore Baptism must be the first Ordinance dispensed or administred after conversion before the Supper So that it would be a profanation of the Ordinances of God to divert their proper order end and use to which our holy and jealous God hath appointed them and it is a tender point for those that profess themselves friends to Christ the Bridegroom to be venturing to take his peculiar privilege or prerogative out of his hands as to order and dispose of his own order in his solemn worship contrary to his Commission I do judge such a man that hath not a tender conscience in such cases is in that much unlike Christ and shewes much carnality because as you have heard God will have the honor to direct his people both for the matter and manner of their worship and order of his house But again as you have heard before in Ephes 4.3 What things are essential