Selected quad for the lemma: soul_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
soul_n body_n eat_v life_n 5,930 5 5.0703 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A02831 The confutation of the abbote of Crosraguels masse, set furth by Maister George Hay ... Hay, George, d. 1588. 1563 (1563) STC 12968; ESTC S112574 167,121 196

There are 7 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of Christes body ones offred vpon the Croce whose fleshe and blood by his death are become the verrie nurishment of our Soules according to his owen promes saying and the bread that I shall geue yow it is my fleshe which I shall geue for the lyfe of the warld Playe thou thy self with thy mearie conceait dreaming that he firste offred his bodye and then he gaue it to be eaten We are assured he did offre it vpon the Croce by which onely oblatiō we haue obteyned lyfe Sear●h then what thow lest in thy Sacrific● of thy masse lyfe shal thou not fynd in it for that floweth frome Christes death only but maister Doctor if a mā should demāde by which wordes is this your Sacrifice of the masse instituted if ye answer by these this is my body Then ye grant that there wes no thing offered before they wordes were pronounced Then if some mā shuld demād were the Apostles obedient to Christes commandiment or not It wel be harde to yow to say that they repined in that caise but plaine it is that the bread being broken Christ said take ye eat ye ād efter subiuned the other wordes then it appeareth that some of the Apostles were busye with the bread before the whole wordes were pronunced And so wolde some captius man and that not without some iuste cause seing ye deale with the mater so captiuitie say that if his body wes not eaten yet it wes in eating before it wes offred thus ye may espy that we can trouble yow if we list for oure coniecture hes more probabilitie nor hes your bolde affirmation Christes body wes offred before it wes eaten because the pasouer wes offred before it wes eaten But suche anxius and to curious obseruation of euery moment of tyme will not serue to establishe and for vp a new doctryne wicked and impius it that is worthy obseruation of the tyme is this in the o●e and the vther that the Lorde our God being of mynde to delyuer his people out of Egypt and to see them at libertie he instituted the Pasouer whiche should be vnto them as a figure and a monument of there fredome and 〈◊〉 to all ginerations in the ages to come and that they should be the more diligent in obseruation of his ordināce at that same tyme there wes no lytle dainger appearing to Egypt and they not as yet delyuered he commanded them to do this for we be more moued affected with those thinges that we be teached in the myddest of a great trouble and calamitie nor with those that be repdited vnto vs in al quietnes and securitie for as solicitude and fear maketh a mā more attentiue war and able to conceaue so do they make a mā more thankful and myndful of the benefite receaued Lykewise we obserue that our maister sauiour Christ that same nyght he wes betrayed the displeasour and melancholie hauing occupyed the hertes of his Apostles then did he institute his holy supper whereby they should be admonished of there insta●te delyuerance that wes to follow at hande Yet since ye vrge the figure and preisseth so earnestlie at the tyme I praye yow answer to me if any Preiste wee disquieted called vpon appoynted for the Immolation of the Easter Lambe ye knowe I truste the contrarie it wes commāded to be eaten in euery housse slayne be the maister of the housse without any Ceremonye or circumstance commanded in otheres Sacrifices as of preiste altare and sofurth whereby it appeareth euidentlie that it wes onely rekned to be a Gratulatorie Sacrifice and of the kynd of suche as were called meat offringes no suche as ye meane and this we will not denye to conueine most properlie to the Communion as hath bene clearlie declared Now then a lytle with yow where of proceadeth this your Papisticall Preisthead by the whiche ye claime Authoritie to offre vp the Lambe of God since ye see no preist called vpon here in the figure but the maister of the housse in this to haue the charge Now apply the figure to the veritie and ye shall perceaue how great a vanitie it is to seik the congruence aggrement and similitude of the one with the other in all poyntes for if that should haue place neuer shall I seik one other argument but the figure to euert thy whole purpose as thow alledgest the Sonne of God should be first offred and sacrificed according to the figure then shall it follow that he wes firste slayne syne eaten yea and efter he wes eaten slayne againe as we know Christe Iesus to haue dead vpon the Crioce efter his holy Supper These are the great absurditeis following vpō the figures Forther to inquire of the tyme it is vaine and ●ur●u● yea and foulishe to lead any probation thereby an establishe any thing any wayes doutsum let be it that is manifestlie wicked Here Iames is moued seing this dimne bryng all his probations out of the figures of the olde Testament to vtter his Iudgement and think that the figures of the auld Testament ar noche sufficient confirmatioun of the maters of faith concerning the new Testament As in verrie deid allegoreis how soeuer the Ancients delyted in them are but weak ꝓbatiōs not mekle to be leaued vnto In some places being vsed modestlie they may be receaued in doctryne of admonition But to this this Doctor boldly pronunceth ze think sayis he all wrāg because zour hart is against the Scripture dois not our Sauiour confirme his burying tyll indure thre dayis and thre nychtis be the figure of Ionas Dois nocht Peter proue Baptisme necessarie be the figure of the Arke of Noie affirminge all thaim tyll haue perissed that wer withoute it Lykewise Paule callis to remembrance the twa Sonnes of Abraham to haue signified the twa Testamentis thus may we perceaue the speciall matters of our faith conteaned in the new Testamēt to be cōfirmed be the figures of the auld Testament To proue his intent this glorious diuine adduces thre exemples out of sindre places of the new Testament euen as these places were cyted out of the ould Testament as solide probations When as they are adduced onely to Illustrate the mater which is already decleared to be luke for or then that whiche is already prouen by strong arguments Last to shaw that they haue some figure or similitude in the ould Testament We knowe that our Sauiour to whome and to his holy spirit it apperteneth to expone and declare the conformitie of the figure● with the mater represented by them and not to euery one to take vpon him to deuise and ymagine al thing according to us fond fai●talie our Sauiour I say againe being in oportuned be the Iowes continuallie calling for signes tokenes wounderous workes according to there ingyne he thus disdanefully tr●etteth them ād pronunceth them vnworthy of the thinges they called for moste earnestlie ād ●o ●urte●h them
haue added it as Christe did in the latter Supper Communicat to the multitude and ze tak all to zour self How soeuer this glorius diuine sheweth a bould and a throwen countinance it appeareth that he is moued with this argument and in deid not without cause for all the Papistes in the earth can not excuse this great Churlishe Sacriledge Let vs consider his answer Be that same argument sayeth he I wil cut thy throte with thy awin sworde the cause of this boiste he exponeth for why sayeth he Christe Cōmunicated efter Supper and ze of the new learning dois communicat vther tyme of day I thoght ye should haue said and we papistes doeth play our masses at an other tyme of day For who should haue beleued this man who taketh vpon him the defence of the Papistrie should damne in vs that he alloweth in his owen faction His Second argument is Christe communicat to his tuelf Disciples allanerly and ze communicat to all men and wemen indefferently swa ze do not as Christe did For why the Scripture makes na mention that thair was ony wemen thair Perceaue the captius ingine malicius and stubburne mynde preasing euer to that that he may damne in vs all the most laudable and godly customes that hath bene since the beginning yea and practised by them selues albeit in a wicked maner He proceadeth Trewly brother and ze besa scrupulus Scripturares that ze will do nothing but but is not in my Text as Christe did towardes the vse of the Sacramentes ze will subuert our haile Faith and commend our awin doinges so I ride it our owen doinges or commonly I can not tell which should be red or if there be any other thing yet For quhair find ze that Christe euer appointed ane man to be Baptised I darre bauldly say this ordinance wes neuer of the Euangell nor zit of the Kirk of God nor of ony vther haue and iuste authoritie ather God or man My maister here findeth him so bound with the argumēt that he can not tell what way to escape And in verie deid it is no wonder for in this they haue abused them selues so wickedly against the manifest ordinance of God the practise of the Apostles the cōs●tetude of all antiquitie and authoritie of the godly Fathers that they can pretend nothing Yet neuertheles that he might not seme altogether dume and so to zeild to the treuth thus blasphemusly he brusteth furth and cauillateth the alteration of tyme as our Sauiour thereby had giuen an expres commandemēt and so had astricted the practise of the holy action to that tyme in the which he did vse it moued by good causes and considerations For the Supper we know most assuredly that the intention of our Sauiour wes not that it should be practised and celebrated by night but we knowe the cause why he taried and aboide the comming of the night which wes that he wes to eat the Pasouer with his Disciples the which Lambe of the Pasouer wes vnder the Lawe of Moyses euen as the holy Table is to vs now for therein the Iowes had a certaine visible signe how that God had preserued them miraculusly when as his furie wes disployed vpon the Realme of Egypt As lykewise there wes a greater and more excellent Redemption proponed in this vmber ceremonie and shaddow to them to pause moste diligently and meditate vpon The Apostle Paule therefore declareth our Sauioure Iesus Christ to haue bene this pasouer this Pashe lambe he then with his Disciples receaued this Sacrament that wes appointed for the Fathers vnder the Lawe and so being willing to abolishe this signe he instituteth the holy Supper now it wes not lefull to eat the Pasouer before the going doune of the Sonne This is the cause then why our Sauioure did institute and practise this holy communion at that tyme so that this is not to make a certane reule or to giue a certane instruction so continually to do Now then we haue to aduert and discerue diligently and to followe this as an infallible reule that in the actions of our Sauiour we muste luke what it is that he willeth vs to take and follow as a certane and sure reule to giue as it were from hand to hand but in other thinges that are not to be drawen exactly to imitation nor consequence we haue nothīg there to moue as when our Sauiour sayeth hauing receaued the bread take ye eat ye this oght to be obserued strictly The cause is for it wes not for a tyme that our Sauiour gaue the bread but he willeth that the bread yea euen this day and to the end of the world the bread I say should be distributed in his Name and euen as he were in the middest of vs. And suchlyke of the Cuppe He willeth that we eat the bread to be thereby admonished instructed that our nourishmēt is of his body and when we shall drink the wyne that we receaue it as a figure that his blood is our Spiritual drink it whereby our soules and consciences are refreshed to that heauenly immortalitie that is to be reueiled vpon the Sonnes of God To determine thus exactly vpon the tyme of the celebration of the Lordes Supper that we shall insist with all rigor hauing no necessitie as it were mere rashnes so we grant that the Church may appoint some other tyme since there is no commandemnt thereof The cause why the communion is distrybuted in the morning it is easy to be gathered of Cypriane First that the morning is more commodius to the celebration of the holy assemblies For we obserue many thinges to fall in the rest of the day whereby men are withdrowen from godlie actes and interpryses Secondly we are moste sober then and haue our mindes moste able and ready to cōceaue heigh weightie maters He addeth thridly that the morning tyme is a certane monument of the Resurrection of our Sauiour which is not to be dispysed in this holy mysterie Trew it is that the Ancients in the tyme of abstinēce and fasting because they tuke no meat before night they defered the communion to that tyme spending and bestowing the whole day in fasting praying preaching Psalmes singing and other godly exercise At night wes the celebration of the Supper whē they offered them selues to the holy Table syne passed home to the refection of their bodies But this consuetude wes abbrogated by the sext council of Cōstantinopole holden in Trullum The Decries we haue in the Greik tonge where plainely mention is made that this consuetude wes obserued in the Churches of Affrica yea Augustine shaweth that in his tyme in many places vpon the Thurisday before the Pashe tyde after Supper the Table wes proponed vnto the faithfull that there might appeare no defference from the action of our Sauiour But in this we haue not to be verie cairfull so we may haue the
is moste certane we haue the mater expressed by the wordes at large declared in them so that any man that shal here these wordes pronounced incōtinently knoweth the mater being moste properly and euidently shawen by the wordes But this word masse I pray thee what affinitie hath it with the mater signifieth by it which nether it self is found in the Scriptures nor the mater signified by it I pray thee let me know the signification of it or what cuntrie language is it I know that some of your men trauelleth to draw it from the Hebrew some affirmeth it to be an latine tearme receaued in the great dekay of the latine tongue ▪ What euer it be the Authors can not conuene vpon it some affirming one thing and some an other It is moste probable that it proceadeth from the ryte of the Sacrifices of the Greikes who in the end thereof vsed some certane solempnitie in geuing leaf to the people to depart saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the which ye say Ite missa est crossing the people with an emptie chalice I myght take occasion here to speak somwhat at more large of this mater if my purpose were not to waite vpon this Author nowayes to pas by him Now followeth to intreat somwhat of the diffinition of the masse giuen by this glorious glosare an he giues first which is this That the masse is noght els properly but the Sacrifice of the Lordes body really contened vnder the formes of bread and wine institute by Iesus Christ in his latter Supper in remembrance of his death and passion Hereafter he interiectis this disputation of the name of the masse and then as new hauing digested his wyne he returneth and assigneth an other diffinition which is this The masse I vnderstand to be a commemoration of Christes death passion in the which the bread and wyne are cōsecrated according to Christes institution and the body and blood of Iesus Christ vnder the forme of bread and wyne are offered to the Father of heauen and are receaued as the heauēly food of our soules This fare this Author any man that conferreth the one with the other may consider easylie how necessarie it wes to this Author to assigne this new and last diffinition because of the great imperfection of the formare Alwayes howsoeuer he is troubled with him self to patche sowe clamp and set together such peaces as will neuer aggre let vs procead to the examinatiō of the treuth of his sayinges This I vnderstand to be the maner of teaching of the Logique Scooles and namely of Aristotle whome to not without cause the Scoole giueth the praise and prerogatiue in the sext boke of his Topickes where he of set purpose entreateth of the conditions properties and qualities of a laufull diffinition that it shall haue it that they call Senus which being as it were confuse because it extendeth the self to other members nor it that is ī question they do adde differences which shall so properly apperteyne to the mater that is spoken of that they shall declare the nature and the substance thereof so that there shal nether want nor be superflous any thing therein but deuide discerne and seperate it from all others our inuerted Silenus in the former explication taketh the masse to be a Sacrifice but because there be many kyndes of Sacrifices therefore he addeth the rest that it may be knowen to be a Sacrifice of such a kynde and thus seperated from all others Now haue we to consider how iustly he doeth call it a Sacrifice All Sacrifices whatsoeuer thou shal here of in the Scriptures albeit they be many in nomber yet be they all redacted to this strate that ether they be of the no●ber of thē that the Greik calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yea sōtymes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby men doeth testifie and oppenly witnes them to receaue all thinges out of the handes of God and for his wonderfull and inestimable giftes and benifites offerreth the Sacrifice of thankesgeuing vp vnto his maiestie Of this sorte were they Sacrifices appointed in the Law and called solide offerringes libations the first stuctes oblations peace offerringes and such others whereby the people sometymes did testifie there Religion sometymes did vse them in maner of supplication to search the fauon● of their God now to practise with them selues the obedience and loue that they owe to their God in consideration of his liberalitie yea and now to stirre vp their hartes to the trew and vnfenyed feare of God and all together moste chieflie to renew the remembrance of that blissed and happy couenant which it hath pleased the Eternall to make with them I do think ye wil not minishe the glorie and prerogatiue of this your owne doghter whome ye flatter so busylie as to put her in the rank of these seing ye ascribe vnto her remission of sinnes Er opere operato For thus speaketh your gostly Fathers the Scoole men with the whole rable of Sophisters vnto that vndefyled lady who is ready to ioyne with euery shauilling and also is at all tymes ready deckt to him that hath the price in his hand Of this kynd of Sacrifices ye do not tak the masse to be as may euidently appeare by your boke where ye set her vp euen with the Sacrifice of the croce as we shal after here The other kynde of Sacrifices be when an oblation is offered vp for a sinne whereby it is redeamed before God and this is called a propitiatorie expiatorie an sacrifice of satisfaction as by the which the wraith of God is appeased satisfaction made to his ●●ste and ryghteous iudgementes so that the sinner purged and restored vnto puritie and iustice is in fauor with God by virtue thereof seing it hath power and force to wype and washe away sinnes And this name had they offerringes in the Law that were ordeined appointed for remission of such sines as were committed euerie one in the own kynde not that they were able of them selues or had that force but because they were appointed to this end figuring that Sacrifice which is onely worthy of that name persyted by our Sauioure Iesus Christ vpon the croce putting end and syne to all Sacrifices If this Iowel and block of yours shal be of this kynde it falloweth well that she forgiueth sinnes And not without cause ye beck and bowe to her so earnestlie that is by virtue of that action that God remitteth sinnes But here wold I glaidly inquire whose sinnes are remitted whither the sacrificer or the beholder of the which I am sure no man knoweth for the moste parte any more but that he sees the murgeons played a disguysed preist somtymes pufting somtymes blawing somtymes dreaming now as it were walking out of his slepe now turning his face to the people now to the Alter now crosing now bowing him self doune
vnto his Apostles and lykewise did with the Cuppe In your masse what is lyke this First there is no thankes geuing or any that can be pretended since it is in a forrane language it is euē as there were none there is no breaking of bread nether yet distribution What can it haue then lyke vnto the Lordes institution To the offerring vp of the body and blood of Iesus Christe vnder the formes of bread and wyne to the father of heauen I am assured there is no such thing in the institution of our Sauiour shaw your warrand produce your commission the action I haue rehearsed wherein there is no such thing to the iudgement of all But if ye will say it is here conteined do this in remembrance of me this sentence is relatiue to the action preceading so that there can be no mention at all in this whole institution By whome ye will the body and blood to be receaued as the heauenly foode of our Soules it is incertaine whither of God or of vs be lyke ye wold meane of God seing ye haue spoken of offerring immediatly before as ye should meane that as it is offered by vs vnto God so lykewise is it receaued of his part which in verie deid is a strange maner of speaking and vntrew for who did euer here that the Sacramentes giuen and appointed vnto vs by God as a moste speciall benefite and comfort that euer they wer commanded to be offered to God or so receaued of him I am not ignorant that that thing which is done according to his holy ordinance he is co●tent with it and in that consideration receaueth it But here we speak of offerring of our part and receauing in that respect of the part of God We are commanded to vse and practise his holy Sacramentes whereby we testifie our Religion and witnes our obedience vnto God but to offer them vp vnto him this did I neuer here In deid the body and the blood of Iesus Christe represented by bread and wyne in this Sacrament being receaued according to his holye institution and ordinance and no wayes els I knowe to be the foode and nourishment of the Soule of the faithfull receauer If this be your mynde in the latter wordes of your diffinition then doeth the latter part moste ineptlie and improperlie aggre with it that preceadeth of the offerring This farre haue we trauelled with your fond diffinitions and al 's shortly as wes able and more shortlie nor the mater should require if we should not haue occasion after to speak somwhat as ye trauel forwarde in the explication of your owne sayinges It that ye adde to your former diffinition I can not tel what triflus orations īuented deuised as you say by the ācient Fathers that as seames to you moste iustlie to decore the Maske I answer vnto you that all proceadeth of a Fornace and one Author to wit the Deuill for as the principall is blasphemous so is all that is ioyned wi●h it and pretex not such godlie orations as be vsed in the holy Communion for there is nothing there but it that is drawen out of the Scriptures of God and practysed accordīg to Christes holy institutiō ordināce For the prayers which we do vse before the table of the Lorde Iesus we repute no part of that holy action but onely vse them to inflāme and stirre vp our dul hartes to the due consideration of that great mysterie to the practise whereof when we approche we do nothing which the Lorde Iesus did not nether yet omit we any thing which we finde that he did and commanded vs to do but in your masse if the Collettes Pro Pecore infirmo I wil not say for a seick sow Pro Partutientibus Pro Defunctis Pro na●uigantibus and such others be omitted Sire Iohn is not worth his Six blankes Now haue we to consider the reasons and argumētes whereby this Romish Doctor trauelleth to confirme his fond diffinitions Iames as he is introduced requireth a probation of Scripture for iustification of the which is adduced an part of the wordes of the institution out of Lucas and Marcus do ye this in remembrance of me By the which wordes sayeth this Gospeller He commanded his Disciples to consecrate the bread and the wyne as he did saying this is my body and so he institute the consecration and by the consecration the verie body and blood of Iesus Christe our Sauiour are contened vnder the forme of bread and wyne by the power of y e Lordes word which is omnipotent according to this ye shal mark the godlie Ancient sayinges of Chrisostome written in this maner It is not man that maketh our Lordes body and bloode of the breade and wyne and so furth Whereupon first we shall obserue the olde practise and shift of sathā in the recyting of any place of Text alledged or broght in for his purpose that euer he rehearseth a certane portion or part of the text neuer the whole sentēce Why is not the whole action recyted This hath bene a great occasion of these wicked errors we are now troubled with all and principally in this mater we haue now in hand for hereof hath proceaded that there wes nothing Iudged to appertene to this action by the aduersaries of the Euangle but onely this sentence this is my body that not pronounced plainely but mumled and blowen vpon the bread and so of the Cuppe as nether the thinges preceading nether yet the commandement ensewing should haue any place in this action the fructes whereof are that not onelie the sentence is vtterlie wryed and peruerted but the wordes altered changed and adulterate which no man of a sober wit can esteme to be attempted without a great Sacriledge For as deprauing of sentēces bringeth in all corruption so innouation of tearmes vsed by the Spirite of God can procead of no sobrietie whosoeuer be the Author and inuenter of them Of the one we haue the horrible and monsters mother of all impietie transubstantiation and real presence dinging Christe from the ryght hand of the Father taking from him the office of preisthead and mediation in that that it leaueth not to him the proprieties of the manlie nature pernerting and exstinguishing the ordor and effect of a Sacrament ascribing vnto our Sauioure a phantasticall body with Marrion and fynally affixing him to a certane peice of bread at the appetite of a filthy whormōger not vnlyke to that that we reid in Theotritus and after him in Virgile in his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where they gaue such strenth to the versis of Inchanters that they moue Iupiter the Sonne Mone to fal out of the heauen and discend in their bossomes I wold this glorius gloser should haue red Bonauētura and Stotus otherwise called Doctor Subtilis and suche others in the impugnation of this wicked and deuillishe impietie set furth by Nicolaus Secundus and Innocentius
we be here called to where the same is the banked and the banked giuer as this same Author sayeth We shall consider this bread exhibited to vs here to be the bread of lyfe nourishing our Soules vnto immortalitie We shall consider these Elementes which he giuen as sure pledges of eternall Saluation and of all benefites procured and obteined to vs by Iesus Christe So that we must not go to this table as to a common table to farce and stuffe our bellies with bread and wyne but we muste vnderstand this bread to be seperated from the common vse and sainctified and dedicated to the holy Communion of Christes body and blood to declare to vs that we are not now leuing in our selues but Christe leueth and rigneth in vs we are no more the seruandes and slaues of Sathan but members of Iesus Christe that we are now made participant and partakers of his iustice and ryghteousnes and that by him we haue remission of our sinnes so that now albeit we be in the earth exposed to all kynde of tentation trouble and persecution yet our conuersation is in the heauen with him on whome our Soules stayeth and feadeth This change then that they do meane of is to extoll this mysterie as it is worthy all praise and declare with what trymbling feare and humilitie we oght to present our selues thereto because this that wes common bread appointed for the refection of mans body is now sanctified to an holy vse to assure vs of that coniunction yea and liuely perticipation we haue now with the Eternall Sonne of God who ioyneth him self so familiarly with vs that we are now ingrafted so in him that we now as it were soucketh our verie substāce out of his body blood He is now vnto vs that that he called him self the wynetre and we the brenches he is the head and we the members he is shortlie he out of whome lyfe ryghteousnes iustice holynes and sanctification proceadeth and floweth vnto vs. So that this whole change and immutation is to be referred to the myndes and consciences of the receauers not to any other change that is in the substances of the Elementes that be there proponed but the bread remaneth bread and the wyne wyne albeit they be sanctified to an other more holy vse as we haue said and shall alter declare in the conference of the Doctors This I take to be and douteth not but it is the verie naturall meaning of the wordes of this Au●hor and of all the Anciētes whē as they speak of any change here Yet I am not ignorant that thou and thy fellowes will apply the former sentences and referre them vnto the commandement do ye this in remembrance of me as hereby the Lorde should giue vs the charge to sanctifie or as thou speaketh to consecrate the bread and wyne which as it is moste vntrew and cōtrarious to the simple treuth of the Lordes commandement so the Author do●th meane no such thing For the lord did not cōmand vs to sanctifie bread and wyne and change them but that we shoulde take them giue thankes break and distrybute them amongest vs. and that with all humilytie and reuerence we should eat and drink them in remembrance of him as the verie Sacrament of his body and blood which Sacramentall ceremonie passeth not the reach and capacitie of man And in this whole institution one 's made by him self he still sanctifieth for euer the Sacramentall Simboles to the perpetuall vse and confort of the whole Churche which this Author Chrisostome signifieth moste clearlie In that he sayeth he that wroght then in the Supper doeth them euen now so that he still sanctifieth them by his holy institution and ordinance that he made then in the Suppere where he changed not the substance of bread and wyne but the naturall vse appointed to the resection of our bodies he turned and conuerted in a Sacramentall vse to serue vs by the inwarde operation of the Spirite of God to the nourishement of our Soules and vpholding of our Faith Ones he said this is my body this cuppe is the new Testament in my blood do this in remembrance of me And in these wordes ones pronounced did he ones īstitute and sanctifie this holy action and ceremonie and changed these Elementes from a naturall vnto a Sacramentall vse by vertew whereof this whole action is sāctified throghout all wheresoeuer it is practised which is the verie meaning and interpretation of this Author and all the Ancients wheresoeuer they vse such forme and maner of speaking Here then thou seeth plainely that this Author ascribeth nothing to the wordes pronounced by the Minister but vendicates and reserueth to Christe the instituter the whole strenth and power of sanctification which wes thē done when as he instituted this action and commanded it to be practised in remembrance of him But alwayes here it is not to be passed by that in these wordes cyted out of this Author there is no mention of an Alter but of a Table whereby thou may vnderstand clearly that this Author knew no suche Alters whereof we haue such a multitude erected euerie where without the which the Papistes opinion is that no masse can be done but onely a Table to the imitation of our Sauiour which properly apperteaneth to the practise of his holy Supper Whereof lykewise we may collect that there wes no preuy masses such as in our dayes in the aige of our forebiers that hath bene vnder Antichristes authoritie moste prophanely abused hath bene preuy masses I call all suche where as the preist the people wholy secluded without any distribution deuoreth swelloweth vp all in a moste reuinus maner as in all masses we haue sene which as they are contrarius to the ordinances of Christe Iesus so moste iustlie they lacke and hath no testimonie nor approbation of antiquitie but are moste impius blasphemus and detestable When this inuerted Silenus hath thus played him with the wordes of this Author he inferreth concludeth That not onely said our Sauiour this is my body where through he institute the consecration but al 's he eaked these wordes saying which is giuen and broken for you by the which wordes presētly as the same verie time he declared his body to be an vnbloodie Sacrifice to be offered by the Apostles and all other Ministers of Christes Church to the end of the world in remembrance of his death saying do this in remembrance of me In the answer to this conclusion I wil be verie shorte because afterward ye intreat this mater as it were of set purpose in the. 14. leaf speaking there of the wordes that be vsed in the present tyme. As to the obseruation of the tyme and full vnderstanding of those wordes I will reserue to that place that I be not driuen to make an vnpleasing and lothsome repetition Alwayes that that may serue instantly that we shall not
wes deceassed placed vpon the graue which ryte Augustine rebuketh calling them that so did Infideles And it is not to be wondered that they who were instructed in the scole of Pythagoras Plato reteyned and sauored somthing of their olde dregge This vse dured a sufficient tyme amongest them that were conuerted therefore sayeth Augustine cease brethrē from this heathen error of infidelytie for the holy Soules sayeth he ether be innocency of lyfe are cleane or are purged by satisfaction of repentance and so are receaued by our Sauiour are to be iudged to be with him according to the saying of Paule I wisse to be dissolued be with Christe this farre Augustine making no mētion of Purgatorie nether yet sending the Soules of the dead to any suche place This consuetude thus flowing from the gentilytie could not be altogether remoued yet wes it corrected in this maner that at the practeis of the Lordes Table and in the buriall oblations were made of bread and wyne suche others thinges to 〈◊〉 ●eleif and vse of the poore yea and in the funerall this wes ●e●●er adioyned that not only almous wes geuin to the supporte of the nedy by the freindes of the dead but there w●s added prayer thankes geuing and funerall orations made in the publique assemblie The forme is setfurth by Dionisius that the minister after he had set vp the monument of him that wes to be buried then he gaue thankes to the eternall God who by Iesus Christe had distroyed death and the author of it ād by him had giuen eternall lyfe to them that beleued in him then wes there certane Psalmes recyted sung by the assistence after this a certane place of Scripture confortable of the resurrection of the dead wes red and exponed immediatlie they that were vnder instruction and vnbaptised were put furth of the temple This done a cathologue wes recyted of them that had bene called vpon to Gods mercy before and the name of him that wes to be buried put in his virtues rehearsed as constancy in religion faith Innocency of lyfe mercy and liberalitie to the nedy to this wes ioyned one exhortation to them that assisted to follow there exemple and fotesteppes then and last came the Minister vnto the corps there recyted certane prayers commending the dead to God Of this ordour vsed in the buriall proceded that euen in the holy communion mentioun wes made of the dead as Augustine planely wytnesseth speaking that his Mother earnistlie craued that mention should be made of hir at the table as we may gather of his book that he wrytteth de Te cura pro mortuis Yet wes not this memorie and commemoration so superstitious as in this aige when oure masse mounging schauelinges braggeth that they offre vp the body and blood of Iesus Christe for the dead and the quick for redemyng of them that be in Purgatorie the Supper of the Lorde being institute nether for dead nor for quick others nor doeth vse it according to the institution and practies of our Sauiour Whereby we may clearlie perceaue in the tyme of Augustine as I haue alreadye declared and may proue by the Greike Canon there wes no oblation suche as ye pretend for the deade but onely ane ●ction of thankes to God for his mercy shewed vpon them in receauing them to his cumpanye The oblations we read in the ancien wrytters are to be vnderstand of bread and wyne and suche others thinges giuen and seruing to the vse of the poore and not for redemption of any Soules out of Purgatorie It can not be denyed but they speak as I haue oftentymes warned excessiuelie yet all is to this end that the releif of the poore may be the more depely imprented in our hartes and that we may haue the greater care ouer them ād thus brusteth furth to promes remissiō of sinnes increase of goodes multiplication of the benefites of God yea and some tymes to encurage them the more affirmeth it to auale euen to the deade not that any fructe redoundeth to the deade but onely that they may moue them to greater pitie and liberalitie towardes the indigent they amplyfie and deck vp the mater For this ye bring out of Augustine is not to be vnderstand of any other oblatiō nor of almus giuen to the poore to the which wes ioyned certane orations or rather commemorations and actions of thankes for the dead And that these be called propiciations and meanes whereby grace and mercy is purcheshed to the dead this we haue to take excessiuelie spokē to the prayse of almons and to kendle the charitie of mē towards there indigent brethren which charitie mercy they complene to be waxed cold thus by faire persuasions and promisses they walken allure and encurage the dull hartes of mē ād so the wordes are not to be taken rigoruslie strictlie For if ye shall so do we muste haue recurse to the reule of Augustine already declared that is to the eternall veritie of God reueled in his Scriptures where there is no suche commandement giuen to pray or offre for the deade nor yet allowed by any exemple of attenticque Scripture nor worde spoken of Purgatorie but planely teached that all faithfull are saued vnfaithful condēned Where vnto aggreth the doctours them selues as Ambrose De bono mortis He that receaueth not remissiō of sinnes here there shal be none there to wyt after the departing of this lyfe there shal be nōe because they could not atteyne to eternall lyfe which is remission of sinnes And Cypriane after the departing of this lyfe there is no place to repentance nor effect of satisfaction Here is lyfe ether loste or holden here is prouided for eternall lyfe by the worshipping of God and the fructe of faith And Ieronimus in this worlde we know that we may help euerie one others ether by oratioun or then by Counsell when we shall cum before the Trybunal of Christ nether Iob Daniel Noah may pray for vs but euery man shall bear his owen burthene And Augustine him self besydes the places alledged sayeth he not all hath at there departing out of this world there owen diuers receptacles the godlie hath ioy the wicked tormētes but at the resurrection the ioy of the godly shal be amplyfied and the panes of the vngodlye shal be made more greuous when they shal be troubled with there bodyes the holy Patriarches Prophets Martyres Apostles all good faithfull are receaued in peace yet they shall all receaue in the end that God hath promised for there is promished ●esurrection of the fleshe consumption of death eternall lyfe with the Angells this we are to receaue at ones for the rest which immediatlie is giuen after the death euerie man receaueth if he be worthy of it when he dieth This farre Augustine If a rest be prepared for all faithfull where is thy Purgatorie and since
foreshewē to the fathers the offerring vp of the Sauiour of the world yea and declared that he wes the Lambe of God that taketh awaye the sinnes of the world of whom there wes no bone broken yea and of whose mactation Isay as fore prophecieth vnder the image and figure of the Lambe and the shepe to the which alludeth the historie of the oblation of Isaac By the which testimonies and figures wes plainely and euidently declared to the Fathers that which the Baptist declared in few wordes calling him the Lambe of God the taker away of the sinnes of the world These things then now fulfilled euen according as they were adumbrat in the Law and forespoken by the Prophetes there is no other oblatiō nor emisiō of blood for sine for synce the way that he hath prepared for vs is freshe by his blood which is the blood of the new testamēt whereby he testifieth that we haue not to esteme this recōciliation made by him and in the which we are receaued in his blood to īdure for a ●eason but the strenth of it to be Eternall and permanent What haue we to do then as it were to gaise for a new Christe and to luke continually for others Sacrifices and Lawes such as no godly harte can susteane The Sacrament of the pasouer conteyned a Sacrifice and a banked the one to forewarne of that eternal Sacrifice of the Croce whiche was ones perfyred ād neuer reiterated the other to instruct of the Lordes Table The Sacrifice being offred and perfected ref●eth to vse the cōnsaill of the Apostle and so to of●re vs to the ban●ed of the Lordes table where we are made participant of his body and blood For the Apostle sayeth not since our Pasouer Christ is offred vp let vs Sacrifice him a new but let vs make merry offring and representing vs to his holy Table in all sinceritie and veritie to be made one with him Besydes this the sprinkling of the Lambes blode which wes a maner of Sacrifice declared planely the wraith of the Father to be appeased ād the people reconciled which properlie apperteaneth to the Sacrifice of the croce be virtew whereof we are restored to the fauour of God The eating of the Lambe apper●aneth most ꝓperlie to the Supper for thereby is witnessed that we be al ꝑticipant of that Sacrifice by the which reconciliation wes made and saluation procured and purchassed to so many I say as worthelie eateth of that Banked The mysterie of the tyme which wes commanded to be efter the going down of the Sonne aggreith moste properlie with the Sacrifice of the croce representing declaring in the latter dayes the fulnes and plenitude of tyme being come then should the Sonne of God be offred vp That how soeuer our Sauiour practeist did institute this holy action efter down passing of the Sone beīg drewē so to do by a certane necessitie as I haue decleared yet wes it not to leif a ꝑpetuall reule and bynd vs straitlie to that tyme But by his owen wordes he hath set vs at libertie aswell touching the frequent vsing as touching the tyme. The pasouer wes eaten but ones in the year and at a statute day and tyme but our maister sayeth do this as oft as ye do it in remembrance of me Setting vs in fredome to vse his supper as oft as we please And at what tyme we Iudge moste couenient Be the aggreance and dissimilitude of the pasouer with the Supper of Iesus Christe it may now euidently appear what apperteaneth to the supper properlie and what is to be referred to the Sacrifice of the Croce yea how fondlie ye are abused in applycation hereof to youre fond Sacrifice let vs returne to our maister Doctor where he playeth the Sophistre in dede and hyngeth I warrand now by a small grip Attoure it is sure sayeth he that Iesus Christ our sauiour come to fulfyll the law not break it it wes cōmanded be the law to make oblātion of y ● Pascale Lambe afore it wes eat●n so wes it necessare that our Sauiour hade firste maid oblation of his bodye afore he gaue the same to be eatin to the effect that the veritie sould corresponde to the figure Quharefore we at cōpelled to affirme that our Sauiour maid oblation of his body in the latter Supper afore he gaue the same to be eatin or els the veritie was not correspondent to the figure Quhilk is against all veritie and this may ze clearlye perceaue that the Pascal Lambe was not only a figure of the sacrifice of the Croice but a mere expresse figure of the sacrifice of the masse as is sufficientlie prouen Trewly Brother since thow hast no other refuge but to cleane to a certane circumstance of tyme I euen pietie the repent me vetray fore vndoutedlie that thow should mell with the defence of so desperate wicked cause And here as euer thow did in all thy lyfe thow playest the sophister moste craftilie if thow could haue couered thy craft but thow knowest craft when it is oppenned vp and perceaued whate a hindrence it is to the faime and opinion of a man Trew it is that thow proponest our Sauiour to haue come to performe ād not to break the Law but that thow affirmest the Lambe to haue bene offred afore it wes eaten that thow prouest not nether yet art thow able to proue by the institution of God or by the playne wordes of the Text that any commandement wes geuen to the people to offre the Lambe to God before it wes slayne ▪ or before it wes eaten commandement wes geuen that they should take it keip it slay it sprinkle the blood of it rost it eate it and so furth But of offring of it shal thow and no commandement I wil not denye but that the pasouer ryghtlie done with all circumstances according to Gods commandement may be called a Sacrifice but I absolutlie denye that it wes commanded to be offred before it wes commanded to be eaten so that the offring signified a Sacrifice as thow alledgest and the eaten out other and so seing thow leauest that vnprouen whereupon thy vnsa●erie Sacrifice dependeth considdre with thy self how vnfaithfull a Patron art thow to the miserable Masse But if I should grant that which thow art neuer able to proue to wit that the Lambe wes offred before it wes eaten ▪ what will thow conclude that there wes two Sacrifices or the figures of two Sacrifices that I denye for what soeuer wes done with the Lambe or to the Lambe before the eating wes done in respect of the eating and to the end it should be eaten of the people so that if the eating had bene omitted al that preceded had bene vnprofitable and so the whole action of the pasouer wes but a sacrifice if thow so wil haue it termed and the figure of a sacrifice to wit