Selected quad for the lemma: soul_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
soul_n	body_n	call_v	natural_a	3,680	5	6.6307	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A00294	A booke intituled, The English Protestants recantation, in mattersof religion wherein is demonstratiuely proued, by the writings of the principall, and best learned English Protestant bishops, and doctors, and rules of their religion, published allowed, or subscribed vnto, bythem, since the comminge of our King Iames into England, that not onely all generall grownds of diuinitie, are against the[m], but in euery particular cheife question, betweene Catholicks & them, they are in errour, by their owne iudgments : diuided accordingly, into two parts, whereof the first entreateth of those generall grounds, the other of such particular controuersies, whereby will also manifestely appeare the vanitie of D. Morton Protest. Bishop of Chester his boke called Appeale, or, Ansuueare to the Catholicke authour of thebooke entituled, The Protestants apologie.	Broughton, Richard.	1617 (1617)	STC 10414; ESTC S2109	209,404	418

it and it is a reasonable satisfactiō euen to humane reason from whence Protestant arguments against it bee deduced that the maner is by Transsubstantiation as wee Catholicks teache no man but Irreligeous and vnreasonable can call it into question And hee writeth further of this matter in these words it is on all sides plainely Couell sup pag. 119. confessed that this Sacrament is a true and reall participation of Christ who thereby imparteth himself euen his whole entire parson Therefore if the whole entire parson of Christ which cannot bee without his bodie and blood is there and there imparted and receaued damnable is that diminisheing doctrine wherein sacramētaries would haue it but a signe figure And hee expressely teacheth that they doe not or should not differ from the Romane Churche concerning the true reall and substantiall presence of Christ in this Sacrament Which hee as plainely expresseth where entreatinge of the dignitie of Preists hee writeth thus To these parsons God Couell sup pag. 87. imparted power ouer his mysticall bodie which is the societie of soules and ouer that naturall which is himself for the knitting of both in one a worke which Antiquitie doth call the makinge of Christs bodie And in an other treatise hee speaketh of the same matter in this maner The power of the Couell modest examinat pag. 105. Ministry by blessing visible Elements it maketh them inuisible grace It giueth daily the holy Ghost It hath to dispose of that flesh which was giuen for the life of the worlde and that blood which was powred out to redeeme soules Hitherto this Learned Protestant whose words bee so plaine in this point that no conclusion but themselues needeth to bee inferred from them And not onely in this but other Questions as before these Protestants of England are so cleare for Catholiks doctrine and against that which their parlamentarie Religion doth or would seeme to teache that D. Willet Willet apud Parkes against Limbom pag. 20. 21. def first testim writeth of them in this sorte They maintayne traditions free will freedome from sin Iustification by workes workes of super erogation of transsubstantiation with diuers others Therefore euen by Protestants this sacred doctrine of the Romane Churche is to bee embraced and defended as well taught by Catholicks Protestants and D. Feilds true Greeke Church also from which lastely thus I argue That doctrine which is taught by the true Church in Protestants Iudgment which by them cannot err in any essentiall thinge is true But the doctrine of the Romane Church concerning the reall presence and transsubstantiation is such Therefore it is true The first proposition is proued and graunted before And the second is manifest in these the expresse words of the Greeke Churches censure vppon Protestant doctrine It is the Iudgment of the Church that in the holy Hierem. in censur cap. 10. supper after consecration and benediction the breade doth passe and is chaunged into the verie bodie itself of Christ and the wyne into that blood of his by the power of the holy Ghost For our Lord in the same night wherein hee was betrayed taking breade and giuing thankes brake it and saide take and eate this is not breade or a figure of my bodie but this is my very bodie and my blood So that both then and now the breade is transformed and chaunged into his bodie and the wyne into his blood as our Lord promised and affirmed in many places of scriptures And this is more then sufficient of this matter especially seeinge not onely Queene Elizabeth in her Parliam An. 1. Elizab parl 1. Iacob parl 1. Edw. 6 c. bothe kindes first Parlament receaued this doctrine of Transsubstantiation by allowing and reuiuing the statute of Kinge Edward the sixt in that behalfe and this their statute was neuer yett repealed But also in the first parlament of his maiestie confirmed with the rest of Q. Elizabeth The Protestant publishers of Praefat. in Petr. Gallatin Frāc An. 1602. Mortō App. pag. 396. pag. 395 Petrus Gallatinus tell vs that the testimonies which hee bringeth from the Rabbynes before Christ are vndeniable which allowed D. Morton writeth thus They are more playne and pregnant for transsubstantiation then are these sayings of transsubstantiators themselues They make so directly for transsubstantiation that the moste Romish Doctors for the space of allmoste a thowsand yeares after Christ did not in so expresse termes publish this mystery to the world Againe D. Androwes Protestant Bishop Casaubon resp ad Card. Per. pag. 50. 51. of Ely cited by Casaubon and Casaubon himself from our Kinge himself as hee saith affirme Yt is Christs body the same obiect and thing which the Romane Church beleeueth Therefore acknowledging there is a chaunge in this Sacrament as commonly they do that before the words of consecration it was breade and wyne and after is the same obiect and thing which the Romane Church beleeueth the body and blood of Christ This chaunge beeing from breade into the body of Christ and from wyne into his bloode which is a chaunge Substantiae in Substantiam of one substance into an ohter must needs bee as wee Catholicks teache Transsubstantiation CHAPTER XVI Of the holy Sacrifice of Christs blessed bodie blood cōmonly called the Masse daily offered in the Church AND hereby is not onely proued the Catholicke doctrine of this particular question of Christs reall presence in the B. Sacrament and the maner how by transsubstantiation of the elements breade and wyne by power of his omnipotent worde into his moste sacred bodie and blood but those also which depend from thence as is before remembred the sufficiencie of communicating of such as doe not offer the holy sacrifice first instituted and euer to be continued in both kindes in the one kinde onely as also the true externall and publicke sacrifice of Christs true Church consistinge of the oblation and offering of his most B. bodie and blood in these holy Misteries for which because it hath beene so prophanely and blasphemously contradicted by diuers of our English Protestants I meane to speake a little more particularly therein and from themselues first argue thus Whatsoeuer is the reall and true bodie and blood of Christ now vnseperable from his moste blessed soule and is publickly offered vnto God by the lawfully called and authorized preists of his Church is a true publicke and holy sacrifice But that which is commonly called the Eucharist or blessed Sacrament of the altare offered by Catholicke preists of the Romane Church in Masse is such Therefore it is a true publicke and holy sacrifice The Maior proposition is euidently true and confessed of all men of learning in Christianitie neither can be doubted of any that is ignorant if hee knoweth the termes themselues expressely signifieing and shewing the veritie thereof euen by the light of nature The second proposition is also more then aboundantly proued and verified by these

proued in this maner The communion Booke reconfirmed in the title of Confirmation giueth this direction to the Bishop in these words The Bishop shall lay his hand vppon euery child seuerally therefore there is an externall Ceremonie or signe and that it was ordeined by Christ may both appeare by their Conference at Hampton Court in these Conference at Hamptō pag. 10. 11. words Confirmation is an Apostolicall tradition And that they meane it to be signe such as the signe of a Sacrament is the Bishop is appointed to vse these words Wee make our Communiō Booke tit conf sup §. Almightie humble supplications vnto thee for these children vppon whome after the example of the holy Apostles wee haue layde our hands to certifie them by this signe of thy fauour and gracious goodnes towards them Therefore this externall signe both deliuered by the Apostles vsed by their example and so far signifieing Gods grace and fauour and certifyeing the parties thereof must needs bee ordeined by Christ and a Sacrament no other externall signe by Protestants being able to make such certificate whis is further confirmed with this Protestant Argument that followeth Whatsoeuer signe externall giueth spirituall strength to the receauers thereof and force to serue God is a Sacrament But Confirmation doth this Therefore a Sacrament The Maior is euident by Protestants graunteing that such spirituall force and strength is not giuen by any signe but such as is a Sacrament neither doe all of them graunt that it is giuen by Sacraments The Minor is proued by D. Couell in these words Couel Mod. Examinatiō pag. 192 Remembringe the conflict wee haue vndertaken in Baptisme wee come to Confirmation for an addition of new forces in Baptisme wee are regenerate to life but in Confirmation wee are strengthened to battaile So that being an externall signe and giueing grace as Baptisme doth it must needs bee a Sacrament as that is and the signe must needs bee ordeyned by Christ for none other but God can ordeyne Penance a Sacrament by protest Chapter of Indulgēces a signe to bee a meanes of grace Concerninge Penance to bee a Sacrament I haue made demonstration before in the chapter of Indulgences and it is euidently true in this order Wheresoeuer in any ceremonie and externall signe grace is so amply giuen that not onely all guilt of synnes by Protestants but their punishments are forgiuen and by authoritie from Christ there must needs bee both an externall ceremonie or signe instituted by him and a Sacrament But thus it is in these Protestants Iudgments in Confession and Absolution Therefore a Sacrament Bothe the Maior and Minor are aboundantly proued in the recited chapter before And to proue that such confession may bee auricular as they terme our Catholike confession to a preist though that kinde of confession is not soe needfull to make it a Sacrament M. Hull writeth thus Auricular confession was Hull Romes polec pag. 89. 90. vsed in the primatiue Churche before the time of Zozomenus the auncient historian And his Maiestie in the Conference at Hampton Conference pag. 13. witnesseth That the particular and parsonall absolution from syn after confession is apostolicall and a verie godly ordinance Therefore I thus argue againe That which was vsed in the primatiue Churche is an externall ceremonie forgiueing syn an Apostolicall and godly ordinance is a signe ordeyned by Christ and a Sacrament But Penance is such Therefore it is a Sacrament Bothe propositions are graunted and proued before And hence also is proued that Orders is a Orders a Sacrament by Protestants of England Sacrament For whosoeuer haue power to giue grace and forgiue syns except in Baptisme by an externall ceremonie must needs haue and receaue that power in a Sacrament for such extraordinarie guifts bee not giuen as Protestants confesse by miracle But preists as before haue this power Therefore Order and consecration is a Sacrament Both propositions are manifestly true Further I argue thus whosoeuer acknowledge that in consecrateing preists by imposition of hands by the Bishop the holy ghost grace and power is giuen to giue grace and forgiue syns must needs acknowledge Orders or ordination to bee a Sacrament But the Protestants of England doe this Therefore they must acknowledge Orders to bee a Sacrament in their proceedings The Maior is euident And the Booke of cons in Preists Minor expressely is conteyned in their authorized and confirmed publicke Booke of Consecrateing preists c. Againe thus I argue That externall visible ceremonie by Imposition of hands vppon ordinary men whereby power is giuen them aboue others from Christ to translate from darkenes into glorie to make inuisible grace of visible Elements daily to giue the holy Ghost to dispose of the flesh and blood of Christ and giueth power which noe potentate on earthe can giue and the like prerogatiues aboue all humane power is to bee esteemed a Sacrament But by these Protestants Orders hath these and such more prerogatiues by Imposing of hands c. Therefore to bee esteemed a Sacrament The Maior proposition is euidently true for an externall ceremonie giuing and signifying such power grace and priuiledges that no terrene power and authoritie can giue must needs bee instituted by Christ himself and so by that which is proued before bee allowed for a Sacrament The Minor is proued by D. Couell where entreating of the power and eminencie of Preists by their Couell def of Hooker pag. 87. function and Order in the externall ceremonie of imposition of hands hee hath these words To these parsons God imparted power ouer his mysticall bodie which is the societie of soules and ouer that naturall which is himself for the knitting of both in one a worke which antiquitie doth call the making of Christs bodie And in an other Couel mod Examinat pag. 105. Pag. 115. See D. Couell def of Hooker pag. 87. 88. 91. and cited cap. seq of Character c. Treatise thus The power of the Ministry by blessing visible Elements it maketh them inuisible grace it giueth dayly the holy Ghost It hath to dispose of that flesh which was giuen for the life of the worlde and that blood which was powred out to redeeme soules And againe It is a power which neither Prince nor Potentate King nor Caesar on earth can giue The Apostles leaue and impart the fame power to ordaine which was giuen to them From whence I argue further in this order That externall and visible Ceremonie whereby the Apostles receaued supernaturall grace power and preeminencie and left it to the Church to continue beeing first instituted of Christ is a Sacrament But Orders is such Therefore a Sacrament The Maior is graunted and proued before and the Minor also to which I add the sentence of their publicke Cōference at Hampton Court Conference at Hamptō where it is concluded by authoritie among them that this power of Orders giuen as they pretend by imposition

of his nature is righteousnes onely mans transgression syn Which might also be sufficient for an other Argument for if onely transgression of the lawe is synne and vniustice then good workes the keeping of the lawe must needs be Iustice And in an other place thus the same Author speaketh of prayer a part of good workes Prayer is the best meanes both to Couell modest examinat pag. 176. testifie our dutifull affection and moste effectuall to obtayne whatsoeuer wee wanting can desire at Gods hands D. Sutcliffe thus commendeth this good worke By prayers wee obtaine remission of Sutcliff ag D. Kellison pag. 72. 73. sins By prayers wee obtayne Gods grace And yet it is euident euen in Protestants doctrine that they which haue remission of syns and Gods grace are iust and righteous in their phrase of speakeinge Good deeds done in grace meretoreous by English Protestants Now that good deeds done in grace are also meritorious thus I argue Whatsoeuer is rewarded rewardable bindeth an other to giue for it was by antiquitie and now also properly called meritt is meritorious But good workes done in grace are such Therefore they are meritorious The Maior is euident And the Minor thus proued first by D. Couell which speaketh thus That Couell def of Hooker pag. 51. 52. workes of perfection to which wee are not bownde haue greater reward then keeping of the precepts Then bothe the one and other must needs haue their reward the one greate and the other greater and consequently be so meretorious and deserueing for euen in our vulgare language and proprietie of speache reward is not but where deserueing is signifyeing a Retribution or payeing againe for a thinge Againe the same Protestant Doctor writeth thus in Coueli sup pag. 40. 44. playne termes Rewards doe allwayes presuppose such duties performed as are rewardable It was the phrase of Antiquitie to call our vertuous attaynment by the way of meritt The phrase of the Latine doth properly make one to meritt of an other and as it were to binde him to him who doth any thinge which pleaseth and delighteth him for whome it is done Which sufficiently proueth that second proposition And from this graunt this matter is thus further demonstrated by their Articles to which they haue all subscribed Articl of Relig. Articl 12. where it is thus defined good workes which are the fruites of faith ar pleaseing and acceptable to God in Christ Vppon which words good workes doe please God their publick glosse is in these Rogers in art 12. pr●pos 1. pag. 53. words God hath commaunded them to be done and requireth righteousnes not onely outward of the body but also inward of the mynde and hath appointed for the vertuous and godly rewards both in this life and in the world to came and to the wicked punishments spirituall corporall and of body and soule eternall in the pitt of Hell And for this doctrine cite these scriptures Matth. 5. 16. Ioh. 15. 12. Phil. 2. 14. c. 1. Thess 4. 3. c. 2. Tim. 2. 19. Iames 2. Matth. 5. 22. 26. c. And all these Protestant Confessions Heluetia Basile Boheme Fraunce Belgia Ausburge Saxonie Wittemb Sueue Therefore wee need not be doubtfull of it by Protestant proceedings But to make it further and without all exception moste apparantly true I further argue in this maner That which was taught by the true primatiue Church in this point is true doctrine But meritt of good workes was then taught by it Therefore it is true doctrine The Maior is euident before And the Minor is proued thus by these Protestants D. Morton from Caluyn acknowledgeth Morton apolog part 1. pag 275. 276. Couell modest exam pag. 120. Sutcliff subuers pag. 50. that the word meritt was vsed of the Auncient Fathers in obtayning rewarde D. Couell assureth vs thus Diuers both of the Greeke and Latine Church taught freewill meritts and inuocation of Saincts as Catholicks doe D. Sutcliff telleth vs that within the first 600. yeares time of truth with him and other Protestants the doctrine of meritts and good deeds was taught And M. Wotton acknowledgeing that the auncient Fathers vsed the name of meritt in this question concludeth thus The doctrine of meritts as it was held and taught by the auncient Christians wee acknowledge and embrace Therefore seeing Protestants as M. Wotton generally Wotton def of Perk. pag. 339. vndertaketh in their name acknowledg for true the doctrine of the Fathers concerning meritts and as before by Protestants the Fathers and the present Romane Church agree in this poynt Protestants also must subscribe vnto them And not to make these Protestants singular in this consent I will add M. Bell to their number hee Bell tryall of the new Religion cap. 9. writeth thus True it is I freely graunt that the holy Fathers doe often vse the word meritt and doe often call the workes of the faithfull meretorious And doth not onely yeeld that to be worthie and meretorious is all one but that such workes of the faithfull are rewarded with heauen I Argue againe in this order workes that are rewarded in heauen may or ought to be done in respect of reward and bringe a speciall worthines vnto the workers of them are meretorious But the good deeds of Christians done in grace be such Therefore they are meretorious The Maior is euident before both by the description of reward by the graunt of Protestants and in respect that M. Bell last cited hath assured vs that to be worthie and to be meretorious is all one The Minor is thus proued first M. Ormerode writeth thus You meaning Catholicks Ormerod paganopapis pag. 53. doe notoriously slaunder vs Protestants beareing the world in hand wee teach that none ought to doe good in respect of reward be it knowne vnto you wee are farre from teacheing that a man ought not to doe good in respect of reward M. Wotton hath these words God will reward the Wotton def of Perk. pag. 302. pag. 334. leaste good worke of any of his children And agayne They that are iustified shall haue a speciall worthynes in themselues when they shall come to receaue their inheritance because they shall be truly and fully sanctified Where not onely a reward is graunted to good workes but that they make the doers of them meritinge and worthy of their eternall inheritance and that this worthynes is caused by grace and Iustice whereby they are iustified and bringe forth workes of such worthe value and deserueinge And to cleare further this name of reward which some of them would violently wrest from the true and proper meaneing thereof in this question Thus I argue againe whatsoeuer is so effectuall that reward or stipend cannot be denyed vnto it without iniustice is meretorious But good workes done in grace are such Therefore they are meretorious The Maior is manifest for that which is due by iustice is due by Title and

themselues to the Church of Rome and doctrine thereof as hee hath before aduised CHAPTER XIIII CONCERNINGE REVERENCE of holy Relicks WHEN I entreated before of the religeous vse of holy Imadges I would also haue spoken of this question the reuerence of holy Relicks being so neare and symbolizing doctrines had not the Relator of Religion before referred mee to an other course Therefore I will now speake thereof in which case the Catholick doctrine expressed in the Councell of Trent is this Cōcil Trid. Sesi 9. Veneranda esse àfidelibus c. The bodies of Martyrs c. Are to be reuerenced of the faithfull According to which thus I argue in this Article by these Protestants That which was the doctrine of the primatiue Church in this question is true and what it cōdēned for Heresie is false But the primatiue Church taught reuerence of Relicks as the present Romane Church now dothe and condemned the contrary of Protestants for Heresie Therefore the Catholicke doctrine is true in this controuersie and the contrary of Protestants false and Hereticall The Maior proposition is euidently true by often graunte before And the Minor is thus proued First D. Willet citeth and approueth S. Ambrose thus speaking Willet Antill pag. 201. Sutcliff Subu pag. 27. Pag. 50. of Valentinian deceased I will honor his Relicks and commend his gratious memorie D. Sutcliffe wittnesseth that S. Gregorie and S. Augustine that conuerted this nation esteemed much the relicks of Saincts And in their time Churches were built in the honor of Saints and their relicks worshipped And D. Willet with others Willet Antil pag. 13. acknowledge as they needs must that Vigilantius was condemned of heresie for denyall thereof in the primatiue Church and by the authoritie thereof Secondly I argue thus againe That which was the custome and doctrine of the primatiue Church may or is still to bee kept and defended But to pray at the monuments of Saincts and reuerence their Relicks was the custome and doctrine then Therefore still to bee kept and defended The Maior is euident and the Minor thus proued First M. Wotton Wotten def of Perk. pag. 9 hath these words It was the maner of the primatiue Church to pray at the Tombes of Martirs and the Christians assembled ordinarily where the Martirs were buried And to shew what they did there which hee would willingly haue concealed for hee loueth not prayers to Saints nor reuerence of their Relicks for which causes the primatiue Christians so there assembled hee citeth S. Hierome writing Wotten sup pag. 544. in this maner of holy Paula shee went into the Sepulchre and kissed the stone of his Resurrection which the Angell had remoued from the dore of the Tombe the place of his bodie where the Lord had lien as if shee had thristed for the desired waters shee li●k●d with her faithfull tonge D. Downame writeth the like of the holy pilgrimadge of that blessed woman And to giue moste conuincing instance and proofe in this matter M. Perkins in his Problema writeth thus Primitiua Perkins problem pag. 81. Ecclesia honorauit veneratione prosecuta est reliquias mortuorum The primatiue Church did honour and prosecute with reuerence the Relicks of the deade Thirdly thus I argue That vsadge and behauiour which was lawfull to the Iewes and practized of them towards their Reliks is now in the time of grace giuen by Christ as lawfull for Christians towards their holy Relicks and things But the true faithfull Iewes lawfully vsed reuerence and honour to their Relicks Therefore it is lawfull to Christians to doe the like The Maior is euident this beeing no ceremoniall or legall thinge abrogated by Christ but rather confirmed by making the things of his lawe and Ghospell more reuerentiall then the figuratiue was The Minor is thus proued by M. Wotton in these words You bringe diuers Wotton def of Perk. pag. 581. proofes that the Arke was had in greate reuerence all needlesse for whoe denies it and againe The Iewes saith Hierome in foretimes worshipped the holy of holies because there were the Cherubins and the propitiatorie and the arke of the testament Manna Aarons rodd and the golden altare and further in this maner Hee speakes not of worshippinge the Pag. 581. 582. Arke but the holy of holyes because of the things that were in it Hee makes the Propitiatorie Manna Aarons Rod and the golden Altare causes of that worship as well as the Cherubins In the words followinge hee counts the Sepulchre of our Lord more worthie of wor●hip Then seeing those Relicks vnder the lawe and before Christ the meritorious cause of all grace and such excellencie were so worthie of worshipp and reuerence that they were not onely reuerenced in themselues but other things were worshipped and reuerenced because of them and yett by this Iudgment the Relicks in Christianitie as the Sepulchre no part of Christ but the place of his sacred bodies some few howers lyeing there are more worthie of worship as this Protestant writer confesseth wee may not deny this Reuerence and the Catholick doctrine thereof to bee holy euen by English Protestants sentence Lastely thus I argue from the generall practice of English Protestants if it is lawfull to giue ciuill reuerence to the bodie of a noble man or woman deceased because they were noble and honored when they liued much more reason there is to giue religeous and spirituall Reuerence to the bodie of a Saint holy and honored by God and man when hee lyued and now in Ioyes in heauen truely and for euer honorable But the Antecedent is true by English Protetestants whoe by their Heralds of armes allowe and practice that all Inferiours shall giue and yeeld the same honour to the bodie of the honorable parson deceased that was due vnto him lyuing his soule and bodie beeing vnited and this though in all morall Iudgment the soule of such an one is damned And this is the custome and ceremonie not onely with Heralds but vsed in Court ratified by their Bishops Doctors and Vniuersities as many and late examples teache which I will vrge no further but desire all may liue and die well that they may leaue behinde them sufficient or some motiue eyther to bee honored or helped by the prayers and deuotions of the lyuinge The consequence is euidently true and thus demonstrated for as excellencie is the cause of honor and ciuill excellency of ciuill and terrene honor so spirituall or religeous excellency of spirituall and such honor And much more for the ciuill honor and motiue thereof is onely ens rationis an inuention worthines and attribute of men and nothing at all Inherent in the bodie or soule of the partie so honored when the other excellency and cause of honor is both permanent and an Inherent dignitie as is proued before of inherent Iustice and for euer remayneth in the soule glorified in the presence of God his Saints and Angells in heauen and

Minor proued out of their publickly allowed and reconfirmed Communion Booke Where in the Buriall of the deade their Ministers are appointed to pray for the partie deceased in these words That wee with this our Brother and all other departed Comm. Booke Tit. Buriall of the dead● neare the end §. allmightie God in the true faith of thy holy name may haue our perfect consummation and blisse both in body and soule in the eternall and euerlasting glorie Amen If this prayer that people deceased may come to heauen bodie and soule man hath no other part to be prayed for is not to pray for the dead nothing can be called praying for the deade and for their saluation And so I end this Question with this sentence of M. Higgons in his publick sermon Theophil Higg serm 3. Mart. 1610. at S. Paules Crosse giuing a reason of this doctrine in these words As there is a death in syn and a deathe to syn soe there is a double resurrection The first a culpa from syn the second a paena from the punishment which followeth thervppon Which must needs be the temporall punishment of syn the grownde of Purgatorie and satisfaction after death being oftentimes not satisfyed answeared or to vse his owne phrase not risen from in this life For the eternall punishment of hell due for greate syns is euer remitted and risen from in his resurrection a culpa from syn Otherwise a man now intituled heire of the kingedome of heauen and saluation should also be guiltie of hell and damnation saued and damned in heauen and hell together And vppon this and other such holy grownds these Protestants in their late Theater recompt vnto vs so many hundreds Theat of greate Brit. c. of Religeous howses fownded by holy Kings princes and others in England to pray for the soules of themselues their Auncesters posteritie and other Frends CHAPTER XIX TEACHEING HOW THERE be 7. Sacramentes in number by these Protestants accordinge to the doctrine of the Romane Church HAVEING ended all other Questions to the full satisfaction and accordinge to the requests and demaunds of Protestants desiringe to be satisfied therein and performing this from themselues and owne writings I will proceede in the same maner in the Articles of the holy Sacramentes and first of their number thus sett downe in the Councell of Trent There be seuen Sacraments Concil Trid. decret de Sacrament of the new lawe instituted by IESVS CHRIST our Lorde neither more nor fewer Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penaunce Extreame Vnction Orders Matrimonie For defence and proofe of which doctrine by these Protestants themselues thus I argue Whatsoeuer doctrine a confessed true generall Councell hauing authoritie to bynde all by these Protestants before hath determined in this question is to be receaued and followed But the Catholicke doctrine of the Romane Churche concerning seuen Sacraments is thus determined by such generall Councell and bynding authoritie Therefore to be receaued and followed The first proposition is graunted before and must needs be thought so equall to all Protestants that how soeuer they thinke of the infallible sentence of such assemblies in matters of faith yet none of them may be soe partiall but to preferre a generall Councell to any Protestant assemblie censure sentence or decree The second is euidently proued supposeing what is written before euen by Protestants of the generall Councell of Florence and for such with the doctrine thereof not onely acknowledged by D. Willet and M. Parkes but Willet Limbom Parkes pag. 137. 180. Gennadius in defens concil Flor. Concil Florent de Sacramentis nouae legis by the Patriarke of Greece himself in his defence thereof Where it is thus decreed both with assent of Grecians Armenians Nouae legis septem sunt Sacramenta scilicet Baptismus Confirmatio Eucharistia Poenitentia Extrema Vnctio Ordo Matrimonium c. There are seuen Sacraments of the new lawe that is Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penance Extreame Vnction Orders and Matrimonie Which doe muche differ from the Sacraments of the olde lawe for they did not cause grace but did onely figure that it was to be giuen by the passion of Christ But these of ours bothe conteyne grace and giue it vnto them that worthely receaue them Hitherto the decree of that holy generall Councell receaued by all Christendome Latines Armenians Iacobynes Grecians From whence I further argue in this maner Whatsoeuer doctrine essentiall in Religion such as Sacraments be is taught by the true Church that is neither hereticall nor Scismaticall is to be embraced But the doctrine of seuen Sacraments as the Romane Church teacheth is such being likewise taught by the Protestants true Greeke Churche therefore to be embraced The Maior is also proued in the laste Argument and further confirmed in the Censure of the Greeke Church vppon Protestants in these words There is an holy Hierém in censur cap. 7. Catholicke and Apostolicke Churche of all true Christian men In this Catholicke and true beleeuing Church there be seuen diuine Sacraments Baptisme the Vnction of holy Oyntment holy Communion Orders Matrimonie Penance and the oyle of Extreame Vnction And they further prosecute as also the cited generall Councell of Florence doth the institution forme matter effect and other things belonging to these seuen holy Sacraments according to the present doctrine of the Romane Churche Againe I suppose that Catholickes in their definition of the Sacraments of the new lawe requiring a conteyning and giueing of grace by these holy Sacraments besides their signification thereof being onely signes Seales c. as the common Protestant opinion is to be farre more restricted and limited then that of Protestants because many more thinges be and may be signes of any thinge then bothe signes and causes as appeareth to be true in all genericall and specificall differences For example vnder animal a lyuing creature are conteyned more then vnder animal rational● a lyueing creature with reason onely limited to man who otherwise abstractinge from his rationalitie is with all other lyueing creatures comprehended Vnder the Genus Animal a lyueing Creature So a Signe of grace as well agreeth to the Sacraments of the old lawe as to those of the Ghospell but not to conteyne and giue grace Onely proper to those of the new Testament as is recited before from the generall Councell of Florence and is at Concil Trident. decret d● Sacramentis ecclesiae c. lardge sett downe against Protestants in the Councell of Trent This supposed which no man can deny I argue thus All things that agree with the definition of a Sacrament be Sacraments But according to Protestants all those seuen before remembred Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penance Extreame-Vnction Orders and Matrimonie agree with and haue the definition of a Sacrament Therefore they are Sacraments The Maior is euident because in Logicke the thinge defined and definition are conuertibles as this man and a reasonable creature Whoesoeuer is the one