substance for he was diversly seene 9. And that it is impossible Oculis corporis substantiam Dei aspicere with the eyes of the body to see the substance of God it is evident by our blessed Saviours answer unto Philip who desired Christ to shew them the Father He that hath seene me hath seene the Father insinuating thereby that God cannot otherwise be seene of us than in Christ his Son who is the verie engraved forme of his person And if Christ would not grant any such carnall vision of God unto his Disciples who were conversant with him in the flesh who can in this life expect it 10. Whereas then the Prophet Isaiah saith I saw the Lord sitting upon an high throne and he is said to have beene seene of other of the Saints wee must not thinke that they saw Gods substance with their carnall eyes sed juxta possibilitatem humanam non ut est sed ut voluit se videre but as mans nature could see him not as hee is but as it pleased him Hierom who in the same place reproveth the Jewes who affirme that Isaias was slaine of their fathers because he writeth he saw God with his eyes whereas Moses saw only Gods back-parts for seeing Moses also writeth that God talked with him face to face interficite Mosen cum Esaia yee might as well have killed Moses as Isaias QUEST XLV Whether we shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life BUt it is a greater question whether the Saints shall not in the next life see the Divine Essence with their bodily eyes which some doe affirme upon these reasons 1. Iob saith he shall see God in his flesh Iob 19. that is in the resurrection 2. S. Paul also saith that then we shall see face to face 1 Cor. 13.13 3. We shall then be like unto the Angels which doe behold the face of God 4. Our bodies shall then be spirituall and therefore wee shall even with our bodily eyes see and discerne Spirits 5. Otherwise if our eyes should not behold God what use should there be of our sight Contr. 1. The Hebrew Interpreters expound that place of Iob of his sight of God in this life but taking it rather to be spoken of his state and condition in the resurrection as most of our writers doe interpret we deny not but then the Redeemer who is cloathed with our flesh shall be seene of us even with these our eyes as Iob there saith But it is one thing to see the person of the Mediatour another to see the divine essence and nature 2. Saint Paul speaketh not of the â—ight of the bodily eyes but of the sight of the minde as hee expoundeth himselfe Now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am knowne 3. The likenesse similitude which we shall have with the Angels holdeth not in everie thing as that we shall have the like nature or knowledge but in that wherein the resemblance is made as that we shall neither marrie nor be married nor need meat and drinke but in that respect shall be as the Angels and yet neither doe the Angels fully comprehend the divine nature as afterward shall be shewed 4. Our bodies are said to be spirituall not as opposite to the nature of our bodies now which shall remaine but as set against the corruptible and earthly qualities thereof our bodies shall be bodies still but not earthly naturall corruptible bodies as they are now therefore the argument followeth not 5. And this shall be the use of our heavenly sight wee shall see God in his workes but after a more cleere manner than now we shall see the elect we shall behold Christ himselfe Upon these reasons Simlerus concludeth In futura vita nos oculis corporis corpora tantum visurâ—s In the next life we with our bodily eyes shall see onely bodies and not the essence of God Thomas Aquine also thus interpreteth Iobs words I shall see God in my flesh I consisting of body and soule shewing Quod suâ— modo visionis illius erit particeps corpus That the body also after a sort shall be partaker of that vision not that the eyes of the body shall see the Divine Essence Sed quia oculi corporis videbunt Deum hominem factum But because the eyes of the body shall see God which was made man Videbunt etiam gloriam Dâ—i in creatura refulgâ—â—tem They shall also see the glorie of God shining in the creatures But this further must bee added that though the divine essence of God shall not bee seene of our bodily eyes then because God is of an infinite and incomprehensible nature yet the blessed Spirits the Angels and Ministers of God shall bee seene of the elect Angelorum beatorum omnium consortio conspectu colloquio fruemur We shall enjoy the fellowship fight and conference of the Angels and of all the blessed Buâ—an For if the eyes of the young man were so opened at the prayer of the Prophet that he saw the Lords heavenly host which appeared in the likenesse of fierie horse and charriots much more shall our eyes then be so cleared as that we shall see the Angels themselves though not in their very spirituall nature yet in such sensible manner as that we shall both converse have conference with them QUEST XLVI Whether the Divine Essence can be seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life NOw it followeth to be considered seeing Gods essence cannot be seene by our bodily eyes either in this life or the next whether that in our minde and understanding here in this life wee may attaine to the fight and knowledge of God where that position of Thomas Aquine is to be held Impossibile est animae hominis secundum hanc vitam viventis essentiam Dei videre It is impossible for the soule of man in this life to see the essence of God the reasons whereof are these 1. Because the soule being in the body naturally knoweth not any thing nisi quâ— habent formâ—â— in materia but such things as have their forme in some matter or may be knowne by such things but the essence of God per naturas rerum materialium c. by the nature of materiall things cannot be knowne Thomas 2. Almost all our knowledge initium habet à sensibus taketh the beginning from the sense but God cannot be perceived by sense Simler 3. Ambrose likewise saith Anima carnis hujus maculis coâ—â—â—vionibus obumbratae faciem Dei sâ—ncere videre non possunt The soules being shadowed and obscured with the spots and blemishes of the flesh cannot cleerely here see the face of God c. And he further giveth this reason Qui faciem Dei videt esse â—ine peccato He that seeth the face of God must be without sin as our Saviour saith Blessed are the pure in heart for
Gen. 7.2 where mention is made of cleane and uncleane beasts which difference was observed before the floud and continued by tradition not in regard onâ—y of sacrifice but also for their eating as it may appeare in the reviving of this law afterward Levit. 11.47 That there may be difference betweene the uncleane and cleane and betweene the beast that may be eaten and the beast that may not be eaten that then is said by the definition of the law to bee a cleane beast that might be eaten that uncleane that might not be eaten So I conclude this question with the sentence of Ambrose Quicoâ—vivium adornat c. he that prepareth a feast doth kill his oxen and fat cattell before and then biddeth his guests so the Lord ante homini caeterorum animalium praeparavit epulas before prepared the meats of other beasts and then as his friend invitavit ad convivium bid him to the banket Epist. 37. His opinion is that the cattell were provided of God to bee meat for man Mercerus is of another judgement that the eating of flesh was generally forborne before the floud which is also the opinion of the Hebrewes 1. both because it was necessary for the preservation of the kinds of cattell 2. as also herbs being then of greater vertue and strength before the floud and after might suffice for mans sustenance Mercer in v. 29.1 ch Gen. But these reasons conclude not 1. Like as after the floud when liberty was granted to eat flesh as the greene herb yet they did forbeare for a time till the breed of Cattell was increased upon the like reason before the floud immediately after the creation they might abstaine for a time from the eating of flesh but not altogether 2. The great vertue and strength of herbs concludeth that the eating of flesh was not so generall or necessary then as afterward but the whole abstinence from all kind of eating of flesh it concludeth not I rather preferre Musculus opinion who upon the sacrificing of beasts and wearing of their skins inferreth that beasts were killed before the floud and consequently their flesh eaten in 1. Gen. v. 29. 4. The didactica that is places of doctrine observed out of this first chapter 1. Doct. Of the Trinity proved 1. AGainst the Jewes that deny the Trinity and the Sabellians which affirme but one person in the Deity we have evident proofe in this chapter vers 1. where the word God or in the hebrew elohim gods is joyned to a verbe of the singular number bara created noting the singularity of the Godhead and plurality of the persons But exception is taken against this argument by Cajetanus for the which he is reproved of Catharinus another Popish writer lib. 4. animad ver and by Bellarmine lib. 2. de Christ. c. 6. for that it is the use of the Hebrewes to joyne words of the plurall with a verbe of the singular number upon which reason this collection is misliked also by Calvin and Mercerus but it may be replied that it is not the use of the Hebrewes to put in the plurall number that which hath no plurality in nature as to say Gods if there were but one person in the godhead But yet this argument for the Trinity is more evident vers 26. Let us make man after our image c. where God neither speaketh to himselfe saying let us make not I will make neither yet to the earth as though that wrought together with God nor to the Angels for God only created man vers 27. nor yet doth God speake in the plurall number according to the fashion of great men for that use of speeâ—h was not yet knowne but in this forme of speech is set forth the consultation of the blessed Trinity the Father Sonne and holy Ghost 2. Doct. That the heavens and earth had a beginning 2. OUt of the first verse wee conclude that the world had a beginning and that it was created by God contrary to the opinion of Xenophanes who held the world to bee without beginning or end and of the Epicures who did impiously hold that the world was made by chance by the concurrence of bodies together and of Aristotle among the heathen and Eugubinus in Cosmopeia among Christians who affirme Coelum empyraeum the highest and supreme heaven to have beene eternall Likewise wee condemne the folly of the lying Aegyptians and Chaldees who extend the age of the world many thousand yeares before it was made The Aegyptians boasted that they had a continuall succession of Kings 70. thousand yeares Augustine maketh mention of a letter that Alexander writ to his mother Olympias wherein he reporteth that hee heard of an Aegyptian Priest that the Kingdome of the Assyrians exceeded 5000. yeares of the Persians 8000. yeares Pompeius Mela writeth that they have chronicles of 13000. yeares Diogenes Laertius from Vulcan to Alexander accounteth 48860. yeares August lib. 12. de civitate dei cap. 10. The Aegyptians also reckon 100. thousand yeares since they first learned Astrology de civitat dei 18. c. 40. All these are lying fables seeing by just computation of yeares it is found that the world hath not yet continued since the first beginning thereof 6000. yeares 3. Doct. The word from the beginning 3. Vers. 3. THen God said hence Servetus would confirme his wicked error that the word was not from the beginning because the heavens and earth are here said to bee made before God spake But wee have an evident testimony that the word was in the beginning with God and that nothing was made without it Ioh. 1 2 3. and seeing the light was made by this word the word must needs be before the light the cause goeth before the effect so that the heavens and earth were in the beginning made by the word of God but in this place first onely it is added And God said because now more manifestly the wisdome and power of God appeareth in the distinction and perfection of the creatures which before were confused together Calvin Mercer Further another heresie of Servetus is confuted who thinketh that this was a new quality in God to speake which spake not before for this speaking in God was no quality in God as in man but it signifieth only his will and decree though Ab. Ezra doe without cause finde fault with R. Saadian for so expounding this word of God was nothing but Gods decree and commandement whereby the heavens also and earth were first made Psal. 148.5 so that then God thus spake also Calvin Mercer 4. Doct. Of the different beginning of the soules of man and beasts 4. Vers. 24 LEt the earth bring forth every living thing animam viventem the living soule from hence it was gathered that not only the bodies of bruit beasts but their life also and as it were soule were derived out of the earth whereby a manifest difference appeareth betweene the originall of mans soule which was breathed of God
a great distance Tigris by Ninive Euphrates by Babylon and then ioyning together and parting againe doe compasse Mesopotamia so called because it is betweene the rivers These then are the foure heads or streames of Paradise as hath beene shewed QVEST. XVII Whereof Adam was made and of the excellent constitution of his body Vers. 7. THe Lord God made man of the dust of the earth First it is evident that God only made man not the Angels they were not so much as preparers or temperers of the matter whereof man was made as some have thought for God himselfe said Gen. 1.26 Let vs make man 2. Man was made of the dust as the thinner and purer part of the earth not of a slimy matter mixed of earth and water as some thinke and this is evident by this reason Man was made of that element to the which he is last resolved but his body falleth at the last to dust Gen. 3.19 Dust thou art and to dust thou shalt returne Wee deny not but that out of dust God might prepare a second matter compounded of the elements and thereof frame mans body but it is curiosity to inquire after that which is not in Scripture expressed or out of the same by some collection may bee gathered 3. It is also evident that God made mans body of a more excellent constitution than any creature beside and of a fit temper to be a convenient instrument for his soule 1. Mans body hath the preheminence in respect of his upright stature whereas other creatures looke downewards whereby he should be admonished to looke upward toward his Creator and to behold the heavens as also thereby is signified the lofty dominion and command which is given unto man over other creatures 2. The temperature of mans body is most excellent whereas other creatures by reason of their grosse and cold humours doe grow over beasts with haire fowles with feathers fishes with scales 3. The fashion of mans body and the ready use of his members surpasseth all other creatures as God hath given unto man his hands whereby he worketh and perfecteth the invention of many profitable art 4. Though other creatures in the quicknesse of some senses exceed man as the vulture in seeing the dog in smelling the moule in hearing the spider in feeling and in strength many beasts goe beyond man yet herein is mans excellency that he both better discerneth and judgeth of the outward sense and is endued with reason wherby he subdueth all other creatures to his service and so maketh use unto himselfe of their strength sense or what other naturall faculty they have Lastly it was fit that mans body should bee made of an earthly not of an â—ethereall or celestiall matter because he was to live in the earth and for that such a body was fittest to bee capable of sense by the which the soule being sent into the body as a naked table might gather experience and by experience knowledge Perer. QVEST. XVIII In what state or age Adam was created 1· FVrther that Adam was created in a perfect age it is without question because his body was in the first instant apt to generation for the Lord said unto them increase and multiply and immediately after his transgression Cain was begotten Genes 4 1 2. But in what age and stature of body Adam was created it is not so certaine some think that he was made about the yeares of Christs age between 30. and 40. but I rather approve their collection that thinke his body was in the creation of the same growth and perfection wherein those long lived Patriarks were fit for generation which was about 65. yeares for at that â—ge Kenan Henoch begat children and none under those yeares Genes 5.12 whereupon it followeth that 〈◊〉 Adams bodie did shew as it were 50 or 60 yeares in his creation he might well bee thought to bee â—ongest liver of all the Patriarks for he lived after his creation 930 yeares to the which adde 50 yeares â—ll which time his bodie if it had beene borne would haue beene growing to that state wherein he was â—reated and so he shall exceed the age of Methuselah who lived but 969 yeares 3. But that is a ridiculous conceit of Ioannes Lucidus lib. 1. de emendat tempor c. 4. that Adam was the biggest Giant that ever was and Moses Barcepha reporteth the like fansie of some that iudged Adam to be of that bigge stature that 〈◊〉 could wade ouer the Ocean This fansie is grounded vpon the Latin text Iosu. 14.15 the name of Heâ—orn was before Ciriatharbe or citie of Arbah Adam the greatest among the Anakims is there placed and â—hose Anakims say they were Giants Contra. But the text in the Hebrew is thus he was a great man among the Anakims meaning Arba before mentioned the word indeede is Adam which is here no proper name but a common name for a man as it is taken in the Scripture he a great Adam or man among the Anakims if Adam should be taken properly then must they make the Giant Arba and Adam all one which is impossible the one living before the other after the floud QVEST. XIX Whether Adams soule was created after his bodie Verse 7. ANd breathed in his face the breath of life and the man was a living soule 1. We neither thinke that Adams soule was created before his bodie as Plato among the heathen and Origen among the Christians thought that all soules were made together in the beginning and after sent into the bodie 2. Neither that Adams bodie and soule were created in the same instant together as Damascen lib. 2. de fide c. 12. Thomas Aquinae with others are of opinion 3. But wee rather judge with Chrysostome hom 12. that Adams bodie was first framed out of the dust and then God breathed into it life and this opinion is most agreeable to the text that God first made man out of the dust and then breathed the breath of life and so he became a living soule so that he was not a living soule in the first instant of his creation but after God had breathed into him the breath of life such also is the generation of Adams posteritie the bodie is first framed in the wombe and then the soule is infused as David describeth the manner of his conception Psalm 138.15.16 I was made in a secret place and fashioned beneath in the earth thine eyes did seeme when I was yet without forme where David may seeme to allude to Adams creation who properly was framed beneath in the earth and of whom also it may truly bee said that God saw him when hee was yet without forme QVEST. XX. What is meant by breathing the breath of life Vers. 7. THe Lord had formed man c. 1. The word is jatsar which signifieth to fashion or to give shape so the Lord here doth perfect the feature of man 2. He is made
not of the dust as some read but dust of the earth to shew that man is nothing else but duâ—t as the Lord afterward said unto him Dust thou art the Lord compounded the bodie of man both of the dust red clay of the earth called adamab whereof Adam had his name 3. But where God is said to breath into man the breath of life we neither thereby understand with Ramban that God inspired into Adam his reasonable soule as part of his owne substance neither yet doe we thinke that God used any materiall blast nor yet is it only a metaphoricall speech uttered according to our capacitie as Mercer neither doe we understand here only the vitall and sensitive facultie to be given to man with Musculus for the words following he was made a living soule which S. Paul setteth against a quickning spirit 1. Cor. 15.45 doe shew more than life and sense therefore I thinke that properly the breathing of the breath of life is to be referred to the vitall power yet so that the soule of which that facultie dependeth must be understood together to have beene infused and inspired by the spirit of God which is here signified by the breathing of God so that mans creation is set forth in three degrees the forming of his bodie the giving of it life the endewing of him with a reasonable soule created after Gods image Gen. 2.26 QVEST. XXI Whether Adam were created in Paradise Vers. 15. THen the Lord tooke the man and put him into the garden of Eden that he might dresse it and keepe it Wee reject their conceit that imagine that Adam was created out of Paradise as also Eva as Iosephus lib. 1. antiquit c. 1. and Rupert lib. 2. de Trinitat c. 22. because it is said the Lord tooke the man c. Contra. 1. God is said to take him not as remooving him out of another place but shewing him what he should doe namely to keepe the garden 2. The word javach signifieth to leave as Iud. 3.1 These are the nations which God left God then left Adam in Paradise where he had made him as before is expressed vers 8.3 It is evident that Eva was made out of Adams side in Paradise by the order of Moses narration it is therefore most like that Adam also was made there 4. Where it is objected Gen. 3.23 that God sent Adam out of Eden to till the earth whence he was taken as though he were taken from the earth out of Paradise there by earth is not understood any speciall kind of earth but generally that element out of the which he was created for as well that ground within where Paradise was planted as that without was earth QVEST. XXII Wherefore Adam was placed in Paradise TO dresse and keepe the garden 1. Though man should not have toyled or wearied himselfe with any labour in Paradise for that was laid upon him as a punishment afterward to eat his bread in the sweat of his browes Gen. 3.19 yet it is evident that hee should have exercised himselfe in some honest labour even in Paradise 2. As his charge was both to dresse the garden in planting and nourishing of trees in which kinde of husbandrie many even now doe take a delight and hold it rather to bee a recreation than any wearinesse unto them as also to keepe it from the spoile of the beasts 3. This labour was enjoyned Adam 1 that beeing thus occupied in continuall beholding of the goodly plants in Paradise he might thereby bee stirred vp to acknowledge the goodnesse and bounty of the Creator 2. as also thereby the Lord had respect to our instruction that if Adam was not to live idely in Paradise much lesse should we spend our daies now in doing of nothing QVEST. XXIII Whether the precept given to Adam were only negative Vers. 16. ANd the Lord commanded him saying Thou shalt eat freely of every tree of the garden c. From these words divers questions are moved First wee doe not thinke with Thomas Aquinas par 1. qu. 97. art 3. that this precept was as well affirmative in commanding Adam to eat of all other trees as negative in forbidding him to eat onely of one tree 1. This precept to eat of every tree should have beene burdenous to Adam and a restraint to his liberty if hee should have beene tyed to eat of all and not where him liked 2. It had beene superfluous seeing his owne naturall appetite would have moved him to eat of the food appointed for him for though Adam in the state of innocency should not have beene pinched with such hunger and thirst as wee now are yet a naturall appetite to his meat hee should have had for otherwise his food would not have beene pleasant unto him 3. Eva best sheweth what Gods precept was Gen. 3.2 We eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden but of the fruit which is in the middest of the garden God hath said ye shall not eat of it Gods charge then was only negative not to eat the other to eat of the trees was left unto their choice QVEST. XXIIII Whether the precept was given both to Adam and Eve SEcondly though Augustine doe thinke that this precept of not eating was given only to Adam and by him to Eva lib. 8. de genes ad lit c. 17. yet we hold it more probable that God gave this charge unto them both together 1. Eve confesseth that God spake unto them both and said Yee shall not eat of it Gen. 3.2 2. The Lord saith unto both of them together Gen. 1.19 Behold I have given unto you every herbe and every tree c. at which time also it is like that he gave them the other prohibition of not eaâ—ing of that one tree for if God had made that exception before he would not have given a generall permission after or if this generall grant had gone before the exception comming should seeme to abrogate the former grant 3. The Septuagint seeme to bee of this minde that this precept was given both to Adam and Eve reading thus in the plurall number In what day ye shall eat thereof ye shall dye and so doth Gregory read lib. 35. moral c. 10.4 But though in the originall the precept be given in the name of Adam only that is so for that Adam was the more principall and he had charge of the woman and for that the greatest danger was in his transgression which was the cause of the ruine of his posterity or as Mercerus well noteth Adam was the common name both of the man and woman Genes 5.2 and so is taken vers 15. and likewise here QVEST. XXV Why the Lord gave this precept to Adam THirdly if it be asked why the Lord gave this precept to Adam 1. we answer with Gregory lib. moral 35. c. 10. that for the better triall of Adams obedience it was fit he should bee prohibited to doe that which of it selfe was
birth of Esau and Iacob which was 15. yeare before Abrahams death and 63. yeares before Ismael died for Abraham lived 175. Ismael 137. yeares and where Isaack was younger than Abraham by 100. and than Ismael by 14. they are found so long to have lived after the birth of these twins from hence then it is evident that the order of time is not alwayes observed in the sacred histories but that sometime is set downe first which was done last 3. Doct. Against the casting of mens nativities Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger This example is urged by Augustine against the Genethliakes that is casters of mens nativities for hereby the vanity of their observations appeareth in that these two twins conceived at once and borne together were of such divers natures and qualities August de civit Dei lib. 4. c. 5. And whereas they answer that in the birth of twins there may bee great diversity by reason of the swift motion of the planets which change their aspects and conjunctions every moment as one Nigidius Figulus would demonstrate by the example of a wheele which while it was swiftly carried about he marked twice with inke which markes when the wheele had left running were found not to be farre asunder whereby he would insinuate that in a small distance of time a great part of the celestiall globe may be turned about But to this fansie Augustine answereth that if the celestiall motions be so swift and continue not in one stay then hardly can any man discerne under what constellation any is borne and Gregory thus wittily derideth their follies that if Esau and Iacob were not therefore borne under one constellation because one came forth after another by the same reason neither can any be borne under one constellation because hee is not borne all at once but one part after another Hâ—m 10. sup Evangel 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against Limbus patrum Vers. 8. WAs gathered to his people c. This the Popish writers do understand of the fathers in Limbus patrum whither Abraham also went sic Lyran in Gen. 49. Rupert lib. 6. in Gen. cap. ult Contra. 1. The place to the which Abraham went is called Abrahams bosome Luke 16 which Augustine by no meanes thinketh to have beene a member or part of hell as they make Limbus 2. The Apostle sheweth to what people the faithfull are gathered Ye are come c. to the company of innumerable Angels c. to the spirits of just and perfect men Heb. 12.22 23. Where then the spirits of just men were there also were the Angels for so we read that Lazarus soule was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome But the Angels are not in Limbus patrum upon this reason Lyranus refuseth the interpretation of Augustine and Tostatus who by this people to the which Abraham was gathered understand the society of Angels which is in no place but heaven Lyranus also holding that all the just men from the beginning of the world went to Limbus is confuted by Paulus Burgens who saith that Abraham was the first that went to Limbus because of him first this phrase is used in Scripture That he was gathered to his people Thus we see that these Patrons of Limbus cannot agree among themselves for what certainty of opinion can there be which is not grounded upon Scripture 2. Confut. Election is not of good works foreseene Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger S. Paul inferreth upon this text that wee are not elected by workes but according to the purpose of him that calleth Rom. 9.11 here then the errour of the Pelagians is confuted who taught that men were elected for their good workes fore-seene of God before But this errour is repugnant to Scripture Eph. 14. He hath chosen us in him that we should be holy he saith not because we were holy so that good workes are not a precedent cause of our election but a consequent effect thereof 3. Confut. The soules merited not before they came into the body HEre also that errour ascribed to Origen is overthrowne who thought that the soules have a being before the bodies and that they are disposed of in this life according to the merit of the former life which they lived in before they entred into the body for the Apostle expounding this place saith before they had done either good or evill and immediately before yer the children were yet borne Rom. 9.11 therefore before they were borne they had neither done good nor evill 4. Confut. S. Paul alleageth the examples of Esau and Iacob not for temporall election or figuratively onely of eternall but originally and properly IT is therefore evident 1. That neither Moses writing this prophecie The elder shall serve the younger did not only speake of the externall inheritance and preeminence of Iacob before Esau neither did Paul so understand Moses for then the example had not beene pertinent to S. Pauls purpose who goeth about to prove these two things that all are not the children of promise which are the children of Abraham after the flesh which he shewed by the instance of Ismael and Isaack vers 7. The other point is that Gods election is of grace not by workes as appeareth in the example of Esau and Iacob wherefore the one was hated of God the other loved before they had done good or evill If the Apostle then had brought in an example of temporall election it had been impertinent seeing thorowout the Chapter he treateth of eternall 2. Neither yet was this outward preheminence of Iacob and refusall of Esau a signe onely and figure of their eternall election and reprobation as Lyranus in 1. Malach. And therefore not directly implied in the words but so applied by the Apostle for as the Preacher saith No man knoweth either love or hatred of all that is before them Eccles. 9.4 that is Gods love or hatred is not discerned by the condition of outward things 3. Neither is it the literall and historicall sense only to shew that Esau was temporally rejected but. S. Paul by his divine spirit doth draw it to a mysticall sense as Pererius thinketh in 25. Gen. numer 45. for S. Paul understandeth Moses no otherwise than Malachy did Esau have I hated Iacob have I loved chap. 1.1 who out of Moses words inferreth a conclusion of Gods everlasting love toward Iacob 4. Wherefore the truth is that the very literall and proper sense of these words The elder shall serve the younger written first by Moses and cited by S. Paul doth principally describe the everlasting state and condition before God and are especially to be referred to the celestiall inheritance but secondarily the promise of the externall inheritance of Canaan is here also comprehended This may be made evident by these two reasons 1. That is the proper sense of the place which is principally and chiefly intended by the Spirit but so is this spirituall sense as the
was the sonne of seventeene yeares now he cannot be the sonne or birth of so many yeares before they are expired the father must be before the sonne so is this phrase used Gen. 17.25 where Ismael is said to bee the sonne of thirteene yeares that is so many complete when Abraham was 99. yeare old for Ismael was borne when Abraham was 86. yeares old Gen. 16.16 And bee it granted that the Latine might agree in sense with the Hebrew yet it is too great boldnesse in a translator to change the number to put downe 16. for 17. 2. Now to say that the Latine interpreter did this not without the instinct of the spirit is in effect to say that the Hebrew writer had not the instinct of the spirit or that the instinct of the spirit is contrary to it selfe if both he that writeth sixteene and he that numbreth seventeene years in the same place and of the same person were moved by the same spirit But the Latine translator was led by the same spirit to write here 16. for 17. which moved him Gen. 8.4 for the 17. day of the moneth to write the 27. day which is a manifest errour and so is this here Hence then appeareth the grosse blindnesse of the Tridentine chapter which maketh the Latine translation authenticall without acception 2. Confut. A concubine not simply or properly a wife Vers. 2. WHereas Zilpah and Bilha are here said to be Iacobs wives Pererius noteth that Iacobs concubines were simply his wives though not his principall wives as Rachel Leah were Perer. in Gen. 37. nume 9. Contr. The Scripture maketh a manifest difference between a wise a concubiner for the concubine was still under the government of the wife as Hugar after she was given to Abraham is still called Sarahs maid Gen. 16. and the sonne of the concubine did not inherit as the sonne of the wife yet sometime she that was properly a concubine is called improperly a wife as Zilpah and Bilha here either because the principall wives being dead they succeeded in their place or for that their sonnes were privileged to be co-heires with the sonnes of Lâ—ah and Rachel which was not usuall but onely for the sonnes of the principall wives to inherit See more of this quaest 8. in Gen. 25. 3. Confut. Against free-will Vers. 4. THey could not speake peaceably unto him So our Saviour saith to the Pharises How can you speake good things seeing you are evill Matth. 12.34 Hence is confuted the popish doctrine of free-will that a man of his owne power is apt to chuse that which is good Iacobs sonnes abounding with malice could not speake peaceably to Ioseph nor the Pharises being a generation of vipers could speake well of Christ for an evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit Matth. 7.18 Muscul. 4. Confut. Our election unto life not by works Vers. 6. HEare this dreame c. Ioseph obtained this great favour with God to have the preeminence over his brethren not by any merit or worthinesse in himselfe but of Gods meere grace and favour toward him for as yet Ioseph had not shewed his faithfullnesse and chastity in Potiphars house The purpose of God then to exalt Ioseph revealed in these dreames went before any merit of Iosephs part Calvin So also Gods free and gracious election in setting us apart to everlasting salvation is without all respect of works in us as the Apostle teacheth That the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by works c. Rom. 9.11 5. Confut. Against the Sadduces of the immortality of the soule Vers. 21. LEt us not kill him or verbatim smite his soule Hence the Sadduces did inferre that the soule is not immortall because it may be smitten and killed But Augustine answereth this objection That here by the word soule the life is understood the effect by the efficient as in Iob where Satan is forbidden to touch his soule that is his life for otherwise concerning the nature and substance of the soule it cannot be killed according to the words of our Saviour Feare not those which after they have killed the body cannot kill the soule Matth. 12. 6. Confut. Sheol in this place not taken for hell Vers. 35. I Will goo downe into the grave mourning c. 1. The word sheol here used is neither to bee translated gehenna hell the place of torment after this life as the Chalde and some Hebrewes for Iacob did not suppose that Ioseph was in hell or that he should goe thither 2. Neither is it taken here for Limbus patrum the dungeon of darknesse where the soules of the fathers remained till Christs comming as Perer. and other popish writers for that place of rest and joy where Lazarus was in Abrahams bosome could be no part or member of hell where there is no joy to be found 3. Wherefore it is better translated the grave and cannot be otherwise in this place understood as even now shall appeare But because Pererius here fighteth with his owne shadow and goeth about to prove that sheol in the Scripture is not alwayes taken for the grave but sometime for hell properly as though the protestants so affirmed that the word was never found used for hell I will first set downe the divers acceptations of the word sheol in Scripture I find therefore that this word is used in foure severall senses 1. It is taken for hell metaphorically that is for the deepe plunging in extreme sorrow misery and danger as Psal. 86.13 Thou hast delivered my soule from the nethermost hell 2. It is taken for the locall place of hell properly as Proverbs 15. Hell and destruction are before the Lord. 3. It signifieth the grave Prov. 30.16 The grave and the barren wombe are reckoned among those things that are never satisfied where Pererius will have the word taken for hell not the grave for the grave saith he is soone filled and satisfied ' it holdeth not above one body Contr. 1. This is a very childish answer seeing the Wise man speaketh not of any one particular grave but of the condition of the grave in generall which is never satisfied with dead bodies but receiveth more still as in the same place saying The earth cannot be satisfied with water he meaneth not any severall peece or lumpe of earth which may be soone drenched with water but of the quality nature of the earth in generall 2. So that in this sense the grave is rather sheol than hell because it is more craving for to hell goe none but the wicked but the grave receiveth the bodies of all both good and bad 4. Sheol is taken to signifie the lower deepe and remote parts of the earth as without any relation to the place of punishment as Psal. 139.8 If I ascend into heaven thou art there if I lie downe in hell thou art there also sic Mercer 7. Confut. Against Pererius exposition of that place Psal. 16.10 FUrther whereas
Pererius allegeth that place Psal. 16.10 Thou wilt not leave my soule in hell to shew that sheol is taken for hell it shall not be amisse by the way to examine the sense of this place whereof there are three expositions First some by soule nephesh understand the dead body as it is taken Levit. 21.1 Let none be defiled among the dead the word is nephesh soule Genebrard a popish writer thus confuteth this opinion denying that nephesh is in this place taken for the body but by a metonymie it signifieth the exequies and funerall duties performed to the soule of the dead Contra. Though we also approve not the former exposition of nephesh in this place and that reverend man that so translated Act. 2. hath himselfe in that point altered his translation in his last edition of his annotations upon the new testament yet Genebrard had no reason to deny the word to bee so taken Levit. 21.1 for 1. beside that the Israelites had no such custome to use any suffrages or exequies for the soules of the dead and therefore nephesh can signifie no such thing 2. The defiling was by touching the dead Levit. 22.4 or by going to the dead Levit. 21.11 but the soules of the dead cannot be touched neither could the suffrages for the soules but the presence of the bodies pollute them 3. The Levites are forbidden to defile themselves with the dead saving their fathers and mothers and other of their neare kindred Levit. 22.2 But it is not like that they should have beene forbidden to pray or offer suffrages for any but their owne kindred yea the high Priest is forbidden to defile himselfe for his father and mother vers 10. Let them say also that he was forbidden to pray for the soule of his father and mother if any such thing had beene in use then therefore Genebrards exposition is vaine and without any good ground Secondly Pererius and other of that sort doe take hell here for that locall place and region of soules where they imagine the fathers to have remained before the comming of Christ and Pererius best reason is because the Prophet maketh a manifest distinction betweene the soule and body of Christ and hell and the grave saying Thou shalt not leave my soule in hell nor suffer thy holy one to see corruption Perer. in cap. 13. numer 100. Contra. 1. Here is no distinction of divers parts but an explanation of the same thing in divers words according to the use of Scripture so that what is first said somewhat darkly Thou wilt not leave my soule in grave is afterward more plainly declared that is Thou wilt not suffer thy holy one to see corruption 2. That such locall place of hell cannot be here understood may appeare by these reasons out of the text it selfe 1. That place where Christs soule was not left and it was impossible he should be holden of it God loosed the sorrowes of Act. 2.24 but God loosed not for Christ the sorrowes of hell which he felt not after his passion Ergo Christs soule was not left in hell 2. The not leaving of Christs soule in hell was the cause why his flesh did rest in hope vers 26 27. the not leaving of his soule in the locall place of hell caused not his flesh to rest in hope but the not leaving of it in the grave and the not seeing of corruption for their soules which are left in hell shall also returne to their bodies and bee raised together with them Ergo. 3. That hell where Christs soule is not left is the place where corruption is to be seene for so one clause of the sentence is expounded by the other but in hell there is no corruption Ergo. 4. David when he said Thou shalt not leave my soule in hell spake of Christs resurrection Act. 2.31 but the not leaving of Christs soule in the infernall hell concerneth not the resurrection of Christs body Ergo David meaneth not that hell The third exposition therefore is which I preferre before the rest that Christs soule that is his life or person should not be left in the grave and so this place of the Psalme may bee expounded by the like Psal. 89.48 What man liveth and shall not see death shall hee deliver his soule from the hand of hell or the grave here the Psalmist himselfe expoundeth hell to be death where the soule that is the life lieth as it were hid and buried as Psal. 88.3 My life draweth neare to the grave sic Paul Fag annotat in Chaldaic paraphras in Pentateuch 8. Confut. Iacob goeth mourning to the grave not to hell BUt whereas Pererius yet further in this place concerning Iacobs descending c would have hell and not the grave understood for all goe not downe to the grave and Iacob did thinke that Ioseph was not in the grave being supposed to be torne of wilde beasts the contrary shall now appeare 1. This is a friuolous objection for the grave is not onely a pit or a hole made for the dead but any place where the body falleth to dust and corruption as Iob describeth it chap. 17. vers 13. The grave shall be my house vers 14. I shall say to corruption thou art my father vers 16. They shall lie together in the dust thereof even Ioseph also though he had beene torne of wilde beasts and rotted upon the earth should have had his grave 2. In saying all goe not to the grave he manifestly contradicteth the Scripture as is before alleaged What man shall deliver his soule from the hand of the grave Psal. 89.48 3. Hell in the old Testament is not taken otherwise than for a place of torment and punishment but neither Iacob not Ioseph went to any such place 4. This hell Iacob went unto with his gray head or haires Gen. 42.38 but the grave not hell is the place for gray haires 5. Lastly that sheol here signifieth the grave it is the opinion of Ab. Ezra whom Eugubinus Cajetanus Oleaster Vatablus follow and among the Protestants Fagius Mercer with others 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. That parents be not partiall in their loves toward their children Vers. 4. IOsephs brethren hated him because they saw that their father loved him Ambrose noteth this to have beene an over-sight in Iacob for preferring one of the brethren before the rest who if he in Ioseph loved and preferred his vertue should rather have concealed his affection for as hee well saith it is no marvell if brethren fall out for houses and land when Iosephs brethren hated him for a coat Ambr. lib. 2. de Ioseph Wherefore parents may learne how inconvenient a thing it is to bee partiall toward their children and by immoderate love toward some to exasperate and provoke the rest which the Apostle giveth warning of Fathers provoke not your children to wrath Eph. 6.4 2. Observ. A pitifull man will first offer himselfe to them that are in misery Vers.
Now Abraham and Ismael had not the same people to goe unto the faithfull cannot be said to be Ismaels people nor the prophane sort to be Abrahams But if the meaning of the phrase were no more than that they were gathered and joyned to the state of the dead the faithfull and prophane sort should all goe to one people wherefore this phrase betokeneth a speciall disposition of the soules of the faithfull after this life in being associated to the company of the just and a laying up of their bodies in assured hope of the resurrection Calvin Muscul. Luther The Apostle also sheweth what it is for the righteous to be gathered to their people Wee are come to the celestiall Ierusalem to the innumerable company of Angels to the congregation of the first borne c. to the spirits of just and perfect men Hebr. 12.22.13 To all these are we joyned by faith while we live and really when we are dead now quoad spem in hope then quoad rem in deed 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Fathers must rebuke and chastise their children Vers. 4. THou shalt not be excellent Fathers may learne by Iacobs example to chastise their children for their sinnes as here Ruben is censured for defiling his fathers bed for this cause Heli and his posterity were punished because hee did not reprove his sonnes according to the quality of their offence Perer. 2. Mor. Gods vengeance though it be deferred will certainly come FUrther in that Rubens punishment had beene a long time suspended and deferred almost 40. yeeres after he had committed this uncleane sinne yet at the last it commeth let no sinner flatter himselfe in his impunity for if the long suffering of God draw him not to repentance it shall but increase his punishment as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 2.4 5. 3. Mor. The short pleasures of sinne deprive men of many blessings AGaine as Ruben for a little short pleasure lost his birthright and dignity so many for the vaine and momentany pleasures of this life are deprived of many and great blessings like to Esau that for a messe of pottage did part with his birthright 4. Mor. Contumely against parents never goeth unpunished WE see also what an high offence before God it is to offer any wrong or contumely to our parents such was Cham toward Noah Absalon toward David and here Ruben that polluted his father Iacobs bed 5. Mor. Against unjust and immoderate revenge Vers. 7. CVrsed be their wrath The Lord condemneth all kinde of revenge that proceedeth of wrath especially such as here was committed by Simeon and Levi. 1. It was done by craft and subtility under pretence of friendship 2. Against men unawares suspecting nothing 3. When they were in griefe of body 4. With a pretext and shew of religion 5. The revenge farre exceeded in greatnesse the quality of the offence Such a kinde of revenge is unjust and cruell Wherefore in this case wee should follow the Wise-mans counsell Say not I will recompence evill but wait upon the Lord and he shall save thee Prov. 20.22 Perer. 6. Mor. Every mans portion in the earth assigned of God Vers. 13. AS Zabulun shall dwell by the sea side Hence we learne that the lot of men for their habitation and dwelling in the earth falleth not out unto them by chance but by Gods providence and appointment for as it is in the Psalme The earth is the Lords and the fulnesse thereof Psal. 24.1 therefore every one should be contented with his lot and portion as assigned unto him of God Perer. 7. Mor. The Church shall overcome at last Vers. 19. ANd an host of men shall overcome him but he shall overcome at the last c. So the Church of God though it shall indure much trouble and sorrow in the world yet it shall triumph and have the victory in the end as our Saviour saith to his Apostles In the world yee shall have trouble but be of good comfort I have overcome the world Iohn 16.33 8. Mor. The quiet and peaceable end of the righteous Vers. 33. HE plucked up his feet into the bed Before Iacob had raised up himselfe as well as he could not having his legs hanging out of the bed as Perer. that had beene no fit lying for a man ready to dye but he had stretched out himselfe before as well as he could for reverence unto the word of God which he delivered but now feeling the houre of his death to be instant hee doth gather up his legs after a seemely and quiet manner not strugling or striving against death as many doe but as though death â—ere in his power he doth meekely and gently yeeld himselfe unto it such a peaceable and quiet kinde of departure God often granteth to his children Muscul. Howbeit this is not alwayes so for sometime a wicked man may dye like a lambe still and quiet as the Psalme saith There are no bands in his death Psal. 73.4 and a righteous man may have a strong death by reason of the extremity of his sicknesse and the manner of the disease but yet inwardly he hath a peaceable and quiet soule and therefore Balaam had good reason to pray as he did Let me dye the death of the righteous and let my last end be like his Num. 23.10 CHAP. L. 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth 1. Iosephs piety toward his father Iacob in causing him to be embawmed vers 2 3. in his buriall 1. He procured leave of Pharaoh vers 4 5 6. 2. He did honourably accompany him vers 7 8 9. 3. They mourned for him by the way vers 10 11. 4. Then they buried him as he had commanded 2. His humanity toward his brethren with their message in their fathers name vers 14 15 16. their humility vers 18. Iosephs friendly answer vers 19 20 â—â— 3. Iosephs prosperity in seeing his childrens children v. 23. 4. His faithfull departure buriall and age v. 24 25. 2. The divers readings v. 2. he commanded those which had charge of funerals S. commanded the Physitians câ—t v. 4. spake to potentates of Pharaoh S. spake to Pharaohs house caet v. 8. only their kinred they left their sheepe and oxen c. S. their children or little ones caet v. 10. they came to Goren Atad G. to the corne-floore or field beset with thistles T. to the corne-floore of Athad cat of Achad H. athad signifieth a thistle v. 11. Abel Mizraim G. the mourning of the Egyptians cat v. 13. beside Mamre G. before Mamre B. over against Mamre caet against or before the face of Mamre cat v. 19. feare not can we resist Gods will H. for I am Gods S. for I feare God C. am not I under God G. am I God B. am I in the stead of God T.P. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions and places QUEST I. Of the divers fashions of buriall Vers. 2. ANd Moses commanded his servants
first common and usuall as a signe of griefe and mourning as David came to Jerusalem barefoote 2. Sam. 15.30 The second civill as by putting off the shooe they signified the yeelding up of their right as it is prescribed Deut. 25.9 and practised Ruth 4.7 The third was religious which betokened the putting off of earthly carnall thoughts and the preparing of the minde for spirituall things Iun. in Analys 2. This putting off the shooes 1. some say was commanded Moses that he thereby should sanctifie that place by making bare his feete but the place was holy already because of Gods presence the place was not holy because Moses put off his shooes but because it was holy Moses is bid to put off his shooes 2. Ambrose thus applieth it that because the shooes are made of the skinnes of dead beasts Moses should put off all feare of death for feare whereof hee fled at the first time from Pharaoh 3. Cyprian would have thereby signified that Moses by putting off his shooes doth not challenge any right in the spouse of the Church but resigneth it to Christ the head and husband thereof for this was the custome that the next kinsman by putting off the shooe did surrender his right in the brothers wife deceased unto the next after him Ruth 4. 3. Because the putting on of the shooes did betoken haste as the Israelites were commanded to eat the Passeover with their shooes upon their feete therefore the putting them off betokeneth the contrarie not in haste but with due preparation Moses should approach Perer. 4. But the most likely signification is that all carnall thoughts set apart Moses should draw neere with reverence and spirituall preparation Ferus as into the house of God Eccle. 4 17. QUEST X. Why the Lord called himselfe the God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob Vers. 6. I Am the God of thy father the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob 1. By thy father he meaneth Amram shewing that he was the God of them and of their seed and of all Israel being mindfull of his promise made to their fathers Simlerus 2. Abraham Isaac and Iacob are here named not so much in regard of their sanctity and excellent vertues for Abel Enoch and Noah were holy men in their time but for these causes are they especially named 1. Because to them specially were the promises made touching the land of Canaan 2. They were the next and immediate fathers of Israel 3. To them God more fully revealed himselfe and shewed his counsell 4. And principally for that those Patriarks had most evident prophesies of the Messiah as Abraham Gen. 22.18 that all the earth should be blessed in his seed and the same promise was renewed to Isaac Gen. 26.4 Iacob also prophesieth of the comming of the Messiah under the name of Shiloh 5. These three Patriarks are named to shew the efficacie of Gods promise made unto them the time now approching when they should see the accomplishment thereof Perer. 3. The name of God is thrice repeated and set before Abraham Isaac and Iacob both to expresse the mysterie of the Trinitie and to shew the speciall and particular care that God had of each of them being a gratious God unto them all and because unto them all were the promises made the certainty whereof by this repetition is insinuated Pererius QUEST XI Why Moses hid his face Vers. 6. THen Moses hid his face 1. For these causes wee find in Scripture that men have used to hide them for feare as Adam hid himselfe in Paradise for shamefastnesse as Rebeckah covered her selfe with the vaile when she saw Isaac Gen. 24. for reverence and humility as Elias covered his face when the Lord spake unto him 1. King 19. for weaknesse and impotencie as Moses face was covered from the Israelites because they were not able to behold the glory of his countenance Exod. 34. Perer. 2. For two of these causes Moses here covereth his face first as being guilty of his owne infirmity and weaknesse as being not able to behold the exceeding great glory of God as also of reverence Piscator 3. Moses is not mentioned here in direct words to have prayed or worshipped as wee read of others the servants of God when the Lord appeared unto them not that Moses either being astonished forgat it or disabled himselfe as not worthy but he inwardly in his soule adored the divine Majesty as the humility of his externall behaviour sheweth Simler QUEST XII How this text is alleaged by our Saviour in the Gospell to prove the resurrection of the dead NOw whereas our Saviour Christ Matth. 22. Mark 12. and Luk 20. alleageth this divine testimony I am the God of Abraham c. and inferreth thereupon he is the God of the living and not of the dead and so convinceth the Sadduces that held there was no resurrection the question is seeing that this scripture proveth onely the immortality of the soule which some of the Philosophers held and yet beleeved not the resurrection how this place was applied by our Saviour to prove the resurrection of the body First then it may bee answered that seeing Abraham Isaac and Iacob being departed out of this world are said to bee living unto God and these names were given unto them as consisting of soule and body this place sheweth that both their soules doe live actually with God and their bodies also in hope not being dead but onely asleepe Ireneus lib. 4. cap. 11. so also Chrysostome in 22. cap. Mat. 2. Some answer that by necessarie consequent the mortality of the soule being granted the resurrection of the body must follow because the soule naturally hath a desire to the body and cannot have true and full happinesse untill the bodie which was partaker of the labours and travels of this life with the soule bee made fellow also with it in joy which reason moved some of the Philosophers as the Pythagoreans and Platonists which held the soule to be immortall to dreame of the remigration and returne of the soule to the body thinking it impossible that the soule should for ever bee separated from the body sic Thomas lib. 4. contra Gent cap. 79. 3. But the best solution of all is Hieromes that against the Sadduces who denied the resurrection of the body onely for that they beleeved not the immortality of the soule it was a strong argument to convince them of error in denying the resurrection to take away the ground of their error in proving by this text the living and being of the soule this also is the solution of Cajetane QUEST XIII Why our Saviour specially urgeth this place against the Saduces FUrther though out of the old Testament divers other places might be alleaged more pregnant at the first sight than this to prove the resurrection of the dead as Hierome doth specially note that place Iob. 19. I know my redeemer liveth yet our Saviour maketh
them In the Apostles times Iarchas among the Indian Drachmanes Tespesion among the Gymnosophists of Aethiopia excelled in this kinde and Simon Magus was in that time But Apollonius Tyaneus in Domitians time went beyond them all 5. And what might be the cause that these Diabolicall studies received such liking in the world Plinie declareth because this Magicall profession borroweth of three notable Arts Physicke or Medicine the Mathematikes and a colour or shew of Religion is the third and thus mens mindes were bewitched therewith But whosoever was the minister and instrument to set abroach these impious Arts Satan was the author and inspirer of them for he was a lier from the beginning and when hee telleth a lye hee speaketh of his owne as our Saviour saith Ioh. 8.44 Porphyriâ— also confesseth as much that the mysticall knowledge of these things came first from the spirits themselves Quibus rebus gaudâ—ant quibus alligantur dâ—i hominibus significarunt ad haec quibus rebâ—s ipsi cogantur qua illi offerenda sint c. The Gods hee meaneth such Gods as Magicians worship themselves signified unto men what things they were pleased with and with what they are bound and further wherewith they are forced and what is to bee offered unto them Ex Perer. Which testimonie of Porphyrie by the way sheweth what we are to thinke of those usuall receits against witchcraft as in scratching the Witch burning of some part or seething of the urine and such like that these were Satans owne revelations at the first in making carnall men beleeve that he is bound with such things QUEST X. Who were the ringleaders and chiefe of the Egyptian Magitians BUt if further it be inquired who these Magicians were 1. Saint Paul sheweth that the principall of them were Iannes and Iambres 2. Tim. 3. which Paul had either by some certaine tradition or by inspiration for in Scripture their names are not found so thinketh Chrysostome Theodoret and Theophylact upon that place It seemeth that some Heretikes afterward by occasion of these names framed a booke of Iannes and Iambres which Origen and Ambrose count among the Apocryphall bookes and of hid authority 2. Other forren Writers also have made mention of these two Iannes and Iambres as Nuâ—enius Pythagoricus as Eusebius reporteth writeth that these two resisted Moses whom he calleth Musius the Captaine of the Jewes Plinie also calleth them Iamne and Iotape whom hee saith were many thousand yeeres after Zoroastres wherein he is deceived for from Abrahams birth which was in the time of Ninus when Zoroastres flourished were not above 500. yeeres 3. But that seemeth to bee very strange which Palladius reporteth in the life of Macarius if it be true that whereas Iannes and Iambres in their life had made them a sepulchre in a pleasant place set with all manner of fruitfull trees and therein made a fountaine of water which place was kept by evill spirits Macarius having a desire to see this place and approaching thither was met with 70. Devils in divers shapes gnashing their teeth and running upon him but he not affraid passed along and came to the sepulchre where the great Devill appeared unto him with a naked sword shaking it at him and there he saw a brasen bucket with an iron chaine wasted and consumed and pomegranates dried having nothing in them Wee may worthily suspect that some Friers finger hath beene tempering with this fable as in other reports of the Saints lives to get credit unto them with fained miracles QUEST XI Whether things done by magicall enchantment are in shew or in truth NOw it followeth to shew by occasion of this conversion of rods into serpents wrought by these Egyptian Magitians whether such things done by magicall inchantment are verily so effected or but in shew and appearance only 1. It cannot bee denied but that many apparitions brought forth by sorcery are meere illusions as the transforming of Vlysses companions into divers shapes of beasts so the Arcadians are said by swimming over a certaine river to bee turned into wolves Augustine writeth of certaine women in Italy that by giving certaine inchanted cheese unto passengers changed them into beasts and used them to carry their burdens for a time The like Philostratus reporteth of Apollonius that as he sat at the table brasen men served them with drinke and filled the cups like butlers and how the image of Memnon in Egypt as soone as the Sunne rising shined upon the mouth began to speake and how Vespesion the chiefe of the Gymnosophists in Aethiopia caused an elme with a low and soft voice to salute Apollonius So to this purpose in the Cannons mention is made of certaine women that were so deluded of Satan that they thought they did ride in the aire in the night and were brought unto a pleasant place where they did feast with Diana and Herodias 2. These and such like were but done in conceit and imagination for the Devill cannot in truth bring forth the substance of Lions and such other beasts which cannot come without generation and not at once but in continuance of time they come to their growth and seeing to speake and worke are actions incident to man they cannot bee performed in truth by images and dead things And whereas they have seemed by Magike to raise up the dead as is also written of Apollonius that is beyond the Devils power for the soule being immortall the Devill hath no command over it it is in Gods hand and though he had yet can he not prepare the body being without naturall heate and life to bee a fit and apt instrument againe for the soule 3. Yet notwithstanding that some workes of Magicians are counterfeit it followeth not that all should bee so the Scripture sheweth that a false Prophet may shew a signe or wonder that may come to passe Deut. 13.1 Apollonius principles and receipts were currant through the world whereby they used to stay the inundation of waters and incursion of wild beasts which Iustinus Martyr thinketh might bee done by the great skill which hee had in naturall things The Roman histories remember how Claudia Vestalis to prove her chastity did move a ship her selfe alone tying her girdle to it that many men and oxen could not stirre So Tucia another vestall Virgin for the triall of her chastity carried water in a fieve from the River Tibris unto the Capitoll Plin. lib. 28. cap. 2. These things seeme verily to have beene so done but by the operation rather of Satan to keepe the prophane Gentiles still in blindnesse and unbeleefe than by the ministry of the good Angels as thinketh Thomas Aquinas ex Perer. 4. Now that many such things may be truly effected by Sorcerers through the power of Satan it is evident by these two reasons first because Satan by the subtility of his nature and long experience hath great knowledge of naturall things he knoweth their sympathies
of the Pharsaliam battell Tertullian writeth that the Nasomannae and Celtae used to consult with the dead at the tumbes of their parents and of warlike men lib. de anima Such was the vaine opinion which the heathen had of this magicall art which Plinie himselfe derideth as vaine and foolish because Nero that wicked and bestiall Emperour who was given over to all lewdnesse yet could not be induced by Tyridaetes whom he greatly advanced and gave him a Kingdome solliciting him thereunto and bringing Magitians unto him to give any credite unto Necromancie Plin. lib 30. cap. 2. 2. Now this vaine or rather prophane profession of summoning of the dead and consulting with them may evidently be convinced to be nothing else but the Devils sophistry and forgery for first the soule being separated from the body hath no power to move or exercise any body but that which it did give life unto being the forme thereof which being now dead is an unapt organ or instrument for the soule and therefore such soule being once departed from the body can neither assume it nor any other body Secondly the soules that are departed are either in heaven at rest and over the soules of the holy and righteous which are in the hands of God the Devill hath no command or they are in hell and from thence there is no returning againe as is manifest in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus where it was denied unto the rich man that any could goe from thence to be a messenger to the living 3. True it is that the Lord by his power hath called againe into the bodies and caused to appeare some that were departed of the which we finde three sorts some were restored to life and their soules joyned againe to their bodies as the daughter of Iairus the widdow of Nains sonne and Lazarus others appeared in their true bodies and came out of the graves yet not to converse among the living but to bee witnesses of the resurrection of Christ Matth. 27.53 And yet wee reade of a more strange apparition of Moses and Helias in mount Tabor where our blessed Saviour was transfigured who appeared not out of their graves but from heaven in their glorious persons We deny not but that God hath and can at his pleasure cause the Saints departed to appeare unto men but not out of purgatory as Pererius imagineth or to the end to bee patrons and helpers to his Church for wee have alwayes the presence of Christ and of his Angels neither yet can we beleeve that so many Martyrs have appeared at their Tombes as some Ecclesiasticall histories make mention for as Christ is gone out of the world not to returne till the day of judgement so because he saith where I am there shall my minister bee Ioh. 12.26 so wee cannot but thinke that the Saints departed attending upon Christ are not now to bee seene in the world This then being granted that the Lord hath power over the soules of men departed to command them to their bodies for a time for some speciall service and to send them into the world at his pleasure yet this is no warrant at all to thinke that Satan or his ministers can doe the like for seeing this is as great a miracle for the spirits of the dead to appeare as to raise the dead to cause the borne blinde to see or to doe any such great worke and God being the only worker of miracles this cannot fall under Satans jurisdiction Such visions then and apparitions when dead men appeare in their bodily shape though not with true bodies and in their wonted apparell counterfeiting their voice and behaviour while they lived are to bee held meere illusions of Satan that can transforme himselfe into an Angell of light so I conclude this point with that saying of Tertullian Et si quosdam revocavit Dei virtus in documentum juris sui non id circo communicabitur fidei audaeciae Magorum falaciae somniorum licentiae Poetarum c. Although the power of God hath called some againe to shew his dominion yet this power is not communicated to the confidence and boldnesse of Magicians to the deceitfulnesse of dreames or to the libertie of Poets QUEST XVIII Why Satan doth counterfeit the spirits of the dead THe Devils then doe counterfeit the spirits and soules of the dead as Chrysostome sheweth Homil. 29. in Matth. and August lib. 10. de civit Dei cap. 12. for these causes 1. By this meanes the Devill more strongly deceiveth seeing men are ready to heare their parents and friends departed 2. By this subtilty the Devill perswadeth men that hell is not so fearfull a place nor so enclosed but that there may bee a respite and going forth 3. Thus that opinion is nourished of the passing of soules from one body to another as Pythagoras taught 4. And it commeth also to passe that the living are afraid of the dead whom they imagine doe appeare unto them and so to please and reconcile them they superstitiously worship them and offer unto them Ex Perer. 5. Tertullian addeth further that these apparitions bred a conceit that all wicked men goe not to hell but their spirits wander up and downe 6. Et judicii resurrectionis fidem turbant And they doe hinder the faith of the last judgement and of the resurrection if they could assume their bodies being dead which the Christian faith holdeth to sleepe in the grave untill the resurrection QUEST XIX Of the divers kindes of miracles NOw to proceed and draw neere to the principall question in hand concerning these wonders wrought by the Egyptian Magicians two things in generall are briefly to be touched first concerning the divers kindes of miracles then of the difference betweene true miracles and false Concerning the first A miracle is taken three wayes first simply and absolutely in respect of any nature whatsoever so there is no miracle for unto God the author and framer of nature to whom all things are possible there is nothing strange or miraculous that is called a miracle which either excelleth ones power or understanding but God both knoweth all things and can doe all things 2. A miracle is called in respect of men those things which are unusuall and whose causes they are ignorant of men use to wonder at and in this sense not only spirits and their ministers the Sorcerers but wise and cunning men may doe miraculous and strange workes 3. But properly that is a miracle which exceedeth the nature and power of things created and is beside the ordinary course of naturall things And this kinde of miracle last spoken of is effected three wayes 1. The miracle is either in the thing that is made or done which nature can by no meanes bring forth as for the body of man to bee made immortall and to remaine in the heavens and this is the highest degree of miracles 2. Or else the
woman with child or shee be behind him and he knew it not and hee hurteth her with his heele that she die in this case the man deserved no punishment at all no not so much as a pecuniary mulct to be inflicted which yet is appointed by this law where death followeth not therefore this law meaneth not any such act which is altogether involuntarie Tostat. quaest 24. 2. Neither is this law to be understood of murther altogether voluntarie as if a man of purpose should smite a woman with child and shee die for this was provided for before what punishment should be laid upon him that committed wilfull murther 3. This law therefore is made concerning such violent acts as were of a mixt kinde partly voluntarie partly involuntarie as if a man striving with one and seeing a woman with child within the danger cared not whether shee was hurt or no Tostat. Or if striving with a man he thrust him upon a woman with child Galas Or a woman comming to rescue her husband receiveth hurt by the other that striveth Lyran. In this case if death followed in the woman with child the 〈…〉 to die foâ— it 4. And the reasons are these 1. Because adfuit laedendi animuâ— he that so striveth had a minde and intent to hurt Simler Consilii ratio habenda est his counsell and intention must be considered which was to assault the life of another and by this occasion he killeth one whom he intended not to hurt Iunius Piscator 2. Againe Vxor una carâ— est cum viâ—o quem intendeâ—â— pâ—râ—utere The wife is one flesh with her husband whom he intended to smite Lyran. 3. And beside instance is given of a woman with child who neither could shift for her selfe and a double danger is brought both upon her her child which she went with therefore in this case the law provideth that such oversights should be severely punished Tostat. q. 25. QUEST LVI Whether the death of the infant be punished as well as of the mother Vers. 22. ANd death follow not c. 1. Some thinke that this is to be understood onely of the death of the woman and not of the child Osiander That if the child died and not the woman he was onely to pay a peece of money not to lose his life for it and their reason is because he deserved not so great a punishment that killed an infant in the wombe as he that did stay a perfect man Oleaster who findeth fault with Cajetane for understanding the law indifferently of the woman and her child 2. But Cajetanâ— opinion is to be preferred for like as it is a more heinous thing to kill a man in his owne house than in the way so is it a prodigious thing to suffocate an infant in the mothers wombe qui nondum est in lucem editus which is not yet brought forth into the light of this world Calvin And againe Foetus quamvis in utero inclusus homo est The infant though yet inclosed in the wombe is a man Simler And the child in the wombe is yet a part of the person of the woman so that if there be corruptioâ—â—tius perâ—oâ—a aut partis a destruction of the whole person or of a part Iun. he that so hurteth a woman with child in her owne person or her childs is subject to this law QUEST LVII Whether this law extendeth it selfe to infants which miscarie being not yet perfectly formed NOw it being agreed that this law as well comprehendeth the infant that perisheth as the woman that beareth it yet there remaineth a question whether if the childe in the wombe bee yet imperfect and so not endued with sense and life that in this case though the woman die not but onely lose her birth he that did the hurt is to suffer death 1. Some hold the affirmative that if any child whatsoever by this meanes miscarrie the offender is subject to this law 〈…〉 propâ—â—qua est effectui The iâ—fant being now formed is so neere unto the effect thâ—â— is the life that who causeth the same to miscarrie may be said to have killed a man Gallas And therefore by the Civill law he that of purpose procured the birth to miscarrie if he were a meane person was condemned to the metall mines if a noble person to banishment Cicero also in his oration pro Cluentiâ— reporteth of one Milesia a woman who being hired of the heires in reversion to destroy the infant that shee went with had a capitall puishment therefore inflicted upon her Ex Simlero But these lawes were made against such as did of purpose seeke to destroy infants in the wombe and cause abortion of them here the cause is divers where the fruit of the wombe miscarrieth by some chance 2. Therefore this penaltie was onely by the law inflicted when as the infant perished that was endued with life So Augustine thinketh using this reason Nondum potest dici anima viva in eo corpore quod sensu caret c. The living soule cannot be said to be yet in that bodie which wanteth sense qu. 80. in Exod. And thus the Septuagint interpret If the infant came forth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not yet formed c. which forming of the infant beginneth fortie dayes after the conception as Procopius Cajetane giveth this reason why in such a case when the birth commeth forth imperfect the sentence of death is not inflicted quia homo in potentia non est homo because a man onely in possibilitie is not a man quia tunc non occiditur homo non est homicidium and because then a man is not killed it is no manslaughter Tostat. And the word jeladim sons signifieth as much that the law meaneth formed and perfect infants Simler And it is put in the plurall because a woman may have more infants than one in her wombe at once for otherwise why should one give life for life or soule for soule seeing such imperfect births are not yet endued with life soule As Augustine saith In Adam exemplum datum est c. An evident example is given in Adam quia jam formatum corpus accipit animam that the bodie when it is now fashioned receiveth the soule and not before For after Adams bodie was made the Lord breathed into him the breath of life So August lib. quaest vet nov Testam qu. 23. as he is alleaged Caus. 32. qu. 2. cap. 9. QUEST LVIII Why the action is given unto the husband Vers. 22. ACcording as the womans husband shall appoint him c. 1. Because the injurie is done unto the man in that his issue is cut off and because hee is the head of the woman the law referreth the prosecution of this wrong unto the husband Tostat. 2. But the taxation of the mulct is so referred to the man as yet if he should exceed a just proportion the Judges in their discretion are to moderate it Gallas 3. Tostatus
done upon that day he materially breaketh it who doth a worke like unto that which is forbidden but yet is permitted by the law As if there were a law that no citizen should sell any thing to a stranger but such as were licensed to do it hee that so selleth being not allowed transgresseth the law formally he that doth it being thereunto licensed doth transgresse onely materially in that he doth the same thing which he committeth that transgresseth the law but not in that manner The same difference there was betweene the workes of the Priests which were allowed by the law upon the Sabbath day and the like workes of those which laboured in the building of the Tabernacle upon that day which were forbidden 3. Another difference is this the sacrifices belonged to the service of God which if they should have been intermitted upon the Sabbath the service of God should therby have been neglected But though the workes about the Tabernacle did cease upon the Sabbath Gods worship was not thereby neglected for they might as well be made upon other daies and so were 4. They were to do no servile works upon the Sabbath but many works necessarie for the building of the Sanctuarie were servile so were not the sacrifices and other duties performed by the Priests upon the Sabbath therefore the one were permitted upon the Sabbath and not the other Tostat. qu. 9. QUEST XIII How the Sabbath is said to bee a signe that the Lord did sanctifie them Vers. 13. IT is a signe betweene me and you that I the Lord do sanctifie you Which words are diversly expounded 1. Some make this the sense It is a signe that I sanctifie you in that I have separated you from other people selected you unto my self Vatab. Lyran. 2. Oleaster thus Sanctitas Sabbatâ— signum est munditia c. The holinesse of the Sabbath is a signe of cleanenesse which I require of you Vt ex dicato tempore Deo credamus magis nos ipsos dicuri Deo c. That by the time dedicated to God wee should know that wee our selves much more should be dedicated Cajetan But more is here signified than so the words implie an actuall sanctification not signified onely 3. Hierom saith it is so said because it was signum veri Sabbati a signe of the true Sabbath wherein wee shall rest from the labours of the world 4. So also Irenam Non sine symbole erant signa the signes were not without some symbole and signification Sabbatâ— perseverantiam totim diâ—i c. The Sabbaths holding our the whole day did signifie our continuance in Gods serâ—â—ce But here the Lord speaketh of an actuall sanctification not of a typicall signification 5. Some say it is so called quia signum erat â—udâ—ris because it was a signe of the Covenant whereby the people did bind themselves to worship the Lord for their God and such signes were all the other ceremonies Marbach But there is a morall consideration in the sanctifying of the Sabbath therefore it was otherwise a signe than the other ceremonies 6. It was then a common signe betweene God and them they holding God to be their God Creator and sanctifier because the Sabbath was a commemoration of the creation and the Lord taking them for his people whom he created redeemed and sanctified Iun. Tostat. 7. Beside the keeping of the Sabbath was a signe of difference between them and all other prophane people of the world who derided the Jewes for their Sabbaths as 〈◊〉 derided them for this Quod septimâ—m partem 〈…〉 Because they lost the seventh part of their age in resting every seventh day Tostat. qu. 10. 8. And specially it was a signe of their sanctification because that day they were sequestred by an holy rest from thinking or studying upon prophane things and in respect of the exercises of religion upon that day whereby they were sanctified sanctificaâ—â—r verbo Dei we are sanctified by the word of God Simler And they did meet together ad confirmandam 〈…〉 to confirme their faith by the sacraments Osiander And because every Sabbath discatiâ— doctrinam meam you learne my doctrine c. Iunius QUEST XIV The reasons why the Sabbath must be observâ—d Vers. 13. FOr it is a signe c. There are here divers reasons yeelded for the observation of the Sabbath 1. The first is à sine from the end it was a signe betweene God and them 2. Ab â—tili it is holy unto you that is ordained for your benefit and commoditie as our blessed Saviour saith Mark 2.27 The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Pelarg. So also Cajetan It is holy unto you that is ad vestrum bonum mandatur custodiendum it is appointed to be kept for your good 3. A necessarie from the necessitie of it because if they did not keepe it they should surely die as thrice the punishment of death is here threatned to those that defile the Sabbath and doe any worke therein Pelarg. 4. From the authoritie of the Institutor quia dicatur Domino c. because it is consecrated unto God vers 15. It is the Sabbath of the holy rest unto the Lord therefore it ought to be observed Cajetan 5. A facili from the easinesse of the precept the Lord appointeth but one day for the holy rest whereas he alloweth six for labour Pelargus 6. Ab exemplo Dei from Gods example who created the world in six daies and rested the seventh Pelarg. Simlerus 7. A consequenti from the event or consequent in observing the Sabbath efficient in succedentibus generationibus c. They shall procure that a perpetuall covenant shall be established in their generations betweene the Lord and their posteritie for ever Cajetan QUEST XV. What death is meant in this phrase He shall die the death Vers. 14. SHall die the death Whereas there are divers kinds of death there is everlasting death both of bodie and soule in the next world and the temporall death in this life either of the soule in being deprived of the life of grace or of the bodie either by the hand of God by sudden and extraordinarie death or by the hand of the Magistrate according to these divers kinds of death so is this place diversly interpreted 1. Some referre it to everlasting death and excluding from the societie of Gods servants Iun. 2. Some understand it of being deprived of the life of grace Vita gratiae destituetuâ— hic infuturo seculo c. He shall be destitute of the life of grace both here and in the next world Lippoman 3. Some of being excluded from the people of God no more to be counted an Israelite Eâ— Oleastr 4. Some of the violent death by the Magistrate Osiander Simler 5. Some of extraordinarie death when God cutteth one off and so punisheth him by death unlooked for as God is said to offer a man into ones hand when he is suddenly killed
must limit our desires with a subordination of our wils unto Gods will as our blessed Saviour there prayeth out of the naturall will and desire of man not looking unto Gods secret counsell But in spirituall things where Gods will is evidently knowne as Moses knew that it was impossible for Gods decree in the election of his Saints to bee changed it had beene an idle and superfluous condition inwardly to have so conceived or outwardly to have professed if it were possible himselfe knowing the contrary that it was impossible 9. And to say that Moses preferred the safety of the people before his owne soule as Calvin seemeth to affirme Nihil aliud venit in mentâ—â— quam ut salvus fit populus Nothing else came into his minde than that the people should be safe may be thought to be against the rule of charity for though another mans soule ought to be dearer unto mee than mine owne bodily life yet my soule ought to be dearer unto me than all mens soules in the world And Tostatus further addeth that if all the soules of the Saints yea of the Virgin Marie should perish unlesse my soule perish Citius deberem eligere omâ—es illas perire quam animam meam I ought rather to wish all their soules to perish than mine owne 10. Wherefore this only remaineth to be the meaning and sense of Moses fervent desire here that because the salvation of Israel was joyned with Gods glory both in respect of the promises made to Fathers which it was not for Gods honour to frustrate and to prevent the blasphemies which the Egyptians and other would be ready upon the ruine and destruction of the Lords people to cast out against him Moses therefore Non tantum populi salutem sed ante omnia gloriam Dei spectavit Did not only looke unto the salvation of the people but unto the glory of God so that in respect thereof is carelesse of his owne salvation Simler Pretiosa est nobis animarum salus sed multo pretiosior nobis esse debet gloria Dei The salvation of our soules is precious unto us but Gods glory ought to be more precious unto us Gallas So Moses in this place prayeth not as a man beside himselfe not considering what he said as neither was Paul forgetfull of himselfe when he wished to be accursed so Israel might be saved for Paul so writeth Post longam meditationem After long meditation and â—dvisement QUEST LXXXIII In what sense the Lord saith I will put out of my booke c. Vers. 33. WHosoever hath sinned against me him will I put out of my booke c. 1. Some doe gather hence Inconsideratè precatum Mosem That Moses prayed inconsiderately quia castigat Deus praepostorum ajus votum because God correcteth his preposterous desire Calvin But Ferus collecteth better as if the Lord should say thus Delector quidem tanto charitatis tuae ardore c. I am delighted with such great heat of charity but justice must be kept which condemneth not the innocent c. 1. Hugo de S. Victor understandeth the Lord here to speake of blotting out not secundùm praescientiam Dei according to Gods prescience but secundum praesentem statum in respect of their present state So also Tostat. quaest 44. But the Lord answereth to Moses petition in his sense which was to be raced out of his booke rather than the people should perish not in respect of his present state for that had beene to desire to sinne and by sinne to be raced out but eternally therefore in that sense the Lord also maketh answer 3. Some hold indeed that God may race out the very elect upon their sinne Marbach But that were to make God mutable and changeable See this assertion confuted before quâ—st 80. 4. Iunius maketh it a conditionall speech si aliqui delendi essent if any were to be blotted out then they which sinne shall be so raced out But the Lord speaking here of notorious sinners pronounceth certainly what shall be their end they shall have no part in God 5. Some interpret it only of the manifestation of the rejection of the wicked Deâ—â— tandem patefacturum reprobâ—s c. That God will at the length make manifest the reprobate which for a while seemed to be counted in the number of the elect Calvin But the Lord answering to Moses petition keepeth the same sense now Moses by racing out meaneth not any such manifestation for he was no reprobate but indeed an actuall blotting or putting out therefore that must be also the Lords meaning here 6. Borrhaiâ—s giveth this sense of these words Whosoever hath sinned c. that it must not be understood of every sinne but of such as sinne and are not restored by repentance So also Ferus Qui peccaverit mihi He that sinneth against me quò inâ—â—itur finalis impâ—â—nitâ—ntia by the which is signified finall impenitencie This exposition is sound but yet it taketh not away the doubt and scruple which lieth in the other words him will I put out c. and not in these 7. Wherefore I rest in Gallasius interpretation Delere hic dici impropriè atque accipi pra rejici reprobari That to blot out is spoken improperly and it is spoken to be rejected and become a reprobate the Lord will blot them out that is they shall not be numbred among the elect And this exposition is warranted by that place Psal. 69.28 Let them be put out of the booke of life neither let them be written with the righteous to be put out then of the booke of life is as not at all to be written there QUEST LXXXIV What day of visitation the Lord meaneth here Vers. 34. IN the day of visitation c. 1. Some of the Hebrewes say Primum diem anni That the first day of every yeere is this day of visitation But God did not use to plague them upon every such day 2. Some understand it of the captivity of Babylon but beside that other causes are shewed by the Prophets of that captivity so the sinnes of the ages then present God would not visit the sinnes of the fathers upon so many generations he saith he will visit the iniquities of the fathers but to the third and fourth generation 3. The Interlinearie Glosse referreth it to the Romanâ— captivity But our Saviour in the Gospell sheweth there was another cause thereof for that they did not know the time of their visitation Luk. 19.44 Christs bloud which the Jewes wished to be upon them and their seed calleth for vengeance against them 4. Lyranus taketh this day of visitation for the day of finall judgement So also Osiander But that judgement shall be generall the Lord here speaketh of a particular day of visitation for the Israelites onely 5. Some thinke that God sent a speciall plague not long after for this idolatry which is mentioned in the last verse of this chapter Tostat. quaest 46. So also Iunius
Gods face and glorie Quia non expediebat because it was not expedient Iun. in Analys quia exitiale foret because it would be to his destruction Calvin 6. Wherefore as Gallasius well noteth Rationem subjungit c. God adjoyneth a reason why Moses would not see Gods face because such is the imbecillitie of mans nature Vt pracelsam ejus splendorem sustinere nequeâ—t that it is not able to sustaine or indure his excellent brightnesse c. This then is set downe as an effect or consequent of the seeing of Gods face that it would so oppresse them and astonish them that they could not live after And that this is the meaning it appeareth both by Iacobs speech that counted it as a singular benefit that he had seene God face to face and yet his life was preserved yet indeed Iacob had not seene the very divine essence at that time So Manoah Sampsons father said to his wife We shall surely die because we have seene God they thought they had seene God whereas it was an Angell onely which they saw But yet by these examples it appeareth how they did understand this saying No man can see God and live Neminem posse citra mortem Deum facie ad faciem videre That no man without perill of death can see God face to face Oleaster Irenaeus also confirmeth this sense out of the new Testament as Iohn saith when he saw that vision Apoc. 1. vers 17. I fell at his feet as dead ut fieret quod scriptum est that it might be fulfilled as it is written No man can see God and live Ambrose well giveth the reason hereof Si Solis radios oculi nostri ferre non possunt c. If our eyes cannot indure the sight of the Sun beames if one creature cannot behold another sine offensione sui without hurt of it selfe how can any fine periculo sui without great danger unto himselfe behold the glistring countenance of his Creator Fulgor ille tantae Majestatis nos in nihilum redigeret The brightnesse of so great a Majestie would bring us to nothing Calvin Simler 7. Tostatus alloweth this sense Immediate ut viderit morietur Whosoever should see Gods face should immediately die after it But he restraineth it onely to the sight of the bodie because the eye could not indure to behold such an excellent object but he saith it cannot be understood of the seeing of the divine essence in the soule for that Non causat aliquam passionem in corpore for the inward and intellectuall sight doth not cause such a passion in the bodie as wherewith the harmonie thereof should be dissolved qu. 18. Contra. 1. As though the soule of man may not be as well oppressed and astonished with an excellent intellectuall object such as is the essence of God as the bodily sight may be with a sensible object 2. And the astonishment of the soule may also worke upon the bodie as we see when the soule is with griefe and care oppressed the bodie also is therewith affected 3. Cajetan hereof thus noteth Quamvis excellens intelligibile non corrumpat intellectum sed confortet illum est tamen illi improportionatum excedit capacitatem illius hoc est opprimere illum Though an excellent intellectuall object doe not corrupt or destroy the understanding but comforteth it yet it is unproportionable to it and exceedeth the capacitie thereof and so doth in a manner oppresse it c. QUEST L. What place this was in the rocke which the Lord here speaketh of Vers. 21. BEhold there is a place by me c. Thou shalt stand upon a rocke c. 1. Cajetan understandeth this place in the rocke in a spirituall sense Moses erecta fixa mente elevatus that Moses as it were lifted up with a setled and upright minde c. should addresse himselfe to this vision 2. Procopius thus understandeth Petra est Christus hac petra est locus apud Deum The rocke is Christ and this rock is that place with God as our blessed Saviour saith He that seeth me seeth my father 3. Augustine will not have it understood of any materiall place Qui enim locus non penes Deum est For what place is there not with God who is every where present Ecclesiam ergo significat He therefore hereby signifieth his Church 4. But it is evident by this whole description that the Lord meaneth the very rocke in Horeb where Moses should be set In rupe qua soleâ— apparere in the rocke where I used to appeare unto thee Vatab. In monte Sinai ubi consuevi tibi loqui In mount Sinai where I use to speake unto thee Lyran. Tostat. So also Chrysostom Vidit Moses sed extra per cavernam in petra Moses also saw God but outwardly in a rocke thorow a cleft 5. Fuit hac petra corporea This was indeed a materiall rocke in a cleft whereof Moses was put but it signifieth the true rocke Christ by whom we attaine to the true knowledge of God QUEST LI. How the Lord is said to cover Moses with his hand Vers. 22. I Will cover thee with my hand c. 1. Gregorius Nyssenus thus expoundeth these words Qui ad Christum pervenit manu Dei tectus est manus autem Dei creatrix omnium rerum virtus He that is come unto Christ is covered as with Gods hand and Gods hand is the power wherewith all things are created but this sense cannot stand for the Lord doth not remove his hand or protection from them which are placed in the true rocke Christ as the Lord is said here to remove his hand from Moses 2. Pelargus understandeth the removing of the hand De collapsione politiae Mosaicae post adventum Christi of the removing and falling of the politike state of Moses common-wealth after the comming of Christ. But the text describeth a thing now presently done 3. Simlerus thinketh it is but a phrase of speech as we use to put our hand before our eyes when we looke upon the Sun Sic oculi Mosis teguntur so Moses eyes are hid that they should not be dazled with Gods glorie So Iunius taketh it to be humanitus dictum to be spoken according to the use of men I will hide thine eyes 4. Tostatus thinketh it was quaedam nubes densa a certaine thicke cloud which covered the hole of the rocke till the Lord passed by quâ—st 19. So also Calvin Dei manus pro caligine accipitur c. The hand of God is taken for a mist and darknesse put before Moses eyes that they might not be intent curiously to looke further than was meet 5. But there is nothing to the contrarie why this may not be added further that this cloud put before Moses eyes might not also have as it were the fashion of an hand Ponam quasi figuram manus mea super te I will put as it were the figure
and of the soule or life of beasts which was produced out of the earth contrary to the opinion of Porphirius and the Pythagoreans who taught that the soule of man tooke beginning from the elements as the life of other creatures 5. Doct. That God hath no humane shape 5. LEt us make man after our image vers 26. which image was shewed before to be in the graces of the soule and not in the body against the heresie of the Anthropomorphites who imagined God to be of a humane shape like unto man 6. Doct. God not the author of evill 6. Vers. 31. GOd saw all he had made and â—oe it was very good From hence we conclude that God only is the author of good and that whatsoever the Lord doth is very good Against the Manichees who affirmed that the God of the law was the Prince of darknesse and anchor of evill 7. Doct. Marriage made free for all men 7. Vers. 28. BRing forth fruit and multiply This Scripture sheweth 〈◊〉 marriage had the institution in mans innocency and that this blessing to increase should have taken place though 〈◊〉 had not fallen against the heresie of the Tatiâ—â—i and Maâ—ichees which condemned marriage as a work of the devill Againe seeing God giveth here a liberty to all men and women by marriage to increase and multiply it maketh strongly against the Popish inhibition of marriage in Ecclesiasticall persons and Monasticall enforced vowes for by both these this generall liberty given of God is restrained To this argument divers answers are framed 1. That this precept of multiplying was onely to hold â—ll the world was replenished Magister lib. â— distinct 2â— 2. This precept was not given to all but onely to the multitude Thomas 2.2 quast 152 art 2.3 This precept was not for all times but only in case of necessâ—ty when propagation failed Scotus 4. Some say this precept did hold onely till Christ. 5. Some that this increasing is to be understood of â—â—â—ctifying in the soule not in the body But all these answers mislike the moderne Papists And therefore now their answer is that these words increase and multiply containe not a precept but an institution of nature and a promise of fecundity â— for the same words are uttered untâ— other creatures which are not capable of precepts and if iâ— were â— precept iâ— should binde all to increase and multiply by marriage and so injury should be offered to Christ to Mary and other holy Virgins thus Bellarmine de Clericis lib. 1. c. 21. Pererius in Genes lib. 4. p. 657. Contra. 1. Our adversaries fight here with their owne shadow for neither doe wee say that this is an absolute precept binding all to marriage but a liberty granted to all that will marry that thereby mankinde may still be propagated like as where Christ faith if they persecute you in one City flye into another hee doth not take away this liberty that flyeth not having received a greater gift of strength and patience to stay and endure the utmost triall but he which shall deny this remedy to the weake So they offend not against this grant of marriage for increase that need it not but are indued with a more excellent gift of continency but they which deny it to those that are apt to generation 2. Though bruit beasts are not capable of mans precepts yet when God biddeth the creatures understand in their kind and obey Ion 2.10 God spake to â—he fish and it cast up Ionah upon the dry land 3. If it bee an institution of nature then they tyrannize by their superstitious lawes over the bodies of men forcing them to single life against the generall inclination of nature 5. The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is places of confutation out of this first chapter 1. Confut. Against the Manichees and Atheists I Will briefly first set downe the objections of the Manichees and ancient Pagans concerning the creation because they are sutable to the impious conceits of the Atheists in these dayes 1. Object If God in the beginning made the world what did hee before was hee weary in doing of nothing Answ. God as Augustine saith nec cessando torpuit nec operando laboravit neither was idle in resting nor weary in working neither received he any happinesse by the things created without which he was happy but when it pleased him he made the world to manifest his glory and declare his mercy August cont aedvers leg lib. 1. c. 2. 2. Object If God created light hee was before in darknesse Answer God needeth no corporall light which was made but dwelleth in a spirituall and uncreated light Aug. de gâ—n cont Manic cap 4. 3. Object If God made the light who made darknesse Answer Darknesse is nothing it need no creation being but the absence of light as nakednesse is the want of cloathing silence the ceasing of a sound ibid. 4. Object If the spirit moved upon the waters then were they the habitacle or mansion of the spirit Ans. The Sunne is carried above the earth yet is not the earth the habitation thereof and the spirit did so move upon the waters as the workman over the worke which he intendeth to make Aug. ibid. c. 5. 5. Object But who made the waters whereupon the spirit moved Answ. It is comprehended under the name of the earth which was covered with the waters made at the first as an unformed lumpe or matter whereout other creatures were made Aug c. 7. 6. Object God saw that the light was good it should seeme he knew it not before Answ. It followeth not that because God approveth the light being made he knew it not before Christ wondred at the Centurions faith which he himselfe had wrought God saw it before in his intention and now approveth it brought forth in action 7. Object How could there be light or the distinction of daies and nights before the Sun was made Cels. lib. 6. Orig. and so object the Manichees Ans. Augustine answereth that there was a division of the day and night before the sunne but a more exact division afterward de genes cont Manich. c. 15. Ambrose saith the light of the day is one thing the light of the sunne another as wee see by experience that there is a light before the sunne rise and after he is set lib. 4. Hexemer c. 3. But we doe againe say that God is not tyed to the creature as though hee could not make light without the sunne â—ee that made the â—unnâ— was able to make light before and without the sunne see more hereof in the Theologicall explanation upon vers 3. I will now touch some of the Papists objections 2. Confut. Sacraments doe not conferrâ— grace BEllarmine by the moving of the spirit upon the waters enforceth that the Sacrament of Baptisme conferreth grace as those waters concurred to the making of naturall things so the water of baptisme toward spirituall regeneration lib. 2. de sacram ca.
vanish howsoever some in their heat and intemperance are not afraid to call them Sabbatorum errores yea hereticall assertions a new Jubile Saint Sabbath more than either Jewish or Popish institution God grant it bee not laid to their charge that so speake or write and God give them a better mind 2. Doct. The soule is not part of Gods substance SEcondly where it is said God breathed into the face of Adam the breath of life we are not thereby to gather that the soule of man is part of the divine substance to the which opinion Lactantius seemeth to have inclined lib. 2. divinar institution for as the breath is no part of his substance that doth breath so neither is the soule of Gods essence that gave it for then the soule of man if it were of the divine nature it should be immutable and without beginning from all eternity as God is 3. Doct. There is but one soule in a man THirdly from hence it may be concluded that there is but one soule in man and that all the other faculties of sense and powers of nature are but handmaids to the soule waiting upon it and departing with it therefore God is said to have breathed into man the spirit of lâ—â—e that is the reasonable soule because the body no longer doth breath or live than the soule is present We doe therefore refuse Origens conceit upon these words Mat. 24.51 The Lord will divide or cut him off that is the spirit of the wicked shall returne to God and their soule shall goe to hell hee maketh A difference betweene the spirit and soule contrary to the Apostle who saying be ye renewed in the spirit of your soules and minds Eph. 4.24 sheweth 〈◊〉 the spirit belongeth to the mind or soule as the purer part thereof 4. Doct. Paradise was a place not altogether unknowne FOurthly whereas Paradise is described by the countrey of Eden where it was situate and by the knowne rivers of Tigris and Euphrates we inferre that Paradise then was not a place secret and unknowne as Bellarmine supposeth lib. de grat prim hom c. 12. for if it had beene unknowne in those dayes the Lord needed not to set the Cherubims to keepe it with A sword shaken And if it be objected that Paradise was never found out by any the answer is easily made 1. because it was kept by the Angels with great terrour that none durst approach 2. The Infidels and incredulous persons regarded it not 3. The faithfull looked for a much better Paradise in heaven and therefore sought not after it And herein we have the judgement of Pererius against Bellarmine one Jesuit against another lib. 3. in genes qu. 5. de paradis 5. Doct. The terrestriall Paradise is not now extant FIfthly whereas Bellarmine affirmeth that the terrestriall Paradise is yet remaining and that Henoch and Elias are there kept it appeareth by the description of Paradise to bee a meere fable 1. Paradise was planted where the knowne rivers Tigris and Euphrates ran together which is either in Armenia or Mesopotamia or some of those knowne countries then if Paradise were now extant in the world it is like that in all this time it should have beene found out by the inhabitants of those places 2. The floud over-flowed the highest hils 15. cubits Gen. 7.20 then Paradise also was covered with the water where if Henoch then was he must have also perished in the waters being out of Noahs Arke 3. The scripture maketh mention now of no other Paradise but heaven 2 Cor. 12 13. S. Paul calleth it the third heaven Paradise 4. Pererius sheweth Ruperius and Gregory to have beene of this mind that Henoch was not translated to the terrestriall Paradise to the which he subscribeth against Bellarmine 6. Doct. Marriage is not to be prohibited to any SIxthly whereas the Lord saith vers 18. It is not good for man to bee alone wee enforce this text against the popish forced virginity for whereas God saw it was not good neither for Adam then present not for his posterity which should have more need of the remedy to bee alone they contrariwise constraine their Priests and votaries to live alone depriving them of that mutuall helpe and society which God hath appointed for their comfort and to be a remedy against sinne and that this place is understood not of the marriage of Adam only but of all the faithfull Bellarmine confesseth lib. de Matrim cap. 2. 7. Doct. Polygamie condemned SEventhly vers 24. They shall be one flesh and as this place is alleaged Matthew 19. 5. They two shall bee one flesh This place sheweth the corruption of polygamie which is the having of many wives for if God had seene it good for one man to be joyned to two or divers women he would have made at the first to one man more helpes than one 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Experimentall knowledge of evill not to be desired 1. THe Maniches objected why did God forbid man to eate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evill would he have him like unto bruit beasts that cannot distinguish betweene good and evill Augustine answereth this experimentall knowledge of evill which Adam got by transgression was not the wisdome of an happie but the experience of a miserable man for Christ knew no sinne by his experience though he knew it by his saplence or wisdome 2. Confut. Why God gave a commandement that man would not keepe 2. WHy did God give a commandement that man should not keepe and why did he not make him so that man should not have fallen Ans. 1. God gave man this precept that hee might shewe his obedience and though he foresawe he would sinne yet he also provided a remedie and redeemer for his sinne 2. Though hee be in a better state that cannot sinne at all yet his state is good and not to be complained of that if he will cannot sinne lib. cont adversar leg c. 14. 3. Confut. against Celsus 3. CElsus derideth this storie of the making of the woman and counteth it a fable Origen answereth if you will not beleeve Moses why doe you credit Hesiod your Poet who hath the like narration how Vulcan made a woman out of clay whom all the gods adored Venus gave her beautie Pallace comelinesse of bodie Mercurius wit whereupon she was called Pandora which opening the lidde or cover of the tunne divided care and griefe unto men that lived without before Origen lib. 4. cont Câ—lsum 4 Confut. Paradise planted in a knowne place 4. THe Papists object thus Bellarmine would proove that Paradise was an unknowne place because it is said the river that went out of Eden did divide it selfe into 4. heads But there is no such river in Mesapotamia Bellar. lib. 1. de grat prim homin c. 12. For further answer to this objection I referre the reader to q. 13. before these 4. streames might be known in former
usuall food before the floud as it is now as seemeth to thinke Dominicus à Soto a Popish Writer for when as yet the earth and plants were not corrupted by the floud but retained their naturall force and vigour they yeelded more sufficient nourishment so that the eating of flesh was not then so necessary and as the more delicate use of some plants as the use of Wine by Noah was brought in afterward so much flesh of fowles and beasts did grow in request after the floud which was not covered before 5. Wherefore the sounder opinion is that not onely the eating of flesh was permitted before the floud but used not onely among the prophane race but with the faithfull though with greater moderation Our reasons are these 1. Because there is made no new grant neither in this nor in the rest as of multiplying and bearing dominion c. but onely the ancient privileges granted to man confirmed 2. The distinction of cleane beasts which it was lawfull for them to eat and the uncleane whereof they might not eat Levit. 13.8.3 It is evident by the oblation of Abel who offered the first fruit of his sheepe and the faâ— of them but it had beene no praise to Abel to offer the fatlings if he used not to eat of them it had beene all one to God whether to offer leane or fat but herein Abel is commended because he preferred the service of God before his owne private use and therefore Iustinus well collecteth Si anâ—e posuit Abel utilitatisâ—a Deum non dubium quia solitus fit ex labore suo utilitatem percipere If Abel did preferre God before his profit certainly he did reape profit of his labour and to the same purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Who feedeth a flocke and eateth not of the milke thereof 1 Cor. 9.7 and by the same reason also of the flesh thereof 4. In that expresse mention is here first made of eating of flesh it is not as one well resolveth quantum ad usum in respect of the use sed quantum ad necessitatem in regard of the necessity The food of flesh beganne now to be more necessary because the plants and herbs had lost the first naturall vigour and strength QVEST. IIII. Whaâ— the meaning is of eating the flesh with the life or bloud 4. BVt flesh with the life thereof that is the bloud c. 1. This word anima in Hebrew nephesh translated life is taken foure wayes in Scripture first for man as the soule that sinneth shall die Ezek. 18. Secondly for the reasonable soule feare not those that can kill the body but cannot kill the soule Matth. 10. Thirdly it is taken for the inferiour part of the soule that is the affection as thou shalt love the Lord with all thy heart and soule Matth. 22. Fourthly it is taken for the life as a good shepherd will lay downe his life for his sheepe Ioh. 10. and so it is taken in this place for the bloud is the seat and chariot of the life and vitall spirics 2. These words are neither figuratively taken as Eugubinus thinketh for the shedding of mans bloud because he that killeth a man seemeth to devour his flesh for in this sense the words should have no coherence at all with the former verse and where words may be taken in their proper sense without any inconvenience a figure is not to be enforced neither is it all one to eat flesh with the bloud thereof and to eat things strangled as Chrysostome collecteth for the Apstoles distinctly speake of bloud and things strangled Act. 15. Neither is the eating of live flesh here onely prohibited as Cajetanus conjectureth or of hot bloud as Mercer for from this bruitish kinde of food the very nature of man abhorreth and therefore it needed not so especially to be provided for by precept But here generally the eating of the bloud with the flesh is forbidden whether together with the flesh alive or dead or separated from the flesh as to drinke it or to eat it as now the use is in confected meats QVEST. V. Wherefore the eating of bloud was prohibited NOw whereas the eating of bloud was forbidden both before the Law and under the Law Levit. 17. and after the Law in the beginning of the Gospell Act. 15. it shall be profitable to consider the causes of this prohibition First it was forbidden before the Law 1. Not so much for decencie and comelinesse or for that bloud is a grosse and heavy food 2. But either that aforehand by these ceremoniall precepts mens minds might be prepared the better to beare the yoke of the Law which afterward should be promulgated 3. Or rather that by this precept of abstaining from bloud men might be the more terrified from the shedding of mans bloud sic Chrysost. Secondly this law was revived Levit. 17.11 12. whereof two reasons are given one civill because the life of the flesh is the bloud that they should forbeare from all shew of cruelty and so much the more detest the shedding of mans bloud the other religious because I have given the bloud to offer at the Altar the bloud the organ of life is holy unto God the Author of life and therefore they should not pollute or prophane it by devouring thereof Thirdly the Apostles did forbid the eating of things strangled and bloud 1. Not because among the Gentiles suffocated things were held to be the food of evill spirits as Origen writeth for it is not like that the Apostles would ground their decree upon such heathenish fantasies 2. Neither by bloud is homicide forbidden and by things suffocated uncleane as some thinke for the Apostles would not use obscure and mysticall tearmes in their decree and these things were already provided for by law among the Gentiles 3. Neither did the Apostles forbid these things onely to restraine intemperancie for many kinds of food are more delicate and to be defiâ—ed than these 4. But Augustine sheweth the true cause of this prohibition Quâ—dideo fâ—ctum est quia elâ— gere voluerunt Apostoli pro tempore rem facilem c. This was decreed because the Apostles for a while would chuse some easie thing not burdensome to the observers which the Gentiles might observe in common with the Iewes c. Thus Augustine disputing against Faustus This the Apostles did onely for a time lest the beleeving Jewes who could hardly all at once be removed from the legall rites might have beene offended at the libertie of the Gentiles but now this cause being removed and there being no such feare this decree also is expired QVEST. VI. How this prohibition dependeth of the former verse Vers. 5. FOr surely I will require your bloud c. 1. Which words are neither an exposition of the former verse as Eugubinus who by the eating of flesh with the bloud understandeth figuratively the shedding of mans bloud 2. Neither is the
Hebrew ach to be read as an adversative as Paulus Burgensis readeth veruntamen notwithstanding as though the sense should be this though yee are permitted to shed the bloud of beasts yet it is unlawfull for you to shed the bloud of man 3. Neither is this another exception concerning mans food as Cajetane that as before the bloud of beasts is excepted so here humane flesh that if it be not lawfull to shed the bloud of man neither is it to eat his flesh which first must be kiâ—led before it be eaten 4. Neither need there to be here understood any sentence as this I will not have you to shed mans bloud and then this to follow as a reason for this prohibition to shed mans bloud followeth directly in the next verse 5. But this word translated for may be read as a causall why God would have them abstaine from all cruelty or savage behaviour in eating of the bloud of beasts that they should have a greater detestation of the spilling or shedding of mans bloud Perer. Mercer QVEST. VII How God will require the bloud of man at the hand of beasts Vers. 5. AT the hand of every beast 1. Rupertus by beast understandeth the Devill that shall answer for the death of mens soules but Moses here directly speaketh of the bodily life which is in the spirits and bloud 2. Neither by beasts here are understood cruell and beastiall men for it followeth afterward aâ— the hands of man will I require it c. 3. Neither doth Moses insinuate the death of martyrs which were exposed to beasts for which the persecutors shall answer for that did cast the Saints before the beasts 4. But here is shadowed forth that Law which was afterward published that even the beast that killeth a man should be stoned Exod. 22. QVEST. VIII How his bloud shall be shed that sheddeth bloud Vers. 6. BY man shall his bloud be shed 1. Some reade in homine and referre it to the first clause Hee that sheddeth mans bloud in man as they which are strangled have their bloud shed as it were in them sic Tostatus but in this sense one kinde of murther onely should be prohibited 2. Some read in homine against man that is in despite of man Cajetan 3. But the best reading is per hominem by man and to referre it to the last clause by man shall his bloud be shed that is by the Magistrate as the Chalde interpreteth by witnesse by the sentence of the Iudge for it should seeme that before the floud there was no law made nor power given to man to punish murther as Adam proceeded not against Cain that killed his brother Abel Mercer 4. And this must be understood not de facto sed de jure merito not of the fact for many times murtherers escape but of the right and due desert of murtherers that they are by Gods Law worthy of death and many times where the law of man faileth that such are not executed Gods vengeance overtaketh them such are either slaine in battell or by the hands of other or by some other meanes as it is in the Psalme men of bloud shall not live halfe their daies Psalm 55.24 Calvin QVEST. IX That mans life should be preserved because of Gods image IN the image of God c. 1. Hence it followeth not as Oleaster collecteth that the image of God is in mans body because the image in the soule cannot be by the killing of the body destroyed for the reason concludeth well though this image of God be not in the body yet because the body is the Tabernacle of the soule and beareth that which beareth the image of God it ought for that cause to be reverenced and yet the image of God though not originally or principally yet by the consequent and effects is expressed and shineth in some sort in mans body in that it is made upright and aspiring to celestiall things and so sutable to the soule and in regard that into the hand of man God hath delivered the rule and dominion of the creatures cap. 1. vers 28. 2. Though the image wherein man was created be much decayed and impaired yet some part thereof remaineth for the which the life of man should be spared and preserved Calvin 3. And if for this reason the life of any man whatsoever should be regarded much more the life of Christians in whom this image is renewed in Christ Muscul. QVEST. X. Of the Raine Bow Vers. 13. I Have set my bow in the cloud c. 1. Neither Ambrose conceit can be admitted who understandeth not here the visible Raine-Bow in the clouds but the invisible power of God whereby he sometime intendeth sometime remitteth his judgements as a bow is bent and unbent againe But this collection is contrary to the text which saith The Bow shall be seene in the cloud vers 14. 2. Neither is their opinion found that thinke there was neither raine noâ— Raine-Bow before the floud for how could the plants and fruits of the earth have beene so many yeares preserved without raine so then the Raine-Bow was before the floud but it beganne onely now to be a signe of this covenant betweene God and man as the Lord chuseth sometime naturall things for signes as Bread and Wine and Water in the Sacraments Mercer 3. Neither is the opinion of some Hebrewes to be admitted that thinke the Raine-Bow to have beene before the floud but then it appeared in the cleare aire now in a cloud for the iris or Bow can have no existence or being but in a dewing or stilling cloud Mercer 4. Neither is Thomas Aquinas judgement and Cajetanus sound which thinke that the Râ—ine-Bow is partly a naturall signe that there shall be no floud because the Raine-bow sheweth not but when the clouds are thinne and dispersed whereas thicke and blacke clouds ingender inundations for the causes of the generall floud were not naturall and God without the clouds by the overflowing onely of the waters could drowne the world and beside if the Rain-bow were a naturall signe then before the floud came it might have prognosticated so much but then it should have beene a lying signe for notwithstanding the Raine bowes often appearing before the deluge as it is like the floud came 5. Though the Raine-bow bee not a naturall signe but voluntary depending upon the will and institution of God yet notwithstanding hath it some agreement with that which it is made a signe of like as baptisme in the flesh hath some resemblance of the soule so the Raine-bow is a fit and convenient signe to portend no inundation likely to follow because it is orâ—inarily a signe either of faire weather or of no long raine And it hath beene observed that a Raine-bow in the morning betokeneth showers in the evening faire weather Beside the Raine-bow is found to be wholesome to plants and herbs that where it lighteth it giveth them a more pleasant and
the rest of his sonnes being yet unborne Ramban 3. Neither is this an imprecation but a prediction of that which was to come Theodoret Calvin 4. Canaan is accursed not Cham not for that Canaan first saw his fathers wickednesse Theodoret or because of Gods favour towards Cham in preserving him in the Arke as some Jewes thinke nor yet lest that if Cham had beene named his whole posterity should have beene under this curse whereas Canaan only standeth under it Perer. for the whole lineage of Cham stood accursed But Chams sonne is noted not the father both to shew the greatnesse of his sinne whereby the punishment was derived also to his posterity Calvin And to declare that Canaan following his fathers ungodly steps who was partaker with him deriding Noah Mercer was also worthy of the same malediction Ambrose ibid. As also Canaan is singled out from the rest of Chams sons by the spirit of prophesie whereby Noah foresaw the wickednes of that nation and now the time was come when the event was to answer the prophecy in expelling the Canâ—nites and making them servants to Sems posterity Calvin As also hereby we are given to understand as Gregory well noteth in that Cham sinning Canaan is cursed quod reproborum nequitia hic inultae proficiunt sed in posterum feriuntur that wicked mens sinnes goe a while unpunâ—shed but they are afterwards met withall QVEST. XX. How Canaan became a servant to his brethren SErvant of servants 1. That his condition should be most slavish and servile more vile than the lowest degree of servants which should be so much the more grievous because he is subjected to his brethren whereas to be a servant to strangers is more willingly borne as Iosephus brethren thought great scorne that their brother should be their Lord Muscul. 2. We see that as in Adam sinne brought forth death so in Caine it is the beginning of slavish servitude ecce fratrem eodem natum patre peccatum fecit servâ—m behold sinne maketh the brother borne of the same parent a servant Chrysost. A profitable service and subjection should otherwise have beene in the world as when men for order sake and their better preservation obey their mercifull and prudent rulers that governe them as fathers But the slavish life and service had the beginning in cursed Canaan such as their state is that are taken captives in battell who being saved alive servi fiebant a servando appellati became servants being so called because they were saved Augustine 3. Though this curse did not presently take place for the Cananites did hold the Israelites a while in subjection yet at the length Gods judgements which hee in his wisdome and secret counsell for reasons best knowne to himselfe suspendeth were executed to the full upon Canaans seed Calvin QVEST. XXI How children are punished for their parents sinnes BUt here a great question will be moved that seeing Canaan was accursed for his fathers sinne how it standeth with Gods justice to punish the children for the fathers transgression for the better resolving of this doubt these severall considerations are duly to be weighed 1. The judgements of God are of two sorts they are either executed in this life or in the next in this many times they which sinne escape unpunished and they which are innocent are temporally chastised but in the next world every man shall receive according to their workes 2. Gods judgements in this life are either in spirituall or temporall things in spirituall which properly concerne the soule none are punished for another as the Lord saith by his Prophet Ezechiel the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father nor the father of the sonne but the soule that sinneth shall dye But in temporall things as the losse of the commodities and pleasures of this world yea of life it selfe one may be punished for another 3. The judgements in temporall things are to be considered either as chasticements and medicines or as punishments in the first sense they may fall upon innocents as Daniel and Ezechiel went into captivity being not guilty of the peoples Idolatry but this was a medicine tending to their spirituall good But as they are punishments they are onely incident to those which have deserved them So then God in his infinite wisdome doth lay temporall chasticements upon some even for others sinnes 1. That thereby we should be admonished both to detest sinne in our selves and to disswade others from it seeing it enwrappeth many in the same judgement 2. God can recompence abundantly the losse of temporall things yea of life it selfe with spirituall and eternall blessings 3. Yet none are so pure and innocent but must confesse that howsoever they are free from some great offences yet for other sinnes they may justly deserve punishment 4. But this course to punish one for another is onely to bee left unto God Man must observe another rule to punish him onely that sinned as it is in the Law the father shall not be put to death for the sonne nor the sonne for the father Deut. 24.16 though in other punishments which tend not to the death or affliction of the body as in depriving of honours liberty goods it standeth with justice even among men to punish the children for the fathers and many for one as is seene in the case of treason yet this privilege in general to punnish one for another is peculiar to God because he is both the Soueraigne Lord over man and all he hath he only knoweth how to make such chasticements medicinall and how otherwise abundantly to recompense those that are afflicted which things are not in mans power who therefore in inflicting of punishment must respect every mans desert 5. Yet for the most part they which are punished for other mens sinnes are guilty of the same themselves and therefore the Lord saith he will visit the iniquitie of the fathers vpon the children to the third and fourth generation of them that hate me Exod. 20.5 Where is to be considered 1. That God alwayes thus punisheth not but rather by this threatning terrifieth than verifieth the same by his iudgements Theodoret. yet sometime the Lord thus judgeth the posterity of the wicked as Gregory well saith si nulla puniret quis Deum res humanas curare crederet sin cuncta puniret extremum judicium unde restaret if God should punish no sinnes who could thinke that God had any care of humane matters and if hee punished all no man would looke for the latter judgement 2. Herein the long sufferance of God appeareth that hee deferreth his judgement sometime to the third and fourth generation to see if in the meane time the wicked parents or their children may amend if they doe not then the Lord is said to visit their iniquities that is to remember them at the length which he had a great while left unpunished as the Prophet saith
said to have slept with his fathers 2 King 16.20 Mercer For if it were no more but thus to be gathered to his fathers that is to die and be buried the same was said before and such repetition of the same thing might be thought needlesse 6. Wherefore beside this sense this phrase doth further shew the divers state of the soule after this life that both Abraham had his people the just and righteous to whom he was gathered as also Ismael his that the soules which goe hence are not solitary and alone but goe as it were from one people to another from one city to another Luther Calvin Perer. QUEST XVI Why Ismael is joyned with Isaack in the buriall of his father Vers. 9. HIs sonne Isaack and Ismael buried him c. 1. Isaack is set before Ismael not as though he had repented him of his presumption against Isaack and gave him the prioritie as the Hebrewes imagine but Isaack is preferred before Ismael for the dignity of his prerogative 2. Neither doth this shew that Abraham had called Ismael home againe after he was cast out for that had beene against the counsell of God that the bond-woman with her sonne should bee cast out 3. But it is like that Abraham being sicke and wearing away sent for Ismael dwelling not farre off and reconciled him and Isaack Mercer QUEST XVII How Isaack was blessed after Abrahams death Vers. 11. AFter the death of Abraham God blessed Isaack c. 1. We refuse here the fond conceit of the Hebrewes that Abraham blessed not Isaack because of Esau which should come of him and therefore God and not Abraham is said to blesse Isaack for although no expresse mention be made of Abrahams blessing Isaack it is not to bee thought that Abraham omitted it and seeing God blessed Isaack Abraham had no reason to withhold his blessing 3. This blessing of Isaack was rather spirituall than temporall for Isaack was married twenty yeareâ— before he saw his posterity or had any children borne whereas Ismael begat twelve Dukes Isaack therefore with patience expected Gods promise and blessing upon him Mer. 3. We see here also performed that promise of God I will be thy God and the God of thy seed for Isaack is blessed after Abrahams death Marâ—â—ret QUEST XVIII Of the dwelling of Ismaels sonnes Vers. 13. THese are the names of the sonnes of Ismael c. Nebaioth of whom came the Nabathaei in Arabia Petraea and Napathaei in Arabia foelix or the happie of Kedar the Kedarens as Lampridius or Cedraei as Plinie calleth them in Arabia petraea of Adbeel the Adubeni or Agubeni with Ptolomy in Arabia the happy of Mibsam the Mnasemanenses in Arabia the happie of Mishma the Raabeni in Arabia the desart where Ptolomie placeth the towne Zagmais of Dumah the Dumaei betweene the Adubenes and Raabenes where is the towne Dumetha of Massa the Masani neare to the Raabenes of Chadar the Athritaei of Thema the Themanei in Arabia foelix where is the towne Thema of Iethur the Itureans in Coelae-Syria of Naphish the Nubaei Arabians neare to the mount Libanus of Kedma the Cadmonaei called Esites because they worshipped fire by the corrupt use of the Hebrew word ish fire ex Iâ—niâ— QUEST XIX The Massorites curious observation Vers. 14. MIsma Dumah Masha 1. Of Dumah and Masha mention is made Isay 21.11 where some translate masha burden in the same place also Thema is mentioned verse 14. another of the sonnes of Ismael here rehearsed 2. The Massorites doe note that this is one of the 14. verses through the whole Bible that consisteth of three words Mercer 3. And further they observe that these three names the first derived of shamang to heare the second of dum which is to keepe silence the third of nasha to beare doe signifie the three principall things that make a quiet and good life to heare to keepe silence to beare but these notes are too curious Mercer QUEST XX. Why mention is made of Ismaels age Vers. 17. THere are the yeares of the life of Ismael 137. yeares The Hebrewes thinke that Ismael a wicked mans age is recorded for this end that we may have a perfect account of Iacobs yeares for if Ismael died the same yeare that Iacob went from his father unlesse he be supposed to have hidden himselfe 14. yeares in Hebers house before he came to Laban as the Hebrewes thinke which is not like he shall want 14. yeares of his age as they further gather thus Iacob was 63. yeares old when he fled from his fathers house because of Esau his father being then 123. years old and Ismael 137 14. yeare elder than Isaack then he served 14. yeare before Iosephs birth Ioseph was 30. yeare old when he stood before Pharao then followed 7. yeares of plenty and two yeares of dearth when Iacob went downe to Egypt all maketh but 116. yeare But Iacob then confesseth when hee appeared before Pharao to bee 130. yeare old the 14. yeares wanting they imagine Iacob to have spent in Hebers house But this computation of the Hebrewes faileth many waies 1. Heber was dead long before Iacobs 60. yeare he died some 4. yeares after Abraham in the 19. yeare of Iacobs age as may be gathered thus Heber was borne 67. yeares after the flood Gen. 11. v. 10. to 15. and lived 464. yeares which make together 531. yeares after the flood and Abraham died 527. yeares after the flood as is before shewed quest 11. 2. It is also an uncertaine conjecture that Ismael died the same yeare that Iacob went toward Mesopotamia neither can it be proved 3. These 14. yeares may be otherwise supplied if we say that Iacob might be 14. yeares in Labans house before he served for his wives Mercer or which is the more likely that Iacob was 77. yeares old before he went out of his fathers house Concent 4. Therefore for this cause is mention made of Ismaels age who is the onely evill man whose whole age is recorded in Scripture but to shew the fulfilling of Gods promise who condescended to Abrahams request that Ismael might live in Gods sight Genes 17.18 for so the Lord endued him with long life and blessed him with much prosperity and an honourable issue QUEST XXI How Ismael is said to dwell in the presence of his brethren Vers. 18. ANd they dwelt from Havilah to Shur c. And he lay or his lot fell before all his brethren 1. The meaning is not that Ismael did issue out or fall upon all his brethren as the word Naphal signifieth whereof commeth the word Nephilim Giants Muscul. 2. Neither that hee full that is died Aben Ezra 3. Or that he died before his brethren that is his sonnes in a full age Lyran. 4. Or that he died before his brethren as though his life was shorter than of the rest 5. But either it may be expounded his lot fell Iun. or if this seeme to be coact as Calvin
gave him a name Edom Calvin this action was governed by Gods providence and the prophecie began now to take place the elder shall serve the younger QUEST XL. Whether Iacob offended in causing Esau to sell his birthright Vers. 31. SEll me now thy birthright 1. Iacob may be thought to have dealt cruelly with Esau and uncharitably that would give him no releefe being ready to die but upon such hard conditions but the answer is that Esau coveted Iacobs pottage not of necessity for there was other meat in the house whereby he might have satisfied his hunger but of an unsatiable greedinesse 2. But Iacob was too covetous to cause Esau to sell for so small a trifle so rich a thing as his birthright which included many priviledges as the priority and government of his brethren a double portion to the rest the priesthood and right to sacrifice Exod. 19.22 and 24.5 and beside was a type and figure of everlasting life Vatabl. here the answer is not as the Hebrewes thinke that Iacob gave a greater summe and this to be onely as an earnest for no such thing appeareth in the Scripture but the true answer is this that Iacob knew by the instruction of his mother that the birthright by Gods appointment belonged unto him and therefore as a wise man he taketh this occasion to recover his right from him that was an usurper of it 3. But seeing this birthright was a sacred thing for otherwise Esau should not be counted a profane person for selling it how could Iacob buy it without sinne Answer Iacob intelligitur suam vexationem redemisse Iacob did but redeeme his owne vexation he buyeth not a thing which was not belonging to him but onely recovereth that which was his owne and this is not simoniacal in sacred things for a man to redeeme his quietnesse and peaceable possession 4. But seeing Esau sinned in selling his birthright how could Iacob be without sinne yes Iacob offended not being hereunto no doubt stirred and incited by the spirit of God and sparing from his owne belly to obtaine such a blessing preferring things spirituall before temporall but Esau sinned in setting so light by the blessing of God as shall appeare in the next question Mer. yet this extraordinary fact of Iacob is not to be drawne into imitation QUEST XLI Whether before the law the first borne did alwaies exercise priesthood BUt whether the priesthood did goe with the birthright and that the first borne did execute the priests office it is questioned among the learned for the solution whereof 1. I neither thinke with the Hebrewes that the first borne of the family alwayes had the preheminence of the priesthood for Abel the younger brother offered sacrifice as well as Cain 2. Neither with Oleaster that this was never practised whose opinion is that the priesthood was not due to the first borne before the law of Moses in hunc loc for the contrary is evident Exod. 24.5 3. Neither do I wholly assent to Hierome who thinketh that omnes primogeniti ex stirpe Noe that all the first borne of Noahs stocke were priests epist. 126. ad Evag. for then Iapheth rather then Sem should have had that prerogative for hee was elder than Sem being borne in the 500. yeare of Noahs age Gen. 5.32 Sem two yeare after Gen. 11.10 yet Sem was the Priest of the most high God supposed to be Melchisedeck and Noah saith Blessed be the Lord God of Sem Gen. 9.26 4. Neither doth the Apostle call Esau prophane only as Pererius thinketh because he sold the Priesthood annexed to the birth-right for it was a holy thing in respect of the spirituall blessing annexed unto it In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed Gen. 22.18 5. This then is our opinion rather that before Moses the father of the house was the Priest for the family as wee read that Iob every day offered sacrifice for his sonnes but after the father was deceased then the first borne succeeded both in the inheritance and priesthood and so after Isaacks decease the birth-right should also have conveyed with it the Priesthood Mercer But that ordinance that the first borne should exercise the Priesthood and offer sacrifice though he were not the father of the family is no older than Moses Exod. 19.22.24.5 Who then were sanctified and set apart unto God Exod. 13.2 QUEST XXXVII How many wayes Esau offended in selling his birth-right Vers. 32. LOe I am almost dead c. Esau diversly offended in selling his birth-right 1. Because he esteemeth his birth-right only by the present commodity and pleasure of this life for whether he meane in respect of his daily danger in hunting he was subject to death as Iun. Or generally speake of his mortality as Mercer Or which is most like of his present faintnesse Calvin Hee onely limiteth his birth-right to this life as though it could not profit him afterward whereupon the Hebrewes gather that hee denied the resurrection 2. Esau offended in his intemperancy and ravenous desire that preferred his belly before so great and rich a birth-right 3. In that for so meane a value hee would forgoe such an inheritance for whereas Aben Ezra would excuse the matter because Isaack was now become very poore and therefore Esau set the lesse by his patrimony it hath no ground at all for whereas Abraham was very rich and left all to Isaack and God blessed Isaack beside how is it like that Isaack in so short a time could bee wasted 4. Another sinne was Esau his profanenesse noted by the Apostle Heb. 12.16 that parted with a spiritual blessing for a temporal and momentany pleasure 5. His unthankfulnesse to God appeareth in that he no more regarded the dignity of the first borne given unto him 6. His obstinacy in that he repented not his folly but after he had done went away carelesse and therefore it is said Esau contemned his birth-right vers 34. 7. His falshood and persidious nature appeareth who though hee had passed over his birth-right to Iacob with an oath yet seemed to make but a scoffe of it and purposed not in his heart to performe it Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the immortality of the soule Vers. 8. WAs gathered to his people Theodoret from hence well concludeth the immortality of the soule and the hope of the resurrection for if men wholly perish and did not passe to another life Moses would not have said He was gathered to his people qu. 109. in Genes our Saviour also useth the like argument to prove that Abraham was alive to God because the Lord calleth himselfe the God of Isaack Abraham and Iacob God is not the God of the dead but the living Matth. 22.23 2 Doct. Order of time not alwayes observed in the sacred histories Vers. 20. ISaack was 40. yeare old c. Whereas Moses setteth downe the death of Abraham and of Ismael before he describeth the
his friends as Onkelos Lyranus Tostat. 3. Abimelech commeth a farre journey not of love or good will but partly pricked in conscience for the wrongs which he had offered to Isaack Chrysost. hom 52. in Gen. partly providing for their posterity that Isaack would doe them no hurt Mercer 4. Origen by these three that came to Isaack understandeth the tripartite wisdome of the Gentiles the morall naturall rationall which dissenting at the first from the Christian faith were afterward reconciled to it hom 14. in Genes QUEST XIII Why Isaack made a feast to Abimelech and his company Vers. 3. HE made them a feast 1. Isaack did this of a simple and sincere affection that they might know there remained no grudge or purpose of revenge in his minde for to invite unto feasts is a signe of remitting and forgetting of former wrongs as Augustus Caesar did bid Catullus the railing Poet to supper in token he had forgiven him though Alexander dissemblingly brought Philotas to his table to have the better opportunity to murther him as Absolom served his brother Ammon 2. Some thinke that the next morning the oath before betweene them made was againe ratified Mer. But it is more like that the oath was deferred till the next morning as being the fittest time for serious consultations it was the Persians barbarous manner in the middest of their cups to advise of their weightiest affaires Perer. QUEST XIV Wherefore the well is called Shibah Vers. 33. SO he called it Shiba 1. Some interpret this word abundance or saturity because of the plenty of water that was found as Hierome who findeth fault with the Septuagint because they translate it oath But sabang signifieth to abound not shabang which is here used 2. It is more like that this was both the same well which Abraham digged and the same name derived from the oath which was made betweene Isaack and Abimelech as before betweene Abraham and Abimelech for so this story saith that Isaack gave them the same names which his father gave them vers 18. Mercer Calvin QUEST XV. Of the marriage of Esau. Vers. 34. WHen Esau was forty yeare old c. 1. The Hebrewes thinke that Esau till hee was forty yeare old gave himselfe to a vitious and a licentious life which may well be and that to imitate his father who was married at forty he doth the like 2. This his marrying into the flocke of Canaan was abdicationis praeludium a fore-runner of his casting off and missing of the blessing as it followeth in the next Chapter Calvin 3. Tostatus thinketh that in the forty yeare of Esau which was the hundred of Isaack Sem died but Pererius thinking to correct his oversight falleth into a greater errour referring the death of Sem to the 50. of Esau and 100. of Isaack whereas they are both in a great errour for Sem died in the 50. yeare of Isaacks life 60. yeare before this time which was 502. yeares after the floud QUEST XVI The evill qualities of Esau his wives Vers. 35. THey were a griefe of minde 1. Some read rebellious of marah to rebell sic Chald. But it rather commeth of marra to be bitter 2. And so were the wives of Esau bitter unto Isaack and Rebeckah and a great offence of mind unto them both in respect of their corrupt manners and their divers profession being given to idolatry as the Canaanites were Tharg Hierosol 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God maketh rich Vers. 12. THe Lord blessed him Gods blessing is given as a reason of Isaacks increasing and growing rich whereupon Augustine noteth Etiam ipsa bona temporalia nec dari posse nec sperari debere c. nisi ab uno Deo That these temporall goods cannot be given or hoped for but from the only God quast 76. in Genes as the wise man saith Prov. 10.22 The blessing of the Lord maketh rich 2. Doct. The soules of the righteous live with God Vers. 24. I Am the God of Abraham Abraham was now dead and yet the Lord professeth himselfe to be his God whereby we are taught that the soules of the righteous after this life doe live with God for as our Saviour saith He is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 Muscul. 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against the breaking of covenants Vers. 15. THe Philistims filled all the wels c. Though that Abimelech had made a covenant with Abraham concerning the well Gen. 21.30 yet after Abrahams death they goe from the covenant such are the enemies of the Church of whom the Prophet speaketh Isa. 33.8 He hath broken the covenant c. he regardeth no man such are the Romanists which hold that faith is not to be kept with heretikes as they brake the safe conduct granted to Iohn Hus and Hierome of Prage Mercer 2. Confut. Of restoring the ancient doctrine with the ancient names Vers. 18. HE gave them the same names which his father gave them The Philistims both stopped the ancient wels and abolished the names Isaack restoreth both so the Church of Rome hath abolished both the true ancient doctrine of the Sacraments as also taken away the name thereof calling it by an idolatrous name of their owne invention of the Masse Muscul. We therefore with Isaack have restored the pure doctrine of the ancient primitive Church together with the names as the Communion the Lords supper the Lords day c. As the Prophet saith Aske for the old way which is the good way and walke therein Ierem. 6.16 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Not to imitate our fathers infirmities Vers. 7. HE said she is my sister Abraham before had offended in the same kinde and yet Isaack cannot take heed so apt children are to imitate the infirmities of their parents Mercer But we should rather learne to decline from our parents errings as the Prophet saith If he beget a sonne that seeth all his fathers sinnes c. and feareth neither doth the like c. Ezek. 18.14 2. Observ. The punishment of adultery Vers. 11. HE that toucheth this man or his wife shall dye the death Thus by the light of nature they were taught that adultery was a grievous sinne and Abimelech pronounceth the sentence of death against such as should violate another mans wife as the Lord had said before to Abimelech Thou art but dead because of the woman which thou hast taken Genes 20. vers 3. 3. Observ. Adversity and prosperity tempered together Vers. 12. ISaack sowed c. Thus the Lord tempereth adversity and prosperity sorrow and joy together like as the night and day summer and winter doe one succeed another Isaack after these grievous tentations concerning his wife is increased and blessed of God likewise vers 20. when his servants had strived for two wels they peaceably enjoy the third calling it Rehoboth roomth as the Psalme saith Weeping may abide in the evening but joy commeth in the morning Psal.
Ioseph with Calvin 2. Neither with some excuse this fact and say it was iocosum mendacium a pleasant lie or in sport 3. Much lesse was it a purposed lie as though Ioseph should sweare to it by the life of Pharaoh for by that oath hee affirmeth not that they are spies but bindeth them to bring their brother Benjamin 4. Wherefore I thinke rather that Ioseph used here no lie at all 1. But not in that sense as R Salomon taketh it as though Ioseph had called them spies one way because they searched the next way into the land of Egypt out of Canaan and that they understood Ioseph another way for Ioseph expoundeth himselfe that he meaneth spies properly that they came to see the weakenesse of the land 2. Neither doth he speake in the opinion of others that they are counted spies but this thrice urging of that word sheweth that he spake as from his owne judgement 3. Neither doth he speake figuratively turning his finger to himselfe and that they spied out his weakenesse and abused his youth and simplicity when they sold him to the Ismaelites as Rupertus 4. But I rather thinke that Ioseph thrice spake not assertive by way of assertion or affirmation but probative and tentative by way of question to trie them which was no lie nor dissimulation at all as neither was that in our Saviour that to make triall of his disciples humanity made shew as though he would have gone further Luke 24. QUEST VIII Whether Ioseph had before forgotten his dreames Vers. 9. ANd Ioseph remembred the dreames which he dreamed of them 1. Not that Ioseph had either made small account before of his dreames seeing the contrary event in his imprisonment and other afflictions 2. Or that prosperity had made him to forget his former visions 3. But now when he saw his dreames to take effect he doth more lively remember them better understandeth them than before as it is said of the disciples that they understood not those things which were said of Christ at the first but after hee was glorified then they remembred that they were written of him Iohn 12.16 Calvin QUEST IX Whether Ioseph sweareth by the life of Pharaoh or therein did wel Vers. 15. BY the life of Pharaoh you shall not goe hence First some excuse Ioseph here admitting this to be an oath 1. Because in effect he did sweare by God who was the author of Pharaohs health and life 2. Some againe doe extenuate his oath that he sware in effect by nothing as Socrates used to sweare by a goose or dog Zeno by the Caper tree to shew the vanity of the heathen that used to sweare by their Gods but it is not like that Iosâ—ph set so light by the health of Pharaoh as Augustine well noteth an bono fideli servo vilis fuerit salus Pharaonis 3. Some would excuse it because Iâ—sâ—ph was not in good earnest but did all this in a friendly kind of dissimulation but as it is not lawfull to lie in jest so much lesse to sweare in jest Secondly they that denie this to have beene an oath 1. Some say it was but a vehement kind of obtestation as Moses calleth heaven and earth to witnesse Deut. 30.19 and as a man may contest by his faith by his head and such like Calvin But yet this will not helpe for our Saviour condemneth whatsoever in our speech is used beside yea or nay Math. 5. that out of Deut. is a patheticall compellation of the creatures to be witnesse against the people of their ingratitude and disobedience which is much unlike this case here 2. Some hold this speech of Ioseph to be an execration as if he should say he wished Pharaoh no otherwise to live than he would doe as he said Thom. Aquinas But Ioseph was more reverent and respective of Pharaohs health and life 3. Iunius saith it is a constant kinde of affirmation used both among Christians and others and will have it like to those asseverations 1 Sam. 2 2â— O my Lord Anna saith to Eli as thy soule liveth and Abner saith to Saul as thy soule liveth O king I cannot tell 1 Sam. 17.55 and as the use was to sweare by the soule of the Emperour as he alleageth out of Vlpianus But herein I cannot consent unto that learned man for in those phrases they alwayes either protested by themselves in the first person as 2 King 6.31 God do so to mee and more also or by those to whom they speake in the second person as in the examples given in instance and therefore the case is not all one with this And concerning that use to protest by the Emperous soule though it continued under Christian Emperors yet it is certaine that it was taken up before in the time of Idolatry when they ascribed divine honours to their Emperors 4. Wherefore I rather incline to thinke that this kind of speech to say by the life of Pharaoh was used commonly in Egypt as an oath partly of flattery partly of superstition in ascribing too much to their Kings which use they seeme to have derived from the Hebrewes that as they used to sweare vivit dominus the Lord liveth so they Pharaoh liveth and the Hebrewes write that to this day it is a law among the Egyptians that he which falsly sweareth by the kings head in a pecuniarie matter shall be put to death Perer. yea and the imperiall law is that he which did commit perjury swearing per genium Imperatoris by the soule or spirit of the Emperour should be beaten with clubs and it should be written over his head 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sweare not rashly Iun. ex Vlpian But yet Ioseph in this place of purpose sweareth not but by the common use and custome spake as the rest did as it appeareth by his twice using of the same words together like as in our English tongue many suddenly will say Mary having no intent to sweare which notwithstanding at the first I thinke was taken up as an oath by the name of Marie And beside Ioseph doth conforme himselfe of purpose to the Egyptian phrase that his brethren should not suspect him to be an Hebrew which they might easily have done if he had said as the Lord liveth Therefore although Ioseph may be somewhat herein excused yet can he not be cleared or justified but that living among a superstitious people he was somewhat polluted also by their manners Mercer Genevens annot in the great Bible and so Iosephs brethren did take it that he charged them with an oath QUEST X. Whether Ioseph did forsweare himselfe Vers. 16. BY the life of Pharaoh yee are but spies It might seeme that Ioseph here did forsweare himselfe because they were indeed no spies 1. It doth not satisfie to say he did not forsweare because there is no mention made directly of God for though we ought onely to sweare by the name of God yet he that sweareth faâ—sly by any
18. to 24. then of their conference with their father vers 24. to 30. 2. Iudahs perswasion 1. from the griefe that his father should be brought unto if Benjamin returned not vers 30 31. 3. From his owne perswasion who became surety for him 4. By the oblation and tender of himselfe to remaine a servant in Benjamins place vers 33 34. 2. The divers readings v. 5. In the which he useth to divine H.S.G. the which he useth to consult with the Propheciers B. which he carefully sought for C. by the which he trieth P. or by experience certainly learneth what manner of men ye are T. heb nachash signifieth to divine or play the Augre and to trie by experience v. 15. Are ye ignorant that there is not a man like unto me in the skill of divining H. doe yee not know that a man such as I am will divine S. that such a man as I doe consult with Propheciers B. that such a man as I can divine G. that such a man as I will search it out Carrie it out P. or learne it out by experience sic heb nachash the same word that was used before v. 18. You are my Lord next after Pharaoh H.S. you are aâ— Pharaoh caet v. 21. And I will have care on him S. that I may set mine eyes upon him caet v. 28. And you said a beast hath devoured him H.S. and I said he is surely torne in peeces caet v. 30. His soule is deare unto him as his owne soule C. his life hangeth upon his life B.G.S.H. his soule is tied or bound to his soule T. heb v. 31. Bring the old age of their father with sorrow to hell S. his gray haires with sorrow to hell C.H. his gray head with 〈◊〉 to the grave B.G.T.P. heb sheol the grave 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of Iosephs divining in the cup how it is to be taken Vers. 5. IN the which he doth divine and prophecie vers 15. Know you not that such a man as I am can divine and prophecie First some doe expound these words as that Ioseph should be cleared from all blame 1. Theodoret. qu. 104. in Genes saith that Ioseph doth not arrogate the skill of divining to himselfe but saith that such a man as he is could divine as the Septuag read for it was no rare thing in Egypt for great men to use divination but Iosephs steward vers 5. speaketh of his masters skill and use in divining 2. Augustine excuseth this fact of Ioseph Quia magnum aliquid isto ludo significatur because there was some mystery in it qu. 145. in Gen. but if this thing had beene evill in it selfe a mysticall signification cannot make it good 3. Others say that the word divining is here taken generally for any kinde of prediction and so Ioseph indeed had a gift of divining and knowing secrets Thom. Aquin. Perer. But it is evident in the fifth verse where Iosephs steward attributeth to his master the skill of divining in his cup that he speaketh of such a kinde of divining as was used among the Egyptians for it is like that the servant added not that of his owne as Pererius thinketh but that he spake as he was instructed 4. Others answer that Ioseph here affirmeth nothing of himselfe but onely asketh a question by way of interrogation Know ye not But vers 5. the steward doth directly so affirme of his master 5. Some make this to be the meaning that Ioseph by the losse of the cup wherein he did drinke did conjecture that some evill was toward himselfe ex Vatablo but the contrary is evident by Iosephs speech vers 15. What act is this that yee have done that he by divining found out their fault and was not a Prophet against himselfe 6. Some Hebrewes whom Iunius followeth doe thus reade by the which cup hee now findeth by experience what manner of men ye are and so the word nachash is taken for an experimentall knowledge Gen. 30.27 where Laban saith I have perceived or found by experience that God hath blessed me for thy sake But this interpretation I cannot wholly approve for these reasons 1. Because divers words must be supplied not in the text to make the sense perfect as quales sitis what manner of men yee are 2. Because as yet having not found the cup hee had no such experience of them 3. The steward giveth two reasons whereby he doth aggravate their offence in taking away the cup because his master did drinke in it and did divine by it and so the whole verse hangeth together but in the other sense there is no coherence with the rest 4. Although this word be so taken some where else it followeth not it should be so here Secondly as these former doe altogether discharge Ioseph so some doe charge him too farre 1. The Hebrewes thinke that Ioseph indeed by this cup did know every mans age and nativity but it was farre from worthy Ioseph to pollute himselfe with those grosse superstitions of Egypt 2. Some read thus Know ye not that such an one as I am doe consult with Propheciers or Augers Paul Burgens But as it is a fault to professe such divining so is it also no lesse fault to consult with such 3. Some think that Ioseph did in hac simulatione graviâ—er peccare grievously sinne in this dissimulation and did impiously profane the gift of the spirit in professing himselfe a Magitian in stead of Gods Prophet Calvin But in mine opinion this is too hard a censure for whatsoever Ioseph here spake or professed he did it not seriously or as he would be taken and counted but in respect of the vulgar opinion erroniously conceived of him Thirdly therefore I thinke the meane way betweene both to be safest that as I exempt Ioseph from such grievous sinne so I free him not from some infirmity and oversight in this action 1. Yet with Tostatus I thinke not that Ioseph voluit se vere augurem haberi à fratribus would have his brethren indeed take him to be a diviner for seeing he presently purposed to discover himselfe hee would not his brethren should have such a prejudicate opinion of him 2. Neither sufficeth it to say with Augustine Quod non serio sed jocâ— dictum est that this was alleaged in jest not in earnest for this is no excuse for him that doth evill to say Am I not in sport Prov. 29.19 3. Therefore this is the best excuse for Ioseph that he did all this not with a purpose to hurt his brethren but onely to sift them and know their affection toward Benjamin and to take occasion to detaine him longer as also he useth this allegation of his skill in divining neither as out of his owne judgement who abhorred such vanities neither because he would be so counted but according to that opinion which the Egyptians had of him who tooke
poenitentiam That he which committed adulterie after publike penance should finally be denied the Communion In Hieromes time it seemeth that adulterie was punished by death who in a certaine epistle maketh mention of a young man qui adulterâ—i insimulatus ad mortem trahitur who being accused of adultery was led forth to death yet Augustine as is shewed before reasoneth against it but of all other Origen writeth most plainly Apud Christianos si adulterium fuerit admissum c. Among Christians if adulterie be committed it is not commanded that the adulterer or adulteresse bee punished with corporall death c. neither therefore was the law cruell then neither now doth the Gospell seeme to bee dissolute but in them both the benignitie of God appeareth yet by a divers dispensation then by the death of the bodie the people was rather purged from their sinnes than condemned but unto us sinne is purged not by corporall punishment but by repentance and it is to be seene unto lest our punishment be greater whose vengeance is laid up for the next world when as they were absolved from their sinne by the paying of the punishment as the Apostle saith how much more punishment is he worthy of that treadeth under foote the Sonne of God Two reasons Origen yeeldeth of this his opinion that there is now a mitigation of the rigour of Moses law because then it served as an expiation of their sinnes prefiguring the death of Christ as S. Paul applieth that sentence Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree which is generally delivered by Moses to the particular death of Christ Galat. 3.13 but now the expiation of sinne is by repentance and remission of sinnes in Christ. Againe now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospell even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now for God punisheth not twice for the same thing as Origen in the same place alleageth Yet although we contend that the capitall punishment of Moses law may now be dispensed with in some cases upon the reasons before alleaged this is not either to condemne those Common-wealths which doe reteine still and practise the severity of Moses law against adulterers who therein sinne not but as Ambrose saith of the Apostles that asked for fire to come downe upon the Samaritanes Nec discipuli peccant legem sequentes Yet did not the Disciples offend following the law neither to excuse those places where this sinne is too easily and lightly punished as Erasmus complaineth in his time Nunc adulterium lusus magnatum est Now adulterie is but a sport of great men Where adulterie is not capitally punished yet great severity otherwise should be used as it was decreed in the Elibâ—rin Councell that he which having a wife committed adulterie should be under penance five yeeres can 〈◊〉 He that did sinne that way after should not bee received to the peace of the Church till his dying 〈…〉 that did commit adulterie after penance should never be restored to the communion of the Chuâ—â—â— c. 7. These or such like severe constitutions this wanton and lascivious age hath need of that this overflowing sinne might be kept in with higher bankes than now it is So then I conclude this point with Cyprian who speaking of divers kindes of Ecclesiasticall censure used in divers places thus writeth Manente concordia vinculo actum suum disponit dirigit unusquisque Episcopus c. The bond of amity remaining still every Bishop so directeth and disposeth his owne act that he is thereof to give account unto God The like may bee said of Princes and Magistrates in their dominions and regiments that the difference in publike punishments all intending the glorie of God and the brideling of sinne is no cause to breake peace or breede jelousie betweene Christian states Now for the other part that Moses Judicials doe bind negatively that is where Moses Law inflicteth not death there Christian Magistrates are not to punish with death the reasons are these 1. Because then the regiment of the Gospell should exceed in terror the strictnesse and severitie of Moses Law 2. God is that one Lawgiver that saveth life and destroyeth Iam. 4.12 he gave life and he only hath right to take it away God hath created man in his image Gen. 9.6 which image is expressed in mans soule animating the bodie This image then is not to be defaced and dissolved but by warrant and direction from God therefore the equitie of the Judicials of Moses ought to be a rule either by generall direction or particular president to all Magistrates in what cases and for what sinnes they are to deprive the offendors of their life But here it will be objected that if this be so then all those Common-wealths are in error which punish theft by death which by Moses law is satisfied by making restitution Exod. 22.2 Ans. Even by Moses law some kinde of theft received a capitall punishment as if it were a violent theft as it was lawfull to kill a theefe breaking into the house Exodâ—s 22.2 or a wanton theft as David judged him worthy to dye that having many sheepe of his owne tooke by violence the onely sheepe which his poore neighbour had 2. Sam. 12.5 Likewise publike theft and sacrilege in Achan was punished by death Iosh. 7. But that simple theft when a man stealeth only to satisfie his hungrie soule or to supply his present necessitie should be proceeded against to the losse of life it seemeth hard And as I take it the lawes of this land have used a good consideration herein that such small felons should escape by their booke wherein to my understanding greater clemencie and favour in some Judges were more commendable who require an exactnesse of such simple clerkes unlesse they bee such as are worthy for other former evill demerits to be cut off as rotten members There is a saying in the law Favores sunt ampliandi Where favour is intended it should be the largest way extended It were also to be wished that a greater valuation were yet set than of the usuall rate in such small fellonies when a man is to bee judged for his life By Dioclesians law some kindes of theft are charged with restitution of foure fold by another authentike law the theefe is adjudged to bee beaten with clubbes By the Decrees Qui fecâ—rit furtum capitale c. Hee that committed any capitall theft as in breaking into an house in stealing a beast or some other thing of price if he were a Clergie man he was to be under penance seven yeeres if a lay man five if it were a small theft he was to make restitution and to doe penance one yeere By any of these or the like constitutions sufficient provision might be made against simple theft But it can no wayes be justified that such simple theft should bee more straightly
originall NOw whereas after the 22. verse the Septuagint and the Latine translator doe insert a whole verse of the birth of Eleazar with the reason of the imposition of his name all which is not in the Hebrew in this place but is transposed hither from the 18. chap. of Exodus vers 4. Bellarmine would therefore make us beleeve that herein the Latine text is perfecter than the Hebrew because mention is made onely of one of Moses sonnes whereas he had two lib. 2. de va Dei cap. 2. Contr. 1. It followeth not because some thing is omitted in one place to be inserted in another that therefore the Hebrew text is defective as S. Marke making mention of one blind man chap. 10.46 and S. Luke likewise chap. 18.36 whereas S. Matthew speaketh of two blind men chap. 20.29 are not therefore defective So neither is the Hebrew here thought to be wanting expressing onely one of Moses sons seeing the other is supplied chap. 18.2 And if the Septuagint is to be justified here then let them be borne out also for adding five more of Iosephs posteritie Machor Gilead of Manasseh and Suâ—â—am and Taam and Edom of Ephraim Genes 46. which are not mentioned in the Hebrew as not then borne but borrowed from the 26. of Numb and 1 Chron. 7. Likewise Exod. 6.19 the Latine and Septuagint put unto Moses and Aaron Miriam which is not in the Hebrew this rather sheweth great boldnesse 〈◊〉 thâ—se translators to adde that which the spirit of God passeth over in silence 5. Cont. Prayers are not meritorious Vers. 24. THen God heard their mâ—ne and God remembred his covenant The Israelites prayers are heard not for any worthinesse or merit of their sorrow but the Lord for his promise sake the foundation whereof is Christ heareth their complaint and hath respect unto them Simler Borrh. And that our prayers are not meritorious but heard in mercie Salomon sheweth Then heaâ—s thou in heaven and be mercifull to the sinne of thy people 1 King 8.24 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Rich and great men should have compassion on the necessities of their poore brethren Vers. 11. HE went forth to his brethren to looke on their burdens Moses though himselfe lived in all ease and courtly pleasure yet could not so content himselfe but goeth to visit his afflicted brethren and is touched in compassion towards them as Queene Hester also was moved with pity toward her people which teacheth us that rich and mighty men that are in high and wealthy place should submit themselves to take knowledge of the necessities and wants of their poore brethren therefore the Prophet reproveth the rich men of Israel that dranke wine in bowles and lived at ease but no man was sory for the affliction of Ioseph Ferus 2. Mor. Friendly admonition is not to be despised Vers. 14. WHo made thee a man of authoritie Moses here for his friendly admonition is recompensed with scornefull and disdainfull words which is the property of naturall and carnall men to repay them with evill which carefully watch over them by wholesome admonitions for the good of their soule Simler But the Wise man saith The eare that hearkeneth to the correction of life shall lodge among the wise but he that refuseth instruction despiseth his owne soule 3. Mor. Godly names to be given unto children Vers. 22. WHose name he called Gershom Moses giveth unto his sonne a name that might put both himselfe and his sonne also when he came to yeeres of discretion in minde of their state and condition that they were but pilgrimes and strangers here So did the Fathers use to give names unto their children of good signification and godly edifying that fond use therefore is to bee reproved among Christians that give names unto their children borrowed and taken from the Gentiles and such as have no good signification or which they understand not Pellican 4. Mor. Patience is necessarie in prayer Vers. 24. THen God heard their mone Yet it was forty yeeres before the Lord sent them deliverance we must not then thinke that our prayers are neglected of God if presently we see not the effect thereof but we must waite the Lords leisure and expect with patience till it bee his pleasure to performe our prayers and grant our requests Ferus S. Paul prayed thrice that is often that the pricke of the flesh the messenger of Satan might be taken from him yet was it not but the Lord gave him his sufficient grace with patience and strength to endure that combat 2. Cor. 12. 5. Mor. In affliction we must flie unto prayer ANd in that the people cried unto God in this their distresse they rebelled not nor sought to deliver themselves by their owne arme or strength it teacheth us that in all our afflictions wee should depend upon God and betake our selves unto prayer Pellic. as Saint Iames saith If any be afflicted let him pray Iam. 5.13 CHAP. III. 1. The method and parts THe generall preparation of the Instrument of this great deliverance is set forth in the Chapter going before in his preservation education persecution Now followeth the more speciall preparation in the vocation of Moses in this third Chapter and his confirmation chap. 4. In this Chapter is set forth first the preparation to his vocation to vers 7. Secondly the vocation it selfe to vers 22. The preparation consisteth partly in a vision which Moses saw both in what place vers 1. what vision it was vers 2. how Moses behaved himselfe vers 3. partly in the voice of God which Moses feared wherein Moses is charged what he should doe vers 4.5 and the Lord proclaimeth who he is vers 6. The vocation of Moses is either a generall charge or commandement to goe unto Egypt where 1. Moses office is injoyned him of God vers 10. with the occasion thereof the afflictions of the people vers 7. the twofold end thereof to deliver them out of Egypt and to bring them into the good land of Canaan vers 8.2 Moses excuseth himselfe 1. By his infirmity where the Lord satisfieth him by that present signe and assuring him of the future event that they should serve him in that mount vers 11 12. 2. By pretending the curiosity of the people in inquiring after his name that sent him verse the 13. where the Lord also satisfieth him by shewing his name vers 14 15. Beside the generall charge followeth a particular direction what course hee shall take to vers 19. and what effect it shall have For the first there is prescribed whom hee shall joyne with him the Elders of Israel vers 16. what he shall say unto them vers 17. what they shall doe goe unto Pharaoh vers 18. The effects or events are foure 1. Pharaoh shall refuse to let them goe vers 19. 2. The Lord will worke signes and wonders 3. Then he will send them out vers 20. 4. They shall goe out richly with ornaments and jewels vers
begin to be longer than the night so then Christ brought light to the world the light of righteousnesse which chaseth away the darknesse of our sinnes Rupert 2. As in March all things began to revive and spring againe so Christ brought life and refreshing to the world Ferus 3. It was a generall received opinion among the Jewes that the same time that the Israelites were delivered out of Egypt the deliverance which they expected from the Messiah should be accomplished Aâ—doe Masius in 5. Iosh. And so accordingly Christ the true paschall lambe was slaine in the Feast of the Passeover 4. The fulnesse of the Moone sheweth the fulnesse of time when the Messiah should come Rupert 5. The eating at even signifieth that Christ should suffer toward the end of the world Simler Secondly in the tenth of this moneth let every one take a lambe Like as the lambe was set apart foure dayes before upon the tenth day of the moneth so our Saviour came to Jerusalem upon the tenth day of the moneth five dayes before his Passion for upon the sixt day before Christ came to Bethanie Ioh. 12. and the next day he went to Jerusalem Ferus 3. The lambe signifieth Christ as Iohn Baptist calleth him the lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world Ioh. 1.29 unto whom all the properties of the lambe doe most fully agree 1. The lambe is taken from the flocke so Christ tooke the nature of men in all things like unto us sinne only excepted Ferus It was a lambe without blemish so was Christ without sinne Simler A male to shew his strength Iun. of a yeere old not above but under it might bee to shew that Christ died at a full and perfect age Pellican Beside Christ is resembled to a Lambe for his patience he was as asheepe before the shearer not opening his mouth Simler for his innocencie Ferus And as a Lambe cloatheth so are wee cloathed with Christs righteousnesse Hierom. As the Lambe feedeth so are wee nourished spiritually by the body and bloud of Christ. Simler 4. The bloud of the Lambe was a most lively type and figure of the bloud of Christ 1. As they were delivered from the temporall death of the plague of the first borne so are wee redeemed by the bloud of Christ the undefiled Lambe 1. Pet. 1.19 Iun. 2. The bloud was sprinkled or stricked with hyssope upon the doore postes so the bloud of Christ doth not profit us unlesse it be sprinkled upon our hearts by faith Calvin 3. It was stricked upon the doore postes that we should at all times both going out of our houses and entring in thinke upon the passion of Christ and it was laid upon the upper doore poste to shew that we should not be ashamed of Christ. Pellican 5. The Lambe must be eaten whole so whole Christ must be received and acknowledged God Christ and man Christ perfect God and perfect man consisting of body and soule both the doctrine and life of Christ Pellic. Ferus The Arrians divided the Lambe that denied his Deity the Maniches that impugned his humanity the Apollinarists denied Christ to have a soule or rather it signifieth our perfect conjunction with Christ Iun. 2 The eating of unleavened bread signifieth the laying aside of the leaven of malice and wickednesse and that we should keepe our feast with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth as the Apostle expoundeth it 1. Cor. 6.8 3. The sower herbes signifie the afflictions that accompany the crosse of Christ. Iun. 6. Vers. 11. Thus shall yee eat it 1. By the girding of the loynes some understand the bridling of the affections Gregor Pellican rather it sheweth we should be ready for the Lords service as they which are prepared for their journey Philo as the Apostle saith Stand therefore your loynes girded up Ephes. 6.12 Borrh. 2. The putting on the shooes with Gregory signifieth the imitating of the examples of the Saints departed as the shooes are made of dead skinnes but this is too curious Pellican would have it to signifie our passing thorow this world where we have no abiding City rather it sheweth that wee should be armed and prepared to walke through the crosses of this life and not to bee offended with the troubles which follow the Gospell but as the Apostle saith wee should bee shod with the preparation of the Gospell of peace Borrh. 3. By the staffe in hand Pellican understandeth the enduring of labour Philo direction to guide us in the way Ferus and Iunius better the word of God whereby we are both guided and strengthened in the way Gregory the pastorall duty but the use is more generall than to belong to one calling 4. They are bid to eat it in haste which with Gregory signifieth ad solemnitatem patriae caelestis aâ—â—â—lare to long for our heavenly country as they made haste to goe to Canaan as the Apostle saith I desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ. Some understand it of that feare which they are in which doe things in haste and there it is good semper pavidâ—m esse ne in presumptione securâ—tate pâ—rielitamur alwayes to be fearefull lest bâ— security and presumption we should be indangered Pellican Some doe thus apply it Celeriter relinquendum esse Satana regnum that the kingdome of Satan must speedily bee left Borrh. Ferus beside the two first collections Festinâ—re nos faciant duo desiderium timor Two things cause us to make haste desire and feare addeth a third that as they were bid thus to be in readinesse at what houre of the night soever there should be a cry raised in Egypt Sic semper parati simus quasi omni hâ—ra nobis ex hoc mundo exeundum sit So we should be alwayes ready at what houre soever we are to depart this world But this ceremony betokeneth generally our readinesse and promptnesse to Gods service violentes esse rapere regnum Dei that wee should as it were take the Kingdome of God by force as our Saviour sheweth Matth. 11. Iun. in Analys QUEST XLI How Pharaoh is said here to have called unto Moses Vers. 31. ANd he called to Moses and Aaron 1. Ferus here well noteth Impii non evigilant nisidum judicium Dei sentiunt The wicked awake not till they feele the judgements of God Pharaoh is not so much awakened out of his sleepe as his hard heart is awakened 2. Now he granteth whatsoever they had said before making no reservation or exception of any thing as he had done Simler So wee see that terror and feare are the invincible weapons of God whereby Tyrants are constrained Pellican 3. This was Sera sed non seria animi demissiâ— This submission of his minde though it came at the last it came not in truth Borrh. for Pharaoh repented him afterward 4. Not onely Pharaoh thus called to Moses and Aaron but likewise Pharaohs servants submitted themselves and
before whom all are held as guiltie and who prescribeth no law to himselfe Acacius Contra. But this solution is not sufficient for Ezechiel which saith the same soule that sinneth shall die speaketh also of the judgements of God which should not be inflicted upon the children for the fathers Ex Simler 5. Cajetane giveth this solution Although God in the law command that the sonnes should not bee put to death for the sinnes of the fathers Ipse tamen qui creator conservator Dominus est unicuique nemini facit injuriam c. Yet he that is the Creator preserver and Lord of every mans life doth no man wrong if he temporally chastise the sonnes c. His reason dependeth upon Gods right and power which hee hath over every mans life that as he gave it so he doth no wrong to take it away at his pleasure Contra. But the Lord saith by the Prophet Ezech. 18.32 I desire not the death of him that dieth Now if there were no other cause why the Lord should punish the children of the wicked in taking away their life but the will and pleasure of God the Lord should seeme to desire the death of men contrary to that saying of the Prophet 6. Procopius giveth this exposition that God threatneth to punish the posteritie of the wicked ut parentes à peccandi licentia retraheret to withdraw the fathers from sinning parentes non tam dolent sua morte quà m liberorum prasertim si his fuerint authores mortis Fathers doe not so much grieve for their owne death as for the death of their sonnes especially if they were the cause of it Contra. This is true that the punishment of the children redoundeth to the parents but this is not all that by this meanes the fathers should bee drawne to repentance for although their children be neere them yet they are neerer to themselves and their owne punishment would much more move them 7. There remaine two most usuall expositions the first is that temporally sonnes may be chastned for their fathers but not eternally for aeternaliter quilibet punitur pro malo quod egit c. For eternally every one shall be punished for the evill which he doth himselfe Tostat. quaest 5. So also Thomas Si loquimur de poena qua habet rationem medecina c. If we speake of that punishment which is by way of medicine we may be punished for another Such are all temporall and bodily corrections they are medicinall and tend to the good of the soule and the sonne quantum ad animam non est res patris in respect of his soule is not any thing of his father but in respect of his body Sic Thom. 1.2 quaest 87. artic 8. Contra. Although this exposition be sound and true yet it doth not fully take away the doubt moved before 1. For the Prophet Ezechiel also speaketh of temporall punishment namely of captivitie which the sonne should not beare for the father 2. And this place is rather understood of eternall punishment than temporall which the sinne of Idolatrie deserveth Simler 3. And the phrase here used visiting the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children sheweth that the Lord speaketh rather of penall judgements which should bee inflicted upon the sonnes of the wicked than of medicinall corrections 4. And Augustine further urgeth this reason that if it bee understood of temporall chastisement as of captivitie then non solum odio haebentibus sed diligentibus se redderet peccata c. God should not onely render the sinnes to those that hate him but to those that love him for Daniel and the three children and Ezechiel with other righteous men went into captivitie Sic Augustin quaest 14. quaest veter novum Testament 8. There remaineth the second common and received sense of these words which most of the fathers thus understand that the Lord will visite the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children if they also continue in the wicked race and follow the evill example of their fathers as Hierome Ideo iniquitates eorum portaverunt quia imitatores eorum in nequitia extiterunt Therefore rhey doe beare the iniquitie of their fathers because they did imitate them in their wickednesse Hieron in oration Ierem. Some agreeing in generall with the rest that it is to be expounded of the wicked children of wicked parents yet doe understand it of originall sinne which is properly called the sinne of the fathers because they received it from them which is punished in unregenerate children of the wicked but is pardoned in those that are regenerate To this purpose Gregor lib. 15. Moral cap. 22. Contra. But originall sinne is extended further than to the third and fourth generation which are here mentioned therefore it is not like the Lord meaneth that sinne Ex Simler Some will not have this place at all understood of the sinnes of the fathers but of the children onely qui peccant sicut patres which sinne as their fathers did But as Tostatus well argueth against this assertion This were not to punish the sinnes of the fathers in the children Sed peccatorum filiorum malorum in seipsos but of the wicked sonnes in themselves Tostat. quaest 5. Therefore the former exposition is currant to expound these words of the sinnes of the children which they learned of their fathers Quia patrum extiterunt aemulatores haereditario malo de radice in ramos crescente They are punished because they ded emulate their fathers this hereditarie evill growing from the root into the branches Hieron in Ezech. cap. 18. So also Augustine Ex eo quod addidit qui me oderunt c. In that he addeth which hate me it is understood that they are punished for the sinnes of their fathers Qui in cadem perversitate parentum perseverare voluerunt Which would persevere in the same perversitie of their fathers August cont Adimant cap. 7. Gregor Quisquis parentis iniquitatem non imitatur nequaquam ejus delicto gravatur Hee that imitateth not the iniquitie of his father is not burdened with his sinne lib. 15. moral cap. 22. Chrysostome Si nepos secutus fuerit vias patris avi sui c. If the nephew doe follow the wayes of his father and grandfather thou wilt render unto them to the third and fourth generation Chrysost. homil in Psal. 84. Super illa non in aeternum irasceris c. Severus Therefore it is added Of those that hate me Vt apertum fiat non ob parentum peccata sed ob illorum odium adversus Deum eos puniri That it may bee manifest that they are not punished for their fathers sinne but for their owne hatred against God Ex Lippoman Diodorus In eisdem peccatis persistentes just as poenas exolvetis Persisting in the same sinnes you shall pay just punishment Rabanus Peccata patrum iniquorum non redundant ad filios si eorum imitatores in malo non fiant The sinnes of the wicked
to the floud the 2. from Abraham till the giving of the law the 3 from thence to Christ the 4. from the comming of Christ unto the end of the world which Christ calleth a generation when he saith this generation shall not passe till all these things be fulfilled Augustine not much differing understandeth these foure generations the 1. from Abraham to David the 2. from David to the captivitie of Babylon the 3. from thence to the comming of Christ the 4. from Christ unto the end of the world in the which fourth generation God visited upon the Jewes the iniquitie of their fathers and cast them out of their land August cont Adimant cap. 7. Contra. 1. But if these foure generations should be taken for the continuance of the world then what difference should there be betweene the third and fourth generation and the thousand generation limited for the Lords shewing of mercie 2. The generation that our blessed Saviour speaketh of was that present age wherein those things concerning the destruction of Jerusalem should be fulfilled 3. And lawes are made to meet with inconveniences following not alreadie past to what end then should the generations be counted which went before the making of the law And at the comming of Christ he found not the Jewes given to Idolatrie for the which sinne specially this punishment is threatned 4. Hierome maketh this allegoricall exposition thus mystically applying these foure generations to the foure degrees of sinnes the first in the thought the second in the will and purpose the third when the sinne is brought into act the fourth Si in tuis sceleribus glorieris if thou gloriest in sinne These two last the Lord useth to punish and not the former Hieron in Ezech. cap. 18. Contra. 1. If the third and fourth generation are thus to bee expounded then so must the thousand mentioned afterward but it will be hard to make a thousand degrees of vertue 2. Neither is it true that God onely punisheth the two last degrees of sinne the act and glorying in it for our Saviour sheweth that adulterie may bee committed in the heart Matth. 5. and Moses was punished for his incredulitie at the waters of strife which was internall Numb 20. 5. Lippoman hath this conceit that the third and fourth generation are to be put together and so they make the seventh generation and then this is the sense Deus tantae severitatis c. God is of such severitie that the punisheth impietie in the seventh generation when as it seemeth to be forgotten the posteritie being by so many degrees distant from their ancestors that sinned Contra. But Lippoman in the same place doth answer himselfe shewing out of Scripture that these numbers must be counted not as one added to another but as included one within another as Prov. 30.18 There be three things hid from me yea foure that I know not he meaneth not three and foure but foure in all as it followeth in the next verse 6. Therefore this is the best reason why the Lord nameth the third and fourth generation because men may live so long to see their offspring to the fourth generation as it is said of Iob chap. 42. Acacius Et sic mutuò videre possunt filii peccata parentum ad imitandum patres poenas filiorum ad dolendum And they may mutually see both the sonnes the sinnes of their parents to imitate and the fathers the punishment of their sonnes to grieve at Thomas 1.2 quaest 87. art 8. And two other reasons beside are yeelded hereof both that the parents by this long suffering of God in not punishing presently might bee called to repentance Vt ex hac punitione tolerationem divinam non parvi pendant patres c. That the parent should not lightly esteeme this divine forbearance Cajetan And beside to shew that if they cannot be wonne with this lenitie and longanimitie of God that they shall not goe unpunished Longanimis sum in parentes c. I am long suffering toward the parents and toward their sonnes Si autem nepotes majorum suorum peccata secuti fuerint ultionem infligam But if the nephewes doe follow the sinnes of their ancestors at the last I will inflict punishment Theodoret. QUEST IX Why mercie is promised to be shewed to a thousand generations SHewing mercie unto thousands 1. Augustine understandeth this of a thousand yeeres as if any of the seed of David love the Lord Quem constat utique ante mille annos fuisse who was a thousand yeares since for two causes God will shew him mercie Quia ipse Dei cultor est exejus semine qui amaverat Deum Because both he himselfe is a worshipper of God and of his seed that loved God Quaest. veter nov testam cap 14. Câ—ntra But it is evident by the construction of the words that in this clause must be supplied the word generations which is understood before the words in the originall are To the thirds and the fourths that is those which are in the third and fourth generation from their fathers and so must thousands be understood here now a thousand generations is more than a thousand yeares 2. Theodoret maketh particular application of this unto the calling of the Gentiles Quae per Abraha semen benedictionem divinam adeptae sunt Which through Abrahams seed obtained the divine blessing after so many yeeres But this is not fitly applied for here mercie is promised to a thousand of them that love God but the Gentiles were Idolaters before they were called to the knowledge of Christ therefore they are without the compasse of this promise It was rather fulfilled in the beleeving Jewes who while they followed the faith and did the works of Abraham continued the Lords people more than two thousand yeeres 3. Acacius expoundeth thus Interminatum tempus significavit in quo anima ipsa postquam ex hac vita transmigraverit indeficientem à Deo misericordiam consequetur Hee signifieth an undetermined time wherein the soule after it is passed out of this life doth obtaine mercie never fayling at the hands of God Contra. But this terme of thousands cannot be referred to the immortall state in the next world because hee speaketh of the time of keeping Gods commandements which is in this life and beside as the one part of the third and fourth generation must be understood of the time of this life so likewise must the other 4. Neither can it be taken literally for from the first man Adam to the last shall there not to be a thousand generations seeing from our blessed Saviour to Adam there are rehearsed not full out fourescore generations Luk. 3. and yet here it is said to thousands which cannot bee lesse than two thousand Tostatus 5. Wherefore the best solution is this that here poâ—itur numerus certus pro incerto a certaine number is put for an uncertaine Tostat. q. 5. Soleo meminisse probitatis parentum
we call God to be a witnesse unto our soules that we speake the truth this is a kinde of invocation of the name of God and a part of his worship Deut. 6.13 Yee shall serve him and sweare by his name Contrary hereunto are 1. The refusall of a just and lawfull oath when any refuse to testifie the truth upon their oath which may make for the glory of God and the good of our neighbour as the Apostle saith An oath for confirmation is among men an end of strife Hebr. 6.16 2. To take a false oath either in not performing that which is promised by oath or in testifying upon an oath otherwise than the truth is 3. An idolatrous and superstitious oath which is made by any other name than of God only 4. An oath to performe any unlawfull thing such as Herods oath was 5. A rash oath lightly and vainely made without any necessity as in common and usuall talke which abuse is reproved by our blessed Saviour Matth. 5.23 Vrsin 2. Doct. What an oath is COncerning an oath then briefely this it is 1. In a generall sense to take an oath or to sweare is used for the whole worship of God as Isay 45.23 Every knee shall bow unto me and every tongue shall sweare by me and the reason is because we professe him to be our God by whom we sweare 2. But more particularly and properly an oath is defined thus It is an invocation of the name of God as the onely searcher of the heart whereby he that sweareth taketh God to record that he speaketh the truth and wisheth God to punish him if he doe otherwise Vrsin So that two speciall things are intended in an oath 1. To call God as a witnesse that he speaketh the truth as the Apostle saith Galath 1.20 Now the things that I write unto you behold I witnesse before God that I lye not So Thomas Iurare per Deum nihil aliud est quâ—m invocare ejus testimonium To sweare by God is nothing else but to call him to witnesse 2. Hee that taketh an oath desireth that God may punish him if hee sweare falsly as the Apostle I call God for a record against my soule or unto or upon my soule 2. Cor. 1.13 Nihil aliud est dicere per Deum ita est nisi quòd Deus puniat me si non ita est It is nothing else to say by God it is so but that God punish me if it be not so Thom. in opuscul 3. Places of Controversie 1. Cont. It is not lawfull to sweare by Saints or other creatures 1. THey take the name of God in vaine which doe sweare by any other than by the name of God and therefore the Romanists are in errour which maintaine the swearing by the name of Saints Rhemist annot Math. 23. v. 21. 1. God commandeth that we should sweare only by his name Deut. 6.13 Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and serve him and sweare by his name which text our Saviour alleaging Matth. 4. interpreteth it by the word only him only shalt thou serve So also Deut. 10.20 and Exod. 23.13 it is directly forbidden that they should take the name of any other Gods into their mouthes 2. God reproveth those which sweare by any other than by him as Zephan 1.5 I will cut off c. them that worship and sweare by the Lord and sweare by Malcham 3. Invocation belongeth only unto God but the taking of an oath is a kinde of invocation therefore it is a service due only unto God 4. In taking of an oath we call God to be a witnesse unto our soule but God only knoweth the secrets of the heart neither Angell nor Saint Ergo. 5. He that sweareth giveth unto him power to punish him if he sweare falsly but God onely is able to punish the soule Matth. 10.28 Vrsin But it will be objected thus 1. Our Saviour alloweth swearing by creatures Matth. 23.21 Whosoever sweareth by the Temple sweareth by it and by him that dwelleth therein Rhemist annot in hunc locum Answ. 1. Our Saviour here doth not justifie swearing by creatures but confuteth that nice distinction of the Pharisies that it was nothing to sweare by the Temple but by the gold of the Temple vers 16. and sheweth that they could not avoid swearing by God when they did sweare by the Temple because it was the place of his habitation and so they did in such an oath take the name of God in vaine 2. For otherwise if our Saviour should here allow swearing by creatures as by heaven saying He that sweareth by heaven sweareth by the throne of God he should be contrary to himselfe for elsewhere he saith Sweare not at all neither by heaven for it is the throne of God Matth. 5.34 2. Object Ioseph did sweare by the life of Pharaoh Gen. 42.15 Answ. 1. Some say that this was no oath but a vehement kinde of asseveration as Hannah saith to Eli As thy soule liveth 1. Sam. 1. and Abner to Saul 1. Sam. 17.56 and so they would have the meaning to bee this as truly as Pharaoh liveth or as I wish his life and health so it is true I say Vrsin Iun. But it is not all one kinde of phrase to say unto one present as thy soule liveth and of one absent to say by his life or soule 2. It sheweth therefore some infirmity rather in Ioseph though hee worshipped the true God yet he had learned to speake as other Courtiers did to sweare by Pharaohs life yet rather of custome of speech or the more cunningly to conceale himselfe from his brethren than of any purposed imitation of their superstitious oathes therefore Iosephs example here can bee no warrant See more of this Hexapl. in Genes c. 42. v. 15. 3. Object It is usuall for men in taking of an oath to lay their hand upon the Gospell therefore it is lawfull to sweare by a creature Answ. 1. Men using this externall signe doe not sweare by it no more than Abrahams servant did sweare by his masters thigh when he put his hand under it Gen. 24. 2. he sware by the name of God· So the Lord saith I lift up mine hand to heaven and say I live for ever Deut. 32.40 And the Angell lift up his hand to heaven but sware by him that liveth for ever Revel 10.6 So they lay their hand upon the booke as a visible signe or seale of the oath but they sweare not by the booke but by God the Author of the booke to this effect as the words are repeated unto them as helpe thee God and the contents of that booke So Thom. Cum jur as per Evangelium jur as per Deum qui dedit Evangelium When thou swearest by the Gospell thou swearest by God which gave the Gospell 4. Object It is not lawfull to profane or speake irreverently of the name of the Virgin Mary or of the Saints for this also is a taking of
Apostle preached Act. 17.11 Contrary hereunto are 1. The negligent resorting to the holy assemblies of the Lords people in carnall men or the wilfull refusall in obstinate recusants who are like unto those in the Gospell who being invited to the marriage feast excused themselves and refused to come Matth. 22.5 2. The carelesse and fruitlesse hearing of the Word as Eutychus fell asleepe while Paul was preaching Act. 20. 4. The reverent and often receiving of the Sacraments is prescribed as Act. 20.6 On the first day of the weeke the Disciples came together to breake bread Contrary hereunto are 1. the neglect of the Sacraments 2. The prophanation of them when they obtrude themselves that are not prepared and so receive unworthily 1 Cor. 11.17 5. Publike invocation upon God and faithfull prayer is another exercise for the Lords day as Act. 16.13 On the Sabbath day we went out of the Citie beside a river where they were went to pray Contrary hereunto are 1. The neglect of publike and private prayer 2. To pray with the lippes and and not with the heart 3. Unfruitfull prayer in an unknowne tongue against the which S. Paul speaketh 1 Cor. 14.17 Thou givest thanks well but the other is not edified 6. Charitie is upon this day to be exercised and extended to the poore as our blessed Saviour healed upon this day Mark 3.3 Contrary hereunto are 1. The omitting of the works of charitie and despising of the poore as the rich glutton did despise poore Lazarus Luk. 16. 2. Or the giving of almes for praise and ostentation as the Pharisies did Matth. 6. Ex Vrsin 7. Meditating upon the works of God is peculiar for the Lords day as Psal. 92. which was appointed for the Sabbath day vers 4. the Prophet saith I will rejoyce in the works of thy hands Contrary hereunto are 1. To be occupied in carnall and worldly thoughts and bodily labour as in buying selling travelling working 2. To follow prophane games and sports to spend this day in quaffing drinking dancing and such like as the Israelites kept an holy day to the golden Calfe They sate downe to eat and drinke and rose up to play Exod. 32.6 2. Doct. How the Sabbath is to be sanctified Vers. 8. REmember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy or to sanctifie it In this precept two things are to be considered quid cavendum quid faciendum what is to be taken heed of and what is to be done The things to be avoided upon the Sabbath day are these 1. All corporall worke and labour So Ieremie saith chap. 17.24 Sanctifie the Sabbath so that you doe no worke therein But yet bodily works may bee done upon the Sabbath upon these foure occasions First propter necessitatem for necessity as our Saviour excused his Disciples for pulling the eares of corne being hungry Matth. 12. Secondly propter Ecclesiae utilitatem for the profit of the Church as the Priests did all necessary things that were to bee done in the Temple upon the Sabbath and were blamelesse Thirdly propter proximi utilitatem for the good of our neighbour as our Saviour healed upon the Sabbath one which had a withered hand Matth. 12.12 Fourthly propter Superioris authoritatem because of the authoritie of the Superiour as the Jewes circumcised upon the Sabbath because the Lord so commanded that they should circumcise their males upon the eight day 2. Debemus cavere culpam we must take heed of sinne as the Lord saith by his Prophet I cannot suffer your new Moones nor your Sabbaths Isai. 1.13 and then he giveth this reason vers 15. your hands are full of bloud 3. Debemus cavere negligentiam We must take heed of negligence and idlenesse upon the Lords day as it is said of the Israelites they sate downe to eat and drinke and rose up to play Exod. 34. The things wherein wee must be exercised upon the Lords day are these 1. In faciendis sacrificiis in offering of our sacrifices that as the Jewes offered up their externall sacrifices so Christians now must present unto God their spirituall sacrifices of prayer and thanksgiving as the Prophet David saith Let my prayer be directed in thy sight as incense 2. We must corpus nostrum affligere humble and afflict the body not pamper it upon this day and make as it were our belly our God so the Apostle exhorteth that we would give our bodies a living sacrifice holy and acceptable to God Rom. 12.1 3. Dando eleemosynas in giving of almes as the Apostle saith to doe good and distribute forget not for with such sacrifices God is pleased Heb. 13.16 So Nehemiah adviseth the people Send part unto them for whom none is prepared for this day is holy unto the Lord chap. 8. vers 10. 4. In divinorum exercitiis Wee must bee occupied in divine exercises as our blessed Saviour saith Ioh. 8. He that is of God heareth Gods words for herein consisteth the delight and rest of the soule this is that Sabbatisme or rest which the Apostle speaketh of Heb. 4. There remaineth then a rest to the people of God This pleasant rest of the soule is begun in this life and perfited in the next But before we can attaine to that perfect rest in the Kingdome of God three kinds of rests must goe before 1. Ab inquietudine peccati From the restlesse condition of sinne for as the Prophet saith The wicked are like the raging sea that cannot rest Isa. 57.20 A passionibus carâ—is from the passions of the flesh for the flesh lusteth against the Spirit Galath 5. Ab occupationibus mundi from the troubles and businesses of the world as our blessed Saviour said to Martha thou carest and art troubled about many things Luk. 10.41 Et tunc post hac anima liberè quiescit in Domino and then after all this the soule shall freely enjoy rest in the Lord Sic ferè Thomas in opuscul 3. Places of confutation 1. Cont. Against the Iewes and the Sabbatarians that contend for the Iewish Sabbath FIrst the Jewes doe thus object against the Christians for the perpetuitie and continuance of their Sabbath upon the seventh day 1. Object The morall law is perpetuall but this Commandement for the sanctifying of the seventh day is part of the morall law Ergo. Answ. This Commandement as it is morall continueth still namely that a certaine day should be set apart for the publike service of God yea and further as Chrysostom saith In circulo hebdomadis diem unum integrum segregandum c. That in the compasse of a weeke one whole day should be severed from the rest Hom. 10. in Genes But the ceremoniall part of this precept in the prescript of the seventh day bindeth us not now as the Apostle saith Let no man condemne you c. in respect of an holy day of the new Moone or of the Sabbath c. Coloss. 2.16 Vrsin 2. Object The lawes which were instituted before Moses are
immutable and perpetuall but such was the institution of the Sabbath Answ. The proposition is not true for the fathers before Moses used to offer sacrifices Circumcision was given to Abraham even from the beginning there was a difference betweene cleane and uncleane beasts and yet all these being types and figures of things to come are abrogated by Christ. Simler 3. Object The lawes given before mans fall in the state of his innocencie could bee no types of the Messiah being not yet promised and therefore they doe bind all Adams posteritie such was the sanctifying of the Sabbath Answ. 1. Such lawes the ground whereof was printed in the soule of man in the creation as are all morall precepts are perpetuall but not all in generall given unto Adam as was the prohibition to eat of the tree of life Vrsin 2. But it may be further answered that the Sabbath was not instituted before mans fall for he is held to have fallen upon the sixth day the same day wherein he was created as it is at large handled in that question upon the 3. of Genesis 3. This law of sanctifying the Sabbath in substance remaineth still though the ceremonie of the day be changed 4. Object The keeping of the Sabbath is called an everlasting covenant Exod. 31.16 it is therefore to remaine for ever Answ. 1. So Circumcision is called an everlasting covenant because they were to continue till the comming of the Messiah and so long as the Common-wealth of Israel continued to them it was perpetuall but now their state being dissolved the covenants made with them are expired also Simler 2. It is called everlasting in respect of the signification and substance thereof our rest in Christ and so it remaineth still and shall for ever as the Kingdome of David in the Messiah shall never have end Vrsin 5. Object The reason and cause of the law is immutable namely the memoriall of the creation therefore the law it selfe also and seeing the knowledge of the creation is necessarie so also is the symbole and monument thereof the celebration of the seventh day Answ. 1. The cause or reason of a law being immutable the law it selfe also is immutable if it bee so tied unto the law as that it cannot stand if the law be changed but so is it not here for the creation may as well be remembred upon another day as upon the seventh Vrsin 2. All the sacrifices and ceremonies of the law were symboles and signes of necessary things as Circumcision the paschall Lambe of the Circumcision of the heart and of the Messiah which things remaine still but the symboles are abolished Simler Now then that Christians are not bound unto the Jewish Sabbath it is evident by these reasons 1. By the doctrine of the Apostles Galath 4.10 You observe dayes and moneths times and yeares I am in feare of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vaine and by name S. Paul speaking of the Sabbaths saith They were shadowes of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.16 2. The Apostles by their example shewed that the Jewish Sabbath was determined for they began to keepe the first day of the weeke Act. 20.7 and 1 Cor. 16.2 3. All types and shadowes were but to continue untill the bodie came which was Christ but the Sabbath was one of those shadowes 4. The Sabbath was a note of cognizance and a worke of distinction and difference betweene the Israelites and other people which difference and partition is now taken away in Christ for now there is neither Jew nor Grecian but all are one in Christ Galath 4.28 Ex Vrsin In Gregories time there were Qui die Sabbati aliquid operari prohiberent which did prohibite to doe any worke upon the Sabbath or Saturday whom he refelleth thus Quos quid aliud nisi Antichristi praedicatores dixerim c. whom what else should I call than the preachers of Antichrist who when he commeth shall cause both the Sabbath and the Lords day to be kept without doing any worke for because he shall faine himselfe to die and rise againe hee shall cause the Lords day to be had in reverence and because he shall compell them unto Judaisme he shall likewise command the Sabbath to be kept And thus he concludeth Nos quod de Sabbato scriptum est spiritualiter accipimus c. We spiritually observe that which is written of the Sabbath for the Sabbath signifieth rest Verum autem Sabbatum Redemptorem nostrum habemus and we have our Redeemer and Saviour our true Sabbath 2. Cont. Against the Iewes carnall observing of the Sabbath BEside this that the Jewes would enforce upon us their Sabbath they have another errour in the manner of keeping their Sabbath which they solemnize in taking their ease in eating and drinking and giving themselves over to all pleasure and licentiousnesse for as Burgensis reporteth of them The Jewes thinke they are bound upon every Sabbath to eat thrice that is one dinner and two suppers and in so doing they shall escape the punishment of hell Burgens addition 4. Contra. 1. Thus their forefathers kept an holy day to the golden Calfe in eating and drinking and rising up to play God will not be so served 2. The way to Paradise is a strait and narrow way by many afflictions we must enter into the Kingdome of heaven not eating and drinking and taking our pleasure 3. Augustine saith Quanto melius foeminae eorum lanam facerent quà m in neomeniis saltarent How much better might their women spinne than dance in their new moones Tract 4. in Ioan. 4. Chrysostome also thus proveth that the Sabbath is not â—tii but spiritualis actionis materia not an occasion of idlenesse but of spirituall exercise because the Priests were by the law upon that day to offer double sacrifice but if it were a day of ease Oportebat Sacerdotem omnium maximè otium agere it was meet that the Priest most of all should take his ease then Concion de Lazaro 3. Cont. Of the Iewes superstition in the precise and strict keeping of the Sabbath rest AGaine the Jewes were superstitiously addicted to the corporall rest which they would not breake upon any occasion as our Chronicles doe make mention of a Jew that being fallen into a jakes refused to be taken out thence upon their Sabbath day and the next day being the Lords day the Governour would not suffer him to be pulled out upon that day because it was the Christians Sabbath and so the wilfull Jew there perished Of the like strictnesse were some among the Christians in keeping of the externall rest upon the Lords day therein imitating the Jewes as Gregorie in the fore-cited place writeth how some did forbid any to wash themselves upon the Lords day whom he thus confuteth 1. Si pro luxu animi ac voluptatis quis lavari appetit c. If any man desire to be washed of wantonnesse and pleasure it
Quia nulla nobis rationâ— sociantur because they are not partakers of reason with us thus August lib. 1. de civitat Dei cap. 20. 2. Thomas useth this reason Non est peccatum uti illis quae sunt subdita hominis potestati c. It is no sinne to use those things which are subject to mans power and made for mans use for there is a certaine naturall order that plants are for the nourishment of beasts and beasts feed one upon another Omnia in nutrimentum hominum c. and all are appointed for the nourishment of man and the Lord hath given unto man this liberty As the greene herbe have I given you all things Gen. 9.3 The Apostle also sheweth the Lawfulnesse hereof Whatsoever is sold in the shambles eat yee and aske no question for conscience sake 1. Cor. 10.25 Thom. in opuscul 3. Cajetane addeth further that it is lawfull to kill beasts Vt vescamur eis vel ne molesta sint nobis To feed upon them or that they be not noisome unto us 4. And the word ratzach here used in the opinion of the Hebrewes signifieth properly to kill a man and therefore there need to be no doubt made of the lawfulnesse of killing other creatures for mans use Simler Cajetan QUEST III. Of the divers kindes of killing THou shalt not kill There are divers kindes of killing some doe kill the soule onely some the body only some both the body and soule 1. They kill the soule which seduce and pervert it as therefore the Devill is said to be a murderer from the beginning Ioh. 8. In quantum traxit ad peccatum because hee drâ—w our first parents into sinne 2. The body and soule is killed two wayes occidendo pragnantes in killing of women with childe for so the infant conceived is deprived both of body and soule Secundo interficiendo seipsum secondly when one killeth himselfe for beside the death of the body they bring their soule into danger Thom. in opuscul 3. The body is killed also divers wayes for Homicidium est internum externum murder is either inward or outward the inward is of two sorts either conceptum conceived as in anger hatred desire of revenge which our Saviour forbiddeth Matth. 5.22 or permissum when it is permitted or suffred when one consenteth unto another mans death Rom. 1.31 They doe not only the same things but favour them that doe them Pelarg. Thom. The externall is committed three wayes manu by the hand as in beating wounding and lastly killing or ore with the mouth in railing reviling giving evill counsell and adjutorio by ministring helpe and so being accessary in killing Thom. This externall murder is either Verbis exâ—ptatum gestu attentatum opere designatum wished in word attempted in gesture or designed in deed Pelarg. QUEST IV. How the soule is killed by evill perswasion FIrst then the seducing and perverting of the soule is a principall breach of this Commandement as Piscator well observeth that seductio animae the seducing of the soule is one of the transgressions of this precept 1. Augustines reason is taken from the practice of the Devill Homicida Diabolus non gladio armatus c. verbum malum seminavit occidit The Devill is a murderer he came not unto man with armour or weapons he sowed evill seed by tempting them and so slew them In Ioan. tract 42. 2. Thomas useth this reason Occidunt animam auferendo vitam gratiae They slay the soule by taking away the life of grace So Augustine concludeth Si fratri tuo mala persuades occidis If thou perswade evill unto thy brother thou killest him ibid. QUEST V. That it is not lawfull for a man to kill himselfe SOme thinke that by this precept man is forbidden to kill another but not himselfe But that it is a speciall offence against this law for any man to lay violent hands upon himselfe it may be thus shewed 1. Augustines reason is Neque enim qui se occidit aliud quà m hominem occidit Neither hee which killeth himselfe doth any other than kill a man 2. Pelargus useth this reason Praeceptum eum ipsum comprehendâ— cui praecipitur A precept being simply propounded without any other addition comprehendeth him also to whom the precept is given in that it is said therefore Thou shalt not kill it is insinuated that thou shalt not kill thy selfe 3. Because our life is the gift of God it cannot be taken away from whomsoever without great impiety and Facit injuriam humano generi he that killeth himselfe doth wrong unto humane society in depriving the Commonwealth of a member thereof Basting 4. The same reasons why a man should not kill his neighbour because he is the image of God hee is our flesh and one of Christs members for whom he died are strong to perswade one not to kill himselfe for no man ever hated his owne flesh Vrsinus 5. Whereas it is objected that Sampson killed himselfe the answer is he did it Instinctu Spiritus Dei By the instinct of Gods Spirit so that hee did it Authoritate Dei By Gods authority Thomas QUEST VI. The inward murder of the heart forbidden NOt only the externall act of murther is here forbidden but the internall also by hasty rage malice hatred envy and such like 1. Lex Dei spiritualis est The law of God is spirituall and therefore iâ— bindeth not only the hands and tongue but the heart also and affections as our blessed Saviour the best interpreter of the law teacheth If one be angry with his brother unadvisedly he shall be culpable of judgement Matth. 5.22 Gallas 2. Another reason is because he qui irascitur sine causa quamum ad voluâ—â—â—tem homicidium fecit which is angry without a cause in respect of his owne will and purpose hath committed manslaughter Chrysost. hom 11. in Matth. Therefore the Apostle saith He that hateth his brother is a manslayer 1. Ioh. 3.15 3. Bonus medicus non solum tolliâ— malum quod apparet sed etiam radicem removet infirmitatis A good Physitian doth not only take away the evill that is apparent but also removeth the very root of the disease Thomas Therefore our Saviour biddeth not only to take heed of murther but of anger also ex ira enim homicidium generatur for homicide or murther is ingendred by anger and rage Chrysostome 4. And where the effect is forbidden there also the cause and occasion thereof is restrained as God would not have us to hurt our brother so he would have all occasions thereof to bee cut off Vrsinus QUEST VII What things are to be taken heed of in anger COncerning anger and rage which is the inward killing five things are here to be taken heed of 1. Ne citò provocatur that it be not soone provoked as S. Iames saith Loe every man be swift to heare slow to speake and slow to wrath chap. 1.19 And there be two reasons why anger
safety only and dishonoured God in spreading their heresie by this meanes neither for the matter did Iehu speake untruly for indeed he had a great sacrifice for Baal when he sacrificed his Priests and in the rest he lied not but used a kinde of outward dissimulation which in politike affaires where the rule of charity is not broken and Gods glory sought is not unlawfull 3. Confut. Against Tostatus that maketh lies in meriment tolerable IN the third place Tostatus is here to be dealt withall whose opinion concerning some kinde of lies as namely those which are called mondacla jâ—câ—sa lies in meriment is this that they are tolerable tumea necessitate both for necessity sake because they are made for delight and recreation which is necessary and nulli nocent they hurt no body qu. 26. Contra. 1. Though recreation and delight be necessary which we grant for as quies rest is necessary for the body so recreation is for the minde yet there are other delights and recreations which may bee used there is no such necessity to jest and make sport with telling of lies 2. And though none other be hurt yet the lier hurteth his owne soule because he speaketh not the truth therefore this kinde of lye is not tolerable 3. But here we refuse not Tostatus distinction of the diversity of recreations that are used among men and of the divers kindes of men that affect such delights and recreations whereof he maketh foure sorts 1. Our blessed Saviour needed no such delight or recreation at all who as he is read often to have wept so is he never found to have laughed For whereas recreations and delights are to succour the infirmity of our nature Christ being God Poterat se á conditione mortalinuâ— defectuosae elevare quantum voluit could reare himselfe up from all such mortall defect as he would himselfe without any such helpe or supportation 2. There is another sort of perfect men who are given to heavenly meditation and their delight and recreation is not in jocosis mendaciis in such jests and meriments but in sanctis exhortationibus â—astis colloqutis in holy exhortations and chaste communications 3. There is another sort in another extreme who are altogether earthly minded who when they wil recreate themselves ad ludâ—s iniquitatis convertuntur turne them to the sports of iniquity as unto eating drinking wantonnesse lasciviousnesse 4. There are others mediocrem vitam tenentes c. which are in the middest betweene these two quiaed medias delectationes convertuntur which turne them to delights of a middle nature which are neither spirituall nor altogether carnall but honest and seemely recreations Thus farre Tostatus goeth on well but in that he placeth merry jests and lies among moderate and tolerable recreations therein is his errour For that no kinde of lies at all are tolerable thus briefly I will shew out of Augustine whose reasons some of them are these 1. One reason is taken from the nature of a lye Lex Dei veritaes quod à vero discrepat transgrediâ—ur legem c. The Law of God is truth and whatsoever differeth from truth doth transgresse the Law therefore a lye being a swarving and declining from the truth transgresseth the Law and so consequently is sinne Lib. contr mendacium cap. 18. 2. By way of comparison with other sinnes Cur magis mendacium faciendum quà m aedulterium committendum c. Why should it be lawfull rather to lye than to commit adultery Lib. de mendac cap. 8. If it be not lawfull to doe the one upon any occasion whatsoever then neither the other also for by adultery the body chiefly is corrupted but by making a lye principally the soule 3. Divers speciall cases are propounded wherein if lying were upon any occasion tolerable it should seeme to have the most just excuse but being not allowed in these it is lawfull in none 1. It is not lawfull to tell a lye and commit a lesse evill Vt deterius malâ—â— ividetur to avoid a greater evill as if one had rather make a lye and offer sacrifice to idols than to haâ—e his body defiled which was Origens case For here the case is this they which force a man to do any unjust thing threatning that they will doe a worse doe in a manner say thus Fac tu malè ne nos faciamus Doe thou evill to prevent us from doing evill but here this rule ought to be held Dehemus propria peccata magis evitare quam aliena Wee must rather shun our owne sinnes than anothers August ibid. cap. 9. Againe it is not in sinnes as in matters of profit in the world we call not that a losse which is lost upon hope of greater gaine but it is not so here Vt non sit peccatum quod admittitur ne gravius admittatur that it should be no sinne which is admitted lest a greater be committed cap. 19. 2. Neither is it lawfull to tell a lye to save another mans life for he that lieth slayeth his soule Num ergo quis tenetur occidere animam ut alius vitam corporis servet A man is not bound to slay his soule to save anothers temporall life nay a man is not bound to lose his temporall life to save anothers temporall life Vt consequatur eternam nostra temporalis relinquendâ— We must leave our temporall life for anothers eternall life but to hazard our eternall for anothers temporall there is no reason 3. Nay we are not to lye though it be to preserve the chastity of the body For Magis servende castitat animi quà m corporis The chastity of the soule must rather be preserved than of the body And againe Magis cavenda in peccatis commissio facti tuiâ—quam permissio facti alieni In sinnes we must more take heed of the commission of any fact of our owne than the permission of anothers fact ibid. cap. 20. 4. Non mentiendum aeternae hominis salutis causa We are not to lye no not for anothers everlasting salvation As if one is in captivity and not yet initiate by Baptisme nor perfectly won unto the faith who is not like to be brought to the faith unlesse the keepers be deceived by some lye and he deliâ—ered out of their hands for a lye is no more in this case to be devised than adultery to be committed Siâ—gâ— non violandâ— castitat nec violanda est veritas If chastity be not to be violated much lesse is verity If then in these speciall cases a lye is not to be admitted as to avoid a greater evill to save another mans life to preserve the chastity of the body nay not to save anothers soule then much lesse is it lawfull to make a lye in jest to shew others sport and to delight them 5. Concerning the examples which are objected out of the old Testament as of Iacobs dissimulation with his father when he got the blessing of the Midwives excuse Exod. 1. and
this doubt there is a threefold kinde of liberty to be considered a naturall liberty civill and spirituall 1. The naturall liberty I call that wherein Adam was created being subdued to no bondage neither spirituall of sinne nor corporall in any outward subjection to any creature but as he had a freedome of will and was made Lord of his affections within that he needed not to have sinned unlesse he would himselfe so he had the dominion of the creatures given unto him This originall liberty of nature considered servitude and bondage was brought in as a punishment of sinne and so is not simply and of it selfe agreeable to the Law of nature 2. But now since Adams fall there is another kinde of civill liberty and civill servitude opposite unto it Civill liberty is defined to be a naturall faculty for every man to doe as himselfe liketh nisi si quis aut 〈◊〉 aut jure prohibetur unlesse one be hinâ—â—â—d by force or in right for that is no true liberty for a man against right to doe what him liâ—teth serâ—itude contrariwise deâ—â—eth unto a man power vivend◠〈…〉 to live as he would according unto nature Now this servitude simply accordeth not with nature as the Apostle saith If yet thou mayest be free use it rather 1 Cor. 7.21 shewing that every one by nature desireth liberty and freedome But after a sort this servitude is agreeable to nature not simply or of it selfe but as other punishments are said to be naturall as tending to the maintenance of society among men which is properly naturall And if it be objected why since all men are fallen in Adam and so brought into subjection why all likewise become not servants the answer is that two things must be considered in this our corrupt state the one is the Law of corruption brought in by sinne the other the goodnesse of God that although all men are subject by sinne to the same bondage and corruption yet the goodnesse of God qualifieth that slavish condition of nature as that some doe enjoy an outward liberty and freedome like as in the inward faculties of the soule the Lord giveth unto some more light of understanding dexterity of wit profoundnesse of judgement and other naturall gifts than unto others 3. The spirituall liberty is wrought in us by grace in Christ which is from the subjection of sinne and malediction of the Law that our conscience is no more terrified with slavish feare but we are at peace with God and beside by this spirituall liberty the faithfull have restored unto them the dominion over all creatures that though not in externall possession yet in a spirituall right all things are theirs whether the world life death things present or things to come 1 Cor. 3.22 and all things worke to the best to those that love God Rom. â— So these may very well stand together externall servitude and spirituall freedome it is possible for one to bee a freeman to God and yet a servant in the world and another to be a bondman to sinne and yet free in the world for there are divers objects of these two kindes of liberty and bondage the outward freedome respecteth this life and state the free use of riches and pleasures of this life the spirituall and internall freedome hath set before it the salvation of the soule the favour of God and life eternall Christian religion then overthroweth not the diversity of degrees among men But as Christ though he were by his spirituall right free from all taxes and impositions yet lest he should offend payed poll money Matth. 17. so Christians though they are made free by faith in the Sonne yet for the maintenance of peace and love and avoiding of offence in disturbing the temporall State they are bound as well as others to be subject unto the powers of this world Et potestatibus 〈◊〉 nos subjici in eo homine qui elementis ex quibus constat subditus est In respect of that man of ours which is subject to the elements whereof it consisteth Borrh. QUEST XI How these six yeeres are to be accounted Vers. 2. HE shall serve thee six yeeres in the seventh he shall c. Some doe expound this De publico generali anno septimo of the publike and generall seventh yeere some of the private as every mans service began Lippoman But that it is to be understood of the publike yeere of intermission it may be made plaine by these reasons 1. Because whereas every seventh yeere was appointed a yeere of intermission to forbeare tilling of the ground or exacting of debts Levit. 25. Deut. 15. if every man should make a yeere of remission of servants in his owne house and not observe the generall and solemne yeere of intermission this would have brought in and bred a great confusion Tostat. 2. This also appeareth by the analogy of the great yeere of remission which was in the fiftieth yeere for there the buying of possessions or servants was noâ— to be counted from the time of such buying but from the yeere of Jubile for as many yeeres or few remained of the Jubile so was the price to be valued Leviâ— 25. Tostatus 〈◊〉 Lyran. 3. And beside seeing in the seventh yeere there was a 〈…〉 for if a man might exact serâ—ice of his servant and not 〈…〉 more base than their substance which is not to be 〈…〉 then the meaning is not that every 〈◊〉 of the Hebrewes 〈…〉 for it might so full 〈◊〉 that he should serve but one if he were bought immediatly before the yeere of Jubile but that he should not at any time serve above six yeeres Tostat. QUEST XII The reasons why they ought to set their servants free HE shall goe out free for nothing 1. That is he shall pay nothing for his liberty because he is made free by the Law nor yet for any thing else As if the servant had lien sicke any time of the yeeres of his service and his master had beene at cost in healing of him his master in this case was to expect no recompence because his servant was as his possession even as the oxe or asse purchased for his profit and therefore his master was to stand to the losse of it Tostat. qu. 6. 2. And the reasons why this favour was to be shewed unto the Hebrewes being servants were these 1. The Lord saith For they are my servants which I brought out of the land of Egypt Levit. 25.42 that is he doth not only put them in minde of that generall benefit of their deliverance out of the bondage and servitude of Egypt the remembrance whereof ought to make them kinde and mercifull to their servants the Hebrewes which were partaken of the same common deliverance But the Lord likewise pleadeth his right and interest in them saying They are my servants so that although the Lord did somewhat depart from his owne right in suffring of them to serve six yeeres in regard of
among souldiers and robbing by the high way where ones life is put in danger All these kindes being more than simple thefts may receive the sentence of death by Moses Law and Magistrates herein may with a good conscience execute the rigour of the Law upon such violent outragious impudent wanton and incorrigible thefts But they are wisely to consider every circumstance and the occasion that draweth one to steale whether he doe it of necessity to releeve his hungry soule or of an evill custome and obstinate minde to maintaine his lewd and unthrifty life In the first case it seemeth to be too sharpe to take away ones life unlesse he be such an one as will take no warning but continueth hardened in his sinne And so for simple and single theft only except it be in stealing of men unlesse it be aggravated by other circumstances concurring 〈◊〉 violence rapine obstinacie custome in sinne and such like neither the Law of Moses prescribeth punishment of death nor yet is it practised by our Lawes which in such cases intend favour by allowing the privilege of the booke See before p. 6. QUEST IV. Why the theefe breaking up might be killed Vers. 6. IF a theefe be found breaking up c. 1. R. Salomon thinketh that this Law which alloweth the theefe found breaking up an house to be slaine is understood not only of theeves that breake in by night but by day also and that clause which followeth When the Sunne riseth upon him they interpret metaphorically that if it be evident and manifest as the light that the theefe came not only to steale but to kill that whether by day or night he may be killed So also the Chalde Interpreter seemeth to follow the same sense Si oculus testium vidit eum If the eye of witnesses saw him that is if it were evident that he came not only as a theefe but to assault Contra. Though this be true that a man might defend himselfe even by day against him that assaulted his life yet this is not the meaning here the words of the Law are literally not metaphorically to be understood 2. The reason of this difference betweene a night theefe and a day theefe is because in the night breaking in it is not knowne whether he came to steale only or to murther but in the day it may easily appeare by his armour and weapons Tostat. Simler Beside in the day he may call for helpe against the theefe which cannot be so well done in the night when he is left without all other remedy but his owne defence Galas Marbach And in the day he may have witnesses of his theft and so convent him before the Magistrate Lippom. 3. The Romane Lawes allow not onely to kill a night theefe but a day theefe also si se tel◠defenderit if he defend himselfe by a weapon Moses Law much disagreeth not for though he that commeth only as a theefe in the day time is not to be killed but to make restitution only yet if he come with weapons as having a murtherers intent now he may be repelled by force even as a night theefe may not now as a theefe but as one which commeth to assault and murther Iunius QUEST V. How it is made lawfull for a private man to kill a theefe Vers. 2. ANd be smitten that he dye no bloud shall be imputed 1. Cajetanus here observeth that this Law simply alloweth not to kill the theefe but if a man smite him in his owne defence not intending to kill him that in this case he shall be free Percussio fuit intenta mors autem per accidens sequnta c. He intended only to smite him but death followed accidentally upon such smiting so also Simler Non probat ut animo occidendi feriatur This Law alloweth not that he should be stricken with a minde to kill him sed indulget affectui c. but it beareth with a mans sudden passion if in defence of himselfe it so fall out that he be killed 2. But this Law seemeth not only to permit one to smite a night theefe but directly to kill him also so it be not with a desire to kill him where he may otherwise escape but to defend him and his from violence which he cannot doe unlesse the theefe be killed Borrh. 3. For seeing both the Law of nature and other Civill lawes doe allow a man to defend himselfe now when the Lawes doe arme a man they seeme publicam personam imponere to impose upon him a publike person so that now he smiteth not as a private man but by authority of the Law and in this case he is tanquam minister vindex Dei as the minister and revenger of God so that he doe it not of a lust and raging desire to be revenged but intending to use a lawfull defence in the safegard of his owne life Gallas And the case is here all one as if a man being set upon by the high way should kill him that maketh the assault upon him Marbach QUEST VI. After what manner the theefe was to be sold. Vers. 3. HE should be sold for his theft c. 1. So was also the Law among the Romans that the debter should be given up in bonds unto his creditor Whereupon Cato was wont to say Fures privates in nexu compedibus vivere publicos in aur◠purpura c. That private theeves lived in chaines and fetters but the publike in gold and purple c. But this custome because it seemed very hard was abrogated by the Law of Arcadius and Honorius Gallas 2. But here it must be considered whether the theefe were an Hebrew or a stranger if an Hebrew how great soever the debt were for his theft he could be but sold over for six yeeres for all Hebrew servants were to goe out free the seventh And as the theft was valued so should he serve more yeeres or fewer But if he were a stranger he might be sold over to serve all his life if the value of the theft were great if it were but small he was but to be sold to serve so many yeeres as might suffice to recompence the theft Tostat. QUEST VII Why the theefe is only punished double with whom the thing stollen is found Vers. 4. HE shall restore double 1. That is one beside that he stole because that is found in his hand which is stollen and so restored Iun. And so must the five oxen be taken which the theefe must make good five with that which was stollen Lippom. 2. Now the reasons why when the thing stollen is found only double must be restored and five or foure-fold when it was killed or sold are these 1. Because he seemeth to be the more cunning theefe when the thing stollen cannot be found 2. Adhuc difficilior ratio in investigando and it is harder to finde out the theft and therefore he is worthy to be more punished Simler 3. Potest haberi
with these abominations for the which the Lord cast them out Levit. 18.24 Simler QUEST XXXV What is meant by sacrificing to other gods 〈…〉 hearing that the two tribes and an halfe beyond Jordan had erected them an Altar they assembled themselves together against them as jealous lest they purposed to bring in a new worship of God Tostat. 5. And not onely they which committed Idolatrie themselves but they which perswaded others were to be put to death Deut. 13.6 7. QUEST XXXVI Whether Idolatrie now is to be punished by death Vers. 20. SHall be slaine 1. The word is charam that simply signifieth not to cut off but to destroy as an anathema thing accursed and bequeathed to destruction Iun. Pelarg. 2. The Interlinearie Glosse expoundeth it of excommunication and of eternall death but both the practise of those times and the like punishment here â—nflicted upon other capitall crimes sheweth that it must be understood of the losse of the temporall life though beside without their great repentance Idolaters deserve also everlasting death Rev. 22.8 3. Some object that now Idolatrie is not to be punished by death but that such rather that are seduced should be instructed in the true worship of God and in the times of the Gospell it is fit more clemencie and mercie should be shewed than under the rigour of the law Answ. 1. Though Idolaters are to be instructed to reforme their error for the salvation of their soules yet this letteth not but that for so great impietie and for the example of others they should worthily suffer the paines of death 2. And now under the Gospel seeing robberie against the common peace and â—reason against the life and safetie of the Prince and State are judged worthy of death Qui majestatem Dei 〈◊〉 dissime violavit tam leve facinus admisisse putabitur shall he which violateth the Majestie of God most impiously be thought to commit so small an offence Gallas 4. But although as Osiander saith the Magistrate non gladio in idololatriam vindicare teneatur be not now bound to take revenge of Idolatrie by the sword for some difference there is betweene Pagane idolatrie and Popish superstitious Imagerie the one being an absolute deniall of all Christianitie the other a mixing therewith of superstitious vanitie yet by the equitie of this Judiciall law which serveth for the strengthening of a morall precept the like sin of idolatrie may justly receive the like punishment As Cyprian repeating that law Deut. 13.12 Si audieris in una ex civitatibus c. If thou hearest of any of the cities c. that are drawne away to serve other gods that such a city should be destroyed thus further inferreth cujus praecepti memor Mattathias which precept Mattathias remembring killed him that approached to the idolatrous Altar to sacrifice c. Then he further addeth Quod si ante adventum Christi circa Deum colendum et idola spernendâ— haec pracepta servata sunt c. Now if these precepts concerning the worship of God and despising of Idols were kept before the comming of Christ quanto magis post adventum Christi servanda sunt How much more ought they to be kept after the comming of Christ seeing he hath not onely exhorted us in words but in deeds Augustine likewise shewing a difference betweene the schisme of the Donatists and Pagane idolatrie thus concludeth Quis vestrum non laudat leges c. Which of you doth not commend the lawes given by the Emperours against the sacrifices of the Pagans illius quippe impietatis capitale supplicium est c. for the punishment of that impietie is capitall 5. R. Salomon thinketh that if a Jew did sweep an Idol Temple velornaret vel alia similia faceret quae sunt praambula c. or adorne it onely and doe other things which are but preambles to Idolatrie he was not to be punished by death but some other wayes Ex Lyrano But if enticing in words to idolatrie were judged worthy of death Deut. 17.5 much more to entice and draw by fact and example as in adorning and beautifying the Temples of Idols QUEST XXXVII Why idolatrie is judged worthy of death NOw the reasons why idolatry was held by Moses law to be worthy of death were these 1. Quia is cultus diabolo exhibetur qui idolorum author est Because that idolatrous worship is giuen unto the devill who is the author of Idols Gallas 2. Aequum est vita privari eos c. It is just that they should be deprived of life which forsake God the author and fountaine of life Simler To leave the worship of God who is the author of life and to worship the devill the author of death and destruction mille mortibus c doth shew himselfe to be worthy of a thousand deaths Gallas 3. Though euery transgression of the law be in some sort a breach of Gods covenant yet idolatry more specially is said to be a transgression of the covenant of God Deut. 17.2 Because men apparently and professedly thereby forsake the profession solemnely made of their service and obedience vnto the Lord Simler 4. And this severe punishment the Lord appointeth for idolatrie quia inter Aegyptios idololatria assiâ—everant because the Israelites had accustomed themselves unto idolatry among the Egyptians in so much that they Moses yet living set up a golden calfe to worship Simler 5. Because of the ready inclination and propension of mans nature unto idolatry it was fit that it should by some severe punishment be restrained Calvin 6. And two things there are which doe exaggerate the nature of a sinne and aggravate the punishment thereof Res in quibâ—s committitur is in quos committitur c. The things wherein they are commited and they against whom they are committed Borrh. Both which concurre here in the sinne of apostasie and idolatrie For what mattâ—â— can be of greater moment than the service and worship of God and what sin more grievous than that which is committed against God QUEST XXXVIII Of kindnesse how to be shewed toward strangers and why Vers. 21. THou shalt not doe injury to a stranger 1. There are two reasone why men are apt to doe wrong unto strangers a both because they are not allied by affinity or consanguinity and therefore no naturall affection is commonly shewed toward them because they are destitute of friends and patrons and therefore lye more open to wrong Tostatus 2. The stranger must neither bee injured in word nor wronged in deed Simler Neither secretly by fraud nor openly by violence neither must they be hindred by any private man nor publikely prejudiced by lawes made against them Tostat. And it is not enough not to doe them wrong but we must help them and doe them what good we can Gallas 3. And this reason is added because they were strangers in Egypt they did feele by experience what it was to use strangers hardly that by
for all offer up himselfe in sacrifice for us and still continueth our Mediatour Borrh. 4. Now the inferiour Priests garments are fitly applied to set forth the qualities and conditions of the faithfull which are the members of Christ as the other did shadow forth Christ our head 1. Beda by the linen garment interpreteth decorem castitatis the comelinesse of chastitie by the girdle vigilantem mentis custodiam the diligent watchfulnesse of the minde to keepe the same by the bonnets visus anditus gustus custodiam the diligent keeping of the sight hearing taste and of all the senses 2. Thomas maketh a more generall use Castitas significatur per femoralia c. Chastitie is signified by the breeches Puritas vita per lineam tunicam Puritie of life by the linen garment Moderatio discretionis per cingulum Moderate discretion by the girdle Rectitudo intentionis pertiaram And a right intention by the bonnet 3. But this application is more fit The linen garment signifieth our innocencie and righteousnesse which we receive in the lavacre of regeneration being cloathed with Christs righteousnesse as the Apostle saith All yee that are baptized unto Christ have put on Christ the girdle signifieth constancie in the truth as S. Paul saith Stand therefore your loines girded about with veritie Tiara protectionis divinae signa erant The bonnets were signes of the divine protection the linen breeches shew what care should be had of comelinesse and what reverence is to be used in the service of God Pelarg. Marbach Who addeth this further that as we put more comelinesse upon our uncomely parts as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 2.23 So our Saviour hath respect unto the vile and abject members of the Church such as are despised and counted base in the world 4. And like as we use three kinde of garments some for necessitie to cover our naked parts some for ornament and comelinesse and some for defence as militarie garments as here the Priests had their linen breeches of the first sort their linen coat of the second and their girdle of the third So unto a Christian are necessarie three kinde of spirituall garments the first is the garment of faith whereby our sins are covered secondly the ornaments of the soule are requisite whereby Christians must be adorned in the sanctitie and integritie of life thirdly they must put on their spirituall armour and take the sword of the Spirit the word of God whereby they may fight against Satan Simler Borrhaius 4. Places of Doctrine 1 Doct. None must intrude themselves into the callings of the Church Vers. 1. CAuse thou thy brother Aaron to come In that Aaron intruded not himselfe into the Priests office but was thereunto called Procopius giveth this note Qui temerario ansu ad se trahere sacerdotium c. He that will rashly draw unto himselfe the Priesthood shall suffer punishment So also Oleaster So the Apostle observeth upon this very example of Aaron No man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron Heb. 5.4 2. Doct. The agreement which ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state OLeaster noteth here further in that Moses who was the chiefe Magistrate called Aaron to the Priesthood the concord and amitie that ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state is commended that as Ioash prospered while hee followed the direction of Iehoiadah so both the Ecclesiasticall state should imitate Iehoiadah to give holy counsell and direction unto the Magistrate and the Magistrate to be like Ioash in following the same 3. Doct. Profitable arts are the gift of God Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men whom I have filled with the Spirit of wisdome c. Gallasius hereupon thus writeth Omnem artem industriam c. Dei donum agnosco Every art and industrie which bringeth utilitie unto man I acknowledge to be the gift of God as the Prophet Isaiah saith that God instructeth the husbandman to have discretion Isa. 28.26 Men therefore to whom God hath given the knowledge of profitable and commendable arts should have a care to employ them to Gods glorie and not to abuse them to wantonnesse 4. Doct. Whatsoever is instituted in Gods service must proceed from his wisdome Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men in the Hebrew wise in heart Whatsoever is instituted in the service of God à sapientia Dei proficisci debet must proceed from the wisdome of God no humane device must have place or bee admitted there Simler Sauls policie in transgressing Gods Commandement in saving the best things of the Amalekites though hee thought hee did therein well and wisely yet was displeasing unto God 5. Doct. The sound of the Word in the Gospell exceedeth the sound of Aarons bels under the law Vers. 35. HIs sound shall be heard c. Herein as Lippoman well observeth appeareth the excellencie of the Gospell beyond the Law they heard then but the sound of Aarons bels Nunc audimus clarum sonitum Evangelii Now we heare the cleere sound of the Gospell c And as the understanding of a man exceedeth the capacitie of a childe and the cleere day the dawning so the cleere light of the Gospell excelleth the shadowes of the Law God providing better things for us as the Apostle saith that they without us should not be perfect Heb. 11.40 6. Doct. There ought to be order among the Ministers of the Church Vers. 40. THou shalt make for Aarons sons coats In that Aaron the high Priests coats were made more costly and glorious than his sons the inferiour Priests therein commendatur ordo inter Ecclesiae ministros is commended order among the Ministers of the Church that although Christ doe forbid bid his Disciples Luk. 22. to exercise dominion one over another as the Princes of the world doe Neutiquam tamen ordinem abrogat Yet he doth not abrogate order seeing he hath not onely distinguished them himselfe in gifts but in offices as the Apostle saith Ephes. 4. He hath given some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors c. Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Controv. Against the superstitious apparell of the Romish Priests Vers. 4. THou shalt make a breast-plate an Ephod and a robe and a broidered coat These Priestly garments being ceremoniall and typicall are now abolished Christ the true high Priest being come with his ornaments Therefore the Romanists doe plainly Iudaize in bringing againe into the Priestly order such varietie of garments as the Pall the Miter the Crozier staffe the Albe the Chimere the gray amice the Stoale with such like Their Priests come forth as though Aaron addressed himselfe with his attire to sacrifice at the Altar S. Paul hath given us a rule concerning these things which are but a shadow of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.17 But it will bee here further asked if it bee not lawfull now for the
they shall see God But none are here without sin therefore none here can see God 4. Gregorie Nyssâ—n Propriâ—m suum est ut omnem cognitionem excedat It is proper and peculiar unto God to exceed and goe beyond all knowledge Qui verâ— est is cognitione non comprehenditur He thaâ— truly is and the cause of the being of all things cannot be comprehended by any knowledge c. The minde of man being of a finite nature cannot comprehend that which is infinite and incomprehensible 5. Further Bernard to this purpose urgeth that place 1 Ioh. 3.2 We know that when he shall appeare we shall be like him for we shall see him as he iâ— whereupon he inferreth thus Videre illum jam in hoc mundâ— illuminatus potest tanquam jam in aliquo similis sicuti est non omnino potest quia nondum perfecte similis He that is illuminate may see him in this world as in some thing like unto him but as he is hee cannot see him because he is not perfectly like him c. If then we shall only see him as he is when wee shall be like him then now in this life we cannot see God because we are not like him 6. Irenaeus enforceth this argument Si neque Moses vidit Deum nec Helias c. If neither Moses saw God nor Elias nor Ezechiel but those things which they saw were similitudines claritatis Domini only similitudes of divine brightnesse and prophecies of things to come it is manifest quoniam Pater invisibilis that the father is invisible of whom the Scripture saith Never any man saw God c. For if any had seene God it is most like those great Prophets should have had a sight of him but they saw him not otherwise than by certaine similitudes 7. Cyrillus affirmeth the same out of that place Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at any time the only begotten Son of God c. hath declared him Soli consubstantiali â—ilio Pater visibilis est nulli praeter eum alii Only the Father is visible to his Son of the same substance with him and beside him unto none 8. Whereas then the Prophet Isaiah saith that he saw the Lord chap. 5.1 and the Scripture testifieth that God spake with Moses face to face and that the pure in heart shall see God Matth. 5.8 These places are either understood of the vision and sight of God by faith as Ioh. 14.9 He that seeth mee seeth my Father or else of the symbolicall sight of God by certaine similitudes and representations as Cyrillus calleth it symbolica similitudo divinâ— gloriae a symbolicall similitude of the divine glorie as Ezechiel also saith it was visio similitudinis gloria Domini a vision or appearance of the similitude of the glorie of the Lord. And so Bernard well concludeth Itaque de ipso vides sed non ipsum Therefore in this life thou seest somewhat of God but not God himselfe QUEST XLVII Whether the Angels nâ—w or the soules of men shall fully see the Divine Substance in the next life THat the Saints in the next world shall see God the Apostle is an evident witnesse that when hee appeareth we shall be like him for wee shall see him as he â—s wee shall see him after a more cleare manner than either Moses saw him in the mount or our parents before their fall But even then we shall not bee able fully to comprehend the divine substance of God we shall see him qualis est sed non quantum est as he is but not all that he is Bucanus 1. Deus vere incomprehensibilis dicitur God is said truly to be incomprehensible therefore hee cannot of the creature be comprehended Nec etiam Angelicae naturae comprehensibilis est No hee cannot be comprehended of the Angelicall nature for then he were not simply incomprehensible Alcuinus 2. Chrysostome concludeth as much Ne supernas virtutes Deum posse videre That the high powers of the Angels cannot see God out of that place Isai. 6.2 where it is said that the Seraphim with two of their wings covered their face Cum de Seraphim audis oculos avertisse pinnas visui obduxisse c. when thou hearest that the Seraphim turned away their eyes and drew their wings over their sight c. Nihil aliud docet nisi ejus cognitionem integram non potuisse recipere c. It teacheth nothing else but that they were not capable of the full knowledge of God neither durst behold his most perfect substance c. If then the Angels cannot comprehend the Divine Essence much lesse the spirits of men As Aleniâ—us inferreth Quamvis usque ad aqualitatem Angelicam humana post resurrectionem natura perficiat videra tamen essentiam ejus plene non valet Although our humane nature should attaine after the resurrection to the equalitie of Angels yet it should not be able fully to see Gods essence So also Calvin Licet Angeli excellentiore modo c. Although the Angels are said to see Gods face after a more excellent manner than men yet they are not capable of his infinite greatnesse which would swallow them up quast ex novo Testamento 3. Augustine also urgeth that place Ioh. 1.8 No man hath seene God at any time the onely begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of his Father hath declared him Sinus Patris quid est nisi affectus in châ—â—iâ—ati veri Patris per naturae unionem in filium What is the bosome of the Father but the affection of true charitie of the Father by the union of nature toward the Sonne c. Whereupon it followeth that the Sonne only who is of the same substance and nature with the Father hath seene him But the soules and spirits of the Saints are not in the bosome of God nor of the same substance therefore they cannot see God in his divine nature 4. Further Bernard thus inferreth upon that place 1 Ioh. 3.2 We shall see him as he is for wee shall bee like him Non aliud est videre sicuti est quam esse sicuti est It is no other thing to see him as he is than to be as he is c. But we shall not bee altogether like unto God only in some sort therefore wee shall not see God in his nature perfectly or altogether 5. Therefore whereas the same Bernard saith Talis visio non est vita praesentis c. Such a vision to see God in his nature is not in this life present but is reserved for the time to come c. And Augustine Promittitur sanctis in alia vita That fight is promised to the Saints in the next life c. they must bee understood to speake by way of comparison that in the next life wee shall see God in his owne nature that is more fully and clearely than we can see him here not that indeed
if it be fervent Iam. 5.16 4. Observ. Spirituall things first to be begged in our prayers Vers. 18. SHew me thy glorie Ferus here giveth this note Moses ut plurimum spiritualia petit Moses doth for the most part aske spirituall things Which teacheth us that in all our requests wee should principally beg those things at the hands of God which concerne our soules as our blessed Saviour saith First seeke the Kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and all these things shall bee ministred unto you 5. Observ. Against the feare of death Vers. 20. NO man shall see me and live Then after death and this life ended wee shall see God Borrhaius hereupon well noteth Quam preciosa res sit mors animalis hominis c. What a precious thing the death of the bodie is which bringeth us to see God as S. Paul saith I desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ Philip. 1.23 Death then of a faithfull man is not to be feared CHAP. XXXIV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth the reconciliation it selfe of the Lord with his people consisting of three parts 1. The signes of this reconciliation going before to vers 8. 2. The substance of the reconciliation it selfe to vers 29. 3. The signes which followed after Moses was come downe 1. There are two signes of this reconciliation The first is externall and visible the preparing of the two tables of stone 1. Commanded to be made by the Lord vers 1. 2. With the manner of Moses comming up and the reverent behaviour of the people in the meane time vers 3. 3. And Moses obedience vers 4. The second is spirituall in the proclayming of the Lords name either shewing his substance Iehovah or his properties mercie toward the righteous or vengeance toward the wicked to vers 7. with the effect Moses humbling of himselfe vers 8. 2. The reconciliation consisteth of Moses humble suite to the Lord vers 9. and the Lords gracious answer wherein the Lord sheweth what he will doe for his people v. 10 11. then what he requireth of them where are propounded first morall lawes concerning the avoiding of idolatrie which are 〈◊〉 in number to vers 17. then ceremoniall which are three 1. Of their anniversarie and weekly feasts namely the Sabbath vers 18 21 22 23. 2. Of their first fruits of their cattell vers 19 20. and of their increase vers 29. 3. Of the manner of their sacrifices not to be offered with leaven vers 26. 3. The signes following are two first the bringing of the second tables with their writing by the Lord and Moses preparation thereunto by his fortie dayes fast vers 28 29. The second is the shining of Moses face where is described 1. The manner thereof vers 29. 2. The effects the astonishment of the people vers 30. 3. The remedie which Moses used which was double the inviting and calling of the people to come unto him vers 31 32. and the covering of his face vers 33. when he put it off when he went in to speake with God vers 34. and when hee put it on when he came out unto the people vers 35. 2. The divers readings Vers. 6. Iehovah Iehovah strong I. Iehovah Iehovah God B.G. cum caeter It seemeth rather to be an appellative than a proper name of the Lord here because of the distinction Rebia over Iehovah which separateth it from the sentence following Vers. 7. Not making the wicked innocent B.G.V.I.S. better than leaving one innocent B. or with whom none is by himselfe innocent L. See the reason hereof quest 11. Vers. 10. Behold I will make a covenant before all the people I will doe mervailes I. better than I will make a covenant before all the people and I will worke B.G. cum cater for there is a distinction at covenant and it is in the Hebrew I will worke not and I will worke Vers. 30. His face shined B.G.A.P. or streamed V. was glorious S. the brightnesse thereof was multiplied C. not cornuta erat was hornie L. See afterward the question upon this verse Vers. 33. When Moses had made an end of comming c. hee put a covering I. or So Moses made an end c. and had put a covering c. G. better than when he had made an end c. he put a covering V.L.S.C. it is better translated in the preterpluperfectense for then Moses had most need in respect of the peoples infirmitie to put a vaile upon his face when he spake unto them See the 51. qu. following 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Wherefore the second tables were given Vers. 1. HEw thee two tables of stone 1. The Lord commandeth two tables of stone to bee prepared that it might bee a signe of his perfect reconciliation with the people in these respects 1. Because by this appeared that the Lord purposed not to destroy them for then he would not have given them a law and this was a signe that God would goe before them and be their guide still because he was their spirituall guide in giving them direction by his law Tostat. qu. 1. 2. And seeing the Arke was appointed to receive and keepe the tables of stone it shewed that the Lord purposed that whatsoever he had before prescribed concerning the making of the Tabernacle should stand Cajetan 3. And that he willeth the like tables in all respects to be made he thereby signifieth that he would have all things to returne to their former state Simler 2. But though God returned in grace unto them yet in that he prepareth not these tables as he did the first but willeth Moses to provide them he would have aliquod pâ—â—na vestigium rostare therein some marks of their punishment to remaine Ac si sanato vulnere manerâ—t â—â—catrix as though the scar remained after the healing of the wound Calvin 3. But the people are not sprinkled againe with bloud as they were at the first as neither now they which fall after Baptisme are baptised againe but it sufficed onely those things to be restored by repentance which were decayed by their transgression Ferus QUEST II. Why the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee HEw thee 1. R. Salomon doth gather hereupon because Moses is bid to hew unto himselfe c. that the Lord shewed a quarrie of Saphir stone whereout Moses hewed the tables and so he is willed to hew unto himselfe two tables of stone that is to his commoditie for Moses he saith became very rich by the fragments that were left in hewing of the tables But seeing no such thing is mentioned in Scripture nor yet by Iosephus who was more ancient than R. Salomon it is rather to be thought to be one of his fables Lyran. and beside they lay an unjust and untrue imputation upon Moses as though he intended and respected his owne profit whereas all his courses shew the contrarie that hee sought still the good
5. Burgensis thus understandeth it that the Lord holdeth not the innocent in the remission of their sinne to be innocent in respect of some punishmet which may remaine But daily experience sheweth the contrary that God multa peccata impunita praeâ—erit doth leave many sinnes unpunished at all neither doth the punishment remaine the sinne being once pardoned Calvin 6. Oleaster giveth this sense Vere innocentem ita percutiet c. Sometime hee will smite or correct the innocent as though he were not innocent as he sheweth by the example of Iob lest God might seeme to be unjust in afflicting the righteous But if God should be said in the same action and at the same time to absolve and not to absolve it would include a contradiction 7. Wherefore the best interpretation is that which the Septuagint follow 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the guilty he will not purifie so that here two Hebraismes must be observed first the word is iterated and repeated In absolving I will not absolve to shew the certainty of the thing that is nullo modo absolvam I will by no meanes absolve Iun. Secondly I will not absolve that is punio I doe or will punish Vatabl. And further here must be supplied the word sontem the guiltie I will not absolve Iun. Calvin Gallas Pelarg. As the like place is found Ierem. 46.28 venakeh lo enakeh in setting thee free I will not set thee free that is will not hold thee altogether innocent but will punish thee So also Ierem. 25.19 In being innocent should yee be innocent where the same word is doubled the meaning is they should not be altogether innocent Calvin 8. Calvin also propoundeth another sense because nikkah sometime signifieth to cut off it may be thus interpreted succidendo non succidam in cutting off I will not cut off and so it may be a reason of the former sentence that God will forgive sinnes and not cut off the sinners altogether But he preferreth rather the former interpretation for the other sentence ending with a perfect distinction sheweth that the sentence following hath no dependance of it QUEST XII What the Lord visiteth for in the posteritie of the wicked Vers. 7. VIsiting the iniquity c. 1. Lest God having hitherto proclaimed his mercie might be thought not to regard the sinnes of men the Lord now addeth that he is also a visiter and punisher of sinne upon the wicked and their posterity Ferus 2. And by sinne here is understood neither the act of sinne which cannot be transmitted over unto other but being a transitory thing resteth in the doer nor the fault which only goeth with the act nor the blot which is only in the soule of the sinner and offender nor yet the guilt for if the children were guilty of their fathers sinnes then they should for the same be everlastingly punished therefore by sinne is meant the punishment of sinne which is extended to their posterity Tostat. qu. 8. 3. And God usually punisheth the fathers but unto the fourth generation as the Amorites and Amalekites were punished after 400. yeeres which expired in the fourth generation Gen. 15. vers 13 16. Oleaster QUEST XIII How the children are punished for their fathers sinnes Vers. 7. THe iniquity of the fathers upon the children c. In deciding of this question how the sonnes are punished for their fathers sinnes it must be considered whether the punishment bee inflicted by man or by God 1. If by man the punishment bee imposed it is either in the losse onely of temporall things or in death the children may justly be deprived of temporall things as of possessions privileges honours for the transgression of their parents As by humane Lawes treason against the Prince or Common-wealth is punished with death in the offenders and losse of honours and goods in their posterity But the punishment of death cannot be inflicted upon the children for their fathers offences as a rule is given in Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers 2. If the punishment be inflicted by the Lord it is either eternall or temporall first eternall punishment is laid upon none but upon the party that sinneth The same soule that sinneth shall dye Eâ—ech 18.4 If it be temporall it consisteth either in the losse of some temporall benefit or of life if the first not onely little ones and infants as the Hebrewes thinke shall suffer for their fathers sinnes but even they which are of yeeres as the Israelites did beare the iniquity of their fathers forty yeeres in the desart and the Jewes great and small were afflicted in the Babylonian captivity but where the punishment of temporall death is decreed by the Lord there onely the infants are punished for their fathers sinnes as the children of the rebellious Cora Dathan and Abiram were swallowed up with their fathers the greater sort also perished in that destruction but then they were such as consented thereunto Tostat. quâ—st 9. So also Achan was stoned with his sonnes and daughters for the sacrilege by him commited where Tostatus thinketh that they were little ones because the greater sort were not privy to his sinne seeing he had hid the stollen things in the ground But it is more like that they were such as might give consent unto the sinne and conceale it and that the things were not hid without their privity Iun. Or for the greater detestation of that fact and the example of others this exemplary punishment might be inflicted upon them Osiander But here two exceptions may be taken unto Tostatus conclusions 1. That he maketh infants liable to those sinnes of the fathers which the Lord saith he will here visit to the third and fourth generation whereas onely those children which continue like haters of God as their fathers were and imitate their impiety are included in this commination as appeareth by that clause inserted in the second Commandement of them that hate me Againe when infants are cut off by death their owne originall sinne is sufficient cause thereof which bringeth death upon them and so infants are taken away not onely to the fourth generation but in other succeeding ages further off 2. He restraineth this generall speech visiting the iniquity of the fathers onely unto temporall punishments beside death whereas the Lords judgements are not to be limited to this or that kinde but sometime by corporall death sometime by other temporall punishments hee doth visit the iniquity of the wicked fathers in their evill posteritie QUEST XIV Why the posteritie of the wicked are punished for their fathers sinnes VNto the third and fourth generation There are foure answers usually made to shew the equity of this that the posterity of the wicked should be punished for their fathers sinnes 1. Because God that gave life may againe without any injustice require it againe Nulli facit injuriam occidendo quemcunque He doth no wrong by slaying of
oyle and other ceremonies and they hould it as a principle that it is not lawfull to say Masse in a Church not hallowed 2. By such ceremonies and rites they say religion and devotion is stirred up in mens minds 3. By such hallowing devils are expelled 4. Constantine when he had built a Chruch called thither the Nicene Fathers to consecrate it 5. Christ vouchsafed to be present at the dedication feast in Ierusalem Contra. As we condemne not a Christian dedication blessing and sanctifying of things without superstition as David dedicated his house which he had newly built Psal. 30. in the title which kind of sanctifying is done partly by prayer grounded upon Gods word as the Apostle sheweth 1 Timoth. 4.5 partly by the sober and right use of such things when they are employed to a good end as the Churches of Christians are hallowed and sanctified by the word of God and exercises of religion there used So yet such superstitious consecrations as with oyle tapers crossings and such like we utterlie condemne 1. There is no hallowing or sanctifying of any thing without the warrant of Gods word 1 Timoth. 4.5 but they have no word for such ceremonies to bee used 2. They make more account of their owne traditions than of Gods institution for every Priest may baptise but their Bishops onely hallow Churches 3. They commit idolatrie by this meanes in dedicating Churches to Saints and so take away part of Gods honour 4. They make these ceremonies a part of Gods worship and ascribe spirituall vertue unto them for they give indulgences and pardons of sinnes by the vertue of such hallowed Churches The former reasons are of no force 1. The typicall ceremonies of the Law such as was the anointing of the Tabernacle doe not bind us now they are abolished 2. True devotion and religion cannot be stirred up in the mind by humane rites and observations which are not grounded upon Gods word 3. By the same reason if by their anointing devils are driven out of Churches it were good that all houses and other places were anointed to drive away evill spirits but our Saviour sheweth that devils are cast out by prayer and fasting therefore not by such toyes 4. Constantines Church was consecrated by the prayers and thankesgiving of the Christian Bishops not by any such superstitious usages 5. The dedication of the Temple was a legall observation and concerneth us not now neither doth it follow because Christ observed it that it is to be kept still for he was also circumcised to shew his obedience to the Law Simlerus 3. Confut. That there is not in Orders imprinted an indeleble character Vers. 15. THe anointing shall bee a signe that the Priesthood shall be everlasting unto them Tostatus out of this place would inferre that in orders as likewise in Baptisme there is imprinted an indeleble character in the soule which can never be blotted out as these were but once anointed during their life to minister in the Priesthood qu. 4. Contra. 1. This place proveth no such thing for it is not spoken of the anointing of their persons which could be for no long continuance but of the anointing and consecrating of Aaron and his posteritie for the priesthood perpetually the anointing and consecrating of the Fathers could not print an indeleble character in their posteritie 2. This indeleble character or badge which they say is by Baptisme and Orders imprinted in the soule and can never be blotted out is but a device of their owne for what badge or marke of Iudas Apostleship could remaine when hee had betrayed his Master and manifestly shewed himselfe to be the child of perdition or what could be imprinted in Simon Magus soule by Baptisme of whom Saint Peter saith He had no part nor fellowship with them and his heart was not aright in the sight of God Act. 8.21 See more of this controversie Synops. Cont. 2. error 98. 4. Confut. Outward succession not alwaies required in the Ministerie Vers. 12. THou shalt bring Aaron and his sonnes c. The Romanists make this speciall exception against the Ministers of the Gospell that they can shew no lawfull succession which is required in an ordinarie calling nor yet miracles to prove their extraordinarie calling therefore they hold their calling to be none at all Contra. 1. Aaron was the Lords high Priest not by succession from any other but by consecration from Moses the civill governour at Gods appointment and so no doubt but Princes reformers of religion by their authoritie may establish Ministers and Preachers thereunto rightly called 2. Everie extraordinarie calling was not confirmed by signes as divers of the Prophets are not found to have wrought miracles 3. And though it were granted that the calling of the first Ministers of the Gospell were in respect of the manner extraordinarie yet because for the matter and doctrine it is not new but the same which the Apostles preached there need no miracles seeing the same faith was before ratified and sealed by the miracles wrought by the Apostles Simlerus See Synops. Centur. 1. err 20. 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Not to come before the Lord without due preparation Vers. 31. THey washed their hands By this ceremonie was signified that none should assemble or draw neere unto God with impure and unwashen affections Oleaster As Moses also was bid to put off his shooes when hee drew neere unto the fire burning in the bush So the Apostle will have men to examine themselves before they come unto the Lords table 1 Cor. 11.28 2. Observ. Gods house is to be reverenced Vers. 34. THe glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle God shewed such glorious signes of his presence to the end his Tabernacle should be the more reverenced of all Marbach As Iacob said Gen. 28.17 How fearefull is this place this is none other than the house of God So David also saith Psal. 5.7 In thy feare will I worship toward thy holy Temple 3. Observ. The greater gifts one hath the more hee should humble himselfe Vers. 35. SO Moses could not enter Moses the more familiarly the Lord vouchsafed to speake unto tanto se humiliorem praebet c. sheweth himselfe so much the more modest and humble he will not presume to enter into the Tabernacle where Gods presence was though at other times the Lord had admitted him to familiar conference This example teacheth men that the more excellent gifts they have they should so much more shew themselves humble and lowly Gallas As Saint Paul though he laboured more than all the Apostles yet confesseth He was the least of the Apostles and not worthie to be called an Apostle Ves. 36. VVhen the cloud ascended the children of Israel went forward Oleaster hereupon giveth this good note Beatus homo quem direxeris Domine qui non se movet nisi signum ei ostenderis c. Happie is the man whom thou directest O Lord and who will not stirre
powder of the Idoll 59. qu. Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deepely offended about the golden Calfe 60. qu. How farre Moses fact herein is to bee imitated 61. qu. How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of his sinne 62. qu. Why Idolatrie is called a great sinne 63. qu. Why Moses onely rebuked Aaron and forbeareth further punishment 64. qu. What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not 65. qu. Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainely that he made the Calfe 66. qu. In what sense the people are said to be naked 67. qu. Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was 68. qu. VVhether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie 69. qu. Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them 70. qu. VVhether the Levites did not make some difference among the people as they went and killed 71. qu. VVhy none came unto Moses but onely of the tribe of Levi. 72. qu. Of the number of them which were slaine whether they were three thousand or twentie three thousand as the vulgar Latine readeth 73. qu. How the Levites are said to consecrate their hands 74. qu. Of the time when Moses came downe from the mount and when he returned againe 75. qu. VVhy Moses urgeth the greatnesse of their sinne 76. qu. Why Moses speaketh as it were doubtfully If I may pacifie him c. 77. qu. Why Moses againe intreateth the Lord seeing he was pacified before vers 14. 78. qu. What booke it was out of the which Moses wished to be raced 79. qu. How the Lord is said to have a booke 80. qu. VVhether any can indeed be raced out of the booke of life 81. qu. Of the two wayes whereby we are said to bee written in the booke of life 82. qu. VVhether Moses did well in wishing to bee raced out of the booke of life 83. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will put out of my booke 84. qu. What day of visitation the Lord meaneth here 85. qu. When the Lord plagued the people for the Calfe 86. qu. Of the difference betweene the act of sinne the fault staine and guilt 87. qu. How God may justly punish twice for one sinne Questions upon the three and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest At what time the Lord uttered his commination 2. qu. Whether the narration of Moses Tabernacle in this Chapter be transposed 3. qu. How God saith he will send his Angell and yet not himselfe goe with them 4. qu. Why the Lord saith hee will not goe with them himselfe lest he should consume them 5. qu. What ornaments they were which the people laid aside 6. qu. Why in publike repentance they used to change their habit 7. qu. Why the Lord thus spake unto Moses 8. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will come upon thee 9. qu. VVhether the people put off their ornaments twice 10. qu. In what sense the Lord saith That I may know 11. qu. Why it is said They laid aside their good rayment From the mount Horeb. 12. qu. What Tabernacle Moses removed out of the campe 13. qu. Why Moses pitched his Tabernacle without the host 14. qu. How farre from the campe this Tent was removed 15. qu. VVhat is called the Tent of the Congregation 16. qu. Why the people stood up unto Moses and looked after him 17. qu. Whether there were two clouds or one to cover and conduct the host 18. qu. Why the Lord spake to Moses in a cloud 19. qu. How the Lord spake to Moses face to face 20. qu. Why Joshua is here called a young man 21. qu. Whether is here understood Joshua not to have departed from the Tabernacle 22. qu. When the Lord thus said to Moses 23. qu. How Moses desireth to know whom the Lord would send with them seeing hee had promised before to send his Angell 24. qu. Whether the sole government and leading of the people were here given to Moses without the administration of Angels as Burgensis thinketh 25. qu. When and where God thus said to Moses 26. qu. How the Lord is said to know Moses by name 27. qu. What Moses meaneth saying Shew me the way 28. qu. In what sense Moses saith That I may finde grace c. which he was assured of 29. qu. What is understood by Gods presence 30. qu. What rest the Lord promised to Moses 31. qu. Whether Moses here rested in Gods answer or begged any thing further 32. qu. Why Moses addeth Carrie us not hence seeing even in that place they had need of Gods protection 33. qu. Why it is added people upon the earth People upon the earth Gen. 25. 34. qu. Whether Moses desired to see the very divine essence of God 35. qu. VVhat imboldned Moses to make this request 36. qu. Whether Moses shewed any infirmitie in this request to see Gods glorie 37. qu. What the Lord meaneth by All my good 38. qu. How the Lord is said to passe by and why 39. qu. How the Lord is said to proclaime his name 40. qu. Why these words are added I will shew mercie c. 41. qu. Why the Lord is here doubled 42. qu. Of the divers kinds of mercie which the Lord sheweth 43. qu. Of the divers visions and sights of God 44. qu. Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the bodie in this life 45. qu. Whether wee shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life 46. qu. Whether the divine essence can bee seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life 47. qu. VVhether the Angels now or the soules of men shall fully see the divine substance in the next life 48. qu. VVhether Moses had a sight of the divine essence 49. qu. Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live 50. qu. VVhat place this was in the rocke which the Lord here speaketh of 51. qu. How the Lord is said to cover Moses with his hand 52. qu. VVhy the Lord covered Moses with his hand 53. qu. VVhy the Lord put Moses in the cleft of the rocke 54. qu. VVhat is here understood by the Lords back-parts 55. qu. VVhat manner of visible demonstration this was here shewed unto Moses 56. qu. VVhere the Lord promised that Moses should see his back-parts Questions upon the foure and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest VVherefore the second tables were given 2. qu. VVhy the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee 3. qu. VVhether the Lord or Moses wrote in these tables and why 4. qu. VVhether Moses was to bee readie the next morning and why 5. qu. VVhy none are suffered to come up now with Moses 6. qu. VVhy their cattell are forbidden to come neere the mount 7. qu. VVho is said here to descend and how 8. qu. VVho proclaimed the name Jehovah God or Moses 9. qu. VVhy the name
and ministerie was to be executed 3. And there betweene the doore and the Altar was the brasen Laver where Aaron and the Priests were to wash themselves before they put on the holy garments thither therefore are they called because there they were to be washed with water Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST V. Why Aaron and the rest are washed and how Vers. 4. ANd wash them with water 1. Not with common or every water but with that which was in the brasen Laver chap. 30.18 Iun. 2. But here we must consider that alwayes the order of time is not set downe in Scripture in setting downe the storie of such things as were done for the brasen Laver wherein they were to be washed is afterward appointed to bee made chap. 30. Tostat. quast 2. 3. They were washed not onely their hands and feet as in their daily ministerie chap. 40.33 but in their whole bodie as thinketh Rab. Salomon because their first consecration required a more solemne oblation and washing than their daily ministration And like as the oyle was powred upon Aarons head but ran downe along upon his beard and other parts so it is like the water was applied to his whole bodie Lyran. Tostat. And this washing was a figure of Christs baptisme who went into the water when he was baptised Matth. 3. Simler 4. It was fit they should be washed before they put on the holy garments both for decencie and comelinesse that the soile of their bodie might be cleansed before they applied the precious and glorious apparell and for signification that they might thereby be admonished to cleanse and purge themselves from their sins and corruptions QUEST VI. Of the Priestly apparell which Aaron put on and why the girdle is omitted Vers. 5. PVt upon Aaron the tunicle c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that this was the linen garment which was common to Aaron and the inferiour Priests But it is shewed before chap. 28.39 that the high Priests linen coat was embroidered and so were not the other Priests linen coats 2. Tostatus also hath another conceit that the high Priest did put on this linen coat supervestes communes upon his common wearing apparell qu. 2. But that is not like for Aaron put off his cloaths when he was washed and then he is immediatly cloathed with his Priestly apparell 3. Because no mention is here made of the girdle Cajetan thinketh that cingulum erat commune pontifici sacerdotibus that there was one common girdle for the high Priest and the rest and therefore afterward vers 9. mention is made once for all of the girdles of the Priests But it is evident chap. 28.39 that the high Priests girdle was embroidered of needle worke whereas the common girdles were onely of linen Levit. 16.4 This rather is to be supplied out of Levit. 8.8 where he is girded with a girdle upon his coat and so Oleaster thinketh well that Aaron hath seven ornaments put upon him beside the linen breeches the tunicle the robe the Ephod the pectorall the girdle the miter and golden crowne 4. And whereas it is said and shall cleanse them with the broidered gard of the Ephod Tostatus following Iosephus thinketh that this was the girdle wherewith his garments were girded all together qu. 2. whereas it was the broidered gard which was in the nether part of the Ephod the laps whereof below did gird the Priest in the waste as a girdle Iun. Lippoman Simler Vatab. QUEST VII How Aaron was anointed and with what Vers. 7. ANd thou shalt take the anointing oyle 1. Though it be called oile yet was it more than oile for it was a precious ointment made of Rosin Myrrh Cinamom and other things as it is prescribed chap. 30. Iun. 2. The high Priest was anointed in his head but it is not expressed how the inferiour Priests were anointed it is like but in their hands though Tostatus useth but a slender conjecture to prove it because now their Bishops use to be anointed in the head the inferiour Priests but in the hands to signifie that the one receive a superioritie in their consecration the other but a kinde of service and ministerie for what warrant have they to use the Jewish rites and ceremonies under the Gospell in their consecrations 3. Now because it would seeme an uncomely thing that all Aarons garments should be besmeared with this ointment if it had beene powred on Aarons head R. Salomon thinketh that Moses tooke his finger and dipped it in the oile and so strake it on Aarons forehead But the text is against his conceit both in this place because it is said and shalt powre it upon his head and likewise Psal. 133. where it is expressed that the ointment ran downe upon Aarons beard and so to the skirts of his cloathing Tostat. qu. 2. QUEST VIII How the ordinance of the Priesthood is said to be perpetuall Vers. 9. THe Priests office shall be theirs for a perpetuall law 1. Whereas the like phrase is used chap. 28.43 This shall be a law for ever c. which some restraine unto the particular precept of wearing linen breeches because the law of comelinesse and decencie is perpetuall here it is evident that it is generally meant of the exercising and execution of the whole Priesthood Calvin 2. Therefore this ordinance is said to be eternall and perpetuall in respect of the subject because it was to continue toto tempore quo durarent sacrificia all the time that the sacrifices were to continue the sacrifices then in Christ being determined for the Jewes themselves at this day forbeare to sacrifice nay they would chuse rather to die than offer sacrifice out of the land of Canaan and especially because they have no Tabernacle nor Temple where onely by the law they were to sacrifice the law of the Priesthood must also cease the sacrifices wherein the Priesthood was exercised being abolished Tostat. cap. 28. qu. 21. 3. Augustine giveth another reason why it is called perpetuall quia res significaret aeternas because it signified eternall things So also Gloss. interlin it is so called quia perpetuam futuram id est Christianam religionem significabat because it signified the Christian religion which should be perpetuall And Calvine also approveth this sense Hac vera est ceremoniarum perpetuitas c. This is the true perpetuitie of the ceremonies that they have their being in Christ the substance and truth of them QUEST IX The spirituall application of Aarons manner of consecration NOw this manner of consecrating of Aaron by offering sacrifices washing putting on the Priestly apparell in being anointed hath this signification 1. The presenting of the bullocke to be sacrificed Aspersionem designat sanguinis Domini nostri doth signifie the sprinkling of Christs bloud Beda The two rams doe set forth Christ ex anima corpore c. consisting in his humane nature of bodie and soule Strabus or they signifie duplicem populum c. the two people
the old and new Lippom. panes azymi munditiam vita the unleavened bread betokeneth the holinesse of life without the leaven of maliciousnesse as S. Paul expoundeth 1 Cor. 6. 2. The solemne washing of Aaron and his sons did signifie the Sacrament of Baptisme and as they doe not put on their garments untill first the filth of the flesh be washed away Sic nisi in Christo novi homines renaseantur So unlesse they become new men in Christ they are not admitted unto holy things Hierom. They which come unto God must first bee purged and cleansed from their sins Pelarg. And hereby more specially was signified in this solemne washing with water the publike Baptisme of Christ which though he needed not in respect of himselfe yet thereby he would consecrate that Sacrament for us Osiander 3. By the putting on of the Priestly garments after they were washed is signified the putting on of Christ cum tunicas polliceas deposuerimus after we have put off our old vestures Hierom. So Procopius applieth those words of the Apostle Put on the Lord Iesus Christ So also Pelarg. 4. By the oyle wherewith Aaron was annointed Beda understandeth Gratiam Spiritus sancti The grace of the Spirit And Hierom here applieth that saying of the Prophet David Psal. 45. God even thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes Therefore was Aaron onely annointed in the head and none of the rest because Christ received the Spirit beyond measure and the holy Ghost descended and lighted upon him when he was baptized Matth. 3. Osiander QUEST X. Why the Priests lay their hands upon the head of the beast Vers. 10. AAron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head c. 1. Augustine by this ceremonie understandeth the receiving of power Vt ipsi etiam aliquid consecrare possent that they also might consecrate afterward unto God So also Lyranus But because the people also did use to lay their hands upon their sacrifices which they brought Levit. 4. who received thereby no power to sacrifice this seemeth not to be the meaning 2. Iunius thus expoundeth it Quasi seipses sisterent sacrificarent Iehovae As though they did present themselves to bee sacrificed unto God yet not in their owne person but Christs But this cannot be the meaning for the former reason because the people did also lay on their hands who were therein no type of Christ that sacrificed himselfe for us 3. Some thinke that by this ceremonie in imposing of their hands they did resigne their right in that beast Tostat. Et destinarunt illud ut fieret sacrificium and ordained it to be a sacrifice Osiander 4. But there is more in it than so they hereby confesse that they were worthie to die in Gods justice for their sins Sed ex divina misericordia mors in animal transferebatur But by the divine mercie their death was transferred upon the beast Lyran. wherein Christ is lively shadowed forth who died for us Simler QUEST XI Of the divers kinds of sacrifices and why some kinde of beasts were taken for sacrifice and not other Vers. 11. SO thou shalt kill the calfe c. 1. There were three kinde of sacrifices which were usually offered the first was called holocaustum a burnt offering because it was wholly consumed upon the Altar and this kinde was offered specially ad reverentiam majestatis for reverence of the divine majestie to testifie our obedience and service The second was the sacrifice for sin whereof part was burned upon the Altar part was for the Priests use unlesse it were a sin offering for the Priest or the people in which cases all was consumed on the Altar The third sort were peace offerings which were offered in signe of thanksgiving for some benefit received or to be received whereof part was burnt upon the Altar part was for the Priest and the rest was for the offerer Thom. 2. Now although there were many cleane birds and beasts yet there were onely two kinde of the one the pigeon and turtle dove and three of the other bullocks sheepe and goats which were taken for sacrifice whereof Philo giveth this reason because both among the fowles and beasts these are of the meekest and mildest nature the pigeon and turtle dove and amongst the beasts these three sorts are tamest when we see that whole heards and flocks of them may be driven by a boy and they have neither pawes or clawes to hurt as ravenous beasts nor yet armed with teeth to devoure wanting the upper row wherein appeareth the harmlesse disposition of these creatures Philo addeth further that these beasts of all other are most serviceable unto mans use sheepe and goats for cloathing and food and bullocks beside the use of their flesh for meat and their skins for leather they serve with their labour in the tilling of the ground To these may a third reason bee added because the land of Canaan most abounded with these kinds of fowles and beasts they are prescribed for sacrifice And a fourth also may be this they were not to offer of wilde beasts because they could not easily bee had and hardly are they gotten alive for which cause they were not appointed to offer fishes which could not so easily be taken and very hardly alive but their sacrifices must be brought alive Riber 3. Now in the consecration of Aaron and his sons all these sacrifices are offered a bullocke for a sinne offering one ramme for a burnt offering and another for a peace offering QUEST XII Why the bloud was laid upon the horns of the Altar Vers. 12. THou shalt take of the bloud and put it upon the hornes c. 1. The bloud here was not used to confirme any league or covenant betweene God and his people as chap. 24. for in that case first the words and articles of the covenant were read before the bloud was sprinkled and beside each partie betweene whom the covenant was made were besprinkled not onely the Altar which represented God but the people also But here neither of these is performed there is no covenant rehearsed neither are the people sprinkled with the bloud 2. There was then another use beside this of the sprinkling of bloud which was to purge and cleanse and so to pacifie and appease as this reason is yeelded why they should not eat the bloud because the Lord had given it to be offered upon the Altar to be an atonement for their soules Levit. 17.11 And not onely the Altar of burnt offering was cleansed by bloud but the whole Tabernacle the high Priest in the day of reconciliation sprinkled the bloud upon the Mercie seat and before the Mercie seat the Altar and Tabernacle also to purge them from the sins and trespasses of the people Levit. 16.16 Therefore the Apostle saith Almost all things by the law are purged with bloud Heb. 9.22 The bloud of the sacrifices then was put upon