born of the Virgin bread into his body wine into his blood and that this consecrated Host being offered to God by the Priest is a Propitiatory Sacrifice for the Quick and the Dead and that men are thereby reconciled to God and that it must be worshipped and carried about in Processions and that such as denyed the same should be Anathema accursed And not only this Council but also the Lateran Council Pope Nicholas Pope Leo Pope Innocent Pope Pius the fourth Pope Victor Pope Honorius c. taught the same for denying of this Doctrine many have been burned to Ashes as Ecclesiastical Writers testifie Summa Concil et Pontif. Oruphrius Pope Innocent the third invented Pixes and Boxes as 't is said to put the sacramental Bread in Again such Reverence came to be given to consecrated Bread without when the bread of life was turned from yea and the true Worship of God in Spirit and in Truth that a Council put out a Canon forbidding Women to receive the Eucharist that is the consecrated Host with bare Hands Concil Antisid Summa Concil et Pontif. Roman-Catholicks tell of a Miracle of an Ass that left his Provender to worship the consecrated Host on such Conceit as this saith Mede the Doctrine of Transubstantiation is grounded Of Aderation given to the Consecrated Host When it came to be believed that bread after consecration was the very Christ the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the World then Popes and Councils ordained that at certain times it should be lifted up above the Priests Head and that at the heaving of it up a Bell should be rung and that all that hear it s found should not only do low Obeysance but fall down on their Knees and with Hands lifted up towards Heaven worship it and say Pater Noster or some other Prayer they ordained also that it should be born to the Sick with great Reverence and that with lighted Caudles though at noon day for the same they instituted a solemn Feast called Corpus Christi Day on which the consecrated Host is born about lifted up and worshipped Further 'T was enjoyned That if a Priest were called in the Night season to housel the Sick and there spent all his Hosts as he came Homeward he was to put out the Candle left the people should adore the empty Tabernacle such as read the Canons of Pope Honorius Gregory the ninth Pope Innocent Pope Clement the fifth their Lives and Councils in their dayes they may see these things In France saith Heylin in his Survey of the Estate of France a couple of Priests carries the Host under a Canopy before it goeth a Bell continually tinkling all in Houses perceiving their God to go by make some shew of Reverence all in the Streets with bended Knees and elevated Hands do it Honour to the Protestants it is as a Watch-Peal to be gone left for their â—â—reverence they be knocked down in this saith he is a smatch of Turcism who when they hear the Cryers bawling in their Streets they fall prostrate on the Ground where-ever they are and kiss it thrice so perform their Devotions to Mahomet their carrying it about the Streets hath a touch of Judaism from the Levites carrying about the Ark on their Shoulders their Adoration of it is especially from Gentilism for never any people but Heathen saith he afforded divine Honours to things inanimate Thus when Heavenly Salt Wisdom from above was lost within multitudes of Inventious swarmed into Apostatized Christendom Lanctantius in his first Book of Institutions taxed the Gentiles of Ridiculousness who worshipped Jupiter as a God Cam cundem tamen Saturno et Rhea gentium confiterentur seeing they so perfectly knew his Original much more are they to be blamed who impose upon the peole the Adoration of a Dead God a principis non ita fuit it was not so from the the beginning Heylins Survey c. Christ said unto his Disciples Take eat this is my Body this denotes signifies be tokens my Body what bread and wine is to the body of man that is Christ the Bread of Life his Flesh his Blood to the Soul the Doctrine of Bread-worship Invocation of Saints Worshipping of Images and many other pestilent Errors have steamed into the Church from the mis-understanding and mis-interpretation of Scriptures saith Rainold in his Orations Paul who had the Mind of Christ a feeling sense of Christs Institution said thrice in a Breath as I may say that the Bread after it was blessed or Thanks were given which is called Consecration remained Bread he called it so and he called it what it was his words imply not his belief of Transubstantiation but expresly the contrary 1 Cor. 11.26 27 28. Again Mat. 26. Christ took the Cup and gave Thanks and bad them drink saying This is my Blood that is signifies betokens or holds out my Blood not his Blood after Consecration but a Shadow of his Blood his own words immediately following evidently demonstrates this I will not drink henceforth of the Fruit of the Vine he calls what was in the Cup the Fruit of the Vine now his Blood was not the Fruit of the Vine but Wine is the Fruit of the Vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Fathers Kingdom saith he now whoever say that Bread and Wine after Consecration is Christ's Flesh and Blood consider this Did Christ cat his own Body Did he drink his own Blood you say consecrated Bread and Wine is Christ's Flesh and Blood and Christ eat and drank thereof what Consquences would follow this Doctrine Christ his Flesh his Blood is hid from apostatized Ages and Generations his Word became Flesh living Food Food of living Souls Christ is the living Bread which came down from Heaven his Flesh is the Bread that he gives who came from Heaven given for the Life of the World but perishing Bread and Wine though consecrated a thousand times came not from Heaven this said he who also said The Flesh profiâ—â—eth nothing it is the Spirit that quickeneth and the words that I speak unto you they are Spirit and they are Life John 6. And whereas Paul said to the Corinthians As often as ye eat this Bread and Drink this Cup ye do shew the Lords Death till he come 1 Cor. 11.26 Now if the consecrated Host were Christ then he were come then how is it done till he come and were it proper to say till he come when he is already come Christ was obedient to Death even the Death of the Cross the Corinthians were in the Cross in the daily dying having Tastes of the eternal Inheritance and in the dying he comes with perfect Conquest abolishing Death and bringing Life and Immortality to Light And Paul said This do ye as often as ye drink it in remembrance of me this plainly shews that consecrated Bread and Wine is not his Body where his Body is there is no need of
first telling them that all Power was given unto him in Heaven and in Earth then he informed them what their Work should be First To Disciple the Nations that is by the Power of their Ministry to bring them to be Disciples of Christ to learn of him to know his Teaching to take up his Yoke to bear the same to learn Obedience to come into the self-denying state of Discipleship so the word â—riginally imports saith Bullenger Zwinglius Leigh Fisher c. Trapp Secondly He told his Disciples that they should baptize or dip the Nations not in the Name but into the Name of the Father c. Dell Fisher Hammon Trapp And what is it to baptize or dip into the Name of the Father Even the same that Paul spoke of when he said By one spirit we are all baptâ—zed into one body 1 Cor. 12.13 So that it is the Spirit that baptizeth into one Body as also into the Name of the Father to be a living Member of that Body whereof Christ is the Head 't is the Spirit that effects this not visible Water Furthermore Christ in these words commanded not his Disciple to turn back to John's Ministration to dip them in Jordan or in any other River or in a Bowl Bason or Font but into the Name of the Father c. which is no other thing then by the Power of the Spirit whereof they were Ministers to bring them into the Power of God to have fellowship with him through the Spirit Now the Name of God is his Vertue or Power as In my Name they shall cast out Devils that is in my Power this Zwinglius on this place observes Teachers in Sprinkling of Infants which they call Baptism use this Scripture as a Form of words saying I baptize thee in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost which thing the Apostles did not which undoubtedly they would have done if Christ had commanded it as an absolute Form Further Zwinglius said of this place Christus Jesus baptismi formulam qua uteremur his verbis non instituit quemadmodum Theologi hactenus falso tradiderunt that is Christ Jesus did not in these words institute a form of Baptism which we should use as Divines have hitherto falsly taught This was the Testimony of Zwinglius who in his Day was a great Opposer of Anabaptists Lib de bap pag. 66. Tom. 2. oper Piscator on the same place peaks fully to the same purpose Again This place cannot be meant of Water-baptism because Paul thanked God he had baptized none but such and such for saith he Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospel 1 Cor. 1.14 15 16 17. yet he fulfilled that Mat. 28. he preached the Gospel in a circuit from Jerusalem to Illyricum and many by his Ministry were discipled brought into the state of Disciples to learn of Christ yea and into the Name of God that is into his Power many were baptized into the Name of the Father as his Sons into the Name of his Son as his Jewels and Ransomed Ones into the Name of the Holy Spirit as his Sanctified Ones these knew the One Baptism by One Spirit into One Body Why doth Paul thank God that he baptized none but such and such 1st Because he saw them idolizing and jangling about it which he knew to be a thing not of absolute Necessity not a Command of Christ but used or born with for a season for the sake of the Weak and others in reference to Iohn's Ministry if he had commonly practised it before from his Practice they might have been strengthned in their Thoughts about it he being a great Apostle Secondly He thanks God that he baptized none but such and such And why Because he was not sent of Christ so to do Thirdly Lest some should say that he baptized in his own Name rather into his own Name as the Greek Copies and divers English Translations render it seeing from Christ in whose Name he came he had no Command so to do What Ambassadour of an earthly Prince commissioned to treat with a forreign Prince about especial Matters if he fail in reference to the Contents of his Commission and treat about Matters whereto he was not commissioned can he expect that his Prince's Favour should be unto him as Dew upon the Grass or rather that his Wrath should be as the Roaring of a Lyon So if that in Matth. 28. had been a Command obligatory to all Gospel-Ministers to Baptize with outward Water could Paul have Cause of Rejoycing in that he fulfilled â—ot the Command Consider this and judge Cbj. That in Mat. 28. must needs relate to outward Water for the Apostles could not Baptize with the Spirit Answ Who as thus reason are ignorant of the Ministry of Christ which is a Ministry of the Spirit for all that are sent of Christ through their Ministry people are turned from Darkness to Light and translated from Death to Life where Christ's Baptism is known and this they do as indued with Power from above John 17.18 As thou hast sent me into the World saith Christ even so send I them And must not Christ and his Ministers be found in one Work even to turn people from Satan's power to the Power of God where the spiritual Baptism is While Peter preached to Cornelius and his Kinsmen and near Friends the holy Spirit fell on them Acts 10. wherein Christ's Baptism is Moreover Paul laid his Hands on certain and the holy Spirit fell upon them Acts 19. even that Spirit wherewith Christ baptizeth Yea and in Acts 26. Paul gave a Relation of his Call as also of his Work I saith the Lord have appeared unto thee for this purpose to make thee a Minister And what was his Work In preaching to the Gentiles to open their Eyes to turn them from Darkness to Light from the power of Satan usto God that they may receive Forgiveness of Sins and an Inheritance among them that are sanctified by Faith in Christ Iesus Paul declared his Commission to preach and the Effects of it was glorious Conversion Faith Remission of Sins Sanctification Salvation he took not Flesh and Blood into counsel evil Counsellors for the Soul but silencing Flesh entertaining a noble Resolution he put himself into the hand of God saying in effect Te duce vera sequor To duce falsa nego Consider Paul in and through the Virtue of him that sent him opened peoples Eyes and turned them from Darkness to Light and from Satan's power unto God Were not these Witnesses of the Spirit 's Baptism Yes for without the Spirit and its Baptism none come to God nor out of Satans power Thus Paul discipled the Gentiles that received his Testimony and baptized them in and through the Spirit into the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Spirit and this was and is done not by Water-baptism without but by the Spirit 's
denyes Christ and his Baptism with the Spirit and sets John and his Water-baptism in his Throne thou stumblest at the Rock the Day-Star thou knowest not nor the Sun of Righteousness risen and the Shadows flown away Now if any scruple this Scripture and simply desires to be resolved whether Baptism he preaches up the Mouth of Paul in another place may inform thee 1 Cor. 12.13 By one Spirit we are all baptized into one Body Here thou may'st be satisfied he tells thee there is One Baptism he also informs thee what that one Baptism is not into Iordan not into a Bowl Bason or Font but by the one Spirit into one Body So to every seeing Eye Iohn's Water-baptism is here laid aside his Ordinance thereto repeal'd Now it being that Paul was not sent to baptize with Water and that he preached up one baptism and that of the Spirit it necessarily follows that whom he baptized with Water he did it by Permission in reference to Iohn's Ministration Using and Instituting are two things the Apostles Condiscended where they never Commanded And whereas some alledge The Eunuch said unto Philip Here is Water what doth hinder me to be baptized Philip said If thou believe with all thy heart thou mayest Acts 8.36 37. He saith not thou must he held it not to be of absolute Necessity so condescended as before The holy Spirit which seals up to God was received without Water-baptism or Rantism where then is the Necessity of Dipping or Sprinkling Now in reference to what was last objected several Testimonies consonant to what I here assert might be produced and that of such who were not of mean Account in their Day their Works by many yet had in esteem The use of the Ceremonial Law saith Wollebius in his common places was profitabâ—e before the Death of Christ after his Death unto the Promulgation or spreading abroad of the Gospel it 〈◊〉 as indifferent but after the Promulgation or clear publishing of the Gospel the observation of Ceremonies is not only unwholsome and unprofitable but also deadly Hence Paul at the beginning would have Timothy Circumcised because of the weakness of the Jews Acts 16.3 but after that the Gospel was more fully Preached he would not yield that Titus should be Circumcised Gal. 2. And saith he ' The Observation of Iewish Ceremonies would now be nothing but a denying of the Coming and Death of Chrâ—st So there was a time say I when Iordan-washing was profitable there was a time when it was indifferent in which time the Apostles made some use of it and there is a time when it may be said to be Antichristian in pleading for the outward Washing when the Laver of Regeneration filled with the Water of Life for the clensing of the inward Man is set open and when performed in that Spirit which is at Enmity unto Christ Wilfred a Presbyter reasoning with Bishop Coleman about the time of the celebration of Easter said God forbid we shou'd accuse the Apostle of Folly when he observed the Precepts of Moses the Church as yet Iudaizing in many things neither were the Apostles on a sudden able to abolish all Legal Observances which had been of Divine Institution On this account Paul circumcised Timothy offered in the Temple purified himself allowed of Head-shaving had his Head shorn at Cencrea profitable to no other end but to avoid ministring of Offence to the Jews who being weak saw not the End of these things in the year 664. Piscator on Acts 16.3 saith After the Example of Paul and Timothy that the Weak may be gained let us not refuse to submit unto troublesome things which otherwise we might with a good Conscience forbear Paul saith Trapp on 1 Cor. 9. became all things to all men that he might save some and how not in conforming to their Impieties but in the Use of things indifferent in Bowels of Compassion to them Paul saith he harp'd much of this String out of a fervent and ardent Desire to gain Souls to the Lord. Though many Legal Types saith Gell continued some considerable time after Christ's Death yet they lost their positive and obligatory Power and were used only as Adiaphora things indifferent in Compliance with the inveterate Prejudices of new Converts lately brought over from Judaism who could not quickly lay aside that great Veneration which they had for the Rites of Mosaik Institutions Obj. Peter baptized some Gentiles after that the Spirit was fain upon them doth not this perpetuate Water-Baptism Answ True it is while Peter preached the Everlasting Gospel unto the Gentiles the Gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out upon them then said Peter Can any man forbid Water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we Acts 10.44 c. The Grounds and Reasons why Water-Baptism John's Ministration was some time used for a season in the primitive times by the Apostles are before mentioned I do not believe that Peter had any more Command for Water-Baptism then Paul had who said expresly Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospel Yea and this Paul said Acts 20.27 I have not shunned to declare unto you the whole Counsel of God It seems John's Ministration of Water-Baptism's Continuance was not of his Counsel Where did he exhort Timothy Titus Philemon or any of the Churches he wrote Epistles to to continue Water-baptism on the contrary he shews it was fulfilled ended repealed as hath before been spoken to though in Relation to Iohn's Ministration and in Compliance with the present State he baptized some few as others upon the same grounds did Paul circumcised Timothy yet in 1 Cor. 7.19 he saith Circumcision is nothing and Vncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the commandments of God The same may be said of Water-baptism ' Tiâ— not Dipping or Not Dipping but the keeping of the Commandments of God this is the bonum hominis the totum hominis the one thing necessary 't was not easie to bring them from what had been commanded but as Truth discovered it self to be the Substance thereof Paul writing to the Galatians said How turn ye again to the weak and beggarly Elements whereunto ye desire again to be in Bondage Gal. 4.9 Wâ—at is earthly and beggarly is not of power to enrich with spiritual Blessings Water is an Element appertains to the elemenâ—ary Part in man which is to pass away in the Revelation of the Substance which turns out the earthly within and earthly Rudiments without establishing a Kingdom in Righteousness and Substance out of Figures and Shadows Peter never ascribed Regeneration to outward Water neither did he preach That Children damnati priusquam nati that is damned before they be born as the Doctrine is now by sprinkling Water upon them are made Members of Christ Children of God and Inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven but he ascribed Regeneration to the Eternal Word saying Being born again not of
Disciples is undeniable Paul mentioning the Institution unto the Corinthians mentions both as 't is evident the Bread represented his Body the Bread of Life that nourishes the Soul to eternal Life the Wine his Blood which they came to witness to cleanse them from all sin as they kept to the Head thorow the Ligament of living Faith they came to the End of all Figures to partake of the one Bread one in all but in the dark reign of Apostacy they re-assumed the Shadows and divided Christendom into Clergy that is Teachers and Laity that is all others out of Holy Orders so called but all the Faithful are the Lord's Lot as Acts 26.18 translated there Inheritance but properly signifies Lot if the Greek Copies be consulted and makes nothing for but against the distinction of Clergy and Laity Leighs Crit. However the Distinction hath found continuance in the Church and in the year 1215. Pope Innocent the third did first of all as 't is recorded forbid that the Lay People should receive their Communion in both kinds he would allow them Bread but no Drink this kind of Communion as 't is said was not before the Council of Constance where in the thirteenth Session they deprived the People of the Cup yea and a Canon was put out saying in down-right and express terms If any one shall deny whole and entire Christ the Fountain and Author of all Graces to be taken under one Species of Bread c. let him be Anathema accursed Thus in this as in other things it appears that not only the Power of Godliness hath been lost but great Confusion hath followed Of Mixed Wine Alexander if I may use the Language of my Author the seventh Pope from Peter being about to consecrate was the first of all that mingled Water and Wine together Polydor lib. 5. Of taking Money for Bread and Wine I have shewed before how Pope Innocent the third and the Council of Constance denyed the Cup to the Laity so called one Eckius complying with this Doctrine gives an irrational Reason for it The Laity saith he ought to content themselves with the Bread only because equi donation sunt inspiciendi dentes that is a gift Horse is not to be looked in the Month Apud Manlium in loc com He though belike that Lay Men could not claim any Right to the Bread neither Bellarmine grants that they have Right to the Bread but adds that in eating the Bread transubstantiated by the Priest into the Body of Christ they drink his Blood also But Lombard his Master contradicts this his Doctrine saying That the Bread is not turned but into Christs Flesh nor the Wine but into his Blood Let him that is crowned with Heavenly Wisdom judge whether these Contradictions bespeak them to be Builders of Sion a City of Unity the Joy of the whole Earth or Builders of spiritual Babel a City of Confusion The Council of Constance acknowledged that Christ instituted and administred both Bread and Wine tamen hoc non obstante yet notwithstanding the Authority of the holy Canons and the Custom of the Church hath and doth deny the Cup to the Laity But to return Neither did Christ take Money for the Bread and Wine which he gave to any but as the spirit of Selfishness entred the Temple of the Church it produced other Effects surely there was occasion why the six the general Council of Constantinople decreed That no Bishop Priest or Deacon administring the Communion to people should take any Money whatever of them for the same and that who as did should be deposed Summa Concil et Pontif. Yet notwithstanding the Constantinopolitan Canon in Protestant Churches now the Parish buyes Bread and Wine and the Priest sells it them again that the Priest may have an Offering at Easter so that many otherwise zealous for the established Ministry blame their Ministers their spiritual Hosts as they call them that first the Parish must buy Bread and Wine and give it to the Minister and then the Minister give it to the People and after call for a Reckoning yea and force such as neither bite nor sup thereof to reckon and pay Let us hear the Lord's Proclamation Ho every one that thirsteth come ye to the Waters to the Water of Life the Cup of Salvation Consolation and Blessing a spiritual Thirst is called for neither Money nor Price And further He that hath no Money come ye buy and eat yea come buy Wine and Milk without Money and without Price Here is Bread and Wine and Milk at the Lord's Hand without Money or Price Isa 55.1 2. but such as are made Ministers by the will of man through the strength of Arts Sciences Natural Parts Abilities Qualifications Endowments Acquisitions they have another Language so another Spirit forcing Money and Price not only from Receivers but from Non-receivers also so that the Practice of many I say not all bespeaks them saying We preach the Gospel tantum ut nos pascat et vestiat meerly for Food and Rayment to pick a living by Trap on 1 Pet. 5. Yea and Revel 22.17 The Spirit and the Bride say come and let him that heareth say come and let him that is athirst come and whosoever will let him take the Water of Life freely Here is Communion Royal Communion Water of Life Bread of Life the Cup of Blessing freely without Money or Price But their Voice is not the Voice of the Spirit nor of the Bride nor of him that heareth nor of him that is athirst who forces Money and Price for Bread and Wine the Shadow not only from the Receiver but the Non-receiver also for where Christ's Doctrine and the Apostles is transgressed his Institution for Gospel-Maintenance violated their Voice is the Voice of Balaam who was for Gifts Rewards Wages of Unrighteousness filthy Lucre who have nothing but the Shadow which maketh not alive they make Gain of it sell it but who are Members of Christ's Body of his Flesh of his Bones as freely they have received the Bread of Life so they freely give Of the Kiss of Peace and of the Pax. David the sweet Singer of Israel exhorted Kings and Judges of the Earth to kiss the Son lest he be angry Psal 2.12 These are Greetings cordial Embraces not known but in the operating Virtue of the Seed of Regeneration and in spiritual Submission to his Heavenly Will Let him kiss me saith the Church with the Kisses of his Mouth Cantic 1.2 In the sense-restoring Life these are felt as Seals and Assurances of divine Favour and Acceptance Earnests and Fruits of the Spirit like Balm to the Wounded Paul writing to the Romans said Salute one another with an Holy Kiss Rom. 16.16 This Peter called The Kiss of Love 1 Pet. 5.14 In after Ages as Fellowship with the Lord and with one another in the Light in a high measure came to be loft then the Observation of Shadows more and more got entrance then their
Trent Council What was become of the Unity of the Spirit and the Spirit of the Prophets which is subject to the Prophets Some said Ebrius Infantes Erroneus atque furentes Cum pueris domini non debent sumere corpus Of giving the Sacrament so called to Dead People From the before-mentioned Scripture Except ye eat the Flesh of the Son of Man and drink his Blood ye have no Life in you John 6. â—3 the Fathers in the Degeneration from the primitive Faith Doctrine Worship and Practice fell into the Gulf of that Conceit That none but Communicants should partake of the blessedness of Salvation upon which they not only gave Sacramental Bread c. to Infants but put it into the Mouthes of Dead Men There were some saith Sparke the Kings Chaplain pag. 127. that baptized the Dead and put the Sacramental-Bread in their Mouths as their Viaticum judging it better to have such a necessary Ordinance by Proxy then altogether to go without it That such a thing was in use in the Church may be certainly concluded from the sixth Canon of the third Council of Carthage 't is there apparent that that Council condemned certain Hereticks who thrust the Sacramental Bread into the Mouths of Dead Men yea and the sixth general Council at Constantinople was concerned to eradicate the Tares of that Delusion and smoky Conceit saying Let none give the Encharist that is sacramental Bread to the Dead for it is written Take and eat but the Dead are neither in a Capacity to take nor to eat Summa Concil et Pontif. Thus the Cup of Blessing being lost they received at the old Serpents hand the Cup of Abomination Fornication Delusions and Conceits and they were drunk therewith Of Time and Times of taking the Sacrament As the Churches in the Apostles days and primitive Ages grew up in the sanctifying Faith in the purifying Hope thorow the Cross of Christ the Life of Jesus came to be manifested in their mortal Bodies they were true and living Witnesses of Fellowship with the Lord thorow the Leadings and Teachings of the Anointing they knew Christ supping with them and they with him without outward Bread and Wine being in the Heavenly Banquetting House in the End and Substance of all Types Figure and Shadows but as the Serpent seducing Eve brought in a world of Wickedness so the same by little and little wearing the Church from the Simplicity that is in Christ Jesus brought in a flood of Confusion an earthly Mind within turned to earthly Figures and Shadows without Elements and Rudiments losing the Life of Communion within they placed it in Shadows without and much Confusion and Uncertainty hath been in the Church about the Times of taking it as appears in the Writings of Men. Very anciently saith Polydor Christians took the Eucharist that is the sacramental Broad every day in the Morning and Fasting Polydor lib. 5. After this Augustin said This daily taking of the Communion of the Eucharist I neither Praise nor blame yet my Perswasion is that men take it every Lords Day his Perswasion very likely took place hence it came to be called Panis hebdomadarius Weekly Bread Polydor lib. 5. Zephyrinus afterwards appointed That all Christians who were come to sutable years should once a year at least take the Sacrament namely at Easter Once every day now once a year will serve either much of Zeal was in the one or much of Coldness was in the other Polyd. lib. 5. Fabian afterwards established That men should take the Sacrament thrice in the year if not oftner at Easter Pentecost and Christmas Polyd. lib. 5. Summa Concil et Pontif. Anacletus commanded That they that would not take the Sacrament should be excommunicated as Prophane Persons Polyd. lib. 5. Several are of another Disposition in this our Age who shew not much dislike at peoples Refusal of the Sacrament provide they give them the same Price as they do who take it but refusing that War is prepared Concerning the Communion Cup. In the primitive Times the Church of living Stones was under the Rule and Government of the blessed Spirit in and thorow which the Cry and living Soul-breathing was Abba Father here the Cup of Salvation of Consolation of Blessing full of Righteousness Peace Joy Assurance Heavenly Riches was plentifully drunk of this being lost thorow the Smoke Inchantments Delusions pompous Shew bewitching Splendor Misleadings Muzlings and enfatuating Sleights of Antichtist and men fast bound in the Dungeon of spiritual Servitude and toiling in the Entanglements of Will-worship Self-righteousness Traditions Conceits in this condition the Cup of Abomination and spiritual Fornication got entrance making Nations drunk and in the barren Wilderness of this State there hath been no little jangling about the Sacramental Cup without as of what Mettal it should be made of some have been for Wood some for Glass some for Pewter some for Gold some for Silver as may be assuredly concluded by the Canons and Constitutions of Popes Kings Arch-Bishops Provincial Councils c. It is very clear saith Polydor that the Cups used in the consecration of divine Blood was at the first made of Wood de Invent. lib. 2. cap. 12. Zepherinus afterwards commanded That Glass Cups should be used not Wood Cups as before Polyd. lib. 2. cap. 12. Succeeders skrewed a Peg higher the former Decree by little and little vanished and it was constituted That Golden Silver or at the least Pewter Cups or Chalices should be used Polydor lib. 2. Bonifacius Martyr and Bishop said Formerly Golden Priest did wake use of Wood Cups or Chalices but now on the contrary Wood Priests use Golden Chalices As the Apostatical Pomp and Splendor increased so the simple and homely use of Wood Cups came to be generally hissed at and sleighted so that the Provincial Triburiensian Council decreeed thus We decree that henceforth no Priest may by any means presume to make the sacred Mystery of the Body and Blood of our Lord in Wood Cups or Chalices Summa Concil et Pontif. Our King Edgar put out a Canan to this purpose saying We teach that every Chalice or Cup wherein any one shall consecrate the Eucharist shall be of Molten Mettal and not at all consecrated in a Wood Cup or Chalice One Remigius an Arch-Bishop appointed these his Verses to be set on the side of the Sacremental Cup Haurit hinc populus vitam de sanguine sacro Injecto aeternus quem fudit vulnere Christus c. Hence People drink Eternal Life that 's good For in this Cup contained is Christ's Blood Thus you see what a stir hath been about Invention after that the Simplicity and Stability of the Truth as it is in Jesus was turned from and after that credens was given that Bread and Wine by the Priests consecration was transmuted that is changed into the real Body and Blood of Christ How Communion in both Kinds was forbidden That Christ gave Bread and Wine unto his