from the communion of the Church is no longer a member of the sayd Church 4. This verity to wit That Schismaticks are not members of the Church of Christ is besides the former proofes warranted with the authorityes sentences of the ancient Fathers And first S. Cyprian thus purposely writeth of Schismatikes Qui (h) Lib. 4. ep 9. ad FloreÌ„ cum Episcopo non sunt in Ecclesia non sunt Those who agree not with the Bishop meaning the supreme Bishop of Gods Church are not in the Church And againe the sayd (i) Lib. de vnitate Ecclesiae Father most elegantly coÌ„pareth Schismatikes to Beames diuided from the sunne to Boughs cut off from the tree to Riuers wholy separated from their springes Saint Chrysostome discoursing of Schismatikes thus sayth Schismatis (k) Hom 3. in ep 1 ad Cor. significantia satis eos arguit c. The very signification of this word schisme is a sufficient and vehement condemnatioÌ„ of them c. Which Father in another (l) Hom. 13. in ep ad Ephes place compareth a schismatike to the hand cut off from the body which thereupon ceaseth to be a member and expressely affirmeth that Schismatiks though they consent with the Church of Christ in doctrine yet are not in the Church of Christ but in altera Ecclesia meaning in a Church different from the Church of Christ S. Hierome distinguishing schisme from heresy thus discourseth Inter (m) In c. 3. ad Tit. heresim schisma hoc interesse arbitramur c. VVe take this to be the difference betweene heresy schisme that heresy maintayneth a peruerse and false doctrine whereas schisme ab Ecclesia pariter separat in like manner separateth a man from the Church in regard of dissention and disobedience towardes our Bishop S. Augustine thus wouÌ„deth a Schismatike Haeretici (n) lib. de side simbol c. â—0 Schismatici congregationes suas Ecclesias vocant c. Heretiks and Schismatikes do call their congregations the churches But Heretikes doe violate their fayth in beleeuing falsely touching God whereas Schismatikes though they beleeue the same points which we beleeue yet through their dissentions they do not keep fraternall charity wherefore we conclude that neyther an Heretike belongeth to the Catholike church because he loueth not God nor a Schismatike because he loueth not his Neighbour To conclude Fulgentius (o) lib. de fide ad Petrum cap. 38. 39. agreeth with the former Reuer Father in this point saying Firmissime tene c. Beleeue for certaine and doubt not that only Pagans but also Iewes Heretikes and Schismatikes who dye out of the Catholike church are to go to euerlasting fire 5. And thus farre touching Schismatikes who because they be not of the Church of Christ cannot obtaine saluatioÌ„ which point being made euident by so many authorityes both diuine and human then much more strongely may we conclude that Heretikes as exceeding the Schismatikes in prauity and malice and being excluded in like sort with theÌ„ out of the Church of Christ cannot he saued But before I end this Chapter giue me leaue good Reader to expatiate a little beyonde my designed limits O then you Schismatikes heere in our owne country whose soules are so wholy absorpt in earthy muddy considerations cast your eyes vpon your owne states vse some small introuersies vpon your selues You see what a dangerous censure the ancient Church of Christ by the mouthes of its chiefe Pastors Doctors hath thundred against you It sayth You are not of Christs church you are aliens and strangers therto It further pronounceth That dying in such your state you are all depriued of all hope of saluation Good God what stupor dulnes of yours is this Are you Christians Preferre then Christ before the world Feare your God more then man Giue then to God what is Gods to Caesar what is Caesars Reflect vpon these ensuing principles of the Catholike therefore your owne Religion 6. The one that God ordinarily deriueth his grace vnto mans soule by the conduicts of his sacraments and giueth absolution of ones sinnes particulerly by the sacrament of Pennance and confession you wilfully depriue your selues of the participation of the Sacraments and therby of grace of the remission of your sinnes are you not then as dryed branches void of that heauenly grace which giueth life to the soule You waÌ„t the grace forgiuenes of your sinne s where then is your hope of eternall life Remember the Apostles wordes be afraid Gratia Dei vita aeeterna do not disioyne those asunder which S. Paul hath so inseparably vnited 7. The second the vncertainty of any particuler mans saluation which point is able to strike you dead through feare the rather since it is noe small signe of mans future damnation deliberatly and willfully yeare after yeare to diuide himselfe from the Church of Christ and from al the spirituall influences streaming from thence 8. The third that there is a Purgatory the paines wherof though terminable yet are insupportable Suppose then the best that is that you finally dye with true repentance and reconciled to Gods Church which yet is not in your power but out of the maine Ocean of Gods mercy neuertheles your owne fayth assureth you that you must suffer in that place euen insufferable tormeÌ„ts for your former dissimulation that your continuance in thus dissembling with God serue but as bellowes the more to blowe that dreadfull fire Oh how great interest then are you to pay in the end for the enioying of this your mispeÌ„t time If you be Catholikes though but in hart you beleiue all here said and therfore may the more assuredly presage of your owne future misery If you doe not beleiue these three former points of Catholik Religion then are you lesse damned for want of true faith then otherwayes by your vnchaungeable schismatical liues for want of due conformity to the Church of Christ therefore I wishe you to awake out of that schismaticall letargy of the soule and dayly meditate of that of the Apostle Rom. 10. Corde creditur ad iustitiam ore fit confessio ad salutem With the hart we beleeue vnto iustice but with the mouth confession is made to saluation But I will stay heere my penne remembring my vndertaken subiect and will proceed to the next head The same proued by arguments drawne from reason CHAP. VIIII TO passe from the authority of Gods sacred word his holy Church the ancient Fathers the pillars therof touching the nature of heresy and of Heretikes as also touching the vnity and infalibility of the same Church and the persons disincorporated and separated from it from all which heades it hath beene euidently euicted that a man obstinatly defending any one errour in fayth and Religion cannot expect saluation It now remayneth that the same be made euident by force of reason that therby all men
reason then that a bare opinion not relying vpon any supernaturall grounds as hauing neither God for its Reuealer nor the Church for its propounder conceaued only through moral inducements therefore euer standing obnoxious to errour and mistaking should be able to purchase eternall saluation to mans soule 17. Againe how aduerse is it to all true iudgment to auerre that it is no preiudice or hinderance to mans saluation to beleeue those principle of Religion which teach aduance all liberty sensuality in conuersation and manners do depresse and disparadge all chastity fasting voluntary pouerty keeping of the commandements all rigorous and painefull workes and labours of vertue piety and mortification For it is most contradictory in the very tearmes and no lesse repugnāt to Gods sacred word that that doctrine which transferreth (x) Iud◠vers 4. the grace of God into wantonnes should be accounted the (y) Mat. 7. Luc. 13. strict way which leadeth vnto life 18. Furthermore can it be conceaued as sorting to Gods most mercifull proceeding with man that he should cut off the liues of those mē with most feareful sodaine prodigious deaths who first broached the doctrines of Protestancy if the sayd doctrines had eyther bene true in thēselues or at least of that coldnes or indifferency as that they might stand with the soules saluation No God is iust and withall mercifull therefore neuer extraordinarily punisheth but for extraordinary sinnes poore men that these were who compare as it should seeme both in the diuulging of their mendacious and lyinge doctrines as also in their vnexpected and sodaine death with the false Prophets of (z) 3. Regum Achab. 9. But to hasten to an end in the ennumeration of the Absurdities following the foresaid paradox of saluation in euery Religion and to come to that which within its owne lardgnes inuolueth many improbabilities For if Catholikes and Protestants notwithstanding the disparity of their fayth can both attaine to Heauen in vaine then is the doctrine of recusancy taught ioyntly on both sides and in vaine haue so many sortes of Reuerend and learned Preists others of the laity in our owne Country whose blessed soules I beseech to pray to God dayly for the remission of my many sinnes suffred cruell deaths in the late Queenes raigne only because they refused to present themselues to the sermons of the Protestants but they are gone most happely gone since Clauis (a) Tert. de prescr Paradisi sanguis Martyrum In vaine likewyse these later yeares haue diuers lay persons endured contrary to his Maiesties naturall inclination most prone to mercy and commiseration great losses disgraces and imprisonements only for the same cause But who can thinke that learned men should be so prodigall of their liues and blood and English Catholikes so insensible of their temporall states children and posterity as that they would willfully precipitate and cast themselues into those miseries only for not beleeuing and exercising points of indifferency such as may stand with their soules eternall happines In vaine also then haue the learned men on both sides spent out their whole liues in defending each man his owne Religion in their most paineful and voluminous bookes writtings if so they dissented one from another in matters of such supposed small importance Finally in vaine and without iust cause therefore most cruelly haue many forren states in Christendome imposed proscriptions bannishments and other insupportable disgraces to such of their owne subiects as will not imbrace their owne doctrine and Religion though both sides did conspire and agree in the fundamentall points of faith In vaine also both in former times and at this present haue there beene are such Insurrection of subiects against their Princes such bloody implacable warres betweene absolute Princes themselues such deuastation depopulation of whole Countries such mayne battells feilds fought with losse of diuers hundred thousands liues and lastly such incessant vninterrupted beseiging takinge of great Citties and townes with effusion for the most part of much innocent blood of weomen and children and all this originally and principally for matter of Religion I say in vaine most iniuriously haue all these attempts and actions beene vndertaken if the disagreement in Religiō for which they are vndertaken between Catholikes Protestants were of that reconcileable nature as that the professours on both sides notwithstanding their diuersity of faith might ioyntly be saued 20. What can we now reply hereto in behalfe of our Newtralists Shall we say that the most learned men of all Religions the Kings Princes States and all their subiects of all Christendome were and still are actually madd and out of their senses in managing these their deplorable attemptes for Religion and that our all reconciling and peaceable Newtralists who through his pliable sterne of disposition in these spirituall matters is become in kindred as aboue is touched of the halfe blood with the Atheist and who is commonly deprehended to want learning grace and vertue is peculiarly enlightened by God in setting downe what articles of fayth are only necessary to mans saluation and what are to be reputed but as accessary and of smaller importance To such straites we see is the defence of the former doctrine driuen vnto Seeing therefore this doctrine of our Omnifidians or Nullifidians for indeed while they seeme to allow all Religions they take away all Religion is encompassed on all sides with so many notorious absurdityes as are displayed in this Chapter seeing it cannot be true except there be a retrogradation of all matters heere on earth and a turning of the world as they say vpside downe that is except the most learned become most madd and the most ignorant most wise And except truth in doctrine be necessarily to be accompanyed with infinite grosse absurdityes and errour and falsehood fortifyed and countenaunced with store of proofes both diuine humane as if God did purposely lay trappes to ensnare mans iudgment Therefore since such comportement and carriage of things is not sutable and correspondent to Gods prouidence and charity towardes mankind let euery man who thinketh he hath a soule to saue or loose vndoubtedly assure himselfe that there is but one true fayth or religion wherein he may auayleably expect saluation and that this fayth of Christ wherewith the soule is clothed is like to the inconsutible garment of Christ both being incapable of diuision renting or partition 21. Now for the greater illustration of this point by way of similitude and as tending towards the closure of this treatise Imagine that a man pretendeth right and title to certaine lands and taketh aduise of all the learned Lawyers and Counsailours of the whole Realme to whome he showeth all his euidences of which some do cary a title only in grosse and in general others proue a more particuler and more restrayned right to the sayd lands Imagine further that
wherin at this tyme I wil insist may be takē frō the consideration of the differēt effects which the contrary doctrines betweene the Catholiks the Protestants produce in mans soule touching the exercising of vertue or vice since most vndoubted it is that the beleeuing of such opinions which of their owne nature do impel as it were violētly draw the soule to vice loosenes impurity of manners conuersation cānot stand with the hope of eternal happines And the chief reasō hereof besids others is this in that the wil which is the seate of vertue or vice doth necessarily and irresistably worke as the vnderstanding in which reside fayth all false doctrines doth dictate to the wil now then the vnderstāding being infected with heresies tēding directly to the plāting of vice eradicating of all vertue in the soule it of necessity follweth that the will must worke and exercise it selfe according to those false principles which the vnderstanding suggesteth to the will for true and that with the greater facility in regard of the prones of mans nature through our first Parents fall inclined to liberty pleasure and sensuality But because the subiect of this reason is a lardge field wherin to walke the truth therof is to appeare by seuerall instances drawne from diuers particuler doctrines maintained at this present by the Protestants and all breathing nothing but vice dissolution and all turpitude in manners therfore I will reserue the next ensuing chapter for the fuller manifestation of the truth in this point The same proued from the different effects of vertue and vice which Catholike and Protestant Religion do cause in their Professors CHAP. X. THE first doctrine of this nature wherein we will insist maintayned by the Protestants and denyed by the Catholikes is the impossibility of keeping Gods commandments According heereto Luther sayth The (a) Ser. de Moise ten commandements appertaine not to Christians With whome Fox conspireth in these wordes The (b) Act. mon. pag. 1335. ten Commandements were giuen not to do them but to know our damnation and to call for mercy to God As also D. Willet saying The (c) In sinops Papism pag 564. law remayneth still impossible to be kept by vs through the weaknes of our flesh neyther doth God giue vs ability to keep it but Christ hath fullfilled it for vs. And finally D. VVhitaker in that sentence of his Qui (d) Cont. Camp cat 8. p. 153. credunt ij non sunt sub lege sed sub gratia Quid plura Christiani execratione legis liberantur They who beleeue are not vnder the law but vnder grace VVhat more in this point is to be sayd Christians are freed from the curse of the law Now then if Christians be freed from the curse of keeping the law wherin the ten commandements are contained how can the breach of them be any way hurtefull to the violatours of them And if the comandments were neither giuen vs to keep nor we haue power to keepe them why should the theife forbeare to steale or the homicide to commit murther Who seeth not how this doctrine discourageth a mā from liuing vertuously by brideling his vnruly and sensuall desires 2. Secondly touching Chastity the Protestants teach that Chastity is not in our power And hence it is that Luther thus writeth It is (e) Tom. 5. Wittē serm de matrim not in our power to be without a woman c. It is not in our power that it should be stayed or omitted but it is as necessary as to eate drinke purge make cleane the nose c. To whome omitting all others for greater breuity M. Perkins subscribeth saying The vow (f) In his reformed Catholik pag. 161. of continency is not in the power of him that voweth Now this doctrine being imbraced for true how forcibly doth it inuite or rather impell all people vnmaried either men or women to satisfy their lust by their owne incontinent liues In like sort what great encouragement doth it giue to maried persons to violate the band of matrimony when either of the persons through absence or longe sicknes or some other suddaine and accidentall impotency cannot render the debt of matrimony And the parties thus sinning either maried or vnmaried being expostulated chardged with their offence therin may they not iustly reply in excuse of them selues that they are not to be blamed or rebuked for their incontinency seeing by their owne doctrine Religion they are expresely taught that they haue not the guift of Chastity and that it is not in their power to liue chastly continently 3. Thirdly the Protestants doctrine of veniall and mortall sinne doth wounderfully extenuate and lessen the atrocity and malice of sinne in the beleeuers of that doctrine For the Protestants do teach that there is no such difference of sinnes in themselues but that the most grieuous sinnes whatsoeuer being committed by any one that hath true fayth are but veniall and their reason therfore is because in their doctrine no sinnes are imputed to such who haue true fayth (g) De eccl cōtra Bellarm. contro 2. q. 5. pag. 301. Thus accordingly D. VVhitakers teacheth Si quis actum fidei habet ei peccata non nocent Sinne is not hurtefull to him who actually beleeueth who did learne this of his graund Maister Luther who wryting of this point sayth No (h) Luth. in his ser englished printed anno 1578. p. 176. worke is disallowed of God vnles the author thereof be disallowed before All which being grāted as true doctrine it must needs follow that who so shall take himselfe to be one of these faythfull as euery Protestant is bound by his owne Religion to beleeue of himselfe shall make small accompt of omitting any sinne considering he is taught by the former doctrine to beleeue that to vse the wordes of one of their owne Maisters Sinne (i) VVotton in his answere to the late popish articles pag. 92. is pardoned him as soone as it is committed 4. The Protestants doctrine of Reprobation and deniall of Freewill mightily disanimateth and discourageth the beleeuers thereof from embracing of vertue and eschewing of sinne for if it be true as this their doctrine suggesteth that some men are borne euen from their mothers wombe without any reference to their workes reprobates or thrall to eternall damnation and cannot be saued to what end should they seeke their owne saluation by a true fayth auoyding of sinne and the practising of a penitentiall and vertuous life Or if we haue not Freewill with the concurrency of Gods grace to doe well as the former doctrine instructeth vs why should we bend our best endeauours to embrace vertue and to flye all vice since it is not in our power accordinge to the Protestants fayth to exercise the one and to fly the other 5. To this may be adioyned the Protestants like doctrine of Predestination and their supposed certainty of saluation
stiling her the pillar and foundation of truth And further it should follow that the Church should thus insufferably erre both in generall Councells as also in the priuate authorities and sentences of all the learned Fathers in the firste times 11. And thus for example the Councell of the Apostles should haue erred (k) Act. 15. in decreeing it vnlawfull to eate in those times blood and strangled meates In like sort the first Councell of Nice (l) Euseb l. 6 hist c. 33. should haue erred in condemning the Quartodecimani for heretikes because they would not keepe Easter day according to the custome of the church The councell of Rome vnder Cornelius for condemning the heresie of the Nouatians who reiected the Sacrament of Pennance as also for condemning the errour of Anabaptisme The councell (m) Vt patet in act 2. of Calchedon for condemning the Heresie of Eutiches and for prohibiting the mariages of Monkes and Virgins and the first Councell of Ephesus (n) Socra l. 7. c. 34. for condemning the heresy of Nestorius both which Heretikes beleiued in the most holy Trinity and acknowledged Christ for their Redeemer The fourth councell of Carthage (o) Can. 79. for sententionally decreeing that prayer and sacrifice for the dead was according to the true faith of Chirst and for pronouncing the denyers therof for Heretikes And finally to omitt other Coūcels the councell of Constantinople (p) Zonaras in vita Constantini Nicephorus l. 17. c. 27 should haue erred for condemning the Heresie of Origen who taught that the Diuels in the end should be saued And thus farre of councels condemning points of seeming indifferency for open wicked heresyes 12. But now graunting that the sayd points as they were houlden by the maintainers of thē were not Heresies that the beleiuers of them might be saued then two maine absurdityes doe ineuitably follow The first is the erring of the whole Church of God in condemning them for heresies they being not Heresies but true doctrines as is said The second the inconsiderate carriadge of the church in these matters For to what purpose or end were all these councells consisting of many hundreds of the most graue and Reuerend men of all christendome celebrated with such labour and trauaile out of all countries and infinite chardges if the doctrines for the impugning resisting condemning wherof they were gathered might be indifferently maintayned and defended on all sides without breach of true faith or danger of saluation The erring of the Church is no lesse manifested in the sentences and condemnation giuen by many of the most ancient famous learned Fathers in the primitiue Church not any one orthodoxall Father contradicting them therein against diuers maintayning opinions that seeme in regard or the Trinity the Incarnation c of small importance if so these opinions be not heresies nor the beleiuers of them Heretikes but men in state of saluation 13. And thus according hereto Florinus though he taught God to be the authour of sinne might be saued In like sort the Heretikes who in S. Hieromes dayes denyed the possibility of the Cōmandements the Manichees who denyed Free-will the Eunomians who taught that only faith did iustify The Aerians who denyed prayer and sacrifice for the dead and tooke away all fasting-dayes Vigilantius who taught that Priests might marry that we ought not pray to Saints Iouinian who helde mariadge to be better then virginity The Donatists who taught the inuisibility of the Church And finally to omit many others for breuity sake The Pelagians who denyed the necessity of Baptisme in Children All these men I say might be saued notwithstanding the former doctrines if so euery one might expect saluation in their Religion And yet we finde that the foresaid men were branded for wicked Heretikes their doctrines for damnable Heresies as in the seauenth chapter aboue is showed by S. Irenaeus S. Hierome S. Epiphanius Philastrius S. Augustine Theodoret and others diuers of these holy Fathers wryting Catalogues of Heresies did place the foresaid doctrines and their authours within the said Catalogues and this they did without any reluctation or gainesaying of any other ancient and learned Father of their tymes 14. From which consideration I do gather that if those opinions were not iustly condemned for heresies and their authours for Heretikes then not only the Church did fondly erre in so great a matter but also the aforesayd alleadged Fathers to wit S. Irenaeus S. Hierome Epiphanius S. Augustine with many such others should deseruedly be reputed for Heretikes for their condemning of true doctrines for heresies and the beleeuers of them for heretikes and on the contrary side Florinus the Maniches the Eunomians Vigilantius Iouinian the Donatists Pelagius and many other such should be accounted for their teaching of true doctrins orthodoxall Fathers and authours and might haue iustly complayned of their insupportable wronges and indignityes proceeding from the pennes of the foresayd Fathers an absurdity which I thinke no man enioying the benefit of his fiue senses will allow And yet the admittance of our Newtralists paradox inauoydably draweth on this inference 15. Another absurdity accompanying the former doctrine is that Heretikes should be true members of Christs church This I deduce For seeing by the consent of all learned men none can be saued but such as be members of Christs Church for otherwayes Turks and Iewes dying in that state might be saued and seeing the foresayd registred doctrines and the authours are condemned for heresies and Heretikes both by the authority of Gods Church and according to the true definitiō of heresy aboue set downe for the foresayd Heretikes made choyce of those their heresies and did maintaine them most frowardly against the whole Church of God not submitting their iudgments to it it must of necessity follow that if those men could be saued then Heretikes continuing Heretikes are members of Christ his Church then which what paradox in it selfe can be accounted more absurde or in the iudgment of learned men more incredible Considering with what acerbity of comportement the Apostles all the orthodoxall learned pious Fathers both in their writings otherwise haue in all ages entertained Heretikes as aboue I haue manifested in the sixth Chapter 16. Againe supposing the truth of the doctrine of the Omnifidians as I may tearme thē yet obserue how repugnant it is to all reason otherwise absurd euen in its owne nature I will heere passe ouer diuers reasons alleadged in the precedent chapter and insist a little in some few of them The first It is certaine that that faith which belieueth some articls yet belieueth not others which are no lesse true such is the faith of our Newtralists is no true supernatural fayth seeing it beleeueth nothing thorough the authority of God his Church both which reueale and propound all articles alike indifferently to al men to be beleeued Now what more crosse to
the hearers From which it euidently followeth that these Heretikes continuing and dying in the foresayd heresy could not be saued since that fayth which erreth from the truth and which subuerteth the true fayth of others and which in killing and destroying the soule resembleth a Canker cannot afford saluation to its Professors 8. Another passage which heere I will vrge is that of S. Iohn who calleth certaine Heretiks Anti-Christs saying Now (m) 1. Ioan. c. 2. there ate become many Anti-Christs who went out of vs but were not of vs for if they had beene of vs they had remayned with vs. These Heretikes belieued in the Trinity in the Incarnation of Christ that he dyed for the saluation of the whole world only they erred touching the person and natures of Christ and yet they are figuratiuely styled Anti-Christs and are sayd to departe out of the church of Christ But no saluation is reserued for Anti-christs such as departe from the Church of God And thus much out of Gods holy writ expresly touchinge Heretikes in general and in particuler 9. To these Texts I will adioyne though not immediatly and directly ranged vnder the former head a place in S. Peter in my iudgment most vnanswerable and by necessary inference euicting the point heere vndertaken The place is those wordes in the 2. epistle of S. Peter cap. 3. where he sayth thus In the Epistles of Paul there are certaine thinges hard to be vnderstood which the vnlearned and vnstable do peruert vnto their owne destruction Now here I thus argue But these things hard to be vnderstood in S. Pauls epistle do not concerne the doctrine of the Trinity the Incarnation the Passion c. and yet the misvnderstanding of them doth cause as the Text sayth the destruction that is the damnation of these who misunderstand them therefore farre lesser points then the denyall of the Trinity the Incarnation the Passion c. doe iustly threaten to the false belieuers of them damnation and consequently that a bare beliefe of those supreme points are not only necessary to saluation 10. That those difficulties in S. Pauls epistles intimated by Sainct Peter doe not concerne the Trinity the Incarnation the Passion c. I proue seuerall wayes first because S. Peter maketh no such mention which no doubt he would haue done if the subiect of them had touched only those supreme mysteries and were not to be extended to other inferiour points 11. Secondly it is acknowledged by the commentaries and writings of all the fathers besides that the epistles themselues showe no lesse that Saint Paul is most euident and cleare in all his epistles touching the Trinity the Incarnatiō the Passion c. and therfore there is no reason why the difficultyes in them should be applied to those articles muchlesse restrained to them alone 12. Thirdly the Fathers do vnderstand those difficultyes in Saint Pauls epistles insinuated by Saint Peter cheifly touching Iustification as appeareth by the testimony euen of S. Augustine himselfe in his booke de fide operibus lib. 12. who particulerly instanceth in that place 1. Cor. 3. If any man builde vpon this foundation golde siluer c. Which Text treateth of Iustification and works and expressely saith (n) Lib. de fide operibus cap. 15 16. that this is one of the difficult passages intended and meant by Saint Peter With whome Saint Hierome may seeme wel to agree who in those worden Epistola ad Romanos Nimijs (o) Epist. ad Algasiain quest 8. in epist ad Rom. obscuritatibus inuoluta est Intimateth no lesse for it is found that the epistle to the Romans most intreateth of Iustification and of faith and workes Fourthly and lastly the Protestants themselues doe vnderstand the said obscurities of Saint Pauls epistles touching Iustification as appeareth to omit the testimonies of all others herin from the wordes and comment of M. Doctor Fulke against the Rhemists Testament vpon the foresaid place of S. Peter and thus far of this text where we find by an ineuitable deduction that a false faith touching Iustification only cānot stand with saluation 13. The same is proued from the definition and propriety of faith In this place we will take into our consideration the definition of fayth set down by S. Paul secondly the dignity worth of faith much celebrated by diuers of the Apostles thirdly the inseparable propriety of fayth which is vnity for so doth the Scripture delineate and describe fayth from all which it will ineuitably follow that the fayth which saueth man is not to be restrayned only to the Trinity the Incarnation and other such sublime points of Christian Religion though in other points it be erroneous but is extended to all other pointes whatsoeuer which the Church of God propoundeth to be belieued 14. And to beginne with the definition of fayth giuen by the Apostle he thē defineth fayth thus Fayth (p) Heb. cap. 11. is the substance of thinges to be hoped for the argument of thinges not appearing The sense whereof is this first that fayth through an infallible certainty causeth those thinges to subsist and haue a being in the mind of man which thinges are yet to come being but hoped and looked for secondly that fayth causeth the vnderstanding to giue assent to those points which it vnderstandeth not acknowledging them to be more certaine then any thinges whatsoeuer according to those wordes of S. Thomas Multo magis (q) ◠2. q. 4. a. 8. homo certior est de eo quod audiuit a Deo qui falli non potest quam de eo quod videt propria ratione quae falli potest Now heere I trust no man will deny but the Apostle defineth that fayth of a Christian which saueth him This being graunted for to deny it were both impious in the denyer and most iniurious to the Apostle we are to remember the nature of euery true definition set downe by the Logitians to wit as is aboue mentioned that the thing defined and the definition be of one and the same extent and latitude so as whatsoeuer is comprehended vnder the definition the same is also contayned vnder the thing defined This then being presupposed by force of all reason for Logicke is but an artificiall and seruiceable handmayd vnto reason we find that this definition of fayth compriseth in it selfe not only the doctrine of the Incarnation the Trinity and the like and this not articulately but only by way of deduction but also it contayneth al secondary points of Religiō seeing the former definition doth predicate or may be sayd of all the sayd secondary lesse principall points of Religion controuerted betweene Christians at any tyme. 15. Therfore the thing heere defined which is the sauing fayth of a Christian is in like sort to extend it selfe to all the sayd secondary pointes of Religion how indifferent soeuer they seeme in mans iudgment This inference is so demonstratiue being
Christ who is God of God and equall with his Father a Sauiour who suffred death quoad sufficentiam for all mankind and who accomplished the functioÌ„ of his Sauiourship only according to his humanity a Sauiour who dyed only in body and not in soule finally a Sauiour who from his first conception was endued with all knowledge wisedome prouidence and exempt from all ignorance passion and perturbation wheras the Protestants doe belieue in Christ as their Sauiour who according to their fayth is God of (h) D. Whitak approueth this opinion alleadging Caluin in proofe thereof cont CaÌ„p p. 121. himselfe and (i) MelaÌ„ in loc com edit 1561. p. 41. inferiour to the Father who dyed only for the (k) D. Willet in his synops printed 1600. p. 780. as also Caluin and Beza in whole treatises elect who performed his mediation not only according to his humanity but also according to his (l) MelaÌ„ supra D Fulk diuinity though in the iudgment of all learned men true diuinity is impassible who in the time of his Passion besides the death of the body as insufficient for our saluation suffred in soule the (m) Cal. instit l. 2. c. 16 sect 10. D. Whitak cont Duraeum l. 8. p. 556. (m) Beza in respon ad acta Colloquij Montisb part 1. pag. 147. D. Willet in his synopsis p. 599. 600. D. Sutliffe in his reueu of D. Kellisons suruay printed 1606. p. 55. torments of hel briefly who laboured with n ignorance passion and euen desperation it selfe 5. Touching the article of Christs descending into hell the Catholikes doe belieue hereby that Christ descended in soule after his passion into that part of hell which is called lymbus Patrum to deliuer from thence the soules of the iust there detayned till his comming of which iudgement are also some learned (o) D. Bilson in his suruay of Christs sufferings and descent to hell p. 650. 651. 652. and the Lutherans are generally of the same opinion ProtestaÌ„ts but the greatest part of Protestants doe interpret this article of Christ descending into his (p) D. Willet in lymbomastix D. Fulke so alleadged by VVillet in synopsi pag. 605. 606. graue soe by the worde hell vnderstanding the graue but (q) Lib. 2. instit cap. 16. §. 20. Caluin teacheth that by Christs descending into hell is vnderstoode that Christ apprehended God to be most angry and offended with him for our sakes and that thervpon Christ suffred great anxiety and griefe of soule and which is more most blasphemously Caluin teacheth that Christ vttered words of desperation in saying my God why hast thou forsakeÌ„ me Touching the article of Christs ascending into heauen we Catholikes and the Caluinists doe belieue hereby that Christ truly in body ascended vp into heauen wheras (r) Luth l. de sacr Coenae Domini tom 2. f. 112. saying credimus quod Christus iuxta humanitateÌ„ est vbique presens Brentius in Apolog. pro cons VVittem Illyricus l. de asceÌ„ Domini and finally by all LutheraÌ„s Lutherans doe teach that Christs body is in all places with the diuinity and that therefore it did not really after his passion ascend vp into heauen it being there both before after his passion thus the Lutherans both in ours and the Protestants iudgments doe destroy by this their construction the whole creede and particulerly Christs incarnation natiuity passion death ascending into heauen and his comming to iudgment seeing supposing Christs body to be in all places all these articles were but apparantly or phantastically and not truly or really performed 6. Touching the article of Christs iudging the quicke and dead wee Catholikes doe beleeue that Christ at his comming to iudgment will so iudge man as that his good workes receauing all their force from our Sauiours passion shal be rewarded whereas the Protestants denying all (s) Cal. l. 3. instit c. 5. §. 2. Bucer in actis collo quij Ratisb Beza Zuingli and most other Protestants merit of workes as iniurious and derogatory to his death and passion do hould that Christ shall then reward only a bare and (t) Calu. in Antid Concil Trident. Kemnitius in exam Con. Trid. and most other Protestants speciall fayth 7. Concerning the Article I belieue in the Holy Ghost Whereas all Catholikes and many Protestants do beleeue that the Holy Ghost is the third person in the most Blessed Trinity Caluin howsoeuer he was persuaded of the truth or falshood therof much lamenteth notwithstanding to auoyd the force of arguments drawne from the chiefest places of Scripture and vsually alleadged by all Antiquity in proofe of the holy Ghost being the third person in the Trinity Thus we find that (u) Iust l. 1. c. 13. §. 15. Caluin will not haue contrary to all Antiquity that passage of Scripture Psalm 33. By the word of the Lord the heauens were made and all the host of them by the spirit of his mouth to be vnderstood of the diuinity of the holy Ghost In like sort he reiecteth the argument (x) See of this subiect against the Trinity Iluumus a Protestant in l. Caluin IudaizaÌ„s drawne from that other most remarkable Text 1. Ioan. 5. There be three that giue testimony in Heauen the Father the VVord and the holy Ghost and these three be one Caluin vpon this place thus saying therby to take away from thence the proofe of the Holy Ghost Quod dicit tres esse vnum ad essentiam non refertur Luth. in l. contra Iacobum LatomuÌ„â—omo 2. Wittem 〈…〉 diâ—â— anno 1552. sed ad consensum potius Finally Luther was so farre from acknowledging the Holy Ghost to be the third person in the Trinity or to acknowledge the Trinity it selfe that thus he writteth Anima mea odit hoc verbum homousion vel consubstantialis My very soule doth hate the worde homousion or consubstantial 8. Concerning the article I beleeue the holy Catholike Church The Catholikes do beleeue this to be a visible company of meÌ„ professing the present Roman Catholike fayth of which some are predestinated others reprobated The ProtestaÌ„ts do belieue this Church to consist only of the elect and (y) Confess Aug. act 5. Luther l. de Concilijs eccles Cal. l. 4. inst c. 1. §. 2. predestinated 9. Touching the article The Communion of Saints The Catholikes do heereby beleeue such a communion to be betweene the Saints in Heauen the soules in Purgatory men vpon earth that the one part doth helpe the other with their most auaileable prayers and intercessions The Protestants deny all such intercourse of benefites betweene these seuerall partes of the Church of Christ accounting (z) Caluin l. 3. inst c. 5. § 6. Conturiatoreâ— Ceâ—â— 1. lib. 2. c. 4. col 460. Brentius in conses Wittenberg c. de Purgatorio the Catholike doctrine heerein superstitious and sacrilegious 10. Lastly touching the article of Forgiuenes of sinnes we Catholikes do beleeue
that this remission of sinnes is performed when the soule by a true and inherent iustice and by infused guifts of God enioyeth a renouation of her selfe and therby becommeth truly iust in the sight of God the Protestants disallowing all inherent iustice doe only acknowledge an imputatiue (a) Kemnitius in exam Concil trid Caluin l. 3. instit c. 11. iustice or righteousnes which consisteth in that the iustice of Christ is as they teach only imputed vnto sinners so as wee remaine still sinners though sinnes be not imputed vnto vs through the iustice of Christ a doctrine most iniurious to the most meritorious passion and death of Christ Thus haue wee runne ouer the articles of the creede from whence wee collect that seeing as is aboue intimated he only belieueth auaileably truly the creede who belieueth it in that sence in which the Apostles did wryte it seeing there are meere different or rather contrary constructions of each article giuen by the Catholikes and Protestants so that if that construction of the Catholiks be true it followeth necessarily that the other of the Protestants befalse or contrarywise We may therefore ineuitably conclude that it is not sufficient to saluation for any one to say that he belieueth the creede who belieueth the words of it in generall without restrayning them to any peculier construction giuen eyther by the Catholikes or Protestants except he belieue it in that one particuler sence and none other which was intended by the holy Ghost when it was first framed by the Apostles 11. Now in this next place we are to demonstrate that graunting for a tyme by an Hypotesis or supposall that a man did beleeue the articles of the creed in their true sense or construction yet followeth it not that this beliefe though it be necessary were sufficient alone for a man to obtaine his saluation thereby and the reason heerof is because it is most certaine that there are diuers points of Christian Religion houlden necessarily to be beleeued in the iudgment both of Catholikes and Protestants accordingly are beleeued ioyntly both by Catholikes and Protestants and yet the sayd points are not contayned or expressed in the Creed Among others I will insist in these following 12. First That there are certaine diuine wrytinges of infallible authority penned by the holy Ghost which we commonly call the Scriptures of the oulde new Testament of which Testament we find no mentiō in the Creed and yet all men are bound vnder payne of damnation to beleeue that such wrytinges there are since otherwayes abstracting from the authority of the Church there were not sufficient meanes left to beleeue that it were a sinne to breake any of the ten Commandements or which is more that Christ Iesus was the true Sauiour of the world 13. Secondly That there are spirituall substances which we call Angels which now enioy the most happy sight of God and that many thousands of them did fall presently after their creation and are become those malignant spirits which vsually are tearmed Diuells 14. Thirdly That there is any materiall place of Hell where the wicked are tormented of which wee find nothing in the Creed in the iudgment of Protestants for although the word Hell be mentioned in that article He descended into Hell yet by the worde Hell the Graue is vnderstood by most of the Protestants 15. Fourthly That the paines of the damned shal be for all eternity and not for a certaine tyme only 16. Fifthly That Adam did presently vpon his creation fall from the grace of God and thereby transferred Originall sinne vpon all mankind So as by reason of his fall all men are borne in Originall sinne 17. Sixthly That the world was once drowned for sinne which innundation is commonly called Noës floode 18. Seueanthly That our Sauiour whilest he conuersed heere vpon earth did many miracles 19. Eightly That S. Iohn Baptist was our Sauiours Precursor or forerunner and that our Sauiour did chose to him certaine men for his Apostles which did first preach and plante the Christian fayth through out the whole world 20. Ninthly That Circomcision is now forbidden as a thing most vnlawfull and vngodly 21. Tenthly That there are any sacraments of the new Testament instituted by Christ for the spirituall good of mans soule 22. Eleuenthly That before the ending of the world Antichrist shall come who shall be a designed ennemy of Christ so as he shall labour to subuert and ouerthrow all Christian Religion 23. These points besides some others all Christians aswell Protestants as Catholikes do beleeue and doe hould that the beliefe of these points is necessary to saluation and yet not any one of all these articles is expressed or set downe in the Apostles Creed whence I conclude that the Apostles Creed cannot be a sufficient boundary to containe and limit an auaileable fayth For what hope can that man haue of his saluatiō who beleeueth that there are neither any diuine Scripture nor any Decalogue commonly called the ten Commandements nor that Christ did worke any miracles nor that he instituted any Sacraments nor that there is any place of hell for the damned nor finally to omit the rest that there is any eternity of punishment 24. And heere I am to premonish the Reader that it is no sufficient answere to reply that most of al the foresayd points are expressed in the Scripture and therefore are to be beleeued this I say auaileth not seeing heere I dispute against those who maintaine with wounderfull pertinacity of iudgment that it is sufficient to saluation to beleeue only the articles nothing els which are contayned in the Creed but not any of the former articles are contayned therein Againe seeing to beleeue that there are any diuine Scriptures is not expressed in the Creed it conduceth nothing to the answering of this our argument to say that the forementioned articles are proued out of Scripture and therfore are to be beleeued 25. Neither secondly can the force of our sayd argument be auoyded in replying that al the former articles are implicitly comprehended in that article I beleeue the holy Church because the Church teacheth that all these articles are to be beleeued this is no warrantable answere by reason that as these may be reduced to this article of the Creed so also may al other points controuerted betweene the Catholikes and the Protestants be in like manner reduced to the sayd article seeing the Church of God setteth downe what is the truth what is to be beleeued in the sayd Controuersyes binding her children vnder payne of damnation aswell to beleeue the truth in the Cōtrouersyes of our dayes as to beleeue the former articles mentioned which are not expressed in the Creed And yet these our Newtralists in Religiō who make the creed the sole square of their faith do not thinke that those questions of Religion insisted vpon betweene Catholikes and the Protestants are in beleeuing or not beleeuing of
them any way hurtefull to their saluation CHAP. V. The same proued from the want of vnity in fayth betweene Catholikes and Protestants in articles necessary to be beleeued and yet not expressed in the Creede IN this third and last place we will insist in certaine controuersyes of Religion so differently maintayned by Catholikes and Protestants as that graunting the maintaynours of the one side to hould the truth it followeth that the other party vphouldeth falsehood and heresy Now for the more dangerous wounding of our Newtralizing Protestants heerein I will omit here to speak of the Controuersies touching Purgatory Praying to Saints Free-will Monachisme and diuers others such like and will restraine my selfe only to these Controuersies the subiect of which Cōtrouersyes are taught by the one side to be vnder Christ the immediate meanes of our grace saluation and denyed by the other party to be of any such force and efficacy for the soules euerlasting good and consequently in regard of their subiect are one way necessarily to be beleeued So as if it be showed that the Protestants and the Catholiks do mainly dissent in the meanes of obtayning grace purchasing of saluation it must of necessity be inferred that both the Protestants and the Catholikes continuing in such their state cannot obtaine grace and saluation since not only Philosophy but euen naturall reason teacheth vs that he neuer shall attaine the end who vseth eyther not the same meanes which are only and necessarily instituted to the gayning of the sayd end 1. But to procced to these points First Concerning the sacraments in generall the Catholikes doe beleeue that all of them where no iust impediment is do conferre grace into the soule of man by the helpe and continuance of which grace the soule in the end obtayneth its saluation The Protestants do not ascribe any such supernaturall effect or operation of grace to them 2. And to come more particulerly to the Sacraments Touching Baptisme the Catholikes beleeue That children being borne in Originall sinne cannot be saued except they be baptized with water according to those wordes of S. Iohn 3. Vnlesse a man be borne againe of water and the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God The Protestants (a) Willet in his meditat in Psal 122. Calu. Beza frequently beleeue that infāts dying vnbaptised may be saued 3. Touching the Sacrament of Pennance or Confession the Catholikes beleeue That after a Christian hath committed any one mortall sinne that sinne cannot be forgiuen him but at least in voto by meanes of confessing the sayd sinne to a Priest of the new Testament and receauing absolution thereof from him answerably to that of S. Iohn 20. Whose sinnes you shall forgiue they are forgiuen them and whose sinnes you shall retayne they are retayned The Protestants beleeue that neyther the confession of sinnes to man nor the absolution of man is necessary for the remitting of them but that it is sufficient to confesse them only to God And thus according to the diuersity of doctrine either the Protestant for want of this sacrament after he hath mortally sinned cannot be saued or Catholiks for wrongfully imposing this yoak vpon Christiās do loose their saluation 4. Touching the most Blessed Eucharist the Catholikes beleeue That the very body and bloode doth lye ineffably and latently vnder the formes of bread and wine according to that This is my body This is my blood Math. 26. That vnlesse we eate his body and drinke his blood we shall not haue life euerlasting Iohn 6. Lastly That we are to adore Christ his body being accompanyed with his diuinity in the sayd Sacraments The Protestants do beleeue that Christs true body as neuer leauing heauen cannot possibly be truly and really vnder the forme of Bread and Wine and consequently they beleeue that the eating of his body and drinkinge of his blood is not necessary to saluation Finally they hould our adoration of the Sacrament to be open Idolatry and tearme Catholikes Idolaters for adoring of it And thus eyther the Protestāts as not feeding vpon this celestiall food shall not haue life euerlasting if the Catholikes doctrine heerein be true or els Catholikes suppose which God forbid they should erre for teaching and practising idolatry heerein should incurre damnation 5. Touching the meanes of our Iustification The Catholikes beleeue That not only fayth but workes also do iustify The Protestants reiect al workes from Iustification teachinge that only fayth doth iustify man yea they further proceed affirming that who once hath true fayth is most assured and certaine (b) Calu. in instit passim Kemnit in exam Conc. Tri of his saluation whereas the Catholikes reputing this as a meere presumption are willing according to the Apostle Phil. 2. To worke their saluation with feare and tremblinge To be short the Protestants do teach that a man by thinking himselfe to be iust is by this meanes become iust whereas the Catholikes do hould this doctrine not only to be phantasticall but also (c) Bella. l. 3. de Iustificatione in reason most absurd 6. Touching Grace without which a man cannot be saued the catholiks beleeue That God out of the Abysse and deapth of his infinite mercy offereth to euery Christian sufficient grace whereby he may be saued and therefore they do encourage euery one to endeauour to seeke their saluation The (d) Calu. Beza in whole treatises D. Willet sinopsi 1600. p. 789. Protestāts teach that God giueth not this sufficiency of grace to euery one but to certaine men only that diuers there are who notwithstanding al their endeauour to beleeue truly and liue vertuously yet they cannot nor shall not be saued 7. Touching the Decalogue or ten Commandements the Catholiks beleeue That except a Christian do keepe them he cannot be saued according to our Sauiour If thou wilt enter into lyfe keepe the Commandements Math. 19. The (e) The impossibility of the commandements is taught by D. Reynolds 2. conclus annexed to his conference p. 697. D. Willet in synopsi p. 564. Protestants do absolutly teach an impossibility of keeping them And thereupon Luther thus affirmeth The ten Commandements (f) Ser. de Moyse appertaine not vnto vs. 8. Lastly touching the Pope or Bishop of Rome the Catholikes do beleeue That he is vnder Christ the supreme Pastour vpon earth that who doth not communicate with him in sacraments and doctrine not yeelding him all true obedience in subiecting their iudgments in matters of fayth to his iudgment and sentential definitions cannot be saued The Protestants doe teach that the Bishop of Rome is that Antichrist which is deciphred by the (g) 2 Thess 2. Apoc. 13 17. Apostle and which is the designed ennemy of Christ and that whosoeuer embraceth his doctrine or enthralleth as they write their assents to his cathedrall decrees in points of Religion cannot obtayne saluation 9. Thus farre of these pointes of which I haue made
doe with all seruour and earnestnes maintaine that the church of Christ cannot erre and that what she defineth for truth is most true or what for Heresy or falsehood is hereticall and to be condemned 3. This basis or foundation of the Churches not erring being thus firmely layd we are herevpon to conclude that what points of Religion the Catholike Church of Christ hath condemned for heresies the same are by vs to be reputed for heresies since the Churches cōdemnation or approbation is most infallible the maintainours of the sayd heresies for heretikes and consequētly that such heretikes as departing out of the Church of God by their houlding of the sayd hereticall opinions cannot be saued Now because the iudgmēt of the Church in matters of fayth is by the aknowledgment of all sides discouered two wayes first by the sentence of generall Councells secondly by the frequent attestations of the chiefe doctors of the Church in euery age in their particuler writings they not being contradicted therein by any other orthodoxall Fathers or doctors of the same age I will therefore distributiuely handle both these wayes shewing that both by generall Councels and also by the particuler iudgment of the learned Fathers many opinions though not touching the Trinity the Incarnatiō the Passion or the expresse articles of the Apostles Creed haue bine condemned for plaine heresies and the belieuers of them anathematized for Heretikes 4. And first to begin with Councells the infallible authority of which euen Christ himself hath by his own words often ratifyed as where he sayth VVhere (k) Math. 18. two or three much more when many hūdred venerable Bishops are gathered together in my name I am in the midst of thē And againe speaking to his Church and in it to the assembled Doctours and Pastours thereof I am (l) Math. 28. with you all dayes euen to the consumation of the world Which councels are euer directed and gouerned by the holy Ghost according to those wordes in the Acts Visum est (m) c. 15 Spiritui sancto nobis It hath seemed good to the holy Ghost and vs. And therefore are worthily receaued admitted for the supremest sentence of Gods Church not only by the ancient (n) Atha epist ad Epictetū Aug. epi. 162. Nazianz oratione in Athanasium Cyrill l. de Trinitate c. Fathers but euen by the more learned Protestants since to omit others one of the most remarkable of them thus writeth Synods (o) D. Bilson in his perpetual gouermēt pag. 370. are an externall iudiciall meanes to discerne errour the supremest meanes to decyde doubts But to proceede The Councell of Nice was celebrated though principally for the repressing of the heresy of Arrius denying the diuinity of Christ yet withall touching the Controuersy of keeping the feast of Easter as is apparent out of (p) D. Bilson supra pag. 374. Eusebius (q) Lib. 3. de vita Constantini Athanasius and (r) De synodis Ariminis Seleuciae Epiphanius Now this Councel pronounceth Anathema to al those who besides their denying of the diuinity of Christ shall deny that the feast of Easter was not to be kept according to the custome of the church but according to the custome of the Iewes And these heretikes were called Quartodecimani Heres 70. Andianorū of whom see Tertul. l. de prescrip Augustine heresis 29. And here we are to vnderstand that the worde Anathema vsed and pronounced by this Councell which word is also almost euery where vsed in all their general Coūcells signifyeth asmuch as accursed and in this sense we find this word Anathema to be vsed by the Apostle in seueral (t) Epist ad Rom. 9.1 Cor. 12. c. places so as when a Councel pronounceth Anathema to any for belieuing such and such heresies or not belieuing such and such true doctrines it intendeth to say that those men so doing are to be accursed and abandoned from God But no man is to be accursed or abandoned from God for belieuing or not belieuing points of indifferency but for belieuing of such errours as cannot stand with his soules saluation 5. Also you shall reade Act. 15. of the Councell assembled in the Apostles time the occasion and reason thereof was for that certaine contentious men maintaining that the Gentiles cōuerted to the Christian fayth might eate meats offered vp to Idols blood and strangled beasts contrary to the custome of the Iewes the Apostles being assembled bearing with the weaknes of the Iewes in the infancy of the Church decreed the prohibition of eating blood and strangled meates After which decree once established it is certaine that it had bine a mortall sinne immediatly to haue eaten of blood and strangled meates so as before it being a point of indifferency is now made necessary This appeareth from the text first from those wordes Certaine going forth from vs haue troubled you with wordes subuerting your soules But men do neyther depart out of the Church by maintaintng certaine opinions nor by their example therein can they subuert other mens soules if their doctrine and practise thereof do stil remaine about things indifferent Secondly from that other passage It hath seemed good to the holy Ghost and vs to lay no further burthen vpon you then these necessary thinges where we find that the prohibition of such meates is ranged by the Apostles in regard of those tymes amoung those things which are necessary Againe neyther would the Apostles haue gathered themselues so solemly neither would they haue ascribed the decreeing of it to the worke of the holy Ghost if the subiect of the question and difficulty then discussed of by them had concerned matters only of indifferency 6. Now from the example of this Councell I do gather that if a Councell by its owne authority may decree that the eating of certaine meates being otherwayes of their owne nature indifferently to be eaten without sinne shal be vnlawful and shall repute and hould the impugners thereof for men departed from out of the Church of Christ then a fortiori what doctrine soeuer a Councell shall condemne of its owne nature for heresy the same is to be reputed by all good Christians for heresy and the defendours thereof for Heretikes 7. The third Councell of (u) Cau. 47. Carthage wherat S. Augustine was present decreed that the booke of the Maccabees with some other bookes should be acknowledged as canonicall and pronounceth an Anathema and condemnation to all those who should not belieue them as canonicall scripture from whence it may be concluded that seeing the booke of the Machabees teacheth prayer for the dead that therefore this Councell alloweth this doctrine and condemneth the contrary doctrine for heresy 8. The doctrine of the Nouatians who taught that there was not power in the Church to reconcile men to God but only by Baptisme excluding and denying thereby the sacrament of Pennance was condemned with the
transibunt verba autem mea non transibunt Math. 24 Heauē and earth shall passe away but my wordes shall not passe 5. But to proceede further touching the foresaid want of vnity disagreements if euery Christian might be saued in his owne Religion then might those be saued which beleiue the articles of the Creed in a most differēt sence manner then which what can be more rashly exorbitātly spoken For seeing there is but one true intended sence by the Apostles of the Creede which if we attaine not then doe we beleiue that which is false but to beleeue the Creede in a false sence is no better then not to beleiue it at all as is aboue said and therefore it would followe by way of inference that he might be saued who beleiued not any one article of the Creede at all Now that the Catholikes Protestants do beleiue the articles of the Creede in different or rather contrary senses and consequently that the one side beleiueth it in a false and erroneous sense is aboue proued in the fourth chapter 6. If it be here replyed that the maintainers of this doctrine do so farre yeald that they only are to be saued which in a true sence beleeue the Creed yet by this their restrainct they condemne all those others which beleeue it in any other sense different from that intended by the Holy Ghost and the Apostles and consequently they condemne in their iudgment and depriue of saluation either the Catholikes or the Protestants since of necessity the one of these do beleeue the Creed not in its true sense but in a false and hereticall sence and construction different from that of the Apostles 7. But granting that the Catholikes and Protestants beleeue the Creed in one true sence intended by the holy Ghost yet if our Newtralists would haue the Creed the square or rule thereby to measure our fayth then marke the absurdityes following For by this doctrine one might be saued who beleeued 1. Not that there were any Scriptures at all written by the Prophets Apostles since the Creed maketh no mention of any such diuine writinges 2. In like sort he might be saued who did not beleeue there were any Angells or Diuels 3. Or that there is a materiall place of Hell 4. Or that the paynes thereof are eternall 5. Or that Adam did presently vpon his creation fall from grace and therby transported original sinne vpon all his posterity 6. Or that our Sauiour whilest he conuersed heere vpon earth wrought any miracles 7. Or made choice of certaine men to be his Apostles to preach the Christian fayth throughout the whole worlde 8. Or that Circumsicion is now forbidden and antiquated 9. Or that there are any Sacraments of the new testament as Baptisme the Eucharist c. 10. Or that finally before the dissolution of the world a designed ennemy of Christ shall come who is tearmed Antichrist I say by our Newtralists Religion he should be saued who beleeued none of the foresayd articles seeing not any one of them is expressed or set downe in the Apostles creed and yet the beliefe of the sayd articles is necessarily exacted required to saluation both in the iudgments of the Catholikes the Protestants both which partyes do with an vnanimous consent teach the necessity of beleeuing the sayd articles 8. But to proceed further to come to the different articles of fayth differently beleeued by the Catholikes Protestants and yet not expressed in the Creed articles of such nature as that they are houlden by the Catholikes to be instituted by our Sauiour as subordinate yet necessary meanes of the grace of God and of saluation whereas the Protestants as not beleeuing at all the sayd articles do wholely disclayme from acknowledging all such meanes These articles I haue recited aboue to wit 1. That Sacraments in generall do conferre grace 2. That a childe dying without baptisme cannot be saued 3. That mortall sinne is not remitted without the sacrament of Pennance and confession 4. That we are to adore with supreme honour the Blessed Sacrament 5. That not only fayth but also workes do iustify man 6. That a Christian by thinking himselfe to be iust is not thereby become iust 7. That euery Christian hath sufficient grace offered by God to saue his soule that therefore God on his part would haue all men saued 8. That without keeping the tenne commandements a man cannot be saued 9. Finally that all Christians ought vpon payne of eternall damnation to communicate in sacraments and doctrine with the church of Rome and to submit themselues in al due obedience to the supreme pastour of Gods church In al which points the Protestants do beleeue directly the contrary condemning vs of heresy superstition yea idolatry for our belieuing the foresayd points Now I say seeing the former articles do immediatly touch concerne either remission of our sinnes or grace of our soule or our iustification or our due honour adoration to our Sauiours body being accompanied with his diuinity or lastly our communion with Christ his church and the head therof in any of which as concerning so nearely our eternall happines who erreth cannot possibly be saued 9. And seeing the Protestants as is sayd do in all the sayd points maintaine the iust contrary to the Catholikes and thereby do abandone the Catholikes acknowledged meanes of their saluation I heare aske in all sobernes of iudgment what can be reputed for a greater absurdity then to affirme with our Newtralists that the Catholikes and Protestants notwithstanding their so different and contrary beliefe and answearble practise in the former articles so neerely touching mans saluation may both be saued Seeing it must needs be that either the Catholikes shal be damned for setting downe certaine means of our saluation contrary to Christs mind and institution supposing the sayd means to be false or that the Protestants shal be damned for reiecting the former meanes of Saluation instituted by Christ admitting them to be true 10. But to passe forward If euery Christian might be saued in his Religion in beleuing only the fundamentall points of the Trinity the Incarnation c. then hath the Church of Christ euen in her primitiue dayes at what time the Protestants themselues (h) See of this acknowledgement the defence of the Apology of Englād written by Doctor Iewel Kemnit in exam Concil Trid. par 1. p. 74. the cōfess of Bohemia in the harmony of confess pag. 400. besides diuers others doe exempt her from errour most fondly intollerably erred in condemning certaine opinions which are not fundamentall for Heresies and the maintayners for Heretikes and consequently the scripture and Christ himselfe haue deceaued vs by ascribing vnto the Church an infallibility (i) Math. 18. Luc. 10.2 Tim. 3. of erring in her definitions of Faith and cōdemnation of heresies and by commanding vs to obey the churches authority and sentence in all thinges as
excōmunication is inflicted The Apostle in 2. Thess cap. 3. coniureth as it were in the name of Christ that all should auoid all false belieuers in these words We denounce vnto you Brethren in the name of our Lord Iesus Chirst that you withdraw your selues from euery Brother walking inordinately and not according to the tradition which they haue receaued of vs. This place concerneth faith and doctrine as the whole chapter sheweth but if these men here to be eschewed were in state of saluation they ought not then to be eschewed Againe this text cannot haue reference to those who deny the Trinity the Incarnation and Passion seeing the deniers of these high articles are not Brethren in Christ and yet the Apostle styleth them Brethren whome he here reprehendeth 3. Againe the Apostle in another place thus forewarneth The (b) Epist. ad Gall. cap. 5. workes of the flesh be manifest which are fornication vncleanes impurity or dissentions sects c. They which doe these things shall not obtaine the kingdome of God Where wee see is expresse mention made of Sects and that maintainours of any sects in opinion of faith much more of any Heresie which is euer auerred with greater contumacy and frowardnes and with neglect of the Churches authority shall not enter into the kingdome of heauen from which Testimonies we may further conclude that as one only act of fornication barreth a man from the kingdome of God so also one Heresie excludeth him from the same 4. A fourth place is this I desire (c) Epist ad Rom. cap. 16. you Brethren to marke them that make dissentions and scandalls contrary to the doctrine which you haue learned and auoid them for such do not serue Christ our Lord But if such men be to be auoided and doe not serue Christ then no doubt they continuing in that state cannot be saued Againe 1. Tim. 1. the Apostle speaketh of certaine men and saith of them that Quidam circa (d) 1. Timoth 2. fidem naufragauerunt Certaine men made shipwracke about the faith Where the Apostle vseth the metaphor of shipwracke therby to expresse more fully that Heretikes once falling out of the shippe of Christs churche are cast into the sea of eternall damnation To conclude the Euangelist Saint Iohn speaketh of all Heretikes in generall not embracing the doctrine of Christ within which all secondary questions of christian Religion are contained in this sort If any man come (e) 2. Ioan vnto you and bring not the doctrine of Christ receaue him not into your house nor say God saue you vnto him But a man is bound in charity to suffer any one who is in state of saluation to come into his house and to salute him or say God saue him 5. Now what can be replyed against these former Texts It cannot be sayd that they are meant only of such Heretikes as deny the mysteryes of the Trinity the Incarnation of Christ his Passion and such like supreme and cardinall points of Christian Religion this I say cannot be auerred for these reasons following First because those who in the Apostles tymes denyed these principall points of Christianity could not be truely tearmed Heretikes seeing he is truely an Heretike who was once a member of Christs church by fayth but after ceaseth to be thereof no more then all the Iewes or Gentils could not be accounted or styled Heretikes because they neuer beleeued the foresayd mysteryes of christianity Secondly by reason that according to the former definition of Heresy or Heretikes aboue set downe the former Texts haue a necessary reference to all Heresy and heretikes whatsoeuer whether the subiect of the sayd false opinion be small or great Thirdly because that in the former Texts of Scripture there is no restriction of the word Haereticus or Haeresis to the chiefe or highest points of Christian Religion but it is extended to all kind of Heretikes or Heresies whatsoeuer euen by the Apostle without exception who no doubt if he had vnderstood Heresyes or Heretiks only in the greatest points at least in some one Text or other among so many would accordingly haue restrayned his wordes only to those kind of Heretikes and the rather seeing the denyall of those great points only not of others do in our Libertines opinion make the denyers thereof Heretikes But not to leaue the least show of refuge or euasion heerin I will produce some passages of holy Scripture in which the maintenours of particuler errours euen in lesser points then the highest articles of Christianity are censured by Christs Apostles to be depriued of eternall saluation 6. And first we find S. Paul thus to prophesy In (f) 1 Tim. c. 4. the later times certaine shal depart from the fayth attending to spirits of errour and doctrine of Diuells forbidding to mary and to abstaine from meates Heere the Apostle prophesieth according to the iudgment of (g) Hom. 12. in Timot Saint Chrysostome (h) In hunc locū Ambrose (i) Lib. contra Iouin c. 7. Hierome and S. (k) Her 25. 40. Augustine of the Heretikes Eucratites Marcionists Ebionists such like who denyed Matrimony as a thing altogether vnlawfull and prohibited absolutly at al tymes and the eating of certaine meates as creatures impure Now these Heretikes belieued in the Trinity and might in the Incarnation c. and yet euen for these two former Heresies touching mariage and eating of meates and not for the Trinity or Incarnation they are sayd by the Apostle to departe from the fayth of Christ and to attend to the doctrine of Diuels But such as leaue the fayth of Christ and attend to the doctrine of Diuels are not in state of saluation In my iudgement this one authority alone is sufficient to ouerthrow this phantasy of our Newtralists since the wordes are diuine scripture the heresies reprehended no fundamentall points of Religion but of as little or lesser consequence then the Controuersies betweene the Catholikes and the Protestants and yet the maintainers of them are accounted to depart from the faith of Christ and to attend to the doctrine of Diuels 7. A second place shal be that of the former Apostle who writing of certaine Heretiks erring touching the Resurrectiō of the body sayth thus Their (l) 2. Timoth 2. speach spreadeth like a Canker of whome is Hymenaeus and Philetus who haue erred from the truth saying that the Resurrection is already past and haue subuerted the fayth of some These men beleeued all the mysteryes of the Trinity Incarnation c. seeing otherwise the Apostle would haue reprehended them for want or beliefe therein as for the article of the Resurrection yet for erring only touching the resurrection of the body they are sayd to erre from the truth to subuert the fayth of some and that as a Canker neuer leaueth the body till by little and little it wasteth it away so their speaches by degrees poyson and kill the soules of
Protestants Religions all who ioyntly do professe to beleeue in generall in the Trinity in Christ his Incarnation his Passion and the creed of the Apostles and so we shall discerne whether the fayth of all these seuerall professors doth inioy the foresayd marke of vnity in doctrine or no. But seeing this subiect is most ample and lardge I will therefore sepose this ensuing Chapter for the more full and exact discouery of the many and great disagreements betweene Catholikes and the Protestants in their fayth and Religion The same proued from want of vnity in Fayth between Catholikes and Protestants touching the Articles of the Creed and from that that the Catholike Protestant do agree in the beliefe of diuers articles necessarily to be beleeued and yet not expressed in the Creede CHAP. IIII. VNdertaking in this place to set downe the multiplicity of doctrines betweene Catholikes and Protestants though they all ioyntly beleeue in the Trinity the Incarnation of Christ his Passion and the like consequently to show that this their generall beliefe wanteth that true vnity of fayth which out of the holy Scriptures Fathers the Protestants I haue aboue showed to be most necessary to saluation I will first examine how the Catholikes and the Protestants do differ touching their beliefe of the creed made by the Apostles Next I will demonstrate that supposing all Professors of both Religions should agree in the true sence and meaning of the creed yet there are diuers other dogmaticall points necessarily to be beleeued are at this instant beleeued both by Protestants and Catholiks which are not expressed or mentioned in the Creed at al or by any immediate inference to be drawne from thence Lastly I will set downe the great difference betweene Catholikes and Protestants in other points of fayth of which the Creed maketh no intimation or mention at all and yet the beliefe of them is houlden necessary to saluation both by Catholike and Protestant from all which it shall appeare how far distant the Catholike and Protestant Religion are from that vnity in doctrine so necessarily required to that fayth whereby a Christian is to be saued 2. I do heere begin with the Apostles creed first because the articles of the Trinity the Incartion the Passion c. are included in the creede Secondly by reason there are many Adiaphorists in Religion as I may tearme them who seeme to deale more lardgly and liberally heerein seeinge they are content to extend the necessary obiect of fayth not only to the articles of the Trinity the Incarnation and Passion but to all pointes set downe in the creed who assure themselues that God exacteth not at our hands the beliefe of any other articles then what are contained in the creed Now heere aforehand we are to conceaue that true fayth resteth in that true sense and meaning of the wordes of the Creed which was intended by the Apostles and not in the wordes themselues seeing both in the iudgment of all learned Catholikes and Protestants to beleeue the words of the creed in a sense different from the intended sense of the Apostles and consequently in a false sense is no better then not to beleeue at all And the reason heereof is because a false construction drawne from the creede no lesse then from the Scripture is not the word of God but the word of man and consequently the sayd letter of the creed so interpreted is subiect to the same censure whereunto the word of man is lyable from whence it followeth that whosoeuer belieueth the wordes of the creed in another sense then was intended by the holy Ghost and the Apostles doth not beleeue the creed at all but only beleeueth the worde of man which euer standeth subiect to errour and mistaking So as the sentence of Saint Hierome deliuered only of the Scripture may iustly be applyed of the creed Scripturae (a) In ep ad Paulinum non in legendo sed in intelligendo consistunt The Scripture or Creed doth not consist in the letter but in the sense and true vnderstanding of the letter 3. This then being truly presupposed let vs begin to examine the articles of the creed and see how we Catholiks and Protestants do differ in the construction and vnderstanding thereof And first touching the first article of our Beliefe in God obserue how different it is The Catholiks do beleeue that their God no way cooperateth or willeth sinne in man that he hath but one simple expressed will touching sinne this in detesting and hating of it that he will not punish vs for not keeping of such precepts the which is not in our power to keepe that he imputeth sinnes to euery man that committeth sinne briefly that he giueth to all men ordinary and sufficient grace to saue their soules and desireth that all men may be saued whereas the Protestants beleeue the meere cōtrary to al these points for they beleeue that their God (b) Beza in his display of popish practise pag. 202. saith God exciteth the wicked will of one thiefe to kill another See Zuinglius tom 2 de proui c. 6. fol. 365. Caluin instit l. 2. c. 18. sect 1. cooperateth forceth and willeth a man to sinne that he hath a double (c) Luther tom 2. Wittemburg de cap. Babil fol. 74. D. VVhitakerus de Eccles cont Bell. controuersia 2. quest 5. pag. 301. wil and therefore a dissembling will the one expressed in Scripture according to which he forbideth man to sinne the other concealed to himselfe by the which he impelleth man to sinne that he will punish (d) Reynolds in his 2. conclusion annexed to his conference pag. 697. vs transgressing the ten commandmēts it not being in our power to keepe the sayd commandements that to the (e) Luth. tomo 2. Wittemb de capt Babyl fol 74. Whitak vt supra faythfull sinning neuer so wickedly no sinne shal be imputed Finally that to certaine (f) Cal. instit l. 3. c. 23. saith God doth ordaine cōsilio nutuque by his Councell pleasure that among mē some be borne to certaine damnatiō from their mothers wombe See D. Willets synopsi p. 554. affirming the same men he giueth not sufficient meanes of saluation but purposeth and decreeth from all eternity that some men lyuing in the eye of the world and in their owne conscience neuer so vertuously shal be damned and cast into sempiternall perdition Thus we see how great a difference there is betweene the Catholikes and Protestants in beleeuing the first article of the creede and how ineuitably it followeth that eyther the Catholiks or protestants do stand subiect and obnoxious to that saying of S. Augustine quest 29. sup Iosue who imagineth God such as God is not he carryeth euery where another God to wit a false God in his mind 4. Touching the 2. article which is And in Iesus Christ his only Sonne wee (g) Con. Trident. Catholikes belieue in