having a Promise not believing entred not into God's Rest and some of them believing did enter So they having a Promise if they believe not shall not enter if they believe shall enter and enjoy the benefit and Rest promised The ground of this Application is that they had a Promise and this thing promised is God's Rest For there was a Rest remaining for them as well as for their Fathers The words are A Promise being left of entring into his Rest. SOme translate and understand the words of leaving and by unbelief forsaking the Promise yet this cannot be the intention of the Apostle which is made clear by these words There remaineth therefore a Rest or Sabbatism to the People of God ver 9. where we have the same simple though not the same compound Verb. To understand this we must know that God promised Rest unto the Israelites in the Land of Canaan which should be their Inheritance Therefore some understand the word left to be taken Metaphorically as Legacies are left and bequeathed in a Testament unto Children and so this was left to them by God's Promise As they had a Promise of a Rest so these Hebrew Christians had a Promise of a far more excellent Rest as well as they But then the Question is where have we this Promise and who makes it and where is it made God makes it and he makes it in the Gospel Therefore he first proves that a Promise is left them as their Fathers had a Promise For it followeth Ver. 2. For unto Us was the Gospel preached as well on to Them VVHere we have two Propositions 1. That the Gospel was preached to the Israelites in the Wilderness 2. It was preached to these Hebrews 1. It was preached to the Israelites For as a Promise was made to Abraham that he in his Seed should inherit the Land of Canaan so this Promise was renewed unto them in the Wilderness and God was ready to perform it and give them possession Yet this Promise was made and to be performed upon certain conditions and duties to be performed by them And because this Canaan was a Type and Figure of the heavenly Inheritance and eternal Rest to be obtained by Jesus Christ therefore the Gospel might be said to be preached to them though darkly and implicitly 2. It was preached to these Hebrews yet more clearly and fully by the Apostles In this Gospel as preached to them the Promises are one principal thing and amongst the Promises that of eternal Rest is the chiefest and includes all the rest This Promise is made for and in consideration of Jesus Christ the condition is Faith in Christ meriting the same and after his Sufferings being entred into this rest This Promise of Rest upon Faith in Christ already come is the substance and matter of the Gospel and the Doctrine thereof is the Gospel in proper sense hough the Doctrine preached to the Israelites whereâ—n Rest was promised upon condition of Faith was also the Gospel and might be so called though imperfectly But what was the issue of this Promise in respect of the Israelites It was two-fold 1. In respect of them who believed not it did not profit them 2. In respect of them that believed they entred into God's rest for so the Apostle informs us But the Word preached did not profit them not mixed with Faith in them that heard it In which words may be observed 1. The Event 2. The Reason The Event It profited not the Reason They believed not the Word For though the Word be the Power of God unto Salvation in them that believe yet it 's a Word of eternal death to Unbelievers Both these the Event and the Reason are delivered in two Propositions 1. That the Word preached did not profit them 2. It was not mixed with Faith in them that heard it The latter is the former in order of Nature Both include many Propositions 1. That the Word was preached unto them 2. They did hear it for how should they hear without a Preacher Where by the way note that the Gospel of Doctrine here meant in the Original is called the Word of Hearing implying that it was so preached as that they did or might hear it as they were bound to do 3. They who heard it did not believe The Expression in the Original is that it was not mixed with Faith For that whereby the Soul receiveth the Word is Faith and that whereby it receiveth it effectually is a sincere Faith For this heavenly Doctrine is like a liquor it 's an heavenly Water and is poured upon men by preaching and is of rare and excellent vertue when it 's received and digested in the Soul by Faith For the saying in Philosophy is true in this case Actus activorum sunt in passo unito disposito For by the Soul rightly disposed and by Faith receiving this Doctrine the Doctrine is as it were incorporated into the Soul and made one with it 4. This Word not believed did not profit that is did not prove any wayes effectual either for a title to eternal rest or for the possession of it For they not performing the condition God was no wayes bound to perform his promise to them yet this was not all he was so offended with them that he pastan irrevocable sentence of exclusion upon them By all this we may understand 1. That it 's a great Mercy in God to vouchsafe us the Gospel and to have it faithfully and constantly preached unto us so that we may hear it This of it self is an excellent means of our Conversion and the mighty Power of God unto Salvation It 's like the Mannâ— and heavenly kind of Food which being eaten and received into our Souls will nourish and preserve us It 's a divine light to guid us to Heaven And â—o unto them to whom God denies it for they sit in darkness and the shadow of death without any hope of Salvation 2. In this Gospel there are precious Promises the cheifest whereof is that of entring into God's Rest The condition of it is sincere Faith and continuance therein unto the end This Rest was merited by Jesus Christ To believe sincerely and persevere therein is the Duty commanded and to be performed to enter is the great Reward Therefore we should diligently consider that it promises the greatest good that God did ever give or Man is capable of and in this respect is the best Doctrine in the World yet lest Man should presume he promiseth it upon condition of perseverance and for the merit of a Saviour If we do attain it we do not deserve it for the enjoyment of it is a free Gift of God yet though God give it freely yet he gives it to none that are guilty of Unbelief and Apostacy 3. Men may hear the Gospel preached and yet receive no benefit by it through their own fault Meat will feed if it be eaten Water will quench thirst if we
are reckoned up jointly with others which are not mentioned by Name After the Catalogue of these Worthies is finished the Argument taken from their Example is applied In all this Discourse you must observe 1. That the end of the Apostle is to shew the Excellency of that Faith and Perseverance which was spoken of in the former Chapter 2. That the Argument or Suasive here used for to confirm them in the Faith is taken from Example of many of the most eminent Saints and Servants of God recorded in the Old Testament and of such as lived before the Exhibition of Christ. 3. That the force of the Argument is not only in this that they believed and persevered in the Faith but chiefly from this that all their rarest and most heroick Acts and Sufferings whereby they attained so many and great Blessings did issue from their Faith without which they could have done little or nothing § 2. But to enter upon the Chapter and the Text it self we read Ver. 1. Now Faith is the Substance of things hoped for and the Evidence of things not seen THis is said to be a Description of Divine Faith a perfect Definition it cannot be That Faith is such a vertue as here is described may easily be known from the former ter whence it may be and is deduced And the Apostle thought good to premise these words for the better understanding and application of the following Examples In the words which speak of Faith we have two Propositions 1. Faith is the Substance of things hoped for 2. Faith is the Evidence of things not seen In both these we may note 1. The Object 2. The Act of Faith In the first Proposition things hoped for are in the Object and the Act is signified by the word Hypostasis here turned Substance The whole Verse may be understood either of Faith in general whether Moral or Divine yet here it 's principally meant of that Divine Faith whereby we obtain Salvation To define what Faith in general is belongs to Logick which is the Rule of Man's Understanding whereof Faith is an Act and that Act which we call Assent and so it differs from Dissent and Doubting Yet Assent may be imperfect and mixt with some degrees of Doubt and this is ordinarily called Opinion and it may be perfect and certain and that without Doubt Yet this Assent may be firm and given unto a false Proposition conceived to be true or to a Proposition true in it self either as clear in it's own Light or upon demonstration and evident Proof or at second hand and represented unto us by some extrinsecal Lights as by the Testimony of another of whose certain Knowledg and Integrity we make no doubt This Testimony is humane or divine The ground of this Faith and Assent here intended is the Testimony of God And here two things are required 1. That the thing testified be credible 2. That we have certain Knowledg that the thing to be believed be testified by God The Tradition of the Church being but an humane Testimony cannot fully satisfy us herein but we must have other artificial Arguments to prove that which the Church saith is the word of God indeed And so far only as we know the things to be believed to be testified by God so far only can we believe with a divine and an infallible Faith So that the Testimony of God known certainly to us to be his Testimony is the ground of this Faith here intended One Object of this Faith is things hoped for Things hoped for in this Text are 1. Things and Rewards promised by God as to come and not yet received 2. The principal of these is eternal life and that great and glorious Reward mentioned in the former Chapter and to be received upon final Perseverance in Faith Of these things or of their futurition we can by Nature and the Light of Reason have no intuitive or demonstrative Knowledg The Truths concerning them and their fruition are revealed from Heaven and as so revealed they are fit and proper Objects of our Faith which is here said to be the Hypostasis of these things This word is interpreted several wayes for some will have it to signify the Substance Ground Foundation of things hoped for Others a certain persuasion and expectation of them Others the Subsistance or Existence of this great Reward to come This variety of Opinions concerning the signification of the word in this place makes the Proposition doubtful unto many The Syriack Translator turns the words in this manner Faith is the Certainty or certain Persuasion of these things which are in hope as though they did actually exist or were in effect to them that do believe This Certainty or certain Persuasion is an act of the Soul of Man divinely enlightned whereby it doth as firmly believe that such as persevere in Faith shall as certainly receive the great Reward as though they did actually enjoy it This is that we call a firm Assent grounded upon the Word and Promise of God for this Word and Promise is the Hypostasis Ground Foundation Basis of this Assent in respect of things hoped for upon which the Soul is firmly fixed and this Assent is the Principle of all other heavenly vertues and in particular and more immediately of our Hope So that by this Assent these things hoped for though in themselvs yet to come have a kind of mental ideal intellectual Existence as present by Faith unto him that hath Faith and this is a mighty motive to perseverance And here is to be noted 1. That though things future as hoped for are here only mentioned as the object of Faith yet it 's not the adequate object for Faith extends further and moves in a larger Sphear 2. That this Faith is not only a certain assent perswasion and belief of the Truths and Revelations of God concerning these things but also a certain expectation of the things promised and a firm confidence and reliance upon God promising concerning the performance of the promise Yet neither this expectation nor this confidence can be Faith strictly taken though it 's certain that in respect of things hoped for as such it 's often taken in this large sense The firm assent is indeed alwayes presupposed as the ground of both § 3. The second Proposition which is That Faith is the evidence of things not sin Where 1. The Object is things unseen 2. The Act is evidence of those things 1. The Object is something not seen Things unseen are not only such things as are invisible and such as cannot be received by the eye but also such as are not perceivable by any of our senses Neither are things insensible meant but such as are above the reach of reason Most of our knowledg is acquired by our senses especially of hearing and seeing according to that Maxim Nihil est in intellect is quod non prius fuer at in sensu Though this be true only
enlarge but also polish his Discourse and excellently set forth their Faith and the forenamed Effects thereof The whole is an excellent Testimony of the three eminent Patriarchs and therein we have 1. The Duty they performed 2. God's owning them and expressing his dear Affection towards them The first of these is continued from the beginning of Ver. 13. to the latter end of the 16th in the last words whereof we have the second thing here observed Their Duty and the Performance thereof may be reduced to certain Propositions 1. These all not receiving the Promises dyed in the Faith Of which two parts 1. Their not receiving the Promises 2. Their dying in the Faith though they received them not 1. They received not the Promises Where by Promises understand the things promised For otherwise it cannot be true because it 's certain that Promises were made unto them they knew them and received them by Faith But the things promised were neither given nor received till long after and these are reduced to four heads which be these 1. A numerous Posterity 2. The Land of Canaan 3. The Incarnation and Exhibition of Christ. 4. The Resurrection to eternal Glory The parties here meant are Abraham Isaac and Jacob not any named before nor any mentioned after these Three for they were the Persons who came from beyond the River Euphrates who sojourned in the Land of Canaan who dwelt in Tabernacles Of these it 's said that they received not the things promised For neither was their Posterity made as yet so numerous nor had they any hereditary Possession of the Land of Canaan nor did they see Christ in the Flesh or hear the Gospel for that followed about 2000 years after the Promises were first made nor did they attain the Resurrection and Immortality 2. Yet they dyed even all of them in the Faith Which words signify 1. They did believe 2. Continued firm in the Faith unto the end though they received not the Promises The meaning is they not only lived but dyed Believers delay and non-enjoyment did not break their hearts neither could Death it self when they might perhaps be put to the greatest Conflict separate their Souls and their Faith though it separated their Souls and their Bodies For this divine vertue was deeply rooted and fastned in them and was immortal as their better part was and followed the Soul into another World Death might bereave them of their Friends and their temporal Estates and all their earthly Comforts but of Faith it could not And it 's to be noted that not only one but all of them dyed in the Faith These were rare Patterns of Perseverance in this rare and incomparable vertue of Faith The second Proposition is That seeing them afar off they were perswaded of them and embraced them This should not have been a distinct Proposition for it's part of the former and added to those words not receiving the Promises And it 's somewhat observable that the word perswaded is wanting in several Manuscripts They received them not but 1. Saw them afar off For they were distant and to come and not to be accomplished or enjoyed in their dayes and some of them were more distant from their times than others some were nearer The principal which were the Exhibition of Christ and the universal Resurrection stood at the most remote distance of time from them Yet these they saw for divine Revelation as a celestial Light did represent them unto them the Promise did signify they had a Right unto them and part in them And as by this divine Light they were manifested unto them so by the Eye of Faith which is the spiritual visive Faculty of the Soul they saw them as they were represented that is at a distance For Faith can see beyond and above the World and hath some glimmering or imperfect sight of Eternity 2. They were perswaded of them and assured that in God's good time which was the sittest they should be fulfilled The Revelation and Promise was a sure Ground of this Perswasion and the Substance of things hoped for and the Evidence of things not seen 3. They embraced them the word signifies to salute to draw near to rejoyce to embrace for in saluting dearest friends we draw near unto them embrace them rejoyce to seethem Some think the word here is Metaphorical and the Expression taken from such as after a long and tedious Voyage at Sea come within ken of Land and discover their own dearest Country where they expect to abide and rest For so soon as they discover and have sight of their own dear native Soil they wonderfully rejoice and begin with joyful Acclamations to say Land Land Land Haven Haven Haven now Rest and Safety are near So it 's certain that these Saints and heavenly Worthies drawing near their end beheld these excellent Blessings and especially their Saviour and their heavenly Country and being sure of the futurition and enjoyment of them rejoyced with exceeding great Joy Our Saviour saith thus Abraham rejoyced to see my day and he saw it and was glad Joh. 8. 56. When Abraham lived the day of Christ's Incarnation and the blessed Redemption of sinful Man was to come and afar off Yet Abraham by Faith saw that day and seeing it though not near or so clearly he was glad and rejoyced wonderfully And now our Faith and Hope of eternal Glory though afar off is a Cause of unspeakable Joy The third Proposition They confessing themselvs Strangers and Pilgrims on Earth declared plainly that they sought a Country Here we may consider 1. What they did express 2. What they did imply 1. The thing expressed is That they were Pilgrims and Strangers on Earth For 1. They were Pilgrims and Strangers on Earth 2. They did openly confess this 1. They were Pilgrims and Strangers on Earth That they did so journ in the Land of promise as in a strange Country you heard before yet they sojourned not only there but in other places as in Gerar and Aegypt and for the whole time of their mortal Life they were Pilgrims and Strangers on Earth and could not be said to be Free-men Denizons or Members of any Community or Commonwealth in the World But they might be such either Politically or Spiritually and they were in both respects such for Man being immortal should provide for some place of perpetual Abode and many thinking only of their Settlement on Earth and of perpetuating themselves and their Names in their Posterity by successive Generations look no higher than this World If these travel out of their native Country they must needs be Strangers in all Forreign States if not naturalized in some of them As for these Patriarchs they had forsaken their own Country out of which God had called them and lost all their native and birth-right Priviledges yet they did not seek to settle themselvs in any other part of the Earth neither did they incorporate with any other People in the
4. Who made them by him 1. By Worlds some understand 1. All times 2. All things in all times Others think that he used the expression of the Rabbins who make there Worlds 1. The lowest which is the Earth Sea and all things in them The second and the middle is the Ayr and the Aethereal part with the Sphears The third is the supream the World of Angels God and Souls Yet all these are but one World and systeme of Heaven and Earth and the Word signifies all times and durations with all places and all things in all times and places 2. The making of these Worlds is the giving them their Being after that they had no Being and is the same with creating and framing as we may read in many other places 3. These Worlds were made by the Word which once made Flesh was Christ For by the Word and Wisdom of God which was the Rule and Idea of all things all things were modeled and received their forms shapes and distinct beings 4. It was God who by this Word which was his Word and was with him in the beginning and also from eternity so that it was God as he was God the same God the same essence Yet we must not understand this so as though God made the World by his Son as by an instrument or inferiour distinct Agent but Father Word and Spirit were an individual efficient sole cause of the Worlds This is the same with that of the divine Evangelist All things were made by him that is by the Word and without him was not any thing made which was made Joh. 1. 3. The Apostle Paul expresseth this more particularly and distinctly for speaking of the Son he saith That by him were all things created that are in Heaven and that are in â—arâ—â— visible and invisible whether they be Thrones or Dominâ—ons or Principalities or Powers all things were created by him and for him Colos. 1. 16. This is so clear that I wonder with what face Crâ—llius could expound the words so as by the Worlds to understand Man and by making and creating the Worlds the reforming and restoring Mankind This seems to be more strange seeing he understands those words By Faith we understand that the Worlds were framed by the Word of God Heb. 11. 3. of the Creation of the World The cause of this his false exposition is plain enough For this being affirmed of Christ that by him God made the Worlds it did plainly evince his Existence before his conception of the Virgin Mary nay before the World which was contrary to their damnable Errour Therefore he wilfully devised this interpretation lest he should grant the etemity of the Son of God But in Chap. 11. 3. where there was no mention of Christ he could give the genuine sense § 7. Ver. 3. Who being the brightness of his Glory To be Hâ—iâ— of all things did agree to him upon the Resurrection that God made the Worlds by Him referrs unto the work of Creation but to be the brightness of his Fathers Glory and the express image of his person agrees to Him from eternity For in these words we may observe his eternal generation and production Some think the expression is taken out of the Book of Wisdom though Apocryâ—hâ—l Chap. 7. 26. where Wisdom is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the brightness oâ— effulgency of eternal Light For we find diverse expressions of those Apocryphal Books taken up and used in the New Testament For the better understanding hereof we must observe 1. That God is often called Light because this bodily and visible Light is Glorious and in several respects resembles that eternal glorious essence of God 2. That here God is said to have Light or Glory not that Glory or Light is an accident in God but because he is said to have that which he is For God is not only lightfome and glorious but Light and Glory Therefore this Glory is essential Glory or Light â— 3. The Similitude here used is taken not from accidental but substantial Light as the same is said to be a Light Purity beauty delectability in Light do teach us something of Him 4. Brightness or effulgency here must not be understood to be either an effect or an accident of this spiritual infinite and eternal Glory yet it 's something issuing from and produced by that Glory as the mental Word which is a kind of invisible brightness is the issue product or broode of the intellect which is a spiritual Light From this pâ—ice and such like the Nicene Fathers did conlude That Jesus Christ was the only begotten Son of God begotten of his Father before all Worlds God of God Light of Light very God of very God begotten not made being of one substance with the Father by whom all things were made By this we may easily understand that they believed 1. The Glory to be a substance 2. The brightnesse to be a substance not an effect or accident 3. That the glory and brightnesse were one and the same substance 4. That the brightness issued from and was a product of the Glory not meerly as from a substance but as from a substance acting and acting upon it self 5. That Christ in this respect did exist from eternity We know little of this bodily Light less of the intellectual Light of the Soul and least of all of this eternal Light Therefore we trust believe according to plain Scripture most certainly that which we cannot clearly understand From hence we may understand the reason why Jesus Christ is called the Word and it is as because the word of the Intellect reflecting upon it self to know it self is a product of it self so is the Son of God the product of the eternal Intellect beholding it self to know itself yet this is the difference that this Word of the Soul is not so perfect nor real as this Word of God And the express Image of his person If Light produce Light then the Light produced must be like unto and in some measure represent more the Light and Glory producing and the more perfect and immediate the production is the more perfect is the resemblance and expression And because this production was perfect therefore this brightness is said to be the express Image of his Father The word translated here the express Image is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Character or impression made by Sculpture or some other way and this Character if rightly made is a lively expression of the samplar as an ectypon of the prototype This brightness is said to be the Character of his Hypostasis which some turn substance some turn person This implys 1. That he is a substantial Image yet not another but the same substance 2. That there is a relation between God who is this eternal Light and this image or brightness for he is the Image of this Glory 3. Yet he is not the Image of nor hath relation unto the Essence for
one Person and if that Person be Christ then all not onely one of them agree unto him This Erasmus Johannes did very well observe in his dispute with Socinus concerning some kind of existence which Christ must needs have before the Incarnation Socinus in his Answer doth miserably shift and offers plain violence to the place Volkelius doth the like Crellius Volkelius Socinus make this the Scope of the Apostle in this first Chapter to demonstrate that Christ is more excellent than the Angels onely in such things as he received as Man from God after his Death and Resurrection But as you heard before his intent is to prove 1. That Christ is more excellent than the Prophets 2. Than the Angels And as he was more excellent than the Prophets not onely as sitting at the right hand of God but as creating the World and being the brightness of his Father's Glory and the express Image of his Person so he was more excellent than Angels not onely as sett at the right hand of God but as creating the World It was an hard thing and is still to understand the Mystery of the Incarnation That the eternal Word and Wisdom of God by which he created the World should be made Flesh and possesse dwell in and be united to the Nature of Man is plain Scripture but how he doth possess it dwell in it and is united to it so as he never possessed or dwelt in or was united unto any other Man or Angel is far above our reach and capacity Believe that it is so we must we may we are bound unto it it 's clear certain and the Word of God expresseth it plainly Understand the manner how it is we cannot And how should we seeing we are so ignorant how the Soul and Body are united In this Case as in many other Non vivacitas intelligendi sed simplicitas credendi not our evident Knowledg but our Faith must save us But it 's a wickedness which God will punish to deny that which God doth plainly affirm because we cannot fully comprehend it § 18. Ver. 13. 14. But to which of the Angels said he at any time c. These words may be understood to be a Conclusion of the former premisses or a new Argument If a Conclusion then we must conceive the premisses and the former discourse to amount to this that God set Christ at his right hand and not the Angels and here he briefly sums up the whole and inferrs therefore Christ is above the Angels Yet they rather seem to contain a new another Argument taken from the Psalmist Psal. 110. The Lord said unto my Lord Sit thou on my right hand c. 1. To sit at the right hand of God is not onely to be for ever happy and blessed by enjoying those pleasures which are at God's right hand for evermore nor onely to be advanced to the highest place of honour and dignity next unto God but to be invested with a supream and universal Power above all Men and Angels and by the same actually to reign for with the Apostle to sit at the right hand of God is to reign 1 Cor. 15. 25. This is to be Administrator-general as Law-giver and Judge in that spiritual Kingdom whereby God orders sinful Man unto eternal Glory This agrees to him as the Word made Flesh raised from the dead and ascended into Heaven 2. This Glory Dignity and Power was given to Christ as Man yet united to the Word For the Lord said unto my Lord that is David's Lord who yet according to the Flesh was David's Son who though Flesh was far greater after his Humiliation than his Father David not onely as the Word and the same Supream Lord with the Father but as Flesh and Man The Chaldee turns it to his Word the Lord said to his Word yet to his Word made Flesh. 3. The party who advanced him to his right hand was God for it was God who gave him a Name above all Names none else could give it 4. He gave it him by his Word and Edict For he said In this word we have the Patent or Commission of Christ in which he signifies his Will was that he should be Lord and King and with the word gives him the Power so that his Title is good and valid and stands firm and inviolable 5. The date of this Reign is expressed in those words untill his Enemies be made his Foot-stool that is till the Resurrection and final Glorification of all his Saints This being the meaning of the words the Apostle insists chiefly upon that part of the Text said to my Lord as though he should say 1. You confess that Psalm to be part of the holy Scripture revealed from Heaven 2. That the words are not to be understood of Angels but the Messiah 3. That in the first words of that Psalm God speaks to some certain Person to whom he gives Power to reign 4. He did not by those words give Power unto the Angels but to Christ thence he argues If God gave this Power to Christ and never to any of the Angels did the like then Christ is more excellent than the Angels and the Angels inferiour to Christ But this was said this power was given to Christ and not to the Angels therefore he is more excellent This Argument is stronger and more convictive because it 's negative and exclusive for they might have said that though God did advance and honour Christ and gave him an everlasting Kingdom yet he might do the like to some of the Angels To prevent this he out of the Text proves that God said this to Christ and there is no mention there nor in any part of the Scripture of God's advancing any of them to his right hand And that his Argument might be more forcing he proposeth it interrogatively To which of the Angels said he at any time That is He said not any such thing at any time to any of the Angels If he did he challengeth them to prove or produce the place which they could never do § 19. Ver. 14. Are they not all ministring Spirits c. These words may be considered absolutely in themselvs or relatively as conducing unto the main Conclusion intended by the Apostle The subject of them are Angels of whom something here is affirmed The manner of Expression is Rhetorical by way of Interrogation The Answer implyed is affirmative for they say that negative Interrogations are more vehement Affirmations The Proposition in general is That all the Angels are ministring Spirits sent forth to minister for them who shall be Heirs of Salvation The parts infolded in the general or the whole are many 1. They are Spirits 2. Ministring Spirits 3. Sent forth to minister 4. The Minister for the Heirs of Salvation 5. They are all such 1. They are Spirits that is incorporeal incorruptible intellectual active substances the most noble and excellent Creatures God made 2. They are ministring
did see it To be Crowned with Glory and Honour is to be invested with great Glory Honour Dignity and Power and the words signify the exaltation of Christ at the right hand of God We need not here distinguish of Crowns which were of many sorts For if the Author did allude to any of these the sacerdotal Mitte and the imperial Diadem did most of all resemble the eminency and dignity of this Celestial Pontiff and this universal King But why may i◠not be an Hebraism 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Crown doth signify To compass about for God had circuminvested Christ with the highest and most eminent degree of Dignity and Power and this is the Word used by the Psalmist For the suffering of Death This passion was the meritorious cause his Glory and Honour the Reward according to another Scripture which informs us that because Christ was obedient unto Death the Death of the Cross Therefore God did highly exalt him Phil. 2. 8 9. Neither need we fear to say that Christ merited eternal Glory for Himself if we confess he merited it for Us. It 's true he could not merit the personal union and such things which necessarily followed upon the same but this is nothing to that Crown of Glory which was given him in consideration of that most excellent piece of Service which he performed in expiating the Sin of man and that by his own Blood which is plain Scripture Some referr this clause unto the former of Christ being made a little lower then the Angels yet understand it differently For some say He was made lower then the Angels by or in respect of his Death Others think that it denotes the final cause of his minoration as though the end why he was cast below the Angels was that he might suffer But neither of these are probable we see that is it was manifest both by the glorious Miracles done and excellent Gifts of the Spirit given in his Name and other ways and they did therefore see it The second Proposition He was made a little lower then the Angels It 's not material whether we understand by little a little measure of inferiority or a little time for both are true But the principal thing in these words is where in he was made lower then the Angels and that was in this that he was man and mortal Man is inferior to an Angel as man and much more as mortal because the Angels never dy Now Christ had the body of a man and a Soul separable from his body till the Resurrection and that was the little time here meant the time of his mortality Both might be joyned in one divine Axiome thus We see for the suffering of Death Crowned with Glory and Honour that Jesus who for a little time was made lower then the Angel The third Proposition That he by the Grace of God might taste of Death for 〈◊〉 man In these words we have the reason and the end why Christ was made lower then the Angels for a time For it was that through the Grace of God he might redeem us by his Death In the words we have 1. The Death of Christ. 2. The parties for whom he dyed 3. The inward motive which inclined God to give him to Death and the first Original of Redemption 1. It 's said He insted of Death we need not play the Critick in the explication of the word taste For the plain meaning is that he suffered Death and by this is signified all his Sufferings which were many and bitter the principal and consummation whereof was Death wherein they all ended and without which there had been no expiation 2. He suffered Death for every man not that every man should absolutely enjoy the ultimate benefit thereof for every one doth not yet every man as a sinner hath some benefit by it Because the immediate effect of this Death was that every man's sin in respect of this Death is remissible and every man savable because Christ by it made God propitious and placable in that he had punished man's sin in him and laid on him the iniquities of us all And the reason why every man is not actually justified and saved is not for want of sufficient Propitiation but upon another account 4. That which moved God to transferr the punishment due to our sins upon Christ his only begotten Son was his Grace and free love For he so loved the World that he gave his only begotten Son to be the propitiation for our Sins The end therefore why Christ was made lower then the Angel was that he being man and mortal yet holy and innocent without sin might suffer Death that our sins might be expiated divine justice satisfied and a way made for mercy to save us Ver. 10. For it became him c. § 13. These words must be considered absolutely in themselves relatively in their connexion Absolutely considered they inform us and do affirm that it became God to bring us to Salvation by the Suffering of Christ. This is the substance In the words we may observe the end means conveniency of the means 1. The end is to bring many Sons unto Salvation 2. The means is to perfect their Captain by Sufferings 3. The convenience of these means in respect of this end it was such as that is became God to use them All these may be reduced to certain Propositions which are these 1. Christ is the Captain of Salvation 2. God made this Captain perfect by Suffering 3. This was the means to bring many Sons to Glory 4. Thus to do became him for whom and by whom are all things 1. Christ is the Captain of the Salvation of the Sons of God The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 turned Captain signifies a Prince of a multitude eminent for dignity and priority or one who besides his eminent Dignity is invested with Power to command direct and order the rest inferiour and subject to his Power or one who in any work is a principal cause and hath a great and eminent influx upon the Subject to produce the Effect In all these significations Christ may be here taken For he in respect of all Patriarchs Prophets Apostles Saints Martyrs and Believers is the most eminent for dignity and invested with supream and universal Power and in both respects he is called their Lord and King and Head for as the Head is in respect of the members so is Christ in respect of his Saints and many Sons of God He is also the Authour Beginner and principal cause of their Salvation both for the merit of it and the application of the merit and the actual consummation and collation He by his Death laid the foundation and by his Word and Spirit makes them capable of Salvation and gives them a right unto it He by his Intercession procures their actual Justification and Glorification He by his Power doth raise them up and gives
God's eternal Beeing and Life is more certain and evident to us then his doing this or that good for his sinful Creature 3. God swaring is in some sort inferiour to himself and his eternal Beeing 4. This was a strange condescension in God in regard of man's infirmity that He would hazzard the forfeiture of his Deity O sinful man be eternally ashamed to doubt of God's Promises seeing he hath so deeply engaged himself unto thee and hath laid down his God-head as a stake and pawn never to take it up again if he fail the least jot with thee This Oath we find Gen. 22. 16. where we have 1. The form I have Sworn by my self 2. The occasion whereupon He sware and that was the extraordinary Faith and Obedience of Abraham whereby he was ready at God's Command to Sacrifice his Son his only Son And whosoever shall attain to the same degree of Faith which Abraham did manifest in this act of Obedience may be secured by this Oath for God by it intended to confirm the Promise of righteousness and eternal life not only to him but to all Believers who are the genuine Sons of Abraham This was the Confirmation the Promise confirmed followeth Ver. 14. Surely Blessing I will Bless thee and Multiplying I will Multiply thee ABraham had Faith before and was justified before this time But upon this hard Tryal his Faith did more gloriously shine forth and proved to belike refined Gold coming out of the Furnace far more bright and his righteousness and eternal reward besides other mercies were far more firmly confirmed unto him The words of God spoken are here repeated but in part yet so that we must understand the rest to be intended and taken altogether they are so full and uttered in that manner as though God could not express how much he loved him For the words do signify the certainty and abundance of his love which he would really manifest unto him especially in Christ in whom all Nations must be blessed There are indeed in this Promise some Blessings proper unto Abraham but the chief was spiritual and eternal bliss in Christ without which all the rest could not have made truly and fully happy § 17. Abraham by this Promise thus made sure by Oath was mightily strengthened and by his patient enduring attained in the end the Promise For Ver. 15. So after he had patiently endured he obtained the Promise THe Promise is the thing promised and the thing promised was final Righteousness Joy and Peace the obtaining is the enjoyment of this blessed estate which he so much desired so much sought The means was his continued patience whereby he overcame all difficulties continuing firm in the Covenant to the end The sum of all and the scope of the Apostle is to let them know by this example of their Father Abraham whom they so much honoured that if they patiently endured to the end and faithfully performed their Duty they should obtain and enjoy the same glorious Reward whereof he was already possessed And this example should quicken incite and mightily encourage them and it should so much the more encourage because the event should be so certain But this is our misery few believe these things and so neither the Commands Promises and Oath of God nor these examples of rare Heroick spirits do work upon us and though we might yet we will not be made certain of eternal bliss For God hath done all things on his part to assure and confirm us as appears by this Oath § 18. For this was the end for which God promised and confirmed the Promise by Oath as it appears by the words following wherein we may consider 1. The end of an Oath in general 2. The end of this particular Oath intended by God Concerning an Oath as taken and used by Men for of such he speaks he observes two things 1. That it 's taken by a greater 2. It 's for confirmation an end of all strife Ver. 16. For men verily swear by the greater and an Oath for confirmation to them is the end of all strife 1. MEn verily swear by the greater and some Men and Angels are greater and may have power to punish perjured persons yet suppose such an Oath to be lawful as in some cases it may be yet it 's insufficient for that end for which an Oath in general was intended and ordained For neither Men nor Angels know the secrets and intentions of the hearts of Men who Swear neither can they punish with eternal punishments the Offenders But God who is Omniscient Omnipresent Omnipotent and exactly just knows the hearts and secrets of all Men in all places at all times and can and will punish the Offenders and in particular false and vain Swearers not only with temporal but eternal punishments if they be not prevented by serious and timely Repentance Therefore men usually Swear by God and requires others so to do otherwise they will not believe them and rest satisfied And though they should yet the God of eternal Truth will not be abused and attested for to confirm a falshood and wo to him who shall forfeit his interest in him and provoke him against his own Soul as false Swearers do 2. Because the end of an Oath is to determine strife therefore men swear by a greater who can take vengeance and certainly knows who do profane his Name That this is the end to determine strife the Apostle signifies by these words And an Oath fo◠confirmation to them is an end of all strife Where it 's to be noted 1. The subject matter of an Oath is some strife or controversy that is a thing which may be doubted of and is not known to them who doubt but only to the party that asserts it by Oath 2. This doubt must be such as cannot be cleared by sense or reason or any other argument but a testimony 3. Yet there is some kind of necessity of confirmation 4. This confirmation cannot be made but by testimony 5. Because the testimony of man is insufficient and unsatisfactory therefore God is invoked to be a co-witness 6. Because it 's supposed that no man will forfeit his interest in God and invoke him against his own Soul when a thing is confirmed by Oath they rest satisfied For the party swearing can do no more and when he hath taken his Oath he hath done enough except he be an Atheist and no Atheist should be permitted or admitted to Swear his Oath will signify nothing § 19. As the end of an Oath in general is to end all strife and finally determine Controversies so the end of that Oath in particular which God sware to Abraham is to take away all controversy and doubt about the eternal Inheritance For by it God 1. Shews the immutability of his Counsel 2. By this shewed ministreth strong consolation to the Heirs of Promise which fly for refuge to the hope set before them So that the end is
But the Law had but the Shadow not the very Image Therefore it could not perfect the commers To understand this with that which follows more fully we must observe That the Question is Whether the Law by the Service and Sacrifices prescribed in it could perfect or sanctify any man that did use or observe them The Apostle denies this and proves the Negative and by this Argument because it had but the Shadow not the Substance of good things to come The Propositions in the Text are two 1. The Law had a Shadow of good things to come and not the very Image of the things 2. The Law could never with those Sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the commers thereunto perfect In the first we have 1. A Shadow of things to come 2. The very Image of the things 3. The Law which is affirmed to have the Shadow not the very Image of good things to come 1. The good things to come are some great and excellent Blessings which issued from the great Love of God to sinful Man and tended to his everlasting Salvation and Happiness and they were to come upon the Exhibition of Christ and the Revelation of the Gospel These were Christ the Work of Redemption and the benefits of Redemption Of this Phrase I have formerly spoken Chap. 9. 11. where we â—ead Christ was said to be come an High-Priest of good things to come The Shadow of these good things is the same which was called a Type or Figure that is an imperfect and dark Representation Christ was represented of old not onely by words in the Promises but by things yet in such a manner as that the People of former times had no clear and distinct Knowledg of these things as under the Gospel now we have It was a Mercy of God to give them a Shadow and by the same remind them often of their Saviour that they might the more desire him long for him and expect his coming 2. The very Image of the things themselvs according to some is a more lively Representation of them and these think the Expression to be taken from Limmers which first make a rude Draught after that finish and perfect it so as that the Picture is a more full distinct and lively Representation of the thing to be represented This they make the difference between a Shadow and the Image and this is thus far true as that they under the Law had but a rude imperfect and dark Representation of these good things which the Gospel doth reveal and represent to us far more clearly Their Light might be like that of the Moon and Stars ouâ—'s like that of the Sun already risen Yet others do observe that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 An Image is two-fold 1. The Pattern or Samplar 2. That which is conformed to the Pattern and in this place the Image may be the Pattern and Samplar it self of which the Ceremonies of the Law were imperfect Figurations The word in the Syriack signifying Ipse and turned by the Syriack Translator Ipsa Substantia seems to favour this sense So that the very Image of the things is both the lively Representation of them and the things themselvs represented 3. The Law had the one not the other Where by the Law understand the Ceremonial Law of Moses yet so as it was joyned with the other Laws This Law had a Shadow that is did prescribe certain Shadows and imperfect Representations that is Ceremonies or Ceremonial things and the People under the Law were bound to observe them and did enjoy these Shadows for to lead them to Christ and in this they were more happy than other People though not so happy as we under the Gospel And the Reason hereof was that God neither gave them the things themselves nor the clear Representation of them both which were reserved to the time of Christ's Exhibition § 2. In the second Proposition we have two things 1. Sacrifices offered year by year continually 2. Their Impotency to perfect the commers thereunto 1. By Sacrifices are meant Ilastical and propitiatory Sacrifices such as God commanded under the Law to be offered for Sin and the chief of them principally intended were those Anniversary Offerings of Expiation therefore it is said they were offered year by year And though there was an Intermission of the space of a Year between every single and individual Sacrifice yet they are said to be offered continually For as Year succeeded after Year from the time of Moses unto the Suffering of Christ so there was a continued Succession of these Offerings 2. These Sacrifices as Causes had their Effects and such as God intended for they did legally expiate and shadow out and continually remind the People of the necessity of Expiation to be made by a better Sacrifice for ever Yet they could not perfect that is consecrate and sanctify and free eternally from the eternal Punishment due to sin The parties who might expect Justification and Sanctification from them were such as came unto them and did worship God by them that is the parties for whom they were offered and did humble and afflict themselvs at the yearly solemnity of Expiation who are said to be Worshippers in the next Verse and such as did the Service Chap. 9. 9. And this was the impotency imperfection and insufficiency of them The Reason of this impotency is given in the former words for they were but Shadows and how can Shadows have any such causal Power as the Substance hath This Effect was reserved for that substantial and most noble Sacrifice of Christ himself offered by the eternal Spirit without spot unto God Therefore the Jews did exceedingly wrong themselves and prejudice their own Souls when they rested in these and looked not for their Saviour And we Christians are no better when we rely upon the outward Service of God and the Signs of the Sacraments and not upon Jesus Christ the Pith and Marrow of all who can benefit no Man but such as with a penitent heart rely upon him and him alone This impotency is fully expressed by a peremptory Negation for they could in no wise perfect This Effect was too noble and far and very far above the Power and Activity of Shadows This is the Apostle's first Reason to prove the insufficiency of the Sacrifices oâ— the Law § 3. The second Reason follows Ver. 2. For then they would not have ceased to be offered because that the Worshippers once purged should have had no more Conscience of Sins THis is a new Argument taken from the continuance of them which had been needless if they could have purged away Sin so that the Worshippers thereof should have had no more Conscience of it So that here we have 1. The continuance of them 2. The Reason of the continuance implyed For the Apostle argues from the non-cessation and the re-iteration of them and thence infers their Imperfection But there is some difficulty in the
Antecedent And this is a certain Rule that if the Antecedent be true the Consequent is so too The Connexion is not natural but depends upon divine Ordination who hath determined in general that Punishment shall follow upon Sin and in particular that final Perdition shall follow upon Apostacy This is part of the Text which the Apostle alledgeth out of Habakkuk and therefore the Original is Hebrew And this gives occasion to consider the difference of the Translations the Vulgar Junius Vatablus the Divines of Zurick following him and our English differ amongst themselvs in translating the Hebrew and the Septuagint which the Apostle follows seems to differ much from all the Rest. Besides the Hebrew Copy which they turned did not agree with these of latter times This difference will appear in the Explication of particulars which are two 1. Apostacy 2. God's Displeasure 1. The Apostacy which is signified by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is said to be Pride so some to be Unbelief so others to be a Lifting up so our English to be a drawing back so the Septuagint These may be reconciled for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to fear and out of fear to hide ones self and also to remit and abate of our former Boldness and Courage this signification agrees well enough with the Arabick signification of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gafal which some tells is to hide or neglect For all Apostacy issues from fear and a Remission of our more intensive Courage in time of Persecution so as to yield basely and cowardly unto our Enemy whom we might have resisted and overcome This drawing back is an Unbelief after Belief and Profession of our Faith And it may and sometimes doth proceed from Pride which will not suffer the heart to submit unto the Will of God and depend upon that Righteousness which is by Faith it will scorn to bear the Cross of Christ and it will despise the Promises and Comminations of the Gospel Yet it may issue from other Causes 2. The Punishment is expressed in these words My Soul shall have no pleasure in him In our present Hebrew Copies we read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his Soul whereas the Septuagint read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 My Soul To change the Affix Jod into Vau was an Errour easily committed in the Transcription By Soul therefore is not meant the Soul of the Apostate but of God and the Soul of God is God who is only Soul and Spirit and hath no Body Of God it 's said He will have no pleasure in the Apostate which is a Meiosis and signifies He will be highly displeased with him The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is translated to be upright doth signify also to please so the Septuagint divers time do turn it and I know no Reason why the Translatour should vary from them especially in Habakkuk By this Phrase is declared God's high displeasure against them for their Sin for as their Sin was high and hainous so was his Displeasure who would punish them severely that the penalty might be proportioned and made adequate to their Sin So in these words the words of God we find the Arguments both à Praemio Poena briefly contracted § 41. Yet lest the Hebrews should think that the Apostle had conceived some Jealousy and Suspicion of an Inclination in them to Apostacy he as in the sixth Chapter prevents all such thoughts by these words following Ver. 39. But we are not of them which draw back unto Perdition but of them that believe to the saving of the Soul THis is an Application of the former Doctrine delivered in general to Paul and these Hebrews in particular There is little need of Explication for the words are easily understood from that which went before For to draw back is Apostacy and Perdition is utter Destruction which issues from the Displeasure and severe Justice of God To believe is the Duty Salvation of the Soul the Reward and to believe unto the Salvation of the Soul is to persevere in Faith unto the End and the full Possession of eternal Glory By these words we learn 1. To have a charitable conceit of Professors when we see and know nothing contrary to sincerity 2. To examine and thoroughly search our hearts that we may more clearly understand our spiritual condition Whether it be good or bad Whether our Faith be sincere and our Profession real or no Whether we tend unto Perdition or Salvation 3. They imply a secret Exhortation to Perseverance and a Dehortation from Apostacy upon the two main and principal Reasons of Perdition and Salvation 4. They serve for Comfort for to have a certain Knowledg of our Sincerity Constancy and Performance of our Duty and the Conditions of the Covenant is a Ground of great Joy and Comfort in the midst of our Afflictions and Tribulations for upon this Knowledg we are assured that God doth love us we are freed from the danger of Damnation have a firm Title unto everlasting Glory and all things shall work together for our good And happy we if we can truly say as here the Apostle doth We are not of them who draw back unto Perdition but of them who believe unto the Salvation of the Soul The Sum and Substance of the whole Chapter is 1. The Doctrine of the Excellency and Efficacy of Christ's Sacrifice which once offered doth consecrate the sanctified for ever 2. Exhortation to several Duties and especially to the principal which is Perseverance which is urged upon them by severall Arguments especially that of the fearful Punishment of Apostates and the glorius Reward of Perseverance CHAP. XI Concerning the excellency of Faith exemplisied in the Saints of former times § 1. THE Connexion of this Chapter with the former the Scope and Method are obvious and easily understood by the observant and considerate Reader 1. The Connexion is this the Apostle continues his Discourse concerning Faith and Profession and Perseverance in them unto Life Salvation and the receiving of the great Reward and his Exhortation unto Perseverance So that they agree in the same subject matter 2. The Scope is by a new Argument to stir them up unto continuance in the Exercise of this heavenly vertue 3. The Method is easily perceived by the Disposition of the parts which are 1. A Description of Faith Ver. 1. 2. An Instance in two general Effects Ver. 2 3. 3. An enumeration of many Saints and Worthies of former times who by this Faith did suffer grievous Afflictions did rare Exploits and obtained many great Blessings These Saints are represented unto us as marshalled and set in Array according to the times wherein they lived and 1. Some are expressed by Name 2. Some are not named at all Of such as are named 1. Some are honoured with the Testimony of the rare Acts and Effects of their Faith related in particular out of the Scriptures 2. Some are only named and the Effects of their Faith