Selected quad for the lemma: soul_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
soul_n	believe_v	faith_n	jesus_n	4,985	5	6.2808	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A12211	A friendly advertisement to the pretended Catholickes of Ireland declaring, for their satisfaction; that both the Kings supremacie, and the faith whereof his Majestie is the defender, are consonant to the doctrine delivered in the holy Scriptures, and writings of the ancient fathers. And consequently, that the lawes and statutes enacted in that behalfe, are dutifully to be observed by all his Majesties subjects within that kingdome. By Christopher Sibthorp, Knight, one of his Maiesties iustices of his court of chiefe place in Ireland. In the end whereof, is added an epistle written to the author, by the Reverend Father in God, Iames Vssher Bishop of Meath: wherein it is further manifested, that the religion anciently professed in Ireland is, for substance, the same with that, which at this day is by publick authoritie established therein.	Sibthorp, Christopher, Sir, d. 1632.; Ussher, James, 1581-1656.	1622 (1622)	STC 22522; ESTC S102408	494,750	610

Church they have a Communion Table and Christian Ministers and Christian people who are there to celebrate the memorie of Christs bodily sacrifice and to offer up the sacrifice of praier praise and thankesgiving and such other spiritual sacrifices as belong to Christian Ministers and Christian people to offer But none of these things doe prove anie bodilie sacrifice of Christ to be actuallie and reallie performed in the Sacrament yea if that in the Sacrament were his verie bodilie sacrifice what was or needed that which was performed on the Crosse the next day or what name will you give unto it Was not that which was performed on the Crosse the verie true Propitiatorie bodilie sacrifice You cannot denie but it was What other thing then can this Sacrament be but a Sacrament that is a similitude representation and remembrance of that propitiatorie bodilie sacrifice of Christ once done and performed in his owne person upon the Crosse for all the Elect 4 But you alledge that Christ having taken the bread said This is my Body Howbeit you should consider withall that after that he had taken the Cup he said likewise This is my bloud and yet for all that was not the verie Cup his verie bloud If then in these words ye admit as yee doe a figure or figurative speech why should yee not likewise in the other words of This is my body admit a figure or figurative speech Yea if by reason of these words This is my Body you will inferre that the verie substance of the bread is changed into the verie substance of the natural body of Christ which change yee therefore call Transubstantiation then may I by force of these words uttered of the Cup This is my bloud inferre likewise that the verie substance of the Cup is changed into the verie substance of the natural blood of Christ or if you will take the words as they be recited by S. Paul and S. Luke namely thus This Cup is the new Testament in my blood I may aswell conclude that the verie substance of the Cup is turned and changed into the verie new Testament or new Covenant which were verie absurd Wee grant that the bread is Christs bodie and the wine is his blood in a Sacramental phrase and sacramentally but not litterally and substantially or by waie of Transubstantiation as yee most strangely imagine So that the Argument appeareth to bee fond and vaine when men reason thus Christ said of the consecrated Bread that it is his bodie Ergo it is his Bodie naturallie substantiallie and by way of Transubstantiation For this is more then ever CHRIST spake and it may bee as indeed it is his Bodie otherwise namely Sacramentally Figurativelie and Significatively And so also doe the ancient Fathers themselves expresly declare and expound it as namely Tertullian saith thus Hoc est corpus meum id est figura corporis mei This is my bodie that is saith he a figure of my bodie And S. Augustine saith likewise Non dubitabit Dominus dicere hoc est corpus meum cum daret signum corporis sui The Lord doubted not to say this is my bodie when he gave a signe of his bodie And yet wee grant that after consecration there is a change as the ancient Fathers also affirme but that is as touching the use and end and not as touching the substance For that which was before common bread and common wine is now after consecration become sacramental bread and sacramental wine signifying and figuring out unto us another thing namely the bread doth then signifie and figure out unto us the bodie of Christ which was broken and crucified for us and the wine signifieth figureth out unto us the blood of Christ which was powred out and shed for us So that the Bread and the Wine which in common and ordinarie use serve onely for sustenance of the bodie now after consecrasion signifie and represent unto us that which is the verie true foode of our soules and the sustenance of them to eternal life and doe import unto us that as verily as wee receive the Bread and Wine outwardly with our bodilie mouth so verily and certainely doe wee also receive Christ Iesus and the benefite of his death and passion inwardly by our faith which is the mouth of the soule For as bodily meate must have a bodily mouth to receive it so that which is spiritual meat and sustenance for the soule must have a spiritual mouth to receive it by And this is that eating of Christs flesh drinking of his blood which is spoken of in S. Iohns Gospell when hee is thus received and applied not by a carnal or corporal but by a spiritual mouth namely by faith For whereas some in that sixt Chapter of S. Iohns Gospell hearing Christ speaking of eating of his flesh and drinking of his blood said it was an hard speech grew offended at it Christ to remove all that conceited hardnesse and offence taken at those his words answered and said that It is the spirit that quickeneth the flesh profiteth nothing the vvords that I speake unto you are spirit and life So that yee must take the words which Christ there spake unto them concerning the eating of his flesh and drinking of his blood not litterally grosly and carnally as the Capernaits did but in a spiritual sense and meaning And so doth S. Augustine in divers places tell you that they are to be expounded For he saith expreslie that Credere in eum est manducare To beleeve in Iesus Christ is in that place of S. Iohn to eate his flesh Yea to shew that the words bee not to be taken litterallie or carnallie but figuratively the same S. Augustine giveth this reason saying that otherwise by commanding to Eate the flesh of a man and to drinke his blood he should seeme to command an heinous or wicked thing Figura est ergo praecipiens passioni dominica esse communicandum suaviter atque utiliter recondendum in memoria quod pro nobis caro eius crucifixa vulnerata sit It is therefore saith he a figure or figurative speech commanding that we must communicate with the Lords passion sweetly profitably keep in memory that His flesh vvas crucified and wounded for us When he saith expreslie that it is a figure or figurative speech what doubt should yee make of it But yet further upon the 98. Psalme hee bringeth in Christ speaking thus to his Disciples Spiritualiter intelligite quod locutus sum non hoc corpus quod videtis manducaturi estis ●ibituri illum sanguinem quem fus●ri su●t qui me crucifigent Sacramentum aliquod vobis commendavi Spiritualiter intellectum vivificabit vos Vnderstand yee spiritually that which I have spoken yee are not to eate this very bodie which yee see and to drinke that blood which they shall shed which shall crucifie mee It is a Sacrament that I

had deserved that the due judgement of God should have condemned even those that are justified unlesse mercie had relieved them from that which was due that so all the mouthes of them which would glory of their merits might be stopped and he that glorieth might glorie in the Lord. They further taught as S. Augustin did that Man using ill his Free will lost both himselfe it that as one by living is able to kill himselfe but by killing himselfe is not able to live nor hath power to rayse up himselfe when he hath killed himselfe so when sinne had beene committed by freewill sinne being the conqueror freewill also was lost forasmuch as of whom a man is overcome of the same is he also brought in bondage 2. Pet. 2.19 that unto a man thus brought in bondage and sold there is no libertie left to do well unlesse he redeeme him whose saying is this If the Sonne make you free yee shall be free indeed Ioh. 8.36 that the minde of men from their very youth is set upon evill there being not a man which sinneth not that a man hath nothing from himselfe but sinne that God is the author of all good things that is to say both of good nature and of goodwill which unlesse God do worke in him man cannot doe because this good will is prepared by the Lord in man that by the gift of God hee may doe that which of himselfe hee could not doe by his owne free-will that the good will of man goeth before many gifts of God but not all of those which it doth not go before it selfe is one For both of these is read in the holy Scriptures His mercie shall goe before me and His mercie shall follow me it preventeth him that is unwilling that hee may will and it followeth him that is willing that hee will not in vaine and that therefore vvee are admonished to aske that we may receive to the end that what we doe will may be effected by him by whom it was effected that vvee did so will They taught also that the Law was not given that it might take away sinne but that it might shut up all under sinne to the end that men being by this meanes humbled might understand that their salvation was not in their owne hand but in the hand of a Mediator that by the Law commeth neyther the remission nor the removeall but the knowledge of sinnes that it taketh not away diseases but discovereth them forgiveth not sins but condemneth them that the Lord God did impose it not upon those that served righteousnesse but sin namely by giving a just law to unjust men to manifest their sinnes and not to take them away forasmuch as nothing taketh away sinnes but the grace of faith which worketh by love That our sinnes are freely forgiven us without the merit of our workes that through grace wee are saved by faith and not by workes and that therefore we are to rejoyce not in our owne righteousnesse or learning but in the faith of the Crosse by which all our sinnes are forgiven us That grace is abject and vaine if it alone doe not suffice us and that wee esteeme basely of Christ when we thinke that hee is not sufficient for us to salvation That God hath so ordered it that he will be gracious to mankinde if they doe beleeve that they shall be freed by the blood of Christ. that as the soule is the life of the bodie so faith is the life of the soule and that wee live by faith only as owing nothing to the Law that he who beleeveth in Christ hath the perfection of the Law For whereas none might be justified by the Law because none did fulfill the Law but only he which did trust in the promise of Christ faith was appointed which should be accepted for the perfection of the Law that in all things which were omitted faith might satisfie for the whole Law That this righteousnesse therefore is not ours nor in us but in Christ in whom wee are considered as members in the head That faith procuring the remission of sinnes by grace maketh all beleevers the children of Abraham and that it was just that as Abraham was justified by faith onely so also the rest that followed his faith should be saved after the same maner That through adoption we are made the sonnes of God by beleeving in the Sonne of God and that this is a testimonie of our adoption that we have the spirit by which we pray and cry Abba Father forasmuch as none can receive so great a pledge as this but such as be sonnes onely That Moses himselfe made a distinction betwixt both the justices to wit of faith and of deedes that the one did by workes justifie him that came the other by beleeving only that the Patriarches and the Prophets were not justified by the workes of the Law but by faith that the custome of sinne hath so prevayled that none now can fulfill the Law as the Apostle Peter saith Act. 15.10 Which neyther our fathers nor wee have beene able to beare But if there were any righteous men which did escape the curse it was not by the workes of the Law but for their faithes sake that they were saved Thus did Sedulius and Claudius two of our most famous Divines deliver the doctrine of free-will and grace faith and workes the Law and the Gospell Iustification and Adoption no lesse agreeably to the faith which is at this day professed in the reformed Churches then to that which they themselves received from the more ancient Doctors whom they did follow therein Neyther doe wee in our judgement one whit differ from them when they teach that faith alone is not sufficient to life For when it is said that Faith alone justifieth this word alone may be conceived to have relation either to the former part of the sentence which in the schooles they terme the Subject or to the latter which they call the Predicat Being referred to the former the meaning will be that such a faith as is alone that is to say not accompanied with other vertues doth justifie and in this sense wee utterly disclaime the assertion But being referred to the latter it maketh this sense that faith is it which alone or only iustifieth and in this meaning onely doe wee defend that proposition understanding still by faith not a dead carkase thereof for how should the iust be able to live by a dead faith but a true and lively faith which worketh by love For as it is a certaine truth that among all the members of the bodie the eye is the only instrument whereby wee see and yet it is as true also that the eye being alone and seperated from the rest of the members is dead and for that cause doth neyther se●

in the Text it selfe as directlie opposite to Hell Now what is so directly opposite to Hell as Heaven is consequentlie what must Abrahams bosome bee but Heaven and no part of Hell against which in the Text it selfe it is so directlie opposed S. Augustine saith plainely it is no part of Hell I could never finde in the Scriptures saith he that Hell is taken for good And if it be never so reade in the Divine authoritie verily that bosome of Abraham that is an habitation of a certaine secret rest is not to bee beleeved to be anie part of Hell To the same effect hee speaketh in another place where he affirmeth Abrahams bosome expresly to bee Paradise that is Heaven Quanto magis c. How much more saith hee may the bosome of Abraham vvhich is after this life bee called Paradise S. Crysostome also against the conceite of such as supposed it to be Hell or a part of it saith that the Bosome of Abraham was the poore mans Paradise yea I say this that the Bosome of Abraham is the truth of Paradise yea I confesse it to bee the most holie Paradise But moreover considering that Christ is the slaine Lambe from the beginning of the world and that Hee vvas yesterday and to day and is the same for ever as the Scripture speaketh The force vertue of that his death must needs extend unto all times as touching the elect to redeeme and save them And consequently what doubt can there bee but that Abraham Isaac Iacob and all the rest of Gods people that lived and died before Christ his Incarnation and Passion went after their death as directly into Heaven as those godlie and faithfull people doe that have died since his Incarnation Passion and Ascention for as for that Text which yee alledge of Heb. 9.8 where it is said that The way of the Holies vvas not yet manifested or opened whilst as yet the first Tabernacle vvas standing The meaning and scope of that place is no more but that the way to Heaven was not opened by vertue of anie sacrifices of the first Tabernacle vnder the Law but by vertue of the Sacrifice and passion of Christ which those old sacrifices did prefigure the vertue of which Sacrifice and sufferings of Christ extending it selfe from the beginning of the world to the end thereof as touching all the faithfull to take away all their sinnes and to worke their full redemption is ever sufficient to give those olde godly Fathers rest and felicitie in Heaven in their soules after their bodilie death Yea where else doth Christ himselfe place Abraham Isaac and Iacob even before his Passion but in the kingdome of Heaven Your supposed Limbus Patrum therefore hath no ground to relie upon nor your supposed Purgatorie neither but are both to vanish as smoake being not onelie phantasticall but untrue and ungodlie conceits But to answer yet further to the text alledged for your imagined purgatorie Why should that Prison before mentioned being admitted to be a place of punishment for sinne after death be supposed your Purgatorie rather then Hell the place of the Damned For doe yee allow him to be sent to Purgatorie that is never reconciled to a man but dieth out of Charitie doth not such a one live and die in deadly sinne and consequently deserve hell fire and damnation Ye say that the words of the Text affirme that after hee is committed to the prison there mentioned he is not to come out from thence untill hee hath paid the utmost farthing This worde untill say you importeth that after payment once fullie made by him he is to come out againe and therefore that it is to be intended not a perpetuall and everlasting prison such as Hell is but a Temporarie prison such as you suppose your Purgatorie to bee But deceive not your selves with an argument drawne from this word untill in the Text for it necessarilie enforceth no such matter as you would deduce out of it For example in Matth. 1. vers 25. it is said that Ioseph knevv not Marie untill she had brought forth her first borne Sonne and called his name Iesus will you therefore with Helvidius because of this word untill inferre that therefore afterward Ioseph knew her I am sure ye will not and yet by force of that word if yee were so disposed might yee inferre aswell the one as the other But as that word untill in the last alledged place inferreth no such consequent but rather that hee never knew her so in the other place where it is said That he shall not goe out of that Prison untill he hath paid the utmost farthing is likewise meant that he shall never come out And so in verie deede doth Ferus the Iesuite expound it And the reason for it is verie good and apparant for seeing he is there to continue untill he paie the utmost farthing and that hee for his part after he is dead and committed to this Prison is never able to make payment how can it be shifted but that he must lie there perpetually For the conceite that one man may make payment and satisfaction for the sinnes of another when hee cannot so much as make payment and satisfaction to Gods Iustice for his owne sinnes is a most vaine and idle conceit Yea thus also doth S. Augustine expound this Prison of the place of the Damned namely of Hell and eternall paines Serm. Dom. in monte And so doth S. Hierome also expound it in Lamen lib. 1. cap. 1. and Eusebius Emissenus in Domi 6 p●st Pent. saying Carcer iste infernus est This prison is Hell And so Theophilus Antiochenus in Carcerem id est in Gehennam Into Prison that is Into Hell the place of the damned And Cromatius likewise upon this place and divers others But lastly what reason have they to suppose that anie faithfull godlie soule should after death bee cast into anie Prison for anie debt or sinne whatsoever there to continue for anie time at all when as all their debts or sinnes be fullie paid satisfied for and discharged by Iesus Christ their suertie Saviour and Redeemer in their behalfe How oft must they be told of these things 3 The next place they alledge to prove their Purgatorie is Matth. 12. vers 32. where because it is said that the Blasphemie or sinne against the holie Ghost shall not bee forgiven neither in this world nor in the vvorld to come Ergo say they some sinnes be forgiven in the world to come But first this is a non sequitur followeth not by the rules of Logicke as even Bellarmine himselfe confesseth And secondly admit that some sinnes be forgiven in the world to come yet doth it not follow that your Purgatorie is thereby proved for your Purgatorie is such a place and prison by your owne teaching not where anie forgivenesse of sinnes is to bee obtained but where

a kind of matter appeared insomuch that S. Augustine himselfe sometime speaketh Doubtfully of it and with a peradventure there is some such thing But at other sometimes againe he is verie confident and resolute that there is no such third place and therefore in one place hee affirmeth it expresselie to be the faith of the Catholikes in that time to beleeve onelie these two places namelie Heaven and Hell But a third place saith hee vvee are utterly ignorant of Neyther doe vvee finde it to be in the holy Scriptures And againe he saith Duae quippè habitationes una in igne ●terno alia in regno aeterno For there be two habitations or dwelling places the one in everlasting fire the other in an everlasting kingdome Agreeablie wherunto the scripture that speaketh of fire for the punishment of people after their death expreslie affirmeth it to be an everlasting fire and unquenchable fire which is sufficient to take away all conceit of your temporarie and quenchable fire in your vainelie supposed Purgatorie Yea S. Augustine saith further In requie sunt animae piorum à corpore separatae c. The soules of the godly separated from their bodies be in rest or quietnesse and the soules of the ungodly suffer punishments untill the bodies of those doe rise againe unto life everlasting and the bodies of these unto eternall death vvhich is called the second death And so speaketh also S. Cyprian saying Quando isthinc excessum fuerit nullus iam poenitentiae locus nul●us satisfactionis effectus Hic vita aut amittitur aut tenetur Hic sa●uti aeternae cultu Dei fructu fidei providetur VVhen men bee once departed out of this life there is no more place for repentance there is no more vvorke or effect of any satisfaction Here in this vvorld saith he life is eyther lost or got Here it is that provision is made for eternall salvation by the worshipping of God and the fruits of faith And again he there saith Then shall be vvithout fruit of repentance all griefe of paine inanis ploratio inefficax deprecatio and in vaine shall vveeping be then and prayers shall then be also uneffectuall and of no force 6 To what end then is also your praier for the dead or the Popes pardons and indulgences or singing or saying of Masses Trentals Requiems or anie other your workes satisfactorie or helpefull as you call them for the soules of the dead for in the place vvhere the Tree falleth there it lyeth whether it be toward the South or toward the North saith Ecclesiastes appointing likewise as here you see but two places in that behalfe Agreeably whereunto hee saith againe that when a man dieth his bodie as Dust returneth to the earth from vvhence it came and his soule or spirit returneth to God that gave it And againe he saith after that men are dead They have no more portion for ever in all that is done under the Sunne What part or portion then can they have in your praiers or in anie other works done by men that be living in this world Wee know and beleeve there is a communion of Saints and that the charitie and love of the Saints one towards another is verie great but yee see that the Saints and godlie Elect goe not after their death to anie place of Torment but into a place of blessednesse and heavenlie happinesse where they stand not in need of anie mortall mens praiers or other their workes whatsoever On the other side the soules of the ungodlie reprobates goe to Hell the place of the damned so that no praiers or other works whatsoever can doe them anie good for their ease or deliverance from thence And as for anie third sort of people that be neither Elect nor Reprobates such are not to be found It is true that in this life wee may beare one anothers burden and one may paie a debt for another and the abundance of one mans wealth may supplie the defect or want of another But as touching the next world it is not so for the Scripture saith that The Iust man shall live not by anie other mans but by his owne faith Againe it saith The soule that sinneth that shall dye And againe The righteousnesse of the righteous shall be upon himselfe and the vvickednesse of the vvicked shall be upon himselfe So that neither the righteousnesse nor the wickednesse of one shall bee imparted to another to save or condemne him Yea though these three men Noah Daniel and Iob were amongst them they should deliver but their owne soules by their righteousnesse saith the Lord God And againe the Psalmist saith A man can by no meanes redeeme his brother nor give to God a ransome for him It cost more to redeeme soules and therefore he must let that alone for ever Neither hath anie that is but a meere man anie such abundance of holinesse or righteousnesse in him as to be therewith able to supplie the defects or wants of others in that behalfe Yea all is little enough for himselfe when hee once commeth to stand in Gods presence and before his tribunall For even the holiest and iustest man that is must then say with King David Enter not O Lord into iudgement vvith thy servant for in thy sight shall no man living be iustified Yea even the blessed Virgin Mary her selfe though a most godly and holy woman yet had not such abundance of holinesse in her as to be able thereby to be her owne Saviour much lesse to be able to merit the salvation of others for that she was in respect of her selfe a Sinner and consequently had need of Christ Iesus to bee her Saviour as well as other people her selfe plainely declared when shee said My soule doth magnifie the Lord and my spirit reioyceth in God my Saviour If she had had no sinne at all in her as some Papists affirme what need had she of a Saviour or how could Christ Iesus have beene her Saviour as shee calleth and affirmeth him For he is in no other respect called Iesus that is a Saviour but because he shall save his people from their sinnes as the Angel testifieth Againe doth not the Scripture say expressely that All have sinned and that vvhosoever be iustified be iustified freely by the grace of God through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus The Papists also talke much of the vertues and sufferings of S. Paul as though they were meritorious and satisfactorie as well for others as for himselfe when as nevertheles himselfe sheweth they were not sufficient for his owne salvation It is true that he saith in his Epistle to the Colossians that He reioyced in his sufferings for them that is for their sakes who thereby were to be encouraged strengthned and confirmed in the faith of Christ and that Hee did fill up or accomplish that which was yet behinde

to shew how the other words in the Text be also verified in the Pope whilest he taketh upon him to forgive sinnes as fully absolutely as God himselfe whilest he taketh upon him to depose Kings and to dispose of their kingdomes at his pleasure whilest he taketh upon him not onely to order and dispose of earthly kingdomes but also to rule and order the whole Church of God upon earth at his owne will what doth hee else but sit in the Temple of God as God and so shew himselfe as if be vvere God yea whilest he advanceth himselfe above all Bishops Kings Princes and Emperors of the World and above all general Councels also so that hee will not be censured or controlled by anie of these or by anie of their lawes or constitutions and which is yet more whilest hee advanceth himselfe even above the divine Scriptures then selves dispensing with them at his pleasure what doth he else but so carrie himselfe as if he were God or rather above God But againe what doth he else but sit in the Temple of God as God and so shew himselfe as if he were God whilest he ruleth and raigneth in mens consciences like God yea or rather above God himselfe for common experience sheweth that the men and women that be under his subiection and of his Church and superstition be more devoted and more regardfull to know and obey his will and his ordinances and constitutions then they be to know and obey God his word and commandements It is then verie evident that the Pope is at the least as a God unto them and that upon him they as confidently relie as upon God himselfe affirming and supposing him to have an infallibilitie of iudgement and such a special direction by the Holy Ghost as that he cannot possibly erre in anie thing he teacheth decreeth or determineth Yea doth he not sit in the Temple of God as God so shew himselfe as if he were God when he not onely taketh upon him the proper and peculiar powers honours preeminences rights and authorities belonging unto God as is before declared but even the verie title and name also of God For with a verie bould face hee acknowledgeth himselfe to be called God urgeth the title and challengeth it and further they say of him that he is Dominus deus noster Papa Our Lord God the Pope And doe not also these Verses dedicated to him and accepted of him sufficiently declare the same Oraclo vocis mundi moderaris habenas Et meritò in terris crederis esse Deus That is By Oracle of thy voyce thou rul'st and govern'st all And vvorthily a God on earth men deeme and doe thee call 6 But S. Paul proceedeth and saith thus Remember yee not that vvhen I vvas yet vvith you I told you these things and novv yee knovv vvhat vvithholdeth that hee might bee revealed in his time for the mysterie of iniquitie alreadie vvorketh only bee vvhich novv vvithholdeth shall let untill hee bee taken out of the vvay and then shall that vvicked or lavvlesse ●an bee revealed Here hee sheweth what it was that did withhold and keepe backe Antichrist that hee did not appeare in his colours in those times of the Apostles albeit the Mystery of that Iniqui●y was not then altogether idle but was even then a working in such close manner as it could This same To chatechon vvhich vvithholdeth and letteth and hindereth Antichrist that hee could not then appeare was the Romane Empyre as Tertullian Chrysostome Augustine Hierome and others doe expound it For so long as the Romane Empyre stood in his full and florishing estate Antichrist could not rise to that his power and height And therefore that Antichrist might appeare and shew himselfe in his glorie and greatnesse it was requisite that the Emperour of Rome should give place and depart from that Cittie where the seate of the Empyre then was that so the Pope might possesse it and make it his seat according to that prophesie in the Revelation of S. Iohn before mentioned where it is foretold that that great City of Rome was to become the head and Metropolitan Citie for the Antichristian Kingdome And the issue and event hath shewed it selfe answerable For the Emperor Constantine removed and translated the seat of the Empire from Rome in Italy unto Bizantium otherwise called Constantinople in Greece and after that began the Emperors by little and little to loose their right in Italy so that at the last Rome the ancient seate of the Empyre with a great part of Italy fell into the Bishop of Rome his hands and now and for the space of manie hundred yeares hath the Bishop of Rome otherwise called the Pope not the Emperour there had his seate This is so evident as that it needeth no further declaration Wherefore to goe forward S. Paul saith that The comming of Antichrist shall bee by the vvorking of Satan vvith all povver and signes and lying vvonders and in all deceivablenesse of unrighteousnesse amongst them that perish because they received not the love of the truth c. This is before shewed to agree verie fitly to the Kingdome of Poperie For who boast so much of Miracles as they And yet even touching the Miracles in their Legends Claudius Espencaeus himselfe saith No Stable is so full of dung as their Legends are full of fables Canus also taxeth even Gregories Dialogues and Bedaes Historie in this point And Caietan further taxeth as uncertaine the Miracles done even by those that bee the Canonized Saints in Poperie Why then will they still bee so credulous as to beleeve their Miracles to obiect them or to rely upon them For if you doubt of the reall bodily presence of Christ in the Sacrament they will tell you that it hath beene confirmed by Miracle If you doubt of Purgatorie and whether Masses Trentalls Praiers or such like do the Soules of the dead anie good they will also tell you of a Miracle or of some strange Vision Revelation or Apparition of some dead person to prove the same And so to comprehend all in few words for the confirmation of their whole religion they will tell you strange tales of Miracles Apparitions and wonders wrought by their Popes Priests Iesuites Monkes and other their supposed holy men and holy women of their religion Howbeit God himselfe hath herein given us a good rule and direction saying thus If there arise among you a Prophet or a Dreamer of Dreames and give thee a signe or vvonder and the signe and the vvonder vvhich hee hath told thee come to passe saying Let us goe after other gods vvhich thou hast not knovvn and let us serve them thou shalt not hearken to the vvords of that Prophet or unto that Dreamer of dreames for the Lord your God proveth you to knovv vvhether you love the Lord your God vvith all your heart and vvith all your soule yee

it So likewise is Antichrist described under the name figure of a Beast as is also confessed even by the adversaries themselves and therefore neither can hee be supposed one singular and particular person but a State and Dominion wherein a succession of sundrie persons one after another is admitted For whereas Bellarmine answereth that in the Prophecie of Daniel sometimes by Beasts are signified whole States and Kingdomes and sometimes particular persons as in the eighth chapter he saith that by the Ramme is understood one particular King namely Darius the last King of the Persians hee is much deceived and the Text it selfe directly confuteth him affirming this Ramme to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Reges not one particular King but the Kings of the Medes and Persians So likewise by the Goate in Daniel is not meant one singular person namely Alexander as Bellarmine againe mistaketh but the verie Kingdome or kingly state of Grecia and the great horne betweene his eyes is in the Text it selfe expounded to be the first King of that Empire or Kingdome of Grecia which was Alexander which horne being broken off foure other stand up in the stead of it So that by every Beast in Daniel you see that not any one particular person but an whole State Empire Kingdome or Dominion is signified and intended and consequently Antichrist being in the Revelation of S. Iohn described under the name of a Beast must needs likewise be supposed not one singular and particular person but an whole State Kingdome or Dominion which admitteth manie persons to rule and raigne in it one after another in succession A third argument to prove this is the exposition and acknowledgement of the Rhemists themselves for touching the seven heads of the Beast that is of the Latin or Romane State the sixt head thereof is as themselves doe shew not one singular and particular person but a State Kingdome or Empire namely the Romane Empire wherin were divers that ruled and raigned in succession one after another Now then if the sixt head of the Beast be not one singular and particular man which themselves declare and affirme but a State and succession of men why should they not grant Antichrist whom themselves also affirme to be the seventh head of the Beast to be likewise not one singular and particular person but a State and succession of persons for they are both called Heads alike and there is no reason of difference that can be shewed more for the one then for the other A fourth argument is out of Revelation the 20 where the Divell being bound for a thousand yeares S. Iohn saw in Vision the soules of them that vvere beheaded for the vvitnesse of Iesus and for the vvord of God and vvhich had not vvorshipped the Beast nor his Image nor had taken his marke upon their foreheads nor in their hands and they lived and raigned vvith Christ those thousand yeares But the rest of the dead lived not againe untill the Thousand yeares vvere finished This is the first Resurrection Blessed and holy is hee that hath part in the first resurrection for on such the second Death hath no power c. In which wordes you see mention made of a Thousand yeares expressely in which this Antichristian Beast was in Esse some all that while lying dead in their sinnes and Antichristian Errors and othersome rising from their sinnes and errors to newnesse of life and to true Christianitie which is there called the first resurrection and these are said to live and not to be dead and to raigne with Christ subduing and getting victorie over themselves and over this Antichristian Beast like Kings Conquerors during all that time When therefore there is expresse mention made of a Thousand yeres in which this Antichristian Beast had to do who doth not perceive that Antichrist cannot be one singular and particular man that shall raigne onely three yeares and an halfe but that hee is and must needs be a State and succession of persons that is thus directly discovered to have had a continuance in the world for at least a Thousand yeares A fift argument is this that S. Iohn saith thus It is the last time and as ye have heard that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Antichrist commeth even now there be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 many Antichrists whereby vvee Know that it is the last time Where you may easily observe that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Antichrist is not one particular person but manie and that manie Antichrists be this Antichrist for so the Text it selfe declareth In like sort he speaketh in his second Epistle Many Deceivers be entred into this vvorld which confesse not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh This is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the deceiver and the Antichrist Where againe you see that not onely One but many Deceivers be this Deceiver and the Antichrist Whereunto adde also the opinion of diverse of the ancient Fathers as of Irenaeus Origen Chrysostome Hierome Ruffinus Primasius Augustine expounding that place of Matt. 24. which speaketh of manie false Christs and false Prophets that should arise and shew great signes and wonders so that if it were possible they should deceive the verie Elect as spoken of Antichrist for thereby also they give us to understand that Antichrist is to be conceived to be manie and not one singular person A sixt argument is taken from the Apostasie it selfe which S. Paul speaketh of which Apostasie whether you expound it of the revolt and departure of so manie multitudes of people from the right faith and religion of Christ or of a revolt from the Romane Empire by the Kings and Princes of the earth or from both it cannot be otherwise intended then the worke of manie ages Bellarmine saith that thereby wee may rectissimè most rightly understand Antichrist himselfe and he cyteth diverse ancient Fathers for the proofe of that opinion Now then if by the Apostasie Antichrist himselfe be most rightly understood as Bellarmine teacheth and that this Apostasie cannot in reason be otherwise supposed then the Worke of Manie ages as hee also sheweth especially considering that the Mysterie of that Iniquity or Apostasie began to vvorke even in S. Pauls daies how can Antichrist bee rightly conceived to be one singular man that shall raigne onely three yeares and an halfe and no longer Yea it is manifest that even in the false teachers and heretickes which were in the Apostles daies and which were helpers and workers in this Apostasie and Mysterie of Iniquitie Antichrist was for so hath S. Iohn before assured us Neither indeed could he afterward have beene revealed disclosed detected or discovered unlesse he had bin in Esse before in som secret hidden close covert sort For which cause Theodoret also saith that Defectionem appellat A ntichristi praesentiam S. Paul calleth The Apostasie or defection the presence of

say that in the manuscript books which I have met withall here in S. Brendans own countrey one whereof was transcribed for the use of the Friars minors of Kilkenny about the yeare of our Lord 1350. there is not the least footstep thereof to be seene And this is a thing verie observable in the ancienter lives of our Saints such I meane as have beene written before the time of Satans loosing beyond which we doe not now looke that the prayers and oblations for the dead mentioned therein are expressely noted to have been made for them whose soules were supposed at the same instant to have rested in blisse So Adamnanus reporteth that S. Colme called by the Irish both in Bedes and our dayes Colum-kille caused all things to be prepared for the sacred ministerie of the Eucharist when he had seene the soule of S. Brendan received by the holy Angells and that hee did the like when Columbanus Bishop of Leinster departed this life for I must to day saith S. Colme there although I be unworthy celebrate the holy mysteries of the Eucharist for the reverence of that soule which this night carried beyond the starry firmament betwixt the holy quires of Angells ascended into Paradise Whereby it appeareth that an honourable commemoration of the dead was herein intended and a sacrifice of thanksgiving for their salvation rather then of propitiation for their sinnes In Bede also wee finde mention of the like obsequies celebrated by S. Cuthbert for one Hadwaldus after he had seene his soule carried by the hands of Angells unto the joyes of the kingdome of heaven So Gallus and Magnus as Walafridus Strabus relateth in the life of the one and Theodorus Campidonensis or whosoever else was author of the life of the other said Masse which what it was in those dayes wee shall afterward heare and were instant in prayers for the commemoration of abbat Columbanus their countreyman frequenting the memory of that great Father with holy prayers and healthfull sacrifices Where that speech of Gallus unto his deacon Magnus or Magnoaldus is worthie of speciall consideration After this nights watch I understood by a vision that my master and father Columbanus is to day departed out of the miseries of this life unto the joyes of Paradise For his rest therefore I ought to offer the sacrifice of salvation In like maner also when Gallus himselfe died Iohn Bishop of Constance prayed to the Lord for his rest and offered healthfull sacrifices for him although he were certainly perswaded that hee had attained the blessing of everlasting life as may be seene in Walafridus And when Magnus afterwards was in his death-bed he is said to have used these words unto Tozzo Bishop of Ausborough that came to visite him Doe not weepe reverend Prelate because thou beholdest me labouring in so manie stormes of worldly troubles because I beleeve in the mercie of God that my soule shall rejoyce in the freedome of immortalitie yet I beseech thee that thou wilt not cease to helpe me a sinner and my soule with thy holy prayers Then followeth that at the time of his departure this voice was heard Come Magnus come receive the crowne vvhich the Lord hath prepared for thee and that thereupon Tozzo said unto Theodorus the supposed writer of this historie Let us cease weeping brother because wee ought rather to rejoyce having heard this signe of the receiving of his soule unto immortalitie than to make lamentation but let us goe to the Church and be carefull to offer healthfull sacrifices to the Lord for so deare a friend I dispute not of the credite of these particular passages it is sufficient that the authors from whom wee have received them lived within the compasse of those times whereof we now doe treate For thereby it is plaine enough and if it be not it shall elsewhere be made yet more plaine that in those elder dayes it was an usuall thing to make prayers and oblations for the rest of those soules which were not doubted to have beene in glorie and consequently that neyther the Commemoration nor the Praying for the dead nor the Requiem Masses of that age have anie necessarie relation to the beleefe of Purgatory The lesson therefore which Claudius teacheth us here out of S. Hierome is verie good that while wee are in this present world we may be able to helpe one another eyther by our prayers or by our counsailes but when vvee shall come before the judgement seat of Christ neyther Iob nor Daniel nor Noah can intreate for any one but every one must beare his owne burden and the advise which the no lesse learned then godly abbat Columbanus giveth us is verie safe not to pitch upon uncertainties hereafter but now to trust in God and follow the precepts of Christ while our life doth yet remaine and while the times wherin we may obtayne salvation are certaine Vive Deo fidens saith he Christi praecepta sequēdo Dum modò vita manet dum tempora certa salutis Touching the worship of God that I may now come to that point Sedulius delivereth this generall rule that to adore any other beside the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost is the crime of impietie and that all that the soule oweth unto God if it bestow it upon any beside God it committeth adultery More particularly in the matter of Images he reproveth the wise men of the heathen for thinking that they had found out a way how the invisible God might be worshipped by a visible image with whom also accordeth Claudius that God is to be knowen neyther in mettle nor in stone and for Oathes there is a Canon ascribed to S. Patrick wherein it is determined that no creature is to be swor●e by but onely the Creator As for the forme of the Liturgie or publick service of God which the same S. Patrick brought into this countrey it is said that he received it from Germanus and Lupus and that it originally descended from S. Marke the Evangelist for so have I seene it set down in an ancient fragment written wellnigh 900. yeares since remayning now in the Library of Sir Robert Cotton my worthy friend who can never sufficiently be commended for his extraordinarie care in preserving all rare monuments of this kinde Yea S. Hieroms authoritie is there vouched for proofe hereof Beatus Hieronymus adfirmat quòd ipsum cursum qui dicitur praesente tempore Scottorum beatus Marcus decantavit which being not now to be found in anie of S. Hieroms workes the truth thereof I leave unto the credite of the reporter But whatsoever Liturgie was used here at first this is sure that in the succeeding ages no one generall forme of divine service was retayned but diverse rites and maners of celebrations were observed in diverse parts of this kingdome untill the Romane use was brought in at last by