for the transgression◠against both the morall and ceremoniall lawes So that these Judicials were the very bond of the other lawes and kept the people in order and obedience Vrsinus Catech. 2. These lawes doe thus differ 1. The Morall are generall grounded upon the law of nature so are not the other 2. They are perpetuall to endure for ever so doe not the other 3. The Morals require both externall and internall obedience the other onely externall The Morall were the principall and other lawes were to give place unto them and they were the end unto the which the other tended Vrsin 3. Yet these three the Morall Judiciall and Ceremoniall are not severally but joyntly handled by Moses so that among the Morals there are found some Ceremonials and among the Judicials both Morall and Ceremoniall lawes Lyran. And the Moral law contained in the ten Commandements was delivered by the Lords owne voice to the people the rest they received by Moses from God Tostat. quest 1. QUEST III. Of the validity of the lawes Morall Ceremoniall Iudiciall which are abrogated which are not COncerning the validity of these lawes 1. The Ceremonials are utterly abolished so that there is now no place for them under the Gospell neither can they be revived without derogation to the Gospell of Christ as the Apostle saith If yee be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Galath 5.2 for when the body is come the shadowes must be abolished but the ceremonies were shadowes the body is Christ Coloss. 2.17 Their Temple signified the Church of God their holy place heaven their sacrifices the passion of Christ their expiations the remission of sinnes these things then being fully exhibited and fulfilled in Christ have now no more place in the Church Ferus Againe the ceremonies served only for that carnall people which were as children kept in bondage under the elements and rudiments of the world Galath 4.3 But now we are no longer under tutors and governours the time appointed of the Father being expired but are set free and redeemed by Christ. Ferus Another reason of the abolishing of them is in respect of that people to whom they were prescribed as a marke and cognizance to discerne them from all other nations but now this distinction being taken away and the wall of partition being broken downe both Jew and Gentile being made all one in Christ that also is abolished which discerned them from other people for the causes being changed for the which the law was made there must needs follow also an alteration of the law it selfe Vrsin 2. The Judicials are neither abolished nor yet with such necessity injoyned the equity of them bindeth but not the like strict severity as is shewed before at large in the generall questions prefixed before the first chapter whither I referre the Reader 3. The Morall law remaineth full in force still and is not abrogated Quoad obedientiam in respect of obedience which thereunto is still required now under the Gospell Sed quoad maledictionem but in respect of the curse and malediction which Christ hath taken away So that it is most true which our blessed Saviour saith he came not to dissolve the law but to fulfill it Matth. 5. Hee hath fulfilled it 1. In his owne person in keeping it 2. In paying the punishment for us which was due by the law to the transgressors thereof 3. In enabling us by his grace to walke in obedience to the law Vrsin QUEST IV. Of the difference betweene the Morall and Evangelicall law BUt though the Morall law bee now in force and bind us to obedience as well as it did the Jewes yet there is great difference betweene the law and the Gospell 1. In the knowledge and manifestation thereof for to the Morall law wee have some direction by the light of nature but the knowledge of faith in Christ by the Gospell is revealed by grace 2. The law teacheth what we should be by faith and grace in Christ we are made that which the law prescribeth and the Gospell effecteth in us 3. The conditions are unlike the law tieth the promise of eternall life to the condition of fulfilling the law in our selves the Gospell to the condition of faith apprehending the righteousnesse of Christ. 4. The effects are divers the law worketh terrour the Gospell peace and comfort Vrsin The law revealeth sinne the Gospell giveth remission of sinnes Ferus So that the one is lex timoris the law of feare the other is lex amoris the law of love which also hath a threefold difference yet further 1. Lex timoris facit observantes servos the law of feare maketh the observers thereof servile but the law of love maketh them free 2. The law of feare is not willingly kept but by constraint the law of love voluntariò observatur is willingly observed and kept 3. The one is hard and heavy the other easie and light Tom. opuscul 8. QUEST V. Of the manifold use of the law in the fourefold state of man TOuching the use of the Morall law it is to be considered according to these foure states of man as he was in his creation and state of innocency in his corrupt and decayed nature as hee is restored by grace and as he shall be in the state of glorification 1. Man in his innocency received two benefits by the knowledge of the law which was graft in him by creation that thereby hee was made conformable to the image of God and so directed that he should not have swarved from the will of the Creator and beside he thereby had assurance so long as he walked in obedience of certaine eternity never to have tasted of death corruption or mutability in his state for he that keepeth the law shall live thereby Vrsin 2. In mans corrupt state the law serveth both to restraine the evill and therefore the Apostle saith that the law is not given to a righteous man but to the lawlesse and disobedient 1. Tim. 1.9 as also to discover unto them their sinnes for by the law commeth the knowledge of sinne and therefore the Apostle saith Without the law sinne is dead Rom. 7.9 that is it is not knowne to be sinne Ferus 3. In man regenerate the law is a rule of righteousnesse and a lanterne to their feet as David saith 2. It teacheth the true knowledge of God 3. It assureth a man that walketh therein of his election 2. Pet. 1.10 If ye doe these things yee shall never fall 4. It sheweth what benefit wee have received by Christ the renuing of that image wherein man was first created Coloss. 3.10 5. In the state of glorification the law shall have that use which it had before mans fall to shew the conformity in those glorified creatures in their holy obedience with the blessed will of their glorious Creator Vrsin QUEST VI. Why it pleased God now and not before to give his written law to the world IT followeth now to bee
the rest of his sonnes being yet unborne Ramban 3. Neither is this an imprecation but a prediction of that which was to come Theodoret Calvin 4. Canaan is accursed not Cham not for that Canaan first saw his fathers wickednesse Theodoret or because of Gods favour towards Cham in preserving him in the Arke as some Jewes thinke nor yet lest that if Cham had beene named his whole posterity should have beene under this curse whereas Canaan only standeth under it Perer. for the whole lineage of Cham stood accursed But Chams sonne is noted not the father both to shew the greatnesse of his sinne whereby the punishment was derived also to his posterity Calvin And to declare that Canaan following his fathers ungodly steps who was partaker with him deriding Noah Mercer was also worthy of the same malediction Ambrose ibid. As also Canaan is singled out from the rest of Chams sons by the spirit of prophesie whereby Noah foresaw the wickednes of that nation and now the time was come when the event was to answer the prophecy in expelling the Canâ—nites and making them servants to Sems posterity Calvin As also hereby we are given to understand as Gregory well noteth in that Cham sinning Canaan is cursed quod reproborum nequitia hic inultae proficiunt sed in posterum feriuntur that wicked mens sinnes goe a while unpunâ—shed but they are afterwards met withall QVEST. XX. How Canaan became a servant to his brethren SErvant of servants 1. That his condition should be most slavish and servile more vile than the lowest degree of servants which should be so much the more grievous because he is subjected to his brethren whereas to be a servant to strangers is more willingly borne as Iosephus brethren thought great scorne that their brother should be their Lord Muscul. 2. We see that as in Adam sinne brought forth death so in Caine it is the beginning of slavish servitude ecce fratrem eodem natum patre peccatum fecit servâ—m behold sinne maketh the brother borne of the same parent a servant Chrysost. A profitable service and subjection should otherwise have beene in the world as when men for order sake and their better preservation obey their mercifull and prudent rulers that governe them as fathers But the slavish life and service had the beginning in cursed Canaan such as their state is that are taken captives in battell who being saved alive servi fiebant a servando appellati became servants being so called because they were saved Augustine 3. Though this curse did not presently take place for the Cananites did hold the Israelites a while in subjection yet at the length Gods judgements which hee in his wisdome and secret counsell for reasons best knowne to himselfe suspendeth were executed to the full upon Canaans seed Calvin QVEST. XXI How children are punished for their parents sinnes BUt here a great question will be moved that seeing Canaan was accursed for his fathers sinne how it standeth with Gods justice to punish the children for the fathers transgression for the better resolving of this doubt these severall considerations are duly to be weighed 1. The judgements of God are of two sorts they are either executed in this life or in the next in this many times they which sinne escape unpunished and they which are innocent are temporally chastised but in the next world every man shall receive according to their workes 2. Gods judgements in this life are either in spirituall or temporall things in spirituall which properly concerne the soule none are punished for another as the Lord saith by his Prophet Ezechiel the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father nor the father of the sonne but the soule that sinneth shall dye But in temporall things as the losse of the commodities and pleasures of this world yea of life it selfe one may be punished for another 3. The judgements in temporall things are to be considered either as chasticements and medicines or as punishments in the first sense they may fall upon innocents as Daniel and Ezechiel went into captivity being not guilty of the peoples Idolatry but this was a medicine tending to their spirituall good But as they are punishments they are onely incident to those which have deserved them So then God in his infinite wisdome doth lay temporall chasticements upon some even for others sinnes 1. That thereby we should be admonished both to detest sinne in our selves and to disswade others from it seeing it enwrappeth many in the same judgement 2. God can recompence abundantly the losse of temporall things yea of life it selfe with spirituall and eternall blessings 3. Yet none are so pure and innocent but must confesse that howsoever they are free from some great offences yet for other sinnes they may justly deserve punishment 4. But this course to punish one for another is onely to bee left unto God Man must observe another rule to punish him onely that sinned as it is in the Law the father shall not be put to death for the sonne nor the sonne for the father Deut. 24.16 though in other punishments which tend not to the death or affliction of the body as in depriving of honours liberty goods it standeth with justice even among men to punish the children for the fathers and many for one as is seene in the case of treason yet this privilege in general to punnish one for another is peculiar to God because he is both the Soueraigne Lord over man and all he hath he only knoweth how to make such chasticements medicinall and how otherwise abundantly to recompense those that are afflicted which things are not in mans power who therefore in inflicting of punishment must respect every mans desert 5. Yet for the most part they which are punished for other mens sinnes are guilty of the same themselves and therefore the Lord saith he will visit the iniquitie of the fathers vpon the children to the third and fourth generation of them that hate me Exod. 20.5 Where is to be considered 1. That God alwayes thus punisheth not but rather by this threatning terrifieth than verifieth the same by his iudgements Theodoret. yet sometime the Lord thus judgeth the posterity of the wicked as Gregory well saith si nulla puniret quis Deum res humanas curare crederet sin cuncta puniret extremum judicium unde restaret if God should punish no sinnes who could thinke that God had any care of humane matters and if hee punished all no man would looke for the latter judgement 2. Herein the long sufferance of God appeareth that hee deferreth his judgement sometime to the third and fourth generation to see if in the meane time the wicked parents or their children may amend if they doe not then the Lord is said to visit their iniquities that is to remember them at the length which he had a great while left unpunished as the Prophet saith
of heart to his owne glorie Augustine saith Aliud Deus fecit ordinavit aliud non fecit sed ordinavit Some things God both doth ordaineth some things he doth not yet ordaineth that is disposeth of them to some good end 3. God is to be considered in the action of the hardning of the heart as a just judge that punisheth sinne by sinne so is he also an agent and not a patient or sufferer onely Their owne master of the sentences doubteth not to say that concupiscentia in quantum poena est peccati Deum habet aâ—thorem that concupiscence as it is the punishment of sinne hath God the author thereof lib. 2. distinct 23. So likewise may it be said that the hardning of the heart as it is a punishment of sinne proceedeth from God and his reason is because all punishments are just Therefore as God is a Creator giving power and life to all as hee disposeth and ordereth evill actions unto good as he is a just Judge and punisher of sinne so is he an agent in hardning of the heart therein shewing his power wisedom and justice but the sinne and evill therein committed is only of man who properly hardneth his owne heart 2. Conf. Against the toleration of any contrarie religion Vers. 29. AS soone as I am out of the Ciâ—ie Moses will not pray in the Citie which was given to superstition and Idolatrie he will separate himself from the companie and presence of the superstitious and unbeleevers that he may give himselfe to fervent and zealous praier And for this cause he said before that the people could not sacrifice unto God in Egypt Simler By this then we see that God cannot be purely served in the middest of Idolaters They which will worship God aright must sequester themselves from among such It is therefore a dangerous thing that any toleration of a contrarie religion should be admitted God will have as the whole heart in man so the whole worship in his Church where Gods arke is there Dagon shall be thrust out of his place for there is no fellowship betweene light and darkenes Christ Belial 2. Cor 6.14.15 As Iacob would suffer no superstition in his familie but removed all the images out of his house Gen. 35. so will a religious prince in his kingdom 3. Conf. Of assurance and confidence in prayer I Will spread mine hands unto the Lord and the thunder shall cease Moses here prayeth with confidence and is assured that God will heare his prayer So ought we to aske in faith pray with assurance that God will heare us S. Iames saith let him aske in faith and waver not neither let that man thinke that is he which wavereth that hee shall receive any thing of the Lord cap. 1.6.7 How then are not the Romanists ashamed thus to affirme non requiri in oratione sidem qua certo credamus Deum absolute facturum quod petimus that faith is not requisite in prayer to beleeve certainly that God will absolutely do that for us which we aske Bellarmin de bon operib in parâ—icul cap. 9. Indeed there is a double kind of such assurance one is extraordinarie which proceedeth of some speciall revelation as here Moses building upon Gods particular promises made unto him was sure his prayer should take effect the other is an ordinarie assurance which is also of two sorts either when we pray for things spirituall concerning eternall life where the faithfull have an absolute assurance to bee heard or for things â—emporall where our assurance is but conditionall that God will grant us such thing so faire forth as they are expedient And even in praying for things temporall there is also an assurance 〈…〉 and determinaâ—e which is somewhat rare yet often found in the children of God when they haâ—e 〈…〉 and constant perswasion that God will heare them for their temporall blessing which they pray for and God therein never faileth them as Iacob was assured that God would keepe him in his journey and give him bread to eat and clothes to put on Gen. 28. And of this assurance S. Iames speaketh thâ—t 〈…〉 of faith shall save the sicke Iam. 5. they which pray with confidence and assurance for the health of the bodie even shall be heard therein they which are not heard have not that fâ—iâ—h and God giveth them not that faith and assurance because he seeth such health not to be good for them There is beside this a generall assurance which every one of Gods children feeleth in their prayer as to be fully perswaded that either God will give them that particular temporall blessing which they pray for or some other gift which God seeth to be more necessary for them As Paul was not in particular assured that the pricke of the flesh should be taken from him yet he knew that his prayer should obtaine either that or a more pretious gift as the Lord said my grace is sufficient for thee he received the grace and strength of God to resist and overcome that temptation though it were not altogether taken from him Augustine concerning this difference of assurance betweene prayer for things temporall and for things spirituall hath this excellent sentence Sanitatem quis petit cum agrotat forte ei adhuc aegrotare utile est potest fieri ut hic non exandiaris at vero cum illud petis ut det tibi Deus vitam aeternam securus esto accipies A man asketh health when he is sicke and yet it may bee good for him to be sicke it may bee then thou shalt not be heard here but when thou asketh of God to give thee eternall life be out of doubt thou shalt receive it 6. Places of morall use 1. Observ. Sinne the cause of extraordinary sicknesse Vers. 10. THere came boiles breaking out into blisters As Pharaoh here and his people were smitten with boiles and ulcers for their sins which they had committed against God and his people so when the Lord sendeth strange diseases and sicknesses into the world wee must take them as signes of the wrath and indignation of God Simler As the Apostle sheweth that the Corinthians for certaine abuses which they were guiltie of in receiving the Lords Supper were chastised some with sicknesse some with death 1 Cor. 11.30 2. Observ. Gods judgements tempered with mercy Vers. 19 SEnd therefore now and gather thy cattell c. The Lord remembreth mercie in the middest of his judgements though the Lord had certainly determined to bring this plague of haile upon Egypt yet together Moses giveth advice how both they and their cattell should be preserved from it thus saith the Psalmist Mercy and truth are met righteousnesse and peace shall kâ—ssâ— one another Psal. 85.10 Gods truth and justice is accompanied with mercy truth and favour Pellican 3. Observ. Confession of sins which proceedeth onely from the feare of Gods judgements is no true or right confession Vers. 27. PHaraoh
who did hold concupiscentiam non esse peccatum that concupiscence is not sinne whose objections were these 1. Object Such things as are naturall are not evill but concupiscence is naturall therefore it is not evill nor consequently sinne Answ. This argument must be answered by a distinction for by naturall here may be understood that which was made naturall in man by creation before his fall and so the proposition is true but the assumption is false for inordinate concupiscence and appetite was not in man before his fall or it is taken for that which is now incident to mans corrupt nature since his fall and so the assumption is true but the proposition false 2. Object Even in our nature as it now standeth corrupt the appetite or desire to such things as tend to the conservation of nature and to decline and shun the contrarie are not evill but such is the concupiscence to meat and drinke and such like Ergo. Answ. 1. Such motions and appetites of themselves are not evill as they are naturall motions but if they be inordinate motions and exceed a just measure they are evill as to have an immoderate desire to meat or drinke For as it was naturall in Eve to desire to eat of the fruit of the tree yet to desire it against the Commandement of God was evill so is it with these naturall motions if they bee immoderate and inordinate they are evill 2. There are other concupiscences beside these which are neither naturall nor tending to the conservation of nature as coveting another mans house or wife c. which can have no such excuse or pretenâ—â— 3. Object That which is not in mans power to avoid is no sinne but not to covet is not in mans power Ergo it is no sinne Answ. 1. The proposition is false for sinne is not measured by the necessitie or libertie of nature but by the disagreement which it hath with the will of God 2. When God first printed the law in mans nature before his fall then were the precepts of God given unto man in his power to keepe though man by his voluntarie corruption hath lost his power and libertie yet God forgoeth not his power and right of commanding 4. But that concupiscence is sinne it is both evident by this law that would not forbid it unlesse it were sinne and by the Apostle who useth the same argument I had not knowne sinne but by the law for I had not knowne lust except the law had said Thou shalt not lust Rom. 7.7 Vrsin 2. Confut. Against the Papists that denie concupiscence to be sinne in the regenerate SEcondly the Papists are herein Semipelagians who generally affirme and hold that concupiscence remaining after baptisme is not properly sinne nor forbidden by commandement Rhemist 〈◊〉 Rom. 6. sect 6. So was it decreed in the Tridentine Synode that concupiscence non est vere proprie peccatum in renatis is not verily and properly a sinne in the regenerate but that it is so called quia ex peccato est in peccatum inclinat because it commeth of sinne and inclineth to sinne Session 1. cap. 1. They object thus 1. Object Sinne maketh men guiltie before God of eternall death but the regenerate are not guiltie of eternall death therefore concupiscence in them is no sinne Answ. 1. By this reason there shall bee no sinne at all in the regenerate for there is no condemnation at all to them that are in Christ Jesus 2. Neither concupiscence nor any sinne else shall condemne the regenerate but that is not because concupiscence is no sinne but that both it and all other sinnes are pardoned in Christ and so not imputed 2. Object Originall sinne is taken away in Baptisme therefore concupiscence in the regenerate is no sinne Answ. Originall sinne is not simply taken away in Baptisme but onely quoad reatum in respect of the guilt and as the Schoolmen say it is taken away formally in Baptisme but not materially There are two things to be considered in originall sinne the disagreement or repugnancie which it hath with the law of God and the guilt of the punishment This latter way originall sinne is remitted and released in Baptisme it shall never be laid unto the charge of the faithfull as S. Paul saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen Rom. 8.33 But the other remaineth still in Gods children as S. Paul confesseth of himselfe Rom. 7.23 I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my minde but yet though it remaine and have a being in the faithfull it doth not reigne in them as the same Apostle exhorteth Rom. 6.12 Let not sinne reigne in your mortall bodie 3. But that concupiscence is sinne in the very regenerate it is evident by this precept Thou shalt not covet which commandement is given generally to all both the regenerate and unregenerate S. Paul also calleth the rebellion of his flesh which he felt in himselfe being now regenerate the law of sinne Rom. 7.23.25 And the Apostle speaketh to men regenerate when he saith Be renewed in the spirit of your minds Ephes. 4.23 which renovation needed not if concupiscence in them were no sinne 4. But that place of Augustine will bee objected Quamvis insint dum sumus in corpore mortis hujus peccati desideria c. Although while we are in the bodie of this death there be in us the desire of sinne yet if we should give assent to none of them non esset unde diceremus c. dimitte debita nostra we should have no cause to say to our heavenly Father Forgive us our debts c. August epist. 200. Answ. 1. Augustine must be understood to speake of actuall sinnes that if so men had grace never to consent to their concupiscence they should not need to pray for remission of such sinnes 2. And who is there that liveth who sometime is not carried away with concupiscence to give assent unto it So that if Augustine should speake generally of all sinne yet his speech being conditionall if we should give assâ—â— to none of them and that condition being kept of none this proveth not concupiscence not to bee sinne See more of this controversie Synops. Centur. 4. err 16. 3. Confut. That no concupiscence is a veniall sinne in it selfe THirdly Thomas Aquin his assertion commeth here to be examined Not a quòd cupiditas tunâ— est peccatum mortale quando sine ratione c. Note that concupiscence is then mortall sinne when as the things of our neighbours are coveted without reason but when they are reasonably desired it is veniall Thomas in opuscul Contra. 1. This distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes being understood in their sense that some sinnes in the condition and qualitie thereof are mortall some veniall is contrarie to the Scripture which maketh death the wages of sinne Rom. 6.23 that is of all but to the faithfull through Gods grace all sinnes are veniall
first that it is no murther when one is justly slaine and in the other that it is no breach of the Sabbath when necessitie compelleth to breake the rest thereof 1. This were a dispensation to make it lawfull to kill where one cannot justly be put to death and to worke upon the Sabbath where there is no necessitie 2. And a dispensation maketh that lawfull afterward which was not before such dispensation but it was alwayes lawfull both for the Magistrate to put to death and upon like necessitie to intermit or suspend the rest of the Sabbath 3. Beside these interpretations and declarations of these lawes are not devised by man but warranted in Scripture by the Lord himselfe the maker and author of the law and therefore they are not interposed by any humane authoritie Tostat. quast 35. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Why covetousnesse is to be taken heed of THou shalt not covet c. Men must not onely withdraw their hands from taking their neighbours goods but restraine their inward coveting and desire and that for these reasons 1. Propter concupiscentiae infinitatem because concupiscence is infinite the desire of the covetous is never satisfied as Isay 5.8 They joyne house to house c. till there be no more place 2. Aufert quietem it taketh away quietnesse Eccles. 5.11 The satiâ—â—ie of the rich will not suffer him to sleepe 3. Facit divitias inutiles it maketh riches unprofitable Hee that loveth riches shall be without the fruit thereof Eccles. 5.9 4. Tollit justitiâ—â—quitatem it hindreth justice For rewards doe blind the wise and pervert the words of the just Exod. 23. 5. Necat charitatem it killeth charitie both of God and our neighbour therefore the Prophet saith Hide not thy selfe from thine owne flesh Isay 58.7 The covetous despiseth his brother who is as his owne flesh 6. Producit omnem iniquitatem it bringeth forth all iniquitie as S. Paul saith 1 Tim. 6.10 The desire of money is the root of all evill Thom. in opuscul 2. Observ. Of the remedies against concupiscence THe remedies against concupiscence are these Basil assigneth these two 1. Si cogitaveris quòd dissolvendus es in terram cessabit insana concupiscentia c. If thou bethinke thy selfe that thou shalt bee dissolved into earth unsound concupiscence will cease 2. Meliorum desiderium minora cogit contemâ—ere The desire of better things will make thee contemne the lesse as the love to the Word of God which is more to be desired than gold will withdraw our love from earthly things Basil. in regula Thomas Aquiâ— addeth foure remedies beside 3. Occasiones exteriores fugiendo By shunning all externall occasions as Iob made a covenant with his eyes chap. 31.1 4. Cogitationibus aditum non praebendo In giving no way to the thoughts as by humbling and afflicting the bodie as S. Paul did 1 Corinth 9.27 5. Orationibus insistendo By applying prayer as our blessed Saviour saith that even devils may bee cast out by fasting and prayer Matth. 17.21 6. Licitis occupationibus insistendo c. By being alwayes well occupied for idlenesse brought the Sodomites to lust it was one of their sinnes Ezech. 16.49 Thom. in opuscul 3. Observ. How the Lord hath punished the transgressors of his law THou shalt not covet In the last place I will shew how the Lord hath punished and judged the transgressors of this precept and likewise of the rest The punishment then which is due for the transgression of the law is either divine or humane The humane is that which is inflicted by the lawes of men which are divers according to divers usages of countries and conditions of people among whom one vice may reigne more than another and so more severitie is required But this defect generally is found in humane censures that the transgressions of the second table are more severely punished than those of the first and those in the second which doe concerne mans outward state as theft are more straightly punished than adulterie which Augustine found fault with in his time and he giveth this reason of this partialitie Quia id pejus credimus quod huic vitae nocet Because we thinke that the worse or greater evill which hurteth this life Lib. de Mendac cap. 9. The divine punishment is of two sorts it is either temporall in this life or eternall in the next And for the first where humane lawes are silent or connivent in censuring the sinnes of men yet the divine justice sheweth it selfe As now shall appeare in this particular enumeration of divers presidents and examples of Gods severitie exercised and shewed upon the transgressors of his law 1. Pharaoh is set forth as an example of an Atheist and prophane person who would not acknowledge the God of Israel but said I know not the Lord neither will I let Israel goe Exod. 5.2 who manifestly transgressed the first precept his end was to be drowned in the red Sea 2. Senacherib a most grosse Idolater as he was worshipping his Idoll Nisroch in the temple was slaine of his two sonnes 2 King 19.37 3. He which blasphemed the name of the Lord in the host of Israel was by the Lords commandement stoned to death Levit. 24.11 4. The man also which gathered sticks upon the Sabbath because he did it with an high hand and is contempt was stoned by Gods appointment Numb 15.31 5. Abshalom both a disobedient childe to his father and a rebell against his Prince was hanged by the haire of the head and stricken through with darts and so is made a spectacle unto all stubborne children and rebellious subjects that such should expect the like judgement at Gods hand 6. Cain for killing his innocent brother was cast out of Gods presence and made a runnagate upon the face of the earth Cruell Abimelech as he slew 70. of his brethren upon one stone so his braines were dasht out with a stone Iudg. 9. 7. Ammon an incestuous person was slaine by the procurement of his owne brother Abshalom for the deflouring of his sister Thamar 2 Sam. 13. That whore and strumpet Iezabel was eaten and devoured of dogges 1 King 21.23 2 King 9.22.35 And as adulterie is an abomination to the Lord the punishment whereof God reserveth to himselfe where the Magistrates hand is not extended as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.4 Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge So the sinne of drunkennesse and glutâ—onie shall not escape the stroke of Gods hand as being the nurserie and seminarie of filthinesse and uncleane lust Drunken Nabal for that sinne and others joyned withall was smitten of the Lord and died 1 Sam. 25.38 And that rich Glutton who pampred himselfe but was mercilesse toward poore Lazarus was tormented in hell Luk. 16. And here I cannot omit to make mention of a strange judgement of God shewed of late upon three persons for this sinne of excessive drinking which happened upon the 27. day of December last being
is as it were the eighth day before the tribunall of Christ. 4. Lippoman doth thus morally applie it Nihil Deo offerendum nisi integrum perfectum Nothing must be offered unto God but that which is entire and perfect 5. But the end and use onely was historicall that the first borne should not bee presented unto God before the eighth day because they were yet unfit for any service Marbach Quia talia animalia erant quasi abortiva nondum plenae consistentiae propter teneritudinem Because such yong beasts were yet but as abortive fruit not well consisting or put together because of their tendernesse Thomas QUEST LX. Why they are forbidden to eat flesh torne of beasts Vers. 31. NEither shall yee eat any flesh that is torne c. 1. As well that which was rent and torne of any beast cleane or uncleane as if it were goared of an oxe was not to bee eaten because the bloud was in it as also that which was tasted before and eaten by any uncleane beast as the Latine readeth praegustata if it were tasted before because an uncleane beast had touched it and so made it uncleane Simler Tostatus 2. Not onely that part of the flesh which was so torne but all the whole carcase was to be refused Lyranus Such were fowles and beasts taken in hawking or hunting Tostatus 3. And not onely that which was torne and thereof died but if it after lived and were killed by themselves yet because it was torne of beasts it was uncleane unlesse the beast so torne lived to recover that hurt and and Anabaptists for although the Lord had chosen Israel out of all the nations of the world to bee an holy people to himselfe yet he did foresee that many would depart from his law and therefore appointeth divers kinds of punishment for the offenders Pelarg. 5. Places of controversie 1. Confut. Against the Anabaptisticall communitie Vers. 1. IF any man steale an oxe c. he shall restore five oxen c. This law doth evidently convince the Anabaptists of error who would bring in a communitie of goods for if it were Gods will that all things should be common among men then were it no sinne to steale nay there could be no theft at all committed seeing then no man could take any thing wherein he had not as good an interest as another Ostaâ—d Neither was this onely Moses law that they should not steale but the doctrine of the Gospell also forbiddeth all kinde of theft and stealing Ephes. 4.28 Let him that stole steale no more but 〈◊〉 labour c. 2. Confut. A theefe by his deserved death doth not satisfie for the punishment of his sinne Vers. 2. IF hee bee smitten that he die Lippoman speaking of the capitall punishment of theft that although it doe not satisfie for sinne before God yet expiat eo supplicio 〈◊〉 temporales quanmissa culpa reatâ—â— pâ—nae aeternae reâ—anent exâ—lvendae c. It doth expiate or redeeme those temporall paines which after the fault pardoned and the guilt of eternall death remaine in Gods justice to bee paid c. Contra. This his assertion is grounded upon an error for where God forgiveth sinne he perfitly forgiveth both the sinne and the punishment thereto belonging As he saith by his Prophet I will forgive their iniquitie and remember their sinnes no more Ierem. 31.34 But if there remaine any temporall punishment still after forgivenesse then are the sinnes yet remembred because they are punished Indeed after remission obtained some chastisements remaine But as Chrysostom well saith God doth it Non de peccato sumons supplicium sed ad facuranos corrigens not taking punishment for our sinne but correcting us for our amendment afterward c. The theefe then by his death doth not satisfie before God either for his sinne or the punishment thereof temporall or eternall but onely satisfieth the politike law and giveth satisfaction unto men by his evill example offended His sinne together with the punishment is not otherwise pardoned than by faith in Christ. 3. Confut. Against the Romanists that abridge the power and libertie of the parents in marriage of their children Vers. 17. IF her Father refuse to give her c. This law giveth absolute power unto the father to ratifie his daughters marriage by consenting unto it or by dissenting to breake it off which sheweth what injurie is offred unto this libertie and right of parents by the practice of the Romish Church quae conjugia sine ullo parentum consensu inita probet which ratifieth marriages contracted and begun without consent of parents Gallas And Oleaster a writer of their owne hereupon inferreth thus Est que hic non parvum argumentum ad probandum c. Here is no small argument to prove that libertie unto marriage doth not altogether by the law of nature agree unto the same nor yet to enter into religion c. But it is an ordinarie thing with the Romanists both to marrie children without consent of their parents and to thrust them into Monasteries See more hereof elsewhere 4. Confut. Against Idolatrie Vers. 20. HE that offreth unto any gods but unto the Lord onely c. This is an evident place to convince all Idolaters of great impietie for they in bowing and kneeling unto Idols censing before them and making their prayers looking toward them doe apparently offer unto others than unto God onely Tostatus one of their owne thus writeth upon this text Non solum si immolet eis sed etiam si faciat alia pertinentia ad cultum divinum ut si flectat genua coram eis c. Not onely he which sacrificeth unto Idols but doth other things belonging to the divine worship as if he bow the knee before them c. was to be slaine Cyprian hereof thus excellently writeth Quid ante inepta simulachra sigmeâ—â—taterrâ—nae captivum corpus incurvas rectum te Deus fecit c. Why doest thou bow thy captive bodie before foolish images and terrene fictions God hath made thee upright c. looke up to heaven Quid te in lapsum mortis cum Serpente quem colis sternis What doest thou prostrate thy selfe with the Serpent whom thou worshippest into this deadly fall c. More hereof see elsewhere 5. Confut. Against those which either hold tithes not to be due by the word of God or challenge them by the ceremoniall law Vers. 29 THine abundance and thy liâ—â—ur c. This may be understood as well of the tithes as first fruits which arise of the fruits and increase of the earth whether they be drie or moist Concerning then the law of tithes there was in the paiment thereof a treble right Partim erat morale it was partly morall and naturall for that the people should allow necessarie maintenance unto those qui divine cultu ad salutem populi ministrabant which ministred for the salvation of the people in the divine
silence confessed his errour and suffered himselfe to be reprehended 9. Controv. Against satisfaction before God by temporall punishment Vers. 28. SO the children of Levi did as Moses commanded c. The Lord was well pleased with this punishment which was inflicted by the Levites upon the idolaters yet we must not thinke that Gods wrath was hereby satisfied for God was appeased before by Moses prayer vers 14. neither was it likely that the punishment of a few could satisfie for the sinne of the whole host that the death of three thousand could make amends for the sinne of six hundred thousand Simler But ad exemplum profuit this punishment was profitable for the example of others and by this meanes castra purgata fuerunt the campe was purged of the ringleaders of this sinne Calvin 10. Controv. Of the corrupt reading of the vulgar Latine text setting downe 23. thousand for three thousand ABout three thousand The Latine Translater therefore here readeth corruptly 23. thousand as is before shewed at large quest 72. 11. Controv. All shedding of bloud maketh not one irregular and unmeet for the Ministery Vers. 29. COnsecrate your hands The Romanists observation therefore of irregularity is superstitious that allow none to be admitted to Orders which have beene shedders of bloud Lippoman one of their owne Writers giveth here a good note Non est ergo omnis effusio sanguinis irregularitatis nota All shedding of bloud is not then to be held a note of irregularity seeing the Levites thereby were consecrated c. Indeed manslayers and bloudy men are not easily to bee admitted to the Ecclesiasticall Ministery but one which hath served in the warres or had borne the office of a Judge being otherwise meet for his gifts is not for any such respect to bee debarred As Ambrose in the better times of the Church of a Judge was made a Bishop 12. Controv. Against the Romanists that thinke no man can be certaine of his salvation but by revelation Vers. 32. RAce me out of thy booke Procopius here well collecteth Ecce Mosi per omnia exploratum fuit c. Behold Moses did certainly know that his name was contained in the booke of life But Tostatus thinketh that this was extraordinary and that now Aut rarissimi homines aut quast nullus certus est That few or in a manner none are sure of their salvation Moses he thinketh had this by revelation and by his familiar conference with God and so S. Paul when he was taken up into the third heaven Tostat. quaest 42. Contra. 1. Moses was assured of his election even as other faithfull are God answereth him that hee which sinneth that is without repentance and recovery shall be raced out therefore he that sinneth not so but repenteth of his sinne is sure he is there written as the Apostle saith Hee that is borne of God sonneth not sinne doth not reigne in him and so againe it may be turned he that sinneth not is borne of God And S. Peter saith Brethren give diligence to make your election and calling sure for if yee doe these things ye shall never fall 2 Pet. 2.10 By good workes then as lively testimonies of our faith our election may be made sure 2. The ground also of S. Pauls confidence and assurance was not so much any speciall revelation as the common operation of faith in Christ he was perswaded nothing should separate him from the love of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord Rom. 8.39 Faith therefore in Christ Pauls Lord and ours assureth us of Gods inseparable love See more Synops. Centur. 4. err 25. 13. Controv. That God doth not only foresee but upon his foresight also decree the condemnation of the reprobate Vers. 33. HIm that sinneth will I put out of my booke Tostatus further here hath this observation that the reprobate are not predestinate of God as the elect are but praesciti tantum onely foreseene Solum cognoscit Deus quod iste vel ille homo erit infoelix non quod de eo aliquid statuerit c. He only knoweth that this or that man shall be damned and be unhappy not that God decreeth any thing of such quest 41. Contra. 1. This opinion is contrary to the Scripture Iudas is called the child of perdition Ioh. 17.12 Saint Paul calleth the reprobate vessels of wrath prepared to destruction Rom. 9.22 and Saint Inde They were of old ordained to this condemnation vers 4. These places doe evidently shew that the reprobate are ordained prepared and appointed unto condemnation 2. Otherwise if it were not so that God decreeth the end and condemnation of the wicked hee should be deprived of the one part of the office of the supreme Judge which is as well to decree punishment to the wicked as rewards to the righteous 3. Indeed a difference there is betweene the decree and foreknowledge of the one and of the other but not that which Tostatus imagineth As first God ordained both for the elect the end which is salvation and the way for them to walke in but God foreseeth only the evill wayes of the wicked but their end he both foreseeth and decreeth secondly the decree of election is only of grace without the foresight of the faith or good workes of the Saints but the decree of actuall condemnation in the wicked is upon the foresight of their sinne and misbeleefe as is elsewhere shewed more at large See more hereof Synops. pag. 822. 14. Controv. The punishment of sinne remaineth not after forgivenesse of sinne Vers. 34. YEt in the day of visitation I will visit them Ferus hereupon observeth that God many times dimissa culpa pâ—nam sibi reservat c. doth reserve the punishment the fault being pardoned As Adam and Eve had their sinnes forgiven upon the promise of the Messiah yet they both received punishment so Numb 14.20 God at Moses request forgave the sinne of the murmurers yet all their carkasses fell in the wildernesse Contra. 1. That which God forgiveth he perfectly pardoneth Ierem. 31.34 I will forgive their sinnes and remember their iniquities no more Ezech. 18.22 His transgressions shall be mentioned no more unto them But if the punishment should bee reserved still then after remission their sinnes should bee remembred 2. Wherefore their chastisements which follow after the confession of sinne as in the examples given in instance were rather corrections for their owne emendation or the example of others than punishments for sinne as Tostatus reasoneth that if sinne be directly punished nunquam daeretur ei temporalis poena sed aeterna it should never have temporall but eternall punishment it is therefore non poena peccati sed admonitio quaedam not the punishment of sinne but a certaine admonition Tostat. qu. 47. See Synops. pag. 653. 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. The absence of the Pastor verie dangerous Vers. 1. OF this Moses we know not what is become Vides hoc loco absentia rectoris
Neither yet were they fastened directly in the verie corner of all where the sides joyned together for then the bars could not conveniently have beene thrust thorow them but by the corners are meant the sides neere unto the corners as it is said afterward that the barres were in the rings by the sides of the Arke Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST II. Why it is said He made where the Lord said before to Moses Thou shalt make Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat c. The phrase must be observed that whereas chap. 25. the Lord saith to Moses Thou shalt make an Arke thou shalt make a candlesticke thou shalt make a table and so of the rest here it is said He that is Bezaleel made the Arke he made the table he made the candlesticke The reason hereof is to shew the obedience of Moses and the people lest they might have beene thought to have received many precepts of the Lord and performed few of them In that therefore the Lord said to Moses Thou shalt make there the charge and commandement is given But now where it is thus rehearsed and he made the dutifull and carefull performing is expressed of that which was given them in charge Pellican QUEST III. In what forme the branches of the candlesticke went up Vers. 18. SIx branches came out of the side thereof 1. Pellican seemeth to thinke that these branches went up erectis calamis with their stalkes upright 2. But their opinion seemeth more probable who thinke that the branches in their going up semicirculos effecisse made halfe circles for both that forme and fashion was more comely to sight and beside if they had gone upright this inconvenience would have followed that the lamps above where the oyle was put for the lights would not have stood right up but leaning one way which had been unfit both for the droppings of the oyle and the lights would not have burned so cleare nor so bright if the lamps had not stood even and levell Gallas The rest of the questions concerning these instruments and ornaments of the Temple which are described in this chapter are before discussed chap. 25. and chap. 30. in the beginning of the chapters 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Christ our true propitiatorie and Mercie-seat Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat The Mercie-seat signified Christ our true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Propitiatorie who hath reconciled us to God his Father The Cherubs upon the Mercie-seat doe represent the holy Angels whose ministerie Christ useth in the government of his Church Pelargus As the Apostle saith They are sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Hebr. 1.14 Marbach 2. Doct. Christ both God and man THe making of the Arke of wood within and gold without did set forth the two natures in our blessed Saviour joyned together in one person the divine and humane Simlerus In the Propitiatorie and Mercie-seat are typically set forth the benefits that we have by Christ that as the Propitiatorie covered the Arke wherein was the Law so Christ Legem nos accusantem tegit doth cover and hide the Law which accuseth us Simler But more particularly the Apostle rehearseth the benefits which we have by Christ saying that he is made of God unto us his wisdome righteousnesse sanctification redemption 1. His wisdome in that Christ hath revealed unto us the will of his Father to give his Sonne for us That whosoever beleeveth in him should have eternall life 2. He is our Iustice in that hee imparted to us both his active righteousnesse in fulfilling the Law and his passive obedience in bearing the punishment due unto our sinne so the Apostle saith Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to everie one that beleeveth 3. Christ is our Sanctification in that hee doth not only impute unto us his righteousnesse by faith but doth also sanctifie and regenerate us by his Spirit inabling us in some measure to keepe his Commandements as the Lord saith by his Prophet I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes 4. He is our Redemption in that he hath by his innocent death appeased the wrath of God toward us as the Apostle saith Who shall condemne us it is Christ which is dead c. Marbachius 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against such hereticks as erred concerning Christs divine or humane nature AS Christ is shadowed forth in the Arke to be both God and man so all such are condemned which doe erre concerning the divine or humane nature of Christ. As touching Christs divine nature 1. Some utterly deny it making Christ a meere man and not to have beene before he was conceived of the Virgin Marie in which heresie were Cerinthus Ebion contrarie to the Scripture which saith that the Word which was made flesh was in the beginning c. Ioh. 1.1 2. Some confesse another nature in Christ beside his humanitie but not of the same substance with God yet of an higher nature than any creature so held Carpocrates Basilides Arrius but our blessed Saviour himselfe saith I and my Father are one Ioh. 20.30 3. Some affirmed that Christ beside his humane nature consisted also of a divine yet not begotten of the Father but making one person with God the Father as well as being of one substance so the Sabellians and Patropassians whereas the Apostle saith God sent his Sonne made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The person then of the Sonne and not of the Father was made man for us Concerning Christs humane nature 1. Some affirmed that he was not a true man but onely in outward appearance as the Manichees and Marcionites who are confuted by Christs owne words Luke 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me have 2. The Valentinians and Anabaptists hold that Christ had not his flesh of the Virgin Marie but brought it with him from heaven contrarie to the Apostle who saith That hee was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. c. 3. 3. Some taught that Christ had a true humane nature but in respect of his body onely not of his soule as Apollinaris Bishop of Laodicea who is convinced by the words of our Saviour Matth. 26. My soule is heavie unto death 4. Some grant that Christ tooke upon him our whole nature but not our humane infirmities But the Apostle teacheth the contrarie that Christ was in all things tempted in like sort as we are yet without sinne There are two kinde of infirmities some are personall as leprosie blindnesse sicknesse diseases these Christ was not subject unto there are naturall infirmities which doe belong unto the whole humane nature as wearinesse hunger griefe and such like these our blessed Saviour undertooke that he might be in all things like unto us 5. Some hold that Christ had a true humane nature but after the uniting thereof in one person to his
not evill that Adam in abstaining from that which was good might shew his humility to his Creator 2. In that God gave Adam so easie a precept to keep only to refraine to eat of one tree having liberty to use all the rest beside not like in hardnesse and difficulty to the commandement given to Abraham to sacrifice his only sonne herein the transgression and disobedience of Adam appeared to be the greater in transgressing a precept so easie to have beene obeyed This Augustine lib. 14. de civit dei c. 15. Thirdly we answer with Tertullian that this precept though in shew but easie and light yet containeth the very foundation of all precepts and of the whole morall law for therein was contained both his duty toward God in obeying his will and love toward themselves in escaping death which was threatned if they transgressed Tertul. lib. con Iud. So that in this precept Adam might have shewed both his love toward God in his obedience faith in beleeving it should so fall out unto him if he disobeyed as God said hope in expecting a further reward if he had kept the commandement The Hebrewes here are somewhat curious as R. Isaach that if they had tasted only of the fruit and not eaten it they had not transgressed but the commandements of God doe concerne the very thought R. Levi by eating understandeth the apprehension of things spirituall which is here forbidden but we take it rather litterally and historically that God giveth them so easie a precept to try their love and obedience Mercer QVEST. XXVI How a Law is not given to a righteous man BUt the Apostle saith The law is not given to a righteous man but unto the disobedient c. 1 Tim. 1.9 And Adam was now just and righteous and therefore he needed not a law for answer whereunto I say that the law in two respects is said not to be given to a just man 1. in respect of the negative precepts as to abstaine from murther theft adultery but in regard of the affirmative precepts to retaine them in obedience and doing of good workes so the just man had need of a law and so had Adam 2. A just man need not to feare the punishment of the law as S. Paul in another place saith of the Magistrate which is the speaking or living law he is not to be feared for good workes but for evill Rom. 13.4 And in this respect so long as Adam remained in his integrity and justice the punishment in the law concerned him not 3. And a righteous man rather of a voluntary disposition than by compulsion of law yeeldeth his obedience QVEST. XXVII Why God gave a precept to Adam fore-seeing before that he would transgresse it FOurthly A question will here bee moved why the Lord gave this precept to Adam which hee knew hee would not keepe for answer whereunto first wee say that God gave him a precept which was possible to be kept and Adam had power to keep it if he would it was then not Gods fault that gave him free will but his owne that abused that gift Secondly if it be replyed why God did not give him grace and stay him from transgression I answer that God could have given him such grace and to the Angels likewise that they should not have fallen but it was fit that God should leave the creatures to their free will and not hinder the course of nature which hee had made Thirdly though God foresaw mans transgression yet that was no reason to withhold the precept for then God should neither have made the Angels nor man because he saw that some of both should bee reprobates and by the same reason God should not have given his written word because many heretikes doe pervert it to their destruction Fourthly as God foresaw mans transgression so he knew how to turne it to good as in shewing mercy to sinners and in sending Christ to restore what man had lost so that notwithstanding Gods foresight of Adams transgression he was not to forbeare to charge Adam with this commandement in regard of the great good which God also did foresee should ensue QVEST. XXVIII What kind of death was threatned to Adam Vers. 17. IN the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death The first question here moved is what death God threatneth to Adam whether the death only of the body or soule or of both 1. We neither think that the spirituall death of the soule is here only signified whereby the soule is separated by sinne from God which was the opinion of Philo Iudeus lib. 2. de allegor Mosaicis and of Eucherim lib. 1. in Genes for wee see that the Lord himselfe threatned the death of the body to Adam Genes 2.19 Dust thou art and to dust thou shalt returne 2. Neither is the death of the body here onely implyâ—d as some have thought but the death of the soule by sinne also which bringeth forth the death of the body as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 5.13 Death went over all men for as much as all men have sinned There was first sinne in the soule before there followed death in the body 3. Neither doe we think that everlasting death is here excluded as Pererius seemeth to insinuate lib. 4. in Genes qu. 4. of this matter For the Apostle saith We were by nature the children of death as well as others Eph. 1.5 by Adams transgression we were the children of wrath hee therefore much more that made us so and if Adam had not by sinning made himselfe guilty of eternall death why was the promise of the Messiah presently upon his fall made unto him Gen. 1.15 whose office is to redeeme us from sinne and everlasting damnation 4. Wee therefore thinke with Augustine that by death here is understood whatsoever death either of the soule or body temporall or eternall lib. 1. de câ—vâ—â— dei c. 12. for Augustine maketh foure kinds of death the temporall death of the soule when it is for a time separated from God by sin the eternal death of the soule when it is separated from the body the temporall death of the body when it is separated from the soule the eternall death of the body in hell So Adam first died in soule by losing his innocency he died in body returning to dust he was subject also to everlasting death both of body and soule but from that he was redeemed by Christ. 5. Beside under the name of death are comprehended all other miseries calamities and sorrowes which are the forerunners of death so that we may fitly compare death to the center all other miseries as the circle or circumference about the center or as the Scripture resembleth it death is as the burning coale other sorrowes and miseries are as the sparkles that doe rise from the coale Iob 5.7 Man is borne to travaile as the sparkes flye upward QVEST. XXIX When Adam began to die SEcondly it is
be deferred like as the eating of the Passeover might bee put off to the second moneth upon extraordinary occasion as if a man were uncleane or in his journey Num. 9.10 This also appeareth in that for the space of forty yeares all the while that the Israelites sojourned in the wildernesse their children were not circumcised till Iosua his time Iosua 5.5 and the reason is given vers 7. They did not circumcise them by the way they were continually in their journey to remove from place to place and therefore could not conveniently be circumcised But if Moses example be objected whom God would have killed because his sonne was not circumcised the answer is ready that the case is not alike for Moses might either have circumcised his childe before he came forth or he had not such great haste of his way but might have stayed to performe so necessary a worke 6. But whereas the Lord prescribeth the eighth day both some Hebrewes are deceived that thinke the sonnes of bond-servants might be circumcised before and the Ismaelites that circumcised at the age of thirteene yeares QVEST. IX Circumcision found among those which belonged not to the covenant Vers. 13. HE that is borne in thy house and bought with thy money c. All which belonged to the covenant or would have any part among the people of God were circumcised but on the other part it followeth not that all which were circumcised did belong to the covenant as the Ismaelites Egyptians Ammonites Moabites and other people inhabiting neare to Palestina were circumcised as Hierome sheweth upon the 9. chap. of Ieremie vers 26. These people retained circumcision as a rite and tradition of their fathers but not as a signe of the covenant or profession of their faith and obedience QVEST. X. Circumcision not imposed upon strangers FUrther it is here questioned whether the Hebrewes were to compell their servants that were strangers to take upon them the profession of their faith and to be circumcised 1. Tostatus thinketh that their servants might be compelled but not other strangers that dwelt among them but that it is not like for seeing he that was circumcised was a debter of the whole Law Galat. 5. and circumcision was a badge of their profession it was not fit to force any man to take upon him a profession of religion against his desire 2. Cajetane thinketh that servants might be forced to take the outward marke of circumcision though not the spirituall profession thereunto annexed in 12. chap. Exod. But these two cannot be severed as whosoever is now baptized must needs also enter into the profession of Christianity 3. Pererius thinketh aright that the necessity of circumcision was not imposed upon any beside the posterity of Abraham neither that the Hebrewes might force their servants to take circumcision yet he saith that it was lawfull for them to use the ministery of servants uncircumcised as now Christians have Moores and Turks to serve them Perer. disput 5. But herein Pererius is deceived and I preferre the opinion of Thomas Anglicus which he misliketh that it was dangerous for the Hebrewes to be served with men of a divers religion lest they also by them might have beene corrupted 5. Wherefore the resolution is this that as no stranger servant or other was to be forced to circumcision but it must come from his owne desire as it may be gathered Exod. 12.48 so neither were they to receive any uncircumsed person into their house that would not be circumcised this is evident by Abrahams practice that circumcised all his servants both borne and bought with money who no doubt would not have served him if they had not submitted themselves to Gods ordinance againe seeing every one in the house must eat the Passeover Exod. 12.4.19 neither stranger nor borne in the house must eat any leavened bread for the space of seven dayes and yet none could eat the Passeover that was not circumcised vers 48. it followeth that no uncircumcised persons were to bee entertained unlesse they were contented to be circumcised QVEST. XI The penalty for the neglect of circumcision afflicted onely upon the adulti Vers. 14. THe uncircumcised male shall be cut off c. Saint Augustine following the reading of the Septuagint in this place who adde the man childe which is uncircumcised the eighth day which addition is not in the originall doth understand this place of infants and their cutting off he interpreteth of everlasting death to be cut off from the society of the Saints and by the breaking of the covenant would have signified the transgression of Gods commandement in paradise for the not being circumcised saith he Nulla culpa in parvulis Is no fault in little ones and therefore not worthy of so great a punishment and so he urgeth this place against the Pelagians to prove that infants are guilty of originall sinne and therefore have need of remission Lib. 16. de Civit. Dei cap. 27. 1. In that Augustine expoundeth this cutting off of separation from the society of the Saints he interpreteth right some take it for the corporall death some for the extraordinary shortning of their dayes some for excommunication but it is better taken for the cutting off from the society of Gods people now and the fellowship of the Saints afterward for he that should contemne circumcision being Gods ordinance doth consequently refuse the covenant and grace of God whereof it is a seale and pledge 2. But that exposition of Augustine seemeth to be wrested to referre the breaking of the covenant to Adams transgression 1. The Apostle saith that they sinne not after the like manner of the transgression of Adam Rom. 5.14 2. The Scripture calleth not that prohibition given to Adam a covenant 3. The Lord calleth circumcision his covenant vers 20. what other covenant then is broken but that which the Scripture treateth of here 3. Neither can this place be understood of infants that are uncircumcised 1. That addition the eighth day is used onely by the Septuagint it is not in the Hebrew 2. the words are qui non ciâ—cumciderit hee which shall not circumcise c. so readeth the originall the Chalde paraphrast Iunius c. which sheweth that it must be understood of them that are adulti of yeares of discretion not of infants 3. Abrahams practice sheweth as much who circumcised those that were of yeares 4. Againe to breake the covenant is not incident to children the punishment therefore is not to be inflicted where the offence cannot be committed 5. If Infants be not circumcised it is the parents faults for omitting it not the Infants as may appeare in the example of Moses whom the Lord punished and not the childe for the neglecting of that Sacrament QUEST XII Whether Abraham laughed through incredulitie Vers. 17. ABraham fell upon his face and laughed 1. This was not onely an inward rejoycing of the minde as the Chalde translateth for Abraham indeed
have heard thee c. God had promised before to Hagar that he would greatly increase her seed Gen. 16.10 and yet here it is ascribed to the prayer of Abraham whereby we learne that we are to pray even for those things which we know God purposeth toward us as our Saviour saith Your heavenly father knoweth whereof ye have need before ye aske of him Matth. 6.8 yet in the same place he teacheth his Apostles to pray Mercer 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against adoration of Angels Vers. 3. ABraham fell on his face and God talked with him If it were an Angell that in the person of God talked with Abraham then was this no gesture of adoration in that Abraham fell upon his face for the Angels will not suffer men to worship them Revel 22.9 But if they will needes have it adoration then it was God that talked with him and not an Angell as the words of the text insinuate Muscul. 2. Conf. The circumcision of the male how it served also for the use of the female Vers. 12. EVery man child of â—ight daies c. Though the males only were circumcised because the beginning of generation and so of originall corruption was from them yet it served also for the signe of the covenant for the female sexe because the woman is of the man as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 11.8 and so was circumcised in the man But hence it followeth not that sacraments now may be applyed to the use and benefit of such as receive them nor which is an usuall thing in the popish Church because there is now no such reason or meanes of communicating the sacraments to the not receivers as circumcision both by the intention of the Author and order of nature in the male was forcible also in the other sex 3. Confut. Sacraments doe not actually conferre grace HEnce also it is evident that Sacraments doe not actually conferre the grace of Justification or remission of sinnes because Abraham was not justified by his circumcision But he was first justified by faith and afterward received circumcision the seale thereof as S. Paul sheweth Rom. 4.10 11. This Irenaeus concludeth Quod non per circumcisionem justificabatur homo sed in signum data est populo clarum fuit judicium ipse Abraham qui ante circumcisionem justificatur c. That man was not justified by circumcision but it was given as a signe to the people Abraham is a cleare evidence who was justified before circumcision Chrysostome also rendring a reason why Infants were circumcised thus writeth Altera causa fuit ut re ipsa discerâ—mus nihil animae circumcisionem illam profuisse sed eam signum tantum gratia esse factam c. Another cause is that we should learne that the circumcision did not profit the soule but was onely a signe of grace for children when they understand not what is done to them can reape no profit thereby to their soules Hence also is confuted the note of some Hebrewes that Abraham chap. 17. vers 1. is bidden to be perfect because he had not yet received circumcision whereby he was made perfect for circumcision was no cause but a signe of his election in the covenant Mercer 4. Confut. Baptisme wheretâ— it excelleth circumcision WHerefore whereas Pererius sheweth a threefold preeminence of Baptisme beyond circumcision 1. In the facility or easinesse of it because it is not so painfull to the flesh as circumcision was 2. In the universality and liberty for baptisme is free for both sexes for all Nations that professe Christ at all times circumcision belonged onely to the Israelites and to males and was tied to the eighth day 3. In the efficacie because baptisme absolveth a man from all sinne and the punishment thereof c. We willingly acknowledge the two first points of preeminence but such an efficacie actually to give remission of sinnes neither circumcision had then nor baptisme now for it would then follow that every one that is baptised is surely saved his sinnes being remitted or else that his sinnes being remitted may returne againe But God useth not where hee hath once forgiven sinnes to remember them any more Esech 18.22 Baptisme then we confesse significationâ— in signification and representation is more rich than circumcision was for washing is a more lively resemblance of our cleansing in the bloud of Christ and it is a commemoration of a benefit performed whereas circumcision was a type of the same to be exhibited But otherwise for the efficacie there is no difference they both are seales and confirmations of faith for the remission of sinnes nor actuall conferrers and bestowers of grace 5. Confut. Abraham the first that received circumcision FUrther Herodotus is here found to be in an errour that thinketh that the Egyptians were the first that were circumcised and that the Jewes received it from them Whereas it is evident that Abraham was the first that received circumcision by the commandement of God himselfe and that the Egyptians above 200. yeare after learned it of the Hebrewes that sojourned with them above 200. yeares more 6. Confut. Neither Circumcision under the Law nor Baptisme under the Gospell absolutely necessary Vers. 14. THe uncircumcised male c. shall be cut off c. This place I shewed before quest 1. to be understood not of children that were uncircumcised which was their parents fault and not theirs but of such as were adulti of yeares therefore it is no good reading to say the uncircumcised man childe but the male Zachar for the infant of eight dayes old mentioned vers 12. is of purpose omitted here Hence then it is inferred that there was no such absolute necessity of circumcision that children wanting it should be damned 1. For the children of Israel were not circumcised for the space of fortie yeares all the time of their sojourning in the wildernesse Ios. 5.6 Neither is it noted to have beene any fault to neglect it because they were continually in their journey So they were charged to keepe the Passeover by an ordinance for ever and whosoever kept it not as it was prescribed should be cut off Exod. 12.14 15. yet upon extraordinary occasion as of some uncleannesse or by reason of a long journey they might deferre the eating of the Passeover till the foureteenth day of the second moneth Numb 9.10 11. yea it is evident that the Passeover after the first institution was but once kept in the wildernesse for the space of forty yeares namely in the first moneth of the second yeare Num. 9. 1. And it was not celebrated againe till Iosua his time Iosua 5.10 after they were entred into the land of Canaan 2. Cajetane a popish Writer giveth good evidence here Consentaneum est ut non puniatur nisi qui culpam admisit infantes antem nullam possunt admittere culpam proinde poena hic designata adsolos adultos spectat ut ii solum merito
and custome and princes pleasure was so that they should be maintained and he was but the kings officer and minister to see every one served according to their allowance Ioseph could not have gainsayed without very great tumult and sedition seeing those superstitious priests were greatly honoured with the king and people Mercer QUEST XII Why Iacob desireth to be buried in Canaan Vers. 30. BVrie me in their buriall Iacob desireth to be buryed with his fathers in the land of Canaan 1. Not thereby shewing his hope of remission of sinnes in Christ as Augustine interpreteth sepultura mortuorum remissionem significat peccatorum the buriall of the dead signifieth the remission of sins quaest 161. in Genes for although Iacob had this hope of remission of sinnes yet it is not the proper and literall meaning of these words 2. Neither yet was it the love of his country that moved him wherein men desire to live and die Oleast there was a greater matter that moved Iacob 3. Neither yet as Lyranus because he hoped to be one of those which should rise out of his grave at the resurrection of Christ for this is too curious and it is not like that any buried so long before or so far off as this double cave was thought to be 30. miles from Ierusalem did rise out of their graves but some about Ierusalem and such as had beene lately dead and were knowne in the citie for the text saith they went into the holy city and appeared to many Matth. 27.53 and it is like that they returned to their graves againe 4. Therefore Iacob desireth to be buried with his fathers partly to testifie his faith that he doubted not â—ut that his soule should presently be joyned to his fathers Calvin and his body rise againe in the generall resurrection Mercer partly to admonish his children not to be too much addicted to the pleasures of Egypt but to wait for their returne into the land of Canaan as Ioseph also dying declared his hope Gen. 50.25 Muscul. QUEST XIII Why Iacob causeth Ioseph to sweare Vers. 31. THen he said sweare unto me Iacob requireth an oath of Ioseph not because he did mistrust his obedience but 1. that Iacob might be better satisfied and confirmed in the thing which he desired 2. Lest that Ioseph might have beene otherwise perswaded or overruled by Pharaoh to have his father buried in Egypt and therefore Ioseph when he obtained leave of Pharaoh to burie his father hee urgeth the oath which he made to his father Gen. 50.6 Mercer Rupert 3. Hee rather bindeth Ioseph to performe this than any of his other sonnes because of his authority and favour with Pharaoh QUEST XIV How and whom Iacob worshipped toward the beds head Vers. 31. HE worshipped toward the beds head 1. Some doe read he worshipped toward the top of his rod for mittah signifieth a bed mitteh a rod so the Septuagint and they which follow this reading 1. Some interpret that he worshipped toward Iosephs rod or scepter as giving reverence to him Chrysost. 2. Some that he leaned upon his owne staffe doing reverence to Ioseph Theodoret 3. Some that he worshipped Iosephs scepter as a figure of the kingdome of Christ Procop. But all these are deceived by the translation of the Septuagint who themselves in the 48. chap. vers 2. doe translate not rod but bed as Hierome well noteth tradit in Genes 2. Some doe read the beds head and they that follow this reading 1. Some say that he worshipped that way because it was east ward toward Ierusalem Lyran. as though Iacob had beene so superstitious as to set his bed east and west 2. Some because God is present at the beds head so the superstitious Hebrews 3. But he did nothing else but reare himselfe upon his pillow at his beds head leaning also upon his staffe and so gave thankes to God and that he bowed upon his staffe may be supplied out of the Apostle to the Hebrews Heb. 11.21 Iun. Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Corne and food more worth than money Vers. 14. ANd Ioseph gathered all the money the Egyptians that were horders up of gold and silver yet were contented to exchange their money for corne we see then that money if it be rightly estemed of is a baser thing than that which belongeth either to the belly or backe Muscul. which consideration should teach men not to covet money but if they have foode for the belly and rayment to put on to be therewith content as the Apostle saith 1 Timoth. 6.8 2. Doct. They which preach the Gospell must live of the Gospell Vers. 22. ONly the land of the Priests bought he not for the Priests had an ordinary of Pharaoh the law of nature then teacheth that they which attend the service of God and the instruction of the people should have their publike maintenance seeing Pharaoh an heathen prince was so liberall toward his idolatrous Priests much more should Christian Princes take care to provide for the Ministers of the Gospel for as the Apostle saith As they which did wait at the altar were pertakers with the altar so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the Gospel should live of the Gospell 1 Cor. 9.13 14. Calvin Luther 3. Doct. They are fit to teach others that first can teach themselves Vers. 23. I Have bought your land for Pharaoh loe here is seed for you c. Gregorie hereupon collecteth that as the Egyptians received no seed till first they had yeelded their land and themselves to be servants to Pharaoh so they are fit to have the seed of Gods word committed unto them which first have reformed their owne life and consecrated themselves to the service of God Restat ut loquendo quisque dâ—ceat vitam alies quam ipse moribus servat It remaineth that he teach others to live well who hath reformed his owne lib. 6. Moral So the Apostle reproveth the Iewes thou which teachest another teachest thou not thy selfe Rom. 2.21 4. Doct. Though sumptuous funerals are not to be desired yet the bodies of Saints must be reverently buried Vers. 30. WHen I shall sleepe with my fathers thou shalt carry me out of Egypt c. Although pompous funerals and sumptuous burials doe not profit the dead which are as Augustine saith rather viventium solatia than subsidia mortuorum comforts for the living than helps for the dead which Augustine sheweth by the example of the rich man and Lazarus that as the one was not helped by his precious and solemne exequies so neither was the other hindred by his vile and base sepulture yea the Heathen man could say eâ—lo tegitur qui non habet urnam he hath heaven for a cover that wanteth a grave neither did Iacob desire to be buried in Canaan either for the holinesse of the place or that he had a delight in pompous solemnities but to testifie his faith as before is shewed quaest 12. yet by
and Simeon 1. We neither say with Ambrose that they are rather to be called prophecies than blessings lib. de Benedic Patriarc c. 2. 2. Neither with Pererius that they were so called of the greatest part for it is said that he blessed every one 3. Neither by the word blessing is cursing understood by an antiphrasis that is a contrary kind of speech as some thinke but Iacob blessed them verily and indeed 4. But the opinion of R. Salomon is not farre from blasphemy that Iacob did indeed purpose to blesse his sonnes but falling into phrensie he cursed them in stead of blessing for this were to make the motions of Gods spirit mad fits 5. Neither is it like that Iacob gave his sonnes other blessings here not expressed 6. But hee indeed blessed them all though not alike for the temporall chastisement laid upon Ruben Simeon Levi was but a fatherly correction for their amendment Calvin they also are blessed because they are counted among the tribes had their inheritance among them Mercer whereupon afterward Moses in particular blessed both Ruben and Levi Deut. 33. Iacob also doth conclude these three within the number of his sonnes and so comprehendeth them within the covenant Iun. QUEST XXXI Of the double cave where Iacob desired to be buried Vers. 30. IN the cave that is beside Machpelah c. 1. Iacob maketh a particular and perfect description of the cave where he would be buried from whence he had beene absent 17. yeares Ioseph 39. yeares that they should not doubt of the place 2. But that is a fable devised by the Jewes that Tsepho the sonne of Eliphaz did strive with Iacobs sonnes about this burying place and that he fought a great battell with them but they overcame him and brought him downe to Aegypt and when Ioseph was dead he fled out of Aegypt into Italy 3. Iacob intreated his sonne Ioseph to bury him with his fathers but he chargeth and commandeth his sonnes because Ioseph was the principall who should obtaine leave of Pharaoh and at whose costs Iacobs funerall should bee solemnized the rest were but to accompany him Mercer beside his other sons did still depend upon him and were as a part of his family whereas Ioseph was a man of great command and authority in Aegypt Perer. 4. Iacob sheweth who were buried there and maketh speciall mention of Abraham that his sonnes should bee more carefull there to bury him also seeing Abraham had of purpose bought that ground to bee a place of buriall for him and his Luther and seeing that his mother was there buried and Leah his wife it might seeme more reasonable that he should be buried there also 5. These three couples here mentioned were buried together there Abraham Sara Isaack Rebeckah Iacob Leah the hebrewes thinke also that Adam and Eve had their sepulture there but that is not like as it is also uncertaine whether any other of the twelve Patriarkes were there interred Mercer QUEST XXXII Why Iacob maketh mention againe of the purchase of the cave Vers. 32. THe purchase of the field c. 1. This repetition is not inserted by Moses as Marlorat but they were the words of Iacob 2. This verse therefore without cause is wholly omitted and left out by the Latine Translatâ—r 3. Yet did not Iacob here shew unto his sonnes the very instrument of conveyance whereby Abraham did purchase the cave and field as the Hebrewes for that rite custome was not then in use But Iacob hereby sheweth the undoubted right which he had to that ground whereof his fathers had possession both alive and dead 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. How the Patriarkes and Prophets used imprecations Vers. 7. CVrsed be their wrath c. The righteous did many times use imprecations and denounce curses as David Psal. 35.4 Let them be confounded and put to shame that seeke after my soule and in other places and Iacob here but they did it not in wrath or in their heat but with these considerations and regards 1. They spake as Prophets and as Ministers and Pronouncers of Gods sentence and decree so that they were not so much maledictions as predictions Perer. 2. For the most part they accursed such only in temporall things for their amendment as Iacob here doth his sonnes as David also saith Fill their faces with shame that they may seeke thy name O Lord Psal. 83.18 Perer. 3. If they denounced any spirituall curse it was upon such as were incorrigible as Psal. 68.21 God will wound the hairy pate of him that goeth on in his sinnes 4. They did not hereby revenge their owne particular cause but did censure them as enemies to the whole Church as Psal. 35.20 They imagine deceitfull words against the quiet of the land But these examples are no warrant for us to use the like imprecations because we have not the like spirit of prophecie as our Saviour answered to Iames and Iohn who asked him if they should command fire to come downe from heaven upon the Samaritans as Elias did Ye know not of what spirit ye are of Luk. 9.55 2. Doct. Iacob prophesieth of his sonnes as the spirit of God directed him FUrther in that Iacob spareth not to pronounce the curse of God against his owne sonnes it is evident that hee spake not of any partiall affection or ambitiously seeking to make his posterity great as the prophane disciples of Lucian the Atheists use to object against the doctrine and history of Moses Calvin but that he spake as he was thereunto moved by the spirit of God both in that against his naturall and fatherly disposition hee pronounceth hard and heavy things against his sonnes as also because the event afterward answered to these his predictions 3. Doct. All our helpe and strength is from God Vers. 24. THe armes of his hands were strengthened by the hand of the mighty God c. Although in waging of battell weapons of warre and other meanes are carefully to be used yet the help power and strength must come from God as Ioseph was strengthened by the hand of God against his enemies as David prayeth Make haste to deliver me make haste to helpe me O God Psal. 70.1 Luther 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That the punishment of sinne remaineth not after the remission of the fault Vers. 6. INto their secret let not my soule come This punishment which was inflicted upon Simeon and Levi was not a satisfaction for their sinne past which was already upon their repentance remitted unto them as the Popish doctrine is that the punishment of sinne often remaineth the fault being pardoned but the Lord thinketh good to chastise those which have offended though their sin be forgiven them for these causes 1. That they may thorowly be humbled and take heed that thy commit not the like againe as David therefore saith It is good for me that I have beene afflicted Calv. 2. For the example of other that they also
post poenitentiam That he which committed adulterie after publike penance should finally be denied the Communion In Hieromes time it seemeth that adulterie was punished by death who in a certaine epistle maketh mention of a young man qui adulterâ—i insimulatus ad mortem trahitur who being accused of adultery was led forth to death yet Augustine as is shewed before reasoneth against it but of all other Origen writeth most plainly Apud Christianos si adulterium fuerit admissum c. Among Christians if adulterie be committed it is not commanded that the adulterer or adulteresse bee punished with corporall death c. neither therefore was the law cruell then neither now doth the Gospell seeme to bee dissolute but in them both the benignitie of God appeareth yet by a divers dispensation then by the death of the bodie the people was rather purged from their sinnes than condemned but unto us sinne is purged not by corporall punishment but by repentance and it is to be seene unto lest our punishment be greater whose vengeance is laid up for the next world when as they were absolved from their sinne by the paying of the punishment as the Apostle saith how much more punishment is he worthy of that treadeth under foote the Sonne of God Two reasons Origen yeeldeth of this his opinion that there is now a mitigation of the rigour of Moses law because then it served as an expiation of their sinnes prefiguring the death of Christ as S. Paul applieth that sentence Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree which is generally delivered by Moses to the particular death of Christ Galat. 3.13 but now the expiation of sinne is by repentance and remission of sinnes in Christ. Againe now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospell even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now for God punisheth not twice for the same thing as Origen in the same place alleageth Yet although we contend that the capitall punishment of Moses law may now be dispensed with in some cases upon the reasons before alleaged this is not either to condemne those Common-wealths which doe reteine still and practise the severity of Moses law against adulterers who therein sinne not but as Ambrose saith of the Apostles that asked for fire to come downe upon the Samaritanes Nec discipuli peccant legem sequentes Yet did not the Disciples offend following the law neither to excuse those places where this sinne is too easily and lightly punished as Erasmus complaineth in his time Nunc adulterium lusus magnatum est Now adulterie is but a sport of great men Where adulterie is not capitally punished yet great severity otherwise should be used as it was decreed in the Elibâ—rin Councell that he which having a wife committed adulterie should be under penance five yeeres can 〈◊〉 He that did sinne that way after should not bee received to the peace of the Church till his dying 〈…〉 that did commit adulterie after penance should never be restored to the communion of the Chuâ—â—â— c. 7. These or such like severe constitutions this wanton and lascivious age hath need of that this overflowing sinne might be kept in with higher bankes than now it is So then I conclude this point with Cyprian who speaking of divers kindes of Ecclesiasticall censure used in divers places thus writeth Manente concordia vinculo actum suum disponit dirigit unusquisque Episcopus c. The bond of amity remaining still every Bishop so directeth and disposeth his owne act that he is thereof to give account unto God The like may bee said of Princes and Magistrates in their dominions and regiments that the difference in publike punishments all intending the glorie of God and the brideling of sinne is no cause to breake peace or breede jelousie betweene Christian states Now for the other part that Moses Judicials doe bind negatively that is where Moses Law inflicteth not death there Christian Magistrates are not to punish with death the reasons are these 1. Because then the regiment of the Gospell should exceed in terror the strictnesse and severitie of Moses Law 2. God is that one Lawgiver that saveth life and destroyeth Iam. 4.12 he gave life and he only hath right to take it away God hath created man in his image Gen. 9.6 which image is expressed in mans soule animating the bodie This image then is not to be defaced and dissolved but by warrant and direction from God therefore the equitie of the Judicials of Moses ought to be a rule either by generall direction or particular president to all Magistrates in what cases and for what sinnes they are to deprive the offendors of their life But here it will be objected that if this be so then all those Common-wealths are in error which punish theft by death which by Moses law is satisfied by making restitution Exod. 22.2 Ans. Even by Moses law some kinde of theft received a capitall punishment as if it were a violent theft as it was lawfull to kill a theefe breaking into the house Exodâ—s 22.2 or a wanton theft as David judged him worthy to dye that having many sheepe of his owne tooke by violence the onely sheepe which his poore neighbour had 2. Sam. 12.5 Likewise publike theft and sacrilege in Achan was punished by death Iosh. 7. But that simple theft when a man stealeth only to satisfie his hungrie soule or to supply his present necessitie should be proceeded against to the losse of life it seemeth hard And as I take it the lawes of this land have used a good consideration herein that such small felons should escape by their booke wherein to my understanding greater clemencie and favour in some Judges were more commendable who require an exactnesse of such simple clerkes unlesse they bee such as are worthy for other former evill demerits to be cut off as rotten members There is a saying in the law Favores sunt ampliandi Where favour is intended it should be the largest way extended It were also to be wished that a greater valuation were yet set than of the usuall rate in such small fellonies when a man is to bee judged for his life By Dioclesians law some kindes of theft are charged with restitution of foure fold by another authentike law the theefe is adjudged to bee beaten with clubbes By the Decrees Qui fecâ—rit furtum capitale c. Hee that committed any capitall theft as in breaking into an house in stealing a beast or some other thing of price if he were a Clergie man he was to be under penance seven yeeres if a lay man five if it were a small theft he was to make restitution and to doe penance one yeere By any of these or the like constitutions sufficient provision might be made against simple theft But it can no wayes be justified that such simple theft should bee more straightly
are in his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1
kinde of beead corne therefore neither fetches nor barley and a middle sort betweene wheate and barley 2. Now in that the barley was smitten and not the wheate and rie the reason is given because the one was cared and the other was hid the word is aphiloth obscure not hid in the hose as Pellican but hid in the ground Iun. 3. the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Latine serotina because the wheates and ries were late sowne but it is not like that wheat and rie were sowne after their barley which sooner commeth up and is sooner ripe but though they were sowne together yet the barley lieth not so long hid in the ground as the wheate and rie the reason then of this difference was the barley was growne of good length out of the ground and so was blasted and smitten the other not yet appearing out of the tilth but lying hid 4. But with us the use is contrarie for our wheate and rie which wee call winter corne are out of the ground before the barley is sowne Some thinke that the Egyptians doe sow all their graine together in the slime and soile that Nilus leaveth behinde about the Autumne and then plow it in November and sow it againe in Aprill Borrh. in cap. 7. but that is not like for both the moistnes of the ground after the overflowing of Nâ—lus and the warmth of the aire which in winter time in Egypt is temperate would have brought forth the wheate and rie sooner that it could not have lien so long hid as toward the spring when it is supposed this tempest of haile came And againe the use of husbandmen is not first to sow their ground and then to plow it but first they make it plaine and readie and then cast in their seede as the Prophet sheweth Esay 28.25 Therefore it seemeth more like that the Egyptians sow no corne at all but toward the spring as the like use is in some parts of England as in Cumberland as I have been informed where they sow not their wheate and rie before winter as in other countries but toward the rising of the yeere and so all these kindes being sowne much about one time the barley might sooner appeare above the ground 5. Now by this it may be conjectured at what time of the yeere these plagues came the corne doth begin to eare but toward the spring when all things as it were revive and begin to flourish But the spring in those countries is forwarder then it is with us for they had ripe corne in mid March when they kept the Passeover this plague then of haile might be sent about the end of Februarie and so all the rest within the compasse of a moneth or in a very short time as is shewed before quest 29. in cap. 7. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. The pestilence is sent of God Vers. 3. BEhold the hand of the Lord is upon the flocke This sheweth that the plague and pestilence commeth not by chance nor by naturall meanes onely but it is sent of God so the Prophet saith Shall there be evill in the citie and the Lord hath not done it Amos 3.6 Ferus 2. Doct. Why the Lord suffereth the wicked and is patient to them ward Vers. 16. THerefore have I kept thee The Lord useth great patience and longanimitie toward the wicked and obstinate as heere to ward Pharaoh which the Lord doth for divers ends 1. Hereby it appeareth how great an evil the hardnes of the heart is which can neither be wonne by benefits nor yet mollified by punishments 2. That the wicked and impenitent may bee inexcusable having so long a time of repentance given them 3. That Gods goodnesse mercie might appeare in suffering so long the vesses of his wrath 4. That God thereby may have occasion to shew his judgements in the world and to set forth his glorie which is the reason here touched why the Lord spared Pharaoh Perer. 3. disput in cap. 9. 3. Doct. How the Lord punisheth sinne with sinne Vers. 12. THe Lord hardned the heart of Pharaoh Thus God in his justice doth punish sin with sin Pharaohs former obstinacie and hardnes of heart is punished with a greater measure and degree of obstinacie Piscator So Saul was punished with desertion and being left unto himselfe after he had committed most grievous sinnes of hypocrisie presumption disobedience crueltie Thus the Lord punished the Gentiles by giving them over to their hearts lusts Rom. 1 2â— The hardning then of the heart as it is evill proceedeth of man as it is a punishment it is disposed and inflicted of God 4. Doct. Of the force of the law of nature Vers. 27. PHaraoh said I have now sinned Heere wee see the force of the law of nature which informeth Pharaohs conscience that he had sinned and done amisse So the Apostle teacheth That the Gentiles did shew the effect of the law written in their hearts their consciences bearing witnes and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing Rom. 2.15 Hence also it is evident how the Law differeth from the Gospell the Law worketh terror and revealeth sinne but the Gospell worketh comfort in the remission and forgivenes of sinne Borrh. 5. Places of confutation 1. Conf. That God hardneth the heart otherwise than by permission Vers. 12. THe Lord hardned the heart of Pharaoh Bellarmine and generally the Romanists do hold that God doth no otherwise blind the mind and harden the heart than permittendo deserendo by permission onely and desertion or forsaking negativè non positivè negatively only not positively that is by denying and withholding his grace not by acting or doing any thing lib. 2. de amission gratia cap. 14. obser 4. But this text evidently doth convince him The Lord is here said to harden Pharaohs heart which sheweth an action in God not a connivence or permission only And three waies God is an agent in hardning of mans heart and yet he is free from all touch or suspition of evill 1. God is to be considered as the Creator of all from whom both the righteous and unrighteous receive al their naturall powers faculties whereby they live move worke or doe any thing In him we move live and have our being Act. 17.28 So Augustine saith Non peccati cujusquam author est deus sed naturae creator God is not the author of any sin but the Creator of nature which when it had power not to offend yet trespassed of it owne accord 2. Though the Lord willeth not sinne to bee done neither approoveth it when it is done yet he doth order and disposeth it being done and directeth it to such ende as himselfe pleaseth so it is said in the Psalme Whatsoever it pleased God that did hee in heaven and in earth Psal. 13 5.6 God would never suffer sin to be committed in the world but that be knoweth how to turne it to good as here he useth Pharaohs hardnes
intended no evill or hurt to their father but it so fell out The wicked are said to hate their owne soules and to procure unto themselves eternall death whereas simply they hate not their soules neither would be damned but upon their committing of sinne it so falleth out that their soules perish by their meanes as if they hated them unruly patients that will not obey their Physitians whereupon followeth death are said â—o seeke their owne death and yet they desire to live but upon their unruly and disordered behaviour death followeth So God is said to harden Pharaohs heart by the like figurative speech because the hardning of their heart ensueth upon the abuse of those things which God intendeth not to that end but they pervert them to their owne hurt Ex Perer. All this may safely bee received and acknowledged and yet somewhat more is to be added as shall afterward appeare QUEST XXIII How diversly in Scripture these termes of blinding and hardning are taken BUt by the way this word to blind to harden though it signifie an action proceeding from him that hardneth yet is it not alwayes so taken therefore we shall find that foure wayes in Scripture a thing is said to blinde and consequently to harden 1. Giftes are said to blind the â—â—es Deut. 16. Not that they being a dead thing can corrupt the judgement but mans corrupt heart taketh occasion and is thereby enticed to pervert justice 2. The Devill is said to blinde the mindes of the wicked â— Cor. 4.4 3. The malice of a mans owne heart is said to blinde and harden as Pharaoh hardned his owne heart 4. God is said to blind the eyes Esay 6.10 and to harden Pharaohs heart gifts doe blinde occasionaliter by way of occasion the malice of mans heart blindeth meritâ—â—â—â— by way of desert and meritoriously because it deserveth to be further blinded and hardned the Devill blindeth incitando by inciting and provoking unto sinne And God as is before shewed by withdrawing his grace and inflicting the punishment of induration upon them QUEST XXIV How divers wayes the Lord forsaketh those which are hardned FUrther God is said to harden mans hart in his diverse leaving and forsaking of them 1. Hee suffereth them to follow their owne lusts and desires not giving them power or grace to restraine them as Rom. 1 24. he gave them up to their hearts lusts 2. He giveth them ease abundance prosperity whereby they are intangled therefore the Prophet prayeth Give me not riches lest I be full and forget thee Prov. 3. 3. He denieth them the benefit of wholsome corrections and afflictions whereby they should learne to know themselves as the Apostle saith the Lord receiveth no child whom hee doth not chastise 4 God forbiddeth his servants to pray for such and so they want the benefit of their prayers as Ieremie is forbidden to pray for the people chap. 7.16 5. God in his justice depriveth them of such as should travell for their soules and bring them unto God as the Apostles left the obstinate and wilfull Jewes and shooke off the dust of their feet against them Acts 13. 6. God taketh away from them the preaching and knowledge of his word as the Lord threatneth by his Prophet Amos to send upon them a famine not of bread or water but of hearing his word Amos 8.11 7. God suffereth them to be deceived by flatterers and unfaithfull counsellers as â—eboboâ—â— was by his young men 8. And the more strongly to delude them the Lord permitteth sometimes false Prophets to shew signes and wonders 〈◊〉 the Apostle saith of the false Prophet Antichrist whose comming is by the working of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders 2. Thes. 2.9 9. The Lord permitteth Satan to invade them and to worke upon them at his pleasure as the evill spirit was sent of the Lord upon Saul and a lying spirit was in the mouth of Baals false Prophets to deceive Achab. 10. God taketh away from them all helpes whereby they should be defended against the assaults of Satan as the Lord threatneth to doe to his unfruitfull vineyard I will take away the hedge thereof and it shall be â—aten up I will breake downe the wall thereof and it shall be troden downe Isai. 5.4 11. But the Lord doth not thus forsake any till they have first forsaken God as Chrysostome saith Quod autem Deus non derelinquat nos nisi fuerit à nobis derelictus apertè ostendit Isaias That God forsaketh not us till wee have forsaken him I say sheweth chap. 59.2 Your iniquities have separated betweene you and your God Ex Perer. QUEST XXV God hardneth otherwise than by foreseeing BEside these divers interpretations of the hardning of Pharaohs heart by the Lord which I have abridged out of Pererius there are three other which I will briefly set downe first some thinke that this in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart is to be understood of Gods prescience that he is said to harden it because he foresaw it should be hardned by their owne malice This seemeth sometime to be the opinion of Augustine in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart Non ad operationem Dei sed ad prascientiam pertinere monstratur it is shewed to appertaine not to Gods operation or working but to his prescience But this cannot bâ— the meaning for by this reason whereas God foreseeth all the sinnes of men which are committed in the world God might be said himselfe to kill steale doe wrong because he foreseeth that such things shall be done in the world QUEST XXVI Whether God may be said to doe those things which he disposeth of to a good end SEcondly God may be said to harden Pharaohs heart because he disposeth thereof and directeth it to such an end as he himselfe propounded because thereby the Lord did take occasion to worke his miracles as he saith to Moses I have hardned Pharaohs heart that I might worke these my miracles Exod. 10.1 So as God ordained the end he may be said also in some sort to doe those things which helpe unto that end as Act. 2.23 Christ is said to bee delivered by the determinate councell of God yet was hee betrayed and delivered by Iudas whose act is said in some respect to be the Lords because God disposed of it to effect and accomplish his glorious councell in redeeming the world by the death of his Sonne But neither can this be safely affirmed that the Lord should bee said to doe those things which hee ordereth and disposeth for God so disposed of that spirituall combate which S. Paul found in his flesh that it tended further to Gods glory and the manifestation of his power as the Lord saith My grace is sufficienâ— for thee my power is made perfect through weakenesse yet God was not the worker of that temptation but the Apostle imputeth it to Satan 2. Cor. 12.7 And like as in the creation God made
light but made not darkenesse but onely made a separation betweene the light and the darknesse Gen. 14. Whereupon Augustine groundeth this distinction Aliud fecit Deus ordinavit aliud non fecit sed ordinavit God mâ—dâ— sâ—me things and ordered them also some things he made not but ordered as he giveth instance of the darknesse so the workes of darknesse God cannot be said to have made but only he disposeth and ordereth them QUEST XXVII God otherwise hardneth then as a generall mover of the heart THirdly some referre that worke of God which he sheweth in the hardning of the heart to that generall power which he giveth unto the creature in whom all things move live and have their being Act. 17.28 So that the hardning of the heart as it is an action or worke is of God but as it is evill it proceedeth from man So Zuinglius Quatenus est Dei Creatoris opus est crimen non est quantum autem hominis crimen est scelus est As it is of God the Creator it is a worke it is no faule but as it is of man it is a fault it is a sinne The Master of the sentences hath the like saying Actus mali in quantum actus 〈◊〉 boni sunt à Deo authore Evill acts as they are acts are good and proceed of God the Author lib. 2. distinct 35. But this solution doth not take away the doubt for as God is the Creator and so generall worker hee only giveth power to move the heart this moving being the generall action is divided into two parts for there are good motions of the heart and evill the mollifying of the heart and the hardning in the good motions God concurreth two wayes as a generall mover by his creating power and as a particular directer by his regenerating grace but in the other motions he only hath a stroke as a generall mover in the particular action of hardning as it is evill hee concurreth not Therefore according to that generall power the Lord is said only to be a mover not an hardner of the heart Some other way therefore yet must be found out whereby the Lord is said to harden the heart QUEST XXVIII How the Lord is said indeed to harden the heart TO conclude then this question of all these wayes before rehearsed which are ten in all I make choice of these three which may fully satisfie every doubt namely the third in the 17. quest before the fift in the 20. quest and the sixt in the 21. The first is that God is said to harden the heart by leaving it to it selfe and depriving it of his necessary grace as God is said to have given over the unbeleeving Gentiles to their hearts lusts Rom. 1.24 The second that beside this God causeth many things to be done which are not in themselves causes of the hardning of the heart yet the wicked take occasion thereby further to bee indurate and hardned as S. Paul sheweth how the wicked abuse the patience and long suffering of God thereby to be further hardned Thirdly God by his just judgement Cum suum in malum quâ— ipse ultro ruit amplius ad finem usque impellit doth force him to his owne hurt whither hee runneth headlong himselfe even unto the end Iun. Aâ—aâ—ysâ—n 7. cap. Exod. God as a just Judge seeing a mans heart to bee bent upon wickednesse doth as a just Judge inflict upon him the spirituall punishment of induration To this purpose Augustine handling that place Rom. 1. how the Lord gave up the Gentiles to their owne lusts useth this distinction that some things there rehearsed are sinnes and no punishment as the pride and vanity of their mindes vers 21. They were not thankefull but became vaine in their imagination Some a punishment and no sinne as eternall death which they were worthy of vers 31. the rest that came betweene are both sinnes and punishments By this distinction Augustine in another place answereth this objection of the Pelagians God say they should not take such punishment of sinne Vt peccator per vindictam plura committeret That the sinners thereby commit more sinne Augustine answereth to this effect Sic ostendit ista esse peccata ut etiam poenae fint peccatorum he sheweth these so to be sinnes as that they are also punishments of sinnes as the Apostle there saith vers 27. Man with man wrought filthinesse and received to themselves such recompence of their error as was meet So the meaning of Augustine is that God did not send them upon the Gentiles as they were sinnes but they are to be considered as punishments of their sinnes as God hath an hand therein Likewise whereas Iulian the Pelagian objected that Per patientiam divinam sunt non per potentiam desideriis traditi That they were delivered over to their lusts not by the power but by the patience of God Augustine to shew the contrarie giveth instance of that place Ezech. 14.9 When it is said If the Prophet be deceived I have deceived him Patientia an potentia est Is it the patience or the power of God that doth this And concerning the hardning of Pharaohs heart Augustine concludeth thus Deus ejus voluntatem proprio suo vito malam in hoc peccatum judicio suo justo occulto inclinavit God did incline his will being evill by it owne faulâ— into this sinne by his just yet secret judgement If God did incline it he did more than suffer it or minister the occasion only whereby it was inclined Hierome expresseth as much by this similitude Vnus est solis calor secundùm essentias subjacentes alia liquefacit alia indurat liquatur cera induratur lutum there is buâ— one kinde of heate in the Sunne and according to the matter which it worketh upon some things it melteth some things it hardneth the wax is melted the clay hardned Origene also useth the same similitude and applieth it thus Sic indurasse dicitur Deus cor Pharaoniâ— quia cor ejus secundùm ea quae cogitabat luteum limosum erat So God as the Sunne hardneth the clay is said to have hardned Pharaohs heart because his heart according to those things which he thought was earthly and muddy And in another place he bringeth in this Simile Vt eodem opere plâ—viae terra diligenter exculta affert bonos fructus inculta tribulos as by the same worke of the raine the earth being well tilled bringeth forth good fruit and the untilled thistles Like as then the Sun hardneth the clay the raine bringeth forth weedes not of it selfe but by reason of the nature of the thing concurring whereupon it worketh so by the working of God after a most secret and hid manner the hearts of the wicked are hardned but the cause thereof is in themselves And thus much shall suffice of this question see it handled before 2. Doct. chap. 7. and
admonished of this singular benefit and mercy Calvin whereby we learne that it sufficeth not onely to have a generall apprehension of our spirituall redemption but a particular application is necessary as the Israelites every one in particular eating of the paschall lambe in their private families had a proper and particular sense and feeling of the benefit as they severally did eat and taste of the lambe This particular application of the redemption of Christ S Paul sheweth saying I live by the faith of the Sonne of God who hath loved mee and given himselfe for mee Galath 2.20 3. Doct. How the paschall Lambe prefigured Christ. Vers. 21.12 TAke a lamb and kill the passeover c. Take a bunch of hyssope and dip it in the bloud c. Because Christ was prefigured in the paschall lambe as is evident Ioh. 9.36 1. Cor. 5.7 the particular resemblances are to be considered wherein the lambe prefigured Christ. 1. The lambe was without blemish vers 5. and Christ was without sinne and so the unspotted lambe 1. Pet. 1.19 2. The lambe must be killed so Christ was sacrificed for us 1. Cor. 5.7 3. As the postes of the house must be sprinkled with the bloud of the lambe so our hearts must bee dipped by faith in Christs bloud to deliver us from eternall death as they were from a temporall Heb. 12.24 1. Pet. 1.2 4. As the lambe was to be rosted with fire so Christ did feele the wrath of his father for our sinnes being made a curse for us Galath 3.13 5. As they were to eat unleavened bread with the lambe so wee that eat Christ by faith must study for newnesse of life 1. Cor. 7.8 6. As they were to eat it with sower herbes so wee must frame our selves to suffer affliction for the faith 7. As the Lambe should be eaten whole so wee must receive the whole doctrine of Christ omitting nothing Heb. 1.1 2 3 4. 8. As no stranger was to eat of the lambe being uncircumcised so no unbeleever can be partaker of Christ Piscator 4. Doct. Divers sorts of men in the visible Church Vers. 38. ANd a great multitude of sundry sorts of people went out with them As among the Israelites there were many other people mingled which were to have no part in the inheritance of Canaan so there are many hypocrites and carnall men in the visible Church which shall have no part in the Kingdome of God for many bee called but few are chosen And as there were fewer companies in that great multitude the first of those which were fighting men the second of weake persons as women and children the third of strangers the fourth of their beasts and cattell so in the Church of God there are first such as are strong in the faith secondly the weake and fraile thirdly Hypocrites which in outward shew joyne themselves to the Church as those strangers did fourthly carnall and worldly which may be compared unto beasts Ferus 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against reservation of reliques Vers. 10. YE shall reserve nothing of it untill the morning This was commanded to take away all occasion of superstition lest they might have superstitiously abused these reliques of the paschall lambe which charge given unto the Israelites may reprove the superstition of those professing Christianity which doe reserve the reliques of Saints and doe fondly yeeld adoration unto them So in time past a superstitious use was taken up in reserving part of the Sacrament and carrying it about unto sicke folkes The Lord therefore foreseeing what inconvenience might arise by such reservations forbiddeth any thing at all to be kept of the lambe Iun. in Analys 2. Confut. That the bread in the Sacrament is not the body of Christ carnally but only a seale and pledge of it Vers. 11. FOr it is the Lords Passeover That is it did signifie it for Sacraments are not the things which they represent but signes and seales of them Genevens So in the Gospell the bread is called the body of Christ being a signe and representation of it Pellican So is circumcision called the Lords covenant Gen. 17.11 yet was it only a signe and seale thereof Then as neither the lambe was the Passeover it selfe nor circumcision the covenant it selfe so it is but weakely inferred by the Romanists upon these words of our Saviour that the bread should be the very body of Christ. 3. Confut. Against the carnall or raw eating of Christs flesh in the Sacrament Vers. 9. EAt not thereof raw Ferus upon these words hath this note Crudem comedunt qui tantum astâ—mant id quod viderint quia solum panem viderint solum panem â—redunt They eat the lambe raw which only esteeme that which they see and because they see nothing but bread they beleeve nothing but bread In which words he seemeth to glance at the Protestants that doe not beleeve the bread to be turned into Christs flesh and yet they beleeve that there is more present than bread that the very flesh of Christ is exhibited to the faith of the worthy receiver But upon this point Pellicans note is more agreeable Non cruâ—us id est Christus non est carnaliter substantialiter vel sensibiliter comedendus Christ the paschall lambe is not to be eaten raw that is carnally substantially sensibly For who may be better said to eat Christ raw they which deny the carnall presence of Christs body or they which hold that they doe eat with their mouth and teeth the very flesh body and bones of Christ they most properly may bee said to eat Christ raw both in respect of their owne opinion of the carnall presence and for that they come not prepared with a true lively faith to the Sacrament but with an erroneous perswasion All they therefore that come unprepared and so doe eat and drinke unworthily may be said to eat Christ raw for as raw flesh is offensive to the stomacke and hee may bee said to eat his owne death so they that eat and drinke in the Sacrament unworthily are said by the Apostle to eat and drinke their owne damnation 1. Cor. 11.28 4. Confut. Against the Anabaptists that allow no allegories in the old Testament Vers. 46. YE shall not breake a bone of him In that the Apostle Ioh. 19. applieth this unto Christ it iâ— evident that he was the true Lambe of God shadowed and prefigured by the paschall lambe and therein divers wayes represented and resembled as is before shewed doct 3. This therefore maketh against the Anabaptists which will not have any proofes alleaged out of the old Testament for confirmation of any thing in the new and take away the use and explication of the types and figures of the old Testament allowing no sense of any place beside the historicall and literall sense whereas it is evident that Saint Paul doth allegorically apply the histories of the old Testament as that of Sarah and Hagar Galath 4. and the
but this is understood of Gods judgement before whom all are held as guiltie and who prescribeth no law to himselfe Acacius Contra. But this solution is not sufficient for Ezechiel which saith the same soule that sinneth shall die speaketh also of the judgements of God which should not be inflicted upon the children for the fathers Ex Simler 5. Cajetane giveth this solution Although God in the law command that the sonnes should not bee put to death for the sinnes of the fathers Ipse tamen qui creator conservator Dominus est unicuique nemini facit injuriam c. Yet he that is the Creator preserver and Lord of every mans life doth no man wrong if he temporally chastise the sonnes c. His reason dependeth upon Gods right and power which hee hath over every mans life that as he gave it so he doth no wrong to take it away at his pleasure Contra. But the Lord saith by the Prophet Ezech. 18.32 I desire not the death of him that dieth Now if there were no other cause why the Lord should punish the children of the wicked in taking away their life but the will and pleasure of God the Lord should seeme to desire the death of men contrary to that saying of the Prophet 6. Procopius giveth this exposition that God threatneth to punish the posteritie of the wicked ut parentes à peccandi licentia retraheret to withdraw the fathers from sinning parentes non tam dolent sua morte quà m liberorum prasertim si his fuerint authores mortis Fathers doe not so much grieve for their owne death as for the death of their sonnes especially if they were the cause of it Contra. This is true that the punishment of the children redoundeth to the parents but this is not all that by this meanes the fathers should bee drawne to repentance for although their children be neere them yet they are neerer to themselves and their owne punishment would much more move them 7. There remaine two most usuall expositions the first is that temporally sonnes may be chastned for their fathers but not eternally for aeternaliter quilibet punitur pro malo quod egit c. For eternally every one shall be punished for the evill which he doth himselfe Tostat. quaest 5. So also Thomas Si loquimur de poena qua habet rationem medecina c. If we speake of that punishment which is by way of medicine we may be punished for another Such are all temporall and bodily corrections they are medicinall and tend to the good of the soule and the sonne quantum ad animam non est res patris in respect of his soule is not any thing of his father but in respect of his body Sic Thom. 1.2 quaest 87. artic 8. Contra. Although this exposition be sound and true yet it doth not fully take away the doubt moved before 1. For the Prophet Ezechiel also speaketh of temporall punishment namely of captivitie which the sonne should not beare for the father 2. And this place is rather understood of eternall punishment than temporall which the sinne of Idolatrie deserveth Simler 3. And the phrase here used visiting the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children sheweth that the Lord speaketh rather of penall judgements which should bee inflicted upon the sonnes of the wicked than of medicinall corrections 4. And Augustine further urgeth this reason that if it bee understood of temporall chastisement as of captivitie then non solum odio haebentibus sed diligentibus se redderet peccata c. God should not onely render the sinnes to those that hate him but to those that love him for Daniel and the three children and Ezechiel with other righteous men went into captivitie Sic Augustin quaest 14. quaest veter novum Testament 8. There remaineth the second common and received sense of these words which most of the fathers thus understand that the Lord will visite the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children if they also continue in the wicked race and follow the evill example of their fathers as Hierome Ideo iniquitates eorum portaverunt quia imitatores eorum in nequitia extiterunt Therefore rhey doe beare the iniquitie of their fathers because they did imitate them in their wickednesse Hieron in oration Ierem. Some agreeing in generall with the rest that it is to be expounded of the wicked children of wicked parents yet doe understand it of originall sinne which is properly called the sinne of the fathers because they received it from them which is punished in unregenerate children of the wicked but is pardoned in those that are regenerate To this purpose Gregor lib. 15. Moral cap. 22. Contra. But originall sinne is extended further than to the third and fourth generation which are here mentioned therefore it is not like the Lord meaneth that sinne Ex Simler Some will not have this place at all understood of the sinnes of the fathers but of the children onely qui peccant sicut patres which sinne as their fathers did But as Tostatus well argueth against this assertion This were not to punish the sinnes of the fathers in the children Sed peccatorum filiorum malorum in seipsos but of the wicked sonnes in themselves Tostat. quaest 5. Therefore the former exposition is currant to expound these words of the sinnes of the children which they learned of their fathers Quia patrum extiterunt aemulatores haereditario malo de radice in ramos crescente They are punished because they ded emulate their fathers this hereditarie evill growing from the root into the branches Hieron in Ezech. cap. 18. So also Augustine Ex eo quod addidit qui me oderunt c. In that he addeth which hate me it is understood that they are punished for the sinnes of their fathers Qui in cadem perversitate parentum perseverare voluerunt Which would persevere in the same perversitie of their fathers August cont Adimant cap. 7. Gregor Quisquis parentis iniquitatem non imitatur nequaquam ejus delicto gravatur Hee that imitateth not the iniquitie of his father is not burdened with his sinne lib. 15. moral cap. 22. Chrysostome Si nepos secutus fuerit vias patris avi sui c. If the nephew doe follow the wayes of his father and grandfather thou wilt render unto them to the third and fourth generation Chrysost. homil in Psal. 84. Super illa non in aeternum irasceris c. Severus Therefore it is added Of those that hate me Vt apertum fiat non ob parentum peccata sed ob illorum odium adversus Deum eos puniri That it may bee manifest that they are not punished for their fathers sinne but for their owne hatred against God Ex Lippoman Diodorus In eisdem peccatis persistentes just as poenas exolvetis Persisting in the same sinnes you shall pay just punishment Rabanus Peccata patrum iniquorum non redundant ad filios si eorum imitatores in
malo non fiant The sinnes of the wicked fathers doe not redound to the children if they doe not imitate them in evill Ex Lippom. All these fathers doe understand that clause eorum qui odorunt me Of those that hate me not of the fathers alone as Tostatus but of the children also named before that it answereth to them all and so not onely the construction of the words giveth it for this clause being the last of the sentence sheweth it hath reverence to that which goeth before but the other opposite part Vnto thousands that love me doth more manifest it for there is no mention made of fathers but of the thousand generations unto whom this condition is annexed Of those which love me But against this exposition which in this place I preferre before the rest it will be thus objected 1. Object If the father be evill and the sonnes evill they shall not onely be punished unto the third and fourth generation sed etiam in mille but to a thousand Tostat. Answ. It is true that the generation of the wicked shall be punished for ever so long as they continue evill but the exemplarie sinnes of the fathers are said to be visited onely to the third and fourth generation because so long the impietie of the fathers may be had in remembrance Wee therefore here understand not the particular sinnes onely of the wicked children but the exemplarie sinnes also of the fathers concurring with the other 2. Object The children of righteous parents are rewarded to a thousand generations onely for the righteousnesse of their fathers therefore the other are punished onely for the wickednesse of their fathers Tostat ibid. Answ. This argument may better be retorted for as the posteritie of the righteous if they doe degenerate shall bee punished notwithstanding the righteousnesse of their fathers as the Prophet sheweth Ezech. 18.13 so the children of wicked parents leaving their fathers sinnes shall not be partakers of their punishment as the Prophet saith Hee shall not die in the iniquitie of his father Ezech. 18.17 Then as the Lord sheweth mercie to thousands but conditionally Of those that love him so he visiteth the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children with the like condition Of those that bare him if both father and children are alike haters of God 3. Object If the children bee punished because they doe participate with their fathers in their sinnes Tune non patris portat 〈…〉 Then he beareth not his fathers sinne but his owne Lippom. Answ. It followeth not they are punished for their owne sinne therefore not for their fathers for one and the same punishment there may be divers causes but the iniquitie of the fathers and the children may concurre together to maâ—e 〈◊〉 punishment Vrsin 4. Object The sense of the punishment of the posteritie cannot reach unto those which are dead of their ancestors therefore this commination is nothing to the parents Answ. 1. The evill parents are vexed with the punishment of their children Cum vident eos cruciari viventes When they see them to be tormented while they live for unto the fourth generation men may live to see their offspring Tostat. 2. Or though they live not to see the punishment of their children yet this may move them while they live that they know assuredly that God will punish their seed after them for their sinne when they are dead 5. Object But why doth not God give grace unto all the posteritie of the wicked as well as to some that they may repent and turne from the wickednesse of their fathers Answ. God is not tied to any man he doth them no wrong in withholding his grace and leaving them to their owne nature for God giveth his grace to whom he will and detaineth it from whom he please and though he should denie his grace to all none could complaine Galas So then wee resolve upon this sense that both this commination here threatned and the promise of mercie exhibited are conditionall the one if the children doe continue in their fathers sinnes the other if they embrace the love of God together with their righteous fathers And herein together with the consent of the ancient Fathers and Interpreters doe concurre our new writers Pelarg. Marbach Calvin Simler Galas Borrh. Pellican Oleast Osiand with others whose particular sentences herein agreeing with the testimonies already alleaged it were needlesse to rehearse Lyranus toucheth both these last interpretations yet seeming to preferre the latter Temporali poena justè filii puniuntur à Deo pro iniquitate patrum quia in hoc puniuntur patres The children are justly punished with temporall punishment of God for their fathers iniquitie because herein also the fathers are punished Alio modo intellegitur de poena aeterna quae infligitur filio pro iniquitate patris in quantum est imitator paterni sceleris It is understood another way of eternall punishment which is inflicted upon the sonne for the iniquitie of his father because he is an imitator of his fathers sinne QUEST VIII Why mention is made of the third fourth generation VNto the third and fourth generation c. 1. Some thinke that this was no generall law but onely concerned that present age of the Israelites and therefore the Lord maketh mention of the third and fourth generation because now the Israelites came out of Egypt in the fourth generation as the Lord foretold unto Abraham Gen. 15.16 and in this fourth generation they committed that grievous Idolatrie in making a golden Calfe therefore the Lord threatned them that if they committed Idolatrie hee would bring upon them the sinnes committed by their fathers in Egypt in the second and third generation in worshipping the Idols of Egypt Ex Procop. But this cannot bee the reason why mention is made here of the third and fourth generation for as the other part of the promise of mercie to a thousand generations is generall so also is this commination generall because also the precept is generall to take heed of Idolatrie 2. Rupertus giveth this reason Iniquitatem patrum qui fratrem suum Ioseph vendiderant nunc reddiderat c. He rendred now upon the fourth generation the iniquitie of their fathers that sold Ioseph for now mount Sinai smoked in terrible manner as though the Lord came downe to take revenge of them Contra. 1. But in this fourth generation God delivered them out of bondage and had wrought wonderfull things for them both in Egypt and in the wildernesse therefore this was a time rather of mercie than of judgement 2. And if God had visited that iniquitie upon them now the posteritie of Iosâ—pâ— should have smarted as well as the rest 3. Further this commination is specially intended for the sinne of Idolatrie which the brethren of Ioseph were not guiltie of then for Iakob before had buried all their strange gods under an oke Gen. 35. 3. Procopius thus understandeth these foure generations for the foure
3. If they doe use herbs and oyntments and such other outward meanes it is but to colour their devillish practice and inchantments whereby they worke and not by the vertue or operation of such herbs therefore it was well decreed in the Matiscane Councell as it is cited in the Decrees Nec in collectionibus herbarum quae medicinales sunt observationes aliquaâ— licet attendere c. In the collection of herbs which are of themselves medicinall it is not lawfull to use any other superstitious observations Now on the contrarie it shall appeare that witches and other of that sort are worthie of punishment by death and that they are not by any meanes to bee tolerated in a Commonwealth 1. They are manifest transgressors against the first Table and every precept thereof for they doe combine themselves with Satan and forsake their faith and so make them other gods beside the Lord they also invent superstitious rites and ceremonies images figures and pictures which the devill hath taught them to worship him by and beside they prophane and abuse the holy name and titles of God in their superstitious invocations and inchantments And they appoint certaine holy daies solemnities and assemblies among themselves as the Lord hath appointed the Sabbath for his owne worship And thus they apparently violate every precept of the first Table 2. They are also enemies to the Commonwealth full of mischiefe practising their malice upon men and beasts and therefore the Civill law Propter magnitudinem scelerum maleficos appellat Because of the greatnesse of their mischievous practices calleth them Evill or Wicked doers They are manifest murtherers assaulting the life of Christian people where God permitteth by all devillish meanes and thus the second Table likewise is by them violated and perverted Gallas 3. They also are perverters of their children and seducers of others and so cause this mischiefe to spread further and to be transmitted over unto posteritie 4. Further if divine and humane lawes condemne all filthie societie and companie with beasts much more horrible and abominable is al confederacie and league made with devils and uncleane spirits Simler 5. Thomas touching this error that some should say Quod maleficium nihil erat in mundo c. That witchcraft was nothing in the world but in the opinion of men addeth Procedit haec opinio ex radice infidelitatis That this opinion proceedeth from the root of infidelitie because they doe not beleeve that there are any devils but only in the estimation of the people c. But we are taught by the Scriptures that the Angels fell from heaven and became devils by whom witches and Sorcerers worke 6. And this is sufficient to convince these men of error because the law of Moses judgeth the sinne of witchcraft worthy of death which they must 〈◊〉 â—â—cuse of 〈◊〉 if witchcraft were so small an offence and consisted but in opinion only And the Imperiall lawes herein doe concurre also with the Divine law which calleth Ars 〈…〉 The Mathematicall it meaneth Magicall science damnable and it decreeth thus 〈…〉 sunt Soothsayers and Diviners are to be burned Nec â—rs ista disâ—i nec dâ—ceâ—t debet This art must neither be learned nor taught yea by the Civill law he which consulted with Soothsayers 〈…〉 shall be punished by the sword QUEST XXXIII Of the 〈◊〉 stone of 〈…〉 Vers. 19. WHosoever lieth with a beast 〈◊〉 Prâ—opins and the 〈…〉 doe understand this of a beastly and bruâ—â—sh man with whom it is dangerous to converse and by death they understand here eternall death But this were to 〈◊〉 these grosse and unnaturall sinnes which here are condemned and these civill politicke lawes are literally to be understood 2. Therefore this law meeteth with that most unnaturall and monstrous sin of more than beastly lust 〈◊〉 this one kind also comprehending all other outragious lusts 〈◊〉 against nature as 〈◊〉 18.22 and 20.15 〈◊〉 3. And there are two sinnes specially against nature either when non servitus 〈◊〉 speciâ—â— the due kind is not kept as when the filthy company of beasts is desired Nature only having ordained the generation of mankinde to be with man the other is when non servatur debitâ—s sermo the due sex is not kept as when man with man worketh â—ilahinesse which was the sin of Sodome Thomas 4. And these are the reasons why such wicked persons should be put to death without all mercy 1. 〈◊〉 latur talibus flâ—giriâ—â— societ 〈◊〉 illa qua cum Deo noâ—â—s esse debet c. By such hainouâ— sins that societie 〈◊〉 violated which ought to be betweene us and God seeing Nature it selfe whereof God is the Author is polluted with such perverse lusts c. 2. Such wicked and vile persons shew themselves worse than bruâ—â— beasts qua coitu naturali contenta sunt which are content with naturall copulation Calvin and goe not out of their kind 3. Serit semen ubi aut nihil nâ—scitur 〈…〉 contrarâ—â—m c. Such soweth seed where either nothing at all is ingendred or a monster contrarie to nature Pelarg. 5. Not only the man or woman committing this filthinesse but the beast also wherewith it is perpetrated was to be put to death Levit. 20.15 both for the detestation of the fact and lâ—st any other by thâ—â— evill example should attempt to doe the like with that beast Lyran. QUEST XXXIV The reasons why mâ—n are given over to unnaturall lust 1. THis bestiall sin may be committed two waies either indirectly when one not at the first intending any such filthy act but being inflamed with lust ad coitum simplicâ—ter simply unto that carnall act because it cannot be satisfied as he would seeketh to have it satisfied howsoever or else directly at the first there is a wicked inclination unto this bestialitie 2. Tostatus giveth three reasons of it why some men are caried into these unnaturall lusts 1. Their vile corrupt nature which is procured by the evill disposition of the country as in Aethiopia and Lybia and toward the poles in the remote countries monstrous shapes and formes are found which are the fruits of such unnaturall lusts 2. Some grow bestiall by frensie and madnes and other distemperatures of the braine 3. Some by an evill use and custome as it seemeth the Sodomites even from their childhood were exercised in those acts of filthines As these reasons may be yeelded of the unnaturall appetite of men which feed of raw flesh yea of the flesh of men as bruit beasts so also of unnaturall lust Tostat. qu. 14.15.3 But a better reason may be given than all these for these unnaturall and beastly lusts are the traits of Idolatry and false worship as here immediately it followeth that they should not offer unto any other gods And Saint Paul sheweth that the Gentiles after they had corrupted the true worship of God were given over unto their owne hearts desire Rom. 1. as the
Heb. 9.22 The bloud of the sacrifices then was put upon the Altar that thereby as if it were their owne bloud Gods wrath might be appeased by which bloud of the externall sacrifices Christs bloud of atonement was prefigured whereby indeed the wrath of God is appeased toward us Tostat. q. 5. 3. And although the sin offerings were specially intended for the remission of sins and so the bloud in such sacrifices was to that end laid upon the hornes of the Altar to purge and reconcile yet in other sacrifices also as in burnt offerings Levit. 1.11 and in peace offerings Levit. 3.2 the bloud was sprinkled round about upon the Altar because in them also there was atonement made with God Levit. 1.4 though not so directly as in sin offerings Tostat. qu. 6. 4. R. Salomon here is of opinion that the bloud was not laid upon all the foure hornes of the Altar but onely in two corners thereof one opposite to another and not upon the same side But Levit. 16.18 it is said in expresse words that he should put of the bloud upon the hornes of the Altar round about QUEST XIII What became of the bloud which was powred at the bottome of the Altar Vers. 12. THou shalt powre the rest of the bloud at the foot of the Altar c. 1. Lyranus thinketh that there was some pipe full of holes in the bottome of the Altar whereby the bloud soked into the ground and was so dried up But the ground could not drinke up all the bloud of the sacrifices especially in their solemne feasts when many sacrifices were offered as when Solomon at the dedication of the Temple offered so many thousands of beeves and sheepe the ground being so filled with bloud would have beene very noisome 2. Tostatus therefore saith that this bloud miraculosè deâ—iccabatur was miraculously dried up and converted by Gods power into some other element qu. 6. But where any other reason may be found out we must not run unto miracles 3. Cajetane here maketh mention of his former conceit that the Altar was filled with earth within which might be imagined to serve to drinke up the bloud and that there was some void place left beside But the same inconvenience in the noisome smell of the earth so tainted would have followed But Cajetane addeth further that jugis ignis altaris tollebat â—mnem indeâ—â—utiam foetâ—ris the continuall fire upon the Altar did take away the stinch of the bloud 4. But the more probable opinion is that not onely the smell was taken away by the smell of the fire but sanguis ipse consumebatur but the bloud it selfe was consumed by the heat of the fire being powred at the bottome of the Altar on the inside Oleast Simler QUEST XIV Why the fat was burned upon the Altar and how Vers. 13. THou shalt take all the fat 1. The Lord commanded the fat of the offerings to be burnt upon the Altar ut obviaretur ritui idololatrarum to contrarie the rite and custome of Idolaters who used to eat the fat of their sacrifices as Deut. 32.38 they did eat the fat of their sacrifices Lyran. Tostat. qu. 6. And another reason is this Deus optimâ— quaque sibi offerri c. God will have the best of the sacrifice to be offered to him Lippoman 2. Together with the fat and kall they must also take the kidneyes which are not properly taken for any part of the flesh for the flesh must bee burnt without the host yea all the flesh Levit. 4.11 3. Because the word katar doth properly signifie thurâ—ficari to burne as incense and so the fat here is prescribed so to be burned Cajetane would inferre that it was to bee burned as incense that is not to be consumed with the flame sed instar thuriâ— paulatim resolvi in fumum but as incense to be resolved into smoake by little and little But this seemeth to be too curious Oleaster giveth a better reason why this word is used because God being displeased with the stinking smell of our sins Hujusmodi suffumigationibus occurrebatur These suffumigations were used by way of remedie whereby the Lord smelled a savour of rest as the Scripture speaketh and yet but typically for the true sweet smelling sacrifice was Christ. QUEST XV. Why the flesh skin and dung was burned without the host Vers. 14. THe flesh his skin and dung shalt thou burne without the host c. 1. In this speciall sacrifice for sin which was offered in the consecration of Aaron the skin together with the flesh was burnt without the host but in burnt offerings because all was to be burned upon the Altar and yet it was not fit the skin should bee consumed with the rest that belonged to the Priest Levit. 7.8 but in peace offerings the skin was the offerers as the rest which remained beside the Priests portion Tostat. 2. All is commanded to bee carried out of the host and there burned not onely to signifie as Lyranusâ—aith â—aith Quod peccata longè esse debene à sacerdotibus That sins must be farre off from the Priest for the like was to be done also in the sin offering for the whole congregation Levit. 4.1 but in every sin offering they did not so as if the sin offering were for the Prince or any other private person they did not then carrie it without the host this was done therefore in detestationem peccati sacerdotis to shew the greatnesse of the sin of the Priest as likewise of the whole congregation Tostat. qu. 7. 3. And whereas this is added as a reason for it is a sin offering it must not be so understood as though generally every sin offering was so to be served for in the sin offerings for the Prince or any private person that usage of burning without the host was not observed but it must have speciall reference to the thing here sacrificed for sin which was a young bullocke Now for the Prince or private person a goat was offered not a bullock but when a bullocke was offered as for the sin of the Priest or of all the whole congregation then it was to be so burned without the host this then is the sense because this bullocke is sacrificed for sin Tostat. qu. 7. 4. Though here no mention be made what shall be done with the inwards and legs and other parts of the beast which are not here rehearsed yet it may be supplied out of Levit. 4.11 that all those likewise should be carried without the host and there burned Tostat. qu. 6. QUEST XVI Of the mysticall application of the sacrifice of the bullocke with the rites thereof THis first sacrifice of the bullocke is thus mystically applied 1. By the fat of the inwards the liver and kidneyes Theodoret understandeth the affections Adeps qui ventriculum operâ—t gulae vitium indicat c. The fat which covereth the bellie signifieth the vice of gluttonie c. that which covereth the
reines and kidneyes the pleasure of the flesh and the liver unto which the seat of choler is annexed betokeneth anger Hâ—c omnia consecrarijubet He commandeth these things to be consecrated To the same purpose also Basil Quibus omnibus id nobiscum agitur ut adversus voluptatem totam quasi contra multorum capitum hydram c. By all these we are moved that we should fight against all pleasure as a serpent of many heads c. 2. So Borrhaius thereby understandeth the mortifying of the old man and by the carrying of the flesh skin and dung without the gate as a thing ignominious the suffering of Christ which tooke upon him our reproach without the gates of Jerusalem as the Apostle applieth it Hebr. 13.12 So also Gallas Marbach 3. By the foure corners of the Altar which were touched with bloud Lippoman interpreteth the shedding of Christs bloud who is our Altar and sacrifice by the which we are redeemed Terra quoque nostris sceleribus polluta c. hausto Christi sanguine reconciliatur c. The earth also being polluted with our sinnes having as it were drunke in Christs bloud is reconciled which otherwise would crie out for vengeance against us 4. Marbach by the laying the bloud upon the foure corners of the Altar would have signified the preaching of the shedding of Christs bloud and the dispersing thereof to the foure corners of the world And by the inwards liver and reines which are the seats of pleasure the willingnesse of Christ and delight in fulfilling the will of his Father So also Osiander 5. But this is the most proper signification thereof by the fat is understood the grosnesse of our nature in all the faculties and powers of the soule which are three 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the understanding in the heart 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the angrie motion in the liver 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the concupiscence or desiring facultie in the reines all which by nature are corrupted and therefore they must be offered unto God to be purged by the fire of his Spirit So Iunius Pelargus Simlerus QUEST XVII Why the sacrifice for sinne was offered first Vers. 15. THou shalt also take one ram Now followeth the second kinde of sacrifice which was the burnt offering 1. The bullocke the sacrifice for sinne was first to be offered that thereby the other sacrifices might be accepted for as it is in the Gospell Ioh 9.31 God heareth not sinners neither doth he accept the sacrifice of sinners And hereof it was that in the solemne day of reconciliation the high Priest first prayed for his owne sinnes and made reconciliation for himselfe and his house Levit. 16.11 and then for the people So in this place the burnt offering and peace offering would not have beene accepted unlesse first the Lord were appeased toward them for their sinnes it was requisite therefore that the sacrifice for sinne should be the first whereby the rest might be sanctified 2. But it will be objected that by the same reason neither can the sacrifice for sinne be accepted because he that offereth it hath not yet obtained remission of his sinnes The answer whereunto is this That it must be considered whether he that sacrificeth for sinne doth it for his owne sinnes or anothers for others his sacrifice cannot be accepted as long as he is in sin but for his owne sins such sacrifice is available As concerning prayer likewise which is the spirituall sacrifice of Christians a man yet in his sins shall not be heard praying for another but for his owne sins he shall be heard otherwise it would follow that he which hath committed any sin should never have remission and forgivenesse of them if his prayers should not be received 3. Beside as it is in the Sacraments of the new Testament Quadam requirunt dispositionem in suscipiente quaedam non Some required a disposition and preparation in the receiver some not as in the Eucharist unlesse one examine himselfe before and so be prepared to receive that holy Sacrament he is an unworthy receiver and eateth and drinketh hiâ— owne damnation 1 Cor. 11.29 But in the other Sacrament of Baptisme no such disposition in the receiver is required for infants that cannot examine themselves neither have faith are thereunto admitted So the like difference there was in the sacrifices of the Law some served to prepare and dispose the offerer to performe other duties as the sacrifices for sin some required a preparation and disposition going before as the burnt offerings and peace offerings Tostat qu. 9. QUEST XVIII How the bloud of the burnt offering was bestowed upon the Altar Vers. 16. THou shalt take his bloud and sprinkle it round about upon the Altar 1. This must be understood to be all the bloud which was to be bestowed round about upon the Altar for it was not lawfull to carrie any part of the bloud to any other prophane place and it was the law of burnt offerings that all the bloud should be offered unto God Levit. 1.5 2. Concerning the manner of sprinkling or powring this bloud round about upon the Altar neither is the opinion of R. Salomon and Lyranus to be received that thinke this was not done in parte superiore sed magis circa basin in the upper part of the Altar but rather toward the bottome for it was sprinkled upon the Altar therefore not under and it was offered unto God but all offerings were offered upon the Altar And againe Levit. 1.15 it is said the bloud should be strained shed or pressed forth on the sides of the Altar it seemeth then that it was sprinkled above and so ran downe by the sides of the Altar Neither yet doth Tostatus ghesse aright that the bloud being powred aloft did run downe per partem exteriorem by the outward part or side of the Altar for it could not be conveniently so powred without as to run downe by the sides therefore the bloud was rather powred on the inside of the Altar because it was part of the burnt offering and therefore was to be consecrate unto God by fire as it is said vers 18. It is an offering made by fire unto the Lord. And by this meanes the fire licked up the grosse substance of the bloud and so dried up the vapours thereof which otherwise would have beene very noisome Simler QUEST XIX Why the hornes of the Altar are not here touched with bloud Vers. 16. ANd thou shalt sprinkle it round about upon the Altar 1. Some things are common to the burnt offering and the sacrifice for sin as that Aaron and his sons did stay their hands upon the head thereof that it was killed before the Lord and that the bloud thereof was laid upon the Altar but these things were peculiar unto it the dividing of the parts not to burne them by peece-meale one after another but to couch them better together and to lay one part upon another then the
to offer a man into ones hand when he is suddenly killed Exod. 21.13 Tostatus who also includeth the punishment of death inflicted by the Magistrate that when the transgression is apparent and found out by witnesses then the Magistrate putteth to death as the man was stoned that gathered stickes Numb 15. But if the profaner of the Sabbath escape the punishment of man the judgement of God shall overtake him Tostat. qu. 12. 6. But beside these kinds of death which shall bee inflicted here in that it is said He shall die the death the other phrase In being cut off from among his people sheweth that beside there remaineth for them everlasting punishment in the next world as the Lord threatneth to the prophane fire unquenchable Ezech. 20.47 QUEST XVI Why the seventh day is called Sabbath Sabbaton Vers. 15. IN the seventh day is the Sabbath of holy rest unto Iehovah 1. Whereas the words in the originall are sabbath sabbaton some Hebrewes by the first understand the determined time of the Sabbath from evening to evening but because they know not certainly where the rest of the Sabbath should begin and where it should end they have added an houre more at the beginning and an houre at the end of the Sabbath and this they say is called sabbaton which is a diminutive word which is formed by putting to on as of ish a man is derived ishon a little man But it is a weake conceit to imagine that their additions which are brought in only by their tradition should be grounded upon Scripture 2. Oleaster therefore as the Hebrewes make both these words sabbath and sabbaton proper names for the seventh day of rest so hee translateth them thus requies requiri it shall be a rest of rest making them both appellative and common names because there was a greater rest required on the Sabbath than upon any other day whereupon in the Gospell Ioh. 19.31 the Sabbath is called a great or high day it was greater than the Passeover But Oleaster is deceived in this collection 1. For that Sabbath is called an high day because the Passeover did fall out upon that Sabbath 2. And though it be true that the Sabbath was a greater day of rest than the Passeover wherein they were allowed to do such works as were about that which they should eat Exod. 12.16 which were not lawfull upon the Sabbath Exod. 16.23 yet the rest of the Sabbath was not greater than of all other festivals for the tenth day of the seventh 〈…〉 where the same word is used 3. Therefore it is better interpreted It is the Sabbath of rest to make the first a proper name and peculiar to the seventh day and the other common So reade Vatad Iun. Pagâ—in agreeing with the Lat. Chald. Septuag who thus interprete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbath a rest holy unto the Lord. 4. Now in that there is so often mention made of rest there is more intended than the outward rest of the bodie only as though it were sufficient to spend all the day in lying downe playing sleeping 〈…〉 die â—acra opera perficienda sunt but upon that holy and sacred day sacred exercises also should be performed Lippoman QUEST XVII How the observation of the Sabbath is perpetuall Vers. 16. THat they may observe the Sabbath 〈…〉 their generations for an everlasting covenant 1. The Jewes hereupon doe take occasion to raile upon Christ tanquam 〈◊〉 as a law breaker for abolishing the Sabbath and so they presse these words literally as though the Lord ordained that the Sabbath injoyned them should be perpetuall But beside that the word gholam or 〈◊〉 doth not alwaies signifie that which is indeed perpetuall and eternall but sometime onely a long time Calvine or 〈…〉 a time not limited or determined the words which are annexed Throughout your generations shew that the perpetuitie of this Sabbath is restrained to their posteritie and that as long as their policie and Common-wealth continued Osiander 2. Some doe understand it to bee eternall in this sense quia erat â—terna rei signum because it was signe of a thing eternall August qu. 139. that is of our everlasting rest in Christ aternum manet ipso effectu it remaineth eternall in effect Calvine that is in ceasing from the works of sin 3. Some thinke that it is called perpetuall with relation unto the time of ceremonies quamdiu vellet Deus observari statum 〈◊〉 imperfectum Iudaicum c. as long as God would have that imperfect state of the Jewes to be observed Tostat. 4. But as I refuse not these two last interpretations so I thinke that there is more signified that God would have perpetually observed a day of rest set apart for his service though not that precise day prescribed to the Jewes as long as the world endureth so that it is not only spiritualiter sed moraliter aternum spiritually but morally eternall Pelarg. and not onely appointed for a politike order to avoid confusion that the people should have some certaine day to meet together in to heare the Word and receive the Sacraments Gallas For if the keeping of the Lords day were only grounded upon policie then any other day might as well be set apart as this which is now observed But I say further with Pelargus Nobis servâ—vissime demandatam religionis exercenda curam That the care of the practice of religion upon the Lords day is straitly commanded us atque ad cam noâ— perpetuo â—lligari and that we are for ever tied unto it by the institution and practice of the Apostles Act. 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 who as Gallasius well concludeth did substitute the Lords day in remembrance of Christs resurrection in stead of the old Sabbath Spiritu Dei quo ipsi regebantur by the Spirit of God whereby they were guided And here Thomas giveth a good note why the Sabbath onely is here mentioned the other festivals of the Jewes being omitted wherein there was a commemoration of some particular benefits as in the pasch of their deliverance out of Egypt on the Sabbath pracipuum beneficium creationis the principall benefit of the creation was remembred which is generall to all people and not peculiar only to the Jewes beside therein was prefigured Quies mentis in Deâ— in prasenti per gratiam in futuro per gloriam The rest of the mind in God in the present by grace and in time to come by glorie Thomas Therefore seeing the seventh day of rest is a commemoration of the creation of the world and includeth a memoriall of Christs resurrection upon that day and is a symbole of our everlasting rest in heaven it ought to be perpetually observed QUEST XVIII Whether the world were made successively in time or in an instant Vers. 17. FOr in six daies the Lord made heaven and earth 1. Oleaster well concludeth from hence that God made the world and the things therein not all at once but successively
c. yet in the originall they are distinguished for the first word is chaâ—â—n which signifieth to give to bestow to shew grace the other is racham that betokeneth to be inwardly moved with pitie and compassion Oleaster The first then signifieth that favour which is seene in bestowing of gifts the other in remitting of sinnes and delivering from evill QUEST XLII Of the divers kindes of mercie which the Lord sheweth I Will shew mercie There is mercie of divers sorts 1. First there is a generall mercie which the Lord extendeth toward all both good and bad as in granting the Sunne and raine indifferently to all 2. There is a peculiar mercie toward his owne children which also is shewed in divers manner 1. As in the remission of great sinnes as David prayeth as Psal. 51.1 Have mercie upon mee according to thy loving kindnesse c. 2. There is mercie also seene in forgiving sinnes of ignorance as S. Paul saith I was received to mercie because I did it ignorantly 1 Tim. 1.13 3. There is a mercie which they taste of that are in Gods favour and doe love him which is seene not only in the remission of sinnes but in the heaping of blessings upon them as the Lord sheweth mercie unto thousands upon them that love him 4. And mercie is also exercised toward them which being unable to performe any thing of themselves are thereunto assisted and aided by grace as the Apostle saith It is not in him that willeth nor in him that runneth but in God that sheweth mercie Rom. 9.16 This mercie here mentioned is of that kinde which is peculiar to Gods chosen Procopius QUEST XLIII Of the divers kindes of visions and sights of God Vers. 20. THou canst not see my fate That wee may arise by degrees to come to the handling of Moses Sinai sight first is to be premised the consideration of the divers wayes and kindes of the vision or sight of God We are said to see either with the eyes of our bodies or with the eyes of our minde and each of these hath a threefold distinction or difference for there is of each an ordinarie or extraordinarie sight in this life but the same imperfect and in the next a perfect sight so there are six kindes of visions in all three of the body and three of the minde First concerning the ordinarie sight of the body 1. It is that whereby wee see and behold sensible things which are object to the eye which discerneth nothing but that which is of a finite and circumscriptible nature 2. The extraordinarie when God in vision sheweth him in some externall forme and shape which is of two sorts either in corporali speciâ— in some corporall shew Quod voluntas elegit non quod natura formavit Which it pleased God to chuse not of natures forming Augustine The other is in humani corporis veritate in the assumption of a true humane body so Christ was seene in humane flesh 3. Then in the next world when our bodies shall be glorified wee shall see more perfectly as Iob saith I shall see God in my flesh Secondly the sight of the soule also is divers 1. There is an ordinarie sight which is of two sorts either common which is the sight and knowledge of God that commeth by the creatures Rom. 1.20 or peculiar to the children of God which is the sight of him by faith whereby the heart is purified Acts 25.9 and the eyes of the minde cleared 2. There is an extraordinarie sight and illumination by the minde as when God did manifest himselfe unto the Prophets by inward visions and revelations As when Peter fell into a trance and saw that foure cornerd sheet Acts 10. 3. And in the next life our inward sight of God shall be perfected as Saint Paul saith Now wee see thorow a glasse darkly but then face to face now wee know in part but then shall wee know even as wee are knowne Now in order it shall be discussed by which of these kindes of vision God may be seene and apprehended of man QUEST XLIV Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the body in this life FIrst it is not possible to see God in this life with the eyes of the body 1. For it must needs follow that God should be of a corporall and materiall substance if he might be seene with carnall eyes for nothing by the eyes of flesh can bee discerned but that which is visible finite and circumscriptible but the Lord is infinite Anthropomorphites and Audiâ—â— Heretikes did hold indeed that God himselfe had an humane and visible shape and that man according to his body is the image of God which heresie is contrarie to the Scripture which saith that God is a Spirit therefore of no bodily shape 2. And God being of a spirituall nature cannot be seene by the eyes of the body for that which is of a spirituall nature non cadit sub sensus corporis doth not come under the sense of the body Simler 3. It is said that God is love which sheweth his substance noâ— a qualitie as our love is then as faith hope and love in us cannot be seene much lesse can God 4. The image of God in man which is the inward renovation of the minde cannot bee seene much lesse God himselfe whose image we beare 5. The minde also of man is invisible mulâ—o magis simplicissima illa infinita mens much more that most pure and infinite minde Simler 6. Chrysostome giveth this reason Deus simplex omni concoctione abjunctuâ— nulla forma aut figura effigiatus God is of a simple nature without any composition he hath no forme or figure c. But nothing is perceived of the sense but that which is of a mixt and compound nature that hath forme and fashion 7. Gregorio Nyssene Est interminabilis divina natura interminabile comprehendi non potest The divine nature is infinite and not to be confined or limited and that which is not to be limited cannot be comprehended c. And that God cannot be confined or determined he thus sheweth Quod continet majus est contento That which containeth is greater than that which is contained and it is also heterogeneâ— natura of another nature as the fish is confined in the water and the bird in the aire But nothing is greater than God and he being perfectly good that which should confine him being of a divers kinde must be perfectly evill So it would follow Deum vinci à malo that God should bee overcome of evill 8. Cyrill useth this argument God is said to have beene seene of divers of the Saints but none of them did thinke that they saw the verie nature of God Aliter alius vidit aliter Esaias aliter Ezechiel c. Therefore everie one saw God after a divers sort otherwise Esaias after another manner Ezechiel saw him c. If they had seene the verie