the Lord would intimate unto us by the Prophet the same thing that the Apostle declares to wit that we attain unto so great Felicity by the free Gift of God only and not by Works or Merits of Works For what can be the sense of these Words of the Apostle Without Works but the same that the Prophet expresseth in these Words without Money and without Price What hole can the Papists find here to creep out at Without our own Works say they or without those that go before Faith as Campian says or without the Works of the Law as Osorius speaks but not without the Works of Faith or those Works which flow from the Grace of God but this vain Sophistry is overthrown by the similitude of the Prophet which would be utterly absurd unless upon all accounts Salvation were freely offered without any Condition of Works For otherwise what will they answer the Prophet or how can they interpret his Words where he commands to eat without Money and without Price Will they distinguish Money in this place just as they distinguish Works So that they reject that Money as unprofitable which is our own being purchased by our own labours but what is given us of God they are so far from excluding this that unless we have it it is in vain to come and eat O vain janglings of Sophisters not so fit to be confuted by Arguments as to be hissed away and accursed by an Apostolical Execration Suitable hereunto is that saying of the same Prophet Ye were sold for nought and ye shall be redeemed without Silver What else can be understood by these Words but the freeness of the Infinite Mercy of God towards us without any Merit of ours Where then are the Merits of inherent Righteousness which the wicked bring before God if none obtain Iustification as they plead but those who are first endued with Charity and thereby are rendered just and worthy of Life Eternal For the Confirmation of what we assert let us add also the Example of Abraham From whence we may argue thus Argument Rom. 4. The VVorks of Abraham were done in Faith and Grace The VVorks of Abraham have no Praise or Glory before God Argument Therefore VVorks done by Faith and Grace Merit nothing before God I am not ignorant what these Interpreters Answer absurdly wresting these Words of Paul to another Sense contrary to the Mind of the Apostle For thus they comment upon this place If Abraham by VVorks c. The good VVorks of Abraham done in Faith are not by these Words excluded from Iustification neither is he declared to be justified by Faith only But the VVorks of the Law done without Faith are excluded which sort of VVorks because Abraham did not therefore he is truly said to be justified by his VVorks before God Moreover as they say it is not proved by these Words that the good Works of Abraham being a renewed Man and righteous though done in Faith did not justifie but that Abraham was not justified by Works only without Faith Thus they say What should I answer then but that their Interpretation doth not agree with the Mind of the Author Paul writing to the Romans when he had proved it by many and weighty Arguments That a Man is justified by Faith without Works being about to confirm the same by an Example He enquires concerning the Works of Abraham What shall we say that Abraham our Father according to the flesh found For if he was justified by Works he hath whereof to Glory but not before God c. First let us see what these Works were of which Paul treats and next whose Works they were The Adversaries Answer and amongst those Campian our Countrey-man who a while since when he was urged by this place of Paul concerning the Works of Abraham is reported to have answered thus like his own Iesuits the Works of the Law as they are done without Faith and Grace avail nothing to Iustification but because the Works of that Holy Man were not such being replenished with Faith and Grace therefore he is truly said to be justified by his own Works before God yet not as his own Works What do you say Was he justified by Works of whom Paul says expresly that he had no cause of glorying in his Works before God Was the Apostle ignorant of the Holiness and Excellency of the Works of the Godly Patriarch which were not without Faith and the Grace of God And yet Paul denies that these Works though excellent in themselves availed any thing before God in respect either of glorying or of Iustification And it is evident by the Authority of Paul that it was of Faith and nor of Works that he was justified before God for Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him for Righteousness How then will those Interpreters agree with the Apostle in affirming he denies for they contrarily do plead that Abraham was justified by his Works Whereas in opposition thereunto the whole scope of this Epistle is to remove the works of the Saints though excellent in themselves from Iustification not that pious works should be contemned but that the free Bounty of God towards sinners may evidently appear who liberally communicates his Righteousness not to the dignity of Merits but to Faith not to him that worketh but to him that believeth in him that justifies the ungodly who justifieth the ungodly saith the Apostle But here Campian objects after his former manner pleading first That Abraham was justified by Works and next he renders the reason why he was justified by Works because that his Works were not done in Circumcision nor in the Law but before Circumcision and the promulgation of the Law by Faith and Grace And therefore they were acceptable to God Thirdly Commenting upon the scope of the Epistle he affirms that we misunderstand the words of the Apostle because his whole drift through all that Epistle is to separate from Iustification the Ceremonies of the Law and the Works that were done before Faith in the Law or by the Law only without Grace For thus he reasons and such are all Camplan's Objections To all which I answer that they are most false 1. Whereas he affirms That Abraham was righteous by Works Paul expresly denies it Reason openly confutes it and the thing appears evident of it self For what need had he of the promised Seed and a Redeemer if already he had been righteous by Works or what need was there that Faith should be accounted unto him for righteousness who was afterwards to obtain the praise of Righteousness by Works Moreover death being the wages not of righteousness but of sin by what right could he be subject to the dominion of death if he had not been a sinner If he was a sinner how then was he righteous by works 2. Whereas he says That these works were not done according to the Law nor under the Law but before the
if they are righteous and not sinners whom Christ helps What need have the Righteous of a Redeemer What need have the whole of a Physician Moreover how will that saying of Paul hold true whereby Christ being made Man is said to have come into the World not to save the Righteous but Sinners I beseech you now O ingenuous Man according to your Modesty that I may deal very modestly with you If any Man treat with you on this manner in disputing about the Doctrine of Iustification what would you answer him if he should ask these things of you If any such Man should come to you who being affrighted in his mind and astonished at the greatness of his sins and burdened with horrour of Conscience and almost dead with the fear of the Iudgment of God should ask the help of counsel and comfort from you of which sort there are found not a few Examples in the Folds of the Lord's Flock what Remedy would you reach forth unto him Perhaps you will send him to those Books of yours concerning Righteousness and what will he find there whereby his afflicted and cast down Mind may be refreshed and recover it self what will you send him to the Law but what will he draw from thence fit for healing his wounds especially seeing that Law of Righteousness can only bring us in guilty because we have not kept the Law and oblige us thereunto as by bond at least it cannot by any means restore Righteousness that was once lost or satisfie the Iudge It remains then that you should bring over the miserable Soul of a Sinner from the Law in which there appears no hope of defence unto Christ seeing it is He only by whose Wounds and Stripes we are healed and who hath taken upon himself all the Impieties of us all that he might communicate unto us his own Righteousness That is very true indeed and upon that account I think you and yours are to be commended who though you seem not to have a clear enough sight of the genuine Office of Christ and his Divine Greatness in procuring our Salvation yet ye refuse not to profess his Name and a certain external reverence of Faith But because at present you have to do with men that are troubled and to whom it is not sufficient to retain only the Name of a Saviour unless we have also a right understanding of the Efficacy of his Death which he suffered for us and of the Power that he hath to save and the great benefits he hath bestowed upon us and his exceeding great Love and Good-will towards us and the infinite Riches that are promised to us in him Therefore you must proceed further and help the afflicted Minds of the Godly as much as may be that they may know and believe not only that there is eternal and durable Life in Christ but also that they may be taught the way and means and manner how that Life comes to us and to whom it belongs and what we must observe in attaining unto it What the power and efficacy of Faith is whom it justifies and how IN which matter there is great variety of Sentiments and Opinions amongst Divines For whereas Paul proclaims with a very audible Voice That Man is justified by Faith without the Works of the Law Those Men by the additions of their Comments do not explain the most evident meaning of the Apostle but render it obscure they do not expound but cavil So that some take the word Faith not as Paul for that Faith only which is in Christ Iesus but which is formed by Charity and Works Others interpret that which Paul saith of Faith without Works to be understood concerning Ceremonial Works Some interpret it of the Works of the Law in this sense that those works are undertaken not by Faith but by the command of the Law without Grace Others expound it otherwise without antecedent works only Some think it should be understood of the first Iustification only which they attribute to Faith alone as in little Children that are Baptized but the second in men come to years they attribute to Faith indeed but not without Works The scope of all which dispute is that Faith being adorned with Works may do something and on the contrary that if Works are not joyned with it it may seem a kind of rude matter void of life and form not only unprofitable to purchase Righteousnes but a certain dead and destructive thing Which if it be true I would know this of them and chiefly I would ask of you Osorius in what Common-wealth in what Church in whose Kingdom do you coyn this new piece of Divinity If it is the Church of Christ that is not yours It is his Kingdom in which you are only a servant What Shall not Christ have a free power permitted to him of administring his own affairs as in his own lawful Common-wealth And whence is this your great boldness in anothers Dominion in a Church that ye never founded to alter and change as you list the appointments and institutions of your Prince contrary to Law and Right Or by what authority do you oppose your selves but that every man may act in his own possession according to his own right and freedom of command What if it seems good in the Eyes of Christ to communicate freely the glory of his Kingdom to whom he will Will ye forbid him What if the most Gracious Lord will pay a full reward to those that come to work at the last hour of the day and make all equal by making the like agreement with them all should your Eye therefore be evil because he is good But now the Lord himself the Prince and Author of the Church professes in very evident words that eternal life shall be given to them that believe in his name What can be said more evident in signification or more clear to be understood He that believeth in me saith he hath eternal life And again repeating the same in the same words He that believeth in the Son hath everlasting life And chap. 11. He that believeth in me though he were dead yet he shall live And lest he should seem to testifie this of himself without the consent of his Father he adds This is saith he the will of him that sent me that every one that seeth the Son and believeth in him should have life eternal Who doth no less most evidently confirm these things by performances which he expresses in word adding also miracles thereunto For how great a multitude do ye meet with every where through all the Evangelists whom you see saved and healed by no other thing but faith only which relied on Christ. How often do we hear from the mouth of the Lord in the Gospel thy Faith hath made thee whole without hearing any mention of works And what Christ performed to faith will Osorius attribute that to Works
promulgation of the Law I would ask him What the Law is which if it is nothing but the Rule of Righteousness how can any man be just where there is no Law But what man was there ever in the World but he carried about with him the Law of God if not written in Tables yet written on his heart and engraven on his conscience But the Decalogue was not yet engraven on Tables of Stone But what was contained in the Moral Decalogue which that holy man did not already comprehend within his own heart both of loving God and his Neighbour of not Murthering of not committing Adultery or honouring Parents c. 3. As touching the scope of this Epistle how greatly is campian mistaken For who is so void of sense that he doth not clearly perceive that the drift of the Apostle is not that which those Iesuits dream of to attribute our Salvation or Iustification to any Works either going before or following after Neither was this Office of an Ambassadour committed unto him that he might contend with the Iews about Ceremonies or with the Gentiles about Moral Duties but as Peter was entrusted with the Apostleship of the Circumcision so also the Preaching of the Gospel to the Uncircumcision was committed unto Paul not that he should Preach the Law but the Faith which before he opposed Not that he might declare the Righteousness of Works in which there is no Salvation but that God by him might reveal his Son amongst the Gentiles and might manifest unto the World that heavenly Trophy and glad Tydings of Peace and Victory obtained in Heaven by Christ and spread abroad far and wide through the Churches the boundless riches of Divine Grace which he had experienced in himself For he was called for this purpose to the Apostleship that the infinitely gracious Lord and Redeemer Christ Iesus might first exercise his Mercy towards him and afterwards by him declare his great Mercy towards Sinners not only by hisExample but also by his Ministry For thus he bears witness of himself that the Ministry of Reconciliation was committed to him for which he was appointed to be a Preacher and Apostle and Teacher of the Gentiles in Faith and Truth that he being an Ambassadour in Christ's stead might invite all men yea and beg of them that they would be reconciled unto God And this seems to be the principal scope that Paul aims at not only in the Epistle to the Romans but also in all his Doctrine to proclaim amongst the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ and that he might set before the view of all men what is the Communion of the Mystery that was hidden with God in former Ages c. But now in the Righteousness of Works no such Mystery lay hidden with God from former Ages Therefore it is false and abominable which Campian the Iesuit and such like Sophisters assert concerning the scope and sense of Paul's Epistle to the Romans For by the Law which Paul excludes from Iustification they understand that part thereof which comprehends Ceremonial and Iudicial Works wherein the Iews gloried or Works purely Moral performed before Faith on which the Gentiles relied Yea on the contrary when Paul removes the Law from Iustification he doth not only exclude it upon the account of Iewish Ceremonies or Moral Works performed before Faith but also upon the account of its weakness through the flesh both in Iews and Gentiles both in the regenerate and the unregenerate so that it cannot make sufficient satisfaction to the Iustice of God And Paul affirms That for this cause God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh What did God do but what flesh could not do For sin he condemned sin in the flesh In what flesh ours or his own Sons Who of all the Regenerate though endued with great habitual Faith and Grace hath so led his life walking not according to the flesh but according to the spirit but he always carries about with him flesh that is weak in many respects and vicious and subject to sin Concerning which every one may complain with the Apostle I know that in me that is in my flesh dwells no good thing And again I find a Law that when I would do good evil is present with me c. For what they speak of Works following Faith and Grace how little that helps their cause appears not more evident by any Argument than by the Lives of those that maintain this Controversie if they be strictly enquired into If that be true which Campian with his Iesuits pleads for That Righteousness is not obtained in men come to years but by Works that follow after Faith Let us behold then what excellent Works this Faith of the Mother Church of Rome brings forth seeing they so much glory in the Title of Catholick Faith and Preach so many things about Charity which is the fulfilling of the Law Let us look into the Life and Works of the Roman Popes Cardinals and Bishops and the whole Crew of the Monks and Iesuits Where can you find more of the flesh or less of true holiness than in those false-hearted and painted Hypocrites whose whole profession of Religion consists in Purple Gowns high topped Mitres Purple Caps Rings adorned with Iewels solemn Vows Ceremonies which in reality are rather Stage-playes than Exercises of Piety This appears to be too true by the unhappy Tumults raised in the World the Wars and Persecutions that are stirred up by none more than by those very men that call themselves Spiritual and Catholick whom it should become to be the chiefest encouragers of Concord and Messengers of Peace But having so much enlarged upon this sort of men with their Works and Merits let us return to the Examples of those of whom we spake before who were freely admitted unto Baptism and received into favour by Faith without any commendation of Merits at all yea without mention of any Works except such perhaps as were evil Amongst which number those Iews may be reckoned of whom three thousand at one time were Baptized by Peter Likewise also the Eunuch whom Faith only without Works made not only meet for Baptism but also an Heir of the Heavenly Kingdom And the Iaylor whom Paul Baptized Moreover Paul himself and all the Apostles and Publicans the family of Cornelius Zacehaeus Mary Magdalen and the Thief on the Cross If Faith without Works was sufficient to them for the Grace of Baptism why not also for the obtaining of Iustification and Life Eternal Vega and those of his Association answers after his usual manner that in all these Repentance was joyned with Faith and other things also belonging to good Manners and a godly Life But it easily appears how vain and insignificant this Answer of Vega is He says Repentance and other Vertues are joyned with Faith Which tho' I confess to be in some sense true in the lives and persons of
dwells not where there is any Sin Con. Therefore no Sin remains in the regenerate Answer No Man discovers the deceit of this argument better than St. Paul himself who complaining of himself and deploring his misery could not according as he desired totally root out the strength of Sin out of his Flesh though he was held in Captivity against his will and yet no Man can say that he was void of the Grace of God But let us more accurately examin the reason of the Argument Which seems to draw its chief force from things privatively opposite for Sin and Grace are privatively opposite Which cannot consist together in the same subject Whence this Reason of the Argument follows Argument Ma. There is no Union of Sin with the Grace of God Mi. The Regenerate stand in the Grace of God Con. Therefore no Sin remains in the Regenerate Answer Here there is need of a Twofold distinction To wit of Sin and of the Sinner For as one Sin is reigning 〈◊〉 another is not reigning So there is more then one sort of Sinners For though both the Godly and the Ungodly Sin Yet not after one and the same manner For that Man Sins one way who rushes upon all manner of Wickedness against his Conscience and wittingly and willingly perseveres in sin without Repentance of whom it is said Iohn 3. He that worketh unrighteousness is not of God And that man sins another way who is rather overcome by his infirmity than yields willingly to the sinful inclinations of his flesh though sometimes he slips into the evil that he would not And nevertheless with his mind obeys the Law of God and endeavouring after Holiness in the midst of his sins he strives and cries out against them Therefore I answer with this distinction of the Majon which I deny not to be true in those who living according to the flesh wallow in all filthiness without measure or shame Of whom Paul said expresly If ye live after the flesh ye shall die but yet it must be acknowledged after the Example of the same Apostle that the Holy Spirit of God dwelling in us may consist with infirmities in the Regenerate And oft-times after this manner the Apostle joyns the Old Man and the New Man in the Regenerate the Law of the Members and the Law of the Mind the Flesh striving against the Spirit and the Spirit against the Flesh as when speaking of himself he testifies Therefore I my self with my mind serve the Law of God and with my flesh I serve the Law of sin As this disease of infirmity being never idle in the Saints doth often drive them into great and grievous sins and brings them to such distress sometimes that for a season they seem like unto the wicked forsaken of God and void of all Faith and Consolation But God in his infinite Goodness never leaves them so destitute of his Mercy whom once he hath planted in his Son by Faith but that he puts his hand under them when they fall that they are not broken to pieces and again he stretches forth his hand unto them to reduce them from their sins Though he is greatly offended and angry at their wickedness yet in his wrath remembring Mercy he doth not cast them off for ever This appears evidently by the known Examples of David Peter Manasseh Evah Adam Aaron Miriam Solomon and others And this is the difference between the godly and ungodly that though both of them fall into grievous sins against their Conscience yet in this they are distinguished the wicked run head-long on in their sins and taking pleasure in them not only for a while but through their whole life give themselves up to the bondage of corruption and take no care to return unto God by Repentance but the case is contrariwise with the Godly and Regenerate for though they may sin securely for a time and reigning sin may have dominion over them for the present yet nevertheless by the Grace of God they are brought to the acknowledgment of their sins and are recovered by Repentance Therefore I answer to the Major with this restriction It were so except Remission came together with Conversion without which Divine Grace hath no place in sinners Now though Conversion may seem lost for a season by the falls of the Saints yet notwithstanding the Regenerate are not cast out of the favour of God in as much as they are not finally forsaken Otherways if any sin of infirmity should utterly make void all the Grace of God how was the Grace of Christ sufficient for Paul when he was buffeted by a Messenger of Satan or how is his strength said to be made perfect in weakness Moreover how else is that saying of the Apostle true Where sin abounded grace hath superabounded if Divine Grace hath no union with any but them that are arrived at perfection But here again there arises an Objection out of Iohn Whosoever is born of God cannot sin c. And what is concluded from hence Therefore he that is truly regenerate in Christ is free from all pollution of sin The same fallacy returns again from that which is said in a certain sense to that which is said simply If the signification of the word sinning be taken simply in this place for any kind of sin in this sense it is false which they assume by a wrong interpretation of Iohn But if it be understood of those only who wilfully give themselves up to work wickedness or through obstinate malice allow themselves in sinning and resolutely persevere therein I confess that which they cite out of the Apostle is true of such to wit that they are not of God who sin after this manner which yet cannot be truly said of the regenerate that are born of God Therefore the difference should be observed not only of the things which are committed but much more of those that commit them For the same disease of corrupted Nature and inclination to sin abides in both which nevertheless the Regenerate suppress by strugling against it resisting their vicious affections as much as in them lies Howbeit they are not so perfect and entire but that sometimes they wilfully fall into gross sins but they do not continue in them but at length return to God by Repentance Therefore let us grant that which neither can be denied nor ought to be excused that both the godly and ungodly by reason of the common Law of Infirmity are liable to sin but yet they differ very much in their purpose and continuance Solomon knew this difference and therefore spake of it The righteous man though he fall seven times yet he rises up again but the wicked fall into mischief Perhaps they of Trent themselves will not deny that there is some natural infirmity common to the godly and ungodly which makes it possible for them to sin if they will but they deny that