that he protesteth to stand and keepe himselfe close to the doctrine of the Pope and Church of Rome to wit that the bread and the wine which are upon the Altar are not onely the Sacrament but also the very body and blood of Christ Words that must be taken in a quite contrary sense For the Church of Rome beleeveth not that the bread is the true body of Christ Item they make him say that Christs body is sensiblie handled by the Priest and is broken and crushed with the teeth of the faithfull But the Doctors Glosse noteth in the margent these wordes Except thou understandst aright Berengarius his words thou shalt fall into a greater herisie than Berengarius did It is the property of untruth to intangle it selfe with figures and not to understand it selfe CHAP. XIII Of the Ascension of the Lord and of his absence and of that our Adversaries say that in the Sacrament he is Sacrmentally present ABove all things the Glosses and figures of our Adversaries are intolerable when as they wrest the places of Scripture wherein mention is made of Christs Ascension and of his departure out of this world The Lord in the 12 Chapter of Saint John 8 Verse saith The poore ye have alwayes but me ye have not alwayes And in the 14 Chapter 3 Verse If I goe I will come againe speaking of his returne at the day of judgement And in the chapter 17.10 speaking of his Ascension neare at hand as if it were past he saith Now I am no more in the World Saint Peter in the third Chapter of the Acts of the Apostles saith Heaven must containe him untill the times of the restitution of all things which is the day of judgement All these words are as many lies if we beleeve the Transubstantiation For in these places Christ saith that he hath left the world and is no more in the world and that we shall not have him alwayes But if we beleeve the Transubstantiation we must say Christ hath not left the world but is much more present than he was before his ascension For then he was but in one place at once upon earth but now they will have him to be present upon a million of Altars in boxes and in bellies And for to conclude that place of Saint Peter which saith that Heaven must containe him untill the day of restitution the Latin version of the Roman Church hath put Heaven must receive him as if when S. Peter said these words Christ was not yet ascended And it is false that heaven doth receive Christ continually untill the day of Judgement The Lovain Doctors which have traÌ„slated the Bible into French have acknowledged the same wherefore they have turned faithfully WhoÌ„ heaven must contain And Emanud Sâ— the Jesuite in his Notes upon this place Recipere id est receptum continere To receive that is to say to containe him after he be received Christ then must be contained in heaven not be still upon earth They rid themselves as ill out of the other places They say that when Christ saith He leaveth the world and is no more in the world it must be understood concerning his visible presence So they make without word of God 2 sorts of Christs presence the one visible the other invisible And make Christ say I goe away but I will remaine invisibly I leave you but my body shall be alwayes with you Now in conscience could a man that had Christs body and soule in his mouth say that Christ is not present under colour that he sees him not By the same reason one may say that a man hath no soule because it is invisible and that a man hath left the towne when he lyeth hid in it What more Christ himselfe in the 13. of Saint Marke 21. verse warnes us that there will come a time in which they shall say unto us Loe here is Christ or loe he is there and forbids us to beleeve it And in the 24. chapter of Saint Matthew he addeth If any man shall say unto you he is in the closets or in the cup-boards for the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth that beleeve it not Truly he speaketh evidently of the places wherein they shall say that Christ is hidden And speaketh in the plurall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in closets as of a Christ which shall be thought to be in severall places at once But Christ refuteth plainly all these shifts and evasions of our Adversaries when as to comfort his Disciples sorrowfull for his departure he promiseth them to send them the Comforter Iohn 14.16.26 chap. 15.26 which is the Holy Ghost According to the doctrine of the Church of Rome hee should have said I goe away but that shall not hinder mee from being present in your mouths and in your stomacks and I shall 〈◊〉 more present unto you than I am now Hâ— saith not a word of all that unto them but comforting them for his departure he promiseth them his holy Spirit Saint Paul in the second to the Corinthians chap. 5.8 saith We are willing rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord. And to the Philippians chap. 1.23 My desire is to depart and to be with Christ Had this Apostle lost his wiâ—s For according to the Popish doctrine he should have said I am already with Christ I do carry him in my hands I have him in my stomacke S. Austin upon that is very expresse in his 50. Treatise upon S. John where he saith According to the Maj stie of thâ— Lord according to his unspeak â—â—â—e and inâ—isiâ—â—e grace is accomplish'd that which he said I will be with you at all times till the consummation of the world But according to his flesh which the world bath taken and is he is horn of the Virgin c. he said Ye shall not have mee alwaies And in the first Treatise upon the first of John * Ipsum jam 〈…〉 sed side contingâ—re Wee can no more handle him with our hands now that he sitteth in heaven but well may we touch him by faith He speaketh to the Priests of these times who bragge to have Christ in their hands And in the 78. Treatise upon S. John * A quibus homo abscedebat Deus non recedebat Christ was going away as being a man and withdrew not himself as he is God And in the 30 Treatise †Corpus Dominiâ—n quo resurrexit in uno loco esse oportet veritas ejus ubâ—que disâ— fusa est The Lords body in which he is risen must be in one place onely but his truth is spread every where There is in the Latin in uno loco esse oportet and not in uno loco esse potest according to the new editions falsified * Gratiaâ—nus Dist 2. de Conseâ—â— Câ—nâ—prim Iuo 2. partâ— Decreti c 18. Lombard lib. 4. Sentent Gratian Ivo Carmitensis Lombard Thomas
divide not their minde into two Adorations and worship not the body of Christ with one kinde of Adoration and the species of the bread with an other but carry their whole devotion to worship with soveraigne adoration the hoste they have before their eyes Bellarmin teacheth as much in his fourth Booke of the E charist Chapter 29. * § Sed haec Cultu latriae diciâ— mus per se proprie Christis esse adorandu eam aderaâ—â—one ad symbola 〈◊〉 â—iâ—m panis vâ—nt perâ—nere quaâ—â—nus â—ppre 〈◊〉 dunâ—ur 〈◊〉 auâ—um â—um ipso Christo quâ—m conâ—â—nent We say that Christ For se proprie is to be worshipped with the adâ—ration of Latria and that this adoration belongeth also to the signes or symboles of the bread and wine in as much as they are conceived or considered as being one with Christ himselfe whom they containe And saith it was just so that Christs garments were worshipped with the same adoration that Christ was For saith he they did not pull off his cloaths for 〈◊〉 worship him For he proposeth this for an infalliblâ— Maxime that bee that worshippeth soâ—â—thing worshippeth also all the things thâ—â— are conjâ—yned to it Bell lib. de Imaginibus cap. 25 Qui adoral ea omnia quae cum ipso conjuncta sunt That is to say that hâ— that worshippeth the Images worships also the Cobwebs that are upoâ— them And that he that worshippeth thâ— Pope worshippeth also his Breecheâ— and his shirt Hee will have then thâ— roundnesse whitenesse length breadth and taste of the hoste to be worshippeâ— with the same adoration that God iâ— worshipped with because these accident and Christ are but one Vasquez the Jesuite saith the same in his second Booke of Adoration Disp 9. Chapter 1. * Quae absolute dâ—â—â—tur adorari adorat one latriae cum tamen per accidens cii d vinitate conjunlla colantur Christs humanity saith he and the Eucharist are worshipped absolutely with the adoration of Latria albeit that being enjoyned by accident with thâ— God-head a worshippe is given to theâ— And that we may know that the accidents of the bread that is to say thâ— breadth length colour and savour of the bread are worshipped with the same adoration that Christ is worshipped he addeth * Accidentia panis vini cum existat non propria exisientâ—a sed exâ—stentia corporâ—s sanguinis Christi optâ—â—â— possiil simul sub cundem cultum adorat onis cadâ—re queadmodum humanitas Christi ejusque divinitas â—odem motu adorationis coluntur The accidents of the bread and wine because they exist not by their proper existence but by the existence of the body and blood of Christ may very well receive the same honour of adoration together with the body and blood of Christ even as Châ—sts humanitie and his Divinitie are worshipped with one and the same motion of adoration This Idolatry is prodigious by which the colour and roundnesse of the bread are worshipped with the same adoration that God is worshipped with The Aegyptians did seeme to have attained to the highest degree of Idolatry when they did worship Cats Onions and Storkes But this Idolatry in worshipping the accidents of the bread goes farre beyond them For these things they worshipped were substances and things really existing But these accidents without a subject are imaginary things and which indeed are nothing The folly of those Aegyptians would have beene much greater if they had worshipped the colour and the length and the faces or lowring of a Cat without worshipping the Cat. Adde moreover that they did not worship beasts and plants as the Soveraigne God but as having in them some sparkes of the Divinity But the Roman Church worshippeth the accidents of bread without bread with a Soveraigne adoration and which onely belongeth to God And marke the doctrine of this Jesuite who saith with approbation of the Examinators prefixed in the forefront of his booke that the accidents of the bread doe exist in Christ after the same manner as the humanitie of Christ hath no proper subsistence but subsisteth in the divine nature This truely is to unite and conjoyne the roundnesse and colour of the bread with Christ with a personall union And as errors are link'd together anâ— cleave one to an other it is certain that the accidents of the bread are noâ— more straitly conjoyned with Christ than Christ with these accidents And by consequent even as because of this imaginary union of the body of Christ with the accidents of the bread the things which befall these accidents are also attributed unto the body of Christ of which they say it is carryed and lifted up and walked up and downe and stolne away and eaten by mice and vomited up and devoured by a beast So by the same reason because of the same union they must say that the roundnesse and whitenesse of the bread are the Sonne of God and are borne of the Virgin and are just and without origiginall sinne In all this truely the Roman Church sheweth her selfe idolatrous in the last degree It is a bog or quagmire of abuses and an abyssus or a gulfe of seduction wherein Satan hath plunged men God punishing in his just anger the contempt of his word which is become an unknowne Booke among the people For it is just that those that have lost Piety should loose also the common sense CHAP. XVI Examen of the Adoration of the Sacrament by the word of God That the Ancient Christians did not worship the Sacrament IF the Scriptures had with our Adversaries any authority this controversie would soone be decided Every action that concernes Gods Service and specially Adoration is to be done in Faith and not with doubts and conjectures as Saint James saith Chapter first Let him aske in Faith nothing wavering And Saint Paul Rom. 14. saith that whatsoever is not of Faith is sinne And the same Apostle to the Hebrewes Chapter 11. It is impossible without Faith to please God Now it is impossible that the people of the Roman Church should worship the hoste of the Massâ— in faith Because God hath not commanded it in his word For as Saint Paul saith Rom. 1â— Faith commeth by hearing and hearing by the word of God In generall we have the Lords commandement saying Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serve Hee speaketh of the Soveraigne God Creator and Governour of the World and not of a God made with words that is made of bread subject to falling to be vomited up and stolne away Certainly to worship such a god as that is to violate the Commandement of the Law which saith Thou shalt have no other God before me In vaine doe they answer that Christ ought to be worshipped since hee is God For besides that they presuppose that which is not to wit that this bread is transubstantiated into the body of Christ they declare themselves
had much paines to discover the falsity of many places and false Workes which are in so great number that if they were taken away the Fathers Workes would bee found diminished of a third part Those among our Adversaries that are well read in the Fathers acknowledge the same with us and passe condemnation in this point Reade Sixtus Senensis about the end of his fourth Booke and the Booke of Cardinall Bellarmin Of Ecclesiasticall Writers where he hath put the Catalogue of the Fathers Works There shall ye wonder to see the multitude of Bookes which he saith to be doubtfull or manifestly counterfeit Which causes men to doubt of the other Workes whose falsitie is not easilie found out For the discovering of these falsities we have beene helped by the Catalogue of the Workes of Ancient Writers which Photius Patriarch of Constantinople who wrote about the yeare of our Lord 878. hath put into his Librarie And by Gennadius a Priest of Marseilles that wrote a Booke of the Illustrious men about the yeare of our Lord 492. Item by the diversity of stile Item by certaine places of the Fathers which are alleadged by Ivo Gratian Burchardus Lombard Thomas and others quite otherwise than they bee found in the editions printed in this last age Item by other places of the same Fathers which say the contrary so that one and the same Father is oftentimes found to contrarie himselfe Even as the ninth Age was the Age wherein the Decretals of the ancient Bishops of Rome were forged under the name of one Isidorus Mercator which was falsely framed for the grounding of the Papall Monarchy which with might and maine was a building in that Age So the eleventh Age in which Berengarius Archdeacon of Angiers withstood and impugned stoutly and vigorously the opinion of the reall presence and Transubstantiation was the Age wherein were forged sundry works in the behalf of that error and divers clauses were chopt into the Books of the ancient Fathers Of this false coyne is the Book attributed to * Bellar. lib. de Script Eccles Sixtus Senensis sub sinem libriquart Cyprian of the Lords Supper which all the learned of the Roman Church acknowledge not to be of his making And the Cathecheses Mystagogicall of Cyril of Jerusalem The Catecheses of Gregory of Nysse are indeed his but horribly corrupted and full of errors which the Roman Church approves not There is mention made there of one Severus an Heretick who is posterior to this Gregory above 150. yeares Of these falsifications and divers others we have entreated more at large in the Book against Cardinal du Perron He that should take away from the works of Cyprian Ambrose Hierome Austin and Athanasius the counterfeit Books should diminish the writings of these Fathers more than of a third part Wherefore after so many falsities discovered when our adversaries object us some place of a Father we might very justly desire them to proveunto us that that place was not added or depraved by some falsifier aswell as so many others By all manner of reasons if in an writing brought in justice there be found but one falsification the whole instrument loseth all its force and is rejected There is another difficulty that deceiveth such men as are not wel seen in antiquity to wit that the words used in old time have now changed their signification In the Fathers are found these words of Pope of Sacrifice of Oblation of Purging fire of Indulgence of Station of Species of Monke of Penance but quite in another sense than these words are taken at this day Notwithstanding these difficulties and disadvantages whereby our adversaries strive to prevaile against us we refuse not for all that to buckle with theÌ„ For what falsifications soever were made in the Books of Ancient writers yet in them remaines still so many expresse and formall places against Transubstantiation that of the collection of them a man might make a great volume Wee have produced above 500 in the Book of the Novelty of Popery and Mr le Faucheur and Mr Aubertin have laboured lately and taken paines about this subject with a â—ost exact diligence and full of great learning Here wee will content our selves to produce some few places for a taste yet with this protestation that I do not alleadge the Fathers for to be a stay to our cause which is sufficiently propped and established upon the Word of God Goâ— doth not beg the testimonies of men Hâ—â— word is as strong alone as being aâ—companied with humane testimonâ— To goe about to defend it with thâ— testimonies of men subject to errouâ— is as if a man would lighten the Sunâ—â— with a Candle But wee doe alleadgâ— the Fathers for to defend their honour because that against their â—â—tent our Adversaries make them Advocates of a bad cause And for 〈◊〉 condescend and yeeld some thing to the disease of this froward age wherein the holy Scripture hath lost its power and efficacy and which armeth it selfe with human testimonies against the Word of God CHAP. XXVI Places of the Fathers contrary to Transubstantiation and to the manducation of the body of Christ by the corporall mouth TErtullian in his fourth Booke against Marcion chapter 40. disputing aâ—ainst the Marcionites that denyed Christ â—o have a true humane body speaketh â—hus a Acceptum panem distributum discipulis corpus suuÌ„ illum fecit dicendo Hoc est corpus meum id est figura corporis mei Figura autem non fuisset nisi veritatis esset corpus Christ when he had taken the bread â—nd distributed it to his disciples made it â—o be his body saying This is my body â—hat is to say the figure of my body But it were not a figure unlesse it were a true body His reason is because men represent not by figure the things that are not And in the third Booke chapter 19. b Panem suum corpus appellans ut bâ—â—c jam euâ— intelligâ—â— corporis sui figuram paâ—i dedisse Christ called the bread his body that thereby thou mightest understand that he gave to the bread to be the figure of his body Origen upon the fifteenth Chapter of Saint Matthew speaking of that which the Faithfull receive by the corporall mouth in the Eucharist * Quod si quicquid ingreditur in os in veâ—â—e abit in sâ—cessum â—jicitur ille cibus qui sanctificatur per verbit Dei perque obsecratâ—oneÌ„ juxta id quod habet materialein ventrem aâ—â—â— in secessuÌ„ emitâ—itur c. â—â—t haecquidem deâ—ypico symboluoqueâ—orpore If every thing that entereth into the mouth goes into the belly and is sent into the prity this food which is sanctified by the Word of God and by the Prayer as it is materiall gâ—â— into the belly and is sent into the privy And a little after And thus much be said touching the typicall and symbolicall body of Christ Vpon this place
unto Priests so that if they would consecrate to a bad use viz as for poysonings or enchantments the consceration never thelesse should have its effect By this meanes Christ shall be in the power of a Magician and shall become the sport or pastime of the Devill Would God have given unto Priests a power against God himselfe which he will not take from them when they employ it in the service of the Devill But upon this intention mens consciences are marvelously confounded and troubled and their Doctors know not at what passe they be For if a Priest hath before him a great houshold-loafe and his intention is but to consecrate one halfe of it without cutting it into two pieces how shall a man discerne Christs body which is in that bread from the unconsecrated bread And if the Priest hath before him a dozen of wafer cakes and his intention is but to consecrate ten of them if these Hostes come to be mingled together how shall he discern the consecrated ones from those that are not coÌ„secrated How shall he discern his God from the wafers of common bread Is it possible that Christ did not leave unto Christians any meanes to know with certainty whether his body be present under the species or whether it be not lest they should pollute themselves with Idolatrie Vpon this adoration it must be observed that the Councell of Trent * Sess 13. â—ap 5. ordaineth that the Sacrament be worshipped Now all the Doctors with an unanimous consent after Saint Austin define that this word Sacrament signifieth a sacred signe This Councell then ordains that the signe be worshipped That if by the sacred signe Christ himselfe must be understood Christ shall be the signe and the figure of himselfe as Bellarmin * S Produâ—â—inâ— saith in the 24. chapter of his second Booke of the Eucharist a I de Christus sui upsius figura suit The same Christ was the figure of himselfe In this point of adoration God in his just judgement hath given our adversaries over into a reprobate sense For when the Hoste is fallen into some filthy place or is vomited up through drunkennesse they worship it thus defiled as Vasquez teaches in his 3 Tome upon the 3 part of Thomas Disput 195. chap. 5. b Vasq 3. Tom. in 3. partem Thomae Disp 195. cap. 5. Hoc est coÌ„ tracomâ—â—â—nem sensum Ecclesiae quae species 〈◊〉 loco soralido eruâ— ras tanquaÌ„ verum Sacramentum veneraretur That is saith he the common opinion of the Church which would worship as a true Sacrament the species taken ouâ— of a filthy place or vomited up againe by a brute beast for there is no reason to say that Christs body ozaseth to be under them before they be corrupted And in the same c Cap. 43. place he teacheth that if a dumbe creature hath eaten the consecrated Hostes and drunken the consecrated cup this beast shall grow fat with them and may be made drunke with it and its belly shall swell It will then be drunke with accidents and farten with roundnesses and lines The words of this Jesuite in the beginning of the 4 chapter of the same Dispute are such * Aâ—â—â—dere poâ—est ut animal quod species Sacramenti sumpsit non mâ—nus nutriatur quà m si panem vinum non consâ—â—ratiâ— manducet Immo 〈◊〉 aceidere potest ut animal inebrictur venter â—jus distedaâ—tur It may come to passe that a beast that hath eaten the species of the Sacrament shall not be lesse nourished with theÌ„ then if it bad eaten bread and wine not consecrated yea it may fall out that this beast may be made drunk therewith her belly stretch swell To be short by this doctrine that beast may burst for having eaten God For to avoid this ignominie and preserve Christ from these inconveniences certaine Doctors of the Roman Church and namely Bonaventure have esteemed that so soon as a beast hath devoured the consecrated Hoste or that it hath beene cast into the dirt or in a privie Christs body with drawes himselfe and the substance of the bread returnes by a second transubstantiation no lesse admirable than the first But Pope †Vasquez in 3 part Thomae Disp 195. cap 5. Gregory the eleventh § Verum Greg. 11. in Directorie Inquisitorum 2. p. 4.10 damnavit asserentes sub hostia consâ—â—rata projecta in lutum aut locum sordidum non manere corpus Christi in his Directorie of Inquisitors part 2. quest 20. condemnes this opinion and that conformably to the opinion of Thomas and of Scotus and of the Jesuites who hold generally that the body of Christ is taken really by a beast and that mice may carry it away CHAP. XVIII That our Adversaries in this matter intangle themselves into absurdities and insoluble contradictions IT is hard to beleeve a man that beleeves not his own selfe and that contradicts himselfe and heapes up together so many absurdities that it seemes he is afraid other men should beleeve him This maxime is true without exception that two things contradictorie cannot both be true Our Adversaries themselves confesse that it passeth the omnipotencie of God and that hee cannot doe that a thing be and be not at one and the fame time that Caesar be a man indeed and not be a reasonable creature That a round sigure be square whilst it is round Against this rule do our adversaries offend destroying the definition of things and affirming things which are â—ncompatible and heaping together in this matter a thousand absurdities whereof we will specifie some 1 They say that in the Masse the Priest with 5 words makes the body of Christ which neverthelesse was already before the Priest made it They speak as if should say that whilest Philip is at Paris some body makes him at Rome To make a thing which is already and to destroy a thing which is not are like absurdities 2 If a man be in this chamber who was not in it the day before it must needs follow that either he came thither from elsewhere or was borne in it But in the Masse they say that Christ is not there before the consecration and that after the consecration he is there and yet that he came not thither It follows then that he was borne there or freshly formed though he was already before 3 They say that the Species of the bread and wine for they speake after that manner contain the body of Christ and yet containe it not for it is in heaven This is a ridiculous contradiction to will that a body be out of that which containes it for thence will follow thaâ— the thing which containeth it containeâ— it not 4 They say that the Lords body with all its bignesse and length is contained iâ— the least crumme of the Hoste and in thâ— least drop of the chalice so that if thâ— point of a pinne were dipt in the