is not revealed The Son was brought forth before all time Prov. 8.22 His goings forth are from everlasting Mic. 5.2 the Father hath given to the Son to have Life in himself as the Father hath Life in himself Joh. 5.26 It is the property of the Father to have Life in himself and to give Life to his Son It is the property of the Son to have Life in himself from the Father I live by the Father Joh. 6.57 The personal action of the Father and the Son towards the Holy Ghost is to send him Joh. 15.26 The personal action of the Holy Ghost is to come to proceed to receive to give Joh. 16.7,8,13,14 to testify Joh. 15.26 as a distinct witness from Christs own and the Father 's of him Joh. 5.37 2. What a Person in the Godhead is The Greek Church used the word Hypostasis Heb. 1.3 and the Latin Church Personâ—… and from them we borrow the word Person There is great reason why we should retain the word tho' we will not divide from any for the use of a Term that acknowledge what is reveal'd in Scripture and can express the truth better A Person in the Eternal God head transcends a Person in Nature A Person in Nature is usually desined or described to be a Compleat Perfect Singular Living Understanding Being or Substance subsisting by it self not sustained by another nor a part of another The Persons in the God-head differ from a Created Person as will appear in these particulars 1. Every particular Man partakes of the same common general and special Nature but these particulars cannot be one Man but every Person in the God-head is that one only living and true God. 2. As Persons are multiplyed in Nature so the nature is multiplyed in Persons but there is but one God the Divine essence is one and not multiplied 3. One Person in nature is not another nor in another but the Father is in the Son and the Son in the Father and yet distinguished John 10.38 chap. 14.11 Joh. 17.21 4. One Person in nature is not only distinguished from another but is separated from another in time and place and many other respects But 1. The God-head or God being eternal the Persons in the God-head are Co-eternal none is before the other 2. Where one is the other is the nature being indivisible The Son is where the Father is tho' the humane Nature be not Omnipresent 3. What the one hath the other hath Joh. 16.15 All that the Father hath are mine said the Son and the Holy Ghost hath what the Son hath He shall take of mine and shall shew it unto you 4. If you know the Son you know the Father also Joh. 12.4 chap. 14.9,10,11 5. What one doth the other doth John 5.19 None of these things can be affirmed of different Persons in humane Nature The three Persons in the Divine essence must not be measured by individuals or singular Persons in Nature but as one Person is really distinguished from another by a Personal property so because the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost are so distinguished we call them Persons tho improperly in a sence peculiar to them Now a Person in the God-head is God as related to himself I humbly conceive it thus God the Father is related to God the Son and God the Holy Ghost God the Son is related to God the Father as a Son to a Father and to God the Holy Ghost And God the Holy Ghost is related to the Father and the Son. You saw before the relative property of each Glorious Person A Person in the Trinity is not a compound of an essence and a property for the Divine Nature is infinitely perfect most pure simple or uncompounded This relation is eternal and primary They bear a voluntary relation to the Creatures as Creator Redeemer Comforter This was intended before time but actual in time And to remove all gross imaginations of the incomprehensible Trinity of Persons tho' we take Person and Body in our Language for the same let us take heed of imagining three Bodies when we say three Persons III. These three Glorious Persons are one God in essence 1. It is most certain there is one God and but one Deut. 6.4 Is 44.8 1 Cor. 8.4 2. It is certain there are three Persons as explained 3. The father is confessedly that one God 1. Cor. 8.4 It is as true that the Son the word is God Joh. 1.1 and the Holy Ghost is God Acts 5.4 Therefore these three are that one infinite God. It is contrary to reason to say there are three Gods It is not contrary to reason that these three should be one because it is revealed and they must be one God or not God at all for there is not to us Christians nor to Mankind more than one God. But before I produce more evidence for this truth I make hold to premise Suppose an Infidel should desire a Socinian to instruct him in the nature of the true God and to shew him the essential difference between God and all Creatures whatsoever Surely he must shew him how God hath made himself known And how is that but by his Glorious Names Titules Properties Attributes and Operations which are above the power of Creatures and by which Creatures are produced Now if the very same Characters by which he declares the true God to an Infidel be ascrib'd to the Son and Holy Ghost then as his demonstration of the nature of God is good so our demonstration of the essential Deity of the Son and Holy Ghost must needs be as good If Christ be God by donation of eminent power office or near conjunction with God if the Holy Ghost be a quality or God by office they are but Creatures and if Creatures tho the highest have those properties which are essential to God then it will follow God hath nothing peculiar to his own infinite Being which is impious and irrational But God is distinguished from all Creatures and the properties of God are truly ascribed to the Son and Holy Ghost therefore they are the true God and not Creatures The three Persons are one God. There being no dispute against the Father I shall apply my self to prove the Son and Holy Ghost to be the true God. Proved by their essential Name 1. The Name which Jehovah signifies Eternal Being is proper to God and not common to any Creatures That they may know that thou whose Name alone is Jehovah art most high over all the Earth Ps 83.18 This name is translated Lord and its signification given Rev 1.4 which is which was and which is to come This Name is the Name of the Son as it is the Name of the Father Ps 110.1 Jehovah said to my Lord that is Christ Mat. 22.42 The Son is called Jehovah Is 40.3 Prepare the way of Jehovah i.e. Christ Mar. 1.23 Luke 1.76 The Angel appearing in the Bush was Jehovah Exod. 3.2 Compare v. 4.5 with
is as much as Messiah or Anointed to be Mediator Prophet Priest and King. 2. His Person is Wonderful He is Emmanuel God with us God-Man He was the eternal Son of God before he was the Son of God by the Virgin Mary He had a Being and a Glory before he was Man. See John 17.5 Where note 1. Who Pray'd he did not pray as he was God for God wants nothing and hath nothing to ask 2. Nor only as he was Man for as Man he had no Glory with the Father before the World began 3. He pray'd as he was mediator a Priest by Office. 4. As Priest it was his duty and office to pray and he pray'd to God as Father for himself as Son now in both Natures 2. Note what he pray'd for Wherein observe 1. He had a glory with the Father before the World was 2. That glory was the glory of a Son v. 2. Glorify thy Son. 3. He had that glory of a Son before he was Man for he was not Man before the World was 4. He was with the Father as a Son from eternity begotten in a manner unconceivable therefore we say he was the eternal Son of God. 5. The glory of a Son was not lost but darkned by his taking our Nature and the form of a Servant Now then he Pray'd for this that his humane Nature now united to him might partake of the glory which he had as a Son and that his Sonly glory might shine forth This glory of a Son was his essential glory possess'd with the Father and not a glory to which he was predestinated as the Adversaries pretend who quote 2 Tim. 1.9 But mark Christ saith The glory which I had with thee before the World was He had it the Elect had it not before they had a Being they were predestinated to it in Christ as their decreed Head and Saviour who possess'd it before all time in his own Person 2. This Eternal Son of God became Man How not by ceasing to be what he was before but by taking to him that humane Nature which he had not before into Personal Union See Joh. 1.14 He was in Being before he was made Flesh and what he was before he was made Flesh we read ver 1,2,3 1. He was God. 2. He made all things therefore was not made himself 3. He was in the beginning of time he did not then begin to be but was before that beginning was in which all things were made by him He must needs be and be able to make all things before they were made by him Now this is He who was made Flesh or took our Nature They who deny his Eternal God-head say 1. Christ is called the Word or Speech of God because God spake by him 2. They will not have our translation stand was made but Was. 3. Was Flesh that is the speech of God was Flesh that is he was frail subject to infirmities and sorrows But beside the absurdity of their sence which comes to this The speech was frail that is the Man who was the speech of God was a frail Man there are two things strongly for our sence 1. What ever is spoken of the word which was made Flesh or became Man is very glorious 2. If their corrupt meaning were true it would better agree And we saw his frailty and Sorows than what follows And we saw his Glory as the only begotten Son of God even under the Cloud and Veil of his humane Nature we beheld more than Man or Creature even the Glory of the only begotten Son of God full of grace and truth To be short Let us believe 1. He who took our Nature was the only begotten Son of God not so called only because more beloved than all other Children as Isaac was 2. He took humane Nature to Union with his own Divine eternal Person and not a humane Person 3. The Divine and humane Nature in the Person of the Son are distinct and not mixed or confounded 4. Because he is but one Person the properties of each Nature are attributed to the Person by what Divines call the Communication of Properties Acts 20.28 5. The humane Nature is not Omniscient nor Omnipresent as the Divine nature is 6. Christ is mediator according to both natures The mediator is God and Man in one Person therefore and all the parts of the mediatory office being performed by the mediator he doth all things according to both natures because he is called the Man Christ Jesus 1 Tim. 2.5 Therefore some say he is but a Man others say he is Mediator only as he is Man. But Mediator includes both Natures he is both and doth act according to both he is called the Man Christ Jesus because of his compassion and freedom of access to pray for all Men. 7. We have but one Redeemer who gave himself for us 1. Tim. 2.6 1 Joh. 2.1,2 therefore but one Mediator of Redemption and Intercession 8. Christ is not called the Son of the Highest Luke 1.32,35 as being the Son of Mary and adopted to be the Son of God He was the Son of the highest before he was the Son of Mary and adoption is an act of favour towards one who is the Son of another by Nature Believers Children of wrath of strangers and Enemies are the Children of God by Adoption Joh. 1.12 But Christ is a Son of the same Nature with the Father as God and the Manhood is taken into Personal Union with him and is so the Son of the Highest that he is over all God blessed for ever Rom. 9.5 SECT XII How Christ became Man. 1. VVE do not say Christ is a Person constituted of two different Natures which being United make one third but that the second Person in the God-head took the humane Nature not a humane Person into Union with himself which did not subsist before he took it This contradicteth no principle of reason We know every Man is constituted of Soul and Body God who hath done the one hath done the other I pray turn to Heb. 2.14 where observe 1. A gracious end and intention towards sinful Man. 2. What Christ did to accomplish it He himself also took part of the same Where note 1. A Person taking He took He was a real Person an understanding free Agent he knew what he took and to what end 2. He was a free Person in Being before he took it 3. He took what he had not Before he took it 4. That which he took was the seed or humane Nature in the Line of Abraham 5. Surely he was one who could destroy the power of the Devil before he took it for humane Nature could not do it If Christ be but a Man or as they say a Divine Man how can it be said he took the seed of Abraham He was before he took that or else he could not take 〈◊〉 He was not Man before he took it he could not be Man before he was Man.
Priest and not Metaphorically as if he only did something like a Priest He answers the description of a Priest made Heb. 8.3 more fully chap. 5.1 We have him described in the fitness of his Person to be a Priest as holy harmless c Heb. 7.26 by the order of his Priesthood Heb. 6.20 and by his call to his Office Heb. 5.4,5,6 He had a true real Sacrifice to Offer for Men for the Sins of Men Heb. 8.3 He offer'd himself Heb. 9.14 Heb. 5.7 chap. 9.14 chap. 10.12 chap. 9.26 and entred into the Holy place of Heaven to make Intercession Heb. 7.25 He excelled all legal Priests and is as truly a Priest as ever any Priest was 2. The Sacrifice which he offered was a real proper Sacrifice See again Heb. 9.14 and Ephes 5.2 This Text is grossly perverted to this sence That the help and kindness shewed to Men by the Death of Christ was as pleasing to God as if it had been a Sacrifice acceptable to him But in the words observe 1. Christ had power to dispose of himself and accordingly he gave himself there was neither violence nor injury done him His Death was violent from Men but voluntary of himself Not my will but thy will be done 2. He gave himself for us as the Beasts were sacrificed for Men for their Sin under the Law. 3. The nature of his Gift he gave himself a Sacrifice and Offering to God. 4. He gave himself an Offering and Sacrifice to God who required it 5. He gave himself for a sweet smelling savour as Gen. 8.21 Levit. 1.9 It was offered to make atonement and God was satisfied and well pleased with it 3. The Excellency Essicacy and All-sufficiency of his Blood his Life his Death as a Sacrifice appears 1. It was but one Sacrifice for Sins Heb. 10.12 2. It was offer'd but once Heb. 9.25,26,28 This offering was suffering thereby to put away Sin in its Guilt and Obligation to Punishment Heb. 9.26 4. The end of this Sacrifice was 1. To satisfy Divine justice and 2. To reconcile us to God. To explain and prove this consider 1. God is essentially Holy and Just he hateth Sin and Sin deserveth it See Ps 11.7 Ps 45.8 Rom. 1.31 2 Thes 1.6 It is a righteous thing with God c. 2. As God may make a Law so he may threaten to punish and punish according to his threatning and righteous Law. 3. God did both and Man sinned and by Sin became liable to punishment 4. Such was the Wisdom of God in making a positive Law which might be relaxed and the punishment transferred upon another who might satisfy by bearing the punishment 5. Yet God stood upon this that his essential and governing Justice should be satissied and that the Satisfier should die So it was agreed in the Covenant of Redemption between the Father and the Son Is 53.10 See the place What God required the Mediator performed Mark 1. The Guilty Sinner could not satisfy by suffering Death 2. The Mediator must be God-Man that he might suffer satisfy merit and save the Sinner 3. Christ did voluntarily engage as a surety to die and satisfy 4. The Death he suffered was the punishment of Sin the curse of the Law Gal. 3.13 5. He was made a Curse for us in our stead and for our good to redeem us that were under the Law Gal. 3.13 6. God had respect to his justice in the Blood of his Son Rom. 3.25,26 that he might be just 7. This Blood and Death was the Price of our Redemption which was sufficient and a satisfaction it was given to God and accepted of him Ephes 5.2 8. The benesit follows which is Redemption in a proper sence 1 Tim. 2.6 Rom. 3.24 Ephes 1.7 And there are two great proofs of this perfect satisfaction 1. Because Christ rose from the Dead 2. They who believe in him are justified Rom. 4.25 Rom. 3.25,26 2. The other end of Christ's Priesthood and Sacrifice was to reconcile us to God. Christ died to atone or appease the Holy and just indignation of God. His Blood is the propitiation for our Sin Rom. 3.25 and when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the Death of his Son Rom. 5.10 He is the propitiatory Sacrifice for Sin and propitiation was the effect of it 1 Joh. 2.2 The propitiatory or Mercy-Seat in the Temple did not reconcile Sinners to God but it was a type of Christ the true propitiatory and a sign that God was reconciled and propitious or gracious but Christ did reconcile Sinners by his Death as he intended Hee 2.17 and God hath so set him forth Rom. 3.25 and declares himself to be truly and properly reconciled 3. We are actually reconciled to God when we believe in Christ and are converted but our conversion is not our reconciliation Christ by making atonement made way for our conversion and reception upon repentance The reconciling of Sinners is the Work of Christ the conversion of Sinners is the Work of the Spirit There are two parts of the Priestly office of Christ 1. Satisfaction by Sacrifice 2. Intercession upon satisfaction or Redemption His Intercession is a part and but a part of his Priesthood Heb. 7.25 He had a Body and Soul for Sacrifice Heb. 10.9,10 He offered himself upon Earth Heb. 9.12,14 and purged away Sin by expiation Heb. 1.3 chap. 10,12 His Death was a Sacrifice for Sins and not a preparation for Sacrifice or a way to his Resurrection The suffering part he finished upon Earth and began his Intercession upon Earth John 17. and at other times and continueth it in Heaven and his Intercession doth presuppose his propitiation 1 Joh 2.1,2 The reason why he could not be a Priest upon Earth was not because he was not properly a Priest or had no Sacrifice upon Earth to offer but because he was not of the order of Aaron but of Melchisedeck Heb. 8.4 Upon what is said of the Priesthoodâ— Sacrifice and Satisfaction of Christ it follows 1. The Sacrifice of the Mass is false and sinful for 1. Because none ever did or could offer Christ but himself He is a Priest for ever and there is none of his order to succeed him or represent him Heb. 7.27 chap. 9.12 2. He was offer'd once and to be offered no more Heb. 9.12 ver 28 chap. 10,12,13,14 3. The Sacrifice of Christ was Bloody without Blood there is no remission of sin Heb. 9.22 there is no Blood-shed in the Mass therefore no remission of sin by it 4. To Sacrifice Christ is all one as to kill him and put him to suffer Heb. 9.22 Christ is in not the hands of the Priests to be kill'd 5. Christ profitteth none but the living through Faith the Mass is for the Living and Dead but to what purpose 2. The satisfaction of Christ is perfect his sufferings are meritorious there is therefore no place use or need of humane satisfactions 1 Joh. 1.7 1 Pet. 2.24 SECT XV. Christ is King. 1.