means was the sacrifice burnt vp Christ for the curing of a blind man teÌ„pers spittle and clay together which in all reason is a fitter meanes to put out the eyes then to cause the blind to see Thus in the worke of our Redemption Christ giues life not by life but by death and he sendes men to heauen by the gates and suburbs of hell he shewes his greatest power in the greatest weaknes nay his power is made perfect through weakenes He will not build vpon an old foundation but he pulls downe and destroies all that Man may haue no hope at all in himselfe but that all the hope he hath may be in God First he kils and then he makes aliue as Anna speaketh first he woundeth and then he healeth He makes man to sowe in teares that afterward he may reape in ioy And he that knowes Gods dealing to be this must herewith rest content and satisfied because in wrath God vseth to remember his mercy yea his mercie is neuer sweete vnto the palate of the soule vntill it be seasoned with some tast of his wrath The Paschall Lambe was eaten with sowre hearbs to signifie that we can feele no sweetenes in the blood of Christ till wee first feele the smart of our owne sinnes and corruptions Secondly these persons vse to alleadge against themselues that if they could feele any comfort at al then they would stay their minds and yeild to good perswasions and exhortations To this the answer is That there is a Rule of grace which we must follow gathered out of the word of God and the experience of Gods Children contrarie to the rule of nature and aboue the light of reason and it is this that in case of aâ—â—liction we must not liue by feeling but by faith This Rule is grounded vpon the speech of the Lord by the Prophet the iust maÌ„ shall liue by his faith When we haue neither sight nor sense nor any tast of Gods mercie but onely apprehend his wrath euen then we must labour to lay hold of mercie in his word and promise Sense feeling are not alwaies fit directioÌ„s for the time of this life For he may be the deare child of God that in present feeleth nothing but his wrath and indignation This indeede is the true triail of our faith when euen aboue and against reason we relie on the mercie of God in the apprehension of his anger So did Dauid Out of the deepe saith he that is beeing nowe deepely plunged into the pangs of a distressed conscience haue I called vpoÌ„ thee O Lord and Iob in the like case Lord though thou kill me yet will I trust in thee Abraham is commended by the holy Ghost amongst other things for this that he beleeued in God aboue hope that is against all matter of hope that might possibly be conceiued vpon the consideration of the strength of natural causes The thiefe vpon the crosse feeling nothing but woe and seeing nothing in Christ but misery and contempt yet he beleeued in Christ and was saued In a word Christ himselfe when he was sorsaken of all men and voide of all wordly comfort and felt nothing but the depth of the wrath God in his agony and passion yet by the faith of his manhood hestaied himselfe and said My God my God Thirdly they vse to plead that their case is desperate that neuer any was in such a state as they are neuer any touched with the like distresse of mind Answ. It is false For the holy Ghost hath penned three notable places of Scripture the booke of Iob and two Psalmes of Dauid wherein are propounded vnto vs the examples of Iob and Dauid Gods owne deare seruants who were in as great distresse as euer they or any other haue beene And they may not thinke that they euer could be able to indure greater paines then Christ who notwithstanding in the anguish of his soule vpon the Crosse cried out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me And thus much touching the first kind of trouble of conscience called the diuine temptation CHAP. IX Of the second Speciall Distresse arisiâ—g from outward afflictions THe second kind of Distresse is that which ariseth from outward afflictions By Afflictions I vnderstand all manner of miseries and calamities in this life from the least to the greatest from the paine of the little finger to the very pangs of death Nowe the Question is howe the Trouble of minde arising by Afflictions may be remedied For the answer of which question two things are required of the partie distressed Practise and Meditation Sect. 1. The Practise is that which is to be vsed in all distresses of minde what soeuer And it is a diligent examination of the conscience in regard of sinne an earnest and heartie confession thereof vnto God and deprecation that is earnest praier vnto him for the pardon of the same These three things beeing done truly and vnfainedly from the heart are a present remedie against this trouble and bring with them much comfort Manasses the king of Iudah that had coÌ„mitted much wickednesse when he was carried captiue to Babel and there put in chaines he humbled himselfe acknowledged his sinnes and praied earnestly vnto the Lord and the issue was good for God was intreated of him and gaue him deliuerance Iob beeing long in outward affliction humbled himselfe in like manner and at length receiued comfort Daniel humbled himselfe before God for his owne sinnes and for the sinnes of Gods people making request vnto God earnestly for them and euen when he was in the acte of praying the Lord sent his angel Gabriel to giue him notice of deliuerance Lastly the Church of God vnder the crosse performed the like dutie Let vs search and trie our waies and turne to the Lord and God in mercie gaue an eare vnto her mourning and lamentation By all these places it is apparent that there is no better remedie in the world for the minde of man grieued by meanes of outward afflictions then the practise of the duties before named Sect. 2. The next thing vnto Practise is the Meditation of the comfortable doctrines that are set downe in the word of God touching afflictions All which doctrines may be reduced to fiue principall and maine grounds of comfort and shall be laid downe in their order The first Ground is that All afflictions from the least to the greatest doe come to passe not by accident chaunce or fortune but by the speciall prouidence of God I explaine it thus In euery particular crosse and affliction there is the hand of Gods particular prouidence and that in three regards First because God decreeth and foreappointeth euery particular crosse Marke the words of Paul Whome God hath foreknowne them he hath predestinate to be made like vnto the image of his sâ—â—ne and what is this image nothing else but a conformitie vnto Christ in
namely in heart to be deepely displeased with our selues the latter is not simply necessary though it be commendable in whomsoeuer it is if it be in truth for Lydia had the first but not the second II. It falleth out oftētimes that the greatnes of the grief taketh away the sensible paine and causeth a mummednesse of the heart so that the partie grieueth not III. Sometimes the complexion will not affoard teares and in such there may be true humiliation though with dric cheekes Sect. 3. The Secōd thing to be done for the attaining of Gods fauour and confequently of saluatiō is to Beleeue in Christ. In the practise of a Christian life the duties of humiliation faith cannot be seuered yet for doctrines sake I distinguish them In Faith ther are two things required and to be performed on our behalfe First to know the points of religion and namely the summe of the Gospel especially the promise of righteousnes and life eternall by Christ. Secondly to apprehend and applie the promise and withall the thing promised which is Christ vnto our selues and this is done when a man vpon the commandemēt of God sets down this with himselfe that Christ and his merits belong vnto him in particular and that Christ is his wisdome iustification sanctification and redemption This doctrine is plaine out of the sixt of Iohn for Christ is there propounded vnto vs as the bread and the water of life Therefore faith must not be idle in the braine but it must take Christ and applie him vnto the soule and conscience euen as meate is eaten The Questions of Conscience touching Faith are these First how we may truly applie Christ with all his benefits vnto our selues For wicked men applie Christ vnto themselues falsely in presumption but fewe doe it truly as they ought to doe I answer That this may be done we must remember to doe two things First lay downe a foundation of this action and then practise vpon it Our foundation must be laid in the word or else we shall faile in our application and it consists of two principles The one is As God giues a promise of life eternall by Christ so he giues commandement that euery one in particular should applie the promise to himselfe The next is that the Ministerie of the word is an ordinarie meanes wherein God doth offer and applie Christ with all his benefits to the hearers as if he called them by their names Peter Iohn Cornelius Beleeue in Christ and thou shalt be saued When we haue rightly considered of our foundation the Second thing is to practise vpon it and that is to giue our selues to the exercises of faith and repentance which stand in meditation of the Word and prayer for mercie and pardon and when this is done then God giues the sense and increase of his grace When Lydia was hearing the Sermon of Paul then God opened her heart Act. 16. v. 12. Secondly it is demaunded When faith beginnes to breede in the heart and when a man beginnes to beleeue in Christ Answ. When he beginnes to be touched in conscience for his owne sinnes and withall hungers and thirsts after Christ and his righteousnes then beginneth faith The reason is plaine As faith is renewed so it is begunne but it is renewed when a man is touched in conscience for his sinnes and beginnes a new to hunger after Christ therefore when these things first shew themselues then faith first beginnes For these were the things that were in Dauid when he renewed his repentance Sect. 4. The third dutie necessarie to saluation is Repentance In which two things are to be considered the beginning namely a godly Sorrow which is the beginning of Repentance 2. Corinth 7. and vpon this sorrow a Change which is indeede Repentance it selfe In Sorrow we consider first the nature of it secondly the properties of it Touching the nature of sorrow it is either inward or outward The inward sorrow is when a man is displeased with himselfe for his sinnes The outward when the heart declares the griefe thereof by teares or such like signes And sorrow in this case called a godly sorrow is more to be esteemed by the first of these then by the second The propertie of this sorrow is to make vs to be displeased with our selues for our sinnes directly because they are sinnes and doe displease God If there were no iudge no hel nor death yet we must be grieued because we haue offended so mercifull a God and louing father And as godly sorrow will make vs thus to doe so is it the next cause of repentance and by this is repentance discerned The next thing in Repentāce is the Change of the minde and whole man in affection life and conuersation And this standeth in a constant purpose of the minde and resolution of the heart not to sinne but in euery thing to doe the will of God Hereupon Paul exhorteth them to whome he wrote to continue in the loue of God and in the obedience of his word Barnabas when he came to Antioch and had seene the grace of God was glad and exhorted all that with purpose of heart they should cleaue vnto God or continue with the Lord. So the Prophet Ezckiel saith if the wicked will turne from all his sinnes and keepe all my statutes and doe that which is lawfull and right he shall surely liue and shall not die In this purpose stands the very nature of repentance and it must be ioyned with humiliation and faith as a third thing auaileable to saluation and not to be seuered from them For a man in shewe may haue many good things as for example he may be humbled and seeme to haue some strength of faith yet if there be in the saide man a want of this purpose and resolution not to sinne the other are but dead things and vnprofitable and for all them he may come to eternall destruction Furthermore we must distinguish this kinde of purpose from the minde and purpose of carnall men theeues drunkards harlots vsurers for they will confesse their sinnes and be sorie for them yea and shed some teares wishing they had neuer sinned as they haue In these men indeed there is a wishing will for the time but no setled purpose And it is a propertie of nature to auoid euill but to haue a constant resolution of not sinning is a gift of grace and for this it is that we must labour otherwise our repentance is no true and sound repentance Sect. 5. The fourth and last dutie is to performe New obedience vnto God in our life and conuersation In this new obedience three things are required First it must be a fruit of the spirit of Christ in vs for when we doe any good thing it is Christ that doth it in vs. To this purpose Dauid praies vnto God Psal. 143. 10. Let thy good Spirit lead me forth into the land of righteousnes And
generally to include all without exception but indefinitely for many or the most part of the cattell that were in the land of Egypt The tenth Allegation Exod. 10. 22. wee read that one of the plagues was a palpable darknes and so great that for three daies together no man either saw an other or rose vp from the place where he sate And yet v. 23. Moses is sent for and called to come before Pharaoh How should this be seeing no man could stirre from his place nor haue any light to goe before him for there was none to be had the darkenes was so palpable and the aire was so thicke Ans. I take it the word Then v. 24. is to be meant thus that Pharaoh sent for Moses after the darkenes was ended not by candle or or other light in the time of darkenes And this answer may very well stand without further exception The eleuenth Allegation Iudg. 16. 29. The Atheists make a mocke at the historie of Sampson as fabulous where it is said that all the Philistims came together in one house to make sport with him and on the roofe sate about 3000 persons to beholde him while he plaied and yet there were but two pillars whereupon the whole house stood and those also standing in the midst so neere together that a man might reach them both with his armes This say they is most absurd and impossible Ans. Although the full resolution of this cauill belongs to them that haue skill in Architecture yet thus much may be faide in way of answer That the house might be capable of so many persons and they also that stood aboue might well see and behold Sampson For first the whole house was not sustained by two pillars onely but by many more whereof two were the principall For in likelihood the middle part whereon the whole building was knit together from the bottome to the toppe beeing the weightiest of all was supported by two master-pillars The other which was more outward and lesse weightie might be vpholden by lesser proppes which Artificers in that kinde call by the name of false-pillars Hence it appeareth that the two maine ones standing so nigh together beeing shaken the whole house together with them must needes fall Neither will this seeme strange that two pillars should beare vp a building of such capacitie if we doe but consider what is recorded of Curio the Romance who deuised the frame of a great Amphitheater the two parts whereof were supported onely by two hinges and yet was so large that it contained the whole people of Rome Secondly old buildings in those countries were made for the most part with open roofe Againe they were full of windowes on euery part like vnto great gates and that they might be the more fit for sight from aboue they were reared vp in some sort after the manner of the Egyptian Pyramides wider below and narrower aboue towardes the top And by this meanes it is probable not onely that they might containe a great companie but that all those which stoode about the sides and vpon the roofe might very well behold what Sampson did below specially considering that he stood in the middest of the Theater betweene the two middle pillars The twelfth Allegation Sam. 16. 19. c. it is saide that Dauid plaied before Saul and that Saul knew him But chap. 17. 55. when he was to fight with Goliah Saul knew him not Here is a plaine contradiction in the Atheists iudgement Ans. This sort of men doe still bewray their grosse ignorance both in the matter and in the order of Scripture For the word of God doth not alway set downe things as they follow in order of time iust one after an other but sometime it doth anticipate putting such things in former histories as are alreadie done and accomplished which in regard of their euent should be related afterward Sometime againe it vseth by recapitulation to declare things as following in order of time which doe properly belong to a former narration An example of the latter to omit many other that might be brought is the text alleadged For that part of the 16 chap. from the 19v to the ende should by order of historie follow the 17 as will easily appeare by comparing the place And the like displacing of things saide and done is else-where to be found in the Scriptures Which beeing considered the Atheists supposed Contradiction falls to the ground For Dauid was to fight with Goliah before he plaied before Saul and though he was then not knowne yet Saul after that time tooke better knowledge of him The thirteenth Allegation is out of 2. Chron. 21. 2. where the Papist plaies the right Atheist in going about to improoue the originall copies There saith he Iehosaphat is called king of Israel when as indeede he was king of Iudah and so is he called in the former booke of Chronicles In like manner Ahaz is tearmed king of Israel 2. Chron. 28. 19. whereas the truth is he was king of Iudah Answ. After the death of Salomon the kingdome was deuided and the ten tribes were called Israel and the other two Iudah and Beniamin did beare the name of Iudah Now after the diuision for some time the name of Israel common to both sides was giuen to either and both were named after it And in this respect Iehoshaphat and Ahaz may be termed kings of Israel Againe the name of Israel sundry times in Scripture and namely in the prophets is taken only for the two Tribes which bare the name of Iudah after the defection And thus also might Ahaz haue that name given vnto him though he were king of Iudah Furthermore the word Israel is sometimes put for a true worshipper of God that is for him that is a Iew not without but within not in the letter but in the spirit Rom. 2. 29. Thus our Sauiour saith of Nathaniel Ioh. 1. 48. Behold a true Israelite in whome is no guile that is a man of an vpright hart that serueth God in spirit and in truth And in this sense Iehoshaphat might be termed king of Israel because he was a king and patrone of all true worshippers of God For euen then the Israelites sorted themselues together and the godly among them came to liue vnder him in Iudah though the distinction of the kingdomes did still remaine The fourteenth Allegation is out of Act. 7. 16. where the Papists and Atheists alleadge the Scripture to be contrary to it self in that there it saith Abraham bought a field of Emor when as Gen. 33. 19. the same field was bought by Iacob Ans. 1. Some say that there is a fault because Abrahams name is put for Iacob Yet not a fault of the Bible but of them that wrote out the Bible Neither doth this diminish the authoritie of scripture though the penmen did erre and slippe in writing so long as we may find out the truth by scripture
church yet the truth is they are not wholly cut off from the societie of the faithfull For the seede of faith remaineth in them and that knits the bond of coniunction with Christ though the sense thereof be lost vntill they repent In this case the partie excommunicate is as a free man in bonds who vntill he get out of prison hath no vse of his freedome and yet continues a free man still though he remaine in prison So also the childrē of God may still be the children of God though excluded from the cōgregation of the church for some offences From this that hath beene said ariseth the Answer to the Question propounded namely that the children of such persons as are excommunicated are notwithstāding their excommunication to be baptised because they are indeede and in the iudgement of charitie true members of the bodie of Christ though in some other regards they are not in present holden so to be Yet further besides the former grounds consider these reasons First children of parents that are professed members of the church though cut off for a time vpon some offence committed haue right to baptisme because it is not in the power of man to cut them off from Christ though they be excommunicated Secondly the personall sinne of the parent may not keepe the blessing from the child and therefore not depriue him of participation of the ordinance of God Thirdly we must alway put a difference betweene them which doe not make separation from the church and yet are grieuous offenders and open Apostataes that ioyne themselues with the enemies of the Church to the ruine and ouerthrow of the truth of the Gospel Fourthly we must put a difference betweene those that haue giuen vp their names to Christ though fallen grieuously and Turks and Infidels that are forth of the Couenant and neuer belonged to the Church Lastly if the mercie of God inlarge it selfe to thousands yea to infinite generations why should man be so hard hearted as to make question whether such Infants belong to the Couenant and consequently keepe them from the Sacrament of Baptisme Out of this Question ariseth a second Whether children borne in fornication haue right to baptisme Ans. They are not to be kept from it For the wickednes of the parent ought not to preiudice the child in things that belong to his saluation Yet in this case some Cautions are carefully to be obscrued as first that the parent hold the true faith and religion secondly that he be by the Minister exhorted to a true humiliation of himselfe and to earnest repentance for his sinne committed and that before the child be baptized Thirdly that their be some appointed to answere for the Infant besides the parents and to make solemne promise openly to the Church that it shall be carefully brought vp and instructed in the faith And the same is to be obserued and practized before the baptizing of the children of parents excommunicate IV. Question How men are to make a right vse of their baptisme when they become to yeares The not obseruing hereof is the cause of many sinnes and corruptions in the liues of men It is commonly holden a great fault in ciuill matters for a man not to keepe his couenants Much more is it a hainous sinne before God not to keepe the promises and pay the vowes made vnto him For answere therefore to the Question wee must first take this for a ground That baptisme both for signification force vse and fruit continues not for a moment of time but for the whole course of a mans life It doth not respect onely the time past or present but that which is to come yea that whole time that a man hath to spend from the very act of his baptisme to his death Againe baptisme is the true Sacrament of Repentance for remission of sinnes which being once receiued remaineth a perpetuall testimonie and pledge of the everlasting couenant of God and of the continuall washing away of sinne in the blood of Christ. This Ground premised I come to the vse of baptisme which is two fold The First is that it serues to be a token and pledge of Gods fauour towards vs and that principally three waies First in that it sealeth and confirmeth to vs the free pardon and forgiuenesse of our sinnes Thus Cornelius was baptized of Peter after he had heard the Gospell preached and receiued the Holy Ghost that it might be vnto him a pledge of the remission of his sinnes Act. 10. 48. And in like manner doth Peter exhort the conuerted Iewes to repent them of their sins to receiue the Sacramēt of Baptisme as a seale and pledge of Gods mercie in the forgiuenes thereof by Christ Act. 2. 38. In regard of this vse baptisme is of great force to releeue the hart in distresse For when any childe of God feeles himselfe loden with the burden of his sinnes the consideration and remembrance hereof that God hath pardoned them all and giuen him a speciall and certaine pledge of his pardon in baptisme will serue to stay and support his soule Yea though his sinnes were of force to make a separation betweene God and him Yet remembring that his name is written in the Couenant of God and that he hath by Gods mercie receiued the seale of the Couenant he shall not neede to be much dismaied When Satan tempteth him to doubt of his owne estate in regard of his corruptions even then let him haue recourse to his baptisme and thinke of the earnest and pledge of Gods fauour which he hath receiued Let him draw out his euidences signed with the seale of Gods couenant made vnto him in Iesus Christ and that shall be sufficient to stoppe the mouth of Satan and to repell his temptations Secondly Baptisme is as a pledge of the vertue of Christs death Doe you not know saies Paul that all we which haue beene baptized into Iesus Christ haue beene baptized into his death Rom. 6. 3. For they that beleeue are by baptisme conformed to Christ their head because they are by it buried together with him into his death vers 4. This point is of excellent vse in our liues For it teacheth a man when his owne corruption mooueth him to sinne and he is now euen in the Combate the Spirit lusting against the flesh and the flesh against the Spirit even then to call to memorie his baptisme wherein it pleased God to seale vnto him the mortificatiō of his sinne by the power of Christs death and consequently to pray earnestly vnto him for the continuance of the same power in his his heart for the continuall crucifiing of the old man and the vtter destroying of the body of sinne Rom. 6. 6. Thirdly baptisme is a pledge vnto vs of the Life of Christ of our Fellowship with him therein For looke as he beeing dead in the graue raised himselfe to life by his owne power euen so and more then so being now
the want thereof Gods glorie is directly impeached the saluation of men hindered and our neighbour offended And then we are necessarily to confesse though no examination be made If it be here asked How we may be able to discerne of this time The answer is by Christian wisdome which teacheth vs that when by our silence wicked men are emboldened to speake euill of Gods word and weake ones occasioned to fall from the faith then is the fittest time to stand in the defence and maintenance of the truth Out of these two times and cases Christians haue libertie not to confesse but may lawfully conceale their faith nay which is more their persons by changing their habit and attire vppon this ground because the affirmatiue commandement doth not alwaies binde Here it is obiected First that we are saued onely by faith and therefore confession is not necessarie Ans. We must consider faith two waies First as an instrument created in the heart whereby we apprehend and apply Christ with his benefites to our selues for our iustification and saluation Secondly faith must be considered more largely as it is a way to bring vs to life euerlasting Nowe in the first acceptiō it may truly be said that we are saued by faith alone For there is no grace of God where by we take hold of Christ but faith But if we take it in the second sense as a way to life then we may truly say that it alone saueth not but hope loue repētance good works and all diuine vertues In this sense Paul saith we are saued by hope Rom. 8. 24. because by it we wait for our saluation and hope is the way in which all must walke that looke to be saued Againe he saith Momentany afflictions doe work vnto vs an eternall waight of glory 2. Cor. 4. 17. But how Not as causes but as waies signes and markes that giue vs direction to our iourneies ende And thus The woman is said to be saued by bearing of Children 1. Tim. 2. 15. Which bearing and bringing vp of children is no cause but onely a way wherein she must constantly walke to glory And though in mans iudgement that may seeme a way of misery and death yet indeede it is otherwise if the Children continue in faith loue and holinesse with modestie Againe the Apostle Iames saith that Abrahams faith wrought together with his workes Iam. 2. 2. which are likewise not to be vnderstood as working causes but as testmonies and euidences declaring and manifesting that he was iust in the sight of God Secondly it is obiected that confession of our faith to God is sufficiēt For so Saint Paul seemes to say Rom. 14. 22. Hast thou faith haue it with thy selfe before God Therefore confession before man is not needefull Ans. The Apostle speakes not of that faith wherby we are iustified and saued but of that which standeth in a perswasion of the vse or not vse of things indifferent And this a man may keepe to himselfe that is he may so vse it as he shall not thereby offend his brother That commandement was giuen by Paul for those times when men were not fully perswaded of the vse of God creatures as meates drinkes c. but to these times it is not II. Question Whether it be lawfull for a man being vrged to goe to Idol-seruice and heare Masse so as he keepe his heart to God Ans. It is not and I proue it by the scope of the eigth and tenth Chapters of the first Epistle to the Corinthians where the Apostle disputes the Question whether the Corinthians might goe into the temples of Idols and eate of meat offered vnto them in the meane time not partaking with Idolaters in the worship of the Idols This he auoucheth to be vtterly vnlawfull for that purpose tells the Corinthians That they cannot drinke of the cuppe of the Lord and of the cuppe of Deuills Now as this was vnlawfull for them so it is vnlawfull for any Protestant to goe to any Popish assembly to heare Masse Again God is the Creator of the Body and Soule therefore he is to be worshipped in both cōsequently we robbe him of his due when we reserue our hearts to him and giue our bodies to Idolls To this purpose Paul exhorteth the Romanes to giue vp their bodies a liuing sacrifice holy and acceptable vnto God Rom. 12. 1. Which place vtterly condemneth the errour of some who thinke that God wil be content with the soule and that they may bestowe there bodie in the seruice of the Devill But against this Doctrine sundrie things are alledged The first is the example of Naaman 2. Kings 5. 18. 19. who said to the Prophet when I bowe my selfe in the house of Rimmon the Lord be mercifull to me in this thing To whom Elisha answered goe in peace Here say some the Prophet giues leaue to Naaman to worshippe in an Idols Temple To this there be sundrie answers giuen Some affirme that Naaman speakes only of Ciuill and Politique worship and not of Religious For his office was to kneele down in the Temple that the King might leane vpon his shoulder when he worshipped the Idoll And Naaman makes open protestation v. 7. that he will worshippe no God but the God of Israel Others answere and that more truly that Naaman doth acknowledge it a sinne to goe to the house of Rimmon and therefore he craues pardon for it at the hands of God twice togither ver 18. and withall makes a vowe that he will thenceforth offer neither burnt offering nor sacrifice to any other God saue onely to the Lord and hereunto Elisha answereth Goe in peace Yet further it is answered that Naaman requesteth the Prophet to pray for him that he might be constant in the seruice of the true God And in case he were drawne against his purpose by humane frailtie to bow againe before Rimmon with his King that the Lord in mercie would pardon his offence And to this the Prophet yeeldeth saying Goe in peace As if he should say Goe to I will pray for thee to this ende and purpose This text therefore giues no warrant for bodily presence in Idolatrous assemblies The second Obiection Iehu openly professed the worship of Baal and yet he dissembled meaning nothing lesse 2. king 10. 18. And the Lord commends him for his diligent execution of that which was right in his eies vers 30. Ans. Iehu is commended not for his dissembling but for his diligence in destroying Achabs house his religion the Priests with all that belonged vnto them though in other matters belonging to the seruice of God he departed not from the sinnes of Ieroboam The third obiection Dan. 3. 6. Nebuchad-nezzar made a decree that whosoeuer would not fall downe and worshippe the golden Image should the same houre be cast into the middest of an hotte fierie furnace Now we doe not read that any moe refused to obey but three and therefore it seemes that