perfect obedience of Christ but our sanctification hath the Lawe for his obiect 4. In the nearest efficient cause Iustification hath not the cause in vs because it dwelleth not in vs Sanctification hath the will which is the beginning of all humane actions for the beginning of action is deliberation of deliberation will and reason And in respect of the persons efficient for Tit. 3.5 Regeneration and Renouation are attributed vnto the Holy Ghost as to the efficient But iustification is wholy ascribed vnto Christ In thy seede shall all nations be blessed Gen. 22.18 5. In effects Iustification absolueth and acquiteth vs beefore Gods Iudgement Seate Sanctification doth not so 6. Iustification is an act vnseparable but Regeneration is an act separable because it is not perfected in an instant but by a certaine order or successiuely and by degrees according to the good pleasure of God and it is here begunne and shall be perfectted in the life to come Moreouer Iustification is a matter of meere gift but regeneration is a matter of our obedience 7. Paule doth notably expresse the difference of him that is to bee iustified and him that is to bee regenerate for hee that is to be iustified lamentably crieth out of his inherent righteousnesse Rom. 7.24 O wretched man that I am who shall deliuer mee from the bodie of this death But flying to imputed righteousnesse which is grounded only vpon mercie hee doth exceedingly reioyce and with a ful confidence tryumpheth ouer life death and al aduersities whatsoeuer Rom. 8.33.34 c. What are the instruments or meanes of iustification The instrumentall cause outwardly shewing and offering the benefit of iustification is the voice of the Gospell Rom. 1.16 The Gospell is the power of God to saluation to all that beleeue that is to say it is the instrument of God truely powerfull and effectuall to saue For the righteousnesse of God is thereby reuealed from faith to faith Hereupon it is called the word of beleefe a Act. 5.20 the vvorde of saluation b Act. 13.26 the word and ministerie of reconciliation c 2. Cor. 5.19 The administring causes and witnesses of this blessing but not the sellers thereof are the ministers of the Gospell according to that Iohn 20.23 Whose sinnes yee remit they shall bee remitted and whose sinnes yee retaine they shall bee retained And 1. Tim. 4.16 Take heede vnto thy selfe and vnto Doctrine continue therein for in doing this thou shalt both saue thy selfe those that heare thee namely because faith is by hearing and hearing is by preaching The instrumentall cause inwardly is also twofold 1. The instrument giuen by God or the hand apprehending and receiuing the grace of Iustifycation offered is sauing faith infused into the beleeuers by the Holy Ghost Rom. 3.28 Therfore vvee conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the lawe So euery where By faith d Gal. 2,6 Through faith e Eph 2.8 of faith f Rom 3 28 for these are all of one signifycation but in no place are we said to be iustified or saued for faith Rom. 10.8 This is the vvord of faith which we preach And hereupon it is called righteousnesse of faith in regard it is apprehended by faith when the Gospell is beleeued 2. The inward sealing cause is the holy ghost who sealeth Iustification in our hearts so as wee cannot doubt therof Eph. 1.13 Wherein also after that ye beleeued ye were sealed with the Holie spirit of promise which is the earnest of our inheritāce And 1. Cor. 6.11 You are iustified by the spirit of God in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ 3. The outward sealing causes are the Sacraments the one of initiation or entrance the other of Redemption Rom. 4.11 He receiued the Circumcision as the seale of righteousnesse which is by Faith Also 1. Cor. 11.23 and Tit. 3.5 He hath saued vs by the washing of the new birth and renewing of the holy Ghost In what sence then are we said to be iustified by faith Not by any inward dignitie or merit of faith it selfe not as it is a worke or new quality in vs not by any force or efficacie of Iustifying taken from Charitie nor because it hath charitie adioyned to it or worketh by it not because faith doth participate of the spirit of Christ to the end the beleeuer may be made righteous for that wee are commaunded to seeke righteousnesse not in our selues but in Christ a 2. Cor 5 2◠But wee are iustified by faith in regard it doth receiue and embrace the righteousnes that is offered in the Gospell Rom. 1.16.17 The righteousnesse of Christ is reueiled from faith to faith For as to iustification faith is a thing meerely passiue bringing nothing of our owne to procure vs fauour with God but receiuing that from Christ which is wanting in and toe our selues How then is faith said to be imputed for Righteousnesse Not absolutely but by Relation namely when it is vnderstood not to be alone but with his obiect Christ crucified as Rom. 3.22 The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that beleeue And verse 25. through faith in Christes bloud In which places by the word faith by a metonymie of the thing cōtaining for the thing cōtained Christ crucifyed is vnderstood but as he is apprehēded by faith In this sence Faith was imputed to Abraham vnto righteousnes or for righteousnes Rom. 4.9 And faith is imputed for righteousnesse vnto euerie one that beleeueth that is to say Christ crucifyed apprehended by faith is accounted our righteousnesse It is accoūted I say of god pronouncing from his tribunal seat the sentence of righteousnesse Euen as therfore the hand that receiueth a treasure that is giuen doth not enrich vs but the treasure that is it that enricheth so neither doth the work or action of faith iustify vs but Christ himself whom we apprehend by faith And this is that that the sound Diuines say that we are iustifyed by faith Correlatiuely that faith is imputed for righteousnes by reason of the obiect which assertion is plainly proued by that of Paul Rom. 3.27.28 Gal. 2.16 Where this sentence We are made righteous by faith is opposed vnto this proposition Wee are iustified by vvorkes as beeing contradictories Wherefore it is manifest by the nature of contradiction that no man is iustified by faith as it is a worke either our worke or Gods worke in vs but as it includeth the merit of Christ To speake properly and simply incredulitie is repugnant vnto faith and to the workes of the Lawe not working or the intermission of good workes is opposite but in respect of Iustification faith which resteth vpon the merit of Christ and workes which rest vpon the merits of Christ are contraries Hereupon also it is that Paule doth oppose the righteousnesse of the lawe and the righteousnesse of faith as contraries betweene themselues when Phil. 3.9
d Num. 12.6 at the last God stirred vp Moses that he should be the first pen-man of holy Scripture Yea and God himselfe writing the ten Commaundements with his owne finger did as it were consecrate the Scripture e Exod. 31.28 and gaue Moses in charge to write the bookes of the Law f Exod. 24 4. Afterwards he deliuered his word by the Prophets g Luk. 1.70 by Christ God and man h Heb. 1.1 Last of all by the Apostles of Christ both by word and writing i Mat. 28.19 Act. 1.18 Rom. 16.25 Reu. 1.11 but there was nothing deliuered by word of mouth but that which is now extant in writing For although there were moe things spoken and done then are written yet nothing contrarie and these things which are written are sufficient k Joh. 20.31 But wherefore was the word of God committed to writing 1. By reason of the forgetfulnesse of mans mind 2. Because men are so prone to fall into all kinde of impietie whereby the works of God are corrupted 3. Because of mans boldnesse to coyne new kinds of religions 4. Because of the subtiltie of Satan who transformeth himselfe into an Angell of light and deceiueth the minds of men with counterfet reuelations In what tongue was either of the Testaments written The old Testament was written by Moses and the Prophets in the Hebrew tongue because that was the language of the people of God to whom especially it did belong But the new Testament was written by the Euangelists and Apostles in the Greek tongue because that language by reason of the Greeke Empire which went before the Romaine was almost in vse among all nations and was more fit for the spreading of the kingdome of Christ through the whole world And therefore the Hebrew text in the old Testament and not the Greeke and the Greeke text in the new is authenticall and not the Latine or anie other Ought the Scripture to be propounded to all Christians in their owne natiue tongues Questionlesse because Christ him selfe taught in their natiue tongue a Luk. 4.17 and the Apostles taught the Grecians and other nations not in the Hebrew but the Greeke tongue and they taught euery nation in their owne natiue language b Act. 2.11 Is the Scripture manifest or is it obscure It is manifest if you regard the foundation of the doctrine of saluation as the Articles of faith the precepts of the Decalogue hence it is called a Lanterne c Psa 119.105 2. Pet. 1.19 to those whose mind God doth open d Luk. 24.45 but it is obscure to those which be blind and to all that perish whose minds the god of this world hath blinded e Cor. 4.3.4 But it is not alwayes obscure to the elect f Ioh. 16.13 and only in part 1. that they shold not too much relie vpon their owne wit but shold seeke the vnderstanding of it at the hands of God by prayer 2. That they might be stirred vp to a more carefull studie of the same 3. That they might make more account of the ministerie of the word whereby they are taught and therefore stand in need to haue it expounded g Prou. 29.18 by the example of Christ h Luk. 4.17 and of Philip i Act. 8.31.35 What is the Interpretation of holy Scripture It is the vnfolding of the true and naturall sense of the Scripture the application of it vnto the manifest vse of the Church k 1. Cor. 14.4 5.31 which Paule calleth prophecie l Rom. 12.6 Peter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the resolution of it m 2. Pet. 1.20 For the word of God fondly vnderstood is not the word of God saith Theodoret Whence must we fetch the interpretation of Scriptures Not out of euery priuate mans braine and forestalled opinions n 2. Pet. 1.20 but it is to be taught out of the Text it selfe that is by obseruing those things that go before and follow after and comparing that place with other places of Scripture What must be the rule of interpreting Onely one namely the Analogie of faith o Rom. 12.6 which is nothing else but the constant and perpetuall sense of Scripture expounded in the manifest places of Scripture and agreeable to the Apostles Creed tenne Commandements the Lords prayer and generall sentences and axiomes of euery maine point of Diuinitie What is the vse of holy Scripture 2. Tim. 3.16 The whole Scripture is giuen of God by inspiration and is profitable for doctrine for reprehension for correction for instruction in righteousnesse and for exhortation p Rom. 15.4 o◠consolation q 1. Cor. 14.3 that is for doctrine or confirmation of true opinions for reprehension of errors for correction of manners instruction of life in righteousnesse for comfort in affliction that the man of God may be perfect and furnished for euery good worke What shall we answer to that saying of Augustine I would not beleeue the Gospell vnlesse the authoritie of the Church moued me That Augustine speaketh of himselfe as yet not conuerted vnto the faith Neither is it any maruell that those which are not as yet conuerted are moued with the consent of the Church and the authoritie of men Therefore his meaning is that the Church is as it were an * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 introduction whereby we are prepared to giue credite to the Scripture What things are contrarie to the Scripture 1. The error of the Sadduces which onely receiued the fiue bookes of Moses which caused Christ to confute their deniall of the resurrection out of Moses Mat. 22.31 2. Of certaine Anabaptists who reiected the booke of Iob as a fained tragicall Comedie yea the Song of songs and Ecclesiastes as if the one taught Epicurisme the other were a wantō loue Ballad Yet for Iob we haue his countrie and condition set downe in the beginning and end of his booke which argueth no fiction and besides he is mentioned by Ezechiel cap. 14.14 and Iam. cap. 5.11 and Paul 1. Cor. 3.19 And for Ecclesiastes it rather deterreth from pleasure in that it argues all pleasures of vanitie and iudgeth them fooles who rest vpon them as on the contrarie it maketh felicitie to consist in the feare of God and keeping his commandements cap. 1.2 7.3.8.12.11.9 and the whole twelfth Chapter As for that of the soules immortalitie cap. 3.19 it is meant not that Salomon so thought but that corrupt reason so iudgeth As for the Song of songs if it were meant of Pharaohs daughter or some Sunamite damosell the comparisons cited cap. 4.1.7.2 were monstrous And albeit the name of God is not mentioned in that booke yet find we equiualent and more fit names for that purpose as Brother Friend Spouse Beloued that it might appeare that the mysticall Spouse of Salomon was here described I meane the Church of Christ 3. The heresie of Manicheus Valentinus Marcion and others
resemblances of vertues which although they are praised in the courts and iudgement places of men yet before the heauenly tribunall they are of no moment to deserue righteousnesse Yea more they are sins because whatsoeuer is done without faith that is without acknowledgment trusting in the Mediator is sinne Rom. 14.23 Therefore what kind of will is remaining in a man not regenerate A will altogither euill namely which doth with a prone inclination make hast to sinne for man is not depriued of will but of the soundnesse and goodnesse of his will Therefore Bernard speaketh thus Simply to vvill commeth from mans nature to vvill vvickedly commeth from corrupt nature to vvill vvell from supernaturall grace But doth not mans vvill freely encline to euill If free be opposed to compulsion or violent constraint in this case man is caried to commit sinne freely that is of his owne accord voluntarily and with earnest desire and so there is in him free vvill to euill a Iam. 1.14 Pruu 2.24 But if free be opposed to seruitude or necessitie certainly man enclineth to euill not freely but necessarilie and so mans will is seruile and thrall but so as this necessitie and slauerie is voluntarie So the will of a man vnregenerate is a Seruant and it is also free in diuers respects a seruant because of the necessitie of sinning free in regard of his will Iohn 8.34 Whosoeuer committeth sinne is the seruant of sinne and verse 38. If the sonne shall make you free you shall be free indeed Therefore if he shall not make free the will shall be a seruant not free and therefore more truly it shall be called seruile or slauish vvill not free vvill For by whomsoeuer a man is ouercome to him he becommeth slaue 2. Pet. 2.19 but if a man become slaue vnto sinne he is no longer free Hovv stands the vvil of man in his conuersion is it meerrly passiue or actiue also In respect of grace which commeth from without a man and preuenteth him the will in as much as it is not yet begonne to be regenerate is meerely passiue as the clay in the hand of the Potter a Rom. 9.21 because all his strength concerning spiritual and heauenly things is extinct by which he might prepare himselfe to grace or of himselfe receiue it being offered or by his naturall strength turne vnto God or wil desire or follow after that which is good acceptable to God for we are all dead in sin b but the dead man is only passiue in respect of his quickening yea moreouer the will is not only dead but also it is stubborne of it selfe and of it selfe and by it selfe q Epes 2.1 Colos 3 12 it cannot choose but resist being not moued kindled by God c Iohn 6. Therefore Dauid faith Psal 51.12 Create in me O God a cleane heart But in respect of the time in which the conuersion it selfe is wrought the will is not like a stocke but whilest it is healed and cured by the holy Ghost it is also actiue that is the will in the act of conuersion is not idle and void of all sense and motion as an Image but followeth the holy Ghost who draweth it For at the same instant God cause vs both by grace to will and to will indeed that is he mooueth and bendeth our wils and causeth vs to will indeed but yet so as all the whole efficacie of the action dependeth vpon Gods spirit Heereupon Aagustine lib. de Gratia lib. arbitrio cap. 2. It is certaine that we will when we will but he causeth vs to will who worketh in vs to will Therfore Phil. 2.13 It is God who worketh in vs both the wil the deed where Will is not vnderstood of the substance of the will but of a newe qualitie How is that to be vnderstood which Christ speaketh Ioh. 6.44 No man commeth to me except the father draw him Not so as if the will in the act of conuersion that is when the party conuerted is begon to be draweÌ„ by the word holy spirit did like an enemie make resistance neither is the case alike as when euil spirits vse the members of bodies possessed by them For we do not beleeue against our wils because faith is a knowledge in the mind and an assent in the heart but because of vnwilling God maketh vs willing of resisting consenting of sluggish lasie persons God maketh vs to become runners In which sense is that saying of Chrysostome to be taken God indeed draweth saith he but he draweth so as the partie is willing Act. 26.19 I was not disobedient to the heauenly vision What therefore be the causes of our conuersion The efficient cause and effectuall by it selfe is one namely the Holy Ghost of which it is saide Ezech. 36.26 I will giue you a newe heart a newe spirit wil I put in the middest of you and I will take the stonie heart out of your flesh and I will giue you a fleshie heart and will make you to walke in my commaundements The instrumentall cause or meanes is the word of God Rom. 10.17 Faith is by hearing and hearing by the word of God by which word being read heard and thought vpon the Holy Ghost becommeth regularlie effectuall enlightning the minde and turning the will The subiect of Conuersion is the vnderstanding and will of man which notwithstanding is saide also to concurre not to the conuersion but in the conuersion because no conuersion is wrought without the thing to be conuerted but in that regard that it is mooued not of it selfe but by the Holy Ghost that being driuen forward thereby it worketh of vnwilling becoÌ„ming willing it willeth For the will is not onely the subiect of Gods operation which the spirit of God worketh in the elect but it is also such an instrument which beeing renewed and mooued by the Holie Ghost doth it selfe also worke together with it and mooueth it selfe What manner of free will is there in a man regenerate It is partly to good partly to euill How to good Because the Holy ghost reneweth by the word of God mans nature onely in part and therefore that will which before was seruant becommeth free only in part that is because a new lâ—ght and knowledge of God is kindled in the minde and in the will and heart new inclinations and motions agreeing with gods law that so man being caused by God to worke may himselfe also worke As Iohn 6.45 Euerie one that hath heard and learned of the father commeth vnto mee Phil. 2.13 It is God who worketh in you both the will and the deede How is there in them a free will to euill 1. Because Regeneration is onely begunne in this life not perfected by regeneration is to bee vnderstoode a a 1. Cor 13 9 12. 2 Cor. 11 9 renewing of minde will and affections and the reliques of the flesh or of sinne do alwaies remaine
admonished them of the vncleannesse which was to be cleansed away by the bloud of Christ Sacrifices did typically shadow out that Sacrifice which was to follow Whereupon Col. 2.7 and Heb. 10.1 The Law had the shadowe of good things to come not the very image of things but the body was Christ 4. That they might be signes and sacraments whereby the holy Ghost might be effectuall and this not ex opero operato for the worke sake as it was wrought but beeing vsed in faith In which sence Sacrifices are called an attonement for sinne b Leuit. 19 27 5. That they might bee markes of their profession signes distinctions or as it were a wall to separate the Church of Israell from other nations and to driue them from the Idolatrie of other nations What vvas the Iudiciall or Politique Lavv It was a commaundement cōcerning outward actions by which the ciuill societie of the Israelites should bee gouerned or you may call it the Ciuil Law of the Israelites concerning Magistrates distinction of gouernments distribution of inheritances punishment of offences the distinction and proprietie of inheritances the order and processe of Iudgements Contractes Rites of Mariage Diuorces bondage the order and lawes of warre witnesse vsurie of raising seed vp to a mans brother punishment of blasphemie periurie profaning of the Sabaoth and ceremonies sedition disobedience manslaughter damage done to a man either in goods or bodie adulterie whoredome theft and to conclude of all outward offences against euery commaundement of the Decalogue What vvas the vse of the Iudiciall Lavv 1 The maintaining of the State according to the condition of time place and nation 2. Secondly that there might bee an apparant and notable difference betwixt that state wherein the Messias shouldbe borne and that of other nations Hovv farre is the Morall Lavv abrogated 1. In respect of iustification we must thinke alike of all parts of it namely that no man is iust or accepted vnto eternall life for any workes of the Law 2. In respect of obedience wee must make a difference in the parts of the Law and the Morall Law hath two parts as it were precepts or the rule of life and an appendix concerning promises or threatnings 3. In regard of the rule of mens liues the Law shall not bee abolished either in this life or the life to come for so much as concerneth the cōmaundements For God requireth a perpetual loue towards himselfe and his creature in his place and in this respect Christ testifieth that He came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it that One iotte of the Lavv should not passe avvay but it should bee fulfilled 4. In regarde of the appendices and appurtenances all the promises of the Lawe are ratified to the regenerate in Christ a Rom. 8.4 Now for the threatnings the inexorable seueritie of the Lawe and the seuere exacting of obedience these are abolished to the regenerate Rom. 6.14 You are not vnder the Lavv but vnder grace Also Chap. 8.1 There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesu Also Gal. 3.13 Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the Law becomming a curse for vs. Also cap. 4.4 Christ became subiect to the Law that hee might redeeme them vvho vvere subiect to the Lavv. But the vnregenerate are subiect to the whole Lawe and the sentence of condemnation which it pronounceth according to that which is saide Gal. 3.10 Cursed is he that doth not all things vvhich are vvritten in the booke of the Lavv. Is the ceremoniall lavv abrogated It is abrogated not in respect of the signification or Scripture that it should no more bee read for this may serue to confirme and instruct vs concerning Christ but in regard of the vse and outward obseruation For Dan. 9.27 it is saide Hee that is Christ shall confirme the couenant vvith many for in one vveeke and in the middest of the vveeke hee shall cause the sacrifices and oblations to cease And Christ saith Math. 11.13 The Lavv the Prophets vvere vntill Iohn came And Iohn 1.17 The Lavve vvas giuen by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Therefore by a publike decree of the Holy ghost in an assembly or counsell of the Apostles Act. 15.6 the ceremonies were abrogated so as they are not to bee called againe seeing Christ of whome they were a type is alreadie come and hath fulfilled them all and hath put out the hand vvriting of ordinances vvhich vvas against vs. Colos 2.14 That is the ceremonies which were vsuall instruments which testified our guiltinesse and vncleannesse So Heb 10.14 for by one oblation hath hee made perfect for euer those who were to be sanctified This was also signified by renting of the veile of the Temple at Christs passion a Mat. 27.5 Therefore saith Paule Gal. 5.2 If you be circumcised Christ shall nothing profit you In stead of this Law the Lord hath appointed the administration of Sacraments to be obserued in the Christian Church according to his direction vnto the end of the world Marc. 16.15 Goe preach and baptize And 1. Cor. 11.26 Shew forth the Lords death till hee come But for those things which pertaine to the order of administring them those hee left free to the Churches disposition Is the iudiciall law in like maner abrogated It is abrogated in regard of the Obligation namely for so much as no cōmon wealth is boūd to receiue the politick Lawes of the Israelites as also in regard of the manner limitation forme and decreeing of punishments or the appointment of them to be set downe according to certaine circumstances which thing is left to the libertie and disposition of good princes accordingly as place time and person shall require For the Ciuill Law bindeth onely those to whome it is giuen Moreouer that law which is made onely for a certaine time doth not stand in force after that time but this Law was onely giuen for a time Gen. 49.10 The Scepter shall not bee taken away from Iuda and the Lawgiuer from the middest of his people vntill Silo come To the same effect is also that saying of Christ Luk. 16.16 The Law and the Prophets that is the gouernment and policie of Moses was vnto Iohn Therefore the Iudiciall Law was positiue and therefore Christians are not compelled to gouerne their Common wealths in the same maner in which the Israelites common wealth was gouerned but it is lawfull for them to vse the politique Lawes of their Nations which agree with the Lawes of Nature and the tenne Commaundements according to that Commaundement Rom. 13.1 Let euery soule bee subiect to the higher powers a 1 Pet. 2.13 Againe God by a notable iudgement hath destroyed the politique gouernment of Moses b Dan. 9.26 27. Mat. 24.15 But yet it is not abrogated in respect of the substance end or that naturall and vniuersall equitie which groundeth vpon the Law of God and of nature and in
necessarie effect of the same for seeing faith is a certaine taste perceiuing and supping downe as it were of that sweetenes which is in God 1. Pet. 2.3 If so be that ye haue tasted how bountifull the Lord is it followeth that the loue of God is an effect which proceedeth of that sweet apprehension and as it were taste of the goodnesse of God 4 Comfort peace of conscience in regard of the remission of sinnes Phil 1.25 Rom. 14.17 gladnesse and spirituall ioy proceeding from the same taste of the fauour of God 1. Pet. 1.8 Beleeuing in Christ ye reioyce with ioy vnspeakable and glorious 5 The sighes of the spirit not to be expressed Rom. 8.26 and that confidence that crieth Abba Father Gal. 4.6 6 Patience in aduersitie yea more a Rom 8.35.38 reioycing in afflictions 7 Contempt of the world 8 A spirituall assurance of the grace and friendshippe of God 9 An affection to our neighbour and that for Gods sake as namely Charitie and loue of our neighbour courtesie bountie gentlenesse and delight in the Saints Psal 16.3 To the Saints that are in the Earth and to the excellent all my delight is in them The actions that proceed from faith are those which break forth out of those inward affections as godlinesse iustice thanksgiuing prayer e Rom 8.15 10.14 confession that is to say a sincere and open f Rom. 10.9 2. Cor. 4.13 profession of Christ which is made with the mind tongue and life peace and concord with all men in the Lord weldoing towards all euen our enemies and so a new obedience for a good tree beareth good fruit g Mat 7.17 Lastly a good conscience a holy care faithfulnesse and diligence in our vocation and calling and a minde h Ro. 12.7.8 Phil. 4.11 rom 11.24 Gal. 2.20 contented with with his owne portion What be the effects and fruits of faith They are manifold For first it ingrafts vs into Christ i Ephs 17. and maketh Christ to dwell in the hearts of the faithfull and that they may be in him and may haue fellowship and communion with him 2 It makes vs the sonnes of God a Gal. 3 26 it obtaines remission of sinnes b Act. 10.43 it iustifyeth vs c Gen. 15.6 Abac. 2.4 Act. 13.39 Rom. 3. 5 Chapter it causeth vs not to be ashameth d Rom. 9.32 it giueth vs entrance to God e Eph. 3.12 it regenerateth our vnderstanding and our will and purifieth the f act 15.9 heart I saueth g Luk. 7.50 it obtaineth what it will of God h Mat. 8 13 1 Ioh. 5 14. now it willeth onely that that tendeth to the glorie of God it worketh all things Marke 9.23 All things are possible to them that beleeue It ouercommeth the world and Satan i 1. Ioh. 5.4 It renounceth Satan and his works in heart in word in life and in manners k Eph. 5.11 Finally it relyeth wholly vpon God and is delighted in his workes and commaundements night and day l Psal 1.2 Rom. 4 1â— And yet faith it selfe doth not performe all these things but he whom it apprehends namely Christ Iesus in whom we are able to doe all things that are necessarie vnto saluation Phil. 4.13 VVhat is the end of faith It is two-fold 1 In respect of our selues the saluation of our soules 1. Pet. 1.9 Receiuing the end of your faith euen the saluation of your soules And life eternall m Io. 3.15 16.18.36 20.31 Secondly in respect of God Gods glorie By what experiment is faith tried 1 Inwardly by the subtilties of the flesh and by certaine 〈◊〉 beings rising from thence in the mindes of men by reason of false Doctrines diuelish arts n Rom. 4.20 heresies the o Deut 13.1 contentions of the teachers in the Church treacherie of brethren impunitie of wickednesse p 1. Cor. 11.19 prosperitie of the wicked the q Ier. 12.1 Mal. 2.17 Psal 73.2.3 small number of beleeuers the deformitie and oppression of the Church the falling away of many from the faith tentations the delay of Gods promises the tokens of Gods wrath the scoffes of the mockers which aske where is the promise of his comming 2. Pet. 3.4 which things saith Augustine God permitteth that they which heare and see the same might be tried what faith they beare towards God 2 By the crosse as Gold is tried in the fire for patience vnder the crosse with calling vpon God and looking for deliuerance is as it were a triall of faith whether it be true or no r 〈◊〉 1.7 as we may see in Iob. Å¿ Iob. 23 19. Of this temptation Saint Iames speaketh Chap. 1. vers 12. Blessed is the man that endureth temptation for when he is tried he shall receiue the crowne of life What is the vse of faith There is verie great vse of it in the whole course of our liues for it is that one thing that is necessarie Luke 10.42 and Heb. 11.6 Without faith it is impossible to please God The vse of it therefore is to make vs in prosperitie not to be lifted vp in aduersitie not to cast downe our selues and in death to passe to life Are wee called faithfull of faith chiefely in regard of the working power of faith or passiuely in regard of our sufferance Although faith in the Scripture doe sometimes signifie constancie and truth in words deeds and couenant keeping and then is taken actiuely and in that sense they are also called faithfull which keepe their faith once plighted or doe faithfully performe their dutie as Luke 12.42 Who is a faithfull and wise steward And Luke 16.10 He that is faithfull in a little will also be faithfull in much And also passiuely they are called faithfull men that doe well deserue to be beleeued and so we vse to say a faithfull word and a faithfull man a 2. Tim. 2 â— 11. yet notwithstanding when the matter of Iustification is in hand men are called faithful passiuely who embrace by faith Christ the Sauiour as Ephe. 1.1 The faithfull in Christ Iesus and Act. 10.45 The faithfull which were of the Circumcision What things haue affinitie with faith Hope and Charitie which are also themselues the gift of the holy Ghost 1. Cor. 12. VVhat doe they differ from faith Faith is the knowledge and apprehension of Christ being exhibited after a sort present in the word SacrameÌ„ts hope is an expectation of Christ hereafter to be fully reuealed with all his benefits Or hope is the expectation of those things which faith beleeueth to be truly promised by God so faith beleeueth God to be true hope expecteth that he should alwaies cary himselfe so towards vs. Faith beleeueth that life eternall is giuen vnto vs hope expecteth till it be reuealed faith is the foundation where upon hope resteth hope nourisheth and sustâ—ineth faith and thereupon by reason of this communion and affinitie the
tree cannot bring forth good fruite Mat. 7.18 2. That Repentance is a Sacrament and that the action of the man repenting is the matter of this Sacrament whereas indeede Baptisme is the Sacrament of Repentance a Mark 1.4 Luk 3 3 Acts. 2 38 And they adde moreouer that it is after shipwrack a second board to swimme out wherby the sinners after baptisme receiued doe come againe into fauour with God 3. Which is their greatest lie of all they apply the ceremonies of the publick or Ecclesiasticall and disciplinarie Repentance which is made before the Church namely Contrition Confession and Satisfaction vnto the generall doctrine of repentance which is made before God and they alledge them to bee parts thereof 4. That contrition of the heart is a sorrow voluntarily taken vpon them for sinnes which doth deserue the mercie of God 5. That auricular confession of the mouth that is to say an exact reckoning vp of al our sinnes laying open also the circumstances of euery one of them in the eares of our owne parish Priest is commaunded by the lawe of God to be performed of all men vpon paine of excommunication and is necessarie for the obtaining of remission of sinnes and that the neglect thereof is deadly But of all other that confession that is made in the time of Lent is most of al pleasing and acceptable vnto God Contrarie to the expresse doctrine of Paul Ro. 14.5.6 Col. 2.16 Gal. 4.10.11 Sixtly that it is not enough for him that repenteth to abstaine frrm the euill course of his life past and to change his manners for the better vnlesse hee doe satisfie God for the things he hath done and this they call specially Penance whereupon is that vulgar Phrase to doe Penance Now this satisfaction for sinnes and for the punishment of sinnes at least for the paines of Purgatorie they say is made vnto God either by workes of Supererogation that are more then duetie that is to say such as are not coÌ„maunded in the word of God as by building of Churches by a certaine nuÌ„ber of praiers by pilgrimages to this or that Sepulcre tapers hoodes sleeping vpon the ground almes deedes buying of Masses pardons and such like or else by punishments enioyned by the Priests or by the sufferings which godly men suffer all which are meerly contrarie to the free satisfaction of Christ who by the power of his death and obedience hath taken away the guilt and punishment due to our sinnes a Isa 44 4.5 1. Iohn 1 3. The endeauour of hypocrites who doe indeede goe about an outward repentance after an externall maner but in the mean time doe not dissolue the internall bandes of wickednesse within Lastly the error of the Anabaptists and Perfectists who dreame they haue attained a perfect degree of regeneration contrarie to that perpetuall combat of the flesh and the spirit which the Saints doe feele in this life Gal. 5.17 The one and thirtieth common place Of the iustification of Man before God VVhat is the meaning of this word Iustifying IN the originall of the Latine it signifieth indeede to make iust that is to say to renewe and change the heart which is proper onely to God as also this word Sanctifying is of a profane man to make him holy In which signification the Apostle may seeme to haue vsed it 1. Cor. 6.11 And such vvere some of you but novv yee are vvashed now yee are sanctified now yee are iustified in the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our God that is to say of vncleane yee are made cleane of profane ye are made holy of vniust yee are made iust by the holy Ghost for Christs sake in whome yee beleeve Which signification some of the Fathers haue followed and especially Augustine obseruing rather the composition of the latine word then the phrase of the holy Ghost so that to be iustified is with them nothing els but of vniust to be made iust by the grace of God for Christs sake as Augustine in his 105. Epistle to Sixtus and in many other places who notwithstanding vseth Remission of Sinnes for that which wee call with Saint Paule Iustication taketh iustification for regeneration or sanctification wherby the Iusticiarie Schoolemen haue taken occasion for their error And yet the sâ—me Augustine is of the same opinion with vs whilest he vseth Remission of sinnes for that which wee with Paule call iustification euen as Dauid also saith Paul expounding him That the man is blessed to whom God imputeth righteousnes without works saying Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen Psalme 32.2 Roman 4.7 For The righteousnesse of the Saints saith Augustine in this world doth more consist in remission of sinnes then in perfection of vertue Where that particle more is to be taken exclusiuely for rather as in that speach Act. 5.29 VVe ought more to obey God then men i. rather And Iohn 12. They loued the praise of men more then the praise of God that is rather 2 It is vsed in the Scripture for a word of lawe and signifieth to impute Iustice by imputation to accompt a man righteous to repute a man to be iust to absolue and acquite a man from the crimes obiected against him to discharge a man or by sentence to pronounce him iust to make acknowledge a man to be iust which signification the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hitsdicke agreeth with and is euerie where in the Scripture opposed to the word of condemning as also the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken in this signification in the vse of law which Suidas expoundeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say to accompt iust As Prouerb 17.15 He that iustifieth the wicked or condemneth the iust they both are an abhomination vnto the Lord. In which place this word Iustifie doth not signifie to infuse iustice for to doe so is no abhomination And Mat. 12.31 By thy words thou shalt be iustified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned So Luke 7.29 The publicans did iustifie God that is they did acknowledge and confesse him to be iust And Luke 16.15 you iustifie your selues before men that is you will be accompted iust In this sence they are pronounced iust before men by the later which do iustlie as Iames. 2.12 Abraham is said to be iustified that is to be pronouÌ„ced iust before men by the effects 3 It signifieth to prouoke and stirre vp others vnto righteousnesse by teaching and instructing them as Dan. 12.3 They that iustifie others that is doe instruct them vnto righteousnesse or by their teaching and instruction doe make them iust shall be as the stars in the firmament And Apoc. 22.11 Hee that is iust let him be more iust that is let him profit in well doing In which signification did Paule vse this word in the doctrine of the Iustification of a man before God Not in the first sence nor in the third but in the second which is
He renounceth his owne righteousnesse which is by the Law resteth vpon the righteousnesse which is by the faith of Iesus Christ or from God by faith Why is the exclusiue particle alone added in this proposition We are iustified by faith alone That it might be vnderstood that the promise of saluation is receiued by faith alone and doth not depend vpon any worthinesse or merit of our worke Can this exclusiue particle alone bee prooued by Scripture Yes it may for Mar. 5.36 it is in expresse words where Christ comforting Iairus saith vnto him Feare not only beleeue In which words Christ doth plainely declare that hee looketh for nothing but faith alone without which it is impossible to please God Heb. 11.6 2. There is asmuch in effect Gal. 2.16 Where Paul saith that men are not iustified but by faith adding expresly not by works R◠3.28 without works for he that taketh away righteousnesse from works doth soundly enough ascribe it vnto faith alone The same thing the word freely Rom. 3.24 confirmeth For this word excludeth all maner of merit and desert from him to whome is done either good or euill as Ps 35.19 They hated mee freely vvithout a cause that is without any cause of hatred proceeding from me 3. The Apostle Rom. 10.3 pronounceth that the Iewes were therefore not subiect to the righteousnesse a Gal. 3 2. of God because they would establish their owne righteousnes together with the righteousnesse of faith And Phil. 3.7.8 hee affirmeth that although hee were vnrebukeable concerning the Lawe before men yet he did account it as dung that hee might obtaine that righteousnesse which is of God through faith shewing that it is not posible that faith and workes should be set together as parts or causes of righteousnesse 4. The necessitie of maintaining the honour of Christ and of comforting an afflicted conscience in the combat doth require the exclusiue particle onely 5. To the Scripture may bee added the opinion of the fathers for Gennadius the interpreter of Paule saith In his exposition vpon the 3. chapter of the Epistle to the Rom. For righteousnesse is euen to beleeue onely And Ambrose They are iustified freely because working nothing neither doing asmuch againe they are iustified by faith alone VVhat then is it that the particle onely or alone doth exclude in that sentence wherein wee are said to be iustified only by faith or by faith alone Not the causes concurring which are without vs but onely the causes of the same kinde and rancke with it selfe which are within vs that is to say not the grace or mercie of God that iustifieth nor the merit of Christs death which is imputed vnto vs for righteousnesse but only the workes or qualities of vs our selues and of the saints Wel therfore is it said that faith alone iustifieth because it is the onely instrument sole facultie in vs by which we receiue the righteousnesse of Christ So God iustifieth as the efficient cause Christ by his obedience as the meritorious cause faith alone as the instrumentall cause But vvhy doth Paule adde Rom. 4.6 VVithout the vvorkes of the Lavve Not because hee would not haue them perswaded but as denying them to be causes of mans Iustification But what vvorkes are they that Paule doth here exclude 1. Not onely ceremoniall workes as our aduersaries would haue it but euen morall workes also as appeareth by those sentences which hee alledgeth for the proofe of his assertion By the workes of the Lavv shall no flesh be iustified because by the Law came the knowledge of sinne Rom. 3.20 and therefore not righteousnesse And. Rom. 4.15 The Law causeth wrath inasmuch as no man is able to performe it and therefore it causeth not righteousnesse And Rom. 7.7 out of the Decalogue or morall Law hee citeth the tenth commaundement I had not knowne lust to be sinne if the Law had not said Thou shalt not lust Gal. 3.10 Cursed is euery one that abideth not in all things that are written in the booke of the Law to doe them And vers 12. The man which doth these things shall liue in them 2. The Apostle doth not only exclude those morall workes as the same our aduersaries would make vs beleeue which men as yet not regenerate do performe literally or by the meere light of nature without the grace of Christ inasmuch as the man vnregenerate being out of Christ can neuer do any thing well but the Apostle excludeth also euen the good works of the very regenerate men or the works of grace or those that proceed from faith For Abraham who is registred as an vniuersall patterne of all Iustified men was both iustified and regenerate when he performed those good workes for the which he obtained praise with men But with God he was not iustified but when he had many yeares excelled in holinesse of life God imputed only his faith vnto him for righteousnes Rom. 4.2.3 Neither doth the Prophet Habacuck speake of the faithles but of the faithful when he saith Chap. 2. vers 4. The iust shall liue by his faith And Dauid after he was regenerate cryeth out of himselfe and of other godly men Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen And Psal 143.2 Enter not into iudgement vvith thy seruant O Lord for in thy sight shall no man liuing be iustified Yea and the Apostle himselfe 1. Cor. 4.4 I know nothing by my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified And no maruell for that indeede good workes are the effectes of Iustification and not the causes thereof 3. Our good workes are fewe imperfect and alwaies polluted and stained with some blemishes and spots that they receiue from vs. Esay 64.6 And 1. King 8.46 There is no iust man vvhich doth good and sinneth not For seing the forme of inherent righteousnesse is not thoroughly let in because after the sence of our aduersaries Iustification consisteth in motion it followeth that the contrarie qualitie which is sinne is not thoroughly let out and shaken off and so in that which is imperfect the reliques of sin do stil remaine And whereas Bellarmine maketh inherent righteousnesse to be perfect in respect of the habite and imperfect in respect of the action it is but a fond deuise of his owne braine for in truthe the perfection and imperfection of the action dependeth vpon the perfection and imperfection of the habite according to that of the Philosopher The best habit hath the best action Yea euen our former righteousnesse is put out of remembrance by our later sinnes Ezek. 18.24 4 Saint Iames saith Chap. 2. verse 10. He that faileth in one point is guiltie of all that is to say he is iustlie and worthily condēned of the breach of the lawe in generall for that he that breaketh one title hath offended against the Maiestie of the law giuer Whereupon commeth this rule The whole law is one copulatiue and that the breach of one commaundement draweth with it the
eternall called a reward In a generall signification according to the proper phrase of the Scripture whereby wage doth signifie not by relation but absolutely the extreame part or the end of any thing Also rewarde yet free yea a gift as Paule declareth Rom. 6.23 The wages of sin is death but the gift of God is eternall life through Iesus Christ our Lord. 2. Not as a cause but as a consequence because that though eternall life be giuen for another cause to wit for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith yet it is giuen also as an appurtenance in recompense of the labours and miseries which the godly suffer in this life as Christ saith Mat. 19.29 Whosoeuer forsaketh houses or brethren c. For my name sake shal receiue an hundred fold and shall inherit eternall life euen as the inheritance is giuen to the sonne not fot doing his duetie but because hee is a sonne according to that common saying As soone as the sonne is borne the portion is due as also in recompence of his obedience And why doth God promise reward to the good workes of his children Because they beleeue now they which beleeue are righteous through the righteousnes of Christ imputed vnto them to the iust life is promised and abundance of all good things To what purpose doth hee thus promise 1. That they might bee spurred on to doe their duety more cherefully 2. That they might be testimonies of Gods prouidence because the goods of this life come from him and are distributed at his pleasure according to the saying in the Prouerbs Pro. 10 20. The blessing of the Lord maketh rich and that hee will preserue his Church in this life and prouide for his wherefore Christ saith Seeke first the kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and other things shall be added vnto you Math. 6.33 3 That God might stirre vp his to beleeue to call vpon him to hope and giuing of thankes according to that Psal 50.15 I vvill deliuer thee and thou shalt glorifie me 4 That they might be remembrances and pledges of the promise of grace for which they are bestowed vpon vs. What causes ought to prouoke vs to liue vvell 1 The commaundement of God whereunto all creatures should obey 1. Thess 4.3 This is the vvill of God euen your sanctificaiton 2 Our dutie which we owe that we may declare our thankefulnesse towards him Rom. 8.12 We are debtors to God and not to the flesh neyther are we our owne men but his who hath elected vs to holines of life Luke 17.10 he hath redeemed vs from all iniquitie and cleansed vs in the bloud of Christ that we might be made followers of good works a Luk. 1.74 75. 1 Cor 16.19 20. 3 The necessitie of order of the cause and the effect for a good tree bringeth forth good fruit Math. 7.17 and they that are lead by the spirit of God are the sonnes of God Rom. 8.14 1. Iohn 3.9 Euerie one that is borne of God doth not commit sinne that is by affirming the contrarie he endeuoureth after holines because the seed of God abideth in him that is the holy Ghost so called by the effect because by his vertue as it were by a certaine seed we are made new men 4 Faith which cannot be kept where we go on in sinne against conscience 1. Tim. 1.19 Fight the good fight hauing faith and good conscience vvhich being put avvay some haue made shipvvracke of faith 5 The excellency of good workes because thorow Christ they are that worship which pleaseth God or sacrifices of thankesgiuing seasoned with faith as it were with salt kindled with the holy Ghost as it were with fire from heauen and sanctified by the merit of Christ and accepted of God thorow Christ 1. Pet. 2.5 6 Our owne dignitie For being iustified wee are the sonnes of God the holy Temple of GOD Kings and Priestes annoynted of the holy Ghost wherewith being clothed wee ought to publish the righteousnesse of God in thought word and deed and the prayses of God by confession 7 The promises of Gods blessings as well corporall as spirituall Leuit. 26.34 a Deut. 28. Esa 1.19 If ye vvill vvalke in my precepts I vvill giue you raine in due season and the free reward of our patience and obedience toward God as Moses Heb. 11.26 is said to haue respect to the recompence of revvard because 1. Timoth. 4.8 Godlinesse hath the promises of this life and that vvhich is to come 8 The good that comes by them for wee must doe good workes to further our neighbour by our godlinesse to glorifie GOD and to stoppe the mouth of the aduersaries b Luk 6.7 1 Pet. 2.12 14. c. Titus 2.8 9 That by the fruits of faith wee may be made more certaine of our election and vocation and being made new creatures may nourish in our selues the hope of life eternall 2. Peter 1.10 Iames. 2.17 Why must we auoid euill workes 1 Because they displease God Psalm 5.5 Thou art not a God that delightest in iniquitie neyther shall the vvicked dvvell vvith thee and they prouoke him to anger thou hatest all those which vvorke vvickednesse verse 6. 2 They doe dishonour the profession of the Gospell and the glorie of God Rom. 2 24. For your sakes is the name of God euill spoken of among the Gentiles as Nathan saith to Dauid 2. Sam. 12.14 Thou hast caused the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme by this meanes 3 Because they draw downe vpon vs punishments both publike and priuate warres famine pestilence c. Deut. 28.15 c. If thou vvilt not heare the voyce of the Lord thy God Leuit. 26.3 14. c. thou shalt be cursed vvhen thou goest forth into the field c. Againe Thou doest chastice the sonnes of men for their iniquities Psal 90.8 4 Because there followeth the tyrannie of Sathan into whose power the reprobate are deliuered vp in whose snares they are taken captiues and doe his whole pleasure 2. Tim. 3.26 5 Because by ill doing all spirituall exercises are hindred faith is weakened the conscience wounded calling one God disturbed and ceased the holy ghost greeued Ephes 4.30 do not ye greeue that holy spirit of God wherewith ye are sealed 6 They deserue eternall damnation as Paule witnesseth they that doe such thinges haue noe parte in the kingdome of god neither shall they possesse it Galat. 5.21 1. Cor. 6.10 Are good workes necessarie to saluation The question is ambiguous for if it be taken in this sense that our good workes are so necessarie to saluation that they are the cause or merite of righteousnesse saluation and life eternall it is false But if it be vnderstood that new obedience is necessarie so as it be a duety which we owe and an effect necessarily following reconciliation it is true 2 Because god will saue noe man without repentance and the gift of the holy ghost is necessarie to life
seruants of God and 8.2 Christ hath set mee free from the law of sinne and death The other whereby wee shall bee wholy redeemed into full and perfect libertie a Epb 1 14. And this is called the redemption of liberty that is freedome of libertie or of deliuerance And Rom. 8.21 The glorious libertie of the sonnes of God b Luk. 21.28 And the redemption of our bodies Rom. 8.23 Wee may tearme that onely begun this perfect For though wee be made free by the first kinde of liberty yet in some part we are held in some slauerie by the power of sinne so as wee cannot doe that we would c Gal. 5.17 And the seruitude of corruption yea euen death it selfe doth hold vs fettered in her chaines vntill that day of redemption d Eph. 4.30 when Christ shall by his power set vs free being redeemed by himselfe For wee are onely saued by hope Rom. 8.24 and 1. Iohn 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God free indeed e Mat 5.17.25 but it hath not yet appeared what we shall be but wee knowe that when he shall appeare wee shall bee like vnto him euen as he is Like vnto this shall that our deliuerance be or the restauration of the creature not of the Angels or of euery particuler man but of the frame of the heauens and of the elements whereby it shal be deliuered from the bondage of corruption whereunto now it is subiect into the libertie of the glorie of the sonnes of god that is into that happy estate of incorruption which shal be made manifest when the sonnes of God shal be exalted into glorie For there shal be new heauens and a new earth 2. Pet. 3.13 f 2 pet 3.21 Ro. 8 19.20 21 now in this place we doe especially speake of the first kinde of libertie What is christian libertie It is a spirituall liberty whereby we that truely beleeue are freed and sett at libertie by the bloud of Christ from the slauery of sinne and the tiranny of the deuill 2 From the accusation burthen and curse of the lawe the weight of Gods anger Damnation and eternall death 3 And being indued with the spirit of adoption of libertie illumination we are deliuered from the vaile of the heart that is from the miserable blindenes of error and the bondage of darknesse which was brought vpon vs by Adams sinne lastly from the yoke of the ceremonies of the law of meates drink daies of apparrell of the bodie and from such necessary obseruing of dâ—fference in thinges indifferent and so from all humane traditions to the end that wee might willingly and cheerefully as well in soule as in body serue God in righteousnesse and holinesse all the daies of our life Rom. 4.12.13.14 a 1. Cor. 9.27 Gal 3.45 Tit. 2.11 12 VVhat is the cause of this libertie The chiefe efficient cause is god the meritorious is Christ alone the deliuerer as Ioh. 8.36 It is expressly said If the sonne make you free you shal be free indeed And. Gal. 5.1 stand fast in that libertie whereby christ hath made you free For he hath purchased this libertie for vs with his owne pretious bloud b Col. 1.14 1. Pet. 1.18 The cooperator is the holy Ghost 2. Cor. 3.17 where the spirit of the Lorde is there is libertie who is also both the earnest and witnesser of the same There be two instrumentall causes namely the trueth or the gospell wherein this libertie is propounded Ier. 34.15 Behold I preach libertie Iohn 8.32 yee shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free And faith whereby it is imbraced Rom. 5.2 By faith are we brought into this grace wherein we stand the subiect is euery one that beleeueth whether Grecian or Iew whether male or female whether bond or free 1. Cor. 7.22 c Gal. 3.28 The manner or forme of this spirituall liberty is not perceiued by the sence of man but it is wrought secretly whilest that the soules of the faithfull are besprinkled and washed in the bloude of the sonne of God and are reformed by the holy ghost and their consciences purified by faith from dead workes to serue the liuing god Heb. 9.14 By which meanes it commeth to passe that this liberty wheresoeuer it is hath these accidents or properties righteousnesse peace a good conscience and ioy in the holy ghost a Rom. 14.17 1. Ti. 3.3 And therefore Ioseph inioyeth this liberty although a slaue and bound in prison b Gen. 39 20.21 Daniell sitting amongst the lions c Dan. 6.17 23. Lazarus full of botches and boiles d Luk. 16.20 22. In what thinges doth it consist or how manie partes hath it or how manie degrees be there of this libertie Foure 1. The first is a deliuerance from sinne and death which is wrought by the remission of sinne that it be not imputed by the mortifieng of the flesh least it preuaile and by freeing vs from the second death according to the saying of Paule Rom. 8 1.2 there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ For the law of the spirit of life which is in Christ Iesus that is the spirit of Christ or the grace of regeneration hath freed me from the lawe the authority and force of sinne and death and therefore this is called the libertie of righteousnesse d Col 1 14 Heb. 9.15 and of life and the remission of sinnes e Eph. 1.7 and transgressionsg. the lawe of the spirit of life that is Christs holinesse inherent in Christe which is in Christ Iesus himselfe hath freed me from the lawe of sinne and of death How are we said to be freed from sinne seing it doth alwaies dwell in vs and. Iohn 1.8 If ye say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs We must distinguish betweene sinne raigning and sinn subdued Rom. 6 6. c. so also betweene the matter and the forme of sinne For we are freed from the raigning and dominion of sinne which dwelleth in vs also from the forme or the guilt of sinne whereupon is that 1. Iohn 3.6 we reade whosoeuer abideth in him sinneth not that is greedily with desire to obey it slavishly and without all resisting of it a that is to say he that is truly partaker of Christ doth not giue himselfe ouer to sinne Againe verse the. 9. euery one that is borne of god sinneth not that is he doth not sinne with full purpose And we do not deny that sinne is in the faithfull or dwelleth in them but that it raigneth not b Rom. 6 12 And touching the guilte Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen and whose sinnes are couered blessed is the man vnto whome the Lord imputeth no sinne But of sinne subdued and the matter of it Eccle. 7.20 it is written there is no man iust vpon earth which doth good and sinneth not VVhat is the vse ef this part
end to another What is the proper end of Election The remote and farthest end in respect of God that electeth is his glory or praise and the declaring of his mercie Rom. 9.23 That he might make knowne the riches that is exceeding greatnesse of hss glory toward the vessels of mercie which hee hath prepared vnto glory Eph. 1.9 Hee hath elected vs to the praise of the glory of his grace wherewith hee hath made vs freely accepted in his beloued And verse 11. That wee shovld bee vnto the prayse of his glorie But in regard of vs that is nigh at hand or successiue that wee should be holy Ephes 1.4 and 2.10 Wee are his workemanship created vnto good workes which God hath ordained thst wee should walke in them And Rom. 8.29 That we might be made like to the image of God The last is our Saluation Life and Glorification a Col. 1.12.13 1 Thes 13.14 Act. 13.48 Rom. 9.23 VVhat are the markes of Election There are many markes whereof true faith in Christ effectuall through Charitie is the spring whereby a spirituall life is certainely discerned and thereby our Election is perceiued as the life of the body is by sense and motion VVhat is Reprobation A certaine execution of Gods will in casting off and refusing them which are predestinate vnto death Or it is a Predestination wherby God froÌ„ the beginning without any iniustice hath determined not to haue mercie on some that were corrupted in Adam and in his eternal iudgment to adiudge them vnto death for their sins being left to theÌ„selues that in these as in the vessels of shame appointed to destruction which is spoken not in respect of the euent but of the purpose for that the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not only declare the euent but the scope and purpose hee might make knowne the glory both of his iustice and power a Exod. 9.16 Pro. 16.4 The Lord hath made all things for himselfe yea euen the wicked for the day of euill b Rom. 9.17 21.22 1. Pet. 7.8 Iudith 4 Apoc. 17.8 20.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What is the efficient cause of Reprobation God who as he hath elected vs according to the good pleasure of his will so hath hee reiected the reprobate according to his iust will or purpose which in order goeth before all for as hee taketh mercie on vvhom he vvill so vvhom hee vvill hee hardeneth For the same verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not otherwise to bee expounded either in the former or latter part of the sentence but because contraries are the consequents of contraries if it bee godly and truely spoken of God which no man denieth he hath mercie on vvhom hee vvill haue mercie Exod. 33.19 without doubt Paul spake truely and godly but vvhom he vvill he hardeneth And Ephes 1.11 God doth all things after the purpose of his will The word of Election doth approue the very same thing For in whose power it is to elect some in his power also it is not to elect others but to passe by them or to reiect them for neyther can the Election of some be granted without a reiection or neglecting nor a reiection or neglecting without the election of others And whereas it is said Ezech. 18.23 I will not the death of a sinner but that he returne from his waies and liue It appeareth to be an indefinite Proposition which differeth very much from an vniuersall and is to be restrained to them to whom is giuen the grace of repentance Which also Christ saith Matth. 23.37 Hovv often vvould I haue gathered thy sonnes and thou vvouldest not hee speaketh of the outward ministerie and as farre as he himselfe was generally promised for the saluation of this nation and as he was also carefull of it in speciall Are not some sinnes as Incredulitie c. the causes of the Decree vvhy some one is reiected No for if sinnes were the cause of Reprobation there should not one be elected because God hath foreseene that all men are sinners But onely the purpose and will of God which in euery worke of his is both iust and the onely rule of all iustice Therfore can it neither bee iustly blamed or accused by vs. a. For in these sayings Ioh 3.18 Hee that beleeueth not is iudged already And 16.9 The holy Ghost shall reprooue the vvorld of sinne because they beleeue not in me And Mark 16.16 He that hath not beleeued shall bee condemned Christ hath not appointed incredulitie the cause of the decree of reprobation but of execution thereof or of condemnation and iudgement Is not God tainted vvith the note of iniustice if his vvill only be determined the cause of Reprobation In no sort for when we entreat of this supreme will of God which ordaineth the causes of all things we must not say there must haue beâ—ne somewhat iust before God willed it but contrarie God must first haue willed somewhat before it could be iust For so is the will of God the principall rule of iustice that whatsoeuer he will ought to be accompted iust euen because it is his will but there is a deeper reason of Gods iustice then that it can be measured by any meanes of man Rom. 11.13 Rom. 5.20.21 or can be comprehended by the slendernesse of mans witb. And as he hath chiefe and free power by his proper right ouer all creatures So likewise ouer man as the potter ouer the clayc. That neither God should haue bene vniust if he predestinated none to saluation seeing he is debtor to no man and we are all borne the sonnes of wrath 2 Betweene the decree of that secret and vnblameable will of God in reiecting some and the corruption of mankind which is the true and first originall of the condemnation of the reprobate the will of the first man commeth which being created good of it owne accord corrupted it selfe and thereupon made open passage for the iust iudgment of God to destroy them to whome he vouchafeth not his mercie Moreouer although no man be condemned but whome the Lord hath reiected yet no man is condemned but he that is for certaine found to haue in himselfe iust causes of damnation Therfore it is manifest that this decree is most iust by the meanes and degrees as wel generall as special wherby the Reprobate in going on are the cause of most iust condeÌ„nation to theÌ„selues so as they can accuse none but themselues For there is one cause of Reprobation and an other of the condemnation of man albeit then that sinnes are not the causes of reprobation which was from the beginning but the iust will of God is the cause yet are they the cause of the damnation which will follow in the last time Neyther are the Reprobate condemned simply for their reprobation but for their impietie and incredulity that is that decree of God is not the cause of the damnation to them that
the order of Application Analyticall namely that euery one who seeketh the declaration of his election should not begin at that most excellent degree that is at the verie secret purpose of God without Christ and the voice of the gospell crying out in the Church for so will it fall out that he cannot at all endure that immensurable right of God in a contrarie course but let him so begin at the lowest degrees as at the effects namely let him make his beginning at the calling through Christ the hearing of him according as Rom. 8.30 Those whom he hath elected he hath called so he may by little and little come to that principall part of our saluation where at last hauing found a firme and substantiall remedie against all tempests he may rest as it were in harbour in this wise Let him search diligētly if he heare the word of God with a good heart and therewith be well affected both to God-ward and toward his neighbour for this is an effect of Regeneration and Sanctification from thence to faith whether he feele himselfe to be in Christ by faith or whether he doth beleeue on Christ From faith to iustification from iustification let him go on to effectuall calling By which graces of God if they be in vs euery faithfull man may most assuredly iudge of his owne election a Iohn 1.12 Eph. 1. v 4 5 1. Pet. 1.20 21.22.23 For sense and motion are not more certaine proofes of an animall life then Faith Hope Charitie are arguments of our election Besides in the childrē of God there is a singuler testimony of the holy Ghost testifying to our spirit that we are the sons of God by which spirit vve crie boldly Abba Father Rom. 8. ver 14.15 Gal. 4.6 But if sonnes then heires vvith God and fellovv heires vvith Christ and so from the last to the first praedestinate to life Hereunto belong also certaine outward things as annexed to them viz. harkening to the word of God and signing of the Sacraments whereto we attribute the second place But vvhat if any shall not as yet feele these effects of faith of the holy Ghost and of regeneration or shall feele them vveake shall he therefore make account that he is of the number of the reprobate or shall he despaire of his saluation By no means but let him rather flie to the word and will of God therein reuealed that by obeying it he may obtaine saluation a Rom. 10.8 14.15 1. Cor. 11.24.25 neyther ought any to despaire of the mercie of God as long as he doth not sinne against the holy ghost for some are effectually called of God later then others as that famous example of the thiefe hanging on the crosse sheweth b Luk. 23 40.41.42 Is there a certaine number as well of the Elect as of the Reprobate Surely with God there is but not with vs Iohn 13.18 I knovv whom I haue chosen 2. Tim. 2.19 the Lord knoweth who are his and by consequent who are not his But are there few that shall be saued Luke 13.23 or is there a greater number of the Elect then of the Reprobate Seeing there are few which find the way of life c Mat. 8.13 14. and it is but a fourth sort of them neither which receiue the word of God with an honest and pure heart surely the number of them is great if it be considered by it selfe But comparatiuely if the number of them that shall be saued be laid vnto the number of them that perish then surely Christ being Iudge the number of these is the greater d Math. 20.26 May the regenerate assuredly by faith make mention of their Election and may they glorie thereof in the Lord They may and ought so to doe 1 Because they shall glorie to the Lord that they are Christs chosen people and peculiers Isa 44.5 2 Those that are foreknowne predestinated and elected the same are called iustified and sanctified neither can they be seperated from the loue of God Rom. 8.29.30.31.35.38 3 Because God confirmeth annoynteth and sealeth vs with others partakers of the faith into Christ through the holy Ghost 4 Because the sonne casteth forth none that are his Iohn 6.31 Nor suffereth one sheepe to bee taken from him Iohn 10.28 5 Because wee must certainely and constantly beleeue in God the father in Iesus Christ and in the holy ghost that there is a holy Catholicke Church a communion of Saints that our sinnes are forgiuen vs through Iesus Christ and for his sake and that the raysing vp againe of the flesh and life euerlasting is assuredly promised 6 Because Gods decree cannot bee made voide Hence our comfort is 1. Iohn 3.14 We know that we are translated from death to life and vers 21. If our heart condemne vs not we haue boldnesse with God And chap. 5.19.20 We know that we are of God vve knovv that the sonne of God is come and hath giuen vs a minde to know him which is true May the Elect perish No neyther be seduced finally Mat. 24.24 I Because they are the blessed of the Father for whome is prepared the kingdome before the foundations of the world were laid Mat. 25.34 2 And it is the fathers will that they which are giuen to the son perish not Ioh. 6.39 3 They are committed to the sonne Ioh. 17.12 4 They are kept by the power of GOD through faith 1. Pet. 1.5 5 And to them is giuen faith and perseuerance to the end Act. 13.48 Phil. 1.6 6 Last of all Gods purpose is vnchangeable But many seeme possible to he blotted out of the booke of life by the place in Exod. 32.32 Blot me out of the booke of life and Psal 69.29 Let them be blotted out of the Booke of life It is the fallacie of a figure of speech For Moses saying is partly Hyperbolicall and Exstaticall of a minde onely bent vpon saluation of the chosen people partly hypotheticall namely if it might be possible as is that speach of Paule Rom. 9.3 I vvould vvish my selfe to be separate from Christ for my brethrens sake Such accompt did they make of the glorie of God and such was their loue towards their brethren And Psalm 69. the Prophet by speaking figuratiuely doth desire nothing but that Hypocrites who seemed in the errour of themselues and others the sonnes of the kingdome and are called the vnwritten might bee manifested that they belong not to the companie of the elect and therefore he addeth Let them not bee vvritten with the iust Of whom 1. Iohn 2.19 They went from among vs but they vvere not of vs For had they beene of vs they vvould in like sorte haue remayned vvith vs but this came to passe that it might appeare that all are not of vs. But vvhat doth it follovv of the doctrine of praedestination that it skilleth not hovv any man liue seeing the elect can no more fall avvay vvhatsoeuer they doe neither can
b 2 Cor. 1 10.11 4.14 2 The soules new birth which is when wee rise ftom sinne that wee may liue vnto righteousnesse which is also called a Repentance and spirituall Resurrection Whereof Paule If ye bee risen vvith Christ seeke those things that are aboue Colloss 3.1 and Reuellat 20.5 It is called The first Resurrection vvherein they that haue their part the second death shall haue no power ouer them verse 6. to which there is a later Reuel 20.13 which is called The resurrection of the flesh and is also called of Christ a new birth Mathew 19.28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby all the Elect indeed shall beginne to liue a newe life and by Analogie an awakening or raysing vp chap. 27.53 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Greeke word that signifieth to raise vp or to awaken whereof heere we must entreate What is resurrection It is the restoring of the same humane bodie to life in the same substance taking away the mortality which by the mighty power of God shall be in the last day to the glorie of God Or It is a certaine new birth or second vnion and insoluble coupling of humane bodies and soules which before by death were seuered one from another as death being ouercome men in all points made immortall may be preserued and may liue for euer some in glory some in paine after the course of their life before led Hovv manifold is Resurrection Twofold Generall or finall which none shall escape which is reserued vntill the last day a Iob 15 12 which we confesse in the Creed I beleeue the Resurrection of the flesh Particuler or going before whereof there are singuler examples in the Scriptures both of the Old and New Testament As 1. Of the widowes sonne of Sarepta raised vp of Elias b 1 Kings 17 22 2 of the Shunamitih womans sonne which Elizaus raised vp c 2 Kâ—ngs 4 33 3 Of a certaine man at the touching of Elizaeus bones lying in the Sepulchre d Cap. 13 21 4 Of Iairus daughter e Math 9 25 5 Of the onely sonne of a widow in Naim f Luk 7 15 6 Of Lazarus the Bethanian g, Ioh. 11 43 7 Of Christ himselfe which obtaineth the chiefe place h, Math 28 6 8 Of some Saints whose Sepulchres though when the stones cleft at the death of Christ they were opened yet they went out of their graues after Christs resurrection 1. Not that they might conuerse amongst men any more to die againe as Lazarus and others but rather that they might accompanie Christ into life eternall by whose power they had risen that they might be vndoubted testimonies of Christs quickening power i Math 27 52 53. 9 Of Tabitha the woman of Ioppa at the word of Peter k, Act 9 40 10 Of Eutychus railed by Paule l Cap 20 10 May the generall Resurrection be declared by Phylosophicall arguments No for to the Philosophers it alwaies seemed ridiculous strange and hard to be beleeued m Act. 17 18 20 and to Festus the President madnes n cap. 26 24 2 Because if we consider the efficient cause and meanes it is a supernatural action which exceedeth the whole power of nature Neyther are the principles thereof first and by themselues knowne in nature 4 And those things which are beleeued cannot be knowne by nature for faith is the euidence of things not seene Hebr. 11.1 Lib. de Resur carnis Whereupon Tertullian saith The hope of Christians is the ResurrectioÌ„ of the dead Moreouer there are many arguments effectual apparantly enough But if they be diligently sifted they are probable argumeÌ„ts onely and not necessarie if we consider naturall things On what foundations then doth the faith of the Resurrection consist 1 On the wil of God that is in the will of god laid open in the wâ—itten word or on the infallible immoouable certainty of the whole Scripture albeit common sense reason nature likewise be altogether contrarie therunto that is by the manifest testimonies of Scripture such as among many other these are 1 Gen. 3.15 The seede of the woman shall bruise the serpents head that is shall destroy the works of the diuell 1. Iohn 3.8 And therefore shall abolish sinne and the wages of sinne which is death which could not be if the dead were not raised vp 2 Iob. 19.25 I know that my Redeemer liueth and he shall stand on the earth in the last day and though after my skinne wormes destroy this bodie yet shall I see God in flesh whom I my selfe shall see and mine eyes shall behold and none other for me that is I my selfe shall rise againe in the qualitie of my person and in the veritie of eyther substance 3 Esay 26.19 Thy dead shall liue and thy slaine shall rise againe c 4 Ezech. 37.12 Behold my people I wil open your graues and cause you to come out of your Sepulchers and will put my spirit in you and ye shall liue for although figuratiuely vnder the resemblance of the resurrection he describeth the restoring of the people out of the habitacles of captiuitie yet euen thereby doth hee prooue the Resurrection For that must needs first bee to it selfe that is compared to another For a similitude of that vvhich it vvast and idle fitteth not a parable of no bodie doth not accord of nothing there is no metaphor and allegorie saith Tertullian 3 Dan. 12.2 Many of of them that sleepe in the dust of the earth shall awake some to euerlasting life and some to shame and perpetuall contempt that is All indeed shall rise but many of them to life many to eternall death or the Prophet speaketh so because all of vs shall not die but wee shall bee all changâ—d But Christ that is priuie to the will of God and the interpreter thereof prooueth it by a firme argument Math. 22.32 That God was not as though they now were not but is euen yet and for euer the God of Abraham Isaacke and Iacob and that truly of the whole person not of the one part thereof viz. the soule onely for so doth he assure those that are his that we will saue both bodie and soule and will not giue them an halfe but a full and perfect saluation Therefore doe they liue and God hath care ouer them and they shall liue For though God be not the God of the dead according to the Sadduces argument who thought that their bodies should neuer rise againe because he cannot be called a God in respect of them who neither are nor euer shall be yet God is Lord ouer the dead Rom. 14.9 according to the argument of Paule namely for that dead bodies are not quite brought to nothing And Christ in his due time shall quicken them againe for euer being ioyned againe to their soules that he may be true in the couenant made with those Fathers For how are they happie saith
personal succession to be an absolute sure marke of the church by the church they vnderstaÌ„d the pastors only and they cal it heresie to referre the name of the church to the number of the faithfull contrary to the saing of Christ super hanc petram i. vpon my selfe will I build my church contrary to the article of our creede which commaunds vs to beleeue the catholike church 5 which make the word of God subiect to the church and not the church subiect to the word of God 6 which make the doctrine and precepts of men the foundation vpon the which the church is built 7. which place the vnity of the church not in faith not in spirit but in the vse and similitude of such ceremonies and which teach that multitude visibility perpetuity antiquity and such like for the marke of the true church 3 The Romane clergie or that rabblement of Monks and Priests which depraue the naturall sence and meaning of the scripture and doe in very deede deny the office of Christ while they doe attribute to the worke of their owne or other that the most proper and peculier vnto Christ and their sectes whereof some are named after one teacher some after another whose rule they haue made choise of to follow and to liue thereafter 4 The assembly of all infidels which doe persecute and reiect the doctrine of the prophets and Apostles and Christ himselfe 5 The error of those men that are of opinion that euery one shal be saued in his owne religion when without that one alone catholicke church their is no saluation 6 Of the Academicks which haue brought into the church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incomprehensibility 7 Of the Platonicks which make the church to be altogether inuisible and on the contrary of them that thinke the church is and hath alwaies bin visible on earth 8 Of donatists Anabaptists and schismaticks which because of the wicked make a departure from the true church in which the true gospell is preached and the sacraments rightly administred which asmuch as in them lyeth deuide the vnity of Christs body breake the band of peace that is Charity wherewith Christ knits the church to himselfe these proudly contemne the church and indanger there owne saluation for he cannot haue any communion with Christ which will not haue communion with the church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 schisme not such whereat a wicked vnity is deuided like as the vnitie of the Iewes who hearing of Christ raised adissention among themselues whereby their vnity brake and was deuided a Iohn â— 16 10.9 neither such by which good Men seperate themselues from wicked men but factions whereby the society of the faithfull is deuided into contrary partes and studies as when the Corinthians were deuided into partes b 1 Cor. 10 11.12 3 3 either when they did disagre one from the other not onely in opinion and will but in the verie communitie of holy things and in rites and customes so that one anothers community and fellowship they auoided as damnable an heresie declares properly some certaine faction and sect about doctrine e Act. 5.37 and so heretickes are called which in such sort depart from the true and sound doctrine that contemning the judgement of God and the iudgement of the Church continue in their opinions and violate the concord and agreement of the Church 10 The contempt of Ecclesiasticall assemblies namely of them which seeme vnto themselues to knowe all things or which keepe themselues busied at home or which misliking the meanenesse of the preachers person or finding some other occasion of absence neglect Sermons or which for feare of the crosse or for the fauour of great men or of their friends contemne and set light by them Also the abuse of those men which either through some foolish deuotion or accustomed ostentation or to beguile the tediousnes of time frequent holy assemblyes either seldome or at them trifle the time away or let their minde raunge abroad or else after they haue heard a word or two depart out or in a word they heare indeed Sermos but yet liue wickedly The two and fortieth common Place Of the Ministerie VVhence comes this word Ministerie OF the Lattin word Ministre to minister or ferue The greeke name for Ministery is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying dust wheÌ„ce is this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to serue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to minister 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Minister 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or seruant who labours til he be as of a dusty sweat a Math. 20 26.27 hence is it that in the new Testament this word is takeÌ„ for any person labouring b Rom. 16 11. painfully earnestly in any seruice c Rom. 13.4 for the common-wealth family or Church d Mat. 22 15 And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is all one with this word Ministerie signifiing both the office of e Act. 6.4 2 Cor. 6 3 Ephe. 4.12 â—eaching and also the performance of any Ecclesiasticall function There are diuersities of Ministeries but the same Lord. 1. Cor. 16. Not vnlike to this is the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Liturgia comming of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to doe minister or doe ones duety so it is vsed Acts. 13 2. f 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whilest they ministred that is as Chrisostome expounds it preached not sacrificed except as the words Liturgia and sacrifice are vsed for the publick functions of the Church As Phil. 2 17. Though I be offered vp vpon the sacrifice and seruice of your faith And for this cause the Fathers called the Lords Supper a Liturgy and Sacrifice whence came that execrable errour of such as will haue the sonne of God daily in the Church to bee offered and sacrificed Hence also was it that publick officers both g Rom. 15.16 ministers and Magistrates were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministers and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 DeacoÌ„s Rom. 13.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yea Heb. 1.7 Angells are called Ministers and ministring spirits Hence also was the publick seruice of the Church called a Leiturgie as Luk. 1.23 Yea and the verie execution of that seruice was so called as if a man should haue giuen that name to the Leuiticall sacrifices Heb. 10.11 euery high Priest standeth daily to Minister So that this action of his were it of preaching 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or performing holy mysteries might be called a Liturgie Furthermore this name of Liturgie Oblation and sacrifice began to bee giuen Metaphorically to Almes h Rom. 15.27 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Gentiles ought to Minister carnall things to the Saints at Ierusalem By the like reason all Christians may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministers as Paul called Epaphroditus Phil. 2.25 To conclude in the Ecclesiasticall storie certain formes of seruice at the Church were called Liturgies as
of the Couenant whereby God doth testifie that he doth truely receiue the beleeuers into his Couenant How doe the Sacraments of the old and new Testament differ 1. By outward adiuncts and the circumstance of time For those continued vntill the time of Restitution for those things are said to bee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 right which passe not with a certaine crooked turning course but are directed straight vnto their marke but these must endure vntill the end of the world or vntill the state of glorie in which all trueth shall clearely and perfectly bee made manifest and therefore there shall bee no neede of Sacraments a Heb. 9.19 2. In the manner or condition of their signifying for the Sacraments of the old Testament foretold Christ as it were to come but the Newe declare him as it were exhibited And â—â—erefore they cannot possibly both stand together seeing the time to come can neuer bee the time past and the time past can neuer make the time to come to bee more ancient b Heb. 8.13 3. In the diuersitie or qualitie of the signes or in the signes and ceremonies which differ much for there bee some signes of the Olde and other of the Newe Testament 4. In the number measure of signifying vertue and easinesse 1 For ours saith Augustine are fewer in number whereas in the Old Testament the signes were more in number because the people of Israell were as yet vnder the gouernment of the Law and therefore as children vse to bee were kept vnder more figures and rites 2. Ours were better in regard of the profit 3. More excellent or manifest not in outward shew or worldly pompe but in the vnderstanding and signification of heauenly and diuine things 4. Ours are greater in force that is of greater efficacie to confirm our faith 5. More easie to bee done for there is nothing in Baptisme or the Supper of the Lord which is hard troublesome or bloudy But Circumcision and the Sacrifices were more troublesome bloudie and required greater paines Yet all this maketh not that our Sacraments and the sacraments of the ancient fathers should not be the same in substance What Doe not the Sacraments of the old Testament differ from ours in the effect because those did only shadowe forth and signifie grace which these offer present vnto vs No because in either testament there is the same grace of Christ yea the same Christ propounded And the Apostle testifieth that the old Fathers did eate the same spirituall meat with vs and drinke the same spirituall drink 1. Cor. 10.3 I say the same with vs not as some expound it only amongst themselues which is vnderstood by the purpose of the Apostle the tenour of the text the name of Christ and the word baptizing there vsed and receiued the seale of the righteousnesse which is of faith and therfore that they were made paâ—takers of Christ which is righteousnesse to all that beleeue in all ages Rom. 4.11 And yet I grant that the sacraments of the fathers were figures pictures and shadowes of ours not in regard of the things themselues but in as much as they shadowed things more darkly and obscurely signified by them a 1 Cor. 10.6 In which respect they may be called types of ours but types not without trueth Why then doth Paul say Gal. 4.9 that the Sacraments of the Fathers were weake and beggerly and carnall Elements which were not able to sanctifie the conscience because of their weaknesse and vnprofitablenesse Heb. 7.19 9.10 1. Because he speaketh of them not simply as that they were naked elements which could offer or seale no grace but in some respect as now abrogated by Christ 2. Hee speaketh of them as he saw them receiued of the Iewes seuered from Christ and his promise that is as they are considered in themselues and by themselues seuered from the things signified in cogitation and as bare signes because the sanctification dependeth not of the signes either old or new but wholie and only of the vertue of the holy Ghost Did the Fathers eate the flesh of Christ seeing that as yet it had no beeing actually and corporally in the nature of things Yes because although it was not extant simply or actually in regard of his bodily substance yet in some respect namely as it was to bee giuen for the life of the world it was that spirituall meat which might no lesse bee eaten of them then that Lambe which was slaine from the beginning of the world is eaten now of vs by faith b Reu. 13.8 2. Because Iesus Christ is the same to day yesterday for euer Heb. 13.8 one and the same Sauiour of both Testaments In whome alone it pleased the Father to gather together all things Ephe. 1.10 3. Because those Fathers were indued with faith which maketh those things to be which are hoped for and doth demonstrate those things which are not seene Heb. 11.1 And therefore although in those ancient times the humane nature was not assumed of the word yet it was preseÌ„t to the faith of the godly in former times which did conioyne them then with Christ that should be borne So that that which had no beeing as yet in the order of nature yet neuerthelesse had euer a being by the force and efficacie of faith Therefore Christ saith Abraham sawe my day and reioyced Ioh. 8 56. But they did eate the flesh of Christ which should be giuen for them wee eate it being alreadie giuen for vs. The times are changed saith Augustine but faith is not shall bee giuen and is giuen shall come and is come in Ioh tract 4 these words differ saith hee but yet Christ is one and the same Doe the Sacraments giue remission of sins and doe they conferre or containe grace and are they ordained to iustifie and to regenerate or whether is grace tyed to the Sacraments No. 1. Because they are the signes not the causes of grace 2. That which is proper to God ought not to be bestowed on the creature 3. The subiect of grace is not the body but the spirit 4. No bodilie thing doth worke vpon spirituall things Againe not by the work done or as an efficient cause by them selues or their owne vertue working any thing or flowing from their essence as they speake in the schooles but ministerially or Instrumentally yet effectually so farre forth as they support nourish our faith Not by any inward power or vertue of their owne but by vertue of the principall agent or worker in that sence that Paul affirmeth the Gospel to be the vertue and power of God to saluation to euery one that beleeueth Rom. 1.16 1. Tim. 4.16 he saith that the remedie of the holy Scripture doth saue a man not that there is any magicall vertue in the letters syllables or sound of the words for the Apostle saith Heb. 4.2 The word profited not them beeing not mingled with faith but because
so would Christ bee baptised that hee might begin a new the ministerie of the Gospell as being ordained and confirmed by the publicke testimonie of the whole Deitie for the voyce of the eternall father sounding from heauen was in steed of a trumpet the oyle was the Spirit of God descending like a Doue couering Christ with his wings and resting on him Also the fathers report of Christ Math. 3.1 This is my beloued sonne in whom I am well pleased fitly agreeth with the inscription which was written vpon the fillet that was set on the high Priest his head Holinesse to the Lord. Exod. 28.36.38 When Paule saith 1. Cor. 15.19 What shall they doe which are baptised for the dead if the dead are not raised Doth he either meane that the dead are to be baptised which custome dured a long time as appeereth by the Carthaginian Councill or that they are to be sprinckled with running water hallowed as the Papists collect from hence or that baptisme doth profit the dead as the papists say Masse for the dead and sprinckle holy water vpon their graues or to baptise any man liuing for one man that died vnbaptised as the Marcionites did whose peruerse course Tertullian noteth as also they say the Iewes had a custome that if any man died before he enioyed the legall washing whereof mention is made Num. 19.12 That then his next kinred should be besprinkled by the priests in their steed or that baptisme was purposely deferred till the houre of death or that being readie to die and now lying on their death-beds for which custome thy were called Clinickes they were then baptised or lastly must they watch lye vpon the earth fast pray voluntarily whip themselues for the soules of the dead that are in Purgatorie and to satisfie for their sinnes as the Papists say None of all these for all these expositions come by ignorance of a fallation called Figura dictionis the figure or phrase of speech For neither doth the proposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signify in stead nor may we thinke that those superstitions or afflictions for the dead Clinici nor that custome of the Clinicks was in vse in the time of the Apostles but yet Epiphanius saith they were in vse a while after that any man after they had been endewed with the knowledge faith of Christ should yet neuerthelesse eyther for feare or for some other cause deferre their baptisme vntill they were readie to die and then require it giuing then first their names both vnto Christ and his Church least they should depart out of this life without that publike testimonie of their saluation which the Lord had appointed all beleeuers to be furnished with Heereunto also was annexed this superstition that some purposely deferred their baptisme till the houre of death least after the receiuing of it they should fall againe into sinne but it is not likely that this was in Pauls time for if it had he would sure haue manifested the superstition which cleaued vnto the same But he heere alludeth vnto a most ancient custome of certaine Churches who were wont to be baptised eyther vpon the dead carcasses of the dead in their graues or vpon the Tombes or bones of the dead to the end they might professe that they did both die vnto sinne with Christ were readie to die for Christ and also beleeued the resurrection of the dead which exposition is indeed most simple and doth not straine the Apostles words for the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth properly a mans carkase and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with a Genitiue case vpon to note a place is verie vsuall with the Greekes Or it declareth the end as Theophilact will haue it namely that they which are baptised as dead men may be baptised for dead men that sinne may be quenched or die in them or else in a sure hope of resurrection and that they may haue a remedie against death Seeing that baptisme is the signe of the remission of sins of regeneration and of the resurrection or lastly it noteth the custome of the Iewes in washing those which had touched a Num 19.12 Ecius 34.10 a dead body or the dead bodies themselues which latter custome we read that the Christians retained at the first as also the custome of the Gentiles in washing and annoynting their dead in their burials b Act. 9.37 The first did it in hope of the resurrection to come but these in a false Imitation ambition superstition and vaine diligence towards the dead But note the Lord remembereth that custome not that he may approoue it though hee refute it not but that hee might confute them by their owne proper rite or acte wherewith they testifyed the hope of their resurrection Therefore hee faith not Why are wee to wit true Christians Baptised ouer the dead but discerning the superstitious from the faithful but what shall they doe Are also things without sense as Bells and such like to be baptised In no wise for we doe not read that Baptisme was ordained saue onely for men for whose sake also Christ was made man and died Secondly because the Sacrament of Regeneration pertaineth onely to them that are capable of Regeneration but the sacrament belōgeth not to those things vnto which the righteousnes of faith agreeth not But baptisme in the presēce of God-fathers and the giuing of a mans name vnto a Bell and that in the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost so taking Gods name in vaine suteth as well with a Bell as with an Oxe or an Asse Who are partakers of the thing signified in Baptisme Onely the Elect and beleeuers who are the sonnes of God by adoption and brethren and fellow heires of Iesus Christ because this condition is added vnto all Christs gifts to be partakers of them If we beleeue And of those onely it is said But yeare washed sanctifyed and iustifyed in the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our God 1. Cor. 6.11 Shall we count it Superstition or Religion in Constantine the great for that he rather wished to be baptised in the riuer Iordan where our Sauiour was baptised then any where else and refused to be baptised till hee was 65. yeares old and then being readie to die he would needs be baptised on the sodaine by Eusebius an Arrian Bishop of Nicomedia Tripart hist Lib. 3. c. 12 Eusebius leo vita Constāt l. 4 Superstition because the diuine institution and the thing signified and not the place doe commend baptisme but yet it is more fit that baptisme be administred in those places where the assemblies meete then in priuate houses both because the publicke prayers annexed vnto the administration of baptisme are not without fruit as also because it much concerneth that all the Church know who are the Saints fellow Citizens and of the houshold of God What time or day holy-day or working day is fitting for baptisme
of God which especially shined to the church in the time of Christ when as the Gentiles imbraced the preaching of the gospel concerning which Heb 13 15. 6. 56. 66 Let vs by Christ himselfe offer to God the sacrifice of praise 13 And whereas Daniell 12.11 saith that in the last times Antichrist raging a docilie sacrifice shal be offered that is to be meant either of the daily legall sacrifice which was interrupted in the time of Antiochus and afterwarde quite taken away in the destruction of Ierusalem as Chrisostome will haue it in the oration against the Iewes or metaphoricallie of the worship of God prescribed out of his worde to be taken away Antichrist possessing the worlde as Hierom will haue it vpon Daniel Chap. 12. 14 But although Melchisedech was a figure of Christ yet not in regarde of outward sacrifice whereof there is no mention made Gen. 14.18.19.20 neither in all that comparison of Christ with Melchisidech which the Apostle doth vnfold most accurately Heb. 7. But 1. because Melchisedech was a King and also a priest 2 Because the same Melchisedech as a Priest blessed AbrahaÌ„ that is he prayed for the grace and fauour of God to him saying blessed art thou Abraham of God most high 3 Because he is set forth vnto vs in the scripture without genealogy as though he were eternal 4 It is gathered that he was more excellent then Abraham his posterity by that that Abraham offered tithes vnto him Notwithstanding that we may graunt which is not spoken that Melchesedech before he entertained Abraham with a banquet returning with his seruants from the conquest tooke parte of the bread and of the wine and sacrificed that is oblation being made gaue thanks to God for the victorie and for the wholesome vse of bodily foode and for all other benifites which was the custome of the holy fathers and which also went forward from them to the Gentiles as Atheneus doth praise Homer because he describeth the Grecian Princes neuer to sit downe at the table or to depart without Sacrifice and praiers it doth not therefore follow that that thanksgiuing was a Sacrifice applyed for Abraham and his companie that it might merit for them remission of sins So in the Lords Supper there is made a most holy Sacrifice that is the bodie and bloud of the Lord being tasted wee giue thanks for spirituall nourishment and for so great victorie whereby Christ hath ouercome sinne and death for vs and hath made his conquest common vnto vs but this thanksgiuing doth not deserue for our selues or others remission of sins It doth much lesse follow that Christ in the Supper offered himselfe to God in the forme of bread and wine but onely in an argument Allegoricall it followeth that the bread and wine offered of Abraham were types of Christ who offereth himselfe to vs in the Supper to be receiued by a true faith In which sense the Fathers doe apply the type of Melchisedech to the Supper of the Lord. Which thing Lombard doth inough declare Melchisedech shewed the rite of this Sacrament b 4. Sentence distinct 8 when as he offered bread and wine to Abraham Lastly wheras the ancient fathers doe euerie where call the Eucharist a sacrifice they do it 1. For the blessing of the signes 2. Because in this mystery there is a commemoration of that onely sacrifice which was made for vs vpon the crosse and a certaine representation of it vnder the image of the Sacrament 3. Because it is an Eucharisticall sacrifice by reason of the solemne profession of faith praiers and especially of a peculiar giuing of thanks 4. Because in it we consecrate our selues wholy vnto God Ro. 12.2 5. Because in old time it was a custome that when the holy Supper was celebrated the faithfull did offer almes wherewith they might helpe the needie brethren which also is a kind of spirituall Sacrifice a Heb. 13.16 Distinct 2 Lombard saith Christ died once vpon the crosse and there Sacrificed in himselfe but he is daily offered in the Sacrament because in the Sacrament there is a remembrance of that which was done once b 4. senten And Distinct 13. It is called a Sacrifice as it were a holie thing done because by a mysticall prayer it is consecrated for vs in remembrance of the Lords passion Because in the celebration of Mysteries there hath beene alwaies a threefold oblatiâ—n obserued in the Christian Church one meere spirituall whereby euery one doth present himselfe before God with a contrite heart and endued with faith another visible euery one bringing something least he should appeare before God emptie Ex. 23.15 The third both of the bodie and of the bloud of the Lord himselfe whether are both the latter iustly taken away by our Churches Yea rather neither of both if they be rightly vnderstood is taken away but rather renued For although now almes are bestowed not as in times past whereby both the common feasts which they did call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loue feasts were furnished and also the ministers and the poore were helped and which serued for other necessarie vses of the Church which were wont to be laid either vpon a table or a cupbord made for that purpose which in the Canons which they call the Apostles Canons Canon 3. is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or an Altar and by solemne prayer vnto God consecrated to holy vses the bread wine first of al being set apart which they did blesse seuerally to the vse of the Sacrament yet notwithstanding the loue feast being now taken away according to the Precept of Paul If any man be hungry let him eate at home not in the Church 1. Cor. 11.34 and so by little and little things being so ordained in the Christian Church that wee neede not labour to seke goods wherewith Ecclesiasticall persons are nourished but rather wee must bee carefull that the wealth wherewith they do abound be bestowed in good vses It was not needefull to retaine in our Churches these kinds of offerings prescribed by no lawe in the word of God but it is better to take heede by what means both iust stipeÌ„ds may be paid to the ministers of the word and also that the poore of euery place may be prouided for and also that an eye may be had to setting vp of schools and to nourishing of poore schollers to maintaine the buildings of Churches neither yet is the collection of priuate almes therefore to be neglected Therefore the offering of the vnbloudie sacrifyce doth remaine among vs sound whether you regard the blessing it selfe of the signes that is the rehearsing and explication of the Lords institution ioyned with prayers wherby after a sort the passion it selfe of the sonne as Cyprian speaketh is offered to God the Father and the whole Church shewing the death of Christ after a sort doth sacrifice and vowe it selfe to God whether by name of a sacrifice you
vnderstand the solemne profession of the Christian faith or finally the giuing of thankes and bestowing of almes What is it to Take Amongst the Euangelists it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is properly vndrestoode of the hand from whence also euery thing whereby a thing is taken as the handle of a cuppe the eare of a pot the hilt of a weapon is called of the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Neither is it like to be true neither can it be gathered out of the historie of the institution of the Lords Supper nor by the maner of the sitting of Christ and of his Apostles at meat that Christ in the first Supper put bread into euery Apostles mouth For Io. 13 23. Iohn is said in the last Supper to haue leaned of Iesus bosome namely according to the manner of feasts of that time wherein in taking of meate they being stretched forth did leane vpon the ground or in an high chamber trimmed with beds as wee may reade Luk. 22.12 so that they did make as it were a certaine circle and the next did as it were leane vpon the former their heades alwaies within and their feete stretched out without 3. Moreouer the manner of taking both of me ate and drinke with the mouth not with the hand agreeth not to those of age and to the great ones that is to those which haue their wits exercised to discerne both good and euill a Heb. 5.14 such as it behoueth all them to bee as much as may be which are commaunded to examine themselues before they come to the Lords table but to Infants yet crying and which cannot discerne betweene their right hand and their left b Ionah 4.11 4. Furthermore that the word of Taking is to be vnderstood of the taking by the hand it is euident because otherwise there should bee a manifest Tautologie in the words of Christ when the taking of the mouth is necessarily vnderstoode out of the wordes by themselues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say Eate and Drinke 5. The practise also and vse of the ancient Church doth shewe the same whose example is extant in the worâ—s of Ambrose to Theodosius the great Emperour How wilt thou stretch out the hands from which innocent bloude doth yet drop How wilt thou take the holy body of the Lord with such hands Theodoreâ— hist Ecâ—lesiasticall bâ— 5 Chap. 8 with what rashnesse wilt thou take in thy mouth the cup of the pretious bloud since that by the furie of thy words so much bloud is vniustly shed Therefore it is a superstitious thing to forbid the communicants to take Eucharisticall bread or cup for the inner mouth is no more holie then the lips and hands Wherefore they which put in whole little morsels into the mouth not into the hands of the receiuers I caÌ„not tel with what reason they can deny that they are papisticall and do cherish the spawne of superstition amongst their people What is declared by this receiuing of bread and wine into the hands As true a spiritual sealing within vs by the instrument of faith both of Christ himselfe and also of his benefits necessarie to our saluation as there is a true and certaine receiuing of these signes into the hands of the takers What doth the bodilie eating and drinking of this bread and this wine and moreouer the conueying of it into our body signifie That Iesus Christ receiued by the instrument of faith by a Diuine vertue through the Couenant of a new league is so farre made ours that hee doth passe as it were into vs by an incomprehensible mysterie to seale vp spirituall life in vs and wee in like manner passe into him yet with this difference that in naturall eating and nourishment those things which we eate and drinke by the strength of naturall heate are changed into our substance that there may be a renewing of that which began to be consumed but in spiritual nourishing the bodie and bloud of Christ doe so nourish and renewe vs and make vs one bodie with Christ that they doe change vs but are not changed in vs because wee had neede and must bee conformed to Christ and made like to his Image Rom. 8.29 Phil. 3.10 Is the giuing of the signes and eating them with the mouth and the giuing and eating of the things signified one and the same in number and kinde No in no wise 1 For as there are two persons administring the Lords supper on of the pastor performing that which is done outwardly and without an other of Christ effecting by his holy spirit that which is done inwardly 2 And as the whole action of the Lords supper doth consist of two things one earthly corporall and to be perceiued by the senses themselues Another heauenly spiritual and to be vnderstood by a faithfull minde 3 And as there are two parts of a man whereof one is the body the other the soule so there are two diuerse giuings one to the body which is done by the minister and another to the minde performed by Christ And so many eatings that is to say one outward corporall orall naturall and sensible namely of sensible signes which also is called Sacramental which is done by the instrumeÌ„t of the mouth the other inwarde supernaturall of the things signified and to be perceiued with the eyes of faith which is called spirituall That first was instituted by Christ that it might be an expresse image of this spirituall eating and drinking This twofold eating Augustine acknowledged He which eateth within not without he which eateth in heart not which presseth with his tooth Tractat. 36. vppon Iohn b. 4. dist 1.9 And Lombard As there are two things of the sacrament so there are two waies of eating one sacramentall whereby the good and bad doe eat the other spirituall whereby onely the good doe eat For looke what those earthly gifts are to mans body the instruments thereof that are heauenly giftes to the soule the most excellent instrument thereof which is faith But earthly signes are laid hold vpon with the body and the instruments thereof that is to say sensibly and corporally therfore the celestial good things are receiued onely with the soule and with the instrumeÌ„t thereof that is to say by faith spirituallie and intellectuallie a Ioh. 6.35 froÌ„ whence also that may be gathered that the word manducandi that is of eating is taken concerning the partaking of the signes properly but concerning the participation of the bodie of Christ in a borrowed sence Seeing that the flesh of Christ is corporall is not the eating of it in the Supper also corporall Truely the flesh of Christ is corporall in respect that it is a bodie but it is not corporall by speaking properly in respect that it is meat for as much as our bodie is nourished neither with his flesh nor bloud as if it were foode for this corporall
temporall and brittle life for this would bring in a Capernaiticall eating of his flesh But it is spirituall not in respect of essence but in the manner of receiuing and by the spirituall strength and efficacie of our norishing by it because the spirit or minde of man doth receiue it by faith alone and really and truely for there is also in spirituall actions their realitie is nourished by the vertue of the holy Ghost and is fed vnto spirituall and eternall life And truely the benefit of spirituall life doth redounde also to the bodie it selfe forasmuch as from thence it is regenerated it is sanctified and at length shall be partaker of the blessed Resurrection but neuerthelesse that meat is not to be called corporal but spiritual because it giueth onely spiritual nourishment Therefore although there is an eating of the bodie in which respect that is to say in respect of the terme or obiect it might be called corporall notwithstanding in respect of the manner it is not a corporal eating Therefore seeing that the flesh of Christ is only spirituall meate and in like manner the bloud of Christ spirituall drinke it followeh that the flesh of Christ is eaten onely spiritually and also that his bloud is drunke spiritually that is with the mouth of the spirit or soule namely by faith which the holy Ghost himselfe doth ingender in our minds Ioh. 6.51 Because the commaunding words of the Supper Take and eate doe speake of a corporall action and of one eating with the mouth And concerning that which ought to be taken and eaten Christ saith a little after This is my bodie whether therefore is the true bodie of Christ taken by a corporall action and eating The Maior is denyed because seing that the holy Supper as hath beene said doth consist of two things earthly and heauenly or of the signe and of the thing signified there are two sorts of eating and therefore a twofold eating is commaunded one of the signe another of the thing signified that corporall and sensible but this spirituall and intelligible The word of eating is attributed to that properly but to this figuratiuely as Psal 14.4 The workers of iniquitie eate vp my people as they eate bread And Ioh 6.53 Otherwise it should followe that the bodie of Christ is to bee eaten by a corporall action which is a horrible thing and the conceipt of the Capernaits For Christ goeth not into the belly but into the heart Ephe. 3.17 therefore is not eaten with the mouth a Mark 7.18 19 And whereas to auoide this absurdity some doe faine a corporall eating which may bee done after a heauenly and supernatural manner it is a deuised forgerie vnutterable and no way is intelligible and moreouer implying a contradiction What is it to eate the bodie and to drinke the bloud of Christ It is not onely to beleeue the promise of God which doth witnesse as Christ himselfe expoundeth it Ioh. 6. vers 35. I am the bread of life hee that commeth to mee shall not hunger and hee that beleeueth in mee shall neuer thirst Where the Lord doth declare that to beleeue is to drinke and to come to Christ by faith is to Eate that the flesh of Christ is crucified for vs and his bloud shed for vs for remission of sinnes but to be spiritually refreshed and to receiue spirituall life and strength by a true communication of the bodie of Christ as it were by nourishment as Christ saith He shall not hunger nor euer thirst and moreouer to lay hold vpon Christ by faith not appearing a farre of but so vniting and insinuating himselfe vnto vs that he may be our head we his members Tractat 26. 27 vpon Iohn Whereupon Augustine in the second Sermon De verbis Apostoli saith That same manducare to eate what is it but to be refreshed that same bibere to drinke what is it but viuere to liue This is saith hee to eate that meate and to drinke that drinke to abide in Christ to haue Christ abiding in him as Christ himselfe declareth Ioh 6.56 Hee that eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud dwelleth in mee and I in him And by this hee which dwelleth not in Christ and in whom Christ doth not dwell without doubt hee neither eateth his flesh spiritually nor drinketh his bloud although carnally and visibly hee presseth the Sacrament of the bodie and bloud of Christ with his teeth Therefore the eating of the flesh of Christ and the drinking of his bloud is not onely faith but a certaine consequent and effect of faith namely the inward coniunction of vs with Christ the effect whereof is ioye in God and moreouer life eternall a Iohn 6.51 54.56 1. Cor. 5.8 Seing that Christ is giuen daily in the word to be eaten by faith and is there eaten of the faithfull Iohn 6.35 why is there neede of the supper That by this Sacrament as by an action more euident vnto vs or by a word visible that is shewing that selfe same thing to the eyes which the word doth signifie to the eares of the hearers our faith being more exercised and more confirmed we may eat him more and more and may apply him vnto vs more nearely more effectually and moreouer by Christ so eaten we may haue more spirituall sense motion and life vntill in that last day needding the vse neither of the word nor of the Sacraments we all in Christ and with Christ being present with vs in verie deede in heauen doe enioy that euerlasting spirituall life Now therefore at the length distinguish exactly the waies of eating of the bodie of Christ As it is a Sacrament it is not taken generally for the whole action of the Lords Supper and for the taking it selfe both of the signe and also of the thing signified but for the signe it selfe Question vppon Leuiticus 57. as Augustine saith Secundum quendam modum Sacramentum corporis Christi corpus Christi est that is after a certaine manner the Sacrament of the bodie of Christ is the bodie of Christ and hee saith the same thing oftentimes Sacramentum Ecclesiae duobus constare Sacramento re sacramenti that is That the sacrament of the Church doth consist of two things of the sacrament the thing of the Sacrament In this sense one eating is outward Sacramentall Symbolicall or Sacramentall onely namely of them which in the Lords Supper doe eate that holy signe of the body of Christ with the mouth of the bodie but which without faith is of no moment to saluation Another is Mentall or spirituall only namely of the thing signified which is done by faith alone by hearing reading and meditating of the word of God concerning which Ioh. 6.53.54 55.63 and it belongeth to all times but yet onely to the faithfull and in the olde time also it was common to the Fathers a Cor. 10.3 verily verily I say vnto you Except yee eate the flesh
or as Damascen saith One nature is not made capable of contrary Substantiae things disagreeing 7 Because the presence of the bodie is opposed to a religious remembance 8 Because it should follow that the Apostles did eate the passible and mortall bodie and that Christ is not to be sought in the heauens 9 Because the heauens must receiue him and being receiued containe him vntil the time that all things be restored Act. 3.21 10 Because the like kinde of speaking is no where found in Scripture which is properly according to the letter to be vnderstood of two natures together and vnlike essences For it is not said water is wine or the rod is a serpent but water was turned vnto wine the rod into a serpent And as often as the first substāce that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc aliquid is predicated of another first substance in scripture the Enuntiation of that sort is figuratiue as the Rocke was Christ 1. Cor. 10.4 Christ is that lambe of God Iohn 1 29 Iohn is Elias Math. 11.14 Christ is the true vine Iohn 15.1 11 Because it is needfull to seeke for an othet sense whē the absurdity of the word or letter written do make against any Article of faith or against any manifest place of Scripture as this doth And to make sense of these words Hoc est corpus meum there are fourteene seuerall opinions amongst the Papists 12 Because when the Capernaits did imagine in their minde I know not what corporall eating of the flesh of Christ Christ drewe them backe from that conceipt saying That his words are spirit and life that the flesh profiteth nothing that is to say so eaten as the Capernaits did dreame And he obiected vnto them the mention of his Ascension into heauen Iohn 6.62.63 13 Because this opinion maketh that the bodie of Christ is common to the godly and vngodly which truly is no light discommoditie but a great impietie 14 No Sacrament can be fully expressed and vnderstood without a Trope For in all Sacraments it is most vsuall that the name of the thing signified is giuen to the signe it selfe or the signe is named from the thing signified and that both for the conueniencie of the signe and the thing signified and also for the most certaine giuing and receiuing of the thing signified Whether doth the omnipotency of God take away the discommodities which follow transubstantiation consubstantiation It is not lawfull to reason Theologically from the Omnipotencie of God vnlesse the will of God goeth before plainly laid open in his expresse word For so Christ said to the Sadduces Math. 22.29 Ye are deceiued not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God Because we must looke not what God can doe absolutely but what he will doe for our God is in heauen saith the Psalme 115.3 He doth whatsoeuer he will not what he can Wherupon Tertullian Dei posse velle est non posse nolle that is de spiritu e◠Litera God can doe that which he will that which he will not that he cannot but that which he would both he could doe and he hath shewed it And Augustine saith God is omnipotent not because he can doe all things but because he can bring to passe whatsoeuer he will so that nothing can resist his wil or any way hinder the same but that it is fulfilled Which sayings are vnderstood of that absolute omnipotencie by which God is said that he can doe many things which notwithstanding he will not and therefore doth not but of the actuall and effectuall power wherby God bringeth to passe all things which he will For the will of God is conuerted with the actuall omnipotencie whereupon we rightly gather God will therefore he can doe and doth in like manner God can and doth therefore he will But it is absurd to gather God is omnipotent therefore he doth al things euen which he will not whereupon Damascene saith omnia quidē quae vult potest non vero quae potest vult potest enim perdere mundum sed non vult that is to say he can do all things which he will but he will not do all things which he can For he can destroy the world but he will not 2 We may not argue from the omnipotency of God to confirme that which containeth a contradiction as when any thing is said to be and also not to be or to be such a thing and also not to be such a thing in act and in deed Therefore the schoolemen doe affirme that God cannot make that contradictories may be together true Because a contradiction doth put to be and not to be togither which to doe is a point of impotency not of omnipotencie This Impossible is not a signe of weaknes but it is a token of exceeding great vertue and constancie So God cannot dy he cannot sin he cannot be deceiued he cannot ly a T it 1.2 Heb. 6.18 he cannot make a thing done vndone one that is begotten vnbegotten hee cannot bring to passe that if there be a thing defined there may not also be a definition thereof He therefore which saith indefinitely and simply that God can doe all things doth comprehend not onely good things but also the contrarie euils of these things which doe agree to the deuill and not to God as saith Theodoret verie well But those things which are said to be possible to God some of them are said to be simplie vnpossible by reason of his constant nature Some Hypothetically that is by a presupposall by reason of the constant and altogether vnchangeable truth of his decree and will God truly can simply bring to passe that that may be done which is not or that which is may cease to bee that a bodie may be a Spirit Also He is able of stones to raise vp children vnto Abraham b Mat. 3.9 he is able to bring to passe that a Camell may goe through the eye of a needle c Math. 19 24.26 but not leauing him as he is by nature but making him so slender as is needfull to be done like as he is able to bring to passe that a rich man may enter into the kingdome of heauen not so long as he is such a one but changing him and teaching him to depend onely vpon one God But because it once pleased God that his son hauing taken vnto him flesh should be made our eternal brother like vnto vs in al things which doe appertaine to the naturall and substantiall truth of a bodie according to his creation a Heb. 2 17 4.15 Phil. 3.28 he will not haue things contrarie to nature which do destroy the humane nature in Christ assumed which do take it away and ouerturne the definition therof therefore potenter non potest that is powerfully hee is not able saith Augustine To bring to passe that the bodie of Christ may be together in act a body and not a bodie
spiritually fed with my bodie giuen for you and my bloud shed for you and are nourished by it to life eternall Why had the Lord rather vse this phrase This is my bodie and this is my bloud then to say this signifieth my bodie and my bloud Because the word of signifying worthily seemed vnto him somewhat light and he would more expresly declare that those signes are not propounded that they may bee considered as they are in themselues but that it behoueth the receiuers so to behold and spiritually to apprehend with the eyes of a faithfull minde those things only in those signes which are represented by them as if that breade and that wine were not the signes of those things but those things themselues which they doe signifie Whether if the bodie of Christ bee denyed to bee in the bread of the Supper therefore Christ himselfe is said to bee altogether absent from his Supper No yet so that whole Christ is present but not the whole for Christ man is truely present 1. By the grace and operation of his spirit Where two or three are gathered together in his name Mat. 18.20 2. And by his power and maiestie a Math. 28.20 Heb. 7.26 3. That he which being absent in bodie and made higher then the Heauens yet may be whole most present by his vertue wherby he doth spiritually communicate both himselfe and all his great things to vs truely by faith 4. And by the promise of the Gospell he doth lift vp the hearts of the faithfull to himselfe euen into heauen that there they may behold namely in the celestiall sanctuarie the sacrifice offered vpon the crosse so may feed vpon it by faith Finally Christ doth truely and fully without all doubt accompish that which he promised Is the bodie of the Lord truely and Substantially present in the Supper It is present not truely by conuersion of the whole substance that is both of the matter and forme of the bread and wine into the bodie and bloud of the Lord either by impanation or assumption of the bread or locall inclusion not as an infant in the cradle for neither is it present in outward signes by in existence or indistance nor in regard of the place where the bread is neither also is it present in the bodies of men or is put into the mouth for if you respect the place the bodie of Christ is in heauen circumscribed But in the minds of the faithfull and in regard of the faith of a man lawfully vsing the holy Supper of the Lord. For that is the strength of faith that it may ioyne together most streightly things neuer so much distant asunder Therefore a true and liuely presence of the bodie of Christ in the Supper and communion of him with the beleeuers in the ministerie of the Sacraments is not reiected but onely that manner of presence which is fained at the bread is denyed Are these propositions contradictorie Christ is corporally in heauen and Christ with his body and bloud is in the Supper Not a whit because this latter is nor rightly vnâ—erstood of the presence at the place of bread but of the communion with man which is sealed and exhibited by the rite of the Supper Is not the Supper of Christ made voide if the very flesh of Christ be determined to be so farre essentially absent from this action as the heauens are from the earth In no wise because the bodie it selfe and bloud of Christ are set forth in these mysteries not simply and so farre forth as they are things subsisting in themselues but to be coÌ„sidered intellectually and are offered to the minde not to the bodie to faith not to the senses to be taken also in the mind by faith alone For truely like as those things which are heard are to be perceiued by the hearing those things which are seene by the sight so also those things which are vnderstoode by the vnderstanding so those things which are beleeued by faith neither are these things alike present to their obiects But the perceiuing of faith is a great deale more certain then all comprehension of the senses or of reason how faith can make a thing present Paule declareth Gal. 3.1 where hee saith that Christ was described in their sight and among them crucified Are earthly and celestiall gifts present after the same manner of presence Not after the same because there is no other presence of Christ in the seale of grace then in the word or promise of grace But the presence of Christ Iesus in the word adde also in baptisme yea in the whole ministerie is only spirituall not corporall or locall For as there is not made an inclusion of Christ in the voice of the minister outwardly sounding so neither in the Sacramental symbols or signes For Paul saith that Wee whiles we are strangers in the bodie are absent from the Lord and doe walke by faith and not by sight 2. Cor. 5.6.7 Neither that wee know Christ henceforth after the flesh but after the spirit vers 16. Also that Christ is aboue Col. 3.1 That Christ shall descend from heauen in the day of iudgement 1. Thess 4.16 And truely that he shall come not daily and euery moment and otherwise then he ascended that is to say inuisibly and vncircumscriptiuely but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in that manner not otherwise wherein he was seene to ascend into heauen a Act. 1.11 Wherfore the presence of Christ also in the Supper is spirituall which you may call celestiall Diuine supernaturall but not corporall or natural Which therefore is the thing signified of the Lords Supper Christ himselfe offering himselfe with all his benefits spiritually to bee apprehended in our mindes by faith for in the Lords supper wee are made partakers not onely of the operation or of the benefits and gifts of Christ but of the substance of the liuing bodie of Christ What is vnderstood by naming of bodie and bloud in the Attribute of these propositions This is my bodie and This is my bloud Not a signe thereof which some fathers call a Sacramentall bodie that is to say Sacramentally vnderstood euen as when they say that the bodie of the Lord is seene touched brused with the teeth doth fall vpon the earth is created made consumed Also not the mystical body which is the Church a Eh. 5.32 Eph. 23 For so the faithfull should seeme to cate either the signes alone or the Church although we doe not deny this that the mysticall bodie is shadowed and moreouer established by the signes of bread anâ— wine b 1 Cor. 10 16 but Synecdochically the whole humanitie of Christ both altogether and in respect of parts the true and naturall bodie of Christ deliuered for vs crucified and buried The true bloud shed for vs and his true soule yea also the whole person of Christ For truely his humanitie without the Deitie of the word
which is life it selfe and the fountaine of life cannot bee the bread of life to vs c Ioh. 14 Neither can the humanitie be separated from the word neither can the humanitie subsist without the Diuinite and his benefits without the whole person and therefore the one without the other are neither giuen nor receiued VVhether in the Supper of the Lord for the thing it selfe of the Sacrament doe wee partake of his merits alone or the liuely operation gifts or benefits of Christ without Christ himself that is without participation of the body and bloud of Christ or doe we partake of Christ himselfe with his benefits Truely Christ himselfe with al his benefits both those which are giuen to vs by imputation alone and also those which are giuen by reall efficacie 1. Because Christ himselfe one and the same God and man is that liuing bread from whom life eternall doth flowe to vs d Ioh. 6.51 and is eaten of them which are endued with true faith 2. Because bread and wine are holy signes not onely of the death and benefits but of the bodie and bloud of Christ 3. Because Paule doth plainly affirme it e 1 Cor. 10.16 we ought to haue a coÌ„munion with the body it self bloud it selfe of Christ that we may be partakers of his benefits For those benefits that liuely vertue or operation which sustaineth our soules vnto life eternall cannot be seuered from the bodie and bloud of Christ and moreouer not from Christ himself to whom it cleaueth a Ioh. 5.11 no more then the effect from the cause conteining it or the qualitie from the subiect in which it is properly inherent and from which it issueth because as Cyrill saith The spirit in Christ is ioyned chiefly with the flesh of Christ and the flesh also with the spirit so that wee can neither take his flesh without the operation nor the operation without the flesh neither in the plaine worde or in the Sacraments 4. Because he which imbraceth the promises of the Gospell by faith is made partaker of Christ b Heb 3.14 5. Because the verie words of Christ doe most clearely witnesse it Take eate this is my bodie Therefore it is needfull that the bodie of Christ should bee receiued and eaten of the faithfull 6. Because the true communion with Christ himselfe God and man is established in baptisme Therefore wee must determine that the same thing is done in the Supper 7. Because the Analogie of receiuing eating of bread wine should be lost vnlesse we should spiritually receiue Christ himselfe but that we may receiue the strength of nourishing which is in the bread it is needfull that we should receiue the bread it selfe 8. Because like as we dye in Adam because we are ioyned together with him by a naturall participation so we do liue in a spirituall life in Christ and we drawe it from Christ by reason of the spirituall participation with Christ c 1 Cor. 15.22 9 Because the Scripture euery where teacheth that the Church is one bodie of one head but truely it cannot be imagined that life doth come from the head to the bodie without the ioyning together of them both 10. Because they which stick to the accidents alone and leaue the substance are in no Science to bee suffered But the death of Christ and his benefits are reckoned among the accidents Therfore it is an intollerable thing to propound the benefits of Christ alone and not Christ himselfe But this we adde like as in the plaine worde the word preached shewing Christ to vs by voice is perceiued by the sense of the eares but Christ himselfe signified by the word preached is not receiued but by the vnderstanding beleeuing and in baptisme the bodie is dipped in the water but the minde of the beleeuer is washed with the bloud signified by the water So in the Supper the bodie is fed with that bread and that wine but the soule of the beleeuer is made fat with the flesh and bloud of the Lord as Tertullian speaketh Manduâ—atio Corporissed non manducatio corporalis Therefore there is an eating of the bodie but not a bodily eating but of faith or spirituall like as the coniunction is spirituall mysticall and supernaturall for as much as it is made by the apprehension of faith by the efficacie of the holy Ghost and also in like manner the presence of the bodie of Christ is spirituall For if our sight in a moment of time be ioyned with the bodie of the sun much more is faith conioyned with Christ himselfe and moreouer with his bodie placed in heauen Can this proposition be endured The bodie of Christ is exhibited with the bread If you do referre the word with to the time wherein the faithfull doe vse the Supper that the sense may bee When a faithfull man vsing the Supper doth eate the bread of the Lord and drinketh the wine of the Lord he is made partaker not only of earthly gifts but also of heauenly that is to say of the bodie of Christ and of the bloud of the same then truely wee doe in no manner of wise mislike that proposition But if any doe referre it being taken together with the other two particles In and sub that is in and vnder to the place that is to ordaine a presence of the inuisible bodie of Christ In cum sub pane that is in with vnder the bread wee doe worthily reiect this consubstantiation inexistence and indistance seing that this is neither expressed in the words of Christ nor can rightly bee drawne out from them Of how many sorts is this vnion or coniunction in the vse of the Lords Supper Twofold one of the bodie and bloud of Christ with the bread and wine which is called Sacramentall and belongeth to the forme of the Sacrament Another is the coniunction of the same bodie and bloud of Christ with the beleeuers which although spirituall is called the mysticall reall and substantiall communion or communication and fruition of the bodie and bloud of Christ which is exhibited vnder the holy symboles of the Supper Calu. Inst b 4. c. 17 sect 19 33 and belongeth to the end of the Sacrament Notwithstanding a mixture or transfusion of the flesh of Christ is not to be imagined in our soule because it sufficeth that Christ doth breath life into our soules from the substance of his flesh yea rather doth powre into vs his owne life although the flesh it selfe of Christ doth not enter into vs. Of what qualitie is the coniunction of the signes and of the thing signified in the supper of the Lord Not consubstantiall or naturall which may make a presence of the thing signified at the place of the signe 1. Because the words of the institution do by no meanes beare it 2. It is manifest that Christ sate placed with the Disciples at the table really and corporally 3. Neither are Sacraments
it vseth these meanes helps and instruments to worke our saluation In which sense the Church is said to be sanctified and washed in the lauer of water thorough the word Ephe. 5.16 Tit. 3.5 Baptisme is called the Lauer of Regeneration Renonation And Act. 22.16 Be baptized washed from thy sins in calling vpon his name Hereupon Augustine hath this saying whence commeth this vertue to the water that it should touch the bodie in Ioh. Trac 80 and wash the heart but that the word causeth it not because it is spoken but because it is beleeued And that the grace of God ought not to bee tyed to the outward signes Peter teacheth speaking thus of Baptisme 1 Pet. 3.21 It saueth vs not that Baptisme whereby the filthinesse of the flesh is cast away but whereby it comes to passe that a good conscience maketh request to God by the Resurrection of Iesus Christ Cornelius receiued grace before Baptisme a Act. 10.5 For God vseth meanes and instruments to worke our saluation but yet so as hee worketh by his owne proper and inward vertue most freely when how and in whome hee will and doth not yeelde vp his power and vertue to the outward signes As also in that seuen times washing of Naaman the Syrian in Iordan was not placed the purging of him from his Leprosie which then the power of GOD alone wrought in him b 2. King 9 â—4 Hence it comes to passe that some receiue grace without the Sacrament as Abraham was iustified before Circumcision and the Theefe on the Crosse without Baptisme and the Lords Supper Some receiue the Sacraments and not grace because they want faith as Iudas of whom Augustine saith Hee receiued the bread of the Lord but not that bread which was the Lord. Others receiue both together as it were by a certaine coniunction of the thing with the signes as the faithfull who take the Supper worthily Whether doe the Sacraments imprint any stampe or anie spirituall worke in soule and that such as cannot be blotted out Not of themselues or their owne power nor yet by anie supernaturall verture inherent in them not by a reall and essentiall imprinting of some signe as the printing of a picture or signe is made in wax or money For the Scripture alloweth none such But yet God doth as it were marke out and seale vp his Sacramentally spiritually by them as instruments giuing the pledge of his spirit and the light of faith whereby they are made conformable to Christ and discerned from infidels and are marked out vnto the profession of Christ And this note in the purpose of God is such as cannot bee blotted out 2. Tim. 2.19 The foundation of God is sure hauing this seale The Lord knoweth who are his And 2. Cor. 1.21 He which hath annointed vs is God and who hath sealed vs and giuen vs the pledge of his spirit And Ephe 1.13 In whom also yee beleeuing yee were sealed with the holy spirit of promise which is the earnest of the Inheritance And Chap. 4.30 Doe not yee greeue the holie spirit of God by whom yee are sealed And Ezech. 9.4 The markes of the letter Tau is saide to be made in the forehead of those men which sigh and mourne And Reuel 7.3 The seruants of God are marked in their foreheads as on the contrarie the children of perdition are saide to bee marked with the marke of the beast Reuel 13.16.17 To whome doth it belong to administer the Sacraments To them only to whom it is permitted to exercise the office of Preaching the Gospell According to that saying Goe yee forth teach all Nations baptizing them in the name of the Father son and Holy Ghost Math. 28.28 and 1. Cor. 4.1 For the Sacraments bee the appurtenances of the Ministerie of the word of God and the seales of Gods promises which cannot lawfully be set too without the vnfolding of this word of God For neiher can their be an accessorie vnlesse their be a principall And it belongeth to the same man as the Chancelor vsing the Kings authoritie to write the tables of the Testament faithfully and to seale them with his seale Whence doe the Sacraments receiue their power and excellency From the institution of God so that that forme be obserued which he hath prescribed that by a publick person either rightly called or at the least by a common error vsing the publicke function and not of the manners merit and excellencie of the person working administring Phil. 1. But whether doe the Ministers to whom is committed the lawfull administration of the Sacraments and are called Gods fellow-morkers deliuer also with their hands the matter of the Sacrament No but they do outwardly giue the earthly signes and doe onely performe the outward dueties and God doth inwardly conferre the heauenly gifts represented by them giues increase because God alone doth Circumcise the heart a Deut. 30 And therefore this Circumcision is said to be made without hands b Col 2 11 And Iohn the Baptist confessed that hee indeede baptised them with water but the Lord Iesus did baptise them with the Holy Ghost and with fire Math. 3.11 And onely the heauenly father giueth that bread which is indeede heauenly Iohn 6.32 Otherwise sometimes that is ascribed to the Ministers of the word which belongeth to God alone For that is the nature of words which belong to one thing that that is attributed to the instrument which belongeth to the principall efficient cause Where and when ought the Sacraments to be admininistred In the assembly of the Church and vsually no where else to wit when the whole Church is gathered together or a great part thereof not out of the assembly of the Church Which ought to be the forme and manner of administration That those signes should bee vsed without change which Christ himselfe hath prescribed And that the words of the institution then also of the Lords promise be recited and explaned not in a strange but in a knowne speach before the Sacrament bee administred and deluered a Act 19.3 4.5 1 Cor. 11 23 For the Apostle doth expresly forbid 1. Cor. 14.19 to vse a strange language in the Church And such ceremonies ought to bee vsed which are not humane and receiued but appointed and commaunded by the authority of the son of God as also praiers and thanksgiuings After the example of Christ who commaunded the Church to doe this Doe ye this And Act. 22.16 Be thou baptised and be thou washed from thy sinnes in calling vpon the name of Iesus Now the comelines and dignitie of the Sacrament is to bee esteemed by the word of God Also the multitude and pompe of humane rites doth occupie the senses and the mindes and doth ouerturne the Ceremonies appointed by God To whom are the Sacraments to bee administred The Sacraments indeed are common to the godly and vngodly and also other outward things in the Church