harlot and the Israelite not only repressed the plague inflicted by God but also got this thereby that euen the selfe same thinges with like number of wordes were written of hym which Paule here citeth of Abraham out of the booke of Genesis And it was imputed vnto hym for righteousnes Which wordes seing they are spoken of him by reason of his worke it might seme that iustification is not After iustification the saintes do workes which God counteth for iust Paule entreateth of the first righteousnes and the psalme of that righteousnes which followeth iustification Good workes also are sayd to be imputed for righteousnes so proper vnto fayth that Paule should firmely auouch that righteousnes commeth vnto vs by it only But we answere that we deny not but that after fayth and iustification are of good men wrought excellent workes which are of God counted for iust especially when they haue their ofspring out of fayth Wherfore Augustine vpon the 31. Psalme when he commendeth Abrahams fact in that he would haue sacrificed his only sonne sayth that he commendeth the building but in the meane tyme he considereth the foundation which was fayth he sayth that he alloweth the fruite but in the meane tyme he hath a regard to the roote But Paule now entreateth not of those thinges which follow righteousnes but of the very roote and hed what that is for which we are counted iust Wherefore the Psalme speaketh of the worke and Paul of the fyrst righteousnes Nether ought we to maruayle that good workes are sayde to be imputed for righteousnes forasmuch as it is necessary it should be so For they haue not in thēselues so much perfection that they can in all pointes satisfye the lawe of God Wherefore it is nedefull that God for his mercy sake receaue them as acceptable in imputing that part of goodnes and of righteousnes which wanteth in them They also are not to be harkened vnto which interprete this sentence so that they vnderstand that Paul speaketh of fayth here as it is a worke so that Fayth is not here taken as it is a worke Two manner wayes of imputing the sence should be that God imputed vnto righteousnes that acte of Abraham whereby he beleued as though he would count that for iuste That is not intreated of at this present to dispute of a iust worke But that is sought from whence we are iustified And to make the matter more playne to be imputed vnto righteousnes is taken two maner of wayes Sometymes it signifieth some acte to be ratified and to be allowed and to speake briefely to be accepted for iust and after this maner we graunte that that acte of Phinees and the good workes of holy men are imputed of God vnto righteousnes An other way it signifieth that by which we our selues are counted in the number of the iust and that Paul attributeth only vnto fayth as though he should haue said Abraham beleued that he was acceptable vnto God and that he was counted with him for iust and lastly that he should attayne to blessednes and as he beleued so he receaued For it came to passe vnto hym according to his fayth Wherefore by it he receaued that which was offred vnto him of God as it is written in the beginning of the 15. chapter For God had sayde vnto hym I am thy protector and thy exceding great reward But that which is sayd of Phinees and of the workes of goodmen pertayneth vnto the dutyes whiche follow them that are iustified But forasmuch as many promises are made vnto workes and God in this place calleth himselfe a reward and eternall life is oftentimes If eternall life be sayd to be rendred vnto workes why is not also sayd of righteousnes Good woorkes may go before eternal life but not before iustification Eternall life is called a reward by a similitude and not properly in the holy scriptures called a reward as though it were rendred vnto workes why may we not by workes likewise obtayne righteousnes seying that it is as great a matter to glorifye as to iustify But two thinges are here to be considered first that good workes may go before glorification but not before iustification Because after that we are iustified we may do such thinges as are acceptable vnto God But before we are iustified we are able to do nothinge that is truely good and which can please God Moreouer we graunt not that eternall life is had by workes as though it were by them merited But when it is called a reward it is in this respect because it is rendred after the worke done euen as that which we deserue by any ciuile actions is not wont to be rendred till the worke be full done And in such sort eternall life may indede haue some similitude of a reward but yet properly and as touching the nature of a reward it is most farre of and that for thrée causes First because those thinges which are geuen and which are receaued are not alyke but that is required to the nature of merite Secondly because the workes which we offer are not our owne For God geueth them vnto vs and woorketh in vs both to will and to performe Wherefore if there were any merite it should not be attributed vnto vs but vnto God as to the author of all good workes Lastly when a reward or merite is properly taken it behoueth the that which is geuen of vs be not bound of duety vnto him vnto whom it is geuē But we although we shoulde not obtayne felicitye yet ought we to doo all our thinges vnto the glory of God Wherefore eternall lyfe can not be called a reward but by a certaine similitude But many say that these sentences of Paul are to be vnderstand by a figure as though it were the figure Synecdoche that faith is therefore said to iustifie because it in iustifieng obteineth the chiefest place and so they will Sinecdoche which y◠aduersaries vse not that good works which are ioyned with faith should vtterly be excluded from y◠power of iustifieng They are in dede content that we should commend faith but yet in such sort commend it that we shoulde say that it iustifieth together with other good workes which workes they say Paul vnderstādeth in it by the figure Synecdoche And by this meanes they thinke may be conciliated very many places in the scriptures For vndoubtedly in the xx chap. of Genesis God for a worke promised many thinges vnto Abraham Bicause saith he thou hast done this thing thy seede shall be increased it shall obteyne the gates of his enemies and in thy sede shall all nations be blessed and other such like And Iames semeth to expound this Synecdoche when he affirmeth that Abraham was iustified by workes Vnto these men we aunswer that the wordes of Paul will in no case suffer any suche trope or figure whose wordes are so playne and perspicuous that they neither can be violated nor yet
Here is declared that the Gospell is The Gosple is setforth to all men indifferently How the Iewes are preferred before the Gentils set forth vnto all in generall neyther doth the preaching thereof exempt any kinde of men The Grecians he taketh here generally and vnder that worde comprehendeth all nacions besides the Iewes And in that he sayth First he signifieth order but not greater aboundance of fruite as though the Iewes should haue more commodity or vtility by the Gospell then the Ethnikes Of which thyng Chrisostome hath a trimme similitude when they of full age which were conuerted vnto Christ were baptised at the tyme of Easter or Whitsontyde they could not be baptised all together yet they which were fyrst washed did not more put on Christ neyther receaued they more grace then they which wer last Wherfore there is here signified an Analogy or proportion of order An analogy of order as touchyng tyme betwene the Iewes and the Grekes The calling of the Iewes was first Paule preched first vnto the Iewes before he preched vnto yâ— Gentila The definicion geuen is proued by the effecte The effect of the Gosple is that we shoulde be iustefied The end of the Exordium and of the entent of hys treatise The propositioÌ„ which shal be proued euen to the 12. chap. A soft transition the Iewes are put in the first place For Christ was the Apostle of the Iewes and minister of Circumcision For he sayd that he was not sent but vnto the lost sheepe of the house of Israell And when he fyrst sent hys Apostles he commaunded them the they should not go vnto the Gentils nor enter into the cityes of the Samarytans But in hys last ambassadge when he was redy to ascend vp into heauen he commaunded that they should be witnesses vnto hym in Ierusalem in all Iewry and Samarya and then he added euen vnto the vttermost borders of the earth Yea and Paule also obserued this order For first when he entred into any cities he preached in the Synagoges And together with Sylas and Barnabas he sayde vnto the Iewes vnto you oughte Christ first to be preached whome because ye haue refufed beholde we turne vnto the Gentiles The Iewes oughte to haue beene the fyrste whiche shoulde be called because they had the prophesyes and Prophetes and tables in a manner sealed wyth the promise of Christ Wherefore fayth was fyrst required of them He proueth thys defynicion now set not indeede by things before or by the cause for that is vnpossible but by the effect and as they say by the latter when he sayth For the righteousnes of God is reuealed in it from fayth to fayth That is the effect of the Gospell and of fayth is that we should be iustified Now the Apostle endeth hys Exordium and commeth to the entreatyng of hys disputacion and thys is the principall proposition which in sum containeth that which he goeth about to proue through eleuen chapters that is that a man is iustified by fayth Wherefore this proposition serueth for two thinges for first it is broughte in as a reason of the difinicion set And agayne as the principall proposition of the whole disputacion And so the Apostle by a soft pleasant and couert transition leadeth the attentyue hearer from the exordium vnto the confirmacions and confutacions which follow When we heare the righteousnes of God named in this place let vs not thinke that he entendeth here to speake of the seuerity of Gods iugdements for that seuerity is not called of the Hebrues Nedech but rather Tischpat that is iudgement and Tsedtreth which our men turne righteousnes signifyeth goodnes clemency and mercy whereby God declareth hymselfe good vnto vs. And because he doth this chiefely in geuing vs righteousnes therefore I thinke How this word righteousnes is to be vnderstand that that word was so commonly turned and that word in this place if a man marke it wel aunswereth vnto saluation which he sayd before commeth vnto vs by the gospell And the Prophetes many tymes craue the righteousnes of god which can not easely be taken euery where of the seuerity of hys iudgement For there is none that is wyse woulde haue god to deale wyth hym according to that Ye rather the saynctes crye Enter not into iudgement with thy seruaunt And god declareth thys his righteousnes or goodnes towardes vs by The meanes whereby God declareth hys goodnes to wards vs. three thinges chiefely First he receaueth vs into fauour forgeueth vs our sins imputeth not vnto death those sins which we commit but contrarily imputeth rather vnto vs the obedience and holynes of Christ Secondly he kindleth in our myndes an endeuor to lyue vprightly reneweth our will illustrateth our reason and maketh vs all whole prone to lyue vertuously when as before we abhorred from that which is iust and honest Thyrdly he geueth vs pure and chast maners good actions and a sincere lyfe All these thinges doth that righteousnes comprehend which is reueled in the Gospell But the first of these thrée is the head and chiefe because it comprehendeth the other and it is sayd to be the righteousnes of God because it commeth from him to vs. For we attayne not vnto it by humane strengthes Wherefore Chrisostome here calleth it righteousnes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is from aboue because it is geuen vnto vs as he speaketh without our sweate and labours Howbeit he addeth one thyng whiche must be warely red namely that we ought to bring 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is from home and from our selues fayth whereby to receaue thys righteousnes In which sentence if he vnderstande that fayth hath hys ofspring of our owne strengthes and nature we ought not to geue eare vnto hym forasmuch as the holy scriptures apertly testifye that it is the gift of God and commeth not of vs which thinge is expressedly read in the epistle to the Ephesians But I thinke not that this father was so farre out of the way wherefore I interprete hym after this The interpretation of ChrysostoÌ„e â—â—nefied maner when he saw that this imputacion of god is after a sort set without vs hys mynde was to declare that if we will apply the same vnto vs it behoueth that we haue fayth in vs whereby we may drawe it vnto vs. But he contendeth not by that sayinge that fayth springeth of our selues as of the first roote Is reuealed in it Some haue vnderstanded that these giftes of the goodnes of god which we haue rehearsed are reuealed in the gospell because they are reade and contayned in it which thyng I deny not but I thinke that there ought to be added after the Hebrew maner that In it is all one with Paule as if he had sayd by it So that the sense is in that the participation of thys righteousnes and goodnes of god is exhibited or geuen vnto vs the same commeth by the gospell so that we receaue
it with fayth Wherefore in this word Reuealed let vs marke two maner of comparisons one is as touching the godly Twokinds of reuelacioÌ„ of the Gosple which receaue these thinges of god that they myght by that meanes acknowledge feele and by suxe experience vnderstand those thynges as touching all the three partes of righteousnes of which before we spake distinctly For they are not so moued of God as though they felt not nor knew by experience such thinges as are done But they which are only lookers one and not doers of the matter neyther see the fyrst part of righteousnes nor yet the second for that they are but naturall men and the god of this world hath blynded their myndes that they shoulde not be able to attayne to these spirituall thynges But the third portion of righteousnes which bursteth forth into act and is set in outwarde woorkes will them or nill them is seene of them and they are euen agaynste theyr will compelled to beare witnesse vnto it as we reade that Pline the yonger wrote vnto Traiane of the innocent life of the Christians Pliny wrote vnto Trayane in the christians behalfe For holy men shewed examples inough whereby the vngodly if they had bene wyse mought haue considered that they were altogether renewed in mynd and that this kinde of menne is more acceptable vnto god then other men are But in these thynges humane wisedome is wonderfully blynded whiche can geue no iudgement of spirituall thinges and yet these partes of righteousnes are of their owne nature so ioyned together that the one depeÌ„deth of the other In thys sense Paule writeth afterward of the righteousnes of God If our vnrighteousnesse commendeth the ryghteousnesse of God where we manifestlye see that the righteousnes of God signifyeth his goodnes and clemency But now let vs consider thys addition From fayth to fayth There be so many expositions vpon these words that if I should rehearse them all time would not serue me I will touch only a few of them and wyll iudge whyche of them seemeth to me more probable and nyer vnto the truth Some vnderstand from the fayth of the elders to the faith of their posterity Others froÌ„ a weaker faith to a stroÌ„ger fayth Others from the fayth of one article to the fayth of an other And to make an end of rehearsing opinions I wil come to that which in my iudgement is best to be allowed A double significatiâ— of fayth It appeareth that Paule taketh fayth two maner of wayes One waye for that assent which we geue vnto God when he promiseth vs any thing an other way for the constancy of wordes and promises And after that maner the fayth of God is commended as we reade afterward in the 3. chapter What if some of them haue not beleued Shall their incredulytie make frustrate the fayth of God By which woordes he signifyeth that God faythfully performed that which he had promised According to this distinction we may say that this reuelation or exhibition of the righteousnes of God towardes vs is brought to passe by faith namely our fayth whereby we geue credite vnto God making promise to vs and that our fayth is both strenghthened and also confyrmed by the fayth of god namely because we see that he hath coÌ„stantly performed the things which he had promised And this interpretacion Ambrose toucheth in this commentaryes and in my iudgement it semeth very agreeable It followeth As it is written The iust shall lyue by fayth Paule laboreth to proue that we Chrisostom sayth that we are iustefied by faith onely are iustified by fayth and Chrisostome when he interpreteth this place testefyeth that by it only we obtayne remission of sinnes For he sayth we way not hope for it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is from any other where If thou aske why scripture is in thys place cited of the Apostle the same Chrisostome aunswereth for that vnto humane reason it seemeth a thing vnlikely to be true that he whiche was euen now an adulterer a murtherer and a committer of sacriledge should straight way be counted iust so that he beleue and receaue the Gospell of Christ These An history of Constaâ—tine seeme to be thinges passing coÌ„mon capacity neither can they easely be beleued For we reade in the Tripartite historie the first booke 6. chapter that Constantyne the great which was the fyrst emperour that publikely receaued the Gospell slew many that were of his affinity and kinred and was the author and procurer that his owne sonne whiche was called Chrispus was murthered Of which wicked actes when he began to repent to hym he asked aduise of Sopater the philosopher who in teching succeded Plotynus whether there might be any expiacion or satisfaction made for these greate haynous crimes Vnto whom the Philosopher aunswered that there could be none Afterward he asked counsell of Christian Bishops and they aunswered that all those sinnes might be expiated so that he would beleue in Christ and with a syncere fayth receaue his Gospel Hereby it came to passe that that Emperour embraced our religion The author of this history reiecteth this narration as a thyng fayned and by diuerse argumentes proueth that it was inuented of malicious men which fauoured not Christian religion But what soeuer it were this thynge onely haue I a respect vnto that they tooke thys occasion to fayne this lye for that both Philosophers and also ciuile men iudged it absurde that a man being vnpure and laden with sinnes should streight way be counted pure iust before God so soone as he receaueth the fayth of Christ Paul therfore lest he should seme to be the author of this wonderfull doctrine from which humayne reason so much abhorreth citeth a place out of the holy Scriptures and by it plainly proueth that it is eueÌ„ so The testimony which he bringeth is taken out Chrisostome Ambrose sayling in memory of Abacuk the prophet the 2. chapter althoughe Chrisostomes interpretation as it is in the Greke citeth the name of Sophonias But that is not to be merueyled at because paraduenture his memory failed him For the fathers as they were men might sometymes erre For Ambrose also when he entreated of this place a little before put To the Iew first and to the Greeke sayth that the Iewes were so first named of Iudas Machabeus which did set at liberty his nacion when they were by the Grecians brought into bondage Which saying how vntrue it is the second booke of kinges testefyeth in the 25. chapter and also Ieremy in hys 40. chapter and Hester in the 3. chapter and Esdras Nehemias Daniell Zachary and other such like places wherein the surnames of the Iewes is most manifestly rede long tyme before Iudas Machabeus was ruler ouer them Neyther do I therefore speake this that I would malepartly contemne the authority of the We must not attribute to much vnto the fathers fathers But that we should
haue good woorkes What Moses and the Prophets had a regarde vnto when in theyr prayers they made mencion of the names of certain of the electe thinges nothing let this sentence which was alleaged namely that before God there is no acception of persons And as often as we read in the prayers of Moses or of the Prophets that mention is made of the Patriarkes whereby they endeuoured themselues to prouoke God vnto mercy we muste thinke that they had a regarde to two thinges First forasmuch as in that nation God had some appointed vnto himselfe they desired that for theyr sakes he woulde spare the whole multitude Secondlye they attributed not these thinges vnto the merites of the saintes which as we haue sayd are none but they made mencion of the promises made vnto those Fathers Hereby therefore it is manifeste by what meanes those thinges which were obiected may be aunswered But nowe let vs retourne to the exposition of the woordes of Paule For as many as haue sinned without the law shall perishe also without the law and as many as haue sinned in the law shal be iudged by the law For the hearers of the law are not righteous before God but the doers of the law shal be iustified For as many as haue sinned c. Paule here teacheth that God in very dede hath no respect of persons neyther in iudgement doth iniury vnto any man He maketh the Iewes equall with the Gentles forasmuch as of ech nation they which haue liued wickedly shall perishe And as touching the maner of iudgement the Iewes which shal be condemned shal be iudged by the law of Moses because they shall haue it both to accuse them and to condemne them But the Gentiles being wicked shall neither be accused nor condemned by that law but by the light of nature and euen by their own cogitations By the law in thys place we must vnderstand the law of Moses For it only is perfect and for it began all the contencion otherwise there were none or very fewe nations which were not gouerned by some institutions or lawes Here are added two preuentions The first is that it mought haue semed wonderfull vnto the Iewes that theyr cause should not be a whit better forasmuch as they were adorned by God with the benefite of the law Vnto whome Paule answereth that therby they were rather the more greuously to be accused because before God not they which heare the law shal be iustefied but they which do it The other preuention is for that it semed a hard thing vnto the Ethnikes that they should perishe when as they wanted the law of God Vnto whome he sayth ye were not vtterly without a law And two maner of wayes he proueth that they had a law fyrst in that by nature they did those thinges which are prescribed by the law secondly because they had within themselues their owne cogitations mutually accusing them or excusing them As touching the Iewes he sharpely reproueth them as which were of so small sound iudgement that they iudged themselues to be therefore iustefyed because they had receaued the lawe And now he beginneth by litle and litle to come vnto them which a litle afterward he doth more openly For saith he the hearers of the law shall not be iustified before God but the doers He therefore saith before God because they before mē wōderfully much boasted of the law which they had receaued God sayth he nothing regardeth this For there shall not be required of you that ye receaue the law but that ye execute the law The discourse which now is in hād is touching the righteousnes The righteousnes of the law requireth deedes and workes of the law which alone they allowed For touching the righteousnes of fayth he will afterward plainly entreate Now he cutteth their throtes with theyr owne sword in defining the righteousnes of the law namely that it vrgeth dedes and requireth works to the fulfilling thereof Whereby he calleth thē backe to consider their owne life Neither saith he in the meane time that mē cā not be otherwise iustified but only sheweth vnto thē that they haue fallē away frō the righteousnes of the law wherof they so much boasted That therfore which he now saith hath this sence If any man should by the righteousnes of the law be iustified before God it behoueth that the same should fulfil the law according to that saying Cursed be he which abideth not in all the things which are writē in the booke of the lawe This is an easy plaine expositiō But Augustine in his booke de Spiritu litera ad Marcellinum is of this minde that the doers of the law are iustified but yet in such sort that righteousnes goeth before the good works which the saintes do For they are fyrst iust before they do iust workes But because he seeth that this word of iustifying is in the future tence and by that meanes is signifyed that men shall not be iustefyed vnles they fyrst haue good workes therefore he addeth that to be iustefied in this place is not first to receaue righteousnes but to be counted righteous so that the sense is they shal be counted for righteous which shal be doers of the law but they ought first by fayth to haue receaued righteousnes whereby they were made iust but afterward they shal be made knowen by the effectes as they were before iust so now shal they be counted for iust And the like kinde of speach sayth he is in this sentence when Halowed be thy name how it is to be expounded we pray Thy name be sanctified Where we desire not that the name of God should be made holy as though before it were not holy but we desire that it may be of men counted holy This is Augustines exposition For when the Gentiles which haue not the law do by nature the thinges contayned in the law they hauing not the lawe are a lawe vnto themselues whiche shewe the effect of the law in theyr hartes their conscience also bearing witnes and their thoughtes accusing one an other or excusing at the day when God shall iudge the secretes of men by Iesus Christ according to my Gospell For when the Gentles c. Now commeth he vnto the Gentles whiche ought not to complayne thoughe they perished seing they had not the lawe of Moses For hee declareth that they were not vtterly without a lawe because they did by nature those thinges whiche were contayned in the law And when hee sayth by Nature he doth not vtterly exclude the helpe of God For all truth that men knowe is of God and of the holy ghost And nature here signifieth that knowledge whiche is grafted in the myndes of men Euen as in the eyes of the body God hath plāted the power of seinge Neither doth Paul in this place entreate of the strēgthes by which the Gētiles being holpē performed these things For that shall afterward bée
neither make those thinges doubtfull which are hoped for In which wordes he sheweth that two principall thinges are to be auoyded The one is that we be not with to much curiositie Two principal things to be taken hede of stirred vp to seeke out the proofe of thinges which we ought to beleue which proofe so long as we lyue here cannot be had the other is that though they be obscure we shoulde not yet doubte of the truth of them And the same writer entreating of the confessiō of fayth thus writeth It is manifest a falling away Basilius sayth that they erre from the faith which adde any thing to the scriptures from the fayth and a poynt of pride either to refuse anye of those thinges which are written or to bring in anye thing that is not written forasmuche as our Lorde Iesus Christ sayd My sheepe heare my voyce and before that he sayde but a straunger they will not follow but wyll flee from him because they haue not knowen his voyce The Apostle also hath by an humaine example straightly forbidden either to adde or to diminishe any thing in the holy scriptures when he sayth And yet no man disanulleth the Testament of a man when it is confirmed neither addeth any thing thereunto In which place a man may perceiue how warely this man affirmeth that as touching fayth nothing ought either to be added or diminished in the holy scriptures Which maketh chiefely against those which obtrude inuencions and traditions of men as necessary to be beleued Farther the same writer plainlye setteth forth the certaintie of fayth when he declareth the propertie thereof in Moralibus the. 80. Summe and 22. chapiter Where he writeth What is the propertie of fayth He aunswereth An vnseperable certaintie of the truth of the wordes of God which is not attayned to by any kinde of reasoning nor any naturall necessitye neyther being framed to pietie can euer be shaken And he addeth That it is the duty of one that beleueth to be in such a certaintie affected according to the power of the woord Basilius sayth that whatsoeuer is with out fayth and the holy scriptures is sinne spoken and not to presume either to dissanull or to adde any thing For if whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sinne as sayth the Apostle and fayth commeth of hearing and hearing by the word of God then whatsoeuer is not of fayth being not contayned in the scripture inspired by the spirite of God the same is sinne This Father confirmeth together with vs the certaintie of fayth and sheweth wherehence it dependeth when he calleth it inseuerable for that when we beleue we doo not examine by our own reasons what is possible or what is not possible to be done And he semeth to allude to those wordes which Paul speaketh of the fayth of Abraham that he doubted not through incredulitie where he vsed this verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wherfore certaintie is contrarie to doubting which commeth of the examination of humane reason Moreouer that which in an other sentence he had spoken he agayne playnly repeateth namely that those things which are out of the scriptures are not to be beleued And this place of Paul Whatsoeuer is not of fayth is Note how Basilius vnderstandeth whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sinne Fayth differeth from opinion and suspicion sinne he vseth in his natiue and proper sense as we also vse it which thing our aduersaries can not abide Faith differeth from opiniō for opinion although it make vs leane vnto one part yet it doth that both wyth reason and also not without feare of the truth of the other partie And suspicion doth engender yet a weaker assent then opinion doth for that it both wanteth reason and also leaueth men doubtfull of the truth of the other part It is true in deede that science engendreth a firme assent but that is brought to passe by adding of demonstrations Seing now we sée playnly both what fayth is and also howe it differeth from opinion science and suspicion let vs sée howe manye wayes fayth is taken For there is one kinde of fayth which is mightie perfect and of efficacie whereby we are iustified there is an other which is voyde without fruite during but for a time vayne which bringeth not iustification Which thing is manifest by the parable of the Gospell where the séede the woorde of God I say is written to fall sometymes vpon good ground and sometimes vpon stony ground vpon thornes and by the high way side where it is lost and Fayth which iustefieth is not in all men equal bringeth forth no fruite Agayne that fayth which is good and profitable is not in all men a lyke for according to the greater or lesser infirmitie of the fleshe it hath degrées Wherfore Paul saith Euen as God hath deuided vnto euery man the measure of fayth And in the selfe same parable the seede falling on the good ground bringeth not forth fruite alyke in all partes For in some place it bringeth forth thirty fold in other some place lx folde and in other some an hundreth folde In sūme the entent of Paule in this place is to make the righteousnes of God whereof he entreateth in this place proper vnto fayth to the ende he myght vtterly take it away as well from our merites as from our workes But I meruayle that forasmuch as this is his scope how the Greke Scholies affirme that we are not so iustified that vnto the obtaynment of righteousnes The Greke Scholies and Chrysostome are noted we bring nothing our selues Fayth say they is brought of vs for that to beleue it behooueth vs to haue a valiant mynde And this selfe thinge signifieth Chrisostome These thinges must be vnderstanded warely neyther can they be admitted in that sense as though fayth proceded from vs when as vnto the Ephesians it is playnly declared that it is the gift of God neyther if it were of our selues could all boasting be excluded For we should bring much if out of our selues should come the power to beleue And this place playnely teacheth that it is not so to be vnderstanded for the Apostle addeth Being iustified freely But it should not be fréely if fayth as it is our worke should bring righteousnes I graunt indede that our vnderstanding and will do assent vnto the promises of God But that it doth or maye do the same it muste of necessity come of God Vnto all and vpon all that beleue There are three thinges now put in this proposition which the Apostle entendeth playnly to declare The first is this That the righteousnes of God is made manifest the second that it is without the law the third that it is by fayth As touching the first he sayth that thys righteousnes of God is declared vnto all and vpon all Which is not so to be Righteousnes is not in all men but only in the elect and in the beleuers ▪ vnderstanded
as generally spoken when as in all men there nether is nor appeareth any such righteousnes But his wordes are contracted vnto those which beleue vnto the elect I say and sanctified Which thing the words of the Apostle sufficiently declare If this sentence should be vnderstanded altogether vniuersally then this manifestation could not be referred but vnto the preaching This vniuersality may haue a respect vnto the preaching which is set forth vnto all men hauing no respect either of persons or estates for so Christ warned the Apostles to preach the Gospell to all creatures and generally addeth whosoeuer beleueth and is baptised shal be saued But the first sense is both true and also more perspicuous He afterward addeth a reason why this righteousnes is made manifest vnto all vpon all that beleue Because sayth he All haue sinned and are destitute of the glory of God That forasmuch as they want righteousnes of their owne they might receaue it at the handes of God There are none so holy but that as sayth Ambrose this place conuinceth them to be sinners forasmuche as this righteousnes geuen of God hath place in all and vpon all But this phrase is to be noted Are destitute of the glory of God By it some thinke is to be vnderstāded the The glory of god somtimes signifieth his dwelling in vs. dwelling of God in vs bycause men were seperated from him nether had they him ioyned vnto them by grace And that the glory of God expresseth this maner of dwelling hereby it is manifest for that the Arke of the couenant is called the glory of God Wherefore when it was taken by the Philistians the glorye of God was sayd to be taken away Others thinke that Paule by the glorye of God vnderstandeth the perfect and true righteousnes which comming from God is iudged glory or that whereby we glorifye God And forasmuch as glory What glory is is nothing els but a prayse most aboundantly published Paule by a figuratiue kinde of speach calleth the most singular giftes of God the glory of God for which giftes we both prayse and celebrate his name so that the thing hath by the figure Metonomia the name of the propriety which followeth it But in my iudgement it semeth that Paule would declare by these wordes that all men in theyr corrupt nature were reiected and that he chiefely reproueth rites sacrifices and workes of the lawe in which they thought the glory of God chiefly to consist For he sheweth that they in very deede were destitute of the glory of God although they were altogether full of their ceremonyes And are iustified freely by his grace Here we haue what that meaneth the righteousnes of God to be made manifest without the lawe namely to be geuen freely And Paule laboring to shew that in iustification is no consideration had of our workes semeth to shew that he neuer satisfieth hymselfe So many wordes heapeth he vp which signifieth one and the selfe same thing For We measure the righteousnes of God by our own righteousnes he saw what a hard thing it is to be beleued of vs which will our selues do nothing freely and by our owne measure do measure the righteousnes of God as though he also would not geue his righteousnes freely Out of this kinde of speach ought to be gathered this common sentence that by fayth only we are iustified And although this word only be not found in the holy scriptures yet is it necessarily inferred of those things which we there reade as Ambrose most Ambrose sayth by fayth onely playnly noteth in this place writing vōp these words saying We do nothyng we recompēce not by fayth only are we iustified which is the gift of God He was not content to say that we are iustified by fayth only but he addeth also other clauses whereby he might more playnly declare the same The selfe same thing writeth Basilius also in his booke De confessione fidei We sayth he haue nothing whereof Basilius was of the same iudgement we may make our boast concerning righteousnes forasmuch as we are iustified only hy fayth in Christ. Which wordes are not so to be vnderstanded as though the fayth wherby we are iustified were alone that is not adorned with good holy works but because our workes though they be neuer so holy are not causes of the true righteousnes The like similitude is shewed in water wherin moistnes and coldnes are ioyned together but to washe away blots and spots properly belongeth to moistnes and not to coldnes Wherefore this is a false argument ab accidente whē as two things being ioyned together that which belongeth to the one is ascribed vnto the other But as touching this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is being iustified being a participle of the nominatiue case it is to be referred vnto that which was a little before spoken For all haue sinned and are destitute of the glory of God as though he should haue sayd they which were such are iustified freely By his grace by the redemption which is in Christ Iesus whome God hath set forth a propitiator by fayth Here Paule expresseth those thinges which by fayth we embrace when we are iustified and sheweth that by fayth he vnderstandeth the obiectes which by it are apprehended And when he sayth by grace he sheweth that he entreateth of a farre other maner of righteousnes then is that which is gotten by workes and he most manifestly excludeth the conditions We are not iustified rashely or by chaunce of the lawe And when we heare that we are iustified fréely and by grace we must not thinke that the same is done rashely or by chance forasmuch as it is tempered by the rule of the election of God The causes and reasons whereof although they be vnknowen vnto vs yet are they knowen vnto God And seing that in respect of hym the same is not done by chaunce we ought not to affirme that men are iustified b◠chance And euē as chaunce is to be takē away so also ought we to banishe necessitye least we should seeme to admitte fate or desteny For God is not compelled to chuse this man more thē that man But whatsoeuer he geueth he geueth it freely and without compulsion By the redemption Hereby appeareth that we are manumitted by Christ and made his free men For we were bond men cast into the prison of sinne Who are redemed death and the deuill But Christ hath fully payd the price for vs and that no small price for he hath shed his owne bloud for vs and geuen his life That is sayd to be redemed which before was both free and also pertayned vnto vs. We were the peculiar people of God and through our owne default we were sold vnder sinne This phrase here of the Apostle manifestly declareth how litle we ought to ascribe vnto free will before we be by the redemption of Christ set at liberty And
whiche sinnes were sayd to be purged but baptised them into repentaunce to the forgeuenes of sinnes adioyning therunto doctrine wherein he made mention of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Gost Which thing vndoubtedly the high Priestes and Scribes and Phariseys coulde in no case abyde that he reiecting the ceremonies which were receaued shoulde put in their place a new maner of purging Wherefore they sent a Messenger vnto him to aske of him whither he were the Messias or Elias or the Prophet as it were confessing that vnder the Messias it should come to passe that the ceremonies of the law should be abolished the the same was not lawfull for other mē to doo And if a man demaūd why God gaue ceremonies which should afterwarde be abolished Chrisostome hath thereof a very apt similitude If a man haue a wyfe very prone to lafciuiousnes he shutteth her vp in certayne places in chambers I say and parlers so that shee cannot wander abroade at her pleasure He appointeth vnto her moreouer Eunuches wayting maydes and handmaides most diligentlye to haue an eye vnto her So delte God with the Iewes He tooke them vnto him at the beginnyng as a spouse as it is said in the Prophet I haue wedded thee with mercy and with loue And by this natiō his wil was at cōueniēt tyme to enstruct the whole world Which thing he did by the Apostls when Christ was now departed frō the earth But that people was very weake and feble and aboue measure prone to adulteries of idolatry Wherfore God seperated them from other nations and would haue them to dwell in the land of Chanaan aparte by themselues and to be kept in on euery side with ceremonies and rites as it were by scholemaisters vntill this spouse was so strengthened and confirmed that her fayth was no more had in suspicion Which thing when husbandes perceiue in their wyues they suffer them to go at their pleasure whither they will and to be conuersant with menne neither do they any more set any kepers to watche them So God when he had nowe by Christ geuen vnto the church the holy ghost he remoued away from it the custodye of ceremonies and sent forth his faithfull to preach throughout the whole world The selfe same father proueth in an other place that the ceremonies and rites of the Iewes were not instituted of God of a principall entente and purpose For God woulde haue a people which should worship him in spirite and in truth But the Israelites which had bene conuersant in Egipt and had contaminated themselues with idolatry woulde needes in any wise haue both sacrifices and ceremonies so that if these sacrifices and rites had not bene permitted vnto them they would haue bene redy to turne to idolatry Wherefore God so A similitude delt with them as the maner of a wise phisition is to do who lighting vpon one sicke of a burnyng agew whiche by reason of his wonderfull great heate requireth in any wyse to haue some colde water geuen him and if he haue none geuen him he is redy to hang himselfe or by some other meanes to destroy himselfe in this case the phisition beyng by necessity cōpelled commaundeth to be brought a viole full of water which he himself hath prepared and geueth the sicke man leaue to drinke but yet with suche a charge that he drinke out of nothing els but out of that viall So God graunted vnto the Hebrewes sacrifices and ceremonies but yet so that they should not exercise them otherwise then he himselfe had commaunded them And that this is true he hereby proueth For that God gaue not ceremonies vntill alter they had made the golden caife God prescribed not ceremonies but when he had made open his wrath against the Israelites who hurling in theyr braselets earinges and ringes caused a calfe to be made for them which they worshipped And seyng it is so Paul saith rightly when he sayth that the law is not by faith abolished although those ceremonies be taken away Which sentence Christ also confirmeth when he saith that he came not to take away the law but to fulfill it The sence of which wordes may easely be gathered out of those thinges which we haue before spoken The reasons which afterward follow are brought to confirme this proposition now alledged namely That man is iustified by faith and that without the workes of the law Hetherto when as at the beginning Here is repeated the methode or order which the Apostle hath hether to kept the Apostles had set forth that by the Gospell and the faith of Christ commeth saluation and righteousnes he vsed this reason that whersoeuer the Gospel and faith want there is most great vnrighteousnes and vncleannes of life but on the contrary side where these haue place there is both righteousnes and true holines Therfore by them saith he come saluation and iustification The Minor or second proposition was proued chiefly as touching the first parte For first the Gentles liued most filthely although they knew God by the nature of things Farther the Iewes were not in their conuersation one whit better then the Gentles And this done he declareth wherehence the true righteousnes should be sought for t namely of faith without workes Which thing before he would proue he thought it good to confute an obiection namely that by faith he ouerthroweth not the law but rather by faith confirmeth it This selfe same thing is obiected vnto vs in our dayes that by faith which with the Apostle we affirme to iustifie we ouerthrowe all honest and holy workes Of this thing do they cry out which defend the worke wrought in the sacramentes which boast of workes of supererogation whiche defend purgatory inuocation of saintes and obtrude vowes and sole life What shall we answer to these things Paul sayth y◠he by faith abrogateth not the law but rather confirmed it In which wordes he geueth a reuerence to the ceremonies instituted of God which for their tyme were of necessity obeyed especially for the they were founded vpon the word of God But we can not so say as touching those things which we are accused to haue ouerthrowen Bicause they are abuses and mere superstitions In this disputacion the condition of Paul and ours is diuerse which are vtterly repugnaunt vnto the worde of God Wherfore we confesse that these thinges we ouerthrow by the fayth of Christ and doctrine of the Gospell Now haue we heard the purpose and state of the question which shall be entreated of which we ought continually to haue before our eyes so that vnto it must we referre whatsoeuer is sayd in this whole discourse And this shal be with fruite to heare those thinges which the Apostle writeth The fourth Chapter VVHat shal we say then that Abraham our Father hath found concerning the flesh For if Abraham were iustified by workes he hath wherein to reioyce but not with God
thinges both that euill lusts should be cut of out of the minde and also that the children of Israell should be seperated from other nations Farther it was the seale of the will and promise of God which was offred vnto Abraham concerning righteousnes the remissiō of sinnes thorough Christ and the league with God and a greate many mo such like good things This promise I say was sealed with the signe of circumcision And besides these significations of the sacraments ar two other cōmodityes not to be cōtemned For the things which ar so marked Sacramentes also are notes whereby we are knowen to pertaine vnto God as vnto our owner and Lord. By these notes also is shewed how muche God maketh of vs. are therby appoynted to be theyrs who are their owners as in horses oxen other suche like thinges the markes and notes which ar burnte in them declare vnto whome they pertayne So the Sacraments when they are receaued do beare witnes that we belong vnto God Farther such outward notes declare of what value and estimation the thinge that is sealed ought to be counted as it is manifest in coynes of gold and also in horses For the best and excellent horses are marked with one marke and dull Iades with an other marke Farthermore the sacramentes which God hath commended vnto vs declare how much God setteth by vs For the notes and markes of circumcision and of other sacramentes are as it were admonishers of the will and promises of God For forasmuch as we are weake neyther do we easely beleue the promises of God it was nedefull that his good will towardes vs shoulde not only be signified by wordes but also shoulde be sealed by thinges which might be offred to our senses Wherefore Augustine very aptly sayth that the Sacramentes are visible wordes And Chrisostome vpon this place writeth that circumcision preached righteousnes Wherefore God would that we should both haue his wordes in the holy scriptures which should be set forth vnto vs whilest the misteryes were in doing and also that vnto them should outwardly be added visible notes that we might the more firmely resist if at any tyme the minde should beginne to doubt By these thinges it is manifest how they are deceaued which thinke that by the power of the action or as they vse to speake by the worke wrought The worke wrought is excluded the sacramentes bring saluation Vndoubtedly euen as the wordes of the scripture nothing profit without fayth so also nothing profit the sacramentes vnles fayth be present Nether is that opinion to be allowed whereof Augustine in his booke De ciuitate dei maketh mēcion namely that they can not be damned They are deceaued which thinke that no man after he hath once receaued the sacraments can be damned In this place abone all other is is expressed the nature of Sacramentes Sacraments are not onely markes notes which haue once receaued the sacramēts of Christ I thinke there is scarse any place in the holy scriptures wherein is so briefely and so expressedly set forth the nature of the sacramentes as in these wordes of Paule wherein circumcision is called a seale And to the ende we should vnderstand that it is not the seale of euery thinge there is added of righteousnes that is of the forgeuenes of sinnes which pertayneth vnto the will of God Lastly he addeth of fayth to geue vs to vnderstand what maner of thinge that is whereby we may take hold of that righteousnes And that is fayth Wherefore euery man may see how much they are deceaued whiche thinke the sacramentes to be but onlye markes and notes of religion whereby men may knowe one an other For so should they attribute no more vnto sacramentes then vnto garments or coulors whereby familyes and sectes are descerned one from an other Nether is this sufficiente whiche others say which thinke that in sacramentes are shewed forth the signes only and professions of those thinges and actions which are required of vs which are initiated into Christ so that circumcision they make to signifye the mortifying of wicked affection and baptisme to signifie that we must stoutely and with a valiant courage suffer losses iniuries aduersities What is the chiefest and principallest thing in the Sacramentes Graeca Scolia Three significations of circumcision because in it is signified that we are crucified and buried together with Christ And that the supper of the Lord is only a signe of Christian beneuolēce of duties of mutuall charity We deny not but that all these thinges are in the sacramentes But the hed and summe of theyr signification we say consisteth herein that they seale vnto vs the giftes and promises of God which he offreth vnto vs to be taken holde of by fayth The Greeke Scholies haue in this place most expressedly put that Circumcision was for three causes geuen that it should be a signe of fayth and of righteousnes that it should seperate the kyndred of Abraham from other nations and that it should be a note and manifest token of a pure and vndefiled conuersacion This place most manifestly declareth y◠which Augustine writeth to Bonifacius namely that Sacramēts haue the names of those thinges which they signifie And that thing he proueth by many stmilitudes amongest which he maketh mencion also of the Eucharist bicause Circumcision because it was the signe of the couenant therefore it had the name of the thinge It is Paul which teacheth that sacraments do signify seale things promised That we call sacramentes are signes we say it out of the holy scriptures Sacramentes not after iustification vnprofitably receaued Sacramentes stirre not vp faith but the holy ghost stirreth it vp A similitude Our righteousnes hath much vncleanes mingled with it The resurrection shal be a perfect regeneration we call it the body of Christ when as it is only the sacrament thereof And wee also teache that the bread in the holy misteryes is therfore the body of Christ bycause it is the signe thereof These things some cānot abide But they ought to remember that in the boke of Genesis Circumcision is called the couenaunt of the Lord which is nothing ells then the promise of righteousnes and of the forgeuenes of sinnes throughe Christ And this couenaunt the Lord commaunded that the Iewes shoulde carye aboute with them in theyr fleshe That thing Paule now expoundeth namely that it was the signe of that righteousnes and couenaunt Wherefore it manifestly appeareth that this kind of interpretatiōs which we vse was brought in by the Apostle and that to follow those interpretations is nothing els then to follow the steps of the Apostles If thou demaūd that for as much as we haue remissiō of sinnes haue by fayth obteined righteousnes what commodity then bringe the sacramentes vnto vs we answere very much for that they offer themselues before our eyes and so doo admonish vs. For our fayth is stirred vp not
vnto the promises But now they which after this maner attribute more theÌ„ is mete vnto the sacrameÌ„ts may be called sacramentaries bicause they put to much affiaÌ„ce in theÌ„ The other thing which we said is repugaant vnto the nature of the sacraments is when we count them to be nothing but bare naked signes For by that meanes they shuld nothing differ from Tragicall and Comicall significations and from colours and garments Nether are they only signes of our actions but also of the promise and of the will of God and are sealinges therof And the holy ghost doth no les vse these signes to stirre vp our hartes then he vseth the woords of God which are in the holy scriptures And hereby also we may se that they likewise are agaynst the sacraments which will haue them to be sacrifices For the nature of a sacrifice is to be offred of vs vnto God but the nature of a sacrament is to be offred of God vnto vs. I confesse indeed that in the celebracion of the supper of the Lord are contayned thankesgeuing almes prayers and other such like things which may haue the consideration of a sacrifice But we deny that the very sacrament The sacrificing priestes offer not Christ vnto God the father The instrument wherby the thing of the sacramente is receaued is fayth of the Eucharist may properly be called a sacrifice And much les is that to bee borne with all which the sacrificing priests make theyr boast of that they offer vp vnto God the body of Christ Our lord hath offered vp himselfe nether hath he nede of any other to offer him vp Now that we haue well considered all these thinges we nede not manye woordes to expresse the instrument whereby the thing of the sacrament is receaued For Paul hath most manifestly declared it when he sayd that CircumcisioÌ„ is the seale of the righteousnes of fayth For it is faith wherby yâ— righteousnes which is signified in yâ— sacrament is receaued of vs for nether can our sense or reason therunto attayne And Augustine expouÌ„ding these woordes of Iohn Now ye are cleane bycause of my word sayth that in that the sacraments doo make vs cleane they haue it of the word of God For if thou take away sayth he from the element the word there will nothing remayne but water only The woord commeth vnto the element and it is made a sacrament For how commeth it sayth he that the water toucheth the body washeth the hart He answereth that the same commeth to passe thorough the force and power of the word not bycause it is spoken but bycause it is beleued By these thinges it is manifest that fayth is it whereby we receaue clensing and sanctification which thing also is written in the Actes of By the power of the word we aâ—e wâ—â—hed not because it is spoken but because it is beleued the Apostles By fayth purifiing theyr harts And Paul to the Ephesians sayth that Christ loued the Church and clensed it with the lauacre of water But there is added In the woord that is by the word which as Augustine sayth is vnderstand to be done bycause it is beleued and not bycause it is spoken For by the pronunciation of the woords are neither changed the natures of the signes nor the benefites of God geuen for so it mought seme an enchantment Fayth I say is the instrument wherby we receaue the woordes of God and let them downe into The benefites of God are not geuâ—n by the pronounciatioÌ„ of the woordes The sacrameÌ„ts must be administred as Christ hath instituted them our mindes But now touching the maner of administring the sacrameÌ„ts there ought none other maner to be brought in then that which Christ himselfe the author of the sacramentes hath commended vnto vs. For if the Iewes durst not deale otherwise in the ceremonies of the old law theÌ„ was prescribed theÌ„ of God much more ought we to obserue those ceremonies which christ hath prescribed vnto vs after the selfe same maner that he hath prescribed them Farther forasmuch as those signes came from the wil of God and of theyr own nature signifie nothing what is more reasonable then to referre all thinges vnto his wil which hath geuen them But his will can by no other wayes be knowen but by the holy scriptures And vndoubtedly no maÌ„ will presume to alter the letters patents of kings graunts much more ought the same thing to be takeÌ„ hede of in the sacramentes of God And the minister by whome these thinges ought to be exercised and distributed althoughe it be conuenient that he be godly and of an honest lyfe for such a one is to be maintayned and when he behaueth himselfe The wickednes of the minister corrupteth not the sacramentes A similitude otherwise and is knowen so to be he ought no longer to be suffred yet though he be wicked so long as he kepeth still that funcioÌ„ he can not vitiate the sacraments so that he doo those thinges which Christ hath commaunded to be done Augustine hath a very trime similitude of a pipe of stone through which water is brought into a garden For although the pipe be made nothing the more fertile by meanes of the running through of the water yet is the garden by it watred and made fruitfull The dignity of the sacramentes dependeth not of the minister but of the institution of God which thing the donatistes not vnderstanding raysed vp much tumults agaynst the Church That is true which is commonly sayd of liuing creatures that by a dried vp member the spirite of life can haue no passage into the other member For if the arme be dead and withered Solucion of the argument obiected vp the life and spirite can not come vnto the hand But in the Church there is no suche greate coniunction betwene menne For the power of the sacraments is to vs as the light of the Sonne which light although it bee dispersed through vile and filthy places yet is it not therfore contaminated or infected But the times of the sacramentes may be deuided into two partes For some were before the comming of Christ and some after And these differ the one froÌ„ the other by outward notes and signes Nether was that done rashly or without Of sacraments some were before the comming of Christe and some after The sacraments of the elders our sacramentes are aptly distinguished vp signes Two errors to be eschewed in the sacramentes A similitude An other similâ—â—ude How the signes of the elders are taken away and how they abide What are the thinges of the sacrament By the second comming of Christ shall our signes be taken a way Our sacrameÌ„ts more excellenter then the sacramentes of the elders The nature of the thinges signified is one and the same We and the Iewes in the old time haue one the same stocke and one and the same roote The diuersity of tyme distinguisheth them
of the law when as otherwise we our selues can not perticularly render a reason of these ceremonies The Apostles haue only generally made them playn vnto vs. And though there haue benne some amongst vs as Origen and a greate many other like which haue attēpted to frame for euery perticular ceremony a proper alegory yet haue they in a manner but lost theyr labour For theyr inuentions could We must not geue our selues to much to Allegories Error of the scholemen bring no profite at all vnto vs. For they most plainely want the woord of God Nether is it to be meruayled at that they so muche delighted in such inuentiōs For euen as euery where our owne deuises woonderfully please vs so in this matter the curiosity of man excedingly delighted it selfe Now those things which we haue spoken most playnly declare how farre the schole men haue missed of the marke which haue betwen the old sacrementes and the new put this difference that the old sacramentes only signified grace and Christ but ours largly and aboundantly exhibite both For the elders say they were holpen by the woorke of the worker For when any man came with fayth and a godly Of the worke working◠and the worke wrought motion of the hart and of the minde vnto those holy seruices he had therby merite But the woorke wrought as they call it nothing profited them as touching saluation But in our sacraments they say it is farre otherwise that not only fayth and the spirituall motion of the minde which they call the woorke of the worker helpeth vs but also euen the outward sacramente it selfe and the institution of God which they call the worke wrought conferreth vnto vs both remission of sinnes and also saluation But I will demaund of these men what that is which the outward worke and the visible sacrament exhibiteth vnto vs that we do not attayne vnto by fayth if they aunswere that it is Christ as for hym we comprehende by fayth If remission of sinnes that also we obtayne by fayth if reconciliation wherby we returne into fauor which God this also we can not obtayne without fayth if last of all the encrease of grace and of the spirite neither vndoubtedly doo we by anye other meanes obtayne this but by fayth what is there then remaning that this worke wrought bringeth This word is altogether strange nether is it once mēcioned of in the holy scriptures Worke wrought a woorde neuer heard of Nether would I at this time haue vsed it but that I haue to contēd agaynst the aduersaries But paraduenture they will say Forasmuch as besides fayth is also added the outward woorke is there nothinge to be attributed vnto it yes vndoubtedly I attribute much vnto it when it procedeth of fayth For I know that such a worke pleaseth God and that he vseth to recompence many thinges vnto such workes But what maketh that to this present purpose Did not the elders vnto theyr fayth adioyne also those workes wherby they exercised and receaued the sacraments of theyr law Wherfore as touching this part wee see that they had in theyrs as many things which pleased God as we haue in ours vnles paraduenture they wil contend that the exercising and receauing of our sacramentes is ether a better or nobler woorke then was the exercising and receauing of the sacramentes of the elders which thing I will not graunte vnto The receauing of our sacraments is not more excellent or better then the receauinge of the sacraments of the elders Whither the sacramentes conferre grace and remitt◠sinnes thē especially seing y◠the perfectin of the worke is to be cōsidered by faith and charity from whēce it procedeth wherfore if Abraham and Dauid had more faith when they receaued theyr sacramentes then any weake Christian when he is baptised or communicateth who will not iudge but that theyr worke is more notable and more excelēt then the other mans worke And moreouer as for that kinde of speach which these men so often vse namely that sacraments remitte sinnes ar conferre grace we do not easly admite vnles paraduenture in that sēse wherin Paule affirmeth that the Gospell is the power of God to saluatiō as vnto Timothe the reading of the holy scriptures is sayd to make saffe which vndoubtedly is nothing ells but that the might and power of God wherby he remitteth sinnes geueth grace and at the end saueth vseth these instruments and meanes to our saluation And euen as to bring vs to saluatiō he vseth the word of the Gospell and the preaching of the holy scriptures so also adioyneth he ther vnto the sacraments For by ether of them is preached vnto vs the liberall promisse of God which if we take hold of by fayth we shall obtayne both saluatiō and also remission of sinnes This is the true sense vnto which also are the fathers to be applied when they say that grace is the power of the sacramentes Which is all one as if they had sayd vnderstanding and sense is the power of speach and of wordes And how vnaptly the Scholemen speake of theyr stay or Of the stay or let of the scholemen let herby it is manifest for that they say that he putteth not a staye or let which although he haue not the acte ether of louing or of beleuing yet obiecteth nothing that is contrary or opposite vnto grace namely the acte of infidelity or of hatred Thē in such case say they the sacraments of the Gospel conferre grace But this is nothing ells then to attribute vnto creatures the cause of our saluation and to binde our selues to much to signes and elements of this world Thys ought to bee certayne and most assured that no more is to be attributed vnto the sacramentes as touching saluation then vnto the worde of God Wherfore We oughte to attribute no more vnto the sacraments then vnto the woord of God How our sacraments are better then the sacramentes of the elders Sometimes is receaued the sacraments onely sometimes the thinge onelye Grace is not bounde vnto the sacramentes as we put corne into sackes if sometimes we heare as Augustine also saith our sacramentes are better then the sacramentes of the elders this ought so to be vnderstanded that it be refer red vnto perspicuitie For we graunt that our sacraments both speake and preach more plainly of Christ then did the sacraments of the elders Wherfore seing we are more clearely and plainly instructed faith is the more fuller and bringeth vnto vs more grace and spirite And we gladly admit that which the same Augustine saith That sometymes it commeth to passe that the sacrament is receyued wythout the thing For so the wicked and infidels vsinge the sacramentes receiue onelye the outwarde signes and are vtterly voyde of saluation and of grace Sometimes also it contrariwise happeneth that the godly being excluded by any necessitie frō the vse of the sacramentes yet are in no wise defrauded
doubted And he vseth this verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to reason with himselfe and to put doubtes In which signification the Actes of the Apostles vse the selfe same word For it is so sayde vnto Peter that he should go vnto Cornelius the Centurion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is nothing doubting Abraham had a respect vnto the will and power of God which made the promise and not to his owne infirmity or to the infirmity of his wife Set God aside and he had nothing whereby he coulde promise himselfe any such thing Wherefore as sayth the Apostle he was strengthned in fayth nether doubted he through vnbeliefe which is all one as if he had sayd On euery side els were offred vnto him in credulity and doubting Nether ought this sentence to be reproued for that that we fele no such experience in our selues For there is none in whose minde sometymes ariseth not some doubt touching those thinges which we beleue For this commeth not of fayth but of our infirmity Which thing we may easely be instructed of hy yâ— which we sée to happeÌ„ in yâ— hâ—bite or quality of any science especially of the mathematical science For therein is certaynty and that vndoubtedly very great For the conclusions there necessarily and most euidently follow of the premisses But if a man haue not perfectlie learned or absolutely attained vnto the science he shal sometimes doubt And this commeth to passe not by meanes of the science but by reason of the default of him which vseth the science So we because so long as we liue here Why sometymes arise in vs doubtes euen against our willes we are weake nether can haue a full and perfect fayth therefore oftentymes do aryse in vs doubtes yea euen agaynst our willes but it is farre otherwise of the nature of an opinion which is such that there can be no blame layde vnto vs if we somewhat enclyne vnto the other part from that which we thinks to be true And the infirmity which happeneth vnto vs concerning fayth may come two wayes For sometymes we firmely cleaue vnto those thinges which we beleue but yet are there other things behind which are to be beleued which yet we perceaue not And after this maner they which still together the Gospell obserued choyce of meates and other ceremonies are in this epistle called of Paule weake in fayth for they yet knew not that the ceremonies of the Iewes were by Christ abrogated Sometymes it commeth to passe that we sée in deede the thinges which are to be beleued but yet we are not so perfect in fayth that we can firmely and constantly cleue vnto them So Christ called the We must pray vnto God to encrease our fayth Apostles men of little fayth and especially Peter when through doubting he was almost drowned with the waues of the sea wherefore as touching eche part we must alwayes pray vnto God to encrease our fayth By this place also is to marked that the power of beleuing commeth from the holy ghost when as we geue not place to so many and so great waues of doubtes beating agaynst our mindes but at the last get the vpper hand of them which thing coulde not be done without a certayne celestiall and supernaturall strength But in this assent What thinges are diligently to be examined in the assent of faith of fayth we must diligently examine both who it is whiche speaketh and also what that is which is spoken and set forth vnto vs to be beleued For the deuill laboreth for nothing more then to make vs to beleue that God said that which he sayd not Oftentymes also those thinges which are spoken of God himselfe are by false deceauers wrested to a wrong sense and corrupted and are so obtruded to be beleued Wherefore seing as touching eche part we haue nede of reuelatioÌ„ we must pray vnto God not to suffer vs to be deceaued One of them that writeth vpon the sentences is of this opinion that if it were most We must pray vnto God not to suffer vs to be deceaued assuredly knowen that God spake any thing therein faith could haue no place For strayght way sayth he by the light of nature we should know that that ought to be true which God hath spoken vnles we will thinke him to be a lyar But this man is wonderfull far out of the way For we doubt not but that the prophetes assuredly knew that God spake in them and yet they gaue faith or beleued those thinges which they foretolde We also assuredly know that Whether it followeth that they beleue which know assuredly that God hath spoken any thing God spake those thinges which are read in the holy scriptures And yet we beleue them The Apostles know that they had receaued the holy ghost And yet for all that they wanted not fayth But that which this man sayth should then be true if by reason or sense we might euidently know that God spake these thinges which vndoubtedly can neuer come to passe For these thinges are not made knowen vnto vs but by reuelation But this man in stede of euidence did put certaynty The last part which is in the definition wherein it is sayde that this assent wrastleth with the sense and wisedome of the fleshe may manifestly be declared not only by this example of Abraham but also by a great many other examples God promised deliuery vnto the Israelites and yet in the Examples meane tyme increased their affliction they had a greater number of brickes layd vppon them they had no straw geuen them for theyr worke they were sharpely and cruelly beaten And wheÌ„ they were now departing out of Egipt the sea came agaynst them on the other side were great huge rockes and at their backes was Pharao at hand with a mighty host against whiche lettes it behoued yâ— flesh to striue And many things in like sort semed to be agaynst the promise made to Dauid to moue him not to beleue the anoynting of Samuell agaynst which it was nedeful that he should by fayth be strengthned The Apostles Fayth perpetually wrestleth with some doubting The ende of fayth Wherein the glory of God consisteth also found in Christ many tokens of infirmity which they could not haue ouercome but by fayth Wherefore we may conclude that such is the nature of our fayth that it alwayes striueth with some doubting Geuing the glory to God Here is set forth the ende whereunto fayth tendeth namely to aduance and encrease the glory of God which herein consisteth that we conceaue a worthy estimation touching God Abraham is sayde to haue bene in a maner an hundreth yeare olde For as it is written in the history of Genesis the 17. chapter he was now 99. yeares of age when this promise was made vnto him He had no like example before his tyme by consideration wherof he mought haue bene confirmed For he is the first vnto whome we
the kingdome of God But the fruites of the spirite sayth he are charity ioye peace lenity goodnes gentilenes fayth mekeâ—et and temperance And Paul more playnely to declare the fight betwene these two affections hath signified it not only by the name of flesh and spirite but also hath added other epithetes or proprieties namely that the affection of the flesh is death and enmity against God but the sence of the spirite is life and peace Now there is none which knoweth What life is not but that death is contrarye vnto life and enmitie vnto peace By life he vnderstandeth the motion of the wil of man and of the whole man towards God What peace is But peace is the tranquillitye of conscience and reconciliation wyth God Paul in that he so amplifieth these thinges playnly declareth how necessary a thing regeneration is for vs. And thereby also he exhorteth vs to follow the better affection namely the affection of the spirite and of grace for that the affectioÌ„ of the flesh is called death Which thing Ambrose sayth commeth to passe by reason of sinne for where sinne is there death of necessity followeth But he meruayleth Why the affection of the flesh is called wisedome why this affection is after the 〈…〉 in translation called wisedome And he answereth that it is so called bycause vnto such men it semeth wisedom for here vnto they apply all theyr industry craft and subtility namely to sinne and they are wise to doo euill Many also herein thinke themselues learned and wise bycause they will not beleue those thinges which passe the capacity of reason as for example the creation of the world the resurrection of the flesh the coÌ„ception of the virgeÌ„ and such like These words declare that Ambrose â–ª vnderstode the affection of the flesh as it extendeth it selfe vnto infidelity or vnto the minde And vndoubtedly Paul in this place vnder affection coÌ„prehendeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is the power of vnderstaÌ„ding the power of desiring With which sentence Augustine agréeth when he saith that wisedome chiefly consisteth in chusing and refusing But it is manifest that vnto election are adioyned two powers the power of knowledge yâ— power of will He addeth moreouer yâ— this affection is enmity against God for they which are so affected do fight against him An horrible sentence vndoubtedly But it is most truly said that the fight of the fleshe against the spirite is a fight against God Enmity saith he but The flesh fightings against the spirite fighteth against God the latine text hath enemy But this semeth to be but a small fault forasmuch as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with an acute accent in the first sillable signifieth enmity â–ª but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with an accent in the last signifieth an enemy And howsoeuer it be it may be ascribed ether vnto the writers or to the variety of bookes for the accent is easely transfered from one place to an other But we ought to consider that if we rede 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is enemy it is a noune adieâ—tiue whose substantiue can be none other but this woord◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whiche is englishâ—â— wisdome whiche we sée is of the neâ—ter gender And thâ—â— should it not to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We ought therefore of This â—hrase of the Apostle maketh the thyng more vehement necessity to rede 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â–ª which signifieth enmity and that agréeth best with the scope of the Apostle For he exaggerateth how great a destruction or hurt the affection of the flesh is And this is a vehementer kind of spech to call a wicked man wickednes then to call him wicked But how the sence of the fleshe is enmity against God â–ª the Apostle thus proueth Because saith he it is not subiect vnto the lawe of God yea neither indede can it Whosoeuer resisteth the wil of an other man and so worketh continually yâ— he can not disagre in any wise with him is his enemy Such is the affection What an enemy is of our fleshe Wherefore it is an enemy vnto God or rather it is euen very enmity it selfe against God That booke vpon Mathew which is ascribed vnto Chrisostome and is called an vnperfect worke vpon these wordes of the Lord He which seeth a woman to lust after her hath alredy committed fornication in hys hart that booke I say saith That the Lord may seeme to some to haue taken occasion to condemne vs for such affections haue we by nature that euen at the first brunt we are in such maner moued to lust And forasmuch â—s we are not able to prohibite these affections from rising vp therefore streight way will we or nill we we are made guilty of thys An vnapt distinction of affectes precept But it maketh a distinction of lust For there is one lust saith it of the mind and an other of the fleshe and there is also one anger of the mynde and an other of the fleshe Farther it addeth that that sentence of Christ is to be vnderstand of the luste of the mynde and not of the luste of the fleshe and that thys place of Paul may haue the selfe same sence namely to vnderstand that the wisedome not of the mynde but of the fleshe can not be subiect vnto the lawe of God And so by this distinction taken out of the philosophers they thinke that they haue very well knit vp the matter But with Paul the affection of the fleshe is not the inferior part of the minde nether is the spirite the mynde which possesseth the more nobler part of the soule as we shall afterward more manifestly declare But of how great credite that booke is Erasmus hath most plainely declared who doubtles in iudging the writinges of the elders was a man of great diligence And that that booke is none of Chrysostomes he proueth by many argumentes And Chrisostome himselfe when he interpreteth this place saith that by the affection of the fleshe is vnderstand the interpretation of the mynde but yet the more grosser part so that it taketh hys name of the worser part For so sometymes the whole man is called fleshe although he want not a soule So he extendeth the name of the fleshe euen vnto the mynde But he obiecteth If a man neither is nor can be subiect vnto the lawe of God what hope then shall there be of saluation Much faith he for we see that the thiefe Paul the sinfull woman Although our mind can not be subiect vnto the law of God yet is there hope of saluation The chaunging of the minde is of the spirite and grace and not of our owne strengthes Paul speaketh not of action or doing but of the affectes Christ by the good or euell tree vnderstoode eyther good or euil men Chrisostom thinketh tares may be made wheate which is not red in
These things we now hold by hope â—nto which hope are not repugnaunt gronings and sighinges yea rather they very Two thinges included in hope much agrée with it For hope includeth two thinges namely the absence of the thing which is desired and the assured wayting for the same Wherfore for that the good thing which we desire is differred is not present we are vexed in mind Sorrow ioy follow hope neither can we be but greued But forasmuch as this waityng for that God will performe his promises is sure and certaine we reioyce and are glad And therfore the scriptures euery where set forth the reioycinges and ioyes of the saintes The absence of the thing waited for Paul declareth by the nature of hope For he saith that the hope which is sene is not hope Which words are to be expounded by the figure Metonymia For hope is put for the thing hoped for And Pauls meaning is Hope is put for the thinge hoped for nothing els but yâ— hope is not touching those things which are sene Those thinges he saith are sene which are present which we may both haue fruicion of and also delight our selues in That which is sene saith he is not hope For that hope is of that thing which is not sene Neither bringeth he any other reason then the coÌ„mon sence of all men For how can a man saith he hope for that which he hath Afterward he declareth the waiting for which we said is contained in hope But if we hope for that we see not we do with patience waite for it By these wordes Paul declareth yâ— vnto hope pertaineth that we with a valiaunt and quiet minde waite for the promises of God although they be absent and long differred And therfore is required hope lest we should fal into dispayre by reason the The good thing which we hope for is hard and difficult Hope is not touching that thinge which is vnpossible good thing which we hope for is difficult and hard Hope erecteth the minde that it should not geue place either to aduersities or to differring of the thing hoped for It behoueth also that yâ— thing which we hope for be not so hard or difficill to thinke that we can by no meanes obteyne it otherwise we should cease from hoping For there is no wise man will labour for things impossible Wherfore when we behold that eternall felicitie is promised vnto vs these two thinges straight way come in to our minde that it is a thing infinitely distant from our strengths and yet may be obteined of such as beleue But the power of attaining vnto it dependeth neyther of our merites nor of our workes but only of the mercy of God and merite of Christ Here heÌ„ce is the certainty of our hope to be sought for which could be none The certainty of hope should be nothing at all iâ— felicitie should depend of merites at all if eternall felicity should be attained vnto by our merites or workes By this certaine and assured expectation our mindes are in aduersities and temptations confirmed For vnto souldiours is set forth the victory which being a goodly thinge and very muche delightinge their mindes causeth them to haue a regard vnto two thinges First that it is a thing hard and to be attayned vnto by great labours and daungers Secondly that it is not only possible for them to attaine vnto it but also that they are certaine therof and so being full of good hope they couragiously fight and obtayne yâ— victory Out of these proprieties which Paul in this place attributeth vnto hope we may gather the definitioÌ„ therof Hope therfore Definition of hope is a faculty or power breathed into vs by the holy ghost wherby we with a valiant and patient minde wayte for that the saluation which is now begun in vs and is receiued by faith may one day be made perfect in vs. And that hope is geuen by the holy ghost hereby it plainly appeareth for that it can not be gotten by any humane reason For we wayt for those good things which farre passe our nature That it engendreth in vs a patient waiting for Paul declareth in these words But if we hope for that we see not we do with patience waite for it That we haue eueÌ„ now receiued some part of yâ— saluation which we hope for hath bene before declared For Paul saith that we ar now adopted to be the sonnes of God are made his heires and the fellow heires of Christ And the epistle vnto the Hebrues teacheth that now are begonne in vs those good thinges which by faith we waite for for theyr faith is described to be the substaunce of thynges that are hoped Hope and charity follow faith for For hope hath no other foundacion to leane vnto but faith wherof it springeth For such is the nature of these thrée principall vertues faith hope and charity that the one euer followeth the other For first by faith we know the eternall good thing which is promised of God Vnto this promise faith geueth a firme assent and therof in our mindes springeth hope For for that we beleue that God is true and will performe that which he hath promised we patiently waite vntil the promise be rendred although we know that in the meane tyme we must suffer The order of the production of the three vertues These vertues haue theyr being togâ—ther at one and the selfe same time One of these vertues produceth not an other as the cause but the holy ghost is the author of them things most hard long enduring But for that we sée yâ— at the length shall be rendred vnto vs so great good things we are kindled with a great desire of them which thing pertaineth vnto charity this is the order of the production of these vertues in this sort the one goeth before the other although in very dede they haue their being all at one time and together But we ought not to thinke that fayth is the efficient cause of hope or that of those two springeth charity For the spirit of Christ is the only author of all these vertues he stirreth them vp in our mindes in such sort as we haue now declared But how the propriety of hope is not to make ashamed and how it hath certaintye inseperably ioyned with it we haue before taught in the 5. chapiter when we expounded this place Hope maketh not ashamed because the loue of God is powred abroade into our hartes Now let vs sée why Paul vnto hope addeth the helpe of the holy ghost In my iudgement he doth it therefore for that faith and hope embrace that good thing which is as yet farre absent neither can be attayned by the senses nor comprehended by reason But euils and calamities and corrupt affectes wherewith we are vexed are alwayes present and light vnder some one sence Wherefore that their rage should not ouerwhelme the power of
We are not taught by any parte of thâ—â—anonicall scripture â—hâ—t the â—â—â—â—tes departed do pray for vs. Althoughe the saintes do praye for vs. yet are not they to be inuocated do make intercession for vs we can not proue by any parte of the canonicall scripture Wherefore we ought to haue Christ only for our mediator aduocate neither are thinges vncertaine to be admitted for certaine Although I can easely graunt that the saintes in our countrey with most feruent desires wishe the saluation of the elect Yet dare I not say that they pray for them especially seyng the scripture no where teacheth any such thing And although I should confesse this yet should it not therof follow that we ought to cal vpon saintes departed For we are not certaine out of the worde of God that they can heare our prayers Wherfore they greuously offend both against religion and against Christ himself which appoint vnto themselues saintes for new mediators and aduocates wheÌ„ as there is but one onely mediator betwene God and men namely the man Christ Iesus who now as Paul saith maketh intercession for vs. The same thing doth Iohn testify saying I write vnto you that ye sinne not And if we sinne we haue an aduocate with the father euen Iesus Christ the iust Augustine against the epistle of Parmenianus in the 8. chap. in these wordes noteth that the Apostle excluded not himselfe None so holy but that he hath nede of the intercession of Christ from yâ— rest For he said not ye haue an aduocate but we haue For there is none so holy but yâ— he hath nede of Christ to be his aduocate and mediator Farther he saith not ye haue an intercessor but we haue an aduocate Iesus Christe Augustine in that place reproueth Permenianus for that he had in some places written that Bishops are mediators betwene God and the people which thing he sayth is not It is a thing intollerable that bishops should be mediators betwene God and the people We must not pray vnto Angels to be suffred of the faithfull The same Augustine in his 10. booke of confessions the 42. chapter thus writeth Whome should I haue found which mought reconcile me vnto thee Should I haue gone vnto Aungels But with what prayers With what Sacramentes And he addeth That there were many which would haue bene reconciled by Angels and were miserably deceyued for that an euill Aungell oftentymes transformeth hymselfe into an Aungell of lyght And if it be not lawfull for vs to pray vnto Aungels much les is the same lawfull for vs to doo vnto dead sayntes For here is no les perill to be deceaued then there These things writeth Augustine in that place both godly and soundly who yet in other places was not so circumspect in eschewing the errour of hys tyme. Who shall separate vs from the loue of God shall affliction shal anguishe shall persecution shall hunger â–ª shall nakednes â–ª shall danger shall the sworde As it is written For thy sake are we deliuered to the death all the day long we are counted as sheepe for the slaughter Neuertheles in all these things we are more then conquerors thorough hym that loued vs. For I am persuaded that nether death nor lyfe nor Aungels nor principalities nor powers nor thinges present nor thinges to come nor heigth nor depth nor any other creature shal be able to seperate vs froÌ„ the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. Who shall separate vs from the loue of God After that Paul had by so many reasons confirmed the exceding great loue of God towardes vs now by way of interrogacion he crieth out that there is nothing which can interrupt that loue wherewith God loueth vs. Let aâ—cuse vs whosoeuer wil let come aduersities be they neuer so great yet all things shal work vnto vs to good For this is the property of one that loueth continually to do good vnto him whom he loueth Wherfore seing God so loueth vs what soeuer he doth or whatsoeuer he sendeth vpon vs we must beleue that it shall be helthfull vnto vs neither ought any aduersities to perswade vs but that we are continually loued of God Wherfore this is a conclusion of all those thinges which haue bene before entreated of And that which the Apostle â—aith he is most fully persuaded of I would to God we were also persuaded of the same He reckoneth vp those thinges which seme commonly to be most harde and wherby men are oftentimes broken and euen these things he auoucheth hinder not the loue of God towardes vs so far is it of that they can plucke it away from vs. The Apostle the longer abideth in this place for that our flesh humane reason can hardly be perswaded of this thing For oftentymes when we are afflicted we cry My God my God why hast thou forsaken me And that with a farre other manner of affect then Christ pronounced those wordes We cry Howe long Men think aduersities to be tokeÌ„â— of Gods anger Ambrose vnderstandeth these thinges of our loue wylt thou be angry O Lord With many such other like For whatsoeuer aduersity happeneth we thinke the same to be a token of Gods wrath towardes vs wheÌ„ as yet he of a singuler loue suffreth vs so to be afflicted I know that Ambrose Augustine and very many other take loue in this place for that loue wherwith we loue God as though the meaning of Paul should be Seing God hath so loued vs ought not we agayne on the other side most constantly to loue hym And thys sentence is neither vnapte nor impious Howbeit I rather preferre the other for that it séemeth to serue better to the scope of the Apostle for hee in thys place goeth about to perswade vs that we should not be in doubt of the loue of God towardes vs. And therefore he sayth that he foreknewe vs predestinated called iustified and glorified vs gaue hys sonne vnto vs together with hym all thinges and that Christ hym selfe maketh intercession vnto yâ— father for vs. All these thinges pertain vnto yâ— loue which God beareth towardes vs. And a litle afterward the Apostle addeth But in all these thinges we are conquerours through hym which hath loued vs. These words most plainely serue to my sentence wherunto also subscribeth Chrisostom I confesse in dede that of this good will of God towardes vs is stirred vp our loue towardes hym howbeit Paul semeth to entreat of that first loue and not of thys our loue But they which will haue these wordes to be vnderstand of our loue towardes God somewhat do doubt whether the elect they yâ— be in very deede iustified may at any time leese faith charity and other vertues or no. But that semeth Paul to denye for he sayth yâ— there is nothing can plucke vs away from the loue of GOD. For this sence is gathered out of the interrogation which he here putteth But whatsoeuer other
mercy for that they haue purged themselues from filthines But what the verye meaning of that place is we haue before declared And that the Gentiles performed by nature those thinges which are of the law we thus expounded that they did many things in outward discipline which were coÌ„maunded in the law of Moses as in yâ— they eschued thefts whordomes adulteries other such like sins Wherfore Paul coÌ„cluded yâ— they waÌ„ted not the knowledge of vice vertue of right and wrong so yâ— when in many things they fell sinned they could not be excused by reason of ignoraunce There are others which vnderstand those wordes of the Gentiles now conuerted vnto Christ which being endewed with the holy ghost executed the commaundementes of God and declared both in life and in maners yâ— righteousnes consisteth not of the law of Moses of which thing yâ— Iewes continually boasted of But the first interpretacioÌ„ more agreeth with the words of the Apostle But whether soeuer interpretacion be admitted Origen hath therby no defence to proue that men attayne vnto righteousnes by the worthines True righteousnes dependeth not of the endeuor of men but of the goodnes of God The Iews did not rightly follow righteousnes of workes Yea rather the very wordes of the Apostle most plainly declare that true righteousnes dependeth not of the endeuor or worthines of men but of the goodnes and mercy of God For he sayth that the Israelites following the law of righteousnes attained not vnto righteousnes But this semeth vnto humane reason very absurd namely that those which followed not should obteyne and those which followed should be frustrated Howbeit this we ought to consider that the Israelites did not vprightly and lawfully seke it For if they had sought it according to the meaning of the law for as much as Christ is the end of the law they had doubtles beleued in him and so should haue bene iustified But by cause Paul in this place twise repeteth the righteousnes of the law some thinke yâ— those wordes are not in either place to be a like vnderstanded For in the first place by the law of rightousnes they thinke is to be vnderstanded the outward law and in the second place the true righteousnes as though Paul should saye that the Iewes applied themselues vnto the outward obseruation of the law but could not attayne vnto the true righteousnes in Christ Which interpretation I indede dislike not howebeit I thinke that these wordes may in eyther place be taken in one and the same sence so that the meaning is although that Wherfore the law of God is called the law of righteousnes the Iewes had purposed in theyr minde to kepe the law geuen them of God which law is called the law of righteousnes for that in it is contayned moste perfect righteousnes yet being voyde of fayth and of the spirite of Christ they could not kepe the law and therfore they were frustrated of theyr purpose and of that which they had determined in theyr minde so that they neyther had the true righteousnes which the Gentiles had obteyned and also were frustrated of that righteousnes which they sought for And the ground of that error was The grouÌ„d of the error of the Iewes in folowing of righteousnes Faith the soule of the commaundementes of God for that they being destitute of fayth and in the meane time supposing that they mought be iustified by workes applied themselues vnto workes only But without fayth these thinges are in vayne enterprised For fayth is the soule and life of all those thinges which are commaunded in the law Seing therfore that they fayled of the prescript of the law they had not Christ by whome their transgression of the law mought be forgeuen and by whome that which wanted mought be supplied And these workes whereof Paul speaketh the Fathers referre vnto the rites and ceremonies of the law of Moses but that as we haue declared is straÌ„ge from the very methode and doctrine which Paul vseth in thys epistle The contencion indede at the first beganne as we haue oftentimes said aboute ceremonies But Paul to proue that they can not iustify added a generall What Paul in this place vnderstandeth by workes In the obteinyng of rightousnes workes are as contrary opposed vnto fayth They which ascribe righteousnes vnto workes are not iustified proposition namely that no workes of what kinde soeuer they be in as much as they are workes haue power to iustify wherefore Paul in this place by workes vnderstandeth not only ceremonies but also all dewties of life This moreouer is worthy to be noted that Paul in this place in such sort affirmeth that righteousnes is taken hold of by fayth that vnto it he opposeth workes as contrary For when he had said that the Gentiles attayned vnto righteousnes by fayth streight way he addeth that the Iewes fell away from the law of righteousnes although they endeuored themselues thereunto namely for that they sought it not by fayth But why they sought it not by fayth he geueth a reason for that they sought it by workes Whereof it followeth that they are not iustified which abscribe righteousnes vnto workes For to put conâ—idence in them and to attribute righteousnes vnto them is an assured and euident let that thou canst not attayne vnto the true righteousnes Chrisostome noteth that these wordes of Paul which eyther pertayne vnto the Gentiles or which pertayne vnto the Iewes may be reduced to thrée wonderful principal poynts For first of the Gentiles he sayth that they attayned vnto righteousnes which Three things here out gathered against the meaning of the Iewes How the righteousnes of faith is greater then the righteousnes of workes thing the Iewes could in no case abide to heare for they would haue had none but themselues counted to pertayne to the kingdome of Christ SecoÌ„dly which is also more wonderfull he sayth that they attayned vnto righteousnes when as they gaue not themselues vnto righteousnes And which is most wonderfull of all he sayth that the righteousnes of fayth which the Gentiles tooke hold of is farre greater then the righteousnes of workes And therefore Paul before in this selfe same epistle thus wrote If Abraham were iustified by workes he hath glory but he hath not whereof to glory before God But how the righteousnes of fayth is greater and ercellenter then the righteousnes of workes is thus to be vnderstanded that although the workes of men not regenerate seme to be honest and notable and bring with them a certayne ciuill righteousnes yet notwithstanding is that righteousnes of so small valew that before God it is none at all yea rather it is counted for sinne Farther the holines and vprightnes of works which are done of men regenerate although it please God yet can it not abide to be examined tried by his exacte iudgmeÌ„t For our righteousnesses are like a cloth stayned with the naturall course of
willeth But that God should will sinnes is to be counted for most absurd and for a blasphemous doctrine They say moreouer that God can not iustly punish â–ª if we committe those thinges which he him selfe both willeth and worketh But this must we of necessity say if we affirme that not only our ends but also our meanes to the endes depend of the purpose of God To satisfye this doubt first let them remember that it can not be denied but that God after a sort willeth or as other some say permitteth sin But forasmuch as that is done without any coaction of our minde therefore no man when he sinneth can be excused For he willingly and of his owne accord committeth those sinnes for which he ought to be condemned and hath the true cause of theÌ„ in himselfe and therfore hath no nede to seke it in God Farther this is no good comparison which these men make betwene good workes and sinnes For God â—o worketh in vs good workes that he ministreth vnto vs his grace and spirit whereby these workes are wrought for those are the groundes of good workes which groundes doubtles we haue not of our selues But sinnes he so gouerneth and after a sorte How God is said after a sort to wil sinne willeth that yet notwithstanding the groundes of them that is the fleshe and our corrupt and vitiate nature are not in God but in vs. Wherefore there is no nede that they should be powred into vs by some outward motion And God is sayd after a sorte to will sinnes eyther for that when he can he prohibiteth them not or for that by his wisedome he directeth then to certayne endes or for that he suffreth them not to burst forth but when and how and to what vses he him selfe will or finally for that by them he will punish other sinnes But these adde that God by no meanes willeth sinne For so it is written in Ezechiell As truly as I liue sayth the Lord I will not the death of a sinner but rather that he be conuerted and liue But we answere that the Prophet in that place entreateth not of the mighty and hidden will of God and of his will of efficacy For God by that will worketh all thinges which he will both in heaueÌ„ and in earth But he entreateth of that will which they call the will of the signe For no man can by those signes and tokens which are expressed in the law gather that God The first aunswer willeth his death or condemnation For the lord commaunded hys lawe to be published vnto all men he hath vnto all men set forth those things which should be profitable and healthfull lastly he vpon all men indifferently powreth greate benefites Wherefore by this will which we call the will of the signe he willeth not the death of a sinner yea rather he prouoketh them to repentance But as touching the other will which they call the will of his good pleasure if by it he would that no man should perish then doubtles no man could perish and there is no will so peruerse as sayth Augustine which God if he wil caÌ„ not make good Wherefore according to this will he hath done all things whatsoeuer he would This is a redy and playne interpretation which if our aduersaries admit not but will nedes contend that the wordes of the Prophet are to be vnderstanded Another aunswer of the mighty will of God and of his wil of good pleasure theÌ„ will we answer yâ— yâ— sentence pertaineth not vniuersally vnto all sinners but only to those which repeÌ„t And those are yâ— electe predestinated vnto whome God as according to his purpose he geueth faith and vocation so also geueth he repentaunce Wherefore which sense so euer they followe they shall neuer by those woordes conclude that God vtterly by no meanes willeth the death of sinners or willeth sinne But they obiect certaine wordes out of the first chapter of the booke of wisedome where it is written God reioyseth not in the destruction of the liuing But if say they he by anye manner of meanes willeth sinne or the punishment thereof he can not be said not to reioyce therein For he reioyseth doubtles in that which he will haue to be done First I aunswere that that booke is not in the Canon and therfore the authority thereof maye be refused But amitte that that booke were canonicall yet do those wordes make nothing against vs. For he whatsoeuer he was that was the author God doth not against his will punishe wicked actes of that booke ment nothing els but to remoue from God that prauitye of nature whereby wicked men take pleasure in euil things And yet was not his meaning that God punisheth wicked factes against his wil. For otherwise whatsoeuer that author vnder the name of Salomon was he should be against the true Salomon For he in his Prouerbes vnder the person of wisedome thus writeth of the vngodly and of the vnbeleuers I also will laugh in your destruction In which wordes is declared that God with a laughing that is with a chiereful minde administreth iustice As touching the wordes of Ecclesiasticus which are writen in the. 15. chapter That no man ought to say of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is he hath deceaued me How it is to be vnderstanded that God deceiueth no maÌ„ in which place the lattine translation hath Me implanauit Vnles we will haue that place to be manifestly repugnant with many other places of the scripture in which God is sayd to haue deceaued the people by false prophets and to haue commaunded that Achab the king should be deceaued and to haue made blind the hart of the people that they shoulde not sée we must néedes after this manner expounde those wordes That no man ought to lay the fault in God as though he woulde excuse himselfe Achab though he was deceaued yet he moste iustly deserued to be They whiche are deceiued are iustly deceiued deceaued for that he contemned the true oracles of God and delighted himselfe in false Prophets The infidelity also and impiety of the people of Israell caused the vengeance of God and execution to come vpon them so that when they were deceaued they could by no meanes be excused Our aduersaries also séeme somewhat to be offeÌ„ded for that we affirme that men haue in themselues the cause of sinnes that is a corrupte and viciate nature For in the first chapter of the booke of wisedome the generations of the world are sayde to be good and not to haue in them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a medicine of destruction This is true indéede so that it be vnderstanded of the first constitution of thinges and chieflye of the creation of Our nature as it was instituted of God wanted corruption man which was created of God in a good estate But afterward thorow his fall he spilt both himselfe and his posterity
to speake of his doctrine did not generally preach yâ— law without Christ For in that he chiefely vrged the Law it was of necessity that therewithal also he taught Christ vnto whome the law as a scholemaister led them But because his trauayle was to this thing chiefely bent to set forth and eâ—pound the law therefore was he peculiarly called the teacher thereof As Christ and the Apostles in preaching repentaunce taught also the Law howbeit bycause that they chiefely hereunto endeuored themselues to publishe abrode grace and the Gospel therefore they are called ministers not of the law but of grace and of fayth But Paul in alledging the wordes of Moses semeth not a litle to disagrée both from his meaning and also from his wordes For in Deut. yâ— 30. chapiter it semeth that the discourse of Moses talke was of the commaundemente of God For he sayth My coÌ„maundement is not wonderfully aboue thee that thou shouldest say who shall ascend vp into heauen to bring it vnto vs that we maye heare it and doo it Neyther is it beyond the sea that thou shouldst say which of vs shall go beyond the sea and bring it vnto vs that we may heare and do it But the woorde is very neare vnto thee in thy mouth and in thyne harte that thou maist heare it and doo it But this we must know that the Apostle considered the matter more depely then the wordes shew at the first brunt For he DeclaratioÌ„ of the words of Moses sawe that Moses althoughe before he gaue the lawe in the name of God yet in this place he simply entreated not of the commaundement but as it was now easy to be obserued by grace and by fayth and the spirite grafted in the harte which workes can not be workes of the law For when the law is set forth the commaundementes are not therefore made easy to be obserued yea rather we labour agaynst that which is forbidden vs and we fly away and leap backe froÌ„ the gouernment of God so farre is it of that his commaundementes should be grafted in our harte Those are the thinges which Paul had a respect vnto And for that he saw that those thinges come vnto vs thorough Christ and the righteousnes of fayth therefore he gaue that sence which is proper and natiue He considered moreouer that in the selfe same chapter at the beginning are such thinges set forth which can not be ascribed but vnto Christ only and vnto his spirite For God sayd that he would conuerte them vnto him that they should loue him with all theyr soule with all theyr hart and with all theyr strengths and that also he would circumcise theyr hartes and the hartes of theyr sede and cause that they should heare and doo his commaundementes And seing that streight way after these thinges are added these wordes which Paul citeth who seeth not but that they pertayne vnto the Gospel Wherefore the commaundemente whereof Moses speaketh is takeÌ„ eyther according to the bare and simple knowledge thereof or ells according to the mighty and effectuall power of driuing men to the obedience thereof The discourse of Moses will not suffer that we should take it in the first sence when as the simple and playne vnderstanding the commaundement is not made easy to be done neither is it grafted into our hartes and bowells Wherefore we must nedes vnderstand an effectuall and mighty knowledge which forasmuch as it is not had but by fayth by Christ therefore Paul erred not from the true sence wheÌ„ he thus interpretateth Moses The Sillogisme or argument is thus to be framed together Moses speaketh of the word which is in our hart and maketh vs apt to performe the commauÌ„dementes We preach the selfe same thing when we set forth the iustification of fayth Wherefore we speake the selfe same thing that Moses did And in verye dede if a man consider that chap. of Deut. he shall see that God most manifestly promiseth vnto the people his gouernment not indede outward which he had The nature of humane wisedome set forth in Sina but inward which in very dede pertayneth to the ministery of fayth and of the Gospell And the Apostle by these wordes of Moses notably declareth what is the nature of humane wisedome namely perpetually to resist fayth Vnto whose reasons they that geue place do as much as lieth in them diminishe the strengths of God and of Christ as though he can not performe the thinges which he is sayd to haue done and promised For as fayth extolleth the power of God so incredulity weakeneth it And this is it which Esay sayd vnto Achaz Is it a small matter for you to be troublesome vnto men but that ye will also greue God And at the least thorough your opinion or rather incredulity make him weake When the vnbeleuers heare that Christ after his resurrection ascended vp into heauen and there hath pacefied the father towardes vs and ministreth eternall life vnto the beleuers streight way they saye with them selues Who shall ascend vp into heauen to see if it be so Which is nothing ells but to fetche downe Christ from aboue and to abrogate his power Likewise when it is preached that by dieng he hath ouercome death sinne damnation and hell they say who shall descend downe into the deape that we may be made sure of these victories whiche is nothing ells but to make voyde the benefite of Christe These wordes may paraduenture be applied vnto other formes of doubtinges of the harte of man but yâ— skilleth not much This we ought without all doubâ— to thinke that it was so sure that the things which Paul cited out of Moses are to be vnderstanded of Christ that at that time the Iewes theÌ„selues durst not haue denied them for theyr Rabines which we haue now in vse most manifestly apply those thinges which are written in the beginning of this chap. of Deut. vnto the times of the Messias Paul also weighed that although Moses had before put this word commaundement yet afterward when he sayth that it is nighe vnto vs in the hart he calleth it Dabar the is word which word serued Pauls purpose wheÌ„ he sayth This is the word of fayth which we preach And the Apostle so alledgeth the sentence of Moses yâ— he excelleÌ„tly wel alludeth to his wordes which he not only amplifieth and by exposition maketh perspicuous but also interpreteth For when he sayth To ascend into heauen which Moses also hath he addeth that it To bring downe Christ from aboue So that those things which Moses spake generally of distrust and doubting Paul applieth to those doubtinges whiche most of all hinder the iustifieng fayth And for that it was a thing very requisite that the Iewes should be perswaded that the righteousnes of fayth is not repugnant vnto Moses therefore would Paul the more largely set forth this place and tary the longer in it When he addeth But what sayth It may
seme doubtfull whether it ought to be referred vnto Moses whome he had before cited or vnto the righteousnes of faith which is brought in as if it should speake But thys is no matter of wayght and there are some greke exēplers wherin is added 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 y◠is But what saith the scriptures Nether is this to be passed ouer y◠in the Hebrue is had not only nigh or next but there is also added this aduerbe Meod which signifieth very whereby is noted a very nigh inward néerenes The Seuenty intepreters haue in their translation not onely in the hart and in the mouth but haue added in the handes But that is not had in the Hebrue and Paul hath left it out Augustine in his questions vppō Deut. who readeth after the translation of the Seuenty diligently noteth that But if it be added it nothing hindreth yea rather it helpeth the interpretacion of the Apostle whereby is declared that in that place is entreated of the commaundement of God as it is grafted in the hart as it is confirmed by the mouth and as it is expressed in worke But all these thinges are to be referred vnto Christe and How great the strēgth of fayth is vnto faith for that is it which causeth our mind and harte to be opened and made able to receiue those thinges which are vtterly repugnant vnto reason iudgemēt and sence and so is that made nigh vnto vs which is by nature most farre of from vs. And that the scripture by name mencioneth the hart it wanteth not a mistery for although faith pertaine vnto the assent of the minde yet notwithstandinge hath it most nighly ioyned with it the affect of the will which is by the hart described for that if vnto our vnderstanding or minde be offred those thinges which are most manifest and plaine it is so ouercome that it straight way geueth assent nether The minde when it assēteth vnto thinges very manifest waiteth not for the consent of the will How the vnderstanding will are vnto faith waiteth it for the commaundement or consent of the will as it is euident in the first principles of all sciences and in mathematicall demonstrations But whē thinges doubtfull are set foorth and that the reasons on either side are obscure and many thinges are agaynst the proposition set foorth the minde and vnderstanding geue not assent but by the commaundement and consent of the will which in that case peiseth and examineth the ambiguity Wherfore when faith is engendred in vs the holy ghost therein vseth two workes The one is so to illustrate the minde that it may be made certaine of the thing set before it although it be not very euident The other is that the will be so strengthned that by the affect therof it may ouercome whatsoeuer sence or reason do set foorth which is repugnante vnto the word of God geuen vnto vs. For in the worke of faith vnto our will is ioyned the holy Ghost for the assente whiche by beleuing we geue vnto the oracles of God is firme and of efficacy for the spirite chaungeth the will and maketh it of hys owne accorde vtterly to will those thinges which it before refused Wherfore God whē he geueth vnto vs faith gouerneth ech power of the soule as is agreable vnto their nature And forasmuch as this pertaineth to the wil not to iudge any thing of it self but to follow the iudgemente of vnderstanding the minde is by the spirite of God made assured of the thinges which are to be beleued and vnto it therewithall it is made plaine that we must wholy be obedient vnto God Therof it commeth that the wil resisteth not but represseth all thinges which otherwise shoulde be a let to this assent required at our hands He calleth the Gospel y◠word of faith for none other cause but for that by faith it is apprehended whereby a figuratiue kinde of speach the obiect is illustrated and described by the vertue which apprehendeth it This is the worde of faith which we preach This is not spoken that we should beleue that the Gospell is not ioyned with the law for how then could repētance be preached But therfore it is written for that the chiefest parte of the ministery of the Apostles is occupied about the righteousnes of faith And when it is said This is the word of fayth which we preach by a certaine Emphasis is declared that the doctrine of the Gospell is in no wise repugnant vnto the lawe of Moses yea rather it excellently well agréeth with it It is not onely sayd that the woorde is nigh in the hart but also in the mouth Which thing Paul weying moste aptly applied it to his purpose for this he saith belōgeth to confessiō which euer straight way foloweth a true effectuall faith Some of the Iewes vnderstood this place as though Moses should say now the word is in your mouth y◠is ye haue it in sight before you for this woorde Pi disagréeth not from this signification for it is sayde Keephi lephi which signifieth hard by and nighe Others also haue not vnaptlye by in the mouthe vnderstanded expressing or rehersing for the lawe being geuen and written the Iewes mought repeat and recite with themselues the woordes thereof And the Leuites daylye repeated it in the Tabernacle or in the temple of God and in this wise it was said to be had in the mouth But this is to be considered that it was for no other cause had in handes and sighte or recited either of the Leuites or of any of the people but to bring men vnto Christe and to stirre them Why the law was oftentimes repeted vp to faith in him and to prouoke the godly to confesse to praise and to allowe that which the Lord had spoken If thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the lord Iesus and shalt beleue in thine harte that God hath raised him vp from the deade thou shalt be saued For with the hart mā beleueth vnto righteousnes and with the mouth is confession made vnto saluation For the scripture saith whosoeuer beleueth in hym shall not be made ashamed For there is no difference betwene the Iew and the Grecian For there is one lorde ouer all who is riche vnto all them that call vpon him For whosoeuer shall call vpon the name of the lord shal be saued If thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus and shalt beleue in thine hart that God hath raysed him vp from the deade Althoughe Paul séemeth not here to obserue a right order for first we beleue before we make confession The fayth of an other mā is knowen onely by confession In the resurrectiō is accomplished our saluation yet because that we cannot iudge concerning our brother whether he beleue vnles we heare him first confesse for this cause the Apostle putteth the effect before the cause And amongst other thinges which are to be beleued he
any difference betwene the Iewes and the Gentiles The selfe same reason in a maner he before vsed in this selfe same Epistle Causes haue an affect towards their â—ffects in the 3. chapiter in that place where he sayd Is God the God of the Iewes onely yea and of the Gentiles also And the argument of Paule is firme for that it cleaueth vnto a sure ground namely that nature hath so framed yâ— things which are ioined vnto any other things as causes of them or beginning haue a desire towardes their effectes As the father hath to his children the woorkeman to his workes the Lord to his seruauntes so also hath God to his But they noorish helpe and adorne the thinges which pertayne vnto them wherefore God also will be vnto his both a helpe and also saluation and that his propriety is to preserue them the common prouer be declareth wherein it is sayd Homo homini Why God helpeth not the damned Deus that is Man is vnto man a God And if thou demaunde why hee helpeth not the damned when as they also pertayne vnto him we answer bicause he is now compared vnto them as a iudge and an auenger and not as God in whom they may any longer put coÌ„fidence or whom they can any more inuocate Moreouer let vs note that this vniuersall sentence is to bee vnderstanded predestination and election remaining safe for God is not so the God of all that he God is the God of all but yet hee predestinateth not all electeth and predestinateth all This thing onely we ought to gather that there are certayne of all sortes of people whome hee hath from eternallye elected and vnto whom in dew tyme he will geue fayth and that also hee woulde that fayth should be preached vnto all meÌ„ without difference yet hath chosen out certain whom he bringeth to the obteinment of the promisses And in this sense also as Augustine teacheth and as we haue oftentymes admonished is to be expounded that sentence of Paule vnto Timothe God will haue all men to be saued And that the proposition now alleaged is in this maner to be contracted the wordes which follow plainly declare Riche vnto all them that call vpon him They which are brought vnto saluation call vpon God and through the singuler and principall gift of God do beleue which gift is not giuen vnto all men Wherefore it is euident that preaching Preaching is common vnto al meÌ„ but â—aith is not commoÌ„ vnto al meÌ„ In what seÌ„se God is called rich ought to be common and so Christ is sayd to pertayne vnto all men But they which haue saluation which are endewed with fayth and the spirite vnto whom God is sayd to be rich are not indifferently all men but are in a certayn and definyte number conteyned in the election of God And God is called riche toward his for that he enricheth them with his grace and giftes In Greeke it is written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for God hath no neede to be increased and enriched but encreaseth and enricheth those that are his This sentence is of great force to pacifie the myndes of the Iewes which through a certayne enuy were grieued that the Gentyles were called vnto the Gospell which thing they woulde not haue done if they had bene perswaded that God is so rich that he hath aboundantly ynough both for the Iewes and for the Gentiles so that by the calling of the Gentiles nothing was taken away from the Iewes And it is a coÌ„mon phrase in the scriptures by the name of riches to signifie the most plentifull goodnes of God So it is said in this epistle doest thou contemne the riches of his goodnes patience and long suffering And vnto the Ephesians Who is rich in mercy And Christ to the Colossians is sayd to be he in whome are all the treasures of the wysedome and knowledge of God When he addeth Rich to all them that call vpon him he adioyneth an other worke of faith For before by the testimony of Esay it was said Who soeuer beleueth in him shal not be made ashamed Now for inuocation A place of Ioel. he annexeth a testimony taken out of the second chapiter of Ioell VVhosoeuer shall call vpon the name of God shal be saued So that again we see that there is required a liuely fayth And as before confession was added vnto faith and Moses made mencion not only of the hart but also of the mouth so now together with faith is mencion made of inuocation And without doubt Ioell in that chapiter spake of the Messias for he saith that in those dayes should be geuen bloud fire pillers of a cloude and the Sunne should be turned into darknes and the Moone into bloud And there is added I will poure my spirite vpon all fleshe and your sonnes and your daughters shall prophesie your olde men shall dreame dreames and I will poure my spirite vpon your seruauntes and handmaydens That all these thinges pertayne vnto Christ and vnto the pouring forth of his spirit no man doubteth Wherfore if Paul applie them to the inuocation vpon him he nothing erreth from the natiue sence The prophet had before said that there should be a great destruction throughout the whole world and throughout the regions adioyning â–ª but he added thereunto that whosoeuer should call vpon the name of the Lord should be saued which forasmuch as he pronounâ—eth generally and vniuersally Paul therby declareth that this proposition is to be taken vniuersally It is true in deede that the Prophet saith that this saluation should be geuen in Ierusalem and in Zion but yet notwithstanding that letteth not but that it may be applied vnto the Gentiles also for he speaketh of that Ierusalem of that Zion which are preserued by God but the carnall kingdome of the Iewes is destroyed wherefore it followeth that such cityes are figuratiuely taken for the people of the faithfull which liued in them And those faithful were in their time the Church which afterward was spred abrod thoroughout the whole world neither are there any which call vpon the name of Christ but in the Church onely And it may be as some thinke that by the inuocation of the name of God is vnderstanded the whole order of piety and of sound religion But in my iudgement I thinke it better by inuocation simply to vnderstand the prayers of the faithfull And this is diligently to be noted that the Prophet writeth of that inuocation which procedeth from the spirite and What maner inuocation obtayneth saluation from a sincere faith for prayers said but of a facion and mumbled vp without vnderstanding obtaine not saluation We must also cal to memory that which Paul said vnto the Corinthians that no man can say the Lord Iesus but in the spirite Moreouer the Prophet sayth not whosoeuer shall call vpon the name of the Lord shall haue whatsoeuer he asketh but shal be saued For
in this place saith when he writeth And they shall say vnto Sion Thy God raigneth Hetherto hath sinne raigned Wherfore Paul in this Epistle said Let not sin raigne in your mortall body Death also hath raigned For the same Apostle Death hath raigned from Adam euen vnto Moses The Deuill also hath raigned whom the Lord calleth the Prince of this world and Paul the gouernour of this worlde and the God of this worlde All these thinges haue hitherto miserably exercised their What maner of princes the Hebrues had tyranny ouer vs But nowe the Lorde raigneth For as touching outwarde kingdomes the Iewes indéede had many iudges and many kings few good some tollerable but a greate many moste wicked tyrannes And they whiche were good as Dauid Ezechias Iosias and suche like were yet notwithstanding weake neyther coulde they eyther defende the people from calamities or make them good Wherefore the Iewes were oftentimes oppressed of theyr enemies led away into captiuitye and being therout deliuered were in reste for a while But after Alexander the greate came the Macedonians and most grieuously afflicted Iewry After theÌ„ came Pompeius Crassus Herode and last of all Vespasianus and Titus whych vtterly ouerthrew all The church also of Christ had hys outward Princes partly wicked and partly good as touching ciuill righteousnes but yet very Then shall we bee in good estate wheÌ„ Christ raigneth in vs. Wherein coÌ„sisteth the kingdom of God weake Wherefore our estate can neuer be in good case vnlesse Christ raygne in vs. Thys as Daniel sayth in hys seconde chapter is the kingdome of heauen which is neuer corrupted in it is peace not during for a time but an euerlasting peace For in the Psalme it is sayd In his dayes shall aryse righteousnes and aboundance of peace vntill the moone be taken away And in Esay And of his peace there shall be no ende But herein consisteth hys kingdome that we be directed by the word and spirite of God After these two maners Christ raygneth in vs. The woord sheweth what is to be beleued and what is to be done The spirit impelleth and moueth vs to doo these thinges Thys is the euerlasting kyngdome of God whereunto when he wil adioyne any people or any nation he visiteth them by hys ambassadours whych are Preachers of the Gospell and them wyll hee haue to be receaued cherefully yea he sayth He which receaueth you receaueth â—e and he which despiseth you despiseth me We haue now the iudgemeÌ„t of God â—ouchyng Ministers wherewith the beleuers ought very mutch to comfort themselues although the world iudge otherwyse and count them for mad men and 〈…〉 castes and estéeme them as paringes and chips so long as there is a world thâ—y shall be so iudged of But for as much as the iudgement of the world is foo 〈…〉 and vnderstandeth not the thinges that pertayne vnto God therefore we 〈…〉 st not leane vnto it but rather embrace the most firme and most pleasant sen 〈…〉 ce of God Nahum the Prophet in hys fyrst chapter hath the lyke saying of 〈…〉 beutifull féete of such as preach the Gospell so that that whych was foretolde of Esay he also foresawe shoulde come to passe But at Rome in our dayes men At Rome they fall downe to kisse the fete of the Pope drawen by thys testimony of the Prophet doo fall downe and kisse the féete of the Pope as though he preached the Gospell going about the whole worlde preachyng peace when as rather he is a sworne enemy of the Gospell and maketh open warre agaynst the true doctrine thereof neyther at anye tyme ceaseth to disturbe peace betwene Christian Princes The Pope as a sworne enemy of the Gospell not a preacher therof But all obeye not the Gospell For Esay sayth lorde who hath beleued our hearing vnto whom is the arme of the lord reuealed Then faith is by hearing and hearing by the word of God But all obey not the Gospell This séemed to bee agaynst that so great dignitye of the Apostles whych hath now bene proued both by the authoritye of God which sent them and also by theyr ambassadge that very fewe and especially Of preaching doth not always follow the faith of the hearers of the Iewes beleued which came to passe by no other meanes but for that outward preachyng is not alwayes of necessity ioyned wyth the fayth of the hearers For it is possible that for as much as the power of God is not bound vnto instruments a man may beleue wythout a Preacher and on the other syde a man may heare preaching yet not haue fayth As in thys selfe same epistle he ioyned foreknowledge together wyth predestination although manye are foreknowen of God which yet are not predestinated vnto eternall life he ioyned vocation also together wyth iustification although verye manye are called whych yet are not iustified The Apostle in thys place describeth fayth by the name of obedience and that not wythout iust cause for in it is contayned obedience twoo maner Faith is iustly called obedience of wayes For fyrst it is necessary that the minde or humaine reason do geue place vnto the reuelation of God simply consenting thereunto whych thing pertayneth to a redy obedience for otherwise there are many thinges which let and after a sort call vs an other way There is also an other obedience for they which truly beleue endeuor themselues to obey the commaundementes of God whiche thing before they neither did nor could do The Apostle vsed this selfe same phrase in the first chapter of this epistle By whome we haue receaued grace and Apostleship to be obedient vnto fayth In the Actes of the Apostles also it is declared that many of the priestes were obedient vnto faith and in this sence is faith somtimes Why faith is called a law called a law not for that it bringeth with it blessing or cursing but because that it likewise as the law doth requireth obedience howbeit diuerse For the law requireth obedience euen of them that will not and yet in the meane tyme doth it not geue strenthes to performe it but faith forasmuch as it most fully persuadeth piety stirreth vs vp to liue according to the profession thereof And for that thys doubt touching the fewnes of the beleuers chiefely moued the Iewes therefore to quiet their mindes he bringeth a testimony of Esay whose doctrine they durst not reiect whereby they mought vnderstand that God had long tyme before prouided for this skarsity of the beleuers For Esay sayth who hath beleued our hearing The Prophet before those wordes brought in God the father which commaunded that his sonne should be preached and that his reproches which he should suffer for the saluation of mankind should be tolde abroade vnto whome the company of the Prophetes aunswered who hath beleued our hearing And to whome is the arme of the Lord reuealed As if they should say we indéede haue
desired easely hereof gather if we loke vpon the contrary Doubtles it is a miserable and horrible thing to sée in one and the selfe same body the members at discorde one with an other yea rather fighting one against an other And when he saith brethern and saith that he setteth forth a mistery he moueth them to geue diligent attentiuenes Mistery Chrisostome sayth in this place signifieth a thing vnknowen vnspeakeable which is full of admiration and is contrary to the opinion of men Augustine in his booke de predestinatione sanctorum when he interpreteth this place turneth mistery by this word Sacrament And touching the signification of this word mistery I finde that it is diuers in the scripture Sometymes What mystery signifieth ▪ how many significations it hath it is a secret thing and which happeneth contrary to hope and to the iudgement of our reason as Paul saith in the first to the Corrinthyans Behold I tell vnto you a mistery we shal not all slepe but we shal all be changed And vnto the Colos vnto y◠Ephe. he calleth the vocation of the Gentiles a mistery Sometimes mistery signifieth that which is indéede partly knowen vnto vs but yet not perfectly but the perfect knowledge thereof is reserued till we come to our contrey where we shall be in full possession thereof and this is it which Paul sayd I speake wisdome in a mistery Of this kind are the articles of the faith which we beleue but not fully vnderstand Now we partly know but then we shall know as we are knowen Lastly that is called a mistery which setteth forth one thing vnto our sēce and ministreth vnto our minde and spirite an other thing as Paul sayth of the coopling together of the man and the wife in matrimony for it signifieth vnto vs the coniunction of Christ with the Church Neither for any other consideration are our sacraments How our sacraments are called misteries Baptisme I say and y◠Eucharist called misteries in which bread wine and water are shewed vnto the senses but farre other thinges are signified But why they ar called Sacraments it is more hard to gather Howbeit this must we know y◠amongst y◠Lattins this word Sacramētum that is a sacramēt is takē for an oth so that we reade oftentimes euen in good writers those wordes Sacramenta Sacramentum militare militaria that which signify othes pertaining to warre for they which were admitted into warre fare sware that they would manfully do whatsoeuer theyr Generall captayne commaunded them to doo for the pub welth of Rome So long as they were bound with this sacramēt or othe they could not depart from warfare and it was neuer lawfull for them to fight agaynst theyr enemies vnles they were bound by Sacramentum militare that is by the othe of warre Wherefore forasmuch as in these misteries and sacramentes and manifest simboles we are adioyned vnto the host of Christe and vnto the Church whereinto we were before thorough the spirit and fayth hiddenly grafted therfore were they called sacramentes And besides this as Varro telleth in his booke de Lingua Latina when any matter of contencion was both the playntife and A maner vsed of them which had any matter of contenciō also the defendant layd downe with the priestes a certayne summe of money and of other thinges which was layd vp in some holy place and he which had the vpper hand receaued agayne out of the holy place that which he had layd downe so that he was sayd to receaue agayne his sacrament but he which had y◠foyle was punished and the things which he had layd downe were forfeated and put into the common threasory Whereby it is manifest that a sacrament signifieth not only the inuocation of the name of God which is vsed in an othe but also a certayne bond And for that in those ceremonies which the Churche now calleth sacramentes men binde themselues vnto the ecclesiasticall society and do also addict themselues vnto God and God by them sealeth his promises therefore it semeth that they are not without good consideration called sacramentes And this is to be noted that such ceremonies are called misteries when they are taken in that third signification which we haue now mencioned But here mistery pertaineth vnto the first for the Apostle now openeth that whiche was hidden vnto humane reason and should come to passe contrary to the opinion of the Gentiles For when they saw the Iewes such enemies vnto God they thought that they should neuer agayne be receaued Be not high minded In Greke it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which word semeth to be referred vnto prudence and wisedome so that the Latine interpreter turneth it Ne sitis sapientes apud vosmetip sos y◠is be not wise in your owne conceate Which sence Origen also followeth when he sayth that this is the wisedome which properly commeth of God whereby we are impelled not to be puffed vp agaynst our neighboures Wisdome of two sortes And he maketh mencion of an other wisedome of the fleshe whiche the Apostle now reproueth But I thinke rather that that word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to be trāsferred vnto the affect namely that we should not be high minded And this affect commenly hereof springeth for that men thinke y◠they haue by theyr owne strēgths gotten the giftes which they haue and thereby are stirred vp in respect of themselues to disdaine others By these wordes we may easely perceaue what the scope of the Apostle is namely to reconcile vnto the Iewes those whome he admonished Wherof springeth hautines of the minde and to take away the discord which y◠Church was infected thē with Blindnes is partly come vnto Israell Origen in expounding of these wordes somewhat digresseth whose digression I thinke it good here to touch At the beginning sayth he the most highest deuided the earth vnto the children of men according to the nomber of the Angelles so that euery nation was vnder the gouernmēt of some one Angell but the people of Israell he reserued vnto himselfe as peculiar and proper whome he would by himselfe gouern These thinges it semeth he tooke out of the booke of deut the 32. chapiter according to the translation of the 70. interpreters for there they haue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is according to the nomber of the angelles of God But in the Hebrew it is not so for in the Hebrew it is written Lemitpar bene Ischraell that is according to the nomber of the children of Israell That the Angelles as ministers gouerne diuerse regions I deny not but that can not Angels are ouer diuers regions by that place be proued but rather it may be proued by Daniell Further we may not thinke that God without the ministery of Angelles gouerned the Israelites for we know that he many times sent angelles vnto the Fathers and vnto God gouerned also the Israelites by aungels God excluded
regarde to his body being past getting of children nor to the wombe of Sara being past childbearing and that he staggered not by reason of distrust but was by faith confirmed most certainely persuaded that God was able to performe what so euer he had promised This example teacheth vs that we ought not to haue a regarde vnto those things which either may or seeme to hinder our iustification but our faith ought vtterly to be fixed in the words and promises of God but contrariwise these men will call vs backe to our owne indispositions as they cal them and will haue vs therefore alwayes to be in doubt of our iustification In dede we ought not to dissemble whatsoeuer imperfection or fault is in vs and that for this cause that it may be daily amended and corrected Yet ought we not therefore to be in doubt and wauering touching our iustification and the grace of God Now haue we to proue the second proposition namely that a man is iustified by faith Which thing we entend first to proue by testimonies of the holy A confirmation that we are iustified by faith scriptures Paule in the first chapter of this Epistle thus defineth the Gosple that it is the power of God to saluation to euery one that beleueth In these wordes is touched the efficient cause of our iustification namely the power of God and the ende which is our saluation and also the instrument wherby it is receiued namely faith for he addeth vnto euery one that beleueth And this he confirmeth by a testimony of Abacucke the Prophet In which sentence he so much delighted that he vsed it both to the Galathians and also to the Hebrues in the self same sense He addeth moreouer that the wrathe of God was reueled from heauen by reason of the knowledge of the Philosophers which withheld the truthe of God in vnrighteousnesse and which when they knew God glorified him not as God but fell to the worshipping of Idols But contrariwise in the gospell is reuealed the righteousnesse of God namely that righteousnesse whereby men are iustified from faith to faith which phrase of speache we haue in his due place sufficiently expounded in the third chapter Now is the righteousnesse of God saith he made manifest without the law the righteousnesse I say of God by the faith of Iesus Christ in all and vpon all them which beleue in him And a little afterward wherefore being iustified frely by his grace by the redemption which is in Christ Iesus whome God hath set forth a propitiator by faith in his bloud Here also is not onlye shewed the grace by which God fréely iustifieth vs but also Christ his deathe is set forthe that it may manifestly appeare that he is the reconciliator and the mediator Wherunto also is added faith wherby we receiue the fruit of his redemption to the shewing forth also of his righteousnesse in this time that he might be iust and iustifying him which is of the faith of Iesus Christ. If men coulde by theyr workes get vnto themselues righteousnesse the righteousnesse of God shoulde not then be so declared But seeing we sée that it is communicated vnto vs by faith without any preparation of workes it must needes seeme vnto vs very great And amongst other things which God requireth of men this is the chiefest that they should not any thing glory of themselues But if iustification should consist of workes men might boast of their owne endeuor and industry But seeing we are freely iustified by faith there is no place left for boasting Wherfore Paule saith Thy boasting is excluded by what law by the law of works No but by the law of faith Wherfore he concludeth after this manner We iudge that man is iustified by faith without works And that we should not think that that proposition is particular he declareth that it is vniuersall â–ª God saith he is he the God of the Iewes only is he not the God of the gentiles also Yea of the Gentiles also For it is one God which iustifieth vncircumcision through faith and circumcision by faith Wherefore euen as there is but one God ouer all men so iustifieth he all men by one and the selfe same way And in the fourth chapter he saith but vnto him which worketh not but beleueth in him which iustifieth the wicked faith is imputed vnto him vnto righteousnesse By this sentence are bothe workes excluded and also faith is set forth by which is imputed righteousnesse vnto men And straight way he addeth of Abraham that he is the father of all them that beleue by vncircumcision that it might also be imputed vnto them and that he is the father of circumcision not only vnto them which are of circumcision but also vnto them which walke in the steps of faith which was in the vncircumcision of Abraham our father Afterward by the nature of the promesse he sheweth that iustification is by faith For he saith by the lawe was not the promesse made vnto Abraham and vnto his seede to be the heire of the worlde but by the righteousnesse of faith for if those which are of the law should be heires then shold faith be abolished and the promesse made voide In these words are two excellent things to be noted The first is that the promesse is free â–ª neither is it ioyned with the condition of workes and therfore seing faith is as a correlatiue referred vnto the promesse it must needes follow that it is such as the promesse is and therefore it hath a respecte vnto the promesse by it selfe and not to the conditions of our vntowardnesse or indisposition as the good holy Fathers of Trent â—eache The second is that if the inheritance and righteousnesse should depend of that condition of works then had there bene no néede of the promesie For meÌ„ might haue sayd why is that fréely promised vnto vs which we can claime vnto our selues by our owne endeuor and labor Or why is it so necessary that we shold beleue when as by our owne workes we can attaine vnto righteousnesse Afterward Paule addeth the finall cause why iustification commeth by fayth By grace sayth he that the promesse might be firme for if by our owne works and preparations we should be iustified the promesse should alwayes be vnstedfast neither could we appoint any certaintie of it Afterwarde he putteth the example of Abraham who as it is before said contrary to hope beleued in hope neither had he a regarde vnto those things which as touching his owne part mought haue bene a let vnto the promesse of God namely his own body being nâ—w as it were dead and an hundreth yeare olde and the age of Sara his wife These things sufficiently declare what maner of faith that was by which vnto Abraham was imputed righteousnesse so that thereby we also may vnderstande the power and nature of faithe which iustifieth Paule also addeth that by suche a faith is muche aduaunced the
thinketh is much more plainly confirmed by Iohn For he saith that many rulers of the priestes beleued in Christ whiche yet durst not openly professe hym But they which abhorre from the confession of the name of Christ ar farre from saluation For Christ himselfe sayth he that is ashamed of me before men of hym will I be ashamed before my father These arguments although at the first sight they séeme to haue some shew yet if a man more narrowly examine them he shall sée that The iudgement of Epictetus touching hys own bokes A similitude that very wel agréeth with them whiche Epictetus pronounceth of his bookes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is these are but sights or ghosts of the dreames of hell Wherefore we must diligently ponder these reasons and not iudge of them by the first sight And euen as in coynes of mony we vse not so much to haue a regard vnto the inscriptions or Images as to the goodnes and waight of the matter so also in arguments ought we to weigh and regard not so much the shew and coulour of them as the thing it selfe and the strength of them We first deny that fayth can be seperated from iustification And whereas Pigghius sayth that that is not repugnaunt vnto the nature and definition of fayth we in no wise admit it For agaynst that sentence are all the holy scriptures and the true sense of the definition of fayth and also the fathers For as touching the scriptures Iohn saith he that beleueth that Iesus is Christ the sonne of God is borne of God And he which is borne of God sinneth not For so long as faith beareth sway in our hart we commit not those sinnes which destroy the conscience and alienate vs from God How theÌ„ sayth Pigghius that it is not agaynst the nature of fayth to be seperated from iustification and from good workes especially seing Iohn sayth he which sinneth knoweth not God This thing also saw the fathers For Ciprian de Simplicitate Prelatorum where he complayneth of the infelicity of his tyme for that charity feare good workes and such like things were waxen very cold thus writeth No man thinketh vpon the feare of things to come no man considereth the day of the Lord and the wrath of God and that vpon the vnbeleuers shall come punishments and that euerlasting tormeÌ„ts are appointed for the vnfaythfull Of which things our conscience would be aferd if it beleued because it beleueth not therfore is it vtterly without feare but if it beleued then also would it beware and if it did beware then also shoulde it eschape These words declare that with true fayth is ioyned the feare of God and the eschewing of eternal punishments and auoyding of sinnes Now let Piggbius go say that true faith can be seperated from holy motions of the mind and from good workes This self same thing together doth Ierome with Ciprian affirme agaynst the Luciferians And if sayth he I beleued truely I would clense that hart wherewith God is sene I would with my hands knock my brest I would with teares water my chekes I would in my body haue a horror I would in mouth waxe pale I would lye at the feete of my Lord and would washe them wyth weeping and wipe them with my heares I would vndoubtedly cleue fast vnto the stocke of the crosse neither would I let go my hold thereof before I had obtayned mercy Hereby also it is manifest that with true faith The definition of faith declareth that it can not be separated from iustificatioÌ„ A similitude are ioyned good workes and repentaunce But as touching the definition and nature of fayth it may easely be proued that it can not be seperated from iustification and from good workes that is from his effects For fayth is no common but a firme and vehement assent and that proceding from the holy ghost And if in case a poore miser being condemned to â—y should receaue a promise only at the hand of a maÌ„ that he should be deliuered and should geue credit vnto those words straight way his mynde would wholy be chaunged to mirth and would begin to loue him that promised hym such things and would pleasure him in what thing so euer lay in his power How much more is to be attributed vnto the true faith which is geuen vnto the word of God and is inspired by the spirit of God Wherfore if that human fayth do draw with it wonderfull motions of the mynd how can we say that the true and Christian fayth is naked without good works and destitute alone Wherefore we now playnly sée both by the holy scriptures and by the Fathers and by the definition and nature of fayth that it can not be seperated from righteousnes and from holy workes Now let vs come vnto Paul He sayth If I haue all fayth c. But how knoweth Pighius that Paul there speaketh of that generall fayth which cleaueth vnto the promises of God and iustifieth and not rather of a perticular fath wherby are wrought miracles and which is a fre or gracious gift of the holy ghost This faith is not applied vnto all thinges which are found in the holy scriptures but only is a certayne vehement confidence wherby we certaynly beleue that God will doo this miracle or that miracle Of this sayth Chrisostome interpreteth Paul in thys The fayth of doctrine the faith of miracles â–ª place And to the end of this distinction either part should haue a distinct name the one calleth the fayth of doctrine the other the fayth of signes And vnto this latter fayth Chrisostome applieth those wordes If ye haue of fayth as a grayne of mustard seede and shall say vnto this mountayne Get thee hence and hurle thy selfe into the sea it shal be done Neyther vndoubtedly can it be denied but that there is such a kind of fayth For Paul in the 12. chapter of the first epistle vnto the Corrinthians wheÌ„ he reherseth vp the frée gifts which the holy ghost distributeth vnto euery man as it pleaseth him thus writeth Vnto one is by the spirite geuen the word of wisedome and to an other the word of knowledge by the same spirite and vnto an other is geueÌ„ faith by the same spirit and vnto an other the gifts of healing by the same spirit Here we sée that amongst the frée gifts of the holy ghost is reckoned fayth and that in the third place bicause Paul spake not there of the generall fayth wherby we are iustified And if we diligently peyse thinges we shall sée that Paul kepeth the selfe same order in the 13. chapter of the first to the Corrinthians For as here in the first place he putteth the woord of wisedome so there he putteth prophesieng and as here in the second place he putteth knowledge so there also in the selfe same place he putteth knowledge and as here so also there he putteth faith in the third
terrible But suffer not thy selfe gentle reader to be deceiued with a vaine shew Examine it wel and try it diligently and thou shalt finde that it is a weak and ridiculous argument We graunt that a man that is by sinnes and wicked factes alienated from God may assent vnto the articles of the faith and beleue that there is a God But this good man should haue taught farther that the same is done by the motion and impulsion Faith abideth with such sinnes as are most greuouâ—s and do wast the conscience on of true faith There may in déede be left to a wicked man a certaine humaine persuasion either by education or by opinion bicause he thinketh it to be most likely But lest any man should thinke yâ— this that I say is of mine owne inuenting namely that a man which greuously sinneth is destitute of the true and iustifying faith let him rather consider what Paul saith For he vnto Timothe saith He which hath not a care ouer his owne and especiall ouer his houshold hath renounced faith and is worse then an infidell Doubtlesse he which hath renounced faith hath not faith And vnto Titus he saith They coÌ„fesse that they know God but in dedes they deny him To confesse and to deny are things contrary wherefore it must néedes be that forasmuch as bothe are spoken of one and the selfe same men they are to be taken in a diuers sense Wherfore they may haue faith that is a certaine humaine opinion such as it is but yet not that firme and mighty assent inspired by the holy Ghost wherof we now intreat Iohn saith in his first Epistle and seconde chapter he which saith that he knoweth God and kepeth not his commaundements is a lier and the truthe is not in him Wherfore the true faith wherby we beleue truely in God is not without good workes Neither ought it to séeme vnto any man absurd that one and the self same thing may be known diuers wayes For the deuil also as well as we both knoweth and confesseth many things touching Christe The deuill is not endued with true faith A similitude whome yet neither Pighius doubtlesse as I suppose will graunt to be endewed with the true faith whereby we are persuaded to beleue those thinges which we confesse of Christ It is possible also that one skilful in the Mathematical sciences may assent vnto some one conclusion confirmed proued by demoÌ„stration which demonstration if he chaunce afterward as oftentimes it happeneth by reason of age or of some disease to forget he wil not yet for al the cease to affirme yâ— propositioÌ„ which he before knew but this doth he by opinioÌ„ or some probable argumeÌ„t not as before he did by demonstration Therfore the knowledge of one the self same thing doth not of necessity infer yâ— self same grouÌ„d of knowledge And those things suppose to be spoken only by supposition vpoÌ„ that sentence which holdeth yâ— after a man hath committed any great haynous wicked fact true fayth is lost which yet in the elect is afterward by the benefite of God again recouered otherwise it may be sayd that in men iustified and appointed of God vnto saluation fayth can not thorough the committing of any haynous crime be vtterly extinguished but is as it were in dead sléepe and lieth hidden neither bursteth it forth into act vnles it be agayne stirred by the holy ghost for in such men that haue so fallen the séede of God still abideth although for that tyme it bringeth not forth fruit But Pigghius goeth on and sayth Fayth is the foundation therefore it is farre from the perfection of the building wherfore it iustifieth not For vnto iustificatimany other preparations are required If by this perfection of the building he vnderstand Faith is very far from the last perfection the blessed resurrection and chief felicity wherein we shall sée God face to face we graunt that fayth is very farre from it For we must by many tribulations aduersities and gréeuous labours come vnto the kingdome of heauen But after the self same maner we may say yâ— iustification also is only the foundation of that eternal saluation and that it also is farre from that blessednes which we looke for For the first degrée vnto saluation is to be receaued of God into fauor and to be regenerated through Christ And afterward follow other degrées by which we come vnto that chief goodnes which we looke for But where this man found that fayth is only the foundation he can not teach out of the holy scriptures except paraduenture he wil bring that out of the Epistle vnto the Hebrues Faith is the substance of thinges that are hoped for But by those words is nothing els meÌ„t but that those thinges which we hope for are by fayth vpholden and confirmed in our minds which would otherwise wauer neither should they by any meanes stand fast But this maketh nothing at all to this purpose And if in case he will cite this also That he which will come vnto God ought to beleue we haue already before answered therunto peraduenture we wil afterward in due place speake somewhat more as touching that But goe to séeing he by so many meanes goeth about to ouerthrowe our sentence let vs heare what he himselfe at the length affirmeth and vnto what thing he attributeth the power of iustifying There are sayth he many preparations Pighius sentence and dispositions required in vs to be iustified First saith he we beleue the words of God afterward we are afeard of his wrath after yâ— we hope for mercy then we detest sinnes To be briefe he reckeneth vp all those things which we before declared vnder the name of the Synode of Trent but in the last place he sayth succedeth a sincere pure loue of God which altogether beareth dominion in our heartes and vnto this he saith is ascribed iustification I can not inough meruaile at the deuise of this man For he affirmeth that a man is in a manner perfecte before he can be iustified For he which beleueth feareth hopeth repenteth and sincerely loueth God what wanteth he to perfection But this man holdeth that a man without Christ a straunger from God and not yet iustified is able to accoÌ„plish those things which vndoubtedly in no wise agréeth with yâ— holy scriptures For they teach that a man before he is iustified is occupied in euil works wandreth in the hatred of God as it is manifest in the Epistle to the Colossians the first chapiter and to the Ephesians the seconde chapiter But how can they by whome are wrought so excellent workes as this man maketh mention of be the children of wrath how can they be sinners how caÌ„ they as it is written vnto the Romaines be the enemies of God But omitting those things let vs sée what are the groundes of this opinion First he citeth that out of Iohn he which loueth not
man called into doubt But yet by that litle which he hath may sufficiently be vnderstand what his iudgement was as the saying is that Protogenes knew Apelles by the draught of one line only Ireneus sayth that the old Fathers euē those also which were before the law were iustified by fayth For first when he had spoken of Abraham he ascēdeth from him vnto Loth them vnto Noe and vnto Enoch and afterward he addeth a reason why in these mens time the law was not written Bycause sayth he they were alredy iust vnto whome the law was not geuen For the iust haue the law written in theyr hartes But paraduenture thou wilt scarcely admitte this testimony bycause Ireneus in that place when he speaketh there of Enoch sayth that he was sent a legate vnto the Angells which may seme to be Apocriphall But I thinke that the same is cited not so much out of any booke which is counted apocriphall as out of some old tradition For many things were as it were by hand deliuered vnto the elders which indede are not to be riected so that they be not repugnant with the holy scriptures Otherwise if for that cause we reiect this testimony why do we not also reiect the epistle of Iudas For he also citeth a sentence of Enoch that God shall come with thousands vnto iudgement But wheras Ireneus sayth that Enoch was a Legate vnto the Angells I suppose that it may thus bee vnderstande to say that those Angells were men which were princes and great kinges or such as were borne of the famely of Seth. For so in Genesis the sonnes of God are sayd to haue sene the daughters of men that they were fayre Paraduenture Enoch was sent vnto them by God to reproue them And thus much out of Ireneus Tertullian in his booke of Baptisme sayth that a perfet fayth hath security of saluation Wherfore it is not we alone that haue brought in a perticular fayth touching the remission of sinnes Neyther ought it any thing to moue vs that in that booke he defendeth most manifest errors touching Baptisme and exhorteth men to differ Baptisme till they come to ripe age and not to make hast vnto it before they marry For although we allow not these things yet in y◠meane time whilest he entreateth hereof he hath many thinges which ought not to be contēned which were at that time receaued and confessed in the Church So Ciprian when he entreateth of rebaptising of heretikes when they returned vnto the Church hath in the meane time many true and weighty testimonies which we can not reiect although in the very state of the question we vtterly disagrée from him And what father I pray you is there amongest them all which in some one place defendeth not some sentence which is not to be allowed and yet ought not all theyr workes therfore to be contemned For there is no Pomegranet so fayre which hath not in it some rotten carnells Nowe let vs come vnto Origen He in his first booke vppon Iob if yet that be Origens worke thus writeth All thinges which men do whether it be in virginity or in abstinency or in chastity of the bodye or in burning of hys fleshe or in distribution of his goodes all these thinges I say they doo Gratis that is in vaine if they doo them not of fayth In this place whereas he sayth Gratis all men vnderstande in vaine Whiche thing doubtles Pigghius and his companions will not admitte For they will haue these thinges to be certaine preparations vnto iustification But that Origen is by expresse wordes against them those wordes which follow do more plainly declare For thus he writeth That all holines and righteousnes which a man doth without faith he doth it in vaine and to his owne destruction And he citeth this sentence of Paul whatsoeuer is not done of faith is sinne I am sure that neither Pigghius can deny but that Origen in this place maketh on our side that he in that sence vnderstoode these woordes of Paul whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne whiche wordes yet he crieth out that we are accustomed to abuse Althoughe not onely Origen but also Augustine Basilius and other fathers as we haue before taught expound those wordes after the selfe same manner Wherfore he doth vniustly and impudētly accuse vs but if he will say that we must not so much regard what interpretacion the fathers bring but must sée whether the place in the texte may so be taken therin we commend him For we gladly admit appealing from the Fathers vnto the word of God But he ought to haue remembred that it is not the point of a good man to reproue that in others which he doth himselfe Wherefore he should suffer vs also on the other side when the matter so requireth to appeale from the Fathers vnto the scriptures But as touching the very matter we haue els where declared that that sentence of Paul as it written in his Epistle is so to be expounded that of it may be inferred that the woorkes of men not regenerate are sinnes Origen afterward addeth Of whome shall he receaue a rewarde Of him thinke you whome he sought not for whome he hath not acknowledged in whom he hath not beleued He shall not sayth he receaue of him a rewarde but iudgement wrath and condemnation If these thinges be rendred vnto such woorkes who will denye but that they are sinnes Afterward he bringeth a similitude Euen as saith he he which buildeth without a foundation loseth his labour and hath onely trauaile and sorrow euen so it is with him which will build vp good workes without faith And euen as vnto him whiche beleueth all thinges are possible to finde refreshing at his handes in whome he hath beleued so vnto him that beleueth not nothing is possible Euen as the earth without the Sun bringeth not foorth fruites so except the truth of God do through faith shine forth in the hartes the fruite of good workes springeth not forth For so sayth he all that whole yeare wherin Noe was saued from the floud for that the Sunne shined not forth the earth could bring forth no fruite Thus much hath Origen in that place which we haue now cited by whiche we conclude that faith sormeth and maketh perfect al good workes which follow and not that it as these men I can not tell who haue fained taketh and boroweth his forme of them The same Origen vpon the. 4. chap. vnto the Romanes thus reasoneth If he which beleueth that Iesus is Christ be born of God he which is born of God sinneth not thē is it certain that he which beleueth in Christ Iesus sinneth not This kinde of argumēt is called Sorites is allowed of y◠Logicians For y◠Stoikes were wont oftētimes to vse it The assumptes of this argumēt cannot be denied For they are takē out of the holy scriptures But he addeth afterward And if in case he sinne
of a sharpe witte at the last this he fayneth That God is not knowen by fayth onely but also by loue But who euer would so say but this man onely Vndoubtedly by loue we know not but by loue we loue But that which is spoken in the booke of wisedome whiche yet with me is not of so great authority Christ himselfe hath most manifestly testified in the Gospel saying This is eternall life that they know thee the onely true God Although of this saying also of our sauior Winchester hath fained a new deuise I know not what namely that to know God is not properly eternall life although it somewhat helpe forwarde thereunto But forasmuch as neither the Fathers nor Paul nor Christ himselfe can satisfy these men there is no hope that we shall any thing preuayle with our reasons They adde moreouer That the fathers say that onely faith iustifieth that is is the principallest thing whereby we are iustified I confesse indéede that only sometime signifieth principall But this sense can not agrée with Pauls purpose This word Only some tymes signifieth principall For if charity be compared with faith charity is excellenter and better as Paul sayth Wherefore if both of them iustify as these men will haue it then shoulde charity haue the chiefest part and not faith And this also is a great let vnto these men which I haue oftentimes spoken of that Paul so ascribeth iustification vnto faith that he sayth without workes But Augustine say they vnto Simplicianus writeth That by fayth we beginne to be iustified Vnto this we may answere two maner of wayes first that that beginning is such that in very déede it hath the very full and whole iustification So that Augustines meaning is that we are iustified so soone as we haue faith Or if this please them not we will say as the truth is indéede that Augustine ment of the righteousnes which cleaueth in vs. They cite also Ambrose vpoÌ„ the 5. chapiter vnto yâ— Galathians In Christ c. For saith he we haue nede of fayth onely in charity to iustification Behold say they vnto iustification we haue no lesse nede of charity then of fayth But they are far deceaued For by those words Ambrose ment nothing els but to make a distinction betwene true faith and a vaine opinion Therfore he sayth that we haue néede of faith only namely which is ioyned with charity But Ierome vppon the 5. chapiter vnto the Galathians sayth That it is charity onely which maketh cleane the hart What other thing els shall we here aunswere but yâ— this his saying if it be vrged roughly simply is false For it is faith also which purifieth the hartes as it is written in the Actes of the Apostles And Paul to Timothe sayth Charity out of a pure hart good conscience c. By which words it is playne tâ—at the hart must of necessity first be pure before charity can come Wherefore we will interprete that sentence by the effect and as touching our knowledge For then is it most certayne that we are regenerate and haue a cleane hart when we be endued with charity After this maner also â—aue we before expounded this Many sinnes are forgeuen her because she hath loued much And by the selfe same meanes also may that saying of Augustine in his booke de natura Gratia the 38. chapiter be aunswered vnto It is the charity of God saith he by which onely he is iust whosoeuer is iust But this séemeth vnto me best to vnderstand such sayinges of the fathers of that righteousnes which cleueth vnto vs. For that consisteth not onely of fayth but also of all vertues and good workes But because amongst all vertues charity is the principallest therefore the fathers sometimes Why our righteousnes is attributed sometymes vnto charity attribute righteousnes vnto it onely And that which our aduersaries haue most vniustly vsurped to expound this word Only for principall or chiefe may in this place most iustly serue vs. For here we entreat not of that iustificatioÌ„ which is had by imputation but of that which we attayne vnto after regeneration Wherefore in this our proposition we exclude not from a man that is iustified hope charitie and other good woorkes but this only we say that they haue not the power or cause or merite of iustifieng And when we say that a man is iustified by fayth only we say nothing ells vndoubtedly but that a man is iustified only by the mercy of God and by the merite of Christ only which we can not apprehend We must not leaue oâ— from vsyng this worde Only by any other instrument then by fayth only Neither must we geue place vnto our aduersaries not to vse this worde Only though they cry out neuer so much that of it springeth great offence and mens mindes are by this persuasion somwhat weakned in the excercise of vertues For by sound doctrine we may easely remedy these discommodities For we alwayes inculcate that it is not true iustification or true fayth which wanteth the fruites of good life But we se the subtle and craftie deuise of these men For if we should say that a man is simply iustified by fayth leauing out this word Only Sreight way they would adde of theyr own that a maÌ„ indede is iustified by faith but yet is he no les iustified by hope and charity and other good woorkes For this selfe same cause the Catholikes in times past would not permit vnto the Arrians this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of like substance bicause they would A like example streight way haue sayd That the sonne indede by appellation or name is GOD like vnto the father in a maner equall vnto him but yet not of one and the selfe same nature and substance Wherefore they did with tooth and naile defend and kepe still this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of one and the selfe same substance as a word most apt to expresse the truth of that controuersie which they might also by good right doo and chiefely for that they saw that that word was of necessity concluded out of the holy scriptures out of which also is most euidently concluded thys our word Only and is thought of vs a word most mete to confute the errors of those which would haue iustification to come of workes Moreouer Gardiner bishop of winchester counted this our proposition to be absurd and agaynst it amongst other arguments vsed this and it is to me more then wonderfull how much it is estemed of certayne Papists his parasites The righteousnes sayth he that is geuen vs of God wherby we are iustefied pertayneth to all the faculties of the mind or rather to the wholâ— man Ergo we are not iustified by fayth only For that pertayneth only vnto the higher part of the soule Here gentle reader lest thou shouldest be deceaued lieth hidden a double fallace or disceate For first graunt
signification For Paul here meaâ—â—th not that power wherby were wrought miracles but only describeth those offices which are at all times necessary in the Church Wherfore that Prophesie yâ— was spoken of in the first Epistle to the Corinthians the. 14. chapiter when Paul sayd he which prophesieth speaketh edification exhortation and consolation And againe ye may all one by one prophesie that all may learne and all receiue consolation the same prophesie I say I thinke is meÌ„t in this place And this is to be noted yâ— the Apostle did at the beginning set forth two offices generally which are afterward deuided into their partes as we shall sée And there are two for that man consisteth of body and soule And God for that his will is that the whole man should be saued hath instituted ministeries in the church both which pertaine to the soule and which pertayne to the body Prophesy comprehendeth the giftes which pertayne to doctrine and to exhortation And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is ministery containeth those thinges which conduce to relieue the body either from pouerty or from diseases and which restrayne it from wicked and vncomely actions Touching the first he sayth Whether prophesie according to the proportion of fayth In this place many thinke that by faith are to be vnderstanded the chief groundes and principall sentences of religion as those which are comprehended in the symboles And so the sense is that they which teach or exhort or comfort the people of God ought chiefly to beware of this that they speake nothing that is repugnaunt to the whole summe and principall groundes of the Catholike faith which things they which haue the charge of suche functions ought alwayes to haue before their eyes least peraduenture they decline from them Others by faith vnderstaÌ„d the roote of such giftes And Origen thinketh that this particle is to be repeated in all those things which are afterwarde mentioned namely that the ministery and doctrine ought to be exercised according to the measure and portion of that faith as though all those parts of this generall thing which séeme to haue in them the figure 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shold by this particle be made complete But I thinke that this place is more simply to be vnderstanded so that faith here signifieth that knowledge whereof God maketh them partakers whome he placeth in suche functions that he which teacheth which exhorteth or which comforteth set forthe nothing vnto the people but that which God hath put into his head namely by his inspiration and reuelation that they presume not to speake those things which either they vnderstande not or which are of their owne inuention If our elders had obserued this rule we should not now haue had in the Church so many new inuentions of men nor so many abuses nor so many superstitions For when euery man toke vpoÌ„ to speake and to teach the people what so euer came in his head then began these mischiefs to encrease without measure Farther this we ought to knowe that Origen and Chrysostome of this that the Apostle saith according to the proportion of faith tooke occasion to thinke that it lieth in euery mannes power to obtaine these giftes at his owne pleasure For God say they poureth in those things according to the vessell of faith offered of vs. As though it were not before sayde that God deuideth vnto euery man the measure of faith But say they GOD deuideth it according as we our selues will Not so vndoubtedly For Paule to the Corrinthians of these frée giftes thus writeth All these thinges worketh one and the selfe same spirit deuiding to all men as he will But thou wilt say He woorketh Free giftes are not distributed of God according to the will oâ— the receauers indede as he will but he would frame his will to our disposition and therefore he geueth not but so much as we wil. He which thus speaketh considereth not the history of the primitiue Church For it is manifest that there were many amongest the Corinthians which would indede haue spoken with tounges as they saw others speake but yet they could not attayne vnto it At this day also there are many which would faine haue the gift of teaching aptly and of exhorting with fruit yet are they not therfore endewed with the gift And there are iust causes why God wil not somtimes geue those giftes For paraduenture they should turne to yâ— destruction of the receauers either for that they would become insolent or ells for that otherwise they would abuse the gift of God The scripture manifestly admonisheth vs that we are ignorant what we should pray as we ought And therefore God reiecteth not the prayers of his although oftentimes he geue not those things which they aske perticularly of hym Farther Paul vnto the Ephesians playnly Those gifts depend not of â—ur preparatioÌ„ but oâ— the will of God admonisheth that God hath put in the Church some to be Apostles some Prophets and some Euangelistes And if it be God which ordereth the disposing of these giftes theÌ„ depend they not of our preparation but of his will But some man will say if thys lie not in our choyse what neded Paul to say to the CorinthiaÌ„s Labour to attaine to the better giftes but chiefly to prophesie I answere that the Apostle there reproueth the preposterous iudgement of the Corrinthians For they most estemed the gift of toungs when as rather prophesie was much better And if any maÌ„ had ech faculty namely of speaking with tounges and of prophesieng which thing happened to many for Paul himselfe both spake with tonges and prophesied yet he admonisheth to labour rather to execute the gift of prophesie then of tonges And if a maÌ„ wil desire of God any of this kind of gifts Paul sheweth what gift most conduceth to the edifieng of the Church And yet doth he not therefore affirme that it lieth in the hand of euery man to haue what he will For he sheweth only what is rather to be desired Origen findeth fault with the Lattin translation which thus redeth â—uxta rationem fideâ— that is according to the reasoÌ„ or consideration of faith For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is proportion he thinketh signifieth a competeÌ„t measure But whether those be the woordes of Origen or rather added to by the interpreter I somewhat doubt For in my iudgement it seemeth not verye likely that Origen in his interpretations would seke for any helpe of the Lattin bookes And besides that I sée not howe iustly our translation in this thinge shoulde be reproued For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may very aptly be turned ratio Now resteth to declare why I sayd that prophesie is here set forth as a general office which afterward is deuided into doctrine into exhortation This I proue by the woordes of the Apostle which I before cited out of the 14. chapiter to the Corinthians He which prophesieth speaketh edification
exhortation and consolation to all men In these wordes Paul most manifestly teacheth to what peculiar offices the gyft of Prophesie pertayneth in the Churche Or a ministery in ministery The want of this speach may thus be supplied whether he haue a ministery let him abide and be occupied in the ministery and wholy apply himselfe thereunto vnles paraduenture any had rather with Origen to repete that former particle namely according to the proportioÌ„ or measure of fayth let him exercise himselfe in the ministery As touching the sence Paul in these wordes No man ought to be idle in his vocaâ—ion sheweth that God will not that any man should be Idle in his vocation For as Alexander sayd to Mammea There is nothing more pernicions to a common welth then to haue thinges done by deputies Euery maÌ„ ought to labour himselfe in his vocation But what a lamentable case is it to sée in these dayes infinite ministers in the Church which boast that they are not bound to preach to fede the flocke and to gouerne the shepe of Christ when yet in the meane time they receue no small gaynes at the handes of theyr shepe He which teacheth in teaching Of this commaundemeÌ„t the Apostles haue geuen vs an excellent example when they sayd It is not mete for vs to leue the word of God and to minister at tables For forasmuch as they were appoynted of the Lord to teach the whole world they would be occupied in teaching He which exhorteth in exhortacion These two to teach and to exhort are To teach to exhort are diuers of very nigh affinity the one to the other And sometimes ech is geuen to one and the same man But sometimes and for the most part they are deuided For a man shall sée some teach aptly and most playnly set forth thinges most subtle and perspicuously expound thinges that are obscure which selfe men yet in exhortatacioÌ„s are very vnapt There are others which haue a wonderfull dexteritie and efficacy in exhortacions which yet of all men are most vnapt to teach By the woordes of the Apostle to the Cor. a litle before alledged we sée how the giftes of the prophesie are distinguished â–ª First he sayth He speaketh edification which pertayneth to doctrine secondly exhortacion namely whereby men are stirred vp to doo good and to eschew euill thirdly is put consolation For oftentimes it commeth to passe Thre parts of prophecy that some are broken in aduersities which by that meanes may seme redy either to dispayre or to fall away frome the truth Wherefore it is necessary that they be holpen by consolation This part Paul here prosecuteth not I thinke therfore for that he comprehendeth it vnder exhortacion And how much publike teachinges and exhortacions were vsed in the old time in the Church we may gather out of that 14. chapiter to In the sinagoge of the Iewes these offices of prophecy were vsed the Corinthians Yea neither were these thinges euer entermitted in the sinagoges of the Iewes so often as there was had an holy assembly Which may here by be proued for that vnto Christ when he was set downe in the sinagoge was deliuered a booke to expound somewhat thereof vnto the people And when Paul and Barnabas came to Antioch as Pisidia as it is writteÌ„ in the 13. chapiter of the Actes and were come to the sinagog with the rest of the Iewes the ruler of the sinagog sayd vnto them If ye haue any word of consolation for the people say on He that distributeth let him do it with simplicity Here is touched the office of deacons as they were at that time and ought also to be in our time Theyr office was to destribute to the poore the almes and oblations of the faythfull Let theÌ„ doo theyr office sayth he with simplicity Let them conueighe nothing away by craft or by euill practises For noughty and deceatefull men when they haue the chardge of common receauinges of mooney doo nothing simply but vse wonderfull The office of Deacons guiles and subtletie The faultes Paul willeth to be remooued away from this kind of ministery Others thinke that the geuing ought to be done simply that is without any regard to get the prayse of men which some seke for in the distribution of other mens almes But the first interpretacion in my iudgement semeth more apt He that ruleth with diligence Although I doubt not that there were many kindes of gouermeÌ„t in the Church yet to confesse the truthe this as I thinke may most aptly be vnderstanded of those which were called praesbiteri that is elders not of these which had the charge of the woord and of doctrine but of those which The office of the elders were appointed as helpers to the pastors They as men of the wiser sort endewed with a greater zeale and piety were chosen out of the Laytie Their office was chiefely to se vnto discipline and to looke what euery man did and in euery house famely to se what euery man neded either as touching the soule or as touching the body For the Church had his elders or if I may so speake his senate which as time required prouided for all thinges mete and profitable Paul describeth thys kind of ministery not only in this place but also in the first to Timothe For thus he writeth The elders are worthy of double honour especially they which labour in the word in doctrine In which words he semeth to signify there are some praesbiteri which teach and set forth the woord of God and there are others which although they doo not this yet are they gouerners in the Church as elders This thing Ambrose left not vntouched when he expounded that place yea he complayneth that euen theÌ„ either thorough the pride or thorough the slouthfulnes of the priests they were in a maner worne away For whilest they which haue the gouerment of yâ— Church seeke to draw all thinges to themselues they diligently as much as they can labour that in that roome should be ioyned no fellow officers with theÌ„ Wherfore Paul willeth that they which haue this charge doo put to theyr diligence and expell slouthfulnes and sluggishnes He that sheweth mercy with cherefulnes This semeth to haue bene the office of widdowes of old men which were to that end maintayned of the Church to se vnto strangers and to sicke persons Vnto these he not without iust cause coÌ„maundeth cherefulnes For men weake and afflicted are much relieued if they sée their necessities holpen with cherefulnes For they which doo these thinges with an heauy and frowning loke doo seme to adde sorrow to them that are in sorrow For thereby they suspect that they are greauousome and burdenous to theyr Why these giftes are called free giftes brethern By meanes wherof they are oftentimes brought to that poynt that they count death much better theÌ„ that life Thus much hath Paul spokeÌ„ of the
vnto vs the choise of meats by this place any thing be holpen For Paul sayth it commeth of weakenes to estéeme one day aboue an other and commendeth them as men of more strength which count euery day all one and a like Touching which matter it shall not be amisse to cite the words of Theodoretus which wryteth thus vpon this place This custome sayth he abideth euen to this day in the Churche and this man embraceth abstinence but that man dothe without all manner scruple eate all kindes of meates â–ª and neither doth this man iudge that man nor that man this man but the lawe of concorde maketh them renowned and notable These wordes of Theodoretus and those which are vpon this place gathered out of Origen Ambrose and Chrisostome plainly declare that these differences of dayes as touching fastings and abstinences DiffereÌ„ces of dayes as touching fasting and abstinence were free Some abstained froÌ„ flesh on the fourthe day of the weke and some on the saterdai were in suche sorte vsed amongst Christians that yet notwithstanding they were frée Neither doubt I but that at the beginning Lent was of the same nature although afterwarde the yoke thereof was vrged at menues handes Out of Ambrose vpon this place this I note that in his time some abstained from fleshe the fourth day of the wéeke and some on the Saterday I thought it good gentle Reader to mencion these things that thou mightest know whereto some of the fathers wrested these wordes of Paul How be it the first interpretation touching the dayes of the Iewes is both more simple more agreable with Pauls purpose Let euery man be fully satisfyed in his minde The olde reading hath let euery man abound in his own sense which some hereto wrest as though we ought in those things which pertaine to religion to permit euery man to his owne sense This In maters of religion euery man must not follow his owne sense thing Chrysostome proueth not to be true For when we come to matters of fayth Paule pronounceth that he is accursed which teacheth any other Gospel yea although he were an Angell from heauen But this is true in things indifferent Why then doth not the Pope at this day suffer men to be frée as touching meats But the wordes of Paul haue not this sense In Gréeke it is thus written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is let euery man be in his minde fully persuaded and assured of that which he doth and defendeth to be true This thing ought euery man chiefly to sée vnto that when he either doth or defendeth any thing he be first of al assured and firme as touching it For a man shal sée some which dispute contend We must not dispute of matters of fayth for victori sake only for victory sake when as oftentimes in theyr mind they either staÌ„d in doubt or thinke otherwise Those doth Paul in this place reproue which either affirme or do any thing when in the meane time they stand in doubt thereof themselues It may here aptly be demaunded whether this sentence of Paule wherein he admonisheth How farre for the we must beare with the weake A distinctioÌ„ of the Cerâ—monies of the law â–ª as touching thre times to bear with the weak be vniuersally true Chrisostom sayth yâ— this sentence is so long to be followed as long as the fruit is not yet ripe For so loÌ„g must we beare with the weake least by rashnes they take hurt But we wil make a distinction of the ceremonies of the law this distinctioÌ„ al meÌ„ in a maner refer to thrée times One time was when yâ— law was in force then were all those ceremonies of necessity to be obserued of all yâ— Iewes An other time was when yâ— gospel was now spred abrode shined throughout the worlde and yâ— coÌ„mon welth of the Iewes and their temple was vtterly destroyed There was also a midle time wheÌ„ the coÌ„mon wealth of Israel after a sorte remayned still namely when Christ had now ascended into heauen and the Gospell was yet after a sorte in swadling clothes and the light had not fully burst forth out of these darkenes Then it was lawfull Let the godly beware that no maÌ„ abuse theyr lenitye towards the weake for a time to kepe still the ceremonies of Moses but yet so that no man should put in them the hope of his saluation And this moreouer was to be sene vnto that others should not guilefully abuse this indulgency which was for a tyme permitted towardes the weake to defend their supersticion by the example or lenitie of the godly Paul when he saw that there was some consideration to be had of the weake circumcised Timothie But afterward he would in no case circumcise Titus For he saw that if he shold haue so done christian liberty shold by his example haue bene oppressed Paul towardes the Romanes shewed himselfe very gentle remisse for that he thought it mete to beare with their infirmitie simplicitie For forasmuch as they were but newly come vnto Christ they could not straight way learne all thinges But contrariwise let vs sée how the same Apostle vsed himselfe towards those which now bitte vpon the bridle and of a certayne obstinacie resisted his doctrine Vnto the Col. the 2. chap. he saith Take hede that ye be not wonne away by philosophie and vayne deceite according to the tradition of men accordyng to the elementes of the world and not accordyng to Christ. And streight way Let no man therfore iudge you in meat or drinke or in parte of a feast day or of the newe Moone or of the Sabbothes And to the Galathians ye which are circumcised haue fallen away from grace Christ is nothing profitable vnto you And agayne ye obserue dayes and times and monthes yeares I feare me lest I haue labored in vayne amongst you This consideration also ought we at this day to obserue that whome we se When in this case we must deale either geÌ„tly or seuerâ—ly not yet sufficiently instructed we gently cheresh and quench not the smoking flax namely so long as there is hope of repentance and of a better mind But if they declare themselues to be hardened and to be of purpose sworne enemies of the truth there we must deale seuerely and constantly He that obserueth the day obserueth it to the Lord. There were two things in the weaker sort of which the one could by no meanes be allowed namely that they were ignorant of those thinges which they ought chiefely to haue knowen and were in a maner destitute of faith and of the knowledge of Christian liberty This thing Paul now omitteth as which made not much to yâ— preseÌ„t purpose The other was that they so feared God and obserued his law that they durst committ nothing which they thought was prohibited by the authority of God And for that What might be commeÌ„ded in those weker sorâ—
my kinsmen according to the flesh Affinity of the flesh is oftentimes an occasion that maketh vs to loue our neighbour and that of charity Paul Affinitie of the flesh is an honest occasioÌ„ to make vs to loue our neighbor saith to Tim. He which hath not a care of his own and especially of his housholde hath denied the fayth and is worse then an infidel for the vnder the pretence of religion he leadeth a worse life theÌ„ infidels who being led only by the instinct of nature are louing towards their kinsfolks prouide thinges necessary for theÌ„ Wherfore we ought to thinke yâ— the coÌ„iunctioÌ„ of the flesh of kinred is geuen vnto vs of God as a pricke to charity not yâ— we ought to haue a regard to such thinges as be our owne but as adioyned vnto vs of God For otherwise there is none which doth chose vnto himselfe parentes brethren or countrey Wherfore we ought to haue a care of those which are geuen to vs of God and not to bestow our endeuor as we list our selues without choyse not that we ought not to loue and to do good to all meÌ„ whatsoeuer they be Now onely he entreateth of degrées and sheweth an ordinary and an accustomed way wherehence we must begin vnles peraduenture some occasion more necessary draw vs an other way How then doth the Apostle say in the latter to the Cor. that he knew none as touching the flesh yea neither Christ him selfe There to know is to put confidence for he saith that he did no more put coÌ„fidence in any outward thing but in Christ onely For the false Apostles continually boasted of their Iewishe religion of the stocke of Christ according to the flesh of the law of ceremonies and other such like as though of these thinges should depend the saluation of men These thinges in déede are benefites of God and those not to be contemned but yet without Christ no man ought to put confidence in them This meaneth Paul in that place by these wordes to know accordyng to the The flesh of Christ without faith profiteth not flesh yea eueÌ„ the flesh of Christ without a true and sound faith nothing profiteth For so Christ himselfe saith in Iohn The fleshe profiteth not any thyng it is the spirite which quickeneth Wherfore we haue not now knowen Christ by the iudgement of the flesh neither do we consider him according to the base conditions which he had whilest he was here on earth Paul before when he was of the Iewish religion attributed much vnto these thinges namely that he was a Iewe of the tribe of Beniamin a Pharisey and that of his people should Christ be borne Yea he then in these thinges did put the whole ground and stay of his saluation But beyng afterward conuerted vnto Christ he placed al his confidence in faith in him Wherfore he sayth that he now knewe nothing according to the flesh namely in that manner that he had before knowen Which are Israelites From a priuate condition wherby they according to the flesh were knit vnto him he ascendeth to a publike condition namely yâ— they were Israelites that is the people of God Teuolah the chosen people of God dere Places made noble by the Gods vnto whome they were consecrated vnto them the flocke the shéepe the lot and the inheritaunce of the Lord. Many nations and cities had a wonderful great delight in themselues for that they were consecrated vnto certaine Gods Athenes was commended of Minerua Dolos the â—land of Apollo and Diana Cicero against Verres praiseth al Sicilia but especially the mountaine Etna for that it was consecrated vnto Ceres as though it were wholy nothing els but an house and temple of Ceres How much more honorable The Israelites were coÌ„secrated vnto God was it to yâ— Israelits for yâ— their whole natioÌ„ was consecrated vnto yâ— true God the creator of heauen and of earth Hereby ought we to learne that the giftes of God can not be so contaminated of men but that they are perpetuallye to be commended And that we should not here erre Paul maketh an excellent distinction We must make a distinction betwene the giftes of God and betwene the mâ— that are adorned with theÌ„ betwene the giftes of God and betwene the men that are adorned with theÌ„ The giftes of God are alwaies to be highly commended but the men as they behaue themselues are either to be dispraysed or to be commended Before in the 3. chap. Paule spake of the selfe same matter when he said What is then the preferment of the Iewe. He answereth hauing a respect vnto the giftes of God Much euery maner of way First because vnto them are committed the wordes of God For what if some of them haue not beleued Hath their incredulity made voyd the faith of God God forbid Howbeit afterward when he entreateth of saluation where he hath a respect vnto the common vices of nature vnto infidelity and other sinnes he speaketh otherwise Wherin then do we excell them No maner of way And to declare how much he estemed those giftes be they neuer so excellent if we want faith and be agaynst Christ in his epistle to the Phil. when he had reckened vp all the things which he had when he was of the Iewish religion he saith That he counted all these things as losses and donge For that being seioyned from faith they do nothing but puffe vs vp and more and more lead vs from Christ Israelites This is a name deriued of their father Iacobâ— it is a much more To be called Israelites is more excellenter then to beÌ„ called Iacobites excellenter name theÌ„ if they had ben called Iacobites for they receaued that name not of yâ— name which was geueÌ„ vnto yâ— Patriarch at his birth but whiche he got by a victory by such a victory wherin he ouercame God himself Ther is set forth vn to vs no smal nobility of that man of whom they tooke their name when as he is Why Iacob was called Israell said in wrastling to haue ouercome eueÌ„ God himselfe For therfore was he by God called Israell as it were a prince with God and who had preuailed against God And together with the name he receiued a signe or a token or marke in his body For after that time he began to halt The godly ouercome God when they ouercome the temptations sent of him Abraham was tempted of God to stay his own How the godly 〈◊〉 to ouercome God sonne that temptation he ouercame and was made therby most famous They also ouercome God when they ouercome all aduersities which vndoubtedly happen not vnto them without the prouidence and gouernement of God So reade we in the holy scriptures that Iob and many other holy men did And they so ouercome that vnto them all thinges worke to good Finally they ouercome when wyth a liuely and perfect faith they embrace the
promises offred of God though they be neuer so hard and difficile So Abraham when God promised vnto him séede ouercame sence which resisted reason which dissuaded and the feblenes of his vnfruitfull body and the age of his wife and her perpetuall barennes vnto that tyme. He beleued God and wonderfully gaue vnto him his due glory These are those most notable victories by which God delighteth to be ouercome and geueth a blessyng vnto those which haue so ouercome him Their names are chaunged so that they An allegory of the halting of Iacob are called princes with God to the ende they should not ascribe such victories vnto themselues but vnto God They ought rather to count that they haue receyued them at his handes through whose grace onely they haue obteyned them They haâ—t and haue a weake thigh for that the flesh sinne and the remnantes of original corruption the more we ouercome in this kinde of wrastling the more weaker are they made To whome pertayneth the adoption That they were the kinsemen of Paul as touching the fleshe if came vnto them by naturall propagation Now he turneth his speach to thinges which farre passe all nature namely that meÌ„ should by adoption be made the sonnes of God This they can not be by nature but by the singular mercy of God they â—btains by adoptioÌ„ to â—â—â—ade his children Hâ—reby is very manifest that which I before did put you in minde of that from the The Hebrâ—â—â— also were â—â— opâ—ed of God in to children â–ª people of the Iewes is not to be taken away adoption but that they also were the â—â—â—nce of God But we speake not of the whole multitude confusedly but of holy â—en aâ—d of the faithfull wâ—ich were amongsâ— that people â–ª But thou wilt say that they â—ad the spiâ—â—te of â—ondage I graunt they had in consideration of the tyme wherein they were holden vnder the multitude of ceremonies But this nothing These are not contrâ—â—â—y â—o â—aâ—â—â—he spiâ—iâ—e of â—â— are aâ—d to â—â— the 〈◊〉 children of God letted their adoption as Paul declareth to the Galathyans So long tyme saith her as the 〈◊〉 is a child be nothing differeth from a seruant For he lyueth vnder tutors â–ª goâ—erâ—eâ—â— and scholemasters â–ª vntill the tyme appoynted of hys father when as yet notwythstandyng he is indeâ—dâ— the heyre and Lord of all And if they pertayned to adoption then must it nedes follow that they were endewed both with fayth and with the spirite Yea if thou wilt haue a consideration to the ancientnes of tyme The children adopted haue both the spirite and faith they attayned vnto this adâ—ption before vs. God not only graunteth vnto holy men to be by adoption called the sonnes of God but also communicateth vnto them of his nature and geueth vnto them the holy ghost which thing men can not do when they adopt any man for their child Moreouer as Paul hath before admonished God vnto his adopted children communicateth of his nature we ought to remember that after adoption followeth the inheritaunce that is that they should be the heyres of God and fellow heyres of Christ Glory They which write of glory do say that it consisteth in two thinges â–ª the one is to haue an honorable opinion of a man the other is that that estimation Wherin consisteth the nature of glory be set forth by some outward signes These two thinges did God most aboundantly performe vnto the people of the Iewes For he did not only beare good will towardes them but also continually many maner of wayes declared this his good will towardes them He placed amongst them the Arke of the couenant as his God adorâ—ed the Israelites with glorâ—e habitacle there he heard their prayers and requestes and gaue oracles vnto them that sought them In Deut â–ª it is written That there was no nation so notable which had God so nigh vnto them as had the Israelites when as they called vpon hys name That glorious Thraso in Enucho boasted that the king delighted to haue him in his sight and that wheÌ„ being ouerweried with affaires he would case his mind of that burthen and care he would send for him and make him sitte with hym at his table apart and alone and hereof he so boasted for that he counted the entier familiarity of the king as a great glory vnto him The Hebrues also had glory not only in respect of God but also by comparison vnto other nations For Dauid saith in the Psalme God hath not done so to euery nation neither hath â—e manifested his iudgementes vnto them The geuing of the Lawe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 When God had now chosen the Iewes to be his people he would also instruct them with good lawes with lawes â–ª I say farre passing all the lawes either of Solon or of Liturgus or of Nâ—ma or of Minos The couenauntes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is couenauntes This worde although sometimes it do signifie promises yet because afterward is mencion made of them in this place it signifieth as we haue sayde couenantes which God oftimes made with the people And therefore the Apostle vseth the plurall number God oftentimes renued the couenant made with the Hebrues For God made a couenaunt with Abraham with Isaack and with Iacob and renued the same afterwarde vnder Moses Iâ—sua and Ioâ—ias and last of all hath sealed it through Christ In these couenauntes were the Iewes long tyme comprehended before that we were adopted of God Touching the olde couenaunt In the new couenant the Iewes were â—efore the Gentils there can be no doubt and as for the new it is playâ—e by the history both of the Apostles and of the Gospell For the Apostles came first to Christ and by them afterward were called the Gentles And of so great waight were these couenantes that they were sealed not only with wordes but also with outward signes theirs â–ª by circumcision and ours by baptisme VVorshipping 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this place signifieth the maner of worshipping of God which vnto the Iewes was so prescribed of God that it was not lawfull for them to adde any thing thereunto But not in that case were the Gentils The rites ceremonies of tâ—e Gentils were not constant For they in their idolatry continually deuised new rites and ceremonies Promises Of these dependeth saluation For they which beleue the promises of God haue both remission of sinnes and eternall felicity Amongst the Iewes were extant promises not only of their saluation but also of the calling of the Gentles But the Gentles themselues had no such promises geuen them Amongst the Iewes were extant promiâ—es of the calling of the Gentils of God Yea rather if a man consider the oracles and answeres of idols he shall see that they had a greater care to foretell thinges to come then they had to promise to do any thing But the promises of God are of two sortes