vs even by the very appointement of God that which hee did for vs and in our name may not impertinentlie be saide to bee imputed by God vnto vs as done by vs But for myne owne iudgement I esteeme the first interpretation of the word as to bee most sounde and agreeable to the trueth and beeing so taken there shal be no difference in substance betwixt the second and third opinion onely that which is not expressed in the second but vnderstood in the word imputation touching the trueth and effectualnes of it is by similitude expressed in the third and in this sense it is to bee taken in the matter of our iustification and it declareth the forme of our iustification importing this much that God iustifieth vs by accompting vnto vs Christes obedience which is in it selfe perfect righteousnes in such sorte as by this his imputation it is ours as truely and doeth as truely cleere vs before God as if it were our owne in deede and we our selves in deed had performed it Thus we have need to take heed of two extremities whereinto it is evident that many men doe fall in this point some taking imputation too slenderly and others taking it too strictlie each being to other the cause of others stumbling Furthermore wee shall vnderstande the more cleerlie the right meaning of the word imputation if wee doe consider it in the two coÌ„trarie phrases wherein it is vsed al to one sense in the Scriptures For sometimes our iustification is described negatively by not imputing of sinne sometimes affirmatively by imputing of righteousnes For as the word imputation is taken in the negative phrase it must also be taken in the affirmative now in the negative we may know how it is taken by the Apostle 2. Cor. chap. 5. ver 19. where it is saide God was in Christ reconciling the world to him selfe not imputing to them their sinnes As likewise Psal 32. and Rom. chap. 4. where it is saide Blesied is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sinne In which places not imputing of sinne signifieth the not reckoning vnto vs sinne nor iniquitie and the not accompting of vs to be vnrighteous and so the not laying guiltines to our charge nor exacting punishment of vs for it wherevpon it followeth that imputation of righteousnes must signifie the reckoning of righteousnes vnto vs and accompting of vs to be righteous pronouncing of vs guiltlesse and decerning life vnto vs. For clearer vnderstanding whereof we are to knowe that the word of imputation hath alwayes reference to some other thing fo that it commonly cometh in betwixt two things the one the thing which is imputed the other that wherevnto it is imputed so that imputation hath relation vnto both and to make this manifest we shall consider these 3. phrases The obedience of Christ is imputed vnto iustification conforme to the saying of the Apostle Rom. chap. 5. ver 19. By the obedience of one man many shal be made righteous The second phrase is Faith is imputed vnto righteousnes And the third is Righteousnes is imputed vnto life The equivalent whereof we have Rom. chap. 4. ver 11. and 5. 17. 18. In the first phrase imputation commeth in betwixt Christes obedience as the thing which is imputed iustification as the end wherevnto it is imputed and it hath reference to both In the second phrase imputation coÌ„meth in betwixt faith as the thing which is imputed and righteousnes as the end wherevnto it is imputed In the last phrase imputation commeth in betwixt righteousnes it selfe as the thing imputed and life as the end wherevnto it is imputed Thus we see that imputation in the matter of iustification hath alwayes reference to two things and thus much concerning the meaning of the word Now we are to consider what thinges they are which are said to be imputed coÌ„cerning which there are two extremities wherein men do commonly fall the one holding that nothing inherent in vs can possibly be imputed to vs the other hold the contrarie that nothing is imputed to vs but that which is inherent in vs. That opinion which is betwixt both seemeth to agree most with Gods truth that is that not only things inherent in vs but things that are not inherent in vs are imputed to vs therefore imputation is vsed by the holy ghost when hee speaketh of iustification by grace and of iustification by works as Rom. cha 4. likewise when he speaketh of the accompting of vs sinners because of our workes and corruption inherent And when he speaketh of the accompting of vs righteous by grace through the obedience of Christ Rom. chap. 4. this same is cleare by other examples of Scripture as 2. Sam. chapt 19. vers 19. where Sheâ—ei sayeth to David Let not my Lord impute wickednes vnto me and Rom. chap. 2. ver 26. where it is saide His vncircumcision shal be imputed vnto circumcision This same may bee confirmed vnto vs Psalm 32. and 2. Cor. chap. 5. and Rom. chapt 9 ver 8. and 2. Cor. chap. 12. ver 6. Gal. chap. 3. ver 6. and 2. Tim. chap. 4. 16. And therfeore somtimes righteousnes is said to be imputed by debt and sometimes by grace Rom. cha 4. 4. For vnderstanding whereof we are not only to distinguish betwixt thinges as they are inherent or not inherent in vs but also as they are our owne or not our owne For somethings inherent are so in vs that they are our owne because they consist in these thinges which are in our nature and are the effectes and fruites of our naturall powers somethings againe are so in vs as they are no wayes our owne being no parte nor portion of any naturall power or qualitie nor flowing from any power or facultie in nature but beside and above nature coÌ„ming to vs from God and wrought in vs by the power of his spirit and therefore though they be in vs cannot be said to be our owne because they are no parte nor propertie of our nature nor effectes produced by nature such as is faith for although we be saide to beleeve with the hearte yet neither is faith it selfe any naturall power or facultie in the hearte nor produced by any naturall power or facultie of the hearte neither doe wee beleeve with the heart naturally and by our owne strength as though wee might make our heartes to beleeve or that faith or beleevinge were our owne worke but faith as wee have showen before is an instrument supernaturall and wrought not by our heartes but in our heartes by the supernaturail power of God by the which as by a supernaturall meane given vs of God we beleeve with our harts and so lay hold vpon supernatural things and performe supernaturall workes According to this diverse consideration of thinges in vs or proceeding from any power that is in vs so is there a distinction of imputation in the scriptures One is said to be by debt another is saide to be by
flesh and bones of his bones in that he did give himselfe to death for them to this end that hee might iustifie them For as the bonde of Mariage doth oblige the husband to a particular and speciall love to his wife wherein he is obliged to none other even so the Lord Iesus did submitt himselfe vnto the Fathers will to lay downe his life for none but such as were given him of the Father and made members of his body and his spirituall spouse And if any will obiect that this place of the Apostle is to be vnderstood of the order of Christ his doing according to the eternall purpose and Decree of God and not according to the Dispensation of God towards vs in tyme. It is easie to be answered that the order of God in both is one and the same For as the Lord doth particularly predestinate men to Adoption before he give his Sonne to the death for their iustification even so in tyme he doth Adopt vs that is effectuallie call vs bring vs to his Sonne and make vs one with him before he iustifie vs. Moreover this shall yet be more manifest if we shall marke this one distinction of the fruites of faith to wit if we can discerne betwixt the immediate fruite of faith and the mediate fruites The mediate fruite we call that which is wrought by God in vs even by the very working of faith in our heartes together and at once and that is our verie vnion and coniunction with Christ For by faith Christ dwelleth in our heartes and this is the worke whereby we are made the sonnes of God For as sayeth the Apostle If we be Christes we are the seed Gal. chapt 3. vers 29. The mediate fruites of faith I call those which by vertue of this vnion as the necessarie forerunning meane faith produceth in vs such as is our iustification sanctification c. so that in a manner we can distinguish betwixt these benefites and our faith but more hardly betwixt our faith and Adoption seeing our abyding in Christ and Christes abyding in vs is all one thing with our beleeving in Christ That saying therefore of these learned Divines that GOD cannot acknowledge vs his sonnes before he iustifie vs is not simplie and absolutelie to be vnderstood but by comparison relation that is because God powreth in our heartes after our iustification a more lively sense of his love and a cleerer sight of our Adoption then we receyved in our calling And this maner of speach the spirit of God vseth familiarly in the scriptures which is comparatively to be vnderstood as Iohn chap. 7. vers 39. For the holy Ghost was not yet because Christ was not yet glorified Which is not to be vnderstood as though the holy Ghost had not bene at all but only that he was not in that measure that he was therafter to be given Likewise in that of Iohn ch 16. Christ sayeth touching his Disciples hetherto have ye asked nothing in my name which were great prophanes in vs to vnderstand simply of those holy men of God who knew Christ to be the Christ Sonne of the living God and who were directed in their prayers by the spirit of God who inditeth none but in the name of Christ albeit more darkely and obscurely manifested in our hartes then after the comming of the holy Ghost in greater measure Even so it may bee iustly saide of our Adoption that God doeth not acknowledge vs his sonnes before hee iustifieth vs because that which in small measure and darkely was manifested to vs in our calling is more fully and clearely revealed in our Iustification because then the spirit of Adoption is more aboundantly shed abroad in our heartes for the sealing of our Adoption For as we haue saide before although our Adoption be begunne in our Calling before our Iustification yet hath it the clearer manifestation and fuller accomplishment in and through all the rest of the benefites following our Calling For as sayth Iohn in his first Epistle chapter 3. verse 2. VVe are now the sonnes of GOD but yet it is not made manifest what wee shall be Therefore are we who are already called Iustified and Sanctified still saide to wayte yet for our Adoption Rom. chapter 8. verse 23. Not as though we were not already Adopted but because our Adoption is not fully accomplished vntill our bodies bee redeemed and fully glorified So that with as good reason wee may saye that God doth not acknowledge vs to be his sonnes whylest our bodyes are yet vile and corruptible seeing we must Waite for our Adoption vntill our bodyes be redeemed CHAPTER XV. THE second ground wherevpon this opinion is builded is the testimonie of Iohn Which not the lesse in my iudgemēt makes not much for it if it be wel wayed For it would appeare that that place is mistaken by many that especially in three things The first is in mistaking the right sense of that description wherein the propertie of these to whom Christ gives this benefite is set downe The second is the mistaking of the benefit it self givē by Christ The third is the ground of both the former two in not distinguishing betwixt the Fathers part and the Sonnes in that worke of our Adoption Touching the first the description of those persons is set downe three maner of wayes I. Those that receyved him II. Those that did beleeve in his Name III. Those that are borne of God Of these three the first two are interpreted to signifie Iustification of which sense that place well marked doth give no warrant seeing in scripture these phrases may as wel be interpreted of Adoptiō as of Iustificatiō For as by faith in Christ we are iustified so by faith in Christ we are the sonnes of God Gal. 3. 26. and therefore to restrayne beleeving in Christes name receyving of him vnto the benefit of iustificatiō is an oversight which easily may breed mistaking of the true sense not onely of this place but divers other places of scripture so they take it for granted which in it self is questionable Moreover the place it selfe and the very words of this description doe yeelde two sufficient arguments to prove that heere adoption by these phrases is rather designed then iustification The first argument lieth in the first wordes of the description which is Those that receyved him Which phrase is in the scripture still meant of the worke of the Fathers Calling of vs vnto the Sonne and not of his iustifying of vs in him For no man sayeth Christ can come vnto mee except the Father that hath sent me drawe him Iohn chap. 6. ver 34. Now to come vnto Christ to receive Christ are both one as is manifest by Ioh. cha 5. where that wherwith in the 40. verse Christ chargeth the Iewes vnder these words but you will not come vnto me is in the 43. verse interpreted by Christ him selfe in these wordes And you receyved me not
in the same Adoption is distinguished from both The worke of the Father is our Vnion with Christ when he brings vs vnto him and makes vs to receive him by beleeving in his name And this is our comming to the Sonne Which is the proper worke of the Father For none can come vnto the Sonne except the Father drawe him And this is the principall act of our Adoption which most properly is to be called Adoption and as we have said consisteth chiefly in our calling For seeing most properly it is the worke of the Father to adopt certayne it is that our Adoption most properly must consist in the action of the Father For which cause the Fathers worke in making vs to receyve the Sonne that is to beleeve in his name is in this place expounded by way of similitude in a borrowed speech that is to be borne of God For the begetting and working of faith in our hearts is the chiefe and principall part of our spirituall birth beeing the roote ground of all that followeth The worke of the Sonne is next subioyned which stands in giving to those who have receyved him prerogative or as some do render the word dignitie as others authoritie and as others power to bee the Sonnes of God Of all which significations of the word there is none which doth not fitt this place without giving any advantage vnto the Papists in their forged sense of the word power Which benefite proceeding from the Sonne is alwayes to bee distinguished in our Adoption from our Vnion and communion with him by faith which is the worke of the Father vpon which as the cause dependeth the other as the effect for to those whom the Father doth give to the Sonne to be his brethren and in vnitie with him to be the Sonnes of God the sonne doth give the prerogative the dignitie the authoritie and the power belonging to the sonnes of God And this work consisteth in the sonnes bringing vs to the Father For none can come to the Father but by the Sonne for Christ suffred for vs that he might bring vs to God 1. Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. And this is that which is so often spoken of in scriptures by Christ himselfe that to those whom the Father giveth him to those he giveth eternall life and that he giveth the glorie that the Father hath given him vnto those that beleeve in him For whatsoever prerogative dignitie c. the Father hath given vnto the Sonne the same doth the Sonne impart to vs that are his brethren For the prerogatives and priviledges of sonne-ship appertayne onely to Iesus Christ as the onely sonne of God and therefore it belongeth to him alone to communicate those prerogatives to such as the Father doth first by Adoption make his brethren For the prerogative of a sonne is a dignitie depēding not vpon the essence and nature of our Redeemer but vpon his subsisting and personalitie For as the prerogative of a father is proper to the first person so the prerogative of a sonne is proper to the second person and therefore as we doe holde that to adopt is the prerogative of the first person because he onely is the Father so to communicate the prerogatives belonging to those who are adopted to bee children is the prerogative of the second person because he only is the Sonne And therefore is it said if the Sonne make vs free wee shall bee free indeed Iohn chap. 8. ver 36. for freedome is the prerogative of a Sonne and not of a servant And therefore the whole libertie and freedom bee it from ignorance Sathan sinne or death which the saints enioy in Christ is called by the Apostle the libertie of the Sonnes of God in which libertie is comprehended both our wisdome righteousnes sanctification and redemption Which prerogatives when we doe enioy them then may we bouldly esteeme our selves the Sonnes of God And this is that which it seemes the spirit of God doeth meane when he sayeth that Christ doth give vs the prerogative to be the Sonnes of God that is that he bestowes vpon vs such priviledges and blessings or such authoritie and power over all our spirituall enemies as may make vs not only to glorie in God the Father of Christ as our God and our Father but also to carrie our selves in our whole conversation as becommeth the sonnes of God For we do esteeme that to be adopted or made sonnes and to receyve prerogative to be sonnes are two distinct benefites of the two first persons of the Trinitie For a man may bee a Sonne and yet wante the prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a Sonne For as saith the Apostle Gallath chap. 4. vers 1. 2. The heyre while hee is a childe differeth nothing from a seruant though he be Lord of all but is vnder Tutors and Governours vntill the time appointed of the Father Which custome of men the Apostle applyeth to the Church of God to let vs know that it is a thing to be considered in the children of God aswell as in the children of men so the oversight standes in the not distinguishing betwixt the being of a sonne simply which comes by procreation and birth and the being of a sonne in prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a sonne which comes by age and fulnes of time appointed by the Father For every child is a sonne to his Father as soone as he is borne yet longe after he receyveth not the prerogative of a sonne but still is in condition as a servant But when the time appointed for his freedome commeth he who was before a sonne by birth but a servant in condition becōmeth to be a sonne likewise by condition aswell as by birth when as the prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be a sonne in estate is given vnto him And in this sense is this place to be vnderstood if it be rightly taken that is that vnto them who were borne of the Father and so which were sonnes by the Fathers begetting of them Christ the sonne did give prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be sonnes in cōdition and state For as we have said before the benefit of being sonnes simply by begetting or birth or by adoption is the proper worke of the Father but to make vs sonnes in the condition and estate belonging vnto sonnes is the proper worke of the Sonne For we have no boldnes to call the Father our Father nor have wee any accesse vnto him as vnto our Father but through Christ alone Neither have we the libertie of the sonnes of God from sinne either by righteousnes or sanctification nor any part of the glory of the sonnes of God but frō Christ alone in whom doth all fulnes dwell and out of whose fulnes we all receyve and by whom only we come vnto the Father And this distinction of these two works of the Father and of the Sonne shineth cleerly in the wordes of the Evangelist
For as by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so also by the obedience of one man many shall be made righteous and this general is embraced of all who acknowledge Christ to be our righteousnes but yet in a threefolde different sense The first is of those who by the obedience of Christ vnderstande the whole worke of his humiliation in the which they lay three groundes wherein they place the matter of our righteousnes The first is the worke of Christ in taking vpon him our Nature without sinne The second is his active obedience in fulfilling the Lawe of God during the whole course of his life The third is his passive obedience in submitting him selfe to the death and that of the crosse In the first of these actions they place our iustification from originall sinne and the inborne corruption of our nature In the second they place our Iustification from all our actuall sinnes both of commission and of omission In the third they place our Iustification and absolution from the punishment due to our sinnes The second sense wherein the obedience of Christ is taken is when thereby his active and passive obediēce are only meant without respect of the integritie of his nature and this twofold obedience they esteeme to be necessarie in our iustification against the two evills wherevnto wee are subiect through the fall of Adam The first is the evill of sinne From the which they esteeme vs to bee iustified by the imputation of Christes active obedience in fulfilling the Law The second is the evill of punishment From the which they esteeme vs to be iustified by the imputation of Christes passive obedience in his death and sufferings The third sense wherein the obedience of Christ is taken in our iustification is when thereby the passive obediēce of Christ only in his death is vnderstood by the imputation whereof only as that wherein Christ only is made our righteousnes wee are iustified from all sinne and punishment thereof These three opinions agreeing all in the mayne pointe that is that onely Christ in his obedience is our righteousnes may well without any contention strife or scisme bee tollerated in the Church of God if Christian modestie humblenes of mind meeknes did in that measure possesse al that they could support one another in love and studie more to keepe the vnitie of the spirit in the baunde of peace then by controversies of disputations to engender strife Especially seeing none of these opinions overthrowe the foundation or yet contayneth in them any impietie or leadeth any man from the marke or matter of his righteousnes seeing all three exclude all things except onely Christes obedience from our righteousnes Moreover if wee shall consider two thinges distinctlie we shall easilie perceyve that these three opinions may easily be reconciled and made all to agree in one and that none of them is contrarie to the trueth of God The two things which are distinctly to bee considered are these The first is that wherein standeth the righteousnes it selfe which is imputed vnto vs. The second is of these thinges which are requisite in Christ to the end that in the other he may be righteousnes vnto vs. For these two thinges are not to bee confounded that is that wherein Christ is made righteousnes and that whereby he is made meete to be our righteousnes in that wherein hee is made righteousnes vnto vs. Like as the bloud of the Lambe shadowing Christes bloud is to bee distinguished from these thinges in the Lambe which made the Lambes bloud to serve for a propitiation for sinne For the properties of the beast which was to bee sacrifised for sinne are to bee distinguished from the bloud of the beast which onely was carried in to the most holy place to make expiation of sinnes before the Lord. This ground being considered wee shall easilie perceyve that although Christ bee made righteousnes vnto vs in one particular thinge yet before in that thinge hee can bee our righteousnes all his perfections both in nature and action is required For cleering hereof yet more we have to consider that the matter of our righteousnes in it self is not to be confunded with the action of God in iustifying vs thereby vnto the which many things are required that are no parte nor portion of the righteousnes it selfe so that if wee speake of the action of our iustification all what soever is conteyned in all these three opinions and more also in Christ is required thereto but if we speake of the matter of the righteousnes it selfe whereby wee are iustified wee are to consider of them otherwise Therefore it shall bee needfull that wee consider these two points severally that is first what it is wherein particularly Christ is righteousnes vnto vs. Secondly What thinges they are that are required in him to the ende that in the other hee may bee righteousnes vnto vs. Touching the first The question or doubt seemeth chieflie to arise vpon the worde Obedience which in deede is oftentymes in the Scripture referred to the whole worke of Christs humiliation even from his conception to his resurrection So that all whatsoever hee did in the world is accompted obedience vnto the Father Thus his very Incarnation and takinge vppon him our nature and taking of it in the similitude of sinfull flesh his becomming vnder the Lawe his taking our sinnes and transgressions vpon him his becomming a curse for vs his becomming our high Priest his offering of him selfe vnto the Father his doctrine his actions his sufferings and resurrection are all to be accompted obedience For it was the Father that sent him into the worlde and he came into the world not to doe his owne will but the will of the Father that sent him therefore he witnesseth him selfe that hee spake nothing but according to the commandement which his Father had given him Iohn chap. 12. vers 49. the same hee witnesseth of his actions Ioh chep 14. vers 31. as also of his death and resurrection Iohn chap. 10. ver 18. and yet there is no man that will say that all the particulars of Christes sayings and doinges are parte and portion of the matter of our righteousnes albeit every one of them be a parte of his obedience Therefore we must needes take the name of Christes obedience in a more strict sense when we vnderstand by it the matter of our righteousnes and this stricter sense we are not to gather out of our owne conceyts and fantasies but out of the expresse word of God The word every where when it speakes of our righteousnes not vnder the generall worde of Christes obedience but particularly by those workes of his obedience wherein our righteousnes consisteth doeth onely mention his sufferinge death or laying downe of his life or his bloud or his oblation or offering of him selfe or his being made sinne or his bearinge the chastisement of our peace and such like phrases Which all signifie one
evidently what is the matter and substance of our righteousnes before God Now in them nothing but water and the washing thereby and bread broken and wine poured out with eating drinking thereof is set before vs as either the signes or seales of our righteousnes To teach vs that our righteousnes consists in nothing but in Christs bloud shed and sprinkled vpon vs and in his body broken vpon the Crosse and his bloud communicated vnto vs. But it is most certayne that if there had bene any other thing in his obedience in which had consisted any part or portion of our righteousnes he would likewise have left it in the seales of the covenant to bee remembred of vs and vsed by vs for our instruction and comfort For nothing is to be esteemed to bee any part or portion of our righteousnes in Christ wherof Christ himselfe hath institute neither signe nor seale This ground is confirmed further vnto vs by divers sentences of the holy Ghost touching Baptisme which beeing answerable vnto circumcision is most properly both the signe and seale of the righteousnes which is by faith In which sentences Baptisme is made to have referēce to no part of Christs obediēce except vnto his death only as is manifest Rom. chap. 6. vers 3. Where it is said knowe yee not that all wee which have bene baptised into Iesus Christ have bene Baptised into his death Therefore also this same Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 1. vers 13. taketh his argument from no parte of Christs obedience but his death only and from Baptisme in the name of Christ as the signe and seale of our righteousnes in his death and suffering to remove the schismes and divisions that were amongst the Corinthians saying Was Paul crncified for you or were ye Baptised in the name of Paul For which cause also the Apostle to the Eph. chap. 5. vers 25. 26. 27. doth wholly attribute the worke of our iustification purgation from sinne vnto Christs giving himselfe vnto the death for vs the vertue whereof hee makes to bee applied vnto vs by the washing of water through the word And this point is most cleere by the words of the Apostle Peter who sheweth the veritie hereof in the practise of God towards his saints both before the comming of Christ and now after For hee affirmeth that Noach and these that were with him in the Arck were saved by water and that now we are saved by Baptisme as answering in analogie to the waters of the floud Thereby expresly teaching vs that from the beginning Christ was crucified and set forth in nothing but in his death and bloud to be the matter our righteousnes as by the Apostle Peter in the same place interpreting the benefite that redounds vnto vs by Baptisme or rather defining what Baptisme it self is whereby we are saved may easily be gathered when he saith that this Baptisme is uot a putting away of their filth of the flesh but a confident demanding which a good conscience maketh vnto God 1 Epi. chap. 3. vers 20. and 21. Which discription is nothing els in effect but iustification Which the Apostle in another place calleth the purging of our consciences from dead workes Heb. chap. 9. vers 14. and the sprinkling of our harts from an evill conscience Heb. chap. 10. vers 22. which by the Apostle Peter is discribed from the effect which is our accesse with confidence vnto God in calling vpon him as our Father vpon the sense and frelling of the remission of all our sinnes in the bloud of Christ This same also is manifest touchinn the other seale of the covenant which is the Supper of the Lord by the wordes of Christ himselfe Luke chap. 22. vers 19. 20. and of the Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 11. vers 24. 25. where expounding his owne minde touching the bread and wine he sayeth that the bread was his body which was given and as the Apostle sayeth which was broken for them and that the cup was the new Testament in his bloud which was shed for them For Iesus Christ flesh and his bloud are vnto vs no righteousnes vntill his body be broken and his bloud shed vpon the crosse for vs. For neither did hee destroy the Devill but by his death nor set vs at libertie from our bondage but by his death Heb. chap. 2. vers 14. 15. Neither did he put away our sinnes but by the offering of himselfe Heb. chap. 9. vers 26. 28. And therefore sayeth Christ himselfe Ioh. chap. 12. vers 24. except the wheat corne fall into the ground and die it abydeth alone but if it die it bringeth forth many fruite Thus by the seales of the righteousnes of faith and by the phrase of the spirit concerning them and by the testimonie of Christ himselfe touching his owne death it would evidently appeare that the matter of our righteousnes consisteth in no parte of his obedience proceeding his death but consisteth wholly in the onely one oblation of him selfe vppon the crosse The third grounde in holy Scripture confirminge this pointe is builded vpon the testimonie of Christ him selfe and the Apostles interpretation of his minde sett downe Hebr. chapt 10. where first out of the 40. Psalme the speech of Christ is cited wherein hee declareth what is the will of the Father touching the expiation of our sinnes in him Which is by his obedience vnto the Father in doeing his will Which will of the Father is expounded by the Apostle in the 10 verse in these wordes By the which will we are sanctified even by the offering of the body of Iesus Christ once Now the obedience of Christ in the matter of our righteousnes is not to bee esteemed of any larger extent then is the will of GOD which hee did obey and by which wee are sanctified Therefore seeing the will of GOD in the matter of our righteousnes is restrayned onely to the offeringe of Christ Surely his obedience as it is saide to make vs righteous must bee of no larger sense except we will be wise above that which is written If the Lordes owne interpretation of his owne minde touchinge his owne will and obedience of his Sonne therevnto whereby wee are iustified will not serve to satisfie mens mindes it is in vaine to labour by any other meanes to give contentement to those who cannot be content with that which God him selfe hath revealed touching this point Whose minde must needes be best knowne to him selfe and in the which we are to rest according as it is revealed And that this interpretation set downe in this same place is the vndoubted mynde of God him selfe it may evidentlie appeare by the cōstant course of his speech set down thronghout all the New Testament In the which still all the partes of our Redemption touching Iustification Reconciliation and Sanctification are ever attributed vnto the bloud of Christ◠vnto his death and vnto his crosse and sacrifice of him selfe And the killinge of
can Christ live in any more of our soule then that wich liveth by the faith of CHRIST By this it may appeare how vngraciouslie they speake of Gods grace in the worke of faith who make him effectually to renewe no more of man but his vnderstanding leavinge the action of consenting and embracing by faith the things reveiled to the will of man as also how slenderly they speake of faith who place it in nothing but in the willes assentinge to the trueth of God CHAPTER XXVIII NOw it followeth that we speake of faith it selfe what it is In which point wee will first intreate of the divers significations of Faith in the word of God And secondly of the true signification and nature of it in the wroke of iustification Touching the first Faith is taken in foure divers significations in the scriptures of God besides that signification which it hath in the worke of iustification The first signification is when faith is taken for fidelitie and trueth as Math. chap. 23. 32. Yee leave the waightier matter of the Law as iudgement mercie and fidelitie Likewise Rom. chap. 3. ver 3. Shall their vnbeliefe make the faith of God of none effect and 1. Timoth. cha 5. ver 12. having damnation because they have broken their first faith Secondly faith doeth signifie the doctrine of the Gospell because it is begotten in vs by the Gospell for faith commeth by hearing therefore faith is called the faith of the Gospell as also because the Gospell preacheth salvatiō to be no otherwise but by faith and therefore the Gospell is called the worde of faith Rom. chap. 10. ver 8. In this signification it is taken Gall. chap. 3. Receyved ye the spirit by the workes of the Lawe or by the hearing of saith And againe Galla chap. 1. ver 23. He which in time past persecuted vs. nowe preacheth the faith that he before destroyed And Acts chap. 6. ver 7. And a great companie of the Priests were obedient to the faith Thirdly faith is taken for particular knowledge Rom. 14. 22. Hast thou faith have it with thy self c. That which in this place the Apostle calleth faith in the same question matter and purpose he calleth knowledge 1. Cor. chap. 8. Fourthly faith is somtimes put for Christ himself in the gospel because al that ever faith in the gospell apprehendeth is Christ who is the only true obiect of faith vnto salvation In this sense it is takē Gal. 3. 23. before faith came we were kept vnder the law as vnder a garrison shut vp vnto that faith which afterward should be reveiled which words being cōpared with the 24. 25. verses folowing with the 19. verse preceeding it shal be manifest that by the name of faith in that place Christ the obiect of faith is vnderstood Thus much for these foure divers significations wherein faith is taken in the word of God Now we come to the special significatiō and nature of it as we are said thereby to be iustified And when it is said to be imputed vnto righteousnes In which point there is greatest need of carefull attention because vpon the mistaking hereof ariseth principally the mistaking of iustification it selfe Specially in that sentence where it is saide that Faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Concerning which there is a two-folde controversie The first is whether faith in this place be taken in the owne proper signification or in a borrowed sense The seconde controversie is touching the proper signification of faith what it is In the first controversie these who take faith in a borrowed speech doe expound that sentence Metonymically by faith vnderstanding Christ crucified apprehended by faith and so doe esteeme that faith relatively or instrumentally taken and not properly is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes And this opinion agreeth with the trueth of the matter it selfe But there is no necessitie why faith in that place should bee taken in a borrowed sense if the right minde and meaning of the holy Ghost in this phrase be gravely and maturely considered so that if they who take it properly did not erre eyther in the signification of it or in the true sense of the imputation of it their opinion might wel be allowed For faith in this sentence is in my opinion to be taken properly in that sense whereby in it selfe it is distinguished both from the worde whereby it is begotten and from the obiect of it in the worde which is Christ As also from the naked knowledge of the worde and Christ therein reveyled how soever it doeth comprehend knowledge For searching out therefore the true significatiō of the word Faith in this sentence we will first set downe the divers significations wherein it is taken Secondly wee will speake of the true nature and signification of it in this place where it is saide to be imputed vnto righteousnes Cōcerning the first we are not to speak of that differēce which in the scriptures is warranted of historicall faith miraculous faith and iustifying faith but onely of the different opinions of men touching iustifying faith In one thing all men doe consent and agree that faith is an action of the heart consisting in iudgement but they differ in three sortes The first sorte make this iudgment of the harte in beleeving to be nothing but a naked opinion which is a doubtfull inclination of an vncertayne minde to the best part of the contradiction with feare of the contrarie parte beeing destitute of the knowledge of the true cause As for example in this contradiction Christes death shall save vs. and Christes death shall not save vs they have an opinion of the best that is that Christes death shall save them but no certaine knowledge because they are ignorant of the cause of that effect and therfore feare that they shall not bee saved and in this opinion they place faith The seconde sorte which are the wiser amongst the Papistes doe make faith to be an action of the heart in iudging neyther by way of opinion nor yet by way of certayne knowledge but by a middle way of iudgement betwixt opinion and knowledge Which participates of both and yet is neyther of them For they will not have it a doubtfull inclination of the minde vnto the best parte with feare of the worst vpon ignorance of the cause Neither will they have it a certayne inclination of the minde to the best without all feare of the worst vpō certayne knowledge of the cause and necessarie meanes But will have it middle conceyte of the minde neither altogither contingent neither altogither necessarie And now in these dayes there is a sorte of men which agree with this second sorte in substance whatsoever deceitfull shew their wordes doe make to the contrarie Therefore as touching this point wee make no severall order of them For albeit in word they seeme to admit in beleeving knowledge of the thing beleeved yea which is more albeit they graunt application yet seeing they
make neither of the two necessarie stable or constant but variable and subiect to change affirming that the Saintes may fall from saving grace they must needes agree with the former touching the sense and meaning of the word faith as it is the action of our heartes in iudging and apprehending of our salvation The third sorte are they who esteeme faith to signifie the assured confidence of the heart vpon certayne knowledge of the best parte without any feare of the worst And this opinion onely agreeth with Gods truth For nothing can be more contrarie to the nature of faith then an vncertayne opinion seeing no demonstration can ever make a surer conclusion then faith maketh in the heart of man of all whatsoever it beleeveth So that iustly we may say that salvation beleeved and embrased by faith is more sure and stedfast and certayne vnto vs by faith then ever it was in the beginning to Adam or Angells by possession For he that beleeveth shall never perish and the gates of hell shall never prevaile against him For hee that beleeveth is perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angells nor Principalities nor powers nor thinget present nor thinges to come nor height nor depth nor any other ereature shall be able to seperate him from the love of GOD which is in Christ Iesus his Lord. And for confirmation heereof wee referre the Reader to that which we have spoken before touching the supernaturall effectes of faith and to that which heereafter followeth in the description of the true nature of faith vnto the which we nowe come leaving to speake of the error concerning the imputation of faith vntill we come to treate of imputation it selfe Wee have heard alreadie that faith is the supernaturall gift of God And that the meanes whereby the holy Ghost worketh it is the Word the Sacraments and the ministerie and that the persons to whom he giveth it are only his elect whom he hath given to Christ to be his sheepe And lastly that the whole heart of man and the powers of his soule are the subiect wherein it is wrought So that nowe it resteth to know what it is that God worketh in our soules when he giveth vs faith For in these things that have already beene said it differeth nothing from the rest of Gods saving graces For they are all heavenly spirituall and supernaturall giftes of God wrought in the whole heart of every one of Gods elect eyther by the inward operation of the holy Ghost extraordinarily or els in ordiraaie dispensation by the effectuall revelation of the Gospell Therefore seeing faith hath these things common with all the rest wee are nowe to trie the particular difference whereby it is distinguished in substance and nature from all the rest of Gods blessings The consideration of the nature of faith in it selfe is twofolde First faith is to be considered as it is the gift of God cōming from him and wrought by him in our heartes Secondly faith is to be considered as our hearts having it not wrought in them worke by it againe towards God vnto iustification This twofold consideration of faith is necessarie for the right knowledge both of the nature of the working of it For faith passively taken signifieth the effect of Gods working framinge faith in our heartes but actively taken it signifieth the action of our hearts now beleeving in laying holde vpon Iesus Christ as he who is made of God vnto vs wisedome sanctification and redemption First then we will speake of it as it is the worke of God in vs. And next as our hearts worketh by it And this we are carefully to consider for herevpon dependeth all our fellowship with God in Christ and all participation of the promise and inheritance promised to the children of God all true reioycing and gloriation in God and in this worke of faith consisteth all the strength whereby we are made able to stande against all powers of darknes and sinne and are vpholden to the ende In the scriptures of God we finde that all blessings that come from Christ vnto vs are attributed vnto faith as also our beeing Christs and the children of God in him is likewise attributed vnto faith For there be two speciall grounds in the which consists all our felicitie The first is our becomming Christes that is when wee are made his The seconde is the infallible consequence of the former when all that Christ is made of God for vs is made ours So that his death his resurrection his ascention his glorification c. are all made ours And this followeth vpon the former for as sayeth the Apostles If yee bee Christes then are yee Abrahams seede and heyres by promise Gallat chapt 3. ver 29. according to which also the Apostle sayeth All thinges are yours and ye Christes Christ Gods 1. Cor. chap. 3. ver 21. 32. 23. Now faith is the meane and instrument of both these points For by faith wee are made Christs and by faith Christ is to vs wisdome righteousnes sanctification and redemption The first of these two is the fruite of faith as God worketh it in our hearts or rather the work of God by working faith in our hearts The second is the fruit of faith nowe wrought in our hearts or rather the worke of our heartes by faith Thus faith is the mean effectual instrumēt of al our blessednes both in our vnion with Christ the sonne of God and also of our cōmunion with him both in his death life and glory and therefore we are said both to bee the sonnes of God by faith in Christ and to be iustified by faith in him and to live by faith in him and to be saved by faith in him so that faith is the supernaturall gift of God given vs for these supernaturall endes that by it we may be in Christ and Christ in vs for by faith he dwelles in our hearts and that in him and by him we may enioy righteousnes and life To speake then of the first that is of faith as God worketh it it consisteth specially in foure things The first is in Gods opening illuminating of our vnderstandings making our hearts in our vnderstanding power not only to know the promise in Christ Christ to be the seed in whom blessednes is promised to all Nations and in whom all the promises of God are yea and amen but also to iudge and esteeme these thinges reveyled of God to be a most vndoubted and vnfallible trueth so that by this first worke of the Father the heart of Gods elect is made to see vndoubtedly to acknowledge that there is no blessednes vnto man but onely in Iesus Christ crucified So that his eyes are open to see in him selfe nothinge but iust cause of condemnation from the which there is not any helpe neither in him selfe nor any creature but in Iesus Christ alone And therefore is made of God to determine with him selfe to knowe
this gift it is that in this place we speake for howsoever by the Fathers givinge Christ vnto the death the full redemption of all Gods elect was wrought Yet in our particular persons we enioye it not vntill wee bee called of God therefore IustificatioÌ„ is placed after our calling Rom. chap. 8. and this giving of Christ is the cause why God firste giveth vs faith because before we receyve faith it is impossible to vs to enioye Christ because we have neyther hande heart nor will to receyve him and in this gift as wee have showen before standeth the matter of our righteousnes and the forme of our iustification consisteth in parte in the giving of it and this is needfull to be marked of vs for their cause that make our iustification to consist in Gods gracious acceptation of our faith and not in his gracious giving of faith vnto vs and Christ by faith Touching this second gift which is Christ in his death and bloud I will speake no more the things preceeding serving sufficientlie to cleare it and therefore we come to the next pointe wherein we have said consisteth the forme of our iustification CHAPTER XXXI THE second thinge wherein consisteth the forme of our iustification is the Lords imputing of the thinges given vnto vs that is both of faith and Christes obedience and for the observation of the imputation of both wee are to marke these two phrases First where it is saide that faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Rom. cha 4. ver 5. 9. Secondly where it is saide that righteovsnes is imputed Rom. chapt 4. ver 11. For the one importes plainely the imputation of faith the oher importes the imputation of righteousnes it selfe which is by faith For we have alreadie shewen that our faith is neither our righteousnes nor called in the Scriptures our righteousnes howsoever our righteousnes be called the righteousnes of the faith of Iesus or by the faith of Iesus and it may be that the not observing hereof hath made some worthie and learned Divines to denie al imputation of Christes obedience to maintaine nothing to be imputed vnto vs but faith only that not vnto righteousnes but as they interprete the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that is in the place of righteousnes For cleering of this point of Imputation we will first speake of the word imputation what it signifieth Secondly what sorte of things are saide to be imputed in the Scriptures whether thinges that are inherent in vs or thinges not inherent or both Thirdly we will speake of these things which are saide in scripture to be imputed to vs for our iustification Concerning the first the word it selfe signifieth the sentence of our iudgement or resolut opinion of his minde and in this sense it is taken Rom. chap. 3. 28. as also Rom. 6. 11. Secondly it is referred to the reasoning of the minde and the disputing of the vnderstanding as Marke chap. 11. ver 31. Thirdly it is referred to a mans purposing or imagining or plotting any thing as 1. Corint chap. 13. ver 5. Fourthly it is referred to the estimation or accompt of the minde touching any thing as Acts chap. 19. ver 27. in which sense also it may be taken Mark 15. 28. Luke chap. 22. ver 37. Fiftly it is reâ—erred to the laying to a mans charge of any debt or guiltines as 2. Timoth. chap. 4. ver 16. Lastly it is taken in a borrowed sense froÌ„ accompts and reckonings for accompting vnto a man or reputing vnto a man and reckoning to a man any thing to bee his or to be good payement and satisfaction from him in his accompts and in this sense is it taken in the matter of our iustification when as God eyther reckoneth that to be ours which is not ours or when hee esteemeth and accompteth that sufficient which hee giveth vs freely for our iustification before him But in this sense it appeareth that there is a three folde difference in mens taking of the meaninge of the worde imputation The first is when imputation is taken for naked acceptation of a thing although in it selfe insufficient as sufficient by God and this maketh some men to define our iustification to be nothing els but a gracious acceptation of our imperfect faith by God in place of perfect righteousnes but to this wee have answered before and certaine and sure it is that God receyves no righteousnes from vs but gives righteousnes vnto vs. The second meaning is when imputation is takeÌ„ not simply for a naked acceptation of a thing whether in it selfe perfect or imperfect but for accompting that which is perfect righteousnes in it selfe and yet is not ours to be ours The third sense is when imputation is so taken that it signifieth not only the accompting or reckoning to vs as ours the righteousnes which is imputed but so reckoneth and reputeth it to vs as done by our selves The first importeth no more but the Lordes accompting and holding of a thing sufficient which notwithstanding of it selfe is not sufficient nor perfect righteousnes which opinion can never be maintayned with Gods honour The seconde importeth not onely an accompting and holding of a thing which in it selfe is sufficient righteousnes to bee full and perfect but also an accomptinge of that perfect righteousnes vnto vs as ours howsoever it bee onely Christes so that this opinion taketh the word imputatioÌ„ so as when God reckoneth to vs that to be our righteousnes which in effect is not our righteousnes but onely by his accompt and imputation The third importeth that same that the second doeth but in a more strict sense to wit that God by imputing of Christs obedience vnto vs doeth not onely accompt it to be our righteousnes but also doth accompt it as performed and done by vs and this sentence though it seeme hard and to derogate something to the honour of God and praise of his grace yet one word being taken in a charitable which also is a true sense there shal be no fault fouÌ„d in the speech The word is as when it is saide that the Lord imputeth Christes obedience to vs as if we had done it our selves which word is not to be taken as though it imported that God did impute vnto vs. that wee had done this but oely is set downe by similitude to shewe the faithfulnes and trueth of Gods imputation to wit that GOD imputeth Christes righteousnes as truely to be ours and as effectually to iustifie vs as it should have done if wee had in our owne persons actually performed it and in that sense this speech may well be approoved Moreover it may be taken in good parte even although we take it in the strictest sense spoken before if wee consider that Iesus Christ did beare all our persons in his death and therefore he is saide in scriptures to have died for vs so that what he did bearing our persons even in the sight of God and dying for
be mans owne but Gods because it is not in the power of man by all that hee is according to nature ever to attayne to the possession of it but by that meane instrument supernaturall which is given him of God to the end he may attayne to the possession of the righteousnes of God Thus we see that the meane whereby we possesse the righteousnes is faith onely and because faith is not our owne therefore the righteousnes that we posses by it cannot be ours vntill both be made ours and this is only done and performed by the Lords gracious imputation of both that is faith and the righteousnes of Christ possessed by faith But first especially faith must be imputed to vs as our own to the intent that the righteousnes that by it we possesse might be our owne For as a man hath right to that which hee possesseth as his owne in equitie and iustice if by his owne meanes he hath obtayned possession but hath no right in equitie and iustice to it although he have it in his possession if by another mans substance given him to be imployed hee doe acquire the possession even so if we could attayne to the possession of righteousnes by our owne meanes then should that righteousnes in equitie and iustice be our owne and therefore the Scripture admitteth debt in accompting wages to him that worketh Rom. chap. 4. ver 4. but because wee doe not attayne to the possession of righteousnes by our owne meanes but by the meanes of GOD which hee hath given vs to vse that is by faith therefore this righteousnes in equitie and iustice is not our owne vntill the Lord doe impute it vnto vs and accompt it our owne So by imputinge faith vnto vs as our owne the righteousnesse which wee possesse by faith is made our owne so that faith beeing reckonned and accompted ours the righteousnes of GOD which wee possesse by faith in Christ is also reckonned and accompted ours and this is the cause why the holy Scripture doeth offtner describe the manner and forme of our iustification vnder the phrase of the imputation of faith then vnder the phrase of the imputation of the righteousnes because the right that is made vs vnto faith in Christ maketh vs to have right vnto Christ him selfe as our righteousnes and all blessings in him which by faith we possesse Secondly it is for this cause that in the description of the forme of our iustification that the spirite of God vseth this phrase to wit That to him that beleeveth his faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Which word vnto beeing commonly rendered for doeth much darken the true sense of the wordes and maketh many to fall into dangerous errour thinking that the verie acte of beleevinge is imputed for righteousnes that is as they take it in the verie same place and as the verie matter of our righteousnes whereas the Greeke worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this sentence doeth declare the ende wherevnto faith is imputed that is that the obedience of Christ apprehended by faith may bee righteousnes vnto the apprehender For faith and beleeving ever imployeth the possession of Christ and his obedience in our heartes and the imputation of faith vnto righteousnes is the thing that makes Christ possessed by faith to bee our righteousnes I say to be our righteousnes for Christes obedience is righteousnes in it selfe so that it is neyther our faith nor Gods imputation of our faith that maketh his obedience to bee righteousnes but imputation of faith to vs as ours maketh the obedience of Christ possessed by faith beeing righteousnes in it selfe to be our righteousnes for as wee have saide before the making that whereby we obtayne possession to bee ours maketh the thing possessed also to be ours so that imputation of faith maketh Christes obedience to be that vnto vs which it is in it selfe though it were never imputed vnto vs. And that this phrase is so to be vnderstoode it may cleerely bee perceyved by that sentence of the Apostle Rom. chapt 10. ver 10. VVith the heart man beleeveth vnto righteousnes and with the mouth hee confesseth vnto salvation In which sentence the greeke worde which is rendered vnto can not be rendered for without darking and also perverting the true sense and meaning of that place for we are saide to beleeve with the heart vnto righteousnes in that same sense and meaning wherein wee are saide to confesse with the mouth vnto salvation But we cannot bee saide properlie at least cleerely without ambiguitie to confesse for salvation because neyther is our confession the efficient cause of our salvation neyther yet the matter or substance of our salvation neither can it bee put in place of our salvation but we confesse to this ende that wee might attayne to salvation knowing that hee that confesseth not Iesus before men shall not be saved For he that is ashamed of him before men he wil be ashamed of him before his heavenly Father Luke chap. 9. ver 26. And hee who shall denie him before men him shall hee denie before his Father which is in heaven And whosoever shall confesse him before men him shall he also confesse before his Father that is in heaven Math. chap. 10. Luke chap. 12. Therefore knowing that without confession there is no salvation seeing confession is the way and meane whereby we attayne vnto the possession of salvation we doe confesse to this ende that we may attayne to salvation And therefore in the same sense wee must bee saide to beleeve with the heart vnto righteousnes that is because there is no meane to attaine vnto righteousnes except wee beleeve For Christ is righteousnes vnto everie one that beleeveth Rom. chap. 10. ver 4. therefore we beleeve to this ende that wee may enioye righteousnes according to the saying of the Apostle Gal. chap. 2. ver 16. VVee also have beleeved in Christ that wee may bee iustified by the faith of Christ In which place that faith is vnderstood onely instrumentally and not materially it is playne by the next verse following where it is saide If then while wee seeke to bee made righteous by Christ c. Which wordes shewe plainly that Christ is the matter of our righteousnes Nowe there is no reason why faith should be said to bee imputed vnto righteousnes in any other sense as concerninge the worde vnto then wee were saide to beleeve vnto righteousnes but in all reason without contradiction the Greeke worde which we render vnto must in both these phrases bee taken in one and the same sense that is that as we beleeve with the hearte to this end that we might by faith as the onely apt and meete instrument and onely convenient and effectuall meane whereby to apprehende and possesse attayne to the possession of the righteousnes of God in Christ even so the Lord our God imputeth faith to vs as our owne to this end that the righteousnes which we possesse
adoption but also as the propitiation for sinne in his bloud which is the ground of Gods iustifying him For as God first openeth our eyes to see Christ to bee the sonne of God and by making vs to beleeve that maketh vs partakers of adoption so secondly by opening our eyes to see him to be ordayned by God a propitiation for sinne in his bloud and by making vs to beleeve that he layeth the foundation of our iustification in our heartes which is finished and accomplished by his gratious and free imputation For vnto the iustification of a sinner by the obedience of Christ in his death not onely faith but also the imputation of faith and that by grace must preceed before that Christ or his obedience can bee our righteousnes not that there is any defect or insufficiencie in Christes obedience but because neither faith hee nor his obedience is iustly ours vntill that by the free imputation and accompt of GOD they be made ours This we are carefully to consider that wee doe not confound the sufficiencie of Christes obedience our right therevnto as many perverslie doe in these dayes for the sufficiencie which is in Christ and his obedience vnto righteousnes is restrayned according to Gods gratious giving and imputinge faith and his obedience by faith and his imputation gift and grace are restrayned to his calling for the promise of God is restrayned to his calling as is cleere Acts chap. 2. vers 29. and all vertue in Christ vnto salvation is likewise restrayned vnto his calling as is cleere 1. Cor. chap. 1. ver 24. and his callinge is restrayned to his Decree and his Decree is restrayned to his purpose of which it appeareth evidently that all sufficiencie of Christes merit how great and infinite soever is no larger in right and efficacie then his calling and so consequently then his Decree and purpose For Gods promise is no larger then his calling and his calling no larger then his Decree and his Decree no larger then his purpose Heerevpon it followeth that Gods purpose is no larger then his applying by â—ustifying and glorifying seeing his iustification is as large as his calling and his calling as large as his Decree and his Decree as large as his purpose This is yet more evident by his promise which wee have shewen to bee of no larger extent then his calling of which it must followe that his purpose can bee of no larger extent then his applying because his calling and applying must bee of equall extent and his purpose of equall extent with his calling Of all these thinges it is manifest that the subiect of Gods iustification is the man indued with faith and this is to bee marked against those who esteeme the beleeving man in the foreknowledge of God to be the subiect of Gods Decree CHAPTER XXXIIII THE next pointe that we have to speake of is touchinge the finall cause of iustification in the which wee purpose to be short seeing it is not a matter controverted but yet it serveth to cleare the trueth of that going before concerninge the ordet of Gods benefites It is receyved vniversallie of all that the finall cause of righteousnes is life for there is no way to attayne vnto life but by righteousnes and for this cause iustification is called The iustification of life Rom. chap. 5. vets 18. and for the same cause it is saide That they who receyve that aboundance of grace and of the gift of that righteovsnes shall reigne in life Rom. chap. 5. ver 17. therefore is salvation called the end of our faith Pet. 1. Epist cha 1. ver 9. Carrying about with you the end of your faith even the salvation of your soules And this is according to the plaine speech of God Ezek. chap. 18. If a man be iust he shall surely live saith the Lord but the soule that sinneth shall die And againe in the same chapter ver 20. The righteousnes of the righteous shal be vpon him and the wickednes of the wicked shal be vpon him selfe And againe In his righteousnes that he hath done he shall live By these testimonies it is plaine that the end of righteousnes is life according to the saying of the Prophet Haba The iust shaell live by faith in the 2. chapter ver 4. and therefore eternal life is called the hope of righteousnes Gall. chapt 5. ver 5. For wee through the spirit waite for the hope of righteousnes through faith And in this same sense is the saying of the Apostle to bee taken Rom. chap. 8. ver 23. VVee doe sigh in our selves wayting for our adoption even the redemption of our bodyes as may easilie bee perceyved by the wordes following wherein hee giveth the reason of this our waytinge when hee sayeth for by hope wee are saved c. where our Adoption is put for our salvation or glorification or redemption in that sense wherein redemption is taken 1. Corinth chap. 1. ver 30. and this is needfull to bee marked to let vs see how diversly Adoption is taken in the holy scriptures of God And that wee may see the trueth of that which wee have saide before concerning the difference betwixt beeing a sonne by faith and by prerogative for as sayeth Iohn 1. Epist chap. 3. ver 2. we are now the sonnes of God but it is not made manifest yet what wee shall bee where he plainly distinguisheth betwixt beeing a sonne and being a glorified sonne for by faith wee are the sonnes of God Gall. chap. 3. ver 26. and yet by faith wee are not the glorified sonnes of God but yet still wayte for our Adoption that is our glorification And this diverse sense of Adoption is evidently cleered by the diverse sense of redemption wherein it is taken in the Rom. chap. 8 ver 23. and Heb. chap. 9. ver 15. For Rom. chap. 8. it is taken in one sense with Adoption that is for the glorification of our bodyes But in the 9. chap. to the Heb. it is taken for iustification which place also confirmeth eternall life to bee the end of our iustification whyle it is sayde that Christ is the Mediator of the New Testament for this cause that through death which was for the redemption of the transgressions that were in the former testament they which were called might receyve the promise of eternall inheritance And this same is made manifest by the Apostles order set downe Rom. chap. 8. where hee sayeth whom he iustifieth them also hee glorifieth For as calling is the fruite of predestination and iustification the fruit of calling so glorification is the fruite of iustification CHAPTER XXXV THus we are brought to the conclusion of the maine point touching iustification what it is which in the scriptures is described shortly and succinctly somtimes by the not imputatioÌ„ of sinne somtimes by the remission of sinne somtime by the covering and hiding of sinne somtime by the imputation of righteousnes sometime by the imputation of faith vnto
righteousnes sometime by the making of a man righteous by the obedience of Christ sometime by the making of Christ sinne for vs and vs the righteousnes of God in him and somtime by healing of vs by Christ his stripes and all these are to one effect the iustified man is sometimes shortly described in one worde the iust by faith sometime in relatiō to the action of God more amply he that hath received the aboundance of grace of the gift of that righteousnes which is by one man Iesus Christ somtime he whose sinnes are remitted to whom sinne is not imputed and whose sins are covered c. out of which and the consideration of the points preceeding wee may gather a more full and cleare definition of the action of iustificatiō in this maner Iustification is that seconde gratious action of the free dispensation of GOD in Christ towarde those whom accordinge to his foreknowledge and purpose hee had predestinated to bee Adopted through Christ whom nowe hee hath adopted through him havinge effectuallie called them to the fellowship of Christ by faith by the which action he maketh them who in them selves are sinners to bee righteous in Christ crucified that is whom albeit he knew no sinne hee had made sinne for them and that by the free imputation of Christs obedience and satisfaction vnto them as their owne righteousnes even as they them selves had performed it and by the imputation of faith which he hath given vnto them as their owne to this end that the righteousnes of God which they possesse no wayes but by faith might be their owne righteousnesse and so they might have remission of sinnes in his bloud of Christ whom God had not onely ordayned but also made a propitiation for them in his bloud In this definition we cal iustification first the action of God because it is he only which iustifieth Secondly wee call it the action of his dispensation to distinguish it from the action of Predestination or of Gods Decree in it selfe Thirdly wee call it the second action of his dispensation to distinguish it from the first action which is our calling preceeding it Fourthly wee call it a gratious and free action because it is dispensed for no merit or deserving of those which receyve it neither for any thing given by them to God before whereof it should be the recompence but is given freely of his grace Fiftly Wee call it the worke of God in Christ to distinguish it from the Decree of God which is a worke of God in him self and to shewe iustification to be a worke of externall dispensation which wholy is performed by God in Christ in whom all the blessings of grace are comprehended as our filiation or iustification and glorification in whom and through whom only God maketh vs his sonnes righteous and glorious he being made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption And these five pointes are to bee considered in the nature of this action The next thing that is to be considered is the subiect that is iustified And this we make not simply to be a man foreknowne and fore-purposed neither yet a man simply predestinate but moreover a man effectually called and made one with Christ by faith and in that vnitie the sonne of God For a man simply and nakedly foreknowne is the onely obiect of Gods Decree and Predestination For those whom hee foreknew hee predestinate sayeth the spirit of God And a man predestinate is the only obiect of Gods calling according to his purpose For whō hee had predestinate them also hee called sayeth the spirit of God And the man now called effectually to the faith of Iesus as the sonne of God and promised seed in the which all the nations of the world should be blessed is the onely obiect of Gods iustification like as a iustified man is the onely obiect of Gods glorification Thus to goe backward againe the Lord in glorifying a man hath before him especially his righteousnes for none but the iust shall live next in iustifying a man hee hath particularly before his eyes his vnion with Christ by faith without the which not any man shal be iustified of God And in giving this blessing to bee one with Christ by faith and so in that vnitie the sonne of God in which cōsisteth the calling of God Hee onely hath before his eyes the man predestinate to be Adopted through Christ that is the man whom hee hath ordayned to call that is to Adopt and to make his sonne by faith in Christ And in predestinating a man to this blessinge hee had not any thing before his eyes but his owne foreknowledge of the person of that man his purpose or the good pleasure of his will which are all one in substance and different onely in respect The will of God which limiteth all the actions of his power seeing hee doeth all thinges accordinge to the counsell of his owne will being the highest and the first cause of all thinges created and done by GOD in the world of the which no cause possiblie can bee given and therefore it is in some respect the cause of Gods purpose or counsaile which therefore is called the counsaile of his will although his will and his counsaill in effect bee both one For his will is his purpose and his purpose is his will in all thinges and especiallie in the whole worke of his grace towardes the vesselles of mercie vnto the which his purpose is especiallie restrayned oftentimes in the booke of God which purpose is nothing save a setting of such persons before him from all eternitie as hee him selfe willeth or pleaseth which may cleerlie be perceyved by the holy bread set vpon the Table in the Sanctuarie being twalfe in number representinge the twalfe Tribes of Israell that is the whole elect of God which are called the shew bread in the vulgar translation the worde beeing the same which is called the purpose of God as is cleere by Christ his owne wordes Math. chap. 12. ver 4. Luke chap. 6. ver 4. that is the bread of the purpose of God or of the setting before the face of God And therefore the action of the Priest in settinge those bread vpon the table before the Lord is called by the Apostle Heb. chap. 9. ver 2. Prothesis ton arton that is the setting before or the presenting of bread to shewe vs that by that worde which is commonly called the purpose of God which was shadowed in that type of the Lawe is to bee vnderstood the eternall action of God in settinge before himselfe as in the sight of his owne eyes the persons of such as hee willed And in the same sense the same word is referred vnto Christ Rom. chapt 3. ver 25. whether it be referred to Gods eternall purpose touching the humane nature of Iesus Christ in setting it particularly before him as that which should be the onely expiation of the sinnes of his
sealing them in mans heart This worke therefore of man is likewise attributed vnto God vnder these two phrases First when it is saide that he giveth vs to come vnto the sonne Iohn chap. 6. ver 65. Secondly the Fathers giving vs vnto the sonne Iohn chap. 6. ver 37. and 17. 6. Thus the motion of man with his heart being moved of God is called mans beleeving with the heart eveÌ„ as a wheele which of it selfe caÌ„not move yet being moved by an other doth move whose motion therefore though it be but one yet is said to bee the motion of two that is of the maner and of the thing moved and therefore is both actively and passively to be considered in the one sense God is said to bring vs vnto Christ in the other sense we are saide to come vnto Christ and this is carefnlly to be marked least with a great many we erre in esteeming faith to be mans owne proper worke flowing from the natural power of his owne will and so mistake the saying of the Prophet the iust shall live by his owne faith as alfo Christes forme of speach when he sayeth thy faith hath saved thee for faith is called ours and our owne not in respect that we are the Authors the cause or workers of it but because we possesse it and are the speciall subiectes of it in the which it is wrought by God as also because it concerneth onr selves in particular and what wee beleeve wee beleeve it particularly touching our selves so that faith is called our owne faith in the Scriptures of God to declare the perticular nature of savinge faith in two particular thinges The firste is that it is not the faith that GOD workes in another mans hearte but the faith which hee worketh in myne owne hearte that saveth me Secondly it is not the faith which I have in myne owne hearte concerning others but the faith that I have concerning my selfe in particular that saveth me So that this worde vsed by the Spirit of God saying thy faith hath saved thee and the iust by his owne faith shall live is set downe not to designe the cause but the subiect of savinge faith and that in two respectes that is both in respect of him in whom it is wrought and also in respect of him concerning whom it is wrought so that my faith that saveth mee must bee wrought by GOD in my owne hearte and what hee maketh mee beleeve hee must make mee beleeve it concerninge my selfe in particnlar If the Papistes did rightly vnderstande this they would see that every particnlar Christian hath a particular warrant by particular revelation from God of the certaintie of his owne salvation For when hee saide to beleeue with the heart the same beleeving includes in it a particular knowledge by the particular revelation of God in his heart coÌ„cerning him selfe in particular that hee is chosen and elected of God that Christ is given for him that in him hee is redeemed that in him hee hath remission of his sinnes that through him hee shal be glorified Secondly they should likewise knowe and with them such as in the Church of God follow their opinion that when it is saide that man with the heart beleeveth the heart is not to bee esteemed the cause of beleeving as though naturally of it selfe it could beleeve but as a wheele moved by another doth move so our heartes action of beleeving is nothing but the action of God moving our heartes CHAPTER XXIX NOW it followeth that we speake of the vse and ende wherefore this supernatural gift is given vnto man this shortlie we may reduce vnto foure points The first is faith is given for knowledge Secondly faith is given for possession of the things knowen Thirdly faith is given for keeping and constant retayning the things possessed and that during this life Fourthly faith is given for practise Wee saye that it is given for these vses during the time of this life because that in the life to come both knowledge possession and keeping are performed in vs by another meane that is by sight For in this worlde wee walke by faith and therefore doe neither knowe possesse nor keepe but by faith but in the world to come we shall walke by sight for we shall see him as he is and therefore we shall both knowe posses and keepe by sight Now concerning the first vse and end of faith which is knowledge we are to remember the saying of the Apostle 1. Corinth chap. 2. ver 9. the things which God hath prepared for his elect are such which the eyes of man hath not seene and which the eare hath not heard which hath not entred in the hart of man Whereby the Apostle will declare vnto vs that the thinges which God hath ordayned for our glory are such as the heart of man can never possibly of it selfe conceyve therefore as sayeth the Apostle Iohn God must needes give vs a minde to knowe them before wee ever can perceyve them and this minde that God giveth is a beleeving heart For the heart of man is able by faith to know thinges to will affect thinges to enioye and possesse things and to keepe and retayne them which of it selfe by all the power of reason will c. it never could nor possibly can bee able to knowe possesse c. Thus we saye by faith that the worlde was made by the word of God and that thinges that are seene were made of thinges which did not appeare Hebr. chapt 11. which all the Philosophers and Princes of the world by all the light of nature could never vnderstand For the things of God are not naturally but spiritually discerned therefore the naturall man can not perceyve them In the same sense Abraham is saide to have seene the day of Christ and to have reioyced and by the vertue of our faith it is that we knowe IESVS to be that Christ and the sonne of God and by faith we knowe that we are elected of God and by faith we knowe that in Christ alone consisteth our adoption our righteousnes fanctification and redemption so that wee knowe that it is impossible to any man to be the sonne of God or iust or holy or free from death but in and by Christ onely thus take me away faith from the heart it is impossible to all the wisedome of the wisest hearte ever to vnderstande these thinges and to know them for vndoubted verities therefore it is as wee haue marked before that Christ sayeth to Peter Flesh and bloud hath not reveyled that vnto thee but my Father that is in heaven Math. chap. 16. For this cause Christ sayth vnto the Iewes Except yee beleeve that I am bee yee shall die in yonr sinnâ—â— Shewing vs by that speech that there is no way to knowe Christ to be the sonne of God but by beleevinge onely Nowe this knowledge that commeth by faith is not to bee taken in that sense wherein sometymes
the worde knowledge is put which is when it signrfieth the naked and bare vnderstanding of thinges that are reveyled but it is taken for an infallible science when as the heart knoweth God and knoweth him vndoubtedly to be God and when as it knoweth Christ and knoweth him vndoubtedly to bee the sonne of God and when it knoweth Gods trueth and knoweth it vndoubtedly to be the trueth of God therefore saieth Iohn the Baptist Hee that receyveth his testimonie hath sealed that God is true Iohn chap. 3. ver 33 And againe Iohn 1. Epi. chap. 5. ver 10. Hee that heleeveth not God hath made him a liar because he beleeved not the record that God witnessed of his soune Neither is this all which is meant by the knowledge of faith but a third thing is yet to be added for the full vnderstandinge thereof For besides the sight and knowledge of the thinges which are reveiled by God and also besides the knowledge of the vndoubted veritie and trueth of them it is required that wee knowe them to bee reveyled by God vnto vs and knowe the vndoubted trueth and veritie of them toward vs in our particular person that is that whatsoever God reveyle to vs he reveyleth it vnto vs as a thing which he hath appointed for vs and when he giveth vs the sight and knowledge of the vndoubted veritie of the things reveyled he maketh vs assuredlie to knowe that they shal be truely verily accomplished in our persons conforme to that ground which we have laide downe before concerning faith that is that what we beleeve we must beleeve it concerning our selves in particular according as it is said of Abraham that he beleeved God that he should bee the Father of many Nationâ—s And as Iob speaketh of him selfe chap. 19. verses 25. 26. 27. I am sure that my Redeemer liveth and I shall see God in my flesh whom I my selfe shall see and my eyes shall beholde and none other for mee According to which certaintie the Apostle Paul speaketh also of him selfe Rom. chap. 8. and for this maner of knowledge which commeth by faith the Fathers doe call faith the eye whereby we see the invisible things of God as also the ingraveÌ„ forme of the sonnes of God and for this same cause it is called by the Apostle Heb. chap. 11. the evidence of things which are not seene where by the word evidence is vnderstoode that faith doeth not onely shew them but by evident demonstration confirme the vndoubted veritie of them and that to vs in particular so that it letteth me not only see life eternall in Christ and this eternall life to belong to all that are in Chtist but particularly it letteth me see my selfe in Christ and this life to belonge to me in him and that so certainlie as nothing in heaven nor earth can bee more certaine and thus much for the first vse of faith The seconde ende wherefore faith is given is possession and this confirmeth evidently and plainely the former ground touching knowledge that it is so to be vnderstood as we have spoken For the knowledge of faith is never without possession according to thar saying of Christ Ioh. cha 14. ver 17. speaking of the spirit whow the world can not receyve because it seeth him not neyther knoweth him but yee knowe him for hee dwelleth with you and shal bee in you According to which ground it is that Ioh. sayth Hee that beleeveth in that sonne of GOD hath the witnes in him self 1. Epist chap. 5. ver 10. Thus faith maketh vs to know nothing but that which it also maketh vs to possesse therefore doeth the Apostle pray to God for the Ephesians that Christ might dwell in their hearts by faith chap. 3. vers 27. For as the heart of man can never know Christ by it owne light but by the supernaturall light of faith so it can never apprehend Christ nor any blessing in Christ by any natural power that is in the will affection thereof Therefore God giveth to his elect the supernaturall gift of faith in their hearts that his elect whose heartes could never by any naturall strength ever attaine to the possession of Christ nor ever desire to have him nor yet embrace him with vnfayned love as their only treasure righteousnes and life might chose him and count all things but dunge to gaine him forsaking them selves and their owne righteousnes and to love him and embrace him with such affectioÌ„ that they prefer him to all things eveÌ„ to their owne life so that man by faith is not only made to know his redeemer but also to possesse him and all blessings in him And for this cause is it that in the scriptures we are saide to be the children of God by faith in Christ to be iustified by faith in him to bee saved by faith in him and as saith the Apostle Peter beleeving in him we carrie about with vs the end of our faith the salvation of our soules 1. Epist 1. 9. And for this working of faith it is called by the Apostle the subsisting of things hoped for Hebr. 11. 1. because it giveth a certaine being and subsisting vnto things that are yet invisible and are yet only expected and hoped for and maketh theÌ„ to subsist in our hearts therfore saith Christ he that beleeveth is alreadie translated from death to life and hath everlasting life Ioh. 5. 24. Thus we see that faith being taken away the heart of man should never be able to possesse nor apprehend Christ nor righteousnes or any other spirituall blessing in him Therefore because it is the effectuall instrument of Gods supernaturall power in our heartes whereby we apprehende and possesse Christ and all blessings in him The Fathers doe call it the hand of a Christian as also the mouth of a Christian and likewise the bound of a Christian because by faith as by a hand we lay holde on him and by faith as by a mouth wee receyve him into our heartes and by faith as by a bande that never can be broken wee are so vnited to him and hee with all the benefites that are in him vnto vs that we never can possibly bee seperated from him nor he or his blessinges from vs for this cause is it that Augustine sayth Beleeue onely and thou hast eaten him And for cleering of this grounde it is that these phrases of speech are vsed to wit that Christ is the ende of the lawe vnto righteousnes to all that beleeve that the promise is given to them that faithfully beleeve That the Gospell is the power of GOD vnto salvation to everie one that beleeveth c. all to teach vs that neither the Gospell can helpe vs to salvation neither is the promise made ours nor Christes righteousnes belongeth vnto vs except we beleeve because there is no mean to make any thing conteyned in the Gospell especially the promise or Christ him selfe to be ours but faith onely And for this same