Selected quad for the lemma: sense_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
sense_n	church_n	scripture_n	way_n	3,397	5	5.4178	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09434	A godlie and learned exposition upon the whole epistle of Iude, containing threescore and sixe sermons preached in Cambridge by that reverend and faithfull man of God, Master William Perkins, and now at the request of his executors, published by Thomas Taylor, preacher of Gods word ; whereunto is prefixed a large analysis, containing the summe and order of the whole booke, according to the authors owne method, to which are further added, foure briefe tables to direct the reader ...	Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Taylor, Thomas.	1606 (1606)	STC 19724.3; ESTC S100865	274,393	200

is corrupted so as wee may not build vpon it that thereby they might bring their Latin Bible into credit as most authentical and yet that they might make the sentence of their Church the rule of faith the most learned of al that Church hold that the Latin Bible is also corrupt so indeede they couertly renounce all scripture that the sentence of the Church may obtaine the chiefe stroke Secondly in teaching that the authoritie of the Church in regarde of vs is aboue the Scriptures because wee knowe not the sense thereof but by the Church Thus putting downe the true and principall ground of Scripture that they might more easily set vp their own dotages The second ground concerneth the sufficiencie of scripture and is this The Scripture of the Prophets and Apostles is a perfect rule of faith and manners It is of all things to be beleeued or done to saluation 2. Tim. 3.16 The Scripture is profitable to teach improue correct instruct in righteousnes to make the man of God absolute yea perfect in euery good worke If it make him perfect in al kind of teaching it is also able much more to make euery man perfect to all the duties of his calling Gal. 1.8 If an Angell should teach otherwise that is diuerse or besides though not contrary to that which is taught hee shall bee accursed many doctrines indeed of Artes and other things are diuers and besides it but the meaning is that no doctrine of saluation must be brought no not besides it therfore the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles containe a perfect rule Many things which cannot bee found in scripture may be supplied by tradition Ans. Traditions can neuer settle the conscience for though diuerse of them are found in the writings of the fathers yet they were subiect to error and so might and did erre in them Aduersaries of this ground to bee contended with First all men by nature Iob. 22.14 Who say to the Almightie Departe from vs for wee desire not the knowledge of thy waies yea our common Protestants who in iudgement acknowledge this rule yet in their life they leaue it and take the leaden rule of naturall reason sense sight and feeling and few there be that liue by faith Secondly the Romish Church for first they make the written word a thing ruled by setting vp another Rule saying that there are two kindes of Scripture The first is inward written in the heart of all Catholikes which is the vniuersall consent of the Church The second is outward written by the Prophets and Apostles an inken scripture say they and a dead letter without the former Whereas the cleane contrarie is true the true rule being the scripture of the Prophets and Apostles and the other in the heart in this life but an imperfect patterne drawne according to the former Secondly they ouerturne the ground in ioyning to the written word vnwrittē tra●●tions so making it but half a rule and indeed as good no rule but where are these traditions In the writings of Fathers they say But how shall we know them to be scripture Because the Fathers say so But how shall wee know they say true Here must they flie to man whereof yet no man can assure vs. Thirdly in teaching that the true sense of scripture cannot be found without the Churches determination and so indeede make it no rule because a right rule both ruleth it selfe and is plaine to rule other things also The third ground is There is one true God By one I meane one in number not two 1. Cor. 8.6 To vs there is but one God that is to the Church to vs that looke to bee saued which is plaine by this reason for there can be but one infinite and if there were two or moe Gods there should be two or moe infinites which is impossible Aduersaries to this ground First the common Protestant who in iudgment holdeth one God yet in heart and life he setteth vp two or moe some riches some pleasure some one sinne or other for where a mans heart is there is his God Paul saith some make their bellie their God and that the Diuell is the God of the world Secondly the maine Enemie is the Popish Church which in word holdeth one God but diuers waies set vp diuers gods As first the Pope himselfe who by their reformed Canon law is to iudge all and to be iudged of none Who maketh himselfe a forgiuer of sinnes and that properly yea a maker of lawes to binde conscience aswell as Gods lawes which is horrible blasphemie Secondly the Virgin Mary whom they make a Goddesse as Christ a God as Christ a King so her a Queene as he a Lord so her a Ladie yea they set Christ below her whom they desire to commaund her sonne by the right of a mother yea and in some of their reformed Seruice bookes they trust in her for saluation Thirdly the Saints whom they pray vnto wherein they attribute vnto them the knowledge of the secrets of mens hearts and omnipresence for they must also be in all places which are things proper vnto God alone The fourth ground is that God is all sufficient in himselfe Gen. 17.1 I am all sufficient that is he hath in himselfe all perfection for first he taketh being from none but giueth being to all Secondly for substance he is a Spirit of perfect nature Thirdly euery way infinite in regard of time place attributes This may well be called a ground for whosoeuer placeth any want or imperfection in God denieth God and maketh him no God Aduersaries hereof First the common people who conceiue a God made all of mercie without his iustice Secondly the Papist who robbeth God of his perfection two waies first they attribute an imperfect iustice vnto him namely such a one as may be satisfied by mans satisfaction Secondly an imperfect mercie whereof our own merits must make a supplie teaching that indeed Christ must make vs iust but we must make our selues more iust and merit saluation The fifth ground is There be three in heauen the Father Sonne and holy Ghost and th●se three are one God 1. Ioh. 5.7 How can it be that three are one God Ans. It is a mysterie which the ancient Church answered thus They be three in person and one in substance so wee also say they be three in manner of subsisting but one in nature and Godhead Three they be distinguished in person the Father not being the Sonne nor the holy Ghost and so in the other persons 3. subsistences in one nature Ioh. 17.2 This is life euerlasting c. This is a groūd because wee must worship one God in three persons neither can wee aright thinke of God out of the Trinitie Aduersaries of this ground First Heretikes innumerable whose memorie is accursed as Arians of former and later times denying the Godhead of Christ. Secondly the Turke and Iew

was the seuenth from Adam Here two questions are to bee answered first whence had Iude this historie seeing it is no where recorded in the Scriptures and how knew he it to be Enochs I answere two waies first he either had it and learned it to bee his by some tradition which went from hand to hand or else written by some Iew or secondly he learned it out of some booke which went vnder Enochs name then extant in the daies of the Apostles though now lost it is certaine that one of these waies hee had it Hence the Papists gather that the Iewes had vnwritten traditions and consequently all their traditions are to be obserued Ans. We denie not all vnwritten traditions of which some are true and profitable but wee renounce and denie all those traditions which are made articles of faith rules of Gods worship necessarie to saluation for all such doctrines are written in the books of the Prophets and Apostles which containe perfect direction and rules concerning faith manners of which kind the Romane Church holdeth their traditions to be this is of another kind it being no article of faith nor necessary to saluation to knowe whether Enoch writ this prophecie or no. Againe from the second answere others who are no Papists conclude that some bookes of Canonicall Scripture are perished and lost But this is vntrue for then first the fidelitie of the Church which is the keeper of these Oracles should be called in question and secondly in the bookes Canonicall extant not one sentence or tittle no not the sense of any sentence is lost how then should whole bookes come to be lost It is alleaged that the books of Salomon are most of them lost Answ. The bookes of Salomon which were lost were bookes of humanitie and Philosophie for hee writ of all beasts birds trees euen from the Cedar in Libanus to the hyssop vpon the wall the books of humane truth might faile but no part of Canonicall Scripture Ob. Mention is made in the Scripture of the bookes of the Chronicles of the Iewes or Kings of Iudah but these are perished Ans. They were politique histories as are the Chronicles of England or other Countries Ob. The bookes of Nathan Gad Idd● Shemaiah and other Prophets are perished Ans. All these as is though by the learned are contained in the bookes of the Kings Chronicles and Samuel Ob. This book of Enoch is lost Ans. First it is doubted whether it was a booke or no or went by a tradition Secondly if it was a booke it was no part of Scripture for Moses was the first penman of Scripture who liued long after Enoch The second question why doth the Apostle make choise of this testimonie of Enoch rather than some other Prophet Answ. Himselfe giueth two reasons First he was the seuenth from Adam it is therefore an ancient testimonie to be receiued and reuerenced for the antiquitie but withall it sheweth what is true antiquitie namely when a doctrine of religion can bee prooued from some Prophet or Apostle for this testimonie was a prophecie and therefore that antiquitie which the Church of Rome challengeth to her religion and doctrine is but counterfeit because they are not able to iustifie the maine pointes thereof from any Prophet or Apostle yea in these wherein they dissent from vs they cannot bring their proofe and descent from within the first hundred yeeres after Christ. It is then a vaine plea and false pretence of them to boast of the antiquitie of their religion The second reason is in the word prophecied for Enoch spoke not this of his owne head or motion but from God for no creature Angell or man can foretell things to come it being a prerogatiue properly belonging vnto God Ob. Yes but the learned Physition can truely foretell the death of the patient to come Ans. He doth not properly herein foretell a thing to come for the death of the partie is present in the signes and causes of it Ob. But the Diuell could foretell Sauls death 1. Sam. 28.19 To morow shalt thou be with me and thy sonnes Ans. The Diuell could not properly foretell it but might see it in the causes and signes Againe hee might speake so to Saule because God had made him an instrument for the execution of that iudgement and destruction so as God only properly foretelleth that which is simply to come and no man or Angell The second point is the testimonie it selfe Behold the Lord commeth c. In which obserue three points first the comming of the Lord secondly the iudgement of the Lord thirdly the cause of it in the 15. verse To giue iudgement against al men c. First of the party comming Behold the Lord commeth Where the Apostle speaketh in the time present which is put for the time to come which forme of speech sheweth the certaintie of Christs comming to iudgement who shall as certeinly come as if he were now alreadie comming Concerning which certaintie it may be demaunded first whence commeth this comming of Christ to be so certaine Ans. From the vnchangeable will of God which hath certainly decreed the same For he hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnes And thus are all other the articles of our faith most certaine in that they are grounded on the vnchangeable will and word of God Secondly how or from whence may we know this will of God to be so certaine Ans. From the manner of propounding the doctrine of it wherein the euidence of the spirit plainly appeareth saying peremptorily the Lord commeth euidently expressing the certaintie as if it were now present And the same may be spoken of the whole scripture which in it selfe is most sure and certain because it is the most vnchangeable will of God but how do we know it so to be will some say I answere by the euidence of the spirit the authoritie puritie maiestie effect and ends of the doctrine it neede not seeke euidence elsewhere than from it selfe not from man or the Church it selfe The Romish Church confesseth it is of it selfe and in it selfe sufficiently certaine but not to me or thee except the Church say so but this is a false position The Scripture is certaine both in it selfe and vnto vs and we know it so to be though neuer a man would acknowledge it the heart seasoned with grace will make the mouth confesse it Secondly the Apostle speaking in this forme he commeth for he will come wee learne to set before our eyes the comming of the Lord Iesus to iudgement and to make account of euery present day as the day of his comming the Scriptures euery where commend watchfulnes vnto vs which is to do nothing else but to make reckoning continually of this day But some will say we cannot make account daily of it for we see it commeth not neither may we enquire into the time of it Answ. Although wee cannot exactly

not hauing the spirit of God then euery one hath power to receiue the spirit of God Ans. This is no good reason but is all one as if because a bankrout is blamed for not discharging his debts to his creditors another man should conclude that surely he is therefore able to pay them But these wicked men were blamed here first because they professed Christ but yet had not his spirit secondly because that in Adam they were the causes that they were borne without the spirit of God and so made themselues vnfit to receiue him Secondly if naturall men bee iustly condemned much more those that are worse than they as Atheists prophane persons those which contemne the assemblies and neglect the meanes of their saluation and yet looke for saluation as wel as others The Gentiles who were without the law doe the things of the law by nature Rom. 2.24 and yet many that professe the name of Christ and liue vnder the Gospell goe not so farre as those naturall men in doing the things of the law so as euen those Heathens and naturall men shall rise vp in iudgement and condemne many a professor of Christ of whom euen many come short of the Diuell himselfe who beleeueth and trembleth and yet not a few professors neither know what the Diuell beleeues neither through h●rdnes of heart can tremble at the iudgements of God as he can doe Thirdly those come farre short that think themselues in state good enough because they liue ciuilly and deale iustly and neighbourly as they say for the naturall man can doe this and yet shall be condemned no plea shall stand at the great day of the Lord but that which assureth of the pardon of sinne sealed vp with the blood of Christ. Let a mans outward and ciuill righteousnes be neuer so great yea if it could be equall to the righteousnes of the Scribes and Pharisies which for outward appearance was without all exception yet if hee bring not a righteousnes exceeding that he can neuer be saued Fourthly in that the naturall man is blamed for being a naturall man this ouerthroweth all merits of congruitie which the Papists boast of because a mans person not being accepted before God all his works are sinnes the worke neuer pleaseth God till the worker first please him Fifthly euery professor of Christ must strip the naturall man and become a spirituall person that is such as the spirit of God dwelleth in for first as the Father worketh our saluation by giuing Christ and his merits so must the holie Ghost by applying the same vnto vs else can we looke for no saluation Secondly as the soule giueth life to the bodie which else were dead so the spirit of God is the soule of our soules and quickneth them with new life being dead in sinne Thirdly wee can neuer know that wee are in Christ or belong vnto him but by the presence of the spirit in our hearts 1. Ioh. 3.24 Hereby we know that he abideth in vs euen by the spirit that he hath giuen vs. Quest. But how shall a man know whether hee hath the spirit or no Ans. Let him examine himselfe first whether he inwardly loue and feare God in his word of promise and threatning secondly whether he subiect his heart and life vnto him thirdly whether his heart be continually lift vp in inuocation and thanksgiuing All these are the workes of the spirit of God and they which 〈◊〉 of the spirit thus sauour and ●ffect the things of the spirit Rom. 8. Quest. But I feare I haue not the spirit how shall I obtaine it Ans. By vsing the meanes of reading the Word meditation and prayer especially Luk. 11.13 Your heauenly father giueth the holy Ghost to th●● that desire him Psal. 143.5.6 I meditate in all thy workes and stretch foorth my hands vnto thee Vers. 20. But ye beloued edifie your selues in your most holie faith praying in the holy Ghost IN this verse vnto the end of the 23. are set downe some meanes whereby all beleeuers may be fitted to the maintenance of the faith and true religion vnto the which the Apostle hath in the former part of the Epistle perswaded These meanes are contained in fiue rules here prescribed first concerning Faith secondly Loue thirdly Hope fourthly Meekenes fifthly Christian seueritie the first of which is contained in this twentith verse which is that they should build themselues vpon their faith which is not barely propounded but inforced and vrged first by a motiue in this word most holy faith secondly by the meanes of it which is prayer praying in the holy Ghost In the rule note two things first that faith is a foundation secondly that the dutie of beleeuers is to build vp themselues vpon this foundation Concerning the former first is may be demanded what is here meant by faith Ans. Here by faith is not so much meant the gift of faith as the matter of it namely the doctrine of faith and religion comprised in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles in which sense it is said that the Ephesians were built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles that is vpon their doctrine Ephes. 2. The same was the rocke confessed by Peter vpon which Christ promised to build his Church and yet in the second place we must not exclude the gift it selfe for although the doctrine be a foundation in it selfe yet it is not so to vs vnlesse we beleeue it and applie it to our selues by this gift If any man aske what doctrine is this I answer the summe of it may be reduced to three heads the first whereof concerneth mans miserie by his sinne originall and actuall as also the dangerous fruits thereof The second the redemption of man from this miserie and his freedome by Christ. The third the thankefulnes which man oweth for this deliuerance and ought to testifie and expresse in newnes of life Hence learne first what is the infallible marke of the true Church whereby it may be discerned from the false and Apostaticall Church and that is the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles for this being the very foundation of the Church where it is there the Church must needes bee and this note of it selfe is sufficient to point out the true Church wheresoeuer Secondly seeing faith is the foundation of the Church and not the Church the foundation of faith beware hence of a damnable doctrine of the Popish Church which teacheth that there can be no certainty of the points of religion no nor of the Scriptures themselues but onely by the iudgement of the present Church of Rome and that Church must giue what sense soeuer she pleaseth to the Scriptures else hath it none wherein they play the part of preposterous builders laying the foundation in the top of the building Thirdly it may be demaunded how any doctrine becommeth a foundation vnto the saluation of men Answ. Properly to speake God and Christ is our foundation and

childe of God or no for if he haue the spirit of God he is his and if he haue these holy motions and desires to pray and can send out these cries vnto God vnfainedly he hath the presence of the Spirit and he that hath not this spirit in these blessed fruites of it is none of his Thirdly these words are added to teach vs that when wee pray wee must doe it our hearts for where the spirit of God dwelleth thēce must prayer proceed but his abode is in the heart and therefore prayer that God many acknowledge it to proceed from the spirit must bee hartie and so of all other spirituall duties Colloss 3. singing with grace in your hearts Rom. 1. whom I serue in my spirit where the Apostle expresseth a reason why prayer should proceed from the heart because prayer is of the same nature with faith and the spirituall worship of God yea indeede is a part of it answerable vnto God himselfe who is a spirit but all these are seated in the heart and spirit and consequently prayer it selfe ought so to be neither is it the outward action or words which is simply the worship of God but so farre as they consent and proceed from the heart Which teacheth vs that whatsoeuer religious dutie wee are to turne our selues vnto wee are first of all therein to approoue ou● hearts vnto God Fourthly that there may bee a distinction made betweene the true beleeuer and the hypocrite and carnall man The hypocrite he prayeth outwardly for forme and fashion the naturall man in affliction prayeth of compulsion as a man that is racked and tormented without any loue of God at all both of them without any inward sense or rectified disposition of the heart but the beleeuer hee prayeth in the heart and in faith the spirit of God disposing his heart aright vnto prayer Quest. How doth the holy Ghost direct the heart Answ. By fiue waies or meanes first by illumination whereby hee reueileth God to man as also his owne estate both of them in part Secondly by conuersion whereby hee turneth the heart vnto God once made knowne Thirdly by direction whereby hee directeth the heart to deale as with God himselfe taking it from outward meanes Fourthly by feruent and constant desire● for things spirituall or temporall Fifthly by faith whereby we can rest on God for the accomplishment of the things wee haue heartily desired Quest. Whether may we not pray to the holy Ghost seeing here it is said praying in or by the holy Ghost Ans. We may not onely pray in or by him but vnto him for although wee haue no particular example hereof in the Scripture yet wee haue sufficient warrant for the three persons being vndiuided in nature must be also vndiuided in worship and one being worshipped all must be worshipped Secondly wee are baptized into the name of the holie Ghost as well as of the Father and Son and therefore hee is to be prayed vnto euen as they are Ob. But wee are not commanded to pray any where by the Father or Sonne as here by the holie Ghost which argueth that the holie Ghost is not the author of our prayers as they are Answ. The Apostle here would haue vs obserue an order in the working of the Trinitie for all the three persons are authors of our prayers the Father and Sonne make vs to pray but by the holy Ghost the holy Ghost maketh vs pray but more immediatly for he is the immediate author of our prayers which teacheth that when we pray it is not of our selues but from the spirit which stirreth and sendeth vp heauenly requests for vs herein then wee must renounce our selues magnifie the grace of God within vs and shew our selues thankfull by entertaining carefully such holie motions of this most holie Spirit of God Vers. 21. And keepe your selues in the loue of God looking for the mercie of our Lord Iesus Christ vnto eternall life THese word● containe the second rule of the Apostle tending to the preseruation of faith and true religion concerning loue and it is indeede of speciall vse and direction for the framing of our liues Christ calleth the loue of God and men the summe of the whole law Paul calleth it the end of the Commandements This caused Paul to keep faith good conscience 2. Cor. 5.14 The loue of Christ constraineth vs. Now for the better informing of our vnderstandings and our furtherance in obseruing this rule fiue things are to be considered first what is meant by the loue of God Ans. Wee are to vnderstand by the loue of God a diuine vertue in the hearts of the beleeuers whereby they loue God and Christ properly and simply for himselfe rest in him and cleaue vnto him as the most absolute good for by Gods loue in this place is not meant that loue wherby God loueth man but whereby man loueth God Quest. Why doth the Apostle here omit the loue of man Ans. Because the loue of man to man is included and to bee vnderstood in the other as a fruit necessarily flowing from it for first whē a man loueth his neighbour herein after a sort he loueth God for then is God loued not onely when our affection of loue is directed vnto himselfe but also when his ordinances his creatures image and other things partaining vnto him are loued Secondly the Apostle Paul calleth the loue of the neighbour the fulfilling of the law which cannot be vnlesse we include also therein the loue of God or rather it within Gods loue and ioyne them both together Now if the loue of man be the fulfilling of the law how much more is the loue of God which by the same reason must include the other Thirdly it is a true rule in Diuinitie that the first Commandement must bee included and practised in all the nine following as being the foundatiō of them all Now the maine dutie of the first Commandement is the loue of God which must goe with the practise of all the other so as al the duties of the other Cōmandements are included in the same The second point is whether this loue of God bee in man by nature or giuen by grace Ans. It is not from nature but a gift of grace following faith and iustification Ioh. 14.14 If yee loue me yee will keepe my commandements both which proceed from one beginning as no man then can by nature keepe the Commandements so no man can by nature loue God aright Rom. 8.5 The wisedome of the flesh that is mans best things his best thoughts and affections is enmitie to God therefore can there be no true loue of God in nature 1. Tim. 1.5 The end of the commandement is loue out of a pure heart and of a good conscience and faith vnfained Againe wee must first beleeue that wee are loued of God before wee can loue him 1. Epist. Ioh. 4. We loue him because he loued vs first It will bee obiected here