perfect obedience of Christ but our sanctification hath the Lawe for his obiect 4. In the nearest efficient cause Iustification hath not the cause in vs because it dwelleth not in vs Sanctification hath the will which is the beginning of all humane actions for the beginning of action is deliberation of deliberation will and reason And in respect of the persons efficient for Tit. 3.5 Regeneration and Renouation are attributed vnto the Holy Ghost as to the efficient But iustification is wholy ascribed vnto Christ In thy seede shall all nations be blessed Gen. 22.18 5. In effects Iustification absolueth and acquiteth vs beefore Gods Iudgement Seate Sanctification doth not so 6. Iustification is an act vnseparable but Regeneration is an act separable because it is not perfected in an instant but by a certaine order or successiuely and by degrees according to the good pleasure of God and it is here begunne and shall be perfectted in the life to come Moreouer Iustification is a matter of meere gift but regeneration is a matter of our obedience 7. Paule doth notably expresse the difference of him that is to bee iustified and him that is to bee regenerate for hee that is to be iustified lamentably crieth out of his inherent righteousnesse Rom. 7.24 O wretched man that I am who shall deliuer mee from the bodie of this death But flying to imputed righteousnesse which is grounded only vpon mercie hee doth exceedingly reioyce and with a ful confidence tryumpheth ouer life death and al aduersities whatsoeuer Rom. 8.33.34 c. What are the instruments or meanes of iustification The instrumentall cause outwardly shewing and offering the benefit of iustification is the voice of the Gospell Rom. 1.16 The Gospell is the power of God to saluation to all that beleeue that is to say it is the instrument of God truely powerfull and effectuall to saue For the righteousnesse of God is thereby reuealed from faith to faith Hereupon it is called the word of beleefe a Act. 5.20 the vvorde of saluation b Act. 13.26 the word and ministerie of reconciliation c 2. Cor. 5.19 The administring causes and witnesses of this blessing but not the sellers thereof are the ministers of the Gospell according to that Iohn 20.23 Whose sinnes yee remit they shall bee remitted and whose sinnes yee retaine they shall bee retained And 1. Tim. 4.16 Take heede vnto thy selfe and vnto Doctrine continue therein for in doing this thou shalt both saue thy selfe those that heare thee namely because faith is by hearing and hearing is by preaching The instrumentall cause inwardly is also twofold 1. The instrument giuen by God or the hand apprehending and receiuing the grace of Iustifycation offered is sauing faith infused into the beleeuers by the Holy Ghost Rom. 3.28 Therfore vvee conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the lawe So euery where By faith d Gal. 2,6 Through faith e Eph 2.8 of faith f Rom 3 28 for these are all of one signifycation but in no place are we said to be iustified or saued for faith Rom. 10.8 This is the vvord of faith which we preach And hereupon it is called righteousnesse of faith in regard it is apprehended by faith when the Gospell is beleeued 2. The inward sealing cause is the holy ghost who sealeth Iustification in our hearts so as wee cannot doubt therof Eph. 1.13 Wherein also after that ye beleeued ye were sealed with the Holie spirit of promise which is the earnest of our inheritāce And 1. Cor. 6.11 You are iustified by the spirit of God in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ 3. The outward sealing causes are the Sacraments the one of initiation or entrance the other of Redemption Rom. 4.11 He receiued the Circumcision as the seale of righteousnesse which is by Faith Also 1. Cor. 11.23 and Tit. 3.5 He hath saued vs by the washing of the new birth and renewing of the holy Ghost In what sence then are we said to be iustified by faith Not by any inward dignitie or merit of faith it selfe not as it is a worke or new quality in vs not by any force or efficacie of Iustifying taken from Charitie nor because it hath charitie adioyned to it or worketh by it not because faith doth participate of the spirit of Christ to the end the beleeuer may be made righteous for that wee are commaunded to seeke righteousnesse not in our selues but in Christ a 2. Cor 5 2◠But wee are iustified by faith in regard it doth receiue and embrace the righteousnes that is offered in the Gospell Rom. 1.16.17 The righteousnesse of Christ is reueiled from faith to faith For as to iustification faith is a thing meerely passiue bringing nothing of our owne to procure vs fauour with God but receiuing that from Christ which is wanting in and toe our selues How then is faith said to be imputed for Righteousnesse Not absolutely but by Relation namely when it is vnderstood not to be alone but with his obiect Christ crucified as Rom. 3.22 The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that beleeue And verse 25. through faith in Christes bloud In which places by the word faith by a metonymie of the thing cōtaining for the thing cōtained Christ crucifyed is vnderstood but as he is apprehēded by faith In this sence Faith was imputed to Abraham vnto righteousnes or for righteousnes Rom. 4.9 And faith is imputed for righteousnesse vnto euerie one that beleeueth that is to say Christ crucifyed apprehended by faith is accounted our righteousnesse It is accoūted I say of god pronouncing from his tribunal seat the sentence of righteousnesse Euen as therfore the hand that receiueth a treasure that is giuen doth not enrich vs but the treasure that is it that enricheth so neither doth the work or action of faith iustify vs but Christ himself whom we apprehend by faith And this is that that the sound Diuines say that we are iustifyed by faith Correlatiuely that faith is imputed for righteousnes by reason of the obiect which assertion is plainly proued by that of Paul Rom. 3.27.28 Gal. 2.16 Where this sentence We are made righteous by faith is opposed vnto this proposition Wee are iustified by vvorkes as beeing contradictories Wherefore it is manifest by the nature of contradiction that no man is iustified by faith as it is a worke either our worke or Gods worke in vs but as it includeth the merit of Christ To speake properly and simply incredulitie is repugnant vnto faith and to the workes of the Lawe not working or the intermission of good workes is opposite but in respect of Iustification faith which resteth vpon the merit of Christ and workes which rest vpon the merits of Christ are contraries Hereupon also it is that Paule doth oppose the righteousnesse of the lawe and the righteousnesse of faith as contraries betweene themselues when Phil. 3.9
spiritually fed with my bodie giuen for you and my bloud shed for you and are nourished by it to life eternall Why had the Lord rather vse this phrase This is my bodie and this is my bloud then to say this signifieth my bodie and my bloud Because the word of signifying worthily seemed vnto him somewhat light and he would more expresly declare that those signes are not propounded that they may bee considered as they are in themselues but that it behoueth the receiuers so to behold and spiritually to apprehend with the eyes of a faithfull minde those things only in those signes which are represented by them as if that breade and that wine were not the signes of those things but those things themselues which they doe signifie Whether if the bodie of Christ bee denyed to bee in the bread of the Supper therefore Christ himselfe is said to bee altogether absent from his Supper No yet so that whole Christ is present but not the whole for Christ man is truely present 1. By the grace and operation of his spirit Where two or three are gathered together in his name Mat. 18.20 2. And by his power and maiestie a Math. 28.20 Heb. 7.26 3. That he which being absent in bodie and made higher then the Heauens yet may be whole most present by his vertue wherby he doth spiritually communicate both himselfe and all his great things to vs truely by faith 4. And by the promise of the Gospell he doth lift vp the hearts of the faithfull to himselfe euen into heauen that there they may behold namely in the celestiall sanctuarie the sacrifice offered vpon the crosse so may feed vpon it by faith Finally Christ doth truely and fully without all doubt accompish that which he promised Is the bodie of the Lord truely and Substantially present in the Supper It is present not truely by conuersion of the whole substance that is both of the matter and forme of the bread and wine into the bodie and bloud of the Lord either by impanation or assumption of the bread or locall inclusion not as an infant in the cradle for neither is it present in outward signes by in existence or indistance nor in regard of the place where the bread is neither also is it present in the bodies of men or is put into the mouth for if you respect the place the bodie of Christ is in heauen circumscribed But in the minds of the faithfull and in regard of the faith of a man lawfully vsing the holy Supper of the Lord. For that is the strength of faith that it may ioyne together most streightly things neuer so much distant asunder Therefore a true and liuely presence of the bodie of Christ in the Supper and communion of him with the beleeuers in the ministerie of the Sacraments is not reiected but onely that manner of presence which is fained at the bread is denyed Are these propositions contradictorie Christ is corporally in heauen and Christ with his body and bloud is in the Supper Not a whit because this latter is nor rightly vnâ—erstood of the presence at the place of bread but of the communion with man which is sealed and exhibited by the rite of the Supper Is not the Supper of Christ made voide if the very flesh of Christ be determined to be so farre essentially absent from this action as the heauens are from the earth In no wise because the bodie it selfe and bloud of Christ are set forth in these mysteries not simply and so farre forth as they are things subsisting in themselues but to be coÌ„sidered intellectually and are offered to the minde not to the bodie to faith not to the senses to be taken also in the mind by faith alone For truely like as those things which are heard are to be perceiued by the hearing those things which are seene by the sight so also those things which are vnderstoode by the vnderstanding so those things which are beleeued by faith neither are these things alike present to their obiects But the perceiuing of faith is a great deale more certain then all comprehension of the senses or of reason how faith can make a thing present Paule declareth Gal. 3.1 where hee saith that Christ was described in their sight and among them crucified Are earthly and celestiall gifts present after the same manner of presence Not after the same because there is no other presence of Christ in the seale of grace then in the word or promise of grace But the presence of Christ Iesus in the word adde also in baptisme yea in the whole ministerie is only spirituall not corporall or locall For as there is not made an inclusion of Christ in the voice of the minister outwardly sounding so neither in the Sacramental symbols or signes For Paul saith that Wee whiles we are strangers in the bodie are absent from the Lord and doe walke by faith and not by sight 2. Cor. 5.6.7 Neither that wee know Christ henceforth after the flesh but after the spirit vers 16. Also that Christ is aboue Col. 3.1 That Christ shall descend from heauen in the day of iudgement 1. Thess 4.16 And truely that he shall come not daily and euery moment and otherwise then he ascended that is to say inuisibly and vncircumscriptiuely but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in that manner not otherwise wherein he was seene to ascend into heauen a Act. 1.11 Wherfore the presence of Christ also in the Supper is spirituall which you may call celestiall Diuine supernaturall but not corporall or natural Which therefore is the thing signified of the Lords Supper Christ himselfe offering himselfe with all his benefits spiritually to bee apprehended in our mindes by faith for in the Lords supper wee are made partakers not onely of the operation or of the benefits and gifts of Christ but of the substance of the liuing bodie of Christ What is vnderstood by naming of bodie and bloud in the Attribute of these propositions This is my bodie and This is my bloud Not a signe thereof which some fathers call a Sacramentall bodie that is to say Sacramentally vnderstood euen as when they say that the bodie of the Lord is seene touched brused with the teeth doth fall vpon the earth is created made consumed Also not the mystical body which is the Church a Eh. 5.32 Eph. 23 For so the faithfull should seeme to cate either the signes alone or the Church although we doe not deny this that the mysticall bodie is shadowed and moreouer established by the signes of bread anâ— wine b 1 Cor. 10 16 but Synecdochically the whole humanitie of Christ both altogether and in respect of parts the true and naturall bodie of Christ deliuered for vs crucified and buried The true bloud shed for vs and his true soule yea also the whole person of Christ For truely his humanitie without the Deitie of the word
resemblances of vertues which although they are praised in the courts and iudgement places of men yet before the heauenly tribunall they are of no moment to deserue righteousnesse Yea more they are sins because whatsoeuer is done without faith that is without acknowledgment trusting in the Mediator is sinne Rom. 14.23 Therefore what kind of will is remaining in a man not regenerate A will altogither euill namely which doth with a prone inclination make hast to sinne for man is not depriued of will but of the soundnesse and goodnesse of his will Therefore Bernard speaketh thus Simply to vvill commeth from mans nature to vvill vvickedly commeth from corrupt nature to vvill vvell from supernaturall grace But doth not mans vvill freely encline to euill If free be opposed to compulsion or violent constraint in this case man is caried to commit sinne freely that is of his owne accord voluntarily and with earnest desire and so there is in him free vvill to euill a Iam. 1.14 Pruu 2.24 But if free be opposed to seruitude or necessitie certainly man enclineth to euill not freely but necessarilie and so mans will is seruile and thrall but so as this necessitie and slauerie is voluntarie So the will of a man vnregenerate is a Seruant and it is also free in diuers respects a seruant because of the necessitie of sinning free in regard of his will Iohn 8.34 Whosoeuer committeth sinne is the seruant of sinne and verse 38. If the sonne shall make you free you shall be free indeed Therefore if he shall not make free the will shall be a seruant not free and therefore more truly it shall be called seruile or slauish vvill not free vvill For by whomsoeuer a man is ouercome to him he becommeth slaue 2. Pet. 2.19 but if a man become slaue vnto sinne he is no longer free Hovv stands the vvil of man in his conuersion is it meerrly passiue or actiue also In respect of grace which commeth from without a man and preuenteth him the will in as much as it is not yet begonne to be regenerate is meerely passiue as the clay in the hand of the Potter a Rom. 9.21 because all his strength concerning spiritual and heauenly things is extinct by which he might prepare himselfe to grace or of himselfe receiue it being offered or by his naturall strength turne vnto God or wil desire or follow after that which is good acceptable to God for we are all dead in sin b but the dead man is only passiue in respect of his quickening yea moreouer the will is not only dead but also it is stubborne of it selfe and of it selfe and by it selfe q Epes 2.1 Colos 3 12 it cannot choose but resist being not moued kindled by God c Iohn 6. Therefore Dauid faith Psal 51.12 Create in me O God a cleane heart But in respect of the time in which the conuersion it selfe is wrought the will is not like a stocke but whilest it is healed and cured by the holy Ghost it is also actiue that is the will in the act of conuersion is not idle and void of all sense and motion as an Image but followeth the holy Ghost who draweth it For at the same instant God cause vs both by grace to will and to will indeed that is he mooueth and bendeth our wils and causeth vs to will indeed but yet so as all the whole efficacie of the action dependeth vpon Gods spirit Heereupon Aagustine lib. de Gratia lib. arbitrio cap. 2. It is certaine that we will when we will but he causeth vs to will who worketh in vs to will Therfore Phil. 2.13 It is God who worketh in vs both the wil the deed where Will is not vnderstood of the substance of the will but of a newe qualitie How is that to be vnderstood which Christ speaketh Ioh. 6.44 No man commeth to me except the father draw him Not so as if the will in the act of conuersion that is when the party conuerted is begon to be draweÌ„ by the word holy spirit did like an enemie make resistance neither is the case alike as when euil spirits vse the members of bodies possessed by them For we do not beleeue against our wils because faith is a knowledge in the mind and an assent in the heart but because of vnwilling God maketh vs willing of resisting consenting of sluggish lasie persons God maketh vs to become runners In which sense is that saying of Chrysostome to be taken God indeed draweth saith he but he draweth so as the partie is willing Act. 26.19 I was not disobedient to the heauenly vision What therefore be the causes of our conuersion The efficient cause and effectuall by it selfe is one namely the Holy Ghost of which it is saide Ezech. 36.26 I will giue you a newe heart a newe spirit wil I put in the middest of you and I will take the stonie heart out of your flesh and I will giue you a fleshie heart and will make you to walke in my commaundements The instrumentall cause or meanes is the word of God Rom. 10.17 Faith is by hearing and hearing by the word of God by which word being read heard and thought vpon the Holy Ghost becommeth regularlie effectuall enlightning the minde and turning the will The subiect of Conuersion is the vnderstanding and will of man which notwithstanding is saide also to concurre not to the conuersion but in the conuersion because no conuersion is wrought without the thing to be conuerted but in that regard that it is mooued not of it selfe but by the Holy Ghost that being driuen forward thereby it worketh of vnwilling becoÌ„ming willing it willeth For the will is not onely the subiect of Gods operation which the spirit of God worketh in the elect but it is also such an instrument which beeing renewed and mooued by the Holie Ghost doth it selfe also worke together with it and mooueth it selfe What manner of free will is there in a man regenerate It is partly to good partly to euill How to good Because the Holy ghost reneweth by the word of God mans nature onely in part and therefore that will which before was seruant becommeth free only in part that is because a new lâ—ght and knowledge of God is kindled in the minde and in the will and heart new inclinations and motions agreeing with gods law that so man being caused by God to worke may himselfe also worke As Iohn 6.45 Euerie one that hath heard and learned of the father commeth vnto mee Phil. 2.13 It is God who worketh in you both the will and the deede How is there in them a free will to euill 1. Because Regeneration is onely begunne in this life not perfected by regeneration is to bee vnderstoode a a 1. Cor 13 9 12. 2 Cor. 11 9 renewing of minde will and affections and the reliques of the flesh or of sinne do alwaies remaine
seruants of God and 8.2 Christ hath set mee free from the law of sinne and death The other whereby wee shall bee wholy redeemed into full and perfect libertie a Epb 1 14. And this is called the redemption of liberty that is freedome of libertie or of deliuerance And Rom. 8.21 The glorious libertie of the sonnes of God b Luk. 21.28 And the redemption of our bodies Rom. 8.23 Wee may tearme that onely begun this perfect For though wee be made free by the first kinde of liberty yet in some part we are held in some slauerie by the power of sinne so as wee cannot doe that we would c Gal. 5.17 And the seruitude of corruption yea euen death it selfe doth hold vs fettered in her chaines vntill that day of redemption d Eph. 4.30 when Christ shall by his power set vs free being redeemed by himselfe For wee are onely saued by hope Rom. 8.24 and 1. Iohn 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God free indeed e Mat 5.17.25 but it hath not yet appeared what we shall be but wee knowe that when he shall appeare wee shall bee like vnto him euen as he is Like vnto this shall that our deliuerance be or the restauration of the creature not of the Angels or of euery particuler man but of the frame of the heauens and of the elements whereby it shal be deliuered from the bondage of corruption whereunto now it is subiect into the libertie of the glorie of the sonnes of god that is into that happy estate of incorruption which shal be made manifest when the sonnes of God shal be exalted into glorie For there shal be new heauens and a new earth 2. Pet. 3.13 f 2 pet 3.21 Ro. 8 19.20 21 now in this place we doe especially speake of the first kinde of libertie What is christian libertie It is a spirituall liberty whereby we that truely beleeue are freed and sett at libertie by the bloud of Christ from the slauery of sinne and the tiranny of the deuill 2 From the accusation burthen and curse of the lawe the weight of Gods anger Damnation and eternall death 3 And being indued with the spirit of adoption of libertie illumination we are deliuered from the vaile of the heart that is from the miserable blindenes of error and the bondage of darknesse which was brought vpon vs by Adams sinne lastly from the yoke of the ceremonies of the law of meates drink daies of apparrell of the bodie and from such necessary obseruing of dâ—fference in thinges indifferent and so from all humane traditions to the end that wee might willingly and cheerefully as well in soule as in body serue God in righteousnesse and holinesse all the daies of our life Rom. 4.12.13.14 a 1. Cor. 9.27 Gal 3.45 Tit. 2.11 12 VVhat is the cause of this libertie The chiefe efficient cause is god the meritorious is Christ alone the deliuerer as Ioh. 8.36 It is expressly said If the sonne make you free you shal be free indeed And. Gal. 5.1 stand fast in that libertie whereby christ hath made you free For he hath purchased this libertie for vs with his owne pretious bloud b Col. 1.14 1. Pet. 1.18 The cooperator is the holy Ghost 2. Cor. 3.17 where the spirit of the Lorde is there is libertie who is also both the earnest and witnesser of the same There be two instrumentall causes namely the trueth or the gospell wherein this libertie is propounded Ier. 34.15 Behold I preach libertie Iohn 8.32 yee shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free And faith whereby it is imbraced Rom. 5.2 By faith are we brought into this grace wherein we stand the subiect is euery one that beleeueth whether Grecian or Iew whether male or female whether bond or free 1. Cor. 7.22 c Gal. 3.28 The manner or forme of this spirituall liberty is not perceiued by the sence of man but it is wrought secretly whilest that the soules of the faithfull are besprinkled and washed in the bloude of the sonne of God and are reformed by the holy ghost and their consciences purified by faith from dead workes to serue the liuing god Heb. 9.14 By which meanes it commeth to passe that this liberty wheresoeuer it is hath these accidents or properties righteousnesse peace a good conscience and ioy in the holy ghost a Rom. 14.17 1. Ti. 3.3 And therefore Ioseph inioyeth this liberty although a slaue and bound in prison b Gen. 39 20.21 Daniell sitting amongst the lions c Dan. 6.17 23. Lazarus full of botches and boiles d Luk. 16.20 22. In what thinges doth it consist or how manie partes hath it or how manie degrees be there of this libertie Foure 1. The first is a deliuerance from sinne and death which is wrought by the remission of sinne that it be not imputed by the mortifieng of the flesh least it preuaile and by freeing vs from the second death according to the saying of Paule Rom. 8 1.2 there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ For the law of the spirit of life which is in Christ Iesus that is the spirit of Christ or the grace of regeneration hath freed me from the lawe the authority and force of sinne and death and therefore this is called the libertie of righteousnesse d Col 1 14 Heb. 9.15 and of life and the remission of sinnes e Eph. 1.7 and transgressionsg. the lawe of the spirit of life that is Christs holinesse inherent in Christe which is in Christ Iesus himselfe hath freed me from the lawe of sinne and of death How are we said to be freed from sinne seing it doth alwaies dwell in vs and. Iohn 1.8 If ye say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs We must distinguish betweene sinne raigning and sinn subdued Rom. 6 6. c. so also betweene the matter and the forme of sinne For we are freed from the raigning and dominion of sinne which dwelleth in vs also from the forme or the guilt of sinne whereupon is that 1. Iohn 3.6 we reade whosoeuer abideth in him sinneth not that is greedily with desire to obey it slavishly and without all resisting of it a that is to say he that is truly partaker of Christ doth not giue himselfe ouer to sinne Againe verse the. 9. euery one that is borne of god sinneth not that is he doth not sinne with full purpose And we do not deny that sinne is in the faithfull or dwelleth in them but that it raigneth not b Rom. 6 12 And touching the guilte Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen and whose sinnes are couered blessed is the man vnto whome the Lord imputeth no sinne But of sinne subdued and the matter of it Eccle. 7.20 it is written there is no man iust vpon earth which doth good and sinneth not VVhat is the vse ef this part
the order of Application Analyticall namely that euery one who seeketh the declaration of his election should not begin at that most excellent degree that is at the verie secret purpose of God without Christ and the voice of the gospell crying out in the Church for so will it fall out that he cannot at all endure that immensurable right of God in a contrarie course but let him so begin at the lowest degrees as at the effects namely let him make his beginning at the calling through Christ the hearing of him according as Rom. 8.30 Those whom he hath elected he hath called so he may by little and little come to that principall part of our saluation where at last hauing found a firme and substantiall remedie against all tempests he may rest as it were in harbour in this wise Let him search diligētly if he heare the word of God with a good heart and therewith be well affected both to God-ward and toward his neighbour for this is an effect of Regeneration and Sanctification from thence to faith whether he feele himselfe to be in Christ by faith or whether he doth beleeue on Christ From faith to iustification from iustification let him go on to effectuall calling By which graces of God if they be in vs euery faithfull man may most assuredly iudge of his owne election a Iohn 1.12 Eph. 1. v 4 5 1. Pet. 1.20 21.22.23 For sense and motion are not more certaine proofes of an animall life then Faith Hope Charitie are arguments of our election Besides in the childrē of God there is a singuler testimony of the holy Ghost testifying to our spirit that we are the sons of God by which spirit vve crie boldly Abba Father Rom. 8. ver 14.15 Gal. 4.6 But if sonnes then heires vvith God and fellovv heires vvith Christ and so from the last to the first praedestinate to life Hereunto belong also certaine outward things as annexed to them viz. harkening to the word of God and signing of the Sacraments whereto we attribute the second place But vvhat if any shall not as yet feele these effects of faith of the holy Ghost and of regeneration or shall feele them vveake shall he therefore make account that he is of the number of the reprobate or shall he despaire of his saluation By no means but let him rather flie to the word and will of God therein reuealed that by obeying it he may obtaine saluation a Rom. 10.8 14.15 1. Cor. 11.24.25 neyther ought any to despaire of the mercie of God as long as he doth not sinne against the holy ghost for some are effectually called of God later then others as that famous example of the thiefe hanging on the crosse sheweth b Luk. 23 40.41.42 Is there a certaine number as well of the Elect as of the Reprobate Surely with God there is but not with vs Iohn 13.18 I knovv whom I haue chosen 2. Tim. 2.19 the Lord knoweth who are his and by consequent who are not his But are there few that shall be saued Luke 13.23 or is there a greater number of the Elect then of the Reprobate Seeing there are few which find the way of life c Mat. 8.13 14. and it is but a fourth sort of them neither which receiue the word of God with an honest and pure heart surely the number of them is great if it be considered by it selfe But comparatiuely if the number of them that shall be saued be laid vnto the number of them that perish then surely Christ being Iudge the number of these is the greater d Math. 20.26 May the regenerate assuredly by faith make mention of their Election and may they glorie thereof in the Lord They may and ought so to doe 1 Because they shall glorie to the Lord that they are Christs chosen people and peculiers Isa 44.5 2 Those that are foreknowne predestinated and elected the same are called iustified and sanctified neither can they be seperated from the loue of God Rom. 8.29.30.31.35.38 3 Because God confirmeth annoynteth and sealeth vs with others partakers of the faith into Christ through the holy Ghost 4 Because the sonne casteth forth none that are his Iohn 6.31 Nor suffereth one sheepe to bee taken from him Iohn 10.28 5 Because wee must certainely and constantly beleeue in God the father in Iesus Christ and in the holy ghost that there is a holy Catholicke Church a communion of Saints that our sinnes are forgiuen vs through Iesus Christ and for his sake and that the raysing vp againe of the flesh and life euerlasting is assuredly promised 6 Because Gods decree cannot bee made voide Hence our comfort is 1. Iohn 3.14 We know that we are translated from death to life and vers 21. If our heart condemne vs not we haue boldnesse with God And chap. 5.19.20 We know that we are of God vve knovv that the sonne of God is come and hath giuen vs a minde to know him which is true May the Elect perish No neyther be seduced finally Mat. 24.24 I Because they are the blessed of the Father for whome is prepared the kingdome before the foundations of the world were laid Mat. 25.34 2 And it is the fathers will that they which are giuen to the son perish not Ioh. 6.39 3 They are committed to the sonne Ioh. 17.12 4 They are kept by the power of GOD through faith 1. Pet. 1.5 5 And to them is giuen faith and perseuerance to the end Act. 13.48 Phil. 1.6 6 Last of all Gods purpose is vnchangeable But many seeme possible to he blotted out of the booke of life by the place in Exod. 32.32 Blot me out of the booke of life and Psal 69.29 Let them be blotted out of the Booke of life It is the fallacie of a figure of speech For Moses saying is partly Hyperbolicall and Exstaticall of a minde onely bent vpon saluation of the chosen people partly hypotheticall namely if it might be possible as is that speach of Paule Rom. 9.3 I vvould vvish my selfe to be separate from Christ for my brethrens sake Such accompt did they make of the glorie of God and such was their loue towards their brethren And Psalm 69. the Prophet by speaking figuratiuely doth desire nothing but that Hypocrites who seemed in the errour of themselues and others the sonnes of the kingdome and are called the vnwritten might bee manifested that they belong not to the companie of the elect and therefore he addeth Let them not bee vvritten with the iust Of whom 1. Iohn 2.19 They went from among vs but they vvere not of vs For had they beene of vs they vvould in like sorte haue remayned vvith vs but this came to passe that it might appeare that all are not of vs. But vvhat doth it follovv of the doctrine of praedestination that it skilleth not hovv any man liue seeing the elect can no more fall avvay vvhatsoeuer they doe neither can
administratioÌ„ of the Sacraments But yet the spirits are to be tried that is by a Metonymy those which say they are indued with the spirit of god whether they be of God 1. Ioh. 4.1 which cannot be done more certainly by any thing then by the scripture to which the Lord commandeth the triall of spirits to be conformed a Deut. 13.1 2.3 4 neither must we harken to the words of the false Prophets b Ier. 23 19 By what name were they wont to cal the definitions of Synods Canons which then especially haue authority are as lawes whosoeuer contemns violates them must vndergo the politicke punishmeÌ„t inflicted by the magistrate so soon as they are ratified coÌ„firmed by the chief magistrat but before they are not auailable by reason of politicall punishment although they be by reason of censure Do such constitutions bind the conscience before God No truly by themselues for that they are humane and mutable yet notwitstanding being once set downe to violate or contemne them with safe conscience no man can both in respect of scandalizing others as also by reason of contumacy but euerie one is tied faithfully to obserue them and that with a free conscience e 1 Cor. 10.28 29 but so as it may be done without scandall that is so that the weaker brethren be not offended and when vpon iust causes we be hindered sometimes it is lawfull to omit them our consciences being not offended VVhat is the ende of this power In generall the glorie of God and the edification of the Church to vs saith Paule 2. Cor. 10.8 13.10 is power giuen to edification not to destruction but the end of Synods is the assertion of the pure doctrine of God comprehended in his word against the heretickes and the constitution of Ecclesiastical gouernment in respect of the diuerse circumstances of time place and persons VVhat effect or vse haue they Order and Decencie d 1. Co. 4.40 Order whereby the presidents and publishers of the gospell haue a certaine rule in their actions and doe accustome their auditors to obedience and in a well gouerned estate of the Church peace and concord is kept Comelines whereby we may be incited by those helpes to pietie and that grauitie may appeare in the handling of pietie VVhat things are repugnant to this Doctrine 1 The errour both of those which ascribe to much and also of those which do attribute too little to the Church 2 The errour of the Nouatians or Catharists who deny pardon to those which are fallen by their confession or to those which are defiled with great offences 3 The Monarchie of the Papacie and tyranny which they haue arrogated to themselues in translating the kingdomes of the world 2 That tyrannicall voyce that the Pope of Rome ought to be iudged of no mortall man and that hee is aboue the councill 3 That vsurping and abusing the keyes and the power of remitting or retaining sinnes at his pleasure 4 That maioritie and supreme power which hee hath taken to himselfe by vertue of succession and of the Church when soeuer hee please in consigning the Canon of Scripture In interpreting the word of GOD and giuing the true sense of the Scripture in forging new Articles of our faith in making lawes and proposing traditions and establishing wicked decrees because as they say that the Bishoppe hath all lawes in the closet of his heart 5. All Ceremonies Popish rites and will-worship repugnant to the word of God 6 That errour that the Church is the rule of all things which are to bee beleeued when as on the contrarie the Scripture alone is the rule of faith 7. A wicked and superstitious opinion of necessity merit and worshippe in the obseruation of humane ceremonies 8. A foolish zeale of Moses law 9. That Sacriledge wherby they driue the laity from the reading of the word of God and doe prohibite Bibles to bee Printed in the vulgar tongue 10. Furthermore that Councils should be assembled and gouerned by the authoritie of the Pope and that such Councils cannot erre 11. That the Church ought to supply the defect of the word written by written traditions which is to attribute more authority and power to the Church then is meete 12 That the Church is eminent in generall Councils and that the trueth remaineth no where but amongst their Pastors 13. That the power of interpreting the Scriptures is in the Councils and that no man may appeale from them 14. That the approbation of the Scripture to be either Canonicall or Apocryphall dependeth on the iudgement of the Church 15. The contempt of constitutions simply for order and decency appointed in the Church 16. The errour of those who in Ecclesiasticall controuersies resting on their owne priuate iudgements opinions do disclaime Synods and all definitions deliuered by Synods The foure and fortieth common place Of the Gouernment and Iurisdiction of the Church where also of fasting What is the third part of Ecclesiasticall power IVdiciarie or Iurisdiction Ecclesiastical altogither to be distinguished from ciuill and is commonly called power and it is another part or kinde of the power of the keyes distinguished from the former for that the first whereof Mat. 16.19 and Ioh. 20.23 which is the office of teaching or of preaching the Gospell committed to the Pastors doth properly appertaine vnto them but this doth belong to the moral discipline of the Church and repressing of offencs commended to the Church which the Graecians cal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is discipline correction institution wherof Christ speaketh Mat. 18.17.18 If a brother do not heare the Church let him be as a Heathen or Publican vnto thee verily I say vnto you whatsoeuer you shall binde on earth shall be bound in heauen and whatsoeuer you shall loose shall be loosed for the Church doth bind whom she doth excommunicate and she doth loose when she againe receiues men into her society VVhat is Ecclesiasticall gouerâ—ment It is an Ecclesiasticall Paedagogie instituted by the authority of the word of God whereby men being receiued into the familie of Christ they are guided to godlinesse and compelled not to commit any thing vnworthy the Christian profession but those which do offend and are inordinate are reproued chidden and corrected that they may returne into the right way and that euery one may do their dutie according to the direction of the Gospell How manifold is Ecclesiasticall gouernment Twofold Common vnto which all citizens of the Church ought equally to be subiect and proper which is peculier to the Clergie and doth solely appertain to the ministers of the Church to reteine them in their dutie and the common againe is twofold ordinary extraordinary now that is ordinary which alwaies hath the word of God and Apostolicall tradition for his rule and from which it doth neuer decline and is alwaies obserued in the Church How many parts bee there of ordinary
or as Damascen saith One nature is not made capable of contrary Substantiae things disagreeing 7 Because the presence of the bodie is opposed to a religious remembance 8 Because it should follow that the Apostles did eate the passible and mortall bodie and that Christ is not to be sought in the heauens 9 Because the heauens must receiue him and being receiued containe him vntil the time that all things be restored Act. 3.21 10 Because the like kinde of speaking is no where found in Scripture which is properly according to the letter to be vnderstood of two natures together and vnlike essences For it is not said water is wine or the rod is a serpent but water was turned vnto wine the rod into a serpent And as often as the first substāce that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc aliquid is predicated of another first substance in scripture the Enuntiation of that sort is figuratiue as the Rocke was Christ 1. Cor. 10.4 Christ is that lambe of God Iohn 1 29 Iohn is Elias Math. 11.14 Christ is the true vine Iohn 15.1 11 Because it is needfull to seeke for an othet sense whē the absurdity of the word or letter written do make against any Article of faith or against any manifest place of Scripture as this doth And to make sense of these words Hoc est corpus meum there are fourteene seuerall opinions amongst the Papists 12 Because when the Capernaits did imagine in their minde I know not what corporall eating of the flesh of Christ Christ drewe them backe from that conceipt saying That his words are spirit and life that the flesh profiteth nothing that is to say so eaten as the Capernaits did dreame And he obiected vnto them the mention of his Ascension into heauen Iohn 6.62.63 13 Because this opinion maketh that the bodie of Christ is common to the godly and vngodly which truly is no light discommoditie but a great impietie 14 No Sacrament can be fully expressed and vnderstood without a Trope For in all Sacraments it is most vsuall that the name of the thing signified is giuen to the signe it selfe or the signe is named from the thing signified and that both for the conueniencie of the signe and the thing signified and also for the most certaine giuing and receiuing of the thing signified Whether doth the omnipotency of God take away the discommodities which follow transubstantiation consubstantiation It is not lawfull to reason Theologically from the Omnipotencie of God vnlesse the will of God goeth before plainly laid open in his expresse word For so Christ said to the Sadduces Math. 22.29 Ye are deceiued not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God Because we must looke not what God can doe absolutely but what he will doe for our God is in heauen saith the Psalme 115.3 He doth whatsoeuer he will not what he can Wherupon Tertullian Dei posse velle est non posse nolle that is de spiritu e◠Litera God can doe that which he will that which he will not that he cannot but that which he would both he could doe and he hath shewed it And Augustine saith God is omnipotent not because he can doe all things but because he can bring to passe whatsoeuer he will so that nothing can resist his wil or any way hinder the same but that it is fulfilled Which sayings are vnderstood of that absolute omnipotencie by which God is said that he can doe many things which notwithstanding he will not and therefore doth not but of the actuall and effectuall power wherby God bringeth to passe all things which he will For the will of God is conuerted with the actuall omnipotencie whereupon we rightly gather God will therefore he can doe and doth in like manner God can and doth therefore he will But it is absurd to gather God is omnipotent therefore he doth al things euen which he will not whereupon Damascene saith omnia quidē quae vult potest non vero quae potest vult potest enim perdere mundum sed non vult that is to say he can do all things which he will but he will not do all things which he can For he can destroy the world but he will not 2 We may not argue from the omnipotency of God to confirme that which containeth a contradiction as when any thing is said to be and also not to be or to be such a thing and also not to be such a thing in act and in deed Therefore the schoolemen doe affirme that God cannot make that contradictories may be together true Because a contradiction doth put to be and not to be togither which to doe is a point of impotency not of omnipotencie This Impossible is not a signe of weaknes but it is a token of exceeding great vertue and constancie So God cannot dy he cannot sin he cannot be deceiued he cannot ly a T it 1.2 Heb. 6.18 he cannot make a thing done vndone one that is begotten vnbegotten hee cannot bring to passe that if there be a thing defined there may not also be a definition thereof He therefore which saith indefinitely and simply that God can doe all things doth comprehend not onely good things but also the contrarie euils of these things which doe agree to the deuill and not to God as saith Theodoret verie well But those things which are said to be possible to God some of them are said to be simplie vnpossible by reason of his constant nature Some Hypothetically that is by a presupposall by reason of the constant and altogether vnchangeable truth of his decree and will God truly can simply bring to passe that that may be done which is not or that which is may cease to bee that a bodie may be a Spirit Also He is able of stones to raise vp children vnto Abraham b Mat. 3.9 he is able to bring to passe that a Camell may goe through the eye of a needle c Math. 19 24.26 but not leauing him as he is by nature but making him so slender as is needfull to be done like as he is able to bring to passe that a rich man may enter into the kingdome of heauen not so long as he is such a one but changing him and teaching him to depend onely vpon one God But because it once pleased God that his son hauing taken vnto him flesh should be made our eternal brother like vnto vs in al things which doe appertaine to the naturall and substantiall truth of a bodie according to his creation a Heb. 2 17 4.15 Phil. 3.28 he will not haue things contrarie to nature which do destroy the humane nature in Christ assumed which do take it away and ouerturne the definition therof therefore potenter non potest that is powerfully hee is not able saith Augustine To bring to passe that the bodie of Christ may be together in act a body and not a bodie
seuered from the end of that signe or from the vertue and truth of it which he cals spirit as Rom. 2.27 But they that by the letter vnderstand the literall sense and by the name of the Spirit the allegoricall speake to no purpose But when it is attributed to the Creator himselfe how many waies is the word Spirit taken Two manner of wayes one way essentially otherwise personally And essentially either in common of the whole Trinitie Ioh. 4.24 God is a spirit or else specially for the diuine nature of Christ or for the power and efficacie of the truth in the humanitie assumed f Mat. 12.28 Ro. 1.4 Of his Sonne made of the seed of Dauid according to the flesh declared to be the Sonne of God according to the spirit of sanctification by the resurrection from the dead 1. Pet. 3.18 Put to death according to the flesh but quickened in the spirit in the which also he preached vnto the spirits that are in prison So Heb. 9.14 Christ by the eternall spirit offered vp himselfe without spot to God and 1. Tim. 3.16 he was iustified in the spirit But when is this word Spirit vsed personally When it is taken for the third person in deitie who together with the Father and the Sonne is the same in essence and deitie as Mat. 28.19 Go baptize all nations in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Spirit But why is the third Person called the Spirit Because he is that essentiall vertue and working being of the same substance together with the Father and the Sonne proceeding equally and as it were breathed from them both or else by a Metonymie of the effect or else because he breatheth where he listeth g Ioh. 3.8 or else because he stirreth vp spirituall motions in the hearts of the beleeuers and doth purifie their hearts and quicken them which also is shewed by this epithet Holy not sanctified but sanctifying or the sanctifier in way of excellencie as the Father is called the Creator the Sonne the Redeemer of his especiall operation in vs which is called Sanctification h 1. Pet. 1.2 Proue now that the holy Ghost is God I proue it 1. By the Phrases of Scripture 2. By the attributing of those properties belonging to God vnto him 3. By the workes or effects which agree to God alone 4. By that worship and honor which is performed vnto him by the faithfull 5. By that punishment which is inflicted vpon such as sinne against the holy Ghost Shew me those sentences of Scripture whereby you can proue that the holy Ghost is God Those words which the Prophets do affirme were spoken by the God of hoasts the Apostles do ascribe to the holy Ghost As that we reade Esa 6.9 Iehouah said vnto the Prophet Go and say to this people Heare and vnderstand not c the Apostle Act. 28.25 attributeth to the holy Ghost Againe Act. 5.3 Peter saith thus to Ananias How is it that he hath filled thine heart that thou shouldest lye vnto the holy Ghost and presently after Thou hast not lyed vnto men but vnto God But the Spirit is in plaine words called God and the temple is assigned vnto him which belongs to God alone c 1. Cor. 3.16.17 6.19 20 2. Cor. 6.16 and he is called Lord and God d 1. Cor. 12.4.5 Shew some testimonies wherein the proprieties which agree to God alone are attributed to the holy Ghost Gen. 1.2 It is said that the Spirit of God moued vpon the waters presently in the beginning of the creation therefore he is eternall a Heb. 9.14 He is said to be present euery where and of infinite greatnesse Psal 139.7 O Lord whither shall I flie from thy spirit Wisd 1.7 The spirit of the Lord filleth the world Whereupon Basill in his book intreating of the holy Ghost against those which denie him frameth this demonstration Euery creature hath a substance circumscribed The holy Ghost hath not a substance circumscribed Therefore he is not a creature and ergo he is a God He is said to be omniscient knowing all things Ioh. 15.13 That spirit shall leade you into all truth 1. Cor. 2.10 The spirit searcheth all things yea euen the deepe things of God And he is called Almightie b Esa 14.13 Proue the diuinitie of the holy Ghost by his workes The works which are onely proper to God alone are ascribed to him as the worke of creation conseruation viuification Iob 33.4 The Spirit of Iehouah hath created me and the Spirit of the Almighty hath quickened me Psal 33.6 By the word of the Lord were the heauens made and all the power of them by the spirit of his mouth He is said in like manner to dwell in the hearts of the faithfull as in a temple c Rom. 8.9 1. Cor. 3.6 Regeneration iustification sanctification d Ioh 3 6.8 1. Cor. 6.11 1. Cor. 3.16 truth grace and whatsoeuer good thing can be imagined 1. Cor. 12.4.5.11 One and the same Spirit diuideth all things How do you proue that he is God by that worship and honor which is giuen vnto him 1. Because faith and inuocation is attributed vnto him for we are baptized into the holy Ghost as well as into the Father and into the Sonne e Mat. 28.19 and as we call vpon the name of the Father and the Sonne euen so also on the holy Ghost 2. We confesse in the Creed that we beleeue in the holy Ghost 3. Because euen the Angels themselues called Seraphims do adore the holy Ghost f Esa 6 3 and the Apostles call vpon him g Act. 13.2.3 2. Cor. 13.13 Reu. 1.4 How do you proue by the punishment which is inflicted vpon them that sinne against the holy Ghost that he is God Because blasphemie against him is not remitted h Mat. 12.31 for Christ saith Mark 3.29 He that shall sinne or speake blasphemie against the holy Ghost shall neuer be forgiuen neither in this world nor in the world to come Now proue that the Spirit of God is a person subsisting in God really distinguished from the Father and the Sonne 1. Out of the Creed for whereas we say in the beginning I beleeue in God and presently adde 1. the Father 2. the Sonne 3. the holy Ghost as we confesse the holy Ghost to be God so also do we acknowledge the same to be the third person in the deitie not by degree but by order 2. In the baptisme of Iesus Christ the Fathers voice is heard from heauen Christ stands by who was baptized of Iohn Baptist and the holy Ghost descended in the forme of a Doue who sitteth vpon Christ i Mat. 3.16.17 But euen Christ himselfe Ioh. 14.16 distinguisheth the holy Ghost from himselfe and the Father when he saith Another comforter shall he giue vnto you he saith another in person not another thing in essence and 15.26 I will send you the Spirit euen the
the Lord doth manifest his power by him h Exo. 18.17 2. Againe he is called water Iohn 3.5 Vnlesse a man be borne a new of water and the spirit he shall not enter into the kingdome of God And 7.18 He that beleeueth in me as saith the Scripture riuers of water of eternall life shall flow out of his belly Now this he spake of the spirit because it cooleth vs it quencheth our spirituall thirst i Ioh. 4.14 it watereth vs being emptie of all the iuice of life and maketh vs fruitfull it washeth away all the filthinesse of our hearts and like water is poured into the beleeuers as it is said I will poure out of my Spirit Ioel 2.28 and Esa 44.3 3. He is called fire as Math. 3.11 He that shall come after me he shall baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire From the effect because he purgeth out all the drosse inflameth vs to the feare of God to loue and kindnesse both of God and our neighbour and hath other effects like vnto fire 4. He is called Seed 1. Iohn 3.9 He which is borne of God hath his seed in himselfe because by his power as it were by seed the faithfull are renewed and are made new men that being dead to sinne they may liue to God 5. He is called the annointing b 1. Ioh. 2.27 Psal 45.8 and the Oile of gladnesse the speech being borrowed from the custome of annointing which was vsed in time of the law to signifie the fragrant smell and spirituall sweetnesse of the gifts of the spirit What doth the holy Ghost dwell in the hearts of the beleeuers onely by his gifts or also by his Essence Yea euen by his Essence yet not extensiuely or as it were a part of the essence of things as the Manichees and others dreamed but intensiuely so farre forth as he is euery where present as he is God and in the efficacie of his presence Rom. 8.11 The Spirit of him that raised vp Iesus from the dead dwelleth in you And Ioh. 14.23 Christ saith We shall come vnto him and make our abode with him For we may not thinke that he bestowes his gifts so vpon vs that he himselfe should be in another place but he is present with his gifts both to the whole Church and euery particular elect gouerning and quickning them both within and without 1. Câ—â—int 6.19 Your body is the temple of the holy Ghost which is in you And â— Cor. 13.13 The communion of the holy Ghost be with you all What doctrines are contrary to this 1. The heresie of the Pneumatomachoi who denie the holy Ghost who do of set purpose oppose themselues and impugne the holy Ghost of which stamp was Samosatenus who called the holy Ghost the power of God hauing no person and the simple action of God in the hearts of men 2. Macedonius who affirmed the holy Ghost to be not a Lord but a seruant and a Minister and that he was not the Creator but a creature and by the name of Spirit was onely signified those new motions which God stirreth vp in the regenerate abusing that place Psal 51.12 Create a new heart in me O God and renue a right spirit in my bowels Where the name of Spirit is vsed for the created gifts of the Spirit 3. Seruetus who imagined that the holy Ghost was nothing else but the power of God infused into euery creature whereby they moue and liue which Philosophers call Nature 4. The errour of the latter Grecians who denied that the holy Ghost proceedeth from the Sonne 5. The blasphemie of Campanus and certaine other Anabaptists who cried out that the holy Ghost tooke his beginning as soone as Christ was glorified abusing that testimonie Iohn 7.39 As yet the holy Ghost was not giuen because Iesus was not yet glorified Where it is manifest that the Euangelist speaketh not of the person but of those admirable gifts which were powred out vpon the Apostles in the day of Pentecost as also in that saying of the Disciples of Iohn Act. 19.2 Yea we haue not so much as heard whether there be any holy Ghost or not 6. The errour of those who denied him to be adored with one and the same faith and inuocation with the Father and the Sonne The fourth common Place of the holy Scripture What is the holy Scripture called THe Scripture putting one name for another is vsed for the writings of the Prophets and Apostles which the companie of the faithfull doth religiously vse for the instruction in godlinesse And it is called holy because being deliuered of God it containeth holy things necessary vnto eternall life And in the same sense it is called the written word of God and the vnappealable Iudge of all controuersies in religion a Esa 8.20 Luk. 16.29.31 Who is the Author of it God himselfe who did commit his will vnto writing by men called immediatly of himselfe and inspired by the holy Ghost as * As his penmen and publike notaries his seruants at hand 2. Pet. 1.21 For the Prophesie was not at any time brought by the will of man but the holy men of God spake as they were moued by the holy Ghost Hereupon all the Prophets do with one accord repeate this The mouth of the Lord hath spoken it Esa 58.14 These things saith the Lord Ezec. 12.25.28 2. Tim. 3.16 The whole scripture was giuen of God by inspiration 1. Cor. 2.13 Which things we speake not in the words which mans wisedome teacheth but which the holy Ghost teacheth Wherupon depend the adiuncts of the Scripture as the authority the excellency the truth and fulfilling of them which is as necessary as it must needs be that God is true Whence also it comes to passe that the Scripture alone is to be beleeued for it selfe of it selfe is worthy to be beleeued neither is it subiect to the censure addition diminution or alteration of Angels or men a Deut. 12.32 Reu. 22.18 It alone is without all error b Mar. 16.24 and we are bound to beleeue it alone vpon the bare affirmation thereof by it alone all opinions which all men shall reade c Deu. 17.9.10 Esa 8.20 Mal 2.7 Act. 17.2 are to be confirmed and to be decided d Iosu 1.8 Iob. 5.39 Act. 17.11 This alone is perfect and containeth all things necessary vnto life eternall e Psal 19.8 Luke 16.29 Ioh. 15.15 Act. 20.20.27 2. Tim. 3.16 17 Lastly it is firme and constant f 2. Pet. 1.19 How manifold is it Two-fold for it is deuided into the old and new Testament or into the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which is contained in the Canonicall bookes Which bookes be called Canonicall All those which being indited by the holy Ghost were either written or allowed by the Prophets and Apostles that these alone might be the rule and direction of faith and good workes by which all other doctrines are to be weighed
and examined so as all men may vnderstand that it is the doctrine of God and true according to the Apostles precept to walke by the same rule or canon Phil. 3.16 that we should walke after the same rule How many bookes are there of the old Testament The auncient Hebrewes to whom as the Apostle plainely writeth were committed Rom. 3.2 the oracles of God and also the Iewes do receiue at this day 24. bookes of the old Testament as canonicall and of vndoubted authoritie which they cal Esrim veorba of the number of 24. bookes How do they deuide those 24. bookes 1. Into foure classes or rankes the first they call Thorah the law or doctrine and to this ranke they assigne the fiue bookes of Moses Genesis Exodus Leuiticus Numbers and Deuteronomie which the Greekes call the Pentateuch Which is the second ranke It is called Nebijm Reschonim that is of the former Prophets and is contained in foure bookes Iosuah Iudges Samuel and the Kings Which is the third It is called Nebijm Acharonim that is of the latter Prophets and containeth foure bookes Esaias Ieremie Ezechiel and the booke of the twelue small Prophets Which is the fourth It is called Sepher Ketubim that is the booke of holy writers and containeth eleuen bookes Chronicles Psalmes Prouerbs of Salomon Iob Ruth Ecclesiastes of Salomon Lamentations of Ieremie Song of songs Ester Daniel Esdras and Nehemias which two last are reckoned for one All these bookes if they be reckoned together make foure and twentie Now that some men reckon only two and twentie that comes to passe thus because they reckon the booke of Ruth with the booke of Iob and the Lamentations of Ieremie with his Prophecie as one booke Are there added to these canonicall bookes any other bookes There are added certaine writings called Apocrypha as if you would say couered secret or hidden because in old time they were not produced publikely in the Church to proue any articles of faith but onely to reforme manners Haue the bookes called Apocrypha equall authoritie with those called Canonicall In no case because they were neither written by Prophets nor Apostles neither are we to beleeue them for themselues neither doth the efficacie force and maiestie of Gods spirit shine in them as it doth in the Canonicall and in them there be some things which are cleane contrary vnto the Canonicall Scriptures Neither were they euer giuen to the Iewes to whom notwithstanding were committed the oracles of God because they are not extant written in the Hebrew tongue And their authorititie was euer doubtful in the Church and it is doubted of the authors of them Into how many parts is the new Testament deuided Into foure parts The first containeth the foure Gospels namely of Matthew Marke Luke and Iohn The second the Actes of the Apostles written by Luke The third the Epistles of the Apostles foureteene of Paul three of Iohn two of Peter of Iames one and one of Iude Iames his brother The fourth the Reuelation of Iohn How do the writings of the Prophets differ from the Apostles Nothing in regard of the doctrine for the same faith and doctrine of manners is taught in them a Iohn 5.46 but in regard of the time For the writings of the Prophets containe prophesies of Christ to come but the Apostles writings containe the history of Christ now exhibited and shew the accomplishment of those prophesies in narrations and applications Whereupon the old Testament may be called the foundation of the new as the new the accomplishment of the old and as the old Testament giues credit to the new euen so the new Testament giues credit to the old And Christ compares the Prophets doctrine to seed time the Apostles to haruest and those things which are obscurely shadowed out in the books of the Prophets are more clearely and abundantly vnfolded in the bookes of the Apostles b Mat. 13.16 1. Cor. 10.11 2. Cor. 3.13.18 Heb. 10.1 After that the new Testament was added to the old was the word of God made more perfect No for when there were no mo but onely the fiue bookes of Moses they were sufficient To these the Prophets were added as interpreters Therefore the old Testament was perfect and sufficient in regard of the sense although not in regard of the wordes And by the adding of the new it was not made more perfect but more plaine c Gen. 3.15 Esa 53. Luk 16 29. Iohn 5.39 1. Cor. 15.3.4 How may it appeare that the writings of the Prophets and the Apostles were indited of God Partly by testimonies partly by reasons And by testimonies partly inward partly outward The internall witnesse is one alone namely of the holy Ghost inwardly speaking to our heart and perswading vs that those writings are inspired of God and sealing them vp in our hearts Eph. 1.13 and 1. Ioh. 2.20.27 Ye haue an oyntment of the Lord and this oyntment teacheth you of all things for whosoeuer are led by the spirit of God can easily discerne his power speaking in the Scriptures as it is said 1. Cor. 2.15 The spirituall man discerneth all things and Esa 53.1 The arme of the Lord is not reuealed to all men So Luk. 8.10 and Mat. 13.11 The mysteries of the kingdome of heauen are not reuealed to all men but to those to whom it is giuen of God And this testimonie properly maketh for our confirmation and this alone doth satisfie vs being knowne of them alone that are conuerted vnto Christ a Ioh. 14.17 which doth euermore agree with the Scripture without which the testimonie of the Church can be of no waight with vs. For as none but God alone is a fit witnesse to testifie of himselfe in his word euen so the word neuer findeth credite in our hearts till such time as it be sealed vp vnto vs by the inward testimonie of the spirit The externall testimonie of the Scriptures that they proceed from God is to be taken from the Iewes themselues who with one consent testifie that those books of the old Testament were inspired by God and therefore do most carefully reade and preserue the same wherupon not without cause Augustine calleth them the Libraries and Stationers of the Christians who haue affoorded vnto vs the reading of the holy bookes the vse whereof they themselues despise Besides those Iewes do testifie that Iesus Christ was famous for his wisedome and vnspeakable miracles and that he was put to death of the people and rose againe the third day Iosephus lib. 18. 4. of the Iewes Antiqu. What reasons haue you to proue that the Scripture came from God 1. The Antiquitie of them For that which is most auncient is most true that is counterfeit which is later 2. The euent and accomplishment of the Prophecies as of the Messias and Sauiour of mankind b Gen 3.15 the foretelling vnto Abraham that his seed should go into Egypt their slauerie in Egypt and their deliuerance which
c. To all which he gaue power to beget their like in kind by the coniunction of the male and female of the same kind which were created the sixt day f Gen. 1.24.24 And the same day was man created distinctly from them all of whom we will speake in a speciall place How manifold is the procreation of liuing creatures Twofold Extraordinarie and diuine with perfect bodie and soule without male or female without egges or seed whereof God speaketh Let the waters bring foorth Let the earth bring foorth The other is naturall and ordinarie which hath God for the principall cause for Christ saith of himselfe and his Father my Father worketh hitherto and I worke Ioh. 5.17 and the second cause not so much the water or the earth as the liuing creatures going before by their seeds through the coniunction of the male and female for the knitting together of greater loue betweene the liuing creatures either by the egges as those which lay egges or else by the fruite as those which bring foorth young that be aliue by the blessing of God whereof Moses speaketh vers 22. And he blessed them saying Increase and multiply What is the end and vse of fishes and birds For meate medicine and delight and many other vses which no man can vtter as also for the example of vertues which we should follow and of vices which we should shunne being set before our eyes in their natures As namely of humnnitie and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loue to man in the Dolphine of flatterie in the fish Polypus of the resurrection in the Phoenix of pietie and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remuneration in the Storkes of simplicitie and matrimoniall fidelitie in the Turtles of * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vnnaturall affection in the Rauens and of crying vnto God And therefore it is well said Aske the beast and he shall tell thee and the bird of the ayre and she will declare vnto thee b Ier. 8 7. Mat. 10.16 Iob 39.3 Psal 147.9 Luk. 12.24 Iob 12.7.8 And what is the vse of those liuing creatures which liue vpon the earth They are profitable to cloth nourish and to carrie men and for sundrie other vses yea to till the ground moreouer also they may serue for to direct the life of men in manners Psal 32.9 Be ye not like the horse and mule in whom there is no vnderstanding Prou. 6.6 Go vnto the Pismire ô sluggard Mat. 10.16 Be ye wise as serpents Ioh. 10.3.4 The sheepe heare the voice of the shepheard and follow it For which respect it is very behoouefull to know the natures of beasts For what cause were those beasts that liue vpon the earth created the sixt day Because they differ in kind from the former and were to dwell with man and were more like to man as wel in bodie as in wit then either fishes or birds and because many of them should be an helpe for man and that there might be an order kept beginning with those which are more imperfect and after with them which be more perfect Seeing that it is written God saw all that he had made and they were exceeding good how commeth it to passe that there be hurtfull things as Scorpions venimous Serpents death sicknesse and such like 1. We must put a difference betweene the euill of the fault and the euill of the punishment for the diuell is the author of the former but God of the latter c Esa 45.7 2. Some things after the fall and therefore by accident by reason of mans sinne began to be hurtfull Gen. 3.17 Cursed is the earth in thy labour thornes and thistles shall it bring foorth vnto thee And Rom. 8.20 Euery creature is now subiect vnto vanitie But as for death and sicknesses although they were not created of God at the beginning yet they are ordained of God as of a righteous Iudge as things that must go before death a VVis 1.13 2.24 1. Cor. 15.21 Ro. 5..12 Iam. 1.15 3. All things are good and profitable for the whole and the conseruation of the world and the adorning thereof and that which is hurtfull for one it is b Gen. 2.17 Amos 3.6 Eccles 11.14 profitable for another and one poyson is cured by another What is the difference betweene the producing of the soule of brute beasts and of man Because that although both be and are tearmed spirits yet the soules of beasts are brought foorth by God partly of the waters and partly of the earth but now in the ordinarie procreation of the substance of their Sires as Moses teacheth when he saith that God created euery liuing soule speaking of the whole liuing creature which the waters brought foorth and therefore are mortall But touching the soules of men he sheweth that they were breathed into vs by God immediatly and therefore are incorruptible and immortall and for that cause they returne to God againe who gaue them Eccles 12.7 and are called a breath not of life as beasts haue but of * Nephesh Hachaijm liues in the plurall number Gen. 2.7 Haue brute beasts the facultie of vnderstanding and reason We do easily grant that they haue indeed sense not so much the externall as sight hearing smelling tasting touching as also the inward namely phantasie imagination memorie a certaine naturall wittinesse and prudence in some more in some lesse Moreouer some birds do well perceiue of whom they are brought vp and nourished yea they can learne certaine words of men and can tell how to imitate them as the Parrat and the Thrush And Bees do declare a singular skill in making of hony But we denie that they haue the true facultie of vnderstanding and reason For Dauid saith Psal 32.9 that there is no vnderstanding in the horse and the mule both which are seene to go farre in imitation c Gen. 2.23 Why is God said to rest the seuenth day from all his workes To wit of Creation because in the seuenth day he ceassed to create new creatures For he made not any thing afterward which in some manner did not go before in his former workes for after his workes finished he rested in himselfe because he satisfieth himselfe and fulfilleth his owne desire Againe he worketh still by conseruing sustaining and vpholding the things made without any labour by his meere prouidence alone a Ioh. 5.17 But whence come those things which haue their beginning of putrifaction or which be altogether vnprofitable or are onely hurtfull as Flies Waspes and such like They proceed of putrifaction by vertue of the Sunne or heate but yet after the fall of man as testimonies of Gods anger but yet euer by vertue of that word of God which still continueth Let the waters bring foorth Let the earth bring foorth Neither are they thought to belong vnto the workes of Creation within the compasse of the sixe dayes whereof we speake here What things are we principally
ignominiously punished that hence it may appeare he was despised of men and full of sorrowes according to Esais Prophecie cha 53.3 3. He is crucified Gal. 3.13 then which punishment there was at that time none more grieuous ignominious for as it is to be gatherd out of Ps 22.17 the words of Thomas Iohn 20.25 they being strongly stretched vpon the crosse were fastned vnto it with nailes driueÌ„ through their haÌ„ds feet afterwards being set vpright on high they ended their life in the horrible torments of all their nerues whole body also the death of the crosse was most abhominable pronounced accursed by gods own mouth b Deut 21 23. This curse would the son of god vndergo therby to free vs froÌ„ the curse we had deserued that it might appeaer that sin was most abhominable for which god would haue his son vndergo such punishment that euen as death by a tree entred into the world eueÌ„ so by a tree of the crosse it might be takeÌ„ out of the world To conclud that the truth might bee answerable to the figure for euen as the sacrifice was lifted vpon the Altar and offered c Lev. 1.9.13 Deut 2-27 so Christ was lifted vp from the earth into the ayre being hanged and killed vpon the Crosse because he must ouercome the powers of the aire Ephes 2.2 Also Iohn 3. 14. And as Moses lift vp the Serpent in the wildernesse so must the son of man be lift vp that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but liue for euer He suffereth betwixt two the eues as a captaine of theeues that the Scripture might bee fulfilled Esa 53.13 He was committed among the transgressors and praied for sinners that he might suffer the punishment which we had deserued and might the second time make vs equall with the Angels in the kingdome of his father by the merit of which punishment hee also sanctified the infamous places appointed for punishment of malefactors as also the punishmeÌ„ts themselues of malefactors least any man should think that the infamie of them should be any hindrance before God to them which beleeue in him or that they could bee any impediment to mans saluation He was crucified with his hands spread abroad that with the one he might call and inuite the Iewes with the other the Gentiles vnto him offering them his merit and likewise as one that should become iudged of all men should set some on his right hand some on the left 6. He hangeth aliue vpon the crosse three whole houres namely from the sixt houre to the ninth that is froÌ„ twelue of the clock after our count til three in the afternoone Which great ignominy of Christ is the reward of our arrogancie and also our greatest glory prize before God by which all our iniquitie is put away Therfore Paul Gal. 6.4 saith God forbid that I should glory in anie thing but in the crosse of our Lord Iesus Christ 7. He hangeth naked that he might make satisfaction for the sin of our first parents who were disrobed spoyled of the garment of innocency also that he might cloath vs with his innocency glory immortality that he might enrich vs by his pouerty to conclude that such as the first man was dwelling in Paradise such might be the second man at his entrance into Paradise Also lots were cast vpon his garments which thing was also foretold Psal 22.19 that we might beleeue the euents of things shewing vs that this was he which should come 8. He feeleth thirst corporally coÌ„ming through the anguish and bitternesse of his griefe through the sense of Gods wrath as also spiritually through a most ardent desire of our saluation 9 In steed of Hippocras or some pretious wine that was wont to be giuen to them who were condemned to die that thereby they might be comforted Prouerb 31 6.7 he is made to drinke a most bitter drinke of vineger and gall mixed together that in him might be fulfilled that which long before was foretold by Dauid Psal 69.22 And that the second Adam might suffer punishment for that sweete iuyce which the first Adam sucked out of the forbidden apple 10 Men of all conditions reuile him the common people the Priests and Scribes the theefe vpon the crosse the souldiers scoffe at his prayers and wrest them to a verie wicked sense as though forsaking God he asked helpe of the creatures 11. He dieth else would the crucifying haue done no good vnlesse the soule had beene pulled away from the bodie because God had said In dying thou shalt die the death Gen. 2.17 12. His side is thrust through with a speare out of which ranne bloud by which the Church springeth and is quickned euen as Eua was formed out of Adams side and water wherewith the Church being new born is washed And from this wound as from a fountaine of life springeth the saluation of the Church comfort and expiation of all sins satisfaction and that washing or purifying which behooued to be done with the bloud is vnderstood to be now accomplished for without the shedding of bloud there is no remission of sinnes Heb. 9.22 Also by this wound the death of Christ was made manifest and certaine for the water which issued out of that wound of his side shewed that the weapon entered euen into the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 namely that skinne which being full of water encloseth the hart which being wounded it is necessarie that euerie creature so wounded should forthwith die At what time was he crucified At the feast of the Passeouer that he might shew himselfe truly to be that Pascall Lambe which was slayne for the sinnes of the world As the soule of Christ was separated from his bodie for the space of three daies was the Godhead likewise separated from them both or was the Godhead ioyned with the soule and seuered fâ—om the bodie Neyther saith Damascenus For the Godhead remayned vnseparable from both de Orthod fide and that which the word once tooke vpon him neuer afterwards left But how could it be that the diuine nature should continue vnited to the soule which was in Paradise and the bodie which was in the earth The diuine nature of the Sonne because it is both infinite and present in all places remained whole and vndeuided vnited to both together that is as well to the soule of Christ which was in Paradise as to the bodie which lay liueles in the earth For seeing the nature of God is most simple and so not to be parted or diuided God is not to be said to haue one part in heauen and an other in earth but he is whole in heauen and whole in earth not at seuerall times and by succession but both together which thing no created nature can doe Hence commeth the saying of Augustine It is proper to the whole Trinitie to be whole euerie where in spaces of places not diuided
second death What was the end of his resurrection The glorie of God and Christ and the saluation of the elect Rom. 6.4 Christ rose againe to the glorie of the father 2. in respect of Christ that hee might obtaine eternall glorie due to him by the expresse forme of the promise in the Law a Leu 18.5 Gala. 3.12 3. That he might translate and bring vs to eternall life beeing freed from mortalitie VVhat are the effectes and fruites of Christs resurrection The first concerneth Christ for by his resurrection he was declared to be the Sonne of God Rom. 1.4 he became conquerour tryumpher ouer sinne death and hell and ouer the whole kingdome of Sathan For in Christ God stroue with the diuell righteousnesse with sinne life with death who all ouercame and that Prophecie was fulfilled Gen. 3.15 The seede of the woman shal break the head of the Serpent that is Christ shall destroy the workes of the Diuell 1. Iohn 3.8 The second respecteth Sathan who being troden downe lyeth vnder the feete of the conquerour Iohn 16.11 The prince of the world is alreadie iudged and expulsed in respect of the faithfull that in such maner as hee can not hurt them in such sort as hee would and he trembleth at the name of Iesus Christ by whome hee knoweth himselfe to be ouercome and condemned to eternall punishment The third pertaineth to vs vnto whom he is raised that wee might bee absolued from sinne and iustified 1. Cor. 15.7 If Christ be not risen againe yee are as yet dead in your sins For the death of Christ is of no efficacie if Christ remaineth stil in death And Ro. 4.25 He is risen againe for our iustification not because he added any thing thereby vnto the price of our redemption seeing hee fullie made satisfaction for our sinnes by his death but because the resurrection of Christ is an euident testimonie of Christs perfect righteousnes and obedience according to the Law and that not in respect of some parts onely thereof as the righteousnesse of Elias and other the Saints but in respect of the degres of the parts so as it may suffice to make vs righteous before God and may giue strong testimony that the passion of Christ is a sufficient sacrifice acceptable to God appeasing his anger and that he did plainely conquer and disarme death b Luc. 11.22 and therefore did c Osâ—â— â—3 14 perfectly abolish sinne whereupon the rule of death depended Neither could our sins haue bin perfectly expiated done away by Christs death if death had got the vpper hand in this combat whereupon it coÌ„meth to passe that our faith hope safely relyeth vpon God d 1. Pet. 1.21 2. Because by the power of Christs resurrection we shal be quickned that is we shall be regenerated vnto a liuely hope a Ephes. 2.5 And Rom. 6.4 He hath risen againe that we might walke in newnesse of life The third cause is the stay the supporting and pledge of our resurrection vnto immortality for seeing Christ is our head is risen again For ye are al saith Paul Gal. 3.28 as one maÌ„ in Christ we also of necessitie shall rise againe who are his meÌ„bers Therfore as wheÌ„ we see a mans head aboue the water we doubt not but the rest of the meÌ„bers wil also get forth straight follow so must we thinke of Christ and of our selues Hereupon Paule saith 1. Cor. 15.20 Christ is risen againe therefore shall we also rise againe And 1. Thes 4.14 For if wee beleeue that Iesus is Dead and is risen againe euen so them which sleepe in Iesus that is in faith whereby they are ingraffed into Christ will God bring with him Also Phil. 3.20 Our conuersation is in heauen from whence wee looke for a Sauiour euen our Lord Iesus Christ who shal transforme our base bodie that it may be made like to his glorious bodie What is the vse of the resurrection 1. That by cur beleeuing this Article we may conceiue vnspeakable ioy of conscience by liuely sense of the remission of our sins of our Iustification regeneration by the resurrection of Christ For hence proceedeth our greatest ioy in that wee behold man beautifull glorious immortall in Christ who before in the Passion was so miserable ignominious sorrowfull bloudie filthy and horrible for our sinnes 2. That we may both in prosperitie and aduersitie think of that most happie estate which we expect in the life to come and may raise vp our mindes vnto hope of our future glorie Iob. 19.25 I knovv that my Redeemer liueth c. And Paule 2. Tim. 2.8 Remember that Iesus Christ is risen from the dead 3. That wee may tryumph and finde securitie in death for so much as Christ by his resurrection hath ouercome and destroied our twofolde death namely the death of sin the death of hell VVhat is against this Doctrine 1. The obstinacie of the Iewes who deny Christs resurrection 2. The error of the Eutychians who dreamed that the humane nature of Christ was turned into the Diuine after his resurrection 3. The error of the Vbiquitaries who make the body of Christ such as no bodie is and that both before and especially after his resurrection seeing that they will haue all properties of a true bodie laid aside and that it is now in no certaine place but spread abroad in all places in an vnspeakable manner 4. Of the Papists who euery year do lay in a graue the Image of Christs body cause Priests monks to guard and watch with it who also with a mournfull song doe celebrate his buriall do bestow vpon a wodden Image those things which hee commanded to bestowe vpon the poore a Iohn 12.8 2. They superstitiously take pilgrimages to that place which Iesus did honour with his buriall contrarie to those sayings of Christ Iohn 4.23 The houre is come and now is when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth And of Paule 1. Tim. 2.8 I will therefore that the men pray euerie where lifting vp pure hands without vvrath or doubting The seuen and twentieth common Place Of Christs Ascension What is the Historie of Christs Ascention IT is to be taken first out of Mark ca. 16.19 The Lord after he had spoken vnto theÌ„ was againe taken vp into heauen and sate on the right hand of God Againe out of Luke in the Gospell cap. 24.50 Afterward he led them out into Bethania and lift vp his hands and blessed them And it came to passe that whilest he blessed them he departed from them and was caried vp into heauen And in the Acts. cap. 1.9 And when he had spoke these things while they beheld he was taken vp for a cloud tooke him vp out of their sight and while they looked stedfastly to heauen as he vvent behold two men stood by them in vvhite apparell VVhich also said Ye men of Galile vvhy stand ye
described in the scriptures The Iewes in time past did pray somtimes standing a Math 6.5 Mark 11 25 but sometime with bowed knees as Solomon b 1 Kings 8 54 Dan 6 10 and Christ himselfe c kneeled downe and praied as also Peter d Luk. 22 4 Acts 9.40 and Stephen e Act. 7.60 Paul also vsed bowing of the knees Ephes 3.14 For this cause saith he I bowe my knees vnto the father of our lorde Iesus Christ by which gesture a lowly subiection and an empting of our selues before God is signified 2 Moses lifteth up his handes towardes heauen and Paul willeth 1. Tim. 2.8 that pure hands should be lifted vp vnto God which gesture belongeth vnto children who do reach their hand to the parents when they will obtaine any thing or are suppliant to them But this cerimonie of lifting vp of handes doth admonish vs that the heart and senses are to be lifted vpon hie least they which desire to be heard of God should abide in their dreggs as Dauid interpreteth Psal 86.4.25.1 vnto thee o Lord I lift vp my soule f Ioh 11.41 3 Iesus lifting vp his eies praied which is also a token of the heart lifting vp it selfe vnto god with confidence of hearing contrariwise the letting downe of the eyes in the publican g Luk. 18.13 was a signe of exceeding great demission of the minde 4 Paul biddeth the man to pray with his head vncouered to testifie the greater reuerence of God but the woman with her head couered for subiection and for modestie sake 1. Cor. 11.4 5. There beseemeth also the office of prayers a voycc or tongue both in speaking moderately and also in singing either priuately or in the church assemblie so that it followeth affection 1. Cor 14.15 I vvill sing vvith the spirit I vvill sing vvith the vnderstaÌ„ding also And Ephes 5.19 And. Col. 3.16 Teaching and admonishing your ovvne selues in hymnes psalmes spirituall songs singing making melodie with a grace in your hearts to the Lorde So Christ after the supper instituted by himselfe together with the Apostles did sing a psalme a Mat. 26.30 And Plinie the second in a certaine Epistle to Traiane the Emperour writeth that Christians accustomed to sing hymnes to their Christ before break of day But we must take heede least that the song be made onely for sweetenesse and the delight of the eares least that the eares be more bent to the pleasant tuning then the affections to the spirituall meaning of the wordes and that neither merit nor the greater parte of Gods worship be placed in singing Non vox sed votum non musica cordula sed cor Non clamans sed amans cantat in aure dei For It s not voice but vote not musicall harmonie but heart Not clamant but amant chaunts it in gods holie eare Otherwise the tongue moueth the senses exerciseth and retaineth the minde in thinking of God and is made speciallie to declare and publish the praise of God according to that Affectus cordis verbis excitatur orantis The affection of the heart is stirred vp by the wordes of him that prayeth Yet it is not alwaies necessarie For sometime the best prayers are without voice so Moses Exod. 14.15 is said to haue cryed vnto God who yet is not read to haue opened his mouth So the mouing of the lips of Anna the mother of Samuell is commeÌ„ded b 1. Sam. 2.13 whose speech notwithstanding was not heard for as Cyprian saith est Deus non vocis sed cordis auditor that is God is a hearer not of the voice but of the heart yet notwithstanding the principall vse of the voice is in publique prayers for mutuall edification and for the setting forth together of the praise of god c Coll. 3.16 VVhat kinde of language ought there to be of praiers Not outlandish or straunge but popular which may be vnderstood of the common people and of all the assemblie to the edification of the whole church Therefore Paul 1 Cor. 14 16.19 If thou blessest with the spirit he that occupieth the roome of the vnlearned how shall he say amen seing he knoweth not what thou sayest For thou verily giuest thanks wel but the other is not edified But in the Church I had rather to speake fiue words with true vnderstanding that I might instruct others then ten thousand words in a strange tongue By the word spirit signifying the singular gift of tongues which some being indued therwith did abuse when they did take it away froÌ„ the chiefest part of the soule that is the vnderstanding there is no doubt but that a language without vnderstaÌ„ding displeaseth God What is to be decreed concerning fasting That it was and is wont to be ioyned to prayers both priuate publique as it were a preparatiue a 1. Cor. 7.5 only let it not be superstitious nor in opinion meritorious b Ioel. 1.14 2.15 Mat. 17.21 Mark 9.29 There is a kind of diuels saith Christ which is not cast out but by prayer fasting And Anna the prophetesse c Luke 2.37 is said to haue serued God with fastings praiers also Act. 13.3 After fasting praying the Prophets teachers of the Church that was at Antiochia laid hands on Barnabas and Paule d Act. 14.23 VVhat is the end of prayer Twofolâ— the chiefest is the glory of God The subordinate is our safetie profit for we pray to that end that we may obtaine those things by which we may be blessed may honour God by this seruice e Mat. 4.10 VVhat is the fruit or effect of prayer 1 The custome of seeking of louing of worshipping God and of flying to him as it were to a holy anchor 2 A powring forth of the soule beore God 3 A preparation to thanksgiuing 4 A meditation of his benignitie 5 ExperieÌ„ce of his prouidence abilitie 6 An hearing or obtaining of spiritual corporal good things asked of god yea more then we aske or think f Eph. 3.20 saluation g Rom. 10.13 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 7. Ioy or the peace of God which pâ—sseth all vnderstanding Phil. 4.6 In all things let your requests be shewed vnto God in prayer supplicatioÌ„ with giuing of thanks And the peace of God which passeth all vnderstaÌ„ding shal preserue your harts minds in Christ Iesus 8 Sanctification of the good creatures of god as of meats of drinks the lawful vse of other things necessary for this life coÌ„ioined with the good fauor of God 1. Tim. 4.5 Prayer ioyned to the word of God sanctifieth the creature VVhose prayers petitions doth God heare 1 Of the pore Psal 9.10 The Lord forgetteth not the crie of the poore And 10.17 The Lord heareth the desire of the poore 2 Of the afflicted Psal 22.24 He despiseth not the affliction of the poore neyther hideth he his face from him but when he
visible heauens c Heb. 7.262 or that third heauen into which Paule was rapt which by Interpretation he calleth Paradise 2. Cor. 12.2.4 But after the Iudgement restoring of all things eternall life or the seate and place of the blessed shall bee not onely in the heauens but in the earth also For wee looke for new heauens and a new earth according to his promise wherein dwelleth righteousnesse that is which are the mansion place of the righteous Isa 65.16 2. Pet. 3.13 Reuel 21.1 What is the end of eternall life 1. That God may make good in very deede and fact his grace toward the elect 2. That the godly may enioy the fruite of Christs death and passion 3. That they may receiue rewardes meete for their labours d Tim 4.2 4. That they may acknowledge Gods bottomelesse mercie That they may see him for euer which is the end of all their desires and that they may praise him continually without tediousnesse VVhat are the effectes of eternall life 1. Our being like vnto the Angels that is not as touching the substance but as concerning the proper conditions of this life a Math. 22 30 2. Our participation of the dignitie of the man Christ for theÌ„ hee will make vs verily Kings Priests and Prophets with himselfe b rev 1 6 but with this condition that himselfe be vnspeakeablie aboue all in dignitie What is the vse of the Doctrine of life eternall 1. It is a comfort in calamities and iniuries whereunto we are subiect in this life 2 It mitigateth the sorrow which we take for them that are dead 3 It lesseneth the feare of death when wee beleeue that a better life shall follow after this death and when we thinke vpon that saying Reuel 14.13 Blessed are they that dye in the Lord. 4 It maketh vs earnest and cheerefull to performe our duetie to God and charitie to our neighbors with whome we shall haue a perpetuall conuersation hereafter in heauen What are the Opinions disagreeing thereunto 1 The absurd opinions of Democritus Epicurus Plinie Galene and others who iest at the question of eternall life and think that all parts perish with the bodie 2 The curious questions and determinations of the Papists concerning the degrees of the Saints in eternall life as of a thirtieth folde pofite to maried folke that liue chastly to them that keepe themselues widowes sixtiefold and to Virgins a hundreth folde to be recompensed And of them also who before the time desire to know what is done in heauen and take no care which way to goe to heauen 4 The opinions of some Fathers as Irenaus Tertullian and others who did not thinke that the soules of the godly went vnto heauen vntill after the resurrection but were in a temporary store-house receptacle or Region though not in an heauenly one yet in an higher then hell where they might haue a refreshing euen vntill the resurrection The errour of Pope Iohn the twentieth who thought that foules did not see God face to face vntill the last day of resurrection 6 Especially eternall death doth directly thwart eternall life and so likewise doth lamentation feare crying out mourning colde wearinesse sleepe sicknesse death hunger thirst pouertie the snares and temptations of Sathan torment feare of hell c. The fortieth common place Of eternall Death From whence is death deriued MAny take it in a good sense to be deriued from the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taken vpward vnto God and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to consider diligently those things which are aboue because it brings vs back againe to God It is also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an entrance into eternall life In Latine Death seemeth to bee deriued from tarrying because death tarrieth or stayeth for vs and it commeth stealing on vs with a still foote or because it esteemeth the condition of none How manifold is death Fourefolde 1. A corporall death which is also called temporarie and it is either naturall or accidentall and it is either violent or a voluntarie separation of the soule from the bodie common both to the good and bad inflicted on all through the malice of Sathan by the iust iudgement of God for the sinne of Adam a Gen. 2 17 Ioh. 8.44 Ro 5.12.17 6.23 1 Co. 15.21 Heb 9.27 and it is called by Iohn the first death in respect of the wicked Reu. 20 14. And surely the godly doe not escape it likewise albeit their sinnes be forgiuen them 1. That thereby they might learne to hate sinne 2. That they might acknowledge the seueritie of Gods anger for sinne 3. That they might lay away the remnants of sinne togither with the miseries that cleaue vnto them by reason of sinne 4. That they might try the power of God in raising the deade and so their death and infirmitie might serue for their owne good and for Gods glorie And for that respect should it be desired of them after the example of Paule I desire to be dissolued Phil. 1.23 Not for that they are wearie of life or for their ownselues because this desire is contrarie to naturall reason but for another end namely because it is a deliuerance from sinne wholy as also from the miseries of this life and a passage vnto the bright presence of God a returning and remoouing from banishment not vnto a ruinous but vnto a new and most delectable dwelling a 2. Co. 5. â—0 Because it is an aduantage b Phil. 1.12 a passage to the father c Ioh. 5.24 13 1. and therefore not to be feared because Christ hath ouercome it d Ose 13 14 and it is such vnto vs as he hath made it e He. 2 4.3 and the verie hower thereof is appointed vnto euery one by God but it should bee desired by the desire of faith yet so that we continue in this earthly house as long as it shall seeme good to the Lord for the godly do rather wish to liue vnto the glorie of Christ then for their own benefite 2 A spirituall death and it is either of beleeuers or vnbeleeuers and that of the beleeuers is threefolde 1. Of sinne as concerning the strength that is the force or life of sinne which is called mortification Rom. 6.2.8 Wee are deade vnto sinne in the datiue case how shall wee liue yet therein 2. Of the Law but in part as farre as the Law is the power of sinne 1. Because it accounteth them which are in Christ guiltie no more 2. Neither doth it prouoke men to sinne Rom. 7.4 Yee are deade to the Law by the bodie of Christ And Gal. 2 16 19. I am dead to the law that I may liue vnto God for Christ maketh vs dead to the Lawe because by iustifying vs hee taketh away those terrours of conscience which the Lawe doth cast into vs and by sanctifying vs hee maketh
by latine signification whereby hee is in the Latine phrase so called who is first in order though not superiour in degree With what titles are the ministers of the word adorned in the Scriptures With many and sundry wherby they are admonished of the dignity and duety of their charge for they are called 1. Angels a Malach. 2.7 3.1 Reu. 1.20 because being sent vnto vs by God they declare vnto vs the will of God 2. Seers b 1 Sam 9.9 and Prophets because they foretell of things to come concerning the saluation of the beleeuers and the damnation of the reprobates they expound vnto vs the Oracles of God propound nothing of their owne but onely that that God hath spoken vnto them 3. Bishops or ouerseers and watchmen c Ezeh 3.17 33.7 act 20 28 because they are set as Centinels and scoutwatches that they may watch for the saluation of the people 4. Embassadors d 2. Cor. 5 20 because they ought onely to deliuer those things which they haue in commandement from God and not their owne 5. The seruants of God e Titus 1.1 and seruants of Iesus Christ f Rom. 1.1 because they must regard and doe those things that are Gods and not their owne i Luk 12.42 6. Gods witnesses g Ioh 15.27 Act. 1â—8 because they haue beene vnto God truely vndoubtedly conscionably and faithfully a sure witnesse approued by the word of God and that not in words onely but in life and death yea and with their bloud if neede be 7. Preachers h Mar. 3.14 because they preach and proclaime the Gospell concealing nothing thereof Mat. 16.19 8. Faithfull disposers and Stewards of the mysteries of God because they giue euery one their portion in due season and k 1 Cor. 4.1 dispose all things according to the will of their Lord that which the Lord hath committed vnto them they deliuer from hand to hand And because they haue receiued the keyes from the Lord wherby they open the kingdome of heauen to the beleeuers and shut it to the vnbeleeuers l 9. The light of the worle m Mat. 5.14 because they should shine before others in doctrine and manners 10. The salt of the earth n because they should not be themselues foolish and vnsauorie but ought to season others with the salt of Doctrine and life 11. Husbandmen o Mat. 12.2 1 Cor. 3.9 and sowers p Isa 32.20 Mat. 13 32 and planters and reapers because they should q Mat. 9.37 Ioh 4 38 plow vp the hearts of men by the preaching of the lawe and fit them for the receiuing of the seede of Gods word and throw this seede into mens hearts the force and increase whereof is onely from God alone 12. Leaders and r Ioh. 10.2 Sheepheards of soules because they must feede nourish and refresh the flocke of Christ with heauenly foode gouerne them with the sheepehooke of Ecclesiasticall discipline and take care that the sheepe be not deuoured of the wolues nor infected with the poyson of peruerse Doctrine nor with the contagion of euill manners 13. Priests 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not in that they offer vnto God either Christ or any other propitiatorie sacrifice but because by the ministery of the Gospell they withdrawe men from the profanenesse of the world and offer and present them before God and set them vpon the Altar Christ Iesus by whose obedience they are iustified and by whose spirit they are sanctified to the end their oblation may be made holy and acceptable before God through Christ Rom. 15.16 14. Begetters and Fathers a 2. King 6.21 1 Cor. 4.15 Galat. 4.19 for honours sake in respect of them whom they teach and Sauiours b Obadia vers 21 1 Tim. 4.16 in which sence they are said to remit sinnes which otherwise is proper to God alone d Mar. 2 17 but instrumentally because the spirit of God in the preaching of the word is powerfull in the regenerating e 1 pet 1.3 23 of the elect 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellow workers with God ministers and f 1 Cor 3 9.10 builders 16 The trumpet g Isa 58.1 of God because they must proclaime perpetual warre to the wicked and must stirre men vp to warre against the deuill and sinne 17. The voice of God h Mar. 1.3 18. Fishers of men i Mat. 4.19 19. The feete of those that bring the glad tidings of peace and good things k Rom 10.15 20. Presbyters that is to say Elders because they must auoide youthfull inconstancie and lightnesse and embrace and vse such grauity as may procure them authoritie and credit among the people 21. Lastly Christ could no way more honorably set fourth his ministers then when he saith of them Luk. 10.16 Hee that heareth you heareth mee hee that despiseth you despiseth mee And Paul 2. Cor. 3.8 could attribute nothing more glorious and excellent vnto the ministerie then when he said That it is the ministerie of the spirit of righteousnesse of life eternall and of reconciliation 2. Cor. 3.8.9 What is the office of pastors l Ioh. 21.15 To speake in the name of God or to feede the flock of Christ with the pure that is the onely word of God and that learnedly faithfully sincerely constantly freely without respect of persons or any euill affection of the minde a Ier. 1.7 teaching modestly b 2. Cor. 10 13 14. defending the trueth reprouing c Tit 1.9 errors not with scoffes but with argumentes rebuking offences admonishing all and singuler of the calamities and tribulations to come which accompany or follow the preaching of the Gospell By the example of Christ d Ioh. 15.18 and of Paule e 1. Thess 3 â— comforting the heauie hearted confirming those that are readie to fall prouoking those that are sloathfull often to beate vpon righteousnesse faith hope charity and good workes both in publick and in priuate 2. To administer the Sacraments according to Christs institution 3. To gouerne his flock with spirituall discipline 4. To pray for the flock 5. To haue a care of the poore 6. To be themselues the patterne of the flock in Doctrine in life and in the crosse and to beware that they do not pull downe that with their euill maners whith they build vp with sincere and wholsom Doctrine or as the prouerbe is that they build not heauen with their words and hell with their workes and that they be not like the Carpenters which built the Arke of Noe for they preparing an Arke for others whereby they should be freed from the Deluge perished themselues in the midst of the floud a 1. Tim. 1.3 18 19 1 Tim. 4.12 2 Pet. 5.3 What is the cause that should moue the pastors to such an earnest desire of feeding the sheepe of Christ The loue of the Prince of Pastors our Lord Iesus Christ who gaue himselfe for his
dependeth this power Not vpon the person or worthines of the ministers for indeed they cannot properly eyther bind or loose any man or open or shut the kingdome of heauen vnto any man at their pleasure but it dependeth vpon their lawfull ministerie or rather vpon God himselfe who by the holy ghost is powerfull in the ministerie of the word as often as the minister doth duely execute his office a heb 4.12 In which sense those sayings Marke 2.7 Who can forgiue sinnes but God alone namely in his owne right and by his owne authoritie and that Iohn 20 23. Whose sinnes ye remit namely instrumētally or by preaching in the name of Christ they are remitted must be reconciled To whom are these keyes giuen Not to Peter alone but equally to all the Apostles and to the faithfull Pastors of all ages to whom Christ saith Receiue the holy Ghost if you remit the sinnes of anie they are remitted vnto them if you retaine the sinnes of any they are retayned Iohn 20.23 Which is the other part of Ecclesiasticall power It is called the power of Order because it hath a certaine and set rule namely the word of God which it must alwaies follow And it is rhar power of the Church whereby it is occupied both about doctrine and the principles of faith and is callled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Doctrinall and also about the making of lawes in the Church for the outward gouernment thereof and is specially called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is ordained or appointed VVhat is the power of the Church concerning Doctrine It is of two sorts Common and Speciall Common is the common right belonging to the whole Church not to the Pastors onely but to euerie member thereof 1 To keepe and preserue the scriptures with verie great faithfulnesse like a Notarie or Register diligently to read them and not by way of authority to iudge of the scriptures for the Church it selfe is subiect to the scriptures but to iudge according to the scriptures and to distinguish and discerne like a Moderator the true naturall and right scriptures from the false imaginarie and counterfeit the spirit of God being their guide for the sheepe know the voyce of the shepheard Iohn 10.4 2. To know admit and approoue true Doctrine out of the scriptures Iohn 5.39 Search the Scriptures And to reproue false doctrine Mat 7.15 Beware of false Prophets And Luke 12.1 Take heede of the leauen of the Pharises And Galat. 1.8 If any man teach another doctrine let him be accursed Whereupon Augustine lib. 11. Contra Faustum cap. 5. The scripture is set in a seat on high whereunto euerie faithfull and godly vnderstanding must stoope And in another place lib. de Religione cap. 31. It is lawfull with pure hearts to know the eternall Law but to iudge it is altogether vnlawfull and wicked Speciall power the Church hath none to frame new Articles of faith or to teach any thing beside the word of God written but like a Cryer to publish and preach the scriptures to propound onely the word of the Prophets and Apostles to omit nothing 〈◊〉 alter nothing to adde or inuent nothing of their owne a Deut. 4.2 12 32 Reue. 22.18 19 and to referre all things according to the word to Gods glorie and the edification of the Church Furthermore so to expound and prooue the Principles out of the Canonicall scriptures and to interptete the same Scriptures not out of any preiudicate opinion or the priuate sense of any one man but out of the fountaines and originals by examination of euerie seuerall word by obseruation of the style and phrase of the scripture by consideration of the state of the question and matter in hand and of the things going before and comming after and by conference of one scripture with another that they may agree with the Analogie rule and square of faith briefly comprehended in the Apostles Creed a Mat. 23.8 28.20 Rom. 12.6 1 Pet. 4.11 Lastly to take away all ordinances or rather phantasies of all men of what degree soeuer they bee that the decrees of God alone may remaine firme and established 2. Cor. 4.7 These are those spirituall weapons mightie b 2 Cor. 10 4.5 through God to cast downe strong holds whereby the faithfull souldiers of God may cast downe the imaginations and euerie high thing which is exalted against the knowledge of God wherby they may build the house of Christ ouerthrow Sathan feed the sheep driue away the Wolues instruct them that are apt to learne to proue them that are stubborne and froward lastly whereby they may lighten and if neede be thunder and resting themselues vpon the power of Christ may rule and gouerne all from the highest to the lowest but all things according to the word of God and so as no man must take vnto himselfe any authoritie to teach in the Church eyther by writing or word without a lawfull calling where indeede Order preuaileth which no man with a good conscience can despise for this were to open a window to the Anabaptistical furie and that The Spirits of the Prophets may be subiect to the Prophets 1. Cor. 14.30.31 Albeit that all Christians ought mutually to teach exhort reprehend and comfort one another in the Lord and that all housholds should so be gouerned of the maisters and mistresses of the family that they should beare a representation of so many priuate Churches no man will denie Are we simply to heare the voyce of the Church to receiue whatsoeuer it teacheth No but whatsoeuer it is taught of God and commaunded to teach and is able to approoue by the authoritie of the word of God Is it in the Churches power to consigne the Canon of Scripture The Church cannot make Bookes not Canonicall to be Canonicall but onely is a meanes that such Bookes be receiued as Canonicall which in truth and of themselues are such The Church I say doth not make Scripture to be Authenticall but declareth it to be so For that onely is called Authenticall which is of it selfe sufficient which commendeth supporteth and prooueth it selfe and from it selfe hath credit and authoritie May not yet the Church be a meanes to beleeue that there is a word written and other thinges which pertaine to saluation It is indeede a meanes not a principall meanes but onely an externall and ministeriall meanes but the principall cause of beleeuing is the spirit of God and the Church is a lesse principall instrument that is by which not for which we beleeue Paule doth plant and Apollo doth water but God giueth the increase 1 Cor. 3.6 The church hath no efficacie to reueale without the spirit neither can the Church make that true thinges in themselues be beleeued of vs for true but by the testimonie of the holy Ghost shee doth commend the Scripture which is her chiefe office Truely the Church sometimes may compell men by her authoritie and perpetuall testimonie that they
the high Priest wherein eyther partie of the plaintifes did gage a peece of money which the partie forfaited against whom the Iudge did pronounce sentence whereupon Varro said he which had the day had his pawne restored vnto him againe Now from the first signification this word Sacrament is borrowed to signifie holy things ordained of God in the Church which word notwithstanding hath sundrie significations For 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 generally both in the old Latine translation as also in ancient diuines 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this word Sacrament signifieth in his larger signification the same thing which the Grecians call a Mysterie that is hidden or secret or as Clemens Alexandrinus taketh it that he might deride the heathen sacrifices of a Greeke word signifiing a most execrable thing because indeed they were abhominable or else they were called Mysteries of a word that signifies fables or falsities or else of another Greeke word which signifies to initiate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or to enter into holy actions or to consecrate whereof commeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the chiefe ruler of holy things or else because they must be silent and kept it secret or as Suidas takes it to shut the mouth so that a Mysterie is a certaine secret and hid matter of a sacred and holy thing not euerie secret but an holy mysterie not to be committed or reuealed to profane men such a secret indeed as is farthest remooued from the common sense of men In which signification of a Sacrament or Mysterie the word is vsed Math. 13.13 To you it is giuen to know the Misteries of the kingdome of heauen to them it is not giuen where he calleth those things which Christ reuealeth to his Church alone Mysteries And the purpose of God concerning our redemption in Christ is called a Mysterie or a Sacrament as the olde Interpreter translateth it Eph. 1.9 Rom. 16.25 Eph. 3.3 where also the calling of the Gentiles is called a Mysterie and by the olde Interpreter a Sacrament And chap. 5.32 The coniunction of Christ and the Church is called a Mysterie or as the olde Translator hath it a great Sacrament which word hath deceiued many to conclude mariage to be a Sacrament where as the Apostle speaketh not of mariage but of the coniunction of Christ and the Church So the incarnation of the sonne of God is called That great mystery of godlinesse 1. Tim. 3.16 And the secret work of our redemption a mystery hidden from the beginning of the world Col. 1.26 2. Thess 2.7 Antichrist is said to worke the Mysterie of iniquitie 2. Ecclesiasticall writers doe improperly and abusiuely referre the word Sacrament vnto external signes of holy things of which sort there bee many in the word of God namely many earthly things which signifie some inuisible and spirituall gift of God as the graine of mustard seede a Mat 13 31 the seede b v 23 the pearle c v. 46 and such like which set out vnto vs the word and Kingdome of God In which signification there bee almost infinite Sacramentes and the worde Mystery and Sacrament may in this signification bee extended to the verie sacrifices and rites of the olde Testament and so also the coniunction of man and wife may be called a Sacrament of the communion of Christ and the Church 3. Strictly and specially in a more speciall signification and properly this word Sacrament is referred to that signe of grace whereby GOD doth as it were seale vnto vs the benefits of his promises and in like manner whereby hee doth as it were consecrate and binde vs to the mutuall testification of our couenant made with him and that Religion wee owe vnto him Whereupon the word Sacrament is deriued of a verbe that signifies to consecrate because wee are as it were consecrated to GOD by the Sacraments to the end hee might bee our GOD and wee might bee his Temple Which therefore are called mysteries not that they bee the effecting of miracles but because they bee Ceremonies wherein there is a visible representation appointed by Gods ordinance of a secret heauenly and spiritual thing altogether vnknowne to the reason of man naturally but yet reuealed by God in the true Church or else as Augustine speaketh because they bee the signes of things being one thing indeede and signifying another In which signification the name of a Sacramēt is not to be foūd in the scripture for the scripture doth in no place call the supper of the lorde and baptisme mysteries and sacraments And in this sense againe the word sacrament is vsed twoe manner of waies 1. By a Synecdoche for the signe it selfe or for the outward action of the sacrament onely 2. In the lawful vse a sacrament doth comprehend the representation or outwarde signe and also the thing signified or the inward benefit of grace for no sacrament can fullie be expressed or vnderstood without a trope yet the trope must be in the wordes not in the things or matter The greeke Fathers call them Symboles or signes and representations as Peter also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. Pet. 3.21 calleth our baptisme a representation that is an exampler correspondent to that deliuerance which came vnto the church in the flood What is a sacrament Seeing that a sacrament is not some simple subiect not yet a compound or some whole thing consisting of forme and matter or bodily materiall or else some third substance compounded of twoe substances but a diuine institution it must be defined by the scope and the end wherefore that is mention being made of the end wherefore the sacrament is instituted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is then Paul being the definer of it a signe or seale of the righteousnes which is of faith that is to say whereby the righteousnes of faith and the communion of the faithfull in Christ the head and with all the members of the same misticall bodie I say the communion incorporation coniunction is not onely signified but also sealed to witt so farre forth as the holy ghost doth performe that inwardly in deede which the outward ceremonie doth represent For although we cannot rightly reason from the speciall to the generall but on the contrarie yet notwithstanding that is rightly attributed to the generall that is to say to a sacrament which is common to all the specials as namely to circumcision and to the other sacraments a Rom. 4.11 1 Cor. 10.16 〈◊〉 12.13 Or else it is an holy action inioyned of God vnto the church wherein as God by a fit proportion of the outward Elements the things signified doth as it were offer by the hands of the minister the signes of things which belong to our saluation in Christ to the senses of the bodie So hee doth offer and apply these selfe same heauenly things to the minde by the Holy Ghost to the intent that they might be more and more spiritually sealed
vp in them through faith Or else it is a visible signe of inuisible and sauing grace of God instituted of God to seale and confirme that grace in vs. Or a Sacrament is a testimony of the grace of God toward vs in Christ confirmed by a visible signe with the mutuall testification of our faith and religion towards him b Gen. 17 7 10.11 1 Cor. 11 23 Who is author of the Sacrament God alone for as it belongs to God alone 1. To promise and to giue grace 2. To make a couenant with the Church 3. To bestow the gift of righteousnesse So also it belongs to him alone to institute a signe of grace or of the couenant and remission of sinnes 1. Cor. 11.23 I haue receiued of the Lord that which I haue also deliuered vnto you Therefore may wee not receiue any other Sacrament into the Church then those which God hath ordained to that vse neither yet is the forme or manner of the institution any manner of waies to bee violated For Thomas saith well The ordaining of Sacraments is a note of the excellencie power and maiestie of God Why did God adde the Sacraments to the word 1. To the intent that they might be visible Sermons of his promises applyed to our capacitie who be stil carnal wherupon Augustine saith that the Sacrament is a visible or a sensible word 2. That they might be signes whereby men yea such as bee most ignorant and rude might bee stirred vp to perswade themselues that God doth not mock men when hee promiseth his grace and eternall life vnto them and that by such signes they might bee led by the hand vnto the thing promised as it were present For if thou hadst beene spirituall saith Chrysostome God would haue propounded his spirituall gifts spiritually vnto thee But now seeing the soule is vnited to the bodie hee propoundeth his spirituall gifts vnto thee by those which are corporall 3. That he might vnderprop and confirme our faith in his promises none otherwise then ciuill contracts being subscribed by the Secretarie the Princes seale is wont to bee added that so there may be a strong euidence or authenticall instrument 4. That by signes of his owne institution hee might call vs back to worship him might hold vs therin and might put a difference betweene vs and other sects Whereby it comes to passe that the first man yea being pure and free from sinne hereupon earth had neede of Sacraments because hee was made earthly and naturall a 1. Cor. 15.45 But after that we shall bee in heauen heauenly and spirituall and haue once obtained the promises wee shall then haue no more neede of them In what predicament is a Sacrament To wit of Relation so farre forth as it is considered as a signe or a thing signifying in respect of the end or the scope whereunto it is ordained for a signe hath relation to the thing signified Therefore a Sacrament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in the predicament of Relatiues that is of those things which haue relation to others For Relatiues are such whose essence is nothing else but this by some meanes to haue relation or reference to another thing And it is also in the predicament of Action so farre as being a visible action it is commanded to be done with a certaine ceremonie For the water simply taken by it selfe is not the baptitisme but the sprinkling of the water in a conuenient manner together with the institution of Christ Neither are the bread and wine simply by themselues vnderstood the Supper of the Lord but the bread together with the breaking distributing taking and eating of bread and drinking of wine as it is ordained by Christ for the remembrance of him What is the genus of a Sacrament A signe because it signifieth something For euery Sacrament is a signe but not euery signe is a Sacrament but a signe in lawfull vse for that golden rule is infallible nothing hath the nature of a Sacrament out of the vse instituted of God Now a signe as Augustine defineth it â—ib 2 docâ— Christ is a thing that besides that forme which it offereth vnto the senses maketh some other thing thereby to come into the minde So Gen. 17.11 Circumcision is called the signe of the couenant And of signes some bee naturall which signifie of their owne nature as the dawning of the day is a signe of the sunne approaching some be at the will of the Institutor as the signes of families And these are such as either haue some Analogie and likenesse with the thing they do signifie of which sort be the sacraments Whereupon Augustine saith If the sacraments should not haue a certaine likenesse with those things wherof they bee sacraments they should not bee sacraments or else such as haue no similitude with the thing signified but doe altogether depend of the institution In which sense words are signes of things and the ringing of the bell a signe there shall be a Sermon How many sorts of signes be propounded to be considered in the scriptures Three sorts some of Doctrine or of the word as the extraordinarie and vniuersall worke of God or miracles which are seene with the eyes where at the mindes of men doe wonder which giue testimonie of the infallible trueth of the word vnto the glorie of God As in the old Testament Abrahams smoking furnace and burning firebrand a Gen 15.17 the bush burning and not consumed b Exod. 3.2 Epist 23.40 Bonif Moses his rod c Exod. 4.2 3 the pillar of a cloud in the day and that pillar of fire by night d Cap. 13.20 the drying vp of the red sea e Ca. 14.14 water flowing out of the rocke f Cap. 17 6 the standing still of the Sunne g Iosu 10.13 the signe of the Prophet Ionah In the new the healing of the sick raising vp of the dead casting out of Diuels h Mark 16 17 18 c. Some of Anger and those either threatning with some fell iudgements to hang ouer mens heads for their sinnes as namely wonders in heauen comets tempests earthquakes the signe of the sonne of man i Mat 24 30 or else punishing both temporal as thunders lightnings famine pestilence wars euill beasts as also spirituall to wit heresies corrupting of Doctrine idolatry schismes which the Lord sendeth that men being admonished and corrected by these might repent and there be signes which God shall send before the day of Christs comming k Mat 24 4 5 Others be the signes of grace which are added to the promises of God and doe testifie of the grace of God toward vs. Wherfore they are not signes simply which serue to shadow out signify only the things with God promiseth but seales pledges because they seale vp vnto the beleeuers the things promised l Gen. 9.22 37.9.10 Of how many essentiall parts doth a Sacrament consist Of
three 1. The word of the institution or the commaundement and the ordinance of God and the promise of grace I say of grace not of any of the gifts of God either corporall or spirituall but of Iustification that is to say of the remission of sinnes and life eternall which is repeated in the Church not for consecration sake neither that any vertue might bee added to the Element but that the faithfull might heare and beleeue it 2. Of an outward signe and visible which otherwise is called an Element because in the first Sacrament that is in Baptisme the signe is the element of watet by another name by a visible forme because it is a bodily thing and sensible subiect to the sight and sense otherwise a Symbole because of the proportion and resemblance vnto the thing signified and because it is as it were a marke token of Gods promise Both which Augustine comprehendeth in this saying Let the word to wit of the institution and of the promise of grace be added to the element and there is a Sacrament 3. Of the thing signified which some call the matter of the sacrament others the inuisible grace or the wholesome gift As in Circumcision there is the apparant commaundement of the Lord Thou shalt keepe the couenant Gen. 17. and the promise is expressed I will bee thy God the God of thy seede after thee the signe the cutting off of the foreskin lastly the thing signified the Circumcision of the heart or of the old nature a Deu. 10 15 et 30.6 What is the matter of the Sacrament It is double one sensible externall or corporall subiect to the bodily sense the other intelligible internall spirituall and heauenly which is perceiued with the minde and vnderstanding I say with the minde indued with that her fit instrument to receiue it namely faith What is tho outward matter It is double both a bodily substance and not an accident as water bread wine as also a ceremoniall action or rite which is performed by men in a certaine manner as circumcision in a certaine part of the bodie the externall and corporall washing eating and drinking Wherefore did God chuse such common things in the ordering of the Sacraments Least that in the vse of them being therfore ordained that they might lift vp our mindes to heauen wee should on the contrarie stick in the earthly things and admire them What is the inward matter It is the thing signified and that in like manner both the substance and the action The substance is Christ who is called the verie marowe of all the Sacraments with all his riches which he hath in himselfe and either properly is tearmed whole Christ or else by a Synecdoche a part for the whole is called the bodie of Christ deliuered vnto death or his bloode shed The action is proper to God alone and it is either iustification and washing or spirituall circumcision or the communion of the body and bloud of Christ What is the forme common to all Sacraments If wee consider the verie essence of a Sacrament his forme or at least the speciall part of the essence and the rule whereof it doth depend and hath his beeing is the ordinance or institution of God conteined in the word For Sacraments are that which God doth testifie by the word of his institution and promise that hee would haue them to bee so that that verie worde must bee as it were the verie life of the Sacrament or the cause whereby a Sacrament is that which it is But by the word vnderstand not that it which is conceiued in a certain number of syllables vttered without vnderstanding and faith hath any force to consecrate or transforme the element to giue any vertue to it For as the forme of the letters can doe nothing so neither the pronouncing or sound of the words but that which beeing vttered by God is preached and published by the Minister with a cleare voice doth cause vs to vnderstand and beleeue what the visible signe meaneth Whereupon Augustine saith not because it is spoken but because it is beleeued Furthermore the goodly Analogie or proportion of the signe with the thing signified and the mutuall reference or relation affection habit of the one to the other because the essence of a Sacrament is nothing else but to haue relation to the thing signified and Sacramented that is to say the thing signified Now the Analogie or proportion which is the agreement or conueniencie of one thing hauing relation to another is in the proportion or likenesse of the actions or effects as for example as water washeth away filth euen so the bloud of Christ washeth away sins The relation is in the institution vnto the thing signified or in the mutual respect of the one vnto the other as when together with the signe exhibited to the senses the thing signified is represented to the vnderstanding To conclude if wee respect the vse the forme of a Sacrament is an action wherein an earthly thing is lawfully and rightly administred and vsed for that end whereunto it is appointed of God or the manner of performing celebrating the Sacrament for the forme of the Action is the manner wherein it is done What manner of coniunction or vnion of the signes and the things signified is in the Sacraments Not naturall by the touching and knitting together of substances or the vnitie and vnion of the accidents and subiect to make one and the same indiuiduum or locall without distance or existing of one in the other Neither is it to bee called spirituall as if it should giue life to the signes themselues which is against diuinitie But such as hath conueniencie and relation or Sacramentall and significatiue whereby things inuisible in a fit proportion are represented by visible and in some sort are made one for the mutuall respect which they haue betweene themselues as the Scepter and the Romane Empire Such is this vnion as is betweene the true Relatiue and his Correlatiue as betweene the father and the sonne the vnion is not naturall and substantiall but of Relation which consisteth not in transubstantiation or consubstantiation not in conuerting or including but in the naturall respect affection one vnto the other So then as the father is therefore a father not because hee is either conuerted to the sonne or because hee conteineth his sonne in himselfe essentially but because hee hath relation to his sonne euen so it is a signe or Sacrament not because it is conuerted in to the thing signified or conteineth it as a sack doth corne or a cuppe of wine but because the signe and the thing signified are vnited by the vnion of relation as the sonne with the father and the seruant is ioyned with the master or else as the vnion is betweene the voice of the preaching of the Gospell and the thing promised in the Gospell not reall but intelligible and apprehended by faith But in respect
it vseth these meanes helps and instruments to worke our saluation In which sense the Church is said to be sanctified and washed in the lauer of water thorough the word Ephe. 5.16 Tit. 3.5 Baptisme is called the Lauer of Regeneration Renonation And Act. 22.16 Be baptized washed from thy sins in calling vpon his name Hereupon Augustine hath this saying whence commeth this vertue to the water that it should touch the bodie in Ioh. Trac 80 and wash the heart but that the word causeth it not because it is spoken but because it is beleeued And that the grace of God ought not to bee tyed to the outward signes Peter teacheth speaking thus of Baptisme 1 Pet. 3.21 It saueth vs not that Baptisme whereby the filthinesse of the flesh is cast away but whereby it comes to passe that a good conscience maketh request to God by the Resurrection of Iesus Christ Cornelius receiued grace before Baptisme a Act. 10.5 For God vseth meanes and instruments to worke our saluation but yet so as hee worketh by his owne proper and inward vertue most freely when how and in whome hee will and doth not yeelde vp his power and vertue to the outward signes As also in that seuen times washing of Naaman the Syrian in Iordan was not placed the purging of him from his Leprosie which then the power of GOD alone wrought in him b 2. King 9 â—4 Hence it comes to passe that some receiue grace without the Sacrament as Abraham was iustified before Circumcision and the Theefe on the Crosse without Baptisme and the Lords Supper Some receiue the Sacraments and not grace because they want faith as Iudas of whom Augustine saith Hee receiued the bread of the Lord but not that bread which was the Lord. Others receiue both together as it were by a certaine coniunction of the thing with the signes as the faithfull who take the Supper worthily Whether doe the Sacraments imprint any stampe or anie spirituall worke in soule and that such as cannot be blotted out Not of themselues or their owne power nor yet by anie supernaturall verture inherent in them not by a reall and essentiall imprinting of some signe as the printing of a picture or signe is made in wax or money For the Scripture alloweth none such But yet God doth as it were marke out and seale vp his Sacramentally spiritually by them as instruments giuing the pledge of his spirit and the light of faith whereby they are made conformable to Christ and discerned from infidels and are marked out vnto the profession of Christ And this note in the purpose of God is such as cannot bee blotted out 2. Tim. 2.19 The foundation of God is sure hauing this seale The Lord knoweth who are his And 2. Cor. 1.21 He which hath annointed vs is God and who hath sealed vs and giuen vs the pledge of his spirit And Ephe 1.13 In whom also yee beleeuing yee were sealed with the holy spirit of promise which is the earnest of the Inheritance And Chap. 4.30 Doe not yee greeue the holie spirit of God by whom yee are sealed And Ezech. 9.4 The markes of the letter Tau is saide to be made in the forehead of those men which sigh and mourne And Reuel 7.3 The seruants of God are marked in their foreheads as on the contrarie the children of perdition are saide to bee marked with the marke of the beast Reuel 13.16.17 To whome doth it belong to administer the Sacraments To them only to whom it is permitted to exercise the office of Preaching the Gospell According to that saying Goe yee forth teach all Nations baptizing them in the name of the Father son and Holy Ghost Math. 28.28 and 1. Cor. 4.1 For the Sacraments bee the appurtenances of the Ministerie of the word of God and the seales of Gods promises which cannot lawfully be set too without the vnfolding of this word of God For neiher can their be an accessorie vnlesse their be a principall And it belongeth to the same man as the Chancelor vsing the Kings authoritie to write the tables of the Testament faithfully and to seale them with his seale Whence doe the Sacraments receiue their power and excellency From the institution of God so that that forme be obserued which he hath prescribed that by a publick person either rightly called or at the least by a common error vsing the publicke function and not of the manners merit and excellencie of the person working administring Phil. 1. But whether doe the Ministers to whom is committed the lawfull administration of the Sacraments and are called Gods fellow-morkers deliuer also with their hands the matter of the Sacrament No but they do outwardly giue the earthly signes and doe onely performe the outward dueties and God doth inwardly conferre the heauenly gifts represented by them giues increase because God alone doth Circumcise the heart a Deut. 30 And therefore this Circumcision is said to be made without hands b Col 2 11 And Iohn the Baptist confessed that hee indeede baptised them with water but the Lord Iesus did baptise them with the Holy Ghost and with fire Math. 3.11 And onely the heauenly father giueth that bread which is indeede heauenly Iohn 6.32 Otherwise sometimes that is ascribed to the Ministers of the word which belongeth to God alone For that is the nature of words which belong to one thing that that is attributed to the instrument which belongeth to the principall efficient cause Where and when ought the Sacraments to be admininistred In the assembly of the Church and vsually no where else to wit when the whole Church is gathered together or a great part thereof not out of the assembly of the Church Which ought to be the forme and manner of administration That those signes should bee vsed without change which Christ himselfe hath prescribed And that the words of the institution then also of the Lords promise be recited and explaned not in a strange but in a knowne speach before the Sacrament bee administred and deluered a Act 19.3 4.5 1 Cor. 11 23 For the Apostle doth expresly forbid 1. Cor. 14.19 to vse a strange language in the Church And such ceremonies ought to bee vsed which are not humane and receiued but appointed and commaunded by the authority of the son of God as also praiers and thanksgiuings After the example of Christ who commaunded the Church to doe this Doe ye this And Act. 22.16 Be thou baptised and be thou washed from thy sinnes in calling vpon the name of Iesus Now the comelines and dignitie of the Sacrament is to bee esteemed by the word of God Also the multitude and pompe of humane rites doth occupie the senses and the mindes and doth ouerturne the Ceremonies appointed by God To whom are the Sacraments to bee administred The Sacraments indeed are common to the godly and vngodly and also other outward things in the Church
word of God 3. The multitude and pompe of humane rites hath ouerthrowen the ceremonies ordeined by God 4. In those ceremonies spirituall efficacie and operation not bare signification is vsed without the word of God as may appeare by the consecrations of oyntments salt wax c. 5. They haue degenerated into superstition and abuse 6. They are falsly supposed and held to perteine to the integritie and trueth of Baptisme VVhat is the word in Baptisme The word of the Gospell the summe whereof Christs institution conteineth beeing conioyned with the promise of eternall life being in these words Baptize yee in the name of the Father the sonne and the holie Ghost whosoeuer beleeueth is baptized shall be saued Mat. 28.19 And the pronunciation of this forme plainely and clearely in our natiue speach that all may vnderstand it I Baptize thee in the name or into the name of the father and of the sonne and of the Holie Ghost which words in the Schooles are called the forme of baptisme But wee had rather call them the forme of words therefore Dydimus saith that Baptisme is vnperfect if any of th◠three persons bee omitted For whereas in the Act. cap. 2.38 wee read that the Apostles baptized in the name or into the name of the Lord of Christ it is either spoken by Synecdoche as Ambrose thinketh and is of the same sence with the aforesaid forme because the father is in Christ the holy Ghost also whosoeuer beleeueth in the Son beleeueth likewise in the father in the holy Ghost a Io. 12.44 14.9.10.12 or in the name of Christ that is through the name commaundement of Christ that is as he had appointed and ordained as name is often taken for commaundement or the terme to which that is the end and scope and effect of baptisme is signified but not the forme of Baptizing so that the meaning is that he had baptized them into the name and profession or euen into the death of Christ and to haue incorporated them into Christ by baptisme and to haue consecrated and sealed them Christians vnto him as their Mediator but with the accustomed forme of baptisme What is it to be baptized in the name of the father the Son and the holy Ghost By this phrase is signified that by calling on the fathet the sonne and the holy Ghost he who is baptized his sins being forgiuen is receiued into the fauour of that God which is the Father sonne and holy Ghost and is adopted sealed ingrafted installed receiued and consecrated into the sheepefold familie inheritance power worship league fauour religion faith and communion of the father the sonne and the holy Ghost that is the true God in nature and essence one but in propertie of persons three which is the Author of saluation that wee might liue after his pleasure Therefore he saith not In the names but in the name least from hence occasion might be giuen of making three Gods In which sence this phrase is to bee taken as it is plaine by the words of Paul 1. Cor. 1.13 where he denyeth that he baptised any in his owne name So then by Baptisme wee are consecrated to GOD the Father because in him our Adoption and regeneration which followeth after it is established by the Holy Ghost VVhat is the internall matter of Baptisme The thing signified which is both the bloude and spirit of Iesus Christ which are correspondent to the water and also the Ingrafting and incorporating into Christ by the holy Ghost and consequently the imputation of the righteousnesse of Christ the remission or washing away of sins the Regeneration or spirituall second birth the renewing and sanctification of that man which is baptized The putting on of Christ as it were of a garment wirh which wee are couered a Gal. 3.8 Ephe. 5.26 Tit. 3.5 Likewise the fruite fellowship and participation of the death buriall resurrection of Christ b Rom. 6.4.5 Col. 2.1.3 Lastly our Adoption and entrance into the Church of God as it were an admittance into the societie of the Saints which thing signified may be also called the essentiall part and internall forme of Baptisme What is then the forme of Baptisme Of outward Baptisme that holy externall symbolical action which the Minister of the word of God vseth which consisteth first in the reciting declaring of the institution of the diuine promises anexed to baptisme or in signifying the lawful wholsome vse of baptisme Secondly in the confession of that faith into the which baptisme leadeth or in Catechisticall questions answers or in stipulation by which those that were to be baptized in times past did testify their Inward baptisme being then to be cōfirmed with the outward as Act. 8.31 c 1 Pet 3.21 But first especially in the sprinkling of water in the name of the Father the sonne and the Holy Ghost And last of all in prayers blessings giuing of thanks in a language knowne vnto the people that the congregation may be able to say Amen 1. Co. 14.16 for all these things are commaunded by Scripture and example as Preach the Gospell hee that beleeueth c. Mat. 24.19 Act. 22.16 and Bee thou baptized and wash away thy sinnes by calling on of the name of Iesus Now the Scripture hath not prescribed a set forme in certain words concerning those admonitions and prayers touching the institution and Doctrine of baptisme which the word of God deliuereth but hath left that free as circumstances may require for the better edifying of the Church so that the foundation be kept But the forme of inward baptisme is that inward action which is proper vnto Iesus Christ himselfe working by the Holy Ghost VVhat Analogie and agreement is there of the Signe with the thing signified in Baptisme Verie great for euen as the water doth wash the body and the filth thereof so the bloud of Christ by his merit doth wash away our sins and spirituall spots for his spirit doth sanctifie vs d Rom. 3 25 Tit. 3 5 1 Iohn 1 7. And like as euery generation cōsisteth of moyst watery matter Wherevpon some Philosophers as Thales haue said that water was the beginning of all things so our regeneration is by the holy Ghost in Baptisme who is often signified by the name of water for euen as water prepareth the earth to bring forth fruit and quencheth thirst So the holy Ghost that same which sate vpon the waters a Gen. 1.2 maketh vs fit for good workes and quencheth in vs the thirsting after terrene things and hereof good workes are called the fruites of the spirit b Gal. 5.22 and Christ saith who so thirsteth let him come to mee and drinke for hee that drinketh shall neuer thirst but this hee spake of the spirit which they that beleeue should receiue c Esa 51.1 Secondly the sprinkling with water doth plainly note the sprinkling of the bloud of Christ
temporall and brittle life for this would bring in a Capernaiticall eating of his flesh But it is spirituall not in respect of essence but in the manner of receiuing and by the spirituall strength and efficacie of our norishing by it because the spirit or minde of man doth receiue it by faith alone and really and truely for there is also in spirituall actions their realitie is nourished by the vertue of the holy Ghost and is fed vnto spirituall and eternall life And truely the benefit of spirituall life doth redounde also to the bodie it selfe forasmuch as from thence it is regenerated it is sanctified and at length shall be partaker of the blessed Resurrection but neuerthelesse that meat is not to be called corporal but spiritual because it giueth onely spiritual nourishment Therefore although there is an eating of the bodie in which respect that is to say in respect of the terme or obiect it might be called corporall notwithstanding in respect of the manner it is not a corporal eating Therefore seeing that the flesh of Christ is only spirituall meate and in like manner the bloud of Christ spirituall drinke it followeh that the flesh of Christ is eaten onely spiritually and also that his bloud is drunke spiritually that is with the mouth of the spirit or soule namely by faith which the holy Ghost himselfe doth ingender in our minds Ioh. 6.51 Because the commaunding words of the Supper Take and eate doe speake of a corporall action and of one eating with the mouth And concerning that which ought to be taken and eaten Christ saith a little after This is my bodie whether therefore is the true bodie of Christ taken by a corporall action and eating The Maior is denyed because seing that the holy Supper as hath beene said doth consist of two things earthly and heauenly or of the signe and of the thing signified there are two sorts of eating and therefore a twofold eating is commaunded one of the signe another of the thing signified that corporall and sensible but this spirituall and intelligible The word of eating is attributed to that properly but to this figuratiuely as Psal 14.4 The workers of iniquitie eate vp my people as they eate bread And Ioh 6.53 Otherwise it should followe that the bodie of Christ is to bee eaten by a corporall action which is a horrible thing and the conceipt of the Capernaits For Christ goeth not into the belly but into the heart Ephe. 3.17 therefore is not eaten with the mouth a Mark 7.18 19 And whereas to auoide this absurdity some doe faine a corporall eating which may bee done after a heauenly and supernatural manner it is a deuised forgerie vnutterable and no way is intelligible and moreouer implying a contradiction What is it to eate the bodie and to drinke the bloud of Christ It is not onely to beleeue the promise of God which doth witnesse as Christ himselfe expoundeth it Ioh. 6. vers 35. I am the bread of life hee that commeth to mee shall not hunger and hee that beleeueth in mee shall neuer thirst Where the Lord doth declare that to beleeue is to drinke and to come to Christ by faith is to Eate that the flesh of Christ is crucified for vs and his bloud shed for vs for remission of sinnes but to be spiritually refreshed and to receiue spirituall life and strength by a true communication of the bodie of Christ as it were by nourishment as Christ saith He shall not hunger nor euer thirst and moreouer to lay hold vpon Christ by faith not appearing a farre of but so vniting and insinuating himselfe vnto vs that he may be our head we his members Tractat 26. 27 vpon Iohn Whereupon Augustine in the second Sermon De verbis Apostoli saith That same manducare to eate what is it but to be refreshed that same bibere to drinke what is it but viuere to liue This is saith hee to eate that meate and to drinke that drinke to abide in Christ to haue Christ abiding in him as Christ himselfe declareth Ioh 6.56 Hee that eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud dwelleth in mee and I in him And by this hee which dwelleth not in Christ and in whom Christ doth not dwell without doubt hee neither eateth his flesh spiritually nor drinketh his bloud although carnally and visibly hee presseth the Sacrament of the bodie and bloud of Christ with his teeth Therefore the eating of the flesh of Christ and the drinking of his bloud is not onely faith but a certaine consequent and effect of faith namely the inward coniunction of vs with Christ the effect whereof is ioye in God and moreouer life eternall a Iohn 6.51 54.56 1. Cor. 5.8 Seing that Christ is giuen daily in the word to be eaten by faith and is there eaten of the faithfull Iohn 6.35 why is there neede of the supper That by this Sacrament as by an action more euident vnto vs or by a word visible that is shewing that selfe same thing to the eyes which the word doth signifie to the eares of the hearers our faith being more exercised and more confirmed we may eat him more and more and may apply him vnto vs more nearely more effectually and moreouer by Christ so eaten we may haue more spirituall sense motion and life vntill in that last day needding the vse neither of the word nor of the Sacraments we all in Christ and with Christ being present with vs in verie deede in heauen doe enioy that euerlasting spirituall life Now therefore at the length distinguish exactly the waies of eating of the bodie of Christ As it is a Sacrament it is not taken generally for the whole action of the Lords Supper and for the taking it selfe both of the signe and also of the thing signified but for the signe it selfe Question vppon Leuiticus 57. as Augustine saith Secundum quendam modum Sacramentum corporis Christi corpus Christi est that is after a certaine manner the Sacrament of the bodie of Christ is the bodie of Christ and hee saith the same thing oftentimes Sacramentum Ecclesiae duobus constare Sacramento re sacramenti that is That the sacrament of the Church doth consist of two things of the sacrament the thing of the Sacrament In this sense one eating is outward Sacramentall Symbolicall or Sacramentall onely namely of them which in the Lords Supper doe eate that holy signe of the body of Christ with the mouth of the bodie but which without faith is of no moment to saluation Another is Mentall or spirituall only namely of the thing signified which is done by faith alone by hearing reading and meditating of the word of God concerning which Ioh. 6.53.54 55.63 and it belongeth to all times but yet onely to the faithfull and in the olde time also it was common to the Fathers a Cor. 10.3 verily verily I say vnto you Except yee eate the flesh
the grounds of Doctrines or of the Articles of faith and of the commandements of God alwaies to be taken without figures altogether as the words doe sound No seeing that there is no lesse certaintie in a figuratiue speech which may bee applyed to the nature of the thing concerning which it is spoken then in a proper Like as the first promise of the Gospell was published by God in a figuratiue speach The seede of the woman shall breake the Serpents head Gen. 3.15 which Iohn declareth in a proper speach 1. Epistle chap. 3. verse 8. The sonne of God appeared that hee might dissolue the works of the Diuell And the first chapter of Iohn is the ground of Doctrine concerning the person of Christ and yet in it are figuratiue speeches Verse 4. 5. That light was the light of men And that light shineth in the darkensse and the darkenesse comprehended it not But is it not absurd that Christ spake tropically and therefore enigmatically that is obscurely or doubtfully in the institution of his supper with the Disciples which were rude and simple In no wise for the thing it selfe sheweth that that Metonymicall speech was not enigmaticall doubtfull or darke to the Disciples for vnlesse it had come into their minde that bread was called of the Lord his bodie because it was a signe thereof doubtlesse they had beene troubled at so prodigious a thing as followeth vpon the proper and literall sense of the words And that so much the more because almost at the same time they could not vnderstand farre more easie things a Iohn 14.8 16.17 a seeing therefore they are not trobled with these words it is plain that they vnderstood those things Metonymically after the mnaner of the Scripture Especially as a little before they had eaten the Lambe which in the same sense is called Pascha that is the Passeouer Exod. 12.27 Which is the other part of words of Christ concerning the bread Which is giuen for you In Luke 22.19 or VVhich is broken for you in Paule 1. Cor. 11.24 For in Mathew and Marke this part is wanting the subiect of which member is not bread but bodie expressed in the Pronoune Relatiue which And the Attribute VVhich is giuen or deliuered for you namely vnto death or is broken that is Esay being interpreter Chap. 53.10 He is broken with sorrowes or is crucified and killed VVhat is signified in this proposition 1 The mysticall bodie of Christ is not signified for the mysticall bodie of Christ which is the Church is not giuen or deliuered or broken for vs but the true bodie 2 It is signified that Christ gaue not a glorified and spirituall bodie and therefore that the flesh of Christ is not simple meate in respect that it is glorified but that it is liuing meat vnto vs in respect that it was in time past crucified Iohn 6.51 3 It is gathered by a proper and regular predication that the bread is not called the body of Christ but figuratiuely because it is vniuersally true of a proper and regular signification Whatsoeuer is the predicate of the predicate is also the predicate of the subiect But that which is said heere of the bodie of Christ cannot be spoken properly and regularly of bread For bread is said to be giuen to vs properly not giuen for vs Neyther is wine said properly to be shed for vs by powred in to vs. Againe that which is giuen is but an Enallage of the present time for the future spoken for that which shall be shortly giuen vpon the crosse but not in the Eucharist Because Christ therein offered not or gaue his bodie for a sacrifice but vpon the crosse For it is an vsuall Enallage of scripture to speake concerning a thing now instant to be forthwith as it were of a thing present And so to vse the present tense for the future So Mat. 26.24 Wo be to that man by whom the sonne of man is betrayed And Iohn 10.15 I lay downe my life for my sheepe And the common translation hath VVhich shall be giuen for you VVhich is broken cannot be affirmed of the signe which the Lord had broken alreadie neyther can it be spoken of the bodie of Christ vnlesse it be Metonymically seeing that it was said of the bodie of Christ Exod. 12.46 and Iohn 19.36 yea shall not breake a bone thereof 4 And also the loue of Christ towards vs is commended because when he owed nothing to Death because he was without sinne for he was holy and vndefiled a Heb 17.26 he would vndergo it for vs. 5 Last of all the fruit of his death because he is said to be deliuered vnto death not onely for the Apostles but for many What are the words of the Lord concerning the cup They also consist of two branches the former is in Mathew and Marke This is my bloud of the new Testament Or as Luke and Paule hath it This cup is the new Testament in my bloud The subiect of which speech is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This of the neuter gender but not hic this in the masculine gender as hath the old interpretation which pronounce hoc this is referred to the wine not to the bloud for so it should bee an Identicall proposition which is manifestly plaine out of Luke 22.20 who addeth vnto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is this the Noune 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is cup or wine as as if he had said This which I hold in my hands and giue to you And the predicate is bloud or the new testament in my bloud The couple the verbe substantiue est is which in Luke is wanting In which proposition surely it cannot be said without a Metonymie that the word cup is taken for wine which is contained in the cup and that this cup is that New testament In the one is the continent put for the thing contained in the other of the thing signified is for the signe For properly according to the word the cup it selfe or wine is not the new Testament it selfe but a pledge and seale of the new Testament or rather that wherewith the Testament is established that is to say of the bloud of Christ like as Circumcision was called the old Couenant By all which it appeareth that the words of the Lords supper are ful of figures but yet most vsual easie to be vndestood Whether may this proposition of Christ This is my bloud be so compared with that of Moses saying Exod. 24.8 concerning the bloud of calues this is the bloud of the couenant that both here there bloud being in deed in it owne essence as that being holden in the hands of Moses and this in the hands of Christ be demonstrated properly and not figuratiuely In no wise For Moses truly sprinkled the people with the bloud of the offering taken out of a basen that bloud was a sacramental signe therfore that enuntiatiō of Moses
1. Cor. 10.3 VVhat is the same but that which also wee haue saith Augustine Therefore the same meat and the same drink but to the vnderstanding and beleeuing But to the not vnderstanding that Manna alone Book de Vti lit paenitent vpon Ioh. tract 21 that water alone but to the beleeuers the same which now for then Christ was to come now he is come was to come and is come are diuers words but the same Christ 5 Because it could not be that Christ locally sitting at the table and communicating with the disciples as it is Mat. 26.29 I will not drinke henceforth of this fruit of the vine should himselfe eate himselfe really and corporally Did Christ Iesus take part of the same signes Truly no lesse then of the Paschall Lambe Concerning which let him which doubteth thinke 1 That the Lord Iesus sanctified the ordinarie Sacraments of both the Testaments in the vse thereof 2 And in instituting of the supper by his example went before in sayings doings that the whole Church may know that the first paterne is to be respected of her in that regard that it was the greatest cause why he did not abstaine whereupon Hierome saith ipse conuiua conuiuium ipse comedens qui comeditur that is Epist ad Hed. biam he is the guest and the feast he is eating and that which is eaten Is there that vertue and that sense of the words of Christ wherewith he instituted this Sacrament that as often as vpon the bread and wine they are recited by the Priest who hath a purpose to consecrate then the substance of bread and wine eyther by Analysis is resolued into the first matter or euen into nothing so that in steed thereof doe succeed the bodie and bloud of Christ or by a simple mutation is turned into the substance of the true bodie and of the true bloud of Christ so that the substance of bread is formed into the flesh of of Christ the bare accidents of breas and wine remayning hanging without a subiect God forbid 1 Because it were magicall to attribute the power of changing the substance of the signes to certaine words mumbled ouer 2 Because in expresse words of the Apostles and Euangelists the true natural substance of bread and wine is affirmed before and after consecration as they call it 1. Cor. 10.16.17 and 11.26 27.28 The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ And wee that are many are one bread and one bodie because we all are partakers of one bread and As often as yee shall eate this bread ye shew forth the Lords death till he come And Whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke this cup of the Lord vnworthily shall be guiltie of the bodie and bloud of the Lord. And Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup. For whereas they say that it is called bread not which is now but which was before it is confirmed by no testimonie of Scripture or iudgement of sense and besides Math. 26.29 I will not drinke saith hee henceforth of this fruit of the Vine Thus spake Christ after consecration 3 Because the kingdome or God is not corporall meate and drinke Rom. 14.17 4 Because in the proposition the pronoune hoc this demonstratiue doth not demonstrate the bodie of Christ For the transubstantiation saith Thomas is not accomplished but in the last instāt of the pronouncing of the words neither doth it demonstrate the accidēts alone of the bread For the accidētes are not the body of Christ neither doth it demōstrate any wandring thing or singular thing vncertainly determined For there is no Indiuiduum or singular thing which is not something And therefore certaine not wandering vndetermined or indefinite and especially the Demonstratiue Hoc this doth signifie some certaine thing 5 Because it is a wicked thing to be thought and spoken that the bread it selfe is properly and substantially the bodie of Christ 6 Because of this conuersion neither doth the Scripture giue sentence nor sense or reason iudge as of the rod of Moses turned into a Serpent a Exod 4.3 and of the water turned into wine Iohn 2.9 Where the Euangelist said not simply Water but Made wine For the accidents of bread doe plainely shew that bread doth remaine and they which partake of those holy signes doe feele in themselues a taste of wine and the power of the bread and wine This is an vnanswerable reason Framed thus euerie miracle is sensible transubstantiation is not sensible therefore it is no miracle 7 Because the substance the accidents thereof remayning cannot perish neyther can the accidents subsist without a subiect nor be the accidents of bread which are not the accidents of bread 8 Because the substance being remooued and the nature of the signes the similitude affinitie habit relation and Analogie of the signes to the thing signified come to nothing For the bread signifieth the bodie of Christ because it nourisheth strengtheneth and sustaineth which accidents cannot doe 9 Because heere is no word of Christ which may signifie a conuersion or transubstantiation For the verb Est doth not signifie to be made to be changed to be turned And note that which is said to be made cannot properly be said to be for Esse to be and Fieri to be made are said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say contradictorily 10 Because a carnall eating of the bodie of Christ is no where prooued in the Scriptures 11 Because it should follow that both the faithfull and vnbeleuers doe receiue the bodie of the Lord and his quickening spirit which neuer can be feuered from his bodie And Augustine saith that They doe not eate the bodie of Christ but which are in the bodie of Christ Because that bodie cannot be spoyled of quantitie nor in an instant and without locall motion be together in heauen in earth vnlesse vpon necessitie we should make an vbiquitie of Christs bodie which the verie transubstantiators do refuse to doe and the Fathers denie and they doe determine contrarie things which say that a bodie and the quantitie are truely present and yet not by meanes of the quantitie 13 Because now the bodie of Christ cannot be separated from the bloud nor the soule from his bodie and concerning Concomitancie there is nothing extant is the word of God 14 Because they write that Victor the third Bishop of Rome died hauing drunk poyson out of a chalice giuē him by his Subdeacon and that Henrie the seuenth Emperour of Lucelburge tooke poyson from the bread taken in the Eucharist by a Monke of Senens one of the preachers order 15 Because infinite discommodities doe follow this Transubstantiation as that the accidents must remaine without a subiect that if it happen that Mice do gnaw the bread they shal be said to gnaw accidēces or that if worms do breed of the bread it
shall be said that they are brought forth out of the accidences that although the bread be broken it shal be concluded that the accidences are broken with many of the like kinde all which are against the nature both of Christs sacrament and Christs bodie Is not the bread of the Supper at leastwise by a miracle turned into the bodie of Christ No. 1 Because such a miracle doth not affect the outward senses for miracles doe plainely shew a change if there be any made and doe runne into the eyes and the rest of the senses and doe strike men with admiration as the rod did being turned into a Serpent and the water when it was made wine 2 Because miracles are ceased 3 Because miracles although they are done besides and aboue yet not so against nature as that they doe ouerturne it 4 Because this is spoken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is contradictorily that a miracle which is an extraordinarie worke of God should bee done in an ordinarie Sacrament of the Church For miracles are extraordinarie works of God and of a certaine time and belong to certaine persons if you looke to the workers of miracles But the Sacraments doe belong to all times and to the vniuersall Church and are part of the ministerie of the Gospell wherin Christ dealeth after an ordinarie manner or by certaine and perpetuall ordination not making a miraculous change in the nature or in the qualities of the Elements 5 Miracles take not together away the substance or qualities naturall and also leaue them that is they doe not implie a contradiction as when the rod of Moses was turned into a Serpent it was not together a rod and a serpent But the miracle of Transubstantiaâ—ion taketh away the substance of bread and withall keepeth the properties of bread And it repugneth this immoueable and euerlasting principle of any thing whatsoeuer eyther the affâ—â—matâ—on or negation thereof is true that is to say euerie thing is or is not 6 For the faith or credit of miracles as that in the hands of Gregorie in his booke of the super at his praiers this Sacrament was turned into a fleshie fingâ—r sometime there appeared a little boy and that the Sacrament being bored through with Laurell stickes sent out bloud aâ—d that it was turned into coales and ashes in the time of Cyprian as he wâ—â—teth we doe thus imbrace them that they may be said to be done eyther to driue away vngracious and vnworthy men from so great a Sacrament or to declare and commend the dignitie thereof but not to confirme the superstition and error concerning Transubstantiation For we know that we must not beleeue false Prophets making meÌ„ by miracles to beleeue theÌ„ a Math. 24 2 Thess 2.9 that Antichrist shal come being famous for signes lying wonders Is not that true which Christ spake and can it not be performed by him No doubt it is and is also performed the question is not concerning the truth but concerning the sense of the words namely whether it be plainely affirmed by the words of Christ that the bodie and bloud of Christ together with the bread and wine are essentially actually really present vpon earth and really corporally in the mouth of the bodie although inuisiblie receiued as well of the godly as of the vngodly which thing we denie 1 Because the words of Christ do not beare it and they which hold Consubstantiation keepe not the words of Christ as they are most properly spoken but they follow a certaine sense For Christ neither said In or vnder this bread is my bodie but this that is this bread is my bodie which things doe as much differ betweene themselues as to be and to containe something And the visible bread it selfe not any thing hidden in the bread is called the bodie of the Lord. And the Schoole men themselues doe confesse that the letter of the words is not kept if for this is my bodie thou sayest heere or vnder bread is my bodie 2 Because a reall inexistence of the bodie of Christ In with or vnder the bread maketh nothing to the spirituall taking therof which notwithstanding is the finall cause of this Sacrament Seeing that faith being taught by the word of of God and more confirmed by those holy signes doth truly receiue the bodie of Christ being in heauen by the holy Ghosts working as the sayings do teach which bid vs seeke behold Christ in the heauens a Col 3.1 Moreouer a reall and bodily presence doth bring no profit which may not be had from the spirituall presence For Iohn 6.51.54.56 The Lord promised to them which eate him life eternall and also that he will dwell in them they in him what is required more then these things 3 Because the bodie of Christ is spirituall meat and therefore of the minde not of the bodie to be eaten with faith not with the mouth Neyther is it more difficult to faith to receiue the bodie being in heauen then in the bread or in the mouth and that which is more faith of her owne nature and force looketh vpward and is not excluded by any distances of times or places 4 Because how much is giuen to the Eucharist by an Hyperbole or exaltation so much is taken away from all other sacraments by a Tapeinosis or extenuation 5 Because the opinion of the inexistence of the bodie of Christ doth confirme the worshipping of bread and the carnall opinion concerning that iornall prouision necessary to saluation for them which are about to die 6 The nature of a bodie is ouerturned whiles that it is decreed that it is substantially in many places or euery where which thing agreeth to no creature For most truly Athananasius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is That which is consubstantiall with God is euerie where And Chrysostome 2 Col. Hom. 5. Hee is God whose center is euerie where and circumference no where In like manner there is determined against nature that there is a thing not to be felt insensible inuisible vncircuÌ„scribed without qualitie quantitie forme and figure and yet corporally present that is a bodie without a bodie against the Essentiall properties of a true bodie whereby Christ prooued the true and essentiall presence of his bodie Luke 24.38.39 Iohn 20.27 saying Behold my hands and my feete For it is I my selfe handle mee and see For a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me haue For hee is said not to bee seene of them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 24.31 because he was taken from their sight But He denieth the nature it selfe which denieth the properties thereof or as Theodoret saith the taking away of the properties is the denying of both natures And that eistinction of corporal presence into visible and inuisible is a fained distinction For this abolisheth the manner of a bodie neither doth one nature receiue any thing contrarie and diuerse in it selfe
Christ because it signifieth Christ So we say with Cyprian that the forme that is that the appearance and sight of bread and wine are not changed but that the substance of breade and wine are changed into the Sacrament of the bodie and bloud of the Lord which before they were not So Chrysostome That which belongeth to the signes he attributeth to the thing signified especially in respect of faith and the cogitation of the minde What meane the ancient fathers whiles that euery where they doe admire with astonishment the mysterie of the Supper they call it the Fearfull mysterie they require Faith they celebrate the power of God they deny that the order of Nature is to be sought in the bodie of Christ they attribute a conuersion to the signes They signifie a change made by grace not of the substance that is of the naturall matter and forme but of the qualitie that is of the former office condition calling end and vse of the Elements which is the consecration appointment and adhibition or traduction of the signes from a common vse to an holy mysticall vse or office that is to the obsignation and testimony of eternall life that surely they may be nourishment not for the bodie onely for this life as in our ordinarie table or before the blessing but that by reason of Gods ordinance because they are now the Sacraments of the bodie and bloud of Christ they may feed the soule also for as much as they are taken that they may bee vnto vs most sure pledges of the bodie and bloud of Christ and of eternall life flowing vnto vs from him Whereupon Paule doth not simply call it the Supper and the cup but the Supper and cup of the Lord and 1. Cor. 10.4 he calleth the rock of which the Israelites did drinke in the wildernesse spirituall Dial. 10 8 From hence Theodoret saith The Lord honoured the signes which are seene with the name of his bodie and bloud verily not chaunging the nature it selfe but putting grace to nature because these Elements are made Sacraments or spirituall things that is outward meanes of the holy Ghost and instruments of strengthning keeping and increasing the communion of Christ in vs. Therefore this change not essentiall but Sacramentall the fathers admire as wonderfull and supernaturall and that worthily For it cannot be done without the power of God that that earthly and decaying thing which is appointed properly to nourish the bodie should begin to be vnto vs a most holy thing a spirituall and heauenly foode Neither is it a worke of nature that those signes should moue the minde so powerfully and effectually and should offer and exhibit the bodie and bloud of the Lord to bee apprehended also of our minds by faith like as it is not a worke of nature that water should be made the lauer of regeneration or washing of the new birth Tit. 3.5 Although the Sacramentall change is no more a thing miraculous and vnspeakable then when of common waxe is made an authenticall seale of a publick instrument but because that is diuine and a cause of diuine things but this is humane and an ordinance instituted to establish mens matters Whereupon Augustine saith that SacrameÌ„ts may haue honour as religious things De trinit B. 31. c 10. but not astonishment as wonderfull things Moreouer the same fathers doe require faith because faith is heere especially necessarie whereby wee may firmely determine that the breade is the bodie of the Lord that is that wee by the lawfull vse of the bread are truely made partakers of the bodâ—e of Christ Finally they doe grant that that vnspeakeable and truely meruailous fellowship of vs with Christ is established wherin the order of nature is not to be sought for because it goeth beyond all humane sence Whether when we say of a firie sword of an infant lying in a cradle of wine contained in a vessell and the like This is Fire this is an Infant this is wine And Deut. 12.23 The bloud is the life because it containeth the life by which speaches the presence of the Attribute is manifestly affirmed are therefore the words of Christ to be vnderstoode of his bodilie presence at the place where the bread is No for truely the fire doth set the sword on fire doth pierce through the whole substance thereof but it changeth not the nature of the Sword saith Theodoret and in a fired sword the fire doth keepe still the force of burning as the sword of cutting neither hath the sword the operation of fire Dial. 2 c 19. B. 3 c â—9 but the burning is the effect of fire as cutting of the sword saith Damascen By which simile the ancients declared the most streight vnion of the two natures made without confusion and not a reall effusion of the Properties of the Deitie into the humane nature But heere is a great dissimilitude For those are naturall coniunctions whereby either new qualities are applyed to bodies or substances to substances but here all things are supernaturall by the institution of Christ Besides Christ is present in the Supper not for the bread but for the man for Christ spake not these words This is my bodie for the bread as though hee were about to make a substantiall change thereof or were about to communicate his bodie to the bread but hee gaue a promise to the disciples concerning the communication of his bodie whereby he doth ioyne vs to himselfe as it were members of his bodie What is therefore the naturall and proper sense of the words of the Lords Supper This that is bread which being broken Christ did reach with his hands to his disciples is not substantially or essentially or naturally in it self but mystically or by a SacrameÌ„tal promise not by a simple bare signification but also although spirituall yet a reall signification that is true and not imaginarie but hee himselfe because nothing is so truely done as that which hee doth by exhibition of the holy Ghost vnder coÌ„dition of faith that he himselfe My bodie or as Paul doth vnfold it 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread is the CoÌ„munion of the body of Christ that is the seale effectual token or instrument or meanes of the communion of the bodie of Christ Which interpretation Augustine doth confirme The Lord doubted not to say This is my bodie when he gaue the signe of his bodie And Tertullian Against Adimantus c 12 Against Marcion b. 4 hauing taken the bread and distributed it to the Disciples he made it his bodie by saying This is my bodie that is a figure of my bodie Neither doe wee otherwise interpret that enuntiation This or this cup is my bloud that this may bee the sense of the words of Christ As often as yee which are my Disciples and beleeue in mee doe eate this bread and drinke of this cuppe let it be vnto you a sure remembrance and testimonie that you are truely but yet
which is life it selfe and the fountaine of life cannot bee the bread of life to vs c Ioh. 14 Neither can the humanitie be separated from the word neither can the humanitie subsist without the Diuinite and his benefits without the whole person and therefore the one without the other are neither giuen nor receiued VVhether in the Supper of the Lord for the thing it selfe of the Sacrament doe wee partake of his merits alone or the liuely operation gifts or benefits of Christ without Christ himself that is without participation of the body and bloud of Christ or doe we partake of Christ himselfe with his benefits Truely Christ himselfe with al his benefits both those which are giuen to vs by imputation alone and also those which are giuen by reall efficacie 1. Because Christ himselfe one and the same God and man is that liuing bread from whom life eternall doth flowe to vs d Ioh. 6.51 and is eaten of them which are endued with true faith 2. Because bread and wine are holy signes not onely of the death and benefits but of the bodie and bloud of Christ 3. Because Paule doth plainly affirme it e 1 Cor. 10.16 we ought to haue a coÌ„munion with the body it self bloud it selfe of Christ that we may be partakers of his benefits For those benefits that liuely vertue or operation which sustaineth our soules vnto life eternall cannot be seuered from the bodie and bloud of Christ and moreouer not from Christ himself to whom it cleaueth a Ioh. 5.11 no more then the effect from the cause conteining it or the qualitie from the subiect in which it is properly inherent and from which it issueth because as Cyrill saith The spirit in Christ is ioyned chiefly with the flesh of Christ and the flesh also with the spirit so that wee can neither take his flesh without the operation nor the operation without the flesh neither in the plaine worde or in the Sacraments 4. Because he which imbraceth the promises of the Gospell by faith is made partaker of Christ b Heb 3.14 5. Because the verie words of Christ doe most clearely witnesse it Take eate this is my bodie Therefore it is needfull that the bodie of Christ should bee receiued and eaten of the faithfull 6. Because the true communion with Christ himselfe God and man is established in baptisme Therefore wee must determine that the same thing is done in the Supper 7. Because the Analogie of receiuing eating of bread wine should be lost vnlesse we should spiritually receiue Christ himselfe but that we may receiue the strength of nourishing which is in the bread it is needfull that we should receiue the bread it selfe 8. Because like as we dye in Adam because we are ioyned together with him by a naturall participation so we do liue in a spirituall life in Christ and we drawe it from Christ by reason of the spirituall participation with Christ c 1 Cor. 15.22 9 Because the Scripture euery where teacheth that the Church is one bodie of one head but truely it cannot be imagined that life doth come from the head to the bodie without the ioyning together of them both 10. Because they which stick to the accidents alone and leaue the substance are in no Science to bee suffered But the death of Christ and his benefits are reckoned among the accidents Therfore it is an intollerable thing to propound the benefits of Christ alone and not Christ himselfe But this we adde like as in the plaine worde the word preached shewing Christ to vs by voice is perceiued by the sense of the eares but Christ himselfe signified by the word preached is not receiued but by the vnderstanding beleeuing and in baptisme the bodie is dipped in the water but the minde of the beleeuer is washed with the bloud signified by the water So in the Supper the bodie is fed with that bread and that wine but the soule of the beleeuer is made fat with the flesh and bloud of the Lord as Tertullian speaketh Manduâ—atio Corporissed non manducatio corporalis Therefore there is an eating of the bodie but not a bodily eating but of faith or spirituall like as the coniunction is spirituall mysticall and supernaturall for as much as it is made by the apprehension of faith by the efficacie of the holy Ghost and also in like manner the presence of the bodie of Christ is spirituall For if our sight in a moment of time be ioyned with the bodie of the sun much more is faith conioyned with Christ himselfe and moreouer with his bodie placed in heauen Can this proposition be endured The bodie of Christ is exhibited with the bread If you do referre the word with to the time wherein the faithfull doe vse the Supper that the sense may bee When a faithfull man vsing the Supper doth eate the bread of the Lord and drinketh the wine of the Lord he is made partaker not only of earthly gifts but also of heauenly that is to say of the bodie of Christ and of the bloud of the same then truely wee doe in no manner of wise mislike that proposition But if any doe referre it being taken together with the other two particles In and sub that is in and vnder to the place that is to ordaine a presence of the inuisible bodie of Christ In cum sub pane that is in with vnder the bread wee doe worthily reiect this consubstantiation inexistence and indistance seing that this is neither expressed in the words of Christ nor can rightly bee drawne out from them Of how many sorts is this vnion or coniunction in the vse of the Lords Supper Twofold one of the bodie and bloud of Christ with the bread and wine which is called Sacramentall and belongeth to the forme of the Sacrament Another is the coniunction of the same bodie and bloud of Christ with the beleeuers which although spirituall is called the mysticall reall and substantiall communion or communication and fruition of the bodie and bloud of Christ which is exhibited vnder the holy symboles of the Supper Calu. Inst b 4. c. 17 sect 19 33 and belongeth to the end of the Sacrament Notwithstanding a mixture or transfusion of the flesh of Christ is not to be imagined in our soule because it sufficeth that Christ doth breath life into our soules from the substance of his flesh yea rather doth powre into vs his owne life although the flesh it selfe of Christ doth not enter into vs. Of what qualitie is the coniunction of the signes and of the thing signified in the supper of the Lord Not consubstantiall or naturall which may make a presence of the thing signified at the place of the signe 1. Because the words of the institution do by no meanes beare it 2. It is manifest that Christ sate placed with the Disciples at the table really and corporally 3. Neither are Sacraments
the persons as Ioh. 4.24 God is a spirit where God is taken for the whole essence of the Deitie as is also the name Iehouah Or else 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 personally when there is ioyned vnto the name of God the name of the person as God the Father God the Sonne God the holy Ghost Or when the Father is opposed to the Sonne who is very God and the second Person in the Trinitie as Rom. 7.25 I thanke God by Iesus Christ So Rom. 8.3 the Father is called God the word Father being vsed personally because the Person sending is opposed to the Person sen◠Improperly when it is attributed to Angels or men and truly either in regard of their office e Exod. 22.28 Psal 82.6 or else in respect of the reuealing of the wil of God and of their reuerence f Exod. 7.2 falsly either by error or else by vsurpation and custome as 1. Cor. 8.5 or else by worshipping them 2. Cor. 4.4 Phil. 3.19 Be there any parts or kinds of God None at all because he is a most simple essence which doth admit no composition or diuision and simply and in euery respect of vnitie one and in act most infinite Are there any causes of God Not any for he is the cause of all causes Is there any accident in God No in regard of God himselfe for whatsoeuer is in God is his essence Seeing the essence of God is most simple in what respect do power goodnesse iustice wisedome mercie differ in God Not in essence for all these attributes in essence are but one very thing indeed but in our weake capacitie and manner of knowing in regard of vs and by the effects in respect of the creatures How many sorts are there of Gods attributes Two the first whereof is incommunicable so that there appeareth not the least impression therof in any of his creatures This kind we may call Absolute such is his simplicitie and which depend vpon it his immutabilitie eternitie and immensitie The second sort is some way communicable which you may call fitly a relatiue propertie in that it hath relation to the creatures such are his power wisedome will goodnesse iustice and mercie Be there any effects of God There be infinite effects of his grace iustice power and mercie How are the Gentiles said to be without God Ephes 2.12 seeing they adored so many gods Because none of their gods was the true God But yet they acknowledged God the Creator of heauen and earth I answer out of Hilarie in his third booke of the Trinitie Not the name of God but euen God himselfe was altogether vnknowne vnto them because no man knoweth God but such as confesse the Father and the Sonne But do you not by this make both Iewes and Turks Atheists There are many kinds of Atheists First such as acknowledge no diuinitie secondly such as worship fained gods in stead of the true God thirdly such as do indeed acknowledge the true God yet not as he is but as they fancie him to be Such are the present Iewes and Turkes who denie both the Father and the Sonne as also all Antitrinitarian Hereticks who denie the Trinitie of Persons in one essence and they also who say the Sonne is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of the same essence with the Father And surely they who challenge to themselues the name of the Catholike Church may be ranked in this order who professing in name one onely God the Father the Sonne and holy Ghost and Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God and man yet set downe such grounds which being granted the true God is transformed into such an Idoll as neuer was is or shall be found and withal the humanitie of Christ must needs vanish into a ghost What vse make you of the knowledge of God Surely this that he alone may be rightly worshipped to which purpose man was created and that we being guided by this knowledge may pray for to him and acknowledge that from him we haue euery good thing What things are repugnant to the doctrine concerning God Atheisme Epicurisme the mad worshipping of Idols the Gentiles making of many gods the heresie of Maniche making two beginnings one good another euill blasphemies against God false opinions concerning God as that of the Anthropomorphites who make God like vnto a man all doubting of God c. Of the Trinitie How many Persons be there in that one Essence of God THree and those both in number and in very deed distinguished the Father Sonne and the holy Ghost which haue their subsisting in one diuine essence whereupon it comes to passe that there be not many Gods but one God and the same eternall infinit and omnipotent who is named Iehouah in the Scriptures and is said to be most simple by reason of essence and three by reason of Persons By what testimonies of Scripture do you proue the Trinitie Genes 1.1 God or Elohim created the heauen and the earth In which place the verbe being of the singular number doth signifie the most simple essence of God and the substantiue Elohim being the plurall number doth note out the three Persons Also in the creation of man God as it were taking counsell with his eternall wisdome that is the Sonne and the holy Ghost saith thus vers 26. Let vs make man after our image Where he saith Let vs make because of the number of the persons and after our image because of the vnitie of the essence Gen. 19.24 The Lord rained from the Lord brimstone and fire vpon Sodome and Gomorrha in which place the person sending the raine and the person from whome it was sent that is the Sonne is distinguished from the Father Haue you any more pregnant proofes out of the new Testament 1. In the baptisme of Christ Math. 3.16 and Ioh. 1.32 the voice of the Father is heard from heauen This is my beloued Sonne in the same place there stands the Sonne by the riuer Iordan the holy Ghost descends in the forme of a Doue and sits on Christ 2. Againe in the transfiguration there is the Sonne and the voice of God the Father is heard from heauen Mat. 17.5 and Christ is shadowed with a cloud which doth signifie the holy Ghost And further Mat. 28.19 Baptize all nations in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost he saith not in names but in the name to shew the vnitie of the three Persons 1. Ioh. 5.7 Gal. 4.6 2. Cor. 13.13 The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ and the loue of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all Seeing the Scripture doth not vse the name of the Trinitie doth the Church well to reteine the same Yea no doubt for the thing it selfe is found in the Scriptures two manner of wayes 1. According to the letter 2. According to the sense Now sith that the sense of it and the very thing it selfe is found in
the Scriptures the Church hath libertie to vse such words as may familiarly expresse the thing it selfe Moreouer we call the three Persons in God the Trinitie not because the Scripture cals them so but because the Scripture saith nothing against it Yet this word three whereof this word Trinitie is deriued is expresly set downe 1. Ioh. 5.7 There be three that beare witnes c. Whence we argue that as from one comes Vnitie so from three comes Trinitie How doth this word Essence differ from this word Person in God Essence is the nature which is not more belonging to one and lesse to another of the three Persons but common to them all yea one and the same and cannot be diuided and is all in each one of them not without them subsisting by it selfe to wit the very Deitie it selfe And therefore the essentiall properties which be in them are one in number and of one nature Now a Person is the subsisting in the diuine nature or the nature of God which hauing relation to others is distinguished by some incommunicable proprietie for indeed the Persons are onely distinguished and not seuered as three men are indeed sundred though they be but one in kind The reason is because the essence of God is infinite and impartible and therefore it is all in euery Person which are not seuered each from other but only distinguished amongst themselues But as for the essence of Angels and men it is finite and partible so that it is not all in euery singular person but part in one and part in another How manifold is the difference of Persons Twofold inward and outward The inward difference is that which is caused by the internall proprieties or the workes from within concerning which we say Opera Trinitatis ad intra sunt diuisa The workes of the Trinitie from within are diuided that is the workes which God doth within himself without any creature are not common to the three Persons but are proper to one person alone Now the proprietie of the Father is this that from eternity he was not made nor begotten but hath begotten his eternall Sonne of the same substance with himselfe a Psal 2.7 Heb. 1.3.5 Pro. 88.24 The proprietie of the Son is this that he being neither made nor created but was from all eternitie begotten of his Father without any mother b Heb. 7.3 Col. 1.15 who is of himselfe as he is God but of his Father as he is the Sonne For as light commeth from the Sunne euen so the Sonne proceedeth from the Father one distinct from the Father and therfore the second in order so farrefoorth as he is begotten c Psal 110.3 Mich. 5.2 one and the selfe same with the Father as he is God And here let vs cal to mind the saying of Nazianzene The begetting of God let it be honoured with silence it is no smal matter for thee to learne that he was begotten The proprietie of the holy Ghost is this that he was neither made nor begotten but from all eternitie proceedeth from them both inseparably d Ioh. 14.26 15.26 16.13.14 Ro. 8.9 But did the Sonne take his Deitie from the Father When we speake simply of the Sonne without the Father we auouch truly and properly that he is of himselfe and call him God because of himselfe he hath his being and all that he hath and therfore we call him one alone beginning But when we point at that relation which he hath with his Father we iustly make the Father the beginning of the Sonne and say that the Son receiued all from the Father Ioh. 3.33 For the Essence is one thing and the * Modus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 manner of subsisting another Hence it is that the schoolemen say that the Son is by himselfe not of himselfe So the essence of the Sonne is without beginning but the Father is the beginning of his Person This made Hilarie to say The gifts of the Father do not infirme but affirme the Diuinitie of the Sonne And Augustine Christ in regard of himselfe is called God and of the Father is called the Sonne Ob. The Son and holy Ghost are not without beginning therefore they are not eternall Answ This is not a beginning of time or continuance but only of order and ofspring but the Sabellians here cauill viz. Christ saith He that seeth me seeth the Father and beleeuest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in me Ioh. 14.9.10 therefore the Father and the Sonne are one person Ans Indeed he that seeth the Sonne seeth the Father because the Sonne hath the same essence with the Father and being manifested in the flesh hath deliuered to vs the whole will of God Ioh. 1.18 Ob. 2. That which is one in number cannot without contradiction be said to be thâ—ee in persons but God is one in number Deut. 6.4 ergo Ans That vnitie doth signifie Gods simple essence not the maner by which that simple essence subsisteth Therefore God absolutely according to his essence is one because he is indiuisible and onely in respect of inward relation I meane the reason of subsisting is three Ob. 3. If there be one being of the Father another of the Son and another of the holy Ghost it followeth that in God there are three diuers beings and consequently three diuers persons Ans The being of the Father doth not signifie that essence by which he is absolutely God but by which he is Father that is in that he otherwise subsisteth then doth the Sonne therefore the being of the Father is one thing and the being of the Son is another and yet both of them haue the same essence Ob. 4. If there be three Persons truly distinguished and one only essence then is there a quaternitie in God Ans Not so for the essence differeth from Person onely in reason but the Persons differ each from other both in reason and in being Ob. 5. The Father begot his Sonne either existing or not existing to say either of these is absurd Ans We may well say that the Father begat his Sonne alreadie existing because the Father was neuer without the Sonne euen as the sunne was neuer without his light Againe it may be as well said that he begat him not existing in that his generation although it be eternall yet in order goeth before existence as the sunne is before his light Is this difference rationall essentiall or reall It is not essentiall as in the creatures where euery one hath his proper essence or being defined and circumscribed for the essence of the Father is not one and the essence of the sonne another and of the holy Ghost another but one and the same which the Father doth wholly communicate to the Sonne the Father and the Sonne to the holy Ghost Not onely in reason because not in notion or mind or onely in word is he called Father Sonne and holy Ghost neither
couplings contrarie vnto them in euery prohibition filthinesse and abhomination before God And certainly that generall proposition in the sixth verse Let no man go vnto her that is neare of kindred a Leuit. 18.6 agreeth with the lawe of nature And Christians are bound by the iudgement of Paule vnto the obseruation of the Leuiticall lawe touching degrees 2. Cor. 5.1 How then is that to be vnderstood Deuteronom 25.5 where the wife of the brother dying without issue is to be marâ—ied vnto the other brother and that example of Iudah who gaue his first sonnes wife after his death vnto his second sonne and after he was dead promised her to his third sonne also Gen. 38.8 whereas the Lord in Leuit. expressely forbiddeth the brother to marrie his brothers wife b Leuit. 18.9.16.18 I answer that the law Leuit. 18.9 is simply common vnto all nations as the lawe is of not stealing But that law Deuteronom 25.5 is either not to be vnderstood of a naturall brother but of the next of consanguinitie in another degree for they are all called brethren amongst the Hebrewes or else that it was a peculiar priuiledge granted after a sort vnto the Israelites that the familie should be conserued in the name of the first born and that the first birth of Christ which should neuer die should be signified Aug. quaest 61. in Leuit. What then shall we thinke of Abraham who married his brother Arans daughter c Gen. 11.29 of Iacob who married two sisters both aliue together d 29.16 and of Moses who was borne of a mariage betweene the nephew and the aunt e Exod. 2.1 6.20 as the Hebrew word is taken Numb 26.59 Either that those mariages were made both while there were but a few of the holy seede and also in the publike confusion God dispensing with and tolerating it or that those Patriarchs sinned and are not to be excused in all things and we are not to iudge by examples but by lawes But may a faithfull man marrie an vnbeleeuing woman No except the vnbeleeuing person promise consent to the true religion And thus Moses married a wife of Aethiopia and Iacob Labans daughter For God forbad his people to ioyne in matrimonie with the other nations f Deut. 7.3.4 And although that precept be iudicial yet it appertaineth vnto all if the reason be considered for he giueth a plaine moral reason which is at this day in force For she will seduce thy son that he shall not follow me but rather serue strange Gods the same is repeated in the Kings g 1. Reg. 11.1 2.4 also coÌ„firmed by Salom. example And besides the vnequall matches of the sons of God with Caines posteritie k Gen. 6.2 brought a pernitious corruption into all the world But the commandement of Paul is expresse Be not vnequally yoaked with infidels l 2 Cor. 6.14 and againe Let them marrie in the Lord m Cor. 7.39 that is religiously and in the feare of God What are the constitutions of Princes concerning this That a guardian shall not marrie his ward an adopting father his adopted daughter or an adopting mother her adopted sonne As also that brethren and sisters children shall not marrie Yet must the Magistrate abolish that law which teacheth that witnesses at the font may not marrie nor that he may marry her for whom he witnesseth at baptisme Do these lawes bind Christians They do so farre foorth as they agree with Gods word For each one must obey his gouernor when he can do it without breach of pietie and the libertie of conscience that is if it be not a sinne to conscience if it be done otherwise so as mariages contracted against these constitutions be not disanulled How is the coupling in mariage called in the Scriptures 1. Coniugium wedlocke of that common yoake wherewith the man and wife are ioyned into one flesh and as it were into one man 2. Matrimonium mariage of the end for a woman is married vnto a man to this end that she may be a mother of children and mariage is as it were Matriage of a mother 3. Connubium couering and in the plurall number nuptiae à nubendo that is of couering for as the heauen is sometimes couered ouer with clouds so were virgins in old time couered n 1. Co. 11.5.10 with a veile when they were brought vnto their husbands and that both to testifie their bashfulnesse and modestie and also their subiection and obedience or anothers power ouer them As the example of Rebecca testifieth who when she saw her husband Isaac she couered her selfe with a veile o Gen. 24.64 Like vnto which is that spreading abroad of the garment in Ruth 3.9 and Isa 4.1 What is against this 1. Mariages euery where graÌ„ted by that impure Antichrist between Vnkles and sisters daughters against all law both of God and man 2. The imagination of the Papists who say that indeed by the law of nature it is forbidden the father to marry the daughter or the mother the son but the forbidding of all other persons in Leuit. is a meere positiue law concerneth the Israelites only That Christians are not tied to those laws therfore the Pope may dispense 3 The Iewes error that those persons whosoeuer are not expressed in Leuiticus are also not forbidden to marie for then it would follow that the nephew might marie the grandmother because it is not forbidden by name wheras nature sheweth it to be wicked VVhat is Mariage An inseparable coniunction excepting the causes expressed in the written word of God of one man and one woman a Mat 19.9 Rom. 7.2 1. Cor. 7.27 being fit of yeares lawfully consenting into one flesh instituted by God for mutual help as wel in diuine as humane things for procreation if God will giue them of children and bringing them vp in the feare of God for God his Church and common wealth How manifold is mariage Twofold begun or promised consuÌ„mated ratified perfected VVhat is betrothing or contracting It is mention and promise of a future mariage called Sponsalia sponsals a spondendo of promising for that they were wont in old time to assure their daughters vnto them to whom they had promised to marie them to couenant that they in like sort should marie them and hence proceeded the names of Sponsus Sponsa the man-spouse and the woman-spouse How many kindes of Sponsals or contracts are there Two one conceiued by words de futuro for to come as they speake in schooles either plainely as I will take the to be my wife as if I should say I promise that I will sell thee my house for there is difference betweene promising and doing Or else vpon condition as If my parents consent if I may haue her dowrie Likewise if the contracters be vnder age or one of them in sense of the Law such contracts are de futuro
The other is by words de praesenti for the present as I do betroth thee to be my wife which present and actual promise is called simple absolute consent although the mariage be not yet celebrated Thus she is accounted betrothed named a wife VVho so defileth anothers mans betrothed wife or spouse let him be stoned to death for he hath huÌ„bled his neighbours wife b Deut. 22.23 And Iacob speaking of Rachel who was only betrothed vnto him Giue me my wife c Gen. 29.21 The Angel saith vnto Ioseph Fear not to take Mary thy wife d Mat. 1.20 when she was but betrothed vnto him but she that was betrothed was now by determination accounted a wife vnlesse some thing fell out which might frustrate the contract Is the bond alike in both contracts No for in the contracts de futuro indeed touching the promise and to free the faith plighted they may be admonished but they can not be coÌ„pelled especially if they bring probable reasons why they wil change But the coÌ„tracts de praesenti induce an effectual obligation which ought not to be dissolued by mutuall conseÌ„t for it is a truly ratified mariage e Math. 19.6 although not wholy consuÌ„mated without adding the duties of mariage Also contracts de futuro if they be confirmed with copulation following ought to be ratified VVhy are contracts instituted and why is there a certaine time obserued betweene it and the celebration of mariage There are diuers causes first that the bridegroome and bride may first consent in minde before they coÌ„ioyne in body or as Austine saith lest the husband easily obtaining make light account of that which he longed for being deferred SecoÌ„dly that in the mean time the coÌ„tracts may be published in the Church to the end that if any iust cause ly hid for which the mariage beguÌ„ may not be coÌ„summated it may be manifested in due time Thirdly naturall honestie that meÌ„ might not presently after the contract be caried violently like beasts with the sway of their sensuall desires Which three causes appeare in the contract of Ioseph and Marie a Mat. 1.18 Deut. 21.12 Which is the other degree of mariage The consummation which is done by consecrating or blessing and by celebration of the mariage What is consecration of mariage It is a holy actioÌ„ wherein the bride groome bride being brought into the church before the congregation are taught by the minister touching the institutioÌ„ ends of mariage there expresly witnes their conseÌ„t either by signes if they be duÌ„b or deaf or by words if they can speake For the Canons say that mariage is of no force except consent be declared by words so iâ— their mariage publikly confirmed and they themselues consecrated vnto God by prayer From whence is this custome taken From the example of God himselfe who as soone as he had giueÌ„ Adam a wise blessed them like a Minister in these words Increase and multiplyb Also from a general rule which commandeth That all things be done in the Church decently and in good order c 1. Cor. 14 40. Further it maketh for the dignitie of mariage and freeth the new maried of all ill suspition least they should be thought to liue together like harlots Lastly it cannot but be approued by God who will both be called vpon and is alwayes at hand to them that call vpon his name What is the celebration of mariage All the other whole politicke action by which the couenants of mariage are confirmed and the bride is honestly and modestly brought into the bridegromes house Ought a Christian to obserue this festiuitie and celebration Yea and that according to the custome of the country where he dwelleth and that rule which Paul commandeth Whatsoeuer things are true honest iust holy of good report c. do them d Philip. 4.8.9 Thinke you the mariage feast lawfull Yea it is vsed almost amongst all nations and also confirmed by many examples of Scripture as we reade that Laban made a great feast at the mariage of Iacob and Rachel e Gen. 29.22 and Christ both with his presence and present of 6. galons of excellent good wine confirmed this custom f Ioh. 2.1.2.7.8 But yet in such bankets we must remember that which is recorded concerning Tobias his mariage that they feasted in the feare of the Lord g Tob. 7.17 8.20 As also that at King Ashuerus his great and solemne feast such modestie and honestâ—e was obserued as that no man was compelled to drink more then himself pleased h Hest 1.8 Wherfore mariages celebrated with riot pride gluttonie drunkennes vnchast playes al kind of wantonnes are solemnized to the diuel and not vnto God these are not the least cause of euils which make mariage troblesome vnpleasant vnto many withall rob many parents of their children What is the forme of mariage A iust coniunction of one man and of one woman into one flesh for they which were two before mariage are after marrying made one flesh that is one man by the coniunction and vnion both of soule and bodie What positions do you gather out of this formall cause of mariage First that the bond of mariage is most straight far exceeding that which is betweene the parents and the children as God saith a man shall leaue his father and his mother and shall cleaue vnto his wife i Gen. 2.24 2. That it is not only most strait but indissoluble because that two are made one flesh therefore Christ saith Whom God hath ioyned together let no man separate a Math. 19.6 Thirdly that it is mutuall and reciprocall in one ouer anothers bodie for the Apostle gathereth hereout in that they are one flesh that neither of both hath power ouer their owne bodie b 1. Corin. 4.7 Fourthly an argument of mutuall loue betweene them The husband must loue his wife as his own flesh and as Christ loueth hâ—s Church c Ephes 5.28 Fiftly that there ought to be a communion of all things both spirituall and corporall betweene maried couples What and how many are the ends of mariage Three if thou respect the persons themselues first that they mutually helpe one another both in heauenly and humane things This God expressed Let vs make Adam a helper like vnto himselfe d Genes 2.20 that humane societie may be familiar and friendly yet so as that the husband may appeare to be the wiues head e 1. Corin. 11.3 The second is procreation of children which may succeed their parents both in name and goods which end the Lord hath likewise expressed Increase and multiply f Gen. 1.28 Thirdly that it may be a remedie against all wandring lusts as Paul noteth For auoiding fornication let euery one haue his owne wife and euery woman her owne husband g 1. Cor. 7.2.3 But if you respect either the church or common wealth