473. mentioneth many good things that that Committee were preparing but being obstructed by A. B. Laud though then in the Tower and some other Bishops the Commons laid the ax to the root of all evil as * Tindal of the Obedienâ—â— of Christian Magist p. 114. Tindal of old called the Bishops looking upon them as the â—inderers of all good as Martin * Martin Bucer de regnâ— Christ l. 2. c. 1. Bucer told King Edward the Sixth and so instead of mending things they grew worse Heylin confesseth nay braggeth that Books against Arminianism which he saith is * Cypr. Anglic. Introduct p. 36. agreeable to the Council of Trent cap. de fructu Justificationis Can. 3 4 were suppressed Sure I am that Dr. Prideaux his Sermons which he had preached at Court were not permitted to be reprinted at Oxford because he would not yield to the obliterating of some passages in them against Arminianism yet several passages which he as Doctor of the Chair rased out of Mr. Chillingworth ' s Book were inserted and printed after the good old Doctor had put his hand to the license for its printing which Book is now highly commended though the Doctor openly disowned it in the Chair saying That he had been abused in that Book Mr. Cheynell being opponent upon this Socinian question An ratio sit fundamentum fidei But what are these things to the purpose now I answer 1. The Author of the Friendly Debate often printed and its continuation hath raked up things against some Nonconformists which were of longer standing 2. If some Clergy-men of these times preach or print or act as they did in those days it is directly to the purpose Let any judicious indifferent man read the Book intituled The causes of the decay of Piety and he will find much of the Soveraign drug planted here as the Jesuit said in A. B. Laud ' s time to purge the Protestants of their Heresie as they call our true Religion Let him read Mr. Fowler ' s two Books viz. his Free Discourse and his Design of Christianity and he will see whatsoever he pretends to the contrary that his endeavour if not prime design is to promote that most Antichristian Doctrine of the Papists viz. Justification of our persons before God by our own good works or inherent holiness and overthrow the true Doctrine of Faith of the Church of England to which 't is believed he hath subscribed denying the * Free Discourse p. 126 128 129 130 145. Imputation of Christs Righteousness in the sound sense of the Church of England sometimes calling it a false yea a grosly false notion thereof and sometimes a * Ibi. p. 141. sottish and mischievous Doctrine abusing those that hold it by branding them with the ignominious name of * Ibi. pag. 141 143. and Design of Christianity c. 19. p. 223. Antinomians affirming That our persons are justified before God by our own inherent holiness and good works and that faith * Free Discourse 159. Design of Christianity c. 19. p. 221. as it includes sincere obedience justifieth our persons before God and to this end using and improving Bellarmine ' s arguments to the utmost And lest any should charge him with the Doctrine of the Church of England which he cannot but know is contrary to his Doctrine he endeavours to prevent it saying That those Divines of his opinion do heartily subscribe to the 39 Articles of our Church taking * Free Discourse Edit 2. p. 2. p. 191. that liberty in the interpretation of them that is allowed * But where doth the Church allow this liberty what do you mean by the Church it's contrary to the end of the Law of 13. of Elizabeth and of the fifth Canon by the Church her self though it is most reasonable to presume that she requireth subscription to them as to an instrument of peace only And again p. 2. p. 305. he saith further thus What was said of General Councils we also most heartily acknowledg concerning our own particular Church viz. that we are bound by no means to oppose the determinations of the Governours and Representatives in disputable matters nor do they as hath been shewed require our internal assent to their Articles but enjoin our submission to them as to an instrument of peace only Lo here you may see what these Latitudinarians are â—a name which some I know not who have given them but whether they deserve it let others judg but such is the latitude of these men that they would have liberty for themselves to preach and print what Doctrine they please but would have none allowed to dissenters in points of Church-government and Ceremonies as may be evidently seen in his Free Discourse by which we may see what Broth and Beef his palate relisheth best But what is there no internal assent required to the Doctrine of faith of the Church of England and yet an unfeigned assent and consent to the use of the Liturgy and the Ceremonies and Rites thereof Are these more essential to the being of the Church of England than those Are the Ceremonies Rites and Liturgy more surely and certainly and indisputably grounded upon the Canonical Scriptures than the doctrine of Faith which concerns the Trinity justification of a sinner Christs satisfaction c. Have not all our 39 Articles been disputed nay do not some amongst us question whether there be a God and whether the Canonical Scriptures of the Old and New Testament be the Word of God and of divine authority and have not the Ceremonies of the Church of Rome which our Rulers have retained been from the first beginning of the Reformation here disputed and opposed by godly and learned Bishop Hooper and Mr. John Rogers and denied and detested even to the death by many godly Martyrs Do not all the Calvinistical Churches abroad join with the Church of England in maintaining the Articles of Religion which concern the confession of the true Christian Faith and the Sacraments and yet reject the Liturgy Ceremonies and Church-government of the Church of England â—nd if only indisputable matters may not be opposed and all disputable ones may be opposed I pray what Article of our Creed and Religion may not be opposed by these men of the long name It is â—â—ear that though these men heartily subscribe to the 20 the 34 and the 36 Articles Whatsoever is not read in the holy Scripture nor may be proved thereby is not to be required of any man that it should be believed as an article of Faith Art 6 Church of England which are not Articles of Religion of the true Christian Faith because not contained in or proveable by the Word of God in their sense yet they give not an unfeigned assent and consent to the Articles of Religion concerning the Doctrine of Faith and the Sacraments for they take liberty they say 't is allowed them by the Church to interpret them as
justified So Gal. 2. 21 For righteousness come by the Law then christ is dead vain Dr. Fearley gives this Note Although the * Notes in loc be many uses and benefits of Christs death besidâ— our justification yet the Apostles argument is very strong that the would have been no necessity for 〈◊〉 Salvation that Christ should have diâ—â— Luther upon the place saith That to seek to be justified by the works of the Law is to reject the Grace of God which he saith is blasphemy more horrible than can be expressed it is to deny Christ to spit in his face to tread him under foot We despise Grace when we observe the Law that we may be justified through it We constantly affirm that either Christ died in vain or else the Law justifieth not but Christ died not it vain Ergo the Law justifieth not and by his blood expiated our sins 〈◊〉 men might have been justified by 〈◊〉 works of the Law either Ceremonial 〈◊〉 Moral Rom. 3. 28 Therefore we coâ—clude that a man is justified by faith with out the deeds of the Law And v. 3â— seeing it is one God which shall justifâ— the circumcision by faith and the uncâ—â—cumcision through faith That is Jeâ— called the Circumcision and Gentilâ— called the Uncircumcision are justifie by one God by and through Faith 〈◊〉 Jesus Christ Read further Rom. 4. 2. 〈◊〉 4 5 10 11. but Rom. 3. 20. which I haâ— almost forgotten is very considerablâ— as to this point Therefore by the deâ—d of the Law there shall no flesh be justifie in his sight for by the Law is the know ledg of sin Where observe 1. That he speaks of a Justification of mens persons before God in his sight and not of saith and before men as Saiâ— James Chap. 2. 17 18 20 21 22 24 26. is to be understood 2. He saith That a man is not justified by the works of the Law 〈◊〉 which is the knowledg of sin which is the Moral Law for by thâ— Moral Law all men are convinced of sin and that there is sin in their best works even in those that proceed from Faith Papists and their followers amongst us say that mens persons are not justified in the sight of God by doing the works of the Ceremonial Law but they say they are * Mr. Fowler 's free Discourse p. 186. justified by the works of the Moral Law which proceed from faith which is directly contrary to the Doctrine delivered by St. Paul which is That by the deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight For by the Law is the knowledg of sin by the Moral not by the Ceremonial Law is the knowledg of sin And so the word Law is taken in Rom. 2. 12 13 14 15 18 21 22 25 26. as not only Protestants but also Papists themselves expound Dr. Feaâ—ley Dr. Willet Mr. Calvin Pareus and Cornelius a Lapide in Loc. the word And that mens persons are not justified by their own good works of the Moral Law which spring from Faith as Papists affirm Mr. Fowler 's free Discourse pag. 187. they are I prove thus 1. If any meer man since the Fall was ever justified by the works of the Moral Law which proceeded from Faith then certainly Abraham the Father of the Faithful was so justified but Abraham was not so justified therefore no meer mans person since the Fall was so justified The sequel of the Major is evident 1. Because Abraham's Personal works which proceeded from his Faith were as good as any meer mans works For by faith Abraham left his own Country and went when he was called of God into a strange Country which he should after receive in his posterity and be went out not knowing whither he went and there sojourned Heb 11. 9. And by faith Abraham when he was tried offered up Isaac and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten Son of whom it was said that in Isaac shall thy seed be called Hebr. 11. 17 18. 2. Because he being the Father of the Faithful there is the same reason and way of all faithful mens Justification that was of his as the Apostle shews Rom. 4. 12 13 24 25. Now the Minor viz. That Abraham was not justified before God by his own personal good works which proceeded from his faith I prove by the Apostles own arguments 1. If Abraham was justified before God by his own personal good works which proceeded from his Faith then he had some matter to glory or boast of before God but Abraham had no matter to glory or boast of before God therefore he was not justified before God by his own Personal good works which proceeded from his faith Both the Promises are in Rom. 4. 2. for if Abraham were justified by works of his own he had whereof to glory there is the Major but not before God there is the Minor That is he had no matter to glory of before God Rom. 3. 27. in the point of his Justification he brought nothing of his own to justifie his person before God for God wrough his Faith and his works in him True he might have somewhat 〈◊〉 glory or boast of before men but not before God for the reasoâ— alledged and also because what he had was imperfect and due 2. To him that is justified before God by his works there is a reward due of debt not of grace but to Abraham there was a rewarâ— due not of debt but of grace therefore he was not justified beforâ— God by his works The Major is in Rom. 4. 4 Now to him that worketh is the reward reckoned not of grace but of debt The Minor 〈◊〉 proved thus 1. Because he was justified by faith Rom. 4. 3. For what saith thâ— Scripture Abraham believed and it was counted to him for righteousnesâ— Gen. 15. 6. 2. Because he was not justified by his works Rom. 4. 5. For to hâ—â— that worketh not that is seeketh not righteousness or justification 〈◊〉 his works but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly his faith 〈◊〉 counted for righteousness 3. Abraham believed and was justified before God before he performed those eminent acts of faith mentioned Rom. 4. 18. as may be seen Geâ— Pererius Pareus in Gen. 15. 6. Rom. 4. 3. Dâ—b 2. 12. 3 4 7. Gen. 13. 16 18. Gen. 14. 14 18 19. and which is urged by Papists and yielded by Protestants But the Apostle as Moses before him puts his justification upon that eminent act of faith because then he mosâ— manifested his faith even when he was or had been under a great affliction and not upon any eminent act of Faitâ— before or after this that no man might * Willet in Rom. 4. 3. impute 〈◊〉 justification to his works and then he did more firmâ— believe the promise than he did before and then he had more sense and feeling of it than he had at the first making of
for the merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ * That is applied by faith as the Thirtyfourth Article of the Church of Ireland explains it by faith and not for our own good works That we are justified by faith only is a most wholsome Doctrine As more largely is expressed in the Homily of Justification 2. In her Homilies as Homily for Salvation of Mankind p. 13 14 15 16. No man by his own acts works or deeds seem they never so good can be justified and made righteous before God but every man is of necessity constrained to seek for another righteousness or justification to be â—â—ceived at Gods own hands that is to say forgiveness of his 〈◊〉 And this justification or righteousness whiâ—â— we so receive of Gods mercy * Vide 34. Article of the Church of Ireland and Christs â—â—rits imbraced by Faith is taken accepted 〈◊〉 allowed by God for our perfect and full justiâ—â—cation On our part we are justified by Faith 〈◊〉 the merits of Christ which is not ours 〈◊〉 by Gods working in us We are justified freely by Faith withoâ—â— the works of the Law Ambrose saith That is the Ordinance of Goâ—â— that they which believe in Christ should be saved without worâ—â— by faith only freely receiving remission of their sins And p. 18 〈◊〉 Faith putteth us from it self and remitteth or appointeth us 〈◊〉 Christ for to have only by him remission of our sins or justificatioâ—â— So that our Faith doth as it were say to us It is not I that take â—â—way your sins but it is Christ only and to him only I send you 〈◊〉 that purpose forsaking therein all your good vertues wordâ—â— thoughts and works and only putting your trust in Christ bâ—cause Faith doth directly send us to Christ for remission of our siâ—â— and that by Faith given us of God we embrace the promise of Goâ— mercy and of the remission of our sins which thing none otheâ— of our vertues or works properly doth therefore the Scriptuâ—â— useth to say That Faith without works doth justifie Faith onlâ— justifieth us is all one with St. Paul Faith without works justifietâ— us And in her Homily of Christs Death and Passion T. 2. p. 186 187 The only mean or instrument of Salvation required of our part iâ— Faith that is a sure trust and confidence in the mercies of God whereby we perswade * This Mr. Fowler calls a strong fancying and thereby labours to scoff us out of our Religion and Faith p. 127 130. of his Free Discourse our selves that Goâ— both hath and will forgive our sins that he hath accepted us again into his favour and that he hath released us from the bonds of damnation and received us into the number of his Elect-people not for our deserts but only and solely for the merits of Christs Death and Passion who became man for our sakes and humbled himself to sustain the reproach of the Cross that we thereby might be saved and made inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven and Faith shall be imputed to us for righteousness as well as it was to Abraham Isaac and Jacob. And Ibid. p. 188. 't is said thus Faith is the only instrument of Salvation now left unto us By which 't is clear that it justifieth not as an act habit or work â—ut only as an instrument apprehending and applying the righteousness of Christ Observe that the word Faith in this Proposition We are â—ustified by faith is to be understood relatively with relation to or coâ—otation of its object and is sense equivalent to this We are justified by Christs merits or righteousness apprehended and applied by faith Here is a Metonimie where the effect of the principal cause Christ is attriâ—uted to the instrumental cause Faith as the Plow is said to enrich the husbandman and eating is said to nourish that is instrumentally it 's the corn that enricheth and the meat that is eaten nourisheth the Plow and eating are but the instruments So 't is said We are saved by hope that is by Christ in whom we do hope so here 't is said that faith justifieth that is Christs righteousness received and applied by Faith to the Believer justifieth him in Gods sight 2. Because 't is contrary to the judgment and declared Doctrine of all those learned and Orthodox Divines and * Vide Latter Confession of Helvetia p. 〈◊〉 King James in his pious Meditations upon certain Verses of Revel 20. saith the Pope is Antichrist and Popery the loosing of Satan which he proves by several marks among the rest this is one Blasphemeth he not in denying us to be saved by the imputation of Christ his righteousness p. 78. And K. James also saith That Christs sealed ones have washed their garments made themselves white in the blood of the Lamb for they by vertue of his deaâ—h are made righteous by imputation whose blood is the only full purgation of us from our sins In his Par. on Rev. c. 7. p. 22. Confessions I named before as may be seen before Yea and 't is contrary to the Doctrine of the Reformed Churches as Mr. Pemble very fully and learnedly manifesteth against Papists and Arminians and Socinians in his Treatise of Justification Sec. 2. c. 1. p. 159. where he sheweth that the sentence of the Reformed Churches concerning the manner how Faith justifieth consisteth in two Branches 1. That a sinner is justified by faith not properly as it is a quality or action which by its own dignity and merit deserves at Gods hands remission of sins or is by Gods favourable acceptance taken for the whole and perfect righteousness of the law which is otherwise required of a sinner but only in relation unto the object of it the righteousness of Christ which it embraceth and resteth upon 2. That a sinner is justified by faith in opposition unto the righteousness works in the fulfilling of the Law whereby no man now can be justified Where interpreting this Proposition a man is justified by faith faith We must understand all things relatively thus a sinner is justified the sight of God from all sin and punishment by faith that is by the obeâ—â—ence of Jesus Christ believed on and imbraced by a true faith And this â—â—terpretation of that Proposition the Reformed Churches do admit and 〈◊〉 other rejecting as erroneous and contrary to the Scriptures such gloâ—â— as ascribe any thing to the * As Dr. Heylin Dr. Hammond Dr. Patrick and Mr. Fowler do as I have declared before dignity faith or make any combination betwâ—â—â— faith and works in the point of our Jusâ—â—fication Amongst which there are thâ—â—â— erroneous assertions touching mans Juâ—â—â—fication by faith which they reject 1. That faith justifieth us per modum causae efficientis meritoâ—â— as a proper efficient and meritorious cause which by its own worth and â—â—nity deserves to obtain Justification remission of sins and the grace well doing this is properly Popish which he refutes
of Gods righteousness which shall be applied to them by Faith So Diodate in Isa 45. 25. 2. Rom 4 6. Blessed is the man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works Now that righteousness is not cannot be inherent properly in our persons for that is not without works it must necessarily therefore be Christs righteousness which is imputed to him that is blessed 3. Rom. 5. 17 18 19 For if by one mans offence i. e. Adams death reigned by one i e. by Adam much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one Jesus Christ therefore as by the offence of one that is Adam judgment came upon all men unto condemnation even so by the righteousness of one that is Christ the second Adam the free gift camt upon all men that is that are elected in Christ unto justification of life This next verse makes it most clear For as by one mans disobedience that is Adams many that is all that were naturally in Adam by ordinary generation were made sinners so by the obedience of one that is of Christ many that is all Gods Elect shall be made righteous Not efficiently and meritoriously only but formally as by Adams disobedience we weâ—â— made sinners not efficiently and meritoriously only but formally for his first sin was imputed to us and made our sin so are believers Christ formally made righteous by the Imputation of Christs righteousness them 4. 1 Cor 1. 30. Christ is made to us of God wisdom and righteousneâ—â— and sanctification and redemption Where the blessed Apostle doth â—â—presly distinguish righteousness from sanctification the righteousness 〈◊〉 Christ imputed to us from inherent righteousness wrought in us 5. To this might be added this That no righteousness but the rigâ—teousness of Christ who is God and man in one Person is now 〈◊〉 to satisfie the justice of God and purchase for us remission of our 〈◊〉 and perfectly fulfill the Law of God for us and therefore St. 〈◊〉 who understood himself very well Phil. 3. 8 9 Counted all thing but dung that he might win Christ and be found in him not having his oâ—â— righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith That is clothed witâ— the righteousness of Christ imputed to him as not only Dr. Featly bâ—â— all our sound Divines that have written upon the place expouâ—â— it 6. Before I leave this point I pâ—â— observe * Tilen Syntag. de Justif p. 724. Wendâ—lin Theol. lib. 1. c. 25. Thes 8. p 491. with Divines That remissâ—â— of sins or absolution from the curse of tâ—â— Law and the imputation of the righteousness of Christ are not two divers or distiâ—â— integranting parts of Justification or two acts in number and really distinct but one and the same act respecting two terms à quo ad queâ— from which and to which As darkness is by one and the same act expelled the air and light introduced into the air so by one and tâ—â— same act of Justification is the sinner absolved from guilt and pronounced just by one and the same act is the sinners sin pardoned and the righteousness of Christ imputed to him Remission of sins and imputation of righteousness are not two divers or distinct parts secuâ—dum essâ— but only secundum dici in nature but name and sound foâ— either of them taken asunder doth express the whole nature of Justification as appears Rom. 4. 6 7. where the Apostle purposely handling this argument doth use to remit sins and to impute righteousnesâ— as things or phrases of equal force or signification David describeâ—â— the blessedness of man unto whom God imputeth righteousness withoâ—â— works saying blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven Psal 32. 1 〈◊〉 To these arguments I might add what Cardinal Contarenus in tractaâ—â—u de Justificatione doth teach to be seen in Dr. Ames his Bellarminus Enervatus T. 4. l 6. c. 1. p. 128. and what Cardinal Cajetan also saith to the same purpose there to be seen but I forbear because I am now to deal with Protestants in profession though Papists indeed in those points about Justification And that you may see I do not wrong them I shall here insert what Mr. Fowler * And I hope I may without offence call them so seeing they hold the very same that Papists do in their tract of Justification seeing he calls us Antinomians for holding the Doctrine of St. Paul saith that he and his party do hold Free Discourse p. 1. p. 125. he saith That those men are angry with those Preachers that is his Latitudinarian party that preach a truly †As if those he writes against did not preach such a moral and real righteousness as well as they and as though Christs righteousness which is imputed to believers were not such moral and real righteousness because they hear no talks from their Pulpits of an imputative righteousness And p. 126 he saith They do not use the phrase so often but they believe the thing in their sense that is so to handle the doctrine of imputed as to shew the necessity of inherent righteousness that is as he explains himself elsewhere to the justification of a sinners person before God which whether it be not downright Jesuitical or if you rather will Socinian-Popery let the judicious and indifferent Reader judg This then is their notion of Christs imputed righteousness that those which are sincerely righteous and from an inward living principle allow themselves in no known sin nor in the neglect of any known duty which is to be Evangelically righteous shall be dealt with and rewarded in and through Christ as if they were perfectly and in a strict legal sense so 'T is certain I acknowledg that those that are justified are sincere but that their sincerity doth antecede or copulatively or concausally concur to the Justification of their persons before God with the righteousness of Christ imputed to them is a grosly false notion of Christs imputed righteousness and amounts to no more than what the Papists teach That Christ hath merited that our works might merit and is directly contrary to the Doctrine of the Church of England as I have shewed before And besides he speaks not out plainly but saith they shall be dealt with and rewarded in and through Christ but how whether as the efficient or meritorious or formal cause he doth not shew The latter he cannot mean because he denies the Justification of a sinners person before God upon the account of the imputed righteousness 〈◊〉 Christ And p. 127. he saith thus I am confident that this which 〈◊〉 immediately before gave is the only true notion of the imputed righteousness of Christ And p. 128. The true notion he saith of those mâ—â— he writes against of the imputed righteousness of Christ is this that Christs righteousness * Christs righteousness
as it was operatiâ—â— by good moral works that is in St. Paul'â— sense that his person was justifieâ— before God by it as so operative else he speaks not to the purpose as Bellarmine commonly doth for 't is yielded That Abrahams faith was justified by works and declared before men yea and his person too before men that 't was a true and living faith and not a dead faith or a meer profession of faith and that he was a justified person is very false and his endeavour to prove it is like it He saith The Apostles design in the fourth Chapter is to prove that the observance of Mosaical rites whereof Circumcision was the chief is not necessary to mens Justification or acceptance with God and this he would prove by the instance of Abraham who was accepted and also very high in Gods favour even while he was in uncircumcision p. 134. But to this I say that 't is clear the Apostles design in that Chapter is to prove that no mens persons are justified by works but that all that are justified are justified only by Faith in Jesus Christ and lest any should think that only the Jews were thus justified by Faith in Christ without the works of the Law he proves that even the Gentiles and the Jews are justified the same way even by faith in Christ because Abraham was so justified before he was circumcised v. 9. Cometh the blessedness upon the circumcision only or upon the uncircumcision also No but it comes upon both Jews and Gentiles alike for Abraham was justified by faith in Christ before he was circumcised that he might be the father of all them that believe though they be not circumcised that righteousness that is that Christs righteousness might be imputed to them also And p. 136. he saith That St. James his design was to prove against Gnosticks who were ranting * Sir we are no more Antinomians than St. Paul was nor Gnosticks Antinomians the absolute necessity of new obedience in order to mens being received †This is most false into Gods favour that is justified or accepted as righteous By which 't is clear that he makes as Dr. Patrick doth new obedience to go before Justification In p. 137. he expounds Phil. 3. 9. of inherent righteousness and to that end saith that Paul chiefly desired to be found in Christ Whereas 't is clear that there is no such expression nor meaning but that he desires only to be found in Christ not having mine own righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith that is clothed with the righteousness of Christ imputed to him as all our Orthodox Divines expound the place as Calvin Piscator Dr. Featly Diodate Beza in Locum And Dr. Willet in his Synopsis Willet Synopsis Papismi pag. 580 986 1000. Bp. Prideaux Fascic Controversiarum c. 5. q. 5. p. â—66 Bp. Downham of Justificaâ— l 7. c. 3. 〈◊〉 15. p. 460. Assembly of Divines in their larger Catechism of justifying Faith Papismi 12th Gen. Controversie of the Sacrament of Baptism in answer to Bellarmine who denieth that we are justified formally by the righteousness of Christ but that we are justified by our own righteousness inherent in us answers thus This is a great * Vid. King James his saying to this purpose before p 〈◊〉 in the Margent blasphemy and contrary to the Apostle who saith That I might be found not having mine own righteousness which is by the Law but the righteousness of God through faith Phil. 3. 9. The righteousness 〈◊〉 God by faith is not our own righteousness but we are justified by the righteousness of God that is by the righteousness of Christ by God imputed to 〈◊〉 And so Bishop Downham expounds the place and answereth Bellarmine's shifts and Mr. Fowler 's improvement of them which learned answer of his is too large here to be inserted where he proves ouâ— of Chrysostom and Châ—mnitius that the Apostle did in the point of Justification of his person before God account all his works not only those before his conversion but even those since yea his works both past and present as loss and dung Though these men declare themselves by their works to be Factors for Rome preach and print most Antichristian Popish Doctrine and such as some of the honester and sounder sort of Papists have disclaimed and written against with approbation of the learned and Regent Papists themselves as Dr. Ame's shews out of Contarenus whose works were approved by the Regent Doctors of Divinity at Paris An. 1572. Contarenus words are these Dr. Ames Bellar. Enervat T. 4. lib. 6. de Justif c. 1. Thes 1. compared with his 13th Protestants argument pag. 151. Quoniam inquit ad duplicem justitiâ—â— pervenimâ—â—â— per sidem justitiam inhaereâ—tem nobis charitatem ac gratiam qua efficimur consortes divinae naturae justitiam Christi nobis donatam imputatam quoniam insâ—â—rti sumus induimus Christum restat inquirere utranam debeamus niti existimari nos justificari coram Deo idest sanctos justos haberi ego prorsus existimo piè Christianè dici quod debeamus niti niti inquam tanquam restabili quae certò nos sustentâ—t justitia Christi nobis donata non auteâ—â— sanctitate gratia nobis inherente haec etenim nostra justitia est inchoata imperfecta quâ— tueri nos non potest quin in multis offendamus quin assiduè peccemus Id circo in conspeclu Dei non possumus ob hanc justitiam nostram haberi justi boni quemadmodum deceret filios Dei esse bonos sanctos Sed justitia Christi nobis donata est vera perfecta justitia quae omnino placet oculis Dei in qua nihil est quod Deum offendat quod Deâ—â— noâ— summopeâ—â— placcat â—ac ergo sola re certa stabili nobis â—â—tendum est ob eam solam credere nos justificari coram Deo id est justos â—aberi dici justos Now I suppose Mr. Fowler will have no just cause to blame me for discovering so plainly his erroneous opinions seeing I have dealt canâ—idâ—y with him in repeating his own words and he will thereby in reâ—se that preferment which he hath gotten already by his printing these his erroneous Doctrines I have confuted Though I confess I have taken this pains to convince and convert him and prevent others To preach against Calvin's Doctrine was the way to Preferment as Heylin shews in Cyp. Angl. p. 68. imbracing of his Errors To all which I shall add Bishop Sanderson's judgment Justification of sinners by the imputed righteousness of Christ apprehended and applied unto them by a lively Faith without the works of the Law is a sound true comfortable profitable and necessary Doctrine Serm. upon Rom. 3. 8. p. 49. in 4 to ART VI. That mens foreseen
we read thus And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth yea saith the Spirit that they may rest from their labours The word here most observable is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which saith Cornelius a Lapide and Pâ—reus saith that all Copies except Montanus's doth end the full sense of the former sentence Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ab hoc tempore from this very time that is from this instant of time that they dye they are blessed as learned Mr. Leigh in his Criticks expounds the word and assures me in his Notes upon the place that Dr. Reynolds and Gerard do so interpret it and so doth Scriveliâ—â— too and the Latines interpret it * Amodo id est ex nunc deinceps in aternum puta a tempore mortis illico requiefcunt requiescent in omne aenum Cor. a Lapide 〈◊〉 amolâ—â— which we English henceforth that is from this time forward that is from the time of their death and so forward for ever are they blessed that die in the Lord. Pareus upon the place saith That this is a true and charitable opinion that those that die in the Lord do from the point or instant of their 〈◊〉 become and continue to be blessed And 't is observable that they are said to be blessed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 morientes dying or qui moriuntur who 〈◊〉 die in the Lord in the present tense not in the future who shall diâ—â— hereafter though they shall be blessed too which shews that 〈◊〉 soon as ever they are dead they begin to be blessed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 preseâ—â— and perfectly as some expound the word and henceforth even for eâ—â— though before their death they are in some sort as St. Paul was partly carnal as well as spiritual yet their souls depart not so 〈◊〉 are if not immediately before yet in the instant of their departure from their bodies through faith purged by the blood and spirit of Jesus Christ from all their sins and so their spiritual uncleanness being perfectly done away they are fitted for and received into that City into which nothing that defileth shall enter And this may be proved further 5. From Joh. 5. 24. Verily I say unto you he that believeth my word and believeth on him that sent me hath everlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but is passed from death to life So Joh. 3. 36. He that believeth on the son hath everlasting life he hath it not only in the price and promise and expectation but also in the * inchoation and first Vrsin Catechis p. 2. q. 58. p. 414. Dr. Reynolds in 1 John 5. 12. p. 430. He that hath the Son hath life 1. In pretio 2. In permisso 3. In primitiis fruits he hath the beginnings of it here in this life in the kingdom of grace and he shall have it in more full and compleat possession of it as soon as he departs out of this life habenti dabitur to him that hath shall be given to him that hath true saving grace shall be given more grace not only quoad sufficientiam here but quoad gloriam hereafter Cornelius a Lapide a great Jesuit and Father in the Church of Rome assures me that the Church he means the Church of Rome calls the days of Saints death dies natales their birth-days and that hac de causa for this reason because the same days they are new-born into a blessed and glorious life and upon this account saith he doth the Church solemnize their birth-days not those in which they are born with sin into a temporal life but those in which by a temporal death they pass to an eternal life And 6. This may be further confirmed by that of the wise man the Preacher King Solomon Eccles 12. 7. Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was and the Spirit to God who gave it then that is when a man dies his body which was made at first of the dust of the earth returns to the earth its first material principle and the soul that was immediately made by God of a spiritual substance returns to God the Father of Spirits for judgment either of absolution or condemnation which is more particularly and privately passed upon every Heb. 9. 27. mans soul immediately after its separation from the body that is saith the learned Bishop Reynolds in his Notes upon the place commonly called the Assemblys-notes Vt stet judicio ante Deum that it may appear before his tribunal to be judged and certainly as the body goes into the dust so certainly the soul returneth unto God to be judged Now the bodies go immediately to the dust to the earth so the souls immediately to God Hence saith he the godly are translated into Paradise in Abrahams bosom into the condition of just men made perfect Luke 16. 22. Luke 23. 43. The wicked into the prison of disobedient spirits reserved there in Hell unto the judgment of the great day Luke 16. 23. 1 Pet. 2. 19. As the souls of wicked men when they die go immediately from God into Hell so do the souls of godly men go immediately to God into Heaven and consonant to this is that of our Saviour John 5. 24 before alledged He that heareth my word and believeth on him that sent me hath everlasting life and shall not come into judgment that is into the judgment of condemnation as our translation according to the sense hath it and John 3. 36. He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life it notes a present and indeseasable interest and possession in heaven 7. Very agreeable to this is that devout and believing confident prayer of St. Stephen at his death Lord Jesus receive my Spirit Upon which this is the Assembly-note as 't is commonly called That this is the true comfort of the elect that they are assured that Christ Jesus who died for them in their dissolutions receiveth their souls into his safe and blessed custody to live with him who is the life and God of the living And 8. This is confirmed also by 1 Pet. 4. 19. Wherefore let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well-doing as unto a faithful Creator 9. To these testimonies may be superadded 2 Cor. 5. 4. For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 habemus we have in the present tense a building of God an house not made with hands eternal in the heavens and that the souls of all believers enter into this heavenly house as soon as they depart out of their earthly tabernacles may be further proved from the 6th and 8th verses of that Chapter where 't is said thus That while we are a home in the body we are absent from the Lord and that we
upon unbelievers are yet they are not formally such for we must know that the formal reason of pâ—nishment properly and strictly so called is always to be fetched frâ—â— the final cause for the pain which is inflicted of God as a revenging or punishing Judg with that intention that it shall satisfie his Justice hath the true and proper or formal reason or nature of punishment and this kind of pain we deny to be inflicted upon Moses David or any other true believers after remission of their sins but what pain is inflâ—cted of the same God as a provident Father with this intention that he may further the salvation of his children obtains the nature of a * Aquin. 12 ae q. 87. a. 7. medicine not of punishment and this kind of pain we grant is by our most wise and loving Father imposed upon true penitents in this life after their sin is pardoned but Papists devised punishments are for satisfaction not for correction True believers in Christ do in this life undergo poenam correctivam corrective pain but not poenam satisfactoriam satisfactory pain here in this life or in Purgatory 1. Ad demonstrationem debitae miseriae 2. Ad emendationem labilis vitae 3. Ad excitationem necessariae patientiae dixit Augustinus in Joh. Tract 124. Potest quantum adjici quod Christus docet Joh. 93. Manifestatio operum Dei Tilen Syntag p 2. c. 65. de Purgatorio Thes 15. p. 956. or any where else they suffer not pain to satisfie Gods justice but for the demonstration of deserved misery the â—â—endment of a sinful life the exercise â—f necessary patience and the manifestation of Gods power as the word poena pain or punishment is taken in a large sense so paternal castigation of the godly for their sins such as Davids was affliction for the trial of their faith patience and constancy such as Jobs was and Martyrdom for the testimony of saving truth are by some of our Divines called punishments but not in that sense that punishment properly so called is taken which only is called penal satisfaâ—â—ion and that is punishment inflicted upon the sinner or his surety for sin to satisfie Divine Justice which is either temporal for duration but everlasting and infinite for virtue and value by reason of the transcendent dignity of the person suffering equivalent to the everlasting in time and such was the penal satisfaction which Christ suffered for the sins of his elect or everlasting in duration which is begun in this life and continued for ever after this life in the world to come and such is that which impenitent reprobates suffer Reprobates are bound by the Law of God to perform for themselves this penal satisfaction and therefore they do begin it in this life and after this life continue it in hell to all eternity because they can never fully satisfie Mat. 25. 41. But this penal satisfaction is not required to be made in part or in whole of true believers in Christ because Jesus Christ their surety hath satisfied for them to all eternity 3. Because this Popish Doctrine that the souls of believers in Purgatory suffer punishment to satisfie for their sins not sufficiently purged away in this life is a very dishonourable and destructive Doctrine to the full and perfect satisfaction of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ therefore I lay down this plain Position Position 3. That the satisfaction our Saviour Jesus Christ hath made for all the sins of true believers in him is a full sufficient and perfect satisfaction But Papists Doctrine of Purgatory-satisfactions saith virtually interpretatively and in effect 1. That it was not an universal satisfaction for all the sins of all true believers in Christ which is contrary to express canonical Scripture Tit. 2. 14. Jesus Christ who gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity 1 Joh. 1. 7. And the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin 1 Joh. 1. 9. If we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness s if he cleanse us from all iniquity from all sin from all unrighteousness then certainly from venial sins 2. Christs active obedience and sufferings were not a sufficient satisfaction to the Justice of God for the breach of his Law by true believers in him which is directly contrary 1. to the Doctrine of the Church of England in her order of Communion which saith there That Jesus Christ did suffer death upon the cross for our redemption and that he made there by his own oblation * Homil. of Christs death T. 2. part 2. p. 187 188. So Homil. of the worthy receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper T. 2. part 1. p. 200. of himself once offered a fâ—â— perfect and sufficient sacrifice obâ—â— and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world and Homily of Christs Nativity T. 2. p. 169. Christ made perfect satisfaction by his death for the sins of all people and Homily for Good-Friday T. 2. p. 175. concerning the death of Christ it saith That it was impossible for us to be loosed from this debt by our own ability it pleased 〈◊〉 therefore to be the payer thereof and to discharge us quit and p. 177. of the same Homily it saith thus Such favour did Christ purchase 〈◊〉 us by his death of his heavenly Father that for the merit thereof 〈◊〉 we be true Christians in deed and not in word only we be now fully in Gods grace again and clearly discharged from our sin 2. 'T is contrary to Canonical Scripture which saith that Christ hath made a full and perfect satisfaction to God for all the sins of all believers in him 1. Because the Scripture saith that he paid the price that was due to God from us For 1. he not only perfectly fulfilled the Law for them he was made under the Law Gal. 4. 4. And he fulfilled all righteousness Mat. 3. 15. And he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfill it Mat. 5. 17. And that he did not for himself but for believers is evident Gal. 4. 3 4 5. Phil. 2. 6 7 8. And the righteousness of Christ is imputed to believers for righteousness Phil. 3. 9. 2. But he suffered for true believers in him great sorrow in his soul Mat. 26. 37 38. Grievous torments in his body Mat. 27. 46. Luk. 22. 44. Joh. 20. For he was crucified and died Mat. 27. 35. Phil. 2. 8. Mark 15. 24 37. He was buried and remained under the power of death for some part of three days but without corruption he suffered poenas infernales hellish torments eternal in essence as Maccovius will have it equivalent to hell-torments by reason of the worthiness of his person into which our humane nature that suffered was taken that what he suffered in his humane nature is attributed to and taken to be the suffering of his person 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
product if there be any fractions remaining maketh the firâ—â— number Now the square-root of the Beasts number 666 is the fatal evil number 25 and the fractions remaining are 41. Prove this by multiplying In short that is the square-root of a number which being multiplied by it self exactly makes the number given or comes nearest to it but doth not exceed it 25 by it self 25 times which makes 625 add the remaining 41 and you have the just number 666. As 12 is the greatest and least square-number which is or can be contained in the number 144 so 25 is the greatest and least number which can be contained in the number 666. It 's frequent in many Mathematical praxi or Arithmetical operations to cast away and not to regard the fractions of numbers If a * An Example Captain have 666 men under his command and would reduce them to a square-figure which he would find to be 2541 51 by that he would conclude that he must of necessity take the number 25 to be the number of his ranks and the number of men in every rank and no other number would serve his turn and the 41 odd men he must reject as unuseful if he will have his Army exactly square 25 is the root of the square-number without fractions and of other numbers with fractions added to it Potter 68. 25 is remarkable in the root of 666 two ways 1. In that 't is the only Cardinal number of the prime or Cardinal Vnities 2. In that 't is the only number of ordinal unities or fractions by which that root can be by fewest figures most exactly expressed and therefore I conclude that this fatal number 25 is the number of Antichrist opposed to the number 12 and that in an higher and greater degree of opposition than 666 is opposed to the number 144 seeing that number is most remarkably applicable to the City and Hierarchy of Antichrist and is chiefly intended by the number 666. 12 Is a good and a perfect number always taken in a good sense in Scripture So 25 is an unfortunate number in it self and hath been branded for an evil and unluckie number both by Prophane and Sacred Writers although they knew no relation that it had either to Antichrist or the number 666. The number 5 is a fatal number and all numbers ending in 5 or made by it are evil Jerome upon Ezek. 11. saith that the 25 is never used in a good sense Jerome and Lyra upon Ezek. 11. say that the 25 men mentioned there that were at their Images do signifie Apostates from Faith and Religion John Huss on Ezek. 8. interprets the 25 men which stood before the pictures to be understood of the mystical Whore So Oecolampadius upon the place it mystically and typically shews that quintessence of impiety and malice and Idolatry which these latter times have discovered in the Church of Rome Petrus Bougus shews that this number 25 which doth not only end in 5 but is made by the multiplication of 5 by 5 is mysteriously evil And let me add that those that were to be trained up for the service of the Tabernacle were to pass that number before they were to be admitted except extraordinarily called Numb 8. 24. From 25 years old and upward they shall go in to wait upon the service of the Tabernacle As Antichrist is opposed to Christ and as 666 is opposed to 144 so is 25 opposed to 12 so must those things which are chiefly to be measured and numbred by this number 25 be correspondent on the one side and in some sort opposed to or set against those things which are measured numbred and described by the number 12. For this cause is the Church-militant in Revel 21. measured numbred and described by these two numbers only 144 and 12 that there might be an express example in sacred Scripture not only shewing in general how the number 666 ought to be interpreted but also leading us as it were by the hand to those particulars in which the root of the number ought principally to be applied As that Rome is answerable to Jerusalem and the Popeâ—â— Cardinals to Christs Apostles 1. As Jerusalem was truly Mater gremium ostium omnium Ecclesiarum so doth Rome falsely pretend her self to be And so Rome really is the mother of all spiritual whoredom and abominations in respect of all those Churches which have been seduced by her 2. That the Popes Cardinals are answerable to Christs Apostles they stile themselves by way of eminency the Apostles Successors they are the soul of the Papacy and the Pope accounts them parts of his own body who with him make a compleat Corporation and Mystical body maintaining and upholding and representing all Ecclesiastical power and jurisdiction 1. They were instituted at Rome in the first foundation of the Papacy by the Pope about the time of Constantine the Great in imitation of our Saviour Jesus Christ who did in the first most remarkable foundation of his Church erect the Colledg of Apostles at Jerusalem giving them a name prefixing their number and giving their office as the Pope hath done at Rome 1. The name which Christ gave to his Disciples was to be called Apostles Luk. 6. 13. and the name which the Pope gave his best beloved Disciples is to be called Cardinals For as Christ in his Church gave some to be Apostles some Teachers some Prophets 1 Cor. 12. 28. Ephes 4. 11. so the Pope in the Romish Church hath given some to be called Cardinals some Abbots some Jesuits some Monks some Friers some Exorcists some Acolytes and some other titles and dignities 2. The first limited number which Christ gave to his Apostles was according to the number of the Gates and Tribes of Jerusalem so the first limited and prescribed number of Cardinals given by the Pope was according to the number of the common Gates of Rome and according to those divisions of the City and people of Rome which the Popes have made answerable to the Tribes of Jerusalem 3. The office and commission which Christ gave to his Apostles consisted in three things 1. The administration of Baptism was committed chiefly and originally to them and they were first commanded to go and baptize all Nations and as it were by the 12 Gates of their Baptism to bring all true Israelites into the spiritual Jerusalem so at the first institution of the Popes Cardinals their office and commission was chiefly to baptize and they were fixed to certain Churches in Rome in which only Baptism was to be celebrated 2. The Apostles were to preach the Gospel and to plant Christian Religion in all the world So the Cardinals having quickly committed the celebration of Baptism to others employed themselves wholly to preach the Pope and to plant and propagate Popery in all Kingdoms of the world 3. Christ gave to his Apostles chief power to forgive and retain sins so likewise the Pope committed the chief care