pretiosissimo sanguine dignetur vos à paenis liberare inter choros suorum sanctorum angelorum collocare ibique nostri memores suppliciter exorare vt vobis associemur vobiscum in coelis coronemur Innocentius Papa 2. concessit cuilibet qui hanc orationeÌ„ sequentem deuotè dixerit 4000. millia annorum indulgentiarum Aue vulnus lateris nostri saluatoris c. Quicunque deuote dixerit istam orationem habebit 3000. dierum indulgentiarum criminalium peccatorum 20000. millia dierum venialium à Domino Iohanne papa 22. concessarum vt in Autidatorio anâ—â—ae habetur Quicunque orationem sequentem deuotè dâ—â—cerit premerebitur 11000. annorum indulgentiarum c. Aue Domina sancta Maria mater dei regina coeli porta paridisi Domina mundi lux sempiterna imperatrix inferni c. Ora pro me Iesum Christum dilectum filium tâ—â—um libâ—ra me ab omnibus malis ora pro peccatis meis Amen Whosoeuer being in the state of grace shall deuoutly say the seuen prayers ensuing with seauen Our Fathers and as many Haile Maries afore the image of Pietie shall thereby merit 56. thousand yeares of Pardons Pope Iohn the 12. hath granted to all persons which going through the churchyard doe say the prayer following so many yeeares of pardons as there haue bin bodies buried since it was a Churchyard The prayer for the dead Haile all faithfull soules whose bodies here and euery where doe rest in the dust The Lord Iesus who hath redeemed you and vs with his most pretious blood vouchsafe to deliuer you from paines and to place you in the companie of his holy Angells and there beeing mindefull of vs meekely to pray that wee may both be ioyned vnto you and crowned with you in the heauens Pope Innocent the 2. hath granted to euery one which deuoutly shall say this prayer following 4000. yeares of pardons Haile wound of our Sauiours side c. Whosoeuer deuoutly shall say this praier shall haue 3000. daies pardons of criminall sinnes and 20000. daies of veniall offenses granted by the Lord Pope Iohn the 22. as it is to be read in the Antidatorie of the soule Whosoeuer deuotly wil say the praier following shal merit thereby 11000. yeares of pardons Haile Lady saint Mary mother of God Queene of heauen the Gate of paradise the Lady of the world the Light eternall the Empresse of hell c. Pray vnto thy belooued sonne Iesus Christ for mee and deliuer mee from all euils pray for my sinnes Amen 3. Proposition The Romish doctrine concerning Images is fonde and not warranted by the holy Scriptures nor consonant but contrarie vnto the same The proofe from the word of God Images are such an abomination to the Lord as to make them among all men odious he describeth the vanitie of them by his Prophets as that they are the doctrine of vanitie The worke of Errors the teachers of lies siluer and gold the worke of mens hands Vanitie they haue a mouth and speake not eies and see not eares and heare not hands and touch not feete and walke not 2. Hee giueth a strait commandement Not to bow downe to them nor worship them nor to make them to flie from them yea to destroy both the images themselues the Idolaters and the Enticers vnto Idolattie 3. Hee commendeth greatly and praiseth such men as haue destroyed Images and not bowed vnto Idols 4. Hee finally curseth the Images the Image makers and the Image seruers or worshippers Hereunto with vs the Protestant Churches euery where doe subscribe The adversaries vnto this truth The Romish church most fondly and contrary to the word of God doth allow and not onely allow but publikely erect not onely erect but adore not onely adore Images but doth accurse and more then so condemne to the fire yea to hell fire as heretikes such persons as will not worshippe Images and the Images to which is most abhominable Of God himselfe euen of God the Father and that in the likenes of an old man with a long white Beard of the Sonne in the Similitude of a man hanging on rhe Crosse of the holy Ghost in the shape of a Doue of the wholy holy and incomprehensible Trinitie with three Faces in one head Also of God his creatures as of Angels alwaies with wings sometimes with a paire of ballance as S. Michael of men as of Moses as it were with hornes the Apostles with round orbes on their heades like Trenchers the blessed virgin with frisled haire and costly garments And of other base things as Agnus deis of waxe wafer cakes of flower Crosses of gold siluer stone wood paper copper c. 4. Proposition The Romish doctrine concerning Reliques is fond and not warranted by the holy Scriptures nor consonant but contrary vnto the same The proofe from Gods word Of all the erroneous opinions among the Papists which are infinite none is more to the illusion of wel meaning Christians then their doctrine concerning worshipping and adoratioÌ„ of the reliques of Saints A doctrine which is so farre from being found as it is forbidden in the holy Scripture and a doctrine in the purer times and writers of the Chureh no where to be found and in all the best Churches at this day vtterly condemned Adversaries vnto this truth Such notwithstanding is the Satanicall boldnes of the Antichristian synagogue of Rome that as they will delude men with the reliques of Saints which are not such so likewise they teach the people which is most offensiue and execrable to giue diuine adoration and honour vnto them Hence is it that some doe pray vnto S. Benet whose Reliques they had stolne O Benedict after God our onely hope leaue vs not orphanes who art come hither not through our merits but for the saluation of many soules Others haue published that the Bodies of Saints and specially the Reliques of the blessed Martyrs are with all sincerity to be honoured as the members of Christ c. If any denie this conclusion hee is to be thought not a christian but an Eunomian and Vigilantian The Councell of Trent also hath decreed that they are to be taken for damned which affirme how worship and honour is not to be giuen vnto the Reliques of Saints Of this preposterous deuotion they haue appointed a certaine and common seruice for the holy Crosse whereon Christ was hanged they haue made a feast for the speare and Nailes wherewith Christ was fastened to the Crosse they haue canonized for a Saint the chaines which bound S. Peters To say nothing of the adoration they giue vnto the Haire Milke Smocke of the blessed virgin vnto the Head Haire Thombe Coate of S. Ihon Baptist vnto the breeches of Ioseph the sword and Handkercheife of S. Paul the Keies of S. Peter and vnto many other things
and feare of God according to the rule of the Apostle afore mentioned let all things be done honestly by order All churches reformed consent hereunto Errors and Adversaries vnto this truth The premises beeing as they are most true most false then is it which the Papists doe publish viz. that The church hath power to change the Sacraments ordained euen by Christ himselfe Whatsoeuer the Apostles and Rulers of the Church command is to be kept and obeyed The authoritie of the of the Church is greater then of the Sacred Scripture 3. Proposition The Church hath authoritie to iudge and determine in controuersies of faith The proofe from Gods word Authoritie is giuen to the Church and to euery member of sound iudgement in the same to iudge in controuersies of faith and so in their places to embrance the truth and to auoid and improoue Antichristianitie and errors and this is not the priuate opinion of our Church but both the straight commandement of God himselfe particularly vnto all Teachers and hearers of Gods word and generally vnto the whole Church and also the iudgement of our godly brethren in forraigne countries The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Vnsound therefore in iudgement are the Papists For first they maintaine That the Pope of Rome hath the power to iudge all men and matter but may be iudged of no man to decree without controlment against the epistles of S. Paul to dispense euen against the new Testament and to giue the sense and meaning of the holy Scripture to which sense or Interpration of his all and euery man without contradiction must yeeld and obey Next they publish hold that the power to iudge of religiō points of doctrine is either in Bishops onely as some of thē doe thinke or in their Clergie onely as other deeme and in the Church of Rome onely as all of them suppose 4. Proposition The Church hath power to interpret and expound the word of God The proofe from Gods word To interpret the word of God is a peculiar blessing giuen by God onely to the Church and companie of the faithfull though not to all and euery of them For No man knoweth the Sonne but the Father neither knoweth any man the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the Sonne will reueale him It is giuen to you to know the secrets of heauen saith our Sauiour vnto his disciples but to them it is not giuen The manifestation of the Spirit is giuen to euery man to profit withall For to one is giuen by the Spirit the word of wisedome c. and to another Prophecie If any thing be reuealed to another that sitteth by let the first hold his peace saith S. Paul vnto the Church at Corinth Yee haue an ointment from him that is holy and yee haue knowen all things c. yee neede not that any man teach you saith the Apostle Iohn Hereunto subscribe the Churches in Heluetia Wittemberg Boheme The errors and Adversaries vnto this truth Many sundry are the adversaries vnto this truth wherof Some thinke that to expound the word of God is so easie a matter as any Student endued with a good naturall wit by diligence and industrie of his owne may doe the same Some teach how to interpret the Scriptures is too hard a thing for any mortall man to attaine vnto so did Iohannes de Wessalia and doe many Anabaptists Some though they acknowledge that diuers haue the gift to open the sense of Gods word yet that some say they are not the knowen Preachers writers in the reformed and Christian assemblies whom the Familie of Loue in scorne doe tearme the scipture learned For saith the said Familie It is meere lies and vntruth c. whatsoeuer the Scripture learned through their knowledge out of the Scriptures institute preach and teach They preach the letre c. but not the wotd of liuing God but themselues onely haue that gift neither euery one of the Familie but the illuminate Elders For to them it is giuen to knowe the truth they are the Elders of the godly vnderstanding and of the manly wisedome the Primats or principalls in the Light Some doe suppose that to interpret the holy Scriptures is not so much a speciall gift of God vpon some chosen persons as an ordinary power annexed to the state and calling of Popes Bishops and Clergie men Others be so farre from giuing the people of God not being of the Clergie power to expound as they will not suffer them to read nor so much as to haue the Scriptures by them in a vulgar tongue except it be their owne most corrupt and barbarous translation which but of late yeares neither and that in part too is granted by the Papists but in place thereof they thrust vpon the Laitie their most idolatrous and blasphemous Fustinals Legendes Rosaries Horaries and Psalteries of our Lady as falsly they called her 5. Proposition The analogie of faith must be respected in their exposition of the Scripture The proofe from Gods word Forasmuch as no prophecie is of any priuate motion and whatsoeuer interpretation man giueth if it agree not to the analogie of faith which S. Paul gaue in commandement to be obserued is a priuate interpretation speciall heede is to be had that one place of Scripture be so expounded as it agree with another and al to the proportion of faith The Churches reformed approoue this assertiō by their subscriptions Errors Adversaries to this truth Of another iudgement are many For Some doe thinke the Scriptures may be expounded in what sense and to what purpose men list as the Pharisies the Seuerians and Papists among whome there be which from this opinion doe tearme the most holy word Scriptures of God most reprochfully A shipmans hoase a Leaden rule a Nose of waxe Some doe mislike all interpretations and written Commentaries vpon the Scriptures as vnnecessary and vaine such were Seruetus Valdesius Coranus with others of late yeares and are the Libertines Scwenkfeldians and Familie of Loue Some depend wholly vpon visions revelations as did the Enthusiasts Nicholaus Storch Thomas Monetarius the Anabaptists and our late English reformer Hacket Some dislike of the literall and preferre the Allegoricall sense of the Scriptures and thereby deuise what them list most monstrously from the word of God as did the Originists and doe the Libertines and Familie of Loue hence teaching on the other that the spirituall vnderstanding is the worde of God and that to embrace the literall sense is to commit Idolatrie Some of euery place of Scripture will haue an exposition both Analogicall Allegoricall historicall and morall as the curious Thomists and Monckes Some are addicted to an interpretation which they cal
Iesus was bound led away and deliuered vnto Pilate A councell iudged our S. Christ to be both a deceiuer and a blaphemer A councell corrupted the Souldiers and willed them to tell a Lie A counsell withstood Peter and Iohn and commanded them that in no wise they should speake or teach in the name of Iesus A councell both caused the Apostles to be beaten and commanded them also that they should not preach in the name of Iesus In auncient writings of credit wee may read how contrarie to Gods word by Councells Arrianisme hath bin confirmed as by the Councell at Ariminum By councells the traditions and bookes of foolish men haue bin made of equall authoririe with the word of God as by the counsell of Trent By councells hath bin established both the adoration of images as by the second councell of Nice and the Inuocation of creatures as by the Tridentine councell By councells the authority of princes hath bin empaired the Pope and Clergie advanced aboue all earthly Princes as by the Councell of Lateran The consideration of the premises and the like mooued S. Hilarie to call the Synode of Mediolane The Synagogue of the malignant and S Augustine to write vnto Maximinus Neither ought I to obiect against thee the Synode of Nice nor thou against mee the Synod of Ariminum and Nazianzene openly to pronounce that Hee neuer sawe any good end of a Councell and The French king his Embassadour to say vnto the chapter of Trent that scarsely any good at all or very little came by Councells vnto the state of Christendome and Cornelius Bishop of Bitonto to breake out into these words in the face of the Councell at Trent I would that with one consent wee had not altogether declined from religion vnto superstition from faith vnto infidelitie from Christ vnto Antichrist from God vnto Epicures Aduersaries vnto this truth This notwithstanding the Papists doe continue in an opinion that councells cannot erre 4. Proposition The things ordained hy generall Councells are so farre to be embraced and beleeued as they are consonant to Gods holy word The proofe from Gods word Generall councells we simply condemne not yet doe wee not ground our faith vpon any councell but onely vpon the written word of God Therefore in generall Councells whatsoeuer is agreeable vnto the written word of God we doe reuerendly embrace but whatsoeuer is contrarie vnto or besides the will of God reuealed in the holy scriptures wee doe carefully auoid And so are wee commaunded to doe euen by God himselfe Whatsoeuer I command you take heed you doe it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therefrom Walke ye not in the ordinances of your fathers neither obserue their manners c. I am the Lord your God walke in my statutes and keepe my iudgements and doe them Though that wee or an Angell from heauen preach vnto you otherwise then that which wee haue preached vnto you let him be accursed As wee said before so say I now againe If any man preach vnto you otherwise then that yee haue receiued let him be accursed And so thinke the Churches reformed with vs The adversaries vnto this truth Contrarie hereunto are the opinions of the Papists For of them Some doe thinke that the decrees of Councells doe binde all nations as Pope Hormisda decreed they should Some as Pope Gregory the great supposed that some coūsells and namely the councell of Nice of Constanstinople Ephesus and Chalcedon some as Campian thought that all councells were of equall authoritie with the word of God Others as the Guisiā faction in Frāce be resolued in matters of religion to follow the footesteps of their ancestors though Gods word and a thousand councells decree to the contrary 22. Article Of Purgatorie The Romish doctrine concerning 1 Purgatorie 2 Pardons worshipping and adoration as well 3 of images as 4 of Reliques and 5 also Inuocation of Saints is a fond thing vainely inuented and grounded vpon no warrantie of Scripture but rather repugnant to the word of God The Propositions The Romish doctrine concerning 1. Purgatorie 2. Pardons 3. Worshipping and adoration of Images 4. Reliques 5. Inuocation of Saintes is a fond thing and not warranted by the holy Scripture nor consonant but contrarie vnto the same 1. Proposition The Romish doctrine concerning Purgatorie is fond and not warranted by the holy Scripture nor consonant but contrary vnto the same The proofe from Gods word IT is granted as well by the Romish or false as by the true Church that none vncleane thing can enter into the kingdome of God And because all men either haue bin or be still vncleane therefore they must be purged from sinne But in the manner of purging them who are vnpure they doe greatly differ For the true church looking into the word of God doth finde that wee are sanctified or made cleane in diuers respects diuersly as by Baptisme by the word preached by the blood of Christ and by the spirit of God and that in this life and not in the other world For in the sacred scripture there is mention but onely of two waies one leading vnto destruction the other bringing vnto life of two sorts of men whereof some beleeue and they are saued some beleeue not and they are damned and of two States one blessed where Lazarus is the other cursed where Diues doth abide A third way or sort or state cannot be founde in the word of God And therefore the Purgatorie in another world both denied hath alwaies bin by the Greeke Churches and neither is nor will be acknowledged by any of Gods reformed Churches in this world as their Confessions do testifie Adversaries vnto this truth Erroneous therefore and not warrantable by Gods word concerning Purgatorie is the doctrine both of the old Heretikes the Montanists who thought there was a purging of soules after this life and of the newe and renued Heretikes the Papists For They thinke it to be vnsound doctrine and not sufferable in any booke for Christians to diliuer that it is vnpossible for godly and faithfull men or women to be punished after they be dead Therefore deleatur say they Blot out such doctrine They teach by their Catechismes that to doubt whether there is a Purgatorie or no is a breach of the first commandement Thus doe they pray for the soules of the faithfull as they fancie boyling in the torments of purgatorie Auete omnes animae fideles quarum corpora hîc vbique conquiescunt in puluere Dominus Iesus Christus qui vos nos redemit suo pretiosissimo sanguine dignetur vos à poenis liberare c. that is All haile all faithfull soules whose bodies doe here and euery where rest in the dust The Lord Iesus Christ who hath redeemed both you and vs with
inestimable benefits which wee haue and shall receiue from your selfe and your late Predecessors D. Whitgift Grindall Parker Cranmer of famous and honourable remeÌ„brance Bishops of our Church Archbishops of the See of Canterbury for this vniforme doctrine by some of your Lordships drawen and penned by all of you allowed defended as agreeable to the Faith of the very Apostles of Christ and of the auncient Fathers correspondent to the Confessions of all reformed Churches in Christendome and contrariant in no point vnto Gods holy and written word commended vnto vs both by your authoritie and Subscriptions Now the all mercifull God and heauenly Father which so inspired them and your Lordship with wisedome from aboue and inabled you all to discerne truth from falsehood sound religion from Atheisme idolatry and errors vouchsafe of his infinite goodnes to encrease his graces more and more vpon your Grace to his owne glorie the Churches benefit and your owne euerlasting comfort And the same God which both mercifully hath brought and miraculously against all hellish and diuelish practises of his and our enemies continued the light of his truth among vs giue vs all grace with one heart and consent not onely to embrace the same but also to walke and carrie our selues as it beseemeth the Children of light in all peaceablenesse and holinesse of life for his Sonne our Lord and Sauiour Christ his sake At Horninger neere S. Ed. Bury in Suff. the 11. of March â—n 1607. Your Graces poore Chaplaine alwaies at commaund Thomas Rogers Constitutions and Canons ecclesiasticall an 1604. WHosoeuer shall heereafter affirme that the Church of England by Lawe established vnder the Kings Maiestie is not a true and an Apostolicall Church teaching and maintaining the Doctrine of the Apostles let him bee excommunicated ipso facto and not restored but onely by the Archbishop after his repentance and publike reuocation of this his wicked error Can. 3. Whosoeuer shall heereafter affirme that any of the 39. Articles agreed vpon by the Archbishops and Bishops of both Prouinces and the whole Cleargie in the Conuocation holden at London in the yeare of our Lord God 1562. for the auoyding of diuersities of opinions and for the establishing of consent touching true Religion are in any part superstitious or erroneous or such as he may not with a good conscience subscribe vnto let him be excommunicated ipso facto not restored but only by the Archbishop after his repentance and publike reuocation of such his wicked errors Can. 5. Whosoeuer shall heereafter seperate themselues from the Communion of Saints as it is approoued by the Apostles rules in the Church of England and combine themselues in a newe Brotherhood accounting the Christians who are conformable to the Doctrine Gouernment Rites and Ceremonies of the Church of England to be prophane and vnmeete for them to ioyne with in Christian profession let them be excommunicated ipso facto and not restored but by the Archbishop after their repentance publike reuocation of such their wicked errors Can. 9. The Titles of the 39. Articles with the Pages where to find euerie of them in this booke Art 1. OF faith in the holy Trinitie Page 1. Art 2. Of the Word of God which was made verie man Page 7. Art 3. Of the going downe of Christ into Hell Page 15. Art 4. Of the Resurrection of Christ. Page 17. Art 5. Of the holy Ghost Page 21. Art 6. Of the sufficiencie of the Scripture for saluation Page 26. Art 7. Of the old Testament Page 33. Art 8. Of the three Creedes Page 39. Art 9. Of Originall or birth sinne Page 41. Art 10. Of Free will Page 47. Art 11. Of the Iustification of man Page 50. Art 12. Of good workes Page 56. Art 13. Of workes before Iustification Page 56. Art 14. Of workes of Supererogation Page 59. Art 15. Of Christ alone without sinne Page 62. Art 16. Of sinne after Baptisme Page 65. Art 17. Of predestination and Election Page 69. Art 18. Of obtaining saluation onely by the Name of Christ. Page 82. Art 19. Of the Church Page 86. Art 20. Of the authoritie of the Church Page 98. Art 21. Of the authoritie of generall Councells Page 112. Art 22. Of Purgatorie Page 118. Art 23. Of Ministring in the Congregation Page 131. Art 24. Of speaking in the Congregation in such a tongue as the people vnderstand not Page 141. Art 25. Of the Sacraments Page 142. Art 26. Of the vnworthines of the Ministers which hinder not the effect of the Sacraments Page 160. Art 27. Of Baptisme Page 165. Art 28. Of the Lords Supper Page 170. Art 29. Of the wicked which doe not eate the body and blood of Christ in the vse of the Lords Supper Page 178. Art 30. Of both kindes Page 179. Art 31. Of the oblation of Christ finished vpon the Crosse. Page 181. Art 32. Of the marriage of Priests Page 185. Art 33. Of Excommunicate persons how they are to be auoided Page 189. Art 34. Of the Traditions of the Church Page 193. Art 35. Of Homilies Page 192. Art 36. Of Consecration of Bishops and Ministers Page 196. Art 37. Of the ciuill magistrate Page 201. Art 38. Of Christian mens goods which are not common Page 215 Art 39. Of a Christian mans Oath Page 217. FINIS ¶ THE CATHOLIKE Doctrine beleeued and professed in the Church of England 1. Article Of faith in the holy Trinitie There is but 1 one liuing and true God euerlasting without bodie parts or passions of infinite power wisdome and goodnes 2 the maker and preseruer of all things both visible and inuisible 3 And in vnitie of this Godhead there be three persons of one substance power and eternitie the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost The propositions 1. There is but one God who is liuing true euerlasting c. 2. God is the maker and preseruer of all things 3. In the vnitie of the Godhead there is a Trinitie of persons 1. Proposition There is but one God who is liuing true euerlasting without bodie parts or passions of infinite power wisedome and goodnes The proofe from the word of God THat there is but one God who is c. is a truth which may be gathered from the al-holy and sacred Scripture is agreeable to the doctrine of the reformed Churches For both Gods word giueth vs to knowe that God is one and no moe liuing and true God euerlasting without bodie parts or passions of infinite power wisedome and goodnes and Gods people in their publike confessions from Ausburgh Heâ—uetia Bohemia France Flanders and Wittemberge testifie the same Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Then impious execrable are the opinions of Dragoras Theodorus who fasly denied there was any God Of Protagoras and the Machiuilian Athiests which are doubtfull whether there be a God Of such as fained vnto themselues diuers and sundrie gods as did
the Manichies the Basilidians the Valentinians the Messalian heretikes the Gentiles and heathen people whereof some in place of God worshipped Beastes vnreasonable as the Aegyptians did a Calfe an Oxe Cats Vulturs and Crocodils The Syrians a Fish and Pigeons the Persians a Dragon some as Gods haue adored men vnder the names of Iupiter Mars Mercurie and such like and some euen at this day for God doe worship Kine the Sunne and what they thinke good so doe inhabitants of Baly in the East Indies Of the Anthropomorphites which ascribed the forme and lineamentes of man vnto God thinking God to be like vnto man Of such as put their trust and confidence to be reposed in God alone either in men liuing as doe both the Persians in their Soldan and the Papists in their Pope who with them is God their Lord and God of infinite power or in Saints departed this life as doe the same Papists both in their S. Francis whome they tearme The glorie of God prefigured by Esay when he said Holy Holy Holy c. and in their Thomas Becket whom they say God hath set ouer the workes of his hands or in Beastes vnreasonable as doth the Mordwite Tartar or finally in riches and other senslesse creatures as doe the Atheists and irreligious worldlings 2. Proposition God is the maker and preseruer of all things The proofe from Gods word THat the world and all things both visible and invisible therein both were made and are preserved by the almightie and onely power of God are truthes grounded vpon the holy Scripture and agreeable to the confessions of Gods people For touching the creation of the world we read that in the beginning God created the heauen and the earth c. He made heauen and earth by him were all things created which are in heauen and which are in earth things visible and invisible whether Thrones or Dominions or Principalities or Powers all things were created by him and for him by his Sonne he made the worldes and all these acknowledged by the Churches primitiue and reformed at this day And touching the preseruation of all things by him created My soule praise thou the Lord c. saith the Psalmist which couereth himselfe with light as with a garment spreadeth the heauens like a curtaine which laieth the beames of his chambers in the waters and maketh the cloudes his chariot and walketh vpon the wings of the winde which maketh the spirits his messengers and flaming fire his ministers c. Are not two sparrowes sold for a farthing and one of them shal not fal on the ground without your Father yea and al the haires of your head are numbred saith our S. Christ God that made the world and all things that are therein he is Lord of heauen and earth he giueth life and breath and all things and hath made of one blood all mankinde to dwel on all the face of the earth and hath assigned the times which were ordained before and the bonds of their habitation saith S. Paul The Sonne is the brightnes of the glorie and the ingraued forme of his person and beareth vp all things by his mightie word The Churches of God in Heluetia Basil France and Flanders testifie the verie same Errors and aduersaries vnto these truths Hereby are condemned all Heretikes and errors impugning either the creation of the world by God or his providence in the continuing and preseruation of the same Of the former sort was First Aristotle and his followers which said the world was eternal and without beginning Next the Marcionites that held how God made not the world as being too base a thing for him to create 3. Simon Magus Saturnius Meander Carpocrates Corinthus who ascribed the worldes creation vnto Angels 4. The Manichies who gaue the creation of all things vnto two Gods or Beginnings the one good whereof came good things the other euill whence proceeded euill things 5. The same Manichies and Priscillianists which did affirme man to haue bin the workemanship not of God but of the Deuill 6. The Familie of Loue who deliuer that God by them made heauen and earth 7. The Papists who giue out how sacrificing Priests are the Creators of Christ Of the latter sort were The Stoike Philosophers and the Manichies who are the great patrones of Destinie Fate and Fortune The Familie of Loue which may not say God saue any thing for they affirme that all things be ruled by nature and not ordered by God The old Philosophers who thought that inferior things were too base for God to be carefull of And lastly the Epicures who thinke God is idle and gouerneth not the same Of which minde was Cyprian who held that God hauing created the world did commit the gouerment thereof vnto certaine celestial powers 3. Proposition In the Vnitie of the Godhead there is a Trinitie of persons The proofe from Gods word THe Scripture saith In the beginning God the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost created the heauen and the earth By 1 the word of the 2 Lord were the heauens made and all the host of them by the 3 Breath of his mouth Loe the heauens were opened vnto 1 him and Iohn sawe 2 the Spirit of God descending like a Doue and lighting vpon him and loe a voice from heauen saying This is 3 my beloued Sonne in whome I am well pleased Because yee are sonnes 1 God hath sent forth 2 the Spirit of his 3 Sonne into your heartes which crieth Abba Father saith the Apostle and againe The grace of 1 our Lord Iesus Christ and the loue 2 of God and the communion of the 3 holy Ghost be with you all And S. Iohn There are three which beare record in heauen 1 The Father 2 the word and 3 the holy Ghost and these three are one This truth hath alwaies bin and serously is confessed in the church of Christ. Errors adversaries vnto this truth Then cursed are all opinions of men contrarie herevnto whereof Some denied the Trinitie affirming there is one God but not three persons in the Godhead so did the Montanists and Marcellians and so doe the Iewes and Turkes Some as the Gnostikes Marcionites and Valentinians affirme there be moe Gods then one and yet not three persons nor of one and the same nature but of a diuers and contrarie disposition Some thinke there be three Gods or spirits not distinguished onely but diuided also as did the Ennomeans and Trethectes Some feare not to say that in worshiping the Trinitie Christians doe adore three Deuils worse then all the idols of the Papists such blasphemers were the Heretikes Blandrat and Alciat Some will
of the virgine onely but by the seede of man too so said Ebion and Carpocrates 6. The flesh of Christ was spirituall and his soule carnal so dreamed the Valentinians 7. The carnal bodie of Christ was consubstantial with the Father as published the Apollinarians 8. The humane nature of Christ before his passion was deuoide of humane affections so thought the Seuerites 3. Proposition Christ is God and man and that in one person The proofe from Gods word THat the Diuine and humane natures of Christ are vnited in one person it accordeth with the holy Scripture For The worde was made flesh and dwelt among vs and wee sawe the glorie thereof as the glorie of the onely begotten of the Father full of grace and truth saith the Euangelist Iohn And Matthew Iesus when he was baptized c. loe a voice came from heauen saying This is my beloued Sonne in whome I am well pleased He that descended is euen the same that ascended farre aboue all heauens that he might fill all things saith S. Paul Againe Christ Iesus being in the forme of God thought it no robberie to be equall with God he made himselfe of no reputation and tooke on him the forme of a seruant and was made like vnto men and was found in shape as a man c. wherefore God hath also highly exalted him c. that euery tongue should confesse that Iesus Christ is the Lord vnto the glorie of God the Father And the same Apostle There is one God and one mediator betweene God and man euen the man Christ Iesus who gaue himselfe a ransome for all men Vpon these and the like grounds I beleeue in God the Father almightie c. and in Iesus Christ his onely Sonne our Lord which was conceiued by the holy Ghost borne of the virgine Mary The right faith is that wee beleeue and confesse that our Lord Iesus Christ the Sonne of God is God and man c. who although he be God and man yet he is not two but one Christ. One not by the conuersion of the Godhead into flesh but by taking of the manhood vnto God One altogether not by confusion of substance but by vnitie of person I beleeue in one Lord Iesus Christ the onely begotten sonne of God begotten of the Father before all worldes God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made beeing of one substance with the Father by whome all things were made Who for vs men c. came downe from heauen and was incarnate c. He suffered and was buried c. and he shall come againe c say the ancient and first Christians The very same is the beleefe and confession of all the reforformed Churches at this present and alwaies hath bin Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Detestable therefore is the error Of the Acephalians who denied the properties of the two natures in Christ Of the Seuerites of Eutiches and Dioscorus who affirmed the diuinitie and humanitie of Christ to be of one and the same nature Of the Monothelites who denied that two wils viz. a diuine and humane were in Christ Of Theodorus Mesechius who said that the word was one thing and Christ another Of Nestorius who denied the two natures of Christ to be otherwise vnited than one freind is ioyned to another which onely is in good will and affection Of Seruetus who said of Christ that he was the patterne of all things and but a figure of the Sonne of God and that the body of Christ was compact of three vncreated elements and so confounded and ouerthrewe both natures 4. Proposition Christ is the Sauiour of mankinde The proofe from Gods word Christ to be the Sauiour of mankinde we finde it perspicuously in the holy Scripture which teacheth vs that Christ was crucified dead and buried and that to reconcile his Father vnto vs and to be a Sacrifice for all sinnes of men Hence I beleeue the forgiuenes of sinne He suffered for our saluation For vs men and for our saluation he came downe from heauen say our forefathers in their confessions as doe also our brethren through-out Christendome Errors and aduersaries vnto this truth Wicked then are all opinions and assertions contrarying crossing this truth as That the Father in his deitie not the Sonne in his humanity did suffer which error the Patripassians did hold That Christ aswell in his diuinitie as in his humanitie suffered for mankind an error of Apollinaris of old and of Islebius and Andreas Musculus of late yeares That the whole and holy Trinitie was crucified as said Petrus Antiochenus That Christ really and indeed hung not on the crosse for his passion was in showe onely said the Cerdonites the Euticheans and the Manicheans and another man said the Theopaschits and Basilides yea the very Deuils and not Christ said the Manichies suffered and hung on the crosse That the whole passion of Christ is to be vnderstood allegorically and not according to the letter as the Familie of Loue doe thinke That Christ on the Crosse hath suffered 1 for the redemption of mankinde and shall suffer againe for the saluation of the Deuills such heretikes there haue bin 2 as Iesus but shal againe suffer as Iesus Christ which was one of Francis Ket his heresies for which he was burned 3 for men but one mother Iane is the Sauiour of women a most execrable assertion of Postellus the Iesuite The fantasies of the Iacobites and Turkes The popish doctrine touching the Masse praiers vnto Saintes Pardons and Purgatorie which make the passion of Christ either of none effect or to put away but originall sinne onely That albeit our Sauiour hath suffered for all men in generall yet both each man must suffer for himselfe in particular and the workes of one man may satisfie the iustice of God for another which are popish errors That Christ died not for the sinns of all men and that some sinnes are so filthie and enormous as Christ his blood vpon true repentance of the delinquents part cannot wash them away which was Kains Fr. Spiras and other desperate persons error That whatsoeuer is written touching Christ his sufferings must in vs and with vs be fulfilled the false doctrine of H.N. 3. Article Of the going downe of Christ into Hell As Christ died for vs and was buried so also it is to be beleeued that he went downe into Hell The Proposition Christ went downe into Hell The proofe from Gods word SVndrie be the texts of Scripture for Christ his descension into Hell Mine heart was glad saith Dauid a figure of Christ my glorie reioyced my flesh also shall rest in hope For why Thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell O Lord my
God I cried vnto thee and thou hast healed mee Thou Lord hast brought my soule out of Hell I will thanke thee ô Lord my God with all my heart will praise thy name for euermore For great is thy mercie towards mee thou hast deliuered my soule frō the nethermost hell In that he ascended what is it but that he had also descended first into the lowest parts of the earth He that descended is euen the same that ascended farre aboue all heauens that he might fill all things O death where is thy sting O hell where is this victorie Also that Christ went downe into Hell all sound Christians both in former daies and now liuing doe acknowledge howbeit in the interpretation of the article there is not that consent as were to be wished some holding that Christ descended into Hel. 1. As God onely and not man as they doe which say how Christ descended powerfully and effectually but not personally into hell and that the deitie exhibited it selfe as it were present in the infernall parts to the terror of the deuill and other damned spirits 2. As the man onely and that as some thinke in body onely as when death as it were preuailed ouer him lying in the graue as others deeme in Soule onely when he went vnto the place of the reprobate to the increasing of their torments 3. As God and man in one person as they do which affirme that Christ in bodie and soule went some thinke as it were into Hell when vpon the Crosse and els where he suffered the terrors and torments prophecied of Esay 53. v. 6.10 Psal. 116. v. 2. and mentioned Matth. 26. v. 38. or 27. v. 46. Luk. 22. v. 42. some say euen into Hell the verie place destinied for the Reprobate which he entred into the very moment of his Resurrection at which time hee shewed and declared himselfe a most glorious conqueror both of death and Hell the most powerfull enemies Errors adversaries vnto this truth But till wee know the natiue and vndoubted sense of this article and mysterie of religion persist wee adversaries vnto thē which say That Christ descended not into hell at all calling this article an error and a fable as Carlile doth That Christ beeing dead descended into the place of euerlasting torments where in soule he indured for a time the very paines which the damned spirits without intermission doe abide Bannisters error That Christ aliue vpon the crosse humbled himselfe Vsque ad inferni tremenda tormenta euen vnto the dreadfull torments of hell endured for a time those torments quales reprobi in aeternū sensuri sunt which the reprobates shall euerlastingly suffer in hell euen despaired of Gods mercie finding God at this time Non Patrem sed Tyrennum no a Father but a Tyran and ouercame Despaire by despaire death by death hell by hell and Satan by Satan suffered actually All the torments of hell for our redemption and descended into the heauiest torments that Hell could yeeld suffered the torments of hell The second death Abiection from God and was made a cursse that is had the bitter anguish of Gods wrath in his soule and body which is the fire that shall neuer be quenched That Christ personally in Soule went downe into Lake Lymbo to fetch from thence as Canisius to loose from thēce as Vaux he saith the soules of our forefathers which afore his death as the Papists dreame were shut vp in the close prison of Hell That Christ by his descension hath quite turned Hell into Paradise Costerus the Iesuits error 4. Article Of the Resurrection of Christ. Christ did truly 1 arise againe from death and tooke againe his bodie with flesh bones and all things appertaining to the perfection of mans nature 2 wherewith he ascended into heauen and there sitteth 3 vntill he returne to iudge all men at the last day The propositions 1. Christ is risen from the dead 2. Christ is ascended into heauen 3. Christ shall come again at the last day to iudge all men euen the quick and the dead 1. Proposition Christ is risen from the dead The profe from Gods word THe resurrection of Christ may easily be prooued from the holy Scriptures in which it is euident first that Christ should and next that hee did rise from death vnto life both by his appearing to Marie Magdalene to diuers women to two to tenne to all the disciples f to moe then 500. brethren at once to sundry persons by the space of 40 daies together and by the testimonie also of the Apostles Peter Paul A truth both beleeued and acknowledged by Gods people from age to age Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Vtterly false then and vnchristian is the opinion of those men Which vtterly denie the resurrection of any flesh as did the Sadduces the false Apostles Simon Magus and the Manichies Which would acknowledge no resurrection of Christ as would not nor will the Iewes nor heretike Hamant nor Dauid Georg one of whose errors was that the flesh of Christ was dissolued into ashes and so rose no more which affirme as did Cerinthus that Christ shall rise againe but yet is not risen Which say how our Sauiour after his resurrection was so deified as he reteined no more the parts and properties of his bodie and soule nor the vnion of both natures but is meerely God So thought the Schwenkfeldians Which take the Resurrection of Christ to be but an allegorie and no true and certaine historie as doe the Familie of Loue 2. Proposition Christ is ascended into heauen The proofe from Gods word In saying how Christ with his bodie is ascended into heauen and there sitteth and abideth we doe agree with the Prophets Euangelists and Apostles with the ancien fathers and Gods people our brethren throughout all Christendome Errors and adversaries vnto this truth But we altogether dissent From Hamant the English heretike which denied the ascension of Christ Also from Ket the heretike and Apostata which likewise denied our Sauiours asscension affirming that his humane nature is not in heauen but in Iudaea gathering a Church and people Also from the Germane Vbiquitaries and Papists they saying that Christ as man is not onely in heauen but in earth too at this instant wheresoeuer the deitie is these affirming the humane nature of Christ is wheresoeuer the Sacrament of the Altar is administred Also from the Montanists Cataphrygians and Carpocratians who held how Christ not in body but in soule ascended into heauen From the papists who say that Christ ascending into heauen carried with him the soules which he loosed from captiuitie and bondage of the deuill euen the soules of the righteous afore that time were not in heauen
but in Lymbo And lastly from those Germane diuines which thinke that our Sauiour carried with him into heauen the faithfull people in soule and bodie raised at his resurrection 3. Proposition Christ shall come againe at the last day to iudge all men euen the quicke and the dead The proofe from Gods word God annointed Iesus of Nazareth with the holie Ghost and with power c. Hence God raised vp the third day c. And he commanded vs to preach vnto the people to testifie that it is hee that is ordained of God a Iudge of quicke and dead saith S. Peter God shall iudge the world by Iesus Christ Iesus Christ shall iudge the quicke and dead at his appearing and in his kingdome c. Henceforth is laid vp for me the crowne of righteousnesse which the Lotd the righteous iudge shall giue mee at that day and not to mee onely but vnto all them also that loue his appearing saith S. Paul The Iudge standeth before the doore saith S. Iames And this Gods church and people doe firmely beleeue and faithfully confesse Errors and adversaries vnto this truth On the other side both they abroad and we at home abhorre them for their opinions which said that There shall be no generaâ—l iudgement at all as did the Manichies and doe the atheists That the deuills and the most vngodly some of them and namely so manie as in hell do call vpon God for mercie and forgiuenesse say the Turkes yea of al them say the Originists and Catabaptists shall be saued That the wicked shall not be iudged at all but shall die as the bruite beasts and neither rise againe in body nor come vnto iudgement An error of the Familie of Loue That Christ shall not be the future Iudge so thought both Dauid George Coppinger and Arthington For that George rumord himselfe to be the iudge of the whole world and Coppinger and Arthington published how one William Hacket was come to iudge the world and themselues to be his angels for the separating the sheepe from Goates That besides Christ the Pope is iudge of the quick dead An error of the Papists That afore the iudgement there shall be a golden world the godly and none besides enioying the same peaceably and gloriously as the Iewes imagine That the Beleife touching the general Iudgement of Christ ouer the liuing and dead is a doctrine mysticall or a mysterie no historie as H.N. teacheth That the righteous are alreadie in godly glorie and shall from henceforth liue euerlastingly with Christ and raigne vpon the Earth as the Familie of Loue holdeth 5. Article Of the holy Ghost The holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Sonne 2 is of one substance maiesty and glorie with the Father and the Sonne 1 very and eternall God The Propositions 1. The holy Ghost is very and eternall God 2. The holy Ghost is of one substance maiestie and glorie with the Father and the Sonne 3. The holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne 1. Proposition The holy Ghost is very and eternall God The proofe from Gods word THe holy Ghost to be verie and eternall God the Scripture teach vs. For he is the Creator of all things In the beginning God created the heauen and the earth c. And the spirit of God mooued vpon the waters O Lord how manifold are thy workes c. If thou hide thy face they are troubled if thou take away their breath they die and returne to their dust if thou send forth thy spirit they are created Ergo the holy Ghost is God Christians are to be baptized in the name of the holy Ghost aswell as of the Father and the Sonne Therefore is he verie God Ananias lied vnto God and Sapphira tempted God when both he lied vnto the holy Ghost and shee tempted the spirit of the Lord. As God he chooseth assigneth and sendeth forth men for the ministerie of the Gospel as God he decreeth orders for his Church and people and as God he is to be invocate and praied vnto as well as the Father and the Sonne Vpon this and the like words I beleeue in the holy Ghost I beleeue in the holy Ghost the Lord and giuer of life the Catholike Faith is this that wee worship one God in Trinitie and Trinitie in Vnitie c. The Father is God the Sonne is God and the holy God And yet they are not three Gods but one God c. say the auncient Fathers which also is the Faith and confession of all Gods people at this day The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth This maketh to the condemnatioÌ„ of the Pneumatomacheis whereof Some impugne the deitie of the holy Ghost as did in old time Samosatenus and Photinus of late yeares Seruetus Ochinus abroad and Francis Ket Hamant and certaine Brownists among vs at home Some affirme the holy Ghost to be but a meere creature as did Arius the Semiarians the Macedonian heretikes the Tropickes Ochinus Some haue assumed the stile and title of the holy Ghost vnto themselues as did Simon Magus Montanus and Manes Some haue giuen the title of the holy Ghost vnto men and women so Hierax said that Melchisedech was the holy Ghost Simon Magus tearmed his Helene the holy Ghost The Helchesaites saide the holy Ghost was a woman and the naturall sister of Christ Many Papists and namely the Franciscanes blush not to say that S. Francis is the holy Ghost 2. Proposition The holy Gost is of one substance maiestie and glory with the Father and the Sonne The proofe from Gods word The holy Ghost effected the incarnation of Christ teacheth all things leadeth into all truth giueth vtterance to his seruants gifts vnto his people placeth rulers in the Church and ouerseers to feede the flocke of God sealeth the Elect vnto the day of redemption aswel as the Father and the sonne and these three viz. the Father the word and the holy Ghost are one Therefore is the holy Ghost of one substance maiestie and glory with the Father and the sonne And this was the beleefe of the auncient Fathers I beleeue say they in the holy Ghost the Lord and giuer of life c. who with the Father and the sonne together is worshipped and glorified who spake by the Prophets The Godhead of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost is all one the glory equal the maiesty coeternal Such as the Father is such is the Son such is the holy Ghost c And in this Trinitie none is afore or after other none is greater or lesse then another But the whole three persons be coeternall together and coequal The very
same doe all reformed Churches beleeue and confesse The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth The premises doe make Against the Tretheites which affirme the holy Ghost to be inferior vnto the Father Against the Arrians who said the holy Ghost was inferior to the Sonne Against the Macedonian heretikes who held the holy Ghost to be but a minister and seruant of the Father and the Sonne yet of more excellent maiestie and dignitie then the Angels Against many erroneous spirits which deliuer the holy Ghost to be nothing els but The motion of God in his creatures as did the Samosatenians A bare power and efficacie of God working by a secret inspiration as the Turkes and certaine English Sadduces doe imagine The Inheritance allotted to the faithfull and the beeing or vertuous estate of Christ as dreameth H.N. The affection of charitie or Loue within vs an error of Petrus Lombardus Gods loue fauour and vertue whereby he worketh in his children so thought Ochinus and Seruetus 3. Proposition The holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne The proofe from Gods word The proceeding of the holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne we gather from the holy scripture which teacheth how The Father sendeth the comforter which is the holy Ghost in the name of the Sonne and the sonne sendeth the comforter the spirit of truth from the Father he proceedeth of the Father and is sent of the Sonne So with vs say the auncient Fathers and Christians He proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne The holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Sonne neither made nor created but proceeding So there is one Father not three Fathers one sonne not three sonnes one holy Ghost not three holy Ghostes which is the faith of the moderne christians Errors and aduersaries vnto this truth This discouereth all them to be impious and to erre from the way of truth which hold and affirme That the holy Ghost proceedeth neither from the Father nor the Sonne but is one and the same person that Christ is as the Arrians doe That the holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father but not from the sonne as at this day the Graecians the Russians the Moscouites maintaine That there is a double proceeding of the holy Ghost one temporall the other eternall an error of Peter Lombard vncontrolled hitherto and therefore well liked of the Papists 6. Article Of the sufficiencie of the holy Scripture for saluation Holy Scripture 1 containeth all things necessarie for saluation so that whatsoeuer is not read therein nor may be prooued thereby is not to be required of any man that it should be beleeued as an article of the Faith or be thought requisite necessary to saluation 2 In the name of the holy Scripture we doe vnderstand those Canonicall bookes of the old and newe testament of whose authoritie was neuer any doubt in the Church Of the names and number of the Canonicall bookes Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomium Iosue Iudges Ruth The 1. Booke of Samuel The 2. Booke of Samuel The 1. Booke of Kings The 2. Booke of Kings The 1. Booke of Chronicles The 2. Booke of Chronicles The 1. Booke of Esdras The 2. Booke of Esdras The Booke of Esther The Booke of Iob. The Psalmes The Proverbs Eccles. or the Preacher Canticles or song of Salomon 4. Prophets the greater 12Prophets the lesse 3 And the other bookes as Hierome saith the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners but yet doth it not applie them to stablish any doctrine Such are these following The 3. Booke of Esdras The 4. Booke of Esdras The Booke of Tobias The Booke of Iudith The rest of the Booke of Hester The Booke of wisedome Iesus the sonne of Sirach Baruch the Prophet Song of the 3. children The story of Susanna Of Bel and the Dragon The praier of Manasses The 1. Booke of Macchabes The 2. Booke of Macchabes 4 All the bookes of the newe Testament as they are commonly receiued we doe receiue and accompt them for Canonicall The propositions 1. The sacred Scripture conteineth all things necessarie to be knowen and beleeued for the saluation of man 2. All the bookes in the volume of the Bible are not Canonicall but some and namely those here specified are 3. The 3. 4. bookes of Esdras the booke of Tobias c. are apocryphal 4. Of the newe Testament all the bookes are Canonicall 1. Proposition The sacred Scripture containeth all things necessary to be knowne and beleeued for the saluation of man The proofe from Gods word THe holy Scriptures to be sufficient to instruct vs in all things necessary to be knowen and beleeued for mans saluation the word of God teacheth Ye shall put nothing vnto the word which I command you saith the Lord neither shall yee take ought therefrom Whatsoeuer I command you take heed you doe it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therfrom Thou shalt not turne away from it to the right hand nor to the left that thou maist prosper whither soeuer thou goest Euery word of God is pure c. Put nothing vnto his words least he reprooue thee and thou be found a liar These things are written that ye might beleeue c. and that in beleeuing yee might haue life through his Name The whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improoue to correct and to instruct in righteousnesse that the man of God may be absolute beeing made perfect vnto all good workes If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this booke and if any man shall diminish of the wordes of this booke God shall take away his part out of the booke of life and out of the holy cittie and from those things which are written in this booke Hereunto Gods people both alwaies haue and at this present doe subscribe The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Therefore adversaries be wee to all adversaries to this truth especially To such as scorne and contemptuously reiect the booke of God as both did the Circumcellians which defaced and burnt the holy Scriptures and Pope Leo the tenth who tearmed the holy Gospel A fable of Christ and doe the prophane Atheists Also to such as debase the credite and estimation of the holy Scriptures as Dauid George did and both doe the papists who haue an opinion that the scriptures of God are not sufficient to instruct mankinde vnto saluation and the Anabaptists which deeme not the holy Bible to be the word of God with the Familie of Loue in whose bookes nothing is more frequent then the tearming of Gods reverend ministers and preachers Scripture learned Also to them which with Gods word doe equall their owne doctrines
derision of Christians 7. Article Of the old Testament 1 The old Testament is not contrary to the new For both in the old and newe Testament euerlasting life is offered to mankinde by Christ who is the onely mediatour betweene God and man being both God and man 2 VVherefore they are not tr be heard which faine that the old Fathers did looke onely for transitory promises Although the law giuen from God by Moses as touching 3 Ceremonies and rites doe not binde Christian men 4 nor the ciuill precepts thereof ought of necessitie to be receiued in any Common wealth yet notwithstanding 5 no Christian man whatsoeuer is free from the obedience of the Commandements which are called morall The Propositions 1. The old Testament is not contrary to the newe 2. The old Fathers looked for eternall happinesse through Christ as well as for temporall blessings 3. Christians are not bound at all to the obseruation of the Iudaical ceremonies 4. The Iudiciall lawes of the Iewes are not necessarily to be receiued or established in any common wealth 5. No Christian man whatsoeuer is freed from the obedience of the lawe Moral 1. Proposition The old Testament is not contrary to the new The proofe from Gods word THat the old Testament is not contrary to the newe it may be prooued by many inuincible arguments yet it is most apparent in that our Sauiour Christ very God and very man as aboue art 2. hath bin declared is offered vnto mankind for his eternall saluation by them both For We learne that there is one and no Christs moe in the new and we learne the same in the old That Christ is the Sonne of God in the newe we learne the same in the old That Christ is very man in the new we learne that he should be so from the old That Christ was borne at Berhelem in the newe we learne that he should be so from the old That Christ was borne of a virgine in the new we learne that he should be so from the old That Christ was honoured of wise men in the new we learne that he should be so from the old That he road vpon an Asse vnto Ierusalem from the newe we learne that he should so doe from the old That he was betraied in the new we learne that he should be so from the old That hee suffered not for his owne but for our transgressions in the newe we learne that he should so doe from the old In the newe that he rose againe from the graue from the old that he should so do And in the newe that he ascended into heauen and in the old that he should so doe The adversaries vnto this truth Wee are then adversaries to all them which reiect as of no reckoning the old Testamēt as did both old heretikes as Basilides Carpocrates and the Manichies and the newe Libertines who say the old Testament is abrogated 2. Proposition The old Fathers looked for eternall happines through Christ as well as for temporall blessings The proofe from Gods word The old Fathers to haue looked not onely for transitorie promises but also for eternall happines through Christ the holy Scripture doth manifest S. Paul saith Brethren I would not haue you ignorant that all our Fathers were vnder the cloude and all passed through the sa and did all eate the same spirituall meat and did all drinke the same spirituall drinke for they dranke of the spirituall Rocke that followed them and the Rocke was Christ. By faith Noe was made heire of the righteousnesse which is by faith By faith Moses when he was come to age refused to be called the sonne of Pharaohs daughter and chose rather to suffer adversitie with the people of God then to enioy the pleasures of sinne for a season esteeming the rebukes of Christ greater riches then the treasures of Egypt for he had respect vnto the recompense of the reward c. All these through faith obtained good report and receiued not the promise God providing a better thing for vs that they without vs should not bee made perfite Abraham reioyced to see my day Abraham aboue hope beleeued vnder hope that hee should be the father of many nations Of which saluation the Prophets haue inquired and searched This truth was neuer doubted of in the church of God and is publikely acknowledged by some confessions The adversaries vnto this truth They are not then to be heard which thinke the Fathers faithfull people before Christ his time hoped onely for temporall not for spirituall if for spirituall yet not for etetnall happines as did many of the Iewish Atheists and Sadducis and doe the Familie of Loue which make the promises of happines by temporall blessings to be accomplished in this transitorie life Hence H. N. very strangely allegorizeth of the land of promise when he calleth it The good land of the vpright and concordable life and saith that The louely being or nature of the Loue is the life peace and ioy mentioned Rom. 14.6 and the land of promise wherein hony and milke floweth spoken of Exod. 3. a. 13. a. Deut. 8. b. This and more a great deale to this effect hath H. N. 3. Proposition Christians are not bounde at all to the obseruation of the Iudaicall ceremonies The proofe from the word of God That neither the whole law ceremoniall of the Iewes nor any part thereof is necessarily to be obserued of vs christians the holy Scripture teacheth vs by Peters vision the Apostles decree and by the doctrine of S. Paul As all beleeue so some Churches publikely acknowlege the same Errors Adversaries to this truth In a wrong opinion therefore be they who are of minde either that the lawe Ceremoniall whollie is to continue be in vse or that part thereof is yet in force and must be The former of these was the opinion of the false prophets the Cerinthians the Ebionites and is of the Iewes Armenians and Familie of Loue the latter is an error of our home Sabbatarians For say they The Sabboth was none of the Ceremonies which were iustly abrogated at the comming of Christ When all Iewish things haue bin abrogated onely be their very words the Sabboth hath continued still in the Church in his propet force that it might appeare that it was of a nature farre differing from them Whereas all other things were so changed that they were cleane taken away as the Preisthood the Sacrafices and Sacraments this day meaning the Sabboth day was so changed that it yet remaineth which sheweth that though all the other were ceremoniall and therefore had an ende This Sabboth was moral and therefore abideth still The Commandement of sanctifying euery Seuenth day as in the
Mosaicall decalogue is naturall morall and perpetuall is their doctrine 4. Proposition The Iudiciall lawes of the Iewes are not necessarily to be receiued or established in any Common wealth The profe from Gods word The truth hereof appeareth by the Apostles decree which sheweth wherevnto onely the primitiue church necessarily was tied By the Apostles doctrine which enioyneth Christians to yeeld obedieÌ„ce vnto the ordinaÌ„ces of their lawfull gouerners and commanders whosoeuer By the Apostles example and namely of the blessed S. Paul who tooke benefit and made good vse of the Romane and Emperiall lawes Adversaries vnto this truth This truth neither is nor euer was oppugned by any Church Only among our selues some thinke vs necessarily tied vnto all the Iudicials of Moses as the Brownists For they say The lawes Iudiciall of Moses belong as well vnto Christians as they did vnto the Iewes Others that wee are bound though not vnto all yet vnto some of the Iudicialls as holdeth T.C. and Philip Stubs 5. Proposition No Christian man whosoeuer is freed from the obedience of the law Morall The proofe from Gods word Thinke not that I am come to destroy the Lawe or the Prophets I am not come to destroy them but to fulfill them For truly I say vnto you saith our Sauiour Christ till heauen and earth perish one iot or one title of the law shall not scape till all things be fulfilled whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so shall be called the least in the kingdome of heauen c If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandements c. Thou shalt nor kill thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not steale thou shalt not beare false witnesse Honour thy father and thy mother Doe wee make the lawe of none effect through faith God forbid yea we establish the Lawe Circumcision is nothing and vncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the Commandements of God The publike confessions of the Churches of God in France and Belgia agree with this Doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Whereby are condemned as most wicked and vnsond the opinions Of the Manichies who found fault with the whole Lawe of God as wicked and prooceeding not from the true God but from the Prince of darkenes Of Brownist Glouer whose opinion was that Loue now is come in the place of the tenne commandements Of Iohannes Islebius and his followers the Antinonies who will not haue Gods lawe to be preached nor the consciences of sinners to be terrified and troubled with the iudgements of God Of Banister among our selues who held how it is vtterly euill for the Elect so much as to thinke much lesse to speake or heare of the feare of God which the Law preacheth 8. Article Of the three Creedes 1 The three Creedes Nicene creede Athanasius creede and that which is commonly called the Apostles creede ought thoroughly to be receiued and beleeued For 2 they may be prooued by most certaine warrants of holy Scripture The propositions 1. The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued 2. The three creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooved by the holy Scripture 1. Proposition The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued THis Proposition the Churches of God both aunciently and in these daies doe acknowledge for true The adversaries vnto this truth Therefore much out of the way of Godlinesse are they which tearme the Apostles Creede A forged patcherie as Barrowe doth and Athanasius Sathanasius creede so did Gregorius Paulus in Polouia and in the newe Arrians and Nestorians in Lituania My selfe some â—8 yeares agoe heard a great learned man whose name vpon an other occasion afore is expressed to whose acquaintance I was artificially brought which in private conference betweene him and my selfe tearmed worthy Zanchius a Foole an Asse from his booke de tribus Elohim which refuteth the newe Arrians against whose sounders the Creedes of Athanasius and Nicene were deuised Him attentiuely I heard but could neuer since abide for those wordes in deede I neuer sawe him since 2. Proposition The three Creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooued by the holy Scripture The proofe from Gods word Than this assertion nothing is more true For the Creedes I meane these three Creedes speake first Of one and the same God whom wee are to beleeue is for essence but one in persons three viz. the Father the Creator the Sonne the Redeemer the holy Ghost the sanctifier Next of the people of God which we must thinke and beleeue is The holy and Catholike Church The communion of Saints Pardoned of all their sinnes And appointed to arise from death and to enioy eternall life both in body and soule Aduersaries vnto this truth Therefore wee are enemies to all adversaries of this doctrine or any whit of the same in them comprised whether they be Atheists Iewes Sadduces Ebionites Tretheites Antitrinitarains Apollinarians Arrians Manichies Nestorians Origenians Turkes Papists Familists Anabaptists or whosoeuer 9. Article Of Originall or Birth sinne 1 Originall sinne standeth not in the follwing of Adam as the Pelagians doe vainely talke but 2 it is the fault corruption of the nature of euery man that naturally is engendred of the offspring of Adam whereby man is very far gone from originall righteousnesse and is inclined to evill so that the flesh lusteth against the spirit and therefore in euery person borne into the world it deserueth Gods wrath and damnation 3 And this infection of nature doth remaine yea in them that are regenerated whereby the lust of the flesh called in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VVhich some doe expound the wisedome some the Sensuallitie some the affection some the desire of the flesh is not subiect to the law of God And although there is no condemnation for them that beleeue and are baptised yet the apostle doth confesse that 4 Concupiscence and Lust hath of it selfe the nature of sinne The propositions 1. There is Originall sinne 2. Originall sinne is the fault and corruption of the nature of euery man c. 3. Originall sinne remaineth in God his deere children 4. Concupiscence euen in the regenerate is sinne 1. Proposition There is Originall sinne The proofe from Gods word In the holy Scripture we finde of Originall sinne the cause the subiect and the effects the cause thereof is Adams fall partly by the subtill suggestions of the deuill partly through his owne freewill and the propagation of Adam his corrupted nature vnto his seede and posteritie Except a man be borne againe he cannot see the kingdom of God saith our Sauiour Christ As by one man sinne entred into the world and death by sinne and so death
went ouer all men forasmuch as all men haue sinned saith S. Paul d. As new borne babes desire the sincere milke of the word that yee may grow thereby saith S. Peter And S. Iames Of his owne will begate he vs with the word of truth that we should be as the first fruits of his creatures And the fore-mentioned Apostle Paul againe You that were dead in trespasses and sinnes c. and were by nature the children of wrath as wel as others But God which is rich in mercy through his great loue wherewith he loued vs euen when we were dead by sinnes hath quickned vs together in Christ c. The subiect thereof is the olde man with all his powers minde will and heart For in the minde there is darkenes and ignorance of God and his will and in the will and heart of man there is concupiscence and rebellious affections against the law of God And the effects of this Birth or Originall sinne are first actuall sinnes and they both inward as vngodly affections and outward as wicked lookes prophane speech and diuelish actions next an euill conscience which bringeth the wrath of God death and eternall damnation All churches of God beleeue this and some in their publike confessions testifie so much The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Thus armed with authoritie and forces from the word of God and assisted with the neighbour churches we offer battell 1. To the Iewes Carpocratians and Familie of Loue who flatly denie there is any originall sinne 2. To the Papists which say that Originall sinne is of all the least sinne and lesse then any veniall sinne Originall sinne is onely the debt of punishment for the sinne of Adam and not his fault Originall sinne is not properly sinne all this hath Ruardus Tapperus Such as are infected onely with Originall sinne are free from all sensible punishment 3. To Florinus and Blastus who make God the author of sinne 4. To the Sabbatarians among vs who teach that The life of God in Adam before his fall could not continue without a Sabbath The Sabboth was ordained before the fall of Adam and that not onely to preserue him from falling but also that being holy and righteous still he might haue bin preserued in the fauour of God which D. B. deliuereth in his Sabboth doctrine 5. We are also adversaries to the like curiously affected who enquire Whether it was Gods will that Adam should fall Whether God enforced our first parents to fall Why God stayed not Adam from falling c. 2. Proposition Originall sinne is the fault and corruption of the nature of euery man c. The proofe from Gods word Originall sinne is not the Imitation of Adam his disobedience For the Scripture speaketh of no such thing neither doth Gods people so thinke and some Churches by their extant Confessions with vs denie the same as the Church in France and the Lowe countries but it is partly the Imputation of Adam his disobedience vnto vs and partly the fault and corruption of mans nature as the Churches also acknowledge The adversaries vnto this truth Aduersaries vnto this truth are The Pelagians and Familie of Loue who say that Originall sinne commeth not by propagation but by Imitation Such as ascribe Originall sinne in no sort vnto man but either vnto God as did the Hermogenians or vnto the deuil as did the Valentinians The Manichies who preached that this sinne is another and a contrary substance within vs and proceeded no◠from our corrupted nature The Appollinarians who held originall sinne to be from nature The Papists who affirme that some persons and namely the virgine Mary is free from this Originall sinne sinne 3. Proposition Originall sinne remaineth in God his deere children The proofe from Gods word I allow not that which I doe for what I wouid that doe I not but what I hate that doe I saith S. Paul The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh so that yee cannot doe the same things that yee would Euery man is tempted when he is drawen away by his own concupiscence and is entised Dearely belooued I beseech you as strangers absteine from fleshly lusts which fight against the soule Nothing is more true in the iudgement of Gods people The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth We stand therefore in this point Against the Papists who say that Originall sinne was not at all much lesse remained in the Virgine Mary Against Giselbertus whose doctrine is that Baptisme once receiued there is in the baptized no sinne at al either originall or actuall Against the Familie of Loue who affirme that the elect and regenerate sinne not Against the Carpocratians whereof some boasted themselues to be euery way as innocent as our Sauiour Christ. Against the Adamites both old and newe who said they were in so good a state as Adam was before his fall therefore without originall sinne Against the Begadores in Almaigne affirming they were impeccable and had attained vnto the very top and pitch of perfection in vertue and godlines 4. Proposition Concupiscence euen in the regenerate is sinne Concupiscence in whomsoeuer lusteth against the Spirit fighteth against both the soule and the lawe of the minde and therefore but that there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Iesus it bringeth death and damnation Mortifie therefore your members which are vpon earth saith S. Paul vnto the Colossians fornication vncleanes the inordinate affection euill concupiscence c. for the which things sake the wrath of God commeth on the children of disobedience And vnto all Christians S. Peter I beseech you as strangers abstaine from fleshly lusts To the same purpose is both the doctrine and Confessions of Gods people Errors adversaries vnto this truth Therefore wee mislike their opinions as vnsound which say that cōcupiscēce either is no sinne at all or but a veniall sin the former was an assertion of the Pelagians and is of the Papists that latter was one of Glouers errors Francis the Monke of Colen counted concupiscence no sin but said it was as naturall and so no more offensiue before God for man to lust then for the Sunne to keepe his course Petrus Lombardus saith that Concupiscence afore Baptisme is both a punishment and a sinne but after Baptisme is no sinne but onely a punishment The Church of Rome both teacheth that the power of lusting is not but the vse of wicked concupiscence is euill and numbred amongst most greiuous sinnes and decreeth how Concupiscence is not sinne but proceedeth from sinne and inclineth vnto sinne Glouer the Brownist said that the intemperate affections of the mind issuing from Concupiscence are but
who held that man is iustified by Gods meere mercie without respect vnto the merits of Christ. Nor of Galeotus Martius which was of opinion that all nations and persons whosoeuer liuing according to the rules of nature should be saued and inherit euerlasting happines Nor of the Turkes who think that so many as either goe on pilgrimage vnto Mecha or doe kisse the sepulchre of Mahomet are iustified before God and thereby doe obtaine remission of their sinnes Nor of the Familie of Loue who teach by the shedding of Christ his blood is meant the spreading of the Spirit in our heartes Nor of the Papists whose doctrine is that 1. Though Christ hath suffered for all men in generall yet not onely each man must suffer for his owne part in particular but also that the workes of one man may satisfie for another 2. They teach next that sinnes veniall are done away and purged by prayer Almes-deedes by the worthy receiuing of the blessed Sacrament of the Altar by taking of holy water knocking vpon the breast with holy meditation the Bishops blessing and such like by holy water and such ceremonies sacred ceremonies as Confiteor tundo conspergor conteror oro Signor edo dono per haec venialia pono that is I am confest vnto the preist I knock mine heart and breast with fist With holy water I am besprent And with contrition all yrent I pray to God and heauenly host I crosse my forehead at euery post I eate my Sauiour in the bread I deale my dâ—ale when I am dead And doing so I know I may My veniall sinnes soone put away And sinnes mortall not by the merits of Christ onely but many waies besides are clensed thinke the said Papists as By the mirits of dead Saints namely of S. Mary the virgine Threnosa compassio dulcissimae Dei Matris Perâ—ucat nos ad gaudiasummi Dei Patris The pittifull compassion of Gods best pleasing mother Bring vs to the ioyes of God the soueraigne father And of Thomas Becket Tu per Thomae sanguinem quem proâ—e impendit Fac nos Christe soandere quo Thomas ascendit By the Blood of Thomas which he for the expended Make vs Christ to climbe vp where Thomas ascended By Agnos Deis whereof they say Peccatum frangit vt Christi sanguis angit It breaketh sinn and doeth good As well as Christ his pretious blood By reading certaine parcels of Scripture according to their vulgars Per Euangelica dicta Deleantur nostra delicta Through the sayings and wordes euangelicall Our sinnes blot out and vices all 2. Proposition Onely by Faith are we accounted righteous before God The proofe from Gods word Onely beleeue all that beleeue in Christ shall receiue remission of sinnes froÌ„ all things from which ye could not be iustified by the law of Moses by Christ euery one that beleeueth is iustified The Gospel is the power of God vnto saluation to euery one that beleeueth To him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Christ is the ende of the law for righteousnesse to euery one that beleueth Knowe that a man is not iustified by the workes of the law but by the faith of Iesus Christ c. God would iustifie the Gentiles through faith c. They which be of faith are blessed with faith full Abraham By grace are ye saued through faith and that not of your selues Yea doubtlesse I thinke all things â—ut losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Iesus my Lord for whom I haue counted all things losse and doe iudge them to be doung that I might winne Christ and might be founde in him not hauing mine owne righteousnesse which is of the Lawe but that which is through the faith of Christ euen the righteousnesse which is of God through faith The Cburches of Christ by their publike confessions giue testimonie vnto this truth The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Pertakers of the prophet and sweetens of this doctrine are not they which be altogether ignorant of this mysterie Nor they who knowe the same but applie it not to their owne soules and consciences but altogether despise the same as did Pilate in condemning Christ Herod in killing Iames Agrippa in not defending Paul the Iewes in persecuting the Apostles and doe the Deuills and many vngodly persons Tyrans false Christians and Apostataes Nor they which teach not a sure confidence in Iesus Christ but an historicall knowledge of him as the Papists Nor they which hold that all and euery man is to remaine doubtfull whether he shall be saued or no as doe the same Papists Nor they which teach that man is iustified Either by workes without faith as did the false Apostles in Asia and do the Turkes and Anabaptists Or by faith and workes as both the Pseudapostles at Hierusalem the Ebionites and the Papists with the Russians Or neither by faith nor workes as they which contemne both faith in Christ Iesus and good workes too hoping yet to be saued as they carnally secure worldlings Neither shall they be partakers of the sweetnes of this truth which say that for Christians to trust onely by Christ his passion or by Faith onely to be saued is a breach of the first commandement as Vaux is the doctrine of Deuills as Frier Lawrence a Villanicentia and the doctrine of Simon Magus as do the Rhemists Nor they finally which maintaine how the truly righteous apprehend not Christ by Faith but haue him and his rigteousnesse essentially and inherent within them which is an error of the Catharists Papists Osiandriâ—ns and Familie of Loue 3. Proposition Wee are accounted righteous before God not for our owne workes or deseruings The proofe from Gods word Besides what hath bin said that workes haue no place nor portion in the matter of our iustification it is euident in the holy scripture where wee finde that All men be sinners and destitue of the glorie of God And therefore that no man can be iustified by his owne workes Eternall life commeth vnto vs not by desert but partly of promise partly of gift The iust shall liue by faith and the Law is not of faith Moreouer as the godly in old time were so Christians in these daies are and shall be iustified But the godly were iustified not for any good workes or worthinesse of their owne so iustified was Abraham the Iewes the Samaritans Paul the Eunuch the Iailoâ— and the Ephesians All Churches reformed with a sweete consent applaude confesse this doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Adversaries herevnto are The Pharisies who thought men were iustified by externall righteousnesse morall and ceremoniall The
false Apostles in Asia and at Ierusalem The Pharisaicall Papists who against the iustification by faith alone doe hould a iustification by merits and that of Congtuitie dignitie condignitie The said Papists teach besides that life eternall is due vnto vs of debt because wee deserue it by our good workes They teach finally that by good workes our sinnes are purged 12. Article Of good workes Albeit that good workes which are the fruits of faith and follow after iustification cannot put away our sinnes endure the seueritie of Gods iudgement 1 yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ 2 and doe spring out necessarily of a true liuely Faith insomuch that by them a liuely Faith 3 may be as euidently knowne as a tree discerned by the fruite The propositions 1. Good workes doe please God 2. No worke is good except it spring from Faith 3. Good workes are the outward signes of the inward Beleefe 1. Proposition Good workes doe please God The proofe from Gods word THough God accepteth not man for his workes but for his deere sonnes sake yet that good workes after man his iustification doe please God it is a cleere truth euery where to be read in the holy Scripture For God hath commanded them to be done and requireth righteousnesse not onely outward of the body but also inward of the mind and hath appointed for the vertuous and godly rewardes both in this life and in the world to come and to the wicked punishments spirituall corporall and of bodie and soule eternall in the pit of hell And this is beleeued and acknowledged by the Churches The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth This truth is oppugned by adversaries of diuers kindes For Some hold that seeing man is iustified by Faith he may liue as he listeth as the Libertines Some thinke that to attend vpon vertue and to practise good workes is a yoake too heavie and intollerable as the Simonians Some vtterly cast of all grace vertue and godlines as did the Basilidians the Aetians the Circumcellians and doe the Macchiuilians and Atheists Some permit though not all manner yet some sinnes so allowed was both whordome and vncleane pollutions by the Carpocratians and Valentinians and is of the Iesuits and Papists and periurie in the time of persecution by the Basilidians Helchesaites Priscillianists Henricians and Familie of Loue and violaters of promise yea and oaths made vnto heretikes as they call them Some as the Turkish preists called Seiti and Chagi take it to be no sinne but a worke meritorious by lies swearing yea forswearing to damnifie Christians what they can Much like vnto these are the aequiâ—ocating Iesuits in deluding and deceiuing Protestant Princes their officers by their doubtfull speeches euen when they are sworne to answer plainely and truly by their lawfull magistrates Some suppose that God is pleased with lip seruice onely outward righteousnesse as the hypocriticall Pharisies or Pharifaicall hypocrites 2. Proposition No worke is good excepâ— it spring from faith The proofe from Gods word All which man doth is not pleasing vnto God but that onely which proceedeth from a true faith in Iesus Christ so saith God in his word They that are in the flesh cannot please God In Iesus Christ neither Circumcision auaileth any thing neither vncircumcision but faith which worketh by loue Vnto the pure are all things pure but vnto them that are defiled and vnbeleeuing is nothing pure Without faith it iâ— vnpossible to please God And although the workes of the Beleeuing doe please God yet are they not so perfect that they can satisfie the lawe of God Therefore eueÌ„ of the regenerate iustified saith our Sauiour Christ pray forgiue vs our debts say wee are vnprofitable seruants and S. Paul Wee know that the lawe is spirituall but I am carnall c Wee which haue the first fruits of the spirit euen wee doe sigh in our selues c. and haue infirmities Ye cannot doe the same thing that ye would Which is the faith and confession of the Churches Errors adversaries vnto this truth Therefore wee mislike and condemne the opinions of the Valentinians and Papists The Valentinians say that please God doe Spirituall men which are themselues onely not by Faith but onely by their knowledge of diuine mysteries and Naturall men do please him by their bodily labour and vpright dealing The said Valentinians fained three sorts or degrees of men the first spirituall who through bare knowledge the next Natural who by labour and true dealing shall be saued the third they call Materiall meÌ„ vtterly vncapable of diuine knowledge and religious speculations who must perish both in soule and body The Papists teach that They onely are not good workes which God commandeth but they also which be either voluntarily done of our selues or enioyned vs by preists They are good workes and acceptable before God which are done without faith Workes of themselues without respect vnto Christ please God Men perfectly may keepe the Lawes of God in which error also be the Anabaptists and Familie of Loue 3. Proposition Good workes are the outward signes of the inward Beleefe The proofe from Gods word Many are the reasons why good workes are to be done in part cited afore pag. 49. yet not the least cause is that men may be knowne what they are For the Scripture saith and sheweth that thereby are knowne the good trees from the bad the wheate from the chaffe the tâ—ue disciples from the false the sonnes of God from the children of Satan the regenerate from the vnbeleeuers Hereunto the Saints and Churches doe subscribe Errors adversaries vnto this truth The faithfull shewe their workes yet neither to haue them seene of men as did the hypocriticall Pharisies nor therby to merit heauen as doe the Pharisaicall Papists whose doctrine is that Good workes are meritorious Good workes as Contrition Confession and satisfaction done in penance not onely do merit but are besides a Sacrament for to attaine reconciliation with God and forgiuenes of sinnes Life eternall is due vnto good workes by the iustice of God 13. Article Of workes before Iustification VVorkes done before the grace of Christ and the inspiration of his Spirit 1 are not pleasant to God forasmuch as they spring not of Faith in Iesus Christ 2 neither doe they make men meete to receiue grace or as the schoole authors say deserue grace of congruitie yea rather 3 for that they are not done as God hath willed and commanded them to be done we doubt not but they haue the nature of sinne The Propositions 1. Workes done before iustification please not God 2. Workes done before iustification deserue not grace of
congruitie 3. Workes done before iustification haue the nature of sinne 1. Proposition Workes done before Iustification please not God The profe from Gods word BEfore men doe please God nothing that they doe can please him But men please not God being not renued and iustified by the Spirit For before men be regenerate they are not grapes but thornes nor figs but thistles not good but euill trees not liuely but dead bowes not engraffed but wild oliues not friends but enemies not the sonnes of God but the children of wrath which bring forth no good fruit As the Churches also acknowledge Errors Aduersaries vnto this truth Hereby the vanitie of them is perceiued which thinke before mans iustification his deedes doe please God such are the Papists and were the Basilideans The Papists teach that Workes done without faith doe please God Good works not in respect of Christ onely but in theÌ„selues considered please God The Basilidians placed the doers of ciuill and philosophical righteousnes performed without faith in Christ in the very heauens 2. Proposition Workes done before Iustification deserue not grace of congruitie The vnregenerate not yet iustified haue nothing in them to moue God to be gratious vnto them and being as they are old not newe creatures enemies not fauourers of Godlines The children of wrath not of God sinners not vertuously bent Infidels and not beleeuers of congruitie deserue no grace at Gods hands which is the faith too and confession of other Churches Errors and Adversaries vnto this truth This ouerthroweth the Popish assertions concerning merits of congruitie and that by good workes man is iustified before God and made heire of eternall life As euill workes deserue hell fire so eternall happines is deserued by good workes 3. Proposition Workes done before iustification haue the nature of sinne The proofe from the word of God Whatsoeuer men doe not yet iustified before God it is sinne For of such persons the best workes which they euen their Fasting praying almes-deedes sacrificing vnto God prophecying and working of miracles euen in the name of Christ yea all their actions whatsoeuer are abhominable before God And this is agreable to the Confessions of our brethren The adversaries vnto this truth Erred therefore hath the Councell of Trent in pronouncing them accursed which hold that all workes of men whatsoeuer done before his iustification are sinne 14. Article Of workes of Supererogation Voluntary workes 1 besides ouer and aboue Gods commandements which they call workes of Supererogation cannot be taught without arrogancie and impietie 2 For by them men doe declare that they doe not only render vnto God asmuch as they are bound to doe but that they doe more for his sake then of bounden dutie is required whereas Christ saith plainely when yee haue done all that are commanded to you say wee be vnprofitable seruants The propositions 1. Workes of Supererogation cannot be taught without arrogancie and impietie 2. Workes of Supererogation are that subâ—ersion of godlines and true religion 1. Proposition 〈…〉 arrogancie and impietie The proofe from Gods word WOrkes of Supererogation which are voluntary workes besides ouer and aboue the commandements of God are often condemned in the holy Scripture where wee are commanded to walke not after the lawes of men but according to the Statutes of God and to heare not what man speaketh but what Christ doth say he teaching the dutie of christians setteth before them as their rule and direction the lawe and word of God and more then that hee doth neither vrge nor require And against mans Iniunctions They worship mee in vaine saith hee who for doctrine teach the commandements of men Teach them to obserue all things whatsoeuer I haue commanded you My sheepe here my voice and know not the voice of strangers Which doctrine ordinances workes whatsoeuer besides ouer and aboue that which God hath reuealed and imposed is called of the Apostle somtimes ordinances of the world voluntarie religion sometime the doctrine of Deuills and cursed And the same is condemned in all Churches reformed after the word of God The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Therefore both arrogant and vngodly be the Papists which teach and speak in the commendation of such workes and namely Petrus a Soto the Rhemistes yea and the CouÌ„cell of Trent 2. Proposition Workes of supererogation are the subversion of godlinesse and true religion The proofe from Gods word Where the workes of Supererogation are taught and in regard the Law of God there is broken against the will of Christ that mens traditions may be obserued The holy Scripture must be contemned not as sufficient enough to bring men vnto the knowledge of saluation which S. Paul saith is able to instruct in righteousnesse that the man of God may be absolute being made perfect vnto all good workes God who is onely wise is made vnwise in not prescribing so necessarie workes Faith and other spirituall most special virtues are brought into oblivion Perfection is imputed not vnto Faith in Iesus Christ but vnto workes and which is most detestable vnto the workes too not commanded but forbidden of God ordained by men The Lawe of God is thought to be throughly satisfied and moe duties performed then man needed to haue done The same thinke our brethren of these workes The adversaries vnto this truth Contrariwise the Papists of supererogatorie workes they doe merit say they remission of sinnes and that not for the doers of them onely but for others besides They are tokens of the forgiuenes of sinnes so well as Baptisme yea deliuer fom the wrath of God so well as Christ Are greater and more holy then are the workes commanded in the Decalogue or Law morall And so preferring their owne works and inuentions before God his Law Sacraments and the blood of Christ both ought this doctrine of workes supererogatorie to be counted the doctrine of Deuills and the maintainers thereof taken for the subuerters of godlines and true religion 15. Article Of Christ alone without sinne Christ in the truth of our nature was made like vnto vs in all things sinne onely except 1 from which he was clearely voide both in his life and spirit He came to be the Lambe without spot who by sacrifice of himselfe once made should take away the sinnes of the world and sinne as S. Iohn saith was not in him But 2 all wee the rest although baptized and borne againe in Christ yet offend in many things and if wee say we haue noe sinne wee deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs. The propositions 1. Christ is truly and perfectly righteous 2. All men besides Christ though regenerate be sinners 1. Proposition Christ is truly and perfectly righteous The proofe
from Gods word THat Christ was pure from sinne it is abundantly to be seene in the holy Scriptures For Hee was both conceiued and borne without sinne Hee appeared to loose but not to fulfiâ—l the workes of Satan He liued and was tempted yet without sinne and did no sinne knewe no sinne nor had any sinne in him He died a guiltlesse and iust man euen by the testimonie of Paul Peter Stephen yea of his advsrsarie and iudge Pilate As ours such is the confessions of the purer Churches m. Errors Adversaries to this truth Cursed therefore before God are the Iewes which said that Christ was a violator of the Sabboth That hee taught being not lawfully authorized therevnto That he forbad tribute to be giuen vnto Caesar That hee was the destroyer of the law That he ouerthrew all religion and moued the commons vnto rebellion In this state with the Iewes are The Marcionites which said that he dissolued the Law the Prophets and all the workes of God The Saturnians which blazed that his comming into the world was to ouerthrow the God of the Angels Our newe Heretikes viz. Matthew Hamant in England which divulged that Christ was a sinfull man and an abominable Idol and Leonardus Vairus among the Papists which hath written that Christ was Veneficus or a common poisoner of men and women 2. Proposition All men besides Christ though regenerate be sinners The proofe from Gods word All meÌ„ either be regenerate or vnregenerate the vnregenerate be all sinners vnrighteous sin in whatsoeuer they do The regenerate also be not without their sinnes both originall and actuall Besides there is no man iust in the earth that doth good and sinneth not saith the preacher yee cannot doe the same things that ye would Christ Iesus came into the world to saue sinners of whome I am cheife saith S. Paul In many things we sinne all is S. Iames saying and S. Iohn If we say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues the truth is not in vs Pray therefore Forgiue vs our debts A truth beleeued and confessed by all Churches expressedly by some The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Many adversaries hath this truth had and hath as the Papists the Manichies the Catharans the Donatists the Pelagians Familie of Loue Marcionites Adamites and Carpocratians For The Papists say that the blessed virgin was pure from all sinne both Originall and actuall For these are their owne wordes Our Lady neuer sinned Our Lady sinned not so much as venially in all her life she exactly fulfilled the whole Law that is was without sinne Also of S. Francis they write that for virtue and Godlines he was like vnto Christ and hath fulfilled euery iot of the Law The Manichies and Catharans thought they could not sinne so much as in thought The Donatists dreamed how they were so perfect as they could iustifie other men Some were of opinion as the Pelagians and Familie of Loue how they were so free from sinne as they needed not to say Forgiue vs our trespasses Which Familie also teacheth how there be men liuing as good and as holy as euer Christ was An error of Christopher Vitels a cheife Elder in the said Familie and that Hee which is a Familist is either as perfect as Christ or els a very Deuill Some deemed themselues as pure as Paul Peter or any men as the Marcionites yea as Adam and Euah before their fal as the Adamites yea as Iesus Christ himselfe as the Carpocratians 16. Article Of sinne after Baptisme 1 Not euery deadly sinne willingly commited after Baptisme is sinne against the holy Ghost and vnpardonable VVherefore the grant of repentance is not to be denied to such as fall into sinne after Baptisme 2 After we haue receiued the holy Ghost we may depart from grace giuen and into sinne and by the grace of God wee may rise againe and amend our liues And therefore they are to be condemned which say they can no more sinne as long as they liue heere 3 or denie place of forgiuenes to such as truly repent The propositions 1. Euery sinne committed after Baptisme is not the sinne aganst the holy Ghost 2. The very regenerate may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne and yet rise againe vnto newnesse of life 3. No men vtterly are to be cast off as reprobates which vnfainedly repent 1. Proposition Euery sinne committed after Baptisme is not the sinne against the holy Ghost The proofe from Gods word THough euery sinne in it selfe considered deserueth damnation yet is there a sinne which shall be punished with many and a sinne which shall be punished with few stripes a sinne vnto death and a sinn not vnto death a sinne against the Father and the Sonne which shall be forgiuen and a sinne against the holy Ghost which neuer shall be forgiuen So in their extant confessions witnesse the Churches in Bohem Saxonie and Heluetia Errors adversaries vnto this truth Diuerslly hath this doctrine bin oppugned For Some haue thought all sinnes to be like and equall as the Stoikes Pelagians and Iouinians Some haue taught as Manes the heretike how none of the godly fathers and others from the beginning of the world till the 15. yeare of Tiberius the Emperour though earnestly they did repent were saued but were all punished alike with vtter confusion Some giue out that such persons be vtterly out of Gods fauour and condemned which depart out of this world either afore they are baptized as the Papists doe or afore they come vnto yeares of discretion as Hieranites did 2. Proposition The very regenerate may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne and yet rise againe vnto newnes of life The proofe from the word of God That the Regenerate may fall into sinne and yet rise againe it is a doctrine grounded vpon the Scriptures For in them wee euidently may see that fall they may partly by the admonitions of our Sauiour vnto the man healed of the Palsie and vnto the adultresse of S. Paul vnto the Ephesians Colossians Hebrewes and Timothie and of S. Peter vnto all the godly and partly by the examples of Dauid Salomon Peter who egregiously and very offensiuely did fall and that they doe fall it is most euident by the fift petitioÌ„ of the Lords praier were nothing els to prooue the same but see afore 9. art Prop. 3. art 12. prop. 2. art 15. propo 2. Next that being fallen they may rise againe and be saued it is apparent both by the exhortations of the Angell vnto the Churches of Ephesus Pergamus and Thyatira and by the examples of Peter who denied and
yet afterward confessed his master Christ and of all the disciples who fled and yet returned This both granted is and published for truth by the Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Vnto this truth subscribe will not Either by the Catharans Nouatians Iouinians which thinke Gods people be regenerate into a pure and Angelicall state so that neither they be nor can be defiled with any contagion of sinne Either the Libertines whose opinions were that Whosoeuer hath Gods spirit in him cannot sinne Dauid sinned not after he had receiued the holy Ghost Regeneration is the restoring of the estate wherein Adam was placed afore his fall Or the Papists who are of minde that The workes of men iustified are perfect in this life No man which is fallen into sinne can rise againe and be saued without their Sacrament of Penance S. Francis attained vnto the perfection of holines and could not sinne at all 3. Proposition No men vtterly are to be cast off as reprobates which vnfainedly repent Such as doe fall from grace and yet returne againe vnto the Lord by true repentance are to be receiued as members of Gods church and this by the Scripture is verefied For there wee read that God would haue all men saued God is alwaies readie to receiue the penitent into fauour For there is ioy in heauen for the sinner that conuerteth Christ is grieued when sinners will not repent He shall saue a soule from death and hide a multitude of sinnes which conuerteth a sinner from going astray out of his way The Lord would haue no man to perish but al men to come to repentance If wee acknowledge our sinnes he is faithfull and iust to forgiue vs our sinnes and to clense vs from all vnrighteousnesse Hee exhorteth his erring people to repent and doe their first workes neither refuseth hee the sinner that repenteth as appeareth in the example of the Prodigall sonne and of the debter God then being so gratious and mercifull man after his ensample is both by all good meanes to prouoke sinners vnto repentance and they testifying the same to receiue them into fauour So did S. Paul will the Galatians Brethren saith hee if a man be fallen by occasion into any fault yea which are spirituall restore such one with the spirit of meekenes considering thy selfe least thou also be tempted So did hee enioyne the Corinthians when hee saide If anie hath caused sorrowe the same hath not made me sorie but partly least I should more charge him you all It is sufficient vnto the same man that he was rebuked of many So that nowe contrarywise yee ought rather to forgiue and comfort him least the same should be swallowed yp with ouermuch heauinesse When also he said Receiue him meaning Ouesinus And so teach the Churches Errors and Adversaries vnto this truth Adversaries vnto this truth are they First which leaue nothing but the vnappeasable wrath of God to such as doe sinne after Baptisme as as did both in old time the Montanists and Nouatians and of late yeares Melchior Hoffman the Arch Heretike of his daies and the Anabaptists in Germaine and the Barrowists among our selues in England Next who say that being once regenerate sinne is cut away as with a Rasor so that the godly cannot sinne and therefore neede no repentance so did the Messalians and doe the Familie of Loue Lastly the desperate whose sinnes being either most infinite or abominable they thinke how God hee neither can nor will forgiue them such in times past were Kaine and Iudas in our fathers Franciscus Spira and one Doctor Kraus and in our daies Bolton euen hee that first hatched that sect in England which afterward was tearmed Brownisme 17. Article Of praedistination and election 1 Predestination to life is the euerlasting purpose of God whereby 2 before the foundations of the world was laid he hath 3 constantly decreed by his councell secret to vs to deliuer from curse and damnation 4 those whome he hath chosen 5 in Christ out of mankinde and to bring them by Christ to euerlasting saluation as vessells made to honour wherefore they which be indued with so excellent a benefit of God 6 be called according to Gods purpose by his Spirit working in due season 7 they through grace obey the calling they be iustified freely they be made sonnes of God by adoption they be made like the image of his onely begotten Sonne Iesus Christ they walke religiously in good workes at length by Gods mercie they attaine to euerlasting felicitie 8 As the godly consideration of Predestination and our election in Christ is full of sweete pleasant and vnspeakable comfort to godly persons and such as feele in themselues the working of the Spirit of Christ mortifying the workes of the flesh and their earthly members and drawing vp their minde to high and heauenly things as well because it doth greatly establish and confirme their faith of eternall saluation to be enioyed through Christ as because it doth feruently kindle their loue towards God So for curious and carnall persons lacking the Spirit of Christ to haue continually before their eies the sentence of Gods predestination is amost dangerous down fall whereby the Deuill doth thrust them into desperation or into rechlesnes of most vncleane liuing no lesse perilous then desperation Furthermore 9 wee must receiue Gods promises in such wise as they be generally set forth vnto vs in holy Scripture and 10 in our doings that will of God is to be followed which wee haue expresly declared vnto vs in the word of God The Propositions 1. There is a Predestination of men vnto everlasting life 2. Predestination hath bin from euerlasting 3. They which are predestinate vnto saluation cannot perish 4. Not all men but certaine are predestinate to be saued 5. In Christ Iesus of the meere will and purpose of God some are elected and not others vnto saluation 6. They who are elected vnto saluation if they come vnto yeares of discretion are called both outwardly by the word inwardly by the spirit of God 7. The Predestinate are both iustified by faith sanctified by the holy Ghost and shall be glorified in the life to come 8. The consideration of Predestination is to the godly wise most comfortable but to curious and carnall persons very dangerous 9. The generall promises of God set forth in the holy Scriptures are to be embraced of vs. 10. In our actions the word of God which is his his revealed will must be our direction 1. Proposition There is a predestination of men vnto euerlasting life The proofe from Gods word That of men some be predestinate vnto life it is a truth most apparent in the holy Scripture by the testimonie both of Christ himselfe who saith To sit at my right hand and at my
left hand is not mine to giue but it shall be giuen to them for whome it is prepared of my Father Many are called but fewe chosen For the elects sake those daies shall be shortned Feare not little flocke for it is your Fathers pleasure to giue you a kingdome I tell you in that night there shall be two in one bedde the one shall be receiued and the other shall be left All that the Father giueth mee shall come vnto me Witnessed also is this by the Euangelist Luke and Paul the one saith how of the Gentiles at Antioch so many as were ordained vnto eternall life beleeued and the other those whome he knewe before he did also predestinate Wee are vnto God the sweete sauour of Christ in them that are saued and in them which perish to the one wee are the fauour of death vnto death and to the other the sauour of life vnto life Blessed be God euen the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ which c. hath chosen vs in him before the foundation of the world c. who hath predestinate vs to be adopted through Iesâ—â— Christ vnto himselfe c The examples also of the elected creatures man and Angels of the two brethren Abel and Kaine Isaac and Ismael Iacob and Esau of the two Eunuches of K. Pharao of the two kingdomes Iuda and Israel the two peoples Iewes and Gentiles the two Apostles Peter and Iudas the two Theeues vpon the Crosse the two men in the fieldes and the two women at the Mill make to the illustration of this truth All Churches consent with this doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Erre therefore doe they which stand in opinion that Some are appointed to be saued but none to be damned In soule some persons but in soule and body together none shall be saued of this minde were the old heretikes viz. the false Apostles the Carpocratians the Valentinians the Cerdonites the Manichies and the Hieranites and of their opinion be the Familie of Loue 2. Proposition Predestination hath bin from euerlasting The profe from Gods word Predestination beganne before all times It will be said saith our Sauiour Christ Come ye blessed of my Father inherite ye the kingdome prepared for you from the foundations of the world God hath chosen vs in Iesus Christ before the Foundation of the world God hath saued vs c. according to his owne purpose and grace which was giuen to vs through Christ Iesus before the world was The publike confessions of the Churches namely in Heluetia Basil and France beare witnesse herevnto Aduersaries vnto this truth Those wrangling Sophisters then are deceiued who because God is not included within the compasse of any time but hath all things to come as present continually before his eies doe say that God he did not in the time long agoe past onely but still in the time present likewise doth predestinate 3. Proposition They which are predestinate vnto saluation cannot perish The proofe from Gods word All that the Father giueth mee shall come to mee and him that commeth to mee I cast not away saith Christ I giue vnto them eternall life and they shall neuer perish neither shall any pluck them out of my hand c. none is able to take them out of my Fathers hand The gates of hel shall not ouercome the Church Moreouer whome be predestinate them hee also glorified For the giftes and calling of God are without repentance They went oâ—t from vs but they were not of vs for if they had beene of vs they would haue continued with vs So the Churches of God as afore in this article The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Wander then doe they from the truth which thinke That the very elect totally and finally may fall from grace and be damned That the regenerate may fall from the grace of God may destroy the temple of God and be broken off from the vine Christ Iesus which was one of Glouers errors That the number of those which be predestinate may both encrease and be diminished so thought the Pelagians 4. Proposition Not all men but certaine be predestinate to be saued The proofe from Gods word Wee denie that all and affirme that a certaine chosen and companie of men be predestinate and so doth Gods word Reioice that your names are written in heauen I knowe mine and am knowne of mine is the saying of Christ Iesus I suffer all things for the elects sake saith S. Paul The very same with vs doe the Churches affirme Adversaries vnto this truth Wee are therefore against them which teach how not certain but all euen the most vngodly and damnable yea the very Deuils shall be saued of which opinion were the Originists and are the Cptabaptists All men be elected vnto life euerlasting There is no hell nor future and eternall misterie at all but only either in maÌ„s opinioÌ„ as hold the Atheists or in the heart and conscience of man in this life as the Familists maintaine No certaine companie be foredestined vnto eternall condemnation None more then others be predestinate vnto saluation which was an error of Henry Bolsteck In like sort we condemne such as either curiously enquire who and how many shall be saued or damned or giue the sentence of reprobation vpon any men whosoeuer as doe the Papists vpon Caluine Beza and Verone when they call them Reprobates 5. Proposition Of the meere will and purpese of God some men in Christ Iesus are elected and not others vnto saluation The proofe from Gods word In the Scripture wee read of mans predestination the cause efficient to be the euerlasting purpose of God the cause formall God his infinite mercie and goodnes the cause materiall the blood of Christ the cause finall or ende why both God the Father hath loued and Christ for his elect hath suffered is the glorie of God and the saluation of man And this doe all the Churches militant and reformed with a sweete consent testifie and acknowledge Errors adversaries vnto this truth Hereby is discouered the impietie of those men which thinke that 1. Man doth make himselfe eligible for the kingdome of heauen by his owne good workes and merits So teach the Papists The kingdome of heauen say they is prepared for them that are worthie of it and deserue it by their well doing Licet electis gloria ex eterna Dei predestinatione dimanet non tamen provenit nisi ex eorum operibus c. Sine nobis non glorificamur 1. Although from Gods eternall predestination glory floweth to the elect yet for all that it springeth not but from their owne workes c. Without our selues wee are not glorified 2. God
into the world that he should condemne the world but that the world through him might be saued God will that all men shall be saued and come vnto the knowledge of the truth 2. The doctrine of the Gospell for the free remission of sinnes is to be preached not vnto a fewe but vniuersally and generally vnto all men Goe therefore and teach all nations baptizing them c Goe into all the world and preach the Gospell to euery creature He that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued but hee that will not beleeue shall be damned 3. The seales of the couenant be appointed to be giuen to all men and members of the visible Church or desirous to be ineorporated there into For All are to be baptized and all are to participate of the bread and cuppe at the Lords supper 4. As the disobedience of Adam brought condemnation vpon all men so the blood and obedience of Christ is able all-sufficient to wash away all sinnes and that of all men 5. No man euer truly repented but he was receiued againe into fauour so was Dauid after his adulterie Manasses after his Idolatrie Peter after his Apostacie the Thiefe vpon the Crosse the Niniuites The adversaries vnto this truth They are not to be heard then which say that The number of the Elect is but small and seeing wee are vncertaine whether wee be of that companie or no wee will proceede in our course as wee haue begunne God is an acceptor of persons and so vniust in chusing some and refusing others God hath predestinate all those personns to eternall death which are not in the state of true repentance which was one of Glouers errors It is the part therefore of all and euery man Not to refuse the mercies of God both generally and gratiously offered vnto all men by his word and Sacraments Not to despaire in respect either of the greatnes or multitude of his sinnes Nor yet to prouoke the Lord to execute his vengeance vpon them through prophanes of life or securitie 10. Proposition In our actions the word of God which is his reuealed will must be our direction The proofe from Gods word In our doings but cheiefly in the matter of Predestination wee are to follow not our own iudgement and what seemeth good in our owne opinions but the will of God and that will too not which is concealed from vs viz. of God his omnipotencie wherby he gouerneth at his pleasure the things by himselfe created whereof mention is made both in the Psalmes in the Prophet Isay and other places of his word but of his fauour and good pleasure towards man reuealed in the holy Scriptures by Iesus Christ whome wee are to heare Subscribed hereunto haue and doe Gods church euery where The adversaries vnto this truth This truth is gainesaid by the Phrygians Montanists and Messalians also by the Enthusiastes Anabaptists And Familie of Loue which leaue the written word of God and relie vpon their owne dreames visions and lying reuelations Hence proceedeth the contempt of Gods written word and of the Preachers and all religious exercises thereof For saith the Familie of Loue No difference is there betweene a ceremoniall either Letre Doctor Christian an vncircumcised Heathen 18. Article Of obtaining eternall saluation onely by the name of Christ. 1 They also are to be had accursed that presume to say that euery man shall be saued by the Lawe or sect which he professeth so that he be â—iligent to frame his life according to that Law and the light of nature For holy Scripture doth set out vnto vs 2 onely the name of Iesus Christ whereby men must be saued The propositions 1. The profession of euery religion cannot saue a man liue he neuer so virtuously 2. No man euer was is or shall be saued but onely by the Name or faith of Iesus Christ. 1. Proposition The profession of euery religion cannot saue a man liue hee neuer so virtuously The proofe from the word of God THis we cannot but acknowledge to be a truth if wee beleeue the Scriptures for they testifie that Iewes and Gentiles are all vnder sinn culpable before God and depriued of the glory of God All men that would be saued must be borne againe of the holy Ghost No man is iustified by the workes of the Lawe either ceremoniall or morall God hateth the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes and of Balaam The Reprobate whose names are not written in the booke of the life of the Lambe they doe worship the Beast Punishments eternall and intolerable are threatned both to the Beast and the false prophet and likewise to all such as will not goe out of Babylon and to all Idolaters The confessions of Gods people are to this ende and purpose Errors adversaries vnto this truth Then to be had accursed are they which affirme that This obseruation of the Iudaicall ceremonies is necessarie vnto saluation as did the false apostles the Ebionites and the Corinthians Such throughout the world as lead an vpright life and be morally righteous whatsoeuer their religion is shall be saued as many of the Philosophers were in the opinion of the Valentinian and Basilidian heretikes of Galeatus Martius and Erasmus Roterodam That men externally may professe any religion and notwithstanding be saued if their affections and hart be with the Familie of Loue That all those which liue vprightly and doe good deedes shall be of equall happines in the kingdome of heauen be they Turkes Christians Iewes or Moores A Turkish error That men may embrace and follow the sect and religion which they haue most minde vnto and so doing please God and shall be saued the Lampatians doctrine That no sect euer erred or were out of the way to heauen a fancie of the Rhetorians 1. Proposition No man euer was is or shal be saued but onely by the name or Faith of Iesus Christ. The proofe from Gods word This wee cannot but acknowledge to be true if also wee beleeue the scriptures which say that Among men there is giuen none other name vnder heauen whereby wee must be saued Through Iesus Christ his name all that beleeue in him shall receiue remission of sinnes In thee viz. Christ Iesus shall all the Gentiles be blessed And this is the Faith and confession of the reformed Churches The errors and Adversaries vnto this truth Many waies this truth very heretically is oppugned For Some teach that wee are saued not by Christ but as the Valentinians said by the labour of their hands and by their owne good workes as Simon Magus boasted by his faire Helene as Matthew Hamant held by other meanes and that all persons which worshipped Christ are abominable Idolaters as
that the church of Rome neither hath nor can erre Erraverunt aliae ecclesiae saith Di. Stella other churches as of Antioch Alexandria Constantinople c. haue erred sed nunquam ecclesia Romana but the church of Rome neuer yet erred Id constanter negamus saith Costerus the Iesuit we constantly deny that christ his Vicars Peters successors the Bishops of Rome haue either taught heresies or can propound errors God preserueth the truth of christian religion in the Apostolike sea of Rome and It is not possible that the church meaning the church of Rome can erre or hath erred at any time in any point say the Rhemists 20. Article Of the authoritie of the Church 1 The Church hath power to decree rites or ceremonies 2 and authoritie in controuersies of faith And yet it is not lawfull for the Church 3 to ordaine any thing that is contrarie to Gods word 4 neither may it so expound one place of Scripture 5 that it be repugnant to another VVherefore although 6 the Church be a witnesse and a keeper of holy writ yet as it ought not to decree any thing against the same so 7 besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be beleeued for necessitie of saluation The propositions 1. The church hath power to decree rites or ceremonies 2. The church may not ordaine what rites or ceremonies shee will 3. The church hath authoritie to iudge and determine in controuersies of faith 4. The church hath power to interpret and expound the word of God 5. The Analogie of faith must be respected in the exposition of the Scripture 6. The church is the witnesse and keeper of Gods written word 7. The church may not enforce any thing to be beleeued as necessarie vnto saluation that is either contrarie or besides the word of God 1. Proposition The church hath power to decree rites or ceremonies The proofe from the word of God THe churches authoritie to decree rites or ceremonies is warranted in the word of God first by the example of the Apostles who did ordaine rites and ceremonies among other things that In the church men should not be couered Women should keepe silence and be couered A knowen tongue vnderstood of the common auditorie should be vsed with other things Next by the generall and binding commandement of God himselfe who at all times will haue euery thing in the church to be done vnto edifying honestie and by order as beeing not the author of confusion but of peace All churches protestant confesse the same Errors adversaries vnto this truth This power being giuen by the Supreame authoritie vnto the Church they doe greatly offend which doe condemne either generally all or particularly some rites and ceremonies orderly and lawfully established of the former sort are 1. The Familie of Loue who say of themselues how they are a free people in bondage vnto no creature nor to any created thing they haue no seuerall distenting or variable religions either ceremonies 2. The Brownists who teach that euery Christian is to ioyn himselfe vnto that people among whome the Lords worship is free and not bound or withholden with any iurisdiction of this world 3. The Puritanes whereof some would haue all matters of ceremonies to be left in christian libertie vnto euery man Others would haue both temples to be left without seruice Sermons and Sacraments and Princes to be scared with the feare of vproares and sedition and all because they would be freed from the obedience vnto ceremonies not impious of themseluees imposed by the Church the Father of these men was Illyricus of whome Melancton writeth Of the latter kinde be 1. The Familie of Loue againe who vtterly dislike our Churches or Temples also our Liturgies formes of seruing our God and finally our designed times of meeting together for the worshippe of God Our Churches there blasphemously tearme Common houses and so we tearme Brothell houses or the stewes Our Lyturgies and manner of seruing of God they call Foolishnes of taken on seruices false and seducing Gods seruices of no man to be ordained nor to be obeied or vsed when they are established with these ioyne the Barrowists who doe write that to haue Leiturgies and formes of common praier is to haue another Gospell and another Testament Our Sabboths they contemne yea they condemne for they say There ought to be no Sabboth day Our Sabbatarians goe not so farre yet come they neere unto these Familists when they divulge that The Church hath no authoritie ordinarily and perpetually to sanctifie any day but the seuenth day which the Lord himselfe had sanctified The church cannot take away this libertie of working sixe daies in the weeke These assertions are against all holy daies lawfully established Barrow yet goeth further then doe these men for he saith how the obseruing of times as it is in our church is an error fundamentall They also be alike culpable who approouing some rites and ceremonies do yet tie the church or people of God to the obseruation of the ceremonies either Mosaicall as many haue donne and doe or of the Romish Church as doe the Papists and the halfe papists the Familie of Loue Finally they are out of the way which thinke that either one man as the Pope or any certaine calling of men as the clergie hath power to decree and appoint rites or ceremonies though of themselues good vnto the whole church of God dipersed ouer the vniuersall world 2. Proposition The Church may not ordaine what rites and ceremonies shee will The proofe from Gods word As it is a cleere truth that the church may ordaine ceremonies so true is it also that the church hath no power to appoint what rites or ceremonies shee will For shee must decree none which be Either for their owe nature impious like the ordinances manners and Idols of our forefathers teachers of vanitie and of lies Or for vse superstitious like the brazen Serpent which king Ezekiah brake in peices Or for their weight ouer heauie and greiuous to be borne like the Iewish constitutions Or for their worthines in the eies of the ordainers either of equall price or of more account then the very ordinances of God so as for the performance of them the lawes of God must be left vndone such were many of the Pharisaicall tires and traditions Or against the libertie of christians and to the entangling of them againe with the yoake of seruile bondage Or last of all any way contrary to the commandements word and will of God But the rites ceremonies and constitutions of the church they must make altogether and tend both to the nourishing and encrease of loue friedship and quietnes among christians and also to the retaining of Gods people in the holy seruice worship
mysticall and propheticall as Brocardus Morelius and others Some are of minde that the Gospell or Euangelicall word cannot be committed to letters and wrighting saith Lindanus Some doe thinke as afore also hath bin shewen how that is the olde and onely true sense of the Scriptures which is made and giuen by the Church and Pope of Rome Some doe maintaine that as the Church in time doth alter so the interpretation of the Scripture also therwithal doth vary wherby that which in the Apostles time was a truth in these daies shall be a falsehood In which error was Cardinall Cusanus 6. Proposition The Church is the witnesse and keeper of Gods written word The proofe from Gods word Though the Church hath authority to heare and determine in controversies of faith yet hath the Church power neither to iudge the word of God nor to iudge otherwise then Gods word doth iudge For it is saide to the Church and people of God I beseech you brethren marke them diligently which cause diuisions and offenses contrarie to the Doctrine which you haue learned and auoid them Here him To him giue all the Prophets witnesse Search the Scriptures whosoeuer trangresseth and abideth not in the the doctrine of Christ hath not God yee are c. built vpon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets And of the holy Scriptures Thy word is the the truth They haue Moses and the Prophets let them heare them saith our S. Christ. Wee haue also a sure word of the Prophets saith Saint Peter And S. Paul The whole Scripture is profitable to teach c. If any man teach otherwise and consenteth not to the wholsome wordes of our L. Iesus Christ he is puft vp and knoweth nothing c And so with vs doe other Churches conceiue both of the Scriptures and Church yet all of vs do grant that the Church as a faithfull witnesse may yea of necessitie must testifie to the world what hath bin the doctrine of God his people from time to time and as a trustie Recorder is to keepe make knowne what the word of God which it hath receiued is which truly hath bin perfomed afore the word was written by the Patriarchs and after the same was committed to writing before Christ his incarnation by the Iewes in Christ his life time in the primitiue Church From the Apostles time by the godly Christians thoroughout the world Errors adversaries vnto this truth Be it farre therefore from vs to thinke which the Papists do not stick to write and say namely that The Church is to iudge the Scriptures and not the Scriptures the Church The Scripture is not of the essence of the Church Because without it a Church may be though not very well So said Card. Cusan The Scripture because in their opinion it is vnperfect cannot obscure may not ambiguous ought not be the iudge So Lindan Latomus Petrus a Soto Pighius Coster c. He is an heretike that cleaueth to the Scriptures So said Iacobus Hocstratus Againe the carefull keeping of the holy Scriptures by Gods people from age to age and time to time declareth first how the mother Church of Rome is not the onely keeper of the holy writ and next that cursedly they doe offend which either as greatly esteeme the Ethickes of Aristostle as the commandements of god the Odes of Pindar as the Psalmes of Dauid the workes and bookes of men as the writings of God which the Councell of Trent doth or before and aboue the scripture prefer vnwritten Traditions Hence Petrus a Soto Tradition saith hee is both more auncient and more effectuall the◠the holy Scripture and Lindan The scriptures would be of no validitie neither had continued till this day but for traditions 7. Proposition The Church may not enforce any thing to be beleeued as necessary vnto saluation that is either contrarie or besides the word of God The proofe from the word of God Yee shall put nothing vnto the word which I command you neither shall yee take ought there from Put nothing vnto his words least hee reprooue thee and thou be found a liar Though it be but a mans couenant when it is confirmed yet no man doth abrogate it or addeth any thing thereto If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall ad vnto him the plauges that are written in this booke And if any man shal diminish of the words of the booke of this prophecy god shall take away his part out of the booke of life and out of the holy cittie and from those things which are written in this booke And so witnesse with vs the Churches reformed Whatsoeuer also is grounded vpon Gods written word though not by our common and vulgar tearmes to be redde therein wee doe reuerendly embrace which maketh vs for doctrine to embrace the Consubstantiality of our Sauiour with the Father and the holy Ghost which the Arrians would not a Trinitie of persons in the Godhead which the Sabellians would neuer doe the iustification by faith Onely which the Papists will not the baptisme of Infants and young children which the Anabaptists dare not and for discipline not to refuse of Church officers the names Archbishops Patriarches Primates Metropolitanes Suffragans Parsons Vicars c. of ecclesiasticall censures the tearmes Suspension Excommunication of Ceremonies none at all which tend either vnto order comelines or edification But from the heart wee abhor in matters both of doctrine and disciple whatsoeuer either agreeth not with the canon of the Scripture or is not grounded thereupon The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Hence detest wee both all the old heretikes and their fancies with the newe prophets of Basilides the Manifestation of Marciō the mysteries of the Manichies the Iobolia of the Sathiās the Symbonia of the Archōtikes the Cabala of the Iewes the Alcaron of the Turkes and also all newe heretikes and Schismatikes with all their cursed opinions as first the Anabaptists and namely the Libertines the Dauigeorgians and Familie of Loue and all the codeified Elders thereof as Henry Nicholas Eliad Fidelitas Christopher Vitell Theophilus the Exile and the rest Next the Papists whereof Some haue commanded that all the Popes decrees should be taken as confirmed by the mouth of God himselfe so did Pope Agatho the first Some write as Busgradus that if the Pope beleeue there is no life to come as some Popes haue done wee must beleeue it as an article of our faith Some say if the Pope carrie innumerable soules with him vnto hell yet he may not be iudged so did Pope Boniface the 8. Some as Bellarmine conclude that it is a point of faith to hold that the Bishop of Rome hath succeeded Peter in the vniuersall regiment of the Church Others as the Iesuites perswade their Catholikes
that the king of Spain and their Catholike faith are so linked together as it is become a point of necessitie in the Catholike faith to put all Europe into the handes of the said King otherwise the Catholike religion will be vtterly extingvished and perish Others of them haue published a new Gospell called Euangelium aeternum Spiritus sancti which they say doth so farre excell the Gospell of Christ as the Cernell surpasseth the shell the Sunne the Moone light darkenes The author whereof was one Cyrellus a Carmelite And lastly the Puritanes and all the speculations of Brown Barrow Greene Penrie Marprelate T.C.E.G.R.H. A.C. I.B. with the newe Sabbatarians and their fancies 21. Article Of the authoritie of generall Councells Generall Councells 1 may not be gathered together without the commandement and will of Princes And 2 when they be gathered together forasmunch as they be an assemblie of men whereof all be not gouerned with the Spirit and word of God they may erre and 3 sometimes haue erred euen in things pertaining vnto God wherfore 4 things ordained by them as necessarie vnto saluation haue neither strength nor authority vnlesse it may be declared that they be taken out of holy Scriptures The propositions 1. Generall Councells may not be gathered together but by the commandement and will of Princes 2. Generall Councells may erre 3. Generall Councells haue erred euen in things pertaining vnto God 4. The things ordained by generall Councells are so farre to be embraced and beleeued as they are consonant to Gods holy word 1. Proposition Generall Councells may not be gathered together but by the commandement and will of Princes The proofe from Gods word GReat is the power and authoritie of Kings and Princes by the word of God For as the defense of Religion is committed vnto them so must they see that all men doe their duties That these things the better may be performed they are as iust occasion is offered not as men vnder the power of others to Simon but as Supreame gouernours within their own terretories and dominions to command all sorts of men to meete together and that either to the implanting of the truth where it is not or to the suppressing of sinne errors idolatrie and superstition where or in whomsoeuer it doth arise or is rooted Such Councells were holden both in the time of the Moisaicall gouernement by the commandement of the most godly Kings Dauid Salomon Asa Ezekiah and Iosiah and since the Gospell hath bin receiued into kingdomes and Commonweales by Christian Princes kings and Emperours who gathered Councells both Generall as the Nicene was by Constantine the great the Councell of Constantinople by Theodosius the elder the Counsell of Ephesus by Theodosius the younger the councell of Calcedon by Marcian Nationall and Prouinciall so the Counsell at Frankford Rhemes Taron Arelot and Moguntia by the will and commandement of Charles the great at Matison by Gunthranus at Paris and Orleance by the direction and appointment of Childebert were kept and holden And neuer yet hath there bin a councell either Generall or nationall or whatsoeuer I only except the councells held by the Apostles and Apostolicall men in a troublesome state and time of the Church there beeing then no Christian Princes Emperours to countenance the truth either begun or ended to the glorie of God but it hath bin I say not called onely but confirmed also by some godly Emperour King or Queene This in effect is granted by all reformed Churches The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth This assertion hath bin oppugned and that diuersly both by the Papists and Puritanes For the Papists they say Emperours and kings be the Pope his Summoners but of themselues are no absolute and powerfull commanders and callers of Councels There ought no councel to be kept without the determinate consent of the Bishop of Rome No councell euer yet had firme and lawful authority which was not confirmed by the Bishop of Rome The Popes of Rome and not Christian Princes haue the authoritie and power of making lawes ecclesiasticall and of calling Councells And the Puritanes do thinke that priuate persons without the leaue or priuitie of Princes may summon assemblies about Church causes at their pleasures and consult about the publike affaires of the Church Of this minde was Beza and be the disciplinarians both of South and North Brittaine Others aduersaries to both Puritanes and Papists are of minde that were the Pope a good man as he is nothing lesse he might and hee being wicked other good Bishops though subiect vnto Kings and Emperours may summon Counsells at their discretions An error of Seluererus The Muscouites haue a fancie that since the seuenth generall Counsell that was neither Prince nor Pope nor any other men els haue power to call a generall counsell 2. Proposition Generall coucells may erre The proofe from Gods word Generall Councells consisting first of men who may erre nothing more easily for all the imaginations of mans heart are onely euill continually euen from his youth but God onely is true and all men are yea and euery man is a Liar Next of men differing in yeares riches learning iudgement calling and authoritie whereby distractions of opinions often doe arise Thirdly of many mē wherof the wicked be for nūber commonly the maior part and the better in outward countenance of the world Lastly of men not al nor alwaies either gouerned with Gods holy Spirit and word or gathered together in the Name of Christ none of sounde iudgement in Religion do doubt but they may erre If Paphmitius had bin absent at Nice that Councell had erred If Hierome had bine away at Calcedon that Councell had erred At any time if some be beleeued be the Pope of Rome not present at such meetings either per se or per Legatum by himselfe or his Legate no Councell but must erre Therefore Councells may erre That which one Counsell doth establish another will disanull They will not wee must thinke reuoke that which is well decreed Therefore councells may erre The adversaries vnto this truth Therefore erre doe the papists which say that the holy Spirit is the director of all Councells and That councells cannot erre 3. Proposition Generall Councells haue erred euen in things pertaining vnto God The proofe from Gods word Councells both generall and particular haue erred and that in matters of Faith For in the holy Scriptures wee finde that it was ordained If any man did confesse that Iesus was the Christ hee should be excommunicate which could not be but by a Councell A councell was gathered to suppresse Christ and his doctrine A councell consulted how they might take Iesus by subtilty and kill him A councell sought for false witnesse to put him to death By a counsell
which of modestie I will not mention but doe ouer passe 5. Proposition Invocation of Saints is a fonde thing not warranted by the holy Scriptures nor consonant but contrarie vnto the same The proofe from Gods word The Christian exercise of Prayer is a dutie which may not be either securely omitted or vainly abused And though many things in prayer be necessarily to be obserued yet a speciall point is it that in our supplications and prayers we doe call onely vpon God For so to doe we are both commanded euen by God himselfe and thereunto also allured by manifold as well promises of large blessings as by the examples of godly men in all ages Patriarkes Abraham Isaac Iaakob Prophets as Daniel Elias Ieremie Centurions Publicans Apostles as Paul Peter c. yea of all the Elect of God in this world On the other side to pray vnto any creature that is out of this world besides Iesus Christ there is in the Scripture neither Law to command nor promise of blessing nor any example of godly men or women to prouoke Finally as all Gods people in the purer and former times haue so in these daies the Protestant Churches vtterly condemne the inuocating of or praying vnto creatures whatsoeuer The Adversaries vnto this truth Therefore the Romish doctrine that Saints are to be praied vnto and their daily praying as occasion serueth vnto S Agatha that haue sore breasts vnto S. Benedict that either be or feare to be poisoned vnto S. Clare for them that haue sore eies S. Damian that be sicke for health S. Erasmus for helpe in the intrals S. Feriol for Geese S. Giles for women that would haue children S Hubberts for dogges S. Iob for them which haue the poxe S. Katherine for knowledge S. Loys for horses S. Margaret for women in trauaile S. Nicholas for little children S. Otilia for the headach S. Petronil for the Ague S. Quintin for the cough S. Ruffin for lunacie or madnes S. Sebastian for the plague S. Thomas Becker for sinners S. Valentine for the falling sicknes S. Winefield for virginitie S. ✚ or Crosse for all things it is vaine not warrantable by Gods word but altogether repugnant to the holy scriptures The vanitie and idolatrie of the Popish Invocation further demonstrated from that booke of theirs entituled Horae beatissimae virginis c. Oremus Maiestatem tuam Domine suppliciter exoramus vt sicut Ecclesiae tuae beatus Andraeas Apostolus tuus extitit praedicator rector ita apudâ—â— sit pro nobis perpotuus intercestor per Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum Oremus Deus pro cuius Ecclesia gloriosus martyr Rontifex Thomas gladiis impiorum occubuit praesta quae sumus 〈◊〉 omnes quiaius implâ—rant auxilium prae petitionis eius salutarèm cause quantur effectum per Dominum nostrum Versus Ora pro nobis beata Katherina Resp. Vt digni efficiamur promissionibus Christi Versus Ora pro nobis beate Martyr Sebastiana Resp. Vt mereamur pestem epidimiae illaesi transire promissionem Christi obtinere Virgo Christi egregia pro nobis Apollonia Funde preces ad Dominum vt tollat omne noxium Ne proreatu criminum morbo vexemur dentium Let vs pray O Lord we humbly beseech thy Maiestie that as thy blessed Apostle Andreas was a preacher and ruler of thy Church so he may be a perpetuall intercessor for vs through Iesus Christ our Lord. Let vs pray O God for whose Churches sake the glorious Martyr and Bishop Thomas was slaine by the sword of the vngodly graunt we beseech thee that such as call vnto him for helpe may obtaine a good effect of his godly praier through our Lord. The vers O blessed Katharine pray for vs. Thans That wee may be made worthy of the promises of Christ. The vers O blessed Martyr Sebastian pray for vs. The Ans. That wee deserue to escape the plague without hurt and obtaine the promises of Christ. Christ his noble virgin Apollonia pray vnto the Lord to remoue whatsoeur is hurtfull least for the guiltines of our sinns wee be vexed with the tooth ach Whosoeuer saith this prayer following in the worship of God and S. Roche the very words in the said booke shall not die of the pestilence by the grace of God c. Oremus Omnipotens sempiterne Deus qui precibus meritis beatissimi Rochi confessoris tui quondam pestem generalem reuocasti presta supplicibus tuis qui pro simili peste reuocanda sub tua confidunt fiducia ipsius gloriesi Confessoris tui prâ—camine ab ipsa peste epidiâ—â—ae ab omni perturbatione liberemur per Christum Dominum nostrum Oratio ad tres Reges Rex Iasper rex Melchior rex Balthasar rogo vos per singula nomina rogo vos per sanctam Trinitatem rogo vos per regem regum quem vagienteâ—â— in cunis viderâ— meruistis compatiamini tribulationum mearum hodiè intercedatis pro me ad dominum cuius desiderio exules factiestis Crux Christi protege me Crux Christi salua me Crux Christi defende me ab omni malo Let vs pray O almightie and euerlasting God who by the prayers and merits of thy most blessed Confessour Roche didest reuoke a certaine generall plague grant vnto thy suppliants who for the reuocatioÌ„ of the like plague doe trust in thy faithfullnes by the prayer of that thy glorious Confessour wee may be deliuered from the plague and from all aduersity through Christ our Lord. A prayer vnto the 3. kings O King Iaspar king Melchior king Balthasar I beseech you by euery of yournames I beseech you by the holy Trinitie I beseech you by the king of kings whom yee deserued to see euen in his swadling cloathes that you would take pittie on my troubles this day and make intercession for mee vnto the Lord for whose desire yee made your selues exiles O Christs crosse protect me ô Christs crosse saue me ô Christs crosse defend mee from all euill 23. Article Of ministring in the Congregation 1 It is not lawfull for any man to take vpon him the office of publike preaching 2 or ministring the Sacraments in the congregation 3 before he be lawfully called and sent to execute the same 4 And those wee ought to iudge lawfully called and sent which be 5 chosen and called to this worke 6 by men who haue publike authoritie giuen vnto them in the congregation to call and send ministers into the Lords vineyard The propositions 1. None publikely may preach but such as thereunto are authorized 2. They must not be silent who by office are bound to preach 3. The Sacraments may not be administred in the Congregation but by a lawfull Minister 4. There is a lawfull Ministery in the Church 5. They are lawfull Ministers which be ordained by men lawfully appointed to the calling and sending forth of Ministers 6. Before
Ministers are to be ordained they are to be chosen and called 1. Proposition None publikely may preach but such as thereunto are authorized The proofe from Gods word THis truth in the holy Scripture is euident For there we finde how ◠The godly men were both called by God and commanded to preach before they would or durst so doe So was Samuel Ieremie Iohn Baptist Christ Iesus himselfe who also to preach did send the twelue Apostles and the seuentie Disciples 2 The wicked and false Prophets for preaching afore their time are blamed 3 A commandement is giuen vs to pray the Lord of the haruest that hee would send forth labourers into his harvest 4 Lastly wee doe read that God hath ordained in the Church some to be Apostles some Prophets some teachers some to be workers of miracles and Christ beeing ascended into heauen gaue some to be Apostles some Prophets some Euangelists and some Pastors and teachers And all this is acknowledged by the reformed Churches Errors Adversaries to this truth And so are wee against them Which to their power doe seeke the abolishment of publike preaching in the reformed Churches as doe first the Papists who phrase the Preachers to be vncircūcised Philistins sacrilegious ministers Hieroboams priests inordinate and vnordered Apostataes and next the Barrowists who say how the said Preachers are sent of God in his anger to deceiue the people with lies Who publish how the word is not taught by the Sermons of ministers but onely by the Reuelation of the Spirit so did Muncer the Anabaptist and so doth H. N. and his Familie of Loue Who runne afore they be sent as doe many both Anabaptists and Puritanes as Penrie Greenewood Barrow c. or which hold how they which are able to teach and instruct the people may and must so doe and that not priuately onely but publikely too though they be not ordinarily sent and authorized thereunto which was the doctrine of R.H. Who teach that Lay-men may teach to get faith and that euery particular member of the Church hath power yea and ought to examine the manner of administring the Sacraments c. and to call the people to repentance so teacheth Barrow 2. Proposition They must not be silent who by office are bound to preach The proofe from Gods word As publikely to preach before men are sent is a grieuous fault so not to preach being sent is a great sinne Hereunto beare witnesse 1. Our S. Christ whose words are these Surely I must also preach the Kingdome of God For therefore am I sent 2. Peter and Iohn who being charged to speake no more in the Name of Iesus said Wee cannot but speake that which wee haue heard and seene 3. S. Paul For hee writeth Necessitie is laid vpon mee and woe is mee if I preach not the Gospell 4. The apostles of Christ. For though they were beaten for so doing yet ceased they not to teach and preach Iesus Christ 5. All the Churches of God which be purged from superstion and errors Errors adversaries vnto this truth Then as in glasse they may see their faults Who maintaine how there ought to be no publike preaching at all as doe the Anabaptists Which depraue the office of Preaching as doe the Libertines saying that preaching is none ordinarie meanes to come vnto the knowledge of the word and especially the Familie of Loue who tearme the publike preachers in derision Scripture learned Licentious scripture learned good-thinking-wise Ceremoniall and letter Doctors Teaching masters and further say It is a great presumption that any man out of the learnednesse of the letter taketh vpon him to be a Teacher or Preacher Againe It becometh not any man to busie himselfe about preaching of the word so and more too the Familie Which take vpon them the office of publike preaching without performance of their duty either through ignorance that they cannot worldly emploiments that they may not negligence that they will not or feare of troubles that they dare not preach the word of God Yet thinke wee not which our Sabbatatians let not to publish that Euery minister necessarily and vnder paine of damnation is to preach at least once euery Sunday and Vnlesse a minister preach euery Sunday he doth not hallow the Sabboth day in the least measure of that which the Lord requireth of vs. 3. Proposition The Sacraments may not be administred in the Congregation but by a lawfull minister The proofe from Gods word In the holy Scripture wee read that the publike ministers of the word are to be the Administers of the Sacraments For both our S. Christ commanded his disciples as to preach so to Baptize and celebrate the supper of the Lord and the Apostles and other ministers in the purest times whom the godly Ministers and Preachers in these daies doe succeede not onely did preach but also Baptize and Minister the Lords Supper And hereunto doe the Churches of God subscribe In saying that none may administer the Sacraments in the Congregation afore hee be lawfully called and sent thereunto wee thinke not as some doe that the very beeing of the Sacraments dependeth vpon this point viz. whether the Baptizer or giuer of the Bread and wine be a minister or no. Neither is it the meaning of this article that priuately in houses either lawfull ministers vpon iust occasion may not or others not of the ministerie vpon any occasion in the peace of the Church may administer the Sacraments The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Hereby wee declare our selues not to fauour the opinion that publikely Some may minister the Sacraments which are not meerely and full ministers of the word and Sacraments and so thinke both the Anabaptists among whome their king when it was after Supper tooke bread and reaching it among the Communicants did say Take eate shew forth the Lords death their Queene also reaching the Cuppe said Drinke yee and shew forth the Lords death and the Presbyterians at Geneua where the Elder a Laie man ministereth the Cup ordinarily at the Communion Some ministers and namely the Puritane Doctors may not minister the Sacraments For say the disciplinarians the office of Doctors is onely to teach true doctrine but in our Church of England the Doctor encroacheth vpon the office of the Pastor For both indifferently doth teach exhort and minister the Sacraments None though a lawfull Minister may administer the Sacraments which either is no preacher or when hee ministreth them doth not preach which be the errors of the Disciplinarians or Puritanes Publiquely and priuately too the Sacrament of Baptisme may be administred by any man yea by women if necessitie doe vrge So hold the Papist For saith Iauell in the time of
the seuen Sacraments How there be seuen Sacraments of the newe Testament That he is accursed that shall say there be either moe or fewer then seuen Sacraments or that any of them is not verily and properly a Sacrament or that they be not all seuen instituted of Christ himselfe That there are seuen Sacramēts wherof two are voluntary at the discretion of men to be taken or not as Matrimonie holy orders and fiue are necessary and must be taken and of these fiue three to wit Baptisme Confirmation and Orders are but once to be taken because they imprint an indeleble character in the soule of the receiuers and fower be reiterable and may often be receiued as the Sacrament eucharisticall Matrimonie Penance and of extreame Vnction because at their first ministration they leaue in the soule no indeleble character 5. Proposition Confirmation is no Sacrament Touching Confirmation the sentence and iudgement of the true Church is that rightly vsed as it was in the primitiue Churh it is no Sacrament but a part of Christiā discipline profitable for the whole Church of God For the auncient Confirmation was nothing else then an examination of such as in their infancie had receiued the Sacrament of Baptisme and were then being of good discretion able to yeeld an account of their beleeife and to testifie with their owne mouthes what their suerties in their names had promised at their Baptisme which confession being made and a promise of perseueranc in the Faith by them giuen the Bishop by sound doctrine graue aduise and godly exhortations confirmed them in that good profession and laying his hands vpon them praied for the increase of God his gifts and graces in their mindes The Popish confirmation all Churches of God with vs vtterly doe dislike as no Sacrament at all instituted by Christ Errors adversaries vnto this truth Contrariwise the sinagogue of Rome teacheth that Confirmatiōis a Sacramēt whereby the grace that was giuen in Baptisme is confirmed and made strong by the seuen gifts of the holy Ghost Of which their Confirmation they giue vs fower things principally to obsetue viz. 1. The substance or matter which is holy Chrisme confect as they say and made of Oile oliue and Bawlme consecrated by a Bishop 2. The forme and manner of ministring the same consisting of the wordes of the Bishop which are I signe the with the signe of the Crosse and confirme thee with the Chrisme of saluation in the name of the Father c. of the actions both of a Godfather or Godmother alreadie confirmed holding vp the child to the Bishop and of the Bishop first crossing him which is to be confirmed on the forehead with oile and next striking the partie confirmed on the eare 3. The minister who must bee a Bishop and none inferior Minister 4. The effect or effects rather For by Confirmation they say that Sinnes are pardoned and remitted The grace of Baptisme is made perfect Such become men in Christ who afore were children Grace is giuen boldly to confesse the name of Christ and all things belonging to a Christian man The holy Ghost is giuen to the full And perfect strength of the minde is attained But in so teaching dangerous and very damnable doctrine doe they deliuer For It is an error that confirmation is a Sacrament because it hath no institution from God which is necessarie to all and euery Sacrament inasmuch as a Sacrament cannot be ordained but by God onely euen as the Papists themselues doe confesse To say that popish Confirmation is grounded vpon Gods word is to speake foule vntruthes For in the Scripture there is mention neither of the matter that it must be Chrisme and that made of oile oliue and Bawlme and the same consecrated of a Bishop nor of the forme that either a Bishop must signe the party to be baptized with the signe of the Crosse or that a Godfather c. must be thereat nor of the minister that of necessitie hee must be a Bishop that is to confirme nor of the effects that thereby sinnes are pardoned and released and Baptisme consummated and made perfect It is an error to say there is any other ointment giuen to the strengthning of the Church militant besides the holy Ghost 1 Ier. 2.27 It is an error to maintaine that any Bishop can giue heauenly graces to any creature It is an error to ascribe saluation vnto Chrisme and not onely vnto Christ. It sauoureth of donatisme to measure the dignitie of the Sacraments by the worthinesse of the ministers It is an error to say that men cannot be perfect Christians without Popish Confirmation It is an error that by Confirmation the holy Ghost is giuen to the full 6. Proposition Penance is no Sacrament Touching penance the Papists doe publish fower things to be noted whereof none of them is truly grounded vpon the word of God First the matter which they doe say is partly the actions of the person penitent which are sufficient contrition of his heart perfect Confession of all his sinnes and that in particular with all the circumstances as of time place c. and satisfaction by deedes which maketh an amends for all his offenses partly the absolution of the Preist Secondly the Forme which in the Preist is the words of Absolution which he vttereth ouer the sinner in the person penitent it is his kneeling downe at the Preists feete his making the signe of the Crosse vpon hts breast and his saying Benedicite to his ghostly Father The Preist say they beareth the person of God and is the lawfull Iudge ouer the penitent and may both absolue from the guilt of sinne and inflict a punishment according to the offense Thirdly the minister who ordinarily is the curate of euery parish but extraordinarily and in the time of extreame necessitie or by licence is any Preist And yet some sinnes are so grieuous as none may absolue but either the Bishop or his Penitentiarie as the crime of Incest breaking of vowes Church robbing Heresie adulterie and some againe none remit or pardon but the Pope onely or his Legate as Burning of Churches violent striking a Preist counterfaiting of the Popes Bulles c. Fourthly and last of all the effect Hereby they say the penitent sinner is purged absolued and made as cleane from all sinne as when he was newly baptized and besides enriched with spirituall gifts and graces The consideration hereof hath mooued besides the Church of England all other Churches reformed to shewe their detestation of this newe Sacrament as hauing no warrant from Gods word The blasphemies are outragious and the errors many and monstrous comprised in this doctrine of Popish Penance For neither can the matter of this their Sacrament nor the forme nor the minister nor the effect be drawne from the word of God They say Penance is a Sacrament and yet can they shew no element it
hath to make it a Sacrament Their Contrition is against the truth For no man is or can be sufficiently contrite for his sinnes To confesse all sinnes and that one after another with all circumstances vnto a Priest as it is vnpossible so is it neuer enioyned by God nor hath euer bin practised by any of God his Saints That any man in any measure can satisfie for his sinnes it is blasphemie to say and against the merits of Christ. And yet doe the Papists teach it as also that one man may satisfie for another An vntruth is it that any preist Bishop or Pope hath power at his will to forgiue sinnes or can enioyne any punishment that can make an amends vnto God for the least offense If penance purge men and make them clean from all sinn then is there a time and that very often in this life when men in this life be perfect which tendeth greatly to the error of the Catharans Donatists and Pelagians The doctrine of the Papists that such persons as willingly depart out of this world without their Shrift are damned is damnable doctrine and to be eschewed and yet is it dispersed euery where in their bookes 7. Proposition Orders is no Sacrament The Church of England and of other places reformed doe acknowledge an order of making ministers in the Church of God where all things are to be done by order But that Order is a Sacrament none but disordered Papists will say and yet they obserue none order in speaking of the same For among them Some doe make seuen orders whereof some they call inferior and some superior the inferior be be the order first of Porters whose office is to keepe the doore to expell the wicked and to let in the faithfull next Exocristes or Coniurers which haue power to expell the deuills thirdly Lectors or Readers who are to read Lessons and bookes in the Church Fourthly Acolytes or Candle bearers whose office is to beare Cruels to the altar with wine and water and to carrie about Candles and Tapers The superior is the order of Subdeacons Deacons and of Preists The Subdeacons are to read the Epistle at seruice time to prepare necessaries for mistration and to assist the Priest in ministration The Deacons dutie is to read the Gospell and also to assist the Preist in ministration The Preist his part and office is to minister Sacraments that is to say Baptisme Penance the eucharist and to sacrifice for the quick and the dead Annoiling of the sick and Matrimonie Others numbring the seuē Sacraments doe quite ouerpasse in silence the Sacrament of order and in place thereof mention the Sacrament of Preisthood as Vaux of Bishopdome as Hugh Cardinalls of Archbishopdome as W. Paris These seuen Orders say some Papists as Lombard are seuen Sacraments which added to the other sixe make 13. Sacraments and are from Christ and his Apostles time yea were instituted euen by Christ himselfe Which theire assertions are besides the word of God For in the holy Scripture VVhere can it be seene that either orders as some can make one or seuen Sacraments or Preisthood as others thinke is a Sacrament what element hath it what forme what promise what institution from Christ Where can any of those hideous titles of Porter Exorcist c. be found ascribed to any minister of the new Testament or the manner of their creation or offices established Some Papists themselues doe write that all inferior orders are not grounded vpon Scripture but some of them come by tradition And Peter Lombard saith plainely that fiue of the seuen orders neither can be read in the word of God nor yet were heard of in the primitiue Church Where is it appointed to the ministers of the newe Testament onely to minister Sacraments or to minister moe then two viz. Baptisme and the Lords Supper By what one place of Scripture haue Priests authoritie to offer Sacrifice and that for the quick and the dead also Where without extreame blasphemie can they shew that our S. Christ was a Porter an Exorcist an Acolyst c. alwaies in his Chruch a King a Prophet and a Priest 8. Proposition Matrimonie is no Sacrament Matrimonie is a state of life holy and honourable among all men Howbeit to say that the same is a Sacrament instituted and that by Christ as the Papists doe wee cannot be enduced and that for diuers reasons· For marriage or the wedded state was neuer commanded by God to be taken for a Sacrament Againe it hath neither outward element nor prescribed forme nor promise of saluation and a Sacrament should and Baptisme and the Lords Supper haue Besides matrimonie may be entred into or not at our discretion But it is not at our choise to be partakers or not to participate of the sacraments if wee may come by them Moreouer Matrimonie was ordained euen by God himselfe in the time of mans innocencie but the Sacraments of the newe Testament were institued by Christ. Finally it was no Sacrament to the Fathers afore and in the time of the law and therefore is no Sacrament to vs. Herevnto subscribe the Churches of God elswhere all of vs opposing our selues against the manifold aduersaries of this truth whereof Some haue too highly cōceiued of the wedded state such are the Papists when they will haue it to be a Sacrament as hath bin said and such were the Vigilantian Bishops who would take no men into the Clergie except they would be married first Others againe too basely and badly thinke of Matrimonie defending some of them howe it is not meete that any man or woman should marrie at all such were the Gnostickes the Marcionites the Tatians the Montanists i the Manichies the Hieracites and the Apostolikes That any man or woman should twice marry the husband or wife being dead of this minde were the Catharans Origen and Tertullian That some kinde of persons should euer marrie as namely those which haue taken holy orders or be of spirituall kindred these errors the Papists doe hold Lastly that any persons should be married but by Popish preists thinking all those men and women not lawfully married which are coupled together by Protestant ministers and therefore haue newe married such persons So did the Papists both in the Lowe countries and in France 9. Proposition Extreame vnction is no Sacrament The Papists doe take Anoiling of the sick which they call extreame Vnction for a Sacrament whereof as they write The matter is oile hallowed by a Bishop wherewith the sick person is annoiled vpon the Eies Eares Mouth Nose Hands and Feete The Form is the words which the Preist speaketh when hee doth annoint the sick person in the foresaid places saying By this Oile God forgiue thee thy sinnes which thou hast committed by thine Eies Nose Eares and Mouth by thine Hands
and by thy feete all the Angels Archangells Patriarches Prophets Apostles EuaÌ„gelists Martyrs Confessours Virgins Widdowes Infants heale thee The Minister therof vsually is a priest but may be any other Christian. The effect of annoiling is to purge and put away veniall sinnes committed by mispending of our senses as also sinnes forgotten In this antichristian doctrine many errors be contained For In respect of the matter the Papists make of greasie matter a spiritual ointment whereas there is none ointment spirituall but the holy Ghost In respect of the forme the onely propitiator and mediatour betweene God and man Christ Iesus is blasphemed and the merit and power of his death ascribed vnto greasie oile Besides Christ is not acknowledged for the onely Sauiour of mankinde and Physitian of our soules but other Physitians be called vpon besides him In respect of the minister they hold how any maÌ„ hath power to forgiue sinns which belongeth vnto God alone also that other men yea women and not the minsters of the word onely may be minsters of the Sacraments In respect of the effect they teach vs which is vtterly vntrue that neither all sinnes be mortall nor that Christ hath cleansed such as be his from all their sinnes by his pretious blood 10. Proposition The Sacraments are not to be abused but rightly to be vsed of vs all The proofe from Gods word In the word of God the right vse of the Sacraments and the ends of their institution are euidently set downe For Concerning Baptisme Christ hee saith Teach all nations baptizing them c Hee that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued Touching the Lord his Supper saith our Sauiour of the Bread take eate c. and of the Cup Drinke yee all of it and S. Paul The cup of blessing which wee blesse is not the communion of the blood of Christ The bread which wee breake is not the communion of the body of Christ This truth doe the Chruches reformed by their Confessions subscribe vnto The errors adversaries vnto this truth Then greatly doe they sinne who either doe not vse the Sacraments either at all as doe the Schwenfeldias or minister them but vnto whome they list so is Baptisme of the Seruetians and Anabaptists ministred onely vnto elder persons denied vnto Infants and so is the same Sacrament of the Marcionites ministred vnto single persons but denied vnto married folkes or doe abuse them So abused is baptisme by them who baptise things without reason yea some times without life or sense so haue the Papists baptized both Bells and Babels as the greater Bell of S. Iohn de Lateran at Rome by Pope Iohn the 14. who named it Iohn after his owne name and the great Bell of Christ church in Oxford which D. Trâ—sham the Vice chancellor named Mary Babells as the Duke of Aluar cheife Standare which hee vsed in the Lowe countries was baptized by Pius Quintus An. 156â— and called Margaret by the said Pope and so the Cataphrygians baptized the dead bodies of men Againe Baptisme was Baptized by the Marcionites when they baptized the liuing for the dead also by the Noâ—uatian and Papists when they rebaptized infants afore baptized as they tearmed them by Heretikes And so abused was the Lords Supper by certaine Heretikes condemned in a Councell at Carthage whose manner was to thurst the Sacrament into the mouthes of dead men and is by the Papists whose gift is to vse it magically as a salue against bodily siâ—knes and aduersitie also to carrie the same about pompously and superstitiously in the open streetes to be adored of the beholders 11. Proposition All which receiue the Sacraments receiue not therewithall the things signified by the Sacraments The proofe from Gods word Wee read in the holy Scripture that Some persons doe receiue the Sacraments and the things signified by the Sacraments which are the remission of sinnes and other spirituall graces from God and so receiued was the Sacrament of Baptisme of Cornelius and the Lords Supper of the good disciples and the godly Corinthians Some againe receiue the sacraments but not the things by them signified so receiued was Baptisme of Sunon Magus and the Lords Supper of Iudas and so receiue the Atheists Libertines and impenitent persons And some receiue not the Sacraments at all and yet are partakers of the things by the Sacraments signified such a communicant was the Theife vpon the Crosse This maketh vs to conceiue well both of those men and womeÌ„ which would and yet cannot communicate in the publike and Christian assemblies and of the children of Christian parents which depart this world vnbaptized Furthermore it is apparent how Saluation is promised to such as are baptized yet not simply in respect of their baptisme but if they doe beleeue Againe S. Paul faith whosoeuer shall eate the bread or drinke the cuppe of the Lord Vnworthily shall be guiltie of the body and blood of Christ And this the purer Churches euery where doe acknowledge The adversaries vnto this truth The Papists therefore be in a wrong opinion which deliuer that The Sacraments are not only Seales but also causes of grace and The Sacraments doe giue grace euen because they be deliuered and receaued ex opere operato 26. Article Of the vnworthinesse of the Ministers which hinder not the effect of the Sacraments Although in the visible Church the euill be euer mingled with the good and sometime the euill haue chiefe authoritie in the ministration of the word and Sacraments yet forasmuch as they doe not the same in their owne name but in Christs and doe minister by his commission and authoritie 1 wee may vse their ministerie both in hearing the of God and in the receiuing the Sacraments Neither is the effect of Christs ordinance taken away by their wickednes nor the grace of Gods gifts diminished from such as by faith and rightly doe receiue the Sacraments mâ—nistred vnto them which are effectuall because of Christs institution and promise although they be ministred by euill men Neuerthelesse it appertaineth to the discipline of the Church that 2 enquirie be made of euill ministers and that they be accused by those that haue knowledge of their offenses and finally being found guiltie by iust iudgement be deposed The propositions 1. The effect of the word and Sacraments is not hindred by the badnes of ministers 2. Euill Ministers are to be searched out convicted and deposed but orderly and by the discipline of the Church 1. Proposition The effect of the word and Sacraments is not hindered by the badnes of Ministers The proofe from Gods word OF the ministers ecclesiasticall the Church is to conceiue neither to sinisterly as though their vnworthines could make the word and Sacraments the lesse effectuall to such as worthily doe heare and receiue them nor on the
Manichians which baptize not any Not false christians or Marcionites which did baptise the liuing for the dead Which Marcionites also denied Baptisme vnto all married persons baptized none but persons single virgins widdowes and women diuorced from their husbands Not Originists who maintaine a Baptisme by fire as also that after the resurrectiō of our bodies wee shall haue neede of Baptisme Not of Matthewe Hamants opinion that Norfolke Heretike which stood in it to the death that Baptisme is not necessarie in the Church Not Anabaptists which number Baptisme among things indifferent and so to be vsed or refused at our discretion Not Familists which say there is no true Baptisme but onely among themselues Nor Papists who both baptise Bels Babels as afore hath bin showen art 25. prop. 10 and also make the vowe and profession of the monachall or life of a Monch as good a token of Christians as Baptisme 2. Proposition Baptisme is a signe or seale of the regeneration or newe birth of Christians The proofe from Gods word Baptisme of S. Paul is called the washing of the newe Birth of others the Sacrament of the newe birth to signifie how they which rightly as all doe not receiue they the same are ingrafted into the body of Christ as by a seale be assured frō God that their sinnes be pardoned and forgiuen and themselues adopted for the children of God confirmed in the faith and doe increase in grace by virtue of praier vnto God And this is the constant doctrine of all Churches protestant and reformed The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth But no part of the true Church thinketh as did manie old haeretickes viz. that The baptized of the orthodoxall ministers are to be rebaptized as said the Nouatians Originall sinne is not pardoned in Infants as said the Pelagians because they haue no such sinne in them at all Onely sinnes past and not sinnes future or not yet committed are by Baptisme clensed as the Messalians held Being once Baptized we can no more be tēpted as thought the Iouians which was the error also of the Pelagians The Baptsme of water is now ceased and the Baptisme of voluntary blood by whipping is come in place thereof without which none can be saued as the Flagelliferians published Wee also condemne the opinion Of the Russeis that there is such a necessitie of Baptisme as that all that die without the same are damned Also of the Bannisterians which say that the water at Baptisme is not holy in respect that it is applied to an holy vse that the ordinarie and common washings among the Turkes and Iewes is the same to them that Baptisme is to vs Likewise of the Familie of Loue which conceiue basely of this Sacrament calling it in derision Elementish water and of no better validitie or virtue then common water Also of the Anabaptists who ascribe no more vnto Baptisme then vnto any other thing ciuilly discerning one man from another and say that the Sacraments of the newe Testament are no instruments to raise or confirme faith And lastly of the Papists who maintaine that Baptisme serueth to the putting away of originall sinne onely Baptisme bringeth grace euen ex opere operato 3. Proposition Infants and young children by the word of God are to be baptized The proofe from Gods word Although by expresse tearms wee be not cōmanded to baptize young children yet wee beleeue they are to be baptised and that for these among other reasons 1. The grace of God is vniuersall and pertaineth vnto all Therefore the signe or Seale of grace is vniuersall and belongeth vnto all so well young as old 2. Baptisme is vnto vs as Circumcision was vnto the Iewes But the Infants of the Iewes were circumcised Therefore the children of Christians are to be baptized 3. Children belong vnto the kingdome of heauen and are in the couenant therefore the signe of the couenant is not to be denied them 4. Christ gaue in commandement that all should be baptized Therefore young children are not to be exempted 5. Christ hath shed his blood aswell for the washing away the sinnes of children as of the elder sort Therefore it is very necessarie that they should be partakers of the Sacrament thereof All Christian churches allowe of the Baptisme of infants Adversaries vnto this truth The premises declare that They slander vs which say That all Protestants denie the Baptisme of children to be necessarie and this is Runnagate Hills report They erre which oppugne this truth as doe many persons but not after one and the same sort For. Some vtterly denie that Infants or young children are to be baptized so did the Pelagians the Heracleons and the Henricians and so doe the Anabaptists whereof said some how baptisme is the inuention of Pope Nicholas and therefore naught others that Baptisme is of the deuill So thought Melchior Hoffeman so also doe the Swermerians a set among the said Anabaptists the Seruetians and the Familie of Loue which doth hold that none should be baptized vntill hee be thirtie yeares old Others refuse to baptise not all but some Infants So denied is Baptisme by the Barrowists vnto the seede of whores and witches by the Brownists vnto the children of open sinners by the the Disciplinarians vnto their children which subiect not themselues as Dud. Fenner saith vnto the discipline of the Church or obey not the Presbyteriall decrees Others allow the Baptisme of Infants yet thinke those Infants not lawfully baptized which are baptized either by the newe ministers of the Church of England as the Brownists doe thinke or by Protestant ministers as the Papists are of minde witnesse their rebaptizing of Infants in France and in Netherland or by vnpreaching ministers as the disciplinarian Puritanes doe hold And others are of opinion that none are to be baptized which beleeue not first Hence the Anabaptists Infants beleeue not therefore be not to be baptized Hence the Lutherans Infants doe beleeue Therefore to be baptized 28. Article Of the Supper of the Lord. The Supper of the Lord is not only 1 a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues one to another but rather 2 it is a Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death Insomuch that to such as worthily with Faith receiue the same the Bread which we breake is a partaking of the Body of Christ and likewise the Cuppe of blessing is a partaking of the Blood of Christ. 3 transubstantion or the change of the substance of Bread and wine in the Supper of the Lord canot be proued by holy writ but is repugnant to the plaine words of Scripture ouerthroweth the nature of a Sacrament and hath giuen occasion to many superstitions 4 The Body of Christ
is giuen taken and eaten in the Supper onely after an heauenly and spirituall manner and the meane wherby the Body of Christ is receiued and eaten in the Supper is Faith 5 The Sacrament of the Lords Supper was not by Christs ordinance reserued carried about lifted vp or worshipped The Propositions 1. The supper of the Lord is a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues 2. The Lords Supper is a Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death and to them which receiue the same worthily by Faith a partaking of the Body and Blood of Christ. 3. The Bread and Wine in the Lords Supper be not changed into another substance 4. The Body of Christ is giuen taken and eaten after an heauenly and spirituall not after a carnall sort 5. To reserue carrie about lift vp or worship the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is contrary to the ordinance of Christ. The Propositions 1. Proposition The Supper of the Lord is a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues The proofe from Gods word THe Supper of the Lord is a token of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues For which cause it is called the Lords table the Lords Supper a communion of the body of Christ and they that partake thereof though they be manie yet are but one bread and one body This is the doctrine of all Christian Churches The errors adversaries vnto this truth So thinke not those men who either with heretike Hamant denie the vse of the Lords Supper to be necessarie or with the Rhemists raile on it and the Protestants that vse the same calling it a prophane and detestable Table the Cuppe of deuills 2. Proposition The Sacrament of the Lords Supper is Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death and to them which receiue the same worthily by Faith a partaking of the Body and blood of Christ. The proofe from Gods word The Sacrament of the Lords Supper is to all Christians a Sacrament of our redemption by Iesus Christ. For. This is my blood of the newe Testament which is shedde for many for the remission of sinnes this is my body which is giuen for you c. This cuppe is the newe Testament in my blood which is shedde for you saith our Sauiour And to such as receiue the same worthily and by Faith it is the partaking of the Body and Blood of Christ This is a truth openly both maintained testified by the neighbour Churches Errors Adversaries to this truth Diuersly hath this proposition bin oppugned For Some either denying or not acknowledging the benefite of so heauenly a Sacrament doe say how It is to be receiued onely for obedience sake to the princes commandement but is of none effect to the perfect ones An opinion of the Families It doth neither good nor hurt to the receiuers The Messalians error It doth much hurt and no good to participate the Lords Supper among Protestants say the Papists It is no signe assuring vs that all our sinnes through Christ are pardoned For onlie veniall and mortall sinnes are thereby remitted and we must alwaies doubt of the forgiuenesse of our sinnes say the same Papistes Others doe teach that It can profit such as haue no faith as Babes and Infants in which error be the Russians yea the dead bodies of men It can benefit such as receiue it not at all if on there behalfe it be administred as persons absent vpon the Seas in the warres yea and dead and present too when yet they participate not but the Priest for them These errors the Papistes defend 3. Proposition The bread and VVine in the Lords Supper be not changed into another substance The proofe of Gods word Transsubstantiation or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine in the Supper of the Lord we do vtterly deny and the reasons moouing vs thereunto are for that it is repugnant to the plaine words of the Scripture For I will not drinke hencefoorth of this fruite of the Vine saith our Sauiour Christ Which fruite had it really bin either the Blood or by way of concomitance the very Body and blood of Iesus Christ then our Lord had eaten himselfe which is not only blasphemous to be spoken but also impossible to be done and directly against the word of God where commandement is often giuen that the blood with flesh not of Beast much lesse of man must not be eaten The heauen must containe Iesus Christ vntill the time that all things be restored saith S. Peter If Christ therefore corporally according to his humanitie be in heauen then is he not in the Sacrament As often as ye shall eate this Bread not Christ his reall Body and drinke this Cuppe not the reall Blood of Christ you shewe the Lords death till he come saith S. Paul Therfore hee is not come which hee must be being vnder the formes of Bread and Wine TransubstaÌ„tiatioÌ„ besides ouerthroweth the nature of the Sacrament For where there is no Element there can be no Sacrament Because Gods word comming vnto the element maketh a Sacrament Finally it hath bin the occasion of much superstition and Idolatrie For from hence proceeded the Reseruation of the Transubstantiated bread for sundrie superstitious purposes hence the adoration of the Bread euen as God himselfe and that both of Priest and people hence the carrying about in pompous procession of the wafer-God and hence the Popish feast called Corpus Christi-day The right consideration hereof hath mooued all the Churches reformed to shewe their detestation hereof both by their Sermons and wrightings The adversaries vnto this truth Abhominable therefore be the Popish errors viz. that In the Eucharist there is nâ—t the substance of Bread and wine but onely the meere accidents and qualities Substantially and really the Body and Blood together with the soule and diuinitie of our Lord Iesus Christ and therefore Christ is contained in the Sacrament Eucharisticall Vnder each kind and vnder euery part of each kinde seuerally whole Christ is comprised After the consecration in the wonderfull Sacrament of the Eucharist the Body and blood of our Lord Iesus Christ is and that not onely in the vse while it is taken but afore also and after in the Hosts or consecrated peices reserued or remaining after the Communion In the holy Sacrament Christ the onely begotten Sonne of God is to be adored with the very worship of Latria Marcus also that detestable heretike held that the wine of the Lords Supper was conuerted into blood 4. Proposition The Body of Christ is giuen taken and eaten after an heauenly and spirituall not after a carnall sort The proofe from Gods word The regenerate haue in them a double life one carnall the other spirituall The life carnall and temporarie they brought with them into this
drunken of All Heereunto subscribe the Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Though it be a mans couenant yet when it is confirmed no man doth abrogate or addeth any thing thereunto What impudencie then yea what impietie doe they showe which alter this ordinance of God Some by adding thereto So added was vnto the Bread Cheese by the Autotarits Blood by the Cataphrygians the Seed of man by the Manichies vnto the Wine warme Water by the Moscouits Some by taking there from so the Eutratits the Tatians the Seuerians vse no wine at all the Manichies doe minister only the Bread the Papistes though they vse both kinds yet they alwaies denie the Cup vnto the people and vnto Priests also when they say not Masse affirming that The people participating of the Cup thereby perceaue no fruite of spirituall comfort but receaue to themselues damnation It is not by Gods but Mans lawe that Lay persons communicate either in both kinds or in one Notwithstanding that Christ instituted the Sacrament to be receaued vnder both kinds and the primitiue Church accordingly did so administer the same Hoc tamen non obstante yet this notwithstanding it is to be taken of the Laitie but vnder one kind Some by confounding the elements So the Moscouites doe mingle Bread and Wine together and the Papistes make a mixture of Wine and Water maintaining that Water must be mixt with Wine at the consecration of the blood and that the mixture of Water with Wine without sin cannot be omitted Some by changing the Elements So the Aquarians and the Hydroparastites for Wine administred and gaue Water vnto the people 31. Article Of the one Oblation of Christ finished vpon the Crosse. The offering of Christ once made 1 is that perfect redemption propitiation and satisfaction for all the sinnes of the whole world both originall and actuall and there is none other satisfaction for sinne but that alone VVherefore 2 the sacrifice of masses in the which it was commonly said that the Preists did offer Christ for the quicke the dead to haue remission of paine and guilt were blasphemous fables and dangerous deceipts The Propositions 1. The blood of Iesus Christ once shed for mankind vpon the Crosse is a perfect redemption propitiation and satisfaction for all the sinnes of the whole world 2. Sacrifices of the Masse are most blasphemous Fables dangerous deceipts 1. Proposition The Blood of Iesus Christ once shed for mankind vpon the Crosse is a perfect redemption propitiation and satisfaction for all the sinnes of the whole world The proofe from Gods word OF the benefits redounding vnto mankind by Christ his offering vp of himselfe vpon the Crosse we haue in sundrie places afore spoken and by the word of God prooued him to be the perfect Redemption propitiation and satisfaction for all the sinnes of the whole world both originall and actuall Heereunto the Churches of God beare witnesse The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Hereby it is euident to the eies of all godly persons that most accursed be the errors of them which doe affirme that From the beginning of the world vntill the 15. yeare of the Emperour Tiberius none at al were â—aued The error of Manes the heretike Mans body is not capable of happines but the soule onely and yet no soules shall be saued but there owne said the Marcionites All men and women that sinne after Baptisme are vndoubtedly damned In this error were the Montanists and the Nouatians Our saluation is of our selues so said Melchior Hoffeman an arch Heretike Man is restored to grace of Gods meere mercie without the meanes of Christs blood death and passion One of Mathew Hamants blaspemous assertions The Sauiour of Men is Iesus Christ a man and no woman who came into the world to saue no women but men say some Papists and redeemed the superior world onely which is man said Postellus the Iesuit and yet not all men neither for S. Francis hath redeemed so many as are saued since his daies say the Franciscan Friers The Sauiour of women from her time till the end of the world is S. Clare affirm some other papists as Postellus saith it it one mother Iane The Sauiour of men and women is S. Mary through her virginitie say some is S. Christina by her passion say other Papists There is no sufficient sacrifice yet offered for the sinnes of the world One of F. Kets errors Christ hath satisfied and was offered onely for originall sin an error of Thomas Aquinas Sinnes actuall and veniall are taken away by sacred Ceremonies by a Bishops blessing by a preists absolution Sinnes actuall and Mortall be remised by a Pardon from some Bishop or from the Pope of Rome 2. Proposition The sacrifices of the Masse are most blasphemous Fables and dangerous deceipts The papists deliuer how the the Masse is a sacrifice a sacrifice propitiatorie a sacrifice propitiatorie for the quick the dead the same propitiatorie sacrifice that was offered by Christ himselfe vpon the Crosse A sacrifice in which by virtue of a fewe euen fiue words mumbled by a Preist Christ euen that Christ which hung vpon the Crosse is contained A sacrifice seruing for all persons quick and dead to purge them from their sinnes to ease them of their paines to satisfie for their punishment and for all necessities corporall and spirituall A sacrifice propitiatorie of Iesus Christ really offered to God the Father and that often in the honour of dead Saints A sacrifice wherein Christ is so gloriously as it is to be adored euen with diuine worship both of Priest and people A sacrifice meritorious to all them for whom it is offered although they be not liuing but dead not present but absent not endued either with zeale or knowledge but quite destitute of faith and that ex opere operato Hereby are wee to note first blasphemous Fables For It is a fable that the Masse is a sacrifice and that propitiatorie a fable that a fewe words of a Priest can change Bread into a liuing Body yea many Bodies with their soules and that of Iesus Christ God and man a fable that one and the same sacrifice is offered in the Masse which was offered on the Crosse a fable that the said Masse is any whit profitable for the quick much lesse for the dead Next dangerous deceipts For hereby men are to beleeue that Creatures may be adored contrary to Gods word Christ is often offered contrary to the Scripture The Preist offereth vp Christ contrarie to the Scripture Sinnes be forgiuen without blood contrary to the Scripture Christ died not once but dieth daily contrarie to the Scripture Faith is not
time of Edward the sixt and therefore wee iudge them to be read in Churches by the ministers diligently and distinctly that they may bee vnderstood of the people Of the names of the Homilies 1. Of the right vse of the Church 2. against perill of Idolatrie 3. Of the repairing and keeping cleane of Churches 4. Of good workes first of Fasting 5. Against Gluttonie and drunkenes 6. Against excesse of apparell 7. Of prayer 8. Of the place and time of prayer 9. That common prayers and Sacraments ought to bee ministred in a known tongue 10. Of the reuerend estimation of Gods word 11. Of Almes doing 12. Of the Natiuitie of Christ. 13. Of the Passion of Christ. 14. Of the Resurrection of Christ. 15. Of the worthy receiuing of the Sacrament of the Bodie and Blood of Christ. 16. Of the gifts of the holy Ghost 17. For the Rogation daies 18. Of the state of Matrimonie 19. Of Repentance 20. Against Idlenesse 21. Against Rebellion Touching this Article the greatest matter is not whether these Homilies meant and mentioned doe containe doctrine both godly wholesome and necessarie but whether Homilies or any Apocrypha wrightings at all may be read in the open Church and before the congregation which I thinke they may and prooue thus Great is the excellencie great also the vtility of Gods word preached Therefore saith S. Paul None can beleeue without a preacher and Woe is mee if I preach not the Gospell Howbeit the manner of preaching is not alwaies one the same For the Apostles were to teach as well by the penne as by the liuely voice Paul did preach the Gospell by writing wee owe in a manner more to the bonds of Paul for his bookes than to his libertie for preaching Calvins writings will edifie all men continually in the time to come Protestants bookes are witnesses of sound doctrine and sincere Christianitie For my part I cannot but magnifie the goodnes of God for all good meanes to bring vs vnto Faith and so vnto saluation but especially for the written labours of holy and learned men whose doings in all ages not onely haue bin approoued but also vsed and read many of them in the most sacred assemblies So In the primitiue church was publikely read the Epistle of the Laodicians in the Church of the Colossians the Epistle of Clemens vnto the Corinthians Hermes his pastor and the Homilies of the Fathers In the reformed Churches in Flanders and France read are M. Calvins sermons vpon Iob and in the Italian French Dutch and Scottish churches the said Calvin his Catechisme is both read and expounded publikely and that before the whole Congregation The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Deceiued then and out of the way of truth are they which of Preaching by the mouth conceiue either too basely or too highly too basely as doe the anabaptists and Familie of Loue they affirming there ought to be no preaching at all and that Preachers are not sent of God neither doe preach Gods word but the dead letter of the Scripture these with the said Anabaptists tearming them letter Doctors preaching the letter and imagination of their owne knowledge but not the word of the liuing God Too highly as doe the Puritanes of all sorts For say they Except God worke miraculously and extraordinarily which is not to be looked for of vs the bare Reading yea not of the Scriptures without Preaching cannot deliuer so much as one poore soule from destruction Reading of whatsoeuer in the Church without preaching is not feeding but as ill as playing vpon a stage and worse too Without Preaching of the word viz. by the liuely voice of a minister and without the booke the Sabboth cannot be hallowed either of a minister or people in the least measure which the Lord requireth of vs Next erre doe they which set their wits and learning either against all bookes in generall except the sacred Bible or against the publike reading of any learned mens writings be they neuer so diuine and godly in the open and sacred assemblies Of the former sort are the Anabaptists who as Sleidan recordeth did burne the bookes writings and monuments of learned men reseruing and preseruing onely the holy Scriptures from the fire Of the latter be the Brownists Disciplinatians and Sabbatarians The Brownists doe say that No Apocrypha must be brought into the Christian assemblies so the disciplinarians Ministers ought not to read openly in the congregation any writings but onely the Canonicall scriptures they complaine that humane writings are brought into the church they crie out Remooue Homilies and they supplicate vnto K. Iames that the Canonicall scriptures onely may be read in the Church And so but much more bitterly and erroneously the Sabbatarians we damne our selues say they if wee goe not from those ministers and Churches where the Scriptures and Homilies onely be read and seeke not vnto the prophets when and so often as wee haue them not at home 36. Article Of consecration of Bishops and ministers The booke of Consecration 1 of Archbishops and Bishops and ordering of priests and Deacons set forth in the time of Edward the sixt and confirmed at the same time by authoritie of Parliament doth containe all thâ—ngs necessary to such consecration and ordering neither hath it any thing that of it selfe is superstitious or vngodly And therefore 2 whosoeuer are consecrated or ordered according to the rites of that booke since the second yeare of the aforesaid K. Edward vnto this time or hereafter shall be consecrated or ordered according to the same rites we decree all such to be rightly and orderly and lawfully consecrated ordered The Propositions 1. It is agreeable to the word of God and practise of the primitiue church that there should be Archbishops Bishops and such like differences and inequalities of ecclesiasticall ministers 2. Whosoeuer be or shall be consecrated or ordered according to the rites of the booke of Consecration of Archbishops Bishops and ordering of Priests and Deacons they be rightly orderly and lawfully consecrated and ordered 1. Proposition It is agreable to the word of God and practise of the 〈◊〉 church that there should be Archbishops Bishops and such like differences and inequalities of ecclesiasticall ministers The proofe from Gods word ALbeit the tearmes and titles of Archbishops wee finde not yet the superioritie which they enioy and authoritie which Bishops and Archbishops doe exercise in ordering and consecrating of Bishops and ecclesiasticall ministers is grounded vpon the word of God For we finde that In the Apostles daies howe themselues both were in dignitie aboue the euangelists and the 70. disciples and for authoritie both in and ouer the Church as twelue Patriarches saith Beza and also established an ecclesiasticall Hierarchie Hence came it that Bishop was of Ierusalem Iames
slanderous folkes to be offended 3 we giue not to our Prince the ministring either of Gods word or of the Sacraments the which thing the Iniunctions also sometime set forth by Elizabeth our late queene doe most plainely testifie but that onely prerogatiue which wee see to haue bin giuen alwaies to all godly Princes in holy Scriptures by God himselfe that is that they should rule all estates and degrees committed to their charge by God whether they be Ecclesiasticall or Temporall 4 and restraine with the ciuill sword the stubburne and euill doers 5 The Bishop of Rome hath no iurisdictioÌ„ in this realme of England 6 The lawes of the realme may punish Christian men with death for heinous and grieuous offenses 7 It is lawfull for Christian men at the commandement of the Magistrate to weare weapons and serue in the warres The Propositions 1. The kings maiestie hath the cheife power in this realme of England and other his dominions 2. The kings maiestie hath the chiefe gouernement of all estates ecclesiasticall and ciuill in all causes within his dominions 3. His Highnesse may not execute the ecclesiasticall duties of preaching and ministring the Sacraments and yet is to prescribe lawes and directions vnto all estates both ecclesiasticall and Temporall 4. The King by his authoritie is to restraine with the materiall sword and to punish malefactors 5. The Bishop of Rome hath no iurisdiction in this realme of England nor other of this kings dominions 6. By the lawes of this realme Christian men for hainous and greiuous offenses may be put to death 7. It is lawfull for Christian men at the commandement of the magistrate to weare weapons and serue in warres 2. Proposition The Kings maiestie hath the cheife power in this realme of England and other his dominions The proofe from Gods word Diuers and sundrie be the formes of Common-weales and magistracie For some where many and they of the inferior people beare the sway as in a democratie some where a fewe and that of choise and the best men doe gouerne as in an Aristocratie and some where one man or woman hath the preheminence as in a Monarchie such is the gouernement of this Kingdome Notwithstanding whatsoeuer the gouernement is either democraticall Aristocraticall or Monarchicall Gods word doth teach vs that There is no power but of God the powers that be are ordained of God and that whosoeuer resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God We must be subiect to the principalities and powers and obedient and readie to euerie good worke We must submit our selues vnto all manner of ordinance of man for the Lords sake We must pray for Kinges and for all that bee in authoritie Finally we must giue to all men their dutie tribute to whom tribute custome to whom custome feare to whom feare honor to whom honor is due But of the Monarchiall gouernement speciall mention is made in the wrightings of the Prophets and Apostles Kings shall be their nourcing fathers and Queenes shall bee thy nources saith Esay The Apostle Peter calleth the King the superior or him that hath the chiefe power as our King Iames hath in his dominions All Churches Protestant and reformed subscribe vnto this doctrine as both Apostolicall and orthodoxall The errors and adversaries vnto this truth These Churches with vs and wee with them vtterly condemne the opinions Of the dreamers whereof the Apostle speaketh which despice gouernement and speake euill of them which are in authoritie Of the Manichies Fratricellians Flagelliferies Anabaptists and Familie of Loue all which raile vpon condemne magistracie Of them who allowe not of the gouernement by women but vtterly detest the same such were they in Italie which said Inâ—â—ritus mundi est á muliere regi againe speaking vnto women AbuÌ„de magna ciuitas vobis sit domus publicum neque noscatis neque vos noscat such in France who thinke how the lawe of God and nature is violated where a woman is suffered to reigne and gouerne such in Scotland or Scottish men rather from Geneua which wrote that A womans gouernment is a monstriferous Empire most detestable and damnable Againe I am assured that God hath reuealed to some in this age that it is more then a monster in nature that a woman shall reigne and haue Empire aboue man c And litle differing from these men are they in England which tearmed the harborough for faithfull subiects a carnall and vnlearned booke smelling altogether of earth without rime and without reason for defending the regiment of women ouer men when it falleth vnto them by inhaeritance to gouerne to be lawfull and good Hee which so censureth the said Harborough was the Marprelate and this his Censure declareth that hee was the Mar-prince aswell as the Marprelate 2. Proposition The Kinges maiestie hath the chiefe gouernment of all estates ecclesiasticall and ciuill in all causes within his dominions The proofe from Gods word Wee ascribe that vnto our King by this assertion which is giuen to euerie King or Queene in their owne dominions by the word of God For They are for titles gratious Lords Princes the ministers of God the Nourses of the Church Gods For authoritie the chiefe Which mooueth S. Paule to exhort that supplications be made for all men but first for Kinges as the chiefe Againe euerie soule is commaunded to bee subiect to the higher power c Finally the examples are manifold and pregnant shewing the principallity of kings ouer all persons and causes For Aaron the high preist called Moses the chiefe Prince his Lord so did Abimelech tearme Saul his Lord K. Iehosaphat as cheife in Iudah appointed Iudges Leuites and priests K. Ezekias there also as chiefe sent vnto all Israell and Iudah that they should come to the house of the Lord at Ierusalem to keepe the Passeouer also he appointed the course of Priests and Levites by their turnes and commanded all the priests to offer sacrifice c. and they obeied him and enioyned all the congregation to bring offerings and they brought them Which wee doe vnto ours the very same doe the churches of God ascribe vnto Christian magistrates in their principalities Errors Adversaries to this truth Which being true then false is it which the Papists deliuer viz that The kings excellencie of power is in respect of the Nobilitie and Lay-magistrates vnder him and not of Popes Bishops or Priests as they haue cure of soules kings and Princes be they neuer so great must be subiect vnto some Bishop Priest or Prelate The whole Clergie ought to be free from paying Tribute Sacerdotes etiam Principibus iure diuino subditi deleatur say the expurgators Priests are not by Gods lawe subiect vnto Princes No man is to be subiect vnto his temporall
to goe to warre or to bring any man to a violent death though by law he were adiudged to die In these daies the Anabaptists thinke it to be a thing most exetrable for Christians to take weapons or to goe to warre The Familio of Loue also doe so condemne all warres as the time was when they would not beare or weare a weapō they write first of themselues how all their nature is Loue and peace and that they are a people peaceable concordable amiable louing and liuing peaceably but all other men in the world besides they doe wage warre 〈◊〉 and destroy for which ends they haue diuers sorts of swords Halberds spears bowes and arrowes Gunnes pellets and Gunpowder armour Harnes and Gorgets none of which the Familists doe vse or allowe of 38. Article Of Christian mens goods which are not common The riches and goodnes of Christians 1 are not common as touching the right title and possession of the same as certaine Anabaptists doe falsely boast Notwithstanding 2 euery man ought of such things as he possesseth liberally to giue almes to the poore according to his abilitie The Propositions 1 The riches and goods of Christians as touching the right title and possession of the same are not common 2. Euery man is to giue liberall almes to the poore of that which he possesseth according to his abilitie 1. Proposition The riches and goods of Christians as touching the right title and possession of the same are not common The proofe from Gods word AGainst communitie of goods and riches be all those places which are infinite of holy Scripture that either condemne the vnlawfull getting keeping or desiring of riches which by Couetousnesse Theeuerie Extortion and the like wicked meanes many doe attaine or doe commend Liberalitie Frugalitie free and freindly Lending honest labour and lawfull vocations to liue and thriue by All which doe shewe that Christians are to haue goods of their owne and that riches ought not to be common Of this iudgement be the reformed Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Of another mind were the Esseis the Manichies the Pelagiās the Apostolikes and Fratricellians and are the Anabaptists and Familie of Loue Amōg the Famists saith H.N. none claimeth any thing proper to himselfe for to possesse the same to any owednes or priuatenesse For no man c. can desire to appropriate or challenge any thing to himselfe either yet to make any priuate vse vnto himselfe from the rest ward but what is there is Free and is also left free in his vpright forme 2. Proposition Euery man is to giue liberall Almes to the poore of that which hee possesseth according to his abilitie The proofe from Gods word Vnto liberality towards the poore according to our ability we are in the holy Scriptures prouoked 1. By the commandements from God by his seruants the Prophets by his Sonne our Sauiour and by his Apostles 2. By sweete promises of ample blessings 3. By threatnings of punishments to the couetous and stonie hearted 4. By the examples of the best men viz. the apostles and primitiue Church So the Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Of strange mindes therefore and impious are First the Anabaptists which would haue no man either to giue or receiue For all things in their opinion should be common as afore also hath bin said and none among them be either poore to receiue or wealthie to minister any almes Secondly the hypocriticall Sectaries who are bountiful onely to those which side with them Such were first the publicans in our Sauiour his daies and after them the Manichies who would minister neither bread nor water vnto any hungry and pyning beggar vnlesse he were a Manichean And such are the Familie of Loue who say they are not bound to giue almes but to their owne sect and if they doe they giue the fame to the deuill 39. Article Of a Christian mans oath As wee confesse that 1 vaine and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and Iames his Apostle So wee iudge that 2 Christian religion doth not prohibite but that a man may sweare when the magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and charitie so it be done according to the Prophets teaching iniustice iudgement and truth The Propositions 1. Wee may not sweare vainely and rashly 2. A lawfull oath may be giuen and taken according to the word of God in iustice iudgement and truth 1. Proposition We may not sweare vainely and rashly The proofe from Gods word THe better to auoid vaine and rash oathes and swearing it is good to haue in remembrance that which is said by our S. Christ and his Apostle Iames. Our Sauiour saith sweare not at all neither by heauen for it is the throne of God nor by the Earth for it is his footestoole nor by Ierusalem for it is the cittie of the great King nor by thine head because thou canst not make one haire white or black but let your communication be yea yea nay nay So the apostle S. Iames Before all things my brethren saith hee sweare not either by the heauen or by the earth or by any other oath but let your yea be yea and your Nay nay least yee fall into condemnation All Churches doe and some in their publike writings condemne vaine rash and idle othes The adversaries vnto this truth This declareth many sorts of men to be very impious as The Wantons which for pleasure and the couetous worldlings who for gaine and profit blush not to take the name of God in vaine by idle rash and vsuall oathes Next the Basilidians Helchisaites Priscillianites and Familie of Loue who for ease and to auoid troubles and persecution dread not to sweare and forsweare themselues Thirdly the papists whose common guise is to sweare either by Saints or Idols or by God and creatures together Fourthly the Puritanes who vse to sweare though not by God c. yet as wickedly vsing horrible imprecations as I renounce God God damne me or as Hackets manner was God confound mee Lastly the Banisterians who deeme it hypocrisie for one Christian to reprooue another for commō and rash swearing which are but Trifles in their opinions 2. Proposition A lawfull Oath may be giuen and taken according to the word of God in iustice iudgement and truth The proofe from Gods word The truth of this doctrine appeareth plentifully in the holy Scriptures For in the same there bee both commaundements that we must and may and formes prescribed howe we shall sweare For the first Thou shalt feare the L. thy God and serue him And shalt sweare by his Name saith Moses Againe thou shalt sweare the Lord liueth and thou shalt cleaue vnto him and shalt sweare by his Name
otherside too highly as if the dignitie of their calling were cause good enough that what they doe or say ex opere operato take happy effects These things from the Scriptures are manifest which teach vs that wicked ministers euen the Scribes and Pharisies sitting in Moses chaire and preaching Christ though through enuie strife and contention are to be heard and may administer the Sacraments as did the ordinarie Priests among the Iewes whereof very many both afore and after that our Sauiour came into the world were most wicked men and the best which be are the ministers of God and Gods labourers Also the purer Churches beare witnesse hereunto Neither is hee whosoeuer that planteth any thing neither hee that watereth but God that giueth the encrease saith S Paul And a signe of a good Spirit is it to regard not so much who speaketh or ministreth as what is vttered and offered from God Errors Adversaries to this truth The due consideration of the praemises will both settle vs the more firmely in the truth and make vs the more carefully to abhorre all adversaries thereof as in old time were the donatists and the Petilians who taught that the Sacraments are holy when they be administred by holy men but not els also the Apostolikes or Henricans who had a fancie that he was no Bishop which was a wicked man Among the Fathers also Cyprian and Origen were not â—ound in this point For Cyprian published that no minister could rightly baptize who was not himselfe endued with the holy Ghost hee further deliuered that whosoeuer doe communicate with a wicked minister doe sinne Origen held that in vaine did any minister either binde or lose who was himselfe bound with the chaines of â—inne and wickednes Such adversaries in our time be the Anabaptists the Family of Loue the disciplinarians vsually tearmed Puritants the Sabbatarians the Brownists and the Papists For The Anabaptists will not haue the people to vse the ministerie of euill ministers and thinke the seruice of wicked Ministers vnprofitable and not effectuall affirming that no man who is himselfe faultie can preach the truth to others The Familie of Loue doe say that no man can minister the vpright seruice or ceremonies of Christ but the regenerate also that wicked men cannot teach the truth The disciplinarian Puritans doe bring all ministers which cannot preach and their seruices into detestation For their doctrine is that Where there is no Preacher there ought to be no minister of the Sacraments None must minister the Sacraments which doe not preach The Sacrament is not a Sacrament if it be not ioyned to the word of God preached It is sacriledge to seperate the ministration of the word preached from the Sacraments Of these mens opinions be the Sabbatarians among vs. For their doctrine is to the common people that vnlesse they leaue their vnpreaching ministers euery Sabboth day and goe to some place where the word is preached they doe prophane the Sabboth and subiect themselues vnto the curse of God So the Brownists No man is to communicate say they where there is a blinde or dumme ministerie The Papist doe crosse this truth but after another sort For Pope Hildebrand decreed and commanded that no man should heare Masse from the mouth of a preist which hath a wife The Rhemists doe publish how The Sermons of heretikes and so tearme they all Protestant ministers must not be heard though they preach the truth Their praiers and Sacraments are not acceptable to God but are the howling of wolues 2. Proposition Euill ministers are to be searched out convicted and deposed but orderly and by the discipline of the Church The wicked and euill ministers must not alwaies be endured in the Church of God For they are the euill and vnprofitable seruants the Eies which doe offend the vnsauorie salt which are carefully to be seene vnto and if admonitions will not serue deposed yet orderly and by the discipline of the Churh For that God which appointed a gouernement for the ciuill state hath also giuen authoritie vnto his Church to punish offenders according to the qualitie of their transgressions And so may we read in the word of God Tell the Church saith our Sauiour Let such a one by the power of our Lord Iesus Christ be deliuered vnto Sathan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saued in the day of the Lord Iesus saith S. Paul So the neighbour Churches Adversaries vnto this truth Then deceiued and out of the way are the Brownists and Barrowists which are of minde that Priuate persons in themselues haue authoritie to depose vnmeete ministers and to punish malefactors Euery particular member of a Church in himselfe hath power to examine the manner of administring the Sacraments c. to call men vnto repentance c to reproue the faults of the church and to forsake that church which will not reforme her faults vpon any priuate admonition For want of the due execution of discipline against persons offending and malefactors both women may leaue their husbands as some haue done and husbands their wiues and goe where it is in force See more in Art 33. Prop. 1. 27. Article Of Baptisme 1 Baptisme is not only a signe of profession and marke of difference whereby christian men are discerned from other that be not Christened but 2 it is also a signe of regeneration or newe-birth whereby as by an instrument they that receiue Baptisme rightly are graffed into the Church the promises of the forgiuenes of sinne and of our adoption to be the Sonnes of God by the holy Ghost are visiblie signed and sealed Faith is confirmed and grace encreased by vertue of prayer vnto God 3 The Baptisme of young children is in any wise to be retained in the Church as most agreeable with the institution of Christ. The Propositions 1. Baptisme is a signe of Profession and marke of differeÌ„ce whereby Christians are discerned from other men that be no Christians 2. Baptisme is a signe or seale of the regeneration or newe birth of Christians 3. Infants and young children by the word of God are to be baptized 1. Proposition Baptisme is a signe of Profession and marke of difference whereby Christians are discerned from other men that be no Christians The proofe from Gods word HOw the Sacraments are tokens and therefore that Baptisme is a signe of the true Church which be Christians it is apparent from Gods word in the 5. proposit of the 19. article afore going and the same doe the Churches of God acknowledge Errors adversaries vnto this truth This declareth vs to be sound Christians and. Not Nazarens who were with the Iewes circumcised and baptized with Christians and so as Hierome writeth of them were neither Iewes nor Christians Mot