For as by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so also by the obedience of one man many shall be made righteous and this general is embraced of all who acknowledge Christ to be our righteousnes but yet in a threefolde different sense The first is of those who by the obedience of Christ vnderstande the whole worke of his humiliation in the which they lay three groundes wherein they place the matter of our righteousnes The first is the worke of Christ in taking vpon him our Nature without sinne The second is his active obedience in fulfilling the Lawe of God during the whole course of his life The third is his passive obedience in submitting him selfe to the death and that of the crosse In the first of these actions they place our iustification from originall sinne and the inborne corruption of our nature In the second they place our Iustification from all our actuall sinnes both of commission and of omission In the third they place our Iustification and absolution from the punishment due to our sinnes The second sense wherein the obedience of Christ is taken is when thereby his active and passive obediēce are only meant without respect of the integritie of his nature and this twofold obedience they esteeme to be necessarie in our iustification against the two evills wherevnto wee are subiect through the fall of Adam The first is the evill of sinne From the which they esteeme vs to bee iustified by the imputation of Christes active obedience in fulfilling the Law The second is the evill of punishment From the which they esteeme vs to be iustified by the imputation of Christes passive obedience in his death and sufferings The third sense wherein the obedience of Christ is taken in our iustification is when thereby the passive obediēce of Christ only in his death is vnderstood by the imputation whereof only as that wherein Christ only is made our righteousnes wee are iustified from all sinne and punishment thereof These three opinions agreeing all in the mayne pointe that is that onely Christ in his obedience is our righteousnes may well without any contention strife or scisme bee tollerated in the Church of God if Christian modestie humblenes of mind meeknes did in that measure possesse al that they could support one another in love and studie more to keepe the vnitie of the spirit in the baunde of peace then by controversies of disputations to engender strife Especially seeing none of these opinions overthrowe the foundation or yet contayneth in them any impietie or leadeth any man from the marke or matter of his righteousnes seeing all three exclude all things except onely Christes obedience from our righteousnes Moreover if wee shall consider two thinges distinctlie we shall easilie perceyve that these three opinions may easily be reconciled and made all to agree in one and that none of them is contrarie to the trueth of God The two things which are distinctly to bee considered are these The first is that wherein standeth the righteousnes it selfe which is imputed vnto vs. The second is of these thinges which are requisite in Christ to the end that in the other he may be righteousnes vnto vs. For these two thinges are not to bee confounded that is that wherein Christ is made righteousnes and that whereby he is made meete to be our righteousnes in that wherein hee is made righteousnes vnto vs. Like as the bloud of the Lambe shadowing Christes bloud is to bee distinguished from these thinges in the Lambe which made the Lambes bloud to serve for a propitiation for sinne For the properties of the beast which was to bee sacrifised for sinne are to bee distinguished from the bloud of the beast which onely was carried in to the most holy place to make expiation of sinnes before the Lord. This ground being considered wee shall easilie perceyve that although Christ bee made righteousnes vnto vs in one particular thinge yet before in that thinge hee can bee our righteousnes all his perfections both in nature and action is required For cleering hereof yet more we have to consider that the matter of our righteousnes in it self is not to be confunded with the action of God in iustifying vs thereby vnto the which many things are required that are no parte nor portion of the righteousnes it selfe so that if wee speake of the action of our iustification all what soever is conteyned in all these three opinions and more also in Christ is required thereto but if we speake of the matter of the righteousnes it selfe whereby wee are iustified wee are to consider of them otherwise Therefore it shall bee needfull that wee consider these two points severally that is first what it is wherein particularly Christ is righteousnes vnto vs. Secondly What thinges they are that are required in him to the ende that in the other hee may bee righteousnes vnto vs. Touching the first The question or doubt seemeth chieflie to arise vpon the worde Obedience which in deede is oftentymes in the Scripture referred to the whole worke of Christs humiliation even from his conception to his resurrection So that all whatsoever hee did in the world is accompted obedience vnto the Father Thus his very Incarnation and takinge vppon him our nature and taking of it in the similitude of sinfull flesh his becomming vnder the Lawe his taking our sinnes and transgressions vpon him his becomming a curse for vs his becomming our high Priest his offering of him selfe vnto the Father his doctrine his actions his sufferings and resurrection are all to be accompted obedience For it was the Father that sent him into the worlde and he came into the world not to doe his owne will but the will of the Father that sent him therefore he witnesseth him selfe that hee spake nothing but according to the commandement which his Father had given him Iohn chap. 12. vers 49. the same hee witnesseth of his actions Ioh chep 14. vers 31. as also of his death and resurrection Iohn chap. 10. ver 18. and yet there is no man that will say that all the particulars of Christes sayings and doinges are parte and portion of the matter of our righteousnes albeit every one of them be a parte of his obedience Therefore we must needes take the name of Christes obedience in a more strict sense when we vnderstand by it the matter of our righteousnes and this stricter sense we are not to gather out of our owne conceyts and fantasies but out of the expresse word of God The word every where when it speakes of our righteousnes not vnder the generall worde of Christes obedience but particularly by those workes of his obedience wherein our righteousnes consisteth doeth onely mention his sufferinge death or laying downe of his life or his bloud or his oblation or offering of him selfe or his being made sinne or his bearinge the chastisement of our peace and such like phrases Which all signifie one
iustifie vs by it For the iudgement of God is iust and according to trueth Rom. 2. 2. and 5. verses and the Lord shall iudge the world in righteousnes Acts 17. 31. of which it followeth that there is much more iniquitie in these mens opinion then in the Papistes because they wittingly lay a ground to them selves touching iustification wherein it is impossible that Gods iudgement can be according to trueth seeing they make him to iustifie them by that which in their owne confession is never answerable to the iustice of God Thirdly that can never iustifie a man that causeth wrath and makes both faith and the promise vaine and of none effect and therefore righteousnes can never be by the Law For as sayeth the Apostle Rom. 4. 15. The Law causeth wrath And againe Gal. 3. 10. VVhosoever are of the workes of the Lawe are vnder the curse and that this opinion doth make both faith and the promise of none effect it is manifest by the Apostle Rom. chap. 4. vers 14. saying For if they which are of the Lawe be heires faith is made voide and the promise is made of none effect And againe Gall. chap. 3. vers 18. For if the inheritance be by the Law it is no more by promise By this may evidently appeare the grosse ignorance of the Papistes who doe ioyne faith and the workes of the Law together in the worke of our Iustification which two can never more stande together then grace and workes For to be by faith and to bee by grace is all one thing according to the saying of the Apostle Rom. 4. 16. Therefore is it by faith that it might be by grace Fourthly that whereby cōmeth the knowledge of sinne and which maketh transgression to abound and which includeth all men vnder sinne and which stoppeth all mouth and maketh all the world subiect to the iudgement of God can never serve to the Iustification of a man Now that all these are the effects of the Law it is manifest by these Testimonies of Scripture Rom. chap. 7. vers 7. I knew not sinne but by the Law And againe Rom. 5. 20. The Lawe entered in therevpon that the transgression might abound And againe Gall. 3. 22. But the Scripture hath included all vnder sinne Whereby the word Scripture is vnderstood the Law as is cleer by the testimonie of the Apostle Rom. chap. 3. vers 19. Where he interpretes these Scriptures by the which he had convinced all both Iewes and Grecians to be vnder sinne saying Wee knowe that whatsoever things the Law speaketh it sayeth it to them which are vnder the Law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world be made subiect to the iudgement of God And that the strength of this reason may appeare to be vncontrolable The 20. verse of that same 3. chap. sheweth it to be the argument of Gods owne spirit when as the Apostle concludes after this manner Therefore by the workes of the Law shall no flesh be iustified before him for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne Lastly this opinion fighteth directly not only against the testimonie of God himselfe but also against the testimonie of the knowledge and cōscience of the chiefest saints of God Touching Gods testimonie it is cleere throughout all the Scriptures where he convinceth all men of sinne saying There is none righteous no not one c. Rom. 3. And the Apostle in the same chapter witnesses that by the workes of the Lawe shall no flesh bee iustified before him And expresly in the 4. chap. he sayeth that to him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is imputed vnto righteousnes And David placeth the righteousnes of man in Gods imputing of righteousnes without workes Rom. 4. 6. And the Apostle Paul expresly concludeth Gal. 5. 4. That they whosoever are iustified by the Lawe are abolished from Christ and are fallen from grace Now touching the knowledge and conscience of the chiefe Saints of God we have cleer testimonies from them Esa 64. 6. Wee have all bene as an vncleane thing and all our righteousnes is as filthie clouts c. The like confession and plaine acknowledgment wee have in Daniel chap. 9. in the prayer that he makes vnto God But most clearly in the Apostles speach touching himselfe and Peter and remanent Apostles and all the faithfull amongst the Iewes Gall. 2. 15. 16. where he sayeth VVee who are by nature Iewes and not sinners of the Gentils knowing that a man is not iustified by the works of the Law but only by the faith of Iesus Christ even we have beleeved in Iesus Christ that wee might bee iustified by the faith of Christ and not by the workes of the Lawe For by the workes of the Lawe noe flesh shall bee iustified Therefore the same Apostle Paul albeit hee was vnrebukeable touching the righteousnes which is in the Lawe yet notwithstanding he accompted that righteousnes to bee but losse vnto him and did cast it from him as filtie dounge that he might gaine Christ and bee found in him That is as himselfe interpreteth that he might be found not having his owne righteousnes which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ that is the righteousnes which is of God through faith Phil. chap. 3. Now to conclude this point wee will shew not only the vanitie but the impossibilitie of this opinion by this one ground which is cleere in Scripture First it is evident that the next and immediate end of our iustification is our peace and recōciliation with God For being iustified we have peace toward God saith the Apostle Rom. 5. 1 And therefore peace is said to bee made by the bloud of Christ Collos 1. 20. And the manner how God reconcileth is saide to bee by iustifying 2 Cor. 5. 19. For God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe by not imputing to them their sinnes which is all one as to say that God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe by iustifying them Secondly it is evident that there is no reconciliation betwixt God and vs without a Mediator Therefore the Law was not given but by the hand of a Mediator Gall. 3. 19. Neither is the covenant of the Gospell confirmed without a Mediator And all confirmation of whatsoever covenant is by bloud because without shedding of bloud there is no purgation nor iustification from sinne and that by him who is Mediator For then is the covenant of Peace betwixt God and man confirmed when he who is the Mediator of the covenant hath by the sprinckling of bloud purged away all filthines and obtayned full remission as is cleere by the 9. to the Hebr. And therefore sayeth the Apostle in the same chapter verse 18. That even the first covenant was not ordayned without bloud And Moyses the Mediator of that covenant when with that bloud he had sprinckled all the people he said this is the bloud
nothing vnto life and salvation but Christ and him crucified and this worke of the Father which is the beginning of all grace is expressed in the Scriptures by Gods teachinge vs according as Christ sayeth Iohn chap. 6. ver 45. Every one that hath heard of the Farher and hath learned of him cōmeth vnto me Shewing vs thereby that the first cause of our beleeving or rather the first parte and portion of the worke of faith wrought in our heartes by God consisteth in God teaching of vs according to his promise made in his covenant Esay chap. 54. ver 13. And all thy children shal be taught of the Lord. And Ierem. chap. 31. ver 33. 34. I will put my lawe in their inward partes and write it in their heartes and they shall teach no more every man his neighbour and everie man his brother saying knowe the Lord For they shall all knowe mee from the least of them vnto the greatest of them sayeth the Lord. For it is true which Christ speaketh Math. chap. 11. ver 27. No man knoweth the Sonne but the Father neyther knoweth any man the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the Sonne will reveyle him So that the knowledge of God is a secrete belonging to God alone which no flesh is everable to attayne vnto by any power of his owne naturall light and vnderstanding therefore saieth the Apostle that this is the wisedome of God hid in a mysterie which none of the Princes of this worlde have ever knowne 1. Cor. 2. For as he saith in that same chapter The naturall man perceyveth not the thinges of the Spirit of God For they are foolishnes vnto him neyther can hee know them because they are spiritually discerned And this he confirmeth by a strong argument in that same chapter vers 11. saying For what man knoweth the thinges of a man saue the spirit of a man which is in him even so the thinges of God knoweth no man but the spirit of God For which cause also in that same place he attributeth the cause of all our knowledge vnto God reveyling vnto vs by his spirit the thinges that are given vs of God according to which Christ saieth vnto Peter when hee did confesse him to bee the Christ the Sonne of the living God that flesh and bloud had not reveiled that vnto him but his Father which was in heaven Math. cha 16. ver 17. thereby witnessing plainly that no naturall light nor information of mans owne minde can possibly make a man to know Iesus to be the Christ and sonne of the living God but that this knowledge commeth vnto our heartes by the supernatural gift and revelation of God by his spirit according to which the Apostle saith 1. Cor. chap. 1. ver 18. That the preaching of the crosse is to them that perish foolishnes but vnto vs that are saved it is the power of God For God hath cast away the vnderstanding of the prudent and hath made the wisedome of this worlde foolishnes For by that wisedome the world doeth not know God therefore sayth the Apostle in that same place VVee preach Christ crucified vnto the Iewes even a stūbling blocke and vnto the Graecians foolishnes but vnto them which are called both of the Iewes Graecians we preach Christ the power of God and the wisedome of God Thus it is playne that this wisedome and light of the heart whereby we know Christ crucified to be our onely Saviour and Sonne of God is a gift supernaturally given vs by God when he calleth vs and therefore saith Christ That it is not given to every man to know the secretes of heaven Math. chap. 13. vers 11. shewing vs thereby that the power to knowe these things is givē vs of God Which is yet more cleere by the speech of Christ touching them to whom this gift is not given when he sayeth that seeing they doe not see and hearing they heare not neither vnderstande And this worke of God in the scriptures is signified by opening of the eyes of our vnderstanding Ephes chapt 1. ver 18. and sometymes by opening of the heart Actes chapt 16. ver 14. And in this firste worke of God by his grace consisteth the chiefe foundation of our strength as is showen by Ioh. 1. Epi. chap. 5. vers 5. saying VVho is it that overcommeth the worlde but hee that beleeveth that Iesus is the sonne of God As likewise this is the seale of out Adoption as witnesseth the same Apostle 1. Epi. chap. 5. saying Every one that beleeveth that Iesus is the Christ is borne of God And thirdly on this dependeth our ereruall life as witnesseth Christ him selfe Iohn chap. 17. ver 3. This is eternall life that they knowe thee the onely true God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ and therefore whosoever is ignorant of this point and so much more they that impugne it shal never inherit eternall life according to Christs owne testimonie Ioh. ca. 8. ver 24. Therefore I said vnto you that ye shall die in your sinnes for except yee beleeve that I am hee yee shall die in your sinnes To conclude this point then the first action of God in man and so the first gift bestowed vpon the heart of man vnto life is the power and facultie of conceyving and knowing God in Christ the Saviour as he is reveyled in the worde accordinge to the saying of Iohn Epi. 5. 20. But we knowe that that sonne of God is come and hath given vs a minde to knowe him that is true and wee are in him that is true that is in that his Sonne Iesus Christ this same is that very true God and that eternall life The second worke of God wherein our faith consisteth is in giving a wil to come to Christ and to enioy him to obey him according to the saying of the Prophet Psalm 110. 3. Thy people shall come willingly at the time of the assemblinge of thine armie in holy beautie For as the vnderstanding power of man is darkened al his wisdome is but foolishnes so his will is rebellious against Gods will in all thinges so that as he cannot naturally perceyve nor know the thinges of God so can he not naturally will nor desire the thinges of God and this oftentymes is signified in scripture by the hardnes of mans heart that cannot repent and by his stiff-neckednes and by resisting of the holy Ghost according to the words of God by the Prophet Esay ca. 65. ver 2. 3. I have spred my hands out all the day to a rebellious and gaine-saying people c. And this worke of God is expressed in scripture by the phrase of Gods drawing vs Ion. 6. 44. No man can come vnto me except the Father that hath sent me drawe him as likewise is signified by the opening of the eare as Esay cha 50. ver 5. The Lord GOD hath opened myne eare and I was not rebellious neyther turned I backe This also is
favour Man neyther any wayes deservinge it by his worthines nor paying any thing to God for it and that this is the meaning of the worde it is most evident by this other word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is indifferently put for grace the one being sometimes interpreted by the other as Rom. chap. 3. ver 24. Being iustified freely by his grace where the word which is rendered freely is dorean which word secludeth both price and merit Concerning price it is cleere Math. chap. 10. ver 8. Yee have receyved freely give freely And 2. Thess chap. 3. ver 8. Neither tooke we bread of any man freely Concerning merite it is likewise manifest that this word secludeth it by Ioh. chap. 15. ver 25. They hated me freely that is without cause or deserving so that this word maketh iustification to be a worke of God freely done And this we marke that we may know it secludeth not the merit of Christ although that merit be imputed to vs by grace and by this consideration we shall learne to reconcile two sayings of scripture that seeme to be repugnant The first is Esay chap. 52. ver 3. Yee shal be redeemed without monie The other is 1. Cor. chap. 6. ver 20. For yee are bought for a price The one seemeth to make our redemption free without price the other seemeth to say the contrarie Yet both are true for in respect of man him selfe hee hath paide no price at all to God for his redemption but as concerning Christ he hath given a deare price even his life bloud for our redemption So the word Grace secludeth not the merit of Christ nor the price that he hath payed for vs nor ought els ordayned of God by his grace as causes and meanes subordinate to his grace for our iustification but onely secludeth whatsoever thinge is in man or can proceed from man who hath nothing of him selfe whereby to deserve righteousnes neither hath any thing to give to God to obtayne righteousnes For who hath given to God first that he should recompence him Rom. chap. 11. vers 35. And this third pointe of the forme of our iustification is necessarie to be added to the other two First for the right knowledge both of Gods giving and imputing of faith and Christ to our iustification Secondly for preserving vs from the errours of those who mistake the true meaning of the word grace in our iustification Concerning the first there is a distinctiō of the giftes of God and also of the imputation of God Touching the giftes they be eyther such as are natuall given by God indifferently to al are belōging to our natural life or thē they are gifts supernatural belonging to a supernatural life The first sorte the Lord giveth by naturall meanes as by procreation by naturall generation and by his generall providence extended over all But the second he giveth not but by speciall grace and by a speciall providence and particular love in the Lord IESVS there being no ground nor cause in them to whom hee giveth them why they should have thē nor any meanes in their power to procure them Thus faith and Christ by faith are given vs of God not for any worthines in vs nor for any thing given to God by vs but the Lord giveth vs both faith and Christ vnto iustification freely of his meere grace Secondly touching imputation there is an imputation by debt and an imputation by grace therefore that it may bee knowne that neither faith nor Christes merite is imputed to vs by debt the scripture plainly sheweth that this imputatiō is by grace that is first that faith which is now givē vs secondly that Christ who is givē vs by faith is ours not by any right that we have vnto thē by iustice that accompting of them ours is not by debt but of meere mercy grace so that our whole iustificatiō in al that is either given vs or imputed vnto vs to iustifie vs both in the giving in the imputing is of Gods free grace The secōd vse of the knowledge hereof is to preserve vs from their errors who take the name of grace in our iustification for the gifts of grace inherent in vs be it faith or sanctification or the fruites of our righteousnes And secondly from their error who take the name of grace for a gratious acceptatiō of our imperfect faith whereas grace in iustification is relative to the giving imputing of faith not to the accepting of it For in respect of faith given by grace and imputed by grace wee are said to be iustified by grace not in respect of Gods accepting of it at our handes by grace And thus much concerning the forme of our iustification CHAPTER XXXIII IT olloweth that we now speake of the obiect of iustification that is the man whom the Lord doeth iustifie who is two maner of wayes to be confidered First as he is in him selfe by nature Secondly what he is by grace before he be iustified As concerning him selfe wee have two places of scriptures which doe manifestly instruct vs what man is in him self when God iustifieth him The first is Rom. 4. 5. where God is said to iustifie the vngodly the other Rom. 5. 10. where God is said to have iustified vs while we were enemies and this sheweth the vanitie of the Papists who wil have a man formalie iust before he be iustified Touching that which he is by grace it is in many parts of the scripture evidently declared that he must beleeve before he be iustified that is must have faith wrought in his heart in that sorte that he may be iustified for like as Acts 14. it is saide that Paul perceyving that the creeple mā had faith to be made whole he did heale him even so the Lord first giveth vs faith to bee made iust and then iustifieth vs. For we are to consider that although faith bee the instrument of Gods power to make vs able to apprehende Christ and all his blessings in him yet in the worke of iustification it is particularly to be restrayned both as it is wrought by God in our heartes and as our heartes worketh by it vnto the particular benefite of righteousnes in Christ like as in all the rest of the benefites faith is alwayes to be particularly restrayned to every one of them in the particular apprehension of them Moreover we see the truth of this same in the order set downe by the Apostle Rom. 8. when he sayth whom he hath called them he also hath iustified whereby it is evident that God iustifieth not a man vntill first he hath obtayned that degree of grace which God bestoweth vpō a man whē he calleth him of which it followeth that he must have Christ reveyled vnto him he must likewise be come to Christ must have embrased him by faith and that not only as the sonne of God for in that point of faith consisteth his
predestinate and according thereto effectually called Secondly that those who are so called that is according to Gods purpose or foreknowledge doe remayne sure and never can so fall away from grace and from the trueth of God that they should erre frō the marke But heere it is not my purpose to speake more of the persons that are ordayned because heereafter we wil have occasion at greater length to entreat of them The second thing in the substance of Gods Decree to be considered of vs is that wherevnto they are ordeyned which by the Apostle is called Adoption that is sonneship or filiation When he sayeth he hath predestinated vs vnto adoption which benefire implieth all the rest which consist in these things whereof we are made partakers in the sonne of God to make vs conforme to his Image both in death and life in suffering and reigning with him Which as we haue said appeareth evidently by that other description of predestinatiō set downe in the 8 chap. to the Rom. where it is said that he hath predestinated vs to be made like to the Image of his Sonne Whereby it is evident that the thing whereto first and principally we are predestinate is to be sonnes by adoption and secondarily in and vnder that adoption we are by infallible consequent predestinate to bee made like vnto the only Sonne of God For first we are made Gods sonnes in his sonne then we are made like Gods sonne in his sonne for the conforming of vs vnto Christ succeedeth not only in order but also in some respect in time vnto our being sonnes in him according to that saying of Iohn in his 1. Epist chap. 3. vers 2. We are now the sonnes of God but yet it is not made manifest what we shal be and we knowe that when hee shal be made manifest we shal be made like him for we shall see him as he is And to the same effect speakes the Apostle to the Colossians chap. 3. vers 3. and 4. saying That we are dead and that our life is hid with Christ in God and when Christ who is our life shall appeare then shall we also appeare with him in glorie For this ground is to be well marked that the likening of vs who are made sonnes in Christ requireth necessarily the manifestation of Christ vnto vs to goe before in the same blessings wherein we are to be made like vnto him For as to make vs sonnes by adoption requireth necessarily the revelation of Iesus Christ as the sonne of God vnto vs so the conforming of vs vnto him either in death or life requireth necessarily that he be manifested to vs in his death and crosse and in his life and glorie Therefore doth Peter in his 1. Epist chap. 1. vers 13. ascribe the bringing of all grace to vs vnto the revelation of IESVS Christ saying Trust perfectly in that grace which is brought vnto you in the revelation of Iesus Christ And of this it commeth to passe that in this present life we are in some measure made like vnto Christ in the communion of the benefites flowing from his death and suffering and his resurrection from the death because he hath alreadie appeared to vs in these things But in this life we are not neither shal be made like vnto him in his glorie which followeth the resurrection frō the dead because in that we cannot be made conforme vnto him vntill that he appeare vnto vs againe in glorie but we rest in full assurance of it because of our conformitie in his death alreadie begunne For as sayth the Apostle Rom. 6. 5. If we haue bene planted with him vnto the similitude of his death we shall also be planted with him to the similitude of his resurrection And this assurance made the Apostle Paul to labour above all things to know Christ and the vertue of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings in being made conforme to his death Phil. 3. 10. because as in the same place he declareth by that cōformitie vnto his death he did know that he should attayne vnto the resurrection from the dead that is the glorious and immortall estate in all perfection which the Saints doe enioy in the resurrection from the dead In respect of this ground it is that first principally as we haue said we are predestinate vnto adoption as vnto that wherein Christ is first of all to be manifested vnto vs and in the communion whereof is builded and grounded our communion with him in all other things wherein he is heereafter to be revealed vnto vs to this ende that we may bee made like vnto him This is one of the mayne pointes chiefly to be marked in the consideration of the substance of Gods Decree Which not being rightly conceyved maketh that not onely the Decree of God it selfe is mistaken by many but also that the benefites of God in Christ are both wrongly defined and ordered and specially the benefite of Iustification as heereafter wee will see more cleerly CHAPTER IIII THE third thing to bee marked in the substance of Gods Decree is the Meane whereby we are to attayne vnto that wherevnto we are predestinate that is whereby God hath ordayned vs to be Adopted which is Iesus Christ according as the description of predestination contayneth when it fayeth That we are Predestinate to be adopted through Iesus Christ Of which point for avoyding idle repetition we will not speake much vntill we come to the second of these foure points which we haue propounded to be considered because vnto it it properly belongeth onely these two things we are to marke by the way First that Iesus Christ is not the cause why but the Meane whereby God doth ordayne vs to adoption Which will more clearly appeare when we speake of the cause mooving God to predestinate vs. The second thing that we haue to marke is that all other secondary Meanes whereby in the Scriptures we are said to be made sonnes or iustified c. as namely the Gospell preached the Sacramentes faith are no wayes to be esteemed Meanes simply in respect of them selves but only by relation and reference to Christ in and by them revealed offered and receyved Which is most evident by the description aforesaide of predestination in the which nothing saving Christ alone is set downe to be the Meane whereby God ordayneth vs to be adopted so that it is not the word but Christ revealed by the word neither the Sacraments but Christ signified by the Sacramentes nor faith but Christ receyved by faith which in proper sense maketh vs sonnes and iustifieth vs. They only by consequence and mediatly being said in Scripture to make vs sonnes and Iustifie vs c. because they are the meanes appointed of GOD whereby we atteyne vnto Christ who is the onely proper and immediate meane whereby we are Adopted and Iustified c. Neither are they appointed mediate Meanes absolutely necessarie vnto our adoption and iustification
flesh and bones of his bones in that he did give himselfe to death for them to this end that hee might iustifie them For as the bonde of Mariage doth oblige the husband to a particular and speciall love to his wife wherein he is obliged to none other even so the Lord Iesus did submitt himselfe vnto the Fathers will to lay downe his life for none but such as were given him of the Father and made members of his body and his spirituall spouse And if any will obiect that this place of the Apostle is to be vnderstood of the order of Christ his doing according to the eternall purpose and Decree of God and not according to the Dispensation of God towards vs in tyme. It is easie to be answered that the order of God in both is one and the same For as the Lord doth particularly predestinate men to Adoption before he give his Sonne to the death for their iustification even so in tyme he doth Adopt vs that is effectuallie call vs bring vs to his Sonne and make vs one with him before he iustifie vs. Moreover this shall yet be more manifest if we shall marke this one distinction of the fruites of faith to wit if we can discerne betwixt the immediate fruite of faith and the mediate fruites The mediate fruite we call that which is wrought by God in vs even by the very working of faith in our heartes together and at once and that is our verie vnion and coniunction with Christ For by faith Christ dwelleth in our heartes and this is the worke whereby we are made the sonnes of God For as sayeth the Apostle If we be Christes we are the seed Gal. chapt 3. vers 29. The mediate fruites of faith I call those which by vertue of this vnion as the necessarie forerunning meane faith produceth in vs such as is our iustification sanctification c. so that in a manner we can distinguish betwixt these benefites and our faith but more hardly betwixt our faith and Adoption seeing our abyding in Christ and Christes abyding in vs is all one thing with our beleeving in Christ That saying therefore of these learned Divines that GOD cannot acknowledge vs his sonnes before he iustifie vs is not simplie and absolutelie to be vnderstood but by comparison relation that is because God powreth in our heartes after our iustification a more lively sense of his love and a cleerer sight of our Adoption then we receyved in our calling And this maner of speach the spirit of God vseth familiarly in the scriptures which is comparatively to be vnderstood as Iohn chap. 7. vers 39. For the holy Ghost was not yet because Christ was not yet glorified Which is not to be vnderstood as though the holy Ghost had not bene at all but only that he was not in that measure that he was therafter to be given Likewise in that of Iohn ch 16. Christ sayeth touching his Disciples hetherto have ye asked nothing in my name which were great prophanes in vs to vnderstand simply of those holy men of God who knew Christ to be the Christ Sonne of the living God and who were directed in their prayers by the spirit of God who inditeth none but in the name of Christ albeit more darkely and obscurely manifested in our hartes then after the comming of the holy Ghost in greater measure Even so it may bee iustly saide of our Adoption that God doeth not acknowledge vs his sonnes before hee iustifieth vs because that which in small measure and darkely was manifested to vs in our calling is more fully and clearely revealed in our Iustification because then the spirit of Adoption is more aboundantly shed abroad in our heartes for the sealing of our Adoption For as we haue saide before although our Adoption be begunne in our Calling before our Iustification yet hath it the clearer manifestation and fuller accomplishment in and through all the rest of the benefites following our Calling For as sayth Iohn in his first Epistle chapter 3. verse 2. VVe are now the sonnes of GOD but yet it is not made manifest what wee shall be Therefore are we who are already called Iustified and Sanctified still saide to wayte yet for our Adoption Rom. chapter 8. verse 23. Not as though we were not already Adopted but because our Adoption is not fully accomplished vntill our bodies bee redeemed and fully glorified So that with as good reason wee may saye that God doth not acknowledge vs to be his sonnes whylest our bodyes are yet vile and corruptible seeing we must Waite for our Adoption vntill our bodyes be redeemed CHAPTER XV. THE second ground wherevpon this opinion is builded is the testimonie of Iohn Which not the lesse in my iudgemēt makes not much for it if it be wel wayed For it would appeare that that place is mistaken by many that especially in three things The first is in mistaking the right sense of that description wherein the propertie of these to whom Christ gives this benefite is set downe The second is the mistaking of the benefit it self givē by Christ The third is the ground of both the former two in not distinguishing betwixt the Fathers part and the Sonnes in that worke of our Adoption Touching the first the description of those persons is set downe three maner of wayes I. Those that receyved him II. Those that did beleeve in his Name III. Those that are borne of God Of these three the first two are interpreted to signifie Iustification of which sense that place well marked doth give no warrant seeing in scripture these phrases may as wel be interpreted of Adoptiō as of Iustificatiō For as by faith in Christ we are iustified so by faith in Christ we are the sonnes of God Gal. 3. 26. and therefore to restrayne beleeving in Christes name receyving of him vnto the benefit of iustificatiō is an oversight which easily may breed mistaking of the true sense not onely of this place but divers other places of scripture so they take it for granted which in it self is questionable Moreover the place it selfe and the very words of this description doe yeelde two sufficient arguments to prove that heere adoption by these phrases is rather designed then iustification The first argument lieth in the first wordes of the description which is Those that receyved him Which phrase is in the scripture still meant of the worke of the Fathers Calling of vs vnto the Sonne and not of his iustifying of vs in him For no man sayeth Christ can come vnto mee except the Father that hath sent me drawe him Iohn chap. 6. ver 34. Now to come vnto Christ to receive Christ are both one as is manifest by Ioh. cha 5. where that wherwith in the 40. verse Christ chargeth the Iewes vnder these words but you will not come vnto me is in the 43. verse interpreted by Christ him selfe in these wordes And you receyved me not
as is cleere Rom. chap. 5. 1. In which we have to observe that as the Father by Adoption maketh vs one with the sonne so by Iustification hee maketh vs one with him selfe Conforme to the saying of the Apostle 2. Corinth chapt 5. vers 19. For God was in Christ reconciling the worlde vnto him selfe by not imputing to them their sinnes therefore is our peace and reconciliation with GOD attributed vnto the Crosse of Christ by the which sayeth the Apostle hee killeth hatred Ephe. 2. 16. and also our libertie and boldnes to enter into the most holy place is attributed vnto the bloud of IESVS Heb. 10. 19. Secondly by sanctification the Lord makes vs like to his Son by puritie and holines of nature Thirdly by redemption as it is particularly taken for glorification the Lord makes vs like vnto his Sonne in immortalitie glory and power This order and difference of these benifites is cleere 1 Cor. chap. 1. vers 30. where wisdome is put in the first place which specially answeres to our calling wherein consisteth our Adoption In the second place righteousnes In the third sanctification and in the fourth place redemption Which place is specially to be marked for the right knowledge both of the order and difference that is amongst is benefites of God For in other places of Scripture Redemption as likewise Iustification and Reconciliation are taken in a larger sense to signifie the whole freedome of the sonnes of God and every parte thereof in particular And that because all libertie peace and reconciliation whatsoever is given vs of God floweth from the death of Christ in the which standeth our righteousnes peace redemption For which cause it is that in the Scriptures sometymes our Iustification is ascribed to the death of Christ sometymes our Sanctification sometymes our Reconciliation and sometimes our Redemption Because howsoever these blessings as they are imparted vnto vs differ both in order and nature yet they proceed all from one fountayne and are all comprehended only in that one oblation of Iesus Christ vpon the Crosse For cleering our iudgements therefore in this point we are carefully to marke these two senses in the which in the Scriptures Redemption Iustification and Reconciliation and Sanctification are taken Sometymes they are taken for the action of God in Christ for his saints when as God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe according to that which hee had purposed in Christ which was as sayeth the Apostle Eph. chap. 1. vers 10. That in the fulnes of tyme he would gather together all things in Christ Iesus as sayth the same Apostle Coll. chap. 1. ver 20. It pleased the Father to reconcile all things to himselfe by him making peace by the blood of his crosse In this sense God at one tyme by the only one oblation of Iesus Christ in one worke once performed did eternally redeeme Iustifie Sanctifie and Reconcill to himselfe all his ellect that ever were is or shall bee vntill the end of the world For Christ bare all their persons vpon the Crosse and God did lay vpon him the iniquitie of them all and did wound him for their transgressions and breake him for their iniquities and did lay vpon him the chastisment of their peace Esa 53. Therefore sayeth the Apostle Heb. 10. that by that will of God we are sanctified even by the offringe of the body of Iesus Christ once And in the 9. chap. 12. verse hee sayeth that Christ by his owne bloud entered once in the most holy place and abtayned eternall redemption and in that same Chapter ver 28. it is sayd that Christ was once offered to take away the sinnes of many Now in this sense there is neither difference of tyme nor order nor distinction to be made all beeing accomplished together and at once by one worke of one man Iesus Christ the Lord. Sometymes againe they are taken for the worke of God in vs and toward vs in his owne tyme applying that which hee wrough in Christ for vs to every one of vs in particular bringing vs by effectual calling to the knowledge apprehension by faith of our Redemption Iustification and Reconciliation which God accomplished onely in that day of Christ which all the Fathers desired to see howsoever in divers ages and divers tymes they bee applyed by God to these whō then and in that day by the death of his Sonne he did Redeeme Iustifie and Reconcile vnto him selfe And in this sense we speake of these benefites in this treatise not as they were wrought by God in Christ for vs but as in the dispensation of God they are applied vnto vs for whom Christ dyed In which sense the Apostle speakes of them 1. Coll. 1. 21. 22. saying And you also which were in tyme past straungers and enemies having your mindes exercised in evill workes hath he now reconciled in that body of his flesh by death And in this sense it is that both order and difference is to be marked amongst these benefites In consideration whereof how so ever Adoption and Iustification agree in this that they both are benefites bestowed by imputation without inhesion in vs yet as they differ in nature so doe they in order in respect of the grounds wherevpon they are builded whence they flow For Adoption neither dependeth vpon nor floweth from the death of Christ But from his personall propertie of beeing the sonne of God whereas Iustification dependeth vpon floweth from his suffering and therefore as our cōmunion with him in person goeth before our cōmunion with him in his suffrings so doth our Adoption in order goe before our Iustification CHAPTER XX. HITHERTO have we spoken of those groundes whereby both the nature and order of Gods saving benefites are most cleerly knowen So that by these things which are alreadie set downe a modest minde onely searching truth and abhorring contention may sufficiently knowe what Iustification before God is yet notwithstanding for the further contentement of those of weaker iudgement we will speake something more particularly of the benefite is selfe For the clearer vnderstanding whereof and discovering of the trueth which now almost lyeth hid by the manifold opinions of men it were needfull that we should speake of divers things as namely of God him selfe what place he hath in that worke 2. of his grace 3. of Christ and his obedience 4. of faith 5. of man him selfe and of his workes and lastly of the Lawe and of the Gospell For all these points are called in cōtroversie and mens iudgements is divers concerning every one of them in the worke of Iustification but to eschew longsomnes wee will reduce all that we are to speake into these few grounds The first shal be touching the special divers and severall iudgements of men concerning Iustification The second shal be touching the discussing of these pointes controverted which are of greatest moment The third shal be concerning the worke it selfe of Iustification
hath in all thinges so that whosoever placeth the matter of his righteousnes in any thinge but Christ denieth flatly that hee hath preheminence in all things Thirdlie nothing can bee the matter of our righteousnes which is not the matter of our redemption For as sayeth the Apostle Rom. chapt 3. vers 24. VVee are iustified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ IESVS Therefore is it that in the Scriptures Redemption is so often interpreted to bee remission of sinnes which is in effect righteousnes as Ephes chapt 1. vers 7. and Colos chapt 1. vers 14. Thereby shewing vs that our righteousnes consisteth of that same whereof consisteth our Redemption And it is cleere and manifest throughout all the holy Scriptures that we have Redemption in Christ alone Therefore in the same places cited before the Redemption whereby wee are iustified is saide to be in Christ IESVS and wee are saide to have Redemption in him Wherevppon it must needes followe that seeing our Redemption is in him alone our righteousnes must also bee in him alone For although in the holy Scriptures it bee saide that wee are iustified by faith yet it is never saide that we are redeemed by faith or that our Redemption is in faith Whereby it is most evident that when the spirit of God sayeth that wee are iustified by faith or that God doeth iustifie vs through faith or that hee imputes faith vnto righteousnes that these speeches are never to bee vnderstood of faith materially as though faith properly taken were the matter of our righteousnes before God except wee will say likewise that faith is the matter of our redemption which no man is so ignorant as once to imagine For nothing can bee the matter of our redemption and so consequently of our righteousnes which is not made of God sinne for vs and a propitiation for sinne For it is saide expresly that God made our Saviour Christ sinne for vs that wee might bee made the righteousnes of God in him 2 Corinth chapter 5. verse 21. and Christ is said to have redeemed vs from the curse of the Lawe by beeing made a curse and malediction for vs. Gallath chapter 3. verse 13. All to shewe vs that nothing can bee the matter of our Righteousnes and of our Redemption which is not made both sinne and the curse due to sinners for vs. Which two thinges were lively and openly shadowed in the Lawe The first Levit. chapt 16. by the live Goat where it is saide And Aaron shall put both his handes vpon the head of the live-Goat and confesse over him all the iniquities of the Children of Israel and all their trespasses in all their sinnes putting them vpon the head of the Goat and shall send him away by the hand of a man appointed into the wildernes so the Goat shall beare vpon him all their iniquities And this the Prophet Esay expresseth plainly when he sayeth that the Lord laid vpon Christ the iniquities of vs all and that he bare the sinne of many chap. 53. As also Peter when he sayeth that Christ himselfe bare our iniquities in his owne body vpon the tree 1 Pet. 2. 24. The second was shadowed vnto vs in the ordinance of God concerning all offerings for sinne In which when the trespasser had laid his hande vpon their head the Priest was commanded to kill them before the Lord and to burne them with fire Levit. 4. Which also the Prophet Esay expresseth when he sayeth that hee was wounded for our transgressions he was broken for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was vpon him chap. 53. As also Pet. when he sayeth that hee suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust Now there is no man so foolish as to thinke that these things can bee attributed vnto faith or yet to the workes of the Law or to any thing whatsoever except vnto Iesus Christ alone Therefore nothinge save he alone can possibly be the matter of our righteousnes seeing nothing except he alone was ever made of God for vs either sinne or a propitiation for sinne by death Fourthly nothing that is not the matter of our peace and reconciliation with God can possibly be the matter of our righteousnes For nothing can procure peace vnto vs but that only which iustifieth vs and covereth our iniquities For there is no peace for the wicked sayth the Lord and it is our iniquities that seperates vs from God Esay 57. 21. and 59. 2. Therefore the Apostle sayeth Rom. 5. 1. that beeing iustified we have peace toward God For the cleanging of vs from sinne which is the cause of hatred makes vs to be reconciled vnto God Now the Lord Iesus only in the Scriptures is called our peace and in him only God reconciled the worlde vnto himselfe and that by iustifying vs and this peace reconciliation is said to be made by the bloud of his crosse because therein only we have remission of sinnes and therein onely is Christ ordayned a propitiation for sinne Wherevpon it followeth that seeing nothing is our peace but Christ onely nothing can be our righteousnes but he only For nothing but righteousnes makes peace betwixt God and man Fiftlie righteousnes and life are ordayned to be brought into the world as sinne and death were brought into the worlde therefore is it that Adam in respect of the effectes that come from him to all men is saide to be the Type of Christ in the effectes that flow from him to his members For it is saide that as by one man sinne entred into the world so by one man righteousnes shal be brought into the worlde And as in Adam all die so in Christ shall all be made alive According to which ground it is also saide That as we have borne the Image of the earthlie so shall wee beare the Image of the heavenly Wherevpon it followeth that nothing in the world except Christ can be the matter of our Righteousnes as none in the worlde save onely Adam is the Authour of sinne in vs otherwise the trueth in Christ touching righteousnes should never answer to the Type in Adam concerning sinne Therefore as sinne commeth from Adam alone vnto vs all as he in whom wee have all sinned so from Iesus Christ alone commeth righteousnes to all that are in him as he in whom they have all satisfied the iustice of God In which comparison if we had eyes to marke it faith never hath the place of our righteousnes but answeres in our participation of righteousnes in Christ to that which is the ground of our being partakers in the sinne of Adam For as wee were one with Adam and in respect of origine and nature were in him and so by being in him and one with him did all in him and with him transgresse the commandement of God even so in respect of faith whereby onely we are vnited vnto Christ and spiritually made one with him and ingrafted in him wee
all in him and with him did satisfie the iustice of God in his death and suffering Thus our vnion with Christ and meanes thereof is alwayes to be distinguished from our communion with him in the participation of his righteousnes as the fruit thereof Like as our being in Adam and one with him is to be distinguished from the fruit thereof which is communiō with him in the participation of his transgression For clearing of this pointe we have to marke carefully the wordes of the spirit of God vnto Daniel chap. 9. vers 24. In the which an appeinted tyme is set downe for the finishing of wickednes the sealing vp of sinnes the reconciling of iniquitie and bringing in of everlasting righteousnes in the worlde Thereby shewing vs that it is impossible that faith can bee the materiall righteousnes of GOD whereby we are iustified For then this everlasting righteousnes should have beene in the worlde before Christ came into the worlde and so should not have beene brought in by him For faith was in the worlde from the dayes of Adam Therefore sayeth the spirit of GOD that by it our Flders obtayned good report and yet in that same place the spirit witnesseth that they receyved not the promise distinguishing betwixt faith and Christ apprehended by faith as the matter of the promise and so consequently of righteousnes The one whereof that is faith they had receyved the other that is the promise they had not receyved because Christ in whom their blessednes was promised was not exhibited in their dayes For albeit by faith they apprehended Christ crucified to come and the righteousnes which hee was to bring vnto the worlde at his comming yet notwithstanding that righteousnes in the substance and matter of it was never brought into the worlde vnto the tyme that Christ IESVS was brought into the worlde Therefore doeth the Lord vse this phrase of speech My salvation is at hande to come and my righteousnes to bee revealed Esay chapter 56. vers 1. According vnto which likewise the Apostle Paul speaketh That GOD had purposed in the dispensation of the fulnes of tyme to gather together all thinges in Christ Eph. ch 1. ve 10. Which the same Apostle declareth more cleerlie Gallath chap. 4. vers 4. 5. saying But when the fulne of tyme was come God sent foorth his Sonne made of a VVoman and made vnder the Lawe that hee might redeeme them which were vnder the Lawe c. So that the verie designing of a precise tyme for the bringing in of our righteousnes into the worlde declareth manifestly that that righteousnes is to bee materially distinguished from faith which was in the worlde in all ages before ever it was manifested For faith could bee in the worlde and apprehende righteousnes which was to bee brought into the worlde long before it came as well as nowe long after that righteousnes is performed it can lay holde vppon it vnto iustification For the faith of Gods Children before the day of Christ and the faith of Gods Children nowe after the day of Christ did ever and yet doeth apprehende no righteousnes but that which in that day was brought into the worlde For it is as easie to faith to apprehende righteousnes to come as it is to faith to apprehende by gone righteousnes Like as our faith yet apprehendeth many thinges to come as specially our glorification which is yet a thing no wise manifested neither shall be manifested vntill Christ appeare agayne in his second comming in glorie This same grounde serveth to prove that the Lawe and workes thereof was never the matter of our righteousnes seeing the Lawe was given longe before Christs comming into the world Lastly that which doeth not make manifest God to be iust and the Iustifier can never possibly bee that righteousnes whereby we are iustified This ground is cleere by the Apostles wordes Rom. chap. 3. where hee declareth the ende wherefore God doeth manifest his righteousnes and to that ende setteth foorth Christ to bee a Propitiation by faith in his bloud which is that he may be iust and the iustifier of him that is of the faith of IESVS For the rightousnes of GOD whereby hee iustifieth vs beeing manifested must of necessitie not onely declare GOD to bee mercifull but also iust And therefore it is nor sufficient and enough that grace doe shine in our iustification in respect of Gods grace and mercie towardes vs but moreover it is necessarie that iustice doe shine in our iustification in respect of GOD him selfe so that albeit wee receyve remission of sinnes without any merit or reason in our selves but of Gods free grace toward vs in Christ yet notwithstanding God in doeing so must still be iust For as sayth Abraham Gen. 18. Shall not the Iudge of the worlde doe right Now this iustice of God in iustifying is perceyved by the fight of the righteousnes of God whereby he iustifies as is plaine by that speech of the Apostle in Rom. chap. 3. For to this ende doeth God show his righteousnes that he may be iust Now it is certayne that if God should iustifie vs eyther by the workes of the Lawe or by faith as it is a worke or habit in vs GOD could never bee seene to be iust in iustifying of vs because there is no flesh that abides in every jot that is written in the Lawe of God Neyther is there any that doeth it And concerning faith the very Saints them selves in the scriptures have acknowledged their faith to be imperfect And they who now place faith for the matter of our righteousnes doeth acknowledge that it is not answearable to the iustice of God because it is not full and perfect righteousnes but Iesus Christ whom God hath made righteousnes vnto vs in his death being manifested vnto vs in his satisfaction doeth let vs see a full and perfect righteousnes answerable to the iustice of God in all things so that God is not vniust in iustifying thereby seeing in that iustification hee iustifieth vs by that which in it selfe is a righteousnes as full and perfect as his iustice doeth require and the conscience of this hath forced some of these men who holde our righteousnes to consist in faith to confesse that the obedience of Christ must be imputed vnto vs as well as our owne faith so making a double action of God in iustifying one gracious in respect of faith another iust in respect of Christes obedience Vpon this ground it followeth necessarily that nothing can be our righteousnes except Christ alone seeing the Lord cannot be seene to be iust in instifying vs by any thing except by him alone CHAPTER XXIIII IT followeth now that we speake of the second point which concerneth the matter of our righteousnes that is what is that thing wherein Christ is made of God righteousnes vnto vs and this in one word in the scripture is saide to bee his obedience Rom. chap. 5. vers 19 Where it is said
our libâ—rtie to enter into the most holy place that is to come vnto God proceedeth from the bloud of Iesus Hebr. chap. 10. ver 19. which summarily seemeth to be expressed by the Apostle in that saying Hebr. chap. 5. ver 9. And being consecrate he was made the Authour of eternall salavtion c. By which saying it is manifest that Christ is not the Authour of righteousnes or life to vs but by his consecration that is by his death For therein did his consecration consist as is manifest Hebr. chap. 2. vers 10. and therefore is he said Hebr. chap. 10. ver 14. to have consecrate vs for ever by that one offering wherein consisted his owne consecration And for this same cause is it that the Apostle Hebr. chap. 9. 17. sayeth That the Covenant or Testament is coufirmed when men are dead and that it is yet of no force as longe as he that made it is alive Thereby evidently witnessing that no blessing promised of God in the covenant of grace is made ours but by the death of Christ So that whatsoever went before his death could no wise make the Covenant of God of any force or effect vnto vs. Thus neither in respect of tyme assigned of God vnto the Priestes for entring into their office neither in respect of the Priestlie actions ordayned to bee accomplished by them for reconciliation of the people and expiation of sinne can any thing in Christ before the 30. yeare of his age bee accompted a Priestlie action of expiation neither any action after except onely the offering of him selfe and enteringe with his owne bloud into the heavens for vs all whose names hee carried in that action before the Lorde whom by vertue of his bloud he bringeth vnto God Thus have we shewed such things as in the worde of God doe seeme to exclude all things from the matter of our righteousnes except the blood and death of Christ alone Of which opinion it appeareth evidently that Calvin was if his minde bee wel marked in his owne writings in the third book of his institutions Chap. 11. Secti 4. 11. 21. 22. Where 4. things are expreslie set down by him making all to this purpose The 1. is That righteousnes is simplie opposed vnto guiltines The 2. is That he affirmeth the manner of our reconciliation to be expressed in the words of the Apostle when he saith That Christ who knew no sinne was made sinne for vs. 2. Cor. 5. 21. The 3. is That in that place he affirmeth reconciliation to signifie nothing but iustification The 4. is Touching the place of David Psal 32. cited by the Apostle Rom. 4. In the which he plainiy affirmeth that neither David nor the Apostle doeth speake of one parte only of our iustification but of the whole And therfore addeth that seeing the blessednes of a man which hee taketh to signifie righteousnes is said by the Prophet and Apostle to consist in remission of sinnes there is no reason why we should define it otherwise By which sentence hee plainly cuts away the ground of these men whereon they build their evasion When they are vrged out of that and such other places to acknowledge that full righteousnes consists in remission of sinnes only For to maintayne the imputation of Christs actuall obedience they alledge that vnto eternal life it is not sufficient to have all iniquitie pardoned That is as they interprete it to be innocent but that it is requisit beside the remission of sinnes to have righteousnes which they accompt to come by the imputation of Christ actuall obedience Therfore when these places are aledged wherein blessednes and iustification is only attributed to the death of Christ and only placed in remission of sinnes they answere that these places are synecdochically to be vnderstood As though a parte of righteousnes were put for the whole in which Calvin sheweth himselfe plainly to disagree from them by affirming the direct contrary Thus they who seeme to be followers of Calvin in this point are deceyved CHAPTER XXV NOW it followeth that we speake of these things which are required in Christ to the end that in his bloud hee may be righteousnes vnto vs. For albeit without shedding of bloud there be no remission of sinnes yet many things are required both in the bloud that is shed and in the action of shedding it before it can serve vnto the remission of sinnes First them to speake of the bloud it must needes bee better then the bloud of Goats of Lambes of Bullocks or all the sacrifices of the Law For although the similitude of heavenly things bee purified with the bloud of such sacrifices yet heavenly thinges them selves must be purified with greater and better sacrifices then these Hebr. chap. 9. vers 23. and that because the bloud of those sacrifices which were offered according to the Lawe can never make holy concerning the conscience him that doeth the service To trie then what bloud it must bee First the bloud of a man is better then the bloud of a beast and that it must bee the bloud of a man it is cleere by the holy scripture For he which sanctified and they which are sanctissed must be all of one Heb. chap. 2. 11. And as by one man sinne entered into the worlde so by one man rigreousnes is brought in the world therefore is it saide that IESVS for a little space was made lower then the Angels that by the grace of God he might taste of death for vs all Hebr. chap. 2. ver 9. for the iustice of God requireth that sinne be punished in that nature that hath committed it But yet this is not sufficient to make that bloud that is shed righteousnes vnto vs. For the bloud of a sinner caÌ„ never recoÌ„cile a sinner vnto God and he that hath need to offer sacrifice for his owne sin caÌ„ never by his bloud purge any other man froÌ„ sinne therfore it is requisit not only that it be the bloud of a man but moreover that it be the bloud of a iust maÌ„ in whom there is no iniquitie And this is declared plainly by the types of the law in the which no vncleane thing could be offred for sinne neither behoved there to bee spott or wrinckle or blemish in the Lambe as is cleerly seene in the commaundement of God Levit. chap. 22. ver 20. Yee shall not offer any thing that hath a blemish for that shall not bee acceptable for you According to which lawe it is said of Christ that he offered vp him selfe without fault vnto God Heb chap. 9. vers 14. And the Apostle Peter sayeth That Christ suffered once for sinne the iust for the vniust 1. Epist chap. 3. ver 18 And againe That we are redeemed by the precious bloud of Iesus Christ as of a Lambe vndefiled and without spot Neither is this yet sufficient to make the bloud that is shed to be righteousnes before God but more is required in
can Christ live in any more of our soule then that wich liveth by the faith of CHRIST By this it may appeare how vngraciouslie they speake of Gods grace in the worke of faith who make him effectually to renewe no more of man but his vnderstanding leavinge the action of consenting and embracing by faith the things reveiled to the will of man as also how slenderly they speake of faith who place it in nothing but in the willes assentinge to the trueth of God CHAPTER XXVIII NOw it followeth that we speake of faith it selfe what it is In which point wee will first intreate of the divers significations of Faith in the word of God And secondly of the true signification and nature of it in the wroke of iustification Touching the first Faith is taken in foure divers significations in the scriptures of God besides that signification which it hath in the worke of iustification The first signification is when faith is taken for fidelitie and trueth as Math. chap. 23. 32. Yee leave the waightier matter of the Law as iudgement mercie and fidelitie Likewise Rom. chap. 3. ver 3. Shall their vnbeliefe make the faith of God of none effect and 1. Timoth. cha 5. ver 12. having damnation because they have broken their first faith Secondly faith doeth signifie the doctrine of the Gospell because it is begotten in vs by the Gospell for faith commeth by hearing therefore faith is called the faith of the Gospell as also because the Gospell preacheth salvatiō to be no otherwise but by faith and therefore the Gospell is called the worde of faith Rom. chap. 10. ver 8. In this signification it is taken Gall. chap. 3. Receyved ye the spirit by the workes of the Lawe or by the hearing of saith And againe Galla chap. 1. ver 23. He which in time past persecuted vs. nowe preacheth the faith that he before destroyed And Acts chap. 6. ver 7. And a great companie of the Priests were obedient to the faith Thirdly faith is taken for particular knowledge Rom. 14. 22. Hast thou faith have it with thy self c. That which in this place the Apostle calleth faith in the same question matter and purpose he calleth knowledge 1. Cor. chap. 8. Fourthly faith is somtimes put for Christ himself in the gospel because al that ever faith in the gospell apprehendeth is Christ who is the only true obiect of faith vnto salvation In this sense it is takē Gal. 3. 23. before faith came we were kept vnder the law as vnder a garrison shut vp vnto that faith which afterward should be reveiled which words being cōpared with the 24. 25. verses folowing with the 19. verse preceeding it shal be manifest that by the name of faith in that place Christ the obiect of faith is vnderstood Thus much for these foure divers significations wherein faith is taken in the word of God Now we come to the special significatiō and nature of it as we are said thereby to be iustified And when it is said to be imputed vnto righteousnes In which point there is greatest need of carefull attention because vpon the mistaking hereof ariseth principally the mistaking of iustification it selfe Specially in that sentence where it is saide that Faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Concerning which there is a two-folde controversie The first is whether faith in this place be taken in the owne proper signification or in a borrowed sense The seconde controversie is touching the proper signification of faith what it is In the first controversie these who take faith in a borrowed speech doe expound that sentence Metonymically by faith vnderstanding Christ crucified apprehended by faith and so doe esteeme that faith relatively or instrumentally taken and not properly is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes And this opinion agreeth with the trueth of the matter it selfe But there is no necessitie why faith in that place should bee taken in a borrowed sense if the right minde and meaning of the holy Ghost in this phrase be gravely and maturely considered so that if they who take it properly did not erre eyther in the signification of it or in the true sense of the imputation of it their opinion might wel be allowed For faith in this sentence is in my opinion to be taken properly in that sense whereby in it selfe it is distinguished both from the worde whereby it is begotten and from the obiect of it in the worde which is Christ As also from the naked knowledge of the worde and Christ therein reveyled how soever it doeth comprehend knowledge For searching out therefore the true significatiō of the word Faith in this sentence we will first set downe the divers significations wherein it is taken Secondly wee will speake of the true nature and signification of it in this place where it is saide to be imputed vnto righteousnes Cōcerning the first we are not to speak of that differēce which in the scriptures is warranted of historicall faith miraculous faith and iustifying faith but onely of the different opinions of men touching iustifying faith In one thing all men doe consent and agree that faith is an action of the heart consisting in iudgement but they differ in three sortes The first sorte make this iudgment of the harte in beleeving to be nothing but a naked opinion which is a doubtfull inclination of an vncertayne minde to the best part of the contradiction with feare of the contrarie parte beeing destitute of the knowledge of the true cause As for example in this contradiction Christes death shall save vs. and Christes death shall not save vs they have an opinion of the best that is that Christes death shall save them but no certaine knowledge because they are ignorant of the cause of that effect and therfore feare that they shall not bee saved and in this opinion they place faith The seconde sorte which are the wiser amongst the Papistes doe make faith to be an action of the heart in iudging neyther by way of opinion nor yet by way of certayne knowledge but by a middle way of iudgement betwixt opinion and knowledge Which participates of both and yet is neyther of them For they will not have it a doubtfull inclination of the minde vnto the best parte with feare of the worst vpon ignorance of the cause Neither will they have it a certayne inclination of the minde to the best without all feare of the worst vpō certayne knowledge of the cause and necessarie meanes But will have it middle conceyte of the minde neither altogither contingent neither altogither necessarie And now in these dayes there is a sorte of men which agree with this second sorte in substance whatsoever deceitfull shew their wordes doe make to the contrarie Therefore as touching this point wee make no severall order of them For albeit in word they seeme to admit in beleeving knowledge of the thing beleeved yea which is more albeit they graunt application yet seeing they
to the faith and assurance of the remission of our sinnes by making him sinne for vs and woundinge him for our transgressions So to conclude this point albeit all blessing bee in Christ and he be made of God wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemptioÌ„ yet all this shal be in vaine to vs except we beleeve because there is no meanes in the world whereby to obtaine possesse Christ or any blessing in him except faith only For as concerning the Word and Sacraments they are not so much the meanes of our possessing Christ as the meanes of our faith whereby we possesse Christ The third vse and end wherefore faith is given is keeping preserving vs in the possession which it hath brought vnto vs and that both because through faith wee are kept vnto salvation as saieth Pet. 1. Epi. 1. 5. and also because by it wee keepe Christ and all his blessings in our heart For which cause the scriptures place our victorie over Satan sinne and the world in our faith Ioh. 1. Epi. ca. 5. ver 4. 5. and the Apost Paul placeth the chief strength of a Christlan in his faith as that whereby we are made able to quench all the fierie dartes of the Divell Eph. 6. 16. so that there is no enemie of our salvation so great neither any temptation so vehement and fierie which by faith wee are not made able to overcome Thus faith wrought in our heartes by God is of a stronger might and power then the Divel himselfe and all the powers and principalities of darknes therfore Pet. 1. Ep. 5. willeth vs to resist the divel by being stedfast in the faith thereby to teach vs that in a stedfast faith there is streÌ„gth to overcome him The examples of the great power of God which is â—n them that beleeve set downe in Heb 11. doth suâ—â—icieÌ„tly cleer the truth hereof who only by faith are said to have performed suffered so strange wonderful things as no power that ever nature hath given vnto man was able either to performe or suffer This also is manifest if we marke another pointe which is the Saintes recouering of them selves when they have appeared to have bene overthrowen by Sathan in sinne who notwithstanding have by the strength of faith onely recovered victorie over Sathan and sinne So when as in our practise and obedience to God we fall most fearfully yet by faith we not onely overcome our owne guilthines but also all the feare of Gods iust deserved wrath for our guilthines so that our verie sinnes cannot seperate our heartes that beleeve from Christ nor remove the favour of God from vs. For whatsoever blessing wee have once obtayned by faith by that same saith wee are made able to holde it fast to the ende and the faithfull heart sayeth as Iob chap 27. ver 6. I will keepe my righteousnes and will not forsake it and my heart shall never cast it away all my dayes Vpon this ground it is that the Apostle willeth Timothie to fight the good fight of faith 1. Tim. chap. 6. vers 12. because indeed our faith hath the greatest labour in our spiriruall bataile For when all other grace faileth vs yet faith must vpholde vs otherwise we could not possibly but perish For what should have become of Pieter after his fearefull fall if faith had not sustained him This point is yet more cleere if we marke the strength of faith in other two thinges The first is if we shall consider the examples of the children of God who have drawn from God manifold great blessinges by faith as their vncurable diseases to bee cured their dead to be raysed c. Of which a lively example wee have in Math. chap. 9. and Luke chap. 8. in the Woman that had an ishewe of bloud 12. yeares longe and in the wordes of Christ vnto Iairus Luke chap. 8. ver 50. where he saith Feare not beleeve onely and shee shal be saved The other thing to be considered of vs is when God himself seemeth to set him selfe against his children and they are compelled to wrestle with God as with their owne enimie yet by faith they overcome say with Iob 13. 15. Though hee slay me yet will I trust in him And this was liuely shadowed in the Lord his wrestling with Iacob Gen. chap. 32. where it is saide of the Lord that when he sawe that he could not prevaile against Iacob he touched the hollowe of his thigh c. therefore saieth the Prophet Hose cap. 12. ver 3. 4. By his strength hee had power with God and had power over the Angell and prevayled And this the Lord setteth downe expresly to shew vs that the power of God in him that beleeveth is able so to strengthen him that nothing is able to overthrow him To conclude this point that which Angells by nature could not doe in heaven and that which Adam could not doe in Paradise a poore fraile wretch beleeving in the Lorde Iesus is made able to doe by the power of God which dwelleth in his heart by faith for the verie weaknes of God is stronger then Men and Angells and it pleaseth the Lorde to magnifie his strength in our weaknes that the excellencie of this worke may be knowen to be of him and not of vs. For this cause as the Scripture calleth faith our victorie and our shield so the Fathers likewise cal it and moreover the key whereby the treasures that are in Christ are opened vnto vs the ladder by the which we climbe vp from earth to heauen Now the last vse and end wherefore Faith is given is practise that is to make vs able to doe the will of the Lord and obey his commandements for man whose imaginations are nothing but vanitie and that continually and is of no strength of him selfe to performe any good worke neyther is nor can be subiect to the lawe of God having his minde continually sett on evill workes having no goodnes at all dwelling in him is by this supernaturall gift of faith made able to doe the will of the Lord from the hearte for thereby not onely is his darkened vnderstanding illuminate that he may know what is that good acceptable and perfect will of God but also his rebellious will subdued to will and to doe the will of the Lord and his whole affections sanctified to love the lawe of God and to delight in it more then in all treasures and to esteeme it more precious then gold For by faith he is buried with Christ and also hee is raysed vp with Christ by the faith of the effectuall working of God who raysed Christ from the dead Colos chap. 2. ver 13. For which cause also the Apostle Paul to the Ephe. ca. 2. shewing what is the exceeding power of God in theÌ„ that beleeve saieth That we that were dead in sinnes are through the grace of God by faith quickened raysed and made to sit together in heaven in Christ
this gift it is that in this place we speake for howsoever by the Fathers givinge Christ vnto the death the full redemption of all Gods elect was wrought Yet in our particular persons we enioye it not vntill wee bee called of God therefore IustificatioÌ„ is placed after our calling Rom. chap. 8. and this giving of Christ is the cause why God firste giveth vs faith because before we receyve faith it is impossible to vs to enioye Christ because we have neyther hande heart nor will to receyve him and in this gift as wee have showen before standeth the matter of our righteousnes and the forme of our iustification consisteth in parte in the giving of it and this is needfull to be marked of vs for their cause that make our iustification to consist in Gods gracious acceptation of our faith and not in his gracious giving of faith vnto vs and Christ by faith Touching this second gift which is Christ in his death and bloud I will speake no more the things preceeding serving sufficientlie to cleare it and therefore we come to the next pointe wherein we have said consisteth the forme of our iustification CHAPTER XXXI THE second thinge wherein consisteth the forme of our iustification is the Lords imputing of the thinges given vnto vs that is both of faith and Christes obedience and for the observation of the imputation of both wee are to marke these two phrases First where it is saide that faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Rom. cha 4. ver 5. 9. Secondly where it is saide that righteovsnes is imputed Rom. chapt 4. ver 11. For the one importes plainely the imputation of faith the oher importes the imputation of righteousnes it selfe which is by faith For we have alreadie shewen that our faith is neither our righteousnes nor called in the Scriptures our righteousnes howsoever our righteousnes be called the righteousnes of the faith of Iesus or by the faith of Iesus and it may be that the not observing hereof hath made some worthie and learned Divines to denie al imputation of Christes obedience to maintaine nothing to be imputed vnto vs but faith only that not vnto righteousnes but as they interprete the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that is in the place of righteousnes For cleering of this point of Imputation we will first speake of the word imputation what it signifieth Secondly what sorte of things are saide to be imputed in the Scriptures whether thinges that are inherent in vs or thinges not inherent or both Thirdly we will speake of these things which are saide in scripture to be imputed to vs for our iustification Concerning the first the word it selfe signifieth the sentence of our iudgement or resolut opinion of his minde and in this sense it is taken Rom. chap. 3. 28. as also Rom. 6. 11. Secondly it is referred to the reasoning of the minde and the disputing of the vnderstanding as Marke chap. 11. ver 31. Thirdly it is referred to a mans purposing or imagining or plotting any thing as 1. Corint chap. 13. ver 5. Fourthly it is referred to the estimation or accompt of the minde touching any thing as Acts chap. 19. ver 27. in which sense also it may be taken Mark 15. 28. Luke chap. 22. ver 37. Fiftly it is reâ—erred to the laying to a mans charge of any debt or guiltines as 2. Timoth. chap. 4. ver 16. Lastly it is taken in a borrowed sense froÌ„ accompts and reckonings for accompting vnto a man or reputing vnto a man and reckoning to a man any thing to bee his or to be good payement and satisfaction from him in his accompts and in this sense is it taken in the matter of our iustification when as God eyther reckoneth that to be ours which is not ours or when hee esteemeth and accompteth that sufficient which hee giveth vs freely for our iustification before him But in this sense it appeareth that there is a three folde difference in mens taking of the meaninge of the worde imputation The first is when imputation is taken for naked acceptation of a thing although in it selfe insufficient as sufficient by God and this maketh some men to define our iustification to be nothing els but a gracious acceptation of our imperfect faith by God in place of perfect righteousnes but to this wee have answered before and certaine and sure it is that God receyves no righteousnes from vs but gives righteousnes vnto vs. The second meaning is when imputation is takeÌ„ not simply for a naked acceptation of a thing whether in it selfe perfect or imperfect but for accompting that which is perfect righteousnes in it selfe and yet is not ours to be ours The third sense is when imputation is so taken that it signifieth not only the accompting or reckoning to vs as ours the righteousnes which is imputed but so reckoneth and reputeth it to vs as done by our selves The first importeth no more but the Lordes accompting and holding of a thing sufficient which notwithstanding of it selfe is not sufficient nor perfect righteousnes which opinion can never be maintayned with Gods honour The seconde importeth not onely an accompting and holding of a thing which in it selfe is sufficient righteousnes to bee full and perfect but also an accomptinge of that perfect righteousnes vnto vs as ours howsoever it bee onely Christes so that this opinion taketh the word imputatioÌ„ so as when God reckoneth to vs that to be our righteousnes which in effect is not our righteousnes but onely by his accompt and imputation The third importeth that same that the second doeth but in a more strict sense to wit that God by imputing of Christs obedience vnto vs doeth not onely accompt it to be our righteousnes but also doth accompt it as performed and done by vs and this sentence though it seeme hard and to derogate something to the honour of God and praise of his grace yet one word being taken in a charitable which also is a true sense there shal be no fault fouÌ„d in the speech The word is as when it is saide that the Lord imputeth Christes obedience to vs as if we had done it our selves which word is not to be taken as though it imported that God did impute vnto vs. that wee had done this but oely is set downe by similitude to shewe the faithfulnes and trueth of Gods imputation to wit that GOD imputeth Christes righteousnes as truely to be ours and as effectually to iustifie vs as it should have done if wee had in our owne persons actually performed it and in that sense this speech may well be approoved Moreover it may be taken in good parte even although we take it in the strictest sense spoken before if wee consider that Iesus Christ did beare all our persons in his death and therefore he is saide in scriptures to have died for vs so that what he did bearing our persons even in the sight of God and dying for
vs even by the very appointement of God that which hee did for vs and in our name may not impertinentlie be saide to bee imputed by God vnto vs as done by vs But for myne owne iudgement I esteeme the first interpretation of the word as to bee most sounde and agreeable to the trueth and beeing so taken there shal be no difference in substance betwixt the second and third opinion onely that which is not expressed in the second but vnderstood in the word imputation touching the trueth and effectualnes of it is by similitude expressed in the third and in this sense it is to bee taken in the matter of our iustification and it declareth the forme of our iustification importing this much that God iustifieth vs by accompting vnto vs Christes obedience which is in it selfe perfect righteousnes in such sorte as by this his imputation it is ours as truely and doeth as truely cleere vs before God as if it were our owne in deede and we our selves in deed had performed it Thus we have need to take heed of two extremities whereinto it is evident that many men doe fall in this point some taking imputation too slenderly and others taking it too strictlie each being to other the cause of others stumbling Furthermore wee shall vnderstande the more cleerlie the right meaning of the word imputation if wee doe consider it in the two coÌ„trarie phrases wherein it is vsed al to one sense in the Scriptures For sometimes our iustification is described negatively by not imputing of sinne sometimes affirmatively by imputing of righteousnes For as the word imputation is taken in the negative phrase it must also be taken in the affirmative now in the negative we may know how it is taken by the Apostle 2. Cor. chap. 5. ver 19. where it is saide God was in Christ reconciling the world to him selfe not imputing to them their sinnes As likewise Psal 32. and Rom. chap. 4. where it is saide Blesied is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sinne In which places not imputing of sinne signifieth the not reckoning vnto vs sinne nor iniquitie and the not accompting of vs to be vnrighteous and so the not laying guiltines to our charge nor exacting punishment of vs for it wherevpon it followeth that imputation of righteousnes must signifie the reckoning of righteousnes vnto vs and accompting of vs to be righteous pronouncing of vs guiltlesse and decerning life vnto vs. For clearer vnderstanding whereof we are to knowe that the word of imputation hath alwayes reference to some other thing fo that it commonly cometh in betwixt two things the one the thing which is imputed the other that wherevnto it is imputed so that imputation hath relation vnto both and to make this manifest we shall consider these 3. phrases The obedience of Christ is imputed vnto iustification conforme to the saying of the Apostle Rom. chap. 5. ver 19. By the obedience of one man many shal be made righteous The second phrase is Faith is imputed vnto righteousnes And the third is Righteousnes is imputed vnto life The equivalent whereof we have Rom. chap. 4. ver 11. and 5. 17. 18. In the first phrase imputation commeth in betwixt Christes obedience as the thing which is imputed iustification as the end wherevnto it is imputed and it hath reference to both In the second phrase imputation coÌ„meth in betwixt faith as the thing which is imputed and righteousnes as the end wherevnto it is imputed In the last phrase imputation commeth in betwixt righteousnes it selfe as the thing imputed and life as the end wherevnto it is imputed Thus we see that imputation in the matter of iustification hath alwayes reference to two things and thus much concerning the meaning of the word Now we are to consider what thinges they are which are said to be imputed coÌ„cerning which there are two extremities wherein men do commonly fall the one holding that nothing inherent in vs can possibly be imputed to vs the other hold the contrarie that nothing is imputed to vs but that which is inherent in vs. That opinion which is betwixt both seemeth to agree most with Gods truth that is that not only things inherent in vs but things that are not inherent in vs are imputed to vs therefore imputation is vsed by the holy ghost when hee speaketh of iustification by grace and of iustification by works as Rom. cha 4. likewise when he speaketh of the accompting of vs sinners because of our workes and corruption inherent And when he speaketh of the accompting of vs righteous by grace through the obedience of Christ Rom. chap. 4. this same is cleare by other examples of Scripture as 2. Sam. chapt 19. vers 19. where Sheâ—ei sayeth to David Let not my Lord impute wickednes vnto me and Rom. chap. 2. ver 26. where it is saide His vncircumcision shal be imputed vnto circumcision This same may bee confirmed vnto vs Psalm 32. and 2. Cor. chap. 5. and Rom. chapt 9 ver 8. and 2. Cor. chap. 12. ver 6. Gal. chap. 3. ver 6. and 2. Tim. chap. 4. 16. And therfeore somtimes righteousnes is said to be imputed by debt and sometimes by grace Rom. cha 4. 4. For vnderstanding whereof we are not only to distinguish betwixt thinges as they are inherent or not inherent in vs but also as they are our owne or not our owne For somethings inherent are so in vs that they are our owne because they consist in these thinges which are in our nature and are the effectes and fruites of our naturall powers somethings againe are so in vs as they are no wayes our owne being no parte nor portion of any naturall power or qualitie nor flowing from any power or facultie in nature but beside and above nature coÌ„ming to vs from God and wrought in vs by the power of his spirit and therefore though they be in vs cannot be said to be our owne because they are no parte nor propertie of our nature nor effectes produced by nature such as is faith for although we be saide to beleeve with the hearte yet neither is faith it selfe any naturall power or facultie in the hearte nor produced by any naturall power or facultie of the hearte neither doe wee beleeve with the heart naturally and by our owne strength as though wee might make our heartes to beleeve or that faith or beleevinge were our owne worke but faith as wee have showen before is an instrument supernaturall and wrought not by our heartes but in our heartes by the supernaturail power of God by the which as by a supernaturall meane given vs of God we beleeve with our harts and so lay hold vpon supernatural things and performe supernaturall workes According to this diverse consideration of thinges in vs or proceeding from any power that is in vs so is there a distinction of imputation in the scriptures One is said to be by debt another is saide to be by