written which was before deliuered by the liuely voice Q. I pray you speak in order vnto me of the subiect or argument in scripture written first by God himself secondly by mē by Moses the Prophets and Apostles A. I will do so Q. What then hath God written A. The sum of the doctrine of the couenant of works of the law euen the very same which he had deliuered first by a liuely voice to the Fathers and to Moses Q. What hath Moses written A. All the celestiall doctrine which he had receiued partly of the fathers by tradition partly of God himselfe Moses books who spake mouth to mouth with him for so the scripture speaketh partly he had learned of the holy Ghost by an inward inspiration to speake in a word whatsoeuer had happened to him and to all the people in his life time for the space of 100. and 20. yeares all these things he committed to writing and gaue to the people Q. Did Moses then write what soeuer true doctrine was deliuered from the beginning of the world to that time A. Moses omitted no point of true doctrine which at any time had bene deliuered concerning either faith or manners for from the beginning vntil that very time one and the same doctrine of truth as touching the substance was taught full and whole in all ages The difference only was in the measure of the reuelation of it that it is accidentall Moses deliuered this doctrine fully and wholy by liuely voice more cleerely and manifestly then euer before then after this it was recorded in writing Q. What did the Prophets write who followed Moses euerie one in their time and order A. The same and all as touching the substance which Moses had written before the difference only was herein that euery one by reuelation did adde a more cleare manifest interpretation as the bright morning starre did approch more neere Q. What haue the Apostles written after the Prophets A. All and the same which from the beginning of the world in al ages before them was both by liuely audible voice deliuered and written they first also by a liuely voice deliuered the same and after committed it to writing Q. Doe you then make no difference betwixt the writings of the Prophets and of the Apostles A. In the matter and substance none in the clearenes and perspicuity thereof very great for the scripture of the Apostles conteineth the same reuelation of the mystery which was declared from the beginning of the world but most fully and most clearely Q. I haue heard you speake concerning both kinds of reuelation considered without comparison now I would haue you to compare together the liuely voice writing that by comparison it may appeare whether is of greater dignity authority A. I will compare them together the liuely voice and scripture are compared either in respect of substance and matter is selfe which is reuealed by these meanes or in respect of the kinds of y e reuelatiō of it If cōparison be made in regard of the matter or substance they must needes be both equall alike seeing that the matter in either is one and the same but if you compare the kinds of reuclation together it cānot truly be denied but that the first better place is due to the liuely voice seeing that the liuely voice is both in respect of time more auncient was before the organs or instruments thereof for the mouth is an instrument more worthy to be preferred before the hand and is a kind of teaching more familiar more fit for the capacity of such as are more rude ignorant Albeit also in some respects writing is to be preferred before the liuely voice For it is a more perfect accurate kind of reuelation fit to instruct those that are more perfect to keepe the truth more firmely In the meane while it cānot be denied but y t in other respects they are both alike for they haue both spoken written the same thing in the same manner to wit as being guided moued by the holy Ghost inspired of God 2. Pet. 1. 21. 2. Tim. 3. 16. To conclude seeing that now the liuely voice by the wil of God hath ceased and in the place of it the scripture hath succeeded so that whole dignity of the liuely voice before mentioned is and ought worthily to be ascribed and referred vnto the scripture or written word of God Q Doe you meane then that the Prophetical Apostolical scripture ought to be now in as great account with vs as the liuelie voice of God himselfe and of extraordinarie men was in times past A. I meane so and in his kinde of reuelation alone I willingly rest as in that which came by inspiratiō from God so long vntill I shall heare at his glorious comming that liuely and most sweete voice of Christ my Sauiour when he shall say to them who shall be at his right hand Come ye blessed of my Father inherit the kingdome prepared for you from the beginning of the world To whom be all praise for euer Amen To God only wise be praise through Jesus Christ for euer Amen
constancie of the Martyrs which daylie seale with their blood the truth of this heauenly doctrine the persecution raised by the enemies of the Church against it the enmitie of Sathan against it and the preseruation of the diuine oracles of God vnto our times and to be short the testimonie of the true Church of God for it All these are without or beside the Scripture and giue vs a secundarie kinde of demonstration whereby the holy Ghost worketh also as it pleaseth him and openeth the eies of our vnderstanding inlightening vs to see and heare God him-selfe speaking and shining in the Scripture But here we be to obserue that the holy ghost doth God rather by these meanes the testimonie of the Church and couersation of the saints prepareth vs to receiue the pretious faith not beget faith in our harts properlie and principallie by this second kinde of externall meanes for the proper and principall instrument of God to breed faith is the very word of God himselfe for it must be necessarilie either the liuely voice of God or the sacred scripture which serueth vs in steede of the liuelie voice of God himselfe but either prepares our hearts only to receiue faith afterwards Io. 4. 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. wards by the word of God or to confirme the same in some sort beeing already ingendred in our hearts by Gods word For this cause this second kind of meanes sometimes is sent before the voice of God in the scripture whereby the holy Ghost otherwhiles makes mens minds ready to intertaine faith and grace offred This we reade of Augustine for he speaks it of himselfe I would not haue beleeued the gospell but that the authority of the Catholicke Church moued me thereunto by which words he meaneth that when he was a Manichee he was prepared by the authority and testimonie of the Church to beleeue the Gospell Afterwards notwithstanding the same holie spirit which thus prepared him by the testimonie of the Church I say the same spirit did beget faith in Augustines heart by the very scripture of the gospell whereby he did beleeue that the gospell was the verie word of God For this cause he speaks else where of himselfe And let vs follow them saith he which doe inuite vs first to beleeue that which we cannot behold Augustines wordes as yet that being strengthened by faith it selfe we may be worthie to vnderstand what we beleeue not by the relation of men but by the grace of God himselfe inwardlie confirming and inlightening our mindes So the woman of Samaria Io 4. as a member of the Church did by her kinde of preaching prepare the Samaritanes to the faith of Christ they hauing heard Christ himselfe said to the woman We beleeue no longer because of thy sayings for Io 4. 42 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. Win them with your conuersation which are without the word we haue heard him our selues and know that this is indeed the Christ the Sauiour of the world By which wordes they plainely testified that they were prepared only by the womans testimonie to embrace the faith and that faith was ingendred in their hearts by the powerfull voice of Christ himselfe Wherefore it is cleere that sometimes this kind of meane and argument as is aforesaide goes before faith is begotten in the heart to prepare vs and sometimes this followes faith for confirmation And sometimes also this kinde of argument goes before faith and followes after it it goes before I say for preparation it followes after for confirmation For the spirit teacheth vs many waies applying himselfe to diuers men in diuers Note well Io. 3. manners as it seemeth good vnto himselfe and as mens infirmities do require And here we be to obserue that there is no absolute necessitie of this secondarie kind of argument which is externall and lesse principall to beget faith in vs. For it ought to suffice vs if the spirit teach vs onely by Gods worde but to helpe our weakenes the same spirit addeth the other secondarie kind of argument as Christ plainly teacheth vs Io. 5. where he sayth the testimonie of Iohn Baptist concerning him was not simply necessarie but that God so prouided to helpe their weakenesse and vnbeliefe ver 33. Iohn gaue testimony to the truth but I desire not the testimonie of man Neuerthelesse these things I speake that ye may be saued And that Iohns testimonie was but a secondarie argument only and that Christs owne record of himselfe was the first he sheweth plainly in the words following ver 36. But I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn for the works which the Father hath giuen me to finish the same works that I do beare witnes of me that the Father sent me And this is our iudgment concerning this argument whereby we proue the Scripture to be the word of God and our answere to the question wherefore it is so as we auouch it What the Papists thinke in this matter it is easily seene How the Papists proue the scripture to bee Gods word by their words and writings Their iudgement briefly is this The meane and principall argument and in a manner the only way with them to demonstrate the scripture to be Gods word is the testimony of the church not only the catholick as they speak but also those of their church which haue preserued the faith as they speake by contiall successions from the Apostles vnto our times and here they vnderstand principally the Popes who as they say succeeded Peter and his chaire These men will haue the Church the iudge and interpreter of all Scriptures from whose iudgement it may not be lawfull for any man to depart for an appeale to any other iudge And they ascribe this dignity prerogatiue to the testimony of the Church because they will haue the Scripture which is written in the heart of the Church to be the principall Scripture and that we account and esteeme of the voice of the Church as the very liuely voice of God himselfe as if God now spake first principally in his Church and by the voice of his Church If they will haue it so that the voice of the Church bee the primarie voice of God and the primarie Scripture of God it is euident that they deeme the greatest light we haue is to be found in the voice of the Church and the same to be most cleere and demonstratiue not only to vs but also in and by it selfe and therefore that this light inlightens the sacred Scripture not in respect of vs only but in respect of themselues also For which cause one of them hath said that the The blasphemy of Papists Scripture is of no more validity without the authority of the church then AEsops fables For the voice of the church being vnto them the primarie voice of God in all respects for as much as it is liuely and vocall and for this cause both by nature
and to vs most manifest it followeth according to their iudgement that it yeelds light vnto the Scripture not only in respect of vs but also in respect of the Scripture it selfe yet is it in verity but a certaine secondary Scripture and a certaine secondary voice For as they auouch it the voice of the Church is as Gods owne voice sounding from heauen seruing to confirme the voice of the Scripture which now is but mans voice only and to ratifie and make authenticall the very Scripture as being written but by certaine Scribes and published onely by the hands of men This must bee the consequent of their principles or conclusion of their premisses albeit other men be of another iudgment As for our selues like as we denie the conclusion which they inferre vpon the former principles so we reiect also their very principles For we denie refuse their first ground to wit that the voice of the Church is to be accounted the liuely voice of God himselfe and that the Scripture written in the heart of the Church is to be accounted for that scripture which was written by the very finger of God And we affirme that the only propheticall and apostolical scripture is to be esteemed as the liuely voice of God we auouch it I say that this Propheticall and Apostolicall scripture only serueth vs in steed of that scripture which was written by Gods owne finger We adde also that the sacred Scripture is vnto vs a booke of reuelation of those diuine mysteries which were hidden in Gods owne breast from eternitie for this is the very will of God that we attend on him speaking in the scripture as it were in his owne liuely voice They haue saith he Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16. vers 29. that is the bookes of Moses and the prophets And God will not haue this scripture in no lesse account then that scripture which hee wrote in times past with his owne finger in tables of stone The voice of the Church I meane the true Church not the lying papisticall synagogue is but as the voice of the handmaide or as the voice of a crier which is to publish and to proclaime that voice of God full of excellencie speaking in the scripture But the scripture in the heart of the Church that is the Maximes of Gods truth written in the hearts of the faithfull they be nothing els but a certaine secundarie scripture taken out by the holy ghost out of that primarie and most sacred scripture and ingrauen in the minds of men For how much think you of that ful measure of the Propheticall Apostolicall scripture is there taken forth and ingrauen in our minds I say that if all mens hearts were bound together yet all they could not comprehend all those things fully and perfectly which be recorded in the Propheticall and Apostolicall scriptures For the catholicke Church so long as it is conuersant on the earth is not capable of al that light which shineth in the sacred scriptures of y e apostles the prophets Let their first principle be thus beaten downe and their Corolatie or second conclusion to wit that the voice of the Church is most manifest both in it selfe and vnto vs will fall to the ground of it owne accord and so both principles being shaken their conclusion which they inferre is of no strength to stand but must fall away CHAP. IX Of the first proprietie of the sacred Scripture WE are now to proceed and to make it manifest that the holy scripture is of greatest antiquitie and this is the first proprietie The 1. propriety of the scripture most ancient before ascribed to the Scripture Here first we be to find out the diuers acceptations of this word Scripture This word Scripture may be taken either for the matter onely and Acceptation of the word scripture the very substance which is contained in the words and letters or not only for the matter and substance but also for the verie writing it selfe or the forme wherein that substance is expressed and set before vs. Now if by this word Scripture ye vnderstand the verie substance it selfe it is without all controuersie that the Scripture is most ancient because it is the substance of those diuine oracles which not only Patriarches and Prophets haue spoken but also God himselfe vttered which things also were hidden in Gods mind from eternitie But if yee vnderstand by this word not onely the substance but the very writing and in this respect also the scripture may be said to be most ancient For as touching the Propheticall and Apostolicall scriptures in respect also of the writing and manner of reuealing of them as wee said often before it is Gods will that we so esteeme them not onely as the liuely voice of the Prophets and Apostles nor onely as the liuely voice of God himselfe or as a booke written with his owne hand as the Decalogue was set downe with his owne finger in tables of stone but also that we so accept them as the very mysteries and if I may so speake as the verie diuine notions which were ingrauen in Gods owne mind from eternitie To cleare this point a little The veritie kept secret in Gods mind from eternitie was in time manifested manie wayes or in diuers formes for it was reuealed partly by the liuely voice of God himself partly by the voice of the Patriarches Prophets and Apostles to passe by Angels in silence and partly also by the scripture which was written by the Prophets and Apostles The liuely and immediate voice of God did cease long since neither haue we that copie which God himselfe wrote the Patriarches How to esteem of the written word of God also the Prophets and y e Apostles haue ceased to speake the writings only of the Prophets and Apostles remaine to this day Wherefore this we hold as necessary vnto faith that we accept these writings or books first in steed of the liuely voice of the Prophets and Apostles 1 Next in place of the liuely voice of God himself 2 Thirdly of the Scripture written with Gods owne finger 3 Fourthly and lastly as that holy veritie and diuine mysteries 4 which are recorded in Gods owne breast which Oracles being simply without comparison of greatest antiquitie it is very manifest that the Propheticall and Apostolicall scripture is after a sort most ancient For what may be auouched of the liuely voice of God himselfe or of the Oracles of his mind the same in some respect may be said of the scripture supplying vnto vs their defect For Substance of the scripture simply most ancient if I may truly say in some sort the scripture is the liuely voice of God himselfe doe I not as truly speake also in like manner the scripture is most ancient for as much as the voice of God is most ancient But it shall suffice vs to commend the antiquitie of scripture to
readest thou saith hee and haue ye not read Haue ye neuer read How is it written Againe the Apostles of Christ for all their assertions bring proofe and testimonies out of the old Testament Apollos was a man mighty in Scriptures He strongly confuted publiquely the Iewes with great vehemency shewing by the Scriptures that Iesus was that Christ Act. 18. 24. 28. The men of Beraea receiued the word with all readinesse and searched the scriptures daily whether those things were so Act. 17. 11. Thus the primitiue Church and the fathers refuted heresies by the Scriptures To conclude this point most memorable is that worthy fact of Constantinus the Great who propounding the Bible to the Fathers assembled in the Nicene councell spake on this manner Here I set before you the writings Euangelicall of the Apostles and the sanctions of the auncient Prophets which can informe vs concerning the sacred law of God To beat back therefore the dint of the sword of the aduersarie let vs learne how to answer all obiections of the aduersarie out of the words which are giuen vs of God by diuine inspiration Lastly this I haue said that the Scripture is in it selfe liuely and vocall for as concerning deafe and dead men that is the naturall neuer taught of God vnto such I say it is but as deade mute Here the aduersaries blaspheme and reply saying that y e sacred scripture is but as a dead letter mute and not able togiue answere to any man not able to decide questions and controuersies in religion And contrarily they glory that the voice of the Church which proceeds from the Scripture as they speake which is in grauen by Gods own Spirit in the hearts of men they boast I say that this is vocall and able to answer the demaunders of all questions appertaining to saluation that this cannot be wrested nor peruerted but euer abides the same in al respects The answer to this calumniation and blasphemy is cleere of that which is before shewed for we made it cleere and manifest that the sacred Scripture is most liuely and vocall in it selfe And whereas controuersies are not so soone decided by the Scriptures the cause is not in Gods word but in men which be either so naturally blind and dull that they cannot heare vnderstand the Scripture speaking answering yea crying in their eares or they be so malitious and obstinate that they will not heare and vnderstand yea that they will full often against their owne conscience wrest the voice of the Scripture into another sense and that to their owne perdition Wherefore we conclude this point that the scripture is in it selfe 2. Pet. 3. and by it selfe most liuely and vocall And further we be to remember that to the end it may speake as a liuely voice vnto vs and to the end we may vnderstand it concerning all controuersies in religion we must vse the meanes before mentioned our very Grāmar Meanes to be vsed for the vnderstanding of the scripture is one speciall instrument for this purpose For our eies eares are opened by such meanes to vnderstand the Scripture and to attend vnto Gods voice speaking in the scripture if it shall seeme good to the holy Ghost to worke effectually by them in our hearts and minds If so be that the spirit worke effectually by the aforesaide meanes then the Scripture shall answer to all controuersies concerning faith and religion with a more cleere liuely intelligible and distinct voice then all the men in the whole Church shall answer who can auouch nothing sound and certaine vnlesse first they haue receiued it from the mouth of the Scripture and answer in the verie words of the scripture For whereas these men say the voice of the Church is liuely and vocall heard of all men and cannot bee peruerted and wrested To this I answer first that the voice of the Church as is aforesaid doth depend on the voice of the scripture Next that the voice of the Church is subiect to errours and change so that they may this day answer one thing and to morrow another and this serues no better in a manner then a Lesbian rule to decide controuersies concerning faith religion As for the church of Rome they haue so long and so corruptly answered concerning faith and religion that they haue caried the world from the truth to lies and errours and infinite heresies that there is now no cause wherefore these men may so put forth to sale the voice and sound of their Church which is become so corrupt and adulterous CHAP. XIII Of the fift property of the Church and of the seuenth controuersie NOw it resteth that we proue that the sacred Scripture is simply most necessarie Here then I say that if by Scripture yee vnderstand the substance and the verie matter contained in the words written it cannot be denied that the scripture is so necessarie that without it there can be no Church in earth for the church is borne and bred not Fift propertie Scripture is most necessarie of mortall but of immortall seede which is the word of God 1. Pet. 1. 23. But if ye vnderstand by the scripture the verie writing and forme of reuelation I say that in this respect also it is so necessarie that without this there cannot be a Church For the liuely voice of God is simply necessarie The scripture after a sort is the liuely voice of God therefore simply necessarie I graunt it that when as the liuely voice of God did sound and was heard in the Church this writing and this forme of reuelation was not then so necessarie but when as God did cease to speake and that the scripture came in place of Gods own voice then the scripture was no lesse necessary then the liuely voice of God For the voice of God must euer be in the Church that the church may haue her being and may continue on the earth yea this voice must be heard by the Church either by it selfe or by that which may best supply the want of the liuely voice of God Before Moses time this voice it selfe was heard after his time this voice sounded and spake in and by the voice and writings of Moses and the Prophets When Christ was come his owne liuely voice was heard After Christs ascension for a time the 2. Cor. 5. 19. 1. Pet. 2. 19. preaching of the Apostles and the bookes of the old Testament were receiued for the liuely voice of God himselfe and of his sonne Iesus Christ Then followed the Apostolicall Scripture which together with the holy scripture of the old Testament continue in the Church to supply not only the liuely voice of the Apostles but also of God and of Christ himselfe By the premisses it is euident y t it is simply necessary at all times that the liuely voice of God sound euer in the Church of God either by it selfe or by this supply which wee
now auouch to be only the sacred Scriptures of the old and new Testament Wherefore we plainly conclude the Scripture is most necessarie The Aduersaries oppose themselues against this assertion as against the former and they denie that the scripture is simply necessarie it is necessary say they that is it is profitable or commodious for the well being of a Church but is not so necessarie for the being nor no such thing as without which the Church can haue no being And for this cause do these men denie the necessitie of the Scripture that they may open the doore to their authoritie and traditions that is to their owne dreames which they say be simply necessary and preferre them before the scripture They are easily answered by the rules before set downe For if by scripture they vnderstand the substance of the scripture it cannot be denied that the scripture is simply necessarie but if they vnderstand not the substance onely but also the verie writing in this respect also we haue shewed it by cleere demonstratiō that the scripture is simply necessarie for that it is vnto vs in place of y e liuely voice of God himselfe Wherfore their assertion is false howsoeuer they take this word Scripture either in this sense or the other But they say the Church wanted the scripture neere two thousand yeares all which time religion was preserued by tradition only Therefore the Scripture is not simply necessarie I answer If you vnderstand by Scripture the verie substance of the couenant then your argument followeth not for the substance of the scripture was in those verie traditions whereby the Church was edified and kept But if by this word ye vnderstand the verie writing then I grant the scripture was not extant so manie yeares and I say that it was not then necessarie for that then the liuely voice of God it selfe was heard If they conclude that because it was not then necessarie therefore it is not now necessarie or that it was not necessarie after that God had commanded it and after that it began to be extant surely the consequence is very euill for as ages and times haue changed so diuers formes of reuelation were necessarie Or we may more briefly set downe this controuersie in this forme THe scripture is necessarie not onely for the well-being as Popish Schoole-men speake but also for the being of the Church Et hactenus est simplex necessitas And this necessitie is in respect of time only for there was not a necessitie of the scripture in all ages I vnderstand The word written not necessary in all ages Heb. 1. 1. 2. by the word Scripture not onely the substance of the written word but also the manner or forme of reuelation but this simple necessitie must bee auouched of the substance and forme of reuelation in diuers respects For the scripture as touching the substance of it was necessarie to the Church in all ages but in respect of the manner of reuealing the same it was necessarie for a certaine time only to wit vntill it seemed good vnto Almightie God to teach his church by the scripture ARG. 1. For the Lord God had not giuen his Church the Scripture if he had not thought it necessarie euū for the being of his Church ARG. 2. The liuely voice of God was necessarie in the time appointed for it ergo the Scripture also is necessary in the time the Lord hath decreed for it for there is but one and the same reason of both ARG. 3. It is necessarie that Gods will be reuealed and communicated to the Church at all times in one forme or other either by Gods own liuely voice or by writing or by both but now the liuely voice of God hath ceased therefore now the word written is necessarie The aduersaries deny this absolute necessitie moued hereunto with these arguments following First from Adam to Moses there was no Scripture Ergo. I answer the Lord God thought it not necessarie for all that time But when as the Lord himselfe began to write and that the 2. Pet. 1. 18. 19. 21. holy men of God were acted and moued by the holie Ghost first Prophets then Apostles then the Scripture began to be necessarie euen simply necessary ARG. 2. From Moses vnto Christ Iob and his friends both beleeued and were saued without the Scripture I answer It is most like these also read the scriptures as may appeare by the Eunuches story Act. 8. Next I answer that so manie as were called without the visible Church God dealt with them in an extraordinary manner ARG. 3. They did more attend the traditions of the Fathers then the written word euen in the second age I answer this is false ARG. 4. In the third age there was no scripture of the new Testament extant for a long season Ergo. I answer the Apostolicall scripture beganne not long after Christ Next all that time I grant it was not necessarie but when the Apostles were dead and when their liuelie voice ceased then began it to be necessary CHAP. XIIII Of the sixt propertie of the Scripture and the eight controuersie THE Scripture is perfect containing in it all things necessarie for faith and manners not onely sufficiently but also abundantly for this is the perfection which heere wee doe auouch The sense then of the Proposition is this This kind of reuelation containes all things c. The proofe is this Argument 1. The liuely voice of God contained all articles or instructions concerning faith and manners Ergo so doth the Scripture The reason of the argument is euident for that nothing in respect of substance was spoken by that liuely voice which is not recorded in the Scripture ARG. 2. If the Scripture contained not all things necessarie perfectly then euill were the condition of our Church and of our time which heareth not the liuely voice of anie man speaking by diuine inspiration nor of any prophet or Apostle ARG. 3. The religious and such as be taught of God haue an holy experience of the sufficiencie of the Scriptures and of the fulnesse of it Adde to these arguments these diuine testimonies Deut. 4. Ye shall not ad to the word that I speake c. Reuel 22. If anie shall adde to these things God shall Vers 18. adde vnto him the plagues which are written in this booke Albeit these sayings are to bee vnderstood properly of particular books yet the same reason serues for all books of the canonicall scripture and surely the reason binds more strongly for if we may not ad to particular books how much lesse is it lawfull to adde to the whole Canon Prou. 30. Thou shalt ad nothing to his words This seemes to be vnderstood of the whole Scripture Matth. 28. Teaching to obserue all things which I commanded you Gal. 1. 8. If we or an Angell from heauen shall preach vnto you another Gospel or otherwise then that which we haue preached vnto you
can be in this when the people are so diuided in prayer which in the publike assemblie should offer vp with one mind and with one mouth one and the same prayer vnto God The sixt Argument is from a point which Bellarmine himselfe yeeldeth He granteth that the publike administration 6. Arg. of prayers c. at Corinth were done in the known Greek tongue wherfore then may not all other Churches in the like manner haue their Leiturgie in the vulgar knowne language What can he answer heere but this happily that the publike administration at Corinth was done in the mother tongue not for that it was the vulgar tongue but because it was Greeke for Papists giue the Greeke tongue when they please some prerogatiue The seuenth Argument is from another point which 7. Arg. Bellarmine graunteth The Collations as himselfe speaketh and the exhortations ought to be done in the mother tongue wherefore in like manner may not the publike administration of Gods worship be done in the mother tongue best known to y e people He answereth that the reason is not the same of the collation seruice For saith he the collations tend to the instruction and consolation of the people but the publike seruice principally concernes Gods worship I answer Doth not all the people worship God in the publike administration or seruice of God and therefore ought they not to worship God in a knowne language if they wil worship their God in faith The 8. Argument is from the practise of the old and best Church In elder ages so manie translations were done principally to this end to celebrate the publike seruice of God and that herein the Scriptures might bee read to euery man in his owne knowne mother tongue * Lib. de origine Bohemorum AEneas Syluius writeth that to Cyril Methodius it was permitted that the people of Morauia should haue their common prayers in the mother tongue And at this day the people of Armenia AEthiopia Egypt and the Muscouites haue their common prayers in their known tongue Here Bellarmine answereth all these are heretiques I say they be no more heretiques then Papists Assuredly as touching publike prayers I had rather be in this heresie with them then with the Papists as they thinke to meane well And thus for our iudgement in this matter The Aduersaries say that the publike prayers may not be in a knowne tongue but in Hebrue or Greeke as in the East and Greeke Churches or in the Latine tongue as in the Latine and West Churches The arguments they produce for this purpose be first from the prerogatiue of tongues the first is this Christ in the title of his Crosse gaue honour to these three languages therefore publike prayers ought to be done in these I answer albeit wee graunt the antecedent the consequent will not follow yea rather we may infer the contrarie The Lord would haue the cause of Christs death to be manifested to all people in those languages which then were best known which cannot be denied of the Greeke and Latine therfore publike prayers ought to bee done in the vulgar tongues and knowne to the people The 2. Arg. These three tongues Hebrue Greek and Latine are of greatest excellencie antiquitie authority therfore the common prayers and seruice of God ought to be done onely in these tongues I answer Grant the Antecedent be true yet the fequele is not good for that verie gift of tongues which was giuen the Apostles in the feast of Pentecost plainly proueth that euery toong be it neuer so base is sanctified of God for holy vses and Note for the execution of publique and ecclesiasticall offices and seruice vnto God The 3. Arg. The Scriptures was originally written in these three tongues therefore the publique prayers ought to be done in these only I answer first the Antecedent is false for neither the whole Scripture nor anie part thereof was written first in the Latine tongue For whereas they say Saint Marks Gospell was first written The Papists say Saint Marks Gospeâ— was first written in Latin in Latine it is false but of this point else where Next I answer that it will not followe of that Antecedent that publike prayers should be sayd in vnknowne tongues but rather the contrarie followeth for that whereas the Scripture was first written in these two tongues Hebrue and Greeke for this very cause for that euen then and in those times these two languages were most common and best knowne to the people hence it followes rather I say that the publique prayers ought to bee in the most common and best knowne tongues Thus farre we haue heard of arguments drawne from the prerogatiue of tongues now follow arguments from the practise and vse of the Church The first here is this From Ezra vntill Christ the Scripture was woont to bee read in the Church of the Iewes in the Hebrue tongue that is an vnknowe tongue Ergo publike prayers may be said in an vnknowne tongue I answer I grant the Scriptures were read in the Hebrue tongue but I denie that this was an vnknowne tongue For Nehem. 8. it is very cleare that the sacred Scripture which Ezra read in Hebrue was vnderstood by the people which were present and heard it Whereupon the contrarie consequent must follow The Scripture was read in the Church of the Iewes in elder ages in a known tongue therfore it must be read at this day in popular and knowne tongues The second Argument is from the practise of the Iewish Synagogue of these times To this day saith hee the Scripture is read in the synagogue of the Iewes in the Hebrue tongue therefore publique prayers must be celebrate in an vnknowne tongue I answer The Argument followes not from the euill example of the synagogue of the Iewes for that this reading of the old Testament in an vnknowne tongue is the cause wherefore so manie of them hold backe and will not be conuerted to the faith of Christ The third argument is from the practise of the primitiue Church In the primitiue Church the publike prayers were said in one of these 3. tongues therfore the conclusion followeth I answer the Antecedent is false for that as hath beene before shewed in the time of the old Church yea in the verie dayes of the Apostles the Scriptures were translated in a manner into all languages The fourth Argument is from the continuall practise of the catholike Church for in it the publique prayers were euer either in the Greeke or Latine tongue I answer if by catholike Church they meane the Church of Rome then I weigh not the example and practise thereof but if by this word they meane the true catholike Church then it is cleare alreadie by that which is before deliuered that the Antecedent is false And thus farre of these Arguments taken from the practise and vse of the Church To the former Arguments they adde more from a finall cause The
cause an enmitie betwixt vs and God but dooth a little staine iustice which they place in charitie and they say it A popish veniall sinne spots it a little wherefore this sinne say they is soone pardoned and expiate with a light punishment as in this life with the repetition of the Lords prayer the smiting of the breast satisfactiō or penance imposed by the priest or which men do of thēselues voluntarily vndergo After this life all venial sinnes be expiat in purgatory if they be not pardoned in this life by the meanes before expressed They say veniall sinne is twofold the first veniall sin is so called because it is so by nature and for the substance Venial sin 2. of it as an idle word or immoderate laughter The next veniall sinne they say is that which is not so by nature but for some imperfection for that sin by nature is mortall but because it is imperfect for the measure or quantity of the euill therefore it is veniall This imperfection say they is twofold for this imperfection is either by reason of the will as when there is not a full consent of the will vnto a secret motion of concupiscense In this kind of venial sinne they reckon all euil secret motions which stirre in the affection before the mind can think of them and which get not any full consent of the will as the motions of lust of anger of enuie c. Oragaine there is an imperfection in respect of the matter of the sinne to wit when the matter is so small and light that it makes the sin veniall as for example if a man steale a half-peny or some such trifle wherby the neighbour is little or nothing touched and charity is not violate And they go about to proue their opinion concerning veniall sinne by diuers kindes of arguments First by testimonies of the scripture and of the Church next by reasons of their owne in refutation of which arguments my Popish arguments for veniall sinne meaning is not to insist For veniall sinne they cite Mat. 12. 32. Whosoeuer shall speake against the holy Ghost it shall not be forgiuen him neither in this world nor in the world to come Therefore say they there is a kinde of sinne which shal be pardoned after this life and the same is venial sin which is purged with the fire of purgatory But let Mark chap. 3 29. bee the interpreter of this phrase which Mathew hath in this place Whosoeuer saith he shall blaspheme against the holy Ghost shal neuer haue forgiuenes but is culpable or guilty of eternall damnation Therefore where Mathew saith neither is this life nor in the life to come it is the same as if he said It shall neuer be forgiuen him They bring also the place which is Mat. 5. 22. Whosoeuer is angry with his brother vnaduisedly shal be culpable of iudgment and whosoeuer saith vnto his brother Raca shal be worthy to be punished by the Councel and whosoeuer shal say foole shal be worthy to be punished with hell fire There are here 3. kinds of sins say they of which he adiudgeth one kinde only worthy of hell fire wherefore the two former are to be expiat with some light punishment and therfore be veniall sinnes I answere this place teacheth vs that there is an inequality first of sinnes next of punishments and those also spirituall and infernall which Christ expresseth here by an allusion to ciuill and politique penalties which were vnequall They reason also on this wise No man say they will denie that one sin is lesser then another by nature Therefore Popish reasons for veniall sin is not the lesser sinne veniall by nature I answer it followeth not for that the least sinne by nature meriteth eternall death and eternall punishment albeit not the greatest punishment For we deuie not the inequalitie of the paines of the damned Next say they is not one sin lesse then another in quantity And therefore is it not veniall in respect of the imperfection thereof I answer it followeth not for euery sin howsoeuer imperfect meriteth eternal death or if it be venial it is not for the imperfectiō of it but for Christs sake and his satisfaction for it Thirdly they say is not that sin veniall which doth not destroy or ouerthrow iustice charity or inherent grace But there are some sinnes which doe not ouerthrow or extinguish iustice Ergo there be some venial sinnes The assumption is proued The iust man fals 7. times in the day and riseth againe Behold here one sinneth and yet ceaseth not to be iust I answer The proposition is false for that very sinne which doth not extinguish the grace of Christ and inherent holines that very sinne by it owne nature is mortall And in that it is pardonable and doth not abolish holines that is not to be imputed to the sin it self but to the free mercy of God in Iesus Christ CHAP. XXVIII The controuersie concerning the sinne against the holy Ghost THE aduersaries say there be 6. kindes of this sinne The first sinne is presumption when a The Papists say there be six kinds of the sinne against the holy Ghost man presumeth ouermuch of the grace of God and of faith in the meane while denying his faith by his works This is the man whom Iames taxeth in his Epistle Chap. 2. vers 14. and after Thesecond is desperation contrary to presumption this was Cain and Iudas sin The third is to impugne the knowne truth hereto belongs the blasphemie against the holy 3 Ghost this was the sinne of the Pharasies Matth. 12. The fourth is to enuy or to repine at the graces of God in our 4 brethren this was the sin of the Iewes which did repine and grieue at the grace of God giuen the Gentiles The fift is obstinacy when as a man shal persist in a known sin with an obstinate mind This was Pharaohs sinne and 6 the obstinate Iewes The sixt is finall impenitency when as any shall die in contempt of the sacrament of penance and of any satisfaction imposed vpon him by Ecclesiasticall order Of this they vnderstand that place 1. Ioh. 5. 16. There is a sin vnto death I do not say that ye should pray for him They say a man sins against the holy Ghost al these waies and that all these sins be inexpiable and that these sins are called irremissible because they bee seldome and hardly forgiuen as men seldome and hardly repent them of these sins But the last which is finall impenitency they thinke that onely is properly sayde to be impardonable because it is neither forgiuen in this life nor after this life And this is their iudgment of the sin against the holy Ghost But we auouch that the scripture doth teach vs there is but one sinne only against the holy Ghost Matth 12. 32. Mark 3. 29. Luke 12. 10. called the blasphemy against the holy Ghost Ye haue a description
Christ which notwithstāding hold I know not what freedom of will that our meritorious works do cōcurre in our votion iustification glorification with the grace of God For as touching our calling although they confesse this to be true that preuenting grace as they speak doth so preuent or preoccupy vs euen then when we thinke nothing of the grace of God or of preparing our selues to receiue grace but being as it were a sleep in sin yet they do ascribe to free-wil that affiance which we giue vnto faith wherby we assent vnto preuenting grace admit y e same as though we had any actual free-wil or self power as they speak to receiue the grace of God We do grant some power or freedome of wil wherby it inclines after a sort vnto that which is is good I vnderstand a power of the matter but wee do vtterly deny that men by nature haue any actual free-will or that we haue a selfe power to do that which is good as it is good That selfe or neere power of will or liberty of will to good I define to be that liberty in the will which is by the essentiall forme of Potentia propinqua holinesse or by the image of God which is imprinted in the will as may appeare in the Chap. of free-will before handled Therefore wee hold and teach that in receiuing the first grace our will stands before God meere passiuely and not actiuely that is when the free grace of God preuenteth it we say it hath a power vnto good but the same to be of the matter only as schoolemen speak passiue which they call a remote power Againe we auouch that the same power is made actual by meanes of diuine grace preuenting vs y t is by the working of the holy spirit who taketh possession as it were of vs by the preaching of the Gospell whereby the holy Ghost doth renue our hearts inspiring that life of God into vs frō which we were before altogether strangers as it is writtē Eph. 4. 17. 18. 19. creating in vs againe that image of God which was lost that image I say of holinesse true righteousnesse As touching our iustification where our aduersaries do affirme that it is two fold terming y e 1. habituall the 2. Popish iustification actuall they say that we are prepared by our free-will to the 1. iustification as by a principal agent by the grace working together with the same But as for the 2. iustification that they place in works proceeding from free wil from our first iustificatiō which they cal infused grace And here they ascribe life euerlasting to the merit of this 2. iustification which dooth consist in the workes of our free-will and of infused grace as they call it Hence we may see that they do not attribute to the only grace of God any of the former benefits neither iustificatiō nor vocatiō nor glorificatiō nor any of those spiritual graces which God in time giues to his children But they do part them betweene Gods grace free-will and mans merit Finally if any comparison be made between God vs concerning the conferring of these benefits we shall Note find them to ascribe more to vs and our free-will our works then to the grace of God But we haue written somewhat of this before in the chapters of our effectuall calling of repentance of free-wil Therefore I refer the reader to these places and here I end this matter Thus far then haue we spoken of this common place of our effectuall calling which because it comprehendeth vnder it many other points of diuinity it may be wel reckoned amongst the most generall heads of Theologie OF THE MEANES WHEREby God from the beginning hath reuealed both his couenants vnto Mankind Question HOW many waies are there whereby God from the beginning hath reuealed all his will that is Kinds or forms of reuelation the doctrine of both couenants of works grace vnto mankind A. They are two Q. Which be they A. The first is a liuely voice the second is the Scripture Q. What callest thou a liuely voice A. The first meanes of reuelation whereby God partly by his owne mouth and partly by men hath manifested VVhat is meant by a liuely voice the whole doctrine of both couenants to his church from time to time Q. What were the instruments of that liuely voice from the beginning A. First God himselfe spake sometimes by his Sonne in VVhose it was the forme or likenes of man appearing to the Fathers sometimes by his spirit inwardly in the heart Secondly the liuely voice of Angels was heard Thirdly the liuely voice of men first of the Fathers then of Moses and the Prophets after that of Iohn the Baptist vntil Christ Then lowed Christ himselfe manifested in the flesh Last of all the liuely voice of the Apostles of Christ Q. This kind of reuelation which was by a liuely voice of al The quality of it these whom you haue named was it by inspiration and altogether free from error A. Concerning the liuely voice of God himselfe of Christ and of the Angels there is no question and as concerning men whose liuely voice God hath vsed from the beginning of the world hitherto in reuealing his wil to his Church they truly albeit they were sinfull men and in part onely regenerate notwithstanding in the deliuery of the doctrine of the truth of both couenants they were so extraordinarily gouerned and inspired with the Holy Spirit of God that they could by no meanes erre Q. Doest thou meane then that all men as manie as haue beene from the beginning of the world hitherto by whose mouth God hath-spoken to his Church were men extraordinary endued with extraordinary gifts of the holy Ghost confirmed by miracles A. I meane euen so for prophecy in times past came not by the will of man but holy men spake as they were moued by the spirit of God 2. Pet. 1. 2. Q. At what time began this liuely voice in the Church VVhen it began A. It began euen in the first creation of man Q. How long hath the liuely voice of God and men who could not erre in deliuering the doctrine of the truth continued Continuance of it in the Church of God A. It hath been from the beginning of the world euen to the death of the Apostles all which time there was almost no age wherein at least some one holy man of God was not extraordinarily stirred vp who could not erre in deliuering the doctrine of the truth Q. Why doe you say almost was there anie intermission at all A. Truly there was but I will name onely some more notable intermissions which may be gathered out of the holy scriptures First in the age of the Patriarches it is obserued that there was an intermission in Terachs time who was the Father of Abraham for albeit he retained some grounds of
beene heard anie liuely voice either of God or of anie extraordinarie man A. None at all Q. Do you gather by these things which you haue spoken concerning the causes of the continuance of a liuelie voice in the Church what was the vse of it heretofore in the Church A. Yea truly for the vse of it was first in respect of the Church it selfe to giue it instruction while it was yet so small for place and so young in knowledge next in respect of reuelation to deliuer it from time to time more cleerly and euidently vnto the people Q. By this vse of a liuelie voice which you haue here mentioned it seems that this kind of ruelatiō which was by a liuely voice was the more simple and the more familiar and the more imperfect and therefore the more fit for persons and things that were of like imperfection A. It is euen so as you haue said Q. Hitherto I haue heard you speake concerning a liuelie voice now I would heare something of you concerning the subiect of it what say you then was taught all that time by a liuely voice A. In al that time and in euery age the selfe same and the whole truth of God was deliuered by a liuely voice The subiector master of the liuely voice Q. Wherefore then said you that the perfect manifestation of that mysterie of godlinesse was not accomplished till the Apostles time A. By that fulnesse perfection I vnderstood not the substance of the doctrine it selfe but the quality that is the clearenesse of one and the same doctrine For the mysterie of Christ was in the Church and was manifested in some measure from Adam vnto Christ and the Apostles but if the comparison be made of times it may be said to be shut hidden in all ages before the comming of Christ Q. Was the paritie of the heauenlie doctrine sufficientlie conserued and kept by a liuely voice A. The historie shewes plainely that the doctrine deliuered by liuely voice was often corrupted and adulterated Q. How then was it restored It seemed good to God afterward by new reuelations to restore the puritie of his word decayed to conserue and keepe it and to giue a more full declaration of it Q. Was the puritie of doctrine sufficientlie preserued and kept so A. Not so verily and therefore it seemed good to God at length to adde hereunto the written word Q. Are there no other causes of writing the holie Scriptures A. There are for first the condition of the Church required that the Scripture should be added vnto the liuely voice and next the measure also of reuelation Q. Why the condition of the Church A. Because at length in Moses time the Church began to be both in place more large as being spred throughout a whole nation and to grow greater and riper in yeares for the time from Moses vnto Christ was as it were the time of the midde age or young yeares of the Church Q. What then A. The written word therefore was first in respect both of place and ripenesse of age for both a whole nation is more easily taught by writing then by voice and the age which is more ripe is more capable of that doctrine which is deliuered by writing that is by that kind of reuelation which is not so familiar and simple and by writing doth more easily conceiue any mans meaning Q. Why doth the measure of reuelation require the written word A. Because whereas before Moses the reuelation of the mysterie of godlinesse was small and very obscure it seemed not good to the Lord to cause it straight waies to be written to the intent it might be kept for posteritie But when in Moses time the Reuelation began to bee much more cleare then before then it seemed good vnto God to commit it to writing to the intent it might be reserued and remain for those which should come after For that which is more perfect and full that wee are to write to this end that it may remaine both for vs and our posterity but that which is more imperfect that we doe not esteeme worthy the writing or to be reserued vnto posterity Q. Before you go anie further I would haue you declaare vnto me the ages of the Church where of you haue so oft made mention A. I will so do Q. How manie ages then say you are there of the Church A. Three the first was from Adam vnto Moses which was the infancy and childhood of the Church the second from Moses vnto Christ which was the youth or middle age of the Church the third from Christ and his Apostles euen vnto the end which may be called the ripe age of the Church if it be compared with the ages past for otherwise we are not men growne vntill we bee gathered together with Christ our head in heauen Q. Do you meane then that God had respect alwaies of these three ages in his proceedings with his Church A. I meane so indeed for that I may so speake hee hath tempered these three things proportionally to these three ages of the Church to wit first the measure of reuelation secondly his holy Spirit thirdly the manner of reuelation Q. Declare I pray you more particularlie what you haue said A. To the infancie and childhood of the Church he gaue the least measure of reuelation to wit first the first principles of religion onely Secondly the least measure of the holy Spirit to wit that which was proportionable to the reuelation Thirdly one onely kind of reuelation which was by liuely voice as being the most fit for the instruction of infants and of such as were weake in the faith Q. I vnderstand what you saie concerning the first age of the Church now I would haue you speake concerning the middle age which you call the youth of it and to applie these three things mentioned to it in like manner To the middle age of the Church he gaue first a greater measure of reuelation Secondly so to speake a greater portion of the holy Spirit Thirdly a double kind of reuelation the liuely voice and the Scripture The liuely voice I say because as yet it was but weake and the written word because it was in age better growne and so more capable in some sort of the word written for God hath tempered these two kinds of reuelations together and of both hath made a middle kind of reuelation according to the time and age which wee call the middle and as it were the temperate age Q. You haue spoken of the first second age of the Church now I pray you speake of the third A. To the third age of the Church which I call the manly or ripe age he gaue first a full measure of reuelation Secondly a most plentifull effusion of the holy Ghost Thirdly both those kinds of reuelation and that now truly containing a full and perfect reuelation hee taught it by liuely voice for a certaine
repay and recompense this your loue with manifold comforts of his spirit euen then specially when the comforts and props of this present life shall most be wanting Now the God of hope fill you with all ioy and peace in beleeuing that ye may abounde in hope through the power of the holy Ghost that so ye may perseuer in this your holy faith in Christ and loue to the Saints vnto the end Amen Yours to vse in the Lord Christ Iesus HENRIE HOLLAND To the Reader ALthough the greater part both of authors and translators of bookes may be taxed of officiousnes and not a few of vngodlines yet are there some whose merits in this kinde doe out-way the demerits of the other These are either those worthie lightes themselues or else those second candlestickes to translate the light into which God specially in these latter yeares hath bestowed as gifts to vse Saint Paules word vpon his Church to the edification of it It is true indeede in one sense that both the one and the other are but candlestickes for the light is Gods but otherwise comparatiuely the author is the light and the translator is as it were an other candlesticke to translate the light into and that for those which thorough ignorance of the tongue could not attaine to the light when it shone out of the authors owne lampe Now although there seeme no great gifts to be required in a translator yet the truth is that if he be not of good discretion to choose the fittest workes of good speech to expresse the authors sentence with fittest wordes and of so great apprehension and former store that by that which he seeth in the author he hath attained to more then paraduenture the author himselfe saw or minded his defectiuenes will bring him in daunger of shewing what gifts are required in a translator for a good translator is neither a paraphrast nor a periphrast which is committed by needeles chaunging or adding words He so behaueth himselfe that the comparing of the originall will commend his fidelitie and that they which know of no originall would take the translator for the author himselfe He must naturalize his translation for the reader without miuring the gift of the author in the natiue worke But these seeme criticke rules to the irregular which offend against their authors to please themselues for as there are many translations of vnworthie workes so are there many transportations of worthie workes which like plantes ill taken vp reioyce not to growe in the soyle into which they are translated And yet neuerthelesse it cannot without iniurie be denied that this age hath afforded many excellent translations of excellent and learned authors to the benefit of our people amongst whom Maister Rollocke the reuerend Author of this worke deserueth an eminent place as also this worke it selfe is very acceptable together with the translators godly labour in this and other things commodious to the Church of Christ This inclined me the rather to commend it to thee in these few lines not as taking vpon me any thing but as a poore man where he is better knowne is sometimes engaged for a rich This labour is become ours not onely because it is thus well englished but also because the Author is a Scottishman which is now to the wise hearted a synonymie of an Englishman And it shall be to the praise of both the Nations to receiue both mutuall and common benefits without that emulation which was betwixt Israel and Iuda It is a comely thing to speake in the words of that King that was so miraculously restored to declare the signes and wonders of the high God which we see this day euen this vnanimitie in receiuing the King wrought no doubt by diuine instinct rather then grace in some which otherwise mendaciter deduntie as Dauid saith Let vs on the otherside goe out in our sinceritie and meete the King of Kings with Hosanna And I beseech you by the wonder of our neighbours which is our innocent aggregation to this scepter let the solution of an obiection by King Henry the seuenth of noble memorie and of so renowned wisedome be our satisfaction that the soueraigntie is deuolued where it is not onely by the prouidence but also by the ordinance of God to the comfortable vniting of that Nation rather then Nations which at the first vpon the matter was indeede but one though for some yeares past it were diuided by conceit Let vs take vp the argument of Abraham We are brethren c. And as this is a worke of vocation so let vs hold the comming of our King to bee the worke of reuocation to call vs backe to vnitie And so gentle reader I commit thee to the God of peace and vnitie Thine in Christ Francis Marbury To the Reader CHristian reader I pray thee pardon all faults in this first impression I could not well be present with the workemen for their direction Some schoole poynts and phrases of schoole men doe not so well relish in the English tongue nor could be rendred to my content whatsoeuer is wanting in word or matter in this edition I will amend in the next if the Lord permit farewell Thine in Christ Iesus Henry Holland The Contents 1OF our effectuall calling 1 2 Of the word of God or of the couenant in generall and of the couenant of workes in speciall 6 3 Of the couenant of Grace 11 4 Of such as be comprehended in may truely be said to be vnder the couenant of God 27 5 A comparison of our iudgement and of the aduersaries concerning both these couenants 31 6 Of the written word or of the written couenant of God 38 7 Of the number of the controuersies which are concerning the written word and first whether the scripture be the word of God 40 8 How it may appeare that the scripture is the word of God 45 9 Of the first proprietie of the sacred scripture 54 10 Of the second proprietie of the sacred scripture 57 11 Of the third proprietie of the sacred scripture 62 12 Of the fourth proprietie 66 13 Of the fift proprietie of the scripture 70 14 Of the sixt proprietie of the scripture 74 15 Of the seuenth proprietie of the scripture 77 16 Of the eight proprietie of the scripture 80 17 Questions more accidentall concerning the holy Scripture and first of the bookes wherein the same is contained 82 18 Of the authenticall edition of the Bible 90 19 Of the Greeke edition of the new Testament 97 20 Of the translations of the old Testament 102 21 Of the Syriacke translation of the new Testament 108 22 Of the Latin translations of both testaments 110 23 Of the translation of the Bible into the mother tongue 113 24 Of sinne in generall 127 25 Of originall sinne 133 26 Of concupiscence 144 27 Of actuall sinne 146 28 The controuersie concerning the sinne against the holy Ghost 153 29 Of iustifying faith 158 30 Of the improper significations
the mind enlightned in knowing God in Christ of the will sanctified in imbracing and apprehending God in Christ And here the principall agent is that verie Spirit of Christ who after the first grace and creation abideth and dwelleth in vs not idle but euer working some good in vs and by vs. The second agent working with Gods holy Spirit is the very soule of man or rather the new man or the new creature in the soule and all the faculties thereof By this the holy Ghost that so I may speake knoweth God or otherwise to speake the same to know God the holy Ghost vseth the new creature in man and by this the holy Ghost doth embrace and apprehend God in Christ Thus speakes the Apostle Rom. 8. The holy Ghost saith hee maketh intercession for vs with sighes which cannot be expressed Obserue here how he ascribeth this action of sending forth sighes vnto the Spirit as to the principall agent In this second grace which is the action or worke of faith we stand not as meere passiuely but being moued by the holy Ghost we worke our selues as being stirred vp to beleeue we beleeue and in a word we worke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with Gods Spirit working in vs. The Aduersaries say this second grace in faith is an action of free-will when as we by our own free-will dispose and prepare our selues to a iustifying grace in beleeuing in hoping in repenting In this action they say not the holy Ghost is the principall agent or any motion to vse their owne word of the Spirit but free-will it selfe which as they say goes before whē as that motion of God working together with their free-will must follow after They speake not a word here of Gods Spirit either in the first or second grace who works effectually in both as is aforesaid but in steede of the holy Ghost they talk of I know not what motion standing without and knocking at the doore They say this motion stirres vp free-will they say it worketh with free-will when it worketh and prepareth vs vnto the grace of iustice or iustification This their doctrine is strange it sauoureth not the holie Scripture of God nor the phrase of Scripture Thus farre of Gods grace in faith or of the second part of our calling and of the two speciall branches of it Next in it we are to consider of the points or conditions before noted which are the verie same with those in our calling afore-going To this second part of our effectuall calling referre the doctrine of faith which in verie truth is the same with it Hope loue and repentance follow faith and Free-will is a common place in diuinitie subalterne or to bee referred vnto that of Repentance CHAP. II. Of the word of God or of the couenant in generall and of the couenant of workes in speciall THE common place in religion which is concerning The common places of religion how they follow in order Gods word or couenant is to be referred vnto this of our effectuall calling as to a most generall heade next follow these points of sinne and of the miserie of mankind thirdly that of faith then follow hope loue and repentance Now therefore we are to speake of the word or of the couenant of God hauing first set down this ground that all the worde of God appertaines to some couenant for God speaks nothing to man without the couenant for which cause al the scripture both old and new wherein al Gods word is contained beares the name of Gods couenant or testament The couenant of God generally is a promise vnder Couenant defined some one certaine condition And it is twofold the first is the couenant of works the second is the couenant of grace Paul Galath 4. vers 24. expresselie sets downe two couenants which in the olde Testament were shadowed by two women as by types to wit Hagar the handmaide and Sarah the freewoman for saith he these be those two couenants Let vs then speake something of these two couenants and first of the couenant of works The couenant of workes which may also be called a legall or Couenant of works the first ground of it natural couenant is founded in nature which by creation was pure and holy and in the law of God which in the first creation was ingrauen in mans hart For after that God had created man after his owne image pure and holy and had written his law in his minde he made a couenant with man wherein he promised him eternall life vnder the condition of holy and good workes which should be answerable to the holinesse and goodnesse of their creation and conformable to his law And that nature thus beautified with holinesse and righteousnes and the light of Gods law is the foundation of the couenant of works it is very euident for that it could not well stand with the iustice of God to make a couenant vnder condition of good works perfect obedience to his law except he had first created man pure and holie and had ingrauen his lawe in his hart whence those good works might proceed For this cause when he was to repeat that couenant of workes to the people of Israel he first gaue the law written in tables of stone then he made a couenant with his people saying Doe these things and ye shall liue Therefore the ground of the couenant of works was Note not Christ nor the grace of God in Christ but the nature of man in the first creation holy and perfect endued also with the knowledge of the law For as touching the couenant of workes there was no mediator in the beginning betweene God and man that God should in him as in and by a mediator make his couenant with man And the cause that there was no need of a mediator was this that albeit there were two parties entring into a couenāt yet there was no such breach or variance betwixt them that they had neede of any mediator to make reconciliation betweene them for as for the couenant of works God made this couenant with man as one friend doth Note with another For in the creation we were Gods friends and not his enemies Thus far of the grounde of the conant of works The thing promised in the couenant of works is life eternall first not righteousnes for that man in his creation was euen then iust and perfect by that original iustice as they call it vnlesse you will say that the righteousnes of works was promised in that couenant for which righteousnes sake after that man had wrought it God would pronounce and declare him to be iust For we are to vnderstand that in this couenant there is a double righteousnes the first is that originall iustice which is nothing else but the integritie of nature in that first state of man This iustice out of all doubt is not promised in the couenant of works for it is the ground of it The
in all succeeding ages God himself with his owne hand did first write in tables of stone the words of the Decalogue Next after this he gaue it in charge vnto Moses that he should afterwards write and record all things which hee receiued at Gods owne mouth and that the people of God might be assured that the bookes of Moses came not by mans will but were giuen by diuine inspiration the Lord sealed 2. Tim. 3. 16 and testified these writings to be his heauenly oracles by manie great wonders before they were written when they were written and after they were written And Moses wrote the Word of both couenants of both I say Legall and Euangelicall but whereas he gaue but as it were the first lineaments of the Euangelicall couenant he set forth the Legall couenant clearely and in full measure For the legall couenant in the bookes of Moses is cleerely recommended and vrged but the Euangelical more darkly set before vs. For which cause all the doctrine of Moses is said to be legall The Law came by Moses Ioh. 1. After Moses God stirred vp his Prophets whose writings also he confirmed with his great miracles and gaue them great authoritie yet were they not to set forth any thing diuers or contrary to the doctrine of Moses and the Patriarches nor to publish any thing but what was grounded in the bookes of Moses but by diuine reuelation they did ad more cleere interpretations as the morning starre of the new testament did more neerely approch These holy men wrote the summe and chiefe heads of their doctrine euen so much as God himselfe thought meete to be reserued for posterity And these records being written were laid vp with the holie books of Moses which were kept in the side of the Arke Iosh 24. 26. Finally after the incarnation of Christ the Euangelicall doctrine or the Gospell first beganne for certaine yeares to be deliuered by voice and to be preached by Christ himselfe and then after by his Apostles And lastly the same was written by the Apostles The works of Gods law and nature are commanded in the bookes of the new Testament And the verie moral law is expounded by Christ himselfe freed from the leauen and corruption of the Pharisees but the works of the law and nature are not recommended to the end that by them men might be iustified and saued but they be commended either to prepare men to intertaine grace offered or to quicken them to proceed and grow in grace receiued as is before shewed Againe the works of regeneration be commanded not for iustification but as testimonies of that iustification which is by faith and of thankfulnes vnto God for which cause so soone as the Apostle hath taught the doctrine of faith he descends to the works of the lawe teaching men that their life and conuersation must be worthie that high calling whereunto we are called in Christ Iesu See Ephe. 4. 1. 1. Thess 2. 12. But faith in Christ is that which is principally required in all the books of the new Testament And thus farre generally of the written word of the couenant CHAP. VII The number of the controuersies which are concerning the written Word and of the first controuersie whether the Scripture be the word of God THere be two kinds of controuersies concerning the holy Scripture The first kind is of such controuersies as bee more essentiall that is which concerne the very essence if I may so speake or being of the Scripture The second kind is of those controuersies which bee more accidentall and doe not so neerely concerne the essence of the Scripture Of the first kind there are ten controuersies or questions the first is Whether the Scripture Propheticall and Apostolicall bee the word of God The second is How it may appeare that this Scripture is Gods word The third is Of the antiquitie of it The fourth is Of the perspicuity or cleerenes of it The fift is Of the simplicitie or plainnesse of it The sixt is Of the viuacitie quickening power or life of it The seuenth is Of the simple euident necessitie of it The eight is Of the perfection sufficiencie thereof that it is sufficient and perfect in it selfe without all vnwritten verities or traditions whatsoeuer The ninth is Whether the Scripture may bee the iudge to determine all controuersies The tenth is Whether the Scriptures Propheticall and Apostolicall must haue the chiefe place of excellency and be in authoritie aboue the Church As for those eight controuersies which follow the two first they are touching the properties of the holie Scripture and these when we shall haue proued that the Scripture is Gods word will appeare euidently for they are necessary consequents of that Theoreme For grant we this that the Scripture is Gods word then these things must follow necessarily first that it is most ancient secondly most cleere thirdly most simple or pure fourthly most powerfull fiftly most necessarie sixtly most perfect seuenthly the greatest best iudge of all controuersies without exception eightly most excellent But for as much as the aduersaries denie these eight properties therefore as is a foresaid there is of euerie one of them a speciall controuersie We are then to handle these controuersies in order and first of that which by due right naturally is to haue the first place Whether the Scripture be the word of God The Aduersaries graunt generally that the holy Scripture is the word of God but when they are brought from the generall to a speciall they break from vs. To speake more plainely the word of God at this day is twofold in the Church of God 1. immediate 2. mediate I call that the Gods written word immediate word of God which doth proceede immediately out of Gods owne mouth and that I call mediate which the Lord speakes by his preacher or Minister We hold then and auouch that the holie Scripture is that immediate and primarie word of God and to bee vnto vs in steed of that first immediate and liuely voice of God himselfe yea that it serues vs in place not only of that liuely voice of God but also of the secret and insearchable mind of God and of Gods vnspeakeable mysteries Our arguments are these 1. For that this is the verie will of God They haue Moses saith he and the prophets that is the bookes of Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16. 29. 2. If we had nothing to supply the defect of the liuely voice of God then doubtlesse our state were worse then that of the old Church of the Iewes which had the oracles of God but it is against all light of reason so to Rom. 3 1. 2. affirme 3. Our third reason is this The first ground of our faith must be either the liuely voice of God or the verie mind and counsell of God or something to supply the want of Gods liuely voyce and of the secret mind of God which must also be
vnto vs no lesse certaine and firme then if we heard God himselfe speake or did behold and reade the verie mind of God yea the very diuine oracles written in Gods owne breast but now we haue not the liuely voice of God now we see not the secret mind of God therefore it must follow that we haue something to supply the want of the liuely voice of God euen meanes to reueale vnto vs the secret mind of God and nothing can do this but the sacred Scripture therefore Gods holy written word is and must be vnto vs as the verie voice and as the verie mind or wil of God himselfe manifested vnto vs. The fourth reason The Scripture containes all those things which God hath spoken in elder ages and what God himselfe hath decreed in his secret counsell so farre as is meete for vs to know concerning our life and saluation Ergo c. Thus far of the immediate word of God The mediate voice of God we call the voice of the holy and true Church of God for albeit men speake yet the word spoken is the word of God himselfe Here the aduersaries rise vp and contend that the voice of the Church must haue the priority of excellencie and that it supplieth the want of Gods liuely voice and the manifestation of his mind rather or better then the Scripture for say they the voice of the Church is a Popish Obiection cōcerning the testimonie and the authority of the Church before the Scripture Scripture written not with the penne of any Scribe but by Gods owne finger in the heart of the Church therefore the voice or testimonie of the Church ought to bee accounted the principall voice of God For it is a liuely voice proceedings from the liuing heart of the Church wherein God hath ingrauen all truth with the finger of his owne Spirit whereas the Scriptures of the Prophets and Apostles albeit they were deliuered and spoken by God himselfe yet they were not written by Gods owne hand but by the Prophets and Apostles which were the pen-men Again they were not written in y e liuing hearts of men but in papers and books or tables Hence therefore it followeth that this scripture which is found in the heart of the Church is the principall Scripture of God and that the voice of the holy Church is that most excellent voice of God ought to be vnto vs as the immediate voice of God in steed of the secret counsel of God I answer true it is the testimonie of the Church is a liuely voice proceeding from a liuing heart sanctified by the holy ghost for we speake of the true Church But first I say that the only Scripture prophetical and apostolical is to be accounted that Scripture which was written by Gods owne finger and that immediate word of God Next I say that the heart of the Church is taught and sanctified by the Spirit of the Scripture and that the Scripture which is in the heart of the Church is nothing els but a certain transcript that so I may speak or a copy which the holy Ghost hath written in our hearts according to that ancient and authenticall copie which is the holy Scripture For the holy Ghost teacheth the Church nothing now but that which is written and doth by the scripture after a sort beget the Church the Scripture is the mother the Church is the daughter the Scripture is the mistresse the Church is the scholler Thirdly I adde that the knowledge of the truth which is in the heart of the Church by means of the scripture is not so perfect nor so absolute as is the holy Scripture And lastly I say that the Church being inlightened and renewed but in part may erre from the truth euen in the greatest matter of waight and that it doth erre so often as it forsakes the canon and rule of the sacred Scripture Their former assertion being thus cast downe it is euident that the voice of the Church I vnderstand here the true church only not that whoorish church of Rome the voice of the Church I say is not that primarie and most excellent word of God nor ought to be vnto vs in steed of the liuely and immediate voice of God nor to be reputed for Gods minde and counsell but this prerogatiue is due only to the sacred Scripture I ad further that if thou doest first not so much respect the truth it selfe which the Church speaketh as the instruments of the speech vttered which are men next if ye compare the voice of the Church speaking with the sacred Scripture it selfe it doth not deserue at all to be called by the name of Gods word but may more properlie be called the worde and testimony of man For Christ himselfe calles that testimonie which Iohn the Baptist gaue of him the testimony of man I receiue not saith he or desire not the testimnoie of man Ioh. 5. 34. Be it so that the testimonie of the Church be true agreeable to the holy scripture notwithstanding it is truly called an humane testimonie whether yee respect the men which speake or compare their testimonie with that which doth proceed from the mouth of God and Christ himselfe But it may be replyed that the very Apostles and Prophets which writte and spake all these things which we haue in the Scriptures were men in like manner therefore all the Scriptures are but an humane testimonie I answere that I denie not all is obiected if we were to esteeme the words or writings of an Apostle or Prophet as they are instruments and Ministers or if this were to be compared with the very liuely voice of God and Christ himselfe For in respect of the instruments if we compare the words or writings of these men with the words and writings of God himselfe theirs I say must come after and giue place vnto this and must beare the name of an humane testimonie for so the testimony of Iohn Baptist himselfe as being an instrument in comparison of Christ the Lord of life was called the record of man Wherefore when we auouch that the Propheticall and Apostolicall Scripture is the immediate testimonie of God himselfe we make no comparison with the liuelie voice of God himselfe neither doe we so much respect what Organs the Holy-Ghost vsed to set forth the Scriptures but we consider the matter it selfe and the diuine oracles which be written and we ponder in what estimation God himselfe will haue vs to accept the sacred Scripture not as the writings and sayings of men but as the writings and words of God himselfe And we consider this also as in a comparison made with the Church For to vse that comparison againe the voice of the Scripture is Gods owne voice but the voice of the Church of Christ is called an humane testimonie as the word or writing of a Prophet or an Apostle compared with the liuely voice of God is called the
record of man as Christ himselfe testifieth 10. 5. And thus farre of the 1. controuersie CHAP. VIII How it may appeare that the scripture is the worde of God THE second controuersie is by what argument may it appeare that the scripture is the word of God Like as then the first question was this whether the Scripture bee Gods worde So the question in hand is this how and by what euideÌ„ce this may appeare that the Scripture is Gods word To this I answer on this manner That we haue no need simplie of any other light or of any one speciall euidence to demonstrate this matter but that very light which is in the Scripture For the Scripture being the first and immediat word of God is of authoritie sufficient in it selfe * Scriptura est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so likewise of it selfe mâ—st cleere and euident and the onely cause of al that light which is in the Church and in the harts of men For like as the light of the sun is not perceiued nor to be seene by meanes of any S. other light for that it so far exceeds al other bodily external Note light So that spirituall light of the Scripture hath no need in it selfe of any other light to set forth the same for that of all spiritual lights to inlighten the mind withal it is the most bright and most beautifull in the world But whereas euidences and demonstrations be here demanded for the proofe of this matter to confirme the Scripture to be Gods word that is to be the very light the cause of this doubtfulnesse is in our selues for that we be so bleere-eyed and so blind by nature Wherefore the arguments which are brought for this purpose ad no light to the light of the Scripture which is of it own nature so cleere and can not be made to shine more bright by any additioÌ„ but al serue to this end to make that thing manifest vnto vs which is most euident in it selfe and that our eies may be opened to see that most ful and most glorious light of the sacred Scripture that is to behold the diuine maiestie of God shining bright and speaking S. vnto vs in the holy Scripture Like as if a man were to proue to a blinde man that the Sunne did shine hee would not produce arguments to commend the excellencie of the light of the Sunne but rather prouide such things as whereby if it were possible he might open the eies of the blind that with his own eies he might looke on the glorious light of the Sunne Wherefore in a word whatsoeuer arguments men aske of vs to demonstrate the light of the Scripture they ought not to be demaunded because of any defect in the Scripture but in respect of vs because we bee so blind hauing neede of all arguments and helpes euery way to open our eies that our sight may be quickned to behold this glorious light The arguments and helpes whereby our eies may be opened to behold the light of the Scripture or God speaking and shining in the Scripture these arguments I say which the godly and learned vse for this purpose be not of one sort but many in number But if the holy-Ghost speaking in the Scripture doe not first of all inspire our Eph. 1. 16. 17. minds opeÌ„ the eyes of our vnderstanding for he alone can do it assuredly it is but lost labor to speak of any other argument or help if we be not taught of God and by his Esay holy spirit all other meanes shall profit vs nothing at all Wherefore the first most principal cause to effect this y t we may behold the light of the Scripture so bright in it selfe must be the holy ghost teaching vs inwardly in our hearts and opening our vnderstanding that we may behold that light of the Scripture and may acknowledge the voice of God and of Christ himselfe speaking in the Scripture And the holy Ghost also himselfe in this work giues no new light to the Scripture which is cleere and glorious in it selfe as is aforesaid but inlightens our minds to this end that we may see the great light of the sacred Scripture Againe the holy ghost in this great work of our illumination effecteth it by certaine meanes instruments whereby it pleaseth him to work in our hearts and minds The meanes which the H. G. vseth for this worke are of two kindes The first is internall the second is externall The inwarde meane is in the very Scripture it selfe the outward is without the Scripture The internal meane is the principall organ or instrument of Gods spirit in this work and it is that verie light which shineth in the Scripture The holy Ghost then doth first of al open How the holy Ghost first teacheth vs to know the Scriptures the eies of our vnderstanding by the light of the Scripture to discerne that light of the Scripture so bright in itselfe and so vnknowen vnto vs. And hee cleereth our vnderstaÌ„ding to see the light of the Scripture by the verie scripture it selfe and by the light of the scripture manie waies For partlie hee effecteth this by producing 1 certaine testimonies of Scripture which plainly testifie Inward meanes to see the light of the scriptures of this great light of the Scripture and of God speaking in the Scripture as that place al Scripture is giuen by diuine inspiration 2. Tim. 3. 16 partly by suggesting into vs that we obserue the spirituall matters which are 2 therein described partly by admonishing that we note 3 the spirituall words whereby the same spirituall matters are expressed and set before vs partly by warning vs to 4 obserue the truth of the diuine oracles by the complement of the prophecies Againe he sets before vs the 5 beautifull harmonie of the Scripture in the old and new Testament the one sweetly testifying of the other And 6 heere he omitteth not the miracles which be recorded therein whereby the celestiall doctrine had in the beginning a confirmation Hee putteth vs also in minde of the Martyrs which sealed y e same truth with their blood as we read in the same Scripture By these meanes and such like the spirit teacheth vs out of the very Scripture that the sacred Scripture is Gods word by cleere euidence manifesting that great excellent light which is in the Scripture Ad also vnto the aforesaide meanes the worth and holinesse of those men which wrote the Scriptures as the same is testified and recorded in the Scriptures And this is the internall and principall meane and instrument of the holy Ghost whereby he teaceth vs breedeth faith in our hearts whereby we be certainly perswaded that this Scripture is the very word of God There are also other meanes without the Scripture Externall meanes to proue the scripture to be God word whereby the Spirit proueth the same thing as the
consider the substance onely of the scripture which without all controuersie is most ancient But the verie scripture and writing it selfe hath his excellencie also for that the scripture in respect of the very writing is said to be giuen vs also by diuine inspiration For there is not a iote or pricke in the Scriptura est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 very writing which is not by the inspiration of God Here the Aduersaries take exception and as els where often so here they prefer their Church before the scripture and they affirme the Church is more ancient then the scripture For they say there was a Church two thousand A Popish obiection full yeares before Moses the first writer of the scripture And since Christs comming the Church for many yeares wanted the scriptures But that which hath beene alreadie written and is aforesaid can easily solue this obiection For if we vnderstand by this word Scripture not only the characters and books but also that substance and matter contained in them for we haue the Prophets and Apostles speaking in the scriptures we haue their liuely voice we haue I say the liuely voice of God himselfe and the very expresse mind of God contained in them if I say we vnderstand by this word that substance it cannot thē be denied but the scripture is more ancient then the Church which was borne not of mortall seed but of immortall euen by the word of God who liueth and endureth for euer 1. Pet. 1. 23. I say the premisses well considered it shall appeare the scripture is not onely more ancient then the Church but to be of greatest antiquitie and to haue beene with God from euerlasting But if by this word ye vnderstand both the matter and writing in this respect also it shall be no disparagement to auouch it to be of greater antiquitie then the Church yea to be most ancient as we haue at large before shewed And thus far of the first propertie of the sacred scripture and of the third controuersie CHAP. X. Of the second propertie of the sacred Scripture where begins the fourth controuersie THe second propertie of the sacred scripture is opened sufficiently in a manner alreadie in the second controuersie before handled This propertie is this that the Scripture is most cleere in it selfe and most easie to be vnderstood for it being the very word of God which word euerie man must necessarily graunt to be in it selfe most cleere most manifest and most perspicuous whether you respect the words or the matter contained in the words if men will not offer extreme iniurie to Gods holy Spirit assuredly it must follow I say that the holy scripture is in it selfe and of it selfe most cleere and euident in euery part and in euerie respect Of this great perspicuitie of the scripture the holy ghost testifieth often Psal 119. The word of the Lord is a lanterne to my feete Psal 19. The precept of the Lord saith the Psalmist is cleere and inlighteneth the eyes Prou. 6. The commandement is a lanterne and the law is a light The Lord by the Prophet Esay chap. 45. 19. saith I haue not spoken in secret and 2. Pet. 1. 19. he saith We haue a most sure word of the Prophets to the which ye do well that ye take heede as to a light that shineth in a darke place Wherefore the whole scripture al places of the scripture are by themselues and in themselues most manifest most cleere and applied also to the capacity of the vulgar sort and of the most vnlettered among the people For it is certaine that the Lord in the scriptures doth as it were lispe with vs Io. 3. 12. If I haue spoken to you of earthly things and you beleeue not that is I haue spoken vnto you after an earthly and plaine manner and I haue applied my selfe to your capacitie c. I haue auouched that the sacred scripture is in it selfe cleere and easie True it is if ye respect men as they are All the scripture cleere and easie to the weakest beleeuer 1. Cor. 2. 14. men that is naturall and carnall the holy scripture vnto such is altogether obscure and strange For the naturall man doth not conceiue the things which appertaine to the Spirit of God But if ye consider the spirituall man and such as be taught of God I grant to such it is partly obscure because they be as yet in part carnall And for this cause the godly put vp continually supplications vnto God as feeling the reliques of their naturall blindnes and corruption and making requests that the eyes of their vnderstanding might be opened that they may behold the bright shining light of the scriptures and of euerie place and portion of the scripture being otherwise most euident in it selfe All the religious and godly in their prayers are so farre from laying any imputation of hardnesse and obscurity on Gods word that they do euer accuse condemne themselues and their owne blindnesse and dulnesse And albeit this be true that all the scripture and all places of the scripture be simply and in themselues most Note cleare and easie and onely darke and hard by reason of our corruption and blindnesse yet this cannot be denied but that some places of scripture be more cleere in themselues then others more easie and more euident as those scriptures concerning faith and manners which bee so necessarie vnto saluation they be I say so cleerely set downe so often repeated and in so manie places expounded that we need not manie rules for interpretation or to find out the knowledge of them But these places also require the grace of Gods holy spirit for without him spirituall things which be most perspicuous and euident cannot be vnderstood of anie man on earth Wherfore he that is ignorant of the most cleere scriptures which doe so much concerne his saluation is altogether blind and lieth as yet in the wofull state of perdition for so the Apostle speaketh If that the Gospell be hid it is hidden to them that are lost 2. Cor. 4. 3. 4. As for other scriptures which are more hard in appearance for that they do not so much concerne the necessarie articles of faith and rules of life and conuersation we may be ignorant of them without danger of faith and saluation albeit the knowledge of such places might bring some light for the better vnderstanding of the How to interpret expound hard scriptures scriptures which of necessity must be knowne concerning faith and manners And we may attaine some tolerable interpretation of these scriptures analogicall vnto faith if we obserue those rules of knowlege and interpretation which are commonly recommended by the learned euer making Gods holy spirit our first and principal guide for our inward illumination and instruction The rules which follow this are but the meanes which the holy Rules Ghost vseth and they are borowed partly out of the 1
holy scripture as by conference of places of the scripture 2 either the very same or the like in sense and phrase partly 3 from els where as of the common places of diuinitie 4 of the testimonie of the Church of the Grammar it selfe 5 specially the Hebrue and Greeke and good rules and 6 helpes are had from Rhetoricke and Logicke which teacheth vs to consider not onely of simple arguments set apart 7 but also of the disposition and connexion of arguments bound and knit together in Axiomes or propositions in syllogisme and methode For Logicke teacheth vs the coherence of Antecedents and consequents which serueth not a little for the vnfolding and opening of hard places And to passe ouer other things some little insight in Ethickes and Physickes c. may giue some helpe hereunto But aboue all things we must remember to put vp vnto God contiuall and feruent prayers to open and to enlighten our minds by his holie Spirit If men obserue these meanes for the interpretation and vnderstanding of the Scriptures and hard places of the Scripture we shal not lightly erre from the truth of God Here fume the aduersaries and endeuour to proue by The drift of Papists in affirming the scriptures to be obscure manie arguments that the Scriptures in themselues and of themselues are obscure euen in those places which are necessarie and appertaine to saluation to this end and purpose forsooth to withdraw mens minds from reading the Scriptures that they may attend and trust to their dreames and that they may obtrude their glosses on the Church euen what please them what for the most part they preferre before the text it selfe writhing as it were and drawing rather the text of Scripture to be their glosse then giuing any light of interpretation by or from the text it selfe And heere they contend against vs with testimonie first of the Scriptures themselues next of the Doctors and Fathers of the Church lastly with arguments of their owne all which may easily be answered if we obserue well the grounds before set downe It shall suffice vs now to heare onely one or two of their arguments refuted They demaund whether for these Scriptures now extant of the old and new Testament we haue no need of commentaries which are now in the world verie manie written by manie men I answer that the diuine Scriptures of themselues haue no need of the comments and interpretations of men for the Scriptures we account thē to be the liuely voice of God himselfe and what is there that can make this voice of God more cleere and euident in it selfe Can either man or Angell speake anie thing more cleerely then God himselfe or doth God purposely affect obscuritie both which to auoch is verie blasphemous As for the Commentaries or expositions Commentaries of the godly learned which haue spent some good time in the Scriptures of God we graunt they helpe the ignorant and the common sort very much and that they serue well to dispell the clouds of our naturall corruption But this may seeme a greater question and more doubtful touching the preaching of Gods word and the expounding of the Scriptures by Pastors and preachers in the publike assemblies whether preaching be not necessarie I meane the liuely preaching of Pastors and teachers I answer the Scriptures of God which we account as the liuely voice of God haue no need of this meanes in themselues I say that God and his word in themselues need neither this preaching nor interpretation of the scriptures But the necessitie of the ministery and of preaching is only in respect of vs and of our blindnesse and ignorance which be but as children yea as infants in a manner all the dayes we liue on earth Ephe. 4. 1. Cor. 13. And when as we shall become men in the world to come then shall we haue neede of no such ministerie for we shal rest contented being filled with that The state of the elect in heauen onely light of God and of Christ without any further instruction of men or Angels And thus farre of the second propertie of the Scripture and of the fourth controuersie CHAP. XI Of the third propertie of the sacred Scripture whereof ariseth the fift controuersie THE third propertie of the sacred Scripture is this It is most * Simplicissima plaine and pure whether ye respect words or phrase neither hath it any ambiguitie or doubtfulnesse in it This property differs frō the former herein for that whereas perspicuitie extendes it selfe and concernes words and matter this simplicitie or plainnesse as I may so speake is of words only This we auouch then that the sacred Scripture is of it selfe most single and plaine voide of all ambiguitie and Circumlocution by speech Amphibologie or that it contayneth nothing doubtfull in one place which is not expressed in another if there be any obscuritie in it For the word of the Lord and his spirit be euer single and sincere neither doth God at any time speake to catch men with ambiguous and doubtfull speeches as doe Diuels and Sophisters but to teach men his holy truth For the spirit of truth leadeth vs into all truth Io. 16. 13. And the Scripture is giuen of God by inspiration is the very word of God as is before shewed Wherefore if we will not offer God extreame iniurie we must necessarily graunt that the Scripture in it self is most plaine and * If the scriptures seeme doubtful condemne thine owne sinne and corruption simple in sense and signification I say the Scripture in it selfe is plaine as touching the sense for if there be any ambiguitie in any words of scripture that diuersitie or darknesse may not be imputed to the Scripture but to the blindnes and ignorance of men euen of such also which do not of any euil purpose of hart peruert the Scripture For there be many which impiously wrest the same to the one side and the other when as they know right well notwithstanding the sense of the same Scripture is onely one plaine and euident To approue this plainenesse and simplicitie of the Scriptures first the Son of God himselfe in his disputations against Sathan and all his aduersaries borroweth hence his weapons by his owne example recommending the sacred scriptures to all men Next after him the Apostles and their successors and the Fathers themselues haue drawen their arguments from the sacred scriptures against Heretickes both for confirmation of truth and confutation of error The aduersaries here contend against this property of the sacred scripture and they hold that that is doubtfull ambiguous and blasphemously report that it hath a nose A lutae instar of waxe and may be turned here and there For which cause they affirme it is the book of Heretiques that of it spring heresies and that al men seeke to maintaine their errors by it But these blasphemies are easily
answered by that which is before shewed For this ambignitie and flexiblenesse is not to be imputed to the scripture which is giuen of God by diuine inspiration and serueth vs in steede of Gods owne voice but must be ascribed either to the ignorance or malice or malapertnesse of men who either cannot apprehend the simple true sense of scripture or malitiouslie peruert and turne the same into a strange sense Here they obiect that the scripture is full of tropes allegories Ob. parables words of diuers significations amphibologicall sentences visions all which haue their ambiguity I answer that this matter may the better be cleered we are to looke a little more soundly into it The A. ambiguity which is contrarie vnto simplicity being in the words and not in the matter for the words are ambiguous and not the matter Let vs reduce all ambiguity 5. Principall heads which is in the words vnto 5. principall heads For first there bee simple or common words of diuers acceptations secondlie there bee tropicall or figuratiue words thirdly there be whole speeches or sentences which carry a doubtfull signification fourthly there be allegorical speeches consisting of the continuation of tropes fiftly there be also typicall words and sentences concerning types and figures Of all these this I say generally that in all such places the holy Ghost hath but one only simple sense and meaning For as touching words of diuers significations if any such words be found in scripture in the originals Hebrue and Greeke as that can not be otherwise but there must be such in the scriptures first I say that such words haue but one signification only in such places and that the holy Ghost purposeth and intendeth but one thing by them For the holy Ghost desireth not to vse any fallacion or sophistication Next I answer that wee may deprehend that one signification and that one plaine How to vnderstand a doubtfull worde Phrase or sentence in scripture meaning of the word we desire to finde either by the drift of the holy Ghost in that place or text where any such word is or by conference of other places of Scripture where the like worde is to be found or by other Scriptures expressing the same sense and matter in other words or by obseruation of Grammaticall accidents accents points or pricks and such like And where we find tropes and words borowed and drawn from their proper and natiue signification in any text of scripture I say that there such words are vsed by y e holy ghost purposely to expresse in a more significant and liuely manner but one sense and meaning As where it is saide this is my body by the Metonymie which is in the word body the spirit speaketh more significantly then if he had said This is a signe of my body For by that metonymicall phrase the holy Ghost plainly auoucheth the sacramentall vnion which is of the signe and of the thing signified Next I say if the trope seeme somewhat obscure and strange that ye may finde the signification of the same trope by a word of proper signification either in the same scripture or in some other scripture where the like trope may be found If ye meet in scripture with a sentence seeming ambiguous A sentence in scripture seeming ambiguous first be wel assured that Gods spirit doth not purposely speake doubtfully as sophisters do but hath euer one single and plaine meaning but men doe both giue and receiue an euill construction of the context either ignorantly or malitiously Next I say that other places of scripture do more cleerly set forth the selfe same matter Finally if you find allegories in scripture of them this I affirme that first they serue for illustratiō next that they haue but one signification or sense and the same is either manifest and needeth no further exposition or if it be obscure it is more cleerly expressed some where else in the scripture And as for scriptures concerning types I say of them also first that they haue but one signification and A typicall speech in scripture signify types only and not also the matters signified by them next that one very sense of the types is applyed to signify another thing that is the body it self for the types themselues cary in them the signification of the things signified and shadowed by the types and not the words themselues which are vsed to set forth the types for in that historie recorded Gal. 4. this name Sarah signifieth Abrahams wife that is the type only next the type signifieth the couenant that is the thing shadowed figured and signified by the type And thus farre of the third property and fift controuersie CHAP. XII Of the Fourth propertie and Sixt controuersie THis we say also cōcerning the sacred scripture that it is most effectuall most liuely and most vocall sounding to euery man an answer of all things necessarie vnto saluation The life which here I vnderstād is not any fleshly or carnal life as the life of man but that spirituall life as the life of God and by a liuely voice I meane a spirituall voice speaking not so much to the eare as to the minde of man For first if ye respect the substance of this diuine reuelation this which I auouch is without all controuersie For the scripture containes in it the word of God which is liuely powerfull c. Heb. 4. Next in respect of the forme of the reuelation thereof that is the very writing of God this is euident in like manner for it was giuen and written by diuine inspiration and whatsoeuer is of this kinde must necessarily be in it selfe both liuely and spirituall Againe this Scripture is vnto vs if not the liuely voice of God yet certainly in stead thereof For we haue none other liuely voice of God but this for as for the voice of the Church pastors and teachers in the Church the same may erre neither may it properly be called the voice of God The voice of God we must auouch of it that it is a liuely voice ergo c. Thirdly the very Scripture speaks of it selfe as hauing a liuely voice as we may reade Rom. 9. The Scripture saith c. Againe Esaias Scripture is said to crie concerning Israel Rom. 9. 27. Fourthly so many as propound questions of any matter necessarie to saluation be sent to it Esaie S. Should not a people inquire at their God from the liuing to the dead Turne rather to the law to the testimonie If they speake not according to this word there is no morning light in them Againe the Sonne of God himselfe so often as any propounded questions vnto him of the law of diuorcement of the Sabboth of the Messias of regeneration and of the resurrection or how to attaine eternall life he alwaies gaue them answer out of the sacred Scripture and euer he sends such as moue any such doubts vnto the Scripture How
let him be accursed Ioh. 20. These things are written that ye may beleeue c. And as for the iudgment of the Aduersaries in this matter which affirme that the scripture is lame and maimed chiefly note Bellarmine and his arguments for this purpose They teach the scriptures to bee defectiue and weake that we might giue place to their traditions and forgeries wherefore let vs a little consider this matter of Of Traditions traditions The word Tradition is generall and signifieth any doctrine written or vnwritten and so this word is vsed both in the sacred scriptures and in the ancient Writers albeit the Papists affirme that the Fathers vse this word onely to signifie a doctrine not written Testimonies of scripture which cleere the generall acceptation of the word are these Act. 6. 14. And shall change the ordinances which Moses * Quos nobis tradidit Moses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gaue vs or which wee had from Moses by tradition 2. Thess 2. 15. Keepe the tradition or doctrine * Traditam doctrinam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 deliuered vnto you which ye were taught either by word or by our Epistle The word tradition in Scripture is giuen other whiles to things ncessarie and continuing and sometimes to things not necessarie and temporarie The testimonie which is 2. Thess 2. vers 15. is of necessarie doctrine The place which is cited out of the Acts 16. 4. is of ceremonies for heere the Spirit speaketh of a decree of the Councell holden at Ierusalem concerning bloud and things offered to idols and that which is strangled Of which Act. 15. 28. As touching traditions which concerne necessarie points of faith manners they were first deliuered by the liuely voice of Christ his Apostles and then the short summe of them recorded in bookes as may appeare by that speech of the Apostle concerning the Lords supper 1. Cor. 11. 23. And againe 1. Thess 4. 2. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where he giueth rules of an honest conuersation And againe 2. Thess 2. 15. And as touching traditions which be not necessarie but ceremoniall they were either recorded as of Ecclesiasticall rites 1. Cor. 11. 14. or not recorded 1. Cor. 11. 34. Other things will I set in order when I come He promiseth heere to set in order but ceremonies and namely such as did concerne the Lords supper Of ceremonies onely this I wil say they did no way exceed neither were Of Ceremonies Good rules they vnprofitable neither were they deliuered with anie 1 opinion of necessity to bind mens consciences neither 2 were they contrarie to those things which were written 3 yea this I auouch y t there was nothing deliuered by way 4 of tradition or touching ceremonies by the Apostles which had not good ground warrant in Gods word that is in the bookes of the Prophets and in the doctrine of Christ which not long after was written by the Euangelists and Apostles And as for Popish traditions Popish traditions and ceremonies and ceremonies there is no end of them they are vnprofitable they are like old wiues fables all for the most part deliuered with an opinion of necessitie and most of them most repugnant to the Apostolicall doctrine And thus do we distinguish traditions The aduersaries vnderstand by Tradition their vnwritten veritie not that which is no where found written but that which is not written by the first author thereof that is by him which deliuered the same by his owne liuely voice This then the Papists do here professe that they cannot find their traditions in the Scriptures nor proue them by the Scriptures CHAP. XV. Of the seuenth propertie and ninth controuersie THE sacred scripture is the iudge of all controuersies I meane such controuersies as are concerning religion Now there bee two principall controuersies concerning religion the first is of the scripture it selfe who shall be iudge here or how it may be tryed that the scripture is the word of God The second The iudge of the scripture is of the sense and interpretation of the scripture who shal iudg of that or how it may appeare that this or that is the very naturall sense of the Scripture I meane by iudgement here a definitiue sentence pronounced and giuen with such authority as that all men must herein rest By the word scripture I meane not only the substance thereof but also the form of reuelation which is also by diuine inspiration Againe this manner of speaking is improper when we say of the scripture that it is the iudge of controuersies For to speake properly the holy Ghost is the iudge for the iudge must be a person and the holy Ghost he is the third person in Trinity The Scripture therefore is not properlie said to be a iudge but it is the voice and sentence which the Iudg hath giuen the principall instrument or meane wherby y e spirit sets forth his iudgment whereby he teacheth vs and worketh faith in our hearts And the spirit here iudgeth freely in and by whom he pleaseth being not tied to any one kind of men as Pastors Doctors but in and by whom it seemeth good to him Here then three things must be considered of vs First whether the holy ghost be a iudge Secondly whether the scripture be his principal voice wherby he giueth First whether the holy Ghost be a iudge sentence or determineth any question Thirdly whether he iudg in and by any man without difference or respect of persons or be bound to one certaine kinde or sort of men For the first question I answere the holy Ghost is a Iudge first for that he was promised of Christ Io 14. Math 28. Mar. 16. vnto his church at his last departure from the Apostles is giuen as it were deputed Christs vicar on earth both to teach and to iudge c. Secondly for that among other offices of the holy Ghost this is one to iudge But because the aduersaries do not much gainsay this assertion concerning Io. 16. Gods spirit that by him all things are to be iudged and tried and that by him the scriptures are to be interpreted therefore we will be briefe in this point Now for the second point that the holy scripture is the primarie Secondly that the holy scripture is the principall voice of the iudg voice of this iudge iudiciarie and proper to him whereby he begets faith in our harts may appeare by these reasons following First the scripture is the word of God Secondly it is most auncient Thirdly it is most cleere or euident To these I ad the testimonie of the scripture it selfe Ioh. 14. 25. 26. He shall teach you all things and bring all things to * Suggeret remembrance which I haue told you And hereunto may also be added the common experience of the Saints There are other meanes to prooue this but lesse principall among which the testimony of
the Church is one The aduersaries withstand this conclusion and infring it with these arguments First the scripture is not written in mens hearts with the finger of God neither is it the primary voice of God Secondly the scripture is of no antiquity Thirdly it is obscure Fourthly ambiguous c. Bellarmine ads more to these of which ye may read in him They conclude that the voice of the Church is the principall and proper voice of the holy Ghost as he is the Iudge of controuersies Their proofe is this The scripture is written in the heart of the Church with Gods own finger this is the primary voice of God And whatsoeuer excellency wee doe ascribe to the scripture that they attribute to their owne Church which is nothing els but a den of theeues And that the spirit being this great iudge is not bound to one sort of men as those of the Ecclesiasticall function the Pope and Councels as they speak but doth performe this office without all respect of persons in whom and by whom soeuer it seemeth good vnto himselfe this is manifest first for if the holy Ghost be not the Iudge both of the very context of the scripture whether it be Gods word and of the interpretation of scripture if he be not I say in man himselfe assuredly there can be no faith For the spirit only begetteth faith in mans heart Secondly the holy Ghost executeth his other offices freely in by any man therefore so may he this function of iudging What is meant by iudging in the holy Ghost For I demand what els is it to iudge but to inlighten to teach that the scripture is giuen of God by inspiration and that this is the naturall sense of this scripture Thirdly the same we be taught by our experience for we find it true by experience that he doth freely iudge in and by whom it pleaseth him Testimonies of scripture proue also this assertion 1. Cor. 12. 11 And all these things worketh euen the selfe same spirit distributing to euery man seuerallie as he will And Esay 54. All thy children shall be taught of God Ier. 31. I will write my lawes in their harts The aduersaries impugne this truth of God with some argumēts of their owne of which ye may reade in Bellarmine And these men binde the holy Ghost to the Pope and to councels confirmed by him which point our men impugne also refute with many arguments of which this is one that of their conclusion this must be the consequent that the Pope and his councels must be aboue the scriptures which thing is absurd to be graunted See more arguments of this subiect in their disputations CHAP. XVI Of the eight propertie and the tenth controuersie LASTLY we auouch that the sacred scripture is of highest authority excellency and 10. Propertie dignity on the earth Here againe by this word scripture we vnderstand both the substance of it and the writing And here wee meane it hath such excellency as makes it most worthie of credit and whereby also it gaines authority and estimation to the Church For which cause the Church is called the Pillar and ground of truth 1. Tim. 3. 15. And it hath many other titles which are giuen to it often in the scriptures This is prooued by the former demonstrations as these The scripture is the word of God it is most perspicuous it is most pure and simple c. Ergo. The aduersaries vary in iudgment touching this authority of Scripture For some of them detract from this soueraigne authority of it affirming that of it selfe it is not authentical but takes authoritie and estimation from the Church Of this minde are these Eckius in Enchiridio Pighius in his booke de Hierarchia and one Hermannus an impudent Papist he with a black mouth auoucheth it that the scripture is of no more validity without the testimony of the Church then AEsops Fables c. Others more late writers and more subtile say that the scripture hath authoritie in and by it selfe and is authentical but not to vs before the church approue it and ascertain it to be so Of this iudgmēt be these Bellarmine Coclaeus Canus Stapleton Canisius c. They which speake thus that the written word of God is not authenticall to vs before the iudgment of the Church be manifested these men I say haue this meaning that we bee not bound to beleeue that the Scriptures bee authenticall before the iudgment of the Church be past of it and that we sinne not at all if wee beleeue them not before the definitiue sentence of the Church But we hold this to be false also to say that the scripture is not to vs authenticall without the authority of the Church For it is the holy Ghost that teacheth euery man to know beleeue that the scripture is authenticall and hath soueraigne authority in it selfe And this he teacheth not by any externall meane How the holy Ghost teacheth vs what authority the scripture hath first but by the very sacred scripture by which alone he properly breeds faith in our hearts to beleeue and apprehend this truth of God And so we resting on this illumination of the holy ghost teaching vs by the scripture that this is the excellencie and authority of the scripture doe beleeue this to be so albeit the whole world did oppose it selfe against vs. And thus farre of the more essentiall questions concerning scripture CHAP. XVII Questions more accidentall concerning the holy Scripture and first of the bookes wherein the same is contained THE first question is concerning the books of holy scripture These bookes are commonly called for the excellency of them The Bible The Bible as it is commonly receiued and caried in hands containes in it two sorts of books the first is of books Canonicall and the second is Apocryphal Regular or Canonicall bookes are such as giue rule and direction touching faith and manners The bookes of Moses are the first Canon or president sent from God First Canon which may not be iudged or tryed by any other externall Canon whatsoeuer For there was no booke extant before the books of Moses The authoritie of the writer so holy and the euidence of the spirit so powerfull and the holinesse of these books to passe by other arguments so great hath gained these books this high estimation and authority in the Church The books of the Prophets make vp the second Canon which bee adiudged canonicall Second Canon by that externall Canon of the Mosaicall books by which they were examined Next they were and are discerned of such as be taught of God inwardly by the holy Ghost by the great euidence of Gods spirit which is manifested in them both in words and matter The third Third Canon Canon are the Apostolical books of the New Testament which are adiudged and approoued as Canonicall partly by the Canonicall books of Moses partly by the
this translation also Caluin approoueth Therefore by Caluins testimony the very Hebrue text is here corrupted I answer the sense shall not de greatly vnfitting if ye read whereby he shal cal him to wit the Lord our righteousnesse The name going before is the name of a people of securitie of a people that dwell safely as Tremelius and Iunius vnderstand and reade the place Thirdly Ieremy leaues it to our free choise Fourthly the Hebrue Doctors Vatable Pagnine Arias Montanus read vocabit he shal cal and yet turne the word vocabunt they shal cal The third place is in the 22. Psalm 17. ver They pierced Caari Iaddai Veraglai my hands and my feete In the Latine edition it is Foderunt they digged or pierced and so read all Christians but the Hebrue is Sicut Leo as a Lion Wherefore in this place the Hebrue text is corrupted I answer y e Masorites testify that they haue read in some Hebrue copies Caru which signifieth to dig into or to pierce They also which haue y e word Caari in their books say it is not to be taken here in Caari the proper and common signification The Chaldee Paraphrast doth knit both particles together As a Lion smites with his teeth so haue these pierced c. But these were before Ierom I meane the Masorites and the Chaldee Paraphraste therefore it is false that this place was corrupted by the Iewes after Ieroms time Ierom in his Psalter keeps this reading Caari and yet he translates the word foderunt they digged or pierced Lastly a certaine Popish writer one Augustine Iustinianus who set forth the book of Psal coliected of many languages doth plainly auouch it this place is not corrupted but that there is a defect of a word which the Chaldee Paraphrast hath supplyed The fourth place is Psal 19. 5. Their line is gone forth Becol haarets iatsa kauuam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 through al the earth Here not only the vulgar but the Septuagint also whom the Apostle to the Rom. 10. followeth doe reade their sound is gone c. therefore this place is corrupted Let Genebrard alone answer this in his obseruations on the Psalmes who saith the Septuagint and Paule did rather expresse the sense of the word then the proper and naturall signification thereof The fift place is Exo. 2. after the 22. ver in y e vulgar Latine edition all this place is read of a second son of Moses And she bare a second whose name he called Eliezer saying the God of my Father is my helper and hath deliuerâ—d me from Pharaohs hand But all this place is not to be found in the Hebrue text Ergo. To this I answere the very Louaine editions haue here their marginal note to put vs in mind that this place hath crept into the text and the better sort of the Papists are of this iudgement that this place is not the natural or very text of Gods worde as Caietanus who writes of this place in this manner All this clause of a second sonne is superfluous Wherefore Bellarmine can not conclude by these places that the Hebrue edition is corrupt and therefore is not authenticall I shall conclude contrarily with this one argument that the Hebrue edition is not corrupt If the Iewes corrupted it it was before Christ or after But not before Christ which point to passe by all testimonies of auncients The Iewes before Christ did not corrupt the Hebrue Christ is witnesse and so the apostle Rom. 3. 1. I make euident with this one reasoÌ„ If the Iewes had corrupted the Hebrue text Christ would haue texed them for so horrible an offence But we neuer find that Christ so chargeth them for any such cause but contrarily we reade that hee sends them to that very Hebrue edition which they had in their hands Search the scriptures saith he Io. 5. 39. The Scripture was not corrupted after Christs time which assertion I proue to passe by the authority of auncients with this one argument The Iewes could not corrupt al the Hebrue copies albeit they were neuer so willing to effect it for that they were now for the most part come to the hands of Christians Hence it followeth that if the Hebrue text was not corrupted neither before Christs time nor after his comming then was it not corrupted at all But happily they will say that the Iewes corrupted it after Augustine and Ieromes The Iewes coulde not corrupt the Hebrue after Christs comming time I answere in what places For as touching Bellarmines 5. places we haue already shewed that both in Ieroms time and before these places were thus read as we read them this day Wherefore we conclude the Hebrue edition is most pure and consequently in the old Testament this edition only is authenticall CHAP. XIX Of the Greeke edition of the New Testament WHereas there bee many editions of the new Testament wee say the Greeke only is the authenticall which first I demonstrate on this manner First in Christs time and the Apostles the Greeke tongue among the Gentiles was of greatest excellency Secondly and as it was accounted of best note so was it most famous and most common in the world For albeit as then the Romane Empire was most large great yet the Latine tongue was not so common as is testified by a good * Cicero in oratione pro Archiae poëta writer of that age Thirdly the Idolatrie and superstition of the Gentiles and all the Philosophy of the Greeks was written in the Greek tongue The Lord hauing these and such like respects no doubt at what time it pleased him to carry his Gospell from the narrow bounds of Iewrie into the great and spacious field of all the world It was the Lords will and pleasure I say at that time that the Gospel should be written principally in the Greeke tongue The writers they were some of them Apostles some Euangelists al which first wrote in Greek except Mathew and the author to the Hebrues For first concerning Mathew a In Synopsi Athanasius saith he wrote first in Hebrue the same saith b Lib. 3. Irenaeus c Incarmine Naztanzen and Ierom d In Praefat. in 4. Euang. ad Damas et in Catalog in Math. who saith that Mathew first in Hebrue in his time Mathews Hebrue copie was reserued in the library of Cesaria which Pamphilus the Martyr built Athanasius saith that Saint Mathews Hebrue edition was translated into Greeke by Iames the Apostle others say by Saint Iohn the Apostle others by Mathew himselfe Thus write the Fathers but their assertion hath no strong grounds For when Christ liued with his Apostles all the Iewes spake Syriack that is a language mixt of Hebrue Chaldaiack Therefore if Mathew had purposed to write in any other language but the Greek he would no doubt haue written specially in the Syriack tongue and some Papists of this age are of the
very same iudgment Wherefore it is vncertaine whether Mathew first wrote in Hebrew Syriack or Greeke yet is it more probable that he did first write in Greeke both for that this tongue was not vnknowne to the Iewes and other Apostles first wrote in it not onely to Iewes and Gentiles indifferently but also particularly to the very Iewes * As Saint Iames and Saint Peter 1. Epist Mathew in Hebrue In Catolog in Paul Well howsoeuer it is the Greeke edition which we haue in the Church at this day is authenticall for that it was both written and approoued while the Apostles were yet liuing For as touching the Hebrue edition if there were any I doubt now it can no where be found And as for this Hebrue copie which is in many hands it is not the true copy As concerning the Epistle to the Hebrues Ierom sayth that first it was written in Hebrue next turned into Greek either by Barnabas or Luke or Clement but it is vncertaine and it is more like to be true that this Epistle also was first written in Greeke Howsoeuer it be this Greeke edition of this Epistle which we haue at this day is authenticall Now the New Testament written in Greek by the Apostles and Euangelists hath beene so preserued by the admirable prouidence of God euen in the middest of persecutions and heresies vnto this age and in all former ages so freed and kept by godly and Orthodoxall writers from the corruption of Heretiques the Lord God I say hath so prouided that it is come into our hands most pure and perfect Thus then I reason That edition of the New Testament which was written in the best language and first and originally written in it to wit the Greeke I say the same must be accepted as authenticall of all men But such is the Greeke edition of the New Testament Ergo. The aduersaries except onely against the purity of this edition For albeit some of them the latter and the better learned as Bellarmine doe not say that the Greeke edition of the New Testament is altogether corrupt as some of them haue blasphemed yet they say it is not so pure that they can graunt it to be authenticall because in some places it is corrupt Bellarmine brings forth seuen places whereby he indeuours to prooue this assertion that the Greek edition is corupt and therefore cannot be authenticall The first place is 1. Cor. 15. 47. The first man is of the earth earthly the second man is the Lord from heauē But in the vulgar 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Latine edition it is the second is from heauen heauenly this reading is approued therfore the Greek edition is corrupt and not authenticall I answer first albeit we read as the Greeke is yet the sense is good and orthodoxall and the same with that which is of the vulgar reading differing in word only and not in matter Secondly the Arabick and Syriack translation so read the place Thirdly the Fathers Chrysostome and Theophylact so reade Fourthly Epiphanius citing * Haereseon 22. 2 all the places which Marcion corrupted yet remembers not this place But saith he Tertullian saith that Marcion * Tert. lib. 5. contra Mar. hath corrupted this place I answer that Tertullian in that booke and place reads these words in the very same manner as we do The Lord from heauen The second place is 1. Cor. 7. 33. He that is maried careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. wife and the Virgin are distinctly set downe So reads the Greek But the Vulgar thus He that is ioined to a wife careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife and he is diuided but the woman that is vnmaried and the Virgin bethinketh of the things which please the Lord both in body and spirit Wherefore the Greek edition is here corrupted and so can not be authenticall I answere First that the sense which is by the Greek is not only sound but also more fitting in this place then that which is by the Vulgar translation Secondly the Syriack translation so reads these words Thirdly Theophylact the Greek Scholies and Basil so read the words But he sayth that Ierom * Lib. 1. contra Iouinan auoucheth it that this Greek reading is not Apostolicall I answer the same Ierom in another place * Contra Heluidium Eustochium reads these words as we doe wherefore seeing he changeth his mind he is not fit to iudge for this scripture The third place is Ro. 12. 11. seruing the time But the old Latin is seruing the Lord Ergo. I answer First albeit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ye read so the place yet the sense is good and sounde Secondly the reading varies in manie Greeke copies as witnesseth Origens Interpreter who reads the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and hee noteth it that in many bookes he founde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the time the same saith Ambrose who reades 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seruing the time yet saith he in some bookes wee find 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord. Thirdly the Syriack Chrysostome Theophylact and Basil read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord which reading wee best like For which cause our Beza translates the word Domino the Lord. The fourth place is Ioh. 8. where in the beginning of that Chap. many Greek copies want the storie of the adulterous woman which the cōmon translation in Latin hath the Church approues it as canonicall I answere First that our Greeke books which we haue and hold for authenticall haue this historie also and our Church receiues it Secondly yet we denie not that this hath beene gainsaid by some and the Syriacke translation hath it not The fift place is Mark. 16. where in many Greeke copies that whole chapter is wanting which notwithstanding the Latine edition retaineth Ergo. I answer first that all our Greeke bookes which we account authenticall haue also this chapter and our churches receiue the same as canonicall Secondly Ierome some-where moues some doubttouching it but to no purpose The sixt place is 1. Ioh. 5. 7. where the seuenth verse which containes a worthie testimonie of the Trinitie in manie Greeke copies is missing but in the vulgar it is retained Ergo. I answer first our Greeke bookes which we hold for authenticall haue this verse and our Church receiues it Secondly we denie not but some haue gainesaid it The seuenth place is Matth. 13. For thine is the kingdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. power and glorie Amen But this place is not in the vulgar translation Ergo. L. Valla answereth this place is not added to the Greeke but detracted from the Latine and I pray you what hereticall or vnsound matter hath this place Thus we see then the aduersaries cannot proue by these places that the Greeke edition of the new Testament is corrupted and so not
authenticall Wherefore it resteth that the Hebrue edition of the old Testament and the Greek of the new Testament is only authentical CHAP. XX. Of the Translations of the old Testament NOw it resteth that we speake of the Translations of the old and new Testament And first of the translations of the old Testament The old Testament was first written in Hebrue and afterwards translated into diuers languages specially the Chaldee and Greeke First concerning the Chaldiacke translation next of the Greeke and for the Chaldiack we be to consider first what manner of translation it is Secondly by whom this was done Thirdly what authoritie this hath For the first the Chaldiacke translation is rather a Paraphrase then a translation word for word The Rabbins call this Authors of the Chaldee paraphrase paraphrase the Targum For the second point by whom this Paraphrase was set forth Rabbi Aquila translated the * Fiue bookes of Moses Pentateuch and this they call Onkelos the rest of the bookes of the old testament were translated partly by Rabbi Ionathan partly by Rabbi Ioseph * blind Caecus they liued not long before Christ or about Christs time For the third point The Chaldee paraphrase with the Ancients was euer of great note and authoritie specially that part of the Pentateuch for as for the rest of this Paraphrase one * Praefat. in Biblia complu tensia Ximenius a Cardinall auoucheth it to be full of Iewish fables and of the vaine conceits of the Thalmudists And thus farre briefly of the Chaldee paraphrase Now touching the Greeke translation of the old testament there were diuers translations of it into the Greeke tongue Some number nine translations Of these the first and principall is that of the Septuagint which those 72. Ancients did at the appointment of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus for whereas * Lib. stromat Clemens Alexandrinus writeth that the Scripture was translated long before into Greeke and that Plato had read the same it is not like to be true for neither Plato nor anie of Pythagoras sect euer saw the sacred Scriptures To speake then of the interpretation of the seuentie interpreters and to bind our selues to certaine questions sixe in number the first may be this whether there was euer any Greeke translation set forth by the 72. interpreters Secondly if there were anie when it was done Thirdly of what bookes Fourthly how this was done Fiftly what authoritie this translation is of Sixtly whether this be the true translation of the 72. Interpreters which we haue at this day For the first question the answer is easie for there is no doubt but that there was a Greeke translation by the 72. interpreters for that all antiquitie accords to this This is testified by a Lib. de mensuris ponderib Epiphanius b De praeparat euangel Eusebius c In dialog cum Tryphone Iustin Martyr with many others And as for the second question the answer also to it is easie for all men doe agree that this translation was done in the raigne and at the appointment of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus this write and auouch these men Ioseph Philo d In Synopsi Athanasius Epiphanius Tertullian e In historia sua de hacipsare Aristaeus and manie others And for the third question what bookes were translated by them the answer is not so easie for some thinke they translated but the fiue bookes of Moses only Of this mind is f In proâ—â—io antiq Ioseph and Ierome seemes to incline this way Others say they translated all the Scripture and this is likest to be true For first it is not like that king Ptolomie could haue contented himselfe with the Pentateuch only Secondly the Apostles of Christ vsed the Greeke translation in citing testimonies out of the prophets but in the Apostles time there was none other translation but that of the Septuagints Thirdly there had beene no matter of admiration in that this worke was done with such expedition if the Pentateuch onely had beene translated and finished in the space of 72. dayes for they say his translation was miraculous Fourthly Chrysostome and Theodoret among the Fathers are of this iudgement Wherefore it is best we hold this as most probable that all the old Testament was translated by them And as for the fift question what authoritie this translation had Hereunto men answer diuersly For some ascribe too much to it as * In lib. de mensuris ponderib Epiphanius who saith they were not interpreters only but in a manner Prophets Augustine is too much in the commendation of it he saith It was done by a speciall dispensation of God and thinks it to be set forth by diuine inspiration Others ascribe not so much to it * In praefat in Pentateuchon Ierome saith against Epiphanius they were no prophets And often in his Commentaries he taxeth it not onely as corrupted but as verie faultie in it selfe which thing he would neuer haue don if he had thought this worke had beene done by diuine inspiration What authoritie soeuer this translation is of assuredly it can haue no more then what may by good right be giuen to an interpretation for we may not auouch it to be giueÌ„ by the inspiration of God nor make it of equall authoritie with the Scripture As touching the sixt question some thinke that the old translation of the Septuagint is as yet extant but to Old translation of the 70. be so corrupt that it is no wisdome to correct either the Hebrue or Latine copies by it Bellarmine is of this mind Others affirme that the ancient translation of the 72. interpreters is lost and that this which wee haue is mixt and verie corrupt This also they proue by an induction of certaine places corrupted First the Greeke Bible numbers from the creation of the world vnto the floud 2242. yeares as we may see which Augustine Eusebius and Nicephorus in his chronologie but the Hebrue veritie saith the number of yeares be 1656. therefore the Greeke number exceedes the Hebrue in yeares 586. Secondly from the floud to Ahraham the 72. interpreters reckon of yeares 1082. but according to the Hebrue text of Gods word there be no more yeares but 292. so the Greeke exceedes the Hebrue veritie 790. yeares Thirdly in the Greeke copie Adam is said to haue liued 230. yeares and in some bookes 330. when he begat Sheth but the Hebrue Bible saith Adam begat Sheth when he was 130. yeares old Fourthly according to the Greeke copie Methusalem liued fourteene yeares after the floud which is verie ridiculous for where liued he or how was he kept from the waters In the arke That cannot be for but eight soules onely entred into the Arke among whom Methusalem is not reckoned The Hebrew bible speakes farre otherwise of Methusalems Methusalems life and death yeares and age for by it we gather that he died that verie yeare the deluge came on the
or common prayers of the Church ought to be in the mother tongue Thirdly whether it shal be lawfull for the common people to read the scriptures translated into their owne language or mother tongue To the first question we answer that it is lawfull yea also that it is expedient it should be so and this we proue by some few arguments First the sacred scriptures must be read publiquely before all the people therefore must they be translated into their owne known language for otherwise it were in vain to read them The antecedent is proued Deut. 31. ver 11. 12. The Lord commandeth that the books of Moses be read to all indifferently when they were assembled Men Women and Children with the strangers Ier. 36. chargeth Baruch the scribe that hee should read before all the people the book which he had Translating of the scripture into the vulgar tongues First argument written from his mouth But some will heere obiect that this precept was to indure but for a time I answer the end shewes it must be perpetuall Deut. 31. The end being this that this people may heare learne and feare the Lord. This end is perpetuall therefore so is the law in like manner specially seeing that the reading of the Scripture is the ordinarie and necessarie meanes whereby we be to come to this appointed end So the antecedēt being thus cleered it followeth necessarily that the scripture must be translated into our knowne mother tongue Arg. 2. The people are permitted to read y e Scriptures Second argu therfore they are to be translated into the vulgar tongue for otherwise the common people could neuer reade them The antecedent I proue thus The Sacred Scriptures do furnish vs with weapons against the Deuil as we be taught by Christs example Matth. 4. who gaue Sathan the repulse vsing none other weapons against him but testimonies of Scripture Ioh. 5. chap. Christ commaunded the multitude to search the scriptures Acts chap. 17. the Christians of Beroea are commended for searching the scriptures whether the points were sound and good agreeable to the sriptures which were taught by the Apostles But see more of this antecedent in the handling of the 3. question Arg. 3. The very Papists graunt the scriptures may be read before the people but they say it must be done in an Third argu vnknowen tongue wherefore I reason thus If the scriptures must be read before the multitude in an vnknowen tongue that shall be fruitlesse and without all edification therefore they must be translated into their knowen language The Antecedent is prooued by 1. Corin. 14. 6. If I shal come vnto you speaking in tongues what shal I profit you q. d. nothing And after in the same Chap. ver 19. I had rather speake fiue words with my vnderstanding that I might also instruct others then ten thousandwords in a strange tongue But of this point more hereafter The fourth argument God requires in his people wisdome knowledge and instruction Therefore the scriptures Fourth argu must be read and therefore translated into the vulgar tongues The antecedent I prooue thus Deut. 4. God wil haue his people to be wise of vnderstanding that the nations round about hearing of this might bee smitten with an admiration and say ver 4. Only this people is wise and of vnderstanding and a great nation The Apostle Col. 3. 16. will haue Gods worde to dwell in them richly or plenteously Paul in his Epistles euery where requires the Churches to whom he writes to be filled with all knowledge The aduersaries contend and dispute much against this knowledge which God requires in the common people The fift argument Christ while he liued among the Iewes spake and preached vnto them in their owne mother Fift argu tongue The Apostles of Christ in like manner did preach the Gospell in their vulgar tongue as in the day of Pentecost and after and for this very cause that they might speake to euery nation in their owne knowen language that gift of tongues was giuen them Thus then I reason If to preach the Gospell in the vulgar known languages was no profanatiō of the Gospell then so in like maner to write the Gospel in the vulgar known languages is no profanation of the same for there is like reason of both The sixt argument is from the perpetuall vse and practise Sixt argu of all the auncient Church For in the Primitiue Church the sacred Scripture was translated neere hand into all languages as the Chaldiac the Syriac the Arabian the Armenian the Egyptian the Ethiopian the Indian the Persian the Scythian the Sarmatian tongue There are not a few do auouch this a Homil. 1. in Io. Chrysostome * De corrigend Graecorum Affectib lib. 5. Theodoret c De doctr Chri. lib. 2. cap. 15. Augustine with others And at this day there be extant the Chaldiac the Syriack the Arabick the Egyptian and the Ethiopian translations all which the learned say were done in the Apostles times Chrysostome turned the sacred Scripture into the Armenian tongue as Sixtus Senēsis reporteth Ierom trāslated the scripture into the * Lingua Dalmatica Dalmatick tongue as these men do testify Alphonsus a Castro Eckius Hosius Erasmus Methodius translated it into the Sclauonian tongue as saith Auentine in his Chronicle * Socrates tripartita historia Vlphilas Bishop of the Gothes translated the same into the Gothes language * De ciuitate Dei lib. 15. Augustine writeth that the old Testament was translated into Syriack Harding against Iuel and Eckius write that the Muscouites and the people of Russia had the scripture in their owne mother tongue The historie of England written by Beda affirmeth that the scriptures were translated into the English tongue before his time Beda saith he translated part of the new Testament himselfe Thus far the practise of the old church whereby as by the rest of the arguments afore going it followeth that the sacred Scripture is to be translated into euery countrey vulgar language Now it resteth to see what the Papists answer to this question we haue in hand Some few yeares past they vtterly denied that the sacred Scripture might bee translated into any mother tongue * De choris canonicis Petrus Asoto Censura Coloniensis and Harding before named these write that some are of this iudgment The Scriptures are not to be translated into the vulgar languages And for this cause such as translated Scriptures they were banished and condemned by the Pope and their bookes were prohibited and burnt And when they saw this to be odious to all men these graue Fathers changed their minds and now forsooth they auouch the Scriptures may be translated into the vulgar languages yet by the Popes permission And this albeit it seeme to be something diuers from the former assertion yet in effect it is the verie same For the Pope will permit no man to
publike administration of Gods seruice and worship being performed of all or most Churches in one tongue to wit the Latine this might serue well for the preseruation of the vnitie of faith To this I answer this serues notably for the continuance and increase of vnbeleefe and ignorance Againe our verie experience teacheth by Gods good blessing in these times that notwithstanding the great variety of tongues in the reformed Churches yet they agree well to God be praise in the vnitie of faith Next they reason from the little good which hence ensueth as they imagine It profits the people nothing at all that the Scriptures be read in the vulgar tongues for they vnderstand not any sentence of Scripture albeit they know the words To this I answer Euerie one of the vnlearned if they come to heare the Scriptures with Gods feare and reuerence they shall reape and receiue some profit by it Againe from another danger which may happen they reason thus The reading of the Scriptures in a knowne tongue may more hurt then profit the people for deuotion hath rather decreased then increased since publike prayers or seruice of God hath beene celebrated in popular tongues I answer the consequent is not good The sacred Scripture read in the mother tongue hurts manie therfore it is not so to be read at all because accidentally and through the default and corruption of the people it hurts and profits not So the preaching of the Gospell is the sauour of death vnto death vnto manie therefore the Gospell is not to bee preached Furthermore be it knowne that this is no religion nor true pietie which is so coupled with ignorance but a damnable superstition when as the sacred Scriptures are read and prayers administred in a strange and vnknowne tongue Thus far these three Arguments from the finall causes and effects Againe they reason from an inconuenience first on this wise If the scriptures must bee read in the vulgar tongue then translations must bee renewed in euery age for auncient words weare out of vse and this is inconuenient I answere what losse is it if translations be reuised and renewed in euery age for the whole translation needes no renuing but some words which happily are become obsolete and out of vse Againe an other euill which might follow this conclusion is this The Pope vnderstandeth not all vulgar tongues But the publique prayers must be celebrate in a language which the Pope knoweth Ergo. I answere it is not necessarie that prayers be in that tongue which the Pope knoweth This they proue * Vne concesso errore mille consequuntur because he is the vniuersall Bishop And this I deny also Wherefore there is no domage shal follow if publique prayers be contained in a language which the Pope knoweth not And thus far the 2. question The 3. question followeth whether it is lawfull for the lay people as they call them or the vulgar sort to read the holy scriptures We auouch that it is lawfull for euery one euen of the basest of the people to read the holy Scriptures For this point see Deut. 6. Chap. 11. c. and 17. c. Iosh 1. c. and 10. c. 5. Search the Scriptures saith the Lord Christ Acts. 17. the men of Berea searched the Scriptures and for this cause are commended by the holy Ghost Matth. 4. The example of Christ who resisted the Deuill with no other weapons but of the scripture teacheth vs that the scripture ministreth vnto vs such a furniture as euery man must be prouided of to withstand Sathan in his assaults against vs. Lastly this is prooued by the practise of the Church For wherefore were the scriptures in the old church translated into so many popular languages but that they might be read vnderstood of the people And this is our iudgement in few words What say the aduersaries Some yeares past they taught it was not lawfull at all for any of the common and lay people as they vsuallie tearme them to reade the holy Scriptures Afterwards when they saw how odious Vide Censuram Coloniensem this was they changed their minde and now forsooth they say it is lawful to read the scriptures but with conditiō if it be permitted permitted I say of whom They answer by the Pope his Bishops or inquisitors I demaund what of these only They answer not of these only but of them with the aduertisemēt of the parish Priest or confessor Well I vnderstand who be to permit the reading of the holy scripture now I aske to whom is this permitted They answer not to all indifferently but only to such as the parish Priest whom they call the Curate shall well discerne both by their confession and by their whole cariage of their life to be a true Catholick that is a stubborne or stiffe-necked Papist I see then to whom they yeeld thus far the reading of the scriptures I demand in the next place what translations be allowed them They answer they will not haue them to read all translations indifferently but such only as some Catholicks haue published such as at this day the English Rhemish translation of the New Testament is Thus far briefly of that permission which hath so decreed the condition of this libertie of reading the scriptures And this is their meaning according to the decree of Pius Quartus the Pope which decree is confirmed also by the councel of Trent commended by the Rhemists in the preface of their English translation And this is Bellarmines iudgment who differeth in words only a little from the former popish assertion but in matter and purpose is the same in effect for what difference is there if there be no permission at all to be thus permitted with such a condition as is aforeshewed And thus of the 3. question and as touching the controuersies which are moued at this day concerning holy scripture I remember not any that we haue left vntouched We haue therefore spoken of the word of God which is the word of both couenants as also of the sacred scripture which is a certaine meane wherby it pleased God to manifest his word and wil vnto men It resteth now that wespeake of sinne and of mans miserie CHAP. XXIIII Of sinne in generall THE common place of sin as also the former before handled is subalterne to the place or generall head of our calling For calling is the transferring of a man out of the state of sin What our calling is and miserie into the state of righteousnesse and happinesse Therefore we shall speake of sinne first in generall after we shall come vnto his kindes or partes The name of sin signifies a certaine thing compounded of his owne matter and forme The matter of sinne to speake thereof in the first place is a certaine being or thing that is and that being is not a substance but an accident and What sin is that is either a qualitie or action and this
which is done against Gods will is said properly to be done against Gods decree and not against his reuealed wil or expresse law but sinne as it is a transgression of the law is not done against any decree therefore sinne as it is a transgression of the lawe is not done against Gods will The Assumption is shewed because God decreed not from euerlasting that sinne as it is a transgression of his law should not be done of an euill instrument Therefore thou saist hee decreed that it should be done Answer It followeth not 1 For both these are true concerning God God hath neither decreed that transgression as it is transgression 2 should not be done neither hath he decreed that transgression in so farre as it is transgression should be done For there is no decree of God extant either in this or that respect touching sinne as it is a transgression or breach of the law of God But thou maist aske is not sinne effected as it is transgression some way by the permission of God Answ A thing is said to be done two wayes by Gods permission either by it selfe or by accident That which by Gods permission commeth to passe by it selfe must of necessitie respect and put on the nature of good seeing God proposeth and directeth the same vnto a good end but that which by an accident is done God permitting it or forsaking the creature nothing hindreth but that as it is such it is euill for God leauing the creature and euill instrument to it selfe the creature doth that which is euil as it is euil neither can it otherwise do being left of him who is the Author of al good But now in respect of God permitting and leauing that euill as it is euill is done by accident not by it selfe because God in forsaking purposed not euill as it is euill but on the contrarie so farre forth as it respecteth good and is a meane of his glorie of that especially which is the consequent of his mercie for all meanes whether wrought by God himselfe or suffered to be done of euill instruments in the first place are both ordained of God himselfe and directed to the glorie of his mercie arising from the saluation of the creature God hath shut vp all vnder sinne that he might haue mercie on all And in the second place for the hardnesse of man and because of the heart that cannot repent sinnes and euils which are done by an euill instrument serue to that glory which God getteth vnto himselfe by his iustice and iust punishments If on the contrarie thou obiect God suffereth sinne that he may punish the same but he punisheth sinne in Or I would answer the maior That God suffereth not sin to punish it for that he respecteth not but for that be hath a purpose to manifest his owne glorie in the punishment of sinne that it is sinne or transgression therefore he permitteth sinne as it is sinne I answer vnto the Assumption Sinne as punishment followes thereupon which in it selfe is good and turnes to the glorie of God in this sin I say hath not respect vnto euill but vnto good producing a good effect for an euill cause as it is euill cannot bring forth a good effect But if that cause which in it selfe is euill be also considered as the cause of a good effect it must needes in some sort take vnto it the nature of good I confesse indeed that sinne as it is sinne is the cause of punishment and the punishment as it is the effect of an euill cause must needs it selfe be euill And indeed punish ment Punishment in it selfe is euill which is inflicted is considered two wayes first as a thing in it selfe euill for there is some transgression How punishmēt is euill in euerie punishment and euery punishment after a sort is also a sinne Againe it is considered as a thing that is good to wit as a meane of Gods glorie This I say in a word that all meanes which in and by themselues are euill in respect of God propounding and of the end which is the glorie of God in some sort are good And that whole chaine of meanes which is betweene God propounding as the head and beginning and the glorie of God as the end is the order of things which either by themselues are good or at the least in some sort may be so accounted For those two extremes chaunge all darknesse after a sort into light CHAP. XXV Of Originall Sinne. THVS farre of sinne in generall the first diuision of sinne is into originall and actuall To speake of originall sinne first we be first to obserue the reason why it is so named It is called Originall sinne why so called original because it is in vs with vs from our first being conception and natiuity for it comes by propagation and is deriued from parents to children as an hereditary disease as a leprie the stone or any such like malady of the body And that there is such a kind of sinne it is most manifest for there is none so fottish and so voide of all sense that he feeleth not this hereditarie sicknes in himselfe as the infection and corruption of his nature But the holy Ghost who best knoweth what is in man doth cleerely auouch this in many scriptures Gen. 5. 3. When as Adam saith he begat a sonne according to his owne image Note heere the propagation of that corrupt image which was in Adam into his sonne Sheth Iob. 14. 5. Who can bring forth a cleane thing of an vncleane not one Behold here the propagation of vncleannes Psalm 51. 7. Behold I was formed in iniquitie and in sinne did my mother cherish * Tremel fouit kept me warme in hir bed mee Behold the sin which we haue from our mothers wombe Ioh. 3. 6. What is borne of the flesh is flesh Behold the propagation of flesh that is of our corrupt nature Rom. 5. 12. Like as by one man sinne entred into the world and by sin death c. Obserue here the propagation of sinne Eph. 2. 3. We were by nature the children of wrath Note here our corrupt nature and therefore how subiect it is to the wrath of God And thus far we see that there is a sin which we call originall Now let vs consider what the subiect thereof is The subiect of originall sinne is the whole man body and soule which thing is taught vs cleerely by that one name Soule infected with Orig. sin which is giuen it Ro. 6. 6. as els where that old man whereby nothing els is signified but the whole man corrupted or the corruption of the whole man That the minde is infected with this sin first we be taught it by very sense it selfe next by many testimonies of scriptures Genes 6. 5. When the Lord saw all the imaginations that is all the thoughts of his heart were only euill continually Gen. 8. 21. Albeit the
imagination of mans heart be euill from his youth Ephes 2. 3. Fulfill the will of the flesh and of the minde And that the body is infected with this poison see Rom. 6. 12. Let not sinne raigne in your mortall body And that euery The body and all the members poisoned with originall sinne one of the members is infected and poisoned with the same sin is shewed v. 13. Neither giue your members as instruments of vnrighteousnes vnto sin Againe the very names of this sinne shew the subiect thereof or where it resteth As when it is called flesh concupiscence the law of the members the body of sin the body of death And thus farre of the subiect of originall sinne Now wee bee to come to the parts of it and because it is as a compound thing we are to consider first The materiall cause of originall sinne threefold what the matter thereof is next what the forme The matter of originall sin is threefold The first part of the matter thereof is that apostasie wherein we fell all away from God in the loines of Adam This we receiue from our mothers womb for we are al born Apostates backsliders frō God For that the first apostasie was not Adams only but did appertaine to vs al first reasō it selfe may sufciently conuince it for we were all as then in his loynes and as parcelles of the substance and nature of the first man and so we all fell in him and with him from the liuing God For this very cause Heb. 7. Leui is said before he was borne to pay tithes to Melchisedeck because he was then in the loynes of Abraham Abrahams fact was therefore Leui his fact also and of all his posterity which then were in his loynes Next this is testified by scripture as by name in that place which is Rom. 5. 12. In whom to wit Adam all men haue sinned That first Apostasie I grant is past and vanished away as euery action passeth away yet after a sort it is saide to continue still for albeit the fact be past yet the How the Apostasie of Adam continueth still guilt thereof remaineth still for euery man is borne guilty by nature of that first Apostasie The same is to bee said of euery other sinne Murther Adultery Theft c. For whatsoeuer it is it may be truly sayd to remaine still so long as the guilt remaineth which is consequent thereunto Wherefore euery man is guilty of that first defection and falling from God vntill this guilt be taken away by the bloud of a mediator And that we be such Apostates by nature the scripture testifieth Rom. 5. 15. By the offence of one many be dead Wherefore many must be guilty that one offence Ro. 5. 16. The fault came of one offence vnto condemnation And thus farre of the first part of originall sinne that is of the first backsliding and our falling away which we bring forth with vs from our mothers wombe into the world The second part followeth of originall sinne which is a certaine defect or a certaine want of originall iustice Second part of Originall sinne that is of that righteousnes or integrity wherein man was created according to the image and example of the righteousnesse which is in God the creator For he created man after his owne image wise iust holy For the Apostle to the Eph. 5. and Col. saith that in these respects man was like to God himselfe in his creation This want I speake of originall iustice is the first effect of that apostasie before shewed For that apostasie whereof we are al by nature guilty depriueth vs in our first birth euē in our very conception of that originall iustice and image of God This part of the matter of originall sinne very sense sheweth and many scriptures testifie of it I meane such as speake of sinne negatiuelie or priuatiuelie For Proofe of our want of original iustice by 1. sense 2. by scripture all such places shew plainelie what defect is in vs and what want of originall iustice Rom. 3. 23. All haue sinned and are depriued of the glory of God Ro. 7 18. I know that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing And a little after I find no meanes to performe that which is good Rom. 8. 7. The wisdome of the flesh is not subiect to the law of God neither indeed can be 1. Cor. 14. The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God neither can he know the. 2. Cor. 3. 5. Not that we are sufficient of our selues to think any thing as of our selues Eph. 4. 18. Hauing their cogitation darkened and being strangers from the life of God And thus far of the 2. part of the matter of original sin to wit the want of originall iustice The third part followeth and this we say is an inclination The 3. part of the matter of originall sinne or quality contrary to that originall iustice and integritie before mentioned succeeding euen in place thereof This is that which they call our naturall corruption and it is the second effect of the apostasie of Adam in Paradice For that rebellion of our first parents first depriueth vs of originall iustice and of the image of God next in place there of by Gods iust iudgement it infecteth vs with a quality cleane contrary to that righteousnesse whereby we are made prone and apt to al euil This contratie qualitie or inclination vnto sin to be in vs very sense procues it with many testimonies of the holy Scripture all which speake of sinne affirmatiuely or that I may so speak positiuely Ro. 7. 7. I had not known concupiscence but that the law sayth thou shalt not couet Rom. 7. 23. I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my mind Eph. 2. 3. Fulfilling the lusts of the flesh and of the minde Ad to these the places before cited Gen. 6. and 8. And thus farre of the third part of the matter of originall sin And here as touching the want of iustice and inclination vnto sinne which were two parts of the matter of originall sinne ye must be aduertised that there is no facultie A speciall note of the soule of man which is not infected with both these euils together We reckon as principall powers of the soule the minde or vnderstanding the will and the affections These two last the scripture often vnderstandeth them in the worde hart because the will and affections be seated in the hart The first defect then is in the mind and this is the want of light and knowledge here is also the want of holinesse that is of a quality wherewith our very knowledge and light must be affected and assuredly was affected with in the first creation The light of the minde or knowledge is twofold naturall A two fold light of the mind 1. VVant of naturall light and spirituall In the mind there is a defect
of this sinne Heb. 6. 4. and 10. 26. 27. the Apostle calling it an apostasy or backslyding from God It is so also described 2. Pet. 2. 20. And 1. Io 5. 16. It is called a sinne vnto death As for the other kinds of this sin before specified some of them are consequently of this sin which we call a blasphemie and appertaine vnto it for desperation and final impenitency are the punishments of this sinne Obstinacie is in the very nature of this sinne for it caries with it an obstinate maliciousnesse And as for the other kinds I cannot see how they may be called sins against the holy Ghost for as for presumption what is it els but hypocrisie To Presumption repine at the graces of God in our brethren is a sinne against our neighbour and against the second table of the law Therefore let this rest that there is but one sin against the holy Ghost so called to wit the blasphemy against the holy Ghost or an apostasy from the grace of the spirit once receiued for these are one and the same to blaspheme against the holy Ghost and to fall from grace receiued Notwithstanding I deny not but that this sin which is but one in substance may haue his increase or growth for then it is come to a height when as it fighteth against all the known truth which is according to godlinesse Next we say that this one sinne is impardonable not for that it is seldome and hardly pardoned but for that it is neuer pardoned because such a one can neuer repent him of his sinne that he hath committed For this mans heart groweth to such a hardnesse and that by Gods iust iudgment as can neuer after be mollified And that this sin is simply impardonable is manifest by y e very words of the lord in y e gospel before cited for where it is sayd in Matth. it shall not be forgiuen him neither in this world nor in the world to come and in Mark This sinne is neuer forgiuen but is culpable of eternall damnation Do not these words cut off all hope of pardon So as I cannot but wonder at the Rhemists so impudently to extenuate Rhemists impudency 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the force of the words of the lord To the Heb. 6. he saith it is impossible that he which so sinneth should be renued by repentance then he addeth a waighty cause and most necessarie for sayth he This man crucifieth againe to himselfe the Sonne of God that is as much as in him lyeth Which point the better to conceiue it we must know there is a difference betweene all other sinnes and this sin against the holy Ghost as touching the remission and expiation of them For to expiat all other sinnes the sacrifice of Christ once offered is sufficient for them all and the vertue thereof extendeth it selfe to purge all sinnes for euer But when a man hath once sinned against the holy Ghost and profaned that pretious bloud the vertue thereof will neuer after be effectual for the expiation of his sin Wherefore he stands in neede of some new sacrifice to purge his sinne which thing shal neuer be granted him For if this were graunted then must Christ be crucified againe or some other sacrifice must be offered but neither can Christ be crucifyed againe neither can any other sacrifice bee offered for him as it is written Heb. 10. 26. For there remaineth no more sacrifice for sinnes Therefore this sin can neuer be expiat because a new sacrifice can neuer be giuen for it And this is the cause of the impossibility of the pardon of this sinne The aduersaries namely the Rhemists in their obseruations on this place do thus interpret this impossibilitie they say there is a double repentance or renuing or purging of sinne They say the first is easie and light in and by Baptisme where say they all the sinnes before Baptisme are purged by that light washing of baptisme The second they call penance or the purging of sinnes Popish sacrament of penanc as they say by the sacrament of Penance and in this Sacrament as they speake such sinnes are purged which are committed after baptisme and this is hard and painfull as consisting of fastings prayers satisfactions and other corporall afflictions If you graunt them this distinction then they say this impossibilitie of being renewed is in respect of that repentance renewing and purging of sinne which is in baptisme For they say it is impossible that a sinne committed after Baptisme some baptisme being iterated should be purged for we may not be rebaptized As for the latter penance and renewing they say there is a possibility in it For the greatest sinne after baptisme may be expiat by it Therefore they affirme the Apostle speakes couertly to such as sinne after baptisme sending them to the Sacrament of Penance that by vertue of that Sacrament their sinne may be expiat and that they may be renewed But by this their interpretation 2. Pet. 3. 16 they peruert the holy Scripture to their owne destruction For this is certaine that the Apostle here takes away all possibilitie of being renewed as the reason annexed manifestly proueth Finally it is euident by that place of Iohn before cited that this sinne is impardonable and that this is proper to that sin that it can by no meanes be pardoned For Iohn saith we may not pray for that sinne If we may not pray for it there is no hope of repentance or pardon for it I know what the Rhemists heere would say to wit that by this sinne vnto death we must vnderstand finall impenitencie finall impenitencie is not remitted because here wants repentance and therfore we may not pray for such a one after his death for he died in impenitency contemning the Sacrament of Penance But they affirme it to be lawfull to pray for other sinnes after death This againe is to peruert Scripture for the Apostle speaketh not of prayer to be or not to be after his death which hath so sinned but that prayer must not bee conceiued for him whilest he liueth after that it hath manifestly appeared vnto the church by infallible arguments that such a one hath sinned vnto death As for Iulian the Apostata for whom the Church prayed not while he liued yea it prayed against him in his life time after it was clearely discerned that hee had sinned vnto death that is had blasphemed against the holy Ghost I passe ouer that place of Peter before cited where the Apostle speakes of no difficultie but of a meere impossibilitie of being renewed of repentance and of remission of sinnes where it is said Their latter state is worse then the first and as it followeth but it hath happened vnto him as it is in the true prouerbe the dog hath returned to his owne vomit and the sow to her wallowing in the mire And thus farre of this second controuersie and so much shal suffice concerning sinne
said to be resident in them as to sanctifie them and to stir them vp vnto good and as a Ladie to gouerne them Whereupon it is said After that by faith he had purified their harts Now that faith belongs to the mind it is apparant by those titles which are giuē to faith euery where in the Scripture as whē it is called knowledge vnderstanding sight as whē it is said We see now in a glasse And that it is in the will it is euident by that which is said Ro. 10. 10. For with the heart man beleeueth vnto righteousnesse And Eph. 3. 17. that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith for the seate of the will is attributed to the heart Furthermore the names whereby faith is termed in the Scripture doe sufficiently conuince that the seat of it is not only in the mind but also in the will and heart as when it is called an apprehension and when it is termed a certaine embracing and such like names which signifie the office of the heart and will Thus farre of the subiect of faith Now let vs come neerer to the nature thereof and to the parts of the nature of it The first part of faith is the knowledge or vnderstanding of the mind whereby the mind doth plainly vnderstand some sentence or proposition of the Gospell and by name that proposition which is in the syllogisme of the Gospell which we alleaged before for the proposition of that syllogisme is as it were an abridgment of the whole Gospell From this part as the principall namely knowledge faith is named euerie where in the Scriptures The second part of faith is the iudgment or as it is commonly called the assent of the same mind Of this iudgement the scripture speaketh euery where as 1. Cor. Parts of faith 2. 15. The spirituall man iudgeth all things 1. Ioh. 4. 1. Trie the spirits whether they be of God This iudgement is twofold the first of truth the second of goodnes The iudgment Iudgment twofold of truth is when the mind assenteth to the proposition of the Gospell that it is true of this iudgement see Ioh. 3. 33. He that receiueth his testimonie hath sealed that God is true 1. Tim. 1. 15. This is a faithfull saying and worthie by all meanes to be receiued c. To conclude this iudgment of truth is gathered out of all places of Scripture wherein there is mention made of the truth of Gods word The iudgement of goodnesse is when the mind assenteth to that thing which is in the proposition of the Gospell that it is good and therefore to be followed For it must be knowne that all the propositions of the Gospell The sayings of the Gospel be practicall be practical as they say in the naked speculation and contemplation of which none must set vp his rest but they are to be drawne out into the manners and life euerie day Of this iudgement of goodnesse ye haue that Rom. 7. 16. I consent to the law that it is good 1. Cor. 1. 18. The preaching of the crosse is to vs which are saued the power of God And in the same chap. vers 24. We preach Christ to them which are called the power and wisedome of God And thus much concerning the twofold iudgment which as we haue said must be of the generall proposition of that Euangelicall Syllogisme of both which this last of all is to be held that it is not only general but also speciall whereby I do iudge that those things which are spoken in the Gospell are true of me and good to me For as we said before those things which are published in the gospell are to be vnderstood to be spoken specially of mee and of thee And this special iudgement is properly that which is called * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 full assurance After this followes * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 confidence which belongs to the heart and will whereof we will speake in the next place There followeth therefore in the third place the choice or hold-taking of the will which is when any one doth with his will or heart peculiarly apply to himselfe that The third point of faith which he hath iudged first true then good not onely in generall but also in speciall This apprehension or application is in the Assumption or conclusion of that syllogisme of the Gospell alleaged before by vs. For after that the mind hath seene and iudged the proposition of that syllogisme then the will of euery one doth particularly apply vnto himselfe in the assumption and conclusion those good things which that generall Proposition did concerne Of this apprehension ye haue 1. Tim. 6. 12. Lay The apprehension of faith hold on eternall life Phil. 3. 12. I follow if I also may apprehend it 1. Tim. 1. 15. This is faithfull saying and worthie by all meanes to be embraced by vs. To conclude this third part of faith is to be vnderstood in all those titles wherby the choise of the will is signified in the Scripture From this part faith is termed a speciall confidence or trust for the nature of faith is chiefly seene in it These things thus declared it will be easie to gather a definition of faith For Faith in Christ with all his benefits Faith defined as he is offered in the word and Sacraments is first aknowledge of the mind then an apprehension of the will or heart In this definition we haue first the obiect of faith then the subiect of it thirdly the parts Vnder the knowledge of the mind I vnderstand also the iudgement or assent of the mind and that twofold whereof we haue spoken afore It is to be knowne that faith thus defined by vs is improperly taken for the function and worke of faith seeing faith is properly an infused habit as they call it or an holy qualitie first of the mind then of the will or heart Now this quality in the mind what is it els but that light of which the Scripture speakes euery where Ye were once darknes but now ye are light in the Lord Ephes 5. 8. The eyes of your minde being opened that ye may know what Faith a light is that hope of his calling Ephes 1. 18. God which commanded that the light should shine out of darknes is he which hath shined in your hearts to giue the light of the knowledge of the glorie of God in the face of Iesus Christ 2. Cor. 4. 6. But God hath renealed those things vnto vs by his Spirit for the Spirit searcheth all things euen the deepe things of God 1. Cor. 2. 10. And this light ofy e mind which is the first part of faith seemeth to be not onely a restoring of that natural light which was impaired in Adams fall but also a certaine supernatural light put into the mind by the Spirit of Christ to this end that the mind might behold and see those things which excell
all naturall knowledge Whereupon Ephe. 3. 18. 19. it is thus said That ye being rooted grounded in loue may be able to attaine with all Saints what is the length and breadth and depth and height and to know that loue of Christ which passeth all knowledge I doe not thinke that this knowledge was in Adam in his first creation before his fall For all the knowledge in Adams mind Adams knowledge before his fall before the fall as it was holy so it seemeth it was natural it seemeth it was a naturall knowledge of God himselfe it seemeth it was a naturall knowledge of the things created Neither did he before his fall see God in the mediator Christ nor was it needefull he should see him so Besides this light which I speake of is kindled in our minde by looking on the face of Christ the Mediator as it were in the glasse of the Gospell 2. Cor. 3. 18. We all with open face beholding as in a glasse the glory of the Lord are transformed into the same image from gloxy to glory Also 4. chap. ver 6. To giue the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Iesus Christ But Adam before his fall as he heard nothing concerning the Gospell of Christ so he saw not his face in the glasse of the Gospel Besides 1. Co. 15. 45. of Adam it is said the 1. Adam was made a liuing soule but of Christ the last Adam was made a quickening spirit Out of which words the difference betwixt Adam and Christ is seene that Adam was made only naturall yet holy but Christ was made spirituall and supernaturall for spirituall things are supernaturall Againe out of this difference wee gather that that spirituall and supernaturall light which we haue only by the benefit of Christ that is the second Adam was not in Adam before the fall For in the same place vers 48. 49. Our heauenly or spiritual condition is ascribed vnto Christ But of this thus farre and but sparingly Also in the will or heart faith is a supernaturall abilitie put into it by the Spirit of Christ of which * Or the saith of the operation of God Ephe. 3. 20 According to the power that worketh in vs. Col. 2. 12. By the faith of God that worketh mightilie in vs. This power also as I thinke was not put into Adams heart before the fall being induced by the same reasons which wee alleaged before And seeing that light of the mind and efficacie of the heart are supernaturall it followeth also that the functions of that light efficacie namely the knowledge of the mind and the apprehension of the heart are likewise supernaturall Wherefore vnto that definition of saith before set downe we adde this branch supernatural as the last so that iustifying faith in Christ with al his nofits offered vnto vs in the word and Sacraments is not onelie Iustifying faith defined an holie but also a supernaturall knowledge of the mind and apprehension of the wil. Thus thē we define faith as we admonished before as the name of faith is taken for the function and worke of faith For so the Diuines do commonly define it so also in the Scriptures is the name of faith wont to be taken namely for the function or worke of faith as it is tearmed 2. Thess 1. 3. But if the description of faith properly and as it is taken for an infused qualitie do like any man better thus also he may haue it described that Faith is a light of the mind and an * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 effectuall action in the hart supernaturally put into them both for the knowing and apprehending of Christ with all his benefits offered in the word and Sacraments Now it remaineth that we speak something touching the effects of faith That knowledge and apprehension of Christ which we speake of sith the seat of it is in the principall and reasonable faculties of the soule namely the mind and the will it cannot be idle neither doth it Effects of faith in the mind and heart c. containe it selfe within the bounds of those higher faculties of the soule the mind the wil but is effectuall also in the lower heart that is in all the affections and there is not anie of al the affections but is affected some way or other by this knowledge apprehension being not only sanctified by it but also rapt vp aboue it self the nature therof For as we said of faith y t it is a supernatural knowledge and apprehension the same is true also of the functions of all the affections for they are al not onely made holy but also supernatural by a certaine supernatural facultie put into them by the Spirit of Christ But to speake distinctly of the effects of Faith Christ with all his benefits being once knowne and apprehended an hope of good to come a feare of euill to come Note the specivll effects which follow faith the loue of Christ and the desire of him and ioy gladnesse are in a wonderfull manner kindled in the soule as 1. Pet. 1. 8. Beleeuing in him ye reioice with ioy vnspeakeable and glorious Griefe also which is according to God is kindled with grones which cannot be expressed Ro. 8. 26. To conclude the whole heart burnes to Godward By faith also our affectiōs toward our neighbour are stirred vp and that for God Christ as loue of our neighbour and delight in the Saints Psal 16. 3. And these are the first effects of faith and those are inward in the lower heart or affections There be also outward effects of faith hauing their being in the body and in all the members of the bodie and those are outward actions of the body into which the inward motions of the affections breake forth And those are first such as respect God then such as respect our neighbour for Gods cause And thus much of the effects of faith both inward and outward as also of faith which is properly so called which they commonly tearm iustifying faith CHAP. XXX Of the improper significations of Faith IT followeth that we speake of the improper significations of faith For this word faith is Diuerse acceptions of faith ambiguous and signifieth many things Properly 1 it signifieth this faith which they call iustifying for that is properly and simply termed by this name Secondly it signifieth that faith which 2 they call historicall or dead which is nothing els but as it were the carcase of iustifying faith for it lacks the soule that is the full assurance of the mind and the confidence of the heart in the speciall assent of the minde and in the trust and apprehension of the heart Thirdly it signifieth faith which they call temporary 3 which is as a certaine Ape of iustifying faith Fourthly 4 last of al that faith which they terme miraculous These three last significations of faith are
is he who heareth the word and by and by receiues it with ioy yet hath no roote in himselfe but is for a time and when persecution and trouble ariseth because of the word is offended presentlie To the same purpose reade I. uk 8. 13. Of this faith see also Heb. 6. 4. 5. For it cannot be that they which haue beene once inlightened and tasted of the good word of God and of the powers of the world to come if they fall awaie c. To conclude of this faith ye haue Ioh. 5. 35. He namely Iohn was a burning and a shining candle and ye would for a time haue reioiced in his light The reason of the name is this it is called Temporarie because it endures but for a time and it endureth but for a time because it hath no roote It hath the same obiect with iustifying faith which is properly so called namely Iesus Christ with his benefits offered in the word of the Gospell and in the Sacraments wherein it differs from historicall faith which hath for the obiect thereof the vniuersall truth It hath The subiect of a temporary faith the same subiect with iustifying faith for it hath it scat both in the mind and also in the will and heart Last of all it hath as many parts of nature as the iustifying faith hath For it is a knowledge of the vnderstanding conioyned with both the iudgements of the mind it is the apprehension of the wil or heart whereout follweth also the stirring of the affections as of ioy delight c. But that I may speake a little more largely of this apprehension which is in Temporarie faith and of this ioy First it is certaine by the scripture that these things are in the Temporarie faith For Christ saith in Matth. That hee which is but for a time doth receiue the word and that with ioy And in Ioh. The Iewes are said to haue reioiced for a time in the light of Iohn Baptist And to the Hebr. How the historicall and temporary saith differ one fro another and both from the iustifying there is attributed to this faith not onely the enlightening of the mind but also the taste of the heart and that performed not onely by the word but also by the Spirit for he saith They which haue beene made partakers of the holy Ghost Therefore in Temporarie faith there is indeede a kind of apprehension there is indeede a certaine ioy wherein Temperarie faith differeth from historicall faith For in historicall faith these things are not indeed but he that hath it doth faine and dissemble and lie in his outward profession that he hath these things wherfore he is a shamelesse hypocrite But hee that hath temporarie faith hath these things indeede apprehension I say and ioy after a certaine manner neither doth he so faine or sie as he that hath an historical faith yet he is an hypocrit because this apprehension and this ioy are not sincere albeit after a certaine manner they be true I say they are not sincere because they are not for that cause for which they should be that is they are not for Christ himselfe offered in the preaching of the Gospell they are not for Gods sake they are not for his glory nor for those heauenly benefits of Christ his righteousnes and eternall life but they are for other causes as for the newnesse of the Gospell which is to bee vnderstood in that place Ioh. 5. 35. He was a burning a shining candle and ye would haue reioiced for a time in his light namely for the newnesse of the matter Secondly they be because of a licentiousnesse to sinne which men by and by snatch to themselues vpon the hearing of free iustification by Christ and Christian liberty To conclude they are for riches honours and other commodities of this life Now seeing the Temporizing professor hath these causes propounded to himselfe in hearing and receiuing the word and in reioycing it must needes be that these are not sincere in him For nothing is done sincerely vnlesse it bee Synceritie done in respect of the glorie of God And herein differs Temporarie Faith from iustifying For the iustifying Faith doth all things for Christ himselfe for God himselfe for the heauenly and spirituall benefits of Christ as much as it can for mans infirmity Out of this therfore it followes that the Temporizer is also an hypocrit seeing he is not sincere and that the Temporizer is an hypocrit temporary faith is hypocriticall seeing it is not sincere Out of that againe that it is not sincere another thing followeth namely that it is not sound firme for nothing that is not sincere can be sound For those causes vpon which it depends are not sound as for example those worldly things as riches honours of the world c. In which thing temporary Faith differeth from iustifying Faith for iustifying Faith as it is sincere so it is sound For of that it is said Col. 2. 5. And the stedfastnesse of your The difference betwene a temporary faith and true iustifying faith faith in Christ For iustifying Faith is as it were a solide body consisting of three dimensions length bredth depth for it possesseth the depth and lowest of the heart but temporary Faith is not a body with three dimensions but only a surface sticking in the vpper part of the heart for it is not either a sound light enlightening all the heart or a sound apprehension arising from the bottome of the heart or to conclude a sound ioy possessing the whole body but all these things are only superficiall in the temporary Faith Whereupon Heb. 6. that apprehension of heauenly things which is therein is compared to tasting or sleight touching seeing that the heart doth but as it were with the tip of the tongue lightly tast those heauenly things and not quite drinke them vp and receiue them into it selfe Againe out of this that temporarie Faith is not sound another thing also followeth namely that it doth not endure for euer but onely for a time For that which is not sound is not durable and perpetuall but only temporary Wherein also it differeth from iustifying faith which as it is sound so it is perpetuall and constant From this property this faith tooke her name and was called temporary now this property doth presuppose the two other going before namely first that it is not sounde secondly that it is not sincere albeit it bee in some sort true While I consider somewhat more diligently of the cause of these three properties I found that it is not to be imputed so much to those outward things for which this faith doth apprehend Christ in the word and reioiceth in him as to the inward euill affection of the heart For the heart of man as Christ sayth is stony ground that is it is neither good nor honest of it owne nature Now we measure this goodnesse and honesty
time after this he added the writings of the Apostles And when as the mystery of our saluation was fully reuealed by that liuely voice first and then that full reuelation was written euer since there hath beene no more vse of the liuely voice of any extraordinarie Prophet or Apostle But the Scriptures written first by the Prophets and after by the Apostles remained only without any liuely voice which could not erre Q. Where must wee begin to count the third age of the Church A. Not so much from the comming of Christ and the sending of his Apostles to all nations as from that time when the Apostles ceased to speake with liuely voice aswel to the Iewes as to the Gentiles for euen then the Church catholick came to mans estate full growth and then the Church began to vnderstand and to learne the wil of God by the written word as being a more accurate and perfect manner of reuelation The time then which was frō the cōming of Christ vntil the death of the Apostles was as it were a passage from the middle age of the church vnto the ful growth ripenes of the same Q. I vnderstand what you say cōcerning the causes of additiō of the written word to the liuely voice of the seuerall ages of the Church now I would haue you speake some thing concerning the scripture or of the writing of Gods word A. I will do so Q. What then call you writing or Scripture A. I call scripture or writing the second kind of reuelation whereby God either by himselfe or by the meanes of men extraordinarily reuealed those things which already had beene deliuered by liuely voice before to wit in that first kind of reuelation Q. Who then were they who euer since the beginning haue written A. First God himselfe next men Moses the Prophets and the Apostles Q. This kind of reuelation which was by writing was it not subiect to error like as that kind which was by a liuely voice A. No truly for concerning that which God himselfe did write there is no question and touching men they were so extraordinarily inspired and gouerned by the spirit of God that in writing they could not erre at all Q. When began it then to be written A. In Moses time Q. How long did the word written continue in the Church A. The scripture or the act of writing continued from Moses euen to the Apostles all which time there was almost no age wherein extraordinarily some one was not stirred vp who in deliuering the doctrine of truth by writing could not erre Q. You thinke otherwise of the scripture it selfe then of the act of writing A. I do so for the scripture it self or that which is now written by Moses the Prophets and Apostles yet continues in the Church and shall continue vnto the second comming of Christ Q. Was there any intermission of writing the word from Moses vnto the Apostles A. There was for it appeareth in all that time which was frō Malachy to Iohn the Baptist none was stirred vp either Prophet or writer inspired by God for the books of the Machabees be not giuen by inspiration as we shal shew hereafter Q. You said that writing continued in the Church vntil the time of the Apostles ought it not then to continue euen vnto the end A. Like as since the Apostles time there is no liuely voice heard in the Church which can be said to be so goned by the holy Ghost that it can not erre at all So since the Apostles nothing is written in the church which may worthily be called or said to be giuen by inspiration Q. What then do you think of so many writings of godly and learned men which haue been published since the times of the Apostles from time to time to the great good and profit of the Church A. Verely I thinke of the writings of Pastors and Doctors in the Church as I think of their preaching to wit that both be subiect to errour and neither is so gouerned by the holy Ghost but that in deliuering the truth of God they may erre Q. It seemeth then that the condition of the Church which is since the time of the Apostles is not so good as hauing neither the liuely voice as is afore said nor the writings as now you speak of those very mē who in deliuering the truth cannot erre A. It hath the scriptures of the prophets and Apostles which as pertaining to the substance of reuelation is full and as touching the kind forme of reuelation it is giuē by inspiration not subiect to error out of the which scripture whosoeuer do not learne all things which are necessary to faith and saluation assuredly such would not receiue from the mouth of God himself openly speaking in an audible and intelligible voice the doctrine and instructon of faith and saluation Q. Wherefore did the Lord so continue to record his will by The cause of the continuance of writing Gods word writing in the Church all that time which was from Moses to the Apostles A. There are the same causes of the continuance thereof as are of the addition of the liuely voice vnto writing For both the condition of the church and the measure of reuelation required the same Q. Why the condition of the Church A. Because the church continually increased and grew as in number so in knowledge Q. What then A. The greater number and riper knowledge do require this that the word be written Q. Why the measure of reuelation A. Because the reuelation of the doctrine of saluation was from time to time made more cleare and manifest euen vnto the times of Christ of his Apostles at which time it was in the end compleate and perfected For it was meete that euery reuelation manifested more cleerely fully should be recorded in writing to this end that it might be surely kept and deliuered to posterities Q. Can ye gather by these things the vse of the continuance The vse of writing of scripture in the Church of God A. Yea truly Q. What is then the vse of it A. To passe by the conseruation of the purity of doctrine the first vse was in respect of the Church for the instructiō thereof as being now in place more ample large in knowledge more perfect Secondly it was in respect of the reuelation of the doctrine it selfe that it might cōprehend and keepe it more fully and cleerely Q. By this vse of scripture or writing which you giue it seemes that this kind of reuelation which is by writing is somewhat more perfect high as that which is best agreeing fitting to persons and things that are more perfect A. It is euen so Q. Thus far then forwriting or scripture now I would haue you declare something vnto me concerning the subiect of this writing of the matter it selfe which is written A. As touching the substance the very same is