Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
scripture_n great_a holy_a see_v 3,964 5 3.2444 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A66823 The abridgment of Christian divinitie so exactly and methodically compiled that it leads us as it were by the hand to the reading of the Holy Scriptures, ordering of common-places, understanding of controversies, clearing of some cases of conscience / by John Wollebius ; faithfully translated into English ... by Alexander Ross.; Christianae theologiae compendium. English. 1660 Wolleb, Johannes, 1586-1629. 1660 (1660) Wing W3256; ESTC R29273 215,518 472

There are 10 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

to the Prophets and Apostles do cry down this error Exod. 17.14 and 34.27 Deut. 31.19 Isa. 8.1 and 30.8 Ier 30.2 Hab. 2.2 Re. 1.11.19 14.13 19.9 21.9 The testimonies of the Apostles proclaiming that nothing was said or written by mans advice or counsel cry out against this error John 20.31 But these things are written that ye might believe c. Rom 15.4 But what things are written are written for our learning that through patience and comfort of the Scriptures we might have hope 1 Cor. 10.11 These things are written to admon●sh us 1 Tim. 3.16 All Scripture is given by divine inspiration And 2 Pet. 1.20 21. So that ye fi●st know this that no Prophesie in the Scripture is of any private motion for Prophesie came not of old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost Lastly these precepts cry out against them by which we are directed to the w●itten word in matters of salvation Isa 8.20 To the law and to the testim●ny John 5 39. Search the Scriptures V. We acknowledge therefore no other principle of Divinity than the written word of God VI. It is an unquestionable Principle amongst Christians that the Holy Scripture is both of a divine original and authority VII It is then a question ill beseeming a Christian to demand whether the Scripture or holy Bible be Gods word or not For as in the Schools there is no desputing with him who denies Principles so we account him unworthy to be heard who will deny this principle of Christian Religion VIII Among Christians it is lawful to ask By what testimony do we know that the Scriptures are by divine inspiration So we ask not for this end to seduce others or to cavel but onely to be instructed IX Now this testimony is twofold the one principal the other ministerial The principal testimony is that of the Holy Spirit outwardly in the Scripture it self inwardly in the minds and hearts of the faithful being illuminate by him speaking and perswading the divinity of the Scriptures But the ministerial testimony is the testimony of the Church Outwardly in the Scriptures themselves the holy Ghost when he speaks of the divine original and authority of the VVord useth these phrases The word of the Lord Thus saith the Lord. Iesus said All Scripture is by divine inspiration 2 Tim 3.16 Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost But inwardly in the hearts of the faithful he perswades the divinity of Scriptures so far forth as he openeth the eyes illuminates the mind of him that reads the Scripture with prayer and humility that he makes him see the wonders of God and causeth him to acknowledge the voice of Gods Spirit sounding in the Word The Romanists urge the Churches authority alone which they have in such high esteem that they will have the whole authority of Scriptures to have its dependence from the Church and for this only cause they will have it to be Gods Word because the Church is the witnesse of it But this is not to make the Church a witnesse of the Scriptu●es divinity but to make her self capable of divinity But we will prove by these ensuing arguments that the testimony of Gods Spirit alone is it which firmly assures us of the scriptures divinity 1. His testimony concerning the Scriptures is most firm by whose inspiration the Scripture was written For every one knows his own hand best and is best a●quainted with his own sti●e But the Scripture was written by the inspiration of the holy Ghost 2 Tim. 3.16 2 Pet. 1.20 21. Ergo c. 2. He that together with the Scripture is promised in a most neer conjunction to the faithful his testimony of the Scripture is most firm But the Holy Ghost is promised to the faithful in a most neer conjunction with the Scripture Esa. 59.21 My spirit which is in thee my words which I have put in thy mouth shall not depart from thy mouth 3. Without whose illumination the wonders of the Scripture are not seen his testimony alone of the Scripture is most firm But without the illumination of the Holy Ghost no man sees the wonder of the Scripture Psal. 119.18 Open my eyes that I may see the wonders of thy Law Ergo c. 4. VVhose office it is to lead us into all truth he it is that witnesseth this truth to wit that the Scripture is Gods word But it is the office of the Holy Ghost to lead us into all truth John 16 13. Ergo c. Now as for the Churches testimony although it is to be received as from Gods Minister yet it is false that the Scriptures authority depends on it For what can be more absurd than to make the words of the Master to receive their authority from the Servant or the Fathers letters to receive credit from the foot●post or the Princes mandates from the Printer or that the Rule should have its dependence from the thing ruled VVe know that the oracles of God are committed to the Church Rom. 3.2 and that she is the pillar ground of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 But as it is foolish to tell us that the candle receives its lights from the candle-stick that supports it so it is ridiculous to ascribe the Scriptures authority to the Church The Churches testimony may be prevalent with those who as yet know not the Scriptures and have not received that sincere milk of the word nor by it are grown up 1 Pet. 2 2. But in those who have tasted the sweetnesse of divine oracles the testimony of Scriptures and of the Holy Ghost is most firm and effectual For as he who tasteth hony himself hath a more sure knowledge of its sweetnesse than he that believeth another speaking witnessing of it even so he knoweth more assuredly the Scriptures to be Gods Word who hath tasted its sweetnesse than he who gives credite to the Church witnessing this sweetnesse The Samaritans at first believed the woman when she spake of Christ but after they heard Christ himself they say to the woman Now we believe not because of thy saying for we have heard him our selves and know that this is indeed the Christ the Saviour of the world Joh. 4.42 Even so he that having begged the assistance of Gods Spirit reads the Scriptures again again at length saith Now I believe no longer for the Churches testimony that the Scriptures are divine but because I have read them my self and in reading have stamped this Syllogism in my minde 1. That Scripture which everywhere brings in God himself speaking 2. Which is written by those men who being furnished with the gifts of prophesying and miracle from God extraordinarily do with such faithfulnes record all things that in rehearsing of sins and infirmities they neither spare themselves nor friends 3. Who record not only truths and things agreeing with right reason but
the Church that he who had the charge of the Diocess of particular Churches was named Bishop yet the name of Universal Bishop belongs to none These are Doctors who in the Schooles teach youth the grounds of Truth which they may afterward professe in the Churches The RULE Pastors differ from Doctors That in this they have the charge of the Church these of the Schools They are to move the affections these to informe the understanding of their auditors Presbyters are godly and grave men joyned to assist the Pastors in such things as are fit for the good order of the Church in visiting of the sick in observing disordered livers and such like Deacons and Diaconesses of old were they who had the charge to gather and distribute the Church goods Act. 6.1 c Tim. 3.8 c. The RULE I. The collection and distribution of Church goods is of Divine right This appeares by the Oeconomie of the Old Testament for by the command of God Tithes were gathered for the Priests Levites and poor In the new Testament Christ refused not the money that was offered by godly rich persons Luke 8.3 out of which he sustained his Disciple● freinds and the poor also Ioh. 13.29 In the Apostles time the Deacons had charge of the Church goods Act 6 1. c. II. As we reprove the covetousness of the Romish Church supported with horrible superstition and idolatry in the gathering of Tithes and other Church duties as likewise their profuse wasting thereof upon their pomp and luxury so among Protestants they grievously offend God and the Church who unfaithfully dispense these goods Thus of the proper administration the common consisteth in the calling of Ministers in the well ordering of the Church in judging of Doctrine controversies and in the use of the keyes The calling of the Ministers is the choosing of fit men for the church into the Ministery after tryal had of their life and doctrine and an introduction of them by some solemn Rite into the Possession of their Office The RULES I. The chief efficient cause of this vocation is God who inwardly calls Ministers and furnisheth them with his gifts but the ministerial cause is the whole Church or at least the representative consisting of Pastors and Presbyters or other Church-men and not the Bishop or Pastor alone For the Apostles never challenged to themselves alone the right of Election Act. 1.23 and 6.5 and 14.23 II Three things are required to a lawfull calling triall election and confirmation III. Triall is both of life and doctrine and the life must be first tried before doctrine for he is not to be admitted to the triall of Doctrine whose conditions are not to be endured IV. The manner of Election is this After the pouring out of fervent prayers to God the persons being named out of whose number one is to be chosen either by the vocall suffrages of all or of the greatest part or else by holding up of hands that one is elected V. Confirmation is the introduction of the partie elected in which publike prayers being premised he is recommended to the Church and his calling is confirmed by imposition of hands VI. Pontificians falsly say that that is an unlawful calling which is done by the Presbyters without the Bishop For Bishops have not by Divine right greater power and authority VII The Reformed Church hath ratified the calling of them who in our fore fathers time reformed the Church not as if it proceeded from Popery as a bunch or swelling of the Church but as principally they were called by God and furnished with gifts They object that such men were called under Poperie but that their vocation is expired since they fell off We answer that they are falsly accused of falling off for they have not fallen off from the Gospel to the preaching of which they were called even in Poperie but from the corruption of the Gospel neither have they cause to cry out that they were called to preach the doctrine of the Romish Church for whereas they comprehend their doctrine under the title of the Gospel the Minister who observeth that in very truth it is far from the Gospel he by the right of his calling might contradict the same Although then they have revolted from the Romish Church yet they have not revolted from their calling VIII Neither can they produce any thing whereby they may infringe the calling of our Ministers performed according to the former Rules above handled For 1. When they ask by what right we teach we answer the same that Christ did to those that asked the same question Mat. 21.25 The Baptism of John whence is it from heaven or from men Even so we say the Doctrine of our Ancestors which is preached among us at this day whence is it Is it repugnant to the word of Christ and his Apostles or is it consonant If it be repugnant let them shew in what Articles If it be consonant they cannot reprove our vocation For where the true Doctrin hath place there the vocation is lawful Besides that calling which answers the example of the Apostles and Primitive Church is lawfull but that our calling is such cannot be denied The power of judging Doctrines is that whereby the Church enquires into mens Doctrine and cuts off the controversies that trouble her The RULES I. Every private man may and ought to judge of the Doctrine he professeth whether it be consonant to Scripture or not Act 17 11. The men of Berea dayly searched the Scripture whether these things were so 1. Cor. 10.15 I speak as to those who understand judge you what I speak 1 Joh. 4.1 Beloved believe not every Spirit but try the Spirits if they be of God II. This ought to be done also by the Presbytery or assembly when any great controversie ariseth III. As the holy Spirit is the chief Iudge of controversies so the Scripture which is the voice of the holy Spirit is the rule by which the straight is known from the crooked The power which concerneth the well ordering of the Church is that which determines what things ought to be done decently in the Church The RULES I. The object of this power are the outward circumstances of Divine Worship to wit time place and such like which in themselves be indifferent II. If in these any inconvenience is found the Church may lawfully abrogate the old Ceremonies and substitute such as are more convenient III. Yet the canons and customes of the Church must not equal the Scripture-canons The power of the Keyes is that which the Church useth for preservation of Discipline whereof are two parts to binde and to loose To bind is to denounce Gods wrath against sinners unless they repent To loose is to pronounce remission of sinnes to repentant sinners both which have certain degrees The degrees of binding are 1 A severe exhortation and commination after private admonitions have been re●ected this must be done by the
divine matters also and such as transcend all reason 4. After a divine manner and in a wonderfull harmony of circumstances in the same things rehearsed by different Writers 5. To the Glory of God alone and our salvation 6. With admirable efficacy both in moving the hearts and corroborating them against most exquisite tortures 7. In the miraculous preservation of it against Diabolicall and Tyrannical fury That Scripture I say which thus delivereth these things is doubtless divine both in its Original and in its Authority But such is the holy Scripture Therefore it is Divine both in its Originall and in its Authority That I may then contract the matter in brief the Testimony of the Church is first in respect of time but that of the Holy Ghosts is first in regard of Nature and efficacy VVe believe the Church but not for the Church but we believe the holy Ghost for himself The Churches Testimony doth monstrate but not demonstrate it shews the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the thing is but the holy Ghost Testimony shews the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the cause The ●wasive power is in the Church but the perswasive in the spirit onely The Churches Testimony begets an opinion but the Testimony of Scripture begets Science and ● firm Faith X. The Canonical Books of Scripture are partly of the Old partly of the New Testament To the Old belong the five Books of Moses Josuah Judges Ruth these Books are single the Books of Samuel of the Kings of the Chronicles are double The Books of Ezra Nehemiah Esther Job Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Canticles the four greater Prophets and the twelve lesser are single Now of the New Testament are The four Evangelists The Acts of the Apostles The Epistles of Paul to the Romanes one To the Corinthians two to the Galathians EEphesians Philippians and Colossians single To the Thessalonians and Timothy double to Titus Philemon and Hebrews single The Epistles of Peter two of John three of James and Jude single and the Revelation XI But for the books of Tobiah Judith Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Esdra 3 4. of Machabees 1 ● 3. of Baruch 1 The Prayer of Manasses The Epistle of Ieremiah The Additions to Daniel and Esther Although they may be read with profit yet they come short of that authority which is in the Canonical Books for proving Articles of Faith and therefore they are called Apocrypha that is hid or obscure The reasons be these 1. Because they were not written by the Prophets but they have been written for the most part since Malachi the last of the Prophets 2. Because they are not written in the Stile or Phrase of the Prophets or in the Hebrew Tongue 3 Because they are never alledged in the New Testament 4. Because in reading of them we finde many passages contrary and inconsistent with Canonical Scripture besides many fabulous and repugnant to Faith and P●ety XII The Holy Scripture is sufficient to Salvation 2 Tim. 3 16 17. The whole Scripture is by Divine inspiration and is profitable for Doctrine for Reproof for Correction for Instruction in Righteousness that the man of God may be perfect and throughly furn●shed to every good work XIII Therefore as the constitutions of the Church conducing to the right usage of outward Rites are in their one place to be regarded so no tradition is to be admitted as necessary to salvation except the Scripture The Romanists do not onely fight for popish Traditions but also equal them nay prefer them to the holy Scriptures but we are content to rest in that command of God which forbids to adde to or take away from his word Deut. 4.2 and 5.32 and 12.32 Rev. 22.18 XIV The search of holy Scripture is injoyned to all Christians Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures Colos. 3.16 Let the word of God dwell plentifully among you Neither is that obscurity of holy scripture which the Pontificians pretend any obstacle to this our assertion for though it be obscure in some places yet in other places it explains it self and delivereth the prime articles of Religion with great perspicuity XV Therefore the translation of the Bible ●nto vulgar Tongues is necessary XVI Yet no translation is authentical but that which agreeth with the Original fountains of the Hebrew and Greek XVII Although the Interpretation of Scripture is committed to the Church yet the onely supream Iudge of this interpretation is the Holy Ghost speaking in it Esay 59.29 My Spirit which is in thee and my words which I have put in thy mouth shall not depart from thee 2 Pet. 1.20 21. So that you first know this that no prophesie in the Scripture is of any private motion for the prophesie came not of o●d time by the will of man but holy m●n of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost Therefore sacrilegiously do the Pontificians arrogate to the Church of Rome or to the P●pe alone this right of supreme judge XVIII The sense and meaning of each Scripture is but one yet in the Prophesies of the Old Testament it is composed of a history and mystery For example Hos. 11. ver 1. In these words When Israel was a child then I loved him and called my son out of Egypt I be sense is compounded for literally historically they are to be understood of the delivery of the Israelites out of Egypt but ●ypically and mystically of Christs calling out of Egypt Matth. 2. ●5 XIX The means to finde out the true sense of Scripture are Frequent prayers the knowledg of tongues the looking into the Fountains the cons●deration of the scope argument● the distinc●ion of proper t●rms from figurative the logical analysis or nothing of the Causes the circumstances the passages going before and coming after the comparing of obscure places with cleerer of like with like and of disagreeing places with each other lastly the analogie of faith XX. As God is the proper and prime object so is he also the principal and suprem end of Divinity XXI Whereas then the cheif end and the cheif good are one and the same thing it is manifest that Christian Divinity only doth rightly teach us concerning the chief good XXII The subordinate end of Divinity in our salvation which consisteth in the union and fruition of God The parts of Divinity are two The first is of the knowledge of God the second of the worship of God The first containeth faith or the things to be believed the second works or the things to be performed THE FIRST BOOK OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD. CHAP. I. Of the Essence of GOD. GOD is a Spirit existent eternally in himself One in Essence Three in Persons Father Sonne and Holy Ghost God is known in himself and in his works In himself he is known absolutely in his essence relatively in the Persons Gods essence is known by his Names and by his Properties The names of God are either taken from his essence as Iehova Iah
And he said thou shalt perswade him prevail also go forth and do so As therefore when the Magistrate delivers over to the Hangman a guilty person to be punished he is neither the cause of his wickednesse nor of his destruction even so when God gives up wicked men to Satan neither is the cause of their wickednesse nor of their ruine to be imputed to God CHAP. VII Of the Governmemt of Angels GOd's actual Providence doth chiefly appeare in the government of Angels and men This government is either of good Angels or of bad the government of good Angels is that whereby God hath established them in their original integrity and happinesse in his Son as in their head to the praise of the glory of his grace The RULES I. The good Angels of their own nature were as apt to fall as the bad II. Therefore they ought to ascribe not to themselves but to the grace of God the Father and to the Son as to their head their establishment or confirmation in goodnesse III. The Son of God is the head of the Angels not by right of redemption but of creation and of that gracious Vnion with God For they could not be endowed with the Image of God nor be adopted unto Sons but only in the Son of God Who is the Image of God made visible and the first-born of every creature Col. 1.15 IV. That Angel who so often appeared to the Fathers in the shape of man as a Prologue or Fore-runner of his Incarnation was not a created Angel but the very Son of God Gen. 18.13 The Lord said to Abraham why doth Sarah laugh Gen. 32 28. the Angel said to Iacob Thou hast prevayled with an Angel which is thus explained Hos. 12.4 He prevailed with God Jos. 5.14 That man whom Iosuah saw said I am as a Captain of the host of the Lord and v. 15. And the Captain of the Lords host said to Joshua See Zach. 1. v. 2 3. V. Although there is no ataxie or confusion among the Angels yet it is not to be found in Scripture that they have any prince or other head over them than the Son of God by Michael the Archangel the Son of God is rightly understood For he is set in opposition to the Devil as to the head of evil Angels Rev. 12.7 Michael and his Angels fought against the Dragon ver 10 Now is salvation in heaven and the Kingdom of our God and the power of his Christ. VI The good Angels are ready executors of Gods will especially in the praysing of God and preservation of the godly VII We are not carefully to enquire whether or not particular men or provinces are governed by certain Angels For out of Scripture it appears that GOD useth sometimes the Ministery of one Angel sometimes of more The government of evil Angels is that whereby God hath thrust them out of Heaven into infernal places eternal destruction as voluntary Delinquents having forsaken their first integrity and beeome the enemies of Christ's Kingdom The RULES I. Evil Angels are such not by creation but by their own voluntary defection II What their first sin was whether Pride or not the Scripture doth not specifie yet it is certain that it was not committed without pride For pride is joyned to every sin that is committed with deliberation III. We may more safely with the Apostle Jude ver 6. call it a defection from their first original and a desertion of their proper habitation IV. The evil Angels have a Prince whom the Scripture by way of excellency calleth the Devil the old Serpent Satan and the Dragon See Rev. 12.9 V. Whereas the Scripture speaks nothing of the time when the evil Angels fel● nor of the number we ought also in this to be silent VI. Their punishment consisteth partly in the memory of their happiness lost irrecoverably partly in the perpetual sense of their misery and torments VII The substance of the evil Angels remained simple invisible and immortal VIII There remained also in them no small knowledge and a sagacity also of searching out future things havnig these h●lpes 〈◊〉 Their natural knowledge 2 Their long experimental knowledge 3. Astrologie 4. The knowledge of Scripture cheifly of the Prophets 5. Extraordinary revelation so often as God makes use of the service of these torturers IX As this their knowledge is far from charity so it is void of all comfort and strikes in them a terrour Matth. 8.29 Wha● have we to do with thee Iesus the Son of God art thou come to torment us before our tim● Jam. 2 19. Thou believest there is one God thou doest well the devils also believe and tremble X. There remains also in them great power which they shew by removing huge bodies out of their places in raising storms in overthrowing houses and mountains in infecting the air the bodies of creatures with a venemous breath in possessing men in bewitching the outward and inward sences by altering and changing the organ or object XI But over the Stars or celestial bodies they have no right or power Because to them is granted power to rule in the air onely Eph. 2.2 XII All their power over inferior things is so limited by Gods providence that without his power they can do nothing Matth. 8.31 But the devils besought him saying if thou cast us out suffer us to go into the herd of Swine XIII Evil Angels can do wonders but not work miracles Because miracles are works exceeding all power of the creatures CHAP. VIII Of the government of Man in the state of Innocency SUch is the Government of Angels The government of man is seen in the state of Innocency of Misery of Grace and of Glory The government of man in the state of Innocency is that by which God made a Covenant of works with man promising him eternal happiness under the condition of obedience otherways eternal death The RULES I. God made a double Covenant with man the one of works the other of Grace that before this after the fall II. The Covenant of works was confirmed by a double Sacrament to wit the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowl●dge of good and evil both being planted in the midst of Paradise III. They had a double use 1. That man's obedience might be tried by using of the one and abstaining from the other 2 That the tree of life might ratifie eternal happiness to those that should obey but the Tree of knowledge should signifie to the disobedient the loss of the greatest happiness and the possession of the greatest misery IV Therefore the Tree of life was so called not from any innate faculty it had to give life but from a sacramental signification V. Likewise the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil hath this denomination from signifying the chief good and evil and from the ev●nt For in effect and by experience man found out how great that happiness and good was which he lost and
Christ did manifest it selfe in the state of his Humiliation chiefly by miracles yet this was little in comparison of that glorious manifestation of him in his exaltation In the state of Humiliation he performed his Prophetical office not only mediately by sending Iohn Baptist his Herauld before and by the Apostles whom he called but also immediately to his lost sheep especially of Israel by preaching to them the heavenly Truth with great constancy patience and efficacy both of his doctrine and miracles But his Sacerdotall office he administred in this state making a most full satisfaction and an humble intercession for us The satisfaction of Christ is that whereby he being subject to the Law for us did undergo the curse due to our sins and performed most perfectly obedience to the Law which was required of us and so hath freed us from the curse and hath restored us to life This consisteth in suffering the pains and in perfect justice in that is seen cheifly his passive in this his active obedience I do purposely adde this restriction that we may not think his active and passive obedience so to differ as if the suffering of ●he punishment consisted only in his passive obedience and his perfect justice only in his active for they differ not in time seeing both of them continued from the first moment of his incarnation till his death Nor do they differ in subject because the same obedience in a different respect is both active and passive and consequently Chri●●● obedience is an active passion and a passive action for as passion is a receiving of the punishment it is called passive obedience but as it is a testimony of his great love it may be called active Neither is the division of obedience into active and passive a division into parts but onely a distinction taken from the end to wit the twofold satisfaction for punishment and for life eternal The curse upon the transgresso●s of the Law requires the former Deut. 27.26 The promise of life under the condition of perfect obedience and righteousness requires the latter Lev. 18.5 Therefore we are said Analogicaly by that one and most perfect satisfaction of Christ both to be freed from the punishment because he suffered the punishment for us and to be invested in the right of life eternal because he fulfilled the Law for us The suffering of punishment is whereby he undertook upon himself the punishment due to us and offered himself of his own accord a holy Sacrifice to God for us This consisteth both in the sufferings which went before his great and last Passion but especially in this last agonie The RULES I. No part of Christs Passion must be excluded from his Satisfaction The reason because he did not suffer for himselfe in any thing but all for us II. Therefore those innumerable sufferings which Christ endured until his last journy to Jerusalem are not to be separated from the price of Christs redemption for although the Passion of Christ which went before his last agony might be called a preparative to his death yet it is indeed an integral part of satisfaction As it cannot be denied that the payment of an hundred pounds by him who owe●h divers tuns of gold is an integral part of the paymen● although i●●e but a smal sum in respect of the whole and principal debt III. Yet the Scripture synecdochically and by way of excellency doth describe his last passion as the price of our redemption and his death or oblation on the altar of the cross as an expiatory sacrifice Of this see the 9. and 10. chapter to the Heb IV. The principal efficient cause of this passion was the holy Trinity the ministring causes were Christs enemies both Iews and Gentiles V. the Person that suffered for us is not the Father nor the Holy Ghost but the Son of God VI. Although God is rightly said to suffer yet the God-head suffered not God suffered in the flesh not with the flesh VII The sufferings of Christ were divers of which there were three ranks to wit some before his death death it self and some after death VIII Of those that went before his death some were internal some external IX The internal were his sadnesse anxieties and tortures proceeding from the fiercenesse of Gods wrath and the conflict he had with that tentation of dereliction which cast him into that bloody sweat and made him cry out My God My God why hast thou forsaken me X. But although he wrestled with the tentation of dereliction yet he fell not into desperation neither did he yield to the tentation but overcame it by a strong confidence in his God The undoubted argument of his victory was this that in his greatest agony he failed not to call God his God XI His external sufferings were the tortures of his body which he endured in a manner in all his members senses for his head was torn with throns and beat with reeds his face was defiled with spittle and bruised with buffeting his ears were wounded with scoffs and railings his eyes were troubled with the mourning of his Mother and his disciples his tongue was scorched with thirst and poisoned with vinegar and gall his body was stript and torn with whipping and the same was fastned to the Crosse his hands and feet being pierced with nailes and was hanged between Thieves his sinews were racked and his side was pierced with a lance XII The Cross was chosen to die on which was no ordinary kinde of death but an accursed one for of old it was made execrable by the mouth of God Cursed is he that hangeth on a Tree Deut. 21.23 XIII In Christs death the Personal Vnion was not dissolved the soule indeed was severed from the body but neither of them from the Personality or Hypostasis of of the sonne of God XIV The sufferings that followed his death were not joyned with any pain yet they wanted not disgrace or ignominie such was his burial and the three dayes lying in the grave XV. His burial was a part of his sufferings whereby Christs body no other ways than the carcasses of other men was cast into the grave XVI His three dayes detention or stay in the grave is the last degree of his Humiliation at which time his soul being translated to Paradise his body was detained under the pains and bands of death as if he had been altogether overcome and swallowed up by it his enemies in the mean while triumphing over him as if he had been quite cut off Acts 2.24 Whom God raised having loosed the sorrows of death XVII When mention is made of Christs descent into hell in the fourth Article of the Creed it is demanded of what part of Christs passion that must be understood That opinion of the Papists concerning Christs local descent into Limbus Patrum or the place of the Fathers and their delivery from thence is fabulous and very ridiculous from which their
perform'd in our stead the former is true therefore so is the lat●er They assert boldly that in Scripture there is no example where the particle for is the same that in anothers stead But who sees not this in these subsequent testimonies Joh 10.11 The good shepherd layeth down his life for his sheep to wit by fighting even to death in the stead or place of his sheep Rom. 5.7 Scarce will one die for a just man Rom. 8.26 The Spirit maketh intercession for us and v. 31. If God be for us who can be against us and Rom. 9.3 I could wish to be accursed for my brethren Neither doth the eternity of pain due to our sins make Christs Passion an insufficient ransom in that he suffered not eternally for us because th● his punishment was not eternal in regard of time Yet it is equivalent to eternal pain both in respect of the infinite majestie and dignity of Christs person as also in consideration of the greatness and infinite weight of his suffrings and the b●rthen of Divine wrath which the wo●ld and all ●he creatures ●herein were not able to endure XXII The Papists do overthrow the same satisfaction of Christ in setting up other Priests and obtruding the Idolatrous Mass for a Sacrifice They are refuted by these strong reasons 1. Because there is one Mediator 1 Tim. 2 5. 2. Because Paul speaks onely of one Priest Heb. 7.26 Such a high Priest became us 3. Because there was offred but one oblation Heb. 7 27. He performed that once and 9. ●5 Not that he might offer himself often and 10. 10. by his offering once made and vers 14. By one oblation he hath consecrated forever those that are sanctified ver 18 Where there is remission of sins there is no more offering for sin 4. If therefore the Priesthood of the old Law was abrogated because the ancient Priests were but weak men then it must follow that none in the New Testament was fit to be a Priest except the Son of God Heb. 7.28 For the law maketh men high Priests but the word of the oath maketh the Son But they use this exception to wit that Christ is the chief High Priest and themselves secondary consequently Christs instruments But either they offer the very same sacrifice which Christ offered on the Crosse or another If they offer another then it must be unfit for the reasons alledged if the same then these absurdities wil follow 1 That Christ offered for himself because these offer for themselves for the high Priest and the inferior Priests will do the same thing though after a different way 2. That they reckon themselves among the torturers who crucified Christ. 3. Whereas in this oblation the Priest and the Sacrifice are the same thing they must be a Sacrifice at least in the second place Neither is that distinction of a bloody an unbloody Sacrifice of greater moment for so there should not be one sacrifice which thwarts the former testimonies and remission of sins should be obtained by an unbloody Sacrifice which the Apostle flatly denies Heb. 9 12. XXIII As then much is detracted from Christs sufferings by the former errours so they extend the object thereof wider than is fitting who teach that Christ died universally for all and every one man If we look upon the greatness and worth of Christs merit it is sufficient to redeem ten thousand worlds but if we consider Gods purpose and Christs intention it is false that he died for all singular H●nce it is that he is said to die for al sufficiently but not effectually that's to say that Christs merit is sufficient fo● all in respect of his dignity but not effectual in all in respect of application seeing Christ died to that end that his death should be applied to all for why should he dy for those for whō he prayeth not but he witnesseth that he prayeth not for the world Ioh. 17 9 Our adversaries urge those places in which mention is made of the whole world also of all men 1 Tim. 2.4 and 1 Ioh. 2.2 in which also all men generally are called But in 1 Ioh. 2.2 by the name of the whole world metonymically are understood the elect dispersed over all the world and 1 Tim. 2 4. by all men are meant as the words following shew all sorts of men whether Jews or Gentiles Princes or Peasants and consequently not every one of the kinds but the kindes of every one in which sense the word All is used Gen. 6.19 Ioel 2.28 Perfect Justice the other part of Christs satisfaction is that whereby in comforming himself to the Law and performing perfect obedience thereto he hath purchased for us the inheritance of life eternal And this justice is partly original partly actual Original is the conformity of Christ with the Law in which he was conceived and born The RULES I. Original righteousnesse is opposed to original sin II. And this is not a bare innocency or freedome from sin but an aptitude also and inclination to goodnesse As Original sin is not only a privation of just●ce but an inclination also to evill III. Christs original justice is a part of his Satisfaction for us The reasons are 1. Because the Law requires not onely actual obedience but also a full conformity with the law otherwise original contagion were no sin 2. Because Christ is all ours and what he was made or did or was he was made did and was for us His actual justice is that obedience whereby Christ did most perfectly fulfill the law in the act it self And this is called in the Schools active obedience The RULES I. As Christs passion was necessary to expiate sin so was his active Obedience and justice to obtain life eternal Reasons 1. Because the Law obligeth us both to pun●shment and to obed●ence to punishment because it pronounceth him accursed who doth not all the wordes of the Law Deut. 27 26. To obedience because it promiseth life to them only who do performe all things Lev 18 5. Who doth these things shall live by them and Luk· 10.28 Do this and live Neither doth the distinction of Justice into Legal and Evangelical h●nder see●ng the Gospell exhib●ts in Christ the same Justice which the law requires 2. Because this double satisfaction answers our double misery to wit the guilt of sin and of damnation and the want of Justice Rom. 3.22 All have sinned and come short of the glory of God 3. Because true Justice properly so call'd consisteth in actual obedience Deut. 6.25 And it shall be our righteousness if we observe to do all th●se Commandments before the Lord. 4. Because he performed that actual obedience either for himself or in our stead but not for himself therefore in our stead The assumption is plain out of that relation which Christ hath to us for whatsoever he was or did in all the course of his obedience he was and did that in our stead But they
Presbytery 2. A keeping off from the Lords Supper 3. The greater excommunication by which the sinner is cast out of the Church yet not without hope of pardon and return if he repent 4. Anathema or in the Syriac word Maranatha when he is cast out without hope In loosing the same degrees being observed the sinner is by the Church received again into favour So by the Apostles advice the excommunicated Corinthian is received again into grace 2 Cor. 2.7 8. The RULES I. Christ is the author and founder of this power Out of the testimonies above cited II. This power of the Keyes is in the whole Presbytery not in the Bishop or Pastor alone The Pope falsly arrogates this power to himself For to say nothing of that right which he claims from Peter it is certain that the Keyes were not delivered to Peter alone Mat. 16.18 but the same right was imparted also to all the rest Mat. 18.18 Verily I say unto you whatsoever you binde on earth c. and Joh. 20.23 Whose sins ye shall remit c. III. The object of this binding is the sinner who either was not amended by private admonition or whose scandal was greater than could be done away by private exhortation IV. The forme consisteth in the decent observation of degrees For when the first and second will prevail we should not make use of the third and very seldome of the fourth V. Popish Indulgences which are the fictitious treasure they brag of gathered by the Pope out of the merits of Christ of the blessed Virgin and of the Saints who suffered more as they teach than their sins deserved are farre from the power of the Keyes Let the treasure of Christs blood suffice us which cleanseth us from all sin 1 Joh. 1.7 VI. Loosing consists not in those satisfactions which they enjoyn s●nners By satisfaction here we understand not that which is given to the Church by a serious testimony of repentance and that publiquely when it is required but that which satisfieth for sin Besides their opinion is grounded on a false supposition that the punishment is reserved after the fault is remitted Of this we will speak in the Doctrine of Just●fication hereafter VII The end of this power is the preservation of the Churches honour and that wicked men might be brought to repentance VIII The power of the Church and of the Magistrate differ in these 1 The object of this is any man but of that the members of the Church onely without exception of the greatest personages 2. The object of this are the body and outward goods but of that the soul. 3 This punisheth even penitents that receiveth penitents into favour IX Ministers and Presbyters should not divulge any secret offence revealed to them by him whose conscience is oppressed except the safety and peace of the Publique require it least others be debarred of the Churches comfort Thus of the Church-government the Political followes and is that whereby the Church also is governed by the Magistrate The RULES I. Magistrates are the Churches nursing fathers as they are keepers of the two Tables of the Law as they preserve Churchese and Schooles and defend the Truth II. The Clergy is not exempted from the Magistrates subjection Rom. 13.1 Let every soul be subject to the higher powers The examples of Christ paying toll-money Mat. 17.27 of Paul appealing to Cesar Acts 25 11. witness this III The Infidel-Magistrate must be obeyed in things that may be done with a saf-conscience IV. We must pray for Magistrates that be Infidels 1 Tim. 2.1 c. So much of the Publique Admininistration The Private is whereby each member of the Church is coupled with one another in the bond of love to the edifying of the whole mystical body See Rom. 12.6 c. 1 Cor. 12 12 c. Ephes. 2.20 c. and 4.1 c. Hitherto of the Ordinary Church-Government The Extraordinary is when necessity requiring a Councel is gathered A Councel is a Meeting enjoyned by the Civil Magistrate or the common consent of the Church in which men endowed with the gifts of the Spirit and l●wfully chosen for this purpose undertake the Churches cause and out of Gods word define it And this is either Oecumenical and universal or else particular Particular is National or Provincial The RULES I. A Councel must be called by the Magistrate if he be Faithfull If he be an Infidel either it is to be procured by Petition or if he be an open Enemy to the Councel it must be held by the Churches common consent necessity so requiring it II. The Persons which should be present at the Councel are the Civil and Ecclesiastical Presidents so many Scribes and fit men chosen for this purpose Neither are private men to be altogether excluded who may be present at the handling of Doctrinal points but not in matters of Scandal which charity ought to cover III. The matter which is to be handled in the Councel or Synod is Church businesse which is of weight and worthy of serious consideration IV. The forme of the Councel consisteth in a religious and orderly disquisition of the truth V. It will be religious if after fervent prayers to God all things be tried by Scripture as by an infallible Line and Rule VI. It will be orderly if every man be mindful of his duty VII It is the part of the civil President to gather the Councel to protect it being gathered to prohibit all violence and disorder by his authority to publish the decrees lawfully made and to curb the refractory VI. The ecclesiastike President is to propose the Question to moderate the Disputation by the advise of his Assistance to ask their opinion and by Notaries to record the Decrees IX The rest of the Delegates are to propose their Opinion calmly and roundly or to assent to him that spake before if his opinion was right X The presidencie that the Pope claims over councels is far from this form who neither consulteth with Scripture no● asketh the opinion of his Assistants but obtrudes his Dictates to be confirmed by the Councel XI The forme of the Councel of Jerusalem was far otherwise in which every man might lawfully utter his opinion Paul and Barnabas had as much freedome to speak as Peter and after their opinions had been canvassed too and fro James at length concludes Acts 15. v. 6.19 XII The end of Councels is peace and truth in the Church XIII As far as Councels agree with Scripture so great is their authority neither are they more exempted from erring than the Church her self What credit we are to give to Popish Councels may be seen both by the opposition of Councels to one another as likewise by their impious Decrees The Councels of Constance and ●asil subjected the Pope to the Synod but that of Trent on the contrary extols the Pope above all Councels The second Councel of Nice imp●ously thrusts out the second
And although these two benefits be the same in subject and time yet they are indeed distinct For they differ 1. In definition for it is one thing not to account us unrighteous and another thing to esteem us righteous Which that we may the better understand we must know how these terms are different Not just and just Unjust and just Not just and Unjust Not Unjust and just Not just and just are contradictories Unjust and just are partly privatives partly contraries Not just and unjust also Not unjust and just are diversa VVe must also know that Unjust and just are not immediate contraries for the medium is innocent who is neither unjust nor just Now whereas the remission of sins is a removing or putting away of our sins but the imputat●on of justice is the adjudging of it to be ours by that we are accounted for not unjust or innocent by this for just Now who knowes not that it is more to be just than to be innocent onely and not onely to have done no evill but also to have done good But although these two now in man differ not in subject but in some respect only yet heretofore they diffe●ed in subject also For Adam in Paradise was innocent but not just for he was at length to attain justice by his perfect obedience 2. They differ in their proximate and proper causes for Christs death and passion are the cause of remission of sins which are expiated by them Heb 9.22 without blood there is no remission 1 John 1.7 The blood of Iesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin But the cause of the imputation of Justice is Christs perfect obedience Rom. 5.19 For as by the disobedience of one man many are made sinners so by the obedience of one many are made righteous We have shewed above cap 18. That this obedience is that actuall by which he fulfilleth the whole Law for us 3. They differ in their proper effects for by remission of sins we are freed from damnation Rom. 5. ● Much more then no● being justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him But by imputation of righteousnesse we attain over and above life ●ternal Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance ●f grace and of the gift of righteousnesse shall reign c. so Gal. 4.5 both effects are put Made under the Law that he might redeem them that are under the Law that is under the cu●se of the Law and that we might recieve adoption It is then a greater benefit to redeem a Slave and being redeemed to adopt him than barely to redeem it is a greater favour to give and forgive than onely to forgive therefore that justificat●on is lame by which only Christ passion is imputed and which onely consisteth in remissions of sins Here divers things are objected 1. The Scripture in many places makes mention of Christs passion or Remission of sins onely But this is no wonder for in many places it speaks Synecdochically it● sufficient that it explaines 〈◊〉 selfe in the above cited place● 2. The Apostle promiscuously useth these phrases as equivalent to forgive sins and to impute righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 6. But we answer that it is one thing for propositions to be equivalent and another thing for one proposition to follow upon or to conclude another as Paul out of this phrase of David Psal. 32.2 Blessed are they whose sins are forgiven them c. collects this that David doth describe him to be blessed to whom righteousnesse is imputed wi●hout wo●ks The reason of the consequence is because if the remission of sins be free then so is also the imputation of justice Although then that is not formally spoken by David which Paul affirmeth v. 5. yet it is spoken by way of consequence yea it is an argumentation as Chrysostome saith from the lesser to the greater for if he be blessed whose sins are forgiven then much more blessed is he to whom besides righteousnesse is imputee 3. To whom sins are forgiven to him also righteousnesse is imputed and whosoever is freed from damnation he is inheritor of life eternal therefore these benefits are not different Answ. Those things are not the same which are in the same subject together For so it would follow that Vocation Justification and Sanctification are not different benefits because every man that is called is also justified and sanctified 4. In the pardon of sins there are the sin of omission pardoned and therefore by that man is made perfectly just They adde the reason of the consequence because he performs all things who omits nothing Ans The consequence is fals because there is one cause why we are said to have omitted nothing another why we are said to have done al things We are said to have omitted nothing because Christ hath suffered for our sins also of omission But we are said to have performed all things because he hath for us performed all things Besides to have omitted nothing and to have done all thinges differ in respect of punishment and reward for although the fault the punishment are remited to him who omits what he shold do yet for this there is no reward due to him 5. It is absurd that the same debt should be paid twice If therefore satisfaction is made for sin by Christs suffering satisfaction also is not to be demanded by active obedience Answ. Here is ignoratio Elenchi for there is not a double payment of the same debt but two parts of one payment Neither is Christs active obedience required to make satisfaction for sin but to satisfie for our interest in the Kingdome of Heaven 6. If it be the same thing to be liberal and not to be prodigal nor covetous then it is the same thing to be just and not unjust Answ. The assumption is false be●ause these are not immediate opposites for there are men who are neither covetous nor prodigal nor liberal 7. If it be the same thing to be clothed and to have nakedness covered then it is the same thing to have our sins remitted and justice imputed be●ause by the garment of 〈◊〉 righteousnesse 〈◊〉 sins are also 〈◊〉 Ans. This is an 〈◊〉 simile for the sin●●r must not onely be clothed but he must be first unclothed to wit from the rags of sin Therefore as Ioshuah the High-Priest had his filthy garments taken from him first then new garments were put upon him and a crown on his head Zach. 3.4 5. So we also first must be divested of this dirty garment of sin then we are clothed with the glorious garment of Christs righteousnesse XVI The form of Iustification taken passively is whereby believers lay hold on ●hrist with all his merits by the hand of ●aith and apply him to themselves XVII The end of that benefit is Gods ●lory and our salvation XVIII Out of this commemoration 〈◊〉 causes we firmly gather That man is 〈◊〉 justified before God by his good works 〈◊〉 merits
affection of the mind to maintain inlarge the glory of Gods Name with just sorrow indignation against those things that are contrary to his glory Examples of this are in Lot 2. Pet. 2.8 in Moses Exod. 32.19 in Phi●eas Numb 25.7 8. in David Psal. 69. and ●19 53 in Elijah 1 Kin. ●19 10 in Ieremiah Jer. 23.9 10.11 in Iohn Baptist Matt. 14.4 in Christ Ioh 2.14 c. in Paul Act. 14.14 and 17.16 17. To this is opposite Stupidity not caring for the glory of God erring zeal which is without knowledge inconsiderate zeal counterfeit zeal The Sanctifying of Gods Name in effect or actually is either by words or by deeds Sanctifying by words is a holy using of Gods Name and a constant confession thereof The holy using of his Name is whereby we never speak of him but in cases of necessi●y and that with great reverence and admiration praising the glory shining in it Deut. 28.58 Thou sha●t fear tha● most glorious and terrible Name of the Lord thy God To this is contrary superstitious silence or concealing of Gods Name the taking of it in vaine jests made of Scripture phrases and blasphemie or disgrace cast immediately upon the Name of God An example of horrible blasphemie is in the Assyrian King I●a 10. and in Rabshaketh his Captain Esa. 37. The holy using of Gods Name is in three kinds to wit in Consecration Swearing and casting of Lots Consecration is when things for our use are sanctified by the Word of God and by Prayer To sanctifie in this place is to separate for a good and lawful use thus Temples Ministers the works of our vocation meat and drink are consecrated 1 Tim. 4.4 5. For whatsoever God hath made is good neither is any thing to be rejected if it be received with thanks●giving for it is sanctified by the word of God and by Prayers To this consecration is opposite besides the intermission of it superstitious consecration when in certain forms of words there is believed to be a singular force efficacy so likewise Magick inchantments and consecrations This consecration is intermitted by them who eat drink without Prayer and Thanksgiving among Papists there are many examples of superstitious ●ōsecrations of water salt wax c. Magick consecrations and inchantments are not excus●ble because the words are good For Gods Word is abused when it is not used in a good way By Swearing Gods Name is sanctified both in a simple Oath and in adjuration A simple Oath is the taking of God to witnesse in weighty matters as the Testifier of truth and the Revenger of lying The RULES I. An Oath in it self is good and holy First because it is commanded by God Deut 6.13 and 10 20 Esa. 65.16 Ier. 12.16 Secondly because God and his Angels have sworn Gen. 2● Psal. 9● H●b 3 and 6 Rev. 10. c To this purpose is that of Tertullian O happy are they for whose cause God swearet● and O miserable are we that will not believe God when he swears II. The person swearing must be such a one as may lawful●y swear and not Children 2. Mad-men 3. Such as are convicted of perjury III The matter of an Oath should be things weighty of good moment and lawful IV The forme of it is explicated or unfolded by contestation and imprecation abridged and contracted or consisting of either part V. The end is the confirmation of truth the decision of strife the illustration of Gods glory and the salvation of man Heb 6.16 VI. The object of an Oath by which we must swear in god only For so it is commanded Deut. 6.13 Fear the Lord thy God and serve him and swear by his name Because 1. God is the only searcher of hearts who sees all things who is alone Omnipotent and who revengeth Perjury 2. Because an Oath is joyned with invocation which only belongs to God as it is said above V●I Where the Saints in their oaths mention the creatures metonymically either God himselfe is understood or his vengeance which man wisheth to himself So Gen. 31.53 Jacob swore by the fear of his Fa●her that is by God whom his Father Isacc feared So Paul 2 Cor. 1.23 I call God for a record upon my soul that is that ●e will pun●sh me if I knowingly deceive V●II In respect of adjuncts an Oath is divided into that which is publique and solemn and injoyned by the Magistrate or private and voluntary yet not rashly offered Also into an assertory a promissary Oath IX Oaths must be kept though they be extorted from us and be hurtfull to us Psalm 15.4 That sweareth to his ●urt changeth not But here it is demanded if an oath made to a thief to free our selves from him ought to be kept Answ. Either the Oath is only to redeem our selves or else it is to conceal the whole matter we are bound in the former to keep our promise but not in the latter seeing we are first and more strictly bound to the Magistrate whose office it is to suppresse thieves and robbing therefore whosoever out of fear of death binds himself to a thief in this respect he may declare the matter to the Magistrate and by reason of the tie and obligation to him he may be absovled by publique authority X. Near to swearing is a weighty asseveration Such Asseverations are Gen. 42.15 c. By the life of Pharaoh that is as truly as Pharaoah lives and as I wish he may live So 1 Sam. 1.26 As my soul liveth my Lord I am that Woman To this purpose is that usual asseveration of Christs Verily Verily To swearing in the defect is opposite the denial of it or a refusal to take an Oath it being lawfully profered The Anabaptists offend the former way pretending Christs saying Matth. 5.34 Swear not at all and that of Iames Jam. 5.12 But they observe not that in both these places idolatrous and rash Oaths are forbidden not such as be lawful The latter way they off●nd who when they may by an Oath promote Gods glory or the safety of their neighbour yet they refuse to do it In the excesse are opposed to swearing 1. Perjury 2. A rash Oath 3. An unjust Oath 4. An idolatrous Oath Perjury is when a thing is falsly asseverated or a promise is made without purpose of performance or when the purpose of performance is not performed This sin must be avoid●d 1. Because of the grievousness thereof for a perjured man offends against God whom he calls u●on to be witnesse to ●his lye and so profaneth his most holy name he offends against his neighbour whom he circumvents with his perjury and grievously scandalizeth he offends against himself having wished so many evils to fall upon him 2. Because of the grievousnesse of the punishment for perjuries are never unrevenged examples are in the Kings of Sodom c. Gen. 14.4 in H●shea King of Israel 2 Kings 17 4. in Zediciah
t●e Master of the house shall he brought unto the Iudge● to see w●ether he hath not put his hand to his neighbours goods The same Law follows ver 10 11. concerning the Asse Oxe and small Cattle he that receives a Pawn let him take heed he do not receive on● of a poor body or retain that pawn which the poor man cannot be without Exo. 22.26 If thou take thy neighbours raim●nt to pledge thou shal● deliver it to him by that the Sun goe●h down for that is his covering onely Deut. 24.6 No man sh●ll take the nether or upper M●●stone ●o pledge for he taketh a mans l●fe to ple●g and vers 10. when thou doest lend thy brother any thing thou sha●t not go into his house to fetch his pledge thou sha●t stand abroad and the man to whom thou doest lend shall bring out the pledge abroad to thee Ezek. 18 7. And hath not oppressed any but ha●h restored to the debtor his pledge So much of Justice Beneficence is whereby we help our neighbour with our means freely This vertue is call'd liberality in lesser gifts in greater Magnificence in relation to the poor alms to banished men strangers hospitality To this the Scripture invites us 1 By command Luke 6.38 Give c. 2. By the example of holy men yea of God himself who is the Fountain of all goodnesse Luk. 6.36 Be you merciful as your father is merciful 3. By most sweet promises Luke 6 38. Give and 〈◊〉 shall be given to you c. Especially by promising life ete●al Matth. 25.34 35 Come ye blessed of my Father c. I was ●ung●y and ye gave me food c. To this is opposite the neglect of bounty as also basenes hard-heartednesse and unseasonable bounty c. See above cap. 8. So much of Vertues as they have reference to others the vertues which have respect to our selves are Contentation Parsimonie and Industry 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Contentation is a Virtue whereby man contents himself with his own condition and with the estate which he hath justly got 1 Tim 6 6. Godlines is grea● gain with con●entment To this is opposite unbelieving care concerning the sustaining of this life covetousnesse and a loathing of ones present condition Parsimonie or frugality is a vertue wherby we so moderate our expences that we spend not but what is needful reserve the remainder for future uses We must aime at this 1. Because commanded Joh. 6.12 Gather up the fragments that remain that noth●ng be lost 2. Becaus●●t is a remedy against poverty a mean to exercise our bounty To this are opposite too much sparing and profusenesse Industry or love of labour or the care of getting means honestly is a Vertue whereby one gets an estate by honest labours that he may be the better enabled to live comfortably to himself and to others This was injoyned in Parad●se Gen. 3 19. the same is commended by Paul Eph 4.28 He that st●●e let him steal no mo●e but rather let him labour working with his hands the things that is good that he may have to g●ve to him that 〈◊〉 To this are opposite Idleness and a disordered life dishonest wayes of gaining Usury Dice Mercenarie souldiery and other wayes of getting wealth by right and wrong See what is said of the idle Prov. 6.1 c. and 12.11 and Eccl. 4.1 2. The rest appear out of what is said before CHAP. XIII Of Vertue and Works belonging to the Ninth Commandment HAving spoken of our duty towards our own and neighbours estate now followes that we speak of our duty toward our own and neighbours fame in the ninth precept The summe whereof is that we preserve our own and neighbours fame and good name This precept is negative and Synecdochical for under the phrase of false witnesse is understood every thing wherby our own and neighbours fame or estimation is hurt hence is collected an affirmative precept That we study to preserve our own and our neighbours fame The vertues of this precept are also two-fold some have relation to our neighbour some to our selves those which have respect to our neighbour are truth and sincerity Truth it is a vertue whereby we are bent to know those things that be true to utter or signifie the things known as they are Zach. 8.16 Ephes. 4.25 Let every man speak truth to his neighbour To these in the defect are opposite the neglect of truth and naughty dissembling but in the excesse lying and false witnesse Sincerity is a vertue whereby we deal plainly and ingenuously with our neighbour acknowledging Gods gifts in him taking in good part his sayings and doings not giving rash credit to doubtful evils in him but concealing his known evils or making the best construction of then To this divers sins are opposite to wit evil suspitions curiosity in prying into our neighbors faults not out of any desire to amend them but to calumniate calumnies themselves and flattery To Truth and Sincerity as to the chief vertues are subservient Faith Gravity Silence Gentleness Curtesie and Freedome of speech Faith or fidelity is a constancy in our words and deeds This is called sincerity Eph. 4 15. Carrying your selves sincerely in love for so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is translated by the best Interpreters To this is opposite the double tongue when a man speaks one thing thinks or doth another Imprudent simplicity when a thing is rashly promised before the matter be sufficiently tryed also counterfeit simplicity and fidelity Gravity is w● h uttereth nothing but what is wel● weighed savoring of Christian wisdom tending to edification Col. 4.6 Let your speech be seasoned with grace and salt that you may know how to answer every man Opposite to this is idle pratling foolish speaking counterfeit gravity Silence is a vertue which faithfully conceals secrets committed to it Mat 18 15 But if thy brother trespasse against thee go reprove him between thee him alone To this is opposite perfidiousness wherby secrets are revealed naughty silence whereby things are concealed that should not be concealed Gentleness is a vertue whereby we shew our selves affable 1 Pet. 3 8. Finaly be ye all of one minde one suffer with another love as breth●en be pitifull be courteous To this is opp●site Peevishnesse and counterfeit gentlenesse Courtesie in speech is whereby our words are seasoned with honest mirth wit with a good decorum or grace To this is opposite Rusticity when one can neither utter witty jests himselfe nor with patience hear them Scurrility also and Dicacitie or biting jests and scoffs Ephes. 5.4 Neither fil●hinesse no● foolish talking nor jesting which are things not comely Freedome of speech is a vertue by which we speak the truth and reprove offenders without fear of danger Levit. 19.17 Thou shalt