we do not flie For God willeth not all things which his power is able to do But you say he willeth and commandeth with great Authority that we should observe his Precepts which he would not command unless he knew them to be possible It is true indeed if they be understood according to that Nature which he first created in us So that in him there is no cause but that the Precepts as they should be judged right so also they should be judged possible But hearken to Hierom answering you and aptly untying this Knot God hath commanded things possible saith he this no man doubts of But because men did not possible things therefore all the World is become subject to God and needs his Mercy c. I know that there is not any thing so difficult in humane things but infinite Omnipotency can do it by a word of his Power to whom it would not be difficult to restore this frailty of Fallen Nature to its Antient State of Innocency if he would And there is no doubt but he would do it if he had decreed to do as much by his secret Counsel as he could do by his Infinite Majesty Now therefore either prove that all infirmity of the flesh is taken away in the Regenerate and that they are restored to their former Innocency which is without all sin and also freed from a necessity of dying or cease to dream of that Perfection of Righteousness in this Life which hitherto hath not been found in any of the Saints whether Apostles that I may speak in the words of Hierom or Patriarchs or Prophets phets But that we may pass by this debate about the Power of God from which we detract nothing what shall we say in the mean while of Grace and his most Gracious loving kindness and good will What shall we answer to God promising to us For What saith he hath not God of old engaged his faithfulness by a most sure Covenant that be would ablolish all our Sins through Christ Is not this Grace promised to be obvious and prepared for all that are willing to obtain it which frees Mankind from all Wickedness which immediately imprints the form of Divine Righteousness upon the minds into which it enters and furnishes them with most invincible strength whereby it is possible to destroy Lust to drive away all the pollutions of the Mind and extirpate all remainders of fiâ—thiness and impurity So that now Lust being subdued evil concupiscence extinguished the pravity of a stubborn mind being taken away the mind being strengthened by the Divine support it is stirred up with all its desire to the Study of the Divine Law and most easily keeps the Law of God and obtains Salvation What then when the Majesty of the most high God hath all things in his Power and under his Command and his goodness is no less Infinite than his Power Do we suppose he will at any time be wanting to help the Creature or shall we distrust the Clemency of the most hountiful Creatour An Answer God forbid But pray tell me where hath God so engaged his faithfulness whereof you speak that the remainders of all Sin being cut off and all Infirmity of sinning being taken away he would so heal Mankind having so thoroughly purged them from all Sin that evil concupiscence being subdued and all matter of the Antient Contagion being blotted out no relicks of Sin should remain in this Life but that it may be most easie to obey the commands of God and so obtain Salvation By what Author by what Witness by what Doctor by what Testimony or Example do you prove this to be true which you Preach First You say is not this certain that Sin is hateful to God which necessarily through its violence and outragiousness divides us from Union with God And how can it be that the Lord who is by Nature just and a Lover of Righteousness should not take away all Sins out of the minds of them whom he designs to unite unto himself by Love Moreover he that spared not his own Son but delivered him up for us all How saith Paul will he not with him give us all things If then the Testimony of Paul be true it is thence evident that those are delivered from all Wickedness whom that infinite purity joins unto it self by most pure Love For otherways if God did not take away Sin be would be so far from giving us all things that he would suffer us in the chiefest respects to be miserable unhappy and wretched And so it would come to pass that God would seem to have conferred upon us no great benefit by Christ if he left us in the bondage of Sin if he did not throw off the servile Yoke from our Necks as he had promised of Old Moreover the Blood of Christ poured forth on the Cross had yet brought us no advantage For yet we are in great misery we cannot but be miserable whilest we are held in the bonds of our Sins There are also very evident Testimonies of the Holy Scriptures confirming this Assertion To wit that by the Divine Power of Christ Sin is extirpated Lust is destroyed Evil Concupiscence is restrained and the minds of Men being freed from Sin put on a Divine form For so it is recorded to us by Holy David As far as East is from the West so far hath he removed our Transgressions from us And thou shalt sprinkle me O Lord with Hysop and I shall be cleansed thou shalt wash me and I shall be made whiter than Snow And Isaiah foretold that it should come to pass that all that live in the Church by Faith should be called Holy And he hath blotted out as a Cloud thy Iniquities and thy Sins as a thick Cloud Likewise Ieremiah At that time saith the Lord the Iniquity of Israel shall be sought and it shall not be and the Sin of Iudah and it shall not be found And in Ezekiel he saith I will pour clean Water upon you and ye shall be cleansed from all your defilements Also Micah He will cast all our Sins into the depths of the Sea Moreover Zechariah declares that Everlasting Fountain which was to be opened to wash away the filth of all And how glorious is that Testimony of Iohn the Baptist. Behold the Lamb of God that taketh away the Sins of the World Which Testimonies being so many and together with these infinite others what do they all drive at but that we may understand that by Christ all the pollutions of our sinful Nature are done away c. For this is the sum of those things which you cite and heap together with a long Circumlocution of Words Unto which being so many there is one Answer and a well fitted one out of Augustin Distinguish the times saith he and you will reconcile Scriptures Our Sins are done away by Christ no Man doubts of that But
be feigned by the Apostle for Amplification which is not nor can be And seeing Thomas Aquin. here by all Faith understands perfect Faith Therefore because perfect Faith is not found without Charity it is necessary that according to the Interpretation of Basil we should here take notice of a Trope or Fiction which Quintilian also reckons amongst the forms of amplifying Therefore whereas we deny a Dead Faith without Charity to deserve the name of Faith we speak this by a very usual Trope as we say That an unprofitable and idle Man is no Man or Wine which is decayed and hath lost its strength is no Wine Therefore that which is cited out of Paul If I have all Faith but have not Charity c. Must be understood thus Not that Paul simply affirms Faith to be a gift of God without Charity But he speaks Figuratively to amplifie the praise of Charity as he that says Though I have an hundred Tongues and as many Mouths yet I could not fully set forth the matter as it is he doth not therefore presuppose that there is any Man who hath an hundred Tongues and as many Mouths Paul useth the like Figurative Speech Though I speak with the Tongues of Men and Angels for Angels have no Tongues but it is feigned by way of Amplification to signifie some excellent Tongues surpassing those that are human Thus he said If what hath been hitherto said doth not satisfie the Adversaries I Answer thus That this Speech of Paul belongs not to the manner of Iustification but to the Life of the Iustified Person If I have all Faith saith he But want Charity c. What then Therefore Charity enters together with Faith into Iustification But this is no good Consequence But this is rather the consequence thereof Therefore Charity is necessary in the Regenerate Which must of necessity be granted for Love is necessary and pleasing to God To wit In those that are in a state of Reconciliation and for the sake of Christ. For God naturally delights in the Obedience of his own Which though it be imperfect yet he approves of any endeavours in those that are reconciled unto him by Christ. So then Faith that is Christ apprehended by Faith Iustifies us freely But on the other side we must not receive this Grace in vain But he receives it in vain who is not obedient to the precepts and example of Christ. Howbeit there are also some that answer that this Faith here mentioned by the Apostle should only be taken for the Faith of Working Miracles amongst whom is Chrysostom who calls this the Faith not of Doctrine but of Miracles Moreover whereas they urge this word of the Apostle as if he had used it in a general signification To this it may be answered that the Word all signifies often not the universality of a kind but the perfection of a species to which it is joyned as 2 Cor. 9. God is able to make every good gift abound in you that having all sufficiency in all things c. In like manner in this place of Paul If I have all Faith that is the most perfect Faith of working Miracles so that I can remove Mountains c. Another place out of Paul 1 Cor. 13. Now these three remain Faith Hope and Charity but the greater of these is Charity Argument Our Iustification flows from the more worthy cause Charity is a thing more worthy and great than Faith Therefore we are justified more by Charity than by Faith Or if you would rather take it thus If we were justified by Faith and not by Charity Faith would be greater than Charity But Charity is greater than Faith Therefore we are justified rather by Charity than by Faith Answer That I may briefly Answer both these Arguments First let us rightly conceive not only the words of the Apostle but in what sense he speaks them These three remain saith he but the greater of these is Charity in which words we hear the Apostle preferring Charity before Faith And we acknowledge it to be true but let us see in what sense it is true I will make use of an argument like it There hath not risen a greater than Iohn the Baptist amongst those that are born of Women Therefore Iohn the Baptist must be greater than Christ. I answer from the sense of the Scripture Though Christ seemed less than Iohn the Baptist by the judgment of the World and the general opinion of People yet in the Kingdom of Heaven he was and always will be greater than Iohn we may observe something like this in Faith and Charity Though in this World in Mens dealings with one another mutual Charity hath the preeminence Yet in the Kingdom of Heaven that is in our concernments with God against Satan Death Sin the Iudgement of God his Wrath and Vengeance and the terrors of Conscience Faith doth so far excel that it only hath the Dominion not only above Charity but also without it If the dignity and excellency of any thing is discernable by its effects and performances as a Tree is known by its Fruits let us now compare these Vertues with one another that it may the better appear what each of them can do what is the efficacy of Charity what Faith performs and how much it excels And first as touching Charity and its Offices let us hear how greatly the Apostle commends it Charity saith he is patient and bountiful and courteous fitted for every condition of Life Charity doth not envy doth not behave it self unseemly is not puffed up seeks not its own things but seeks the good of all it is not easily offended nor desirous of revenge and though it suffer injury it deviseth not to do evil to any man it delights not in the wickedness of the wicked but rejoyceth in the Truth it suffers all things believes all things hopes all things endures all things waiting for better with an undefatigable expectation Though other things may fail though Prophecies and Miracles and Knowledge may cease yet Charity will never fail mutual Love will endure for ever Hitherto ye have heard the Apostle set forth the duties and offices of Charity with deserved praise which though they are exceeding great and magnificent and cannot be sufficiently commended by any man according to their worth yet such is the nature of all these offices of Charity that they pass not beyond the bounds of this mortal Life and the mutual Communion of Christians with one another But now let us raise up our minds as high as we can to contemplate the power and efficacy of Faith and what it doth not only upon the Earth but in Heaven in the presence of God Whilst Charity is exercised in this inferiour World amongst men Faith ascends into the Kingdom of God where first by a sublime contemplation it lays hold on the Son of God the Mediatour at the right hand of Majesty
for Mercy and cast himself wholly upon Christ what would the Apostle Iames say in such a case Will not Faith only without Works justifie such a man as this The penitent Malefactor is an evident proof of the truth of this who had no other thing but Faith only to commend him to Christ and so to be admitted into Paradise Like unto which there are many Examples daily of them that die on Gibbets so that the Iudgments of God are very wonderful who hath mercy on whom he will have mercy But now let us return to what we were saying of Abraham If we look upon his Faith what was more sincere If we consider his Works what was more glorious and wonderful Therefore upon both accounts he was certainly an admirable man Now let us compare his Faith with his Works And because it is evident that he was justified before God let us enquire whether he was justified by Faith 〈◊〉 Works because he could not be justified upon both accounts as the Apostle witnesseth If it is of Faith then it is not of Works but if it is of Works then it is not of Faith What shall we say then to these things let the Scripture answer Abraham believed God when he promised and it was accounted to him for Righteousness And the same Abraham obeyed God when he commanded and why doth not the Scripture in like manner add That this was imputed to him for Righteousness Let us hear what the Apostle answers The Scripture foreseeing that God would justifie the Gentiles by Faith he first told the glad tydings to Abraham and what glad tydings was this That he and his Seed should be Heirs of the World A great Promise indeed But how did he obtain this Promise by Faith or by Works There is an answer ready made to our hand by the Apostle The Promise came not by the Law to Abraham or to his Seed that he should be Heir of the World but by the Righteousness of Faith Why so Paul why not by the Law and why by the Righteousness of Faith That he might be the Father of all the faithful who walking in the footsteps of the Faith which was in the Uncircumcision of our Father Abraham shall have Faith in like manner imputed unto them But here St. Iames is represented as fighting with all his might against this Doctrine For the Adversaries say thus Did not the Apostle Iames assert with great Authority That Abraham was justified by Works and will ye deny it God forbid that any man should undervalue the Authority of that holy Apostle And yet I suppose St. Iames would not have us to disbelieve the Scripture which teaches us far otherways attributing the Iustification of Abraham not to Works but to Faith For Abraham believed God and we read it was imputed unto him for Righteousness But God hath not said in his Word concerning Abraham's going to sacrifice his Son That it was imputed to him for Righteousness Or let us grant the assertion of St. Iames That Abraham was justified by Works But where and how was he thus justified before God St. Iames says not so Then it is before men And Paul himself denies not that So that there is no real disagreement between Paul and Iames. But this doth not satisfie some Sophisters who account it is not enough that the holy Patriarch is justified by Works before men as Paul teaches unless he be also thereby justified before God For though he was first justified by Faith as they say yet nothing hinders but that afterwards he might be yet more justified by Works and this they call a second Iustification But Reason shews that to be an utter impossibility for it implies a manifest contradiction for it is a contradiction not to be justified by Works and again to be justified by Works And seeing one of those is denied by the Apostle How can they maintain and plead for the other But hereunto may be added another Reason If there is a twofold Iustification one by Faith and another by Works it would follow that there is a twofold manner of Iustifying But there is one and the same manner of Iustifying as there is one God as hath been proved out of Ambrose Therefore it appears that there is not a twofold Iustification A third Reason is this seeing Iustification consists of the Remission of Sins and God forgives no Man his Sins to whom he doth not perfectly forgive them Therefore it follows that the Iustification of those that are justified is compleat and perfect and cannot be made more perfect than it is already Now in the next place let them prepare to answer this Argument of Paul Whosoever is justified by Works hath whereof he may Glory before God Rom. 4. Abraham hath not any thing whereof he may Glory before God Therefore Abraham is not justified by Works before God By these things which we have quoted out of Paul and other sacred writings I suppose it appears evident enough what we should judge of the Works of Abraham Which though they were excellent and worthy to be admired before men yet they found no place for glorying before God according to the Testimony and Interpretation of the Apostle We need not be at any great trouble to find out the cause thereof Tiletan and other Iesuits produce a cause thereof out of Augustin Because the Works of Abraham were not of the Law but of Faith not of the Flesh but of Grace which because they were not done by the Power of Free-will only but in the Faith and expectation of Christ therefore all Praise and Glory was due to Christ and none to them which Invention of theirs though it savours more of Wit than Solidity yet though we grant all this to them there is no inconvenience in it seeing both of us acknowledge with Paul that the Patriarch Abraham found neither matter of glorying nor Iustification before God by Works and therefore that he had no cause of glorying because he was not justified by Works for otherways if he had been justified by Works he should have had wherein to Glory as the Apostle Paul speaks But now he hath not any thing wherein he may Glory before God therefore he was not justified by Works And thus hitherto we have treated of the Arguments of the Adversaries as much as may suffice not only to discover but also confute their Sophistical Wiles and captious Deceits who fight with so great eagerness for their inherent Righteousness against the Testimony of the Holy Scripture and the Sacred Gospel of Iesus Christ and the bright shining Light of Grace yea and against their own Salvation It remains in the next place that we should hear what those Men on the other side answer and oppose to the Arguments and most approved Reasons manag'd not only by us but by St. Paul and with what Cavillings and fraudulent Devices they darken and baffle the clear meaning of the
Case of a Soul Distressed with the guilt of Sin and relieved by a discovery of forgiveness with God is at large Discoursed The Grace and Duty of being Spiritually Minded declared and practically improved A Declaration of the glorious Mystery of the Person of Christ God and Man Of Temptation the Nature Power the danger of entring into it means of preventing that Danger A Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity these five by Dr. Iohn Owen A Body of practical Divinity consisting of above 176 Sermons on the lesser Catechism composed by the Reverend Assembly of Divines at Westminster with a Supplement of some Sermons on several Texts of Scripture by Tho. Watson formerly Minister of St. Stephens Walbrook Printed from his own hand-writing recommended by several Ministers to Masters of Families and others The Confirming Work of Religion Or its Great Things made plain by their Primary Evidences and Demonstrations Whereby the meanest in the Church may soon be made able to render a Rational account of their Faith Written by R. Fleming Author of the Fulfilling of the Scriptures The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification in sundry practical Directions suited to the Case of those who labour under the guilt and power of indwelling Sin To which is added a Sermon of Iustification By Mr. Walter Marshal late Preacher of the Gospel The Confession of Faith together with the larger and smaller Catechisms by the Reverend Assembly of Divines then sitting at Westminster presented to both Houses of Parliament Again published with Scriptures at large and the Emphasis of the Scriptures in a different Character An Earnest Call to Family-Religion or a Discourse concerning Family-worship being the substance of eighteen Sermons preached by Samuel Slater M. A. Minister of the Gospel The Sure Mercies of David Or a Second Part of Heart-treasure Wherein is contained the summ and substance of Gospel-mercies purchased by Christ and Promised in the Covenant of Grace together with the several ways how they are made sure to all the Heirs of Promise and how they are to be improved for the Saints Fort and Defence Settlement and Incouragement in shaking and back-sliding times By O. Heywood OF Free Iustification by Christ. In Reading your Books Hierom Osorius concerning Righteousness though I had not leisure accurately to trace every particular on which you have enlarged yet by what I have here and there collected I think I do well enough perceive whereat you drive what you design and what you endeavour For according to my apprehension you are endeavouring not to strike at some part of Christian Doctrine of smaller concernment but to cut the very Throat and extinguish the Breath and Spirit of the Gospel and to besiege the whole state of our Felicity and the Castle and chief City of Christian Liberty and to pluck up from the very Foundation all the Munitions of Peace and Life For what other thing dost thou in all these ten Books whereby thou snatchest away out of the Hands Studies Minds and Consciences of Men and out of the Earth as the Sun out of the World that most glorious Light of our Free Iustification purchased by the great bounty of Christ and confirmed by the Eternal Covenant of God Which being taken away I see not what thou leavest remaining to us but Cimmerian and Osorian Darkness in which we may grope like blind Moles Which endeavours of thine though of themselves being vain and frivolous there is no great cause why they should be feared in their opposition against the invincible force of Divine Truth yet because they strive to with-hold from us that which is most excellent in all Religion therefore I thought it was necessary to write these things unto thee not being provoked by any Enmity or Hatred against thy Person that I might vex thee but that I might admonish thee both friendly and freely and so much the more freely in how much greater danger I see thou art entangled unless thou return back and endeavour to walk more uprightly according to the Gospel of Christ. For what think you Sir That by your deeds performed as well as can be imagined and by the steps of your vertues you can lay for your self a passage into the Kingdom of God Or think you that any man living in this slippery condition of Nature can root out all his Lusts and utterly cut off all their enticements and so contain himself within the bounds of his duty that he can equalize those habitations of Eternal Glory with a proportionable dignity of Righteousness or dare promise them to himself upon such an account unless the bounty of God had freely put this honour upon us O be not of such an opinion This is not the way to Heaven Either you must change your mind or lay down this hope Howbeit this opinion seems not to be yours only but common to you with many to wit the late School-Divines especially those who have a greater veneration for the authority of the Pope than the Writings of the Apostles who being all infected with the same contagion of error do boldly profess the same that you affirm But yet all of them do not proceed in the same manner and method Those do so frame their notions that all men may understand they are the professed Enemies of Divine Grace and our Free Iustification in Christ which they hiss out of the Schools and openly anathamatize Your arguings are somewhat different though you have undertaken obstinately to maintain the same thing that they do but you hide the same venom with a more subtile artifice so that it insinuates more easily and lies less open to rebuke For I see you write Books concerning Righteousness and those not a few nor unpolished When I look on the argument I see it is honourable and plausible When I look into your manner of Speech your painted eloquence and laudatory amplifications wherewith you adorn the Glory Loveliness and Beauty of Righteousness with a Tragedian-like sublimity of style I confess this is not unworthy of praise For who should not deservedly praise him whom he sees so inflamed with the praises of Righteousness But if any man look more inwardly and consider with himself according to right reason with what mind for what end for what pretence and with what arguments you maintain those parts of righteousness so much praised and compare them with the Gospel of Christ he will be forced to acknowledge that you are defective in many things If you will permit me briefly to give my opinion of the whole frame of this work though you have little regard to what my censure is yet if you will allow me to speak freely to you as becomes me I will do it according to my duty and I will so do it that you your self may perceive that there was nothing less in my design in writing to you than a perverse inclination to find fault with other mens writings And thus I judge you have so handled
of the general Salvation of Christians nor a filthier blot upon Religion nor have done a greater injury to St. Paul the Scriptures and the Prophets than is manifest in these Books But in writing these things to you I restrain my self for your sake lest I pass the bounds of modesty which I have set to my self What then should the cause of Truth therefore be deserted You your self do not require that of me as I suppose Wherefore that I may as much as I can observe that which is my duty in both respects I have laid hold on this way of prosecuting this design which you see and which necessity hath laid upon me whereby I might both less offend you and likewise perhaps more benefit the cause I have undertaken to defend Therefore seeing I judged it necessary to oppose your attempts in this matter so I thought it most convenient not that I should in this Book answer to all the small scraps of Reasons in the order that you observe which indeed is none at all in a tumultuary confusion in those Ten Books but that I may by choice touch upon and confute the chief of them How easie it is to err in the Doctrine of Iustification SEeing these things and others like unto them contain the principal Heads of all Christian Doctrine therefore Divines should take a special care lest they err in these which care unless they take there will follow a most grievous ruin and perturbation of all things the foundations being as it were put out of their places And yet I know not how it comes to pass that error is no where more easily committed than in these Points Neither is it so strange for so it comes to pass that this animal nature we call Human Reason when consulted with about the things of God is most blind and sees nothing unless it be Illuminated with the better Light of Divine Knowledge shining in upon it For the right understanding of Divine things comes by the Spirit of God and not by Human Capacity and though the Law and the things of the Law were in some sense born with us and cleave unto our Nature Yet the Mysteries of the Doctrine of the Gospel are not apprehended so easily because the Nature of both is very different Moreover you may see many who following the guidance of Nature and her precepts more than is meet do teach and dispute of things belonging to the Gospel just as if a Philosopher should discourse of the Principles of Nature or a Moralist of the perfection of Vertues in which they place their chiefest good or as if a Pharisee sitting in the Chair of Moses should dispute about the Righteousness of the Law But there will be another occasion of treating of these things if opportunity be granted In the mean while that I may speak ingenuously of thee O Osorius with how much the greater natural parts God in his bounty hath adorned thee and heaped upon thee it is the more grievous to me that thou art violently drawn aside with others into that blindness of error That though you teach us many things in your reasoning about Righteousness yet you scarcely teach any thing that makes much to the purpose and nothing at all that is profitable for Salvation but rather on the contrary that which is very hurtful For I beseech you What assurance can there be of Salvation if you shut out Mercy and send us to our own Righteousness as the only way which conveys us to Heaven for all your Doctrine of Divinity looks that way To wit when discoursing of the hope of remedy you affirm there is no other way but that only of becoming like unto God and being united unto him and that this is the only way of a Blessed Life which consists wholly in Righteousness which whoso do observe those you affirm do abound with Divine Riches and Eternal Glory As if there were no hope remaining for him that turns a little aside from these footsteps Than which what could be said or invented more repugnant to the Gospel yea also elsewhere repeating again the same thing tho' in different Words How should a Man be saved say you Is there any other paved way to Salvation but what is contained in the Law of God None at all c. And again in another Book as in all your Books reasoning about the Works of the Law you assert that Righteousness is purchased by these that Men go up to Heaven by these as by steps that eternal rewards are appointed for these and you plead that this is the only way we have to Heaven which is paved with renowned Works c. Moreover you proclaim yet with more open Mouth Wherefore say you it must be attested with greater freedom of Speech that the ascent into Heaven is given to the Merits of the greatest Vertues and that the Mansions of the Everlasting Kingdom are given justly and deservedly to Holy and Chast Men c. It would take up a long time and be much more troublesome to rake together out of every one of your Books every one of those wonderful sayings which are more than Paradoxes whereby you plead that all the safeguard of our Salvation should be placed in nothing else but in the observance and care of Righteousness which if you could as well perform in effect and reality as you set them forth in Words magnificently I should esteem that none were more happy none more worthy of Heaven than you But now let us suppose that which I see you would so fain have granted that Heaven is only due to perfect Men no other ways but upon the account of Righteousness and that there is no other way of coming to those blessed mansions but that which is trodden by the most pure footsteps of good men and settled in the perfect integrity of Works Now we are not against the deserved praises of righteousness neither do we with-hold from it its rewards Be it so indeed But where shall we find this Righteousness Dic quibus in terris erit mihi magnus Apollo Tell me in what Country and I shall esteem you to be a great Oracle This man of righteous life dwells who will so direct the course of his Life according to this Idea of Vertue proposed by you that he fails no where who Roots out all manner of wickedness who refrains himself from railing with his Tongue Suppresses the Haughtiness Insolency and madness of an Ambitious Spirit and the rashness of a Headstrong Mind who Crucifies the Flesh with its Lusts who suppressing ungodly lustings by frequent meditation upon Death brings himself over from all Impurity and Impiety to the resemblance of Christ who separating his mind from the Contagion of the Body applies it wholly to the Imitation of Christ who resembles the humility and meekness of Christ his bounty and benevolence and his excellent Holiness in all respects and also cuts off all
contained in the Law of God So that besides this there is no other way laid open neither in the Gospel nor the Writings of the Apostles whereby we may be brought to the Heavenly Countrey and its immortality but that which is described only in the Law of God Suppose these things were granted you which you affirm though they be in themselves absurd and wholly Iudaical but let me grant or at least feign that this way which you shew is the only way and the most firmly founded and also that the same is the most easie and likewise that there is no other way by which we can come to Heaven but that only which is proposed by the description of the Divine Law Suppose we grant this yet in the mean while see thou teach me this how thou canst know that thou dost as many good works as are sufficient for a compleat obedience to the Law Of old our first Father Adam received but one command and failed in the performance and that in Paradise being placed in the highest degree of Innocency What and thou a miserable mortal man banished out of Paradise compassed about with so much infirmity of the flesh having received the Law of God in which so many and so great things are imposed to be performed and they are so imposed that he is liable to a Curse whosoever doth not most constantly continue in them all do'st thou stand so firmly that no storm of temptation can throw thee down at any time But what if having observed all other commands of God exactly so much as one tittle of the Law is neglected by thee What will thy Righteousness say to us in this Case Do you not see that the Sentence of the Law being pronounced you are as much in the fault as if you were guilty of all 〈◊〉 And yet you talk to us of no other way to the Kingdom of Life but that which is defined by the Ministry of the Law and the Exercise of Charity But now how will you teach that by what Scriptures by what Masters shall this appear evident to us which you assert by Paul I trow What then says he he To wit this is the mind and opinion of Paul say you that he asserts that all manner of destroying and suppressing of Lust is placed in the Grace of God which must be obtained by Faith and teaches that there is no other way of extinguishing and destroying it And a gain elsewhere Paul was never the Man that disapproved the Offices of Bounty as if they were little profitable for Salvation but taught that the only right way to Heaven was that which was Fixed in the continual Exercise of Charity c. I know indeed and confess that all proceeds from the Grace of God alone whatsoever is done by us aright and commendably whether in suppressing the Allurements of Vices or in observing the Discipline of Vertue Moreover that should not be denied which you do well assume according to the mind of Paul that we obtain this Grace from God by Faith Likewise that is not ill said which you add concerning Paul that he was never the Man that disapproved Pious endeavours of Exercising Charity seeing he every where extols those very things with wonderful praises For who knows not that the excellent Sermons of Paul are exceeding full of very serious Precepts and Instructions for governing the Life and that they are not in any matter more affectionate than in this that all every where who profess the name of Christ should together with a sincere profession of Faith joyn a proportionable Holiness of Life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for necessary uses Suppose this to be most true as it is indeed yet that was never the meaning of the Apostle to place our Salvation principally in the Law as if he thought that the Kindom of God and the Righteousness thereof should be measured by our worthy Deeds and Charity or proposed Heaven to us as fit to be paid for or sold for the commodities of our Works as by a kind of Auction Yea when I read Paul's Epistles of a far different sense this seems to me to be the only scope and mind of the Apostle that he transfers all this Righteousness which you attribute to the Law unto Faith and so transfers it that he shuts out all mixture of Works and leaves only Faith in the Son of God which lays open for us a way into the Kingdom of Heaven For I beseech you he that affirms that we are justified by Faith without Works and who again says but now without the Law the Righteousness of God is made manifest being testified by the Law and the Prophets with what Words could he more evidently shut out the endeavours and merits of all our Vertues from the Divine gift of Iustification These things being thus agreed upon and concluded by the weighty authority of Paul of necessity from thence follows That there is a twofold manner or way of being righteous to be distinguished as I said according to the different conditions of both Covenants of which the one belongs to the Law the other is peculiar to Christ. Then both the Law and Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have their own righteousness for as the Law which is wholly exercised in works of righteousness endures no unrighteousness and renders the fruits of righteousness plentifully to those who persevering in that which is good have filled up all the parts of perfect Innocency Likewise Christ also hath his own righteousness both much more powerful and also not a little differing from the other though not so much differing in respect of the matter yet exceeding much in the manner of dispensing for the Law communicates only to them that Work but Christ communicates to them that believe perfect righteousness and often also to the unworthy and underserving by a singular grace of dispensation Therefore this Righteousness is properly called the Righteousness of Faith Which is necessarily to be distinguished by us from the other which is called the Righteousness of the Law Which they who do not verily they do a great injury to the Scriptures and quench all light of Doctrine confounding both their own Consciences and the Consciences of their hearers with a wonderful kind of disturbance so that scarcely any Man can certainly know what should be hoped or feared for they who dispute thus concerning the Righteousness of the Law and draw all things to that alone as if there remained no other way to hope for Salvation but that which the strict and severe observation of the Law brings I beseech you what else do those Men do but leave the Souls of Men in a doubtful wavering And by what way those Men encourage us to hope by the same they compel us to fear and utterly to despair of Salvation seeing there is no Man in the World to whom the daily offences of his Life gives not
unreasonable so to do as if a man disputing concerning Osorius should thus conclude that because he hath no power of governing in the Kings Chamber therefore he hath nothing he can do at home amongst his own family Or because he is not at all excellent in military vertue to gain a victory that therefore he hath no faculty or dexterity in managing the affairs of his own business Luther separates charity from faith and the Law from the Gospel and does it not without cause But it must be considered where in what place and for what cause he does it Not to cause the godly works of good men to be despised nor to discourage the exercise thereof but that the power of justifying should not be attributed to the performance of them Not that faith should not work by love before Men but that it should not work before God For it is one thing to work before Men and another thing to work before God Therefore one and the same faith acteth both ways but one way before God and another way before men for before men it works by love that it may perform obedience to the will of God and be serviceable for the benefit of our Neighbour but before God it works not by any love but by Christ only that it may obtain the pardon of sins and eternal life By which you see what is the difference between faith and vertue and wherein they both agree and how different the working of both is How faith is alone without works and again how the same is not alone for in the mean while Godly works are not therefore condemned because they are not admitted to the justification of life but the trusting in works is only overturned Here then a wise and suitable division should be used that things may be distinguished each by their own places and bounds lest one thing should rashly rush into the possession of another and disturb the order of its station Therefore let the praise-worthy merits of the greatest vertues have their own honour and dignity which no man withholds from them Nevertheless by their dignity they will never be so available in the presence of the Heavenly Iudge as to redeem us from our sins to satisfie Iustice to deliver us from the wrath of God and everlasting destruction to restore us that are so many ways ruinated unto grace and life to unite us as Sons and Heirs to God and to overcome Death and the World These things cost a far dearer price than that we should ever be able to pay so many and so great debts by any works or merits or means of our own For so great is the severity of Iustice that there can be no reconciliation unless Iustice be satisfied by suffering the whole punishment that was due The wrath is so very great that there is no hope of appeasing the Father but by the price and death of the Son And again so great is the mercy that the Father grudged not to send his own Son and bestow him on the World and so to bestow him that he gives Life Eternal to them that believe in him Moreover so great is the loving kindness of the Son towards us that he grudged not for our sakes to bring upon himself this infinite load of wrath which otherways our frailty however assisted with all the help of moral vertues had never been able to sustain Whence Faith hath received its efficacy BEcause Faith alone with fixed eyes looks upon this Son and Mediator and cleaves unto him who only could bring about this Atchievement of our Redemption with the Father therefore it is that it alone hath this vertue and power of justifying not with works nor for works but only for the sake of the Mediator on whom it relies Therefore that is false and worthy to be rejected with disdain which some unhappy and wicked School-Divines affirm in discoursing of Charity to wit that it is the form of Faith and that it must not by any means be separated from faith no more than the vital Soul can be separated from the body or the essential form from matter which otherwise is a rude and unweildy Mass. In answering of whom I think there is no need of many words seeing the whole meaning and drift of Scripture if rightly understood the very end of the Law seeing Christ and the instruction of the Apostles and the whole nature of the Gospel seem to be manifestly against them and wholly to overturn that most absur'd Opinion by so many Oracles so many Signs Examples and Arguments to the contrary Now if that be form which gives subsistence to a thing how much more truly must it be said that faith is the form of charity without which all the works of charity are base and contemptible as again the form of faith is not charity but Christ only and the promise of the word But what say they are not the pious works of Charity acceptable to God being so many ways prescribed unto us and commanded by him Are not these also remunerated with plentiful fruits of Righteousness and heaped up with manifold Rewards in the Gospel I was hungry says he and ye fed me I thirsted and ye refreshed me with drink so that not so much as a cup of cold water shall want a reward when it is given in the name of Christ besides an infinite number of other things of that kind which being taken out of the Scriptures are enlarged upon to the praise of Charity Indeed no man denys that pious and holy works of Charity are greatly approved of God and it is an undoubted truth that the love of God and of our Neighbour as it comprehends the Summary of both Tables and is the greatest complement of the whole Law so it hath excellent promises annexed unto it Neither is there any Controversie between us about that But when we affirm that Charity pleases God we ask this how it pleases whether simply of it self in respect of the very work or upon the account of faith and the Mediatour and then whether the same Charity so pleases that it justifies us before God and obtains the pardon of sins and overcomes the terrours of death and sin that it may be opposed to the judgment and anger of God Moreover whether it hath the promises of Eternal Life annexed unto it If without a Mediatour and the faith of him there is nothing which can please God and it is impossible that works should please him before the person of him that worketh be reconciled it follows that Charity depends on Faith and not Faith on Charity But that it rather goes before Love and is so far from being joyned with it for justification that it also justifies Charity and makes all the works of Charity acceptable to God The matters appear more evident by Example Suppose a Iew or Turk does daily bestow great gifts upon the poor with very great cost
which new qualities being received for the Merit of Christ now man himself by that inherent Righteousness as their words express it merits a greater and fuller righteousness reconciliation and adoption and at length Life Eternal Moreover they proceed so far that they assert there is no Righteousness at all but that which is peculiar to every man and they so define it that in all the nature of Righteousness there is no place at all for faith and there appears not so much as any mention thereof For thus they define it the righteousness of God which is revealed in the Gospel is a vertue in God which distributes to every one according to their deserving Alphonsus adds Evangelical righteousness is an equal proportion of merits to rewards I beseech you Pious Reader those that profess such vile and absurd things will any man suppose that they have been exercised with serious meditation at any time in the holy Scriptures or that they have not rather bestowed their whole age and wits in Heathenish and Aristotelian trifles But now it will not 〈◊〉 amiss to take notice with what props of reason they confirm these their opinions Against the Iesuits and their Topick Arguments whereby they confirm Inherent Righteousness out of Aristotle WHAT say they have you not at any time read that form of reasoning in Aristotle He is righteous therefore he is endued with righteousness Such a man is learned therefore he hath learning We have read it Say they in the Topicks of Aristotle That is true indeed But have ye not also at any time read in the Epistles of Paul these forms of speaking Christ is our Righteousness We are made the righteousness of God by him faith is imputed unto righteousness the Iust shall live by faith What then Shall we believe Aristotle more than Paul We believe Fishermen Saith Ambrose not Logicians And should we translate our Faith which we owe to God with faithful Abraham unto men that are Sophisters But now lest those Iesuits should say that they are not answered let us look more nearly into the force of their argument and pierce them through with their own Dart. They deny that ever this external attribution was heard of since the World was that a thing should receive a name extrinsically from qualities that can be within so that they should be accounted righteous before God not by inherent qualities but the righteousness of another to wit Christs which is applyed to us by Faith c. And indeed this Reason taken out of Aristotle might perhaps be of some force if they had omitted these words before God But now seeing there is a twosold and divers righteousness the one which is called the righteousness of the Law the other which is called the righteousness of Faith and seeing the judgments of God and the judgments of men do differ they do foolishly and ridiculously argue from humane things to divine from the righteousness of the Law to the righteousness of Faith for men are not justified in the sight of God upon the same account that they are esteemed righteous before men Yea oft-times it happens otherways that those whom this World does most cry up and judges just by their inherent qualities God condemns the same men chiefly of unrighteousness out of those very same qualities and so on the contrary part This may easily appear evident by the Example of the Pharisee and the Publican either of which if they were to be valued according to the inherent merits of their life what cause was there I beseech you why the Publican should go home more righteous than the Pharisee Even as with a like diversity the Scripture sometimes names them dead whom humane Philosophy would judge to be alive and in perfect health Suffer ye Saith he the dead to bury their dead But pray how dead who unless they were alive they could not bury their dead What shall we then say that the Scripture lyes in calling them dead which were alive Or does that Iesuitical Rule rather lye which judges those alive by reason of their inherent qualities whom the Scripture calls dead How shall these things so contrary to one another agree together But that it is one thing to live to be dead and to be righteous before God and another thing before Men. The Books of Holy Scripture are full of such Examples and they have been often heard of and seen by Men and yet after all these things those pleasant Gymnosophists deny that this external attribution was ever heard of since the World was that a thing should receive a name extrinsecally from qualities whose nature is to be within Is it so indeed that this was not heard of since the beginning of the World what do I hear have ye not then good men read these words of the Apostle in the Holy Scriptures of God By the disobedience of one man many were made sinners and again by the obedience of one man many shall be made Righteous I pray you what is the meaning of these words by the disobedience of one many are sinners Again by the obedience of one many are righteous Does this attribution seem internal to you or rather external was that rebellion peculiar to Adam or was it ours If it was ours how was it ours but by external imputation What when you hear these words of the Apostle He made Christ to become sin for us that we might be made the righteousness of God through him c. Did either of us receive from qualities that can be said to be within he that he was made sin or we that we are called and made righteousness through him Moreover what is that when the Publican in the Gospel is said to have gone to his house justified rather than the Pharisee what was the cause why the one went away justified and the other went away unjustified I think it came not so to pass by a habit of inherent righteousness but upon this account rather because the Publican confessed his own unrighteousness therefore of wicked he is made righteous the other because he seemed righteous to himself through a false opinion of his own righteousness was manifested to be unrighteous according to the testimony of Holy Scripture The Righteous Man no sooner speaks than he accuses himself and in another place confess thy sins that thou mayest be justified therefore that aying of Augustine seems worthy of Praise this is the true way to perfection if every man acknowledge in truth and confess in humility his own impersection And Bernard spake no less to the purpose who bids us consider the Pharisee praying he was no Robber said he nor unjust nor an Adulterer nor careless of Fastings nor unmindful of the poor nor unthankful to God what then was wanting This one thing was wanting that he took no care to know what was wanting to him but made the most of his own merit and therefore returned
somewhat cleared your Eyes you may search more exactly into the meaning of the Apostles debate and the force of his reasons And first I would have you see into this what it is the Divine Apostle chiefly treats of here what he breaths after what he drives at by this similitude whereby he compares Adam together with Christ and proposes him as a Type and Figure of Christ. But where there is a Type it is necessary there should be something which by certain agreement of similitude may be answerable to the Type On the contrary where there is no agreement there is no Type Where there is no signification there is no similitude discerned Now whereas the former Adam bears a type and resemblance of him that was to follow let us consider in what this similitude consists What in propagating sin Not at all in the very Nature of the Persons What is more unlike Where then is similitude To wit not in the persons nor things themselves but only in the manner of the thing But it must be explained what that manner is For herein lyes all the controversie between us and the Papists For otherways as touching the things themselves and the Persons we are well enough agreed in that for there is no Man who is asked concerning Adam and concerning Christ but will answer concerning both according as the thing is in truth that he is by nature earthly and in his life a Sinner and that he brought upon us not only an Example but also a cause of sinning by a certain venomous contagion of Nature And on the contrary that Christ is from Heaven Heavenly and most pure from all defilement of sin and that he only is the Saviour of the World Concerning which if I am not mistaken there is an agreement between us and our Adversaries But concerning the manner how these either good or evil things come to us from these two Originally herein consists all the matter of controversie between us for as there are many who think we are no other way guilty but that by the example of sinning we imitate Adam the first Author of Sinning So you may see many who think we are upon no other account righteous and acceptable to God but that being helped by Grace we attain unto Christs most Holy Works and his most pure Innocency of Life or do very nearly resemble the same Who though they seem to say something yet is not all contained in that For though good Education and imitation wisely used hath no small influence for the becoming Vertuous whereby it may come to pass that some perhaps may seem less wicked than others and in some respect to excel others in the praise of Piety But imitation or any instruction of discipline will never perform this In short nor any way besides will be sufficient for this that you may shake form off your neck that which you drew from Adam or that you should attain that which is in Christ that is that you should appear righteous in the sight of God unless Christ come in to your succour another way than by any of your endeavours how great soever You will say After what manner is all this No Men can tell you that better than St. Paul For after what manner the former Adam ruin'd you after the same manner the Second Adam Christ restores you That first Author of your kind whilest thou was not yet born killed thee in the root by his not by thy rebellion and drew thee into misery and destruction In Adam behold Christ for in like manner being born and having dyed for thee by his won Innocency not by thine hath restored thee again to true 〈◊〉 and Paradice As therefore the transgression of Adam was imputed to thee who didst not Sin after the similitude of his transgression So the Righteousness of Christ is imputed unto thee who didst not Work after the similitude of Christ. In the one of whom behold the severity of Iudgment in the other the excellency of Grace What if this perhaps seems hard and strange to any Man in Adam that I should suffer the punishment of another Man's Sin and that those should be punished for the crime of another who committed nothing For it must needs be another Mans crime seeing I am deprived of Righteousness not for my own fault but for the fault of my Parent Let this same Man again leaving Adam cast back his Eyes upon Christ In whom the bounty of a most plentiful clemency makes amends by a counterpoize for the severity of the former Iudgment For from one Man Death passed upon all on them also who sinned not And justly Though I do not so much regard merit here I only consider the manner of the thing Come then let us compare the Type with the Antitype from the disobedience of one Man as I said death passed upon all Men who sinned not after his example which is a thing that cannot be denied After the same manner again from the Righteousness of one Man Life is communicated unto all who did not like him work Righteousness which is agreeable by the like reason for otherways Christ could not agree to his Type Here now consider whosoever thou art Christian Reader whether the judgments of God in Adam should be more dreaded by thee in which the severity of God imputed unto thee being not yet born that which thou hadst not committed or mercy in Christ the Lord should be more loved who tothee not working but believing in him that justifies the wicked imputes the Righteousness thou didst not deserve By which you see worthy Man if Paul the Apostle should be credited how unworthy of any credit your Doctrine is whereby you take away the Grace of all Imputation and leave no Righteousness besides to miserable Sinners but what every Man purchases by his own good deeds which how true it is let us examine by that place of Paul which convinces you of a Lye and a shameful Error by this most evident Argument Argument Ma. After what manner Christ was made sin for us after the like manner we are made the Righteousness of God by Christ. Mi. Christ was made sin for us no other way but by Imputation only Concl. Therefore we are made Righteous before God no other way but by imputation only I beseech you by your Chatholick Charity what will you say or what will you feign O most dear Osorius to this so clear evidence of manifest Scripture Do you not see that you are tyed on every side with Bonds that are Apostolick and wholly of Adamant Now what Turning what Hole to escape at can you find Christ is made sin for us Wherefore That we might be made the Righteousness of God by him saith the Apostle Will you deny it I suppose you will not What way then was he made sin Will you say by committing it No By Imputation then Certainly it is so Right indeed What
and being now reconciled to God as it cannot be destitute of the favour of God so being stirred up by his holy breathings begins now to be a Law to it self whereby it fears God and according to its power honours him with due Reverence cleaves unto him with all its might refers its actions and counsels to him calls on him by prayers adheres to him in adversity celebrates his benefits with a thankful remembrance lays its hope and confidence and its whole self upon him and also for his sake loves and cherishes all the Brethren And as there is no Man that denies these Offices of necessary Obedience performed by the help of the Spirit of God are fruits of a well-instructed Faith So there is no controversie between us and you in that matter especially seeing you your self also together with us confess That these are not works of the Law but of Faith and that they should not be referred so much to the Law as to the holy Spirit and Faith relying upon his help as you say But the greatest difference that is between us consists in this that whereas we assert That the Obedience of Man born again by the Divine Power is but begun and imperfect in this mortal infirm state You on the contrary dream of I know not what perfection of obedience in works the Spirit of God so working in us that whosoever is qualified therewith needs nothing that belongs to compleat perfection of righteousness for all your debate about this matter seems to drive at this as being concluded with this one Syllogism Argument Ma. Whosoever walk in the Precepts of the Lord and perform them should be called perfect who can easily live without sin Mi. All the Faithful according to the promise of God walk in his precepts and perform them because God promises nothing but what he can and will perform Concl. Therefore according to the promise of God nothing hinders but Believers may be perfect here who are capacitated to live without sin That I may answer the Argument it is a Sophistical Argument from secundum quid to simpliciter because in the Major those are called perfect who walk in the Precepts of the Lord and frame their life according to them it is true in them who simply and perfectly perform all those things which are commanded in the Law according to that perfection which is requisite According to which Rule if the major be understood that which is assumed in the minor must be upon this account deny'd For though God hath promised to his Saints that the Assisting grace of his Spirit shall not be wanting which may help forward pious attempts in his Elect and stir up their endeavours after more holy obedience but where hath he at any time promised or on whom hath he bestowed that happiness in walking which turns no where to the right hand nor to the left which stumbles not through the whole life which in all kind of vertues by a constant perseverance so conforms the course of life to compleat innocency that it never fails in any thing The Adversaries use for the defence of their own cause to catch at the words that were just now cited out of Ierem. chap. 31. and Ezek. chap. 26. I will cause you to walk in my Precepts and keep my Iudgments c. And then out of Deut. chap. 30. I will Circumcise saith the Lord the fore-skin of your heart that ye may love the Lord with all your heart and with all your soul. I know indeed that in these words there is a glorious promise contained of the gift of the Holy Ghost and the restoring of new obedience but because there is a twofold perfection and a twofold righteousness according to Hierom. one which is suited to the vertues of God another which is agreeable to our frailty And again seeing according to the Authority of Augustine there is a twofold kind of Obedience one that is seen in this Life being but begun and imperfect Another that is perfect which is compleated in the life to come It is not difficult to discern in what sense the perfection of Renovation should be understood in the Scriptures To wit not simply and absolutely but according to the measure and capacity of this Life Therefore Augustine says well that a Man is sometimes called perfect because he hath profited in a great degree And the same again But whereas Men are called Saints sometimes and perfect in the Scriptures I say to this that it is a certain manner of perfection whereby Holy Men acknowledge their own imperfection They are also called perfect who in any respect imitate the perfection of the Heavenly Father who rains on the Iust and Unjust c. And again the same Augustine writing to Boniface The Vertue saith he which is now in a Righteous Man is called perfect upon this account because it belongs to his perfection both to acknowledge in Truth and confess in Humility his own Imperfection Moreover Hierom not much differing from him answered wittily To whom when that place of St. Paul was objected Whosoever of us are perfect we understand this To this Hierom says What then do we understand yea what ought we to understand that we who are perfect should acknowledge our selves to be unperfect and that they have not yet comprehended nor yet attained unto perfection This is saith he the Wisdom of Man to know himself to be imperfect and that I may so speak the perfection of all Righteous Men in the Flesh is imperfect c. And afterwards again in the same Book Therefore we are Righteous then when we confess our selves to be Sinners For our Righteousness consists not of our own merit but of the mercy of God as the Scripture says The Righteous Man is an accuser of himself in the beginning of his Speech And again to Ctesiphon This is Mens only perfection saith he if they know themselves to be imperfect c. Moreover the Adversaries set upon us with another Argument also which they produce out of the words of Deut. 30. To defend the perfection of their own Righteousness after this manner Ma. In these two commands thou shalt love thy God with all thy Soul and thy Neighbour as thy self is contained the summ of all perfection Mi. They that are regenerate can love God with all their Heart and all their Soul and their Neighbours as themselves according to the promise of God Deut. 30. Concl. Hence then it follows that the Regenerate by the help of the Spirit of God can fulfil all Righteousness by the Works of the Law This reasoning as it differs not much from the former so there is implied in it a certain kind of fallacy not unlike it Which of what sort it is if I may with your allowance Osorius I will declare For there lurks under the words of Scripture not rightly understood a fallacy or venom wholly Pelagian But
Church which they by a false Name boast to be Catholick which broaches amongst the common People these so great monsters of errours and tares of Opinions defends them in Schools Preaches them in Churches which sends forth into the midst of us such Dogmatists and Artificers of deceits who not only corrupt the small Veins and Rivulets of sincere Doctrine but also proceed to the Fountains themselves and Invalidate the Foundations of Apostolick Institution and cut and tear the very sinews of the simple verity For what greater injury can be done to the Scriptures of God What more cruel against the Grace of Christ what more Hostile against the mind of Paul and more gross against the soundness of the Christian Faith can be said or devised than what those Roman Potters have contributed by their commentitious deceits to the plague and ruine of the Christian Common-wealth For what may we judge should be hoped for concerning the common Religion the Sins of every one and the state of the Christian Common-wealth if the matter come to this that this largeness of Evangelical mercy being taken away or contracted we must be called back again to the account of good Works Concerning the Vertue and Efficacy of Divine Grace a more enlarged dispute against the Adversaries Answering their Objections BUT Those Men will deny that they detract any thing from the Grace of God yea they say that this is the common Sin of the Lutherans not theirs because all that they drive at is to maintain the mercy of God and to celebrate it with due praises Why so I pray for what say they Do not the Pious Works of the Saints please God Well and what next Should not the same Works having proceeded from God himself the Author be referred to his bounty and mercy Why not Now then Catholick Reader receive a conclusion Roman Catholick enough as I suppose Therefore he 〈◊〉 detracts from good works wrought by Christ 〈◊〉 from the Grace and Mercy of God Well said but pray who detracts from those Who denies good Works which Christ living and dwelling in us Works to be good Works Does any Man take away due praise and dignity from those Now Hosius talks Osorius pleads Andradius crys out that the Lutherans do it eagerly Why so I beseech you Because they do not attribute unto the performance of good Works the Salvation that is due to them but translate it to Faith only What then such as do not attribute Salvation to good Works should they be therefore supposed to attribute nothing to Works or to cast reproach upon the grace of God On the contrary they that detract the promise of Eternal Life from the Christian Faith Shall they be accounted Friends to Grace By the same reason we may turn Light into Darkness and Darkness into Light Let Christ remain in his Sepulcher let Moses rise again to be Iudge of the Living and the Dead But now what Arguments do they rely upon in disputing thus Because say they Works of Righteousness flow from the Fountain of Divine Grace But what Is not Faith in Christ the Mediatour as singular a gift of God and does it not proceed from the Election of Divine Grace But now let us hear an Argument more than Catholick Argument Ma. We are justified by the Grace of God only Mi. Our good Works have their rise from the Grace of God only Con. Therefore all our Iustification consists in good Works The deceit of this Paralogism must be drawn forth And again the word Grace must be explained Which is taken one way in the major and another way in the minor for there it is taken for mercy and the free good will of God whereby he hath redeemed us freely whereby he loves us in Christ Iesus and forgives us our Sins and whereby also he imparts his Spirit and Life Eternal to us And this is peculiarly called Grace of forgiveness of which the writings of the Apostles speak aloud in many places It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy And again Sin shall not have dominion over you for ye are not under the Law but under Grace And what the same Apostle cites out of a Psalm Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven and whose Sins are covered c. And also that which elsewhere he testified very evidently They are justified freely by his Grace moreover that none should be uncertain what is understood by the word Grace presently subjoining and as it were explaining himself he infers next By the Redemption which is in Christ Iesus But what other thing does this adding of Redemption signifie but the Remission of all Sins That this may be the Argument We are justified by that Grace whereby we are redeemed But Grace by renewing us doth not redeem us Therefore we are not justified by Grace renewing us I come now to the minor in which the word grace is taken otherways than in the major For there it is put for remission or redemption here for renovation That is for the effectual energy of the Divine Inspiration in communicating Gifts and Endowments wherewith he afterwards adorns those whom first he hath justified Whence arises a twofold manner of distinguishing Grace according to the twofold diversity of effects on this side and on that side of which one consists in the remission of evil Works the other in the operation of good Works And that is called pardoning Grace and this is called renewing Grace From the one whereof proceeds the Salvation and the Iustification of the Ungodly and from the other come the good Works of the Godly and yet those are not full nor perfect Therefore I answer the Argument proposed which hath more errours than one Moreover it is made up of mere particulars Also in the minor contrary to the manner of Disputants the case is changed whereas the same case should be kept that goes before in the major and the minor should follow thus But our good Works are by the grace of God only or at least in the major the same case of the minor should have been kept after this manner Our Iustification arises twice from the grace of God Therefore all our Iustification flows from good Works So that the true nature of this Pseudosyllogism belongs not to the first but the second figure simply concluding both affirmatively and also most absurdly just as if a Man should argue thus Our corporeal Nature was made of the slime of the Earth Earthen-Pots are made of the slime of the Earth therefore our corporeal Nature was made of Earthen-Pots What need is there of words Whatsoever way these Men form their Argument or reform it they shall never be able to prove that the works of the Law whether such as we our selves have wrought or such as the Divine Grace works in us do contain in themselves any cause of Salvation For
what manner of consequence is this Because habitual influences of Works which make us acceptable to God proceed no otherways but from cooperating Grace Therefore Faith without inherent Righteousness doth not justifie neither doth Salvation consist of any other thing but good Works But because there is a twofold sort of Works one of those which go before Faith another of those which follow Faith I would know of which of those rwo parts they understand it If of the preoedent they will not deny those to be Sins For that which is not of Faith is of Sin But if they understand it of Works subsequent to Faith they will say that those are either perfect or imperfect If perfect and of such a sort that they answer the things commanded in the Law not only according to the substance but also according to the manner of doing To what purpose then is that daily saying of the Church made mention of Forgive us our debts Or what will they answer to Augustine who evidently confutes what they maintain On the contrary if they are Imperfect Languid and Lame upon what account will they make us acceptable to God the Iudge which are of themselves defective and besprinkled with faults and spots and need another Grace by the commendation whereof they may be pleasing to God What if that infinite and Eternal purity for the most part in the Levitical Sacrifices did not endure whatever seemed any way defective or deformed or defiled with the least pollu on and which was not exquisitely entire and blameless in all respects if so great integrity of all parts was required in the Levites and Priests that it was not lawful to suffer any one to enter into the holy place of the Sanctuary who was wounded in any member of his body or deformed in any part or had a Wen Do you think that you can endure the presence of the most holy God with that half-torn and ragged Imperfection Wherefore seeing it must needs be perfect and unblameable upon all accounts which by Iustification indemnifies and frees us from all sin before the dreadful Tribunal of most perfect Righteousness surely no man can believe that it consists in our works but only in the works of the Son of God not those which his habitual grace works in us but those which he himself hath both graciously undertaken to do for us and also having undertaken them hath performed them to the full What Benesits come to us from Christ and what should be chiefly regarded in these Benefits NOW this is it in which chiefly the unspeakable amplitude of Divine Grace towards us doth evidently shine forth that God the Almighty Governour and Creatour of the World according to his fingular Mercy wherewith he hath loved the World having given his Son sent him to us and so sent him that he for us hath fulfilled all Righteousness for there was no need that he should fulfil it for himself and if he hath fulfilled it for us what hinders now but that may be ours which was done for us or to what purpose should he do that for us which he knew was necessary to be done by our selves for our Salvation But what if according to the saying of Thomas Whatsoever things we can do by Friends we our selves are said to be able to do it in some respect How much better then may we our selves be supposed both to be able to do and also to have done those things which a Friend is not only able to do for us but hath also done for us and this is that grace chiefly which every where the Evangelical Writings sound sorth unto us unto which all our both consolation salvation should be referred which Paul the Apostle having received from Christ did propagate it with so continued labour among the Gentiles and taught it with so great fervour of spirit and made it evident with so many Signs and Miracles and also confirmed it with so many Scriptures and most sure Testimonies Wherefore those Papists are the more worthy to be abhorred as being Enemies to Antiquity and Enemies to Paul who seem to be busied about nothing else but to abolish the Gospel of Christ and to overturn the Foundations of the Doctrine of the Apostles that have been long since very well laid by our first Fathers and to sow another Gospel in the minds of Christians For what else doth all their Doctrine drive at who disputing about Grace Faith and Righteousness do so handle the matter by their Philosophical Principles that he who observes their Collections Distinctions Corollaries and Opinions will perceive that they do not teach as Christians out of the Gospel out of Christ out of Paul but that the Antient Philosophers of the old Academy or the Thalmudists of the Law of Moses are again risen up and alive except that this only difference is between them and the Antient Philosophers that these do palliate with the name of Grace and Faith in words at least in some manner but in reality as touching the signification of the word Grace or the force of the word Faith they seem to be so very blind as if they had read Paul little or at least had not at all understood him I do not rail at the men themselves whom I rather account worthy of pity but it is not at all convenient to endure the Errours of men because they cast no small blot upon Religion and are injurious to Christ and do violence to Paul overthrow the simplicity of the Christian Faith moreover they adulterate all the sincerity of Evangelical Doctrine with their Niceties and after a certain manner subdue it unto humane Philosophy Which that it may appear the more evidently to the Minds and Eyes of beholders let it not be tedious to you to hearken a while first what Divine Truth and then what Humane Opinions teach us But because there are two things chiefly in which the whole sum both of our Salvation and Religion is contained Grace and Faith of which the one belongs to God towards men the other agrees to men towards God It very much concerns Christians that their Minds be very well instructed in both And Grace indeed is discerned in those good things that are given to us and promised by God Faith is exercised in those Offices which are chiefly due from us to God and are greatly requisite Therefore that we may rightly apprehend the nature of Grace we must see what and how great those gifts are which the bounty of God hath partly bestowed upon us and partly promised Concerning which thing it remains that we should examine what the Scriblers of Popish Divinity do hold Now what they teach about this matter is for the most part to this purpose They place the end of humane Life in blessedness and the School-Divines dispute about this very blessedness just after such a manner as the Philosophers of old did of their chiefest good unto
which every man must endeavour according to his power to attain by industry and diligent labours and the merits of the greatest Vertues And when the former Pelagians affirmed that we could do that by the strength of Nature there were not wanting others at the same time who valiantly opposing the help of the Grace of God to Free-will successfully rejected and exploded this wicked Opinion by the Scriptures After this came another kind of Divines who having followed Augustine disputed thus against the Pelagians that we cannot so much as will good by Free-will without Grace or merit Eternal Life by any means without Grace And that is true indeed But that those same men joyning Grace again deny not that we can merit Life by Works and that ex condigno according to their worth I do not see what difference is between these and the Pelagians in that except that in the manner of working they somewhat differ for those work without grace these no otherways but by grace but both do equally err from the scope of true Iustification For as untrue as that is that it is in our power to perform any thing aright without the Grace of God It is again as false that this grace of working was not given by God for any other purpose but to produce meritorious works whereby we may be justified Though I deny not that by any means that the Divine grace of the Spirit is both fruitful and abounding with the greatest Vertues which can never be idle but it doth not therefore follow by sufficient strength of Reason that the reward of Eternal Salvation is due to the merits of these Vertues as the generality of Sophisters chatter with a great noise in Schools For thus Thomas the Prince of this Faction and the others that are partakers of his Discipline discourse of grace and in their Summularies do define this grace as if it were nothing else but a certain habitual infusion of the heavenly gift in the essence of the Soul because as they suppose it is a principle of meritorious works for so Thomas defines it And Guillermus not much differing from him calls this grace a form freely given to us by God without merits which makes him that hath it acceptable and makes his work good and meritorious Of these then is a vulgar definition made up and it thus defines grace unto us that it is a gift of good will freely given making its possessor acceptable and rendring his work good And Albert shews the manner how it makes a man good in as much as by infused Vertues as he says it perfects the will of man for act c. By these things I suppose it appears evident enough what Opinion hitherto hath been usual amongst those men in the Popish School In which neither their Divines themselves are well enough agreed with one another for some place this habitual gift of influencing grace in the essence of the Soul subjectively that I may speak in their own Dialect amongst whom is Thomas and Bonaventure Others chose rather to refer it not to the essence but the powers of the Soul as its proper subject of whom is Scotus and the Allies of that Order Again There are those who think grace is nothing else but a Vertue which is the thing that Osorius strongly defends in his Books But Thomas confutes this Heresie with much greater strength and bears it down with suitable Reasons But the summ of all their summs drives at this that Faith only may be excluded from Iustification and that they may not acknowledge any other Iustification but what consists in exercising of Works Neither do they think this grace to be given to us upon any other account but for this end to fulfil as they say the Commands of God according to the due manner without which the fulfilling of them cannot otherways be meritorious The Errour of the Tridentines in defining Grace is examined I Have explained the sayings of some Divines which differ several ways from one another yet they are all wonderfully agreed in this one thing as it were by a common Conspiracy that they may take away from sinners that saving Grace which only justifies us Let us joyn also unto these if you please the Sophisters of later times and especially the Nobles of Trent and the Hereticks of that Council whose Writings Opinions and Decrees when they are read what do they declare I will say in a word and truly nothing that is sound nothing that is not full of Errour nothing that does not disagree with the genuine verity of the Word But what that Errour is lest we should seem to accuse them without cause let us explain in a few words but true to wit seeing there is a twofold Testimony of the Grace of the Father towards us in the Scriptures the one whereby in a free gift he bestowed his Son upon us 〈◊〉 the other whereby he bestowed his Spirit The Son to die for us the Spirit to 〈◊〉 our Life there is not any man but should confess that they are both great gifts He gave his Son than whom nothing was dearer to him he bestows his Spirit than which nothing is higher in Heaven But for what purpose doth he bestow both how does he give them for our advantage for what end with what fruit what did he design in so doing by what Reason was he persuaded by what necessity by what mercy was the most gracious Father and maker of the World moved I would very willingly ask this first either of Thomas Aquinas or rather of those Tridentine fellow-Priests for if Free-will being helped by the grace of the Sprit of God as they say could do so much by meriting through the infused Vertues even as much as was sufficient for obtaining Salvation what cause then was there why all this charge should be put upon Christ the Son of God What need was there of his blood Why did not the most gracious Father spare his Life But if so be that all other helps of grace could afford no help to expedite the business of our Redemption Then it remains to be asked of those men what they affirm of Christ whether they acknowledge him the only Saviour or not And indeed I know that they will not deny that Christ is the only Saviour But in the mean while it remains that they should answer me this after what manner this only Saviour saves his own whether only by his Innocency and Death or by adding other helps besides Now if they judge that other securities are necessarily required it must be known what sort of Securities these are Aquinas with his Associates answers that those are gifts procured by the Holy Spirit and habitual Infusions of Charity and the like faculties of exercising Righteousness which helps unless they are added the Death of Christ according to his Opinion is not of such efficacy that it should be able
due manner Grace is necessarily requisite to wit to fulfill them with that Charity that ought to be by which the fulfilling of them becomes Meritorious Which Comment of theirs we having formerly explained how false and frivolous it is there is no need now of any new Arguments Verily the Christian Doctrine teaches us far otherways for though we confess that which is reasonable That the Divine Grace is never idle but always stirs up the minds of the Regenerate to the best things yet these Works are never of so great value as to promote them unto Eternal Life which is freely promised by God not to them that Work but to them that Believe or if Salvation is premised to them that Work it is not therefore promised because they Work But they that truly believe do therefore Work because Salvation is promised Therefore Iustification first proceeds in the most direct Order as the cause of good Fruits but that is not effected by these But it consists only of the free favour of him that confers it upon them not upon the account of them that Merit but upon another account to wit That whereby the most bountiful Father of his own Will hath given to us Meriting nothing his only begotten Son who hath fulfilled the Law for us and hath satisfied the Iustice of God for our Unjustice For herein consists all our Salvation and the Efficacy of Divine Grace and the praise thereof appears very evidently Not that we in the mean while being idle should do nothing but that doing all things we should Attribute nothing to our selves imputing all to the Mercy of God Which things that they may be confirmed with the greater evidence and certainty let us compare them with the most sure Oracles of Sacred Scripture And First beginning at the very first Head of that Book let us consider Adam that Miserable Progenitor and Overturner of our Nature Who when he had both privately and publickly destroyed both himself and us all by an abominable Wickedness received at length the most Blessed Tidings of the promised Seed What could the bounty of God have promised more firmly or given more largely to any Man though he had been most Holy And what did that first and chiefest sinner deserve to receive Abraham was commanded to leave his Native Country and to go out whither God called him thereunto was added a very glorious promise of giving him an Inheritance and he obeyed him that called him The promiser did not fail he was increased and enriched above measure but if I ask by what Merit of his own what can the Admirers of Works answer me here Afterwards Ifaac was born to him when his Father and Mother were so Old that there was no hope remaining of their begetting Children Why so But that God might make it manifest that in the benefits of God there is not left any thing for Human Pride wherein it may glory Ioseph very kindly helped his Brethren who were in danger to Perish for Hunger though they had very inhumanly Conspired his Destruction neither did he only furnish them with plenty of Corn but also promoted them to great Honours And now what Merits did they bring with them that they should be so Honourably Entertained The same may be asked concerning the Israelites who having slain a Lamb without blemish were delivered from most grievous Bondage for what Vertues of their own Whether for keeping the Law But the Law was not yet made at least it was not yet written Was it because they obliged the Prophet Moses with kindnesses whom rather they endeavoured to betray by most unjust ways and complaints After they had endured so many laborious Travels and Iourneys they came at length to the promised Land of their Inheritance in which First the Town of Iericho is Besieged the Walls fall down not by strength but by sounds Afterwards having slain and subdued so many Kings in one day the People is placed in their Habitations It was verily a great Miracle of Victory but whence happened this Victory What shall we say Because the Israelites were more in number I suppose it was not so was it because they were stronger Neither was that the cause What did they then excell all the other Nations in Vertues Yea what Nation was ever more perverse But you will say they obliged God to befriend them by observance of his Worship Yea how often and how grievously did they exasperate God with their sins How wickedly did they murmur against their Leaders and so provoked the anger of God against themselves How often was the Clemency of God by their Perfidious Rebellion Wicked Contrivances Untractable Stubbornness Murmuring Concupiscence and Perverseness not only provoked but also almost overcome so that he would have utterly destroyed the Rebellious People with all their Posterity unless Moses the meekest of Men by Humble Prayer with hands lifted up had turned the provoked Anger of God into Mercy But it is better to take notice what the Lord himself speaks against this People with his own Mouth Say not saith he in thy Heart when the Lord thy God shall destroy those Nations before thee For my Righteousness the Lord brought me in to possess this Land whereas those Nations were destroyed for their own Abominations For thou shalt not enter in to possess their Lands for thy own Righteousness nor for the uprightness of thy Heart but because they did wickedly they were destroyed at thy entring in And that the Lord might fulfill the Word which he promised by Oath to thy Fathers Abraham Isaac and Iacob Know therefore that the Lord thy God hath not given thee this Land for thy Righteousness for thou art a stiff-necked People c. Ye have heard the naked and simple History but yet true of the thing that came to pass and not only true but also much more Mystical If all things happened to them as the Apostle witnesseth under a figure what else should we judge concerning this History but that under the History lies hid a more hidden Mystery For it can not be doubted that this Land of Canaan that was promised to the Israelites Represents those Celestial and Immortal Mansions of the inheritance above which if it be true let us compare the truth with this figure and shadow the Antitype with the Type Iust as they not being helped by any Merites of their own yea contrary to all their Merits neither for any peculiar cause in them but through the singular favour of God promising and for the sake of the Fathers to whom it was promised by Oath received by gift the possession of the Country that flowed with Milk and Honey So also we should Iudge of the Heavenly Country of Immortality That it is not due to any Vertues or Works of ours but that it comes to us by the free promise of God for the sake of his Son into whose hands all things are given that
we have hitherto discoursed of grace and its gifts I think there is a sufficient defence made against the assaults of Sophisters for the guarding of this principle which assigns all the power of justifying to Faith only through the free mercy of God But because I see it is not clear enough amongst Divines what that Faith is whereof we speak I thought it requisite to speak something of it in this place To wit that having surveyed the Opinions of others and rightly explained those things which seem to need distinction about the manifold homonymy of this Word we may at length be led as it were by the footstepsof the word of God to that true Faith which truly and simply justifies us But because the word Faith is used in various Senses and there are many things that are believed by us for whatsoever things we find to be true and sure we presently give credit to them but yet any sort of perswasion setled in the mind though it be true or any sort of truth about things conceived doth not therefore upon that account justifie before God Therefore in this so great diversity of things to be believed we must see what that Faith is whereof all our Salvation and Righteousness before God consists and what is the proper and simple definition thereof whence it receives its power to justifie to whom it belongs and in what Notions it differs from that Faith which our Adversaries hold Which state of Faith if it had been rightly and definitively seen into by our Divines I am either deceived or else those boasting admirers of Works would wholly change that Opinion or at least moderate themselves more in this matter of disputation But now I know not how it comes to pass that whereas no kind of Doctrine either more admirable for dignity or more excellent for use or more happy for the Salvation of Men hath shined forth or that moreover appears more perspicuously to the Eyes of all Men by manifest Testimonies of Evangelical Scripture yet there is no opinion that hath more numerous or more bitter Adversaries Which whence it comes to pass I can not be satisfied in wondering unless that whereof I spake be the cause thereof because they seem not to have discerned aright by the Gospel what that Faith is to which free Iustification is proposed Which may appear evidently by many Arguments and such as are not at all obscure unto him that reads their Writings Collections Articles Councils and Disputes And in this very Rank Osorius comes first and next Hosius one of his nearest Allies who opposing the Faith of Luther doth not so much consute that as betray his own ignorance For what ignorance is this What kind of intemperance that drawing your pen against your Adversary whom you cannot run down by true Reasons you carp at things not understood and you wound the Innocent with false Accusations where I beseech you did Luther either Teach or Dream of this Faith which you feign he holds To wit that every one obtains Righteousness or is justified upon that account only because he determines himself acceptable to God for these are your words and not yours only For Hosius also harps no less upon the same string together with you and the whole hundreds of almost all the Divines of that Class I know that Luther hath discoursed many things gravely and excellently of Faith and freely saving Righteousness of Faith But he understands this Faith which justifies us much otherways than your accusation pretends Who was ever so mad as that he judged Faith to be confined within these limits and that it is no other thing but that every Man should have a very good opinion of his own Salvation and should be strongly persuaded thereof in his own mind Though in the mean while I deny not that there is always joined with Faith a confidence of good hope yet if we will rightly examin the proper Natures and Causes of things we will find that there is no small difference between Hope and Faith For every Man doth not obtain Righteousness upon the account that he is very couragious in hoping well For otherways what Turk or Iew is there who doth not in his own mind catch at a goodly persuasion about his own Salvation and the gracious favour of God We may also add unto these the Pope of Rome who by a certain Magnifical but most vain hope flattering himself doubts not of his being the only Successour of Peter So also the Papists doubt not but as soon as they have whispered their Sins into the Ears of a Priest by a silent Confession that immediately they go away Pardoned after the performance of this Work and when they put the Innocent Servants of Christ to Death or the Faith they do not at all distrust that they do God Service whereas the matter is far otherways Therefore it is requisite to see not what every Man hopes but how rightly he hopes nor how great his hope is but how true The same also must be done in Faith But that it may appear true it should not be measured by Human Opinion but according to the right Rule of Scripture Neither is it only requisite to look what any one promiseth but to whom and for what it is promised There are wonderful and infinite things which the bounty of God promises in the way of free gift For Salvation and Life Eternal is promised Yet these good things are not therefore promised because they are hoped by us but we therefore hope because they are promised So then Hope doth not go before the promise as a cause and make it but follows it as an effect and it depends upon the promise and not the promise upon it By which you see that it is not Hope no not when it is most right that justifies us and renders us capable of the promise of God But some other thing What is that I beseech you but Faith to which properly the promise is made For the Covenant of Eternal Life is made properly with us believing and not only hoping that is not for the sake of that which is hoped but for the sake of that on which Faith relies Not every Faith Iustifies BUT What I just now said of Hope the same also again must be said of Faith that it must be true and right and not only that it must be great For every Faith doth not avail for Iustification because there are many and divers kinds of believing First there is a Faith whereby we both know that God is and fear him and the Devils themselves are not without this Faith There is another Faith whereby we believe God and give certain credit to his promises The Schoolmen add unto these a third kind of believing whereby we are said to believe in God And this Faith they divide variously into a formed and formless Faith into an habitual and actual faith There is
be necessarily joyned with the Promise Now that we may set the thing more evidently before your eyes God promises Salvation to his own and that freely and for Christ's sake That indeed is most certain and beyond all controversie Go on And you put trust in the Promise of God You do very well in doing so and I commend the constancy of your confidence When Salvation is promised freely for Christ's sake shall therefore an absolute Promise save all men promiscuously for Christ's sake without any restriction of condition I suppose God will not save all promiscuously Now then this Promise belonging not to all but some certain persons only upon some certain condition I would know who those are to whom this Promise properly belongs You say Believers and in that you say well but how or believing in whom Are they not those that believe in Christ himself Is it not he only for whose sake only Salvation is promised to Believers Doth not this Faith only in the Person of the Son of God make us partakers of the promise Doth not this Faith only justifie before God Moreover is not this the only condition which every where the voice of Christ and the Apostles in the Gospel and the voice of the Prophets inculcate which the appointment of the Father especially requires that we should hear his beloved Son that we should receive Christ that we should believe in his Name that we should flie to him by Faith and betake our selves wholly to him that we should believe in him whom he hath sent whom the Father hath sealed that we should digest him inwardly in our minds that we should be ingrafted into him and should grow in him that we should know Iesus and him crucified only that we should behold him only as the Israelites of old beheld the Serpent in the Wilderness that we should put on Christ. Hence come these so frequently repeated Sermons in the Gospel concerning the Person of Christ He that believeth in me hath Life Eternal As many as received him They that believe in his Name He that believes in the Son of God That every one that seeth the Son and believes in him He that believeth in me shall never Die Do ye believe in God Believe also in in me We believe and know that thou art Christ the Son of the living God He that believes in him who justifies the Ungodly Iustifying him that is of the faith of Iesus Christ. If thou confess with thy Mouth the Lord Iesus c. That we may believe that 〈◊〉 is the Son of God and believing may have Eternal Life If thou believe with all thy Heart c. Believe in the Lord Iesus and thou shalt be saved and thy House The Righteousness which is of the Faith of Christ. We have access through the faith of him The promise of the faith of Iesus Christ. By faith which is in me By his Name all that believe in him If ye do not believe that I am he Except ye eat my flesh Except ye abide in me If ye abide in me Ibid. Ye are all the Sons of God by Faith in Iesus Christ. What is the True and Genuine Definition of Faith BY Which so many and so evident places of Scriptute there is no Man that cannot be most sure what is properly the Object of that Faith which justifies us To wit no other thing but the person of the Son of God As again the object of Confidence is the promise of God Which things being so it will not be difficult to gather from these Notions of Scripture what is the true and genuine definition of justifying Faith concerning which we are making enquiry which seems that it ought to be defined according to the right rule of the Gospel after this manner To wit That it is a right knowledge of the Son of God planted in our minds whereby we acknowledge a promised Christ and receive him being held forth and with our Mouth profess him to have dyed for us and rose again Worship him in Spirit and embrace him with all our mind together with all his benefits And this Faith as it is a singular gift of God so of all the gifts of God we believe this faith is that only which justifies believers in the sight of God To which though assurance and confidence of the grace of God is most nearly joyned which is it self also sometimes called by the name of Faith yet this confidence doth not properly infer the cause of Iustification but receives it being brought neither doth it cause Iustification but is rather caused by it and renders those assured who are justified by the Faith of Christ but doth not it self justifie For God doth not therefore forgive thee and receive thee for a Son because thou embracest the Mercy of God with a Holy confidence but because thou embracest his Christ with a right Faith and confessest and lovest him he loveth thee neither do we therefore believe in Christ because we are assured of Salvation and trust the promises but because we believe in Christ therefore we attain unto a certain hope of those things that are promised in Christ for Eternal Life is promised to him that believes in the Son And from hence arises that clear Distinction between Faith and Assurance for they differ in Subjects and Objects The Faith of Christ which brings forth Righteousness takes its place in the higher part of the Soul wherein the understanding is Assurance hath relation to those powers of the Soul in which hope and the like affections are placed As touching the Objects Assurance hath respect to the Mercy or the promise in Christ faith is directed to Christ himself because he obtains Mercy for Believers But perhaps too much hath been said of those things which being clear enough of themselves would not at this time need any Explication unless I were forced thereunto by the Calumnies of Hosius Osorius and such Others whose Opinion seems to me to be faulty upon a Twofold account First in that they think this Doctrine of Christian Assurance which we Establish in Christ should by no means be endured in the Church and which they call Confidence and Presumption than which they affirm that nothing is more hurtful and pernicious to the Salvation of the Godly Hosius adds his own Iudgment that to him no Abomination as he expresses himself seems greater in the sight of God than this so great presumption of the Hereticks Neither wants he here his Authorities wrested from the Scriptures What saith he doth not the command of the Gospel teach us to confess our selves to be unprofitable Servants in all respects yea when we have performed all that God commanded us From whence Hosius presently gathers that he who assures himself that he is in a State of Grace he doth as much as if contrary to the command of the Lord he called himself a profitable Servant O Wise Headpiece
the godly can will to sin because by a voluntary receiving of Grace they are endued with so pure Charity and Innocency that being polluted with no spot of unrighteousness they are not only accounted clean and undefiled by imputation and the remission of sins but are in reality righteous and unblameable by the true possession and exercise of Vertue But where will they find those righteous men that dare profess themselves free from all guilt of sin As I may speak it of all the other Apostles so here I would ask them particularly of Iohn whom they quote whether they think that he himself should be reckoned in the Catalogue of the righteous who are not tainted with the least spot of sin Let us then hear the Apostle confessing of himself If we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves and the Truth is not in us Now then if so great a Disciple of Christ and one so dearly beloved of him durst not plead a total and perfect freedom from sin nor could do so without a Lye dare those Tridentine Seducers attribute that unto themselves and do they suppose that the World can be so blinded by them that it doth not easily take notice of and detest their manifest Lyes Deceits and Impostures and so great an impudence in Lying and Deceiving Pious Reader what Testimonies of greater Authority dost thou look for That which the Tridentines affirm the Apostle denies If they say true the Canonical Truth is a Lye But if it be blasphemy to entertain such a thought must not they of Trent be Lyars What need is there to prove it I will express it in a word The Testimony of Scripture the Consent of Nature the Experience of all Ages the Iudgment of the Learned the Sayings of the Antient Fathers the Examples of all the Saints the general Opinion of all good men the guilty Conscience of evil doers the constant Prayers of the Church her Complaints and Tears the Rebellion of the Flesh the wicked Imaginations arising in the Heart the Deceit of Errours the Groans of troubled Spirits the Disturbances incident to a Mortal Life and Death it self common to all men Moreover the constant Confessions of the Papists and their often repeated Absolutions what is the meaning of these so many and weighty Arguments What is it that they declare but that the Righteousness attainable in this Life is either none at all or such as Augustin describes that consists more in the remission of sins than in the perfection of Vertues And lest any should flatter himself with hopes of perfection in this Life let us hear what the same Augustin commenting upon Iohn infers Let not sin reign in your mortal body He says not let it not be but let it not reign For as long as you live of necessity sin must be in your Members Yet let the dominion be taken from it let not that be done which it commands c. And again writing to Macedonius Who of us is without sin And presently again repeating the same But who in this Life is without some sin But him we call good whose goodness prevails and him we call best who sins least Therefore those whom the Lord himself calls good by reason of the participation of Divine Grace he calls the same also evil because oftheir infirmities until our whole man be thoroughly purged from all corruption by passing into that Life in which we shall sin no more c. Thus said Augustin Where then is that real infusion of Vertues as they call it where are these new Qualities and that Inherent Righteousness that hath no need of remission of sins for what need is there of remission there where there is nothing to be forgiven For what sin can remain there where the perfect purification as they speak of Body and Soul from all pollution of sin makes us holy and partakers of the Divine Nature Briefly that I may comprehend the matter in a few words lest this discourse should grow into too great a bulk I suppose I have sufficiently by what I have discoursed at large cleared these things following First what is the nature of true Faith which causeth Righteousness what is its proper Object from whence it receives power to justifie which we have proved by the Scriptures to proceed wholly from its object that is the person of him only in whom we believe Now because Faith only embraces the person of Christ therefore it is that Faith only upon the account of its Object and not for the sake of our Vertues justifies the sinners and ungodly What sinners are justified by Christ. BUT here there is another thing to be enquired into to wit who are these sinners to whom this Iustification belongs In which the difference must of necessity be observed For as it is not every Faith or act of believing that procures Iustification but that only which eyes the Mediatour So this very Faith doth not belong to all sinners promiscuously Though all men are sinners by nature and in many things we offend all yet all are not sinners alike They that have no sense of their sins no trouble in their Conscience nor shame for the Abominations they have committed but run on headlong and without fear into all wickedness though they prosess Christ and Faith in him with their mouth yet their heart is void of him neither doth this empty profession yield them any benefit Of which sort of men Christ Preaches in the Gospel Not every one that saith to me Lord Lord but he that doth the Will of my Father c. After the same manner the whole Epistle of Iames treats of these and such like men whom he denies to be justified by this counterfeit and hypocritical Faith But on the contrary those that sincerely repent and mourn for their sins and abhorring their own Wickedness return to Christ with all their Hearts and receive him by Faith these only are 〈◊〉 whom Faith alone Iustifies without Works according to that well known saying of Paul And by this means it will not be difficult to reconcile both the Apostles Paul and Iames to one another For as Iames a Servant of Iesus Christ cannot deny but Faith when it is found in a Penitent and Humbled sinner justifies him freely without Works and before all good Works So on the other side neither doth Paul an Apostle of Iesus Christ approve of that Faith which works not by love nor admits abominable wretches of profligate lives to have any fellowship with Christ. Which things being granted what can the Papists say against this Assertion concerning justifying Faith Or what valuble Author can they produce in defence of their Erroneus Doctrine Now if to justifie from sins is nothing else but to absolve from sins as we have demonstrated out of the Apostle Is there any that can absolveus but Christ only Or how should he absolve unless he be received Or after what
without any disadvantage to our Cause For suppose we grant that Faith is Dead which is not moved with a desire of doing good Works according to the saying of St. Iames yet it doth not therefore follow from hence that no Faith Iustifies without Works From which two things do follow worthy of consideration First That no Faith justifies that is not lively And next though it abounds in good Works and never is without them yet it only without Works Iustifies This will appear evident by the Example of St. Paul Who though he was not conscious to himself of any Wickedness yet he durst not affirm himself to be thereby Iustified I think nothing hinders but the whole Argument may be yielded unto if so be the terms are rightly placed The Adversaries gather out of the Apostle Iames that Faith is dead which is without Works and herein we do not much oppose them But what follows from hence Therefore as they say dead Faith without Works doth not justifie And I deny it not But what Conclusion flows from this manner of Arguing Therefore only Faith doth not justiste Why so If no Faith but that which is lively justifies and if it receives Life only from Works then this is the consequence that Faith justifies only upon the account of good Works I Answer First though we grant it is true that the Faith which justifies us in the sight of God is lively and always joyned with a Godly Life Yet that this Faith justifies and reconciles us no other ways but upon the account of good Works is most false For this is not a good consequence from the premises Because Faith is not alone in the Life of the Believer therefore Faith is not alone in the Office of justifying Or because the Faith that justifies is not a dead but a lively Faith therefore it doth not justifie alone without Works For herein is a fallacy of the Consequence But you may object Whence then is Faith said to be lively and not Dead but from Works Which if it be so of necessity it must draw all its Life and Vertue from Works Nay the matter is quite contrary For though in the sight of Men Faith is not discerned to be Lively and Vigorous but by Works yet Faith receives not Life from Works but rather Works from Faith As Fruits draw their Life and Sap from the Root of the Tree but not the Root from them Iust so external actions proceed from Faith as the Root which if they be good they evidence the Root to be sound and lively and this is all they do but they communicate no Life thereunto And this Life and Vertue of Faith is not one but Twofold And it acteth partly in Heaven and partly in Earth If you ask what it doth amongst Men upon Earth It does good to its Neighbour working by Love But before God in Heaven it justifies the Ungodly not by Love but by the Son of God whom it only lays hold of Therefore those Men seem not to have got a clear insight into the Vertue and Nature of the Grace of Faith that suppose the whole Life thereof to consist in Love as if Faith of it self could do nothing but as it receives Vertue and Efficacy from Charity Indeed both may seem to be true in the External Actions of Human Life in which Faith lyes like a dead thing unless it be enlivened by Charity to the exercise of good Works And hereunto belongs that saying of Paul whereby he so much commends Faith working by Love understanding such Works as Faith working by Love brings forth to the view of a Human Eye Yet with God Faith hath a far different operation for it only without any reliance upon Works or assistance of Charity but trusting to the naked promise of God and the dignity of the Mediatour climbs up to Heaven and gets access into the presence of God where it does great and wonderful things combating with the Iudgment to come fighting against the terrours of Death Satan and Hell pleads the cause of a Sinner obtains his pardon absolves and justifies him from the accusations of a guilty Conscience takes away all Iniquity reconciles God to the Sinner appeases his wrath subdues the power of Death and the Devil and procures Peace yea and Paradise it self with theThief that had led a wicked Life and yet at Death was justified by Faith in the Redeemer Who would desire more or greater things And now so many and great things being done by Faith let us enquire After what manner it does them Not as it lives and works by Love but as it lives only by Christ and relies on the promise for the Life of Faith which lives before God is not Charity but Christ not receiving Life from Charity but communicating life unto it and justifying Works that they may be acceptable to God which would otherways be abominable Unto the truth of this we have a sufficient Testimony given us by Paul When he says my Life is Christ and again the Life that I now live in the Flesh I live not by the Love but by the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me And elsewhere speaking of himself he says That he was not conscious to himself of any VVickedness and yet he denies that he is thereby Iustified as the same Apostle discoursing about the works of Abraham though they were never so Eminent for Holiness yet he saw nothing in them which that Great Patriarch might make a matter of Glorying before God Hereunto may be added the Arguments of others that have been strangely wrested out of Scriptures There are six Reasons principally which they pretend the Evangelists furnish them with against the Righteousness of Faith First they draw an Argument from these words of Christ Come ye blessed of my Father to the Kingdom prepared for you For I was an hungred and ye gave me Meat Argument Da. That which is the cause of blessedness is also the cause of Iustification Whom he hath Iustified them he hath also Glorified c. Rom. 8. Ri. Works of Mercy are the cause of blessedness for I was an hungred and ye gave c. Mat. 25. I. Therefore Works of Mercy are the cause of Iustification Answer I deny the Minor For Works of Mercy as they are considered in themselves are not the cause of Iustification or blessedness but rather effects and furits of Iustification for they are no otherways pleasing to God but as they are performed by persons in a justified state and it is by the Faith of Christ that they become acceptable For unless Faith go before and justifie the person of him that worketh his works are not at all regarded by God because they do not satisfie the Law of God being tainted with the corruption of depraved Nature and come far short of that perfection which Divine Iustice requires Wherefore if we will Reason aright about
the cause of blessedness this manner of arguing will appear to be more forcible by an evident Testimony of Scripture Argument Ma. That which is the cause of blessedness the same is the cause of Iustification Mi. Remission of Sins is the cause of blessedness and Salvation Con. Theresore Remission of Sins is the cause of Iustification But you may say What must then be answered to the Words of Christ who seems to promise the blessedness of the Kingdom as a reward of Works You may find an answer to this objection in the Book of Iacobus Cartusiensis who hath written on this manner Men do accept and love the persons of others for their Works that are acceptable and profitable to them but God accepts the Works for the sake of the person c. Therefore here there is need of a distinction between the Work and the person of the Worker But you may say Are not Works that are performed in Charity for the relief of the Poor pleasing and acceptable to God We deny not that our selves But we enquire into the cause wherefore they become acceptable Which that it may appear the more evidently let us examine these words of Scripture I was an hungred said Christ and ye gave me Meat I was thristy and ye gave me Drink c. I ask in the first place who is it here that was an hungred You will say Christ either himself in his own Body or in a Member of his Body Did you then feed Christ when he was an hungred That was Piously done indeed Therefore I see and commend what you have done But I ask what was it that stirred you up to do it Whether was it Charity setting Faith a work or was it not rather Faith setting Charity a work But what if some other that was no Member of Christ whether Heathen or Turk had need of your Meat Would you in your Charity have fed him I doubt of that But suppose you your self had not believed in Christ but had been an Enemy to him if you had seen one that belonged to Christ almost ready to perish for hunger would you have relieved him I do not believe so Why Because it is only believers that feed Christ but Infidels persecute him The Lord was thirsty on the Cross and he had Vinegar given him for drink which was a Hellish wickedness But why did they give him Vinegar Was it want of Love or was it not rather want of Faith in those unbelieving Pharisees Who if they had not wanted Faith they would not have wanted Charity to administer help and Charity would not have been unrewarded But let us proceed Suppose one that is not a believers whether Turk or Heathen should refresh a hungry Christian by giving him of his Meat as old Simon the Pharisee entertained Christ with a Dinner And many of the Heathens have been Eminent in offices of kindness and Love Can the giving of Meat and Drink by any such without Faith merit Eternal Life Surely not But if a believer gives his Christian Brother so much as a Cup of cold Water in his necessity shall he lack his Reward Christ himself says he shall not Hereby you may see whence it is that our Vertues and good deeds are acceptable to God and dignified with Rewards not for themselves but for the Faith of him that works them which first justifies the person before all works And after the person is justified his performances are accepted and though they are of small value in themselves yet they are looked upon as great and rewarded plentifully Wherefore we deny not that sometimes in the Scriptures the name of Reward is joyned with Eternal Life and that the works of Brotherly Charity may in some sense be called meritorious if so be these works are performed by persons who are already justified and received into favour by remission of sins and have obtained a right unto the promise of Eternal Life Not that their works are of such value that they should make satisfaction to the Law of God or merit any thing with God ex congruo or condigne as they phrase it either by congruity or worthiness But they are imputed as Merit by Grace Not that Eternal Life is due to the works themselves but because there are consolations laid up in Heaven for Saints and persons in a justified state to support them in their afflictions Eternal Life not being due to them for their works but by right of the promise just as a Son and Heir to whom his Father's Inheritance is due doth not merit the right of Sonship by any duties that he performs but he being born a Son his duties upon that account are meritorious so that he wants not a due reward and recompence Therefore in this Popish Argument there is a fallacy Another Argument taken from the words of Christ Matth. 25. Da. HE that doth the will of the Father shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Ti. It is the will of the Father that we should do good works that are commanded in his Law Si. Therefore an entrance into Heaven is obtained by the works of the Law Answer Suppose we grant all contained in this Argument what will these Roman Iusticiaries infer from thence Therefore as Vega speaks Faith is not sufficient to Salvation without the keeping of the Commandments It is easie to answer him in a word Let him keep the Commandments according to the exact Rule of the Divine Will and he shall be saved But neither he nor any other man can perfectly keep the Commands of God in this Life From whence we infer this by necessary consequence That either there is no hope of obtaining the Kingdom or else that it lies not in the works of the Law Now if it be so what remains but that finding this is not the way to Heaven we should seek for another way and because there is no door of Salvation opened to sinners in the Law of Commandments therefore we must flie to another Refuge But what that Refuge is appearing to us from Heaven it self the Divine Will declares unto us which is not set forth in the Old Law but in the New Testament of the Gospel And this is his Will that every one who believeth in the Son should not perish but have Eternal Life For whereas the Law was weak because of the flesh God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the spirit Objection But here some may object Will the Faith of Christ justifie us in such a manner that there may be a Legality and Impunity for us to disobey the Will of his Father God forbid The Liberty of the Gospel allows not that for it openly affirms That they who are justified by the Faith of Christ walk not after the flesh but
after the spirit And to this purpose our Lord himself speaks though not in the same words Not every one that saith unto me Lord Lord shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven but he that doth the Will of my Father which is in Heaven For what is it to do the Will of the Father but as Paul expresses it to walk not after the flesh but after the spirit In which place a perfect obedience to the whole Law is not required to Iustification but the meaning of our Lord's words is this that he requires a Faith which is not counterfeit nor hypocritical but upright and sincere which doth not only outwardly and with the mouth make mention of the name of the Lord or the Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord as the Pharisees and Hypocrites did of old but heartily endeavours to walk in the fear of God and though it cannot perform all things commanded in the Law yet it strives as much as in it lies to shun all things that are contrary to the Will of God that at least sin may not have the dominion if it cannot be wholly excluded or rooted out Thus I understand these words of Christ To do the Will of his Father which is in Heaven For God requires us to do his Will but does not exact a compleat perfection of Obedience in this Mortal Life On the contrary he that makes an outward shew of Faith and an external profession of the Name of Christ whilst he takes no care to lead a Life suitable to his profession but runs on in sins against his Conscience it is certain that such a Faith according to the saying of Christ profits him nothing though he boast in the Name of the Lord as much as he will not that Faith without Works doth not justifie before God provided it be true and not counterfeit that is if it is received into a heart truly humbled as seed into good ground But because that Faith which doth not provoke unto Love and good Works though it may be boasted of at a high rate yet in reality it is no Faith at all but only a shadow and false resemblance of Faith And the same Answer may serve for all their Arguments which they have wrested out of the Sermons of Christ in the Gospel to defend their Doctrine of Iustification by Works Of which sort are these next following Argument Matth. 7. Many shall say to me in that day Lord we have prophesied in thy Name and in thy Name we have cast out Devils and in thy Name we have done many mighty works Then shall I profess unto them I know you not depart from me ye that work iniquity From these words they draw this Argument Ce. Whosoever is rejected of Christ is not justified La. Every one that works iniquity though he hath the Faith of Miracles is rejected of Christ. Rent Therefore he that works iniquity tho' he hath Faith he is not justified Or thus We are approved by Christ after the same manner that we are justified By Works ofRighteousness we are approved of Christ. Therefore by Works of Righteousness we are justified Answer I answer to the first The Minor must be understood with a distinction He that works iniquity is taken two manner of ways in Scripture Sometimes godly men work iniquity and likewise wicked men for both of them sin but they differ in their manner of working iniquity Godly men commit many things which they hate and which are truly sins But because they delight not in them in their inner man but in their love to Christ they endeavour with all their might to return unto God by Repentance God doth not impute their sins to them wherefore those sins that are done away by remission are not reckoned for sins But the case is far otherways in those that are wholly bent upon the fulfilling of the lusts of the flesh and continue in them with delight and satisfaction And unto them belongs that sentence of Christ whereby he commands all that work iniquity to depart from him As touching the second Argument it is a fallacy a non causa pro causa as we call it if our Vertues were of sufficient efficacy to merit the Grace of God there would be some ground for that which they infer Now our Works being such as have always need of Mercy and never satisfie the Law of God nor bring Peace to the Conscience nor support us under the stroke of Death or the weight of Iudgment How evidently doth it hence appear what we should answer to this Argument Good Works are pleasing to God I grant their assumption But first the person must please God and be reconciled to him that so his works may please and be acceptable for the person being once reconciled the works from thence derive their dignity I acknowledge therefore that works of Piety are pleasing to God but yet only as they are performed by persons reconciled and justified But if the manner how they that do good works are reconciled be enquired into they do not obtain Reconciliation by works but before all merits of works for works go not before him that is to be justified as a cause thereof but always as an effect follow him that is justified As fruits if they be good they receive their goodness from the Tree whence they grow but they are not the cause why the Tree is good So in like manner we grant with Augustine that the righteous have great merits But it comes not from their merits but from another caufe that they are righteous So Iacob was beloved of God before he had done either good or evil What did David before he was anointed King to deserve so great a dignity The same may be said of Abraham of whom we read in sacred Records how great things were promised to him when first he was called away from his Fathers house But the Scripture gives us no account of any merits of his as if thereby he had Right unto so great preferments What shall I say of Adam did he not first lose Paradise before he received the promise of recovery And God had respect unto the Sacrifice of Abel What is your Opinion concerning this Did the worth of his Oblation procure him this favour Or shall we say there was some other thing that made his person acceptable to God before he had any regard to his Sacrifice If you cast your Eyes about upon all the Histories of the holy Scripture and take a view of all the Generations of the People of Israel when God in his great goodness did bear with all the provocations of that People can you discern any thing in their works that merited so great long-suffering and patience or should we say that it was only for the sake of Christ that was to be born of that Nation In like manner it may be said of the Church which though it hath been
in so many dangers and compassed about with so many troubles and snares yet it continues firm notwithstanding all this opposition in spite of the very Gates of Hell Wherefore is it thus Is it for its own merits or should we account the Grace and Power of Christ to be the only procuring cause thereof and no strength nor merit of ours Now it is evident to every reasonable man that the same thing which is the cause of Preservation is also the cause of Salvation to the Church which consists not in our Works but only in the Faith of Christ and his free Bounty An Argument out of St. Iames. Not the hearers of the Law but the doers shall be justified Not the hearer of the Law but the doer shall be blessed Iames 1. Mat. He that heareth my words and doth them c. Therefore not Faith only but Deeds do justifie I answer The Argument may be granted if the Minor be rightly added with the Inference which we shall set down here that the Argument may appear in its perfect form He is righteous that by deeds fulfils the Law No man by deeds fulfils the Law in this life Therefore no man is justified by deeds in this life The Minor is evident by the Authority of the same Apostle Iames Whosoever shall keep the whole Law and offend in one thing is guilty of all There is none in the Land of the Living but fails in some thing Iames 2. Yea there is no man that offends not in many things Therefore no man in this life fulfils the Law of God no not Iames himself Let us now consider the words of Christ that are cited out of the Gospel He that heareth my words and doeth them c. Who doth not clearly apprehend the mind of Christ in these words for it is manifest that his design was to rebuke the counterfeit pretences of Hypocrites and thereby to stir up the minds of his own Disciples to the power of Godliness and sincerity in their profession which he doth in more than one place and not without weighty reasons For as nothing is more detestable so nothing is more usual than for false Hypocrites to be covered with a Vizard of Holiness who having no experimental knowledge of the things which they profess nor drawn unto God by Effectual Calling nor taught by his Spirit being ignorant of God and strangers to the practice of Holiness do make a great shew amongst all men outwardly pretending to that which they are not indeed but would seem to be who take little or no care at all to be any way instrumental for the Glory of God But their chief endeavours are to encrease their gain and satisfie their ambitious desires that they may be great in this World and get applause and renown amongst men Such a frame of spirit is in most Hypocrites But the great searcher of hearts who looks into every dark corner of the Soul and discerns all the most hidden imaginations is not unacquainted with their Hypocrisie and there is nothing more abominable unto him Therefore our Lord in giving Instructions of Piety to his Disciples strictly commands that such as take upon them the profession of Faith in his Name should not only make shew of it in words or account it enough to encline their Ears to his Doctrine but also practise it in their Lives and endeavour as much as in them lies to walk suitable to their profession By what I have said it may evidently appear that these words do not express the way how we are justified but they only declare what manner of men they ought to be who are Iustified and have obtained a right to the Heavenly Inheritance by Faith and free Grace Another Argument The Foolish Virgins were shut out of Heaven not because they wanted Faith but because they neglected taking Oyl in their Vessels Mat. 25. The same appears in the slothful Servant Therefore The Kingdom of Heaven is due to good Works and not to Faith Answer The Consequence must be denied For this is the true consequence thereof Therefore Men are justly shut out of Heaven for Evil deeds and Impiety For though a slothful and lazy Servant ought to be shut out of the House yet it doth not therefore follow that the Inheritance must needs be due to him that faithfully and diligently performs his duty The Kingdom of Heaven is given to faith not to duties by way of gift not by way of bargain not for merits but freely And though faith in the mean while is not idle but diligently exercises it self in the ways of Holiness yet the possession of this great benefit should not therefore be attributed unto Works suppose an adopted Son in managing well his Father's Goods shews himself a faithful Steward in his Father's House is not his Father's Inheritance bestowed upon him of free gift notwithstanding all this care and industry Moreover that is not true which is denied in the Antecedent that the foolish Virgins were not shut out for want of Faith For had they had true Faith they would not have wanted provision of Oyl For Faith that is lively cannot be slothful Therefore in Scripture these Epithets are given to Faith 1. That it is true and not feigned 2. It is sure and not wavering 3. One and not diverse 4. Lively and not dead 5. Great 6. Fervent and not luke warm 7. Laborious and not Idle 8. Strong 9. Couragious and not fearful 10. Stable and not unconstant Another Objection taken out of Iohn 5. They that have done good shall come forth unto the Resurrection of Life and they that have done evil unto the Resurrection of Damnation and again Rom. 2. Every Man shall be rewarded according to his Works The Argument of the Adversaries taken out of Ioh. 5. Rom. 2. Therefore the Salvation or Destruction of Men depend on their Works and not Faith only If any Man desires to see this Argument in a Syllogistical term he may take it thus There is no Iustification without Works where there is a reward given according to Works The Iudgment of God rewards according to VVorks Therefore there is no Iustification in the Iudgment of God without VVorks Answer As there is nothing more sure than the Words of Peter in which he affirms that Christ is appointed Iudge of the Living and the Dead so also that is a truth which is asserted by Paul That we must all appear before his Iudgment Seat who will render to every Man according to that which he hath done whether Good or Evil. Therefore you say Not Faith but Works do justifie which are the procuring cause either of Salvation or Destruction But this is not the consequence of the Words of the Apostle nor the sense of that Scripture But if we Reason according to the mind of the Holy Ghost in these places of Scripture we must rather draw
are far from Righteousness None need the Physician but they that are Sick neither doth Christ invite any to come unto him but such as are heavy laden Come unto me saith he all ye that labour and are heavy laden and I will give you rest But what is coming to Christ but believing in him according to the saying of Augustin Therefore as Christ rejects none that come unto him that is such as return to him by believing but revives and justifies them so faith in Christ in which only our Salvation consists is no where of a saving efficacy but only in those whom it finds burdened and afflicted Another Objection If Faith only were sufficient to Iustification it would follow that good Works are not necessary But the Consequent is false And Therefore the Antecedent also is false That Faith ony is sufficient Vega confirms the Minor with this Argument Unless good Works had been necessary in all respects Paul had not so carefully given Instructions about Vertue and rebuked Vice and so mightily commended good Manners and Integrity of Life but we shall afterwards enquire into the Minor I come now to the Argument And First I deny the Major for this is not a necessary Consequence Salvation is obtained by Faith in Christ only Therefore good Works are not necessary The necessity of Vertue and honest discipline is and always hath been very great in all respects both private and publick yet this necessity doth not at all detract from the peculiar dignity of Faith that it should not be the only cause of Iustification as on the other side the Iustification of Faith doth not take away the necessity nor lessen the care of a Godly Life Therefore both Faith in Christ and the practice of Holiness are necessary the one to justifie Sinners in the sight of God and the other to exercise them that are justified in this World Therefore There is need of a distinction in this case for according to Philosophy a thing is said to be necessary two manner of ways First Absolutely and simply when one thing is so necessary to another that it cannot be done or consist without it Secondly In respect of Consequence when a thing is of such a Nature that as soon as it begins to be other things also are joyned with it or at least soon follow after and thus good works in persons justified are necessary to Salvation not simply but in regard of Consequence By what I have said any Reader that is not void of Sense may easily discern that we seek not to banish good Works out of the World that they should not be necessary but we only remove them from being a cause of Iustifying That so both Faith and Works may be put each of them in their own place and contained within their own bounds For Paul did not in vain nor without great necessity exhort with much vehemency to the Godly practice of a Christian Life For what is more glorious in it self or more worthy of the profession of Christianity or fitter to adorn the Doctrine of the Gospel than that those who are called by the Name of Christ should resemble him exactly in their manners and the practice of their lives And as they profess themselves to be Citizens of the Heavenly Kingdom they should according to their power endeavour to lead a Life like Heaven upon Earth On the contrary what is more abominable or odius than if those who have been engaged by so many benefits exalted to so great dignity and are joyned to him into so near an union by so many Covenants and Obligations if yet they do not follow his Foot-steps nor imitate him in the practice of their lives Therefore in this we and they agree that Works of Piety are very necessary but we must consider wherein this necessity lies For they are effects which of necessity depend upon their cause from whence they proceed but the cause hath no dependance upon them by any necessity By the like Consequence we call many things necessary in common Offices of Civility and Humanity as when Kindnesses are received what is more necessary and according to Iustice than a thankful remembrance of a Favour received and a readiness of Mind to give evidence of thankfulness not only in Words but also by repaying Kindness with Kindness if there be Opportunity Which thankfulness was nevertheless no cause of the Kindness that was done Let us here compare other kinds of Offices Who knows not that a Son and Heir ought of necessity to be dutiful to his Father But again who can be ignorant that this is no cause in him why he should receive the Inheritance The same also may be observed in Marriage where the Wife being tyed to her own Husband of necessity owes Subjection to him which nevertheless she shews to him not so much for any Law of necessity that extorts it as of her own accord and willingly being provoked by a Principle of Love moreover when she shews him the greatest Subjection this necessity is no cause of the Marriage bond Iust so it is in the performance of Godly Works which Paul commands us to maintain for necessary uses not that necessity of Works is any cause of Iustification but because it cannot otherways be but that where true Faith is there of necessity good Works are required and yet they are not so much required as they are a necessary Consequence for who was ever endued with the true Knowledge of Christ the Son of God or had the secret breathings of his Spirit or had a lively sense of his unsearchable Power and the unspeakable Glory of his Majesty but is drawn after him with the Cords of Love and cleaves unto him with all his Heart setting light by all the Vanities of this World Moreover who hath a true savour of Christ but he dispises the World and all the things of the World as the dirt under his Feet So that now there is no need of any Law to exact Works of Righteousness of him who is truly planted in Christ because he is a Law to himself and does more of his own accord than can be commanded by any Compulsion An Argument of the Iesuites The Word only is not found in the Holy Scripture therefore Faith only doth not justifie Though it is not true that this exclusive Word is no where found in the Holy Scriptures yet suppose we should grant it to be true what would be the Consequence Verily those things that follow from a necessary Consequence though they are not expressed yet they are implied And therefore ye also your selves admit many Words into your Confession of Faith of which the Scripture makes no mention But let us proceed you say this Exclusive Word is not found in Canonical Scripture I confess it is not in so many Letters and Syllables But seeing we meet with so many other things in sacred Writings that exclude all these Accessory
Apostle's Words and with what deceit they wilfully wrest and deprave the genuine Signification of his Words by their most absurd Interpretation to the intent they may maintain their own erroneous Doctrine If they did this only in Ignorance they should not be so much the Objects of our Anger as of our Pity and Commiseration as being Men misled into Errour But they behave themselves as if they were unwilling to be undeceiv'd And though they cannot but see the Truth in such a clear Light of the Scripture yet they wilfully shut their eyes because they are not willing to see or at least believe the clear shining Light of the Truth which that it may appear the more evident unto all Men let us now produce the Answers and deceitful Shifts of the Adversaries whereby they maintain their own Cause against our Arguments And because there are eight Arguments out of St. Paul which we oppose against the Papists we think it is not unprofitable in this place to set down what the Papists answer unto these The Answers of the Adversaries which they oppose against the eight Arguments of St. Paul together with a Refutation of those Answers BY the Works of the Law shall no flesh be justified before him for by the Law comes the Knowledge of Sin But now the Righteousness of God is manifessed without the Law being testified by the Law and the Prophets to wit the Righteousness of God by the Faith of Iesus Christ upon all that believe c. Which is also confirmed by these Words Gal. 3. Knowing that a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law for by the Works of the Law no flesh is justified c. I Appeal unto thee Courteous and Pious Reader what Man is there if he duely consider these Words of Paul that can gather any other thing from them but what their genuine Signification holds forth Which is this That the Works of the Law should be utterly excluded from having any hand in Iustification And if Works are excluded what can be a more undoubted Truth than that we are justified by Faith only What is more solid than this Argument of Paul What can be more plainly expressed What Words are more familiar if so be they are not darkned by a Sophistical Interpretation If according to the Testimony of Paul we are not justified by Works or obedience to the Law but by Faith without Works who can deny that our Iustification consists of Faith only unless he desperately oppose himself not only against Paul the Apostle but also the Holy Spirit God But behold here the Deceit or rather the Malice of sinful Men. They do not openly reject the Words of the Apostle but wrest the sense and meaning of them to serve their own purpose They deny not that Works should be excluded but pray take notice of the captious Snares of Sophisters who endeavour by a cunning way of distinguishing to baffle the simplicity of Apostolical Doctrine For they divide asunder Works and their Iustification into two parts calling the one Works of the Law and the other Works of Grace And they say the Works of the Law are unprofitable to Iustification but the other they account very necessary Therefore they Answer to the Words of Paul with this Distinction By the Works of the Law shall no Flesh be justified c. The meaning of these Words say they is this No Man shall be justified before God for his own Works which he hath done as by the Vertue and Merit thereof but by the Vertue and Merit of Grace infused For according to Paul's manner of speaking then a thing is said to be done by Works when it is done by Works when it is done as a due Debt or for the Works Wherefore there being a twofold Iustification as they say one by Grace infused and another by the Obligation of the Law without Grace In this Case Iustification by VVorks and every thing that is contrary to Iustification by Grace is excluded And so the saying of the Apostle holds true as they Interpret to him that worketh the Reward is not imputed according to Grace but according to Debt as if he should say that what is given by VVorks or for them is not given according to Grace but according to Debt therefore that Iustification which is separated from Grace is excluded but not the Iustification that comes by VVorks with the Assistance of Grace c. VVhat else should I Answer to these Sophisters but that I pray God to give them Repentance and a better frame of Spirit that they may not always resist the Holy Ghost and overspread the Truth with darkness VVhat Man is there but clearly perceives that it is altogether contrary to the VVords and Meaning of the Apostle to build the Hope of Salvation upon any VVorks when he doth so manifestly teach and protest against it denying that we are justified any other way but by Faith without the VVorks of the Law Yea they themselves deny not that the exclusive VVord is understood of the Works of the Law though not of the Works of Grace but now what are these Works of Grace those forsooth which the influence of the Grace of Christ performs in the Souls of the regenerate but were not the Romans to whom the Apostle wrote regenerate in Christ VVere they not partakers of the same Grace Did they not abound in the VVorks of Grace VVhom yet the Apostle denies to be justified by their own VVorks It is true indeed say they if you understand it of their own VVorks which are called VVorks of the Law but not those VVorks which are Christ's How ridiculous is this as if those things that are planted 〈◊〉 us by the Spirit of Christ were not also oftentimes called ours Yea Faith it self which is most especially reckoned amongst those Gifts it is usual to Scripture to give it the Epithet of ours and yours Paul expresses himself thus By the Communion of my Faith and yours and again Hearing of your Faith and in another place Your Faith which is in Christ c. Is it not evident that he speaks of that Faith which we have in Christ through the free gift of God How much more then may this be understood of VVorks which when Paul excludes from Iustification it cannot be doubted but he understands it not only of VVorks that are ours wholly and done by our own Strength but also of those VVorks that are done by the help of Grace operating in us so that there is nothing in the Works either of the Law or of Grace except Faith only but what rather contributes to Destruction than Iustification What is commanded in the Law of God that we can do without Grace Therefore seeing Paul removes all Works from the Office of justifying it must needs be that he understands it of the Works of Grace as well as of our own Works or the Works of the Law What shall we say
this subject matter that you appear to be a Philosopher Platonick enough and no bad Ciceronian Orator but not a very Evangelical Divine I can assure you nor skilful enough to plead the cause of Christian Righteousness First As touching the Title of the Book concerning Righteousness I find nothing blame-worthy Though the frailty of our Nature might persuade you rather to discourse some thing to us of Mercy Yet seeing you chuse rather to discourse Philosophically of righteousness you are not therein unworthy of your own praise For being about to treat of righteousness you have undertaken a very honourable subject and I doubt too weighty for your Shoulders to bear and a work indeed very difficult and excellent For what is more excellent than righteousness in the whole nature of Divine and Humane things Which seeing it comprehends within its circumference all kinds of vertues the whole praise of Piety and not only the highest perfection of the Law but also the perfect Image of God indeed it may be found in Heaven but on Earth it cannot be found when you have said all you can Wherefore I am ready the more to wonder and consider with my self what secret design you had in your mind that you have composed Books so accurately exquisite concerning righteousness If it was that by the Trumpet of your commendation you might make it more acceptable to us you have therein lighted on a matter suitable to your wit and large enough for setting forth the riches of your Eloquence that I may confess the truth to you But I wonder for what purpose or end you did that will you say that men may the more evidently behold the beauty of righteousness and admire it the more But this hath been formerly attempted by Plato and many Academicks and Peripateticks and that with no bad success And who is so void of all natural sense but though he is not himself endued with the excellency of righteousness yet he apprehends in his mind the Divine brightness thereof and greatly admires it and wishes for it with all his heart If wishes in this case could do any good Inherent Righteousness unto that perfection which Osorius describes can no where be found in this Nature AND I could wish that the Integrity of Nature wherein we were of old Created had continued unto the compleat exactness of all righteousness But now in this ruinated and disabled nature why do you seek after that which we have lost rather bring forth something if you can whereby we may make up the loss What can it profit a man already dead to know the danger whereby he perished Verily there is more need of a medicine if you have any by which you may either comfort him being destroyed or restore him to the Life that was lost Yea this is the thing say you which I endeavour in these Books disputing of righteousness For righteousness as you say is the only remedy for restoring Life and regaining Health Yea this is the very thing Osorius that I chiefly find fault with in these Books not because you write of righteousness for I commend the argument in which you are exercised I commend also your praises of righteousness which are high and copious righteousness cannot be praised enough by any Man-But there is another thing for which all good Men should be angry with you What that is if you please I will tell you freely and openly for in these Books you represent unto us a spectacle not very much differing from that which Origenes relates of Celsus and Antipho who though they did write very contrary to truth yet they recommended those very Books that were against the Truth with the title of a true saying After which manner you do in a case not very unlike it whilest you write indeed concerning righteousness but at such a rate that nothing can be said more maliciously against true righteousness A twofold and different Account of Doctrine one of the Law and another of the Gospel FOR as there is a twofold manner of Covenant so also there is of righteousness proposed in the Scriptures The one consists in precepts and works under the weight whereof we all of necessity fall down to destruction The other is that of the Gospel which is safe-guarded not by works not by observance of the Law not by any peformance of duties on our side but by the sure and only Faith of Christ the Son of God Verily whosoever rejecting the righteousness of Christ whereof I speak leads us aside unto any other manner of righteousness I say that he pleads not for righteousness but against it and doth not undertake the defence of the Law of God but is a professed Enemy of the Grace of Christ and his Cross and therefore doth not open but wholly shuts up all passages to true Salvation and all Gates and Doors of Divine Grace For I beseech you if we are willing to confess the truth with the Sacred Scripture what is it else in which all the fountains and causes of our destruction are contained unto which as the principal head and spring we may attribute all our calamity but this very manner of righteousness placed in God and his Law by whose infinite immensity not only our faults but also all the Poizes of our righteousness are weighed down to the destruction of damnation If there is nothing but the righteousness of Works that may help our too scanty and short Obedience But perhaps these things that have been said hitherto are enough concerning the Title of the Book By which your prudence may lead you easily to suppose what should be judged of the rest of the Work In which when I contemplate the external form and countenance of the Workmanship verily I see that it is not without beauty nor unworthy to be looked upon when I number the Books themselves I take notice they are both many and large enough When I look on the Words and Pages I see whole Rivers and Sands that cannot be numbred but when I turn to the things themselves when I consider the Reasons and force of Arguments when I compare the Words and Sayings of the Scriptures at a strange rate quoted with the true sense of Scriptures not rightly understood by you and also when I take notice of the end and scope of the whole disputation I am not willing at present to discover to you what I find here lest in what I say I should seem to exceed the bounds of that modesty which here I profess But yet that I may say something for the sake of Truth to which I am more obliged because of necessity something must be said I will speak but in a few words If any other Man had Published these Books concerning Righteousness amongst the common People except your self I should say to him openly and to his face that no Man could ever have brought in a greater plague into the Doctrine
we must see how they are done away He does them away in this Life he will also do them 〈◊〉 in the Life to come but not after one and the same manner For Iniquity is taken away and Sin receives an end as is evident by the Prophecy of Daniel But if you ask how in this Flesh Augustin will answer you None saith he takes away Sin but Christ who is the Lamb of God that takes away the Sins of the World And he takes them away both by removing the Sins that were done and by helping that they may not be done and by bringing to the Future Life where they cannot be done at all Therefore in this Life there is only a race to Righteousness and in the other Life will be the prize This then is our Righteousness now whereby we run Hungering and Thirsting to the perfection and fulness of that Righteousness wherewith we shall afterward be satisfied in the other Life Hence the Apostle saith Not that I have already attained or am already perfect Brethren I do not think that I have apprehended but one thing I do forgetting the things that are behind and being stretched forth to those things that are before I press forward to the mark of the high calling of God in Christ Iesus c. Therefore according to Augustin here is the Race here is the Progress there will be the Perfection Here as running in a Race we proceed from Vertue to Vertue There we are perfected Now we have only the Seeds of Vertues begun then in that fulness of Charity when that shall be perfected in us which now is imperfect that precept shall be fulfilled Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy Heart and with all thy Soul For whilest there is yet any Carnal concupiscence which may be restrained by continency God is not in all respects loved with all the Soul for the Flesh doth not Lust without the Soul though the Flesh is said to Lust because the Soul Lusteth Carnally c. Therefore as long as the Saints are burthened with this Flesh which they cannot shake off verily Sin dwelling in the Flesh cannot be absent Objection But how say you is Sin taken out of the World If the Corruption of Sin yet does reign in the Saints Answer I will tell you briefly to wit after the very same manner that the death of Christ hath driven 〈◊〉 from our necks and yet we dye The same comes to pass in the destroying of sin that being freed from Sin by Christ yet we are not without sin for these two things come always together being tied to one another by a very near connexion That where sin is there by necessary consequence death follows wherefore if the flesh is yet held in bonds by the cruelty of death by the same reason it is proved that the relicks of sin remain also in the flesh But now where is then that righteousness which Christ hath purchased for us Would you know O Osorius where our life is there is also our righteousness Not in this flesh which we put off but in that body which we shall in due time put on uncorrupted For such are all the benefits of Christ purchased for us that the promise of them being shewed afar off as of old the Holy Land to the Hebrews it is apprehended by Faith and the Spirit in this life but the full possession belongs only peculiarly and in the whole to the other life Christ begins his Benefits in this Life and perfects them in the Life to come Now these great Benefits of the Son of God consist chiefly in this that sin being totally abolished death being destroyed he restores us being plucked out of the Kingdom of the Devil unto the possession of eternal Life in which God communicates himself wholly to us and is wholly all in all And this most glorious work of his most full of the highest dignity he begins in this miserable life and will compleat it in the other life when that shall come to pass which is written Death is swallowed up in Victory O Death where is thy Victory O Death where is thy Sting Howbeit these things are not said upon this account as if there were nothing in the interim or but little in this life which the help of the grace of Christ does for us As of old the help of the Eternal God was never wanting to the Israelites in the waste Widerness whom he was to bring into the habitations of promise so verily neither are Christs benefits towards us little and the riches of his bounty are not small which the present Grace of Christ pours daily upon us with a full hand when in this sinful Nature he often helps our infirmities forgives our sins instructs us with his word refreshes us with hope supports us by Faith feeds and strengthens us by the Sacraments and refreshes us by his own Spirit adorns us with his gifts renews our hearts and stirs them up to spiritual motions of better life and obedience restrains vitious affections by whose guidance there increase in us the beginnings of eternal life the knowledge of God invocation fear faith true repentance a new law and the image of him who Created us c. And seeing Christ works these things in us with continual care daily more and more promoting and bringing unto maturity that which he hath begun in us there is therefore no cause why the Graces of Christ here should seem needless to any Man But these beginnings of Divine Grace must be distinguished from that perfect and compleat renovation of Nature which shall be seen in the glorified after this life For though it should not be doubted but great advantages are communicated to Believers by the Divine help of the Holy Spirit both to shun those things that are grievously offensive and also to exercise the Offices of Piety of which Paul Rom. 8. They who are led saith he by the Spirit of God are the Sons of God Yet there is not given to the regenerate in this life a compleat conformity to the Law of God but it is reserved for the other life for the life of the Saints in this World should not be called a life of the flesh but of Faith rather not a life of perfect but of begun love and mortification as being not so much discerned in justice as in justification not in perfect holiness but in sanctification not in perfect purity but in purification not in perfection but in going forward But this good Friend ours thinks this should by no means be suffered Who so fights against us as if all the Nature of Salvation consisted not in Iustification the name whereof he doth not account worthy of any mention but in Iustice it self not in the growth but in the perfection of Vertues And as if it were not allowable otherways to aspire to those just rewards of Felicity but
these consequences from them Seeing such a Iudgment is approaching as will bring every one to render an account of their Lives therefore no Man should flatter himself with hopes that any of his offences either in words or deeds will go unpunished but every Man should so frame his Life that Faith and Holiness may be jointly united together and not separated from one another And this is a truth which many now a days have need to be admonished of not only Papists but also Protestants who make profession of the Name and Faith of Christ but yet notwithstanding they so behave themselves as if they thought an-outside shew of Religion were sufficient and as if they did not look for Iudgment to come they are so void of care to walk worthy of that Holy profession giving themselves up against their Conscience to all uncleaness with greediness whereby they both greatly provoke the wrath of God and put themselves in dreadful danger of the loss of Eternal Salvation Against such Men as run on into open wickedness without measure or remorse we may by better consequence draw this inference We must appear all of us before the Iudgment seat of God where account will be taken of all the Actions and Practice of our Lives Therefore let every one that hath regard to his own Salvation endeavour according to his power to lead a Life suitable to his Profession and without Hypocrisie to join a good Conscience with a good Faith For the word of Truth hath told us They that have done Evil shall come forth unto the Resurrection of Damnation But are such Scriptures contrary to Iustification by Faith in such as together with the profession of faith in Christ joyn the fruits of Obedience which though it is not perfect upon all accounts yet it is yielded in sincerity and uprightness of Heart according to their weak power and capacity Which though it comes far short of the compleat perfection of the Law yet nevertheless our Iustification is full and perfect in the sight of God For what is defective in our Works he supplies by his own imputation thro' faith in his Son which Faith is imputed to us for Righteousness not for our working but for our believing for though the abominable rebellion of wicked Men who walk not after the Spirit but after the flesh brings upon them the Iudgment of Condemnation yet this continues to be a truth The Iust shall live by Faith And he that believeth in me shall never perish But you may say The Sentence of the Iudge remains evident and uncontroulable which promises the Resurrection of Life to them that lead a Godly Life I answer It is very true which the Lord says but the conclusion drawn from hence is very false For in these Words Christ joyning the Fruit and the Tree Persons and things together gives the comfortable hope of Eternal Life unto his own Servants who according to their power labour diligently in the Gospel Not thereby determining what their Works deserve but shewing with how many and great rewards he will crown their labours who have suffered any thing for his Name But those Men contrariways arguing from the concrete to the abstract and dividing things from persons conclude amiss by this Enthymema They that are believers in Christ exercising themselves diligently in all Holiness shall be received into Eternal Life Therefore Good Works are the cause of Eternal Life To this I may make a brief and easie Answer Answer I deny the consequence for it is a Fallacy a non causa pro causa for in the antecedent the works of the godly are brought in as effects but in the conclusion as a cause whence there is no sound conclusion from the concrete to the abstract For it is no rational arguing because believers living Holily receive the gift of Eternal Life therefore their deeds merit Eternal Life Iust as if a Man should reason on this manner a Wife being Obedient to her Husband is admitted to be a partaker of all his Goods Therefore her Obedience is worthy of a share in all his Possessions A Son being Obedient to his Father is received for his Heir therefore his Obedience deserves the Inheritance VVorks are evidences of faith in Christ but not the cause of Salvation Iust as a Tree that brings forth Fruit if it hath any goodness in it receives it not from the Fruit but the Fruit hath all its goodness from the Tree In like manner the works of the Godly have nothing that they can claim a right unto in Iudgment If they find any favour or reward that is not due to them but partly to Mercy and partly to Imputation for the sake of the Mediatour to Mercy which pardons Evil deeds to Imputation which puts a great value upon good VVorks though of very little worth in themselves and crowns them with rewards So that all the praise belong not to Men but to God Not to Righteousness but Grace not to Works but Faith not to Iudgment but Mercy But you will say Shall we not all come to Iudgment Must we not all appear before the Tribunal of God It is true we shall all come But Augustin tells us of a twofold Iudgment one of condemnation and another of discretion whereby the Goats shall be separated from the Lambs and not Lambs condemned with the Goats It is an Article of my faith that we shall all of us come to Iudgment but I do hope the Elect of God will not come into the Iudgment of Condemnation And here we must carefully distinguish between the Lambs and the Goats between those that are united to Christ by Faith and the damned crew of Unbelievers For though in this just Iudgment of God every one shall give account to God of all their Works And there is no doubt but a reward will be given suitable to every man's Works but in a far different manner to the one and the other For they who seek for Salvation not by Faith nor the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness only but by the Works of the Law they shall receive a reward according to the desert of their deeds upon this condition that they shall live by the Sentence of the Law if they fulfil the Law as they ought but if not what else must they expect but that according to the just Decree of the Law no violation thereof should be found so small as not to make the sinner liable to Condemnation and justly so For he that hath no power in himself to obtain Righteousness and is not willing to receive it when it is offered by another if he suffer the punishment due to his sins let him not accuse the Law of unjustice but himself of unbelief On the contrary they that by sincere Faith are converted unto Christ if they have committed any evil thing for who among the holiest that is can run through his Race without a fall Their sins
consists not in the Merits of Works but in Grace only and the Hope of Mercy unto which Men fly for refuge in their emptyness of Vertues as he speaks But let us proceed Another Argument Evil Works deserve Eternal Destruction Therefore Good Works Merit Eternal Life Answer Both are true indeed if you consider things in respect of the just rewards due unto them For as the vile Abominations of an Ungodly Life procure the Wrath and Vengeance of God so Works of Righteousness would procure his favour if we could perform good things with as great perfection as we do Evil things But because we cannot do that therefore of our selves we can deserve nothing according to the rules of Iustice but only Death and Damnation But now by the right of Redemption through Christ we are set free from the Law of Iustice and translated into the Kingdom of Grace by Vertue of a new Covenant whereby it comes to pass that God hath respect not to our Merits but only to Christ the price of our Redemption Therefore I answer That this opposition of contraries is of force according to the strict severity of the Law but not according to the Grace of the Gospel for here there is a block put in the way To wit The Blood of the Redeemer that frees us from the Law of Sin and Death Moreover the Argument from contraries avails not except the contraries are set equally in their full extent one against another Now Evil Works in us are perfectly Evil but good Works though assisted by Grace yet because of the refractary imperfection of the Flesh in the sight of God are imperfect at the best as they are performed by us Wherefore Hierom says The perfection of all Righteous Men in the Flesh is Imperfection Another Argument The Grace of Iustification is lost by Evil Works Therefore it is retained by good Works Answer By the same Answer the Fallacy of this Sophistical Argument is discovered because our Sins and Vertues are not equally contrary to one another But whereas it is said that the Grace of Iustification is retained by Obedience though this in some sense may be granted yet Iustification is not thereby procured Moreover when we say It is retained by Works that should not be so understood as if this were done for the Merit of the Actions but only for the sake of the Redeemer upon whose account first the person is accepted and afterwards the actions are well pleasing which otherways would be unclean and of no value They say that perseverance in Righteousness is lost by Evil Works But Evil Works as they are in us admit of a twofold consideration either as they are inherent in us as in all Saints thro' the infirmity of the Flesh and we presently rise up again by Repentance and Faith And such kind of Sins as Paul asserts shall not have dominion over us or in the next place as we give up our selves to Sin against our own Conscience that we may serve it and take a sinful delight therein But such a Sin can by no means consist with this Faith whereof Paul speaks which hath place in none but those that are turned from Sin and returned to God Another Argument Faith Iustifies Faith is a Work Therefore Works Iustifie Answer I Answer The Argument is faulty because the middle term is of a larger extent in the Major than in the Minor For Faith in the Major is taken correlatively for Christ or the Promise which is apprehended by Faith In the Minor it is taken only for a quality of the Mind as it is an act of our Will Otherways if Faith is taken in the Minor just as it is in the Major it is false and the Minor should be denied To wit That Faith is a Work Another Argument of the Iesuits If Faith only Iustifies it would Iustifie without Charity Faith doth not Iustifie without Charity Therefore Faith only doth not Iustifie Answer I may oppose unto this Argument another not unlike it that the Fallacy of the one may appear the more easily by the other Thus then by way of Instance a Man may infer If the heat of Fire only makes warm then it makes warm without light But the heat of Fire doth not make warm without light joyned therewith Therefore The heat of the Fire only doth not make warm I doubt not but by this mutual comparing of Arguments it appears evident to the Reader how like the one is to the other and consequently how he should judge thereof so that there is no need of any further Refutation For all things that are joyned and agree together in some respects are not therefore engaged in the same Office He that hath Feet Eyes and Ears though he hath not these Members in separation from one another yet it is an untruth if it is said That he sees not with his Eyes only or walks not with his Feet only Though I deny not that in the performance of those duties which belong to this Life Faith is not separated from Charity So if we look upward to things that are Divine and Eternal if we contemplate and view what that is which can help us at our appearance before the Dreadful Iudgment Seat of God and appease his Wrath and deliver us from Eternal Destruction and conquer Death and the Devil and regain the favour of God and Iustifie us and procure us the Crown of Life Faith only in the Mediatour doth so bear rule in these affairs and so fully performs all things requisite to our Salvation and Redemption that here Charity hath nothing to do for the Kingdom is not promised or due to you because you love this or that Neighbour after your manner but contrarily because you neither love God as you ought nor your Neighbour as your self therefore unavoidable destruction is due to you unless Faith only through the Mediatour should come in for your help and set you free from the condemnation due unto you notwithstanding your Charity Faith is so far from needing to be joyned with Charity for Iustification that unless Charity it self were justified by Faith it could not stand nor keep it self from falling to ruine and Destruction Of the like nature is that Argument which they wrest out of the Writings of the Apostle Paul An Argument out of 1 Cor. 13. If I have all Faith so that I can remove Mountains but have not Charity I am nothing Therefore Iustification comes by Faith and good Works Answer Erasmus did write in his Exposition on the Second Chapter of Iames Faith which is cold without Charity and puts not forth it self when the matter requires it is not Faith but only the Name of Faith c. They of Paris argue contray ways that Faith can be without Charity out of this place of Paul If I have all Faith so that I can remove Mountains Erasmus following Basil Interprets this Scripture on this manner That we should take this to