record of man as Christ himselfe testifieth 10. 5. And thus farre of the 1. controuersie CHAP. VIII How it may appeare that the scripture is the worde of God THE second controuersie is by what argument may it appeare that the scripture is the word of God Like as then the first question was this whether the Scripture bee Gods worde So the question in hand is this how and by what euideÌ„ce this may appeare that the Scripture is Gods word To this I answer on this manner That we haue no need simplie of any other light or of any one speciall euidence to demonstrate this matter but that very light which is in the Scripture For the Scripture being the first and immediat word of God is of authoritie sufficient in it selfe * Scriptura est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so likewise of it selfe mâ—st cleere and euident and the onely cause of al that light which is in the Church and in the harts of men For like as the light of the sun is not perceiued nor to be seene by meanes of any S. other light for that it so far exceeds al other bodily external Note light So that spirituall light of the Scripture hath no need in it selfe of any other light to set forth the same for that of all spiritual lights to inlighten the mind withal it is the most bright and most beautifull in the world But whereas euidences and demonstrations be here demanded for the proofe of this matter to confirme the Scripture to be Gods word that is to be the very light the cause of this doubtfulnesse is in our selues for that we be so bleere-eyed and so blind by nature Wherefore the arguments which are brought for this purpose ad no light to the light of the Scripture which is of it own nature so cleere and can not be made to shine more bright by any additioÌ„ but al serue to this end to make that thing manifest vnto vs which is most euident in it selfe and that our eies may be opened to see that most ful and most glorious light of the sacred Scripture that is to behold the diuine maiestie of God shining bright and speaking S. vnto vs in the holy Scripture Like as if a man were to proue to a blinde man that the Sunne did shine hee would not produce arguments to commend the excellencie of the light of the Sunne but rather prouide such things as whereby if it were possible he might open the eies of the blind that with his own eies he might looke on the glorious light of the Sunne Wherefore in a word whatsoeuer arguments men aske of vs to demonstrate the light of the Scripture they ought not to be demaunded because of any defect in the Scripture but in respect of vs because we bee so blind hauing neede of all arguments and helpes euery way to open our eies that our sight may be quickned to behold this glorious light The arguments and helpes whereby our eies may be opened to behold the light of the Scripture or God speaking and shining in the Scripture these arguments I say which the godly and learned vse for this purpose be not of one sort but many in number But if the holy-Ghost speaking in the Scripture doe not first of all inspire our Eph. 1. 16. 17. minds opeÌ„ the eyes of our vnderstanding for he alone can do it assuredly it is but lost labor to speak of any other argument or help if we be not taught of God and by his Esay holy spirit all other meanes shall profit vs nothing at all Wherefore the first most principal cause to effect this y t we may behold the light of the Scripture so bright in it selfe must be the holy ghost teaching vs inwardly in our hearts and opening our vnderstanding that we may behold that light of the Scripture and may acknowledge the voice of God and of Christ himselfe speaking in the Scripture And the holy Ghost also himselfe in this work giues no new light to the Scripture which is cleere and glorious in it selfe as is aforesaid but inlightens our minds to this end that we may see the great light of the sacred Scripture Againe the holy ghost in this great work of our illumination effecteth it by certaine meanes instruments whereby it pleaseth him to work in our hearts and minds The meanes which the H. G. vseth for this worke are of two kindes The first is internall the second is externall The inwarde meane is in the very Scripture it selfe the outward is without the Scripture The internal meane is the principall organ or instrument of Gods spirit in this work and it is that verie light which shineth in the Scripture The holy Ghost then doth first of al open How the holy Ghost first teacheth vs to know the Scriptures the eies of our vnderstanding by the light of the Scripture to discerne that light of the Scripture so bright in itselfe and so vnknowen vnto vs. And hee cleereth our vnderstaÌ„ding to see the light of the Scripture by the verie scripture it selfe and by the light of the scripture manie waies For partlie hee effecteth this by producing 1 certaine testimonies of Scripture which plainly testifie Inward meanes to see the light of the scriptures of this great light of the Scripture and of God speaking in the Scripture as that place al Scripture is giuen by diuine inspiration 2. Tim. 3. 16 partly by suggesting into vs that we obserue the spirituall matters which are 2 therein described partly by admonishing that we note 3 the spirituall words whereby the same spirituall matters are expressed and set before vs partly by warning vs to 4 obserue the truth of the diuine oracles by the complement of the prophecies Againe he sets before vs the 5 beautifull harmonie of the Scripture in the old and new Testament the one sweetly testifying of the other And 6 heere he omitteth not the miracles which be recorded therein whereby the celestiall doctrine had in the beginning a confirmation Hee putteth vs also in minde of the Martyrs which sealed y e same truth with their blood as we read in the same Scripture By these meanes and such like the spirit teacheth vs out of the very Scripture that the sacred Scripture is Gods word by cleere euidence manifesting that great excellent light which is in the Scripture Ad also vnto the aforesaide meanes the worth and holinesse of those men which wrote the Scriptures as the same is testified and recorded in the Scriptures And this is the internall and principall meane and instrument of the holy Ghost whereby he teaceth vs breedeth faith in our hearts whereby we be certainly perswaded that this Scripture is the very word of God There are also other meanes without the Scripture Externall meanes to proue the scripture to be God word whereby the Spirit proueth the same thing as the
constancie of the Martyrs which daylie seale with their blood the truth of this heauenly doctrine the persecution raised by the enemies of the Church against it the enmitie of Sathan against it and the preseruation of the diuine oracles of God vnto our times and to be short the testimonie of the true Church of God for it All these are without or beside the Scripture and giue vs a secundarie kinde of demonstration whereby the holy Ghost worketh also as it pleaseth him and openeth the eies of our vnderstanding inlightening vs to see and heare God him-selfe speaking and shining in the Scripture But here we be to obserue that the holy ghost doth God rather by these meanes the testimonie of the Church and couersation of the saints prepareth vs to receiue the pretious faith not beget faith in our harts properlie and principallie by this second kinde of externall meanes for the proper and principall instrument of God to breed faith is the very word of God himselfe for it must be necessarilie either the liuely voice of God or the sacred scripture which serueth vs in steede of the liuelie voice of God himselfe but either prepares our hearts only to receiue faith afterwards Io. 4. 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. wards by the word of God or to confirme the same in some sort beeing already ingendred in our hearts by Gods word For this cause this second kind of meanes sometimes is sent before the voice of God in the scripture whereby the holy Ghost otherwhiles makes mens minds ready to intertaine faith and grace offred This we reade of Augustine for he speaks it of himselfe I would not haue beleeued the gospell but that the authority of the Catholicke Church moued me thereunto by which words he meaneth that when he was a Manichee he was prepared by the authority and testimonie of the Church to beleeue the Gospell Afterwards notwithstanding the same holie spirit which thus prepared him by the testimonie of the Church I say the same spirit did beget faith in Augustines heart by the very scripture of the gospell whereby he did beleeue that the gospell was the verie word of God For this cause he speaks else where of himselfe And let vs follow them saith he which doe inuite vs first to beleeue that which we cannot behold Augustines wordes as yet that being strengthened by faith it selfe we may be worthie to vnderstand what we beleeue not by the relation of men but by the grace of God himselfe inwardlie confirming and inlightening our mindes So the woman of Samaria Io 4. as a member of the Church did by her kinde of preaching prepare the Samaritanes to the faith of Christ they hauing heard Christ himselfe said to the woman We beleeue no longer because of thy sayings for Io 4. 42 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. Win them with your conuersation which are without the word we haue heard him our selues and know that this is indeed the Christ the Sauiour of the world By which wordes they plainely testified that they were prepared only by the womans testimonie to embrace the faith and that faith was ingendred in their hearts by the powerfull voice of Christ himselfe Wherefore it is cleere that sometimes this kind of meane and argument as is aforesaide goes before faith is begotten in the heart to prepare vs and sometimes this followes faith for confirmation And sometimes also this kinde of argument goes before faith and followes after it it goes before I say for preparation it followes after for confirmation For the spirit teacheth vs many waies applying himselfe to diuers men in diuers Note well Io. 3. manners as it seemeth good vnto himselfe and as mens infirmities do require And here we be to obserue that there is no absolute necessitie of this secondarie kind of argument which is externall and lesse principall to beget faith in vs. For it ought to suffice vs if the spirit teach vs onely by Gods worde but to helpe our weakenes the same spirit addeth the other secondarie kind of argument as Christ plainly teacheth vs Io. 5. where he sayth the testimonie of Iohn Baptist concerning him was not simply necessarie but that God so prouided to helpe their weakenesse and vnbeliefe ver 33. Iohn gaue testimony to the truth but I desire not the testimonie of man Neuerthelesse these things I speake that ye may be saued And that Iohns testimonie was but a secondarie argument only and that Christs owne record of himselfe was the first he sheweth plainly in the words following ver 36. But I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn for the works which the Father hath giuen me to finish the same works that I do beare witnes of me that the Father sent me And this is our iudgment concerning this argument whereby we proue the Scripture to be the word of God and our answere to the question wherefore it is so as we auouch it What the Papists thinke in this matter it is easily seene How the Papists proue the scripture to bee Gods word by their words and writings Their iudgement briefly is this The meane and principall argument and in a manner the only way with them to demonstrate the scripture to be Gods word is the testimony of the church not only the catholick as they speak but also those of their church which haue preserued the faith as they speake by contiall successions from the Apostles vnto our times and here they vnderstand principally the Popes who as they say succeeded Peter and his chaire These men will haue the Church the iudge and interpreter of all Scriptures from whose iudgement it may not be lawfull for any man to depart for an appeale to any other iudge And they ascribe this dignity prerogatiue to the testimony of the Church because they will haue the Scripture which is written in the heart of the Church to be the principall Scripture and that we account and esteeme of the voice of the Church as the very liuely voice of God himselfe as if God now spake first principally in his Church and by the voice of his Church If they will haue it so that the voice of the Church bee the primarie voice of God and the primarie Scripture of God it is euident that they deeme the greatest light we haue is to be found in the voice of the Church and the same to be most cleere and demonstratiue not only to vs but also in and by it selfe and therefore that this light inlightens the sacred Scripture not in respect of vs only but in respect of themselues also For which cause one of them hath said that the The blasphemy of Papists Scripture is of no more validity without the authority of the church then AEsops fables For the voice of the church being vnto them the primarie voice of God in all respects for as much as it is liuely and vocall and for this cause both by nature
the Church is one The aduersaries withstand this conclusion and infring it with these arguments First the scripture is not written in mens hearts with the finger of God neither is it the primary voice of God Secondly the scripture is of no antiquity Thirdly it is obscure Fourthly ambiguous c. Bellarmine ads more to these of which ye may read in him They conclude that the voice of the Church is the principall and proper voice of the holy Ghost as he is the Iudge of controuersies Their proofe is this The scripture is written in the heart of the Church with Gods own finger this is the primary voice of God And whatsoeuer excellency wee doe ascribe to the scripture that they attribute to their owne Church which is nothing els but a den of theeues And that the spirit being this great iudge is not bound to one sort of men as those of the Ecclesiasticall function the Pope and Councels as they speak but doth performe this office without all respect of persons in whom and by whom soeuer it seemeth good vnto himselfe this is manifest first for if the holy Ghost be not the Iudge both of the very context of the scripture whether it be Gods word and of the interpretation of scripture if he be not I say in man himselfe assuredly there can be no faith For the spirit only begetteth faith in mans heart Secondly the holy Ghost executeth his other offices freely in by any man therefore so may he this function of iudging What is meant by iudging in the holy Ghost For I demand what els is it to iudge but to inlighten to teach that the scripture is giuen of God by inspiration and that this is the naturall sense of this scripture Thirdly the same we be taught by our experience for we find it true by experience that he doth freely iudge in and by whom it pleaseth him Testimonies of scripture proue also this assertion 1. Cor. 12. 11 And all these things worketh euen the selfe same spirit distributing to euery man seuerallie as he will And Esay 54. All thy children shall be taught of God Ier. 31. I will write my lawes in their harts The aduersaries impugne this truth of God with some argumēts of their owne of which ye may reade in Bellarmine And these men binde the holy Ghost to the Pope and to councels confirmed by him which point our men impugne also refute with many arguments of which this is one that of their conclusion this must be the consequent that the Pope and his councels must be aboue the scriptures which thing is absurd to be graunted See more arguments of this subiect in their disputations CHAP. XVI Of the eight propertie and the tenth controuersie LASTLY we auouch that the sacred scripture is of highest authority excellency and 10. Propertie dignity on the earth Here againe by this word scripture we vnderstand both the substance of it and the writing And here wee meane it hath such excellency as makes it most worthie of credit and whereby also it gaines authority and estimation to the Church For which cause the Church is called the Pillar and ground of truth 1. Tim. 3. 15. And it hath many other titles which are giuen to it often in the scriptures This is prooued by the former demonstrations as these The scripture is the word of God it is most perspicuous it is most pure and simple c. Ergo. The aduersaries vary in iudgment touching this authority of Scripture For some of them detract from this soueraigne authority of it affirming that of it selfe it is not authentical but takes authoritie and estimation from the Church Of this minde are these Eckius in Enchiridio Pighius in his booke de Hierarchia and one Hermannus an impudent Papist he with a black mouth auoucheth it that the scripture is of no more validity without the testimony of the Church then AEsops Fables c. Others more late writers and more subtile say that the scripture hath authoritie in and by it selfe and is authentical but not to vs before the church approue it and ascertain it to be so Of this iudgmēt be these Bellarmine Coclaeus Canus Stapleton Canisius c. They which speake thus that the written word of God is not authenticall to vs before the iudgment of the Church be manifested these men I say haue this meaning that we bee not bound to beleeue that the Scriptures bee authenticall before the iudgment of the Church be past of it and that we sinne not at all if wee beleeue them not before the definitiue sentence of the Church But we hold this to be false also to say that the scripture is not to vs authenticall without the authority of the Church For it is the holy Ghost that teacheth euery man to know beleeue that the scripture is authenticall and hath soueraigne authority in it selfe And this he teacheth not by any externall meane How the holy Ghost teacheth vs what authority the scripture hath first but by the very sacred scripture by which alone he properly breeds faith in our hearts to beleeue and apprehend this truth of God And so we resting on this illumination of the holy ghost teaching vs by the scripture that this is the excellencie and authority of the scripture doe beleeue this to be so albeit the whole world did oppose it selfe against vs. And thus farre of the more essentiall questions concerning scripture CHAP. XVII Questions more accidentall concerning the holy Scripture and first of the bookes wherein the same is contained THE first question is concerning the books of holy scripture These bookes are commonly called for the excellency of them The Bible The Bible as it is commonly receiued and caried in hands containes in it two sorts of books the first is of books Canonicall and the second is Apocryphal Regular or Canonicall bookes are such as giue rule and direction touching faith and manners The bookes of Moses are the first Canon or president sent from God First Canon which may not be iudged or tryed by any other externall Canon whatsoeuer For there was no booke extant before the books of Moses The authoritie of the writer so holy and the euidence of the spirit so powerfull and the holinesse of these books to passe by other arguments so great hath gained these books this high estimation and authority in the Church The books of the Prophets make vp the second Canon which bee adiudged canonicall Second Canon by that externall Canon of the Mosaicall books by which they were examined Next they were and are discerned of such as be taught of God inwardly by the holy Ghost by the great euidence of Gods spirit which is manifested in them both in words and matter The third Third Canon Canon are the Apostolical books of the New Testament which are adiudged and approoued as Canonicall partly by the Canonicall books of Moses partly by the
publike administration of Gods seruice and worship being performed of all or most Churches in one tongue to wit the Latine this might serue well for the preseruation of the vnitie of faith To this I answer this serues notably for the continuance and increase of vnbeleefe and ignorance Againe our verie experience teacheth by Gods good blessing in these times that notwithstanding the great variety of tongues in the reformed Churches yet they agree well to God be praise in the vnitie of faith Next they reason from the little good which hence ensueth as they imagine It profits the people nothing at all that the Scriptures be read in the vulgar tongues for they vnderstand not any sentence of Scripture albeit they know the words To this I answer Euerie one of the vnlearned if they come to heare the Scriptures with Gods feare and reuerence they shall reape and receiue some profit by it Againe from another danger which may happen they reason thus The reading of the Scriptures in a knowne tongue may more hurt then profit the people for deuotion hath rather decreased then increased since publike prayers or seruice of God hath beene celebrated in popular tongues I answer the consequent is not good The sacred Scripture read in the mother tongue hurts manie therfore it is not so to be read at all because accidentally and through the default and corruption of the people it hurts and profits not So the preaching of the Gospell is the sauour of death vnto death vnto manie therefore the Gospell is not to bee preached Furthermore be it knowne that this is no religion nor true pietie which is so coupled with ignorance but a damnable superstition when as the sacred Scriptures are read and prayers administred in a strange and vnknowne tongue Thus far these three Arguments from the finall causes and effects Againe they reason from an inconuenience first on this wise If the scriptures must bee read in the vulgar tongue then translations must bee renewed in euery age for auncient words weare out of vse and this is inconuenient I answere what losse is it if translations be reuised and renewed in euery age for the whole translation needes no renuing but some words which happily are become obsolete and out of vse Againe an other euill which might follow this conclusion is this The Pope vnderstandeth not all vulgar tongues But the publique prayers must be celebrate in a language which the Pope knoweth Ergo. I answere it is not necessarie that prayers be in that tongue which the Pope knoweth This they proue * Vne concesso errore mille consequuntur because he is the vniuersall Bishop And this I deny also Wherefore there is no domage shal follow if publique prayers be contained in a language which the Pope knoweth not And thus far the 2. question The 3. question followeth whether it is lawfull for the lay people as they call them or the vulgar sort to read the holy scriptures We auouch that it is lawfull for euery one euen of the basest of the people to read the holy Scriptures For this point see Deut. 6. Chap. 11. c. and 17. c. Iosh 1. c. and 10. c. 5. Search the Scriptures saith the Lord Christ Acts. 17. the men of Berea searched the Scriptures and for this cause are commended by the holy Ghost Matth. 4. The example of Christ who resisted the Deuill with no other weapons but of the scripture teacheth vs that the scripture ministreth vnto vs such a furniture as euery man must be prouided of to withstand Sathan in his assaults against vs. Lastly this is prooued by the practise of the Church For wherefore were the scriptures in the old church translated into so many popular languages but that they might be read vnderstood of the people And this is our iudgement in few words What say the aduersaries Some yeares past they taught it was not lawfull at all for any of the common and lay people as they vsuallie tearme them to reade the holy Scriptures Afterwards when they saw how odious Vide Censuram Coloniensem this was they changed their minde and now forsooth they say it is lawful to read the scriptures but with conditiō if it be permitted permitted I say of whom They answer by the Pope his Bishops or inquisitors I demaund what of these only They answer not of these only but of them with the aduertisemēt of the parish Priest or confessor Well I vnderstand who be to permit the reading of the holy scripture now I aske to whom is this permitted They answer not to all indifferently but only to such as the parish Priest whom they call the Curate shall well discerne both by their confession and by their whole cariage of their life to be a true Catholick that is a stubborne or stiffe-necked Papist I see then to whom they yeeld thus far the reading of the scriptures I demand in the next place what translations be allowed them They answer they will not haue them to read all translations indifferently but such only as some Catholicks haue published such as at this day the English Rhemish translation of the New Testament is Thus far briefly of that permission which hath so decreed the condition of this libertie of reading the scriptures And this is their meaning according to the decree of Pius Quartus the Pope which decree is confirmed also by the councel of Trent commended by the Rhemists in the preface of their English translation And this is Bellarmines iudgment who differeth in words only a little from the former popish assertion but in matter and purpose is the same in effect for what difference is there if there be no permission at all to be thus permitted with such a condition as is aforeshewed And thus of the 3. question and as touching the controuersies which are moued at this day concerning holy scripture I remember not any that we haue left vntouched We haue therefore spoken of the word of God which is the word of both couenants as also of the sacred scripture which is a certaine meane wherby it pleased God to manifest his word and wil vnto men It resteth now that wespeake of sinne and of mans miserie CHAP. XXIIII Of sinne in generall THE common place of sin as also the former before handled is subalterne to the place or generall head of our calling For calling is the transferring of a man out of the state of sin What our calling is and miserie into the state of righteousnesse and happinesse Therefore we shall speake of sinne first in generall after we shall come vnto his kindes or partes The name of sin signifies a certaine thing compounded of his owne matter and forme The matter of sinne to speake thereof in the first place is a certaine being or thing that is and that being is not a substance but an accident and What sin is that is either a qualitie or action and this
vnto vs no lesse certaine and firme then if we heard God himselfe speake or did behold and reade the verie mind of God yea the very diuine oracles written in Gods owne breast but now we haue not the liuely voice of God now we see not the secret mind of God therefore it must follow that we haue something to supply the want of the liuely voice of God euen meanes to reueale vnto vs the secret mind of God and nothing can do this but the sacred Scripture therefore Gods holy written word is and must be vnto vs as the verie voice and as the verie mind or wil of God himselfe manifested vnto vs. The fourth reason The Scripture containes all those things which God hath spoken in elder ages and what God himselfe hath decreed in his secret counsell so farre as is meete for vs to know concerning our life and saluation Ergo c. Thus far of the immediate word of God The mediate voice of God we call the voice of the holy and true Church of God for albeit men speake yet the word spoken is the word of God himselfe Here the aduersaries rise vp and contend that the voice of the Church must haue the priority of excellencie and that it supplieth the want of Gods liuely voice and the manifestation of his mind rather or better then the Scripture for say they the voice of the Church is a Popish Obiection cōcerning the testimonie and the authority of the Church before the Scripture Scripture written not with the penne of any Scribe but by Gods owne finger in the heart of the Church therefore the voice or testimonie of the Church ought to bee accounted the principall voice of God For it is a liuely voice proceedings from the liuing heart of the Church wherein God hath ingrauen all truth with the finger of his owne Spirit whereas the Scriptures of the Prophets and Apostles albeit they were deliuered and spoken by God himselfe yet they were not written by Gods owne hand but by the Prophets and Apostles which were the pen-men Again they were not written in y e liuing hearts of men but in papers and books or tables Hence therefore it followeth that this scripture which is found in the heart of the Church is the principall Scripture of God and that the voice of the holy Church is that most excellent voice of God ought to be vnto vs as the immediate voice of God in steed of the secret counsel of God I answer true it is the testimonie of the Church is a liuely voice proceeding from a liuing heart sanctified by the holy ghost for we speake of the true Church But first I say that the only Scripture prophetical and apostolical is to be accounted that Scripture which was written by Gods owne finger and that immediate word of God Next I say that the heart of the Church is taught and sanctified by the Spirit of the Scripture and that the Scripture which is in the heart of the Church is nothing els but a certain transcript that so I may speak or a copy which the holy Ghost hath written in our hearts according to that ancient and authenticall copie which is the holy Scripture For the holy Ghost teacheth the Church nothing now but that which is written and doth by the scripture after a sort beget the Church the Scripture is the mother the Church is the daughter the Scripture is the mistresse the Church is the scholler Thirdly I adde that the knowledge of the truth which is in the heart of the Church by means of the scripture is not so perfect nor so absolute as is the holy Scripture And lastly I say that the Church being inlightened and renewed but in part may erre from the truth euen in the greatest matter of waight and that it doth erre so often as it forsakes the canon and rule of the sacred Scripture Their former assertion being thus cast downe it is euident that the voice of the Church I vnderstand here the true church only not that whoorish church of Rome the voice of the Church I say is not that primarie and most excellent word of God nor ought to be vnto vs in steed of the liuely and immediate voice of God nor to be reputed for Gods minde and counsell but this prerogatiue is due only to the sacred Scripture I ad further that if thou doest first not so much respect the truth it selfe which the Church speaketh as the instruments of the speech vttered which are men next if ye compare the voice of the Church speaking with the sacred Scripture it selfe it doth not deserue at all to be called by the name of Gods word but may more properlie be called the worde and testimony of man For Christ himselfe calles that testimonie which Iohn the Baptist gaue of him the testimony of man I receiue not saith he or desire not the testimnoie of man Ioh. 5. 34. Be it so that the testimonie of the Church be true agreeable to the holy scripture notwithstanding it is truly called an humane testimonie whether yee respect the men which speake or compare their testimonie with that which doth proceed from the mouth of God and Christ himselfe But it may be replyed that the very Apostles and Prophets which writte and spake all these things which we haue in the Scriptures were men in like manner therefore all the Scriptures are but an humane testimonie I answere that I denie not all is obiected if we were to esteeme the words or writings of an Apostle or Prophet as they are instruments and Ministers or if this were to be compared with the very liuely voice of God and Christ himselfe For in respect of the instruments if we compare the words or writings of these men with the words and writings of God himselfe theirs I say must come after and giue place vnto this and must beare the name of an humane testimonie for so the testimony of Iohn Baptist himselfe as being an instrument in comparison of Christ the Lord of life was called the record of man Wherefore when we auouch that the Propheticall and Apostolicall Scripture is the immediate testimonie of God himselfe we make no comparison with the liuelie voice of God himselfe neither doe we so much respect what Organs the Holy-Ghost vsed to set forth the Scriptures but we consider the matter it selfe and the diuine oracles which be written and we ponder in what estimation God himselfe will haue vs to accept the sacred Scripture not as the writings and sayings of men but as the writings and words of God himselfe And we consider this also as in a comparison made with the Church For to vse that comparison againe the voice of the Scripture is Gods owne voice but the voice of the Church of Christ is called an humane testimonie as the word or writing of a Prophet or an Apostle compared with the liuely voice of God is called the
and to vs most manifest it followeth according to their iudgement that it yeelds light vnto the Scripture not only in respect of vs but also in respect of the Scripture it selfe yet is it in verity but a certaine secondary Scripture and a certaine secondary voice For as they auouch it the voice of the Church is as Gods owne voice sounding from heauen seruing to confirme the voice of the Scripture which now is but mans voice only and to ratifie and make authenticall the very Scripture as being written but by certaine Scribes and published onely by the hands of men This must bee the consequent of their principles or conclusion of their premisses albeit other men be of another iudgment As for our selues like as we denie the conclusion which they inferre vpon the former principles so we reiect also their very principles For we denie refuse their first ground to wit that the voice of the Church is to be accounted the liuely voice of God himselfe and that the Scripture written in the heart of the Church is to be accounted for that scripture which was written by the very finger of God And we affirme that the only propheticall and apostolical scripture is to be esteemed as the liuely voice of God we auouch it I say that this Propheticall and Apostolicall scripture only serueth vs in steed of that scripture which was written by Gods owne finger We adde also that the sacred Scripture is vnto vs a booke of reuelation of those diuine mysteries which were hidden in Gods owne breast from eternitie for this is the very will of God that we attend on him speaking in the scripture as it were in his owne liuely voice They haue saith he Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16. vers 29. that is the bookes of Moses and the prophets And God will not haue this scripture in no lesse account then that scripture which hee wrote in times past with his owne finger in tables of stone The voice of the Church I meane the true Church not the lying papisticall synagogue is but as the voice of the handmaide or as the voice of a crier which is to publish and to proclaime that voice of God full of excellencie speaking in the scripture But the scripture in the heart of the Church that is the Maximes of Gods truth written in the hearts of the faithfull they be nothing els but a certaine secundarie scripture taken out by the holy ghost out of that primarie and most sacred scripture and ingrauen in the minds of men For how much think you of that ful measure of the Propheticall Apostolicall scripture is there taken forth and ingrauen in our minds I say that if all mens hearts were bound together yet all they could not comprehend all those things fully and perfectly which be recorded in the Propheticall and Apostolicall scriptures For the catholicke Church so long as it is conuersant on the earth is not capable of al that light which shineth in the sacred scriptures of y e apostles the prophets Let their first principle be thus beaten downe and their Corolatie or second conclusion to wit that the voice of the Church is most manifest both in it selfe and vnto vs will fall to the ground of it owne accord and so both principles being shaken their conclusion which they inferre is of no strength to stand but must fall away CHAP. IX Of the first proprietie of the sacred Scripture WE are now to proceed and to make it manifest that the holy scripture is of greatest antiquitie and this is the first proprietie The 1. propriety of the scripture most ancient before ascribed to the Scripture Here first we be to find out the diuers acceptations of this word Scripture This word Scripture may be taken either for the matter onely and Acceptation of the word scripture the very substance which is contained in the words and letters or not only for the matter and substance but also for the verie writing it selfe or the forme wherein that substance is expressed and set before vs. Now if by this word Scripture ye vnderstand the verie substance it selfe it is without all controuersie that the Scripture is most ancient because it is the substance of those diuine oracles which not only Patriarches and Prophets haue spoken but also God himselfe vttered which things also were hidden in Gods mind from eternitie But if yee vnderstand by this word not onely the substance but the very writing and in this respect also the scripture may be said to be most ancient For as touching the Propheticall and Apostolicall scriptures in respect also of the writing and manner of reuealing of them as wee said often before it is Gods will that we so esteeme them not onely as the liuely voice of the Prophets and Apostles nor onely as the liuely voice of God himselfe or as a booke written with his owne hand as the Decalogue was set downe with his owne finger in tables of stone but also that we so accept them as the very mysteries and if I may so speake as the verie diuine notions which were ingrauen in Gods owne mind from eternitie To cleare this point a little The veritie kept secret in Gods mind from eternitie was in time manifested manie wayes or in diuers formes for it was reuealed partly by the liuely voice of God himself partly by the voice of the Patriarches Prophets and Apostles to passe by Angels in silence and partly also by the scripture which was written by the Prophets and Apostles The liuely and immediate voice of God did cease long since neither haue we that copie which God himselfe wrote the Patriarches How to esteem of the written word of God also the Prophets and y e Apostles haue ceased to speake the writings only of the Prophets and Apostles remaine to this day Wherefore this we hold as necessary vnto faith that we accept these writings or books first in steed of the liuely voice of the Prophets and Apostles 1 Next in place of the liuely voice of God himself 2 Thirdly of the Scripture written with Gods owne finger 3 Fourthly and lastly as that holy veritie and diuine mysteries 4 which are recorded in Gods owne breast which Oracles being simply without comparison of greatest antiquitie it is very manifest that the Propheticall and Apostolicall scripture is after a sort most ancient For what may be auouched of the liuely voice of God himselfe or of the Oracles of his mind the same in some respect may be said of the scripture supplying vnto vs their defect For Substance of the scripture simply most ancient if I may truly say in some sort the scripture is the liuely voice of God himselfe doe I not as truly speake also in like manner the scripture is most ancient for as much as the voice of God is most ancient But it shall suffice vs to commend the antiquitie of scripture to
consider the substance onely of the scripture which without all controuersie is most ancient But the verie scripture and writing it selfe hath his excellencie also for that the scripture in respect of the very writing is said to be giuen vs also by diuine inspiration For there is not a iote or pricke in the Scriptura est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 very writing which is not by the inspiration of God Here the Aduersaries take exception and as els where often so here they prefer their Church before the scripture and they affirme the Church is more ancient then the scripture For they say there was a Church two thousand A Popish obiection full yeares before Moses the first writer of the scripture And since Christs comming the Church for many yeares wanted the scriptures But that which hath beene alreadie written and is aforesaid can easily solue this obiection For if we vnderstand by this word Scripture not only the characters and books but also that substance and matter contained in them for we haue the Prophets and Apostles speaking in the scriptures we haue their liuely voice we haue I say the liuely voice of God himselfe and the very expresse mind of God contained in them if I say we vnderstand by this word that substance it cannot thē be denied but the scripture is more ancient then the Church which was borne not of mortall seed but of immortall euen by the word of God who liueth and endureth for euer 1. Pet. 1. 23. I say the premisses well considered it shall appeare the scripture is not onely more ancient then the Church but to be of greatest antiquitie and to haue beene with God from euerlasting But if by this word ye vnderstand both the matter and writing in this respect also it shall be no disparagement to auouch it to be of greater antiquitie then the Church yea to be most ancient as we haue at large before shewed And thus far of the first propertie of the sacred scripture and of the third controuersie CHAP. X. Of the second propertie of the sacred Scripture where begins the fourth controuersie THe second propertie of the sacred scripture is opened sufficiently in a manner alreadie in the second controuersie before handled This propertie is this that the Scripture is most cleere in it selfe and most easie to be vnderstood for it being the very word of God which word euerie man must necessarily graunt to be in it selfe most cleere most manifest and most perspicuous whether you respect the words or the matter contained in the words if men will not offer extreme iniurie to Gods holy Spirit assuredly it must follow I say that the holy scripture is in it selfe and of it selfe most cleere and euident in euery part and in euerie respect Of this great perspicuitie of the scripture the holy ghost testifieth often Psal 119. The word of the Lord is a lanterne to my feete Psal 19. The precept of the Lord saith the Psalmist is cleere and inlighteneth the eyes Prou. 6. The commandement is a lanterne and the law is a light The Lord by the Prophet Esay chap. 45. 19. saith I haue not spoken in secret and 2. Pet. 1. 19. he saith We haue a most sure word of the Prophets to the which ye do well that ye take heede as to a light that shineth in a darke place Wherefore the whole scripture al places of the scripture are by themselues and in themselues most manifest most cleere and applied also to the capacity of the vulgar sort and of the most vnlettered among the people For it is certaine that the Lord in the scriptures doth as it were lispe with vs Io. 3. 12. If I haue spoken to you of earthly things and you beleeue not that is I haue spoken vnto you after an earthly and plaine manner and I haue applied my selfe to your capacitie c. I haue auouched that the sacred scripture is in it selfe cleere and easie True it is if ye respect men as they are All the scripture cleere and easie to the weakest beleeuer 1. Cor. 2. 14. men that is naturall and carnall the holy scripture vnto such is altogether obscure and strange For the naturall man doth not conceiue the things which appertaine to the Spirit of God But if ye consider the spirituall man and such as be taught of God I grant to such it is partly obscure because they be as yet in part carnall And for this cause the godly put vp continually supplications vnto God as feeling the reliques of their naturall blindnes and corruption and making requests that the eyes of their vnderstanding might be opened that they may behold the bright shining light of the scriptures and of euerie place and portion of the scripture being otherwise most euident in it selfe All the religious and godly in their prayers are so farre from laying any imputation of hardnesse and obscurity on Gods word that they do euer accuse condemne themselues and their owne blindnesse and dulnesse And albeit this be true that all the scripture and all places of the scripture be simply and in themselues most Note cleare and easie and onely darke and hard by reason of our corruption and blindnesse yet this cannot be denied but that some places of scripture be more cleere in themselues then others more easie and more euident as those scriptures concerning faith and manners which bee so necessarie vnto saluation they be I say so cleerely set downe so often repeated and in so manie places expounded that we need not manie rules for interpretation or to find out the knowledge of them But these places also require the grace of Gods holy spirit for without him spirituall things which be most perspicuous and euident cannot be vnderstood of anie man on earth Wherfore he that is ignorant of the most cleere scriptures which doe so much concerne his saluation is altogether blind and lieth as yet in the wofull state of perdition for so the Apostle speaketh If that the Gospell be hid it is hidden to them that are lost 2. Cor. 4. 3. 4. As for other scriptures which are more hard in appearance for that they do not so much concerne the necessarie articles of faith and rules of life and conuersation we may be ignorant of them without danger of faith and saluation albeit the knowledge of such places might bring some light for the better vnderstanding of the How to interpret expound hard scriptures scriptures which of necessity must be knowne concerning faith and manners And we may attaine some tolerable interpretation of these scriptures analogicall vnto faith if we obserue those rules of knowlege and interpretation which are commonly recommended by the learned euer making Gods holy spirit our first and principal guide for our inward illumination and instruction The rules which follow this are but the meanes which the holy Rules Ghost vseth and they are borowed partly out of the 1
beene heard anie liuely voice either of God or of anie extraordinarie man A. None at all Q. Do you gather by these things which you haue spoken concerning the causes of the continuance of a liuelie voice in the Church what was the vse of it heretofore in the Church A. Yea truly for the vse of it was first in respect of the Church it selfe to giue it instruction while it was yet so small for place and so young in knowledge next in respect of reuelation to deliuer it from time to time more cleerly and euidently vnto the people Q. By this vse of a liuelie voice which you haue here mentioned it seems that this kind of ruelatiō which was by a liuely voice was the more simple and the more familiar and the more imperfect and therefore the more fit for persons and things that were of like imperfection A. It is euen so as you haue said Q. Hitherto I haue heard you speake concerning a liuelie voice now I would heare something of you concerning the subiect of it what say you then was taught all that time by a liuely voice A. In al that time and in euery age the selfe same and the whole truth of God was deliuered by a liuely voice The subiector master of the liuely voice Q. Wherefore then said you that the perfect manifestation of that mysterie of godlinesse was not accomplished till the Apostles time A. By that fulnesse perfection I vnderstood not the substance of the doctrine it selfe but the quality that is the clearenesse of one and the same doctrine For the mysterie of Christ was in the Church and was manifested in some measure from Adam vnto Christ and the Apostles but if the comparison be made of times it may be said to be shut hidden in all ages before the comming of Christ Q. Was the paritie of the heauenlie doctrine sufficientlie conserued and kept by a liuely voice A. The historie shewes plainely that the doctrine deliuered by liuely voice was often corrupted and adulterated Q. How then was it restored It seemed good to God afterward by new reuelations to restore the puritie of his word decayed to conserue and keepe it and to giue a more full declaration of it Q. Was the puritie of doctrine sufficientlie preserued and kept so A. Not so verily and therefore it seemed good to God at length to adde hereunto the written word Q. Are there no other causes of writing the holie Scriptures A. There are for first the condition of the Church required that the Scripture should be added vnto the liuely voice and next the measure also of reuelation Q. Why the condition of the Church A. Because at length in Moses time the Church began to be both in place more large as being spred throughout a whole nation and to grow greater and riper in yeares for the time from Moses vnto Christ was as it were the time of the midde age or young yeares of the Church Q. What then A. The written word therefore was first in respect both of place and ripenesse of age for both a whole nation is more easily taught by writing then by voice and the age which is more ripe is more capable of that doctrine which is deliuered by writing that is by that kind of reuelation which is not so familiar and simple and by writing doth more easily conceiue any mans meaning Q. Why doth the measure of reuelation require the written word A. Because whereas before Moses the reuelation of the mysterie of godlinesse was small and very obscure it seemed not good to the Lord to cause it straight waies to be written to the intent it might be kept for posteritie But when in Moses time the Reuelation began to bee much more cleare then before then it seemed good vnto God to commit it to writing to the intent it might be reserued and remain for those which should come after For that which is more perfect and full that wee are to write to this end that it may remaine both for vs and our posterity but that which is more imperfect that we doe not esteeme worthy the writing or to be reserued vnto posterity Q. Before you go anie further I would haue you declaare vnto me the ages of the Church where of you haue so oft made mention A. I will so do Q. How manie ages then say you are there of the Church A. Three the first was from Adam vnto Moses which was the infancy and childhood of the Church the second from Moses vnto Christ which was the youth or middle age of the Church the third from Christ and his Apostles euen vnto the end which may be called the ripe age of the Church if it be compared with the ages past for otherwise we are not men growne vntill we bee gathered together with Christ our head in heauen Q. Do you meane then that God had respect alwaies of these three ages in his proceedings with his Church A. I meane so indeed for that I may so speake hee hath tempered these three things proportionally to these three ages of the Church to wit first the measure of reuelation secondly his holy Spirit thirdly the manner of reuelation Q. Declare I pray you more particularlie what you haue said A. To the infancie and childhood of the Church he gaue the least measure of reuelation to wit first the first principles of religion onely Secondly the least measure of the holy Spirit to wit that which was proportionable to the reuelation Thirdly one onely kind of reuelation which was by liuely voice as being the most fit for the instruction of infants and of such as were weake in the faith Q. I vnderstand what you saie concerning the first age of the Church now I would haue you speake concerning the middle age which you call the youth of it and to applie these three things mentioned to it in like manner To the middle age of the Church he gaue first a greater measure of reuelation Secondly so to speake a greater portion of the holy Spirit Thirdly a double kind of reuelation the liuely voice and the Scripture The liuely voice I say because as yet it was but weake and the written word because it was in age better growne and so more capable in some sort of the word written for God hath tempered these two kinds of reuelations together and of both hath made a middle kind of reuelation according to the time and age which wee call the middle and as it were the temperate age Q. You haue spoken of the first second age of the Church now I pray you speake of the third A. To the third age of the Church which I call the manly or ripe age he gaue first a full measure of reuelation Secondly a most plentifull effusion of the holy Ghost Thirdly both those kinds of reuelation and that now truly containing a full and perfect reuelation hee taught it by liuely voice for a certaine
written which was before deliuered by the liuely voice Q. I pray you speak in order vnto me of the subiect or argument in scripture written first by God himself secondly by mē by Moses the Prophets and Apostles A. I will do so Q. What then hath God written A. The sum of the doctrine of the couenant of works of the law euen the very same which he had deliuered first by a liuely voice to the Fathers and to Moses Q. What hath Moses written A. All the celestiall doctrine which he had receiued partly of the fathers by tradition partly of God himselfe Moses books who spake mouth to mouth with him for so the scripture speaketh partly he had learned of the holy Ghost by an inward inspiration to speake in a word whatsoeuer had happened to him and to all the people in his life time for the space of 100. and 20. yeares all these things he committed to writing and gaue to the people Q. Did Moses then write what soeuer true doctrine was deliuered from the beginning of the world to that time A. Moses omitted no point of true doctrine which at any time had bene deliuered concerning either faith or manners for from the beginning vntil that very time one and the same doctrine of truth as touching the substance was taught full and whole in all ages The difference only was in the measure of the reuelation of it that it is accidentall Moses deliuered this doctrine fully and wholy by liuely voice more cleerely and manifestly then euer before then after this it was recorded in writing Q. What did the Prophets write who followed Moses euerie one in their time and order A. The same and all as touching the substance which Moses had written before the difference only was herein that euery one by reuelation did adde a more cleare manifest interpretation as the bright morning starre did approch more neere Q. What haue the Apostles written after the Prophets A. All and the same which from the beginning of the world in al ages before them was both by liuely audible voice deliuered and written they first also by a liuely voice deliuered the same and after committed it to writing Q. Doe you then make no difference betwixt the writings of the Prophets and of the Apostles A. In the matter and substance none in the clearenes and perspicuity thereof very great for the scripture of the Apostles conteineth the same reuelation of the mystery which was declared from the beginning of the world but most fully and most clearely Q. I haue heard you speake concerning both kinds of reuelation considered without comparison now I would haue you to compare together the liuely voice writing that by comparison it may appeare whether is of greater dignity authority A. I will compare them together the liuely voice and scripture are compared either in respect of substance and matter is selfe which is reuealed by these meanes or in respect of the kinds of y e reuelatiō of it If cōparison be made in regard of the matter or substance they must needes be both equall alike seeing that the matter in either is one and the same but if you compare the kinds of reuclation together it cānot truly be denied but that the first better place is due to the liuely voice seeing that the liuely voice is both in respect of time more auncient was before the organs or instruments thereof for the mouth is an instrument more worthy to be preferred before the hand and is a kind of teaching more familiar more fit for the capacity of such as are more rude ignorant Albeit also in some respects writing is to be preferred before the liuely voice For it is a more perfect accurate kind of reuelation fit to instruct those that are more perfect to keepe the truth more firmely In the meane while it cānot be denied but y t in other respects they are both alike for they haue both spoken written the same thing in the same manner to wit as being guided moued by the holy Ghost inspired of God 2. Pet. 1. 21. 2. Tim. 3. 16. To conclude seeing that now the liuely voice by the wil of God hath ceased and in the place of it the scripture hath succeeded so that whole dignity of the liuely voice before mentioned is and ought worthily to be ascribed and referred vnto the scripture or written word of God Q Doe you meane then that the Prophetical Apostolical scripture ought to be now in as great account with vs as the liuelie voice of God himselfe and of extraordinarie men was in times past A. I meane so and in his kinde of reuelation alone I willingly rest as in that which came by inspiratiō from God so long vntill I shall heare at his glorious comming that liuely and most sweete voice of Christ my Sauiour when he shall say to them who shall be at his right hand Come ye blessed of my Father inherit the kingdome prepared for you from the beginning of the world To whom be all praise for euer Amen To God only wise be praise through Jesus Christ for euer Amen
holy scripture as by conference of places of the scripture 2 either the very same or the like in sense and phrase partly 3 from els where as of the common places of diuinitie 4 of the testimonie of the Church of the Grammar it selfe 5 specially the Hebrue and Greeke and good rules and 6 helpes are had from Rhetoricke and Logicke which teacheth vs to consider not onely of simple arguments set apart 7 but also of the disposition and connexion of arguments bound and knit together in Axiomes or propositions in syllogisme and methode For Logicke teacheth vs the coherence of Antecedents and consequents which serueth not a little for the vnfolding and opening of hard places And to passe ouer other things some little insight in Ethickes and Physickes c. may giue some helpe hereunto But aboue all things we must remember to put vp vnto God contiuall and feruent prayers to open and to enlighten our minds by his holie Spirit If men obserue these meanes for the interpretation and vnderstanding of the Scriptures and hard places of the Scripture we shal not lightly erre from the truth of God Here fume the aduersaries and endeuour to proue by The drift of Papists in affirming the scriptures to be obscure manie arguments that the Scriptures in themselues and of themselues are obscure euen in those places which are necessarie and appertaine to saluation to this end and purpose forsooth to withdraw mens minds from reading the Scriptures that they may attend and trust to their dreames and that they may obtrude their glosses on the Church euen what please them what for the most part they preferre before the text it selfe writhing as it were and drawing rather the text of Scripture to be their glosse then giuing any light of interpretation by or from the text it selfe And heere they contend against vs with testimonie first of the Scriptures themselues next of the Doctors and Fathers of the Church lastly with arguments of their owne all which may easily be answered if we obserue well the grounds before set downe It shall suffice vs now to heare onely one or two of their arguments refuted They demaund whether for these Scriptures now extant of the old and new Testament we haue no need of commentaries which are now in the world verie manie written by manie men I answer that the diuine Scriptures of themselues haue no need of the comments and interpretations of men for the Scriptures we account thē to be the liuely voice of God himselfe and what is there that can make this voice of God more cleere and euident in it selfe Can either man or Angell speake anie thing more cleerely then God himselfe or doth God purposely affect obscuritie both which to auoch is verie blasphemous As for the Commentaries or expositions Commentaries of the godly learned which haue spent some good time in the Scriptures of God we graunt they helpe the ignorant and the common sort very much and that they serue well to dispell the clouds of our naturall corruption But this may seeme a greater question and more doubtful touching the preaching of Gods word and the expounding of the Scriptures by Pastors and preachers in the publike assemblies whether preaching be not necessarie I meane the liuely preaching of Pastors and teachers I answer the Scriptures of God which we account as the liuely voice of God haue no need of this meanes in themselues I say that God and his word in themselues need neither this preaching nor interpretation of the scriptures But the necessitie of the ministery and of preaching is only in respect of vs and of our blindnesse and ignorance which be but as children yea as infants in a manner all the dayes we liue on earth Ephe. 4. 1. Cor. 13. And when as we shall become men in the world to come then shall we haue neede of no such ministerie for we shal rest contented being filled with that The state of the elect in heauen onely light of God and of Christ without any further instruction of men or Angels And thus farre of the second propertie of the Scripture and of the fourth controuersie CHAP. XI Of the third propertie of the sacred Scripture whereof ariseth the fift controuersie THE third propertie of the sacred Scripture is this It is most * Simplicissima plaine and pure whether ye respect words or phrase neither hath it any ambiguitie or doubtfulnesse in it This property differs frō the former herein for that whereas perspicuitie extendes it selfe and concernes words and matter this simplicitie or plainnesse as I may so speake is of words only This we auouch then that the sacred Scripture is of it selfe most single and plaine voide of all ambiguitie and Circumlocution by speech Amphibologie or that it contayneth nothing doubtfull in one place which is not expressed in another if there be any obscuritie in it For the word of the Lord and his spirit be euer single and sincere neither doth God at any time speake to catch men with ambiguous and doubtfull speeches as doe Diuels and Sophisters but to teach men his holy truth For the spirit of truth leadeth vs into all truth Io. 16. 13. And the Scripture is giuen of God by inspiration is the very word of God as is before shewed Wherefore if we will not offer God extreame iniurie we must necessarily graunt that the Scripture in it self is most plaine and * If the scriptures seeme doubtful condemne thine owne sinne and corruption simple in sense and signification I say the Scripture in it selfe is plaine as touching the sense for if there be any ambiguitie in any words of scripture that diuersitie or darknesse may not be imputed to the Scripture but to the blindnes and ignorance of men euen of such also which do not of any euil purpose of hart peruert the Scripture For there be many which impiously wrest the same to the one side and the other when as they know right well notwithstanding the sense of the same Scripture is onely one plaine and euident To approue this plainenesse and simplicitie of the Scriptures first the Son of God himselfe in his disputations against Sathan and all his aduersaries borroweth hence his weapons by his owne example recommending the sacred scriptures to all men Next after him the Apostles and their successors and the Fathers themselues haue drawen their arguments from the sacred scriptures against Heretickes both for confirmation of truth and confutation of error The aduersaries here contend against this property of the sacred scripture and they hold that that is doubtfull ambiguous and blasphemously report that it hath a nose A lutae instar of waxe and may be turned here and there For which cause they affirme it is the book of Heretiques that of it spring heresies and that al men seeke to maintaine their errors by it But these blasphemies are easily
readest thou saith hee and haue ye not read Haue ye neuer read How is it written Againe the Apostles of Christ for all their assertions bring proofe and testimonies out of the old Testament Apollos was a man mighty in Scriptures He strongly confuted publiquely the Iewes with great vehemency shewing by the Scriptures that Iesus was that Christ Act. 18. 24. 28. The men of Beraea receiued the word with all readinesse and searched the scriptures daily whether those things were so Act. 17. 11. Thus the primitiue Church and the fathers refuted heresies by the Scriptures To conclude this point most memorable is that worthy fact of Constantinus the Great who propounding the Bible to the Fathers assembled in the Nicene councell spake on this manner Here I set before you the writings Euangelicall of the Apostles and the sanctions of the auncient Prophets which can informe vs concerning the sacred law of God To beat back therefore the dint of the sword of the aduersarie let vs learne how to answer all obiections of the aduersarie out of the words which are giuen vs of God by diuine inspiration Lastly this I haue said that the Scripture is in it selfe liuely and vocall for as concerning deafe and dead men that is the naturall neuer taught of God vnto such I say it is but as deade mute Here the aduersaries blaspheme and reply saying that y e sacred scripture is but as a dead letter mute and not able togiue answere to any man not able to decide questions and controuersies in religion And contrarily they glory that the voice of the Church which proceeds from the Scripture as they speake which is in grauen by Gods own Spirit in the hearts of men they boast I say that this is vocall and able to answer the demaunders of all questions appertaining to saluation that this cannot be wrested nor peruerted but euer abides the same in al respects The answer to this calumniation and blasphemy is cleere of that which is before shewed for we made it cleere and manifest that the sacred Scripture is most liuely and vocall in it selfe And whereas controuersies are not so soone decided by the Scriptures the cause is not in Gods word but in men which be either so naturally blind and dull that they cannot heare vnderstand the Scripture speaking answering yea crying in their eares or they be so malitious and obstinate that they will not heare and vnderstand yea that they will full often against their owne conscience wrest the voice of the Scripture into another sense and that to their owne perdition Wherefore we conclude this point that the scripture is in it selfe 2. Pet. 3. and by it selfe most liuely and vocall And further we be to remember that to the end it may speake as a liuely voice vnto vs and to the end we may vnderstand it concerning all controuersies in religion we must vse the meanes before mentioned our very Grāmar Meanes to be vsed for the vnderstanding of the scripture is one speciall instrument for this purpose For our eies eares are opened by such meanes to vnderstand the Scripture and to attend vnto Gods voice speaking in the scripture if it shall seeme good to the holy Ghost to worke effectually by them in our hearts and minds If so be that the spirit worke effectually by the aforesaide meanes then the Scripture shall answer to all controuersies concerning faith and religion with a more cleere liuely intelligible and distinct voice then all the men in the whole Church shall answer who can auouch nothing sound and certaine vnlesse first they haue receiued it from the mouth of the Scripture and answer in the verie words of the scripture For whereas these men say the voice of the Church is liuely and vocall heard of all men and cannot bee peruerted and wrested To this I answer first that the voice of the Church as is aforesaid doth depend on the voice of the scripture Next that the voice of the Church is subiect to errours and change so that they may this day answer one thing and to morrow another and this serues no better in a manner then a Lesbian rule to decide controuersies concerning faith religion As for the church of Rome they haue so long and so corruptly answered concerning faith and religion that they haue caried the world from the truth to lies and errours and infinite heresies that there is now no cause wherefore these men may so put forth to sale the voice and sound of their Church which is become so corrupt and adulterous CHAP. XIII Of the fift property of the Church and of the seuenth controuersie NOw it resteth that we proue that the sacred Scripture is simply most necessarie Here then I say that if by Scripture yee vnderstand the substance and the verie matter contained in the words written it cannot be denied that the scripture is so necessarie that without it there can be no Church in earth for the church is borne and bred not Fift propertie Scripture is most necessarie of mortall but of immortall seede which is the word of God 1. Pet. 1. 23. But if ye vnderstand by the scripture the verie writing and forme of reuelation I say that in this respect also it is so necessarie that without this there cannot be a Church For the liuely voice of God is simply necessarie The scripture after a sort is the liuely voice of God therefore simply necessarie I graunt it that when as the liuely voice of God did sound and was heard in the Church this writing and this forme of reuelation was not then so necessarie but when as God did cease to speake and that the scripture came in place of Gods own voice then the scripture was no lesse necessary then the liuely voice of God For the voice of God must euer be in the Church that the church may haue her being and may continue on the earth yea this voice must be heard by the Church either by it selfe or by that which may best supply the want of the liuely voice of God Before Moses time this voice it selfe was heard after his time this voice sounded and spake in and by the voice and writings of Moses and the Prophets When Christ was come his owne liuely voice was heard After Christs ascension for a time the 2. Cor. 5. 19. 1. Pet. 2. 19. preaching of the Apostles and the bookes of the old Testament were receiued for the liuely voice of God himselfe and of his sonne Iesus Christ Then followed the Apostolicall Scripture which together with the holy scripture of the old Testament continue in the Church to supply not only the liuely voice of the Apostles but also of God and of Christ himselfe By the premisses it is euident y t it is simply necessary at all times that the liuely voice of God sound euer in the Church of God either by it selfe or by this supply which wee
authenticall Wherefore it resteth that the Hebrue edition of the old Testament and the Greek of the new Testament is only authentical CHAP. XX. Of the Translations of the old Testament NOw it resteth that we speake of the Translations of the old and new Testament And first of the translations of the old Testament The old Testament was first written in Hebrue and afterwards translated into diuers languages specially the Chaldee and Greeke First concerning the Chaldiacke translation next of the Greeke and for the Chaldiack we be to consider first what manner of translation it is Secondly by whom this was done Thirdly what authoritie this hath For the first the Chaldiacke translation is rather a Paraphrase then a translation word for word The Rabbins call this Authors of the Chaldee paraphrase paraphrase the Targum For the second point by whom this Paraphrase was set forth Rabbi Aquila translated the * Fiue bookes of Moses Pentateuch and this they call Onkelos the rest of the bookes of the old testament were translated partly by Rabbi Ionathan partly by Rabbi Ioseph * blind Caecus they liued not long before Christ or about Christs time For the third point The Chaldee paraphrase with the Ancients was euer of great note and authoritie specially that part of the Pentateuch for as for the rest of this Paraphrase one * Praefat. in Biblia complu tensia Ximenius a Cardinall auoucheth it to be full of Iewish fables and of the vaine conceits of the Thalmudists And thus farre briefly of the Chaldee paraphrase Now touching the Greeke translation of the old testament there were diuers translations of it into the Greeke tongue Some number nine translations Of these the first and principall is that of the Septuagint which those 72. Ancients did at the appointment of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus for whereas * Lib. stromat Clemens Alexandrinus writeth that the Scripture was translated long before into Greeke and that Plato had read the same it is not like to be true for neither Plato nor anie of Pythagoras sect euer saw the sacred Scriptures To speake then of the interpretation of the seuentie interpreters and to bind our selues to certaine questions sixe in number the first may be this whether there was euer any Greeke translation set forth by the 72. interpreters Secondly if there were anie when it was done Thirdly of what bookes Fourthly how this was done Fiftly what authoritie this translation is of Sixtly whether this be the true translation of the 72. Interpreters which we haue at this day For the first question the answer is easie for there is no doubt but that there was a Greeke translation by the 72. interpreters for that all antiquitie accords to this This is testified by a Lib. de mensuris ponderib Epiphanius b De praeparat euangel Eusebius c In dialog cum Tryphone Iustin Martyr with many others And as for the second question the answer also to it is easie for all men doe agree that this translation was done in the raigne and at the appointment of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus this write and auouch these men Ioseph Philo d In Synopsi Athanasius Epiphanius Tertullian e In historia sua de hacipsare Aristaeus and manie others And for the third question what bookes were translated by them the answer is not so easie for some thinke they translated but the fiue bookes of Moses only Of this mind is f In proâ—â—io antiq Ioseph and Ierome seemes to incline this way Others say they translated all the Scripture and this is likest to be true For first it is not like that king Ptolomie could haue contented himselfe with the Pentateuch only Secondly the Apostles of Christ vsed the Greeke translation in citing testimonies out of the prophets but in the Apostles time there was none other translation but that of the Septuagints Thirdly there had beene no matter of admiration in that this worke was done with such expedition if the Pentateuch onely had beene translated and finished in the space of 72. dayes for they say his translation was miraculous Fourthly Chrysostome and Theodoret among the Fathers are of this iudgement Wherefore it is best we hold this as most probable that all the old Testament was translated by them And as for the fift question what authoritie this translation had Hereunto men answer diuersly For some ascribe too much to it as * In lib. de mensuris ponderib Epiphanius who saith they were not interpreters only but in a manner Prophets Augustine is too much in the commendation of it he saith It was done by a speciall dispensation of God and thinks it to be set forth by diuine inspiration Others ascribe not so much to it * In praefat in Pentateuchon Ierome saith against Epiphanius they were no prophets And often in his Commentaries he taxeth it not onely as corrupted but as verie faultie in it selfe which thing he would neuer haue don if he had thought this worke had beene done by diuine inspiration What authoritie soeuer this translation is of assuredly it can haue no more then what may by good right be giuen to an interpretation for we may not auouch it to be giueÌ„ by the inspiration of God nor make it of equall authoritie with the Scripture As touching the sixt question some thinke that the old translation of the Septuagint is as yet extant but to Old translation of the 70. be so corrupt that it is no wisdome to correct either the Hebrue or Latine copies by it Bellarmine is of this mind Others affirme that the ancient translation of the 72. interpreters is lost and that this which wee haue is mixt and verie corrupt This also they proue by an induction of certaine places corrupted First the Greeke Bible numbers from the creation of the world vnto the floud 2242. yeares as we may see which Augustine Eusebius and Nicephorus in his chronologie but the Hebrue veritie saith the number of yeares be 1656. therefore the Greeke number exceedes the Hebrue in yeares 586. Secondly from the floud to Ahraham the 72. interpreters reckon of yeares 1082. but according to the Hebrue text of Gods word there be no more yeares but 292. so the Greeke exceedes the Hebrue veritie 790. yeares Thirdly in the Greeke copie Adam is said to haue liued 230. yeares and in some bookes 330. when he begat Sheth but the Hebrue Bible saith Adam begat Sheth when he was 130. yeares old Fourthly according to the Greeke copie Methusalem liued fourteene yeares after the floud which is verie ridiculous for where liued he or how was he kept from the waters In the arke That cannot be for but eight soules onely entred into the Arke among whom Methusalem is not reckoned The Hebrew bible speakes farre otherwise of Methusalems Methusalems life and death yeares and age for by it we gather that he died that verie yeare the deluge came on the
or common prayers of the Church ought to be in the mother tongue Thirdly whether it shal be lawfull for the common people to read the scriptures translated into their owne language or mother tongue To the first question we answer that it is lawfull yea also that it is expedient it should be so and this we proue by some few arguments First the sacred scriptures must be read publiquely before all the people therefore must they be translated into their owne known language for otherwise it were in vain to read them The antecedent is proued Deut. 31. ver 11. 12. The Lord commandeth that the books of Moses be read to all indifferently when they were assembled Men Women and Children with the strangers Ier. 36. chargeth Baruch the scribe that hee should read before all the people the book which he had Translating of the scripture into the vulgar tongues First argument written from his mouth But some will heere obiect that this precept was to indure but for a time I answer the end shewes it must be perpetuall Deut. 31. The end being this that this people may heare learne and feare the Lord. This end is perpetuall therefore so is the law in like manner specially seeing that the reading of the Scripture is the ordinarie and necessarie meanes whereby we be to come to this appointed end So the antecedēt being thus cleered it followeth necessarily that the scripture must be translated into our knowne mother tongue Arg. 2. The people are permitted to read y e Scriptures Second argu therfore they are to be translated into the vulgar tongue for otherwise the common people could neuer reade them The antecedent I proue thus The Sacred Scriptures do furnish vs with weapons against the Deuil as we be taught by Christs example Matth. 4. who gaue Sathan the repulse vsing none other weapons against him but testimonies of Scripture Ioh. 5. chap. Christ commaunded the multitude to search the scriptures Acts chap. 17. the Christians of Beroea are commended for searching the scriptures whether the points were sound and good agreeable to the sriptures which were taught by the Apostles But see more of this antecedent in the handling of the 3. question Arg. 3. The very Papists graunt the scriptures may be read before the people but they say it must be done in an Third argu vnknowen tongue wherefore I reason thus If the scriptures must be read before the multitude in an vnknowen tongue that shall be fruitlesse and without all edification therefore they must be translated into their knowen language The Antecedent is prooued by 1. Corin. 14. 6. If I shal come vnto you speaking in tongues what shal I profit you q. d. nothing And after in the same Chap. ver 19. I had rather speake fiue words with my vnderstanding that I might also instruct others then ten thousandwords in a strange tongue But of this point more hereafter The fourth argument God requires in his people wisdome knowledge and instruction Therefore the scriptures Fourth argu must be read and therefore translated into the vulgar tongues The antecedent I prooue thus Deut. 4. God wil haue his people to be wise of vnderstanding that the nations round about hearing of this might bee smitten with an admiration and say ver 4. Only this people is wise and of vnderstanding and a great nation The Apostle Col. 3. 16. will haue Gods worde to dwell in them richly or plenteously Paul in his Epistles euery where requires the Churches to whom he writes to be filled with all knowledge The aduersaries contend and dispute much against this knowledge which God requires in the common people The fift argument Christ while he liued among the Iewes spake and preached vnto them in their owne mother Fift argu tongue The Apostles of Christ in like manner did preach the Gospell in their vulgar tongue as in the day of Pentecost and after and for this very cause that they might speake to euery nation in their owne knowen language that gift of tongues was giuen them Thus then I reason If to preach the Gospell in the vulgar known languages was no profanatiō of the Gospell then so in like maner to write the Gospel in the vulgar known languages is no profanation of the same for there is like reason of both The sixt argument is from the perpetuall vse and practise Sixt argu of all the auncient Church For in the Primitiue Church the sacred Scripture was translated neere hand into all languages as the Chaldiac the Syriac the Arabian the Armenian the Egyptian the Ethiopian the Indian the Persian the Scythian the Sarmatian tongue There are not a few do auouch this a Homil. 1. in Io. Chrysostome * De corrigend Graecorum Affectib lib. 5. Theodoret c De doctr Chri. lib. 2. cap. 15. Augustine with others And at this day there be extant the Chaldiac the Syriack the Arabick the Egyptian and the Ethiopian translations all which the learned say were done in the Apostles times Chrysostome turned the sacred Scripture into the Armenian tongue as Sixtus Senēsis reporteth Ierom trāslated the scripture into the * Lingua Dalmatica Dalmatick tongue as these men do testify Alphonsus a Castro Eckius Hosius Erasmus Methodius translated it into the Sclauonian tongue as saith Auentine in his Chronicle * Socrates tripartita historia Vlphilas Bishop of the Gothes translated the same into the Gothes language * De ciuitate Dei lib. 15. Augustine writeth that the old Testament was translated into Syriack Harding against Iuel and Eckius write that the Muscouites and the people of Russia had the scripture in their owne mother tongue The historie of England written by Beda affirmeth that the scriptures were translated into the English tongue before his time Beda saith he translated part of the new Testament himselfe Thus far the practise of the old church whereby as by the rest of the arguments afore going it followeth that the sacred Scripture is to be translated into euery countrey vulgar language Now it resteth to see what the Papists answer to this question we haue in hand Some few yeares past they vtterly denied that the sacred Scripture might bee translated into any mother tongue * De choris canonicis Petrus Asoto Censura Coloniensis and Harding before named these write that some are of this iudgment The Scriptures are not to be translated into the vulgar languages And for this cause such as translated Scriptures they were banished and condemned by the Pope and their bookes were prohibited and burnt And when they saw this to be odious to all men these graue Fathers changed their minds and now forsooth they auouch the Scriptures may be translated into the vulgar languages yet by the Popes permission And this albeit it seeme to be something diuers from the former assertion yet in effect it is the verie same For the Pope will permit no man to
which is done against Gods will is said properly to be done against Gods decree and not against his reuealed wil or expresse law but sinne as it is a transgression of the law is not done against any decree therefore sinne as it is a transgression of the lawe is not done against Gods will The Assumption is shewed because God decreed not from euerlasting that sinne as it is a transgression of his law should not be done of an euill instrument Therefore thou saist hee decreed that it should be done Answer It followeth not 1 For both these are true concerning God God hath neither decreed that transgression as it is transgression 2 should not be done neither hath he decreed that transgression in so farre as it is transgression should be done For there is no decree of God extant either in this or that respect touching sinne as it is a transgression or breach of the law of God But thou maist aske is not sinne effected as it is transgression some way by the permission of God Answ A thing is said to be done two wayes by Gods permission either by it selfe or by accident That which by Gods permission commeth to passe by it selfe must of necessitie respect and put on the nature of good seeing God proposeth and directeth the same vnto a good end but that which by an accident is done God permitting it or forsaking the creature nothing hindreth but that as it is such it is euill for God leauing the creature and euill instrument to it selfe the creature doth that which is euil as it is euil neither can it otherwise do being left of him who is the Author of al good But now in respect of God permitting and leauing that euill as it is euill is done by accident not by it selfe because God in forsaking purposed not euill as it is euill but on the contrarie so farre forth as it respecteth good and is a meane of his glorie of that especially which is the consequent of his mercie for all meanes whether wrought by God himselfe or suffered to be done of euill instruments in the first place are both ordained of God himselfe and directed to the glorie of his mercie arising from the saluation of the creature God hath shut vp all vnder sinne that he might haue mercie on all And in the second place for the hardnesse of man and because of the heart that cannot repent sinnes and euils which are done by an euill instrument serue to that glory which God getteth vnto himselfe by his iustice and iust punishments If on the contrarie thou obiect God suffereth sinne that he may punish the same but he punisheth sinne in Or I would answer the maior That God suffereth not sin to punish it for that he respecteth not but for that be hath a purpose to manifest his owne glorie in the punishment of sinne that it is sinne or transgression therefore he permitteth sinne as it is sinne I answer vnto the Assumption Sinne as punishment followes thereupon which in it selfe is good and turnes to the glorie of God in this sin I say hath not respect vnto euill but vnto good producing a good effect for an euill cause as it is euill cannot bring forth a good effect But if that cause which in it selfe is euill be also considered as the cause of a good effect it must needes in some sort take vnto it the nature of good I confesse indeed that sinne as it is sinne is the cause of punishment and the punishment as it is the effect of an euill cause must needs it selfe be euill And indeed punish ment Punishment in it selfe is euill which is inflicted is considered two wayes first as a thing in it selfe euill for there is some transgression How punishmēt is euill in euerie punishment and euery punishment after a sort is also a sinne Againe it is considered as a thing that is good to wit as a meane of Gods glorie This I say in a word that all meanes which in and by themselues are euill in respect of God propounding and of the end which is the glorie of God in some sort are good And that whole chaine of meanes which is betweene God propounding as the head and beginning and the glorie of God as the end is the order of things which either by themselues are good or at the least in some sort may be so accounted For those two extremes chaunge all darknesse after a sort into light CHAP. XXV Of Originall Sinne. THVS farre of sinne in generall the first diuision of sinne is into originall and actuall To speake of originall sinne first we be first to obserue the reason why it is so named It is called Originall sinne why so called original because it is in vs with vs from our first being conception and natiuity for it comes by propagation and is deriued from parents to children as an hereditary disease as a leprie the stone or any such like malady of the body And that there is such a kind of sinne it is most manifest for there is none so fottish and so voide of all sense that he feeleth not this hereditarie sicknes in himselfe as the infection and corruption of his nature But the holy Ghost who best knoweth what is in man doth cleerely auouch this in many scriptures Gen. 5. 3. When as Adam saith he begat a sonne according to his owne image Note heere the propagation of that corrupt image which was in Adam into his sonne Sheth Iob. 14. 5. Who can bring forth a cleane thing of an vncleane not one Behold here the propagation of vncleannes Psalm 51. 7. Behold I was formed in iniquitie and in sinne did my mother cherish * Tremel fouit kept me warme in hir bed mee Behold the sin which we haue from our mothers wombe Ioh. 3. 6. What is borne of the flesh is flesh Behold the propagation of flesh that is of our corrupt nature Rom. 5. 12. Like as by one man sinne entred into the world and by sin death c. Obserue here the propagation of sinne Eph. 2. 3. We were by nature the children of wrath Note here our corrupt nature and therefore how subiect it is to the wrath of God And thus far we see that there is a sin which we call originall Now let vs consider what the subiect thereof is The subiect of originall sinne is the whole man body and soule which thing is taught vs cleerely by that one name Soule infected with Orig. sin which is giuen it Ro. 6. 6. as els where that old man whereby nothing els is signified but the whole man corrupted or the corruption of the whole man That the minde is infected with this sin first we be taught it by very sense it selfe next by many testimonies of scriptures Genes 6. 5. When the Lord saw all the imaginations that is all the thoughts of his heart were only euill continually Gen. 8. 21. Albeit the
imagination of mans heart be euill from his youth Ephes 2. 3. Fulfill the will of the flesh and of the minde And that the body is infected with this poison see Rom. 6. 12. Let not sinne raigne in your mortall body And that euery The body and all the members poisoned with originall sinne one of the members is infected and poisoned with the same sin is shewed v. 13. Neither giue your members as instruments of vnrighteousnes vnto sin Againe the very names of this sinne shew the subiect thereof or where it resteth As when it is called flesh concupiscence the law of the members the body of sin the body of death And thus farre of the subiect of originall sinne Now wee bee to come to the parts of it and because it is as a compound thing we are to consider first The materiall cause of originall sinne threefold what the matter thereof is next what the forme The matter of originall sin is threefold The first part of the matter thereof is that apostasie wherein we fell all away from God in the loines of Adam This we receiue from our mothers womb for we are al born Apostates backsliders frō God For that the first apostasie was not Adams only but did appertaine to vs al first reasō it selfe may sufciently conuince it for we were all as then in his loynes and as parcelles of the substance and nature of the first man and so we all fell in him and with him from the liuing God For this very cause Heb. 7. Leui is said before he was borne to pay tithes to Melchisedeck because he was then in the loynes of Abraham Abrahams fact was therefore Leui his fact also and of all his posterity which then were in his loynes Next this is testified by scripture as by name in that place which is Rom. 5. 12. In whom to wit Adam all men haue sinned That first Apostasie I grant is past and vanished away as euery action passeth away yet after a sort it is saide to continue still for albeit the fact be past yet the How the Apostasie of Adam continueth still guilt thereof remaineth still for euery man is borne guilty by nature of that first Apostasie The same is to bee said of euery other sinne Murther Adultery Theft c. For whatsoeuer it is it may be truly sayd to remaine still so long as the guilt remaineth which is consequent thereunto Wherefore euery man is guilty of that first defection and falling from God vntill this guilt be taken away by the bloud of a mediator And that we be such Apostates by nature the scripture testifieth Rom. 5. 15. By the offence of one many be dead Wherefore many must be guilty that one offence Ro. 5. 16. The fault came of one offence vnto condemnation And thus farre of the first part of originall sinne that is of the first backsliding and our falling away which we bring forth with vs from our mothers wombe into the world The second part followeth of originall sinne which is a certaine defect or a certaine want of originall iustice Second part of Originall sinne that is of that righteousnes or integrity wherein man was created according to the image and example of the righteousnesse which is in God the creator For he created man after his owne image wise iust holy For the Apostle to the Eph. 5. and Col. saith that in these respects man was like to God himselfe in his creation This want I speake of originall iustice is the first effect of that apostasie before shewed For that apostasie whereof we are al by nature guilty depriueth vs in our first birth euē in our very conception of that originall iustice and image of God This part of the matter of originall sinne very sense sheweth and many scriptures testifie of it I meane such as speake of sinne negatiuelie or priuatiuelie For Proofe of our want of original iustice by 1. sense 2. by scripture all such places shew plainelie what defect is in vs and what want of originall iustice Rom. 3. 23. All haue sinned and are depriued of the glory of God Ro. 7 18. I know that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing And a little after I find no meanes to performe that which is good Rom. 8. 7. The wisdome of the flesh is not subiect to the law of God neither indeed can be 1. Cor. 14. The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God neither can he know the. 2. Cor. 3. 5. Not that we are sufficient of our selues to think any thing as of our selues Eph. 4. 18. Hauing their cogitation darkened and being strangers from the life of God And thus far of the 2. part of the matter of original sin to wit the want of originall iustice The third part followeth and this we say is an inclination The 3. part of the matter of originall sinne or quality contrary to that originall iustice and integritie before mentioned succeeding euen in place thereof This is that which they call our naturall corruption and it is the second effect of the apostasie of Adam in Paradice For that rebellion of our first parents first depriueth vs of originall iustice and of the image of God next in place there of by Gods iust iudgement it infecteth vs with a quality cleane contrary to that righteousnesse whereby we are made prone and apt to al euil This contratie qualitie or inclination vnto sin to be in vs very sense procues it with many testimonies of the holy Scripture all which speake of sinne affirmatiuely or that I may so speak positiuely Ro. 7. 7. I had not known concupiscence but that the law sayth thou shalt not couet Rom. 7. 23. I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my mind Eph. 2. 3. Fulfilling the lusts of the flesh and of the minde Ad to these the places before cited Gen. 6. and 8. And thus farre of the third part of the matter of originall sin And here as touching the want of iustice and inclination vnto sinne which were two parts of the matter of originall sinne ye must be aduertised that there is no facultie A speciall note of the soule of man which is not infected with both these euils together We reckon as principall powers of the soule the minde or vnderstanding the will and the affections These two last the scripture often vnderstandeth them in the worde hart because the will and affections be seated in the hart The first defect then is in the mind and this is the want of light and knowledge here is also the want of holinesse that is of a quality wherewith our very knowledge and light must be affected and assuredly was affected with in the first creation The light of the minde or knowledge is twofold naturall A two fold light of the mind 1. VVant of naturall light and spirituall In the mind there is a defect
said to be resident in them as to sanctifie them and to stir them vp vnto good and as a Ladie to gouerne them Whereupon it is said After that by faith he had purified their harts Now that faith belongs to the mind it is apparant by those titles which are giuē to faith euery where in the Scripture as whē it is called knowledge vnderstanding sight as whē it is said We see now in a glasse And that it is in the will it is euident by that which is said Ro. 10. 10. For with the heart man beleeueth vnto righteousnesse And Eph. 3. 17. that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith for the seate of the will is attributed to the heart Furthermore the names whereby faith is termed in the Scripture doe sufficiently conuince that the seat of it is not only in the mind but also in the will and heart as when it is called an apprehension and when it is termed a certaine embracing and such like names which signifie the office of the heart and will Thus farre of the subiect of faith Now let vs come neerer to the nature thereof and to the parts of the nature of it The first part of faith is the knowledge or vnderstanding of the mind whereby the mind doth plainly vnderstand some sentence or proposition of the Gospell and by name that proposition which is in the syllogisme of the Gospell which we alleaged before for the proposition of that syllogisme is as it were an abridgment of the whole Gospell From this part as the principall namely knowledge faith is named euerie where in the Scriptures The second part of faith is the iudgment or as it is commonly called the assent of the same mind Of this iudgement the scripture speaketh euery where as 1. Cor. Parts of faith 2. 15. The spirituall man iudgeth all things 1. Ioh. 4. 1. Trie the spirits whether they be of God This iudgement is twofold the first of truth the second of goodnes The iudgment Iudgment twofold of truth is when the mind assenteth to the proposition of the Gospell that it is true of this iudgement see Ioh. 3. 33. He that receiueth his testimonie hath sealed that God is true 1. Tim. 1. 15. This is a faithfull saying and worthie by all meanes to be receiued c. To conclude this iudgment of truth is gathered out of all places of Scripture wherein there is mention made of the truth of Gods word The iudgement of goodnesse is when the mind assenteth to that thing which is in the proposition of the Gospell that it is good and therefore to be followed For it must be knowne that all the propositions of the Gospell The sayings of the Gospel be practicall be practical as they say in the naked speculation and contemplation of which none must set vp his rest but they are to be drawne out into the manners and life euerie day Of this iudgement of goodnesse ye haue that Rom. 7. 16. I consent to the law that it is good 1. Cor. 1. 18. The preaching of the crosse is to vs which are saued the power of God And in the same chap. vers 24. We preach Christ to them which are called the power and wisedome of God And thus much concerning the twofold iudgment which as we haue said must be of the generall proposition of that Euangelicall Syllogisme of both which this last of all is to be held that it is not only general but also speciall whereby I do iudge that those things which are spoken in the Gospell are true of me and good to me For as we said before those things which are published in the gospell are to be vnderstood to be spoken specially of mee and of thee And this special iudgement is properly that which is called * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 full assurance After this followes * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 confidence which belongs to the heart and will whereof we will speake in the next place There followeth therefore in the third place the choice or hold-taking of the will which is when any one doth with his will or heart peculiarly apply to himselfe that The third point of faith which he hath iudged first true then good not onely in generall but also in speciall This apprehension or application is in the Assumption or conclusion of that syllogisme of the Gospell alleaged before by vs. For after that the mind hath seene and iudged the proposition of that syllogisme then the will of euery one doth particularly apply vnto himselfe in the assumption and conclusion those good things which that generall Proposition did concerne Of this apprehension ye haue 1. Tim. 6. 12. Lay The apprehension of faith hold on eternall life Phil. 3. 12. I follow if I also may apprehend it 1. Tim. 1. 15. This is faithfull saying and worthie by all meanes to be embraced by vs. To conclude this third part of faith is to be vnderstood in all those titles wherby the choise of the will is signified in the Scripture From this part faith is termed a speciall confidence or trust for the nature of faith is chiefly seene in it These things thus declared it will be easie to gather a definition of faith For Faith in Christ with all his benefits Faith defined as he is offered in the word and Sacraments is first aknowledge of the mind then an apprehension of the will or heart In this definition we haue first the obiect of faith then the subiect of it thirdly the parts Vnder the knowledge of the mind I vnderstand also the iudgement or assent of the mind and that twofold whereof we haue spoken afore It is to be knowne that faith thus defined by vs is improperly taken for the function and worke of faith seeing faith is properly an infused habit as they call it or an holy qualitie first of the mind then of the will or heart Now this quality in the mind what is it els but that light of which the Scripture speakes euery where Ye were once darknes but now ye are light in the Lord Ephes 5. 8. The eyes of your minde being opened that ye may know what Faith a light is that hope of his calling Ephes 1. 18. God which commanded that the light should shine out of darknes is he which hath shined in your hearts to giue the light of the knowledge of the glorie of God in the face of Iesus Christ 2. Cor. 4. 6. But God hath renealed those things vnto vs by his Spirit for the Spirit searcheth all things euen the deepe things of God 1. Cor. 2. 10. And this light ofy e mind which is the first part of faith seemeth to be not onely a restoring of that natural light which was impaired in Adams fall but also a certaine supernatural light put into the mind by the Spirit of Christ to this end that the mind might behold and see those things which excell
false that the certaintie of speciall grace is a speciall prerogatiue of some certaine men For if iustifying faith be reckoned among the common good things and gifts of all Christians and this speciall certaintie be the propertie of iustifying faith with what face dare any deny this gift of speciall certainty to the common sort of Christians Is it because it was reuealed but to some certaine and few of them that their sins are forgiuen as to that man sicke of the palsie to that sinner to Zacheus to the thiefe is therefore this gift of certainty no other but special and extraordinary Nay wee haue alreadie said that the speciall mercie of God is no lesse now promised and offered to euery seuerall and particular person as to me and to thee then it was offered in times past to those men by Christs expresse words Fourthly the holiest men say they haue bewrayed with a lamentable voice at the very point of death do bewray dayly the vncertaintie of their saluation Therefore there is not that certaintie of mercy and life which wee say there is I answer there is much difference betweene that which is and that which ought to be This argument doth only conclude that which is that is that there is an vncertaintie but it concludes not that there ought to be an vncertaintie nay it concludes against it that it ought not to be For they that weepe and lament for the vncertaintie of their owne saluation doe therby declare that there ought not to be an vncertainty but our aduersaries doereckon the vncertaintie of our owne saluation among the chiefe Christian vertues Secondly I answer that out of that complaint of holy men being ready to giue vp the Ghost the certainty of speciall mercie M. Rollock argueth of the conflicts of the godly in their death that they haue a good faith doth neuer a whit the lesse follow then the vncertaintie For that speech riseth out of that warre that is betweene the Spirit and the flesh betweene faith and vnbeleefe betweene certaintie and vncertaintie Wherefore it is no lesse an argument of certainty then of vncertaintie nay it argueth that in that warre certaintie hath the vpper hand Fiftly they say the best may fall from grace and faith therefore what certaintie can there be of speciall mercie and saluation I answer They which are indued onely with temporarie grace and faith both may indeed fall and doe fall away but they which are indued with true iustifying faith and with regenerating grace can neither Of falling from grace fall away totally nor finally Now that comes to passe not in regard of the men themselues for of their owne nature they are prone to finall and totall defection such is their infirmity and weaknesse but it comes to passe by the nature as I may speak of that grace and gift of God which is giuen in Christ Iesus For the gifts and calling of God are such as that hee cannot repent himselfe of them Rom. 11. Sixtly they obiect testimonies of Scripture these chiefly which commēd vnto vs care thought endeuor for the keeping and preseruing of grace As He that standeth let him take heed least he fall 1. Cor. 10. 12. Also 2. Cor. 6. 1. Paul exhorts the Corinthians that they receiue The Papists cite it thus euer but falsly for the text is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. so it is against them Phil. 2. not grace in vaine To conclude Christ admonisheth that we should watch and pray To say nothing of those places wherein feare is commended to vs as Rom. 11. Thou standest by faith be not high minded but feare And in another place Worke out your saluation with feare and trembling Out of these and the like places they say followeth doubting of a mans owne grace and saluation for why should there be such commandements giuen vnlesse it might be so that one might fall from grace and faith and therefore that he ought to doubt of his owne grace and saluation I answer that out of these and the like places Christian care feare how good it followeth that there is no perseuerance in grace vnlesse there bee ioyned a care thought and labour to keepe grace For care and thought is set God so ordaining it to bee as it were the keeper and watchman to grace forbidding that a man fall not into carnall securitie which is the enemie of grace and this thought and care is giuen with grace yea and it selfe is a kind of speciall grace and a companion of grace which neuer departeth from her side for where grace is there is alwayes surely some thought and care to retaine that grace which is neuer all quite lost euen as grace it selfe is neuer wholy lost for it is euer in proportion to the grace For when there is great grace there is great care when there is but a small grace the care is but little And because God knoweth how necessary this care is which is y e companiō and preseruer of grace therefore doth he so often in the Scriptures stir vs vp vnto care commendeth it vnto vs. And all these exhortations are nothing els but so many outcries as it were wherby this care which we said is the watchman and keeper of grace is stirred vp prouoked to do her dutie that is to keepe grace and to driue away carnall securitie which is an enemie to grace and which would except care stood vpon her watch vtterly abolish grace it selfe as faith regeneration righteousnesse and life Therefore out of these and the like places care and not doubting vertue and not vice doe follow For doubting hath beene euer reckoned in the Scriptures among the worst euils of most enmitie to God man Now let vs speak of the subiect of iustifying faith what that is according to the mind of our aduersaries They Subiect of iustifying faith with Papists make the mind only to be the subiect and in the mind onely one facultie properly which is that that iudgeth and assenteth to the truth of any sentence But of the will and heart they speake nothing when yet iustifying faith doth chiefly belong to the heart as wee haue said before For the parts of the nature of iustifying faith they make not so manie as we For as touching knowledge which is the first part of iustifying faith either they say y t Parts of the nature of iustifying faith with Papists it is not necessary or els that some obscure knowledge will suffice which thing they labour to proue by this reason There is say they a double assent of the mind wherby we consent to the truth of any sentence The first assent is when we consent vnto it for some reason or cause and this is termed knowledge this assent doth necessarily require knowledge to goe before it to the truth whereof we assent The latter assent is when we assent to the truth of a sentence not for some
may be both dead and true but faith is not both true and dead euen as a man is not both true and dead for as a man is a compound thing of his body and his soule so faith is a certaine compound thing as it were of her body and of her soule the tokens or signes whereof are the actions Wherefore in Iames the comparison is made betweene a simple and a compound the simple thing which is the body voide of the soule the compound which is faith And the comparison is of force in that wherein it is made namely in the death of both not in other things And so much of iustifying faith according to the opinion of our aduersaries as also of the whole doctrine of faith CHAP. XXXII Of Hope HOPE followeth faith for that apprehension of Iesus Christ with his benefits offered Hope in the worde and sacraments which is the property of faith dooth giue hope vnto vs that wee shall one day inioy Christ present The Apostle Rom. 5. saith that experience breedes hope Now by faith we get experience and as Peter sayth wee taste how good the Lorde is wherefore it must needs bee that faith begets hope That we may therefore speake of hope it must first of all be seene what is the obiect thereof The obiect of faith and hope is the same in substance namely Iesus Christ with his benefits Heb. 11. It is said that faith is the Obiect of hope the same in substance with the obiect of faith and how they differ ground of things that are hoped for It may be againe said that hope is of those things which are beleued or which haue after a sort a being by faith By these things it is euident that the obiect of faith and hope is the same thing in substance or effect Yet the obiect of hope differeth in reason from the obiect of faith The chiefe difference is this that the obiect of faith is Christ in the word sacraments or the word concerning Christ and the sacrament which shadoweth him Wherefore the obiect of faith is a certaine image of Christ which is propounded to vs to be looked vpon in the glasse of the worde and Sacraments Whereupon 2. Cor. 3. we are saide with open face to behold as in a glasse and to be transformed into that image which we behold in that glasse But the obiect of hope is Christ with his benefits not indeed appearing to vs in the word sacraments but appearing as he is and as I may say in his owne person For hope is not setled vpon that image of Christ which we behold in a glasse by faith but vpon the face of Christ himselfe which we hope we shal see at the last Phil. 3. 20. from whence also we looke for the Sauiour our Lord Iesus Christ Tit. 2. Looking for that blessed hope and the glorious comming of the great God our Sauiour Iesus Christ 1. Ioh. 3. 2. Because we shall see him as he is and whosoeuer hath this hope in him that is he that hopes that he shall see him as he is By these things it appeareth that hope hath for it obiect the very face of Iesus Christ There be three things which are conuersant about one Christ Faith Hope and Sight 1. Faith 2. Hope 3. Sight but each in a diuers respect For faith is properly of his image hope is of his face but to come and appeare hereafter and sight is likewise of his face but present The second difference betweene the obiect of faith and hope is a consequent out of y t first and this is it that faith is of present of things namely of Christ and his benefits or rather of the image of these things which we behold present in the glasse of the word and sacraments whereupon Heb. 11. it is called A ground and an euidence which words signify the presence of those things which are beleeued But hope is of things to come hereafter for hope if it be seene is no hope that is if it bee of things present it is no hope For why should a man hope for that which he sees Ro. 8. 24. Beside hope is of his face which is not yet seen The third differēce followes also out of the first for faith is of the thing only in part seeing that it is of the image and as it were of the shadow and as I may say of the earnest which is but part of the summe See 1. Cor. 13. We know in part But hope is of the whole thing it is of the face of the complemēt to conclude it is of the whole summe the hope whereof that earnest which we apprehend by faith giueth vnto vs. And thus far of the obiect of hope The subiect followeth which is not the mind or some faculty of the mind whether of vnderstanding or iudgeing Subiect of hope nor is it the wil for faith hath made her seate in these But hope being content with the inferior seate hath it a biding in the heart For it is an affection of the heart euen as feare is which is opposed to it If we speake of the nature of it it is not iudgment or assent it is not an apprehension or trust for all these belong to faith but it is an expectation which followeth faith and is begotten by faith The property of hope is not that certainty properly which is of faith or of that assent which is in faith For faith is properly said to be certaine but hope is not properly How hope is certaine called certaine but it is tearmed certaine because of the certainty of faith In scripture I finde that patience is attributed to faith as a certaine property thereof Rom. 8. 25. But if we hope for that which we see not we doe with patience 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Patience of hope abide for it Heb. 6. it is said of Abraham that when he had patiently taried he obtained the promise 1. Thes 1. 3. there is mention made of the patience of hope or of patient hope And this patience is it whereby hope doth sustaine all the crosses and afflictions of this life and doth as it were goe vnder them For all the promises of heauenly things are made with an exception of temporall afflictions Wherefore whosoeuer hopeth that he shall obtaine those heauenly promises he must needes make himselfe ready to beare and sustaine all the calamities which are incident to this life Wherefore patience is so necessarilie ioined with hope as that hope cannot bee without it Out of these things which we haue spoken the definition of hope may be gathered that hope is a patient abiding Hope defined of the heart for the face of Christ or fulfilling of the promise It is to be noted that this is the definition of hope as the name is taken for the worke and office of hope which properly signifies an affection of the heart and that a sanctified one and