remissio est Justificationis efficacis consequens necessarium and the worthy Mr. Bradshaw saith culpae remissio accuratè considerata neque totum neque pars Justificationis existit sed contingens tantùm Justificationis effectus I conceive the application of Christ's Justifying Blood is in order of Nature antecedent to remission under the Law first the Atonement was made and Blood sprinkled and then there was forgiveness under the Gospel first Christ's Blood is applyed and sprinkled upon us and then there is remission Christ is a propitiation through Faith in his Blood saith the Apostle Rom. 3.25 and then he adds To declare his Righteousness for the Remission of sins Christ's Blood is first applyed and then remission follows upon it I say it follows upon it but it is no more the same with it under the Gospel then forgiveness under the Law was the same with the sprinklings and purifyings by the Blood of the Sacrifices when in Scripture there is attributed to Christ's Blood purging washing sprinkling cleansing from Sin and to a pardon covering blotting out taking away and casting away of Sin I cannot imagine that both these are the same as if Christ's Blood did not by it self do away Sin but only impetrate that it might be done away in a pardon I take it these are distinct first that Blood in the sence herein after declared frees us à culpâ and then the consequent pardon frees us à Baenâ Fifthly If Christ's Righteousness be Imputed to us not in it seif but in its effect only that is a pardon then Justification as to the Law wholly consists in a pardon on the other hand if Justification do not stand in a pardon then it stands in the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness to us in this great point I shall offer several things First The Scripture must be the great Rule to judge of Justification by there I find that we are justified by Christ's Blood that we are made rightcous by his Obedience but that we are justified by a Pardon I find not There I read that Christ is made to us Righteousness that we are made the Righteousness of God in him but not that an Immunity from punishment is a Righteousness I know many Learned Divines take Justification and Pardon to be one and the same but I shall consider the chief Scriptures which look that way The first is Rom. 4. There the Imputation of Righteousness Ver. 6. and the remission of sin Vers 7. and 8. seem to be the very same the quotation of the 32. Psalm seems to make it clear to answer to this I shall consider the scope of the Apostle He doth in the third Chapter lay down this Conclusion That we are justified by Faith Ver. 28. and in the fourth Chapter he lays down this That we are not justified by Works Ver. 4. that is perfect Works such as Man may glory in such as might make the reward of debt Abraham himself could not reach such a Justification this is proved by two things the one is this Abraham's Faith was counted to him for Righteousness therefore he was not justified by Works For Faith is not Works The other is this A justified Man is a pardoned one therefore he is not justified by Works for perfect Obedience leaves no room at all for a Pardon Touching the first I shall first consider what was the object of Abraham's Faith and then how Faith is counted for Righteousness The primary object of Abraham's Faith was Chrrist for the Apostle in the third Chapter speaks of the Faith of Christ and in the fourth where the same Discourse of Justification is continued the object cannot in any reason be varied Abraham is set forth as a great pattern of believing and he can hardly be so to Christians if his Faith had not for substance the same object with theirs The Scripture fore-seeing that God would justifie the Heathen through Faith preached before the Gospel unto Abraham saying In thee shall all Nations be blessed Gal. 3.8 That Abraham's Faith and ours might have the same object God took care that a Gospel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Evangelizandi verbum peculiariter conservatum est Doctrinae de Gratuita per Christum reconciliatione Bez. in loc a Blessing Christ should be set before him his Eyes were so far opened that he could see Christ's day and in a kind of Triumph of Faith rejoyce at it 1 Joh. 8.56 'T is true our Faith as having more of Evangelical light in it is more explicite than Abraham's was Abraham's was in the Messiah in universali in more general terms ours is in him in particulari in propriâ formâ in a satisfying atoning Messiah in his Blood and Righteousness nevertheless this being but a gradual difference according to gradual Light our Faith and Abraham's are for substance the same and center in one object and Christ's Righteousness and Satisfaction though not so clearly known to Abraham as to us was no less imputed to him than to us there being the same way of Justification by Imputed righteousness for him as for us Christ being the object of Abraham's Faith the next thing is how Faith is imputed for Righteousness Here I answer Faith is counted for Righteousness not as taken in abstracto meerly in it self but as taken in concreto in its conjunction with its object that is Christ and his Righteousness and then we have the full Righteousness of Justification Faith in it self answering to the Gospel-terms and in its object Christ's Righteousness answering to the Law Here I crave leave to set down the words of an Excellent Person though different from my self in this point the words are these Sir Charles Wols Justif Evang. 42. Faith looks both ways respects both the Law and the Gospel and comprizeth all that is requisite to our Justification with reference to both all the charge of the Law it answers ratione objecti in respect of its object which is Christ and all that is required by the Gospel ratione sui as being it self the performance of the condition annexed thereunto Thus he I quote not these words as if in this point he were of my opinion but because they are full and expressive of my thoughts Now that Faith is in this place to be taken in conjunction with its object appears thus the Apostle in the third Chapter proves That as to the Law every Mouth must be stopped that all the world must become guilty before God verse 19 and then concludes that by the deeds of the Law no Flesh can be justified verse 20. And in his After-discourse as the following words but now do import he sheweth what it is that justifieth us against the Law viz. The Righteousness of God that is of Christ which is not Faith it self but by Faith Vers 21 22. And at last he concludes That we are justified by Faith Vers 28. but Faith in it self cannot justifie us against the Law for Faith was not
propitiatory Sacrifice to God Hereupon God makes a general Decree That all persevering believers shall be saved and because man cannot believe of himself God decrees media ad fidem means to beget Faith and as soon as men believe there is a particular Decree for their Salvation or a kind of incompleat Election such as rises and falls with their Faith and when they arrive at the full point of perseverance the Election becomes compleat and peremptory This is their Scheme here many things are observable Here 's a Mediator Decreed without respect to that Church which in Scripture is the choice mark aimed at in the work here 's a general Decree to save all persevering believers and in that instant no Decree of the media ad fidem the means to beget Faith here 's a strange imperfection attributed to God his Will in its eternal acts must be in succession and make its gradual progresses from a general Decree to a perticular and from an incompleat Election I tremble at the word to a compleat one and in its passage to that compleature it must all the way vary and turn about to every point as the fickle will of man doth that standing in Faith there is an Election that falling there is none and so toties quoties as often as it pleases man to shew himself variable the Election will be something or nothing as it happens This doth not indeed ascribe eyes and hands to God as the gross Anthropomorphites did but it assimulates him to the silly turnings and variations of the creature which cannot but be very unworthy of him Here is such a particular Election as is temporal and totally superfluous it is temporal for if it depend upon persevering faith as its condition then it must be suspended and not in act till that faith be in being It 's condition being temporal it cannot pre-exist or be eternal It is also totally superfluous there being a general Decree of saving all persevering believers once past every individual man who is a persevering believer must needs infallibly arrive at Heaven without any more ado and then to what purpose is such a particular Election Neither do I think that the Remonstrants would ever have offered such an insignificant thing to the world but that they were under a necessity to say somewhat to those many and famous expressions which are found in Scripture touching the election and predestination of persons which could not be satisfied with that general Law That whosoever believeth should be saved Here 's an election of persevering believers but in plain terms that is no election at all Election must be to something but this is to just nothing not to Faith and Holiness these are presupposed in the object and there can be no election to that which is presupposed before There is therefore no election to Grace at all No nor to Glory That persevering believers had a right unto by the general Decree of saving such as they are and there can be no election to that which they had an antecedent right unto Thus all the great expressions in Scripture touching Election vanish into nothing In Election God severs and differences one man from another in a way of choice but according to the Remonstrants he gives all in common And how can God elect without a severing or differencing act Or how can he do such an act who gives all in common It 's true God severs final believers to life and final unbelievers to death but here is no choice of persons some go to life but all if final believers should do so some go to death but all if final unbelievers should do so Here is no choice at all but a meer judicial act according to the Evangelical Law When a Judg according to Law acquits one as innocent and condemns another as guilty it is not an act of choice but of righteous judgment No more is it in God to adjudg believers to life and unbelievers to death But I shall say no more touching the first thing That there is an Election 2. Election is of meer Grace It hath no other cause but the Divine pleasure only We are predestinated according to the good pleasure of his will Eph. 1.5 To the praise of the glory of his grace v. 6. God loves his people because he loves them Deut. 7.8 He saith I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious Exod. 33.19 In which words we have will and grace doubled as the only reason of it self Election is the primum indebitum if that be not purely free in God Cons ad Pol. cap. 29. nothing can be so Iniquus est saith Seneca qui muneris sui arbitrium danti non reliquit He is unjust who leaves not a gift to the pleasure of the giver All souls and graces are Gods and he may dispose of them as he pleaseth If he chuse any to himself he chuses freely else it is no choice at all it is not as the Apostle calls it an election of Grace Election is not built upon foreseen works for then it would not be an election of Grace but of Works the elect would not be vessels of Mercy but of Merit neither is it founded upon foreseen faith and perseverance these are given by God not to all but to some not out of common Providence but out of the Decree of Election Hence the Apostle when he blesses God for the work of Faith in the Thessalonians elevates his praises up to Election the first fountain of Grace Knowing brethren beloved your election of God 1 Thes 1.4 And when he praises God for blessing the Ephesians with all spiritual blessings in Christ he sets down the eternal rule of dispensing them According as he hath chosen us Ephes 1.3 4. He doth not choose us according to our faith and perseverance but blesses us with these blessings according to Election he chuses us not because we are holy but that we should be such Doth God foresee any good in men when he willeth to them their first good Or Doth he foresee good in them before he wills it to them What need then of his purpose to give it Or how can he possibly be the Donor of it If he foresee it they will infallibly have it whether he Decree it or not they will have it without his gift which is impossible Faith therefore and perseverance do not presuppose Election but Election is the eternal spring of those graces Unless this be granted God doth but eligere eligentes chuse those that first chuse him Mans faith must be earlier than Gods Grace he chuses before he is chosen loves before he is loved of God And to assert this What is it but to lift up man above God Mans Will above the Sovereign Will of his Maker A vanity it is and a blasphemy against the fountain of Grace which the Saints bless and adore as the origine of all that good which is in them Gods electing
audiunt they hear and learn of the Father He speaks to them inwardly in such words of life and power as produces the new-creature 4. The Ministry of Christ was a very excellent one He spake did lived as never man did there were Oracles in his mouth Miracles in his hands Sanctity in his life Never was there such an external call as here yet would this do the work Would this secure a Church or people to God No He tells them plainly That except they were born of the Spirit they could not enter Heaven That no man can come to him except the Father draw him There must be an internal traction or else there would be never a believer in the world Trahitur miris modis ut velit ab illo Aust ad Bon. lib. 1. cap. 19. qui novit intus in ipsis hominum cordibus operari In this Traction there is a secret and admirable touch upon the heart to make it believe and receive Christ This is an internal call indeed Yet as pregnant as the words are the Socinians have an art to turn Gods Traction into Mans Disposition and the Divine energy into human probity Vis praecipua in audientium probitate consistebat the chief force consists in the probity of the auditors Prael Theol. cap. 12. Thus Socinus touching that Traction Those who have probity of mind who will do Gods Will those honest Souls will embrace the Gospel When God is said to touch the heart 1 Sam. 10.26 the meaning is they had tangible hearts such as were inclinable to the Divine Will De Vera Rel. l. 4. cap. 1. so Volkelius And again when God draws men he proposes his Will and the probi the honest hearts are perswaded De Ver. Rel. lib. 5. cap. 18. so the same Author Thus by an odd perverse interpretation of Scripture the choicest operations of Grace are at last resolved into nature and freewill This more plainly appears by that explication which Volkelius in the place first quoted gives us of probity There are saith he in Man three things Reason Will and Appetite if the Will the middle faculty apply it self to Reason there is probity if to the Appetite there is improbity We see here what probity is the meer product of the Will Faith is resolved into probity and probity into the Will of man There is no need of Grace at least not of an internal one The probity requisite to Faith is according to these men much the same as Aristotle requires from the auditors of morality that is that they act 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to Reason Eth. l. 1. c. 3. Thus according to them there is nothing of Mystery or Grace in this Traction but only a following the common principles of nature out of this temper Faith will spring up But do these men believe Scripture There the natural unregenerate man is thus described He is dead in sin A corrupt tree which cannot bring forth good fruit He perceives not spiritual things His carnal mind is not subject to the Law nor indeed can be Without grace he cannot do good no nor so much as spend a thought about it He is a stranger from the life of God and blindness is upon his heart and can there be any true probity in such an one The Corinthians at least some of them were before their conversion Fornicators Idolaters Adulterers Effeminate Abusers of themselves with Mankind Thieves Covetous Drunkards Revilers Extortioners 1 Cor. 6.9 and 10. And what probity was in them True probity such as is towards God is no other than sincerity and sincerity is not one Grace but the rectitude of all And may such a thing go before Faith Where true probity is there is a pure intention to do Gods Will and may it antecede that Faith which is the single eye and works by love Probity is not an off-spring of nature but of Grace could Free-will elevate it self to it there would need no traction no influence of Grace at all * Qui humilitati obedientiae humanae subjungunt gratiae adjutorium nec ut obedientes humiles simus ipsius gratiae donum esse consentiunt resistunt Apostolo diceenti quid habes quod non accepisti Gratiâ Dei sum quod sum Conc. Araus 2. can 6. The Fathers in the Arausican Council condemn those who subordinate Grace to mans humility or obedience as if humility and obedience were not gifts of Grace To conclude the Fathers Traction doth not stand in mans probity but in a Divine energy such as produces faith in the heart 2. The internal call is meerly of Grace The Spirit breathes where it lists God calls as he pleases some are called according to purpose all are not so Every heart under the Evangelical means is not opened as Lydia's was God works in us to will and to do of his good pleasure If God be God an infinite Mind he must needs be free if free in any thing he must be so in acts of Grace in his calling men home unto himself It is true that according to some the Spirit is annexed to the Gospel and works equally on all the Auditors But this opinion labours under prodigious consequences I mean some such as these following are The Holy Spirit whose prerogative it is to breathe where he list and divide to every one as he will is here affixed to his own organ the Gospel and must part out his Grace equally to all The Ordinance of Preaching as if it were no longer a meer Ordinance or pendant on the Spirit must confer Grace if not ex opere operato yet in a certain promiscuous way to all The Minister who uses to look up for the spirit and excellency of power to succeed his labours may rest secure all is ready and at hand The peoples eyes which ought to wait on the Lord if peradventure he will give faith and repentance to them will soon fall down and center on the Ordinance where they are sure without a peradventure to have their share of Grace Those emphatical Scriptures which speak of singular Grace to some must now run in a much lower strain The opening of Lydia's heart how remarkable soever must be no singular Grace but common to the rest The tractions and inward teachings of the Father which make some to come to Christ must be general favours and extendible to those who come not to him When the Apostle saith That Christ is to the Jews a stumbling-block and to the Greeks foolishness but to them that are called the power and wisdom of God 1 Cor. 1. 23 24 How signal soever the difference in the Text be the internal call must be all one in those to whom Christ was a stumbling-block and foolishness as in those to whom he was the power and wisdom of God The called according to purpose are called but as other men Gods purpose is to call all a-like mans only makes the difference These are
the consequences of that opinion and too heavy I confess for me to stand under I rest therefore in that of the Apostle He hath called us not according to our works but according to his own purpose and grace 2 Tim. 1.9 Here purpose and grace are joined together if his purpose be free if his grace be gratuitous then he calls as he pleases In calling men home to himself he acts purely totally from Grace I conclude with that of Bonaventure Hoc piarum mentium est ut nihil sibi tribuant sed totum Dei Gratiae The genius of pious minds is to attribute nothing to themselves but all to Grace Thus far touching the first thing The freeness of Grace The next thing proposed is the power and efficacy of Grace The Apostle speaks of an exceeding greatness of power towards those that believe Eph. 1.19 So emphatical are the words there cam oper sol 343. that Camero is bold to say Nemo cui non periit frons negare potest significare vim potentiam None who hath not lost his modesty can there deny a force and power signified Now touching the efficacy of Grace I shall consider three things 1. It s efficacy as to the Principle of Faith and other Graces 2. It s efficacy as to actual believing and willing 3. It s efficacy as to perseverance in the faith The first thing is its efficacy as to the Principle of Faith and other Graces By the Principle of Faith I mean not the natural power of believing God doth not command us to take down the Sun for which we have no faculties but to believe for which we have an understanding and a will no natural faculty is wanting De Praed c. 5. Hence St. Austin saith the posse of believing is of nature This power in faln man because in conjunction with natural impotency never arrives at the effect The natural faculties are by the fall so vitiated that though in a sense he can yet he will not believe Trahit sua quemque voluptas one lust or other so attracts him that he cannot a se impetrare ut velit he cannot find in his heart to do it He hath a kind of can in his natural faculties but the corruption blasts the effect Neither do I mean that power which as some Divines say is supernatural yet not an habit or vital principle of faith Nature being fallen Grace say they gives a second power to set the will in aequilibrio but that power doth not as an habit incline or dispose a man to actual believving This power as I take it is nothing but Nature and Free-will I see not how it should be distinct from it There are as the Learned Doctor Twiss hath observed three things in the soul that is Powers Habits and Passions Powers may be the subjects of Habits and Passions but may a Power be the subject of a Power A natural power of a supernatural one This looks like a Monster By the same reason Habits may be the subjects of Habits and Passions of Passions And is this power of believing free or not If free then it is not supernatural it may be a principle of not believing and that nothing supernatural can be If not free then it determines the event but to what To not believing then it is not supernatural To believing then all men having as these men say the power must infallibly believe which Scripture and experience deny I mean therefore such a Principle of Faith as is an habit and vital Principle such as is seminally and virtually faith such as hath the nature and essence of faith such as inclines and disposes to actual believing and before the act denominates a man a believer When the act of faith comes forth into being is it from a believer or from an unbeliever If from a believer then there was an habit of faith before If from an unbeliever how unnatural is it and how cross to the suavity of Providence There must then be an act of faith before a principle a fruit before a tree or seed What shall we say of such an one He is a believer in act but in principle none as soon as the act ceases he is not at all a believer There must therefore be an habit a vital principle of faith This in the use of means is infused or created and that by the power of grace To clear this I shall lay down two or three things 1. The Principle of Faith and other Graces is not produced by meer suasion by a meer proposal of the Evangelical object In conversion there is a great work wrought within the deadly wound of Original corruption must be healed the new creature must be set up in us and can suasion do this Such a glorious work must be done by an efficient cause not by a meer allicient one such as suasion is A natural man is blind nay dead in spiritual things and what suasion can make the blind to see or the dead to rise Suasion is so far from giving a faculty that it presupposes it The use of it is not to confer a power but to excite and stir it up into act Satan uses suasion to subvert the souls of men and doth God do no more to convert them unto himself How then should he ever gather a Church to himself Satans suasions run with the tide and stream of corrupt nature but Gods are against it and in all reason the balance will be cast rather on that side which hath Natures vote and free concurrence than on that which hath Natures repugnancy and contradiction In this work there is more than meer suasion God is not a meer Orator but an admirable Operator his word is not significative only but factive commanding those Divine Principles into being vox imperativa abit in operativam he calls for a new heart and it is so 2. This holy Principle is not produced by assistent Grace as if a natural man did by Divine assistance work it in himself The Principle or power of believing is either natural or supernatural if natural it is by creation if supernatural it is by infusion or inspiration neither way is it produced in a way of assistance An assistance is not accommodated to a thing to produce a new power but to bring forth an act from thence The light is assistent to the eye in the act of vision but it gives not the visive power to it assisting grace concurs to the act of believing but it confers not a believing principle The greatest Saint in the world stands in need of assisting grace that his gracious principles may come into actual exercise he must have help from the holy one a supply of the Spirit of Christ the Heavenly roots do not cast forth themselves unless God be as dew to them the sweet spices do not flow out actually unless God breath upon them by auxiliary grace still he wants assistance to the doing of good as
he ought the greatest Saint though a man full of divine principles stands in need of assistance And doth a natural man one void of good fraught with evil need no more Is regenerating quickning renewing new-creating grace nothing but an assistance only May any one believe that the holy Spirit in Scripture should give such high stately titles to an assistance only May a man be a co-operator or co-partner with God in the raising up faith and a new creature in himself It 's true a natural man may by a common grace enter upon preparatories he may attend upon the means but what can he contribute to the work it self he is meerly natural the new creature is totally supernatural and what can he do towards it could he contribute ought what would the new creature be must it not be part natural as from man part supernatural as from God part old as from nature part new as from grace Thus it must be if this great work be divided between God and man Notable is that of Lactantius De fal Rel. Lib. 1. Cap. 11. Jovem Junonemque a juvando esse dictos Cicero interpretatur Jupiter quasi Juvans Pater dictus quod nomen in Deum minimè congruit quia juvare hominis est opis aliquid conferentis in eum qui sit egens alicujus beneficii nemo sic Deum precatur ut se adjuvet sed ut servet ut vitam salutemque tribuat nullns pater dicitur filios juvare cum eos generat aut educat illud enim levius est quam ut eo verbo magnitudo paterni beneficii exprimatur quanto id magis est inconveniens Deo qui verus est Pater per quem sumits cujus toti sumus a quo fingimier animamur illuminamur And at last he concludes Non intelligit beneficia divina qui se juvari modo a Deo putat He understands not divine benefits who thinks himself only helped by God Jehovah must not be transformed into a Jupiter or a meer helper man must not share with him in this great work it is God who makes us new creatures and not we our selves We are his workmanship not our own Ephes 2.10 Born not of the will of man but of God Joh. 1.13 As soon as a man is regenerate it may be truly said of him Hic homo jam naâ—ns est ex Deo this man is now born of God but to say that he is in part born of mans will is to blaspheme the Author of our spiritual being and to crown Nature instead of Grace 3. The holy principles of Grace are produced by an act of Divine power God lays the foundations of faith and the new creature as it were in mighty waters in the very same heart in which there is a fountain and torrent of corruption and no power less than the Divine can put back the stream of nature and set up the Heavenly structure of Grace in such an heart The production of gracious principles is in Scripture set forth in glorious titles such as do import power 't is called a Transtation Col. 1.13 it transplants and carries us away out of a state of sin into a state of grace 'T is a Generation Jam. 1.18 it begets us to a participation of the Divine Nature 'T is a Resurrection Ephes 2.5 It quickens us and inspires into us a Supernatural life of which the fall had left no spark or relick at all 'T is a Creation Eph. 2.10 it raises up a new creature out of nothing and gives us a spiritual being which before we had not and if these things do not speak power nothing can Hence the Apostle speaks of the Gospel coming in power 1 Thes 1.5 Nay that in the success of it there is an excellency of power 2 Cor. 4.7 and an exceeding greatness of power towards Believers Eph. 1.19 The work of faith is said to be fulfilled with power 2 Thes 1.11 How much more must it be an act of power to lay the Primordials and first principles of faith in a fallen unbelieving creature When there was nothing appearing in our lapsed nature but a vacuum a chaos of sin a spiritual death and nullity only the Divine power was able to repair the ruins of the fall and rear up the Heavenly life and nature in us This great truth was notably set forth in the conception of our Saviour Christ it was not in the course of nature his Mother knew not a man but the Holy Ghost came upon her the power of the highest overshadowed her that the holy thing might be born of her Luk. 1.35 In like manner when Christ is formed in the heart when the new-creature is set up in us it is not in the way of nature we know not the humane power in this work here is no less than dextra excelsi the right hand of the most High to effect it here are vestigia spiritus sancti the footsteps of the holy Spirit to bring it to pass the same power and spirit which formed Christ in the womb formes him in the heart as in his participation of the humane nature there was a Supernatural operation so is there in our participation of the Divine This is the first efficacy of Grace it new creates the heart and imprints the Divine image there it inspires holy Principles and so lays a foundation for obedience 2. There is an efficacy of Grace as to actual believing and willing St. Bernard asks the question Quid agit liberum arbitrium What doth Free-will do and then answers De Lib. Arbit Grat. Salvatur it is saved And Agatho in his Epistle lays down this as a rule Quod a Christo non susceptum est 6. Gen. Conc. Act. 4. nec salvatum est si ab eo humana voluntas suscepta est salvata est That which was not assumed by Christ is not saved by him If an humane will was assumed then it is saved and it is saved first in that principles of holy rectitude are instilled into it and then in that those principles are drawn forth in actual willing both these are necessary the first implants the vital principles of Grace in the heart the second makes them blossom and bring forth precious fruit without those vital principles the will however assisted ab extra is internally in it self but a faculty meerly natural and void of spiritual life it hath no proportion to the vital supernatural acts of Faith and Love Neither is it possible that any such should issue out from thence no not by any extrinsecal assistance whatsoever an act if vital and supernatural must be from an internal principle that is such Again unless those vital principles bring forth actual believing and willing they must needs lie dead and come to nothing And yet if we estimate things according to their worth and excellency we cannot but think it much more easie and eligible for the wise and good God to suffer an
abortion in all the seeds and principles of nature than in those precious and admirable ones of Grace which do not as the other do carry the meer footsteps but the very image and resemblance of his holy nature Pelagius would at least in some sense own that the posse the meer power of believing is from God but he would not have the velle the actual willing and believing to be so He saith that God worketh all things that is he gives to them the operative power He distinguishes three things Posse Velle Esse Posse in natura Velle in arbitrio Esse in effectu Power Aust de Grat. Christ cap. 4. Willing Being Power is in nature Willing in the free faculty Being in the effect The Power saith he is properly from God but the other two are from our selves as descending de arbitrii fonte from the fountain of Free-will Hence St. Austin tells him That according to his opinion which attributed to Grace not willing or believing but a power only he could not be a true Christian A power of believing whether it be as Pelagius would have it De Grat. Christi c. 10. a meer naked power and no more or whether it be such a power as is an habit or vital principle of Grace is not all that Grace operates a meer naked power is not all To entertain such a thought is highly to disparage Grace A power of believing is from God and is not a power of sinning so too If Free-will which includes in it a power of sinning be a creature it must be so If a power of sinning be from God and no more but a meer power of believing be from him then how is God the author of actual believing more than of actual sinning Pelagius saying That God is said to operate all things because he gives the operative power Bellarmine from thence infers this just consequence That then God operates all sin De Grat. Lib. Ar. lib. 4. cap. 4. because he gave a Free-will by which all sin is wrought Therefore if God be not the author of actual sin as he is not nor cannot be then neither is he author of actual believing by giving a power to believe Both powers are from God and how hard a thing and how contumelious to Grace is it to say That he produces as much towards sinning as towards believing And yet we must say so if there be no more than a meer power to both Neither is such a power as is a habit or vital principle of Grace all that Grace operates those precious Seeds and Principles were never let down from Heaven to sleep and lye hid in the root but to spring up in actual Graces sutable and congruous thereunto There is a Divine vigor in those Principles and when auxiliary Grace stirs them up and becomes an heavenly dew unto them they will spring up as a well of living water and shoot forth as the seed of God There is a special Providence watching over these to make them come up in a crop of holy fruits Some Divines express themselves thus Grace gives a supernatural power and so puts the will in aequilibrio in an even balance that it may believe or not believe as it pleaseth But what a thing is this An 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or indifferency towards such a precious object as Christ is looks very ill and like a sin and how should it come from Grace If Grace work only a kind of indifferency it doth far less than meer Moral virtue doth Moral virtue is as the Philosopher speaks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an habit of acting according to right reason it earries in it a promptitude and inclination to virtuous actions it renders them easie and in a sort natural and may we can we suppose that Grace a Principle much more sublime and of far higher extraction should only put the soul into an aequilibrious state no more propending to good than evil If Grace operate only a kind of indifferency then the comfort of Christians is departed they are afraid of nothing more than of themselves the vanity and corruption in their own hearts is terrible to them yet in this case the greatest of fears I mean to be left to themselves falls upon them They are not to look up to God to fix their hearts upon himself no nor so much as to incline them that way their life must not be a life of faith or dependence upon God the fountain of Grace there is no warrant for such a thing Grace only works a state of indifferency and then leaves the Will to do the rest if they will depend upon any thing it must be upon their own Will that is upon Vanity nothing else determines the great concern of their salvation Now here I shall first prove That Grace works the actual willing and believing and then That it doth it in a way of power 1. Grace works the actual willing and believing And here I shall lay down several things 1. The Scripture is very pregnant God worketh to will and to do of his good pleasure Phil. 2.13 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he worketh efficaciously not a meer power of willing but the very willing Neither doth he work the willing conditionally if we will for then the willing should be a condition to it self which is impossible and should be before he work◠it which is directly opposite to the Text but he works it absolutely of his own good pleasure His work doth not depend on mans consent but it causeth it neither doth he work it so as that man in whom he worketh the willing might actually not will for a man who wills must needs will and a man in whom he works the willing must needs do so If a man do not will then God doth not work the willing for a willing which is not is not wrought in this case nothing is wrought but the power of willing which satisfies not the Text. If the man in whom he works do will the thing is infallible for a man cannot will and nill both at once but he worketh the willing so as that mans willing doth certainly follow upon it Neither doth he work the willing as a partial concause for then he should be a cause only ex parte and do but something towards it the rest must be not from him but only from mans will as the author of it which is to ascribe to mans will not a merit only but a kind of Deity as if it were the sole author of some supernatural good But he works the willing as a total supreme cause he causeth man to will Mans will doth not co-operate but suboperate under the sweet power of Grace moving it to will It is true man willeth but it is causally from Grace that he doth so Mans will is the principium quod which produces the willing but Gods Grace is the principium quo which causeth it Hence St. Austin Nos
is it imputed to us it is derived down upon us as Members of him else the want of Righteousness in us is not a privative want of what we once had in Adam and afterwards lost in him but a meer negative want as being only of that we never had or forfeited Adam's Righteousness being not imputed to us we never had it Adam's sin being not imputed to us we never forfeited it such a meer negative want is no sin Nay if Adam's sin be not imputed to us our inherent pravity is no sin it cannot be sin in unfallen Creatures it is no sin to be born into the World there is no foundation in us to make it sin and the consequence of this is that there is no such thing as original sin at all in us which to say is to oppose the Doctrine of the Church in all Ages We see here that such an imputation to those in conjunction is possible because it is actually done and it must needs be true because it is done by God who is Truth it self and cannot err You will say It cannot be true primitive Righteousness was never in us we never committed Adam's sin I answer This is one thing which over-turns Religion we are apt to reject that as false which our weak Reason cannot comprehend Is not an internal sin in the Will imputed to the Members of the Body if not why must the Body rise and suffer for it if so sin may be imputed to that which it never resided in in this case the conjunction salves the matter and by a parity of Reason Adam's Righteousness and Sin may be imputed to us as being parts and Members of him and the Imputation is true because it is to those in conjunction and according to a just constitution God set Adam to be a Head of Mankind we are propagated from him as Branches from the Root his fin therefore may be justly imputed to us the Imputation of it is according to the Divine Constitution But the reason of that Imputation is because Adam the Head of Mankind sinned and all in him It is a pretty question which is started in Anselm De Concept Virg. cap. 4. how the Senses and Members in Man should be guilty of sin when God himself subjected them to Man's Will I answer God's order was meet and congruous in so subjecting them yet the act of the Will renders them guilty as being in conjunction with it in like manner God's Constitution that Adam should be the Head of Mankind was just and equitable but this transgression of Adam derives a guilt upon us as being parts and Members of him 2ly The Conjunction between Christ and us must be considered and that is double The one is that Conjunction which is between Christ and Mankind in common the Titles given to Christ will manifest it he is a Mediator not only an internuntial one but a satisfying and atoning one a Mediator above all Peer or Parallel and that in all his Offices in which he acted not as a private Person or in his own name only But as the Office was in Gods or ours in his Prophetical and Kingly Offices he acted in God's Name towards us in his Priestly Office he acted in our Name towards God hence the Apostle saith that every Priest is ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for Men Heb. 5.1 to act in their behalf towards God he was our Sponsor or Surety he undertook to satisfie Justice for us Loe I come to do thy will O God saith he Heb. 10.7 Burnt-offerings and Sacrifices could not pay our Debts but he would do it and for that purpose he took an Humane Nature to do it in never was there such a Surety as he he undertook to satisfie for us not as common Sureties do upon a meer contingency but upon a certain determinate Counsel not when we were solvents or able to reimburse him again but when we were known utter bankrupts under a perfect impossibility to expiate the least sin So plenary was that satisfaction that if we receive him by Faith we are Debtors no longer all our debts are blotted out of God's Book no more to be charged upon us a second payment cannot be demanded of us he was the representative of Mankind He did sustinere nostram personam he stood in our room he suffered in our stead not only nostro bono but nostro loco it may be thought perhaps that Christ was not a proper substitute but it was well said by the Learned Rivet in another case Regulis Legibus humanis Deum alligare vult pulvis cinis We are apt to limit the Holy one to our Rules and measures But if the Mysteries of Christ may be put into the straights of humane Laws and Reason he can scarce be properly any thing of that which the Scripture ascribes to him he cannot properly be a Surety and a Mediator too much less a Priest and a Sacrifice too least of all these and a Redeemer too in the same sufferings A Mediator doth not pay as a Surety doth nor a Surety offer as a Priest doth nor a Priest die as a Sacrifice doth neither is a Redeemer the very same with these but distinct from them all may there be a proper Priest and Redeemer a proper Offering and Paying a proper Sacrifice and Price in the same sufferings these conjunctions seem to carry difficulty in them Nevertheless I verily believe that he was properly all these yet in a way of transcendency above humane Law and Reason it is observable in Scripture that one notion of Christ runs into another the notion of a Mediator into that of a Redeemer he is a Mediator who gave himself a ransom 1 Tim. 2.5 6. the notion of a Mediator into that of a Priest he is a Mediator for the Redemption of Transgressions Heb. 9.15 that is for the expiation of them by offering up himself to God as it is in the precedent verse the notion of a Priest into that of a Surety hence in the midst of a Divine Discourse touching his Priesthood comes in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the surety of the Covenant Heb. 7.22 nay it is observable that these notions of Christ are interwoven with that of a Substitute as the mode of performing them Thus as a Priest he gave himself an Offering and a Sacrifice for us Ephes 5.2 as a Redeemer he was made a Curse for us Gal. 3.13 as a Mediator and Redeemer he gave himself a ransom for all 1 Tim. 2.5 6. in each of which the substitution comes in hence it appears that Christ is properly all these or else as Socinus would have it all seems to be but a Metaphor To add no more these Conjunctions tell us that Christ was so far one with us that those things fell upon him which otherwise he was utterly incapable of The Holy One was made sin the Blessed One a curse his sufferings were properly penal such as were not