first caution most necessary for the Sectaries of this time whose new lights are such that among them vetera deperdita and nova reperta go hand in hand together and are almost convertible termes as if a man should not keep what he had because he finds somewhat which he had not Secondly many of those new lights which some brag off not onely expell much of the good old light but bring in grosse Egyptian darknesse There is a woe denounced against those who put darknesse for light as well as against those who put light for darknesse Isay 5. 20. I may well say that grosse darknesse is introduced when the fundamentall Articles of faith are called in question denied and oppugned as the Godhead of Jesus Christ the divine authority of the Scriptures the immortality of the Soul the eternity of glory to the Elect and of torments to the Reprobate c. If the foundations be shaken what can the righteous doe If wee hold not fast this Gospell if we embrace not this Saviour we cannot have another 1 Cor 3. 11. For other foundation can no man lay then that is laid which is Iesus Christ Gal 1. 6. I marvell that ye are so soone removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another Gospell vers 8. But though we or an Angel from heaven preach any other Gospell unto you then that which wee have preached unto you let him be accursed Thirdly beware of those new Lights which make any certain truth although neither fundamentall nor circumfundamentall to be uncertaine as wee ought not to say of any sin so neither of any truth Is it not a little one Let every truth be highly valued Buy the truth and sell it not say not This truth is but a matter of discipline let it goe 'ts not worth the buying He that is faithfull in that which is least is faithfull also in much and he that is unâ—…ust in the least is unjust also in much Luke 16. 10. Melchior Adamus both in the life of Carolostadius and in the life of Luther observeth the great evill which grew out of Luthers dislike of Carolostadius his strictnesse zeal and forewardnesse in abolishing auricular confession and difference of meats and casting out images out of Churches at which things Luther was the more offended because done by Carolostadius in Wittenbreg during Luthers absence and without his knowledge and counsell Luther did also alledge that Carolostadius his strictnesse and zeal in these lesser things hindered and retarded the Reformation in more substantiall points of Doctrine However the story noteth that hence was the first rise of that deplorable Sacramentarian controversie which hath ever since made so great a rupture in Germany I could never yet observe or read or hear of controversies about discipline in any Christian Church but still they grew higher and higher and those who rejected or slighted the will of Christ in smaller things did afterwards slight it in greater things Fourthly beware of those new lights which not only refuse to admit some certaine truths but refuse to admit any truth now held or professed in the reformed Churches as sure and certaine and infallible as if because mens judgements are not infallible but subject to error therefore wee cannot be sure nor infallibly perswaded of this or that Article The holy Scripture will teach us that beleevers may attaine to a certaine and infallible knowledge of some truths for it was no impossible thing that Paul prayed for when he prayed that the Colossians might have all riches of the full assurance of understanding to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ. The mystery of God that he is and that he is eternall invisible omnipotent c his nature and attributes the mystery of the Father or that there is a distinction of persons in the holy Trinity and an eternall generation the mystery of Christ his person natures offices birth passion death resurrection ascension and intercession these are things of which the Apostle would have us most fully and certainly perswaded Timothy was assured of the things he had learned 2 Tim. 3. 14. so was Theophilus Luke 1. 4. A Mariner is not infallible in his judgement yet hee may bee assured infallibly that such a thing is a rocke which he must avoid and such a way is the way he must direct his course A Physitian is not infallible in his judgement concerning the symptomes causes and cures of diseases yet he may be most certainly perswaded such a disease is deadly and there is no cure for it or such a thing may be cured and this is the cure So in Divinty the obnoxiousnesse of mens judgement to error hindereth not but they may be infallibly perswaded of this and this and the other truth Fifthly beware of those new Lights which come not from the Sunne of righteousnesse To the Law and to the testimony if they speake not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Isa. 8. 20. When men walk in the light of their owne sparkes they shall lye down in darknesse New fancies are not new lights 't is no truth which cannot bee grounded upon the word of truth It was a wilde fancy of the Weigelians that there is a time to come which they cal seculum Spiritus sancti in which God shal by his Spirit reveal much more knowledge and light then was revealed by Christ and his Apostles in the Scriptures There is so much revealed in Scripture as the Apostle calls the wisdome of God and the hidden wisdome of God 1 Cor 2. 7. the things which are preached and written to us are the things which the very Angels desire to look or pry into 1 Pet. 1. 12. and saith not Christ That which ye have already hold fast till I come Revel 2. 25 more of this error see in Brochm and System theol com 1. Article 6. cap 2. quaest 12. Sixtly take heed of proud and lofty and self conceited new Lights 1 Cor 14. 32 33. And the spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets for God is not the author of confusion but of peace If the spirits of the Prophets must be so subject how much more the spirits of private persons Wherefore in a reformed Church all pretended new Lights which are against the receaved Doctrine government or forme of worship ought to be in all humility and submission offered to be tryed by a learned and godly Synod The Loâ—…rean severity was such that no man might move for a new law but with a rope about his neck that if his motion were thought good he might be spared but if bad hanged So Demosthenes advers Timocr tells us I will not allow this severity against such as offer new Lights or move for new changes in the Church But I may well applie here the Athenian law recorded by Demosthenes in the same Oration The Athenians went not so
minde in the truth and the stability of the heart in grace go hand in hand together Heb 13. 9. Davids rule is good Ps. 24. 12. What man is he that feareth the Lord him shall he teach in the way that he shall chuse Which is also Christs rule Ioh. 7. 17. If any man will do his will he shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God or whether I speak of my self See also Deut 11. 13 16. Elisha healed the unwholesome waters of Iericho by casting salt into the fountain 2 Kings 2. 21 so must the bitter streams of pernicious errors bee healed by geting the salt of mortification and true sanctifying grace in the fountain 3 Be sure to cleave to thy faithfull and sound teachers the sheep that followes the shepherd are best keeped from the Wolfe I finde the exhortation to stability in the faith joyned with the fruitfull labours of faithfull Teachers Phil. 3. 16. 17. Heb 13 7 9. So the Apostle Eph 4. from the work of the Ministry verse 11. 12 13. draweth this consequence v. 14. that we hencefoorth be no more Children tossed to and fro and carried about with every winde of Doctrine The Galatians were easily seduced al 's soon as they were made to disgust Paul 4 Watch and be vigilant against the first beginnings of declining against the first seeds of error Gal 5. 9. It was while men flept that the enemy came and sowed tears among the Wheat and when he had done went his way Mat. 13. 25. Therefore watch ye stand fast in the faith 1 Cor. 16 13. go hand in hand together 5. Avoid and withdraw from the Authors and fpreaders of Heresies and dangerous errors Rom. 16. 17. 1 Tim 6 5. 2. epist. Iohn 10. 11. Phil. 3. 2. He that would be godly should not use ungodly company and he that would be Orthodox should not use Hereticall company unlesse he have some good hopes to convert some who have erred from the truth and come into their company only for that end Ia 5. 19 20 I remember Chrysostome in diverse places warneth his hearers how much they indangered their soules by going into the Jewish synagogues and there was a great zeale in the Ancient Church to keep Christians that were Orthodox from the Assemblies and companie of Hereticks 6. Get Church Discipline established duely exercised which is ordained to purge the Church from false Doctrine Rev 2. 14. 20. 7. Leane not to thy own understanding and be not wise in thine owne eyes Prov. 3. 5. 7. Let reason be brought in captivity to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor 10 5. That which made the Antitrinitarians and Socinians fall away from the belief of the Trinity of persons in the godhead and of the union of the two natures of God and Man in the person of Christ was because their reason could not comprehend these articles which is the ground of their opinion professed by themselves When I speak of Captivating reason I do not mean implicite faith the eyes of my understanding must be so far opened by the holy Ghost that I may know such an article is held forth in Scripture to be believed and therefore I doe believe that it is though my reason cannot comprehend how it is 8. Count thy cost and be well resolved before hand what it will cost thee to be a Disciple of Christ to be a constant professor of the Truth Luk 14. 26. to vers 34. Act 14. 22. Confirming the souls of the Disciples and exhorting them to continue in the faith and that we must through much tribulation enter into the Kingdome of God This is surer then to confirme our selves with the hopes of a golden age of prosperity in which we shall feel no affliction 9. Search the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 39 Act 17. 11. Do not take upon trust new Lights from any man be he never so eminent for parts or for grace but to the law and the Testimony The up shot of all is that we ought to hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering and be stedfast and even unmoveable in the truth and not to give place to the adversaries no not for an houre Gal 2 4 5. I do not mean pertinacy in the least error nor a vain presumptuous overveening conceit of our knowledge to make us despise any Light which others may give us from Scripture Pertinacy is an evill upon the one hand and to be too tenacious of our own opinions But that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Levity inconstancy wavering Scepticisme is an evill upon the other hand 2 Thess 2 2 be not soone shaken in minde c. And this is the Epidemicall disease of the Sectaries of this time which I have now been labouring to cure their word is yea and nay and not unlike to that which Salust objected to Cicero that he said one thing sitting another thing standing yet it may be sometimes observed that these who are the greatest Sceptiks and Pyrrhonians in reference to the common and received tenents are the most pertinacious and tenacious in Tenents invented by themselves I have read it observed of Socinus that as he set at nought Fathers counsels and the whole current of ancient and moderne interpreters of Scripture so vain glory made him to maintaine stiffely and tenaciously any opinion or invention of his owne as if he had been infallible men are sooner drawne from truth then from error Some are unstable in the truth and unstable in error too you may finde among them annuas atque menstruas fides to use Hilaries phrase they are of a new faith and a new religion every year if not every Moneth Remember Reubens reproach Gen 49. 4. unstable as water thou shall not excell One sort of the Sectaries there is indeed which will not ingage to hold any thing but are known by believing nothing these passe now under the name of Seekers yet if one of the ancient Fathers or of the Reformers themselves who lived an hundreth years agoe were now alive they could tell us that these Seekers were in their dayes called Atheists and in deed what other name is due to these Nullifidians who are of no Religion CHAP. XII Whether a sound heart and an unsound head can consist together vice versa or whether truth and holynesse be not inseparable companions T Is one of the greatest objections against the suppressing and punishing of Heresies errors and Schismes O say they this is a persecuting of those that are godly this is a wound to Piety and the power of godlynesse I do not denie but there may be and is true piety in many who are somewhat infected with the leaven of false Doctrine live in some erroneous opinion I dare not appropriat the name of the godly party to those who are free from any of the errors of the times those that are truely godly may in diverse things differ in opinion every error is
to bee extended to every error which may be confuted by Scripture although happily such an error be too tenaciously maintained Nor yet is it to be so farre restricted as that no error shall be accounted Hereticall but that which is destructive to some fundamentall Article of the Christian faith if by a fundamentall Article you understand such a truth without the knowledge and faith whereof 't is impossible to get salvation When Peter Martyr defines Heresie he makes no mention of a fundamentall error but of an error contrarie to the Scriptures loc com class 2. cap 4. § 50. So Calvin Instit lib 4. cap 2. § 5. understands all such to be Heretiks as make a breach in the Church by false Doctrines Walaeus tom 1. pag 57. saith Hereticall Churches do either erre in the foundation or onlie in some other things built upon the foundation When Peter speaks of such Heresies as take away the very foundation Iesus Christ he thinks it too little to call them simple Heresies but he cals these damnable Heresies But if you understand by fundamentall truths all the chief and substantiall principles I do not mean onely the first Rudiments or A B C of a Catechisme which we first of all put to new beginners but I mean all such truths as are commonly put in the confessions of faith and in the more full and large Catechismes of the reformed Churches or all such truths as all and every one who live in a true Christian reformed Church are commanded and required to learn and know as they exspect in the ordinary dispensation of God to be saved in this sense I may yeeld that Heresie is alwayes contrary to some fundamentall truth 'T is one thing to dispute of the absolute soveraigne power of God and what are the truths without the beleif whereof 't is absolutly and altogether impossible that one can be saved Which question I doubt is hardly determinable by Scripture nor do I know what edification there is in the canvassing of it sure I am 't is a question much abused 'T is another thing to dispute what are these truths which in a Church where the Gospell is truely preached all and every one come to years of knowledge and discretion and having means and occasions to learne are bound to know and according to the revealed will and ordinary dispensation of God must learne as they desire or exspect to have a true fellowship with Christ in the Sacrament of the Lords supper or to bee accepted of God and saved eternally 2. We must not think that no man is a Heretick but he who is consistorially or judicially admonished and thereafter continueth pertinaciously in his error For where 't is said Tit 3. 10 A man that is an Heretick after the first and second admonition reject 'T is intimated that he is an Heretick before such admonition Positively I concieve that these six things doe concurre to make a Heresie 1. T is an error held by some Minister or member of a Church I mean either a true Church or an assembly pretending and professing to be a true Church For both Peter and Paul where they foretell that Heresies were to come 2 Pet 2. 1. 1 Cor 11. 19. they adde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 among you i.e. among you Christians So Act 20. 30. also of your owne selves shall men arise speaking perverse things Therefore the Scripture gives noâ—… the name of Heretiâ—…ks to these who are altogether without the visible Church but it calleth such by the names of Heathens or unbelâ—…evers or they that are without or the like 2. T is an error volunntarlie and freely chosen both in the first invention and broaching of it which is proper to the Heresiarchs and in the maintaining of it or adhering to it whicâ—… is common to all Hereticks This I collect from the very name which the Scripture gives to it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comes from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I choose Therefore we give not the name of Hereticks to such Christians as are compelled in time of persecution to profess such or such an error which peradventure were a formal Heresie if voluntarly and without compulsion professed They ought indeed to die and to indure the greatest torments before they professe what they know to be an error but this their sin is not properly called Heresie for an Heretick doth freely and voluntarily hold that which is his error And in this respect and consideration Tertullian thinks that an Heretick is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemned of himself Tit 3. 10. because he hath of himself choosed that which doth condemne him The Apostle there hath commanded to reject an Heretick If I reject him might one say then I loose him I destroy his soule Nay saith the Apostle his perdition is of himself for he hath chosen his own wayes and his soul delighteth in his abominations This interpretation is much surer and safer then to say that a Heretick is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or self-condemned because he goes against his own light and against the principles received and acknowledged by himself Which sense is accompanied with many dangerous consequences 3. 'T is such a choosing of error as is accompanied with a rejecting of Truth A Hereticke puts light for darknesse and darknes â—…or light good foâ—… evill and evill for good he chooseth eâ—…ror as truth and refâ—…seth truth as error they that give heed to seducing â—…pirits and doctrines of Devils do also depart from the faith 1 Tim. 4. 1. resist the 〈◊〉 2 Tim 3. 8 and turne away their ears from the truth 2 Tim 4. 4. their course hath a teâ—…minus a quo al 's well as ad quem 4 'T is an error professed and maintained and which â—…y that means becomes a scandal and snare to others For although there may be Heresie aâ—…s well as other kinds of sinâ—…urking and hid in the thoughts yet that belongs to Gods judgement only not to mans The Heresies which are spoken of 1 Cor 11. â—…9 are certainly known and apparently discriminative even among men And Hereticâ—…s are scandalous persons to be avoided and rejected Rom 16. 17. Tit 3. 10. which could not be except their errors were known 5. 'T is an error contradictory to some chiefe and substantialâ—… truth grounded upon or be necessary consequence drawne from the holy Scripture There was never yet any Heretick in the Christian world who contradicted that whiâ—…h is literally and syllabically in Scripture The most damnable Hereticke will offer to subscribe to the Scripture in stead of a Confession of Faith who yet will not subscribe to all truths which necessarily follow from the words of Scripture But I call not every error Heresie which is contrary to any consequentiall truth grounded upon Scripture As the Scrâ—…pture reckons not all who sin to be workers of iniquitie so it reckons not all who erre to be Hereticks Although there is not any either sin or
themselves T is marked as a part of Aâ—…imelechs sin Iud 9. 4. that he hired vain and light persons which followed him God would have Amaziah to dismisse an hundred thousand men of Israel being already with him in a body and told him he should fall before the enemy if these went with him because God was not with them 2 Chron. 25. 7. c. If they had not yet been gathered into a body it had been much to abstain from gathering them upon the Prophets admonition but this is much more that he sends them away after they are in a body and takes his hazard of all the hurt that so many inraged Souldiers could do to him or his people and indeed they did much hurt in going back vers 13 yet God rewarded Amaziahs obedience with a great Victory In the last age shortly after the begun Reformation in Germany this case of conscience concerning the unlawfulnesse of such confederacies was much looked at The city of Strassburg Anno 1629. made a defensive League with Zurik Berne and Basil Qui vicini erant dogmate magis conveniebant saith Sleidan they were not onely neighbours but of the same Faith and Religion therefore they made a confederacy with them About two yeares after the Elector of Saxony refused to take into confederacy those Eelvetians because although they were powerfull and might be very helpfull to him yet they differing in Religion concerning the Article of the Lords Supper he said he durst not joyne with them as confederats lest such sad things might befal him as the Scripture testifieth to have befallen those who for their help or defence took any assistance they could get The rule was good in thesi although in that particular case misapplyed The very heathens had a notion of the unlawfulnesse of confederacies with wicked men for as Victorinus Strigelius on 2 Chron 25. noteth out of Aeschylus his tragedy intituled Seven to Thebe Amphiaraus a wise vertuous man was therefore swallowed up in the earth with seven men and seven horses because he had associat himself with Tydeus Capaneus and other impious Commanders marching to the siege of Thebe Lastly take this reason for further confirmation as wee must doe all to the glory of God so wee must not make Warres to our selves but to the Lord hence the booke of the Warres of the Lord Num 21 14 and the battel is not ours but the Lords 1 Sam 25 28 2 Chron 20 15. Now how shall we imploy them that hate the Lord to help the Lord or how shall the enemies of his glory do for his glory Shall rebels traitors be taken to fight in the Kings Wars Offer it to thy Governour as it is said Mal. 1. see if he would take this wel As for the Objections from Scripture they are before answered There are many other exceptions of mens corrupt reason which yet may be easily taken off if wee will receive Scripture light That very case of Iehosophats confederacy with Ahab taketh off many of them for although 1. Iehosophat was a good man and continued so after that association not drawn away into Idolatry nor infected with Ahabs Religion but onely assisting him in a civil businesse 2. Ahab lived in the Church of Israel which was still a Church although greatly corrupted and hee was no professed hater of God only he had professed to hate Micajah the man of God yea lately besore this he appeared very penitent and some think Iehosaphat now judged charitably of Ahab because of that great humilation and repentance of his which God did accept so far as to reward it with a temporall sparing mercy 1 Kings 21. at the end then followes immediatly Chap 22. Iehosaphats association with him Although Iehosaphat was also joyned in affinity with Ahab Ahabs daughter being married to his sonne 3. The enemy was the King of Syria and Iehosaphat doth not joyne with a wicked Man against any of Gods people but against the infidell Syrians even as Amaziah was beginning to joyne with those of the ten Tribes against the Edomites 4. The cause seemes to have been good as Carthusian on 1 Kings 22. 3. and Lavater upon 2 Chron 19. 2. note For Ramoth-Gilead was a city of refuge pertaining to the Levites in the Tribe of Gad and should have been restored by the King of Syria to Ahab according to their Covenant 1 Kings 20. 34. Daneus brings that same example of Ahabs going up against Ramoth-Gilead to prove that 't is just to make warre against these who have broken Covenant with us 5 Iehosaphats manner of proceeding was pious in this respect that he said to Ahab enquire I pray thee of the word of the Lord to day and again is there not here a Prophet of the Lord besides he enquireth ultrà and seeks all the light he could there have in point of conscience from Prophets of the Lord which makes it probable that those 400. Prophets did not professe or were not known to Iehosaphat to be Prophets of Baal but were lookt upon as Prophets of the Lord as Cajetan thinketh Therefore they answer also in the name of the Lord the Lord shall deliver it 'T is not likely that Iehosaphat would desire the Prophets of Baal to be consulted or that hee would hearken to them more then to the Prophet of the Lord Micajah yet in this he failed extremly that he had too far engaged himself to Ahab before the enquiring at the word of the Lord. How ever it seemes he was by this enquiring seeking a faire way to come off againe 6. Iehosaphats end was good Martyr on 1 Kings 22. thinkes Iehosaphat entered into this confederacy with Ahab for the peace and safety of his Kingdome and to prevent a new War between Iudah and Israel such as had been between Asa his father and Baasha King of Israel for which end also Carthusian ibid. thinks that Iehosaphat took Ahabs daughter to his son Yet notwithstanding of all this the Prophet Iehu saith to him 2 Chron. 19. 2. Shouldest thou help the ungodly or love them that hate the Lord. The LXX read hated of the Lord which comes all to one thing And least it should be thought a veniall or light matter headdeth therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord. So that from this example we learn That let us keep our selves unspotted of the false Religion or errors of those with whom we associate let wicked men seem never so penitent and our relations to them be never so near let the common enemy be an Infidell let the cause be never so good let the manner of proceeding be never so pious and the end also good yet all this cannot excuse nor justifie confederacies and associations with wicked and ungodly men And if God was so angry at Iehosaphat when there were so many things concurring as might seem to excuse or extenuate his fault it being also in him a sin of infirmity only and not without
Gem ar Senhedrin cap 11. sect 38. So that here are two sorts of necessary consequences from the Law one is a majori aut minori or if ye will a fortiori another a pari either of which being refused the Law it self was despised yea t is further to be observed with Mr. Selden in his Vxor Haebraica lib 1. cap 3. that the Karaei or Iudaei scripturarii who reject the additaments or traditions of the Talmudicall Masters and professe to adhere to the literall and simple sense of the Law without adding to it or diminishing from it yet even they themselves do not require expresse words of Scripture for every Divine Institution but what they hold to be commanded or forbidden by the law of God such commandment or prohibition they draw from the Law three wayes either from the very words of the Scripture it self or by argumentation from Scripture or by the hereditary transmission of interpretations which interpretations of Scripture formerly received the following Generations were allowed after to correct and alter upon further discovery or better reason The second way which was by argumentation was by the principles of the Karaei themselves of two sorts a pari or a fortiori Which agreeth with the passage of the Talmud before cited And herein our writers agree with the Karaei that all kinds of unlawfull and forbidden mariages are not expresly mentioned in the law but diverse of them to be collected by consequence that is either by parity of reason or by greater strength of reason for instance Levit 18. 10. The nakednesse of thy Sons daughter or of thy daughters daughter even their nakednesse thou shalt not uncover For theirs is thine own nakednesse Hence the consequence is drawn a pari Therefore a man may not uncover the nakednesse of his great grand-child or of her who is the daughter of his Sonnes daughter For that also is his own nakednesse being a discent in linea recta from himself From the same Text 't is collected à fortiori that much lesse a man may uncover the nakednesse of his own daughter which yet is not expressely forbiden in the Law but left to be thus collected by necessary consequence from the very same Text 't is likewise a necessary consequence that a man may not uncover the nakednesse of her who is daughter to his wives sonne or to his wives daughter For here the reason holds 't is his owne nakednesse his wife and he being one flesh which gives ground to that generall receaved rule that a man may not marry any of his wives blood nearer than he may of his own neither may a wife marry any of her husbands blood nearer then she may of her owne Again Levit 18. 14. Thou shalt not uncover the nakednesse of thy fathers brother c. Hence it followeth à pari that a man may not uncover the nakednesse of his mothers brother and by parity of reason ever since that law was made 't is also unlawfull for a woman to marry him who hath been husband to her father sister or to her mothers sister the nearnesse of blood being alike between Uncle and Neece as between Ant and Nephew Other instances may be given but these may suffice to prove that what doeth by necessary consequence follow from the law must be understood to be commanded or forbidden by God as well as that which is expressely commanded or forbidden in the Text of Scripture 3. Argument If we say that necessary consequences from Scripture prove not a jus divinum we say that which is inconsistent with the infinite wisdome of God for although necessary consequences may bee drawen from a mans word which do not agree with his minde and intention and so men are oftentimes insnared by their words yet as Camero well noteth God being infinitly wise it were a blasphemous opinion to hold that any thing can bee drawne by a certaine and necessary consequence from his holy word which is not his will This were to make the onely wise God as foolish man that cannot foresee all things which will follow from his words Therefore wee must needs hold 't is the minde of God which necessary followeth from the word of God 4. Argument diverse other great absurdities must follow if this truth be not admitted How can it be proved that women may partake of the Sacrament of the Lords supper unlesse wee prove it by necessary consequence from Scripture How can it bee proved that this or that Church is a true Church and the Ministery thereof a true Ministery and the Baptisme Ministered therein true Baptisme Sure no expresse Scripture will prove it but necessary consequence will How shall this or that individuall beleever collect from Scripture that to him even to him the Covenant of grace and the promises thereof belong Will Scripture prove this otherwise than by necessary consequence How will it be proved from Scripture that the late warre against the Popish and Prelaticall party in desence of our Religion and Liberties was lawfull that the solemne League and Covenant was an acceptable service to God Necessary consequence from Scripture will prove all this but expresse Scriptures will not The like I say of fastings and thansgiving now and then upon this or that occasion God calls us to these dueties and it is his will that we performe them yet this cannot bee proved from Scripture but by necessary consequences This fourth Argument will serve for the extension of the present assertion which I now prove to ' its just latitude that is that Arguments from Scripture by necessary consequence will not onely help to prove and strengthen such things which may bee otherwise proved from expresse and plain Scriptures but will be good and sufficient to prove such things to be by the will and appointment of God or as we commonly say Iure divino which cannot be proved to be such from any expresse Text of Scripture 5. Argument I shall here take notice of the concession of Theophilus Nicolaides the Socinian in his Tractat de Ecclesia missione ministrorum cap. 10. pag 121. Although hee professeth his dissent both from the Reformed and Romane Churches thus far that he doeth not beleeve things drawen by consequence from Scripture to be equally necessary to salvation as those things contained expressely in Scripture yet he yeelddeth the things drawne by consequence to be as certaine as the the other quantumuis saith he aeque certa sint quae ex sacris literis de ducuntur atque ea quae in illis expresse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 habentur And generally it may be observed that even they who most cry downe consequences from Scripture and call for expresse Scriptures do notwithstanding when themselves come to prove from Scripture their particular Tenents bring no other but consequentiall prooffs So farre is wisdome justified not onely of her Children but even of her Enemies Neither is it possible that any Socinian Erastian c. can
be proved by such marks as have no imperfection in them If the marks be true then is the grace true and that is enough to the point which I now assert But as the grace is not perfect no more are the marks of it perfect And as there is no faith here without some unbelief no repentance without some impenitency no watchfulnesse without some security no contrition without some hardnesse no self-denyall without some self-seeking So no love to the Brethren without some want of Love to the Brethren no marks of true Love without some imperfection and falling short and no marvell because no spirit without flesh no grace without corruption Feelest thou then those contrary corruptions those roots of bitternesse in thy heart if thou warrest against them through the strength of Jesus Christ and endeavourest to have thy love every way such as hath been described then God looks upon thee and would have thee to look upon thy selfe as a lover of the Brethren As long as thou art in this world thou shalt have cause to walk humbly with thy God because of the great imperfection of all thy graces and of thy love to the Brethren among the rest and still thou shall have flesh and corruption to war against all the powers parts acts of thy inward man Let there be but a reciprocall warring of the spirit against the flesh Gal. 5. 17 so shall thou passe in Christs account for a spiritual not for a carnall person Neither do I say that thou must alwayes finde a perpetuall conflict or battell between the flesh and the spirit or otherwise no ground of assurance The Apostle speaks of warring not of conflicting or fighting there is alwaies belluÌ„ though not alwaies praeliuÌ„ between the flesh the spirit The new man dare not make peace with the old man nay nor agree to a cessation of Armes with him dare not allow or approve corruption nor allow the neglect of means and endeavours Yet the new man is sometimes taken napping and sleeping sometime assaulted and spoiled and bound hand and foot he may be carried away as a poor prisoner but Christ will again relieve his own prisoner and set him in a fresh military posture against Sathan and sin I hope I have now so far scattered those mists clouds cast by Antinomians and so farre extricated a poore soul out of those doubtings into which they would drive it as that a Beleever may knowingly and confidently say I love the Brethren sincerly and unfeignedly and hereby I know that I have passed from death to life which is a good and sure argument whether we consult scripture or the experience of Saints CHAP. XXII Of the true reall and safe Grounds of enâ—…uragement to believe in Iesus Christ. OR Vpon what warrants a sinner may adventure to rest and rely upon Christ for Salvation THere are some Divines abroad who condemning Arminianisme and much more Pelagianisme yet have not adhered to the orthodox Doctrine asserted by the most approved Protestants writers and received by the best reformed Churches against the Arminians in the article concerning the death of Christ. These have found out a midle and a singular way of their owne that Christ died for all men conditionally viz if they shall believe in him that he hath redeemed all upon condition of Faith One of their arguments is because otherwise we cannot encourage sinners to believe nor satisfie a troubled conscience nor keep it from desparing Upon the like ground that all may be comforted every man being assured that Christ died for all men and so for himself Mr Moore hath written a tractat of the universalitie of Gods grace and of Christ dying for all men as himself expresseth in the title of his Book T is also one of Mr Saltmaâ—…sh his encouragements which he gives to sinners that Christ died for sinners as sinners as hee speaks whereupon it followeth according to the rule à quatenus ad omne that he died for all sinners Surely this is not the way as is pretended to ease and encourage the troubled and terrified conscience Neither can they by their principles minister solid comfort to a sinner tempted to despair of mércy All the scrupulosity and unsatisfaction of conscience which they object against our Doctrine that Christ died not for all but for the Elect only whom the Father gave him followeth as much yea more as I shall shew afterwards upon their own way First of all when they give comfort and encouragement to sinners upon this ground that Christ hath dyed for all upon condition of faith t is to be remembred that conditio nihil ponit in re the generality of men can draw no result from the death of Christ as it is set forth by their Doctrine but that Christ hath by his death made sure this proposition that whoever believes on him shall be saved or that all men shall be saved if all men believe Now a conditionall proposition is true in the connexion of one thing to another if this be that shall be although neither the one nor the other shall ever have an actuall existence If Sathan and wicked men get their will Christ shall have no Church on earth if the Elect fall away from faith and obedience they shall perish If the damned in hell had place and grace to repent and to believe in Christ they should be saved or the like So what solid comfort can the soul have from that conditionall proposition which is all the encouragement they do or dare give from the death of Christ to all men all men shall be saved by Christ if they believe on him Is it not as true and as certain may a sinner think with himself that no man on earth shall be saved if no man on earth believe and for my part if I believe not I shall be damned If all this hang upon the condition of my believing saith the troubled conscience why then hath not Christ merited to mâ—…e and will hee not give me the grace of believing That new Doctrine answereth that Christ hath merited faith and gives the grace of believing not to all but to the Elect only that God hath in his eternall decree inâ—…ended to passe by in the dispensation of his grace the greatest part of mankinde and to keep back from them that grace without which he knowes they cannot believe on Jesus Christ That though Christ meant that all men should have some sort of call to believe on him and should be saved upon condition of their believing yet he had no thought nor intention by his death to procure unto all men that grace without which they cannot believe This doctrine of theirs while it undertaketh to comfort all men and to encourage all to believe it tels them withall upon the matter that all cannot be saved because all cannot believe that God will not give faith and so not salvation either unto millions of sinners What comfort is