of the other Ubi videbat cruentum facinus Idem ibid. cap. 1. ibi rursum timebat reatum perjurii Ne Deum offenderet peâ—erando Deum offendit saeviendo Where he saw a bloody villany there he feared the guilt of perjury and lest he should offend God by forswearing there he offended God by cruel murdering saith the same Author Subsect 2. What the Covenant obligeth to THus far hath been shewen that the Covenant in reference to the performance of the contents of it bindeth not Yet doth it bind and oblige very strongly For Ecce sanctus David non quidem juratus sanguinem hominis fudit sed eum falsum jurasse negare quis poterit de duobus peccatis elegit miâ—us sed minus fuit illud in conparatione majoris Nam per seipsum appensum magnum malum est falsa juratio Behold holy David Aug. ubi supra cap. 3. he would not shed a mans blood though he had sworn it But who can deny but that he was forsworn of two evils he chose the least It was indeed the least in comparison of the greater but else of it self false swearing is a great sin Saith the same St. Austin Now great sins do bind and oblige unto deep repentance As Paul in another case 2 Cor. x2 ult I must bewail saith he those that committed these lasciviousnesses and have not repented Job 42. We must as Job did after he had spoken words that he understood not to God even abhor our selves and repent in dust and ashes And with the blessed Apostle we must be humbled as oft as we reflect upon it and think the worse of of our selves as long as we live as he did for his sin though not committed in light as ours was 1 Cor. 15. I am not worthy saith he to be called an Apostle because I persecuted the Church of God So every one of us I am not worthy to be called a Christian a subject of the Kings or a son of the Church because I entred into this Covenant But yet with his comfort and some kind of recompence where he had cone the wrong viz. Yet by the grace of God I am what I am that is a penitent and a convert and as a token of it I laboured more abundantly then they all that had not so offended As 't is also prophesied in this cause some should do Eicon Basilic Medit. 27. Prov. 24.21 22. And let us for the future fear God and the King and not meddle with them that are given to change the government of Church and State for their destruction hath come suddenly and who foreknew the ruine of them both i. e. those that have both deserted God in his Church and the King in the State and Common-wealth Prov. 1.10 And if hereafter sinners in that kind entice thee consent thou not no though they should say Come we will have all one purse For they lay wait for their own blood as we have seen And let us not deceive our selves one horn of this dilemma will wound us Either the Covenant is to be literally kept or else repented of Remember palliations expositions and evasions here will do no good Prov. 28.13 Psal 32. Numb 32.23 For he that covereth this sin shall not prosper And whilst we hold our peace our bones will consume through Gods heavy hand upon us And our sin will find us out For there is no darkness nor shadow of death Job 34.22 where the workers of iniquity may hide themselves saith Elihu And thus far of the general exceptions against the Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government of the Church of England viz. That they are unnecessary inconvenient humane inventions Apocryphal Popish not established by Law And an Engagement and Covenant for the removing or reforming of them CHAP. III. Grounds of Separation and Exceptions particular against the Matter of the Premises SECT I. Against the Articles or Doctrine 2. Exceptions particular against the matter of the premises Independents excepts not Apologet. narrat pag. 29. PRoceed we now unto the Exceptions particular namely against the matter of the Doctrine Worship Assemblies Discipline and Government And first of those against the Articles or Doctrine The Independent or dissenting Brethren acknowledge That in the review and examination of the Articles of our Church so are their words our judgments say they have still concurred with the greatest part of our Brethren neither do we know wherein we have dissented Some Presbyters now do But certain of the Presbyterian Brethren do dissent and object against them first doubtfulness secondly error thirdly tyranny in the act requiring subscription Necessity of Reform pag. 1. c. 1. Doubtfulness and fourthly defectiveness and imperfection First doubtfulness because in the book of Articles now printed and ever since 10 Carol. 1. there is a declaration of his late Majesty to the Articles to this effect 1. That those Articles contain the true Doctrine of the Church of England agreeable to Gods Word 2. That the Clergy upon just occasion may have liberty from the King Kings deelar before the Articles under the Broad Seal to deliberate on such things as make for the establishment of the same doctrine yet so that no varying in the least degree should be endured 3. That no man should put his own sense upon them but take the Articles in the literal and grammatical sense pag. 2. whence the Brethren infer that by this Declaration no Minister shall have liberty to interpret any one of these Articles And therefore they will remain doubtful But first Answ 1 this doubtfulness is not per se and in the Articles themselves but per accidens and in reference to this declaration Again though they are prohâ—bited to put any Answ 2 new sense as the King speaks or their own sense as the Judge in Smiths case Necessity of Reform p. 5. yet are they not forbidden to explain the literal and grammatical sense The Scripture in the fundamentals of salvation also the Laws and Acts of Parliament are so to be taken and yet Divines there and Judges here have ever been allowed to open those senses or else the one must not preach nor the other declare Law Thirdly when unto that liberty Answ 3 granted to the Clergy there is this restraint expresly put upon it viz. That from the Doctrine established the least varying shall not be endured and that nothing shall be concluded contrary to the Laws and Customs of the Land is there not a fair assurance that the present doctrine shall remain fixed and that if any heterodox sense shall be put upon them it shall be lawful to oppose the literal and grammatical sense whether in the Article or Explication Fourthly when the Declaration Answ 4 saith We will that all further curious search be laid aside and these disputes shut up in Gods promises as they be generally set forth unto us in the holy
Apostle St. Paul implyeth that faith only which works by love to be effectual to obtain forgiveness of sins Jam. 2. And St. James proves as well concerning love as faith that if it have not Alms-giving it is uneffectual as those words If a brother or a sister be naked or destitute of daily food and one say Go be warmed be filled and give him not that which is needful for the body what doth it profit that is what proof of love is here 1 Tim. 6.19 And Paul exhorts rich men by good works to lay up for themselves a good foundation that they may lay hold on eternal life Explained There is a foundation of right whereby we have title to eternal life and that is faith if it be a living one Foundation of salvation double The right of it such also And there is a foundation of assurance and that is by good works Again There is an original right and that 's by faith in the general promise the Covenant of Grace And there is a collateral right and that is by good works whereunto particular promises are made Homil. of Amlsd p. 161. But as our Authour saith I know some men will not be contented with this answer and no marvel for such men can no answer content or suffice I have done with their Exception against the matter Alms-deeds and the efficacy of them I come now to their objection against the proof or the title of it rather Chap. 4.10 Ecclus. 3.30 That the Book of Tobith being cited for proof it is said that the Holy Ghost did teach in sundry places of Scripture and this Book named whence they infer 1. That the Book of Tobith is here taken for holy Scripture 2. That it was indited by the Holy Ghost But for answer When things seem double to the eye that are single it is an argument that either their opticks or their understanding is defective In all other mens eyes for a Book to be holy Scripture and to be indited by the holy Ghost is all one and vice versâ But if they spake that they did not think if their hearts were worse then their head we may here retort upon them their own reproach upon the Hom. excellent sense Secondly I answer with the Learned Whitaker De Sacr. Script Q. 1. cap. 11. Non est idem esse canonicam Scripturam computari in numerum sacrarum Scripturarum It is not the same thing to be Canonical Scripture Apocrypha how Script and to be counted in the number of holy Scripture Computantur enim in numero Scripturarum quae cum sacris Scripturis leguntur ad aedificationem plebis etsi non ad dogmatum confirmationem They are counted saith he in the number of the Books of Scripture which are read with Scripture for the edification of the Church although not for the confirmation of Articles of Faith The Articles therefore having excluded these Books from holy Scripture Artic. 6. as themselves note and every ones Bible having it in the Apocrypha that expression might be born in a popular Sermon though not in a determination in the Schools But Secondly The Homily saith the Holy Ghost saies it and that implies 't is very Scripture As if Apocrypha how from the holy Ghost as he called it Scripture in a large sense so he might not ascribe it to the Holy Ghost in a like sense also yet not as any truth especially in matters of Religion may be so ascribed but because it is so consonant unto those very expressions which the Holy Ghost hath in the undoubted Scripture touching the same matter as we saw above out of the Sermons of our Saviour and writings of the Apostles But Thirdly because I love plainness What if I grant that the Homily being penned very early and in the morning as it were of the Reformation and before the Articles had determined the number of Canonical Books at least in the Synod 1562. or were confirmed by Parl. And whilest it was still in the peoples minds being so formerly taught that those Books Were Scripture what if to avoid offence in a popular Sermon the Homily spake according to the then received opinion as the holy Evangelists and Apostles oftentimes follow the Greek Translation differing from the Hebrew because it was generally received and the errors not such as overthrew the faith Object so here But why was it not amended since Why is it suffered to Answ 1 stand still Forsooth for the same reasons perhaps in part that those of the Church of Rome our brethren of the Nation and others affected that way may see we do not reject wholly those Books out of the number of holy Scriptures in some sense and as inditements of the holy Ghost in such things as they have agreeable to Answ 2 Scripture And it may be these and such like expressions were left as are the Psalms and Epistles and Gospels after the old Translation not only for the cause now named but also to be as a picture of the face of the Church in its infancy here that the growth of it since in knowledge and distinct understanding of things might the better appear Though it must be avowed that if any man Galat. 1. yea or an Angel from Heaven preach any other Doctrine than what is already and then was established in the Articles Homilies and Liturgies let Answ 3 him be accursed Lastly It is very probable that the things not being of any dangerous consequences as they stood Ipsae quippe mutatio consuetudinis etiā quae adjuvat utilitate novitate perturbat Aug. Januar. Ep. 118. c. 5. and the changing of them might be not only very difficult for some things must have been much altered and detruncated but also give occasion of calumny to the adversary and of scandal to the weak it was thought better to let them stand lest it should be said the Doctrine or Worship was altered and not the same as at the Reformation Art 37. The last place they except against is Art 37. where the Queen being named and we enjoyned to read the Articles as they are we may not they say turn the word Queen unto King which Exception because it foameth out their own shame Jud. v. 13. as the Apostle speaketh representing them to be men of a captious and quarrelsome spirit shall receive no other answer But be the Articles true or false 3. Tyranny in the Act requiring subscription to the Articles Pag. 5. they urge the repealing of the Act requiring absolute subscription unto them upon another ground viz. Because say they if we may not subscribe without an addition so far forth as the same Articles are agreeable to Gods Word it must needs be granted that the Composers of them are admitted to be infallible and their Articles of equal authority with the Canonical Scriptures or else that the Statute intended to tyrannize over the consciences of
fell in with Novatus in the former by seeming to deny forgiveness whensoever a man repents from the bottom of his heart so in the latter with Pelagius in concluding Austin Tom. 7. part 2. from a suposition if we do that therefore we may do it Though indeed he went rather upon the command than supposition Object Secondly where they say it occasions men to delay their repentance Have they not read Answ Rom. 2. That the goodness of God and especially that held out in the promise of forgiveness does lead unto repentance Artic. Relig. 17. Is not despair of mercy truly concluded to be a most dangerous downfall whereby the devill doth thrust men either into desperation or into wrethchlesness of most unclean living no lesse perilous than desperation But God may in mercy let these Brethren one day feel in their own consciences the pretious use of this sentence What time soever c. And indeed there is age enough in some of them before and sin enough I fear to make them need it In Psal 31. In te Domine speravi Savanarola to be sure that learned and constant Martyr having acknowledged in the person of sadness and despair objecting to him when he was very near his end Te scientiâ scripturarum ornavit sermonem praedicationis in ore tuo posuit quasi unum de magnis viris in medio populi te constituit That God had endued him with the knowledge of the Scriptures and put the word of preaching also into his mouth and made him as one of the great men of his time as * En Monachus solers rerum scrutator acutus Martyrio ornatus Savanarola pius Chr. Pflug ad Icon. Savanar Ante compend s Philosoph excellentiss he was indeed yet was glad to make use of this sentence even in the words of the Common-prayer though not out of it to refresh his conscience in the sore conflict under the sense of sin wherein he was Annon audivisti Dominum dicentem in quacunque die ingemuerit peccator omnium iniquitatum ejus non recordabor ampliùs Hast thou not heard the Lord saying In what day soever a sinner repenteth I will remember none of his sins any more But these perhaps are but the prefaces may not so much latent evil be within as that their true quarrel with this Scripture should be the same that theirs was in the Gospel with the good-man of the house Matth. 20. for making those that came in at the eleventh hour and had wrought but one equal to them that had undergone the burden and heat of the day And take it ill that a poor sinner at the last repenting from the bottom of his heart should be as the Thief crucified was with Christ in Paradise as well as they who conceive they have done God so so much good service This for the first General the reply to the Brethren SECT IV. A Vindication of the compilers of the Liturgy A Word now of vindication of the Compilers of the Liturgy and first in general Script Angl. Censur Liturg. cap. 1. and it shall be in the words of Bucer censuring the whole order of the Service till the Communion In descriptione communionis quotidianarum praecum nihil video in libro esse descriptum quod non sit ex divinis literis desumptum si non ad verbum ut Psalmi Lectiones tamen sensu ut sunt collectae Modus quoque harum lectionum ac precum tempora sunt admodum congruenter cum verbo Dei observatione priscarum Ecclesiarum constituta Religione igitur summa retinenda erit vindicanda haec ceremonia In the description saith he of the Communion he meaneth here communion in prayer for of the Lords Supper he speaketh next and in the description of the daily prayers in the Common-prayer-book I see nothing set down but what is taken out of the holy Scriptures if not verbatim as the Psalms and Lessons yet in sense and meaning as are the Collects And the manner or measure and order of these Lessons and Prayers and the times are very convenient and appointed according to the Word of God and the practise of the most antient Churches Therefore this Service is to be retained and defended in a most religious manner Note How weak were Bucers eyes that could not see that beam which our Brethren stumble upon at the very threshold nay he could see nothing in all that part of the Service amiss even as it was then But in particular touching this sentence The wisdom and piety of the Composers did appear therein forasmuch as they prudently considered that there is nothing more necessary than the publishing of the Gospel The wisdom of the Composers of the Liturgy as being the power of God to salvation And that this is nothing else but the offer of mercy to the penitent through faith in Jesus Christ They considered that there is nothing draws to repentance more effectually than the goodness of God and hope of pardon Therefore being to propound the form of Confession and of Repentance they propose this and other sentences to excite them thereunto And because they would have the people to retain in their minds these special places of Scripture for that purpose and the words of Ezekiel being somewhat long they contracted the substance of them into this sentence Except 2 The second Exception in the body of the Book is against that clause in the general Confession No health in us There is no health in us May we not reply There is no Except 3 soundness in them Let the one help the other A third is TE DEUM Benedicite i. e. We praise thee O God All thy works praise thee Answ the TE DEUM and BENEDICITE which are said to be Apocryphals and interrupt the reading of the Scripture So do also the Prayers and Exhortations in the Liturgy If there must be no interruption of reading of the Scripture it must be all reading and no Liturgy That falshood that they would fix upon the Preface of the Book which they say would bear us in hand Scripture that it is provided against that the continual reading of Scripture shall not be interrupted lies in the falseness of their conception for the Preface takes the word Scripture in the sense that sometimes the Fathers do in a larger one namely and as was in use in the time when the Liturgy was compiled as comprehending those antient Religious writings which when properly distinguished from those that are Canonical as they are by the Articles which are the rule to measure particular expressions by that are found in the Offices of the Church then when they are so distinguished they are called Apocryphals but largely often Scripture and holy Scripture As Austin saith the books of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are called Solomons de quadam similitudine Retract l. 2. c. 4. for some
Peter saith he was more savingly displeased with himself when he wept then when he was pleasing to himself and presumed R. Hook Sermon of Pride near the end c. And if the blessed Apostle did need the corrosive of sharp and bitter strokes lest his heart should swell with too great abundance of heavenly Revelations 2 Cor. 12. Surely upon us whatsoever God in this world doth or shall inflict it cannot seem more than our pride doth exact not onely by way of revenge but of remedy Saith a learned and good man Hence that of the Father noted above namely That it is good for high and conceited men to fall into some manifest sin Aug. de Civit. l. 14. cap. 13. ut tu eis placeas quaerentibus nomen tuum qui sibi placuerant quaerendo suum That thou maist please them when they seek thy Name who pleased themselves in seeking of their own 3. Neglect of Reading 3. Hence the neglect of using such helps and following such directions as in the improvement whereof I might have been preserved Negligence in study 1. In general and of the Ministry of the Word must needs have had like some ominous Constellation a sinister influence here The Ministery is onus etiam Angelicis humeris formidandum 2 Cor. 2 16. A burden that the shoulder of an Angel may shake under Of which the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ' For these things sufficient what man is there for so the expression may be rendred Hence that of the same Author to all of this profession 1 Tim. 4.13 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which I mention in this form because they were so commended unto me in my younger years by a learned Mr. Sam. ward sometime Preacher of Ipswich religious and elegant man In an Inscription written with his own hand on his works works indeed being elaborate pieces with the donation whereof he was pleased to befriend me This for studies in the general To come unto particulars And first the study of the Scriptures of which note what one spake Homil. of the perâ—l of Idolatry part 2. that was the best learned in them of all antient Doctors saith the Church of England as was noted above Tanta est Christianorum profundit as literarum ut si eas solas ab ineunte pueritiâ uâ—que ad decrepitam senectutem maximo otio summo studio meliore ingenio conarer addiscere in eis quotidie proficerem Aug. epist 3. Non quod ea quae necessaria sunt saluti tanta in eis perveniatur difficultate sed cum quisque ibi fidem tenuerit sine quâ piè recteque non vivitur tam multa tamque multiplicibus mysteriorum umbraculis opaca intelligenda proficientibus restat tantaque non solum in verbis quibus ista dicta sunt verum etiam in rebus quae intelligendae sunt latet altitudo sapientiae ut annosissimis acutissimis Ecclus 18.6 flagrantissimis cupiditate discendi hoc contingat quod eadem Scriptura quodam loco habet cum consummaverit homo tunc incipit That is So great is the depth of the Scripture and Christian learning that I might every day profit and gain more in them though I should study them onely and that from childhood even unto decrepit age with full leisure earnest intention and a better understanding than I have Not that unto those things which are necessary unto salvation Austin's Caution asscent is so difficult But thus that after a man hath learned as much thence as may enable him to believe without which we cannot live neither godly nor uprightly there remains so many things so darkly involved in so many veils and mysteries that are further to be understood by him that would go forward And there lies hid so great a heighth of wisdom not onely in the words wherein these things are uttered but also in the things that are to be known That this will befall the most antient the most acute and the most studious Reader which the same Scripture saith in another place viz. When a man hath ended Austin explained he must then begin Where by the way let it not offend the Reader that St. Austin calls the Book of Ecclesiasticus Scripture Whereas according to the Doctrine of the Church of England it is none of it but Apocrypha onely For the Canon of Scripture was taken by him strictly and largely as the * Artic 6. of the sufficiency the Scriptures learned note When strictly he acknowledgeth that there is no certain Authority but in the Books received in the Hebrew Canon whereof this is none * Whitak Controv 1. Q. 1. cap. 4. cap. 14. Adversus contradicentes non tanta firmitate proferuntur * D. Civit. lib. 17. cap. 20. quae scripta non sunt in Canone Judaeorum In tribus vero illis libris Proverbiis Ecclesiaste Cantico Canticorum quos Salomonis esse constat c. Against Opponents saith he we cannot with so good security produce any thing that is not written in the Hebrew Canon But in those three Books which it is certain are Solomon's that is Proverbs Ecclesiastes and the Song of Solomon c. But this occasionally And so much for the study of the Scriptures Next Touching the perusing of other good Authors 2. Other good Authors also that the neglect thereof doth object unto error and seducement I remember that when Mr. William Sedgwick Will. Sedgwick had fallen into that delirium touching the end of the world to be terminated by such a day After the time was some while passed certain Ministers Independent meeting on other occasion and among them my self discourse falling in concerning him Mr. Bridge as I remember conceiving him to be obsessed a degree below possession by a spirit communicated unto him by the * A woman near Ely that put this conceit into his head woman that possessed him with that delusion and his understanding thereby bowed down as it were a thing to be well observed Mr. Sydr Symson as rendring the cause of his lying open unto such temptations said That Mr. Sedgwick had lived upon his fancy this seven years and had neglected the reading of the Scripture and other good books Touching other Books Note a friend of his lying in his Study at Ely and observing he made no use of his Library asked in mirth to give him his Books saying ' I see you make no use of them He replyed ' They were good Introductions intimating that he was now beyond them And for the Scripture my self having some discourse with him about his former mistakes which then he Atheistically justified saying There was no other end of the world but this just with Hymeneus and Philetus And that God had burnt up all corruptioâ— in him c. And speech falling in about the Scripture he said 2 Tim. 2.17 18. He could have a glorious use of them
under the degree and calling of a Bishop or Dean of a Cathedral or Collegiat Church and they upon the Kings days and Festival days do take occasion by the expounding of any Text of Scripture whatsoever to fall into any set discourse or common place otherwise than by opening the coherence and division of his Text which shall not be comprehended and warranted in essence substance effect and natural inference within some one of the Articles of Religion set forth 1562. or in some of the Homilies Note set forth by authority in the Church of England not onely for a help for the non-preaching but withal for a pattern and boundary as it were for the preaching Ministers And for their further instruction for the performance hereof that they forthwith read over and peruse diligently the said Book of Articles and the two books of Homilies This I say had they observed the sound godly and comfortable doctrine therein contained might perhaps have so endeared them as not to be traduced by them so reproachfully that I say not their peoples edification the Kingdoms quiet and their own peace might have been more then now it is or like to be As to particulars the instances they give are few in number but two and weak in strength to bear up so heavy a charge as false doctrine The first is out of the Homily of the time and place of prayer part 1. Particular exception against the Homilies 2. 't is said that therefore plurality of wives was by special prerogative suffered to the Fathers of the old Testament because every one hoped and prayed that the blessed seed that should break the Serpents head might come of his stock The Brethren except As if every one did not know out of what Tribe Christ was to issue I answer No for these words may refer unto the Fathers more antient before any distinction of Tribes were Secondly After the distinction of Tribes it was long before this truth was made known and not till the latter Prophets if even by them understood of the people The next place is out of the Homil. of Alms-deeds part 2. pag. 160. The same lesson doth the Holy Ghost teach us in sundry places of Scripture saying Mercifulness and alms-giving purgeth from all sins and delivereth from death and suffereth not the soul to come into darkness The wise Preacher the son of Sirach confirmeth the same when he saith That as water quencheth burning fire even so mercy and alms resisteth and reconcileth sins Two particular places excepted against Against this passage they have three Exceptions 1. Against the expression reconcileth sins excellent sense say they Well we shall see how good theirs will be anon 2. Against the matter 3. Against the proof of it first for the matter they say that a charitable construction of them may be wyar-drawn implying they are not simply justifiable But why did not the Brethren retain so much ingenuity I say not honesty as to give the Homilies own explication of them which in that very page and the next saith But ye shall understand How good works do away sins dearly beloved that neither those places of Scripture before alledged neither the doctrine of the blessed Martyr Cyprian neither any other godly and learned man when they in extolling the dignity profit fruit and effect of vertuous and liberal alms do say that it washeth away sins and bringeth us to the favour of God do mean that our works and charitable deeds is the original cause of our acceptation before God or that for the dignity or worthiness thereof our sins may be washed away and we purged and cleansed of all the spots of our iniquity for that were indeed to deface Christ Note and to defraud him of his glory But they mean this and this is the understanding of those and such like sayings That God of his mercy and special favour towards them whom he hath appointed to everlasting salvation hath so offered his grace especially and they have so received it fruitfully that although by reason of their sinful living outwardly they seemed before to have been the children of wrath and perdition yet now the Spirit of God mightily working in them unto obedience unto Gods will and commandments they declare by their outward deeds and life in the shewing of mercy and charity which cannot come but of the spirit of God and his especial grace that they are the undoubted children of God appointed to everlasting life And a little after The meaning then of these sayings in the Scriptures and other holy Writings How to understand the Script and Fathers concerning good works Alms-deeds do wash away our sins and mercy to the poor doth blot out our offences is That we doing these things according to Gods will and our duty have our sins indeed washed away and our offences blotted out not for the worthiness of them but by the grace of God Note which worketh all in all And that for the promise that God hath made to them that are obedient to his commandement that he which is the truth might be justified in performing the truth due to his promise Alms-deeds do wash away our sins because God doth vouchsafe then to repute us as clean and pure when we do them for his sake and not because they deserve or merit our purging Note or for that they have any such strength or merit in themselves In which words a double account is given of those expressions in Scripture which seem to attribute justification and salvation unto good works First Because they declare a man to be the child of God and to be endued with his Spirit and so do evidence that his sins are pardoned Secondly Because God hath unto believers promised a reward unto his own graces and especially that of Love and that which is prima charitatis deificantis filia eleemosyna as Theophylact calls it the eldest daughter of divine Charity Almes-giving Then which what could be spoken more Orthodox or more comfortable I know not But secondly Lest they should say these Answers are invented to salve Apocryphal and other human expressions they are to remember that the same doctrine for substance is delivered by our Saviour Christ and his Apostles Matth. 5.7 Chap. 6.14 As where he saith Blessed are the merciful for they shall obtain mercy Again If ye forgive your Heavenly Father will forgive you which proceeds upon the same ground Luke 11.41 Also Give almes of such things as yee have and behold all things are clean unto you Calvan Harm Which Calvin expounds in this sense And in the next Chapt. Sell that ye have and give Almes Provide your selves bags which wax not old Luke 12.33 A treasure in the Heavens that faileth not c. And that expression Love covers a multitude of sins is used by the Apostle Peter 1 Pet. 4.8 Gal. 5.6 as well as James to the same effect And the
points but for convelling and tearing up the foundations of many generations in * As the invisibility of the Catholick Church c. Doctrine Worship and Discipline without legitimate Authority and for other things which need not here be named Their third instance of the defectiveness of the Articles Object 3 is that they speak nothing of the creation of providence fall of man of sin of the punishment of sin of Gods Covenants effectual calling Adoption Sanctification Faith Repentance Perseverance of the Law of God Christian Liberty and liberty of conscience Religious worship of the Sabbath or Lords day of Marriage and Divorce the Communion of Saints Church-Government and Discipline of the Resurrection or of the last Judgment All which the Scripture teach as necessary and are comprised in the Apostles creed That the Assemblies Confession hath all these and that with proofs of Scripture which the Answ 1 Articles want But they should consider that a Confession of faith is one thing and a Catechism or a common-place book to refer ones reading unto is another If the Church shall think fit to compile one of these for the help of young students no doubt but all those shall be expresly treated on though perhaps not in the same form or titles But to constitute a Confession of Faith of all these heads with the several Articles which the Assembly hath subjoyned would doubtless have excluded many more from subscription than the Articles ever did Especially where they have made that an Article of faith which never was a Protestant doctrine viz. That the Church Catholick is a visible and organical body Assemblies Confess ch 35. Artic. 2. whereas it is an article of our faith in the Apostles Creed and not of sense And that which is laid as the foundation of the usurpation of the Bishops of Rome Bellarm. de Eccles l. 3. c. 2. by Bellarmine for either that or somewhat like it must follow upon that ground so that a fair Bridge is hereby laid from Thames to Tiber for his Holiness to walk upon A point universally opposed by the Protestant party except Peter Ramus and perhaps one or two more althongh of late owned by some of them of which * Vindicia Catholicae in answer to Mr. Hudson else-where I instance in this that be it true or false yet a point of this nature should not have been made an Article for the not subscribing whereto men must have been rejected from the Ministry others there are that would have stuck no doubt with many men orthodox able and godly 2. As to the things themselves they are all in effect touched either in the Articles Articles of Ireland Anno 1615. whence taken or the Homilies which are approved by the Articles or in the Liturgy or in the Book of Ordination a branch also of the Articles And the Articles of Ireland which are more full in themselves than ours and comprehend in terminis most or all these heads they are taken verbatim out of the books now mention'd And to give some instances The Creation and Providence is mentioned in the first Article of God and in the Catechism in the Common-prayer-book And more largely in the Homily for Rogation week part 1 2. The fall of man his sin and punishment of it professedly discours'd of in the Homily of the misery of mankind and is touched in the Articles Artic. 9. 10. of Original sin and Free-will Gods Covenant may be understood in the Articles of Justification and Predestination Artic. 11. 17. and is discours'd on largely in the Homily of Salvation Effectual calling also in the same 17th Article and more largely in the Homily of Faith Where also of Adoption as likewise in the lesser Catechism in the Liturgy Faith in the Article of Justification by faith Sanctification in the Homily of good works and divers others Repentance hath a proper Homily for it Perseverance is expresly set down in the 17th Article Of the Law of God in the Homily of the misery of Man And in the Catechism in the Liturgy so far as concerns practice Christian liberty in the Articles of the Traditions of the Church And the Homily of disobedience and wilful rebellion Religious worship is the subject of the Liturgy And of several Articles and of the Homily of the time and place of prayer The Sabbath or Lords day in the Homily of the time and place of prayer Of Marriage both in the Homily of Matrimony and in the Exhortation at Marriage in the Common-prayer-book Divorce as a point of Law is discoursed in the Canons Communion of Saints is the ground of all Exhortations to Unity as the Homily against Contention and exhortation to Charity as love and good works Church-government is the subject of Artic. 20. 21. of the authority of the Church and of General Councils And for Orders they are in the Book of Ordination For the Rules in the book of Canons and in the Rubricks in the Liturgy about Order and in the Commination there Of the Resurrection the Homily on Easter-day And of the last Judgment in the Homily against the fear of Death Seeing therefore that most or all of these heads are either expresly treated on or occasionally either in the Articles or branches of them how say they that they contain nothing of them Proofs to Confessions Lastly for the proofs added in the Assemblies Confession not added in the Articles they know it is not usual to add Proofs unto Confessions as may be seen in the Confessions of the Reformed Churches where they are rare And even lately their Brethren of the Independent way published their Confession without proofs And unless it be that of New England the Assemblies and those of the Separation I remember not that I have seen any with frequent proofs And if I mistake not it had not been amiss if the Assembly had kept the Track in this in as much as the Proofs sometimes do not infer the Article In a Catechism or Sermon or Dispute they are more proper than in a Confession Because that is a thing supposed to be grounded not in this or that place but on the current of the Scripture Besides Proofs occasion Dispute which is abhorrent from the nature of a Confession The places alledg'd may be clear a proof and yet not so to every less-intelligent Reader I conclude this discourse touching the imperfection and defectiveness of the Articles with that considerable passage of Erasmus to this purpose Summa religionis nostrae pax est unanimitas Erasm presat in Hilarium ea vix constare poterit nisi de quà m potest paucissimis definiamus in multis liberum relinquamus suum cuique judicium propterea quod ingens sit rerum plurimarum obscuritas c. The sum saith he of our Religion is peace and unanimity of which there is little hope unless those things which shall shall be enjoyned as matters of faith be
likeness-sake So are these also called Scripture and holy Scripture yea and sometimes Canonical some of them De doctr Christ lib. 2. cap. 8. by St. Austin But so that aliter Hieronymus accipit vocabulum hoc Canonicus aliter eam vocem Augustinus Innocentius Patres Carthaginuenses interpretanter Otherwise doth Jerom take the word Canonical and otherwise Austin Innocent and the Fathers at the Councel of Carthage saith our Whitaker Contr. 1. Q. 1. c. 4. And so I say otherwise do the Articles of our Church take the word Canonical and otherwise sometimes the Prayer-book and the Homilies But of this more largely above In the answer to the fourth general Exception Secondly These are brought in here not as an interrupting of the reading any more than the singing of a Psalm which though not express Scripture might be sung betwixt the Lessons or reading an Exhortation or Prayer for they are brought in by way of Hymn onely and are sung also in some Churches But in particular they except first against Te Deum Te Deum We praise thee O God c. that it is a piece taken out of the Mass-book and in Popish Churches usually sung Thence brought in by Bishops into Protestant Churches but no where enjoyned or warranted by any Law in force That it shews the Bishops are not able to give thanks themselves for extraordinary mercies That it is a superstitious formal dress c. Answ To the antiquity of Te Deum beyond the Mass-book its reference unto St. Ambrose might be testimony But it s being used there or taken thence doth no more derogate from the matter of it than it doth from the Psalmes Epistles and Gospels or then it doth from the Doctrine of Free-mercy against Merits which is yet there and in the very office of the Mass as we saw above In answer to the fifth general exception It is recorded as a reputation to the old Romans that they disdained not nec ab hoste doceri To learn even of an enemy for we In what is good all friends and fellows be That the Bishops brought it in does not argue want of ability to give thanks themselves but their want of self-conceit and singularity They prudently and modestly choosing to receive and close with what is good and of general reception That they might declare their communion with all Christians in what they might and fulfilling the Apostles prayer Rom. 15. With one mind and one mouth glorifie God with the rest of his Church That it is no where enjoyned and warranted by any Law in force Not established is more than they have charged the Book hitherto with Answ having not nor indeed being not able to do it alledged any one thing added to the body of the Liturgy established by Law pag. 28. n. 6. but an Appendix as themselves reckon of three prayers one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Progeny 2. Act uniform com pr. Besides it is also untrue for themselves acknowledge as it is in the Act for the Uniformity of Common-prayer that the Books of 5 6 Edw. 6. shall be established without alteration except one sentence in the Letany and the addition of two in the Lords Supper c. Now it is evident that TE DEUM is in King Edwards Books and in the Book of Queen Elizabeth established by Parliament as we now receive it with all the Kings Parliaments and Judges since and comprehended by Bucer in that Elogy of his before named viz. That all generally till the Communion was agreeable to Gods Word and the use of the primitive Church Which form of Communion then hath been since reformed in part as he directed So that Te Deum is as well established by Law as any other part of the Book This gross reeling of the Brethren doth not it argue now they were etcaetera To the last which touches the matter of it viz. That it is a superstitious formal dress Seeing this is a high charge not on it but on the Common-prayer-book also yea and on the Church of England it should have in particular been shewed by the Brethren wherein it is so for dolosus versatur in universalibus This is the fruit perhaps of their Law-studies they have learned the course of Chancery to charge heavy crimes and prove nothing But shall I open this mystery of iniquity to be suspected in the breasts of these Brethren they seem to be Socinians and enemies to the Godhead of our Lord Jesus Christ and to the Doctrine of the Trinity both which are there splendidly acknowledged and professed in the Hymn of Te Deum Mr. Cartwright as it seems before Dr Reynolds and the rest at Hampton-Court were ashamed to except against it though they spared not where they thought exception might with any modesty be taken But as I said here is not onely a profession of the doctrine of the Trinity and a kind of repetition of the common Creed by way of Hymn The special use of the hymn TE DEUM but a particular application of prayer unto our Lord Jesus Christ which is done in no other part of the Book so expresly except the Letany Communion This is the superstition it may be feared that the Brethren aim at for other there is none We may now understand them when they call it and other parts of the Book Popish superstitious and Antichristian namely in his sense who writing against the doctrine of the Trinity and the Godhead of the Lord Jesus entituled his book Antithesis doctrinae Christi Antichristi de uno vero Deo An opposition of the doctrine of Christ and of Antichrist concerning the one true God To which the learned Zanchy making answer shews that for strengthning our faith in the doctrine of the Godhead of Christ Zanch. epistol dedic ad Sturm ante Resp suam ad Arrianum Tom. 8. p. 6. Ad hanc fidem in cordibus nostris servandam fovendam augendam quà m necessaria est crebra ad Christum in coelo residentem pro nobis interpellantem mentis elevatio EJUSQUE ac patris invocatio à verâ porrò seriâ contemplatione personae Christi ab assiâ—ua beneficiorum ejus commemoratione denique ab ardenti nominis ejus invocatione quibus fovetur fidos nostra separari non potest studium perpetuum resipiscentiae c. sunt autem haec meditatio invocatio resipiscentia tria praecipua verae fidei effecta c. For the nourishing this our faith saith he in the Godhead of Christ namely in our hearts and for the encreasing and preserving of it Prayer to Christ necessary for the strengthning of faith in him how necessary is the often lifting up our minds to Christ sitting in heaven and interceding for us and as necessary is prayer to him and to the Father Now from the true and serious consideration of the
sure that it is not there in any point condemned of Heresie unless it be of the ANABAPTISTS as it is here And I do not think but there be some as well there as in England and it is like enough that SUCH do finde fault with it Who are offended with the Liturgy Dr. Martin Nay even of Mr. Cox himself and other that were Preachers in King Edwards time they have disproved your * This Book established 5 6. Edw. 6. was re-established 1. Eliz. with two or three alterations and is that we now use as was proved above The Alterations are in the Act prefixed before the Service-Book second Book in divers points and have now made a third Book how say you which of these three Books will you allow now Careless Forsooth I say still as I have written that the second Book is good and godly and IN ALL POINTS agreeing to the Word of God and I am sure that neither Master Cox nor any other of our godly Preachers that be fled unto Frankford have condemned that Book IN ANY POINT as repugnant to the Word of God though perchance they have altered something therein according to the usage of that Country where now they are And I have not denied in my Articles but the Church of Christ hath power and authority to enlarge or diminish any thing in the same GOOD BOOK so far forth as it is agreeable to the Scriptures D. Martin But what authority have you or how durst you bee so bold to make an Article of the Faith concerning that Book to be beleeved of all men under pain of damnation Carelesse Ah Master Doctor have I bound any man to beleeve that Article under pain of damnation as you do charge mee I am sure there is no such word in all my Articles I have there written what I hold and beleeve my self as I am bound to do in conscience And now I will add thus much more That the same Book which is so consonant and agreeable to the Word of God ☞ Nore in the fear of God and consider being set forth by Common Authority both of the Kings Majesty that is dead and the whole Parliament House ought not to be despised by mee or any other private man under pain of Gods high displeasure and DAMNATION except they repent 2. Concerning Monarchy and that of this Nation * The Testimony of Mr. Sam. Ward sometime the famous Preacher of Ipswitch the Author of several elegant and useful pieces Hoc enim mihi ratum indubitatum semper fuit hoc semper cum Politicis Theologis gravissimis sensi palum apud omnes professus sum Monarchiam haereditariam sub qua mihi vitales auras feliciter haurine bonis omnimodis frui piè tranquillè degere contigit esse omnium quotquot extant aut excogitari possunt regiminum formae longè multumque praestantissimam utilissimam laudatissimam Cui me ex animo favere ille novit qui perscrutatur renes meos c. i. e. This hath alwaies been with mee a certain and undoubted maxime In his Preface to King Charls the first prefixed before his Treatise in Latine of the Load-stone dedicated unto him intituled Magnetis Reductorium this alwaies with the best States-men and Divines I have ever concluded and openly among all men professed viz. That a Monarchical Government hereditary under which providence hath so ordered that I have drawn my vital breath enjoyed many comforts have had the opportunity to live godly and quietly is of all Governments which are or can be divised by many degrees the best the most beneficial and most commendable to which that I am from my heart a well-wisher hee knows that searches my reins and my heart said that Author Dr. Sanderson the now Right Reverend Bishop of Lincoln in his late treatise intituled Episcopacy not prejudicial to Regal Power as established by Law in the Postscript Lastly Concerning the Divine Right of Episcopacy Though from one in that function yet because it derives it higher and founds it somewhat deeper more solidly and also briefer than is usually done deserves more special notice His words are My opinion is that Episcopal Government is not to bee derived meerly from Apostolical practice or Institution But that it is originally founded in the person and office of the Messias our Blessed Lord JESUS CHRIST who being sent by his heavenly Father to bee the great Apostle Heb. 3.1 Bishop and Pastor 1 Pet. 2.25 of his Church and annointed to that office immediately after his Baptism by JOHN with power and the Holy Ghost Act. 10.37 8. descending then upon him in a bodily shape Luke 3.22 did afterward before his ascension into Heaven send and impower his holy Apostles giving them the Holy Ghost likewise as his Father had given him John 20.21 to execute the same Apostolical Episcopal and Pastoral office for the ordering and governing of his Church until his coming again and so the same office to continue in them and their Successors unto the end of the world Mat. 28.18 20. This I take to be so clear from these and other like Texts of Scripture that if they shall bee diligently compared together both between themselves and with the following practice of all the Churches of Christ as well in the Apostles times as in the purest and Primitive times nearest thereunto there will bee left little cause why any man should doubt thereof Thus that Reverend Author II. Certain other Examples of Retractations In the next place other Instances of Retractations and repentings Beda prefat in Retract suas in Actor Apostol Tom. 6. Cujus Augustini industriam nobis quoque pro modulo nostro placuit imitari Nunc in idem volumen Actor Apostolic brevem Retractationis libellum condamus studio maximè vel addendi quae minus dicta vel emendandi quae socus quam placuit dicta videbantur The ingenuity and industry of St. Austin in his Retractations it is my purpose in my small measure to imitate also Now therefore let us compile a brief Treatise of Retractations with this intent especially either of adding those things which were not sufficiently expressed or of amending those that were expressed otherwise than did seem convenient saith venerable Bede Again For my part saith another though a late Author yet one of good note Good Reader Mr. Whately in his Bride-Bush in his advertisement to the Reader I account it no shame to confess and revoke an errour and will therefore do it plainly and without circumstance Then hee closes with this honest and Austin-like expression viz. From him that had rather confess his own error than make thee erre for company The like whereunto wee heard above out of that Father And Dr. Bishop Brownriggs sentence concerning Retractations Related by Dr. Gauden the now very Rev. Bishop of Excester his successon Brownrigge the late most worthy Bishop of Excester would say that Hee
Scripture This refers especially to the seventh Article touching Predestination c. whose words in the latter part they are Lastly Ministers are not prohibited absolutely from searching but from that which is curious Answ 5 and beyond sobriety This for the doubtfulness of the Articles The second exception is their erroneousness 2. Error for on this the Brethren insist though under the other covered head of doubtfulness First because it is said Not every deadly sin committed willingly after Baptism Artic. 16. is a sin against the holy Ghost they infer that the Church holds the distinction of venial and deadly sin which is Popish What if the Article speak in the then received language and according to such distinction not owning of it therefore in the sense held by the adversary but using it for the purpose they had in hand viz. that though all sins be deadly of themselves yet seeing some are greater than other grant the worst which they call deadly sin as we usually express a great evil by that word that it is a deadly one as a deadly grief a deadly mischief yet is not every such a sin against the holy Ghost especially when the Church hath in other places so plainly declared her self to the people as in the Homilies Catechism and Common-prayer-book in the last whereof it prescribeth confession of sins to be made twice every day by all the Congregation Now it is not to be thought that every one is guilty of deadly sin every day in the sense expressed so that the people are in no great danger by that expression And the Articles declaring Artic. 11. Artic. 22. that we are accounted righteous before God onely for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ And that there is none other satisfaction for sin but that offering of Christ alone and damning of all Purgatory Pardons worshipping of Images and Reliques and invocation of Saints do declare they count no sin in it self venial but by the blood of Christ Again Artic. 20. where because 't is said The Church hath power to decree Rites and Ceremonies and authority in controversies of faith Because the Kings declaration and the Act before that say That the Articles must be taken in the literal and grammatical sense they infer ' That if a Convocation declare any thing in the premises they must assent and subscribe in the literal sense or be deprived But I it is not forbidden either by that Act or the Kings Declaration to enquire the literal sense and so to examine them nor 2 are they required by that declaration to subscribe to what a Synod shall conclude in the literal and grammatical sense of such conclusions or Canons but onely to the literal and grammatical sense of the Articles This therefore is a captious inference upon the Declaration and the Act. And so much more are their exceptions against the 34 Article That whosoever through his own private judgment willingly and purposely doth openly break the Traditions and Ceremonies of the Church which be not repugnant unto the Word of God and be ordained by common authority c. But are there not three or four Cautions in it that should defend it from all calumny 1. That these Traditions and Rites must not be repugnant to the Word of God 2. That they be established by common Authority 3. That a man do transgress of his own private judgment And 4. willingly purposely Yea and 5. openly This exception taketh away the obedience to all Church-Laws yea to all Civill Laws they may as well except against subscribing if any such Act were to the sense of this Article applyed to the Laws of the Kingdom As suppose they should be enjoyned to subscribe That whosoever shall through his private judgment willingly and purposely openly break the Laws of the Land which be not repugnant to the Word of God and be ordained by common Authority and to take these words of the Act in the literal and grammatical sense without putting their own private or new sense upon it c. Would not such persons be thought unworthy to have any place in any Common-wealth that should refuse And why then in the Church surely they must be both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 men without yoke and without use and that per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is pernitious unto all Societies and men of Belial 3. Artic. 35. Their third exception is against Artic. 35. wherein is required the subscribing to the Book of Homilies as a godly and wholesome doctrine and necessary for these times Against this they object that there are false doctrines or assertions in them First in general subscription to the Homilies is intended by the Church The Homilies how to be understood in Subscription not in so punctual and verbal a degree as is required unto the Articles as appears because the Articles are to be distinctly and severally read and the expressions in them every one assented to the Homilies not so but onely as they agree with the Articles which are the superior rule unto them Not therefore to every expression or sentence no nor doctrine nor assertion if any were contrary to the definitive doctrine of the Articles All men know that there is a greater latitude of expression allowed to popular Sermons as the Homilies are than to Articles And the Brethren would have their Sermons to contain necessary and wholesome doctrine yet perhaps will not be so hardy as to affirm that they may not have uttered some sentences not so true or congruous if exactly scanned or that nullnm unquam verbum emisit eorum quisque quod revocare vellet as he said above And lest there should any inconvenience arise to the people though now the danger is little the Homilies being so much if not too much laid aside the Common-prayer and reading of the Scripture publickly together with preaching according to the Articles are provided as a remedy Yea which is more if one Homily speak less warily in any material point it is corrected in another as in the Homily of Alms-deeds seeming in one passage or so to ascribe some kind of merit unto them though it doth not taking the word properly yet it explaineth it before-hand in another namely in the Homily of Salvation or Justification wherein that doctrine is excellently set forth as also in the Homily of Faith So when in the Homily of Alms Tobith is cited as Scripture not onely the Article doth regulate that expression but every ones Bible also Instructions to Preachers Artic. 1. Ann. 1622. Besides every exhortatory expression must not be called a doctrine or an assertion but that which as a point is purposely insisted on to be maintained of which sort I believe verily the Brethren will never be able to instance in any one out of the Homilies And indeed had they observed the instructions of King James above mentioned viz. That no preacher