the true Church of Christ and which was Gentilisme but now it is no way knowne vnto those which desire to know which is the true Church but onely by Scriptures wherefore because all these things which belongs so properly to Christ in truth heresies haue the same also in schisme Churches likewise holy Scriptures likewise Bishops likewise and other orders of Clerkes Baptisme likewise the Eucharist and all the rest lastly Christ himselfe One therefore that desireth to know which is the true Church whence shall he know it in the confusion of such likenesse but only by the Scriptures Note this likewise heretofore they were knowne by miracles who were true Christians who false How false Christians either could not do miracles as true Christians did or else they could not do such as true Christians did But now the working of miracles is altogether taken away and it is more found that false miracles are wrought by those who are false Christians as Peter according to Clement expouÌ„deth also power is to be also giuen of doing ful miracles vnto Antichrist Likewise heretofore the Church of Christ was vnderstood by their maners when the conuersation of al or most Christians was holy which was not among the wicked But now either such or worse Christians are become then Heretikes or Gentiles And moreouer greater continencie is found amongst those who liue in scisme then among Christians He therfore that will know which is the true Church of Christ whence shall he know it but only the Scriptures Note this The Lord therefore knowing that such a confusion of things should come in the last dayes he therefore commandeth that Christians who are in the Christianitie being desirous to obtaine firmenesse of the true faith should flie vnto nothing but vnto the Scriptures Note againe For otherwise if they haue regard to other things they shall be scandalized and shall perish not vnderstanding which is the true Church and by this they shall fall into the abomination of desolation which shall stand in the holy places of the Church Whereby it appeareth that the only means to find out the true Church is the canonicall Scriptures especially in these latter times to which we are now arriued 5 To our purpose also Gregorie Nissen calleth the Scriptures Other fathers Orat. de eis qui adeunt Hierosolimam A straight and inflexible rule I obserue also Saint Augustine to ioyne with the former who saith The Scripture pitcheth downe the rule of our faith De bono vid. cap. 1. And againe hee saith This controuersie depending betweene vs requireth a Iudge and let the Apostle Paul iudge with him because Christ also speaketh in his Apostle De nupt cencup ad Vater lib. 2. cap. 33. Epist 112. ad Paulin. In another place If a matter be grounded on the cleere authoritie of the holy Scripture such I meane as the Church calleth canonicall it is to be beleeued without all doubt but as for other witnesses and testimonies vpon whose credit any thing may be vrged vnto vs to belieue it it is lawful for thee either to credit or not to credit them according as thou shalt perceiue them of waight to deserue or not to deserue credit He saith besides De doctrin Christiau lib 2. cap 9. Ibid. cap. 42. All points which concerne faith and good life are found in those things which are plainly set downe in Scripture And againe in another place Whatsoeuer it be that a man learnes out of the Scripture if it be hurtfull there it is condemned if it bee profitable there it is found Tract 3. in 1. epist Ioh. Contra lit Petilian Dâ—â—at lib. 3 cap. 6 de vnit Eccles cap. 11. Againe hee saith The Church is our mother her breasts are the two Testaments of the Scripture whence she giueth her children milke Againe further If we or an Angell from heauen declare vnto you either concerning Christ or his Church any other matter or any thing belonging to our faith or life but what you haue receiued in the Legal and Euangelicall Scriptures let him be accursed The same famous Doctor likewise reuoketh from miracles to Scriptures De vnit Eccles cap. 16. saying Say not these things are so because such a one did such and such marualles but let them proue their Church by the canonicall bookes of Scripture and by nothing else These are the demonstrations of our cause these are our foundations these are our grounds whereupon we build And againe Our faith shal reele totter if the authoritie of the Scriptures stand not fast By all which according to this famous Doctor who is termed malleus haereticorum the hammer of heretikes you see this rule of faith most cleerely approued and iustified 6 Neither doe other auncient Writers swarue from the same doctrine Other fathers De error prophan relig p. 61. for Iulius Firminus sayth Let the venerable mysteries of the Prophets be opened let the credit of the holy Oracles stand by vs. Origen further sayth Hom. 1. in Ierem We must of necessitie call the Scriptures to witnesse for our sences and interpretations without them are of no credit Cyrill the Bishop of Hierusalem sayth Concerning the holy and heauenly mysteries of faith Catech. 4. pag. 15. we must not deliuer any thing though neuer so small Note this without the holy Scripture neither may we be led away with probabilities and shew of words neither yet beleeue me barely saying these things vnto you vnlesse thou also beleeue the demonstration thereof from the Scripture for the securitie of our faith ariseth from the demonstration of the holy Scripture The Emperour Constantine in his speech to the Bishops of the Nicene Councell hath this memorable saying Theod Hist li. 1. c. 7. pag. 284. We haue the teaching of the holy Ghost written for the Enangelicall and Apostolike bookes and the Decrees of the old Prophets doe euidently teach vs the things that are needfull to be knowne concerning God Therefore laying aside all contention let vs out of the dinine inspired Scripture take the rersolution of those things we secke for Neither will I let my penne paste another notable saying of Saint Augustine which is diligently to bee noted saying In Io. tract 21. Some may obiect we doe rashly in discussing and searching out the wordes of God but way are they vttered if they may not be knowne Why haue they sounded if they may not be heard and why are they heard but that we should vnderstand them Thus the Ancient resolued me in the securitie of this rule 7 And not onely these Proofes of late Writers but also the moderne Writers of the Church of Rome forgetting themselues as it seemeth in their writings euen against their owne grounds about the rule of faith haue giuen me no lesse euidence for this most straight and sufficient rule of the sacred letters and Canonical bookes than the former For first their great
offered for the liuing and the dead for their sinnes punishments satisfactions and other necessities let him bee accursed Which curse albeit it carrieth a terrour with it to such as are not enlightned so that they can discerne the erroneous doctrine for which it accurseth and that carrieth not rather in minde the feare of Gods maledication than any of man saying Cursed is hee that putteth his trust in man and taketh man for his defence and his heart goeth from the Lord as the followers of the Church of Rome doe who relie only vpon the Popes authoritie who may be as sinnefull a man as any other thinking themselues secure if his authoritie be their defence and the warrant of their beliefe yet could I not stand in dread of his curse when once I found this Sacrifice of the Masse as it is now taught by the Church of Rome not to haue sufficient warrant by Gods word nor by the ancient Church teaching any such doctrine concerning it as the present Church of Rome teacheth 2. The Masse was not instituted by Christ For first I obserued that this Sacrifice which the Church of Rome teacheth to bee a propitiatorie Sacrifice and such a one as may be offered for sinnes as well of the liuing as of the dead is not any thing agreeable to the institution of our LORD IESVS there is not so much as a word spoken by CHRIST of any offering or oblation to bee made but only commandement giuen to eate and drinke and to doe that in remembrance of him his wordes only importing the institution of a Sacrament and no Sacrifice Neither did hee so much as vtter a word that hee offered himselfe at the last Supper for Cornelius Musso a Bishop so famous for his learning Bib lioth Sanct. lib. 4. Suar. tom 3. d. 74 §. 2. as Sixtus Senensis writeth that hee was a Preacher at twelue yeares old and all Italie ranne after him did defend that Christ at his last Supper offered no Sacrifice at all whereupon I framed this argument Note this argument The Priest in the Commemoration of the last Supper is not to doe other thing in substance then what Christ did but Christ as Musso held offered to Sacrifice at all ergo the Priest in commemoration of Christs last Supper is not to offer vp any Sacrifice at all Behold then here it followeth by necessarie consequence vpon Mussoes Assertion that the Sacrifice of the Masse is not to bee offered at all It is cleare as Musso saith that hee offered not himselfe to his Father at his last Supper for then should hee not haue perfected his Sacrifice with one oblation made as the Apostle Saint Paule teacheth Hebr. 7.27 and 9.26.28 but with a double Oblation twice made namely once in his Supper and once vpon the Crosse which were most repugnant to the holy Scripture Againe the Apostle Saint Paul saith 1. Cor. 11. v. 23. sequent I haue receiued of the Lord that which I deliuered vnto you c. and so sheweth the whole manner of CHRISTS institution of the blessed Eucharist who made no mention at all of any Sacrifice which the Apostle considering he boasted that hee had shewed all the Councell of God would not haue omitted Act. 20.27 if the Supper had contayned any meaning of a propitatorie Sacrifice Moreouer Saint Paul writing to the Corinthians bids vs to shew the Lords death not by sacrificing Christ for to Sacrifice and to shew the Lords death are two distinct thinges and the shewing CHRISTS death by the Sacrament is sufficient for the application thereof to our soules for the remission of our sinnes Therefore I could not conceiue any such Sacrifice as the Masse propitiatorie for sins to be instituted by Christ which Sacrifice if it bee of such importance as the Church of Rome teacheth and so principall an act of religion doubtlesse there would haue beene some apparent touch thereof expresly giuen in the holy Scriptures and especially in that place where the Papists pretend it should be instituted Again The Sacrifice of the Masse disableth Christs sacrifice vpon the Crosse 1 Ioh. 22. I haue further obserued that to teach the doctrine of the propitiatorie Sacrifice of the Masse the perfect satisfaction made by Christs Sacrifice vpon the Crosse is made insufficient and inualid For hee being the propitation or reconciliation not only for our sinnes but also for the sinnes of the whole world for the demonstration of which effect vpon the Crosse he cried Ioh. 19.30 finished I can see no neede why a propitiatorie Sacrifice of the Masse should bee offered for sinnes so often since the reconciliation made by Christ is applied by the Sacrament Hebr. 7.27 Besides since Christ did it once when he offered vp himselfe and as S. Paul saith Not that he should offer imselfe often Hebr. 9.25 none being Priests according to the order of Melchisedech but Christ of whom the Scripture saith Hebr. 5.4.5 Tues Sacerdos in aeternū secundū ordinē Melchi it followeth that no other was to offer vp Christ as a propitiatorie Sacrifice for sins but himselfe Moreouer the Sacrifice of Christ hath no neede to bee often reiterated whereby the Priesthood of Christ is opposite to the Priesthood of the old Testament whose sacrifices ought to bee reiterated for Christ needed not daily Hebr. 7.27 as those high Priests to offer vp sacrifice for his owne sinnes and then for the peoples for that did he once when he offered vp himselfe And againe After hee had said This is the testament that I will make with them c. and their sinnes and iniquities will I remember no more Hebr. 10.16.17.18 Where remission of these thinges is there is no more offering for sinne And againe Christ by his owne bloud entred once into the holy place and obtained eternall redemption for vs not such a redemption as is to be reiterated euery day Hebr. 9.12 And againe Not that hee should offer him selfe often as the high Priest entred into the holy place euery yeare with other bloud for then must hee haue often suffered since the foundation of the world but now in the end of the world hath hee appeared once to put away sinne by the Sacrifice of him selfe And as it is appointed vnto men once to die and then commeth the iudgement So Christ was once offered to take away the sinnes of many Againe Hebr. 9.25.26 By the which Will wee are sanctified euen by the offering of the body of IESVS CHRIST once made And againe Hebr. 10.10 Euery Priest appeareth daily ministring and often times offered one manner of Sacrifice which can neuer take away sinnes but this Man after hee had offered one Sacrifice for sinnes sitteth for euer at the right hand of God Hebr. 10.11.12 c. for with one offering hee consecrated for euer them that are sanctified By which places it is cleare there needes no more reiteration
find also the wise Salomon to affirme that Gods words will make a man vnderstand righteousnes and iudgement and equitie and euery good path I find likewise in Saint Luke and other Euangelists Luke 1. vers 4. These things are written that we might haue the certaintie of that whereof we are instructed and that we might beleeue in Iesus and in beleeuing haue life eternall through his name I find further that Christ saith Search the Scriptures Ioh. 20. vers 31. for in them yee thinke to haue eternall life and they are they which testifie of mee as also in another place When one asked Christ what he might do to be saued Luk. 10. vers 26. he referreth him to the Scriptures for his direction saying What is written in the Law So did Abraham answere the rich Glutton They haue Moses and the Prophets Luke 16.29 I find also Saint Paul free from all exception herein saying The Scriptures are able to make vs wise to saluation 2. Tim. 3. vers 15. Vers 16. Vers 17. through the faith that is in Christ Iesus and are profitable to teach to improue to conuert to instruct in righteousnesse that the man of God may be absolute and perfect to euery good worke And in another place we may not presume aboue that which is written I find likewise Saint Peter to accord with Saint Paul 2. Pet. 1.19 when hee saith Wee haue a more sure word of the Prophets whererunto wee cannot take heed as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place till the day dawne and till the day-starre arise in our hearts Many more proofes would the canonicall Scriptures afford to the same effect therefore since by the premised places of Scripture I see that he that speaketh not according to the word of God hath no light in him since the Scriptures can make vs know righteousnesse iudgement equitie and euery good path since they were written that we might haue certainty in that we are instructed in and beleeuing haue life eternall since we are sent to the Scriptures by Christ since they are able to make vs wise to saluation since they are profitable to make vs perfect to euery good worke since it is presumption to go aboue that which is written since the Prophets be our light in darknesse what better rule can we haue of our faith what can excuse any mans ignorance that knoweth this or what an obstinate wilfulnesse were it for me that knowing these testimonies of Scripture shall not beleeue them or why should I not thinke that the Church of England hath not the best reed or mete-wand to measure the truth of her doctrine by when she teacheth Juel Apol. part 2. cap. 9. diuis 1. That the Scripture comprehended in the canonicall bookes of the old and new Testament is the rule of faith so farre that whatsoeuer is not read therein or cannot be proued thereby is not to be accepted as any point of faith or needfull to be followed 4 Which doctrine cannot be shaken or ouerthrowne By proofes of Fathers if we esteeme the authoritie of the learned who do most plentifully giue witnesse and vnanswerable proofes for the same S. Basil who liued in the fourth centurie after Christ saith Let the holy Scriptures be arbitrators betweene vs Basil opist 80. ad Eustac medicum pag. 334. and whosoeuer hold opinions consonant to those heauenly oracles let the truth be adiudged on their side And Optatus disputing against a Donatist presseth him thus Contra Parmem lib. 5. pag 393. We are saith he to equire out some to be iudges betweene vs in these controuersies The Christians cannot because both sides cannot yeeld them and by parts taking the truth shall be hindered The Iudge must be had from without our selues If a Pagan he knowes not the mysteries of Christianitie if a Iew he is an enemie to Baptisme therefore vpon the earth no iudgement concerning this matter can bee found the Iudge must be had from heauen but to what end should we kocke at heauen when heere we haue one in the Gospell Heere we see Saint Basil appeales for iudgement to the Scriptures and so Optatus likewise to the Gospell no acknowledgement here of other arbitrement vpon earth What shall I speake of Tertullion who is most plaine for me Tertul. contra Hermog calling the Scriptures the rule of faith The golden-mouthed Chrysostome will not heere forsake me who termeth the Scriptures Chrysost hom 13. in 2. Cor. Hom. 3. de Laz. A most exquisite rule and exact squier and ballance to trie all things by And also in another place saith God hath left vs the Scriptures more firme then any miracle And vpon the Acts of the Apostles discourseth very fitly to this purpose Chrysost hom 33. in Act. A Gentile saith hee commeth and saith I would bee a Christian but I know not which side to cleaue vnto many dissensions are among you and I cannot tell which opinion to hold euery one saith I speake the truth and the Scriptures on both sides are pretended so that I know not whom to beleeue to this Chrysostome replieth Truly saith he this maketh much for vs for well might you be troubled if we should say we relie vpon reason but seeing we take the Scriptures which are so true and plaine it will be an easie matter for you to iudge And tel me now hast thou any wit or iudgement Note this for it is not the part of a man barely to receiue whatsoeuer he heareth but if thou marke the meaning thou mayest throughly know that which is good when thou buyest a garment though thou hast no skill in wearing yet thou sayest not I cannot buy it they deceiue me but thou doest all things that thou mayest learne to know it say not then I am no scholler and will be no iudge I can condemne no opinion for this is but a shift and a cauill and let vs not vse it for all these things are easie There is nothing can bee more cleere for this most sufficient rule of faith then that which is written by this ancient Author of the imperfect worke falsely fathered as some thinke vpon Saint Chrysostome whom because he is often alleaged by the learned of the Romane Church I will also alleage against them this Author expounding those of Saint Matthew Chrysost opus imperfect hom 49. Then those that are in Iurie let them flie vnto the mountaines explicateth them thus that is they that are Christians let them repaire vnto the Scriptures The mountaines are the writings of the Apostles and Prophets and wherefore doth he at that time command all Christians to repaire to the Scriptures because in that time heresie hath obtained the Curches there can be no proofe of true Christianity neither can there be other refuge for Christians which shall desire to know the truth of faith but the sacred Scriptures Before it was many wayes shewed which was
learned Doctor whom they call the Angelicall Doctor sayth Tho. Aqu. lec in 1. Tim. 6. The doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets is called Canonicall because it is as it were the rule of our vnderstanding 1. q. 1. ar 4. And againe our faith resteth and stayeth it selfe vpon the reuelation giuen to the Apostles and Prophets which writ the Canonicall bookes 1. q. 1. ar 8. and not vpon reuelation if any such haue beene made to other Doctors And also in another place hee sheweth how all iudgement of truth is to be referred to the Scriptures saying In arguing it properly vseth viz. the said reuealed knowledge Tho. 1 q. part 1. q. 1. ar 8. ad 2. whereof he speaketh of necessitie the authorities of Canonicall Scripture but the authorities of other Doctors of the Church as it were arguing out of her owne but probably For our faith doth relie vpon the reuelation made to the Apostles and Prophets who wrote the Canonicall bookes nd not vpon any reuelation made to other Doctors Therefore Augustine sayth in his Epistle to Hierome Epi. 19. Paulo post princip to 2. I haue learned to giue this honor to the onely bookes of Scriptures which are called Canonicall as to beleeue most firmely that not one author of them hath erred in writing but others I reade so that with what soeuer holinesse and learning they are endued as not therefore to thinke any thing a truth because they haue held or written so And in another place Faith doth cleaue vnto all the articles of faith for one medium to wit for the first truth proposed vnto vs in Scriptures according to the doctrine of the Church vnderstanding rightly and therefore hee that swarueth from this meane doth totally want faith Antoninus the Archbishop of Florence writeth expressely Sum. part 3. tit 18. c. 3. ff 3. That God hath spoken but once and that in the holy Scripture and so plentifully to meete with all temptations and all cases that may fall out and all good workes that as Gregorie in the two and twentieth booke of his Morals expounds it he needes no more speake vnto vs concerning any necessarie matter seeing all things are found in the Scripture Gerson a great man in the Councell of Constance sayth De com sub vtraque specie The Scripture is the rule of our faith which being well vnderstood no authoritie of men is to be admitted against it Durandus sayth That generally in the things that touch our faith wee must speake to that which the Scripture deliuereth Praef. in sent least any man fall into that which the Apostle noteth 1. Cor. 8. If he thinke he knoweth something yet the knoweth nothing as he ought to know for the manner of our knowledge must be not to exceede the measure of faith and the holy Scripture expresseth the measure of faith Alliaco the Cardinall sayth 1. Sent. q. 1. ar 3. The verities themselues of the sacted Canon be the principles of Diuinitie because the finall resolution of Theologicall discourse is made into them and originally from them is drawne euery conclusion of Diuinitie Conradus Clingius sayth Locor l. 3. c. 29. pag. 290. The Scripture is the infallible rule of truth yea the measure and iudge of the truth Peresius the Diuinitie Reader at Barcelona in Spaine sayth The authoritie of no Saint is of infallible truth Iac. Per. de ratio con li. 2. c. 19. for Saint Augustine giues that honor onely to the sacred Scriptures Whereupon I frame this reason That onely is the infallible rule which is of infallible truth but the Scripture onely is of infallible truth therefore the Scripture onely is the infallible rule 8 Bellarmine also writeth thus Other late Writers De verbo Dei li. 1. cap. 2. The rule of faith must be certaine and knowne for if it be not certaine it is no rule at all if it be not knowne it is no rule to vs but nothing more certaine nothing better knowne than the sacred Scripture contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles wherefore the sacred Scripture is the rule of faith most certaine and most safe and God hath taught vs by corporall letters which wee might see and reade what he would haue vs beleeue concerning him Whence I gather that if the Swenckfeldians are to bee drawne to the written Text then ought those of the Church of Rome also be recalled to the same rule from their vncertaine traditions from the Popes sole definitiue sentence and from their Councels not teaching by Scriptures If nothing be more knowne nothing more certaine as the Cardinall confesseth than the Scriptures why doe they reiect them from being the rule as not sufficient to preserue from error not knowne ynough The same Cardinall sayth in another place De not eccles c. 2. ff respond Simpliciter The Scripture is better knowne than the Church in some case as namely where it is receiued and speaketh plainly and the question is of the Church Willauincentius confesseth The Scriptures and they alone are able to teach vs to saluation De ratio stud Theol. li. 1. c. 31. pag. 21. as the Apostle in the third chapter of his second Epistle to Timothie affirmeth saying All Scripture is inspired of God in which words the Apostle comprehendeth all things that are needfull to the saluation of man Comment in 2. Tim c 3 in vers 15 16. Espenceus writeth That if any thing be needfull either to be knowne or done the Scriptures teach the truth reproue the false reclaime from euill persuade to good neither yet doe they make a man good in some sort but perfect yea they can teach a man to saluation and make him learned sufficiently Panormitane writeth thus One faithfull man Part 1. de elect polest ca. significa though priuate is more to be beleeued than the Pope or a whole Councell if he haue better reason on his side and authoritie of the Old and New Testament And Gerson more sully De exemp doct part 1. considera 5. The examination and triall of doctrine concerning faith belongeth not onely to the Pope and Councell but to euery one also that is sufficiently seene in the holy Scripture because euery one is a fit iudge of that he knoweth And againe some lay-man not authorised may be so excellently learned in the Scripture that his assertion shall be more to be credited than the Popes definitiue sentence for the Gospell is more to be credited than the Pope Therefore if such a lay man though he be priuate teach a truth contained in the Gospell and the Pope either know it not or will not know it yet it is euident that his iudgement is to be preferred Costerus Cesterus sayth That such verities concerning our faith as are absolutely necessarie to be knowne and beleeued of all men are plainely taught in the Scriptures themselues Doctor Saunders sayth Rock pag. 193. Wee
haue heard reported once by an English Gentleman that serued sometimes amongst them of a Countriman of his who fighting against the Souldiers of the Reformed Religion in the Low Countries and finding his powder so moist that with often putting match to it it would not take fire in most blasphemous manner see swore in the Spanish tongue I vow to God that this day I thinke God is become a Lutheran For in very truth if the Texts which Viguerius citeth so confidently thinking by them to ouerthrow all the Lutheranes in the world be well and rightly vnderstood you shall finde them to be of no efficacie at all and to be but match powder without fire that is Scripture and his owne sense and priuate vnderstanding without the fire of the holy Ghost without the Spirit of truth and the comfortable Master teaching all truth for the prophecie of Esay only foresheweth how Christ the Messias comming into the world should Preach the remission of sinners to all in generall and deliuerie to those that liued in the darknesse of ignorance before the comming to Christ as the Gentills who should finde mercy and truth by Christ as well as the Iewes Neither will I denie which maketh nothing for Viguerius but that the remission of sinnes and also the remission of paines due to sinne is meant by the word Indulgence the infinite guilt of sinne and the eternall paine due to sinne in hell fire both which belong to sinne being taken away by the bloud of Christ and therefore if the eternall paine why not also the temporal what reseruation did Christ make or his Apostles to shew that the ternall pain should be remitted and the temporall be reserued only for the Pope to be pardoned by means of crosses medalls graines rings knotted cords and the like childish trinkets O miserable blindnesse that cannot discerne such grosse errours and so great a prophanation of Christs merites and satisfaction Sweet Iesu open the eyes of all that are thus blinded let them see how the sacred Scriptures are foolishly misapplied wickedly wrested racked and most impiously prophaned for the supporting of Romish nouelties I will not shew how impertinently other places are applied by Bellarmine for the confirmation of the same Romish errour my designement not being to write a whole Booke of Confutations but only to point at the chief obseruations I made in diuers points of religion inducing me from Romish errors and idolatries vnto the light of truth 4 Vpon further consideration of indulgences I find also The doctriue of Romish In dulgences not ancient that as they are not established by Scriptures rightly vnderstood so neither are they supported by antiquity in the primitiue age of the Church Bellar. cites Greg. the first to haue graunted Indulgences in the dayes of stations Bellar. de sacra poenit lib. 5. ca. 3 in 4. dist 20. q. 1 artic 3 quast 2. Alt. sum Theol. tract 6. ca. 9. for proofe wherof he citeth Thomas Aquinas and Altisiodorensis who was before Thomas hee citeth also Leo the third who as S. Lugderus writeth at Aquisgraue in the Pallace dedicated a Church to the blessed virgin Mary enduing the same Church with many indulgences He citeth besides Sergius the second about the yeere 844. who graunted indulgences of three yeares and of three Quadrigenaries vnto those that should visite the Church of S. Martin vpon the mountaine Spist de sanct Suuiberto apud Sur. tom 2 post S. Suuibert vpon the feast of the same Church He citeth likewise Vrban the second to haue graunted a plenary indulgence to those that went to the holy warres Hee citeth also Martine the fift to huae graunted a plenarie indulgence And the Councell of Trent to haue approued also the vse of Indulgences Amongst all which cited by Bellarmine Pope Gregorie the first liued in the sixt centurie Pope Leo the third who was successour to Pope Adrian the first liued in the eight centurie Sergius the second successor to Gregory the fourth liued in the ninth century Vrban the second successor to Victor the third liued in the eleuenth centurie Pope Martin the fift by some called Martin the third successour to Iohn the one and twentieth liued in the fifteenth centurie as appeareth in the French Iesuite Iames Gaultier Table Chron. de l'estate du Christianisme Now therefore when I doe seriouslie consider these assertions of Ioannes Viguerius and Cardinall Bellarmine for the practise of Indulgences the ancientest they cite is Gregory the great who liued in the sixt centurie which was after the sowing of much cockle and more heresies man being asleepe no such practise hauing beene knowne by anie Pope before then whereby it appeareth that their doctrine euen by their owne assertions about these pardons and indulgences is but a new doctrine lately sprung vp in the christian world and hath not the marke of Antiquitie to stand in defence of it 5 This I find also euen by Bishop Fisher to be most true Other late writers shew the noueltie of Indulgences who saith That so long as there was no care of Purgatorie no man sought after Pardons for on it dependeth the credite of Pardons When therefore Purgatorie was so lately knowne and receiued in the Church Assert Luther confut art 18. pag. 86. who now can maruell at Pardons that in the beginning of the Church there was no vse of them Pardon 's therefore began after that they had trembled a while at the paine of Purgatorie I find also that Durandus saieth There are few things to be affirmed for certainetie concerning Pardons 4. d. 20. q. 3. because the Scripture speaketh not expresly of them and the Saints Ambrose Hillarie Augustine Ierome speake not of them at all Caietane also the great Schooleman saith There can no certaintie be found of the beginning of paerdons There is no authoritie of the Scripture or auncient Fathers Greeke or Latine that bringeth it to our knowledge Tra Hat de Indulg ca. 1. And Alphonsus sheweth in verie plaine termes that they are but nouelties saying Their vse seeme to haue come but lately into the Church Haeres verbo Indulg And Henriquez a Iesuite often cited by the Readers in Rome hath these wordes There bee ceertaine late Dinines which affirme it is no rashnesse Sum mor. li. 7. cap. 3. if a man say the vse and practise of Indulgences is not from the Apostles times Now this beeing considered which these Writers esteemed most learned by their owne associates doe finde euen contrary to cardinall Bellarmine who citeth Scriptures for proofe of Indulgences that there is no mention of in the holy Scriptures nor Fathers nor the ancient Church I could not but conclude but that certainely they are nouelties not to bee embraced the doctrine of them is but cockle that ouergroweth the good corne it is after-comming and therefore not to be esteemed So that now finding no good ground of these Pardons I can find no truer
for that all times places persons words and actions fall out vnto the good of such a one through Gods all-seeing and directing prouidence 3 This sweete prouidence of God towards me in particular I cannot let passe in silence and burie in obliuion The demonstrations of Gods prouidence towards me least concealing his glorie appearing therein and blemishing my soule with a foule spot of ingratitude in feare of his iust punishments I might deseruedly say Vae mihi quia tacui woe is me because I haue held my peace Esay 6. vers 5. When I consider how God in my childhood drew me out of the countrey where I first breathed ayre making me a young trauellei by Sea protecting me from a dangerous storme and affording me after my escape courteous friendly entertainment in a Castle of this land how in danger of like perill by Sea I returned backe againe by my mothers direction when I was about nine yeares of age How neare to Namures I escaped danger of drowning falling into a hole of water where I stucke fast in the mudde by the head had not Gods protection afforded me a hand to be plucked out with how I escaped many dangerous sicknesses and a most perilous fall out of a Waggon where my head escaped the wheele from crushing it in peeces at my going first to Saint Omers with Master Nicholas Smith the Iesuite to be a student there at the first erecting of that Seminarie of which house I was one of the first sixe that were receiued into it and that had their first mission into Spaine from it how being to sent thence by Gods prouidence with M. Baldwine the Iesuite after a sore storme by night neere vnto the Isle of Wight we were cast into the mouth of the Queenes ships the next day by contrarie winds driuing vs backe vnto the downes neare Douer where we were all taken prisoners by Master King Captaine of one of her Maiesties ships and brought into this Realme being first detained and courteously entertained at my Lord Admirals house at Derford then at the then Lord of Canterburies who committed vs either to Bishops or other graue Prelates where we might haue bad better education for the truth of Christian Religion then we had amongst the Iesuits if we had had the grace to haue made benefit thereof had not the poison of false doctrine first so feised vpon all the powers of our soule that at that time for want of experience knowledge we could not relish the most delicious Manna of Gods word nor giue eare to the happie tidings of the true Gospel of Christ so like deafe Adders our eares were stopped 4 And further how by Gods prouidence about six yeares after intending learning and further experience Other particulars of Gods prouidence towards me I went to Rome in which iourney I was imprisoned first at Pheckam in France where I was most wrongfully committed with another Gentleman and our purses prettie well emptied and was secondly also taken againe at New stade in the Palsegraues Countrey where I was detained for a time with the rest of our companie by reason of Master Thomas Coniers a Iesuite with an Irish brother of the same order who vpon suspition and iealousie of being busie dealers in English affaires engendred by the prettie discouerie of some equiuocations at their examinations had beene sent into England had not the Archduke Albertus sent his letters in his behalfe as afterward I heard it reported for his deliuerie How after many sicknesses in Rome where I continued three yeares I was made Priest intending no other end then to employ my whole life and labours in connerting soules to the Church or Rome which I was constantly perswaded then was the true Church of God and therfore I thought I could take no course of life vpon me more gratefull to God more profitable to others or more meritorious for mine own soule then this was thus disposed and resolued how I with my fellowes kissing the Powes feete and receiuing his benediction vpon our selues and vpon our beads crosses and meddalles with power to giue the English pardon to others here for the annulling of temporall paines due to sin in this life or the next and for freeing soules out of purgatorie we were sent into England How since I haue spent my time for the most part heere in England about nine yeares in the practise of this function Where my labours in that kinde were not vnprofitable nor ill esteemed of by those of the Romane profession in the which no danger of lawes affrighted me no imprisonments made me saint no crosses quailed my courage Now when I reflect vpon all these occurrences of my life with diuers others I cannot but magnifie the wisedome of Almightie God and highly exalt his diuine prouidence and therefore the nearer that I approach vnto the consideration of the occasions and motiues which God hath vsed to worke my conuersion in this Realme to the true ancient Apostolike and Catholike faith giuing me knowledge and experience of many nouelties and erroneous doctrines diameterly opposite to the doctrines of Christ his Apostles and the ancient Catholike faith 5 Since my comming into this Realme Priest Reading of Protestant bookes the first occasion of doubts I obserued no one thing to be more necessarie for the ende I aymed at then the studie of controuersies whereunto next vnto the Scriptures for exhortation and cases of conscience for the better directing of soules I chiefely applied my selfe in the studie whereof I found it behooueful nt to neglect the reading of such Protestant writers as fell into my hands thinking I should thereby be the better able to confute all obiections when occasion of conference with any should be giuen which thing being yearely prohibited by the censure of Bulla coenae which is once euerie yeare with many execrations and curses published in Rome I obtained leaue of my Superior to read them with condition not to study them Master George Blackwell but to confute them which distinction seemed strange vnto me as though I could confute them and not study them yet with this condition I promised to read them amongst which the first that came into my hand was Master Perkins reformed Catholike deliuered me by a kinsman of mine who told me of a Cousen of his that promised to be a Romane Catholike if he could see that booke well answered and confuted Next to this I met with Master Robert Abbots booke in Latine of Anti-Christ giuen to a friend of mine by a worshipfull Knight of this Realme who highly praised it and much esteemed thereof After that I lighted vpon Master Doctor Bucklies confutation of Master Thomas Wrightes articles After that I met with the booke of proceedings against the Pouder-Traytors containing in it that most eloquent and learned Oration of the Earle of North-hampton Then came to my hands his Maiesties Apologie for the oath of Allegiance with his premonition to
and when I noted that I could neuer heare any one Iesuit to speake reprouingly of it and further heard some very rashly and foolishly to cast the imputation of inuenting it vpon the best States-men of this land as a traine to make Catholikes the more odious to the State I began to obserue a custome vsed by some which is without any regard of truth or knowledge to speake the worst they can to blemish the reputation of their aduersaries so I heard a certaine young Iesuit report when Garnet was in the Tower A pretty deuice that day and night oyle was put into his eyes with feathers and other means vsed to keepe him from sleepe that so being weakened both in bodie and minde he might be easily drawne to confesse all he knew which circumstances with diuers others belonging to this vnmatchable treason though they made mee not then abandon the faith and beleefe of those that were actors thereof yet did they sow such seedes of doubtfulnesse and care in me to be sound in faith that the effects and fruits issuing from them of doctrine concerning disallegeance to the King which is contained in the Popes Breues hath much auerted me since as namely the doctrine of Bellarmine teaching that the Apostles were not subiect to temporall Princes de iure but de facto retracting the former opinion Bellarmin cont Barclaium tract De potest summi Pontificis in rebus temporalibus ca. 3. fol. 48. extant in his controuersies these many yeares now holding the quite contrarie notwith standing it is a doctrine of faith that as well the Clergie as the Laitie are subiect to Kings and Princes because obedience to Kings whether they be good or wayward in Scripture is commended vnto all 1. Petri 2.18 behold here the second occasion 7 A third occasion concurring to my conuersion Conference with others was conference with others into whose companies by chance I haue falne as once with a learned Knight who not knowing me to be a Priest conferred with me as with a professor of the Romane faith who winded me into such a circle about the Scriptures and the Church that I could neuer winde my selfe out of it till I winded my selfe out of the Romane Church and stayed my selfe vpon a ground not admitted there which is that the Scriptures are the most sufficient and certaine rule of faith that Christians haue which if you take away all religion all faith all knowledge of God falleth to the ground And another time I fell into dispute with a graue ancient Iustice of Peace who pressed me so farre that I promised to send him some principall doctrines of the Roman Church so sufficiently proued by Scriptures by Fathers and by naturall reason that if they could bee answered I would subscribe to his Church but in the examination of the proofes of those very points brought in by Bellarmine and due consideration of them I found them to be of very little force to proue the verities intended as hereafter shall appeare concerning the Masse Transubstantiation the ministration of the Sacrament vnder one kinde to lay people Pardons auricular confession and others whereupon I haue proued since as good as my promise in ioyning my selfe to the Church of England 8 A fourth occasion of examining more carefully the controuersies hath been grounded vpon his Maiesties Title His Maiesties Booke in his Premonition to Christian Princes stiling himselfe the Defendor of the true Christian Catholike and Apostolike faith which seemed so strange vnto me at the first considering that no Church more chalengeth the name of Catholike than the Church of Rome that I began to consider with my selfe whether I could finde any capitall points of faith taught now by the present Church of Rome that were not taught and professed by the ancient and Primitiue Church and now impugned by the Church of England and finding that the doctrine of deposing Princes and Kings by the Pope was not ancient nor Transubstantiation nor the Masse as now it is practised nor the Sacrament as now it is ministred by the Church of Rome nor Pardons nor prohibition of Priests marriages I haue since beene enforced to conclude that certainely the present Church of Rome professeth not in those points the true Christian Catholike and Apostolike faith Further as I noted the profession his Maiestie maketh in his Premonitorie Epistle to Princes Praemonit ful 35 acknowledging himselfe to be such a Christian Catholike as beleeueth the three Creedes that of the Apostles that of the Councell of Nice and that of Athanasius admitting the first foure generall Councels as Catholike and Orthodox the ioint consent of Fathers in the Primitiue age the authoritie of Scriptures c. I could not but conceiue at last that his Maiestie went vpon the strongest foundations of the Catholike faith that could bee layed to auoid the danger of new doctrines which obseruations did much facilitate my search and scrutinie into the true grounds and reasons of faith besides many other occasions of priuat conference with diuers particular persons who thought themselues much tempted in matters of faith and religion because they could hardly beleeue what the Church of Rome teacheth or at least not without great difficultie Whereby you may see courteous Reader the prouidence of God working in me by degrees towards my conuersion affoording mee the occasions and meanes first of searching and examining which brought me at length to the motiues of resoluing as hereafter you shall vnderstand more at large when I shall first haue layd downe vnto you certaine fundamentall obseruations as grounds on which the true Christian Catholike faith must of necessitie stand and the whole frame thereof be surely builded CHAP. III. Containing the first fundamentall obseruation of the end of man and his chiefe happinesse AFter the manifestation of the occasions which by Gods prouidence occurred to forward this worke of my conuersion The chiefe businesse of man is to seeke his end the next thing to be spoken of is to acquaint thee deare Christian Reader with those fundamentall obseruations which made further way to the complete perfection thereof the first of which was of that nature that I assure my selfe no man who hath care of his soule and saluation can chuse but allow for I assured my selfe that if I went vpon such sure foundations and principles as religion ought to stand vpon I could neither stay in error nor fall into any Hence I was moued to resolue most constantly that the most immoueable foundation that all my sp rituall building should stand on should be a frequent consideration that the chiefe and most principall affaire and businesse of greatest importance in this world wherein it was my dutie to employ my endeuors ought to be the saluation of my soule and my future happinesse in the life to come since to this end God created me to his similitude and likenesse redeemed mee with the most precious bloud of his most
condemned for an Heretike for not being a Nouelist where numbring vp many nouelties which are vsed in the Romish Church hee reckoneth this Transubstantiation for one 4. Arguments against Transubstantiation Comp. Theol. verit l. 5. c. 58. Which doctrine of Transubstantiation I discouered to containe a notable Heresie by the proofes following First sayth Ioannes de Combis Latria is a seruice and reuerence exhibited to God therefore if the honour due to God be exhibited vnto the creature it is Idolatrie Latria comprehendeth fiue thinges viz. Faith Knowledge Reuerence Sacrifice and Prayer Whereupon I framed this Argument The doctrine of Transubstantiation admitteth this worship in the Church of Rome to a Creature viz. to Bread and Wine which notwithstanding the words of Transubstantiation remaineth still a creature otherwise how is Bread and Wine the externall signes of inusible grace as euerie true Sacrament is or how is the essentiall part appointed by CHRIST in the Sacrament remaining when it ceaseth to be there as Transubstantiation teacheth the Bread and Wine doth Nay the very Scriptures say so much shewing the Bread still to remaine Bread and the Wine still to remaine Wine Saint Paule the heauenly interpreter of CHRISTS wordes doth not admit Transubstantiation but doth so interpret the Sacramentall vnion that still the visible elements remaine for the Bread of the Sacrament hee calleth Bread still euen after the consecration to teach that the substance of the Bread remaineth still and so he calleth the Wne still Wine as appeareth plainely by his wordes The Cup of Blessing which wee blesse 1. Cor. 10.16 is it not the communication of the bloud of CHRIST and the Bread which wee breake is it not the participation of the bodie of the Lord Now then if the Chalice be but a communication of his bloud and the Bread but a participation of his bodie still remaining Bread and Wine for the thing participating is not the thing participated where then is their doctrine of Transubstantiation or how can it stand sound with the truth of the Scriptures He sayth plainely further 1. Cor. 10.16 1. Cor. 11.26 Vers 27. Vers 28. All wee are partakers of one Bread And againe As often as yee shall eate this bread And againe Whosoeuer shall eate this Bread besides Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this Bread Now therefore the Scripture teaching vs so plainely Bread and Wine to remaine in the Sacrament it followeth that there is no Transubstantiation in the Sacrament and so consequently it is apparant that all those commit grosse Idolatrie that worship it with Latria because they giue that worship which is due to God to the creature which they beleeue to be God teach to be God and pray to as vnto God 5. Fathers against Transubstantiation Secondly I summoned diuers auncient Writers to see whether they would afford me any warrant for Transubstantiation and I finde them against it and none for it I finde Tertullian in expresse wordes to say Iesus Christ hauing taken bread Tertul. l. 4. adu Marc. cap. 40. distributed it to his Disciples he made it to be his bodie saying This is my bodie that is the figure of my bodie I finde him likewise to shew as much in expresse wordes in another place Tertul. l. 3. adu Mars cap. 19. saying God hath so reuealed it in the Gospell calling the bread his bodie to the end that thou mayest thereby vnderstand that he hath giuen to the bread the figure of his bodie Now then if the bread be a figure of CHRISTS bodie according to Tertullian then it is not transubstantiated Saint Cyprian sayth Epist 3. l. 2. Wee finde that the Cuppe which the Lord offered was mingled and that which he called his bloud was wine See here Saint Cyprian giueth but a denomination to the bloud attributing substantiall being to the wine by the Verbe Substantiue Lib. 8. demonstr Euang. cap. 1. Eusebius is also cleare agianst Transubstantiation in these wordes IESVS CHRIST gaue vnto his Disciples the signes of the diuine dispensation commaunding them to celebrate the figure of his owne bodie For seeing that he did now no longer receiue the sacrifices of bloud nor the slaughter of diuers beastes ordained by Moses hee hath taught vs to vse the bread for a signe of his bodie See here it is still called bread and a signe of the bodie how then is it transubstantiated Saint Augustine also standes against Transubstantiation De doctrine Christian l. 3. c. 16. saying These wordes Vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud are a figure commaunding vs to partake the Passion of CHRIST and profitably to remember that his flesh was crucified for vs. Nowe therefore if the eating the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinking his bloud is but to partake of the Passion of CHRIST and a profitable remembrance that his flesh was crucified for vs how did Saint Augustine teach the doctrine of Transubstantiation Nay rather doth he not most plainly insinuate the contrarie I finde also the same Doctor to say against Adamantus Chap. 12. The Lord made no difficultie to say this is my body when he gaue the signe of his body Here I obserue the word Bodie to bee expounded by the signe of his body Who saith in an other place Epist 23. ad Bonifac. The holy signe of Christs body is after a sort the body of Christ and the holy signe of the bloud of Christ and so the holy signe of faith to wit Baptisme is faith Surely Baptisme can not bee said to be Transubstantiated into faith how then can the Sacrament of the body and bloud of Christ bee substantially transubstantiated into the body and bloud of Christ Saint Augustine in an other place is yet plainer against Transubstantiation saying Vnderstand that which I say spiritually Super Psal 98. you shall not eate my body which you see neither shall you drinke the bloud which my Tormentors shall shed I haue recommended vnto you an holy signe which being spiritually vnderstood shall make you liue Behold how cleare S. Augustine is against Transubstantiation So also is S. Chrysostome that golden mouthed Doctor of Greece most clearely gainesaying the doctrine of Transubstantiation in the Sacrament saying The bread before it be sanctified we call bread Ad Caesar Monachum but when the diuine grace sanctifies it it is deliuered from the name of bread and is thought worthy the name of the Lords body though the nature of bread remaine still Now curteous Reader if I should not iudge vnpartially I can not but here conclude that if the nature of bread remaine the substance of bread can not be changed into the body of Christ substantially and therefore no transubstantiation can follow 6. I can not omit here to record Gelasius who saith Other strong places of ancient Fathers agianst Transubstantiation De duabus naturis Christi The bread
ground of them in all rpobabilitie than that the Popes being desirous to enrich themselues with money haue deuised them for the emptying of mens purses throughout all Kingdomes subiected to his vsurping authority like Boniface the ninth of whom it is written That he sent into diuers Kingdomes his Treasurors with Pardons Theod. a mem de scismat lib. 1. ca. 68. pag. 20. who extoried thereby very great summes of money from the simple people that in some one Pronince they would get together aboue an hundred thousand florens and released all sinnes to them that confessed vnto them without anie penaunce Therefore as I said in the beginning anarice caused spirituall blindenesse in Popes and blindenesse as a punishment confirmeth them more and more in their errors 6 Is it not strange considering all reason to bee against this doctrine of Indulgences that the Church of Rome will by her comminations still curse those that embrace it not as the Councell or Trent doth all those That affirme them to bee vnprofitable Ses 25. decret de Indulgentijs or denie anie power to be in the Church to graunt them What shall not as I said before the bloud of Christ as well take away the temporall paine due vnto sinne as the eternall or is not his satisfaction infinite what neede then the superfluous satisfaction of Saints 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Did the auncient Church euer speake of other Pardons than of the Pardons of outward penances which ere enioyned for publique satisfaction of the Church Hath not Christ fatisfied for the whole world what neede then of the satisfactions of Saints what more than Indulgences instilleth a vaine securitie into the soules of men and ouerthroweth the foundations of all true contrition is not Gods forgiuesse and remission expressed with an Omne debitum dimisi tibi Matth. 18.32 I haue forgiuen thee all thy debt if euerie debt why not aso the debt of temporall paine if an exception can be shewed why is it not made manifest Now iudge beloued Reader whether heere bee not sufficient reason to make mee or anie other say farewell vnto the Romish Church that thus enthralleth soules prophaneth the bloud of Christ disableth the Sacraments and picketh mens purses by the deuised doctrine of her Ecclesiasticall Indulgences Deere Iesu pardon my former fault make mee see better heereafter let mee with true compunction for this errour say with the holy Prophet Dauid Erraui sicut ouis quae perijt quaere seruum tuum I haue gone astray like a lost sheepe seeke thy seruant O Lord Psalme 119. verse 176. CHAP. XVI Containing an obseruation about the number of seuen Sacraments admitted by the Church of Rome IN my trauels in the Low-countries I haue often smiled to see how the people in those parts Vaine is the terrors of Romish curses against the truth in a faire corne-field to driue away crowes and other birds from the corne will most artificially frame the reprefentation of a terribleman standing ouer the corne with a grimme countenance and with bow and arrowes drawne vp to the head to the great terror of all birds that none may approach as if forthwith he would hit all that came neare So likewise when I confider how the Church of Rome vseth the shew of terrors and comminations to keepe Christians from feeding vpon the wholesome truthes and verities growing in the spacious fields of Gods word I find much cause of laughter to see shee should thinke men endued with reasonable soules should haue so little sense as not to discouer her vaine scare-crowes of curses and excommunications which are only terrible in words and iust nothing in effect but counterfeit terrors without hurt or harme as for example she makes a great shew in words concerning the number of seuen Sacraments as if she would shoot euery one to the quicke that will be so venterous as to approach vnto the field of Scriptures to know the truth thereof her threatning shew is this Concil trid sess 7. desacra in genere Can. 1. If any shall say that all the sacraments of the new Law were not instituted by Iesus Christ our Lord or that there are more or fewer then seuen viz. Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penance Extreame-unction Order and Matrimonie or also any one of these seuen not to be truly and properly a Sacrament be hee accursed Heere is the definitiue sentence of the Church of Rome casting you out of her Synagogue if you gainesay her decree it is curiositie with her and great presumption to examine her doctrine you must not be so hold as to taste of the sweet and most pleasant fruits of Gods word the arrow is drawne vp to the head against you the terror of Anathema must put you to flight Christs doctrine must be no longer the little graine of mustard-seed growne vp aboue all hearbs for his faithfull birds to sit vpon the boughs therof this scar-crow Anathema must put all to flight 2 But those that are wise and iu siciall doe discouer the vanity of this frightful spectacle Those that are wise discouer the vanitie of them with the Berraeans they will examine the Popes doctrine by the Scriptures as they did Saint Pauls they will follow the directions of Doctor Stapleton who appointeth also a meane to trie the doctrine of false teachers by antiquitie euen for all the common sort of people They will as a great Doctor and Champion of the Popes said to me once find that it had been better that the Pope had left many of the doctrines of the Councell of Trent vndefined because so many new Anathemaes makes the world begin to suspect that the Popes labour more to subiect people vnto them by terrors then by truth as men doe children who to keepe them in awe will tell them of Hobgoblins and Robin-good-fellowes such like that wil fetch them away if they bee vnruly and leaue not their crying Which policie my selfe partly obseruing to be vsed by the Church of Rome euen in a moderne example of Paul the fifth his Breue against the oath of alleageance thinking only by the bare words declaratiue without any one reason alleaged for the vnlawfulnes in taking it other then his owne plaine assertion to strike such a terror both into his owne children and into the King and State as if none would dare to gain-say it but blessed be almightie God who hath so communicated the beames of his vnspeakable wisdome vnto him and his loyall subiects yea and vnto many of the Popes owne children who were long seduced by his pretended inerrable power that they dare not onely beleeue the contrarie but also openly auouch it to the world and ioyne foot to foot in defence thereof both with pen and sword if need be howsoeuer the Iesuites would thinke themselues aduantaged if both sides should come to this latter encounter but I trust God out of his mercie will dispose of milder courses more manife sting therein his
confession to the elder of the two and chiefly in respect of his authoritie The next morning shee went to him desiring him to heare her confession who being willing bad his companion to withdraw himselfe a little a side which he did yet sometimes casting his eies towardes them he perceiued that at euery sinne the Lady confessed a Toade went out of her mouth but being at last neare the point of confessing her most odious and detestable sinne where with her soule was charged for feare and shame shee durst not expresse it whereupon the yong religious Frier who stood at the end of the Chappell saw all the mentioned Toades returne againe into her mouth Soone after these two religious men departed and being vpon the way the yongest beganne to tell the elder that which hee had scene when the Lady was at confession with him wherby the elder vnderstood that the same Lady A strange tale about a Ladie not confessing all her sinnes willingly and to her knowledge had concealed some sinne which shee had not confessed who forthwith returned backe againe vnto her to admonish her to looke well to her conscience but alas hee found her dead And as hee praied to God for her three daies together at length shee appeared vnto him with a chaine of redde hot yron about her necke with two Serpents embracing her and sucking her breasts with two Toades in her cies from her mouth and nostrills issued forth fire and brimstone and about the haire of her head there were a great number of Lizardes who said vnto him O Father I am that accursed and miserable woman that two daies since made a confession vnto you but because I did willingly conceale the sinne of Adulterie and Incest behold I am damned for euer With that the Confessarius adiured her by the liuing God to declare two thinges vnto him first the signification and meaning of these diuers paines Vnto whom shee answered that the Lizards crawling about her head were for the punishment of the dressings shee wore about her head the two Toades which couered hereies were the punishment of her wanton and lasciuious lookes the flaming darts were for punishment of her detractions defamations foule and dishonest songs and speeches The two Serpents which sucke my breasts signifie the foule touchings which haue beene committed vpon mee The crueltie of the Dogges that deuoure my handes are punishments for mine owne vnchast touchings of my selfe and for that I haue giuen presents vnto my Louers out of the goodes wherewith I might haue relecued the poore Seruants of CHRIST IESVS I am seated vpon this Dragon that putteth mee to vnspeakable paine and torment burning my legges and thighes in punishment of all my wicked deedes Then the Penitentiarius willed her to expound his other doubt namely for what sinnes men of these times were principally damned Shee answered that men went downe to Hell for all manner of sinnes but women chiefly for foure sorts of sinnes for the sinne of luxurie for their sinnes of vaine apparell and painting for witch-craft and for their shame to confesse their sinnes And so when shee had said thus much the Dragon with a wonderfull great noise raised vp himselfe and carried her to hell where shee remaineth in endlesse torments If this were a true storie no doubt it would make much for auricular confession but the cause of suspition is that there is no place named where this should happen or where this Ladie dwelt besides it standeth onely vpon the bare relation of a Frier which kinde of people are by many much suspected of forgerie in such deuises and lying miracles which often the very circumstances of them doe discouer to be false Is it likely that she who had long concealed her sinnes would haue gone at all to confession vnlesse shee had purposed to open them he being a stranger and vnknowne But the storie may serue in Friers iudgements to terrifie poore women withall as the Popes Anathemaes doe terrifie many men who stand more in feare of them than of Gods threatnings But sweet Iesus keepe men from beleeuing such lying wonders and giue them grace not to giue eare to any thing not warranted in Scriptures or iustified by antiquitie and as thou hast mercifully led me from beleeuing such lyes so of the same goodnesse impart also the shining beames of truth vnto others and graunt that thy onely two Sacraments Baptisme and the holy Eucharist iustituted by thy selfe may haue their due esteeme and other institutions to be esteemed not as Sacraments but as matters profitable for vse and fit to be practised in the Church CHAP. XVII Containing an obseruation about the doctrine of the Virgine Maries conception in originall sinne ALbeit I finde that God is to be glorified for the great vertues and priuiledges he bestoweth vpon his Saints and chiefest seruants The doctrine of the Virgine Maries immunitie from originall sinne doth derogate from the honor of God yet it is to be done with such moderation and carefull discretion that whilest wee glorifie him in them we be warie not to attribute more vnto the Saints than will stand with the condition of seruants in giuing that glorie which is due to the master vnto his inferiors for although God himselfe haue said Whosoeuer shall honor me 1. Reg. I will glorifie him so hath he also left it recorded from his owne mouth I will not giue my glorie vnto any other Whence it followeth that although God haue bestowed such rare and singular priuiledges and prerogatiues vpon the virgine Marie the mother of Christ as he hath not done the like to any creature whatsoeuer insomuch that she her selfe knowing and feeling the happinesse of them said All generations shall call me blessed 1. Luc. 47. because he hath done me great fauors who is powerfull and holy be his name which is to be fulfilled amongst all good Christians regarding the word of God because she was blessed indeed aboue all women for the blessed fruit of her womb as S. Elizabeth said who being the Redeemer of the world brought benediction and ouercame the diuell the anthor of all malediction Yet ought not any be so much transported with an ouer-deeming affection and iudgement to this virgin as to giue her such glory as surpasseth the nature of a creature descended from Adam and onely may be giuen to Christ Iesus greater in glorie than his mother who being God and man was her Sauior because he came to saue all which benefit she acknowledged her selfe most thankfully in her Canticle saying My spirit hath exulted in God my Sauior 2 And I doe most plainely obserue by the Scriptures And it is most repuguant to Gods word Rom. 8. Tho. 12. q. 81. that she was to be conceiued as well as others in originall sinne for all mankind sinned in Adam S. Paule saying Death passed to all in whom all sinned And Thomas Aquinas sayth According to the Catholike faith it is firmely to be