saluation contrary to the working of the holy spirite of God And thus the Church of Rome pretending onely the name of Christ and of his Religion is so farre altered from the truth of that which it pretendeth that vnder the name of Christ it persecuteth both Christ his Religion working more harme to the Church of Christ then euer did the open tirants and persecuting Emperours among the heathen not much vnlike herein to the olde Sinagoge of the Scribes and Phareseis who vnder the name of God crucified the sonne of God and vnder pretence of the law fought against the Gospell and vnder the title of Abrahams children persecuted the childrē of Abraham And as they bragging so highly of the Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lorde did in deede destroye the true Temple of the Lord right so these pretensed Catholikes in these dayes after they haue raysed vppe a Catholike Churche of their owne and haue armed the same with lawes and haue gathered vnto them a power of Priestes Prelates Abbats Priors of religious men of Cardinals and also of secular Princes to take their part now vnder the name of the Catholicke Church they persecute the true Catholike church and coloring their procedings still with In nomine Domini most cruelly they put to death which die pro nomine Domini condemning them for heretikes schismatikes and rebles not which deny any part of the creede which they themselues professe nor such whome they can conuince by any Scripture but onely such which will not ioyne wyth their errours and heresies contrary to the honour of God and truth of his worde And lest any should thinke this that we here protest against the corrupt errours manifold deformities of this latter Church of Rome to proceede of any raucor or affection rather then grounded of necessary causes and demōstrations euident my purpose is by the Lordes leaue to take herein some litle paine that as I haue collected a litle before the summe cōtents of S. Paules doctrine where with the old Church of Rome was first seasoned and acquainted so now as in a like summary table to discrye the particular braunches and contents of the Popes doctrine now set foorth to the intent that all true Christian readers comparing the one with the other may discern what great alteration there is betwene the church of Rome that now is and the church of Rome that then was planted by the Apostles in the primitiue time And to the ende to open to the simple reader some waye whereby he may the better iudge in such matters of doctrine not be deceaued in discerning truth from errour first we wil propound certeine principles or general positions as infallible rules or truthes of the Scripture wherby al other doctrines opinions of men being tried and examined as in the touchstone may the more easely be iudged whether they be true or cōtrary whether they make agaynst the scripture or no. ¶ Certeine Principles or generall verities grounded vpon the truth of Gods word ¶ The first principle 1. AS sinne and death came originally by the disobedience of one to all men of his generation by nature so righteousnes and life come originally by the obedience of one to all men regenerated of him by faith Baptisme Rom. 5. ¶ The 2. Principle 2. The promise of God was freely giuen to our first parentes without their deseruing that the seede of a woman should breake the Serpents head Gen. 3. ¶ The 3. Principles 3. Promise was giuen freely to Abraham before he deserued any thing that in his seede all nations should be blessed Gen. 12. ¶ The 4. Principle 4. To the worde of God neither must wee adde nor take from it Deut. 4. ¶ The 5. Principle 5. He that doth the workes of the law shall liue therein Leuit. 18. Gal. 3. ¶ The 6. Principle 6. Accursed is he which abideth not in euery thing that is written in the booke of the law Deut. 27. Gal. 3. ¶ The 7. Principle 7. God onely is to be worshipped Deut. 6. Luc. 4. ¶ The 8. Principle 8. All our righteousnes is like a defiled cloth of a woman Esay 64. ¶ The 9. Principle 9. In all my holy hill they shall not kill nor slay saith the Lord. Esay 11.65 ¶ The 10. Principle 10. God loueth mercy and obedience more then sacrifice Osee. 6.1 Reg. 15. ¶ The 11. Principle 11. The lawe worketh anger condemneth and openeth sinne Rom. 3. ¶ The 12. Principle 12. The end of the law is Christ to righteousnes to euery one that beleueth Rom. 10. ¶ The 13. Principle 13. Whosoeuer beleeueth and is Baptised shall be saued Mat. vlt. ¶ The 14. Principle 14. A man is iustified by faith without workes freely by grace not of our selues Gal. 2. Ephes. 2. ¶ The 15. Principle 15. There is no remission of sinnes without bloud Heb. 9 ¶ The 16. Principle 16. Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14. without faith it is impossible to please God Heb. 11. ¶ The 17. Principle 17. One Mediatour betweene God man Christ Iesus 1. Tim. 2. he is the propitiatiō for our sinnes 1. Iohn 2. ¶ The 18. Principle 18. Who soeuer seeketh in the law to be iustified is fallen from grace ¶ The 19. Principle 19. In Christ be all the promises of God Est Amen 2. Cor. 1. ¶ The 20. Principle 20. Let euery soule be subiect to superiour powers gyuyng to Caesar that which is Cesars to God that which is Gods Rom. 13. These principles and infallible rules of the Scripture as no man can denie so if they be granted the doctrine thē of the Popes Church must needes be found not to be Catholike but rather full of errours and heresies as in the sequele folowing remaineth more expressely and particularly by the grace of Christ to be conuinced ¶ Here foloweth a Summary collection of the errours heresies and absurdities conteyned in the popes doctrine contrary to the rules of Gods vvord and the first institution of the Church of Rome Of Faith and Iustification FIrst as touching the onely meanes and instrumentall cause of our iustificatiō wherby the merits of Christes Passiō be applied to vs made ours ye heard before how S. Paule onely ascrybeth the same to faith as appeareth by all his letters especially to the Romanes Where he excluding al kind of works ascribeth al our saluation iustification righteousnes reconciliation and peace with god onely to faith in Christ. Contrary to which doctrine the Pope and his church hath set vp diuers and sondry other meanes of their owne deuising whereby the merites of Christes passion they saye are applyed to vs and made ours to the putting away of sinnes and for our iustification as hope charitie sacrifice of the Masse auricular confession satisfacion merits of Saintes and holy orders the
Philadelphia suffered Martyrdome at Smyrna which Policarpus specially aboue the rest is had in memory so that hee in all places among the Gentiles is most famous And this was the ende of this worthy disciple of the Apostles Whose hystory the brethren of the congregation at Smyrna haue wrytten in this their Epistle as is aboue recited Iraeneus in his 3. booke against heresies the 3 chap. and Eusaebius in his 4. booke and 14. chap. of his Ecclesiasticall history reporteth this worthy saying of Poticarpus This Policarpus sayth hee meeting at a certeine time Martion the heretick who said vnto him doest thou not know me made answere I know that thou art the first begotten of Sathan So great feare what euil might ensue therof had the Disciples of the Apostles that they would not speake to them whom they knew to be the deprauers of the verytie euen as Paule saith The hereticke after the first and second admonition shonne and auoyd Knowing that he which is such one is peruerse or frowarde and damneth himselfe This most holy confessour and Martyr of Christ Policarpus suffered death in the fourth persecution after Nero when Marcus Antonius and Lucius Aurelius Commodus raigned an Dom. 167. as Vrsperg affirmeth an 170. as Eusebius witnesseth in his Chronicles the 7. before the Calendes of Februarie Of Germanicus mention is made aboue in the storye of Policarpus of whome writeth Eusebius Lib. 4. cap. 15. notyng him to be a younge man and most constantly to perseuere in the profession of Christes doctrine whom wheÌ„ the Proconsul went about to perswade to remember his age and to fauor him selfe being in the floure of his age he woulde nor be allured but constaÌ„tly and boldly and of his owne accorde incited and prouoked the wild beast to come vpon him and to deuour him to be deliuerd more spedely out of this wretched life Haec Eusebius an 170. Thus haue you heard out of the Epistle of the brethren of Smyrna the whole order and liâ—e of Policarpus wherby it may appeare that he was a very aged maÌ„ who had serued Christ lxxxvj yeares since the first knowledge of him and serued also in the ministery about the space of 70. yeares This Policarpus was the schooler and hearer of Iohn the Euangelist and was placed by the sayde Iohn in Smyrna Of him also Ignatius maketh mention in his Epistle which he wrote in his iourney to Rome going toward his martyrdome and commended to him the gouernement of hys Church at Antioch whereby it appeareth that Policarpus then was in yâ— ministery Likewise Iraeneus writeth of the sayd Policarpus after this maner He alwaies taught sayd he those things which he learned of the Apostles leauing them to the Church and are onely true Wherevnto also at the Churches that be in Asia and all they which succeeded after Policarpus to this day beareth witnes And the same Irenaeus witnesseth also that the sayd Policarpus wrote an Epistle to the Phillipians which whether it be the same that is now extant and read in the name of Policarpus it is doubted of some notwithstanding in the sayd Epistle diuers things are founde very holesome and Apostolicke as where he teacheth of Christ of iudgement and of the resurrection Also he writeth of faith very worthily thus declaryng that by grace we are saued and not by works but in the will of God by Iesus Christ. In Eusebius we reade in like maner a part of an Epistle written by Irenaeus to Florinus wherin is declared how that the said Irenaeus being yet yong was with Policarpus in Asia at what time he saw well remembred what Policarpus did and the place where he sat teaching his whoâ—e order of life and proportion of his body with the sermons wordes which he said to the people And furthermore he perfectly remembred howe that the saide Policarpus often times reported vnto him those thinges which hee learned and heard them speake of the Lord his dooinges power and doctrine who heard the worde of life with their owne eares all which were more consonant and agreable to the holy Scripture Thus with much more hath Irenaeus concerning Policarpus Hierome also writing of the same Policarpus hath howe he was in great estimation throughout all Asia for that he was scholer to the Apostles and to them which did see and were conuersant with Christ himselfe whereby it is to be coniectured his authority to be much not onely with them of his owne Church but wyth all other Churches about him Ouer and besides it is witnessed by the sayd Irenaeus that Policarpus came to Rome in the time of Anicetus Byshop of Rome about the yere of our Lord. 157. in yâ— raigne of Antoninus Pius whose cause of his comming thether appeareth to be about the controuersie of Easterday wherin the Asians and the Romanes somthing disagreed amonge theÌ„selues And therfore the said Policarpus in the behalfe of the brethren and Church of Asia tooke his long iourneye thether to come and conferre with Anicetus Wherof wryteth also Nicephorus Lib. 4. declaring that Policarpus and Anicetus something varied in opinions and iudgement about that mater And that notwithstanding yet both freÌ„dly communicated either with the other insomuch that Anicetus in his Church gaue place to Policarpus to minister the Communion and Sacrament of the Lordes Supper for honour sake which may be a notable testimony now to vs that the doctrine concerning the free vse and liberty of ceremonies was at that time retained in the church without any offence of stomacke or breach of Christian peace in the Church This Policarpus as is aboue mentioned suffered his Martyrdome euen in his owne Church at Smyrna where he had laboured so many yeares in planting of the Gospel of Christ which was about the yeare of our Lorde 170. as Eusebius rekoneth in his Chronicle and in the 7. yeare of Antoninus Verus his raigne wherby it appeareth that Socrates in Historia tripartita was much deceaued saying that Policarpus suffered in the time of Gordianus In this fourth persecution beside Policarpus and other mentioned before we read also in Eusebius of diuers other who at the same time likewise did suffer at Smyrna Ouer and besides in the said persecution suffered moreouer Metrodorus a ministrr who was giuen to the fier so consumed An other was worthy Pionius which after much boldnes of speeche with his Apologies exhibited his sermons made to the people in the defence of christian sayth and after much reheuyng and comforting of such as were in prisons and otherwise discoÌ„forted at last was put to cruell torments and afflictions then giuen likewise to the fire so finished his blessed martyrdome After these also suffered Carpus Papylus and Agathonyca a woman who after their most constaunt and worthye confessions were put to death at Pergamopolis in Asia witnessing Eusebius Lib. 4 cap 7.
your letters or by any other indulgences to what persoÌ„ or persoÌ„s soeuer of what estate dignity or place soeuer vnder any maner or forme of words grauÌ„ted hereafter by the sea Apostolicke by the which indulgences the effect of the said prouision may be by any maner of waies hindered or deferred yet of our certayne knowledge we will that they shall want theyr strength in the prouision made or to be made for the sayd Frederick in the Church of Lincoln And if any vpon the premisses or any of them shall alleadge agaynst the foresayd Fredericke or his procurator That you will cause them to be cited on our behalfe so that they being cited peremtorily shal within the space of two monethes of your citation personally appere before vs there according to the law to make aunswere to the sayd Fredericke vpon the premisses Any priuiledges or indulgeÌ„ces what soeuer geuen and graunted either generally to the king dome of England or peculiarly to any other person of what state degree and place soeuer graunted by the foresaid sea vnder what soeuer maner forme of words for them not to be called vp beyond the sea or out of their owne City or Dioces by letters Apostolicall vnder whatsoeuer forme of wordes obtayned to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding All which priuiledges and indulgences we will in no case shall stand in any force or effect to the sayd partes Moreouer the day and forme of the citation we will that ye faythfully do intimate vnto vs by your letters containing the tenor therof And if both of you can not be present at the execution hereof yet we will notwithstaÌ„ding that one of you do execute the same without fayle Dated the 7. Kal. Febr. the 10. yeare of our Popedome As theâ—e is no maÌ„ which hath any eies to see but may â—asely vnderstand in reading this letter of the Pope how vnreasonable his request is how impudently he commauÌ„deth how proudly he threatneth how wickedly he oppresseth and racketh the Church of God in placing boyes and straungers in the ministery cure of soules also in making them his prouisors to rauen vp the Church goodes So is it no great maruell if this godly Bishoppe Robert Grosted was offended therwith who in my mind deserueth herein a double commendation not onely that he so wisely did discerne error from sincerity and truth but also that he was so hardy and constant to stand to the defence therof agaynst the Pope according as in this his answere to the Pope agayne may appeare as foloweth The aunswere of Robert Grosted SAlutem Pleaseth it your wisedome to vnderstand that I am not disobedient to any the Apostolicke precepts but both deuoutly reuerently with the natural affectioÌ„ of a sonne obey the same And also am an vtter enemy to al those that resist such Apostolick precepts as a childe zelous of his fathers honor And truly I am no lesse then bound therunto by the precept and coÌ„mauÌ„dement of God For the Apostolick preceptes are none other nor can be then consonant and vniforme to the doctrine of the Apostles and of our Sauiour Christ being the maister and Lorde of all the Apostles whose type and person specially in the consonant and vniforme hierarchie of the Church the Lord Pope semeth to beare the same our Lorde and Sauiour Iesus Christe saying whosoeuer is not with me the same iâ— agaynst me Therefore agaynst him neither is nor can be the most diuine sanctitye of the sea Apostolicall The tenour then of â—our foresayd Apostolicall letter is not consonant to true sanctity but vtterly dissonaÌ„t and disagreeing to the same First for that vpon the clause of this your letter many such other letters like which clause alwayes ye so much do vrge Non obstante induced and brought in vpon no necessity of any naturall law to be obserued doth swarme and floweth with all inconstancy boldnes pertinacy impudency lying deceiuing and is also a sea of mistrust in geuing credit to no man Which as it swarmeth with these so in like maner with innumerable other vices which hang and depend vpon the same mouing and disturbing the purity of Christian religion and lyfe agreable to the same as also the publique tranquility of men Moreouer next after the sinne of Lucifer which shal be in the latter time to wit of Antichrist the childe of perdition whome the Lord shall destroy with the breath of his mouth there is not nor can be any kinde of sinne so repugnant and contrary to the doctrine of the Apostles â—nd holy scripture to our sauiour Christ himselfe more hatefull detestable and abhominable then to destroy and kill mens soules by defrauding them of the mistery of the pastorall office which by the ministery of the postorall cure ought to saue and quicken the same Which sinne by most euident places of the Scripture such men are discerned knowne to commit which being in the authority of the Pastorall dignity do serue their owne carnall desires and necessaries with the benefit of the milke and wooll of the sheep and flocke of Christ and do not minister the same Pastorall office and charge to the benefite and saluation of those theyr sheep The same therefore by the testimony of the Scripture is not the administration of the Pastorall ministery but the killing and destruction of the sheep And that these two kinde of vices be most vile and wicked although after a differryng sorte and farre exceeding all other kinde of wickednesse hereby it is manifest For that the same are directly contrary to two vertues most chiefely good although differring in themselues and vnlike together For that is called most wicked which is contrary to a thing most best So much then as lyeth in the offenders the one of their offences is directly agaynst the deity which of himselfe is alwayes essentially and supernaturally good The other is agaynst the deification and the Image of God in man which is not alwayes but by the participation of Gods lightsome grace essentially and naturally God And forasmuch as in thinges being good the cause of good is better then the effect like as againe in euill things the cause of euill is worse then the effect of euil proceeding therof hereby it is manifest That the inducers of such wicked destroyers of Gods Image and deification in the sheep of Christ that is the church of God are worse theÌ„ those chief destroiers to wit Lucifer Antichrist And as in these degrees of wickednes how much more excellent such be who hauing a great charge committed to them of God to edifâ—ication and not to destruction are more bound to keep away and exclude such wicked destroyers from the church of God So much is it also of that that this holy seat Apostolicall to whom the Lord Iesus Christ hath geuen all maner of power to edification as the Apostle sayth and not to destruction can commaund or will to goe about
the king Wenselaus who thē fauored that pope gaue cōmaundement that no man should attēpt any thing against the sayd Popes indulgēces But Hus with his folowers not able to abide the impiety of those pardōs began manifestly to speake agaynst them of the which cōpany were 3. certayn artificers who hearing the priest preaching of these iudulgences did opēly speak against them called the pope Antichrist which would set vp the crosse to fight agaynst his euenchristened Wherefore they were brought before the Senate and committed to warde But the people ioyning thēselues together in armes came to the magistrates requiring thē to be let loose The magistrates with gētle wordes and fayre promises satisfied the people so that euery man returning home to his own house the tumult was asswaged But the captiues being in prison not withstanding were there beheaded whose names were Iohn Martin and Stascon The death and martirdome of these three being knowne vuto the people they took the bodies of them that were slaine and with great solemnitye brought them vnto the church of Bethlem At whose funerall diuers priestes fauoring that side did sing in this wise These be the Sayntes whiche for the testament of God gaue their bodies c. And so their bodyes were sumptuously interred in the church of Bethlem I. Hus preaching at the same funerall much commending them for theyr constancye and blessing God the father of our Lord Iesus Christ whyche had hidde the way of his verity so from the prudent of this world and had reuealed it to the simple lay people and inferior priestes which chose rather to please God then men Thus this City of Prage was deuided The prelates with the greatest part of the clergy most of the Barons which had any thing to lose did hold with the pope especially Steuen Paletz being the chiefest doer on that side On the contrary part the commons with part of the clergy studentes of the vniuersity went with Iohn Hus. Wenslaus the king fearing least this would grow to a tumult being moued by the doctors and prelates and councell of his barons thought best to remoue Iohn Husse out of the Citty who had bene excommunicated before by the Pope And further to cease this dissention risen in the church committed the matter to the disposition of the doctors and the clergy They cōsulting together among thēselues did set forth a decree ratified and confirmed by the sentēce of the king contayning the summe of 18. articles for the maynteynance of the Pope and the see of Rome agaynst the doctrine of Wickeliffe and Iohn Husse The names of the Doctors of Diuinity were these Steuen Paletz Stanislaus de Znoyma Petrus de Ikoyma Ioannes Heliae Andreas Broda Iohannes Hildesen Mattheus Monachus Hermannus Heremita Georgius Bota Simon Wenda c. Iohn Hus thus departing out of Prage went to his coūtry where he being protected by the Lord of the Soile continued there preaching to whom resorted a great concourse of people neither yet was he so expelled out of Prage but that sometimes he resorted to his church of Bethleem and there also preached vnto the people Moreouer agaynst the sayde decree of the doctours I. Hus with his companye replied agayne and aunswered to their articles with cōtrary articles agayn as foloweth The obiections of Iohn Hus and of his part agaynst the decree of the Doctors FIrst the foūdation of the Doctors wherupon they foūd all their writings and counsels is false which foūdatiō is this where as they say that part of the clergy in the kingdome of Boheme is pestilent and erroneous and holdeth falsely of the Sacramentes 2. The Doctors hereby do defame the kingdome of Boheme and do rayse vp new discordes 3. Let them shew therefore those persons of the Clergye whom they call pestilent so let them verify theyr report binding themselues to suffer the like paine if they be not able to proue it 4. False it is that they say the Pope the cardinals to be the true manifest successors of Peter of the Apostles neyther that any other successors of Peter or the Apostles can be foūd vpon earth besides thē Whē as no man knoweth whether he be worthy of hatred or of fauour And all Byshops and priests be successors of Peter of the Apostles 5. Not the pope but Christ onely is the head and not the Cardinals but all Christes faythfull people be the body of the Catholick church as all holy Scripture and decrees of the holy fathers do testify and affirme 6. And as touching the pope if he be a reprobate it is plain that he is no head no nor member also of the holy Church of God but of the deuill and of his sinagogue 7. The clergy of the gospellers agreeing with the saying of S. Austen which they alledge and according to the sanctions of the fathers and determinations of the holy mother church do say and affirme laudably that the condēnation and prohibition of the 45. articles is vnlawful and vniust and rashly done for that not onely because the doctors but also all Bishops and Archbishops in suche great causes namely touching faith as these articles doe haue no authority at all as appeareth◠De baptismo et eius effectu cap. Maiores Et in Can. 17. dist cap. Hinc sedi c. 8. The second cause of the discord which they alledge also is most false seing the fayth of whole Christendome cōcerning the church of Rome is deuided in 3. parts by the reason of 3. popes which now together do raigne And the 4. part is newtrall Neither is it true that we ought to stand in all things to the determination of the pope of the cardinals but so farr forth as they do agree with the holy scripture of the old and new Testament from whence the sanctions of the fathers did first spring as is euident De accusationibus cap. qualiter c. 9. In the 4. Article they brast out into a certayne dotage are contrary to themselues By reason that they doitishly haue reprehēded the gospellers who in all their doings receiue the holy scripture whith is the law of God the way of trueth and life for their iudge and measure and afterward they themselues doe alleadge the scripture Deut. 17. where all iudges both popes and Cardinals are taught to iudge discern betwene leaper leaper in euery ecclesiasticall cause only after the rule of gods law And so are they cōtrary vnto their secōd article wherin they say that in euery catholicke matter we must runne to the pope which is cōtrary to the foolish condemnation of the Articles aforesaid 10 Consequently like idiots they doe most fasly alledge for their purpose the Canon vnder the name and authority of Ierome written 24. q. 1. Haec est fides papa c. where they do apply the wordes of Ierome most impertinentlye to the pope of Rome which he writeth to S.
to be feared The answere It is not so in my treatise but contrariwise that the subiects are boūd willingly gladly to obey the vertuous and good rulers and also those which are wicked and euill But notwithstāding if the pope do abuse his power it is not thē to be feared as by bondage And so the Lordes the Cardinals as I suppose did not feare the power of Gregory the xij before his deposition whē as they resisted him saying that he did abuse his power contrary vnto his owne othe The 8. Article An euill and a wicked Pope is not the successor of Peter but of Iudas The aunswere I wrote thus in my treatise If the pope be humble and meek neglecting and despising the honors and lucre of the world if he be a shepheard taking his name by the feeding of the flock of God of the which feeding the Lord speaketh sayinge feede my sheepe if he feede the sheepe with the worde and with vertuous example and that he become euen lyke hys flocke with his whole hart and minde if he doe diligently and carefully labour and trauell for the Church then is he without doubt the true Uicare of Christ. But if he walke contrary vnto these vertues for so much as there is no society betwene Christ and Belial and Christ himselfe saith he that is not with me is agaynst me how is he then the true vicar of Christ or Peter and not rather the Uicare of Antichrist Christ called Peter himselfe Sathanas when he did cōtrary him but onely in one word and that wyth a good affection euen him whom he had chosen his Uicare and specially appoynted ouer his church Why should not any other then being more contrary vnto Christ be truely called Sathanas and consequently Antichrist or at lest the chiefe and principall minister or vicar of Antichrist There be infinite testimonyes of this matter in S. Augustine S. Ierome Ciprian Chrisostom Bernard Gregory Remigius and Ambrose c. The 9. Article The Pope is the same beast of whome it is spoken in the Apot. power is geuen vnto him to make warre vpon the sayntes The answere I deny this Article to be in my booke The 10. Article It is lawful to preach notwithstāding the Popes inhibition The answere The Article is euidēt forsomuch as the Apostles did preach contrary to the commaundement of the bishops at Ierusalem And S. Hillary did the like contrary to the cōmaūdement of the pope which was an Arrian It is also manifest by the example of Cardinals which contrary vnto the cōmaundement of Pope Gregory the xij sēt throughout all realmes such as should preach agaynst him It is also lawfull to preach vnder appeale contrary vnto the Popes commaundement And finally he may preach which hath the commaundement of God wherunto he ought chiefly to obey The 11. Article If the Popes commaundement be not concordant and agreeable with the doctrine of the Gospell or the Apostles it is not to be obeyed The answer I haue thus written in my booke The faythfull disciple of Christ ought to wey and consider whether the popes commaundement be expressely plainely the cōmaūdement of Christ or any of his Apostles or whether it haue any foundatiō or groūd in their doctrine or no and that being once knowne or vnderstand he ought reuerētly and humbly to obey the same But if he do certaynly know that the popes cōmaūdement is contrary and agaynst the holy Scripture and hurtful vnto the Church then he ought boldely to resist agaynst it that he be not partaker of the crime and offēce by cōsenting thereunto This I haue handled at large in my treatise and haue confirmed it by the authorityes of Saint Austine Hierome Gregory Chrisostome Bernard and Bede and with the holy Scripture and Canons the which for breuities cause I do here passe ouer I will onely reherse the saying of Saint Isydore who writeth thus He which doth rule and doth say or commaund any thing cōtrary and besides the will of God or that which is euidētly commaunded in the Scriptures he is honoured as a false witnesse of God and a Church robber Whereupon we are bounden to obey no Prelate but in such case as he do commaund or take counsell of the Councels and commaundements of Christ. Likewise S. Augustine vpon this saying vpon the chayre of Moyses c. sayth Secondly they teach in the chayre of Moyses the law of God Ergo God teacheth by them but if they will teach you any of theyr owne inuentions do not geue eare vnto them neither doe as they cōmaund you Also in the saying of Christ he that heareth you heareth me all lawfull and honest thinges be comprehended in the which we ought to be obedient according to Christes saying it is not you which doe speake but the spirite of my father whiche speaketh in you Let therfore my aduersaryes and slaunderers learne that there be not onely 12. Counsels in the Gospell in the which subiectes ought to obey Christ and his appoynted ministers but that there are so many Counsels and determinations of God as there be lawfull and honest thinges ioyned with preceptes and commaundementes of God bindinge vs thereunto vnder the payne of deadly sinne for euery such thing doth the Lord commaund vs to fulfill in tyme and place with other circumstaunces at the will and pleasure of their minister The 12. Article It is lawfull for the clergy and laytye by their power and iurisdiction to iudge and determine of all things pertayning vnto saluation and also of the workes of the Prelates The aunswere I haue thus written it in my booke that it is lawfull for the clergy and laity to iudge and determine of the works of their heades and rulers It appeareth by this that the iudgement of the secret counselles of God in the court of conscience is one thyng the iudgement of the authority and power in the church is an other Wherefore subiectes first ought principally to iudge and examine themselues 1. Corinthians 11. chapter Secondly they ought to examine all thinges whiche pertayneth vnto their saluation for a spirituall man iudgeth and examineth all thinges And this is alleadged as touching the first iudgement and not the second as the enemy doth impute it vnto me Whereupon in the same place I doe say that the lay man ought to iudge and examine the workes of his Prelate like as Paule doth iudge the doinges of Peter in blaming him Secondly to auoyd them according to this saying Beware of false Prophets c. Thirdly to rule ouer the ministery For the subiect ought by reason to iudge and examine the works of the Prelats And if they be good to prayse God therefore and reioyce But if they be euill they ought with patience to suffer them and to be sorry for them but not to do the like least they be damned with them according to this
Church of Rome now beyng hath no coÌ„formitie with the old Romane Churche heretofore For then Byshops debated all causes of fayth onely by the Scriptures and other questions of Ecclesiasticall discipline they determined by the CanoÌ„s not of the Pope but of the Church such as were decreed by the auncient Councels as writeth Greg. Turonensis in Francorum historia Where as now both the rule of scripture sanctions of the old Councels set aside all thynges for the most part are decided by certaine new decretall or rather extradecrâ—tall extrauagant constitutions in the Popes Canon law compiled and in his Consistories practised And where as the old ordinaunce and disposition as well of the common law as of the sacred CouÌ„cels and institution of auncient fathers haue geuen to Byshops other prelates also to patrons and donors of Ecclesiastical benefices euery one within his owne precinct and dominion also to cathedrall Churches and other to haue their free elections to prosecute the same in full effect ordryng and disposing promotions collatioÌ„s prouisions dispositions of prelacies dignities and all other Ecclesiasticall benefices whatsoeuer after their owne arbitremeÌ„t as appeareth by the first generall Councell of Fraunce 16. q 7. cap. Omnes Basilicae by the first generall Councell of Nice cap 6. Also by the generall Councell of Antioche cap. 9. and is to be seene in the Popes Decrees 9. q. 3. Per singulas And also beside these auncient decrees the same is confirmed agayne in more latter yeares by Ludouicus the ninth French kyng in his constitution called Pragmatica sanctio made and prouided by full Parliament agaynst the popes exactions An. 1228. in these wordes as folow Item exactionâ—s onera grauissima pecuniarum per curiam Romanam Ecclesiae regni nostri impositas vel imposita quibus regnum miserabiliter de pauperatum existit siue etiam imponendas vel imponenda leuari aut colligi nullatenus volumus nisi duntaxat pro rationabili pia vrgentissima causa vel ineuitabili necessitate ac etiam de expresso spontaneo iussu nostro ipsius Ecclesiae regni nostri c. that is Item all exactions importable burdens of money which the Court of Rome hath layd vpon the Church of our kingdome whereby the said our kingdome hath bene miserably hetherto impouerished or hereafter shall impose or lay vpon vs we vtterly discharge and forbyd to be leuied or collected hereafter for any maner of cause vnlesse there come some reasonable godly most vrgent ineuitable necessitie that also not to be done without the expresse voluntary commaundement of vs of the Church of the same our foresayd kingdome c. Now contrary and agaynst to these so manifest expresse decrementes of generall Councels constitutions Synodall this latter Church of Rome of late presuÌ„ption degeneratyng froÌ„ all the steppes of their elders haue taken vpon them a singular iurisdiction by them selues for their owne aduauntage to entermedle in disposing traÌ„sposing Churches Colledges Monasteries with the collations exemptions elections goodes landes to the same belongyng by reason and exaÌ„ple wherof haue come in these impropriations first fruites reseruations of benefices to the miserable dispoyling of Parishes horrible decay of Christen fayth which thynges amoÌ„g the old Romaine elders were neuer knoweÌ„ For so much then did it lacke that due necessities were pluckt froÌ„ the Church that Emperours Kyngs Princes plucking froÌ„ their owne rather did cumulate the Church with superfluities Agayne when such goodes were geuen to the Church by those auncetors they were neither so geuen nor yet taken to serue the priuate vse of certaine churchmen takyng no paynes therein but rather to serue the publique subueÌ„tioÌ„ of the needy as is coÌ„teined in the canonicall institutioÌ„s by the Emperour Ludouicus Pius set forth An. 830. The wordes be these Res Ecclesiae vota sunt fidelium pretia peccatorum patrimonia pauperum that is The goods of the church be the vowes and bequestes of the faythfull prices to raunsome such as be in captiuitie or prison and patrimonies to succour them with hospitalitie that be needy Wherunto agreeth also the testimony of Prosper whose wordes be these Viros sanctos ecclesiae non vendicasâ—e vt proprias sed vt commendatas pauperibus diuisisse that is good men tooke the goodes of the church not as their own but distributed theÌ„ as geueÌ„ bequeathed to the poore And sayth moreouer Quod habet Ecclesia cum omnibus nihil habentibus habet commune that is Whatsoeuer the church hath it hath it common with all such as haue nothyng c. Adde to these the worthy testimony of S. August ad Bonif Si autem priuatim quae nobis sufficiant possidemus noÌ„ sunt illa nostra sed pauperum quorum procurationem quodammodo gerimus non proprietatem nobis vsurpatione damnabili vendicamus c. Likewise vowsons and pluralities of benefices were thyngs then as much vnknowen as now they are pernitious to the church taking away all free election of ministers from the flocke of Christ. All which inconueniences as they first came and crept in chiefly by the pretensed authoritie iurisdiction abused in this latter church of Rome so it can not be denyed but the sayd latter church of Rome hath taken and attributed to it selfe much more theÌ„ either the limites of Gods word do geue or standeth with the example of the old Romane church in these three thynges especiall Whereof as mentioÌ„ is touched before so briefly I will recapitulate the same The first is in this that whatsoeuer the Scripture geueth and referreth either to the whole church vniuersally or to euery particular church seuerally this church now of Rome doth arrogate to it selfe absolutely and onely both doyng iniury to other churches also abusing the Scriptures of God For albeit the Scripture doth geue authoritie to binde and loose it limitteth it neither to person nor place that is neither to the Citie of Rome onely more theÌ„ to other Cities nor to the sea of Peter more theÌ„ to other Apostles but geueth it clearely to the Church wherof Peter did beare the figure so that where soeuer the true Church of Christ is there is annexed power to bynde loose geuen and taken meerly as from Christ and not mediatly by the Pope or Byshop of Peters sea The second poynt wherein this present Churche of Rome abuseth his iurisdiction contrary to Scripture and steps of the old Romane Church is this for that it extendeth his authoritie farther and more amply theÌ„ either the warrant of the word or example of time will giue For although the Churche of Rome hath as other particular churches haue authoritie to binde and absolue yet it hath no such authoritie to absolue subiectes froÌ„ their othe subiection and loyaltie to their rulers Magistrates to dispeÌ„se with periury to denounce
singular Apostles For he that said to Peter Feede my sheepe said also to all and singular his Apostles Go into all the world preach c. Math. vlt. Moreouer for as much as this man collecteth out of Chrysostome that the whole world was committed to Peter how shall we then ioyne this meaning of Chrysostome with S. Paule which sayth that the Gospel was committed to Peter euer the circumcision as was Paule ouer the vncircumcision And here an answer to this doughtie argument both to the forme to the matter thereof albeit concerning the matter here lacketh much to be said more of Peters successours in the text of Chrysostome By the which successours is not ment the bishop of Rome onely as the Papists would beare vs in hand but all such true and faithfull Pastors whom the Lordes calling sendeth and setteth ouer his flocke where so euer or whatsoeuer they be For as Peter beareth a representation of the church by the testimonie of August in Ioan. tract 124. Praefat. in Psal. 108. so the successours of Peter be all faithfull Pastors and ouerseers of Christes Church to whom Christ our Lord hath committed the charge of his flocke Wherefore they are not a little deceiued which looking vpō the rocke onely of the person and not the rock of confession contrary to the rule of Hilarie De trinit lib. 6. doe tie the Apostleship or rocke of Peter to one onely Bishop and the succession of Peter to one onely sea of Rome where as this being a spiritual office and not carnall hath no such carnall race or discent after any worldly or locall vnderstanding but hath a more mysticall meaning after a spirituall sense of succession such as Hierome speaketh of epist. ad Euagrium Omnes inquit Apostolorum successores sunt c. That is All saith he speaking of Bishops be successours of the Apostles c. Of like force and fashion and out of the same figure the same Author patcheth moreouer another argument proouing that the Bishop of Rome was tituled the head of Christes church in the primitiue time of the old aunciters before the age of Gregory His argument procedeth thus in the third figure S. Peter was called by the auncient fathers head of Christes church S. Peter was bishop of Rome Ergo the bishop of Rome was called head of the Church in the old auncient tyme. This argument expositorie beyng clouted vp in the third figure and concluding singularly hath rather a shew of an argumēt then maketh any necessarie conclusiō standing vpon no moode in the said figure if the Author thereof were put to his triall Albeit to leaue the forme and to come to the matter of the argument First how wel he wil dispatch himselfe of the Maior prooue vs that S. Peter although he were at Rome and taught at Rome and suffred at Rome yet that he was bishop and proper Ordinarie of that citie and speciall sea of Rome As touching the allegation of Abdias Orosius Ado Tertullian Cyprian Hierome Optatius and Augustine brought forth for his most aduantage to prooue his Maior thus I answer cōcerning Orosius Tertullian Cyprian Hierome and Augustine that where they speake of S. Peters chaire or planting the faith at Rome straightway this man argueth there upon that Peter was Bishop of Rome But that doth not clarkely follow For the office of the Apostles was to plant the faith in all places and in euery regiō yet were they not bishops in euery region And as for the chaire as it is no difference essentiall that maketh a bishop for so much as a Doctour may haue a chaire and yet be no bishop so cannot he conclude by the chaire of Peter that S. Peter was Bishop of Rome For all this proueth no farther but that Peter was at Rome and there taught the fayth of Christ as Paul did also and peraduenture in a chayre likewise yet we say not that Paule was therefore Bishop of Rome But that he was there as an Apostle of Christ whether he taught there standing on his feete or sittyng in a chayre In the Scripture commonly the Chaire signifieth doctrine or iudgement as sitting also declareth such as teach or iudge whether they sit in the chaire of Moyses or in the chaire of pestilence Planting likewise is a worde Apostolicall and signifieth not onely the office of a Bishop Wherefore it is no good consequent he sate he taught he planted at Rome his chaire and seate was at Rome Ergo he was Bishop of Rome And thus much touchyng Orosius Tertullian Cyprian Augustine As for Abdias Ado Optatus and such other although we should haue much wrong offered and neuer should make an ende if we should be prest with the authoritie of euery one that could or did mooue pen in all the whole first age of the church to be our iudges in euery ecclesiasticall matter and much more wrong should haue if the authors either corrupted or countersaited should be layd vnto vs speaking not in the same sense or in the same tongue or in the same time wherin they wrote yet to helpe and to faine the authorities of these authors so much as we may I answer to their allegations with this distinction of a bishop which is to be taken either generally or specially After the first a bishop is he to whom so euer the publike cure and charge of soules is committed without any limitation of place And so the name of Bishop is concident with the office of Apostle or any publique Pastour Doctour or Curator of the vniuersall flocke of Christ. And thus may Paule Peter or any other of the Apostles be called Bishops So also is Christ himselfe by expresse worde called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Bishop and Pastor 1. Peter 2. And thus may Peter wel be named a bishop of these foresaid authors after this maner of taking But this publike and generall charge vniuersally ouer the whole without limitation ceased after Christ and the Apostles For then were bishops by places and prouinces appointed to haue speciall ouersight of some perticular flock or prouince and so to be resident and attendant onely vpon the same The other diuersitie of this name bishop is to be taken after a more speciall sort which is when any person orderly called is assigned namely specially to some one certain place citie or prouince wherunto he is only bound to employ his office charge and no where els according to the old Canons of the Apostles and of the Councell of Nice And this Bishop differing from the other is called Episcopus intitulatus hauing his name of his citie or Dioces And thus we deny that Peter the Apostle was euer Bishop elected installed or intituled to the Citie of Rome neyther doth Optatus Abdias Ado or Hierome affirme the same And if Ado say that Peter was bishop of Rome 25. yeares vntill the last
cities which cause being outward carnall was neither then cause sufficient and now ceasing importeth not to vs the like effect according as they say Sublata causa tollitur effectus So that by the reason therof the foresaid principallitie of the church of Rome did not hold then iure diuino sed humano And as it holdeth by mans law so by mans law may be repealed againe Wherfore be it admitted that both the Pope sitteth and succedeth in the chaire of Peter and also that he is the Bishop of the greatest citie in the world yet it followeth not therby that he should haue rule and lordship ouer all other bishops and churches of the world For first touching the succession of Peter many things are to be considered First whether Peter sate and had his chaire in Rome or not Secondly whether he sate there as an Apostle or as a Bishop Thirdly whether the sitting in the outward seate of Peter maketh successour of Peter Fourthly whether he sitteth in the chaire seat of Peter which sitteth not in the doctrine of Peter Fiftly whether the succession of Peter maketh rather an Apostle then a Bishop so should we call the Pope the Apostle of Rome and not the bishop of Rome Sixtly whether Ecclesiasticall functions ought to be esteemed by ordinarie succession of place or by Gods secret calling or sending Seuenthly and lastly whether it stand by Scripture any succession at all to be pointed in Christes Church or why more from Peter then from other Apostles All which Interrogatories being wel discussed which would aske a long proces it should wel appeare what litle hold the Pope hath to take this state vpon him aboue all other Churches as he doth In the meane tyme this one argument by the way may suffice in stead of many for our aduersaries to answer to at their conuenient leisure Which argument thus I forme and frame in Camestres Ca All the true successors of Peter sit in the chaire of the doctrine of Peter and other Apostles vniformly me No Popes of this latter Church of Rome sitte in the chaire of Saint Peters and other Apostles doctrine vniformely stres Ergo no Popes of this latter church of Rome be the true successors of Peter And when they haue well perused the Minor of this argument and haue well conferred together the doctrine taught them of S. Peter with the doctrine taught now by the Popes of iustification of a Christen man of the office of the law of the strength and largenes of sinne of mens merites of free will of works of supererogation of setting vp images of vij Sacramentes of auricular confession of satisfaction of sacrifice of the Masse of communicating vnder one kinde of eleuating and adoring the Sacramentall elements of Latine seruice of inuocation of prohibitiō of meates and mariage of vowing chastitie of sectes rules of diuers religions of indulgences and pardōs also with their doctrine taught now of magistrates of the fulnes of power and regalitie of the sea of Rome with many other like to these c. then will I be glad to heare what they wil say to the premisses Secondly if they would proue by the allegation of the Doctours Irenaeus Ambrose Augustine Theodoritus aforesaid the Bishop of Rome to bee the chiefe of all Bishops therfore because the citie wherof he is bishop is the chiefe and principall aboue all other Churches that consequent is to be denied For it followeth not taking as I said the principallitie of that church to stand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is vpon the principal dominion of that citie no more then this consequent followeth London is the chiefe Citie in all England Ergo the bishop of London is the chiefest of all bishops in the Realme Which argument were derogatory to the bishop both of Canterbury and of Yorke Yea to graunt yet more to but aduersaries which is all they can require the minde of the foresaid Doctours Irenaeus Ambrose Augustine and Theodoritus in giuing principallitie vnto Rome to haue respect vnto the vertue of inscession from Peter and not vnto the greatnes of the Citie yet notwithstanding for all this their argument holdeth not if it be rightly considered to say The Apostolicall Sea of Rome hauing successiō from Peter with the bishops therof was chief then of all other churches in the primitiue tyme of these Doctours Ergo the Apostolicall sea of Rome with the Bishops therof hauing successiō from Peter ought now to be chiefe of all other churches in these our dayes This consequent might well follow if the tymes were like or if succession which gaue them the cause of principallitie were the same now which was then But now the time and succession is not correspondent for then succession in the time of these Doctours was as well in doctrine Apostolicall as in place Apostolicall Now the succession of doctrine Apostolicall hath not long ceased in the sea Apostolicall and nothing remaineth but onely place which is the lest matter of true spirituall and Apostolical succession And thus much to the authoritie and testimonie of these forenamed Doctors Besides these obiections heretofore recited out of Irenaeus Ambrose Augustine and Theodoritus our aduersaries yet obiect and heape vp against vs moreouer examples of the primitiue time of the church testimonies of generall Councels and opinions of auncient writers taken out of the booke of Councels Epistles decretall wherby their intent is to prooue the foresayd termes of the head of the church ruler of the church chiefe of all other Priestes to bee applied not onely to Peter but also to the Bishop of Rome within the compasse of the primitiue time And here commeth in the testimonie cited of Vincentius Lirinensis Of the Epistle of Paschasius and his fellowes writing to Leo from the Councel of Chalcedon The testimonie also of Iustinian the Emperour in his Codex where Ioannes then Pope was called caput omnium Ecclesiarum Epist. inter claras cap. De summa Trinit fide Cath. The testimonie also of Athanasius with his fellow bishops of Egypt of Thebaida and Libia in their Epistles to Pope Marcius Liberius Felix Likewise the testimonie of Hierome In praef in 4. Euang. Item Epist. 42. Tom. 1. Item Epist. 41. Tom. 2. Of S. Ambrose 1. Tim 3. Of S. Augustina to Boniface Ad Bonifac. contra duas Epist Pelagian Lib. 1. cap. 1. Item Lib. 2. De Baptism cap. 1. Of Theodoritus in his Epistle to Pope Leo. Epist Commentar in Pauli Epist. praefixa Of Chrysostome Epist ad Innocentium Tom. 5. c. By which testimonies our aduersaries would prooue S. Peter and after him the Bishop of Rome to be called and taken for head of the church chiefe bishop prince and ruler of the whole Clergy To all which obiections fully and exactly to aunswer in order would require a whole volume by it selfe In the meane time leauing the rest vnto them vnto whom it doth more
countrey to inhabite in the Citie This Fabian as is sayd thinking nothyng lesse then of any such matter sodenly cōmeth a Doue fleing from aboue and sitteth vpon his head Whereupon all the Congregation beyng moued wyth one minde and one uoyce dyd chose hym for their Bishop In the which function he remayned the space of xiij yeares as Eusebius writeth Damasus Marianus and Sabellicus say xiiij Yeares vnto the tyme of Decius Who whether for that Philippus had committed to him his treasures or whether for the hatred he bare to Philippus in the beginning of his raigne caused him to be put to death Sendyng out moreouer his Proclamation into al quarters that al which professed the name of Christ should be slayne To this Fabian be ascribed certaine ordinaunces as of consecrating new oyle once euery yeare and burnyng the olde of accusations against Byshops of appealing to the sea Apostolicke of not marying within the fift degree of communicating thrise a yeare of offering euery Sonday with such other things moe in his iij. Epistles decretall the which Epistles as by diuers other euidences may be supposed to be vntruely named vpon hym gyuing no signification of any matter agreing to that tyme so do I finde the most part of the iij. Epistle worde for word standing in the Epistle of Sixtus the 3. which folowed almost 200. yeares after him beside the vnseemely doctrine also in the ende of the sayd Epistles contayned where he contrary to the tenour of the Gospell applyeth remission of sinnes onely due to the bloud of Christ vnto the offerings of bread and wyne by men and women euery Sonday in the Church To this Fabianus wrote Origine De orthodoxia suae fidei that is of the rightnes of his fayth Whereby is to be vnderstode that he continued to the tyme of Decius some say also to the tyme of Gallus Of this Origene partly mention is touched before declaring how bolde and feruente he was in the dayes of Seuerus in assisting comforting exhorting and killing the Martyrs that were imprisoned suffered for the name of Christ with such daunger of his owne life that had not bene the singular protectiō of God he had bene stoned to death many tymes of the Heathen multitude Such great concourse of men and women was daily to his house to be catechised instructed in the christian fayth by him that souldiours were hyred of purpose to defend the place where he taught them Agayn such search sometymes was set for him that vnneth any shiftyng of place or countrey could couer him In those laborious trauailes and affayres of the Church in teaching writing confuting exhorting and expounding he continued about the space of 52. yeares vnto the tyme of Decius and Gallus Diuers and great persecutions he sustayned but specially vnder Decius as testifieth Eusebius in his sixt booke declaring that for the doctrine of Christ he sustained bands and torments in his body rackings with barres of iron dungeons besides terrible threates of death and burning All this he suffred in the persecution of Decius as Eusebius recordeth of him and maketh no relatiō of any further matter But Suidas and Nicephorus following the same sayth further concerning him that the sayd Origene after diuers and sundry other torments which he manfully and constantly suffred for Christ at length was brought to an altar where a foule filthy Ethiope was appointed to be and there this option or choyse was offred vnto him whether he would sacrifice to the idole or to haue his body polluted with that foule and ouglie Ethiope Then Origene sayth he who with a Philosophicall mynd euer kept his chastitie vndefiled much abhorring y◠filthy villany to be done to his body condescended to their request Wherupon the iudge puttyng incense in his hand caused him to set it to the fire vpō the altar For the which impietie he afterward was excommunicated of the Church Epiphanius writeth that he beyng vrged to sacrifice to Idols and takyng the boughes in his hand wherwith the Heathen were woont to honour their Gods called vpon the Christians to cary them in the honour of Christ. The which fact the church of Alexandria misliking remooued him from their communion Wherupon Origene driuen away with shame and sorow out of Alexandria went into Iewry where beyng in Hierusalem among the congregation and there requested of the Priestes and Ministers he being also a Priest to make some exhortation in the church refused a great while so to do At length by importunate petition being cōstrained therunto rose vp and turning the booke as though he would haue expounded some place of the Scripture only read the verse of the 49. Psalme but God sayd to the sinner why doest thou preach my iustifications why doest thou take my testament in thy mouth c. Which verie beyng read he shut the booke and sate downe weepyng and wayling the whole congregation also weeping lamentyng with him Suid. Niceph. More what became of Origene it is not found in history but onely that Suidas addeth he dyed and was buried at Tyrus Eusebius affirmeth that he departed vnder the Emperour Gallus about the yeare of our Lord 255. and the 70. yeare of his age in great miserie as appeareth and pouertie In this Origene diuers blemishes of doctrine be noted wherupon Hierome some tymes doth inueigh against him Albeit in some places agayne he doth extoll and commend him for his excellent learning as in his Apologie agaynst Ruff. and in his Epistle to Pammachus and Ocean where he prayseth Origene although not for the perfection of his faith and doctrine nor for an apostle yet for an excellent interpreter for his wit and for a Philosopher And yet in his Prologue vpō the Homelies of Origene vpon Ezechiel he calleth him an other maister of the churches after the Apostles And in an other Preface vpon his questions vpon Genesis he wisheth to himself the knowledge of the scriptures which Origene had also with the enuy of his name Athanasius moreouer calleth him singular and laborious and vseth also his testimonies against the Arrians Socrates Lib. 6. cap. 13. After Origene the congrue order of history requireth next to speak of Heraclas his Usher a man singularly commēded for his knowledge not only in Philosophy but also in all such faculties as for a christiā diuine doth appertain This great towardnes of wit and learning when Origene perceiued in him he appointed him aboue all other to bee his Usher or vnderteacher to helpe in his schoole or Uniuersitie of Alexandria in the raigne of Antoninus Caracalla sonne of Seuerus And after in the x. yeare of Alexander Origene departing vnto Cesarea he succeeded in his roome to gouerne the schoole in Alexandria Further also in the time of Gordianus after the decease of Demetrius bishop of Alexandria this Heraclas succeeded to be Bishop of the said Citie Eusebius Lib. 6. cap. 29.
thinkest to possesse the gift of God by thy money therefore thy part nor lot is not in this worde Neither ought we to bee shauen on the crowne onely because Saint Peter was so shauen but because Peter was so shauen in the remebraunce of the Lords Passion therfore we that desire by the same Passion to be saued must weare the signe of the same passion with him vpon the top of our head which is the highest part of our body For as euery Church that is made a Church by the death of the Sauiour doth vse to beare the signe of the holy crosse in the front that it maye the better by the defence of that banner bee kept from the inuasions of euill spirits by the often admonition therof is taught to crucifie the flesh with the concupiscence of the same In like maner it behoueth such as haue the vowes of Monkes and degres of the Clergy to bind them selues with a straiter bit of continencie for the Lords sake And as the Lord bare a crowne of thorne on his head in his passion wherby he tooke caried away from vs the thornes and prickes of our sinnes so must euery one of vs by shauing our heads patiently beare and willinglye suffer the mockes and scorners of the worlde for his sake That wee may receaue the crowne of eternall life which God hath promised to all that loue him shall by shauing their corporal crownes beare the aduersity contemne the prosperity of this worlde But the shauing which Symon Magus vsed what faithful man doth not detest together with his magicall arte The which at the first apparance hath a shew of a shauen crowne but if you marke his necke you shal finde it curtailed in such wise as you will say it is rather meete to be vsed of the Symonistes then of the Christians And such of foolishe men be thought worthye of the glory of the eternall crowne whereas indede for their yll liuing they are worthy not only to be depriued of the same but also of eternall saluation I speak not this against thē that vse this kinde of shauing liue Catholikely in fayth and good workes but surely I beleeue there be diuers of them be very holy and godly men Amongst the which is Adamnan the Abbot and worthy Priest of the Columbians who when he came Embassadour from his country vnto king Alfride desired greatly to see our Monastery where be declared a wonderful wisedowe humilitie and Religiō both in his maners and wordes Amongest other talke I asked him why he that did beleue to come to the crown of life that should neuer haue end did vse contrary to his belief a definite Image of a crowne on his head And if you seke quoth I the felowship of S. Peter why doe you vse the fashion of his crowne whom S. Peter did accurse and not of his rather with whom you desire to liue eternally Adānā answered saying you know right well brother though I vse Symons maner of shauing after the custome of my country yet doe I detest with all my heart abhorre hys infidelitie I desire notwithstanding to imitate the footesteps of the holy Apostle as far forth as my power wil extend Then said I I beleeue it is so But then is it apparaunt you imitate those thinges which the Apostle Peter did frō the bottom of your hart if you vse the same vpon your face that you know he did For I suppose your wisedome vnderstandeth that it is right decent to differ in the triming your face or shauing frō his whom in your hart you abhorre And cōtrariwise as you desire to imitate the doings of him whom you desire to haue a mediator betweene God you so it is meete you imitate the maner of his apparell and shauing Thus much saide I to Adamnan who seemed then well to like our Churches in so much that he returning into Scotland reformed many of his churches there after our celebratiō albeit he could not do so amongst the Monks with whom he had special authority He endeuoured also to haue reformed their maner of shauing if he had bene able And nowe O King I exhort your maiestie to labor together with your people ouer whom the King of Kinges and Lorde of Lordes hath made you gouernor to imitate likewise in all these points the Catholicke and Apostolical churches So shall it come to passe that in the end of this your temporall kingdome the most blessed prince of the Apostles shall opē you the gates of the heauenly kingdome together with the other elect of god The grace of the eternal king preserue you most derely beloued sonne in Christ long time to reigne ouer vs to the great tranquility of vs all When this letter was read before king Nayton wyth other of his learned men and diligentlye translated into his proper language he semed to reioyce very much at the exhortation therof insomuch as rising vp from among his noble men he kneled on the ground and gaue God thankes that he had deserued to receaue so worthye a presente out of England so caused it forthwith by publike proclamation to be writen out learned obserued throught out all the prouinces of the Pictes defacing the errours that had bene vsed there by the space of 700. and 4. yeares For all the ministers of the altar all Monkes were shauen on the crowne And al the people reioiced for the new dyscipline of the most blessed Prince of the Apostles S. Peter which they had receaued ¶ By this monkish letter aboue prefixed voide of all Scripture of all probation truth of history thou maiest note gentle Reader howe this vaine tradition of shauen crownes hath come vp vpon how light and trifling occasion which in very deede was none other but the dreaming phantasies of Monkes of that time falsely grounding vpon the example of Peter when by no olde monument of any aūtient record they can euer proue either Peter or Symon Magus to haue bene shauen Moreouer in the said leter also is to be noted how the Scottish Clergy at that season did weare no such Priestly crownes as our English Churchmen then did But to cut of this matter of shauing more worthy to be laught at thē to be storied let vs now againe returne where as we left at king Iue of whom W. Malmesbery and Fabian in his chronicle do record that whē the foresaide Iue had ruled the west saxons by the tearme of 37. yeares by the importunate perswasion and subtile policie of his wife Ethelburga was allured to go to Rome there to be made a Monke Which Ethelburga after she had a long tyme laboured him to leaue the world and could not bring about her purpose vpon a season when the king and she had rested them in a faire pallace richly behanged were vpon the morow thence departed she by her commaundement caused the pallace to
much more despissing this vniust decreement through the onerous and importable transgression of their Pastor should shew themselues disobedient With heauines I was troubled and with compassion for that I doubted how the members of the body should doe their head being so greatly out of frame For what can be more greuous or more to be lameÌ„ted touching the state of the church then for you being the Bishop of the principall seat to whom appertaineth the regiment of the whole church to swarue neuer so little out of the right way Certes in this you haue not a little erred in that you haue gone about to constraine your Clergy to singlenes of life through your imperious tiranny whom rather ye ought to stirre vp to the continency of mariage For is not this to be counted a violence and tiranny to the iudgement of all wise men when a man is compelled by your decrees to doe that which is against the institution of the Gospell and the proceeding of the holy Ghost Seyng then there be so many holy examples both of the olde and new Testament teachyng vs as you know due information I desire your patience not to thinke it greuous for me to bryng a few here out of many First in the olde law the Lord permitteth mariage vnto the Priestes which afterward in the new law we doe not read to bee restrayned but in the Gospel thus he sayth There bee some Eunuches which haue gelded themselues for the kingdome of heauen but all men do not take this word he that can take it let him take it Wherfore the Apostle sayth concerning virgins I haue no commaundement of the Lord but onely I geue counsell Which counsaile also all men do not take as in the commaundement of the Lord before but many there be false dissemblers and flatterers goyng about to please men and not God whome we see vnder a false pretence of continencie to fall into horrible wickednesse Some to lye with their fathers wiues some to bee Sodomites and not to abhorre to play the beastes with bruite beastes And therfore least through the infection of this wicked pestileÌ„ce the state of the Church should too much go to ruine therfore he sayd because of fornication let euery man haue his owne wyfe Touching which saying our false hypocrites falsly do lye faine as though onely it pertayned to the laitie and not to them And yet they themselues seming to be set in the most holy order are not afrayd to abuse other mens wiues and as we see with weeping eyes all they do outrage in the foresayd wickednes These men haue not rightly vnderstanded the Scripture whose brestes while they sucke so hard in stead of milke they suck out bloud For the saying of the Apostle let euery man haue his own wife doth except none in very deede but him onely which hath the gifte of continency prefixing with himselfe to keepe and to continue hys virgine in the Lord. Wherfore O reuerend father it shal be your part to cause ouersee that whosoeuer either with hand or mouth hath made a vowe of continencie and afterward would forsake either should be compelled to keepe his vowe or els by lawfull authoritie should be deposed from his order And to bring this to passe ye shall not onely haue me but also all other of my order to be helpers vnto you But that you may vnderstand that such which know not what a vowe doth meane are not to be violently compelled thereunto heare what the Apostle sayth vnto Timothie A Bishop sayth he must be irreprehensible the husband of one wife Which sentence least ye should turne and apply onely to the Church marke what he inferreth after he that knoweth not sayth he to rule his owne householde and familie how should he rule the Church of God And likewise the Deacons sayth he let them be the husbandes of one wyfe which haue knowledge to gouerne their owne house and children And this wyfe how she is woont to bee blest of the Priest you vnderstand sufficiently I suppose by the decrees of holy Siluester the Pope To these and such other holy sentences of the Scripture agreeth also he that is the writer of the rule of the Clergy writing after this maner A Clarke must be chaste and continent or els let him be coupled in the bandes of Matrimony hauing one wyfe Wherby it is to be gathered that the Bishop and Deacon are noted infamous and reprehensible if they be deuided in mo women then one otherwise if they do forsake one vnder the pretence of Religion both they together as well the Bishop as the Deacon bee here condemned by the Canonicall sentence which sayth Let no Bishop or Priest forsake his owne wife vnder the colour and pretence of Religion If he doe forsake her let hym bee excommunicate And if he so continue let hym bee disgraded Saint Augustine also a man of discrete holynesse sayth in these wordes There is no offence so great or grieuous but it is to auoyd a greater euill Furthermore we read in the second booke of the Tripartite history That when the Councell of Nice goyng about to establish the same decree would enact that Bishops Priests and Deacons after their consecration either should abstaine vtterly from their own wiues or els should be deposed Then Paphnutius one of those holy Martyrs whom the Emperor Maximus had put out the right eie hockt their left legs rising vp amongst the withstood their purposed decreement confessing Mariage to be honourable and calling the bed of matrimony to be chastitie and so perswaded the Councell from making that law declaring thereby what occasion might come to themselues their wiues of fornication And thus much did Paphnutius being vnmaried himself declare vnto theÌ„ And the whole Councell commending his sentence gaue place thereto left the matter freely without coÌ„pulsion to the will of euery man to do therein as he thought Notwithstanding there be some which take S. Gregory for their defence in this matter whose temeritie I laugh at ignorance I lament for they know not being ignorauntly deceiued how daungerously the decree of this heresie was being made of S. Gregory who afterward well reuoked the same with condign fruit of repentaunce For vpon a certaine day as he sent vnto his fishpond to haue fish and did see more then sixe thousand infants heades brought vnto him which were taken out of the same pond or mote did greatly repent in himselfe the decree made before touchyng the single lyfe of Priests which he confessed to be the cause of that so lamentable a murther And so purging the same with condigne fruite of repentaunce altered agayne the things which he had decreed before commending that counsaile of the Apostle which sayth It is better to marry then to â—urne Adding moreouer of himself thereunto and saying It is better to marry then to giue occasion of death Peraduenture if these men
their iustice vpon him Certes it had bene the safest way for the king as it proued after who had iust matter inough if he had prosecuted his cause agaynst him And also thereby hys death had bene without all suspicion of martirdome neyther had their followed this shrining and fainting of him as there did Albeit the secret prouidence of God whiche gouerneth all thinges did see this way percase to be best and most necessary for those dayes And doubtles to say here what I thinke and yet to speak nothing agayne charitie if the Emperours had done the like to the Popes contending agaynst them what tyme they had cooke them prisoners that is if they had vsed the lawe of the sword against them and chopped off the heads of one or two according to their trayterous rebellion they had broken the necke of much disturbaunce whiche long tyme after did trouble the Churche But for lacke of that because Emperours hauing the sword and the trueth on their side woulde not vse their sworde but standing in awe of the Popes vayne curse and reuerencing his seat for Saint Peters sake durst not lay hand vppon hym though he were neuer so abhominable and trayterous a maletactour The Popes perceauing that tooke so much vpon them not as the scripture would geue but as much as the superstitious feare of Emperors and kings woulde suffer them to take which was so much that it past all order rule and measure And all because the superior powers eyther would not or durst not practise the authoritie geuen to them of the Lord vpon those inferiours but suffered them to be their maisters But as touching Thomas Becket what soeuer is to be thought of them that did the acte the example therof yet bringeth this profite with it to teach all Romish Prelates not to be so stubborne in such matters not peâ—tayning to them against their Prince vnto whom God hath subiected them Now to the story which if it be true that is set forth in Quadrilogo by those source who tooke vpon theÌ„ to expresse the life and processe of Thomas Becket it appeareth by al coniectures that he was a man of a stout nature seuere inflexible What perswasion or opinion he had once coÌ„ceaued from that he would in no wise be remoued or very hardly Threatnings flatterings were to him both one In this poynt singuler following no mans counsayle so much as hys own Great helpes of nature were in him if he could haue vsed them well rather then of learning Albe it somewhat skilful he was of the ciuile law which he studied at Bonomie In memory excellent good and also wel broken in courtly and worldly matters Besides this he was of a chaste and straite lyfe if the historyes be true Although in the first part of hys life being yet Archdeacon of Canterbury and after Lord Chauncellor he was very euill courtlike pleasaunt geuen much both to hunting hauking according to the guise of the court And highly fauored he was of his prince who not only had thus promoted him but also had committed hys sonne heyre to hys institution and gouernaunce But in this his first beginning he was not so wel beloued but afterwarde hee was again as much hated deseruedly both of the king and also of the most part of his subiects saue onely of certayne Monkeâ—â— and priestes and suche other as were perswaded by theÌ„ who magnified him not a little for vpholding the liberties of the church that is the licentious life and excesse of Churchmen Amongest all other these vices he had most notable to be rebuked Full of deuotion but wythout all true Religion Zelous but cleane without knowledge And therfore as he was stiffe and stubborn of nature so a blinde conscience being ioyned wtall it turned to playne rebellion So superstitious he was to the obedience of the pope that he forgot his obedience to hys naturall and most beneficiall king And in mayntayning so coÌ„tentiously the vayne constitutions and decrees of men be neglected the commandementes of God But herein most of all to be reprehended that not onely contrary the kings knowledge he sought to conuey himselfe out of the realme being in that place and calling but also being out of the realme set matter of discord betweene the Pope hys K. and also betwene the French king and him contrary to al honesty good order naturall subiection and true christianitie Wherupon folowed no little disquietnesse after both to the king and damage of the realme as here in processe and in order following by the grace of Christ we will declare First beginning with the first rising vp of hym so consequently to prosocute in order hys storye as followeth And first here to omitte the progenie of him and of his mother named Rose whom Polyd. Virgilius fasly nameth to be a Saracen when in deede she came out of the partes bordering neer to Normandy To omit also the fabulous vision of his mother mentioned in Rob. Crikeladensis of a burning torche issuing out of her body and reaching vp to heauen his first preferment was to the Church of Branfield which he had by the gift of S. Albous After that he cutred in the seruice of the Archb. of Cant. by whoÌ„ he was then preferred to be his Archdeacon And after by the sayd Theobald was put as a maÌ„ most metest for his purpose to K. Hen. to bridle the young K. the he should not be fierce agaynst the clergy whom in processe of time the K. made lord Chauncellor and then he left playing the archdeacon and began to play the Chauncellor He facioned his conditions like to the kinges both in waighty matters trifles He would hunt with him and watch the tyme when the Kyng dyned and and slept Furthermore hee began to loue the mery gessinges of the court to delight himselfe in the great land of meÌ„ prayse of the people And the I may passe ouer hys houshold stuffe he had his bridle of siluer the bosses of his bridle were worth a great treasure At his table and other expences he passed any earle That on the one side men would iudge him little to consider the office of an Archdeacon and on the other side would iudge hym to vse wicked doyngs He played also the good souldiour vnder the K. in Gascon and both wan and kept townes When the K. sent Thomas being Chancellor home into EnglaÌ„d ambassador with other nobles after the death of the Archb. he willed Rich. Luci one of the chiefest to commend in his name this Thomas to the couent of CaÌ„terbury that they might chose him archbish Which thing he did diligeÌ„tly The monks sayd it was not meet to chuse a courtier and a souldior to be head of so holy a company for he would spend sayd they all that they had Other had this surmise also because he was in so great fauour with the prince the kinges sonne
No say they thou shalt not anoyd though thou wouldest and so the departing with many wordes the arch followeth them out of the chamber dore crying after them here here here shall you finde me laying his hand vpon hys crowne The name of these foure souldiours aboue mentioned were these 1. Reignald BeresoÌ„ 2. Hugh Morteuil 3. William Thracy and 4. Richard Brito who going to harnesse themselues returned the same day agayne But finding the hall dore of the palace of Canterbury shut against them they went to an inward backe dore leading into the Orcharde there brake they vp a window and opened the dore and so issued into the place The Monkes beyng about Euensong tyme had got the Archbishop into the Church who beying perswaded by them caused hys crosse to be borne before hym and so through the Cloyster by a doore which was broke vp for him proceeded into the quire The harnest men following after at length came to the Church doore whiche doore the monkes woulde haue shut agaynst them but as the story sayth the Archbishop would not suffer them So they approching into the Church and the Bishop meeting them vpon the stayres there was slayne euery one of the foure souldiors striking him with his sword into the head Who afterward flying into the North at length with much adoe obtayning their pardon of the Pope through the kinges procurement as some storyes recorde went to Ierusalem Thus you haue heard the life and death of this Tho. Becket of whom what is to be iudged let his owne actes and facts declare And albeit the scripture ought to be onely the rule to vs to iudge all thinges by yet if any shall require farther testimony partly to satisfy their minds therin ye shal heare the iudgementes of certayn men in yeres and tymes almost as auncient as himself what they writ and affirme of him And first to begin with the testimony of one of his owne religion and also not farre as it appeareth froÌ„ hys owne tyme who writing of his martyrdome myracles thus testifieth of the iudgement and sentence of diuers coÌ„cerning his promotion and behauiour The Chronicle being written in lattin hauing the name of the author cut out thus beginneth Quoniam verò multi c. And in the first booke cap. 8. it follo with in this maner Nonnullis tamen id circa promotionem eius visum est minus canonicuÌ„ quòd ad eam magis operata est regis instantia quà m cleri vel populi vota Praesumptionis quoque vel indiscretionis fuisse notatum est quòd qui remuÌ„ tenere vix idoneus videbatur primum gubernaculi locum suscepit c. mox magis etiam secularia tuÌ„ sapiens tam sanctum tantae dignitatis fastigium non horrens renuiise sed vltroneus ascendisse creditus Aliter dei amicus Moses c. With much more as in latine insueth whiche for the Englishe Reader here foloweth translated Diuers notwithstaÌ„ding there be which as touching his promotion suppose the same not to be canonicall For that it was wrought rather by the instance of the king thinking him to be a man ready and inclinable to his vtilitie then by the assent eyther of the clergy or of the people Farther it is noted in him for a poynt of presumption and lack of discretion for that he beyng scarce worthy to take the Ore in hand and play the boteswane would take vpoÌ„ him to sit at the healm and guide the ship namely in that church where the Couent being in gesture and vesture religious be wont to haue their prelate taken out of the same profession Where as he scant bearing the babite of a Clarke and goyng in hys chaunges and soft apparell is more conuersaunt among the delicate rufflers in the court sauoring rather of wordly thinges not refusing moreouer without any dread to clime vp to the high preferment of suche an holy dignitie but rather willingly of hys owne accord to aspire vnto it Moles we read did otherwise who beyng the frend of God and sent of him to coÌ„duct his people Israell out of Egipt trembled at the message and sayd Who am I Lord that I shoulde goe to Pharao and bring thy people Israell out of Egipt And agayne I pray thee sayth hee O Lorde I am nothing eloquent send him whome thou wilt send Likewise Ieremias also being sent to the Lord to prophecy agaynst Ierusalem was abashed to take the office vpon hym answering agayn with much dread of hart A a a. Lorde I cannot vtter my minde for I am a Childe After like maner we reade of the saintes of the newe testament wherof many were preferred ofteÌ„times to their bishopriks and functions of the Churche by meere â—orcement and compulsion rather of other then by their owne willes So was blessed Gregory after hys flight and goyng away brought backe agayne and placed in the sea chayre of Rome Likewise S. Ambrose fore agaynst hys mynde who also of purpose accusing and contessing hys owne defectes because he would be repealed yet by the coÌ„maundement of Valentinian the Emperour was inforced to take the burden vpoÌ„ him which he could by no wise shake of S. Martine in like sorte vnknowing of any such matter was circumuented by a certayne godly trayne and wile of the Citizens before he could be brought to hys coÌ„secration which he did not so much take as he was thrust into it with much pensiuenes and sorrow of hart By these and such other exaÌ„ples this Chancellour likewise shoulde haue rather excused himselfe as vnworthy and vumeet for that romthe shewing himselfe more willing to refuse then to take it To the which this archbishop is iudged to doe cleane contrary c. Haec ex Chronico Cui tutulus De passione miraculis beati Thomae And although scarcely any testimony is to be taken of that age being all blinded and corrupted with superstittioÌ„ yet let vs heare what Neuburgensis an auncient Historiographer sayth who in the dayes of the sonne of thys K. Henry the ij prosecuting his history vnto King Richard the first hath these wordes writing of Thomas Becket Sanè cum plerique soleant in his quos amant laudant affecâ—u quodam propensiori sed prudentia parciori quicquid ab eis geritur approbare planè ego in viro illo venerabili ea quae ita ab ipso acta sunt quum nulla exindè proueniret vtilitas sed feruor tantùm accenderetur regius ex quo tot mala postmodum pullulasse noscuntur laudanda nequaquam césuerim licet ex laudabilizelo processerint Sicut in beatiff apostolorum principe quòd gentes suo exemplo iudaizare coegit in quo eum doctor gentium reprehensibilem declaret fuisse licèt cum constet Laudabili hoc pietate fecisse c. That is in English Whereas many be wont in them whome they loue or prayse iudging them more by
Siria c. Secondly how in processe of time through occasion of the Bishop of Romes tyranny and violent oppressiō this ring of equality being broken all flew in pieces the East church from the west the Greekes from the Latines and that which was one before now was made two vnitye turned to division vniuersality to singularity and free cōsent to dissention Thirdly here is also to be noted after this pitiful breach of equality how many what great natiōs departed frō the communion of the Church of Rome and especialy about this time aboue specified of pope Gregory 9. an 1230 so that both before and after that time many coūcels were holden and many thinges concluded in the westchurche whereunto the one halfe of Christendome lying in the east partes did neuer agree and contrary many councelles holden with them which in the Latine church were not receiued So that the church now as she lost the benefit of vniuersail consent so also she lost the name Catholicke Whereupon this question is to be asked that when the coū cell of Lateran vnder Pope Innocent 3. ordeined the doctrine of transubstantiation and auricular confession here in the westchurch without y◠free consent of the eastchurch whether the same doctrine is to be counted Catholicke or not Fourthly in the departing of these churches from the Bishop of Rome here also is to be noted that the same churches of the Greeks notwithstanding they sequestred themselues and fel out with the church of Rome and that iustly yet they kept theyr vnity still with theyr God and reteined stil the true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is the true and sincere doctrine of fayth ready to debate and try the trueth of their religion by the scriptures as they here in theyr own writings desire to haue the truth examined according as ye haue heard Wherefore the church of Rome hath done them open wrong which being offred so gently to try and to be tryed by the trueth of Gods word not onely would stand to no triall nor abide conference but also hath excōmunicated them as heretickes whiche appeare here to be more orthodorasticall christians then they themselues Fiftly these things thus standing then haue we to cōclude that the church of Rome falsely pretendeth it selfe to be catholicke For if the name of Catholicke must needes import an vniuersall consēt of the whole how can that be catholick where the consent of so many famous and true christian churches hath bene lacking furthermore wher the consent that hath bene amongest themselues hath rather bene coacted then any true or free consent Which is easy to be proued For let these fires and fagottes cease let kinges and princes leaue to presse theyr subiects with the popes obedience but let the scripture and the bishops alone euery one his own Dioces to gouerne their stock after the rule of Gods word and how few be there in this west end of y◠world from you that would not doe the same that these Grecias Ethiopians and Syrians haue done before vs And thus much by the occasion of this Patriarches letters sēt to pope Gregory cōcerning the Grecians Whose doings when I consider as I can not but cōmend their wisdome iudge their state happy and blessed in shaking off from their neckes the miserable yoke of the popes tyranny so on the other side considering with my self the wretched thraldome of these our churches here in the west part of the world vnder the bishop of Rome I can not tell whether more to maruell or to lament their pitiful state who were brought into such oppression slauery vnder him that neither they could abide him nor yet durst cast him of So vntollerable were his exactions so terrible was his tyranny his suspensions excommunications much like to a mad mans dagger drawen at euery trifle that no christen patience could suffer it nor natiō abide it Again so deep did he sit in their consciences falsly beleuing him to haue the authority of S. Peter that for cōscience sake neither king nor Caesar durst withstand him much less poore subiects once mute agaynst him And although his takings and spoylings namely in this realm of england were such that neither the laity nor spiritualty could beare them yet was there no remedy beare thē they must or els the Popes sentence was vpon them to curse them as blacke as pitch In reading the historyes of these crimes any good hart would lamēt and rue to see the miserable captiuity of the people what they suffered vnder this thraldome of the Bishop of rome whereof part hath bene shewed before more God willing shall follow hereafter and some part here presently I mind to expresse * A briefe table or declaration of the Popes unreasonable gatherings exactions and oppressions in the Realme of England ANd first to begin with the elections of the Byshops Abbots Deanes and Priors within this realme it can not be told what mas of mony grew to the popes coffers thereby especially in this kinges dayes for so much as in his time lightly no election hapned either of Archbishopp Bishop Abbot or any roome of dignity but when the Couent or Chapter had chosen one to their minde the king who had maried a stranger and sought therefore to prefer strangers would set vp an other By reason whereof whē the other part was sayne to appeale to Rome and there to plead the case no small riuers of english mony besides expences and trauel by the way went flowing to the popes sea And though the election went neuer so cleare yet the new elect must needes respect the holy father with some gentle reward and further by his othe was bound euery 3. yeares either in his owne person or by another to visit Limina Apostolorum So in the house of S. Albones when Iohn Herford was elected Abbot their publick electiō was not enough but for the confirmation of the same the Monkes were fayne to send Reynold the Phisitiō Nicholas a Monk to Rome with a sufficient vag of mony through the mediation whereof the election might stand and the new Abbot sworne euery third yere by himself or another to visit the doresels of the Apostles An other such like contention happened betweene the king and monkes of Winchester about the election of W. Rale whom the Monkes had chosen but the king refused willing to place a stranger and therfore sent to Rome his messengers Theobald a Monke of Westminster and M. Alexāder a Lawyer with no small somme of mony to euacuate the election of the foresayd W. Rale Commaunding moreouer that y◠gates of Winchester should be shut against him and no man so hardy there to receiue him in his house whereupon the sayd w. being excluded after he had sayd his curse vpon the whole citty of Winchester made his repayre to Rome wherefore 8000. Markes being promised to the pope his bishoprick spite of the
suffered this patiently Glossa The euils which these false Prophetes ioyned together by seculare power doe bryng in Are not the doinges of true Apostles but false Prophets The 34. signe is that true Apostles go not to preach to those which are coÌ„uerted already by other men but rather doe conuert those which are not yet conuerted least that they should build vpon an other mans foundation as S. Paule Rom. 15 sayth I haue laboured so that from Ierusalem to Iliricus I haue replenished the Gospell in euery place Glose That is I haue preached the same abouÌ„dantly in whom the great vertue of the holy ghost appeareth because so many nations that is the Gentiles haue receiued the Gospell by my preaching But I haue preached the Gospell there where Christ was not preached before least I should build vpon an other mans foundatioÌ„ Glose I should not preach to those that were conuerted by an other man Also 2. Corinth 10. we are not such as boast and glory in other mens labours Glose where an other man layd the foundation for that should be to boast inordinately Also in the same place not thinking to boast wher an other man hath gouernmeÌ„t but in those things which are put in experience Glose Of other preachers Because the Apostle did preach vnto those to whoÌ„ the Gospell was neuer preached that he might get prayse by his owne proper labour Therefore those Preachers which goe not to that people which haue neede to be conuerted but to those which are conuerted already which haue apostles of their own that is to say Bishops and Priests and yet do boast ouer an other mans flocke are not true Apostles but false Prophets The 35. signe is because true Apostles when they are sent go to their own dioces not to an other maÌ„s dioces euen as Paule being sent went to the Gentiles when he purposed to preach Actes 13. Seperate Paule and Barnabas for the businesse whiche I haue chosen them vnto Glose According to the appoyntmeÌ„t and decree of Iames Cephas and Iohn went he forth to be a teacher vnto the Gentiles But those preachers that stand vpon theyr feet That is to saye those Preachers whiche haue but small worldly substaunce for which cause they are more readier to goe which way so euer it shall please the Lord to send them I say the Lord hath sent them to preache not to those which be sufficiently learned but to those that are infidels as we read in Ezech. 2. After that the spirit of the Lord set Ezechiel vpon his feet in qua spem situs vnus tangitur and he sayd vnto him O sonne of man beholde I send thee to the nations which haue â—art â—acke from their profession which haue gone from me that is to the Iewish heretickes and to those nations which sometime haue bene Christians as the Egyptians the Babilonians and all those that obserue the law of Mahomet Therefore if such go to those that are already instructed hauing both Apostles bishops and priests of their owne they goe not into their own dioces but into an other mans dioces and are not true Apostles but false preachers And it is greatly to be feared least the Church be in hazard and daunger by such vnlesse they be thrust oâ—t of the same betime EueÌ„ as Ionas which wheÌ„ he was sent to â—iâ—iuy of the Lord which is interpreted large or wide and leadeth to the hill that is to the Infidels we speake of before They go not to those Infidelles according to the commaundement of the Lord but they turne an other way take their iourny into â—harsis which is interpreted â—oâ—king after ioy and pleasure That is they goe vnto thosâ— which receiue theÌ„ with ioy and gladnes do well prouide for them that is to say to godly and deuout Christians And therefore it is to be feared least the ship in which they be that is the Church be in great perill vnlesse they be thrown forth And therefore the Apostle spake of such false Prophets not without good cause 2. Timo. 2. And shonne thou those Glose That is such men as those be The 36. signe is because true Apostles doe not boast neither do they attribute vnto theÌ„selues any other thing but in that God hath wrought the same by them Paule Romaines 15. sayth I dare not say any thing but that which Christ hath wrought and accomplished by me Glo. That is I speake onely those thinges which by me that is by my ministery Christ hath wrought They therefore that boast of many things do attribute much vnto theÌ„selues which they neuer did are not true Apostles but false Prophets The 37. signe is that true Apostles do not apply them selues or leane to Logicall or Philosophicall reasons Therfore those preachers which do indeuour themselues to such kinde of reasons are not true Apostles but false Prophets The 38. signe is that true Apostles doe not loue carnally or after the flesh but hate what thing soeuer doth resist them in the seruice of God as Luke 14. He that doth not hate his father and mother his sonne and sister and also himselfe he cannot be my disciple Glose That is he that doth not hate whatsoeuer doth resist or let him in the seruice of God is not worthy to be a Disciple neither can he abide in that office Therefore for as much as true preachers are the true Disciples of the Lord it must needes follow that those Preachers which do promote their nephewes and kinsfolks how vnworthy soeuer they be to Ecclesiasticall promotions and liuinges contrary to the will of God or do any other thing that letteth or hindreth them in the seruice of God are not true Apostles but false Prophets The 39. signe is that true Apostles do not hunt for the frendship of this world for he that is the frend of this world is the enemy of God Therefore those preachers which purchase the frendship of this world are not true apostles but false prophetes Therefore for as much as the Scripture is infallible as in the 24. chapter of Mathew saying Heauen and earth shall perish but my words shal endure for euer And the holy ghost which spake in the Apostle cannot lie for prophecy for the most part is not spoken by the will of man but the holy men of God spake by the inspiration of the holy Ghost as it is red in the first epistle of Peter the 5. chapter It remayneth that all men which are bound to defend the Church may rise vp in the defence of the same according to that in the 24. chapter of the Prouerbs Deliuer those that are led to death and cease thou not to rescue those which are drawne to destruction Neither may he alleadge vayne accusations because it is sayd in the same place If he say he is not able or strong enough he that beholdeth the thoughtes of mens hartes shall know it c. what so euer
and daunger also by the sayd friers riseth to the Clergy for so much as lay men seeyng their childrē thus to be stollē frō thē in the vniuersities by the friers do refuse therfore to send thē to their studies Rather willing to keep them at home to their occupation or to folow the plough then so to be circumuēted and defeated of their sonnes at the vniuersity as by dayly experiēce sayth he doth manifestly appeare For where as in my time sayth Armachanus there were in the vniuersity of Oxford 30000. studentes now are there not to be founde 6000. The occasion of which so great decay is to be ascribed to no other cause but to this circumuention onely of the friers aboue mentioned Ouer and besides this an other incōuenience as great or greater the said Armachanus inferred to proceed by the friers through the decay of doctrine and knowledge in all maner faculties and liberall sciences which thus he declared For that these begging friers through their priuileges obteined of the Popes to preach to heare confessions and to bury and through theyr charters of improperatiōs did grow therby to such great riches and possessions by theyr begging crauing catching and intermedling with church matters that no booke could stirre of any science either of Diuinity law or Phisicke but they were both able and ready to buy it vp So that euery couent hauing a great library full stuffed and furnished with all sortes of bookes and being so many couents within the realme in euery couent so many friers increasing dayly more and more by reason therof it came to passe that very few books or none at all remayne for other students Which by his owne experiēce he thus testifieth saying that he himselfe sent forth to the vniuersity foure of his owne Priests or chaplaynes who sending him word agayne that they could neither finde the Bible nor any other good profitable booke of diuinitye meete for theyr studye therefore were minded to returne home to their country and one of them he was sure was returned by this time agayne Furthermore as he hath proued hetherto the Friers to be hurtful both to the laity and to the clergy so proceeding farther he proueth them to be hurtfull also to themselues And that in 3. poynts as incurring the vice of disobedience agaynst God against their owne rule The vice of auarice and the vice of pride The probatiō of all which poyntes he prosecuted in a long discourse First sayth he they are disobedient to the law of God Thou shalt not couet thy neighbors house Oxe nor Asse nor any thing that is his In that they procure the Popes letters to preach in Churches and to take burials from churches with licence annexed withal to receiue the auailes which rise of the same which properly belōgeth to the right of parish priestes Item they are disobedient to this rule of the Gospell So do to other as thou would haue done to thee Itē they be disobediēt agaynst theyr owne rule which being foūded vpon straight pouerty and beggery this licence obteined for thē to require necessary for theyr labors of the people is repugning agaynst the same foundation Item they be disobedient to the rule of the Scripture which sayth let no man take honor vnto him except he be called as Aarō Also saith S. Paul how shall they preach vnlesse they be sēt And how obserue they this rule of obedience who professing to keepe the perfection of the Gospell yet contrary to the Gospell procure to thēselues priuiledges to runne before they be sent Itē to theyr own rule they are disobediēt For where theyr chapter sayth that if any wil take vpō them this order will come to our brethren let our brethren first send them to the prouincials to be examined of the Catholicke fayth and Sacraments of the Church c. Cōtrary wherevnto the friers haue procured a priuiledge that not onely the prouincials but other inferiors also may take vnto them indifferently whom they can catch so farre without al examination that almost at this day there is no notable house of friers wherin is not either a whole or halfe a couent of lads boyes vnder 10. yere old being circūuented which neither can skill of the Creed nor Sacraments Agayne the rule of Frauncise sayth that his brethren Obseruaunts must obserue not to preach in the Dioces of any bishop without the consent of the Bishop And moreouer the sayd Frauncise in his testament sayth that if he had as much wisedome as Salomon and found poore secular priests in the parishes where the dwel yet he would not presume to preach without theyr will and also would feare loue honor them all other as his maisters so they be Haecille Against which rule how the friers do disobey how litle they reuerence Bishops or secular priests what priuileges exemptions immunities they procure agaynst them the world may see and iudge Itē when none may be admitted to preach or to heare confessions vnles they be entred into orders and seing by the commō law of the Church none must be admitted into holy orders except he haue sufficient title of liuing and clothing The friers therefore hauing no such title being wilfull beggers do disobey in both respects that is both in entring into such orders without conuenient title and in exercising the office of preaching without such lawfull orders Moreouer the foresayd Frauncise in his testament cōmaundeth thus I commaund sayth he firmely by vertue of obedience to all and singular my brethren wheresoeuer they be that none of them presume to obtayne in the court of Rome any letter or writing either by himselfe or by any other meanes neither for the Church nor for any other place nor vnder any coulour of preaching nor yet for the persecuting of their owne bodyes c. Against which testamen of Francise the Franciscanes in procuring theyr priuiledges from the Bishop of Rome haue incurred manifest disobediēce as all the world may see Neither will this obiectiō serue them because the Pope hath dispensed with Francise rule For if the testament of Francise as he sayth came from GOD and so should God haue three testaments how then can the Pope repeale his precept or dispense with his rule when by the rule of the law Par in parem non habet imperium Secondly concerning the vice of auarice manifestly it may be proued vpon them sayth Armachanus for els seing so many charges belong to the office of a secular parish priest as to minister the Sacrament at Easter to visit the sicke with extreme vnction to baptise childrē to wed with such other wherein standeth as great deuotion how then happeneth that these friers making no labor for these onely procure to thēselues priuiledges to preach in churches to heare confessions and to receiue licence to bury frō parish churches but because there is
the grape when it waxeth great and full is neare to the making of wine and the floure when it shooteth abroad it hasteth to the fruit So the saluation of the world in the swelling and growing of the virgins wombe began to draw nigh to mankinde For then appeared the grace and bengnity of our Sauior when his mother was foūd to haue in her wombe by the holy Ghost as is declared in that as followeth by the Angell saying for that which is borne of her is of the holy Ghost Touching the 2. part of that which is sayd vt veniat this may be applyed to the contemplation of the mistery of Christes comming in the flesh Wherof speaketh Aggeus the Prophet 2. He shal come who is desired and looked for of all nations c. Albeit the same also may be applied to the second Aduent spoken of the 3. of Esay The Lord shall come to iudgemēt c. In memoriall wherof the 4. sonday was dedicate in the olde time of the fathers And of this day of iudgement is writtē in the Prophet Sophon cap. 1. The day of the Lord is neare great mighty it is approching at hande wondrous shoort c. And albeit not in it selfe yet it may be expoūded in tribulatiōs that go before as preambles vnto the same as Greg. saith The last tribulation is preuēted with many sundry tribulations going before although the end of al be not yet Wherfore now cōming to the 3. part of my sermō or the am let vs see of those tribulations that go before the last comming of Christ if there be any such tribulation approching nigh at hand wherof this last part of my theame may be verified where is said vt reueletur that my righteousnes shal be reuealed to wit the righteousnes primitiue that righteousnesse may be brought and the Prophesy of Daniel fulfilled Dan. 9. Concerning which matter 4. thinges here come in order to be declared First concerning the reuealing of tribulation according to that part of my theame Vt reueletur c. Secondly concerning the nearenes of the tribulatiō cōming according to the part of my theame Quia iuxta est c. Thirdly of the false opinions of some vpon this part of my theame Vt veniat c. Fourthly what meanes and consultation we ought to take Vt iuxta est salus As for the first it is so notorious and so commō in the scriptures that the church should suffer and abide tribulation that I need not here to stand in alleadging any thing touching either the causes to be weid or the terme to be coniectured thereof As concerning the which causes I will geue 2. rules to be noted before for the better opening of that to follow The first rule is that by the 2. kingdomes of the nation of Hebrues which were in the olde time to wit by the kingdome of Israel whose head was Samaria is signified in the prophets the erronious sinagoge And by the second kingdome of Iuda of whose stock came Christ whose head metropolitane was Ierusalem is signified the true Church And this rule is not mine but is an authentike glose of S. Ierome and also is the rule of Origene in the last Homely vpon the olde testament and is approued by the church The second rule is that by the brodell house and fornication mentioned in the Prophets is signified simony and abused dispēsations and promotions of persons vnworthy for lukers sake or els for any other partiall fauour whiche by vnlawfull wayes by al lawes of the world to come to office and honor Merx dicitur namque a merendo that is for gaine or price is deriued of gaining For the which gayne or price that is solde which by nature ought not to be solde Therefore to geue any thing for respect of gayne or hier which ought to bee geuen freely for vertues sake is a kinde of spirituall corruption as a man would say an whorish thing wherof the prophet Esay complayneth speaking of Ierusalem and saying The Citty which once was faythfull and full of iudgement how is it now become an whorish city And in like maner Osee also the prophet chap. 9. Ierusalem thou hast fornicated and gone an whoring frō thy God Thou hast loued like an harlot to get gayne in euery barne of corne And in many other places of Scripture where fornication can not be otherwise expounded These two rules thus premised now let vs marke the Scriptures and according to the same iudge of the whole state of the Church both that is past and that is to come first intreating of the causes of tribulation to come secōdly of the vicinity of time of the sayd tribulation to come And first concerning the state of the Church of causes of tribulation Thus sayth the Lord in the prophet Ezechiel 16. cap. speaking to the Church vnder the name of Ierusalem In the day of thy byrth I came by thee and saw thee troden downe in thine owne bloud c. Here he speaketh of the time of the martyrdome of the Church Then it followeth After this thou wast clensed frō thy bloud that wast growne vp waxen great thē washed I thee with water I purged thy bloud from thee speaking of ceasing of persecution I annoynted thee with oyle I gaue thee chaunge of rayments I girded thee with white silke I decked thee with costly apparel I put ringes vpon thy fingers a chayn about thy neck Spangs vpon thy forehead and Earinges vpon thine eares Thus wast thou deckt with siluer gold a beautifull crowne set vpon thine head Meruelous goodly wast thou beautifull euen a very queen wast thou For thou wast excellēt in my beuty which I put vpon thee sayth the Lord God c. This prophecy or rather history speaketh of and declareth the prosperity of the church And now heare the corruptiō and transgression of the churche for so it followeth But thou hast put confidence in thine own beauty and playd the harlot when thou haddest gotten thee a name Thou hast committed whoredome with all that went by thee and hast fulfilled their desires Yea thou hast taken thy garments of diuers coulors and decked thine altars therwith whervpon thou mightest fulfill thy whoredome of such a fashion as neuer was done nor shall be Which whoredome can in no wise be expounded for carnall but spirituall whoredome And therfore see how liuely he hath paynted out the corruption and falling of the Church And therefore followeth now the correction and punishmēt of the Church It followeth Beholde I stretch out my hand ouer thee and will diminish thy store of foode and deliuer thee ouer into the willes of the Philistines and of such as hate thee And they shall breake downe thy stues and destroy thy brodell houses that is the place wherein thou didst exercise this wickednesse they shall strippe
consequently absolue any man confessing hys faulte being contrite and penitent for the same 16. It is lawfull for kinges in causes licenced by the lawe to take away the temporalties from the spiritualty sinning habitualiter that is which continue in the custome of sinne and will not amend 17. Whether they be temporall Lordes or any other men whatsoeuer they be which haue endowed any Churche with temporalties It is lawfull for them to take away the same temporalties as it were by way of medicine for to auoyd sinne notwithstanding any excommunication or other ecclesiasticall censure for so much as they are not geuen but vnder a condition 18. An ecclesiasticall minister and also the Byshop of Rome may lawfully be rebuked of his subiectes and for the profite of the Church be accused eyther of the Clergy or of the Laitie These letters with the articles inclosed being thus receiued from the pope the bishops tooke no litle hart thinking and fully determining with themselues and that in open profession before their prouinciall Councell that all maner respectes offeare or fauour set apart no person neither high nor low should let them neither woulde they be seduced by the intreaty of any mā nor by any threatnings or rewards but that in this cause they would execute most surely vpright iustice and equitie yea albeit presēt danger of life should follow therupon But these so fierce brags stout promise with the subtile practises of these Byshops which thought them so sure before the Lord against whō no determination of mans counsaile can prenayle by a small occasion did lightly confound ouerthrowe For the day of examination being come a certayn personage of the princes court yet of no great noble byrth named Lewes Clifford entring in among the Byshops commaunded them that they shold not proceed with any diffinitiue sentence against Iohn Wickliffe With which wordes all they were so amased and their combes so cut that as in the story is mentioned they became so mute and speachlesse as men hauing not one word in their month to answere And thus by the wonderous worke of God his prouidence escaped Iohn Wickliffe the second time out of the Byshops hands and was by them clearely dismissed vppon his declaration made of his articles as anone shall follow Moreouer here is not to be passed ouer how at the same tyme and in the sayd Chappell of the Archb. at Lamheth where the byshops were sitting vpon Iohn Wickliffe the story writing of the doing therof addeth these wordes saying Non dico ciues tantùm Londinenses sed viles ipsius ciuitatis se impudenter ingerere praesumpserunt in eandem capellam verba facere pro eodem istud negotium impedire confisi vt reor de ipsorum praemissa negligentia praelatorum c. That is I say not onely that the Citizens of London but also the vile abiectes of the Citty presumed to be so bold in that same Chappell at Lamheth where the Byshops were sitting vppon Iohn Wickliffe both to entreat for him and also to let and stoppe the same matter trusting as I suppose vpon the negligence which they sawe before in the Byshops c. Ouer and beside here is not to be forgotten how the sayd Iohn Wickliffe the same time of his examination offered and exhibited vnto the Bishops in writing a protestation with a declaration or exposition of his owne minde vpon the sayd his articles the effect whereof here followeth The protestation of Iohn Wickliffe FIrst I protest as I haue often before done that I doe minde and intend with my whole hart by the grace of God to be a true Christian and as long as breath shal remayne in me to professe and defend the law of Christ. And if it shall happen that through ignoraunce or otherwise I shall fayle therein I desire my Lord God of pardon forgeuenes And now againe as before also I do reuoke and make retractation most hūbly submitting my selfe vnder the correction of our holy mother the church And for somuch as the sentence of my fayth whiche I haue holden in the scholes and els where is reported euen by children more ouer it is caried by children euen vnto Rome Therefore left my deare beloued brethren should take any offence by me I wil set forth in writing the sentēce and Articles for the which I am nowe accused and impeached the whiche also euen vnto the death I will defend As I beleeue all Christians ought to doe and specially the Bysh. of Rome and all other priestes and ministers of the Church For I do vnderstand the conclusions after the sense and maner of speaking of the scriptures and holy doctours the whiche I am ready to expound And if they shall be found contrary vnto the faith I am ready to reuoke and speedily to call them backe agayne An exposition vpon the conclusions of Iohn Wickliffe exhibited by him to the Byshop ALl the race of mankinde here in earth beside Christ hath no power simply to ordayne that Peter c. This conclusion of it selfe is euident for as much as it is not in mans power to stop the cōming of Christ to hys finall iudgement but he must needes come according to the article of our Creede to iudge both the quick and the dead And then as the scripture teacheth shall surcease all ciuill and politicke rule here I vnderstand the temporall and secular dominion pertaining to men here dwelling in this mortall life For so doe the Philosophers speake of ciuill dominion And although the thing which is terminable hath an end is called sometimes perpetuall yet because in holy scripture and in vse of the Church and in the bookes of Philosophers most commonly that is takē to be perpetuall which hath no ende of tyme hereafter to come according to the which sense the Church singeth Gloria Patri c. nunc perpetuum I also after the same signification do take here this woorde perpetually and so is this conclusion consonant to the principles of the Scripture that it is not in mans power to ordayne the course and voyage of the Church here perpetually to last 2. God can not geue to any man c. ¶ To the second conclusion I aunswere vnderstanding ciuil dominion as in the conclusion before And so I hold that God first by his ordinate power cannot geue to any person ciuil dominion here for euer Secondly by his absolute power it is not probable for hym so to doe For so much as he cānot euer detaine his spouse in perpetual prison of thys life nor alwayes deferre the finall beatitude of hys Church 3. To the third conclusion Many wrytings or chartes inuented by men as touching perpetual hereditage ciuile be vnpossible The verity of this conclusion is incident For we must not canonize all maner of Charts what soeuer as Catholicke or vniuersal for then it were not lawful by any meanes to take away
the Church with such ample possessions 39. It is not necessary to saluation to beleue the church of Rome to be supreme head ouer all Churches 40. It is but folly to beleue the Popes pardons 41. All othes which be made for any coÌ„tract or ciuill bargayne betwixt man and man be vnlawfull 43. Benedict Fraunces Dominicke Bern with all such as haue bene patrons of priuate religion except they haue repented with such also as haue entred into the same be in a damnable state and so from the Pope to the lowest Noues they be all together heretickes Besides these Articles to the number of 45. condemned as is sayd by the Counsell of Constance Other articles also I finde diuersly collected or rather wrasted out of the bookes and writinges of Wickliffe some by William Wodford some by Walden by Frier Tyssington other whom they in theyr bookes haue impugned rather theÌ„ coÌ„futed In the number of whom William Wodford especially findeth out these Articles and writeth agaynst the same to the number of 18. as here vnder follow 1. The bread remayneth in his owne substaunce after the consecration therof vpon the aultar and ceaseth not to be bread still 2. As Iohn was figuratiuely Helias and not personally so the bread figuratiuely is the body of Christ and not naturally And that without all doubt this is a figuratiue speach to say this is my body as to say This Iohn is â—elias 3. In the Decree Ergo Berengarius the Courte of Rome hath determined that the Sacrament of the holy Eucharist is naturaly true bread 4. They which do affirme that the infantes of the faythful departing without the Sacrament of baptisme are not to be saued be presumptuous and fooles in so affirming 5. The administration of the Sacrament of confirmatioÌ„ is not onely reserued to the Bishops 6. In the time of S. Paule onely two orders of Clerkes did suffice in the Church Priests and Deacons Neither was there in the time of the Apostles any destinction of Popes Patriarches and Archbishops and Bishops but these the Emperors pride did finde it out 7. Such as in times past either for couetousnes of temporall lucre or of hope of mutuall succour by kindred or for cause to excuse their lust although they dispayred of issue were maryed were coupled together not by true Matrimony 8. The causes of diuorcement either for spirituall consanguinity or for affinity be not fouÌ„ded in Scripture but are onely ordinaunces of men 9 These words I will take thee to wife are rather to be taken in conâ—ract of matrimony then these wordes I doe take thee to wife And the contract with any party by the words of the future tence ought not to be frustrate for the contract with any party afterward made by the words of the present time 10. There be 12. disciples of Antechrist Popes Cardinals Patriarches Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons Officials Deanes Monkes Chanons Friers and Pardoners 11. In the booke of Numbers the 18. chapter in Ezechiell 44. chapter it is commaunded simply that neither the Priestes of Aaron nor the Leuites should haue any part of inheritance with other tribes but should liue meerly of tithes and oblations 12. There is no greater hereticke or Antechrist then that Clerke which teacheth that it is lawfull for Priestes and Leuites of the law of grace to be indued with temporall possessions And if there be any heretickes Apostates or blasphemers these Clerkes be such 13. It is not onely lawfull for the Lords temporal to take away goods of fortune from the Churchmen sinning vsually but also are bounde so to doe vnder payne of eternall damnation 14. He that is the more humble and more seruiceable to the Church and more enamoured with the loue of Christ he is in the church militant the greater and the more nearest Vicar of Christ. 15. If corporall vnction or aneling were a Sacrament as now it is fayned to be Christ and his Apostles would not haue left the ordinaunce thereof vntouched 16. Vnto the true dominion secular is required vertuous life of him that ruleth 17. All thinges that happen doe come absolutely of necessity 18. Whatsoeuer the Pope or his Cardinalles can deduce clearely out of the Scripture that only is to be beleued or to be done at their monitioÌ„ whatsoeuer otherwise they do commaund is to be condemned as hereticall Besides this W. Woodford afore mentioued diuers other there were which wrote agaynst these articles of Wicliffe aforesay maynteyning the Popes part as seemeth for flatterye rather then following any iust cause so to doe or shewing forth any reason or learning in disprouing the same Notwithstanding on the contrary part some there were againe both learned and godly which taking the part of Wickliffe without all flattery defended the most of the sayd articles openly in scholes and other places as appereth by the works of Iohn Hus who in his publicke determinations in the vniuersity of Prage stoode in defence of the same agaynst all his aduersaryes As partly is here to be seene in these tractations vnder folowing ¶ THE PVBLICK DEFENCE of certayne Articles of Iohn Wickliffe in the first Act before the whole Vniuersity of Prage in Charles Colledge ¶ The determination of I. Hus vpon the xiiij Article of Wickliffe as touching the preaching and hearing of the word of God made in the yeare of our Lord. 1412. FOr so much as to condemne the trueth wittingly or without reasonable examination doth tende to greate daunger of saluation as the Lord sayth Luke the sixt doe ye not condemne and ye shall not be condemned Therefore to auoyd this great dauÌ„ger the Vniuersity of Prage and the whole communalty there of the Rector Masters Doctors Bachelers and Studentes in theyr generall assembly not agreeing to the condemnation pronounced by the Doctors in theyr councell house requireth of the sayde Doctors a reasonable proofe of theyr condemnation and that they should by scripture authority or infallible reasoÌ„ proue the falsehead of euery those fiue and forty Articles The which being once done the sayd Vniuersity will agree to the sayd condemnation as iust For the Vniuersity doth well know that as Augustine sayth in the end of his second booke of Christian doctrine That what so euer a man doth learne besides the holy scriptures if it be hurtfull there it is condemned If it be profitable there it is founde And when a man hath founde all thinges therein which he hath profitably learned els where he shall much more aboundantly finde those thinges which are found in no place els but are learned in the maruelous deapth and maruellous profoundnesse of those most sacred Scriptures onely Thus writeth Augustine And Gregory in his three twenty booke of Moralles sayth thus God in the holye scripture hath comprehended whatsoeuer thing may happen vnto any man and in the same hath by the examples of those which are gone afore taught them which are to come how to
that there do not remain accidencies without substance or subiect after the coÌ„secration of the body of Christ. And touching this matter the doctors holde diuers opinions Furthermore as concerning the Pope he said helde and auouched that he is the very Antichrist because yâ— in lyfe and maners he is contrary to the lawes doctrines and deedes of Christ our Lord. All and euery of these things were done euen as they be aboue writteÌ„ and rehearsed in the yeare of our Lord poÌ„tificall office month day place aforesayd at supper time of the day aforenamed theÌ„ and there being present the worshipful and discrete men sir Walter Ramsbury chiefe chaÌ„ter of the sayde Cathedrall Church of Hereforde Roger Hoore Chanon of the same Church Walter Wall Chaplain of the said church of Hereford being a vicar of the Choral certaine other worthy witnesses of credit that were specially called and desired to the premisses Ex Regist. Herford And I Richard Lee whelar clerke of Worcester being a publike notarye by the authoritie Apostolike was personally present at all and singuler the premisses whilest that as is before rehersed they were done and a doing in the yere of our lord 1391. pontisical office month day place the houre aforesaid I did see write and heare all and singuler those things thus to bee done and haue reduced theÌ„ into this publike maner and forme being desired truely to restifie the premisses haue sealed the sayde instrument made hereupon with mine accustomed scale and name In the name of God Amen Be it plainly knoweÌ„ to all persons by this present publike instrumeÌ„t that in the yere from the incarnation of the lord after the course and coâ—â—pâ—â—tation of the church of England 1391. the indiction fifteene in the 3. yere of the pontifical office of the most holy father in Christ and our Lord Lord Boniface Pope by the prouydeÌ„ce of God the 9. in the 19. day of the month of Ianuary Walter Brute layman of Hereford dioces personally appearing before the reuereÌ„d father in Christ and Lord. Lord Iohn by gods grace B. of Herford in the presence of me being a publike notarie one of the witnesses vnder written did say hold publish affirme the coÌ„clusioÌ„s hereafter written the is to say yâ— christen people are not bouÌ„d to pay tithes neither by the law of Moses nor by the law of Christ. Item that it is not lawful for Christians for any cause in any case to sweare by the creator neither by the creature Item he confesseth openly and of his owne accord that within the same month of Ianuary he did eate drink and communicate with William Swinderby not being ignorant of the sentence of the said reuerend father whereby the same William Swinderby was pronounced an heretique schismatique and a false seducer of the common people Which conclusions the same reuerend father caused to bee writteÌ„ and in writing to be deliuered to the same Walter Which when he had seene and red he sayd also that he did maintaine and iustifie them according to the lawes aforesayd These thinges were done in the chamber oâ— the sayd bishop of Herford at his manor of Whitborne of the sayde dioces of Hereford then being there present the same Byshop abouesaid M. Reynold of Wolsten Canon of Hereford sir Phillip Dileske parson of the parish church of Blamurin Thomas Guldefeld parson of the Church of Englisbyknore Iohn Cresset parson of the church of Whytborne and Thomas Wallewayne housholde seruant for witnesses specially called and desired to the premisses of the dioces of Hereford and S. Asse And I Benedict Come clerke of the dioces of S. Asse publike notary by the Apostolike authoritie of the dioces of S. Asse was personally present together with the witnes before named at all and singuler these and other thinges here premised whilest they were so done and a doing did see heare write those things so to be done as is before mencioned and did write the same and reduce them into this publike forme with my wonted accustomed seale and name haue sealed it being desired and required truly to testifie the premisses At the last the aforesaid Walter Brute did present and cause to be presented to vs at diuers places and times assigned by vs to the same Walter to aunswere to yâ— former conclusions and articles diuers scroules of paper writteÌ„ with his owne proper hand for his aunswers to the same Articles and conclusions aboue written he partly appearing by his owne selfe before vs sitting in our iudgement seat and partly by his messengers specially appoynted to that purpose of which scroules the tenors do follow in order worde by worde and be on this maner In the name of the father and of the sonne and the holy ghost Amen I Walter Brute sinner layman husbaÌ„dmaÌ„ a Christian hauing mine ofspring of the Brittons both by my father mothers side of the Britons haue ben accused to the B. of Hereford that I did erre in many matters concerning the catholike Christen fayth by whoÌ„ I am required yâ— I should write an aunswere in Latin to all those matters whose desire I wil satisfie to my power protesting first of al before God before al the world the like as it is not my mind through Gods grace to refuse the knoweÌ„ truth for any reward greater or smaller yea be it neuer so bigge nor yet for the feare of any temporal punishment eueÌ„ so it is not my mind to maintain any erroneous doctrine for any coÌ„modities sake And if any maÌ„ of what state sect or condition so euer he be wil shew me that I erre in my writings or sayings by the authoritie of the sacred scripture or by probable reason grounded in the sacred scripture I wil humbly and gladly receiue his information But as for the bare wordes of any teacher Christ onely excepted I wil not simply beleue except hee shal be able to stablish theÌ„ by the truth of experience or of the Scripture for because that in the holy Apostles elected by Christ there hath beue fouÌ„d errour by the testimony of the holy scripture because that Paule himselfe doth coÌ„fesse that he rebuked Peter for that he was worthy to be rebuked Galat. the 2. Chapiter There hath ben errors fouÌ„d in the holy doctors that haue ben before vs as they themselues confesse of them selues And oftentimes it falleth out that there is error founde in the teachers in our age who are of contrary opinions among themselues and sâ—me of them do sometimes determine mine one thing for truth and others do condemne the selfe same thing to be heresye or error Which protestation premised I wil here place 1. suppositions or cases for a grouÌ„d and a foundatioÌ„ of all things that I shall say out of which I would gather two probable conclusions stablished vpoÌ„ the same and vpon the sacred Scripture By which coÌ„clusions when as
Church and not Peter By which head they say that al the members are sustayned and made liuely The thyrd errour which the authors of the canons cōceiueth in the sayd text of Christ which was sayd to Peter Unto thee will I geue the keyes c. is this They say that in this sentence which was sayd to Peter of the authoritie to binde and loose was ment that as Christ gaue vnto Peter aboue all the rest of the Apostles a speciall and as it I were an excellent power aboue all the Apostles euen so say they he gaue vnto the Bishops of Rome whome they call Peters chiefe successors the same speciall power and authoritie exceeding the power of all other Byshoppes of the world The first part of this similitude and comparison doth appeare manifestly by the premisses to be erroneous wherin is playnly shewed that the other Apostles had equall power with Peter to binde and lose Wherfore cōsequently it followeth the 2. part of the similitude grounded vpon the same text to be also erroneous But and if the first part of the sayd similitude were truth as it is not yet the second part must needes be an errour wherein is sayd that the Bishops of Rome are Peters chiefest successors For althogh there be but one Catholicke christian Church of al the faithful sort conuerted yet the first part therof and first conuerted was of the Iewes the second of the Greeks the third part was of the Romaynes or Latines Whereof the first part was most perfectly conuerted vnto the fayth for that they faithfully obserued the perfectiō of charitie as appeareth in the Actes of the Apostses by the multitude of the beleuers The were of one hart and one soule neyther called they any thing that they possessed theyr owne but all was common amongst them Hereupon Paule to the Romaynes Salutation to euery beleuer first to the Iew to the Greeks after the Iewes The Greekes were the second and after the Iewes best conuerted and after them the Romaynes taking their information of the Greekes as appeareth by the Chronicles although in deed some Romaynes were conuerted vnto the fayth by Peter and Paule And as Christ sayd thrise vnto Peter feed my sheepe so Peter ruled these three Churches as witnesseth the Chronicles But first he reformed the Church of the Iewes in Ierusalem and Iudea as appeareth by the testimony of the Actes of the Apostles For Acts 1. It is manifest how Peter stonding vp amongst his brethren spake vnto them concerning the election of an Apostle in the place of Iudas the traytor alledging places vnto thē out of the scripture that an other should take vppon him his Apostleship And so by lot was Mathias constituted in the 12. place of Iudas acts 2. After that the holy Ghost was come vpon the Apostles and that they spake with the tongues of al men the heares were astonied at the miracle And some mocked them saying these men are full of newe wine But Peter stood vp spake vnto thē saying that it was fulfilled in thē that was prophecied by Ioell the prophet and he preached Christ vnto the people whome they of ignoraunce had put to death To them was Sauioure promised by the testimony of the Prophets And whē they heard the wordes of Peter they were pricked at the heart saying vnto him and the rest of the Apostles What shal we then do And Peter sayd vnto them repent and let euerye one of you be baptised in the name of Iesus Christ for the remission of your sinnes and ye shall receaue the holy ghost And there were ioined vnto them the same day about three M. soules And Actes 3.4.5 it appeareth that Peter aboue the rest did those thinges which belonged to the ministery of the Apostleship as well in preaching as in answering Wherupon some Chronicles say that Peter gouerned the church of the Iewes at Ierusalem 4. yeares before he gouerned Antioche And by the testimony of Paule to the Gal. as before is sayd The Gospell of the vncircumsion is cōmitted to Paule euen as the circumcision to Peter And he that wrought with Peter in the Apostleship of circumcisiō wrought with Paule amongst the Gentils Wherby it apreth that the Churche of the Iewes was commtted to the gouernment of Peter And in the proces of the Actes of the Apostles it appeareth that Peter beleeued that the fayth of Christ was not to be preached vnto those Gentiles which alwayes liued in vncleannes of Idolatry But whē Peter was at Ioppe Cornelius a Gētile sent vnto him that he wold come shew him the way of life But Peter a little before of the comming of the messengers of Cornelius being in his chāber after he had prayed fel in a trance and saw heauen open and a certayne vessel descending euen as a great sheete letten downe by foure corners from heauen to earth In the which were all maner of foure footed beastes serpentes of the earth and foules of the ayre And a voyce spake vnto hym saying arise Peter kill and eate and Peter sayd not so Lorde because I haue neuer eaten any common or vncleane thing This was done thrise And Peter descended not knowing what the vision did signifie and found the messengers of Cornelius As concerning the authoritie iudicial of the clergie many things are written thereof in the Canons of decrees greatly to be marueiled at and farre from the truth of the Scripture The authors of the Canons say that Chryst gaue vnto the priests power iudicial ouer sinners that confessed their sinnes vnto them And this they ground vpon the text of Christ I will geue vnto thee the keyes of the kingdome of heauen and what soeuer thou loosest c. And these keyes of the kingdome of heauen they cal the knowledge to discerne and the power to iudge which they say onely belongeth to the priestes except in case of necessitie then they say a lay man may absolue a man frō sinne And as touching absolution they say there are three thinges to be required on the sinners part first harty cōtritiō wherby the sinners ought to bewaile their offēding of god thorough sinnes the second is auricular confession whereby the sinner ought to shew vnto the Priest his sinnes the circumstances of them The third is satisfaction thorough penaunce enioyned vnto hym by the Priest for his sinnes cōmitted And of his part that geueth absolution there are two thinges say they to be required that is to say knowledge to discern one sinne from an other wherby he ought to make a difference of sinnes appoynt a conuenient penaunce according to the quantitie of the sinnes The secōd is authoritie to iudge wherby he ought to ioyne penaunce to the offender And further they say that he that is confessed ought with al humilitie to submit himself to this authoritie and wholy and voluntarily to doe those penaunces which are commaunded
this despight and reproofe Christ suffered most meekely in his owne person for to geue example of all meekenesse and pacience to all his faythfull folowers Certayne this world is now so full of proud beggers which are named Priestes but the very office of working of Priesthood which Christ approueth true and accepteth is farre from the multitude of Priests that now reigne in this world For from the highest Priest to the lowest all as who say study that is they imagine and trauell busilye how they may please this world and theyr flesh This sentence and many such other dependeth vpon them if it be well considered other God the father of heauen hath deceiued all mankinde by the liuing specially and teaching of Iesu Christ and by the liuing and teaching of his Apostles and Prophetes or els all the Popes that haue bene since I had any knowledge or discretion with all the Colledge of Cardinals Archbishops and Bishops Monks Canons and Friers with all the contagious flock of the communalty of Priesthood which haue all my life time and mikle lenger reigned and yet reigne increase damnably from sinne into sinne haue bene and yet bee proud obstinate heretickes couetous simoners and defouled adulterers in the ministering of the Sacramentes and specially in the ministring of the Sacrament of the aultar For as their workes sheweth whereto Christ biddeth vs take heed the highest Priestes and Prelates of this Priesthood chalenge and occupy vnlefull tēporall Lordships And for temporall fauour and meed they sell geue benefices to vnworthy and vnable persons yea these simoners sell sinne suffering men and women in euery degree and estate to lye and continue from yeare to yere in diuers vices slaūderously And thus by euil example of high priests in the church lower Priestes vnder them are not onely suffered but they are mayntayned to sell full deare to the people for temporall meed all the Sacraments And thus all this foresayd Priesthoode is blowne so high and borne vp in pride and vaine glory of their estate and dignity so blinded with worldly couetousnes That they disdayne to follow Christ in very meekenesse and wilfull pouerty liuing holylye and preaching Gods word truely freely and continually taking theyr liuelihood at the free will of the people of their pure almes where and when they suffice not for theyr true and busy preaching to get their sustenaunce with their handes To this true sentence grounded on Christes owne liuing and teaching of his Apostles these foresaid worldly fleshly Priests wil not consent effectually But as theyr workes and also their wordes shew boldly and vnshamefastly these forenamed Priestes and Prelates couet and enforce them mightely and busily that all holy scripture were expounded and drawne accordingly to their maners and to theyr vngrounded vsages and findinges For they will not since they hold it but folly and madnesse conforme their maners to the pure and simple liuing of Christ and his Apostles nor they will not followe freely their learning Wherefore all the Emperours and Kinges and all other Lordes and Ladyes and all the common people in euery degree and state which haue before time knowne or might haue knowne and also all they that now yet know or might know this foresayde witnes of Priesthood and would not nor yet will enforce them after theyr cunning and power to withstand charitably the foresayd enemies and traytors of Christ and of his churche all these striue with Antichrist agaynst Iesu. And they shall heare the indignation of God almighty without end if in conuenient time they amend them not and repent them verelye doing therefore due mourning and sorow after their cunning power For through presumtuousnesse and negligence of Priestes Prelates not of the Churche of Christ but occupying theyr prelacye vnduely in the Church and also flattering and false couetousnes of other diuers named Priestes Lousengers and lounderers are wrōgfully made and named Heremites and haue leaue to defraud poore and needy creatures of their liuelode and to liue by theyr false winning and begging in slouth and in other diuers vices And also of these Prelates these coker noses are suffered to liue in pride and hipocrisy and to defoule themselues both bodelye and ghostly Also by the suffering and counsell of these foresayde Prelates and of other Priestes are made both vayne brotherhoodes and sisterhoodes full of pride and enuye which are full contrary to the brotherhood of Christ since they are cause of mickle dissetion and they multiply and susteyne it vncharitably for in lustye eating and drinking vnmeasurably and out of time they exercise themselues Also this vaine confederacy of brotherhoodes is permitted to be of one clothing and to hold together And in all these vngrounded and vnlefull doinges priests are parteners and great medlers and counsellers And ouer this viciousnesse Heremites and Pardoners Ankers and straūge beggers are licensed and admitted of Prelates and Priestes for to beguile the people with flatteringes and leasinges slaunderously agaynst all good reason and true beleue and so to encrease diuers vyces in themselues and also among all them that accept them or consent to them And thus the viciousnesse of these foresayd named Priestes Prelates haue bene long time and yet is and shal be cause of wars both within the Realme and without And in the same wise these vnable Priestes haue bene and yet are and shal be chiefe cause of pestilence of men and morein of beastes and of barrennesse of the earth and of all other mischiefes to the tyme that Lordes and cōmons able them through grace for to know and to keepe the cōmaundements of God inforcing them than faythfully and charitably by one assent for to redresse and make one this foresayde Priesthood to the wilfull poore meeke and innocent liuing and teaching specially of Christ and his Apostles Therefore all they that know or might know the viciousnes that raigneth now cursedly in these Priests and in theyr learning if they suffice not to vnderstand this contagious viciousnesse let them pray to the Lord hartily for the health of his Church absteining them prudently from these indurate enemyes of Christ and of his people and from all their Sacraments since to them all that know them or may know they are but fleshly deedes and false as S. Cyprian witnesseth in the first question of decrees and in the first cause Ca. Si quis inquit For as this Saynt and great Doctour witnesseth there that not onely vicious Priestes but also all they that fauour them or consent to them in their viciousnesse shall together perish with them if they amend them not duely as all they perished that cōsented to Dathan and Abiron For nothing were more confusion to these foresayd vicious Priestes than to eschew them prudently in all theyr vnlefull Sacramentes while they cōtinue in their sinnefull liuing slaunderously as they haue lōg time done and yet do And no
of sinnes the vprising of the flesh and euerlasting life Amen And for a more large declaration sayth he of thys my sayth in the Catholicke Churche I stedfastly beleue that there is but one God almighty in and of whose Godhead are these three persons the father the sonne and the holye Ghost and that those three persons are the selfe same God almighty I beleue also that the second person of this most blessed Trinitie in most conuenient tune appoynted therunto afore tooke flesh and bloud of the most blessed virgin Mary for the sauegarde and redemption of the vniuersall kind of man which was afore lost in Adams offence Moreouer I beleeue that the same Iesus Christ our Lord thus being both God and man is the onely head of the whole Christian Churche and that all those that hathe bene or shal be saued be members of this most holy church And this holy Churche I thinke to be deuided into three sortes or companyes Wherof the first sort be now in heauen and they are the sayntes from hence departed These as they were here coÌ„uersant conformed alwayes their liues to the most holye lawes and pure examples of Christ renouncing Sathan the world and the flesh with all their concupiscences and euils The second sort are in Purgatory if any suche place be in the scriptures abiding the mercy of God and a full deliueraunce of payne The third sort are here vpon the earth and be called the Church millitant For day and night they contend against crafty assaultes of the deuill the flattering prosperities of this world and the rebellious filthines of the flesh This latter congregation by the iust ordinance of God is also seuered into three diuers estates that is to say into priesthood knighthood and the commons Among whom the will of God is that the one should ayd the other but not destroy the other The priestes first of al secluded from all worldlines should conforme theyr liues vtterly to the examples of Christ and his Apostles Euermore shoulde they be occupyed in preaching and teaching the scriptures purely and in geuing wholesome examples of good liuing to the other two degrees of men More modest also more louing gentle and lowly in spirite should they be then ano other sortes of people In knighthood are all they which beare sword by law of office These should defend Gods lawes and see that the Gospell were purely taught conforming theyr liues to that same and secluding all false preachers yea these ought rather to hazard their liues theÌ„ to suffer such wicked decrees as either blemisheth the eternall Testament of God or yet letteth the free passage therof whereby heresies schismes might spring in the Churche For of none other arise they as I suppose then of erroneous constitutioÌ„s craftely first creeping in vnder hipocriticall lies for aduauntage They ought also to preserue Gods people from oppressours tyrauntes and theeues to see the clergie supported so long as they teach purely pray rightly and minister the Sacramentes freely And if they see them doe otherwise they are bound by the law of office to compell them to chaung their doinges to see all thinges performed according to gods prescript ordinaunce The latter fellowship of this Church are the common people whose duery is to beare their good mindes true obedience to the aforesayd ministers of God theyr kinges ciuill gouernours and Priestes The right office of these is iustly to occupy euery man his facultie be it marchaundise handicraft or the tilthe of the ground And so one of them to be as an helper to an other following alwayes in their sortes the iust commaundementes of the Lord God Ouer and besidés all this I most faythfully beleeue the the Sacramentes of Christes Churche are necessary to all Christen beleuers this alwayes seen to that they be truly ministred according to Christes first institution and ordinaunce And forasmuch as I am maliciously most falsly accused of a misbeliefe in the sacrament of the aulter to the hurtfull slaunder of many I signifie here vnto all men that this is my fayth concerning that I beleue in that Sacrament to be contayned very Christes body and bloud vnder the similitudes of bread and wyne yea the same body that was conceiued of the holy ghost borne of that virgine Mary done on the crosse dyed that was buryed arose the thyrd day from the death and is now glorified in heauen I also beleue the vniuersall law of God to be most true and perfect and they which doe not so follow it in theyr fayth and works at one time or an other can neuer be saned Where as he that seketh it in fayth accepteth it learneth it delighteth therin and performeth it in loue shall cast for it the felicitie of euerlasting Innocencie Finally this is my fayth also that God will aske no more of a Christen beleuer in this life but onely to obey that preceptes of that most blessed law If any Prelates of the Church require more or els any other kinde of obedience then this to be vsed he contemneth Christ exalting hymselfe aboue God and so becommeth an open Antichrist Al the premisses I beleue particularly and generally all that God hath left in his holy scripture that I should beleeue Instantly desiring you my siege Lord and most worthye king that this confession of mine may be iustly examined by the most godly wise and learned men of your Realme And if it be found in all pointes agreeing to the veritie theÌ„ let it be so allowed and I therupon holden for none other then a true Christian. If it be proued otherwise then let it be vtterly coÌ„demned prouided alwayes that I be taught a better beliefe by the word of God and I shall most reuerently at all times obey therunto This briefe confession of this fayth the Lorde Cobham wrote as is mentioned afore and so tooke it with him to the court offering it withall meekenes vnto the kyng to read it ouer The king would in no case receaue it but coÌ„manded it to be deliuered vnto theÌ„ that should be his iudges Then desired he in the kinges presence that an hundred knightes and Esquiers might be suffered to come in vpon hys purgation which he knew woulde cleare hym of all heresies Moreouer he offered himselâ—e after the lawe of armes to fight for life or death in any man liuing Christen or heathen in the quarrell of hys fayth the king and the Lordes of hys Councell excepted Finally with all geÌ„tlenes he protested before all that were present that he wold refuse no maner of correction that shold after the lawes of God he ministred vnto him but that he would at al times with all meekenes obey it Notwithstanding all this the king suffered him to be sommoned personally in his owne priuy chamber Then sayd the Lord Cobham to the king that he had appeled from the
body The Lord Cobham asked how they could make good that sentence of theirs They aunswered him thus For it is agaynst the determination of holy Church Then sayd the archbishop vnto him Syr Iohn we sēt you a writing concerning the fayth of this blessed Sacrament clearely determined by the church of Rome our mother and by the holy Doctors Then he sayd agayne vnto him I know none holyer then is Christ and his Apostles And as for that determination I wore it is none of theyrs for it standeth not with the scriptures but manifestly against them If it be the Churches as ye say it is it hath bene hers onely since she receaued the great poyson of worldly possessions and not afore Then asked they him to stop his mouth therwith If he beleued not in the determination of the Church And he sayd vnto them No forsooth for it is no God In all our Creede this word in is but thrise mentioned concerning beleue In God the father in God the sonne in in God the holy Ghost three persons and one God The byrth the death the buriall the resurrection and ascension of Christ hath none in for beleue but in him Neyther yet hath the Church the sacramentes the forgeuenes of sinne the latter resurrection nor yet the life euerlasting nor anye other in then in the holy ghost Then sayd one of the Lawyers Such that was but a word of office But what is your beliefe concerning holy Church The Lord Cobham aunswered My beliefe is as I sayd afore that all the scriptures of the sacred Bible are true All y◠is grounded vppon them I beleue throughly For I know it is Gods pleasure that I shuld so do But in your Lordly lawes and idle determinations haue I no beliefe For ye be no part of Christes holy churche as your open deedes doth shew But ye are very Antichristes obstinately set agaynst his holy law and wil. The lawes that ye haue made are nothing to his glory but onely for your vayne glory and abhominable couetousnes This they sayd was an exceeding heresie and that in a great fume not to beleeue the determination of holye Church Then the Archbishop asked hym what he thought of holy Church He sayd vnto him my beliefe is that the holye Churche is the number of them which shal be saued of whō Christ is the head Of this churche one part is in heauen wyth Christ an other in purgatorye you say and the thyrd is here in earth This latter part standeth in three degrees in knighthoode priesthoode and the communaltie as I sayd afore playnely in the confession of my beliefe Then sayd the Archbishop vnto hym Can you tell me who is of this church The Lord Cobham answered Yea truely can I. Then sayd Doctor walden the Prior of the Carmelits It is no doubt vnto you who is thereof For Christ sayeth in Mathewe Nolite iudicare presume to iudge no man If ye be here forbidden the iudgement of your neighboure or brother much more the iudgement of your superiour The Lorde Cobham made him this aunswere Christ sayth also in the selfe same chapter of Mathew that like as the euill tree is knowne by hys fruit so is a false Prophet by his works appeare they neuer so glorious But that ye left behind ye And in Iohn he hath this text Operibus credite belecue you the outwarde doinges And in an other place of Iohn Iustum iudicium iudicate when wee knowe the thing to be true we may so iudge it and not offend For Dauid sayd also Rectè iudicate filij hominum Iudge rightly alwayes ye children of men And as for your superiority were ye of Christ ye shoulde be meeke ministers and no proud superiours Then said Doctor walden vnto him ye make here no difference of iudgementes Ye put no diuersitie betwene y◠euill iudgementes whiche Christ had forbidden and the good iudgementes which he hath cōmaunded vs to haue Rash iudgment and right iudgement al is one with you So swift iudges alwayes are the learned schollers of Wicklisse Vnto whom the Lord Cobham thus aunswered It is wel sophistred of you forsooth Preposterous are your iudgementes euermore For as the Prophet Esay sayth ye iudge euill good and good euill And therefore the same prophet concludeth that your wayes are not Gods waies nor Gods wayes your wayes And as for that vertuous man wicklisse whose iudgementes ye so highly disdayne I shall say here of my part both before God and man that before I knew that despised doctrine of his I neuer abstayned from sinne But since I learned therin to feare my Lorde GOD it hath otherwise I trust bene with me so muche grace coulde I neuer finde in all your glorious instructions Then said Doctor Walden agayne yet vnto him It were not well with me so many vertuous men liuing so many learned men teaching the scripture being also so open and the examples of fathers so plenteous If I thē had no grace to amend my life till I heard the deuil preach S. Hierome sayth that he whiche seeketh suche suspected Maysters shall not finde the midday light but the mid-day deuill The Lord Cobham sayd Your father 's the old Phariseis ascribed Christes miracles to Belzebub and his doctrine to the deuil And you as their natural children haue still the selfe same iudgement concerning his faythfull followers They that rebuke your vicious liuing must needs be heretickes and that must your doctors proue whē you haue no scripture to do it Then sayde he to them all To iudge you as you be we neede no further go then to your owne proper actes Where do ye find in all Gods law that ye shold thus sit in iudgement of any Christen men or yet geue sentence vppon any other man vnto death as ye doe here dayly No grounde haue ye in all the Scriptures so Lordly to take it vppon you but in Annas and Cayphas which sat thus vpon Christ and vppon his Apostles after hys ascension Of them onely haue ye taken it to iudge Christes members as ye doe and neither of Peter nor Iohn Then sayd some of the Lawyers yes forsooth syr for Christ iudged Iudas The Lord Cobham sayd No Christ iudged him not but he iudged himselfe and thereupon went forth so did hange himselfe But in deede Christ sayde woe vnto him for that couerous act of hys as he doth yet still vnto many of you For since the venune of him was shed into the church ye neuer followed Christ neither yet haue ye stande in the perfection of Gods law Then the Archbishop asked him what he ment by that venune The Lord Cobham sayd your possessions and Lordeships For then cried an aungell in the ayre as your owne Chronicles mentioneth wo wo woe this day is veuime shed into the church of God Before that time all the Byshops of Rome were martyrs in a manner And
Lord Iesus they be murtheres and theeues Then sayde the Cardinall of Cambray beholde both this and all other articles before rehearsed he hath written much more detestable thinges in his booke then is presented in hys articles Truely Iohn Hus thou hast kept no order in thy sermons and writings Had it not ben your part to haue applyed your sermons according to your audieÌ„ce For to what purpose was it or what did it profite you before the people to preach agaynst the Cardinals when as none of them were present It had bene meeter for you to haue told them theyr faults before them all then before the laity Then aunswered Iohn Hus reuerend father for so much as I did see many prieste other learned men present at my sermons for their sakes I spake those wordes Then sayd the Cardinal thou hast done very ill for by such kinde of talke thou hast disturbed and troubled the whole state of the Church The 18. Article An hereticke ought not to be committed to the secular powers to be put to death for it is sufficient onely that he abide and suffer the ecclesiasticall censure These are my wordes That they might be ashamed of their cruel sentence and iudgement specially for somuch as Iesus Christ byshop both of the old and newe Testament would not iudge such as were disobedient by ciuill iudgement neither condemne them to bodily death As touching the first poynt It may be euidently seene in the 12. Chapiter of S. Luke And for the second it appeareth also by the woman which was taken in adultery of who it is spoken in the 8. chapter of Sainct Iohn And it is sayde in the 18. Chapter of Sainct Mathew If thy brother haue offended thee c. Marke therfore what I do say That an hereticke whatsoeuer he be ought first to be instructed and taught with Christian loue and gentlenes by the holy scriptures and by the reasons draâ—ne and taken out of the same as S. Augustine and others haue done disputing agaynst the heretickes But if there were any which after al these gentle and louing admonitions and instructions woulde not cease from or leaue of their stiffnes of opinions but obstinately resist agaynst the truth suche I say ought to suffer corporall or bodily punishment As soone as Iohn Hus had spoken those thinges the iudges red in hys booke a certayne clause wherein he seeined greeuously to enuey agaynst them which deliuered an hereticke vnto the secular power not being confuted or contricted of heresie and compared theÌ„ vnto the high priestes Scribes and Phariseis which sayd vnto Pilate it is not lawfull for vs to put any man to death and deliuered Christ vnto him And yet notwithstanding according vnto Christes owne witnesse they were greater murtherers then Pilate for he said Christ which hath deliuered me vnto thee hath committed the greatest offence Then the Cardinals and Bishops made a great noyse and demaunded of I. Hus saying who are they that thou dost compare or assimule vnto the Phariseis Then he sayd all those whiche deliuered vp anye innocent vnto the ciuill sworde as the Scribes and Phariseis deliuered Iesus Christ vnto Pilate No no sayd they agayne for all that you spake here of doctors And the Cardinall of Cambray according to his accustomed maner sayd Truly they which haue made and gathered these articles haue vsed great lenitie and getlenes for his writings are much more detestable horible The 19. article The Nobles of the world ought to coÌ„strayne and compel the ministers of the Church to obserue and keepe the law of Iesus Christ. I answere that it standeth thus word for word in my booke Those which be on our part do preach and affirme that the church militant according to the partes which the Lord hath ordayned is deuided and consisteth in these partes That is to say Ministers of the Church which should keepe purely and sincely the ordinaunces and commaundementes of the sonne of God and the Nobles of the world that should compel and driue them to keepe the commaundementes of Iesus Christ and of the common people seruing to both these partes and endes according to the institution and ordinaunce of Iesus Christ. The 20. Article The ecclesiasticall obedience is a kynd of obedience which the priestes and monks haue inuented wtout any expresse authority of the holy scriptures I answer and confes that those words are thus written in my book I say that there be three kindes of obedience spirituall secular and ecclesiasticall The spirituall obedience is that which is onely due according to the lawe and ordinance of God vnder the whiche the Apostles of Iesus Christ dyd lyue and all Christians ought for to liue The secular obedience is that which is due according to the Ciuill lawes and ordinances The ecclesiastical obedience is such as the Priestes haue inuented without any expresse authoritie of Scripture The first kinde of obedience doth vtterly exclude from it all euill as well on his part which geueth the commandement as on his also which doth obey the same And of this obedience it is spoken in the 24. chap. of Deut. Thou shalt do all that which the priestes of the kindred of Leuy shall teach and instruct thee according as I haue coÌ„maunded them The 21. Article He that is excoÌ„municated by the pope if he refuse and forsake the iudgement of the Pope and the generall Councell and appealeth vnto Iesus Christ after he hath made hys appellation all the excommunications and curses of the Pope cannot annoy or hurt hym I aunswere that I do not acknowledge this proposition but in deede I did make my complaynt in my booke that they had both done me and such as fauoured me great wrong that they refuse to heare me in the popes court For alter the death of one pope I dyd appeale to hys successor and all that did profite me nothing And to appeale from the P. to the Councell it were to long that were euen as much as if a man in trouble should seeke an vncertayne remedy And therfore last of all I haue appealed to the head of the Church my Lord Iesus Christ for he is much more excellent and better then any pope to discusse and determine matters and causes for somuch as he cannot erre neyther yet deny iustice to him that doth aske or require it in a iust cause neither can he condemne the innocent Then spake the Cardinall of Cambray vnto hym and sayd wilt thou presume aboue S. Paule who appealed vnto the Emperour and not vnto Iesus Christ Iohn Hus answered for somuch then as I am the first the do it am I therfore to be reputed counted an hereticke And yet notwithstanding S. Paule did not appeale vnto the Emperoure of hys owne motion or will but by the will of Christ which spake vnto hym by reuelation and sayd be firme and constant for thou must go
affirmed and proued that he shoulde ascende and come in another way for Iudas Iscariot was truely and lawfully chosen of the Lorde Iesus Christ vnto his Bishopricke as Christe sayth in the sixt of Iohn and yet he came in an other way into the sheepe folde and was a thefe and a Deuill and the sonne of perdition Did he not come in another waye when as our Sauiour spake thus of him he that eateth breade with me shall lift vp his heele agaynst me The same also is proued by Saynte Bernarde vnto Pope Eugenius Then sayde Paletz beholde the â—â—ror and maddenesse of this man for what more furious or madde thing canne there be then to say Iudas is chosen by Christ and notwithstanding he did ascende an other way and not by Christ. Iohn Husse aunswered verely both partes are true that he was electe and chosen by Christ and also that he did ascende and come in another way for he was a Theefe a Deuill and the sonne of perdition Then sayde Palettez cannot a manne be truely and lawefully chosen Pope or Byshoppe and afterwarde liue contrarye vnto Christe and that notwithstanding he doth not ascende any other wayes But I sayde Iohn Husse doe saye that whosoeuer doth enter into anye Byshoppricke or like office by Simonye not to the intent to labour and trauell in the Church of God but rather to liue delicately voluptuouslye and vnrighteously and to the intent to aduaunce hymselfe with all kinde of pride euery suche man ascendeth and commeth vppe by an other way and according vnto the Gospell he is a theefe and a robber The 7. Article The condemnation of the forty fyue Articles of Wickliffe made by the Doctours is vnreasonable and wicked and the cause by them alleadged is fayned and vntrue That is to say that none of those Articles are Catholicke but that euery of them be either hereticall erronious or offenciue The aunswere I haue wrytten it thus in my treatise the forty fyue Articles are condemned for this cause that none of those forty fyue is a Catholicke Article but eache of them is either hereticall erronious or offenciue O Mayster Doctour where is your proofe you fayne a cause which you doe not poue c. As it appeareth more at large in my Treatise Then sayd the Cardinall of Cambraye Iohn Husse thou diddest saye that thou wouldest not defend any errour of Iohn Wickliffes And now it appeareth in your bookes that you haue openly defended his Articles Iohn Hus aunswered Reuerend Father euen as I sayde before so doe I now say agayne that I will not defende any errours of Iohn Wickliffes neyther of anye other mannes but for so muche as it seemed vnto me to be agaynst conscience simply to consent vnto the condemnation of them no Scripture beyng alledged or brought contrary and agaynst them thereupon I woulde not consent or agree vnto the condemnation of them And for so much as the reason whiche is copulatiue can not be verifyed in euery poynt according to euery part thereof Nowe there remayneth sixe Articles of 39. These are sayd to be drawen out of an other treatise which he wrote agaynst Stanislaus de Znoyma The first Article No man is lawfully elect or chosen in that the Electours or the greater part of them haue consented with a liuely voyce according to the custome of men to elect and choose any person or that he is thereby the manifest and true Successour of Christ or Uicare of Peter in the Ecclesiasticall office but in that that any man doth most aboundantlye worke meritoriouslye to the profitte of the Churche he hath thereby more aboundant power geuen him of God thereunto The answere These things which follow are also written in my booke It standeth in the power and handes of wicked Electours to choose a woman into the Ecclesiasticall office as it appeareth by the election of Agnes whiche was called Iohn who held and occupyed the Popes place dignitye by the space of two yeares and more It may also be that they doe choose a Theefe a Murderer or a Deuil and consequently they may also elect and choose Antichrist It may also be that for loue couetousnesse or hatred they doe choose some person whom God doth not allowe And it appeareth that that person is not lawfully elect and and chosen In so much as the Electours or the greater part of them haue consented and agreed together according to the custome of men vpon any person or that he is thereby the manifest Successour or Uicare of Peter the Apostle or any other in the Ecclesiasticall office Therefore they which most accordingly vnto the scripture doe elect and choose reuelation being sette a parte doe onelye pronounce and determine by some probable reason vppon hym they doe electe and choose wherevppon whether the Electours doe so choose good or euill we ought to geue creditte vnto the workes of hym that is chosen for in that poynt that any manne doth moste aboundauntly worke meritoriously to the profitte of the Church he hath thereby more aboundaunt power geuen him of God thereunto And hereupon sayth Christ in the 10. of Iohn geue credit vnto workes The 2. Article The Pope being a reprobate is not the head of the holy Church of God The aunswere I wrote it thus in my Treatise that I woulde willinglye receiue a probable and effectuall reason of the Doctour howe thys question is contrary vnto the fayth to say that if the Pope be a reprobate how is he the head of the holy churche Beholde the trueth cannot decay or fayle in disputation for did Christ dispute agaynst the fayth when he demaunded of the Scribes and Pharisyes Math. 12. Ye stocke and ofspring of Uypers how can ye speake good thinges when you your selues are wicked and euill and beholde I demaunde of the Scribes if the Pope be a reprobate and the stocke of Uipers how is he the head of the holy Church of GOD that the Scribes and Pharisyes which were in the Councell house of Prage make aunswere hereunto For it is more possible that a reprobate man shoulde speake good thinges for so much as he may be in state of grace according vnto present iustice then to be the head of the holy Church of God Also in the 5. of Iohn our Sauiour complayneth vppon the Iewes saying How can you beleue which doe seeke for glory amongest your selues and doe not seeke for the glory that commeth onely of God And I likewise doe complayne how that if the Pope be a reprobate can he be the head of the Church of God which receiueth hys glory of the world and seketh not for the glory of GOD For it is more possible that the Pope being a Reprobate should beleue then that he should be the head of the Churche of God For so much as he taketh his glory of the world The 3. Article There is no sparke of apparance that there ought to be one head in the spiritualtye to
hys booke De sacerdotum Monachorum abhominatione desolationis pag. 84. c. I beseech the reader to note Nam ista scribens fateor ê™ nihil aliud me in illis perurget nisi dilectio Dom. Nostri Iesu crusifixi c. That is For in writing these things I confesse nothinge els to haue moued me hereunto but onely the loue of our Lorde Iesus crucified whose printes and stripes according to the measure of my weakenes and vilenes I couet to beare in my selfe beseeching hym so to geue me grace that I neuer seek to glory in my selfe or in any thing els but onely in his crosse and in the inestimable ignominy of his passion which he suffered for me And therefore I write and speake these thinges which I do not doubt will like all such as vnsaynedly do loue the Lord Christ crucified and contrary will mislike not a little all suche as be of Antichrist Also agayne I confesse before the most merciful Lord Iesus Christ crucified that these thinges which I do now write and those that I haue written before neither I could haue writteÌ„ nor knew how nor durst so haue written vnlesse he by hys inward vnction had so commaunded me Neither yet do I write these thinges as of authority to get me fame and name For as S. Augustine Hierome do say that is onely to be geuen to the scriptures and writinges of the Apostles Euangelistes and Prophetes and to the Canonicall Scriptures which doe abounde in the fulnes of the spirite of Iesus And whatsoeuer is there sayd is full of veritie and wholesome vtilitie c. And here place also would require something to say to Aeneas Siluius to Antoninus and to Laziardus which falsly impute articles to him whiche he neuer mayntayned But because tyme suffereth not I wil proceed to the story of maister Hierom of Prage The Tragicall and lamentable history of the famous learned man and godly Martyr of Christ maister Hierome of Prage burned at Constance for like cause and quarrell as Maister Iohn Hus was 1416. THese thinges hetherto being discoursed touching the lyfe Actes and Constant martyrdom of M. Iohn Hus with part also of his letters adioyned to the same whose death was on the 6. of Iuly an 1416. now remayneth coÌ„sequently to describe the like Tragedy and cruell handeling of his Christian companion and fellow in bandes M. Hierome of Prage Who grieuously sorrowing the slaunderous reproch and diffamation of his couÌ„try of Boheme and also hearing tell of the manifest iniuries done vnto that man of worthy memory M. Iohn Hus freely and of hys own accord came vnto Constance the 4. day of Iprill an 1415. Who there perceiuing that Iohn Hus was denyed to be heard and that watche and wayte was layd for hym on euery side he departed to Iberling a Citty of the Empire vntill the next day the which Citty was a myle of froÌ„ Constance and from thence he wrote hys letters by me vnto Sigismund kyng of Hungry and hys Barons and also vnto the Councell most earnestly requiring that the kyng and the Councell would geue him a safe conduct frely to come and go and that he woulde then come in open audience to aunswere vnto euery man if there were any of the Councell that would lay any cryme vnto hym as by the tenour of his intimation shall more at large appeare When as the sayd king of Hungary was required therunto as is aforesayd being in the house of the Lord Cardinall of Cambray he denyed to geue M. Hierome anye safe conducte excusing himselfe for the euil speede he had with the safe conduct of Iohn Hus before and alleadging also certayne other causes The deputies also of the foure nations of the Councell being moued thereunto by the Lords of the kingdome of Boheme aunswered wee say they will geue hym a safeconduct to come but not to depart Whose aunsweres when they were reported vnto maister Hierome he the next day after wrote certaine intimations according to the tenour here vnder written which he sent vnto Constance to be set vpon the gates of the Citty and vpon the gates of the Churches and Monasteries and of the houses of the Cardinals and other nobles and prelates The tenour wherof here followeth word for word in thys maner Unto the most noble Prince and Lord the Lord Sigismund by the grace of God king of the Romanes alwaies Augustus and of Hungary c. I Hierome of Prage maister of Arte of the generall vniuersities of Paris Colleyn Heldeberg Prage by these my present letters do notifie vnto the king together with the whole reuerend Councell and as much as in me lyeth do all men to vnderstand and know that because of the crafty slaunderers backbiters accusers I am ready freely of myne owne will to come vnto CoÌ„stance there to declare openly before the Councell the puritie and sinceritie of my true fayth and myne innocencie and not secretly in corners before any priuate or particulate person Wherfore if there be any of my slauÌ„derers of what natioÌ„ or estate soeuer they be which will obiect agaynst me anye crime of errour or heresie let them come forth openly before me in the presence of the whole Councell and in theyr owne names obiect agaynst me and I will be ready as I haue written to aunswere openly and publikely before the whole Councell of myne innocencie and to declare the puretie and sinceritie of my true fayth And if so be that I shal be fouÌ„d culpable in errour or heresie then I will not refuse openly to suffer such punishment as shall be meete and worthy for an erroneous person or an hereticke Wherefore I most humbly beseech my Lord the King and the whole sacred CouÌ„cell that I may haue to this end and purpose aforesayd safe and sure accesse And if it happeÌ„ that I offering suche equitie and right as I do before any fault be proued agaynst me be arested imprisoned or haue any violence done vnto me that theÌ„ it may be manifest vnto the whole worlde that this generall Councell doth not proceede according to equitie and iustice if they woulde by any meanes put me backe from this profouÌ„d and straight iustice being come hether freely and of myne owne minde and accorde The whiche thing I suppose to be farre from so sacred and holy Councell of wise men WHen as yet he through such intimations copied out in the Bohemian Latine and Germayne tongue being set vp as is aforesayd could not get any safeconduct theÌ„ the Nobles Lords and Knightes specially of the Bohemian nation present in Constance gaue vnto maister Hiâ—rome their letters patentes coÌ„firmed with their seales for a testimony and witnesse of the premisses With the which letters the sayd M. Hierome returned agayne vnto Boheme but by the treason and conspiracy of his enemies was taken in Hirsaw by the officers of Duke Iohn and in Zultzbach was brought backe agayne to
done in the premisses at the day and place aforesayd or that he which hath so executed our commaundement do so certifie vs by his letters Dated at our Manour of Lambeth the xxij day of October an 1457 and in the 4. yeare of our translation This citation being directed the Byshop vpon the sūmon thereof was brought or rather came before the iudges and Bishops vnto Lambeth where the foresaid Thomas the Archbishop with his doctors and Lawyers were gathered together in the Archbishops Court. In which conuention also the Duke of Buckingham was present accōpanyed with the Bishop of Rochester and of Lyncolne What were the opiniōs and articles agaynst him obiected after in his reuocatiou shall be specified In his answering for himselfe in such a company of the Popes frendes albeit he coulde not preuayle notwithstanding he stoutly defending himselfe declared many thinges worthye great commendation of learning if learning agaynste power coulde haue preuayled But they on the contrary part with all labor and trauel extended themselues either to reduce him or els to cōfound him As here lacked no blustring wordes of terrour and threatning so also many fayre flattering wordes and gentle persuasions were admixt with al. Briefely to make a short narration of a long and busy trauers here was no stone lefte vnturned no wayes vnprooued eyther by fayre meanes to entreat him or by terrible manasses to terrifye his mind till at the length he being vanquished and ouercome by the bishops began to faynt and gaue ouer Wherupon by by a recantation was put vnto him by the Byshops which he should declare before the people The copy of which his recantation here foloweth ¶ The forme and maner of the retractation of Reynold Pecocke IN the name of God Amen Before you the most reuered Father in Christ and Lorde the Lorde Thomas by the grace of God Archbishop of Canterbury priuate of England and Legate of the Apostolicke sea I Reynolde Pecock vnworthy Bishop of Chichester do purely willyngly simply and absolutely cōfesse and acknowledge that I in times past that is to say by the space of these 20. yeares last past and more haue otherwise conceiued holdē taught and written as touching the Sacramentes and the Articles of the fayth then the holy Church of Rome and vniuersall Church and also that I haue made written published and set forth many diuers pernitious doctrines bookes workes writings heresyes contrary and agaynst the true Catholicke and Apostolicke fayth contayning in them errours cōtrary to the Catholicke fayth especially these errours and heresies here vnder written 1. First of all that we are not bounde by the necessitye of fayth to beleue that our Lord Iesus Christ after his death descended into hell 2. Item that it is not necessarye to saluation to beleeue in the holy Catholicke Church 3. Item that it is not necessary to saluation to beleue the communion of Sayntes 4. Item that it is not necessary to saluation to affirme the body materially in the Sacrament 5. Item that the vniuersall Churche may erre in matters which perteyne vnto fayth 6. Item that it is not necessary vnto saluation to beleue that that which euery generall Councell doth vniuersally ordeine approue or determine should necessaryly for the helpe of our fayth and the saluation of soules be approued and holden of all faythfull Christians Wherfore I Reynold Pecocke wretched sinner which haue long walked in darckenesse and now by the merciful disposition and ordinaunce of God am reduced brought agayne vnto the light and way of truth and restored vnto the vnity of our holy mother the Church renoūce and forsake all errors and heresyes aforesayd Notwithstanding godly reader it is not to be beleued that Pecocke did so geue ouer these opinions howsoeuer the wordes of the recantation pretend For it is a pollicy play of the bishops that when they do subdue or ouercome any mā they cary him whither they list as it were a yoūg Stere by the nose and frame out his words for him before hand as it were for a Parate what he should speake vnto the people not according to his owne will but after theyr lust and fantasy Neither is it to be doubted but that thys Bishop repented him afterward of his recantation which may easely be iudged hereby because he was committed agayn into prison deteined captiue where as it is vncertaine whether he was oppressed with priuy and secret tyranny and there obteined the crown of Martyrdom or no. The Dictionary of Thomas Gascoigne I haue not in my handes present But if credite be to be geuen to such as haue to vs alledged the booke this we may finde in the 8. Century of Iohn Bale chapter 19. that the sayd Thomas Gascoigne in his third part of his sayd dictionary writing of Reinold Pecocke maketh declaration of his articles cōteining in them matter of sore heresy First saith he Reynold Pecock at Paules crosse preached openly that the office of a Christen Prelate chiefly aboue all other things is to preach the word of God That mans reason is not to be preferred before the Scriptures of the old and new Testament That the vse of Sacraments as they be now handled is worse then the vse of the lawe of nature That Byshops which buy theyr admissions of the Bishop of Rome do sinne That no man is bound to beleue and obey the determination of the Churche of Rome Also that the riches of Bishops by inheritage are the goods of the poore Item that the Apostles themselues personally were not the makers of the Creed that in the same Creede once was not the Article he went downe to hell Item that of the foure senses of the Scripture none is to be taken but the very first and proper sense Also that he gaue litle estimation in some poyntes to the authority of the olde Doctors Item that he condemned the wilfull begging of the Friers as a thing idle and needles This out of Thomas Gascoigne Leland also adding this moreouer sayth that he not contented to folow the Catholicke sentence of the Churche in interpreting of the Scripture did not thinke soundly as he iudged it of the holy Eucharist At length for these and suche other Articles the sayde Reynold Pecocke was condemned for an hereticke by the Archbishops and Bishops of Rosse Lyncolne and Winchester with other diuines moe Wherupon he being driuē to his recantation was notwithstanding deteyned still in prison Where some say that he was priuily made away by death Halle addeth that some say his opinions to bee that spirituall persons by Gods lawe ought to haue no temporall possessions Other write that he sayde that personall tithes were not due by Gods lawe But whatsoeuer the cause was he was caused at Paules Crosse to abiure and all his bookes brent and he himselfe kepte in his owne house during his naturall life I maruell that Polydore of this extremity of
miracles what straunge sightes this Berthwalde or Drithelm did see after hys death read the ix booke of Henr. Huntington King Etheldred made Abbot of Bardney Adelmus Gu. Malmesâ— lib. 5. de pontifiâ— Lying miracles Malmesbery commended for hys stile Lying miracles reproued Aldelme Byshop Swithune Bishop of Wine Bedo lib. 5. cap. 23. Ex historia Iornalensi do regib us Northumb S. Iohn of Beuerlay Anno. 717. Annother lying fable of Sainct Eguyne Ranulphus in Polychro lib. 5. cap. 23. Beda lib. 5. de gestes Angl. Polycron lib. 5. cap. 17. A generall rule seruing for the obseruation of Easter day This rule of Easter seemeth to be taken out of the booke of Numer And they going out of Ramesse the 15. day of the first moneth the next day after held their Easter c. Why priestes crownes were shauen Bede de gest lib. 5. The copy of a Monkish letter of Colfride to King Naiton for the shauing of Priestes crownes How proueth he that the Apostles Iob and Ioseph were shauen Much sayd nothing proued Diuersitie of rites hurteth not the Church See how these shauelinges would father their shauing vpon Peter which is neyther found in Scripture nor in any approued story but onely in paynted clothes Why Priestes and Monkes be shauen in the crowne The shauing of the crowne what it representeth How doth the signe of the crosse defend Churches from euill spirites when it cannot keepe them from euill Priestes If shauing of the crown doth each men patience in suffering how commeth it that we see none more washpish and irefull then these shorne generations of Monkish vipers Simon Magus 〈◊〉 as he sayâ— The difference betweene the shauing of Peter and Simon Magus In outward habite christians ought not to reliâ—â—ble wicked doers * There is but one mediator betweene God and man Christ Iesus The Scottish monke and the Englishe monkes differed in their shauing If Peter shall let in the elect of God into heauen Christ theâ— serueth in little stede A note to admonish the reader Fabia cap. 141. Guliel Malmesb de Reg. An. 724. Ethelburge the Queene perswadeth her husbaÌ„d to be a monke The crafty head of a woman King Iue resigning hys kingdome went to Rome and became a Monke Ethelburga the Queene made NuÌ„ne of Barking Peter pence first graunted and payd to Rome The lawes made by King Iue to his people Celulphus King of Northumberland Bede An. 729. The life of Bede briefly described This Benedict maister to Bede was the first that brought in the vse of glasse windowes into England Also the sayd Benet 〈…〉 An Epistle of Pope Sergius The famous learning of Bede Bede commended for integritie of lyfe Anno. 735. S. Iohns Gospell translated into English by Bede Celulfus of a King made a Monke Egbert Kyng of Northumberland Anno. 747. Ex Malmesb. lib. de gestis pontifi Anglo Cutbert Archbishop of Caunterbury The rogation dayes had not then that superstition in them as they had afterward Boniface an English man Archb. of Mentz Ethelwold kyng of Merceland Edelhim a strong 〈◊〉 valiant warriour Pride ouerâ—throwne A letter of Boniface otherwise called Winfridâ— sent to kyng Ethelbald Nihil factum quod non factum prius The corrupt lyfe of Nunnes noted The popish actes and doynges of Boniface Archbishop of Magunce The Monastery of Fulda in Germany builded by Boniface Childericus The French king deposed and Pipinus intruded Dist. xl cap Si Papa Images in Churches subuerted by Emperours mayntained by Popes Philippicus for holding agaynst Images lost hys Empyre his eyes The author of the book called the dialogues of Gregory Memoriall of reliques offring and sacrifice for the dead brought into the masse Canon The Popes feete first kissed of the Emperours Segebert king of Westsaxons Sigebert slayne Cruell tyranny with like cruelty reuenged Kenulphus king of Westsaxons Anno. 748. Murder reuenged with murder Offa King of Mercia An vntruth noted in the story of Fabianus The primacy of Canterbury remoued to Lichfield Lambrith Archbishop of Cant. This Alcuinus is commended for hys learning nex to Adelmus and Bede aboue all Saxons Ethelbert king of Eastangles wrongfully murdered by Offa. The vayne suspicion and wicked counsell of a woeman Ex historia Iornalensi Malmesocriensi Cruell murder reuenged Offa and Kenredus of Kinges made monkes at Româ— Egfretus King of Mercia Alcuinus Osbâ—â— to patritio The fathers fault punished in the childe Egbert King of Kent taken prisoner A princely example of clemency in a noble king The Church of Winchcombe builded by K. Kenulphus Egbert King of Kent released out of prison A place of Fabian doubted Pope Steuen the second The donation of Pipinus falsely taken to be the donation of Constantine Ex polyer lib. 5. cap. 25. Pope Paule the first Images agayne mayntayned by the Pope agaynst the Emperour A lay man pope who was deposed and had hys eyes put out Pope Steuen the third The counsell of Constantinople the 7. condemned of the Pope for condemning Images The pope also ordayned Gloria in Excelsis to be song in the masse at S. Peters altar by the Cardinals Pope Hadrian the first Images agayne mayntayned by the Pope to be mens Kalenders The body of S. Peter clothed iâ— siluer The order of the Romish masse book when it came in Ex Duraâ—do Nauâ—â—ro Iacobâ—â— Voragine in vita Greg. Et tameâ— ipsis commentum placet Terent Note well the practise of Prelates in planting their popish masse Gregories masse taketh place in Europe Carolus Magnus beneficiall to the sea of Rome Rex Christianissimus intituled to Fraunce A letter of Charles the great sent to king Offa. How the Pope heareth the cry of poore widowes and Orphanes The Empire translated from Greece to Fraunce Images written agaynst as contrary to the true fayth This Albinus was Alcuinus aboue mentioned The Bishops and Princes of England against Images King Egbert made a monke Anno. 757. Osulphus Mollo otherwise called Adelwold Alcredus or Aluredus Ethelbert otherwise named Adelred or Eardulphe Alfweld Osredus Adelred agayn kinges of Northumberland Anno. 764. Northumberland kingdome ceaseth Alcuinus otherwise called Albinus The troubles of the kingdome of Northumberland and described by Alcuinus Ex Historia MalmesberieÌ„si How it rayned bloud in Yorke Anno. 780. Brigthricus K. of Westsaxons Edelburga daughter to Offa poysoned her husband Wickednes reuenged Irene Anno. 784. Images restored agayne by Irene at Constantinople The second councell at Nicea The wickednes of Irene condingly rewarded Kenelmus king of Mercia innocently slayne Celulphus Ceolulphus Bernulphus kings of Mercia The kingdome of Mercia ceaceth Vniust dealinges of men iustly rewarded Paules Church The first aultar and crosse set vp in England The church of Winchester The church of Lincolne The church of Westminster The scholes at Cambridge Abbey of Knouisburgh Malmesb. Abbey of Glocester Mailrose Heorenton Hetesey The monastery of S. Martin at Douer Lestingey Whitbie This Hilda was first conuerted to the fayth by Paulinus a godly and learned
yeare of Nero that is easilie refuted both by the Scriptures and Histories for so we vnderstand by the declaration of Saint Paule Gal. 1.2 that 14. yeares after his conuersion Saint Paule had Peter by the hand at Hierusalem Moreouer the said Paule in the foresaid Epistle witnesseth that the charge Apostolical was coÌ„mitted vnto Peter ouer the Circumcised and so was he intituled Also S. Paule writing to the Romains in his manifold salutations to them in Rome maketh no mentioÌ„ there of S. Peter which doubtles should not haue bene vnremembred if he had bene then in Rome Againe S. Peter dating his Epistle from Babilon was not then belike at Rome Furthermore histories doe record that Peter was at Pontus v. yeares and at Antioch 7. yeares How could he then be 25. yeares at Rome Finally where our aduersary alleaging out of Ado saith that S. Peter was there 25 yeres vntil the last yere of Nero how can that stand when S. Paule suffering vnder Nero was put to death the same day tweluemonth that is a whole yeare after Peter c. But especially how agreeth this with Scripture that Christ should make Peter an Apostle vniuersall to walke in all the world Item per vniuersum orbem Item Etitis mihi testes vsque ad fines terrae c. And our Papists would needs make him a sitting Byshop and intitle him to Rome How accorde these Apostolus and Episcopus ire and sedere Omnes gentes and Roma togither And thus haue I resolued the first vntrueth of that Popish demonstration aboue rehearsed Pag. 14. wherein they thinke to proue that as Peter although hee was not called vniuersall Apostle yet was the head of the whole Churche so the Pope might and hath had after him the charge of the whole Church although he was not called vniuersall Bishop in the olde tyme. c. Now followeth the second vntrueth to be touched in the same argument which is that because Peter was the head of the church so therfore the Pope must also be the head of the church and was albeit he was not called vniuersal bishop a long time But this we do deny yea the matter denieth it selfe by their owne position for being graunted by them that the title of vniuersall bishop was not receiued at Rome but refused to the time of Gregory then mâ—st it necessarily be graunted that the Bishops of Rome before S Gregory had not the charge of the whole church neither could be admitted by that reason to be heads of the church For so much as there can be no head but which is vniuersall to the whole body neither can any haue charge of the whole but he must needes be vniuersal to all and singuler partes of that whereof he hath the charge As in sciences whosoeuer hath knowledge cunning in all the seuen liberal sciences all the partes therof pertaining to liberall knowledge is said to be an vniuersall learned man so in office to whomsoeuer the publike charge of all Churches doth appertaine how is he not to be called bishop vniuersal Now if before S. Gregories time the name of vniuersall bishop was repealed in Rome how then can the name be refused the definition of the name be admitted Or els let our aduersaries tell vs how they define an vniuersall Bishop seing this word bishop is properly the name of office whereto is annexed charge Wherefore if a Bishop be he which hath the charge of all soules in his Dioces coÌ„mitted to him must render account for theÌ„ al then whose charge extendeth to all singuler churches must render account for euery christian soule within the whole world to him caÌ„ not be denied the name of an vniuersal bishop hauing the office of an vniuersall bishop Or if he be not an vniuersall bishop he cannot then haue the charge of the whole that is of all and singular churches of Christ. For such is the rule of true definition Cui coÌ„uenit definitio conuenit definitum contra Cui adimitur definitio eidem definitum adimitur Although this word vniuersall in the Greeke writers signifieth that which we in our vulgar English tongue call catholike yet I suppose our aduersaries here wil not take vniuersall in that sense For after that meaning as we doe not deny that the bishops of Rome may be vniuersall Bishops so neither can they deny but other bishops also may be as vniuersall that is as catholike as they But such as more distinctly schoolelike discusse this matter define vniuersall or catholike by three things to witte by tyme place and person So that whatsoeuer extendeth it selfe to times all places to all persons that is properly vniuersal or catholike And contrarywise what thing is to be called vniuersal or catholike reacheth to all those three aforesaid coÌ„prehending al places times persons extendeth it selfe of his owne nature to the same or els it is not to be called properly vniuersal or catholike And thus iij. things there be which most commoÌ„ly we cal catholike or vniuersal that is the church which is called the catholike church Faith which is called the catholike faith A man whome also we call a man catholike because these iij. of their owne nature disposition no contrary obstacle letting extend themselues so to all that no time place nor persoÌ„ is excluded Which iij. conditions if they altogither coÌ„curre in the charge of the bishop of Rome then is it an vniuersal charge and he an vniuersal bishop if not then is his charge neither vniuersall nor he the head of the Church nor yet vniuersall bishop For how these three can be separated I can not see except the aduersary part do proue it more euidently then yet they haue done And thus much to the obiection of our aduersaries arguing thus that as S. Peter being not called vniuersall Apostle yet was the head of the vniuersal church So the Pope although he was not first called vniuersall Bishop had and might haue the charge of the whole Church and was the vniuersall head of the same The which obiection conteining as is said a double vntruth our aduersaries yet notwithstanding do busie themselues greatly to fortify by sunory testimonies and allegations patched out of old and auncient Doctours but specially out of Theodoritus Irenaeus Ambrose Augustine proouing by them that the sea of Rome hauing the preeminence and principallitie hath bene honoured aboue all other churches Whereupon the said aduersarie before minded groundeth this consequent Irenaeus Ambrose Augustine and Theodoritus affirme that the church of Rome is the chiefe of all other churches Ergo the Bishop and head of that church is chiefe and head ouer all other bishops head of all other churches But this consequent is to be denied for that the excellencie of the church or place doth not always argue the excellencie of the minister or bishop nor yet necessarilie doth cause