like A. Bs. yet none of them was Divinely Inspired Q. Instance How could an unlearned Person write as she did without Divine Inspiration A. 1. It is much doubted if Poiret or some other man wrote not these Books that are said to be hers 2. It is very conceavable how one Unlearned but of a Melancholly Temper and Luxuriant Fancie might write such Books getting Terms of Art by Converse with Learned Men and a Schem and Copy of their Fancies and high flown Notions by reading some of these called Mystiches such as Theular and Joannes à Cruce yet without Divine Inspiration Obj 3. She wrote without premeditation and did neither correct nor read over what she once wrote A. That is not like to be true yet if it was indeed so then her writtings are somuch the worse Obj 4. She had no Worldly aim therefore c. A. Many pretended Enthusiasts seemed to have as little who yet were not Divinely Inspired Obj. 5. She reached the Consciences of Others therefore c. A. All Sectaries and Shismaticks have the like pretension accounting the People of their perswasion the only Inlightned and Godly Party having the Old Gnosticks for their Patrons in Monopolising Godliness to themselves Iren. L. 1. G. 1. see Corse instr L. 1. C. 37. and L. 14.2.1 whereas the truly Orthodox rather make one Christian than an hundred of their Opinion Obj. 6. Her Writtings had no contradiction in them therefore c. A. It shall be shown she had in the next Section as for Example on this present Subject She affirmed that one might know by his Natural Spirit her self to be Divinely Inspired Ap. pt 3. p. 197 But against that p. 200. None can discern her to be Divinely Inspired who is not so himself now to know a certain thing by the Natural Spirit and not to know it thereby is a Contradiction but to know by the Natural and not to know but by the Divine Spirit is to know and not to know by the Natural Spirit which is a clear Contradiction of her self whereas GOD's Spirit cannot contradict Himself He being Truth it self Obj. 7. She had a Pious Life and taught rare Penitence therefore c. A. St. Aug. Epis 106. accounts that Pelagius the Arch Heretick deceived many by the strictness of his Life and Doctrine so he taught the Doctrine revived now by A. B. That riches should be abandoned and that we can by a strict penitence merit remission of sins c. Obj. 8. A. B. affirmed that she was Divinely Inspired therefore c. A. But I have proven the contrary therefore she was not Divinely Inspired SECTION IV. Q. If the Doctrine of A. B. be conform to the Holy Scriptures A. THis is the second Material Head in this Tractate for if it be true which is often written be A. B. and her Ap. That her Doctrine is agreeable to the Holy Scriptures which are the only Publick Standard of Truth then it would be most injurious for any man to offer to give Chek unto it Therefore I hope it will be no less profitable than pleasant to the Readers that this be fairly put to the Test and if it appear upon an impartial inquirie that not a little but very much of A. Bs. Doctrine be alien from and contrary to the Scriptures it may happily prove an Antidote for ingenuous People that they swallow not down her Poisonous Errours together with her Varnisht Pretensions to Devotion and Piety for to write Errours pretending to be Divinely Inspired makes the sin the more hainous to father Untruths upon the Spirit of Truth SUBSECTION I. Anent the Essentials of Religion THe essence of any thing is that which we conceive in the first place as the definitive Idea or formal Notion of it and without which it could not be such a being as the Soul and Body are the Essential Parts of Man so the Essentials of Religion are these most necessary and fundamentall Truths which if any Person disown he is accounted an Atheist or Heretick and none of the True Religion In the beginning of the next Subsection I purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to consider the Aps. distinction of Essential and Accessory Verities and at the present for dispatching's sake shall admit of his Definition of the Essentials of Religion p. 1. p. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. that they are such Truths without the Express Knowledge and Belief of which none can be eternally saved A. B. and the Ap profess that they own the Apostles Creed and that they are content that her Doctrine be entirely tryed by the Holy Scriptures L. W. Pref. to the English Reader now their Knowledge and Ingenuity in that main Point whether or no their Doctrine be agreeable to the Scripture and the Creed which is collected therefrom shall be brought to the tryal distinctly in the subsequent part of this Section SECTION IV. SUBS. I. N. I. Concerning GOD and the Blessed Trinity THe word Religion is taken from a Latine word Religando Binding for it is an Holy Law or Doctrine binding or obliedging Man to worship and serve GOD and binding us to Him for our own Salvation It is the Chief thing in Religion to have true Knowledge of GOD in order to the glorifying of Him and next to that how we shall be happy by Him John 17.3 This is Life Eternal that they may know Thee the only true GOD and JESUS CHRIST whom thou hast sent Heb. 11.6 For he that cometh to GOD must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him But A. B. had not a right notion of GOD Almighty when she wrote that man is made as a little God in his Divine nature inclosed in his humanity Our Souls are little Divinities The Soul is GOD and GOD is the Soul We are not to seek GOD without us GOD made us Deities depending upon Him The Church is an invisible Spirit and the Church is GOD himself S. V. pt 1. p. 54.75 L. W. pt 1. p. 42.53 110.111.113 and pt 3 p. 92. Such Doctrine cannot abide the Test of the Holy Scriptures which teach us that GOD is the most perfect Being most Simple Infinite Immense Immutable Independent and Eternal whereof the contrary properties are in the Creatures Deut. 6.4 The LORD our GOD is one LORD But if the Church or the Soul of man be GOD then there must be more Gods then One which to affirm were blasphemous and hereticall The Ap. p. 52. attempts to answer this citing John 17.21 and thence infering that seeing man may have some sort of union with GOD A. Bs. words may be favourably Interpreted That is but a weak subterfuge for the Learned Author doubtless knows that the Text John 17.21 and its Parallels do not excuse A. Bs. foresaid language for CHRISTS praying That Believers might be one in Him and one among themselves imports only their being Members of His Mystical Body that thereby they might recover the
of God c. The Prophets and Apostles were without any previous Ratiocination of themselves powerfully moved by God both to Teach and Write the Rule of Faith and Manners and that infallibly both as to Matter and Words which they proved to be immediat Objective Revelation or rather Gods word than their own 1 Thess 2.13 by the gift of Tongues Miracles Oracles Visions discovering of Secrets foretelling things to come and the conversion of men to God beyond and above the ordinary Humane Means The phrase thus explained I come to state and answer the Question to wit if A. B. was Divinely inspired The Ap. spends the third part of his Treatise being 38 leaves aiming to prove that A. B. was led by the Spirit of God or what is the same on the matter divinely inspired but never shewing in what sense or meaning he would have the World believe that she was so and therefore all discoursing to that purpose looks too like a continued Sophism commonly called Ignorantio Elenchi or a Fallacious way of arguing seeming to prove the thing intended by an hudle of pretended Arguments which yet conclude nothing as to the main point under Debate Viz. In what sense or respect he alleadgeth his A. B. to have been Divinely inspired 1. Which now to examine particularly I grant that she was Divinely Inspired in the first of the five respects forementioned i. e. She had a Rational Soul if ever there was such a person as A. B. which some doubt of who lived in Flanders about the time she is said to have been at Lisle and yet heard nothing of her but this is not all which the party means by her being Divinely inspired since she pretends to more than an ordinary Spirit 2. It is more to be doubted if she was divinely inspired in the second sense to wit if she was fitted and well qualified for the condition and imployment that she set out for in the World which was three fold the Mistris of a Familie a School-Mistris and a Prophetess or a Teacher to reform all Mankind There is but little evidence given in her own writtings of he Discretion and far less of Divine inspiration in guiding either her School or Family tho she pretended to the knowledge of discerning Spirits and the very thoughts of peoples hearts Pref. to L. W. p. 41 for she testifieth of her self S. V pt 1. p. 196. how all her 32 Scholars at Lisle were in Actual compact with the Devil and yet did very well what she taught them Also the Ap. writes of her pt 4. p. 323. that all her Servants were Witches and for a long time designed to murder her for her Riches yet mentioneth nothing that ever she dismissed them before her Death And if she had a Prophetical Spirit that shall be tryed anon 3. The third and fourth Respects may be considered together whereanent I charitably think that A. B. was a pious person and so was led by the Spirit of God as any other godly person is Rom. 8.1 But this concession will not satisfie the Ap. who holds her to have been incomparably holy and to have exceeded in knowledge the greatest Divines pt 3. p. 240.241 And therefor her pretension must be tryed in another sense Obj. How can she be called pious who wrote many Errours and was very proud and Uncharitable A. 1. She spake aright of Religion in sundry things which might have been by Divine Conduct but in her Mistakes and Errours she was led by her own spirit Ap. p. 216.217 As she confesseth in another Case when she was deluded by St. Saulien p. 239. And it is probable that she intended not to have written Lies or Fopperies which happened either through her want of the means of true Knowledge or the neglecting thereof as the Reading of the Holy Spriptures and Systems of Divinity and medling with things too high for her Ps 131.1 She might have been Pious tho not pefect and persons ought to be charactered from their better pairt and not from the worst from the set of their Spirit and tract of their Life rather than from particular Actions or Escapes and especially if they endeavour to discover and mortifie all Sins in themselves 2. This Obj. might be easily answered in the opinion of A. B. that Saints may apostatise totally and finally even they who have attained to perfection and could keep all the Commandments of God Which is defended be the Ap. pt 2. p 136. which yet is a gross Errour as shall afterward be shown for according to her Hypothesis it might follow that she wrote only Truth she was Humble and Charitable so long as she continued in the state of Grace but wrote her Errours became Proud and Uncharitable how soon she lost the Grace of God and fell into the estate of Damnation 4. As to the fifth Sense or Consideration of the Conduct of the Spirit of God which is the publick and ordinary acceptation of it namely a Prophetick infallible Spirit This I positively affirm A. B. had not in her writtings and so the Question is answered Negativly in Oposition to the affirmation of A. B. and her Ap. and it is thus proved 1. The Holy Scriptures which were written by the Holy Prophets and Apostles have a self Evidence in them shewing themselves to be the Word of God or the Dictats of the Holy Spirit to wit the matchless Sublimity of the matter the Holiness Purity and Harmony of the whole the Efficacie or effectual working for converting Souls to God besids their confirmation from the Pen-mens speaking of all Languages which they had never heard nor learned and other Miracles accompanying them extraordinary Visions sure Prophecies the Antiquity and preservation of the samen and the Confession of Adversaries But A. Bs. writtings have nothing the like Confirmation and therefore she had no Divine Inspiration in writting them The Major is granted by all Christians and the Minor is also clear since neither A. B. nor her Ap. pretend to such Testimonys tho their pretence be very high 2. The Scriptures written be men Divinely inspired are a perfect Rule in Religion teaching us how to glorifie God and be saved our selves 2 Tim. 3 16.17 That the man of God may be prrfect And we are to hold them accursed who would add to this Canon Gal. 1.8 Rev. 22 18. Therefore A. B. dare not pretend to such inspiration under pain of the curse Obj. You have wronged A. B. by mistateing the Question for she did not pretend to Prophecie or to write by an Infallible Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles did but only to interpret the Scriptures to live well and to teach others to do so L W. pt 1. p. 133. There she promiseth to write a Commentary upon the whole Scriptures tho she never performed it A. First denying the Charge for she is not wronged by me nor the Question mistated since it is the ordinary and received Sense of the Phrase to be
Divinely Inspired or to be led by the Spirit of God in writting to write by an Infallible Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles did who were the Amanuenses of the Holy Ghost 2. Though she durst not speak it out in plain Terms that she acclaimed no less than such a Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles had lest the Readers at the first sight had cryed fy upon her for Blasphemie but goes on in Clouds and Darkness never declaring in what Sense she was Divinely inspired yet I say on the matter she acclaimed no less for these Reasons 1. First because when it was objected to her by Divines that she had not such Knowledge as the Prophets had and wrought no Miracles she shifted to give any direct answer but slily strived to diminish their Credit and of the Holy Scriptures also alleadging that the Prophets knew not all things which they wrote that all of them wrought not Miracles that the Devil had opened the eyes of the blind and raised the Dead and that the Lord himself was mistaken I tremble relating it anent the Fig Tree Mat. 11.19 L. W. pt 1. p. 136. Ap. p. 168.203.204.205.206 and 222.223 All which Calumnies might be easily refuted but I leave that Task to those who are writting against them more Copiously 2. The very Title of her Book is Blasphemous to wit The Light of the World which is the Epithite given to CHRIST and his Apostles and in assuming that Title she equaliseth her self to them tho injuriously 3. It is evident that she pretended to such a Spirit as the Apostles had when she affirmed that she could write such a Book as the New Testament L. W. pt 1 p 133. Now if she could have so written then she could have done it either by a fallible or infallible Spirit if only by a fallible Spirit then it could not have been such a Book but if by an infallible Spirit then she acclaimed such a Spirit as the Apostles had which the Objector denyes Many more Instances might be adduced to this purpose but these may suffice 3. Thirdly I answer to the grand Objection that she pretended not to write a New Canon or Rule of Faith but only to expound the Scriptures giving but not granting that her pretensions did run no higher that same is too high The Quakers acknowledge that their Spirit is somewhat inferiour to the Prophets Quakerism no Popery p. 32.33 Mr. G. K. The learned Author whereof is no Quaker now Yea the Roman Church it self would be offended if any man should say that they coine new Tenets in Religion or that they did more by their Dogmatising then to expound the Scriptures and dispense the Churches Traditions but by a Prophetical Light and Divine influence as their doctrine in this point is well collected by Amyrald in Thes Salmur de aut Script n. 15.16 So for A. B. to pretend Divine Conduct to expound the Scriptures better than all others is too great Arrogancie Q. Will you not allow A. B. to have had more of Divine Conduct than you have done alreadie that possibly she had it only in some things which she did and taught as ordinarily every Godly Person hath in what he does aright A. I have granted enough in the said Terms and more I cannot because it is sufficiently proved that she was not Divinely inspired as the Pen-men of the Holy Scriptures were either to add to the Canonical Books or to interpret Scripture infallibly as they did neither was she led by the Divine Spirit as an ordinary Officer in the Church to interpret and apply the Scriptures which is Preaching since she was not fitted for that end by the means of Gods appointment nor yet observed the Rules thereof Neh. 8.8 Ezra the Scribe with the Priests and Levits read in the Book of the Law distinctly and gave the sense and made the People to understand the reading Timothy the Evangelist was enjoined Reading 1 Tim. 4.13 and since his Days all Holy and Wise Men who interpret the Scriptures pray to God for the Direction of his Spirit which indyted them that they may Prophecie according to the Proportion of Faith Rom. 12.6 They compare Scripture with Scripture and look to the Scope of the place they study the Languages in which the Scriptures were first written Histories likewise and Customs of several Countries Proverbial Speeches and famous Writters of them which are often cited and frequent Allusions made thereto in the Holy Scriptures they read the Creeds Confessions of Faith Catechisms and Systems of Divinity of the Orthodox Churches both Ancient and Modern they search for Truth by the Literal Sense of the whole Scriptures pondering well whether or no the speech be in Terms proper to the things treated of or borrowed from other things which is called a figurative Speech By these and the like means the settled and ordinary Teachers and Expositors of the Scriptures doe begging the blessing of God Humbly and Assiduously endeavour to be fitted for the great and Sacred function of labouring in the Word and Doctrine But A. B. does not so much as pretend to use these means nor yet to expound the Scriptures by the true Rules but on the Contrary she laid by the Scriptures and contemned all Systems of Divinity and other helps of Learning Therefore she was not fit or qualified to expound the Scriptures even as an ordinary Teacher So since A. B. was not led by the Spirit of God to write her Books and expound the Scriptures either in an Ordinary or Extraordinary way It remains then that she performed these things by no other Faculty but by Guessing and vain Divination nor can I add a Fourth Member to this Tripartite Division tho possibly the fertile Brain of a new Ap. will gender one shewing how one can be led by the Spirit of God to write not by an Infallible Spirit nor as an Ordinary Teacher nor yet to be a Meer Guesser or pretender to it which as the Roman Proverb was Let the credulous Jew believe not I. To put a Period to this long Section I shall produce all the pretended Reasons which the Ap pt 3. p. 240 and 241. Alleadgeth for proving A. B. to have been Divinely Inspired and shall answer them severally as if they had been Objected against my Conclusion on this Head Obj. 1. Her Doctrine was conform to the Scriptures therefore she was Divinely Inspired A. 1. Denying the Antecedent for her Doctrine was mostly contrary to the Scriptures as God willing shall be Manifested in the next Section 2. I deny likewise the Consequence because a persons Doctrine may be conform to the Scriptures who had no extraordinary Inspiration Obj. 2. She was Unlearned and yet exceeded the greatest Divines A. 1. She exceeded them only in Vanity 2. George Fox was unlearned so he gave it out that all his Divinity was revealed to him among the Hils of Lancaster And Jacob Bhemen the pretended illuminated Sutor wrote seventeen Books
by faith in Christ whereas it is manifest by the Scriptures alreadie cited and many more which could be shown that Christs suffering in our stead and thereby procuring to us remission of sin and freedom from the Punishment due to us therefore is a most true and Divine substitution and not false and Diabolical as A. B. saith 2 Cor. 5.19 GOD in Christ reconcileth the World to himself not imputing their trespasses unto them and not to impute to us our trespasses is to procure a discharge of the samen A wise man should not be ridicul'd for his wisdom but this is the wisest Course that a sinner can take to confess his own frailty and believe to be saved by the free Mercy of GOD for the sake of Christs Merits We do not deny a substitution of love as he calls it that of GOD'S free love in Christ Jesus whereby we are both Justified and Sanctified but neither Penitence nor any other Grace bestowed upon us can be called our Merit nor can there be any addition made to the Sacrifice of Christ which satisfied the Justice of GOD and is the only meritorious cause of our Justification The Ap. insists saying that we carp at the words Merit and Satisfaction while we grant the thing imported thereby that Christ by his Merits hath procured to us to do penitence and to imitat himself without which non can be saved by faith in Him This is the substance of all his suppositions or imperfect sort of Argument in the foresaid place which in the Schools is called a Sorites To which I answer briefly that the Orthodox have good reason to quarrel both at the words and the thing which he understands thereby for it is simply impossible that sinners can either satisfie the Justice of GOD or merit their own Salvation because there is no commutative Justice betwixt GOD and Man as there is in Contracts between man and man so that it were injustice not to remit sin upon all the penitence or good works that we can do He being infinitly Holy and we but frail Creatures who at the best are but Unprofitable Servants Luke 17.10 We ought indeed to evidence our Faith by a good life but to call our penitence or love to GOD or imitation of Christ our own merit is but a vain gloriation and derogatory from the satisfactory Merits of Christ for which I remit him to Bellarmin who is a great Orator for humane merits but confesseth that for the uncertainty of our own Righteousness and the danger of vain Glory it is most safe to place our whole confidence in GOD'S Mercy alone and his Goodness and a few lines after he sayes that without a Revelation no man can know assuredly himself to have true Merits or that he shall persevere in them to the end Likewise because nothing is more easie in this place of tentation than pride to arise from the consideration of good works R. Bell. Card. Jesu de Justi L. 5. c. 7. p. 1266 in 80. SECTION IV. SUBS. I. N. III. Of Mans future State IN the Seventh and two last Articles of the Apostles Creed sundry great Truths are included anent Mans future State which are clearly taught in the Scriptures and are of the essentials of Religion namely that after Death neither Soul nor Body perish but they shall be joined again by the power of GOD through Jesus Christ at the Generall Resurrection and set day of Judgment when He shall pronounce a righteous Sentence upon all Mankind giving unto those who have done well Eternal Life in Heaven and to the wicked Eâ—nal Damnation But A. B. makes a ludicrous Scene of all this writting that the World shall not be consumed by fire there shall be no judgment after Death nor a set and appointed day of Judgment nor any other sort of judgment than what is begun thirty Years agoe that good People shall not goe to Heaven but Christ coming with men and not with Angels shall dwell with them visibly for ever on Earth where they shall propagate their kinde Eternally being retired into a safe Corner of the Earth or rather to the Centre of their Soul to live in all pleasure and the Wicked to another Corner of it to be afflicted by Serpents and all evil things And she believes all this better than all the other Mysteries of our Faith L. W. pt 1. from p. 143. to 148. and from 150. to 159. and from 168. to 170. and pt 2. p. 131. 132. and pt 3. p. 146. And all the foresaid Heretical rapsodie is approved be the Ap. pt 2. p. 180. to 184. the Mysteries of Faith which she doth not so well believe as these her own whimsies are the Unity and Trinity in GOD the Incarnation and Satisfaction of Christ the efficacie of Grace with the free will of Man the Resurrection of the Dead the Day of Judgement and Mens then being mandated to Heaven or Hell These Opinions of A. B. are worse than the Old Millenarâ—â— who yet were still condemned by the Orthodox and Catholick Church which held that the Scriptures in no place promised Christs dwelling on Earth Bodily again but rather the contrary as Acts 3.21 Tit. 1.2 GOD that cannot lie hath in his Holy word assured us of the Truths which I have rehearsed on this head which also demonstrates the falsitie of A. Bs. Tenets lastly repeated John 5.28.29 The hour is comming in the which all that are in the Graves shall hear His Voice and shall come forth they that have done good unto the Resurrection of Life and they that have done evil unto the Resurrection of damnation Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men once to die but after this the Judgment Acts 17.31 He hath appointed a Day in which he will judge the World in Righteousness by that man whom He hath ordained 1 Cor. 15.15.16 For if the Dead rise not then is not Christ raised and if Christ be not raised your Faith is vain 2 Pet. 3.12 Hasting to the coming of the Day of God wherein the Heavens being on fire shall be dissolved and the Elements shall melt with fervent heat there are many parallel places of Scriptures as John 14.3 Mat. 25.46 1 Thes 4.16 The Sophistical shifts that are made be A. B. and her Ap. in the fore cited places for excusing their Errours shall be easily discussed Obj. 1. First Heaven is where GOD is therefore when Christ reigns with his Saints on Earth there needs no other Heaven A. It s answered neither GOD 'S essential Immensity nor His diffused Grace takes away the nature of things or confounds distinct places so Heaven is still His Thron and the place of the Blessed and the Earth his Foot Stool Obj. 2. If Christ doe not reign with His Saints Eternally on Earth then the Earth was made only for Wicked Men and Devils A. The Earth was made for GODS People who serve Him on it now in the Land of the living tho imperfectly but
Sacraments have we not as luculent Precepts for the constant use of them as of any other duties Mat. 28.19 Go teach all Nations baptising them c. 1 Cor. 11.23 I have received of the LORD that which also I delivered unto you and V. 26. As often as ye eat this Bread and drink this Cup c. A. B did snatch the Objection against the baptising of Infants from the Socinians and Anabaptists which is most frivolous that it is not commanded in express terms in the Scriptures Origen who lived in the second Centurie writting on Mat. 6.5.6.7 Assureth us that the Church had it always and that by tradition from the Apostles Yet are we more sure that it is a clear consequence from the Scriptures which being natural from the Text and undistorted doth ever import a Scriptural truth As we read Mat. 22.29 Our Saviour charged the Saducees anent the great Article of the Resurrection That they did err not knowing the Scriptures albeit not the express words of the Text Exod. 3.6 which he cited were directly against them but the consequence thereof so upon this sound foundation Infant Baptism is firmly grounded for the Sacraments are not only Signs but likewise Seals of the New Covenant and they to whom the gracious promises and conditions of the Heavenly Charter belong have a right also to the Seals appended thereunto Gen. 17.7.10 The Promise is to Thee and thy Children said GOD to Abraham Baptism comes in the place of Circumcision which was administred to Children when eight days old The right Preaching of the Word and Administration of the Sacraments are the ordinary means of our Salvation and undoubted marks of the true Church The Ap. pt 2 p. 154. to 159. Alleadgeth what he can to justifie A. B. in this which doth not satisfie 1 That she was above Ordinances Which is a vain boasting and contrary to GODS direction Gant 1.8 2 That she durst not go to the Popish Churches for fear of her life She could not be in alike hazard every where and how doth that excuse her for teaching that no Bodie needs go to Church or partake of the Sacraments 3 That she wrote a Book in defence of the Sacraments against the Quakers The Quaker who offended her was rebuked therefore by his Partie and they were reconciled with A. B. And at the best she contradicteth her self in this Point POINT VII Of Pastors and Church Government THe supposed Gentle-woman and pretended Illuminated A. B. and her Defender or Ap. transforming themselves into Angels of Light S. V. pt 1. p. 112 in all their writtings about Religion have indulged the swing of their absolut and independent free will in nothing more than in their ranting and railing at the Pastors of CHRISTS Flock and the Church Government For thus they write that it is unlawful for any to make it a trade or office to teach others S. V. pt 1. p. 115. L. W. pt 3 p. 90. The office of a Priest is an enemie to the resignation of Souls to GOD and Ap. pt 1. p. 53. All the evils of Christendom comes from the Pastors and all the Peoples degeneracie from their Guides I could adduce many more passages to the purpose but it is needless when the Ap. pt 2. p. 158. declares that the L. W. which is the chief of A. Bs. Books the Key and Rule of all the rest was written on purpose against the Pastors because of the degeneracie of the Roman Church Hereupon it may be reflected without debaiting if she was not injurious to write so against all the Pastors of the Church of Rome without exception of any how can it be thought true that she wrote against the Pastors of that Church only since she declares the Pastoral-Office it self to be unlawful and declaims as much against Protestants as Papists and besides them all Pastors in Christendom not excepting any either in the Greek or Abassine Churches or any where else in the World But on the matter it self how contrary is their Doctrine to the Holy Scriptures Whereby we are well instructed that the Alwise GOD who made Man a social Creature naturally inclined to society and thereby needing both Laws and Government did always prescribe Laws to Mankind and for the benefite thereof positively appointed the Government both Civil and Ecclesiastick and by a special designation Pastors and Church-Officers for his own immediat service and the Salvation of Peoples Souls Eph. 4.11.12.13 He gave Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the Body of CHRIST till we all come in the unity of the Faith and of the knowledge of the SON of GOD unto a perfect Man unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of CHRIST Heb 5.4 No man taketh this honour upon himself but he that iâ— called of GOD as was Aaron Where the true Pastor is there the true Church is and when the Shepherd is smitten the Sheep are scattered abroad Mat. 26.31 So it is one of the main Policies of Satan for destroying the Church altogether to endeavour to bring all the Pastors under contempt as a fit mean for subverting the office it self and consequently to ruin the Church of CHRIST Such railing against all Pastors and the Sacred Function it self is as A flood of water cast out of the mouth of the Old Serpent the accuser of the Brethren for To drown if he could the Woman who is cloathed with the Sun that is the Church of GOD. Rev. 12.9.10.15 The accute Ap. when he readeth this part of the Advertisement may possibly say that the language savours of too much passion and the inference is too hard for may not A. Bs. words bear a more favourable interpretation such as that of the Disc Academ p. 16. 23. That Pastors and Church Government Sacraments and the publick Worship of GOD have no certain connexion with Mans Salvation nor are they certain necessary and infallible means of recovering the love of GOD and A. B. one where or another of her writtings mentioneth the Office of Pastors as a thing that may be reformed and to say that Sacred Offices or means ordained by GOD for his own Glory and Mans Salvation may be reformed is a more moderat Sentiment to hold their phrase than that they are simply unlawful and should be quite abolished Hereto it is answered that I designed in this Censure to evite all hard words as much as possible could be without prejudice of truth which is herein defended yet it is allowed as a maxime among moralists either in speaking writting or other actions to sharpen reason not by our own passions or affections but by these which the cause requireth I called her writting on this point against the Pastoral Office Ranting because her language to that purpose is the same with that of the wild Sect of the Ranters and railing which is calumniating or a wrongous caracterising and ascribing undue epithites to
4. Subs 1. n. 3. how the exotick opinions of some School-men gave her wrong Sentiments of Angels in like manner hearing of some nice points debated among School men and Philosophers she was apt to adopt the worst side of the Problem which being once made hers out it flyes into the World as a new revealed verity for example A. B teacheth S. V. pt 1. p. 96. And the Ap. homologates pt 1. p. 62. That both our Souls and Bodies are propogated from Adam Contrary to Heb. 12.9 where GOD is called the Father of Spirits or the creatour of our Souls in contradistinction to our natural parents who are there termed the Fathers of our flesh And many other of her Accessories she might have learned by ordinary discourse as that the Heretick Eunomius and generally the Gnosticks out of a pretence of magnifying Faith said that good works were not necessary This false and odious opinion her La. after her charitable manner doth most frequently father upon all Protestants without due consideration that St. Aug. confuted it L. de fide oper Whose orthodox strain is followed by Calvin and all Proteslant writters and Billarmine himself de Justif L. 3 c 6. Vindicats Protestants of the foresaid imputation Obj. 2. It was asserted in my hearing by some whom the Borignianists had mistuned that there are more than two thousand verities speaking of these Accessories set out in the Books of A. B. which are not to be read in all the writtings either of Papists or Protestants A. I have discovered in her Books more than an hundreth falsities but have seen none of these new disclosed verities and if any favorite of hers shall be at the pains to number them let him take heed that he make not a false muster or rather such an appearance as drunken men see of great armies in the Air which instantly and quite disappear when sober people are curious to view them And if Accessories be called New Verities they should be rejected on that very head by reason that no truth can be new and all Truths are older than Errours Obj. 3. Have there not been some persons Divinely Inspired Teachers in all Ages such as Antonie and Paul the Anachorets St. Terese St. Briget and St. Katharine Theular and Thomas a Kempeis And were it not for fear of your Pastoral Office A. B. would be respected as one of these and her Books held worthy of all acceptation A. 1. There should be no ground to fear the falling of the Pastoral Office altho many now living were inspired in the measure of the Prophets and Apostles which will never be seeing the Canon of the Scriptures is compleat because the Pastoral Office is appointed of GOD for his especial Service and his perpetual presence is promised to be therewith even as if a King should reveal his will secretly to some special favorits it would no wayes follow from thence that the standing Laws should not be the peoples Rule and be expounded and executed by the settled Judges 2. None of these were infallibly inspired and no more was A. B. neither do I read that Paul and Anthonie the Egyptian Monks spake against the established Offices in the Church though they chused a Monastick Life in time of Persecution If A. B. had any Precedent it was the Spanish Nun Teresa who yet pretended not to be the singular or sole Doctrix of the whole World as A. B. did Thomas a Kempis and Teular were good men but why doth not the Ap. call St. Aug. Bernard and many more eminent men as well inspired as they Obj. 4. To what purpose is all this reasoning against A. Bs. Accessorie Doctrines Since the Ap. did premonish pt 1. Car. 13. p. 38. That if any person did not relish the Accessories he might let them alone that is to say he shall not be bound to believe them and let him forbear to dispute against them how much soever he be dipleased therewith A. That is a shift put into the mouths of all who are become raâ—hly fond of all A. Bs. writtings but it is such a silly shift that I marvel to hear any rationall person pronounce it for a defence when he is pressed with good Arguments against her Errours from Scripture and Reason In the common use of the phrase to let a thing alone is to forbear or to medle or concern with it on such an occasion as when a Boy is to be chastised for a fault he cryes let me alone but let us examine the Aps own gloss of the expression 1. First he says the meaning is you need not believe A. Bs. Accessories to be true unless you please Here he enjoins a rare thing Did ever any other persons pretending to be Divinely Inspired in all their writtings leave the Readers at libertie to believe the half of them to be true or no! Why did she mix and confound them in all her twenty two Books with the Essentials of Religion which ought to be believed and how can unlearned people seperate the Gold from the dross 2. He sayes dispute not against them so says Mahomet in his Alcaron c. 5. and elsewhere If Truth be in them it should be believed if falsehood it ought to be confuted or disputed against and many of them are such as is already proven Obj. 5. It hath been said to me that whoso writes against A. B. will be answered even as the writtings of Le. Clerk at Amsterdam and all Socinian Books are still defended by some persons tho they give much offence to the Church men were it not better then to forbear disputing in matters of Theologie than to increase it A. I aprove not A. Bs. Sentiments in this case who declares that the writtings of Luther Calvin and all the Reformers whom she accounts Hereticks should have been quite despised and not answered or themselves cut off L. W. pt 1. p. 27. It is our duty to dispute for the Truth and altho Errours have Abetters and defenders yet the Truth which is stronger than Errours will at last prevail Obj. 6. The harmonie or consent of all the parts of the Holy Scriptures is one evidence that they were given by Divine inspiration so A.B. never contradicteth herself which sheweth that she was led by the Spirit of GOD in all her writtings A. If she was led by the Spirit of GOD in all her writtings then she should not be opposed but there is one thing said and another thing seen and her deeds in writting falsities proves her saying the contrary to be untrue one may write Books without contradicting himself therein and yet without Divine Inspiration but the tryal of that point anent A. B. shall bring the fourth Section anent her Doctrines to an end NUMBER III. Of her Contradictions IF one proposition be true then the contradictory assertion must be false and no palliating or favourable interpretation can reconcile them as for Instance That is a most true saying which also is
the Amalekits contrary to GOD's command pretending that he did so For the good purpose of Sacrificeing 1 Sam. 15.21.22 Neither should Books be approven in which Errours are mixed with Verities since evil is through any defect but good from the intire cause So I distinguish this Rule if a Writter having a good design mistake in a few things of no great moment and upon sound Advice will revoke his Errours I grant this should be favourably interpreted but if the Errours be gross and many and the Author boasting of being Divinely inspired in writting them and to have had more Light and Piety then all men in that case I deny that such mistakes should pass uncensured Lastly as to the first of the four Pre-concessions for disputing that we should be well acquainted with what we censure that is a very good Rule and by it the Ap. seems to insult his Opponents that either they did not well know the French Language in which A. B. wrote or had not read all her Twenty two Books So not only the Ap. but likewise all that own A. B. whensoever her Errours are mentioned they answer warmly that whatsoever seemeth hard in some of her Writtings is explained in others which the censurers either have not read or will not be at the pains to compare places together Now to ward of this thrust the Reader shall be judge if I censure any thing of A. Bs. Writtings but what I understand well enough having had sufficient means for it by reading sundry of her writtings and particularly The Light of the World which is held for the chiefest of them all and the standard of all both be herself and Poiret see the admonition prefaced thereto by P. P. p. 36. And now I have read the Ap. which is aequivalent to the reading of all her Books since the Author hath read them all and defends all and if I quarrel nothing but what he mantains it were a frivolous shift to bid me go and search any of A. Bs. Books for any explication of her Opinions And if there be reall Errours and Contradictions found in her writtings what explications can remove them To conclude this Section I shall to the foresaid four add other three rules of arguing and especially anent Points of Divinity 1. To explain the Termes and state the Question aright 2. To reason and answer candidly without Sophistry or Deceit 3. To seek Verity rather than victory and therefore though we may justly commend some good things in any Person or his writtings not to mantain their Errours and Evtravagancies which if through fondness we have failed in upon second thoughts to do so no more SECTION III. If A. B. was Divinely inspired A. THis Question cannot be well resolved untill the Terms thereof be cleared in the first place and the Question be rightly stated according to my first Rule for unless this be done all abrupt disputs turn to a meer Logomachie or a proud and ignorant doting about Questions and strife of words which God expresly forbids 1 Tim. 6.4 Divine Inspiration is taken in very different Senses for First in a large sense every man may be said to be Divinely Inspired because of his Rational Soul which was made after the Image of God Gen. 2.7 God breathed into Mans Nosethirls the Breath of Life and Gods breathing into Man is a Divine Inspiration 2ly One is said to be Divinely Inspired to whom God giveth a capacity Genius or fitness for an Office or Imployment as it is written Judg. 3.10 The Spirit of the Lord came upon Othniel and he judged Israel and went out to Warre so it is a necessary Qualification of a Bishop that he be Apt to teach 1. Tim. 3 2. and the Holy Ghost maketh Bishops Acts 20.28 Yea this is ascribed to men of Manuary Callings as to Bezalcel and with him Aholiab Exod. 31.3 I have filled him with the Spirit of God in Wisdom and in all manner of workmanship for the tabernacle 3ly A Spiritual man judgeth not of Divine things by carnal reason Church Authority only Tradition or Custom but according to the Truth and Minde of God revealed in the Scriptures 1 Cor. 2.14.15 But the Spiritual man judgeth all things c. Job 32.8 The Inspiration of the Almighty giveth man Knowledge Which Apothegme may also be referred to the former sense that God qualifies and fitteth every person whom he commissioneth for any Imployment as to teach others Yea persons unregenerated may have something like to this Orthodoxie as that understanding Scribe who in Conference with the Lord did give the true and Spiritual sense of the Law upon whom it was accordingly pronounced That he was not far from the Kingdom of God Mark 12.34 Yet being at a distance from true Conversion all the knowledge he had was only by the common illumination of the Spirit which and other common gifts of the unconverted whether they differ specifically or gradually only from the saving knowledge and graces of the Godly I shall not here abide to determine 4ly Every Pious Person is led by the Spirit of God both in his Conversion when Gods Spirit enlightneth the Understanding and reneweth their Will and likewise afterwards directing and quickning to all Duty which Light and Grace he bestows in such measures as fitteth the work wherein He in his Infinite Wisdom imployes them as reading the Scriptures Praying Preaching Writting doing of good Works and suffering when called thereto Of this the Holy Spirit is the efficient cause he bids us do well Yet it is God who worketh in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure Phil. 2.12.13 so 1 John 2.20 Ye have an unction from the Holy One and ye know all things And this Illumination is by Divines called Subjective Revelation because of the agreement betwixt our Souls and the Divine assistance and to distinguish it from the pretended Enthusiasm of deluded Persons who boast of new Revelations as the chief Rule of their Faith and Manners And in this sense Luther Zuinglius and other Divines who are cited in Quakerism no Popery from pag. 19. are to be understood when they write that the inward word of God and the dictats of the Holy Spirit are the true word of God which profit unto Salvation which is also the Sense and meaning of the ancient Holy Fathers when they speak of the leading of the Spirit of God as S. Chrys upon John 6.63 Christs words are to be heard according to the Spirit And whoso heareth them after a carnal manner profiteth nothing And S. Cypr. de S. sancto p. 485. edit Par. cum Annot. Ja. Pamel Suspiration Inspiration and Aspiration in the Godly they have from the Holy Spirit the cause and effect Matter and Increase 5ly The Prophets and Penmen of the Holy Scriptures were in a strict sense Divinely inspired 2 Pet. 1.21 They spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost 2. Tim. 16.17 All Scriptures is given by the Inspiration