Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard
controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know
he saith thus And I would not speake vnto you Brethren as vnto spirituall mem but as vnto carnall men euen as to Babes in Christ I giue you milke to drinke and not meat for you were not yet able to beare it where he layeth the spirituall man against the carnall man that in regard of carnall affection perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God wherfore it seemeth a strang thing that Sectaries should infer from this text of scripture that euery belieuer hath a priuat (b) S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 2. con haer sharpely rebuks Valentinus for leauing tradition and following the priuat spirit thereby constituting himselfe sole iudge and rule of faith reuealing spirit of truth wherby he is enabled with authority to discern matters of faith and iudge all controuersies and to be iudged of no man himselfe vnto the excluding of all outward Teachers As to the second Text the true meaning of it is not that his vnction only doth teach but that the doctrines of christian religion which men teach outwardly by speaking * Aug. trac 3. in Epis Joan. magisteria inquit forensecus adiutoria quaedam sunt admonitiones cathedram autem in caelo habet qui corda dotet his vnction teacheth inwardly by inspiring grace wherby men are made apt to harken to what the Church ministers teach and indeed this docility or aptness to harken to the word of God is a speciall prerogatiue giuen by the spirit of grace vnto the children of the new law and prophesied of in the old law by Ieremy and Isaias As concerning the third Text set down the true sense is this that whosoeuer beliueth in the son of God aright hath in himselfe inward faith which is a diuine gift and therfore called the testimony of God in as much as it witnesseth that no man can * Mat. tues Christus Filius Dei viui caro sanguis non reuelauit tibi sed pater meus come vnto the son Iesus-Christ except it be giuen vnto him by the Father and albeit that the inward testimony of God hath been the Iole cause to draw some men vnto the maruelous light of faith for example Saint Peter beliued the mistery of the incarnation in vertue of an inward inspiration proceeding from God immediatly neuertheless the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary necessary requisit to the conceiuing of christian faith according to the ordinance of Christ that hath constituted outward Teachers to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church to the worlds end that we be not carryed about with euery wind of doctrine which hath been extreme needlesse if he had thought it expedient to supply euery particular belieuer with a priuat reuealing spirit Furthermore from the premises is clearly deducible that the holy scripture cannot lay clame to the dignitie of a supream Iudge because the office therof which is a primary end intended of necessity * Plato in libris quos de repub scripsit Aristoteles in policicis docent in constitutione formatione alicuius reipub vnum ex ijs quae debent 1. per se intentendi esse ipsum IudiceÌ„ pro dirimendis litibus ciuium ad pacem in rep seruandam in the forming of euery common wealth is to declare laws punish peruerse offenders and pronounce sentence of iudgment for the determining all matter in debate that therby vnity and peace may be preserued but the scripturs can chaleng nothing of iuridicall power in order to iudging defining and deciding controuersies of faith these actions importing life hearing and speaking which the scripturs cannot exercise being vnliud things that neither heare nor speak clearly and consequently vnfit to Iudg matters in debate between one and another besids these were not intended in â—he forming of the Church as requisits absolutly necessary to the Gouerment of it for Christ during the time he conuersed on earth writ nothing himselfe nor commaunded his Apostles or disciples to writ and indeed of themselues they were not much (i) According to Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 18. the Apoles and disciples of Christ were not greatly solicitous to put down in writing the misteries of christian faith being the employment inioyned them was to preach the Gospel in so much that according to the same Eusebius it was a tradition of those days that they were after a manner necessitated to write and according to S. Hierom de viris illus S. Iohn writ his Gospel in regard of Cherintus and Ebion which denyed the diuinity of Christ And indeed t is euident that the Apostles did not write down the principles of christian religion hauing receiued command ad commission from Christ to preach without any commission to write set vpon writing because of their ingagement in an higher imployment namely preaching of the Gospell and it seems that those few which haue written were vrged or necessitated therunto as was Saint Iohn that writ his Gospell to confute the hereticks Cherintus and Ebion who denied the diuinity of Christ Again among the twelue Apostles Saint Matthew and Saint Iohn only and among the 62. Disciples Saint Luke only only writ the Gospell euen diuers years after Christs Ascention into Heauen insomuch that the christiaÌ„ Church had institutioÌ„ exercised iuridicall authority made lawes exacted obedience vnto them along while before the new scripturs were in being and contrary to the old scripture pronounced sentence of iudgment to the anulling of Circumcision which was a controuersy of faith Wherfore doubtless scripturs were neither primarly intended nor primarly giuen as suprem iudges of all matters in debate concerning faith and religion moreouer Saint Irenaeus who florished in the yeare of our lord 160. expresly (k) Irenaeus l. 3. con haer cap. 4. denyes expresly that christian faith had perished if the Apostles had not left vs the scriptures asserteth that the people of sundry countries without the help of paper or inck had preserued christian faith down from the Apostles to his time the vnwritten supplying the room of the written word for this ancient Father writeth and ascribeth that preseruation vnto apostolicall tradition obserued by the ancient Churches together with the help of inward grace proceeding from the holy Ghost Wherfore as those primatiue Churches did perseruer in the profession of the christian faith for the space of many years without scripturs so the present Church assisted with the like meanes might continue pure without spot or wrinckle although it had nothing of written doctrine and consequently the primary end for which scripturs were intended was not to doe the office of suprem Iudg howeuer all things which were written were written for our learning that wee through patience * L. 1. Machabae cap. 11 Ionathas summus Sacerdos scribens spartiatis dicit se suos in rebus aduersis pro solatio habere libros sacros quod ostendit vsum in quem datae sunt nobis
scripturae and comfort of the scripturs may haue hope Rom. 15. although they doe not define and iudge all matters of faith and religion yet they (l) The Apostle 2. Timot. 3. Saith that all scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach argue correct and instruct in iustice That is according to the ancient Fathers to resiste conuince and condemne false doctrines Wherfore according to the same Apostle ad Tit. l. a Bishop must be vnreproueable embracing the faithfull word and sound doctrine that he may be able to exhort and conuince those which say against it conduce mainly therunto tending specially to christian instruction and erudition besides they stir vs vp to ioyne vertue with faith and with vertue knowledg and with knowledg temperance and with temperance patience and with patience godliness and with godliness loue 2. Epis 2. Pet. which is the consistency and plenitude of the law Scripturs are liud * S. Ambros Epis 19. vocat sacras scripturas fontes viuos qui saliunt in vitam aeternam fountains springing vp vnto euerlasting life but the keeping and dressing of them is cōmitted only to the Church of Christ that was the rock whence they sprāg it is the christian catholick Church taught of the holy Ghost that cōprehēdeth the bredth lenght depth and hight of these heauenly fountaines which is to say it is a speciall prerogatiue giuen to the Church of Christ to interpret infallibly and iuridically the holy scripturs (m) According to S. Hierom Epis ad Paulum S Chrys hom 40. in Ioa. S. Austin l. 4. de doct christ cap. 3. the hardness of holy scrpitures proceeds from the profoundnes copiousnes compendiousnes therof in consequence of which a right vnderstanding of sundry passages of necessary depends of tradition as well obserues S. Austiu l. de fide oper and S. Hierom in his scripture prologue ingeniously confesseth that he could not vnderstandand the holy Prophets Isaias Ieremy and Daniel again S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 7. Orig. in explic Epis ad Rom. and S. Austin l. de fide oper cap. 14. confess with one accorde that S. Paul is hard to be vnderstood and especially in regard he vseth frequent hyperboles which proceeded from the vehemency of the spirit that guided his pen. which profoundness of misteries plenteousness of senses shortness of sentences haue rendred obscure hard and intricate as plainly appeareth by the holy writers of the old law namely Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and of the new law Saint Paul especially according to the testimony of Saint Peter 2. Pet. 3. wherein he speaketh of his writings thus * S. Irenaue l. 3. cap. 7. scribens de Haereticis testatur Paulū hyperbolis vti frequenter propter impetu spiritus qui in ipso fuit Idē sentiūt Origines explicat Epistolae ad Rō Aug. de fide operibus cap. 14. 15. our Brother Paul in all his Epis mentioneth things in which Epistles some things are hard to be vnderstood which they that are vnlearned and vnstable wrest as they doe also others scripturs vnto their own perdition for further proofe of this catholick assertion may be alledged the perpetuall contention between one sectary and an other concerning the interpretation of scripture Texts in reference to controuersies of faith for example from the words This is my body Luc. 22. Lutherans doe argue the true and real presence of Christs body in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread contrariwise Caluinists infer a meer figure of Christs body Anabaptists deduce out of the commission Christ gaue vnto his Apostles Math. 18. goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father c. That baptism ought not to be administrated but to such as are de facto apt to receiue instruction And the Arians misinterpreting that saying of Christ Io. * Apud S. Joan. dicit Christus Pater maior me est alibi ego Pater vnum sumus Posterior textus explicatur ab Arianis de vnitate consensus conformitate voluntatū My Father is greater then I denied his Godhead the holy scriptures are a great light of christian doctrine for they are the dictates of the holy Ghost yet not sufficient enough to let vs see the way to euerlasting life vnless they be set on the cādlestick of the * Vt luceat omnibus qui in domo sūt Mat. 5. Church it is not the same thing to be a light and to enlighten a light vnder a bushell is a light and shineth there howeuer it doth not giue light to all that are in the house but when it is put on the candlestick Math. 5. euen so the scripturs light put vnder a bushell that is vnder the interpretation of priuate wits continueth a shining light in it selfe neuertheless doth not enlighten vnto euerlasting life but when it is put on the candlestick of infallible authority proper to the Church of Christ Again the scripture is a booke written within and on the backside Apoc. 5. the outward writing is the letter that killeth the inward the spirit that giueth life 2. Cor. 3. as the soul quickneth the body (n) S. Austin ser 70. de tempore expounding the sacred Text Epis ad Cor. the letter killeth the spirit quikneth If saith he thou follow the true sense of scripture which is the spirit that giues life to the soule it will bring thee vnto saluation but if thou shalt neglect the true sense adhering to the outward letter presuming the true sense to be therein it will often tymes lead thee into errour And according to Tertul. l. de resur carnis Heresies spring vp in regard the scriptures are misinterpreted And he speaking of S. Pauls Epistles affirms that it ought not to seem a hard thing or any way strang that from thence errours should arise since heresies must be 1. Cor. 11. which notwithstanding would not be if the scriptures were interpreted aright Heresies must be not becaus God hath appointed that they should be but because he permitted that they might be and mans free will together with pride and malice makes them to be against Gods positiue will howeuer the supream prouidence from euil heresies draws good things soe the spirit or sense of the scriptures quickneth the letter but to come vnto the spirit of necessity there is required the opening of the booke which the Church onely can doe trusted with the key of authority that openeth it wherfore in as much as many men down from the begining of christianity to these times haue adhered rather to the letter then to the sense of scripture and thence cut out vnauthorized interpretations of their own many heresies haue sprung vp to the distruction of infinit souls wherof Christ prophesying said heresies must be He fore saw that euen of such as were incorporated into his Church would men rise * S. Cypri Epis 55. ad Cornelium Nec aliunde
inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
the Idolatry of the Synagogue and the people her children After the like manner the Digbean Theology which is the product of Mr. Whites 40. yeares study to proue that outward sin doth not necessarily exclude charity from the souls nor that the soul is excluded from the kingdom of Heauen by outward sin make scripture giue an example therof Gen. 19. that is of the sweet agreement between the loue of God and outward sin in Lot and his daughters yet indeed no one place of holy scripture attestes that Lot and his daughters retained charity with their outward sin As touching Lot the holy writer seemes rather to excuse then accuse him in order to outward sin taken in the proper sense For t is expresly set down that his daughters made him drinke wine and lay with him but he perceiued not neither when they lay down neither when they rose so that lot might want knowledg of and thereby voluntary condescention to the fact and in consequence of which might not sin because sin properly taken importes of necessity (d) Sin of necessity includes a voluntary assent of the will which supposeth an act of the vnderstanding for as S Austin often inculcateth no man sinneth by doing a thing which he cannot auoid a voluntary act of the will for S. Austin teacheth that no man sinneth in a thing that he cannot * Hac propositio homo peccat damnabiliter in â—o quod necessario facit est damnata à Pio 5. Gregor 13. secundum Aug. eam asserere summae est iniquitatis ac demeÌ„tiae ait S. Hiero. vbi est necessitas ibi neque meritum neque demeritum neque laus neque vituperium neque vita aeterna neque damnatio auoid or eschew in regard wherof some of the ancient Fathers endeauour to absolue lot from all guilt albeit that the maior part and current of Catholick Doctors of these dayes doe ascribe vnto him the sin of drunkennes at least in the second bout and to his daughters the guilt of both for as much as they voluntarily procured the one and committed the other sin But as to Mr. whites assertion Author of the Digbean Theologie to witt If one should commit an outward deadly sin retaining a loue to God notwithstanding he might goe to Heauen which importes communion fellowship and a Iouing agreement between charity and outward sin a doctrine truly which hath been hid in darknes since the first age of christianity for 1660. yeares till the supream prouidence sent Mr. white to teach Christian schools that charity and deadly sin are not inconsistent together which he proues from the text set down thus God did bless the progeny that proceeded from Lot and his daughters therfore Lot and his daughters retained charity that is continued in holy society and freindshipp with God notwithstanding their externall sin of * Jn filiabus Lot propriè fuit peccatum incestus vt fusè probat Aug. l. 22. contrae faustum cuÌ„ ab illis fuerit causatum voluntariè incest but good God what a poore demonstratiue argument is this where the antecedent proposition is euidently false and the consequence suppose the antecedent were true very inconsequently deduced Falsity as to the antecedent plainly appeares for as that issue was born in horrible incest so was it and the posterity therof namely the Amonites and the Moabites vile and wicked * Aug. l. quaes in Deutro qu. 35. notat ab Abrahamo cuius frater erat Lot vsque ad Ruth quae prima ex Moabitis intrauit in Ecclesiam decem generationes inueniri in so much that euen to their tenth generation they did not enter into the Church of our Lord according to scripture testimony and the deduction is very inconsequent if the antecedent proposition were granted because the supream prouidence many times blesseth the children of wicked parents so that the diuine blessing bestowed vppon children is no infallible argument to demonstrate that their parents did adhere to God in charity and holy society at the time they got them For example God blessed the issue of Iudas and Thamar in a great measure Christ as man descending from it albeit that both were grieuous sinners in order to the bringing forth of the said issue for Iudas the Father voluntarily committed simple fornication and Thamar the mother the sin of incest But perhaps the student of 40. yeares standing will alledge that the antecedent afore mentioned That God did bless the progeny c. is meant of temporall blessings only and indeed it cannot be denyed but that the said progeny for example Moab the son of Lots elder daughter and Ammon son of the younger were heads of great nations the Moabites descending from the one and the Ammonites from the other yet this answer will auail him nothing at all as to the point of the present difficulty being it implieth manifest weaknes to infer from the worldly aduantages of Moab and Ammon that Lot and his daughters retained charity that is holy society with God in the outward sin of incest For God prospered the kings of Egypt many hundred yeares though they did not adhere vnto him in communion and holy society And S. Austin attesteth that God did extend the territories of the Roman Empire for the morall vertues practiced by the ancient Romans which notwithstanding were not endued with diuine charity Hereby plainly appeares that the holy scripture will not receiue into their sanctuary Mr. Whites Theology truly noe wonder for t is a doctrine destructiue of all morality and christian Religion in regard the excellent agreement that it setles between charity and externall sin must as it were of necessity induce fraile nature to commit outward sins of the flesh presuming that notwithstanding all outward vncleanes namely of drunkennes simple fornication adultery the loue retained to God shall bring a man so sinning outwardly to Heauen Besides it doth preiudice the Apostles Theology Neither drunkards nor fornicatours nor adulterers shall inherit the kingdom of Heauen Heb. 13 But perhaps it will be replyed that the Apostle excludes only such drunkards fornicatours and adulterers c. from the kingdom of Heauen as haue nothing of charity together with the sinns of drunkennes fornication and adultery so that though drunkards c. without charity cannot inherit the kingdom of God neuertheless charitable drunkards charitable fornicatours charitable adulterers charitable murderers shall not be excluded is this the Theology that 40. Yeares study hath brought forth But to returne vnto the matter in debate t is an article of Christian faith Trident. sess 6. can 15. can 27. that charity and deadly sin are incompatible and S. Iames the Apostle giueth euidence therof in the 2. Chapter of his canonicall Epistle saying Whosoeuer shall keep the whole law and yet offendeth in one he is guilty of all Because whosoeuer transgresseth one sole precept of the law is liable to eternall malediction enioyn'd by God to the
that went afore to wit with an oath by him that said vnto him Our lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for euer according to the Order of Melchisedech 2. Outward oblation is obseruable which is expressed in the words wherby Christ consecrated his body and blood saying This is my body which is giuen for you (k) The Apostle S. Paul vseth the verbe giue in that signification when he mentioneth our redemption procured by the sacrifice of the Cross for exaÌ„ple Gal. 3. ad Tit. 2. likewise holy scripture vseth frequently the verb to shed for to Sacrifice Exod. 29. Leuit. 1.2.3 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for you which are the terms of proper sacrifice and were outwardly vttered in the last supper For indeed all the actions performed by Christ in celebrating the Eucharist were outward actions namly blessing of the bread giuing thanks to his diuine Father before consecration and * Christus in vltima coena manducauit corpus suum bibit sanguineÌ„ suum vna cuÌ„ Apostolis vt post s. Hiero alios Patres docet S. Thomas 3. p. q. 81. eating his own hody and drinking his own blood together with his Apostles after consecration 3. Oblation of a sensible permanent thing is obseruable vêªt videlicet Christ's body and blood which are sensible things vnder the form's of bread and wine which are sensible also 4. There is obseruable destruction or reall change in the oblation to wit by substantiall conuersion of the bread into Christ's body and wine into his blood Besides by eating and drinking therof the body and blood of Christ lose that sacramentall being they had by reproduction vnder the elements of bread and wine which is a reall change also 5. It was an oblation exhibited to God alone for Christ in celebrating the Eucharist addressed all his speeches to his diuine Father lastly there is obseruable recognition of diuine omnipotency as is plainly euidenced by the oblation it self since it succeeded not only in the room of the Pascall lamb but of all the other sacrifices of the law of Moyses and consequently ought to containe in it self the perfect morall signification essentiall to those sacrifices which is recognition of diuine omnipotency and representation of the sacrifice of the cross Nor is it inconuenient for a sacrifice going afore to be a representation or commemoration of a sacrifice comming after for all the old sacrifices went before the sacrifice of the crosse which neuertheless they represented How euer the sacrifice of the cross is only distinct from the sacrifice of the Fucharist as to the manner of offering bloodily or vnbloodily for the head-offerer is the same Christ and the thing offered the same also body and blood of Christ And albeit that Christ by one sole bloody oblation that is by once offering himself in a bloody manner consummated the generall redemption neuertheless he did not think fit to make that one generall oblation an effectuall redemption or remission of sins without the application therof for so he had entailed the kingdom of Heauen vpon euery sinner and consequently deuested himself of all power to disinherit any for what fault soeuer But the applicatiue perfection as to a sacrifice he gaue to the vnbloody oblation only which by his own institution and appointment is and shall be the externall seruice of the new Testament and the continuall application of his passion vnto sanctification As corporall remedies how perfect and sufficient soeuer doe no cure vpon a sick body that is to say are not effectuall remedies vnless they be applyed so Christ his death and passion though a spirituall remedy superabundantly sufficient to take away all the sins of the world neuertheless is not an effectuall remission of any till it be applied aright neither is the preeminent perfection of Christs death and passion a iot lessened therby application being necessarily requisit to its effect by Christ his own appointmeÌ„t And praiers which the faithfull offer to God one for an other doe not prejudice or diminish any part of the intercession which Christ himself made for his people while he liued vpon earth Io. 17. nor of those which sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father he presenteth continually Rom. 8. Heb. 7. But rather do apply the fruit therof to the effecting of the said faithfull their holy desires especially when prayers are offered by the Bishopps and Priests of the catholick Church vnto whom God hath committed the (l) God saith the Apostle 2. Cor. 5. Hath giuen vnto us the vvord of reconciliation novv then are vve Ambassadours for Christ God as it vvere exhorting by us Wherby is meant that Christ as man is the principall Minister vnto reconciling of sinners to God and for and in the room of Christ in order to the office of reconcilement the Apostles and their successors were instituted as his Vicars namely the Bishops and Priests of the Catholick Church Wherfore their absolution from sinnes by offering sacrifice and their ministring the Sacraments ought to be counted as Christs own absolution remission or pardon being the absoluing from and remitting sinnes in the room of Christ in like manner their preaching and exhorting in stead of Christ is as if it were Christ's own preaching and exhorting the office of Bishops and Priests being the Vicarship of Christ So that when the same Apostle saith Hebrae 8. that Christ onely is the Priest of the new law or Testament his meaning is that Christ is the chief Priest that is the Prince of Priests to whom as to his Ambassadours he hath committed the ministery of reconciliation In the old law according to the Apostle Hebrae 7. there was a series of many chief Priests succeeding one an other in that function for none of all them was of perpetuall durance But in our new law there is but one chief Priest or Bishop that shall endure for euer and all other Priests are his Vicars onely who in his room exercise Priestly function visibly wherfore Christ is chief Priest for euer and exerciseth his Priesthood by his substitute Ministers or Vicars which execute the office of reconciliation for him and in his room ministery of reconciliation for and vnder Christ who is the high Priest and chief Minister according to his humanity of mans reconcilement to God the others exercise Christs vicarshipp only These pray and minister sacrifice and Sacraments in Christs stead both vnto remission of sins and the verifying his For euer Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech so that Christ is a Priest for euer after the right order and similitude of Melchisedech for as much as he dayly doth and shall to the end of the world offer by the Priests of the new law as his Vicars the vnbloody sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine called by vse which is the arbitratour of words and language sacrifice of the
Eucharist sacrifice of the Mass sacrifice of the Altar The name Eucharist comes of the Greek Eucharistia that signifies thanksgiuing for Christ in celebrating his vnbloody oblation the night before his death gaue thanks to his diuine Father both in generall for all the benefits conferred vpon all mankind as in particular also for that one singular grace wherby he was impowred as man to iustitute so diuine a mistery So that vndoubtedly by a speciall prouidence the name Eucharist is appropriated to the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood to the end that euen the name therof might excite Priests whos office and function it is to ofter that sacrifice to imitate the thanksgiuing that Christ exhibited in the enterprise of this mistery The name Mass comes of Missa which is latine doubtless for if it had been an Hebrew word the vse therof would haue remained and continued among the greek Fathers as well as of Alleluya Osanna Amen which be Hebrew words But none of the Greek Fathers vse this term Missa and consequently it is a denomination which the people of the latine Church haue imposed to express the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood and signifies the same thing that dimissio in latine that is to say dismissing or sending away for in the primitiue Church it was an ordinary ceremony practised by the Deacon to cry aloud twice in the Church during the time of celebrating diuine seruice Ite Missa est once in the begining of the mistery or sacrifice wherin the Catecumens were not suffered to be present being Belieuers vnbaptised signifying therby that all such should depart out of the Church and once again in the end of the said mistery or sacrifice intimating therby the dimissing or sending away of the faithfull baptised This signification of the name Missa in English Mass and this originall grownd therof is approued by the vniform judgment of the maior part of orthodox writers Howeuer the appropriation of the said name as to signifying the seruice of the mistery or sacrifice of Christs body and blood is deriuable euen from the primitiue successors of the Apostles who (m) S. Clement that succeeded S. Peter in the supream gouernment of the Church composed a Missale and in his writingmentioneth the word Missa Mass And S. Denys did not onely write of the Ecclesiasticall Hierarchy but of the Mass also And whereas sectaries do not ascribe that work vnto him it is without warrantable ground howeuer whosoeuer was the Author thereof t' is certain that the Church of God hath approu'd it for the first Council of Nice stileth the Author Magnum which Title he had giuen vnto him afore and S. John Damascene calleth him Magnum Theologum à great diuine but all antiquity make mention of the Mass For example Alexander that was the fourth Pope after S. Peter Epis 1. ad orthodox And Sixtus that succeeded him according to S. Damascene in the life of the same Alexander S. Telesphorus seth forth an ordinance that commanded Priests to say 3. Masses in the feast of Christs Natiuity S. Soter prohibited all Priests to eate or drinke before they said their Masses S. Steuen the Pope vnder the persecution of Valerian the Emperour was kill'd at Mass S. Felix Ep. 2. ad Episcopos Galliae mentioneth saying of Masses vpon the Tombs of Martyrs S. Hierom. in cap. 11. Prouerb affirmes that the soules of the faithfull departed receiue comfort and helpe by the celebration of Mass and S. Austin Epis 49. tom 2. ad Deo gratias c. 3. teacheth that the sacrifice which Christians now offer is euidenced both by Euangelicall and propheticall Scripture besides this Catholick assertion is taught in sundry Councils namely in the Nicen. cap. 14. Carth. 2. can 4. So that it is a manifest weakness in sectaries to deny a doctrine that all antiquity by vnanimous consent plainly assert vse the name Missa and the signification therof namely S. Dionys S. Clement S. Euarist S. Alexander S. Sixtus S. Telesphorus S. Higinus S. Soter S. Fabianus S. Stephanus S. Felix S. Syluester S. Damascenus With whom were contemporary the great lights of the Church S. Basil S. Gregory Nazianzenus S. Ambro. S. Chrysost S. Hieron S. Epiphan S. Cyrill S. August wher vnto may be added sundry generall Councills wherof the vnquestionable testimonies and records are enough to euidence the truth of this primatiue doctrine so that with great reason it may be much wondered at how the People of England came to looke with so envious an eye vpon the Mass as to count it Idolatry since the practice therof is agreeing with the full and euident Testimonies of all the primitiue Fathers And as to the Realm of England euen from the first plantation of Christianity setled therein Mass constantly continued the sole publick worship or seruice that was resorted vnto till the ciuill power of Parliament in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth put it down vpon what design of auarice liberty and ambition is needless to express But in the room of the Mass was substituted a new outward seruice named the book of Common prayer and sett forth in the vulgar tongue wheras since the first age for 1500. Years not one example can be produced of any Christian kingdom which had not for the common publick seruice of Religion the Mass and that celebrated in Hebrew Greek or Latin neither were the holy Euangels wrirten in other language then Hebrew Greek and Latine which are the three holy tongues The Hebrew was sanctified from the beginning of the world God euen then conferring with Adam in the Hebrew tongue and teaching him the names of each liuing creature Gen. 2. Besides all three were sanctified in the death and Passion of Christ the son of God the inscription ouer his Cross Iesus of Nazareth king of the Iews being written in Hebrew Greek and Latine letters and prophesied * Septuaginta super psal 56.57.58 ne disperdas Dauid in tituli inscriptionē of long afore This doctrine does not preiudice what S. Paul writeth 1. Cor. 14 saying That he that speaketh a strange language edifieth himselfe but he that prophesieth edifieth the Church of God I would that you all speake with tongues but rather that you prophesied For it is conuincingly euident that the Apostle neither by these or any other words of that chapter commandeth the vse of the vulgar tongue in the Church seruice For so there had been no need of prophesying that is of interpreting vnto edification exhortation or instruction which the Apostle expresly enjoyneth saying That if any man speak a strange tongue let it be by two or at the most by three and that by course and let one interpret Besid's it is plain that S. Paul there treateth of the miraculous guifts or strange tongues infused both into men and women in the first begining of the Church and not intelligible without the miraculous guift of interpretation also and consequently he cannot mean the
(i) Ephes 4. One lord one faith one Baptism Christ is our one sole lord vpon the score of generall redemption which he procured by his death and passion Faith is one onely because the object is but one and common alike to all the faithfull Baptism is one onely because by vertue of the fame baptism all men are incorporated in to the mysticall body of Christ which is the catholick Church one alone wheras if it were a Sacrament of sole man it should be many besid's it's cheife product of sanctifying grace wherby man is made a childe of God Heir of Heauen coheire and brother of Christ Ro. 8. in regard wherof it surpasseth circücision that figured only what it is indeed and verity and the (k) The baptism of S. Iohn Baptist was no Sacrament taken in the proper sense being a preparation there vnto onely howeuer Christ thought fit to be baptis'd of S. Iohn his precursor that thereby the water might be sanctifyed through a touch of his sacred body and likewise consecrated as the instrumentall cause vnto giuing ingress into his Church euen then design'd by him to be built forthwith for Christs baptism happened in that very yeare of his age when he began to preach the Gospel baptism of S. Iohn Baptist that prepared only thereunto it doth (l) S. Gregory Nazian Ora. 40. calleth baptism a seale or marke whereby a man is signed and marked for a souldier of Christ and S. Cyril Ierosol nameth it a sacred vndelible seale wherfore S. Austin l. 2. con Epis Parmeni c. 12. affirmes that as the mark 's made with a hot iron in souldiers that run from their colours abide in their flesh so baptism and holy order continue in Apostates that desert their faith and religion wherefore if such rebellious straglers returne after wards to the Church those two Sacraments ought not to be administred again because they imprinted characters which can neuer weare away imprint in the person baptised a Character which is a spirituall Mark wherby the soul is figured and fashioned in conformity to Christ as also known for his and distinguisht from such as are not his Wherfore it is a distinctiue sign and consequently indelible eternally permanent so that after a soul is once charactarised or sealed (m) Anabaptists are so nam'd because such as were baptised in their infancy those sectaries baptise again as soon as they come to perfect vse of reason as if the baptism conferred afore were invalide they ground their Heresy in Christs word 's Mat. 28. teach all nations baptising them c. but without cause as in the character is prou'd with the seale of baptisme it ought not to be sealed again As concerning the ceremonies belonging to the solemnity and meetness of this Sacrament they be outward sensible actions decently and profitably employed before in or after the administration thereof Before the receiuing of baptism as meet preparations required there unto are first * S. Hieron in cap. 28. Mat. non potest fieri vt corpus baptismi suscipiat Sacramentum nisi antea anima susceperit veritateÌ„ Loquitur de adultis instructions in the rudiments of christian religion if the person or persons suing for baptism are grown to full age of reason Math. 28. which scripture doth set down the order therin to be obserued according to the condition capacity or ripeness of each one such as are apt and capable to vnderstand christian doctrine ought to be instructed before they be admitted to the Sacrament which was the practice of the Apostles Act. 2. and 3. S. Philip the Deacon preached vnto the Eunuch Iesus and required credence therunto before he did baptize him Act. 8. and indeed it is impossible for the body to receiue the Sacrament of Baptism vnless the soul receiue afore the verity of faith when there is sufficient ripeness of judgment in the subject to receiue it Howeuer neither instruction nor any other disposition is of necessity as to the nature or essence of this Sacrament Infants in their infancy * Mar. 10. Luc. 18. Christus ait sinite paruulos nolite prohibere illos venire ad me talium â—nim est Regnum Coelorum being capable of heauenly blessedness are not vncapable of baptism though they want capacity for instruction Christ did expresse the necessity of baptism as to the new Testament after the same manner as God did explaine the necessity of circumcision as to the old Testament Gen 17. and consequently since infancy was no hindrance to circumcision neither is it a lâ—t to baptism Secondly * ScrutiniuÌ„ quo fides baptiz andoruÌ„ explorabatur agnoscit Aug. l. de side operibus c. 6. exprimitur hac caremonia in Rituali quande dicit Sacerdos infanâ—ulo quid petis patrinus respondet fidem deinde Sacerdos dicit abrenuncias Satanae Huius ceremoniae meminit Tertull. l. de spectaculis cap. 4. inspection or examination as to faith by interogatories Thirdly * Signi Crucis vsurpati in baptisme meminit Aug. l. de Catech. Rudibus cap. 20. sign of the cross which sheweth that Christ doth not work in this Sacrament vnto remission of sin 's by water only but by water and blood shed on the crosse It was IESUS-CHRIST that (n) Christ is said to come by water because he instituted the Sacrament of baptism in water signifyed by the sacred water that sprung out of his side hanging on the cross and he is said to come by blood in regard the blood of Christ cleanseth from all sinnes 1. Ioan. 10. came by water and blood vnto saluation of all men Io. 1. cap. 5. fourthly * Exorcismi meminit Iustinus Maertyr Dialogo de Tripho exorcism wherby the deuil is hindred so that he cannot obstruct the ministring of baptism or the effect therof Fiftly * Insufflationis qua vtitur Sacerdos solemniter baptizans dicens exi ab eo spriritus immuÌ„de meminit S. Ambros l. de ijs qui initiantur significat expulsionem Daemonis insufflation or breathing on the person that is to be baptized signifyeth the casting out of the deuill for euery one before baptism is a childe of wrath of Hell of damnation through originall sinne Sixtly * Gustus salis memenit Concil Carthag 4. can 5. transfertur ad significaÌ„dam sapientiam Vnde dicitur sal sapientiae salt giuen to tast which doth represent the wisdome of christian doctrine receiued in baptism Seauenthly * Mar. 7. misit JESVS digitos suos in auriculas eius expuens tetigit linguam eius inspiciens in caelum gemuit ait illi surdo muto Epheta quod est adaperire Huius contactus narium aurium meminit S. Ambrosius loco supra citato the putting of spittle into the nostrills and eares which signifyes the receiuing of faith and grace in vertue of the Sacrament And this ceremony is grounded Mar. 7. Eightly * Mar. 1.
sancti spiritus accipere gratiam Jtem S. Cyrillus Hierosol Cateche 3. vnguentum inquit confirmationis postquam est consecratum non est ampliùs vnguentum nudum commune sed Chrysma Christi quo corpus quidem vngitur anima autem sancto viuifico spiritu sanctificatur ancient Fathers nearest to the Apostles times do vnanimonsly interpret the meaning of the Scripture Act. 8. that saith then laid they their hands on them and they receiued the (c) By imposition of hands mentioned Act. 8. The ancient Fathers vnderstood the administing of sacramentall confirmation namely S. Cyprian Epis 73. S. Hierom. Dial. con Lucif ad S. Austin l. 15. de Trinit c. 26. affirmes that the Apostles Peter and Iohn pray'd that those might receiue the holy Ghost on whom they had laid their hands By the holy Ghost is meant the third person in the B. Trinity and he is said to be giuen when sanctifying grace is infused into or augmented in our souls and doubtless the imposition of hands afore mentioned Act. 8. through the vertue and efficacy of it's application was indeed an effectuall instrumentall cause of grace for t' is said in the same chapter set down that when Simon saw that through the imposition of the Apostles hands the holy Ghost was giuen he offered to buy it conceiuing he might obtaine that diuine gift with money Holy Ghost And albeit that signing and anointing with Chrism in the forehead be not mentioned therein yet it is clear that then S. Peter and S. Iohn did not administer confirmation without either of them they hauing been by continuall vsage receiued and practiced in the catholick Church down from the Apostles to the present times as the essentiall partes therof in so much that euen anciently confirmation is named the Sacramēt * Aug. l 2. con lite petit c. 104. vocat Sacramentum chrysmatis dicit esse Sacramentū sicut Baptimus c. Aug. alij Patres vocant illud signaculum in fronte of Chrism Sacrament or sign in the forehead Christ did think it fitting that the forehead should be signed because of the outward eminence therof aboue the other parts of mans body signifying thereby that a Christian ought not to be ashamed of the cross Besid's in the same chap. Act. 8. though S. Luke relateth only that the Eunuch before S. Philip baptised him said I belieue the son of God to be IESVS making no mention of the other diuine persons to wit Father and Holy Ghost nor of other necessary requisits to diuine faith notwithstanding according to S. Austin lib. de fide oper cap. 9. it is certain that S. Philip instructed the Eunuch in all points necessarily belonging to christian faith howeuer it is a weak argument that hath the support of negatiues onely and a manifest weakness to question what the Church of God armed against all Heresyes through the constant infallible assistance of the holy Ghost doth practise vniuersally Moreouer Christ at his last supper when he instituted (d) Christ iustituted the Sacrament of confirmation at his last supper according to tradition set down in the 2. Epis c. 1. of Pope Fabianus who expresly assertes that Christ at his last supper appointed and determined Chrism for the proper matter of this Sacrament and taught his Apostles how to make it the Sacrament of confirmation taught his Apostles the mingling of oile and Balsom to the making of Chrism which is the necessary matter therof and instructed them as to the forme also which is this or some other equalling it for example * Catech. Trid. par 2. cap. 3. ait Christum tradidisse qua forma administretur hoc Sacramentum legitimā formam esse hanc vel aliam aequiualentem Consigno to signo Crucis c. I signe thee with the sign of the cross and confirm thee with Chrism of saluation in the name of the Father and of the son and of the holy Ghost Amen Which words or others equalling them are (e) The generall practice of the Church and the Decree of Pope Eugenius in the Council of Floreuce giue euidence of the from of sacramentall confirmation The particle Saluation is put vnto signifying the cheif product of this Sacrament which is sanctifying and strengthning grace again the particles vvith the sign of the cross are inserted in the form because the military marke that the party confirm'd receiues is the sign of the cross and indeed all christian signing is perform'd with the sign of the cross as plainly appear's by the generall practice of the primitiue Church the forme of this Sacrament The (f) According to S. Hierom Dial. con Lucif c. 4. Bishops giue the holy Ghost by laying on their hands on the baptis'd that is by the Sacrament of cofirmation the holy Ghost is giuen and Epis 150. ad Iubaian he calleth sacramentall confirmation grace of strengh vnto professing the faith of Christ before king's and Tyrants also obserues that euen the Apostles wanted courage and strengh before they were confirm'd through the comming of the holy Ghost at Pentecost but afterwards saith S. Hierome they spoke boldy to the Prince of the Iewes saying They vvere bound to obey rather God then men and rejoyc'd in the mids of their bitter sufferings speciall effect of confirmation is additionall sanctification and armour of grace or grace of strength as a pleadg of the spirit in the heart 2. Cor. 1. Whereby the person baptised is established in Christ and enabled to wrestle against spirituall wickedness and stand boldly against the sensible assaults of Tyrants that persecute the catholick religion The Apostles after they were confirmed with great confidence preach'd the word of God and with great power gaue testimony of the resurrection of Iesus Act. 4. S. Peter vnconfirmed was frighted at the voice of a poore Maide S. Peter confirmed made light of the imperiall sword of Nero. In as much as this Sacrament is vniterable deputing a christian to a speciall office in the seruice of Christ that is admitting him into Christs militia and withall arming him with the grace of courage and strengh to stand against Tyrants in defence of Christ and his faith of necessity imprinteth an (g) T is an Article of christian faith defined Trident. sess 7. de Sacram. in genere Floren in decreto Eugenij that the Sacrament of confirmation imprints an indelible Character which bear 's the name of a military sign or marke vndelible cbaracter which is a spirituall mark or quality that receiu's its existency in the soul of him that is confirmed through a reall impression thereof made in vertue of the Sacrament In like manner the Character of baptism is a reall physicall quality or entity imprinted in him that is baptised aright and can neuer be blotted out either by Apostacy or Heresy For as much as of necessity cofirmation presupposeth the Character of baptism it is of no effect if conferred on a person vnbaptised
appears that Christ 10.2 did not giue to the Apostles and their successors in the function of Priesthood power and authority only to preach remission of sins because the form of speech and circumstances of that action therein expressed doe euidently demonstrate that Christ both spoke and meant of a new power that he had not conferred before his passion but Christ afore his Resurrection inuested his Apostles with power to preach remission of sins Mat. 10. as ye goe saying the kingdom of Heauen is at hand which words euen Caluin in his euangelicall Harmony doth interpret of preaching saluation through remission of sins Wherefore S. Chrysostom hom 85. explaining that passage of S. Iohn compareth the collation of the power that Christ there bestowed on the Apostles to the authority giuen to officers of a tempoall Prince wherby they are enabled to imprison or deliuer out of prison such as be accused of transgressing his lawes and addeth withall these express words Great dignity of Priest's whosoeuers sins sayes be Christ ye shall remit are remitted Again power to preach the Gospell to all nations was giuen to the Apostles Mat. 28. as a distinct office from the power that Christ conferred on them Io. 20. as plainly will appeare to any rationall and iudicious man that shall consider both Texts together with the circumstances therin expressed Neither did Christ confer vpon his apostles and their successors power only to declare remission of sins since he did not say Io. 20. Whosoeuers sins ye shall declare remitted are remitted but whosoeuers sins ye shall remit Besides these words ye shall remit ought to be interpreted in the same sense as those others Are remitted For other wise the form of Christ's speech had been extream improper in regard that both of them shall be remitted and are remitted be vttered in one and the same sentence But the latter particles viz are remitted doe not signify meer declaration of remission of sins for so Christ's words would carry this sense Whosoeuers sins ye shall declare to be remitted are declared to be remitted and consequently since such a declaration is speculatiue only and not practicall effecting nothing in order to remission of sins a man to whom sucÌ„h a declaration is intimated shall remain in sin as much after as before Again Christ after he inuested the Apostles and consequently their successors with the power mentioned Io. 20. said to them as my Father sent me so I send you but Christ was sent by his Father endued with power to remit sins indeed and not to declare remission only Wherfore Mat. 9. that ye may know saith Christ the son of man hath authority in earth to forgiue sins c. Whereby it is plainly euident that he sent his Apostles inuested with power to remit sins giuing vnto them the ministery of reconciliation 2. Cor. 5. Furthermore by the premises is plain that penance is not * Aug. l. 2. de adulterinis contugijs c. 26. distinguit baptismum a pâ—nitentia St inquit à Cathecun eno factum scilicet vxorcidium baptismo abluitur si à baptizato poenitentia reconciliatione a meer remembrance of baptism receiued afore and indeed setting aside * Trident. dicit nos per poenitentia SacramentuÌ„ sine magnis nostris fletibus â—aboribus ad nouitatem integritateÌ„ quam per baptismum adepti eramus peruenire no posse voluntary acts of corporall affliction and inward contrition together with a full purpose of amendment the meer Sacrament of penance hath not power enough to restore the integrity and newness of life got by baptism and lost through actuall sin Again penance hath all requisits necessary to a Sacrament viz. sensible Rites promise of grace and the institution of Christ as by the premises appear's so that together with baptism it makes two Sacraments of the new law and may often (e) The ancient Fathers S. Cyprian Epis 52. S. Ambrose in 2. Cor. 5. S. Austin con Epis parmeni affirme that the Sacrament of Penance may be oft reiterated and it is an article of christian faith grounded on the words of Christ Luc. 17. Mat. 18. where he bid's his Apostles to remit sinnes as often as through humane frailty they are committed which is meant in order to such onely as are sorry to haue sinned for without true sorrow remission cannot be obtain'd be reiterated but baptism cannot For it is impossible that they who are once lightned if they fall away can be renewed again to penance Hebrae 6. where the particle lightned doth signify baptized according to the interpretation of primitiue Fathers who also doe name baptism a light and consequently the words impossible to be renewed again to penance beate this meaning viêªt videlicet Impossible to be baptized again for the particle Again doth import a repetition of what was meant afore by the words lightened and indeed otherwise the particle once had been impertinent and inserted to no purpose at all since once and Again put in the same period or sentence ought to relate to one and the same thing and therefore seeing that by the first place baptism is vnderstood the Apostles doubtless by the latter meant baptism too This cited scripture Hebr. 6. the * Nouatiani pratextu disciplinae Ecclesiasticae lapsis ad Ecclesiam redditum per poenitentiam negarunt ex qua haresi multarum animarum interitus secutus est Nouatians made the ground of their heresy teaching that no man falling into mortall sin after baptism could rise again by penance vnto iustification and Calvin therin growndeth his heresy impiously asserting that it is impossible for any one that deserteth his faith entirely and becometh an apostate to be renewed again by penance vnto remission of his fins therby denying God's generall mercy and so proud contentious men that follow only the meer words of scripture together with their own sense without respect of the Churches judgment and interpretation of ancient Fathers after which euery scripture ought to be expounded plunge themselves into damnable errours CHAR. XI OF CONTRITION THE CONTENTS Two kinds of contrition the one perfect the other imperfect perfect contrition which is formerly or includeth a formall act of charity wherby God in regard of his infinit goodnesse and supreame excellency is preferd before all earthly enjoyments and sin detested was of absolute necessity before the establishing of the law of Christ imperfect contrition called attrition whereby a sinner detesteth his sin because of the deformity thereof or feare of euerlasting punishment joynt to the Sacrament of penance equalleth perfect contrition as to the effect thereof if perfect contrition were of absolute necessity in the new law christians should be in a worse condition then were the Iewes vnder the old law Those which assert absolute necessity of perfect contrition at all tymes in the law of Christ prejudice christian faith Contrition is * Trident. definit contritioneÌ„ per dolorem animae est
for a sinfull Brother and truly this kinde of forgiuing and loosing is common alike to all such as deuoutly and charitably recite that petition of our Lord's prayer Forgiue us our trespasses as we forgiue the trespasses against vs as witnesseth S. Augus trac 58. vpon S. Iohn and doubtless by the mentioned word 's of the Apostle viêªt videlicet Ye ought rather to forgiue and comfort him and whome yee forgiue any thing c. is meant of this generall manner of forgiuing and loosing which is common alike to all the faithfull of the Church but to demonstrate that he himself laid claime to a higher and better kinde of forgiuing and loosing he professeth that he exercised his forgiueness and power of loosing in the person or room of Christ Wherby again appear's that the Apostle did not forgiue this adulterer the rest of the paine enioyned him in order to the rigour of Church-discipline only that is to the intent only that it should aduantage him in the ecclesiasticall Court but also in order to the diuine Court of Iustice that it might benefit him before God and this is so manifest a truth that no sectary can say the contrary without contradicting the Apostles own words viêªt videlicet I forgaue it in the person of Christ that is in the room of Christ and as his Minister to whom Christ had committed his power of loosing and binding vpon earth and indeed S. Paul should haue extreamly preiudiced the said miserable adulterer which were great impiety to think if his forgiuenesse should haue had no weight * S. Cypria Epis 14. agens de relaxatione poenarum impositarum peccatoribus ait illam fieri per intercessionem martyrum vel aliorum fidelium quorum satisfactionibus suffragijs adiuuantur in delictis apud Dominum id est in foro Dei with the diuine Court and been of no value before God for according to that supposall he should haue pardoned a pain of this life in respect wherof the adulterer should haue suffered a far greater in the next because the punishment a man endureth vpon earth is a thousand times lesser then the torment 's of Purgatory and therby S. Paul would haue brought his penitent Corinthian out of the frying pan into the fyer That is out of the prison of the ecclesiasticall Court into the prison of the diuine Court Conformably vnto this catholick doctrine Bishops in the primitiue Church enjoyned sinners penances to satisfye God and to compence the iniury done to him through their sin 's (k) According to Tertullian l. ad martyres and S. Cyprian Epis 10.11.12.13.14 sundry Christians that through frailty fell from the Church in tyme of grieuous persecution were wont to recur vnto the Martyrs and Confessours that their penances might be remitted vnto them and these ancient Fathers did not mean penances or pains enioynd and due only in the Churches Court but due also in the Court of God wherfore S. Cyprian Epis 14. faith expresly that they receiued help and deliuerance from their pains apud Dominum that is in the diuine Court in consequence whereof Indulgences remit penances or pains at the Tribunall of God as due there and not as due onely in order to the Churches Canons as wanton schollars of these dayes vnaduisedly teach for otherwise according to S. Thomas q. 25. a. 1. Indulgences would be more vnprofitable then profitable reseruing the penitent to more grieuous pains in Purgatory Besides according to the holy scriptures whatsoeuer priest 's shall binde on earth shall be bound in Heauen and whatsoeuer they shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heauen in consequence of which God has a Court in Heauen that remits the guilt and paine of sinne accordingly as they be remitted in the Churches Court and indeed if there were no remitting of pains in the Court of Heauen there would be no need at all of the Churches spirituall Treasure consisting of the aboundant satisfactions of Christ and the blessed Saincts and yet that there is this spirituall Treasure is an article of Christian faith for as such a Treasure could not be necessary vnto remission of pains in a ciuil Court so it could not be necessary vnto remission in an ecclesiasticall Court The ground on which the Digbean diuines build their opinion is a damned heresy namely that God does not forgiue us our sinnes as to the guilt thereof except her pardon the pain also as is plainely clear according to the definition of the Council of Trent sess 6. can 30. and this practice was both in order to such as had publickly sinned in reference to which canonicall pain 's were instituted only as also in order to such as had sinned in secret as doe demonstrate Burchard in the 13th book of decretalls and sundry others which haue made a full collection of the canonicall pains Furthermore no man can say without running into manifest errour that the Apostles forgiuenesse or indulgence in order to the penitent Corinthian was but an absolution of excommunication or of his sinne giuen in the Sacrament of penance for first a deliuerance from an ecclesiasticall censure of excommunication is neuer named by scriptures or Fathers a condonation forgiueness or indulgence Again by the Apostles words appeareth that he forgaue part only of the punishment enioyned which cannot be meant of an absolution either from excommunication or sin 's in the Sacrament of penance where there is no sharing out by partes Yet notwithstanding all this the vsage of indulgences was not neer so frequent in the primitiue times as in the subsequent ages because primary Christians carrying the fresh memory of their crucifyed Redeemer and thereby much enflamed with loue towards his sufferings allwayes bore about his dying mortification that his life also might be made manifest in their mortall flesh 2. Cor. 4. so that then there was strict discipline and great penances enioyned sinners For example rigorous fasting much praying and other painfull afflictions * In 1. Concil Nicae cui intersuerunt 318. Patres indicitur poena vndecim annorum Item in Concil Ancyrano iniungitur poena septenij ijs qui bis vel ter Idolis sacrificauerant Porro vulgatum est vnicuique peccato mort ali poenitentiam septem annorum iniungendam esse iuxta Canones pro quo tam en nullus Textus reperiri potest Et contrarium tenet S. Tho. in 4. l. sent dis 20. sanè Gratianus qui allegatur pro contraria sententia non dicit Ecclesiam septemnem poenitentiam in singula peccata statuisse sed tantum pro grauissimis iniungi solitam fuisse deinde dicit illam poenit entiam non taxatam fuisse pro foro interiori sed exteriori constat illos Canones ad forum exteriùs pertinere as by the ancientest Councils appeareth Neuerthelesse such was their feruour of spirit and extream zeale in complyance to Christ's sufferings that they fullfilled them willingly and chearfully few sought after pardons vnto
(c) S. Austin l. de bono coningij cap. 6. names mortall sin deadly crime and Epis 89. and in sundry other places he calleth offences which are not deadly and therfore commonly nam'd veniall sinnes litle fault 's of which the Apostle S. Iames cap. 2. in many things vve sinne all And S. Mathew cap. 6. foregiue us our treipasses c. and of veniall sinnes the Mileuitan synode interpretes these scriptures so that the iustest man that liues is liable to veniall sinnes and veniall defects and therefore counted imperfect they continue depriued of blessedness till all imperfection be purged away As a Iudg doth not punish all offences with death and as one man after that he is reconciled to another that hath iniured him demandeth some satisfaction for the iniury done for Dauid though he pardoned Absolon his offence Yet he did not suffer him * Reg. 14. Dauid condonauit filio suo Absoloni peccatum sic tamen ci placatus addit reuertatur in domum suam faciem meam non videat to abide in his sight or in his house so God though he doth not punish all sinnes with eternall death some hauing nothin g of mortall malice and though he receiueth a grieuous sinner into grace that casteth away all his mortall transgressions and turneth vnto him with a new heart neuertheless he doth not admit him to his glorious presence till he hath made full satisfaction as to the reparation of he injury done him wherby it is clear that God neither in this life nor in the next * Prouerb 23. Tu virga percuties eum animam eius de inferno liberabis Item Tob. 13. Tu flagellas saluas deducis ad inferos reducis chasteneth sinners that haue turned away from their iniquity as his enemies to destroy them but as his children to make them fit and proper for the enjoyment of their heauenly inheritance This catholick truth all antiquity acknowledgeth Councils define the approued vniuersall practice of christian Churches teacheth and authority of scriptures warranteth The second booke of the Machabees prayseth the noble Iudas (d) Judas Machabae us piously conceiu'd all or at least many of his souldiers to haue dyed godly that is in the state of grace and though they might haue coueted and detain'd some part of the siluer and gold that was on the Idols contrary to the commandement of God Deut. 7. Neuertheless we ought not to infer from thence that the same souldiers did not repent of that sin before their death or that by doing so they committed a deadly sin being they might want sufficient instruction and recogni zance in order to that law Howeuer t' is certain that Iudas Machabaeus appointed a sacrifice to be offer'd for those only which dyed godly As to the books of the Machabies S. Austin l. 18. de ciuit cap. 3. attests that though they be not contained in the Iew 's Canon or Catalogue neuertheless the catholick Church counteth them for canonicall Besides the third Council of Carthage whereof S. Austin was a member placeth he Machabies in the number of diuine scriptures who iudged that it was a holy and good thought to pray for the dead that they might be deliuered from sin and therfore sent three thousand drachmes to Iesusalem for the offering of a sin-sacrifice in regard of his souldiers that were ssaine in the holy warr belieuing that there was great fauour laid vp for those that died godly that is in the state of grace and since this action of religious piety cannot be meant in order to blessed soul's these hauing ful enioyment of blessedness nor in order to damned souls these being sentenced to eternall fire it is plainly euident that the meaning thereof is in reference to good souls which are neither in Heauen nor in Hell but in a third place suffering vnto heauenly blessedness this doctrine the Apostle teacheth * Ex scriptura 1. Cor. 3. Patres Latini in Conlio Florent PurgatariuÌ„ dari definiunt Et quod ibi Apostolus intelligat igneÌ„ PurgatoriuÌ„ testantur Orig hom 25. in Exod. Jtem Aug. in Enchyrd c. 68. l. 21. de ciuit c. 2. 26. 1. Cor. 3. where he affirmeth that after this life some souls are saued by fire saying If any man's work 's burne be shall suffer preiudice but he shall be saued himselfe yet so as it were by fire In which scripture he distinguisheth two kind's of work 's that a catholick christian constituted in the state of grace exerciseth whereof some are meritorious and in as much as they containe nothing of vncleaness or imperfection the Apostle compareth them vnto gold siluer and precious stones which can receiue no detriment through fire therby signifying that such souls as build on the foundation that is Christ and his grace works of gold siluer and pretious stones which is to say pure and holy actions without mixture of vncleaness (e) According to holy scripture fire shall trye all works yet not so as that all works and all the workers shall haue their tryall in burning flam's but because fire that is ordain'd to purge out of our works the dregs of corruption is said to trye works which haue nothing of vncleanes because the fire does not touch them in regard of their purenes Which is s. Ambroses explication in Psal 118. and after the same manner wild beasts are said to haue tryed many martyrs though they touch'd not their sacred bodyes will suffer no preiudice by fire in the day of particular or vniuersall Iudgment but there be other workes built vpon Christ as the foundation which include small defects and imperfections to wit veniall sinnes only which the Apostle nameth Wood bay or stubble that do consume in the fire wherfore such soul 's as be charged with this kinde of vncleane works doe suffer detriment in the day of particular Iudgment remaining afflicted by fire till all vncleaness be purged away and this to be the true meaning of the Apostle his own words explicated aright do clearly euidence For first that by gold siluer and pretious stones be vnderstood good work 's pure without thout staine orthodox writers vnanimously grant Secondly that by wood hay or stuble are meant veniall sinnes it is manifest enough because the Apostle expresly doth assert that the works signified by those word 's are to be burnt by the fire and neuertheless such as haue exercised them are to be saued which cannot be vnderstood of mortall offences the guilt wherof vndoubtedly damneth euery one that dyeth charged with it neither can the said word 's carry the sense of works that haue nothing of vncleaness because fire cannot preiudice those they being as gold siluer and pretious stones vncâ—mbustible wherefore of necessity wood hay or stuble doe signifie small faults which being once purged out by fire the soul that committed them is saued that is to say translated to eternall life and indeed since the Apostle
speaketh of sauing after death it is clear that he meaneth eternall saluation therby Thirdly that by the words The day of the lord shall declare it is vnderstood the day of each souls particular judgment is manifest likewise according to that saying Math. 24. Watch therfore for ye know not what howre the son of man will come that is to say what hower ye shall die and be iudged Again the same Apostle 2. Timoth 4. sayth that there was laid vp for him a crown of Iustice which At that day our lord would giue him a iust Iudg. Yet doubtless he obtained that reward instantly after his death as to essentiall blessedness Lastly that by the word (f) According to S Austin l. de fide operibus the fire of hell is euerlasting against the errour of Origin and the Latin Father 's in the Council's of Florence assert true fire in Purgatory and speake after the same manner of it as of Hell fire and the Current of catholick Doctours teach that the fire of Hell is true corporall fire fire true and reall fire is meant appear's by the Apostles saying That if any mans work burneth for to burne is proper to true fire and as concerning the particles * Jo. 1. vidimus gloriam eius quast gloriam vnigeniti à Patre vbi quasi non est particula diminuens aut faciens comparationem inter veram metaphoricam gloriam sed potius explicat veritatem vt notant S. Patres sic loquendo de Rege dicimus incedit quasi Rex id est vt Regem decet de vâ—ro iusto venit vt vir iustus id est vt decet virum iustum as it were they doe rather affirme then infirme the reality of fire for when S. Iohn sayeth of Christ cap. 1. we saw the glory of him as it were of the only begotten of the Father the particles as it were doe not deny Christ to be the true and naturall son of God the Father but rather affirme that vndoubted truth as all catholick writers doe obserue in their Commentaries vpon that scripture Hereby it is cleare (g) S. Cyprian Epis 52. ad Antonia writes thus T' is not the same thing to be sent to prison and there to remain till the last farthing be pay'd t' is not the same thing to receiue suddenly the reward of faith and vertue and to be clens'd and purg'd by fire after long suffering of grieuous sorrovves for sinnes committed afore that the Apostle held purgation of some soules after they were deuested of their bodies and before their translation vnto eternall life and this the catholick Church calleth Purgatory which name though it be no vsed in holy scripture no more then the words Trinity person and sundry others which are receiued and allowed of by all writers in order to a clearer explicating some misteries of christian Religion howeuer the name Purgatory taken in the sense afore mentioned layeth claime to a large series of Antiquity But seeing that scriptures and * S. Cyprian Epis tota 52. ad Anton Orig. hom 6. in Exod. cum inquit venitur si quis multa opera bona parum aliquid iniquitatis attulerit illud parum tanquaÌ„ pluÌ„bum resoluitur purgatur totum remanet aurum purum .... Hilar. in illud Psal 118. concupiuit anima mea purgatorium vocat indefessum ignem in quo grania sustinentur supplicia per quae animae à peccatis expiantur Aug. l. 2. 1. de ciuit c. 24. ait constare quod spiritus aliquorum fidelium poenas aliquas temporales post mortem patiantur primitiue Fathers doe assert the thing signifyed by the name of Purgatory vêªt videlicet purgation of some souls by suffering of temporall paines in the next life * Aug. quando de re constat de nomine non est conteÌ„ndendum no man can contend about that name without incurring a censure of manifest weakness yet in regard of two states only to which God promiseth eternall life or eternall death that is beatitude or damnation for Purgatory shall cease after the day of generall Iudgment is past both the scripture and the Fathers sometimes doe mention only after death the Paradise of the blessed and the Hell of the damned * De locis seu statibus perpetuis intelliguntur hae scripturae Eccles 11. si ceciderit lignum ad Austrum aut Aquilonem in quocunque loco inciderit sbi erit Item Mat. 25 Jte maledicti in ignem aternuÌ„ venite benedicti possidere RegnuÌ„ which be the two euerlasting states of soules but hence no man can argue an absolute negation of a third place or state in reference to temporall afflictions after death without preiudicing both scriptur's and Fathers as is sufficiently enough proued and though S. Austin Ser. 14. de verbis Domini lib. 10. de peccatorum meritis remissione cap. 20. doth expresly affirme that the catholick faith acknowledgeth two places only vat an eternall kingdome of Heauen or Hell eternall neuertheless by his other writings appeareth plainly that he held the Purgatory of some faithfull soul 's after death and in the cited writing's he denyeth only that the Catholick Church does acknowledge such a third place as Pelagius contended for who taught that children dying without baptism should be saued though they were not admitted into the kingdome of Heauen which errour S. Austin confuteth By the premises is euident that such souls only goe to Purgatory as are liable either to veniall sins or temporall satisfactions corresponding to their sins pardoned in this life as to the guilt thereof both of them importing defects that are inconsistent with the perfection of heauenly blessdeness yet these suffering souls while they endure their painfull afflictions haue something of comfort and refreshment (b) Pope Leo the tenth in his condemnation of Luther's 26. article hath defined that soul 's in Purgatory are assured of their saluation for they know that there is fauour laid vp for them they are certaine of their saluation they loue God with all their power conforming themselues in the bitterness of their afflictions to his diuine will of Iustice they haue confidence in the suffrages and sacrifices of the faithfull vpon earth in order to their deliuerance and are visited by their good Angells that cheare them vp Neither doth it hence follow that their paines are less grieuous for the intensest sorrow is not incompatible with the said refreshments as appeareth by Christ whose grief abounded and exceeded others in intensness notwithstanding the assurance of glory the comfort flowing from his God-head the conformity to the will of his diuine Father and the extream willingness to suffer his death and passion for the Redemption of the world and indeed it is a certaine truth that the anguish and tribulation which a soul endureth in Purgatory * Docent S. Aug. l de euva pro mortuis agenda c. 16. S.
immortality of the soul vsing that scripture-testimony I am God of Abraham God of Isaack God of Iacob and subsumeth thus there is no God of the dead but of the liuing arguing therby that the dead rise again since their souls doe not die with their bodyes Besides it is obseruable (o) Oachinus an Apostata Capucin cutteth an argument out of the cited Chap. Macchabae 2. against Purgatory arguing thus If there were a Purgatory though there were no Resurrection of the dead neuertheless prayers offered for the dead might not be in vaiue because the souls thereby might obtain deliuerance from their pain 's that Ochinus an Apostat Capucin fryer abused the fore mentioned scripture-testimony 2. Macchab. 12. to destroy Purgatory and after the very same way of arguing Mr. White abuseth it to ouerthrow a catholick assertion that teacheth the deliuerance of souls out of Purgatory in vertue of holy Churches suffrages Likewise sundry hereticks haue made vse of the same Text to weaken the authority of the books of Machabies pretending that the words If those that were shain should not rise again containe a manifest errour namely that soul's die with their bodies and rise again wherby is plainly euident that it is no difficult business for a man that is wantonly ambitious to be singular in teaching to cut out of scripture abortiue interpretations and to fit them to his vain vnquiet fancy by which he is biassed But how happens it that Mr. White alledgeth scripture-authority vnto the deteyning of good souls in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection * Mr. White in Dimenso 2. affirmamus itaque nos euideter conuinci ex hoc testimonio non solus poenis Purgatorij animas ante Resurrectionem and to lay claime to euidence in his deduction from thence It is not his custome to fly to that sanctuary for protection of his Nouelties nor to acknowledg euidence enough in the scriptures themselues to determine any controuersy for he expresly writeth that It were as ridiculous to seeke the decision of controuersyes out of the Bible as to cut with a Beatle or knock with a straw howeuer it seemes he hath a good minde to cloath his doctrines in the scripture colour's when that holy liuery how vnhandsomly soeuer put on may serue him for a disguise From the premises is euidenced how little reason Mr. White hath to boast of the two mentioned scripture-Testimonies viz. 2 Machab 12. 1. Cor. 15. vauntingly saying These two texts therfore remaine inviolable as first not to be resisted without manifest violence secondly pointing at the very knot of the controuersy that souls once engaged are not capable of that eminent good of being deliuered from their pain 's before the Resurrection And from these pitifull inferences he passeth vnto other scripture-Testimonies wherby he endeauour's to proue that euen blessed souls haue need of prayers but of his vnnaturall and irrationall arguments as to this point the Character of the Church triumphant shall giue euidence enough CHAR. XVI OF HOLY ORDER THE CONTENTS As God in the old law constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers to serue in the Temple so in the new law he hath appointed Bishops Priests Deacons Sub-Deacons c. one more eminent then an other to dispense diuine misteries in the Church of Christ Though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless enery Priest is not a Bishop to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation is proper to Episcopall authority onely there be seuen Ecclesiasticall Orders taken in the proper sense corresponding to as many distinct functions exercised in relation to the celebrating of the holy Euchariste clericall tonsure can make noe good claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense Episcopacy in an holy Order the noblest part of the Churches Hierarchy a proper Sacrament and imprint's a speciall character in the soul of him that is ordain'd a true Bishop Bishops and Priests down from the Apostles till these tymes embraced a single life answeres to sundry Arguments made in fauour of Priest's Marriages HOly Order taken in the restrained Ecclesiasticall sense (a) 1. Timoth. 4. Neglect not the grace S. Paul saith that is in thee vvhich vvas giuen thee by prophesy and imposition of hand 's of Priesthood S. Chrysostom hom 13. commenting vpon this sacred Text affirmes that the Apostle meant by imposition of hand 's the Sacrament of holy Order which Timothy receiu'd of him after the same manner Theodoret interprets the sacred Text 2. Timot. 1. Stirr vp the grace of god vvhich is in thee by the imposition of mine hands That is by my ordaining thee who am a Bishop and S. Ambrose writing vpon the same Text implyes in the imposition of hands all the outward actions and words which were done and said ouer himselfe when he was ordain'd a Priest Besides in the primitiue Church when a Bishop confer'd the holy Order of Priesthood he vsed to bless the party ordain'd lye his hands on his head and giue him power to offer sacrifice for the liuing and the dead in the name of our lord that is in the room of Christ In consequence of the premises since in the ordination of Priests grace is giuen by an outward sensible sign holy Order is a Sacrament of the new law and so is desin'd by the Council's of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius And Trent sess 23. can 4. is a proper Sacrament of the new law whereby a reasonable creature of the male sex * Baptismus requiritur in eo qui ordinatur quia baptismus in re suscept us est Janua aliorū Sacramentorum cuius proinde characterem character Ordinis supponit vt patet ex cap. si quis presbyter and baptised is ordained and enabled to perform the ministery of the Euchariste or in the celebration therof to serue after a speciall manner (b) Diaconesses mentioned Epis ad Timoth. could make no more claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense then the Religions men and women of those dayes being they had no power or iurisdiction as to the accomplishing or administring of a Sacrament And although Deanship Arch-Deaconship Priorship and Abbat-ship lay claim to something of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction neuertheless by vertue of their institution and consecration they receiue no power to administer a Sacrament or to serue specially in the administration therof and t' is the same as to Arch Bishops and Patriarchs considered precisely in order to the dignity they haue ouer and aboue the Order of Bishops in vertue of his ordination * Hieron Epis 57. quae est ad Euagrium vt sciamus inquit traditiones Apostolicas sumptas de veteri Ecclesia puta ex Vaticinio Jsaiae cap. 6. Assumam exijs in Sacerdotes Leuitas quod Aaron filij eius Leuita in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Epistopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicant in Ecclesia S. Hieron locum Isaiae intelligit ad literam de Apostolis
whilst he pursued the exercise of his Apostolicall Ministery of which sort many followed Christ and sustained him and his of their substances Luc. 8. and the Apostle calleth that woman a sister after the imitation of the Iewes that named the men among them Brethren and the women sisters Hereby it is euident that the Apostle by the words faithfull or sincere companion could not vnderstand a wife and indeed the chiefest sectaries do reject the Commentaries of such as do argue from that scripture against the single life of S. Paul since his own word 's afore alleaged 1. Cor. 7. doe speake him vnmarried (q) The Euangelist's S. Luke cap. 8. and S. Mathew cap. 7 signify that certain women accompanied Christ and ministred vnto him of their substance in imitation whereof the Apostles carried about women that furnish'd them with necessary sustenance to the intent that themselues might enioy greater liberty and better conueniency to preach the Gospell and doubtless women are more proper then men as to prouiding of necessary sustenance wherfore it must be some other that was his coadiutor and fellow-labourer in propagating the Ghospell of Christ which is the interpretation of the ancientest Fathers and truly it had not been hand some for the Apostle to haue made such an Apostrophe to his own wife in an Epistle written to the Philippians and to haue left her with them to help those women which laboured with him in promoting of the Gospell together with clement and other his fellow-labourers as is set down in the same Chapter CHAR. XVIJ. OF MATRIMONY THE CONTENTS The first instituting and celebrating of Marriage was in paradise carnall copulation is not a requisit essentiall thereto The B. Virgin Mary and S. Ioseph were marryed marriage taken in the proper sense Polygamy in the law of nature by diuine dispensation was lawfull Christ in his new law annulled Polygamy and confirm'd Monogamy as agreeing with the first institution of Marriage Though Marriages amongst Persons vnbaptized haue nothing of a Sacrament neuertheless they be lawfull Marriages contracted by christians euen of contrary professions challenge the essence of the Sacrament It lyeth not in the Churches power to vntye the knot of christian Marriage after consurnmation hath tyed it a Parish Priest must assiste at Marriages though he be no efficient cause thereof MAtrimony taken in the precise formall sense is * Definitio contractus à IuriscoÌ„sultis tradita est vltro citreque obligatio a ciuill contract expressed in words or signs wherby a man and a woman by mutuall consent giue and receiue power of each others body reciprocally (a) According to the Council of Trent God inspir'd Adam to speake the words set down Gen. 2. This novv is bone of my bones c. and therby to take Eue for his wedded wife The first Marriage was celebrated in the terrestiall Paradise when Adam said of the woman that God had made out of one of his ribs and brought vnto him This now is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh and doubtlesse euen then Adam tooke Eue to his wife for so he named her immediatly after adding to what he had vttered afore Therfore shall man leaue his Father and Mother and shall cleaue to his wife hereby it is conuincingly euident that Eue likewise tooke Adam to her husband since she could not haue been his wife without her own voluntary consent therunto Marriage essentially requiring mutuall acceptance And as Marriage was first celebrated in paradise so was it there (b) Gen. 1. God created them male and female that is according to S. Cyprian l. de bono pudicit God instituted that diuersity of sex that they might marry together in consequence of which the creation of Adam and Eue is rightly cal'd the institution of marriage instituted for God then made the first man and first woman Gen. 2. in consequence wherof he designed and determinated them to contract matrimony that is instituted matrimony by creating them a man and a woman * Constat ex 2. Gen. AdaÌ„ non babuisse copulä carnalem cum Eua in Paradiso Yet Adam and Eue did not perform the act of generation in compliance with the duty of nature till they were eâ—ected thence through their own voluntary act of disobedienceâ— which clearly manifest's that the * Julianus asserebat copulam carnalem esse de essentia matrimonij coÌ„tra quem Aug. hanc infert absurditatem scilicet fore vt matrimoniuÌ„ inter senes coniuges statim at quo nequenut copulam carnalem exercere deficeret item fore vt adulterium esset propriè matrimonium carnall exercise of the lust of concupiscence is no essentiall requisit to Marriage and it matter 's not that carnall copulation is one end of it for an end laying claime only to extrinsecall causality as do teach all Philosophers can be no essentiall part of the thing in respect wherof it is the end besides if the essentiall consistency of Marriage should depend of carnall copulation of necessity it would cease as to each married couple which is respect of old age were disenabled to company together in the act of generation nay it would plainly follow that fornications and adulteries ought to be counted Marriages taken in the proper sense wherfore the (c) S. Austin l. 3. con Faustum Manichae c. 8. l. de nup. concup treating of the Marriage between the B. Virgin and S. Ioseph denyes that comming together of both sexes in the act of generation mak's a Marriage which other ancient Fathers deny likewise and call S. Ioseph the Husband of the Virgin Mary Virgin Mary and S. Ioseph might truly and really contract marriage though they did not come together and doubtless they were married marriage taken in the proper sense For the Virgin Mary was betrothed and affianced to Ioseph Mat. 1. and consequently both of them were engaged in a mutuall promise of marriage so that if they were not truly married they must haue violated their faith or by consent released each other of the reciprocall engagement neither wherof is agreable to the exceeding sanctity of Persons confirmed in grace and godliness as were the Virgin Mary and Ioseph for to violate faith once pawned by promise is a manifest argument of leuity and inconstancy Besides both scripture and Fathers do call Ioseph the husband of the Virgin Mary neither did her * B VirgineÌ„ virginitate Deo dicasse id est voto firmasse testantur omnes Patres Graecae Ecclesiae hanc doctrinam Augustinus in Africa Ambrosius in Jtalia defenderunt vow of Virginity expressed in her answer to the Angell Gabriel viz How shall this be I know not man Luc. Ye put an impediment therunto for a vow of chastity together with a full purpose neuer to performe the act of generation doth not preiudice the essentiall requisit's to marriage wherfore (d) According to the Council of Trent sess 24. cap. 1. marriage
is a holy thing and ought to be obseru'd and perform'd in holines which doctrine is conform to the Apostles instructions 1. Cor. 7. He that giueth his Virgin in marriage doth vvell And Hebrae 13. Marriage honorable in all that is in all those which are indeed lawfully married In consequence of which the act of generation in persons married aright is both lawfull and honorable but in such as are not lawfully marryed together it is damnable 1. Timoth. 5. For example in Brothers and sister's and in Virgins that haue vow'd to God perpetual chastity consummation of marriage through carnall copulation though it be lawfull honest and laudable hauing a lawfull honest and laudable end which is the generation and education of children for the propagation and conseruation of mankinde neuertheless it addeth no essentiall perfection vnto marriage being extrinsecall therunto only Howeuer God in the begining made and determinated but (e) T' is set down Gen. 1. God created them male and female in the singular number and Gen. 2. they shall be two in one flesh wherfore S. Innocent cap. Gaudemus dediuortijs faith that one rib onely was converted into one and not into many women one man and one woman to contract marriage as t' is said afore forming of one rib one woman only wherby t' is plain that Polygamy which is a plurality of wiues in order to one man can challenge no institution from the begining and indeed such plurality setting aside extraordinary means for supplying of naturall imperfections is destructiue at least of the secondary end of marriage which is a sweet sociable liuing together of man and wife as appeareth by the example of Sara and Agar Gen. 16. of Anna and Phenenna 1. Reg. Again it is not consonant as to the law of nature that a man hauing once giuen the power of his body to one woman by marriage should afterward giue it to an other yet in as much as Polygamy in order to many wiues is not absolutely prohibited by any naturall ordinance and is consistent with the principall end of marriage which is procreation and education of children God can and hath de facto dispensed in it for both Sara and Agar were rightfull wiues of Abraham the Patriarch as likewise Anna and Phenenna of Alcana and Lia and Rachel of Iacob being the scripture praiseth these men for their great sanctity of life without reproaching vnto them plurality of wiues (f) Doubtless persons renown'd for sanctity of life would neuer haue married many wiues vnless God had inspir'd them and the ancient Fathers S. Hierom. Ep. 83. ad Ocia and S. Austin l. 22. con Faus affirme that God dispensed with the Patriarchs and Iews in the plurality of wiues But this Indulgence began onely in the dayes of Noe who taught it his posterity for neither Adam nor any other married many wiues before the generall deluge except Lameth Gen. 4. who therfore was counted an adulterer and is reproch'd for that same act by Pope Nicholas in an Epistle written to king Lotherius And albeit according to holy scripture all the wiues of one singleman except the first be sometymes nam'd Concubins neuerthelesse t' is not meant therby that the others were not true and lawfull but that they were secundary wiues which were also true and lawfull wiues And doubtless God inspired these holy men to doe so that therby maÌ„kinde might be sooner propagated and the diuine blessings promised to the children of Israel fullfilled wherof one was increase and multiplication of children As God after the generall deluge appointed the flesh of beasts to be meate for Noah and his posterity without any restriction at all Gen. 5. and afterward restrained that appointment or concession limitting it in order to the flesh of such beasts as by the law of Moyses were counted clean and vnpolluted and lastly â—nulling that restriction reduced the eating of flesh to the first concession so in the begining God instituted Monogamy that is to say marriage between one man and one woman only afterward he granted Polygamy that is power to take many wiues and lastly reuoked the concession of many wiues and reduced marriage * Matth. 15. ab initio non fuit sic id est ab initio non fuit Poligamia to it's first institution as also raised it which afore was a ciuil contract only to the dignity of a Sacrament (g) The Council of Constance sess 15. declar's marriage between persons baptiz'd and fit to contract a Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense Likewise the Council of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius and Trent sess 24. cap. vnico can 1. Besid's the Apostle Eph. 5. nameth marriage a great Sacrament that is the marriage of those which are baptiz'd for of such only he speak's in the Chapter set down saying For yee were once darknes but novv light in our lord that is through baptism for according to holy scriptures and ancient Fathers baptiz'd and lightned importe the same thing for now marriage contracted by persons that are baptised and enabled to contract is a * Sentiunt communiter Theologi quodlibet matrimoniuÌ„ validè contractum inter duas personas baptizatas esse propriè Sacramentum nec duae personae baptizatae validè contrahentes possunt facere vt illud non sit validum vbi obserua quod pecunia quae datur in matrimonio non datur pro matrimonio sed pro eius oneribus nempe pro nutritione familiae educations filiorum id genus alijs Jdeoque inde non committitur simonia Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense being cloathed with all requisits necessary ther to for first it is an outward sensible ceremony in as much as it is a contract expressed in outward words or other sensible signs secondly it doth effectually sanctifie such as receiue it aright through a speciall grace that is conferred on the married to loue each other mutuall after the imitation of that reciprocall loue and charity which is between Christ and his Church in respect wherof the Apostle Eph. 5. calleth the marriage of the faithfull baptised Magnum Sacramentum a great Sacrament but I speake sayes he in order to Christ and the Church exhorting withall husband's to loue their wiues euen as Christ loued the church which is his wife that was taken and formed out of his own side hanging vpon the cross a mystery S. Aug. often inculcates as Eue Adams wife was made of his rib and consequently bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh wherby is plainly manifest that the marriage of Christians lies iust claime to diuine institution also since there is no outward sensible signe or ceremony that effectually produceth sanctifying grace in the new law which is not instituted by Christ according to that of S. Iohn cap. 1. Grace and truth came by Iesus-Christ by the premises appeares that the marriages of vnbaptised persons (b)
S. Mat. cap. 24. the Church of God bears the name of the kingdom of Heauen And S. Hierom stileth the Church the arke of Noe that contained Leopards kids wolfes and lambs that is to say both good and wicked men dwel in the Church of God and though she is faid Eph. 4. to haue no spot or wrinckle yet that is meant in relation to faith and doctrine which are holy and without blame Howeuer S. Austin l. de perfec iustorum expounds the sacred Text set down also in order to the Church triumphant which is without spot or wrinckle the great house of God wherin are not only vessells of gold and siluer but also of wood and of earth and some for honour and some for dishonour 2. Tim. 2. howeuer no man is so irreuocably a vessell vnto dishonour but that he may be translated into a vessell vnto honour sanctified and meet for our lord IESVS if he will cast from him all his transgressions committed after baptism wherby he was incorporated into this great house which made him a vessell vnto dishonour The Church is called catholick that is vniuersall in as much as it sendeth forth the marueilous light of christian faith from the rising of the sun vnto the goeing douwn therof For Christ that redeemed vs to God by his bloud out of euery kindred and tongue and people and nation Apoc. 5. hath not confined the knowledg of his faith * Aug. ser 13. Ecclesia inquit à solis ortu vsque ad occasum vnius fidei splendore enititur within the bounds of one kingdome Moreouer the Church is rightly named catholick or vniuersall in respect of time that is to say of perpetuall succession of pastours and Teachers for the prouidence of God towards man of necessity preserueth the Church from perishing himselfe hauing prouidently instituted it as the common ordinary way to lead man vnto his kingdom Again its vniuersall because of the obligation euery man hath to embrace it that will aspire to eternall life As out of the arke of Noe there was no deliuerance from the generall deluge (t) According to S. Cyprian trac de vnit Eccle. whosoeuer hath not the Church for his Mother shall not haue God for his Father And according to S. Fulgentius who was contemporary with S. Austin l. de fide Such as are not incorporated into the Church how charitable soeuer they be cannot be saued and this Catholick assertion S. Austin professes likwise li. 4. de baptismo besids according to the holy scriptures no man that is not within the Churches bosome can obtaine heauenly benediction in consequence of which to rebell against or fall from her is execrable and damnable so out of the true Church there is no saluation and indeed the Church is the sole Mother that conceiueth bringeth forth and nourisheth children vnto heauenly blessednes Lastly the true Church is called apostolicall because it hath doth and shall preach in all times to the end of the world christian religion planted by the Apostles vpon whom as the foundation it was built Eph. 2. By the forementioned marks or tokens ioyntly the Church of Christ is shewed and distinguished from euery false congregation The Synagogue of Iews and Mahometans cannot challeng Apostolicall foundation where of Christ himselfe is the Chief corner stone nor catholick propagation from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof for their religion is neither christian nor spread in all parts of the world and the false Churches of sectaries though they carry the name of christian neuertheless they haue nothing of vnity as to the faith of Christ nor of perpetuall succession as to pastours and Teachers down from the Apostles to these present times for they set vp a new mysticall body of Christ composed of reformed members saying that Christ in regard of sundry great scandalls and errours hath elected the old mysticall body wherof he was head afore that is the Roman Church which seemeth a strang thing because that Church according to their own confession was once in possession of the true faith and true religion * Ad Rom. 5. gratias ago Domino Deo quod fides vestra Romana annunciata Est in vniuerso mundo and the Apostle witnesseth as much writing to the Romans I thank my God through Iesus-Christ for you all because your faith Roman is published through out the whole world and no one expresse scripture testimony can be alledged to shew that the Roman Church hath deuiated from that true faith in consequence of which sectaries that will belieue nothing without express scripture ought not to belieue that the Roman Church is deuested of the true faith which it was once in possession of and therby deserted and truly it is not to reason credible that Christ after being marryed to the Roman Church for sundry ages should repudiate her especially hauing promised by the mouth of his holy Prophet that * Sponsabo te mihi in aeternum he will neuer chang the spouse of the new law saying I will espouse thee for euer it is not as to reason credible that Christ that cast out the bill of deuorce practized in the old law should be the first to bring it again into practice nor is it as to reason credible that the spouse which Christ chose without sport or wrinckle and put vnder the conduct of the holy Ghost should cast away her spousall innocence integrity and fidelity and turne to vncleaness fornication and idolatry Wherfore it is plainly euident that the Roman Church is not repudiated or deserted wherefore she and no other is the true Church of Christ that since the first age for 1660. yeares hath not deuiated from one holy catholick and Apostolick faith neither is * Apostolus scribens ad Rom. dicit fidem vestram meam sed fides S. Pau. erat vniuersalis catholica Roman Church and catholick or vniuersall Church less consistent together then christian Church and catholick Church or apostolicall and catholick Church for Christ was a singular person whence the word Christian is deriued and the Apostles were particular men whence the word Apostolicall comes and as the catholick Church is named christian because of Christ that is the supream inuisible head therof and as the catholick Church is called apostolicall in respect of the Apostles which were the foundation of it so the Catholick Church is called Roman from the Bishop of Rome that is the visible head therof subordinate to Christ * Concil Alexand loquens de Roma Eccl. sacer inquit vertex inquo omnis Ecclesia vertitur and indeed the Roman Church taken properly doth not signifie precisely and only that Church which is at Rome but cōprehendeth euery Church through out the whole world that professeth the same faith with it and acknowledgeth obedience to the same (u) According to S. Anaclete S. Anaclete S. Peters disciple and his third successor in the Pontificate
5. asserteth touching children that die immediatly after baptism notwithstanding they will receiue aduantages in order to their bodies in the day of generall resurrection But as to Onesiphorus Mr. White perhaps will answer that the Apostle supposeth him dead because in the same Chapter t is said Our lord giue mercy to the house of Onesiphorus Yet that form of speech doth not make him dead for the Apostle sayeth Rom. 10. salute them which are of Aristobulus his house and Mr. White cannot make it appeare by any orthodox writer that then Aristobulus was dead again the same Apostle 1. Cor. 10. writeth thus now brethren I beseech you ye know the house of Stephanus and Fortunatus be you obedient vnto such and yet it is certaine that Stephanus and Fortunatus were liuing at that time for the Apostle saith in the same Chapter I am glad of the coming or presence of Stephanus and Fortunatus Howeuer the Latine and Greek Martyrologes ought to carrie more weight with wise and iudicious men then Mr. Whites meer asserting the contrary But let his supposall be admitted gratis what doth he infer thence Mary that the soul of Onesiphorus bath not already found that mercy the Apōstle prayed our lord might grant vnto him because the Apostle praid that Onesiphorus might find it in illo die in that day In earnest a manifest weake inference in regard it relies on a false supposall as the former did viz. that of necessity by illo die thay day is meant the day of generall iudgment neither doth Mr. White produce any proofe besids his own bare assertion to shew that to be the Apostles meaning nor indeed can he produce any for both the words that day as likwise euen the words the day of our lord doe commonly signifie in scripture and namly 1. Cor. 5. 2. Cor. 1. Philip. 1. 1. Thes 2. as doe * Doctores Rhemenses in Annot a. super cap. 3. Epis 1. ad Cor. obserue Catholicke writers either the particular or generall iudgment And doubtless the mentioned Text of the Apostle is truly very fied in respect of particular judgment where vnto euery man is liable immediatly after his death because euery one shall be iudged in the generall iudgment according to the account he giues after his death at the particular tribunall of diuine Iustice and not only the fauour that a soul findeth in the generall iudgment but also the fauour that it finds at the particular iudgment is called in the scripture mercy both the one and the other being shown vpon the score of good works which proceed from the mercyfull grace of God through the merits of our lord Iesus-Christ Hereby plainly appeareth the vnquietness of Mr. Whits hawty spirite for as much as through a sacrilegious ambition he endeauours to wrest the Apostles words to ouerthrow the common practice of the whole Church of God Moreouer in persuance of his vnquiet ambition he passeth from this scripture-text vnto Church Lyturgies bearing himselfe confident to euidence thereby that the vnanimous consent of antiquitie witnes plainly on his side Let S. Iames be our first witness saith he in his lyturgy of the Hierosolymitan Church be mindfull lord God of the spirits and their bodyes whom we haue commemorated or not commemorated who were orthodox from the iust Abell to this present day Thou grant them there to rest in the region of the liuing in thy kingdom in the delights of paradise And to assure the reader that the Hierosolymitan Church which by origine is the Cheif in as much as she begun from the iust Abell could not exclude any he produceth S. Cyrills testimony for which he citeth his first catechesis next faith S. Cyril for the holy Fathers and Bishops departed and of all vniuersally who are dead from amongst vs. The second witness S. Basils Mass or lyturgy Bee mindfull also of all who haue slept in hope of resurrection vnto life euerlasting The third witnes S. Chrys Mass or lyturgy For the memory and remission of their sins who were the founders of this habitation worthy of eternall memory and all who haue slept in thy communion in the hope of resurrection and life eternall our orthodox Fathers and brethren The fourth witness S. Marks Mass or lyturgy Giue rest our lord our God to the souls of our Fathers and brethren who haue slept in the faith of Christ mindfull of our Ancestours from the begining of the world Fathers Patriarks Prophets Apostles Martyrs Confessors Bishops Saints and iust men all the souls of Those who departed in the faith of Christ and moreouer of those whose memory this day we celebrate and our holy Father Marke the Euangelist to the souls of all these giue rest our supream lord and God in thy holy Tabernacle c. and he concludes saith Mr. White to their souls grant rest and admit them to the kingdom of Heauen The fift witnes S. Greg. the great his lyturgy Remember also o lord thy seruants who haue gone before vs with the sign of faith and now rest in the sleep of peace To them our lord and all that rest in Christ wee beseech the grant a place of ease and light and peace From the witnesses set down Mr. White argueth thus So many Patriarchall Churches continually in their publick lyturgyes beseech God in generall tearmes to giue saluation to all the faithfull departed assigning them a place of ease light and peace and where none is excepted all are included and in our case eminent Saints particularly named we cannot therefore doubt but that prayer was anciently offered for the blessed that is to say we cannot doubt but that the ancient Churches offered prayers for such as departed in the faith of Christ that they might find mercy saluation place of ease light and peace euen after their souls were beatified these aduantages according to Mr. White being the motiues on which ancient Churches grounded their prayers suffrages and sacrifices which they offered for such as were already blessed that they might find mercy place of ease light and peace which implies manifest weakness for he contradicts himselfe since blessedness is a clear sight of God importing of necessity saluation mercy place of ease light and peace Wherfore it seems a strang thing that vpon such premises he should conclude with soe much confidence as if the point were euidently clear that the anciēt lyturgyes acknowleged prayers for the blessed as to procuring them mercy saluation place of ease light and peace besides it s not as to reason consonant that the said lyturgyes should require the prayers and sacrifices of the faithfull on earth for the aduantages of the blessed in Heauen since these (m) As to the Churches lyturgyes it is obseruable 1. That in Saint Iames lyturgy these words are set down Let vs celebrate the memory of the most holy immaculate most glorious Mother of God and euer Virgin Mary and of all the Saints that through their prayers vve may obtaine
deadly schism caused by themselues that departed from and not by Catholicks that abided in her In euery ciuill state such as dissobey not such as obey authority such as abrogate not such as conserue the ancient lawes and ordinances such as reject not such as keep the setled customes therof bear the infimous brand to all posterity of being the men that rent and diuided the common wealth but Protestants haue dissobeyed not obeyed abrogated not preserued reiected not obserued the authority lawes and Customes of the Roman Church hauing by their own power only vnder a specious colour of reformation introduced nouell doctrines lawes and rites contrary to the vsage and practice therof wherfore they of necessity bear the guilt of deadly schism and not Catholicks that haue altered nothing Besides Protestants went out of the Roman Church without cause for at the time of their departure the Roman Church retained all requisits necessary vnto saluation for then was there no Christian Church vpon earth Seperated from her so that when the Protestants reformation begun the Roman Church or none was the true Church of God in consequence of which their departure was without cause * Aug. l. 3. de baptis con Donat. c. 2. in fine ait si Ecclesia Romanae sit verae Dei Ecclesia in qua salus haberi potest non habent Donatista sua pracisionis aliquam defonsionem sed exeundo communionem Ecclesiae relinquâ—â—do in quae poteraÌ„t saluari irrucrunt in sacrilegium schismatis For whosoeuer goeth out from a Church wherin he might attaine to saluation goes out without cause and commits sacriledge of damnable schism as the great Doctour S. Austin teacheth in his third book of baptism against the Donatists Moreouer this asserted truth appeares euidently by the foundamentall doctrines of Protestant Religion which are as opposite to the faith of the Roman Church as the ends of a Diameter are ouerwhart and cross For example Protestants commonly teach that good works proceeding from diuine grace can neither iustify nor merit saluation these being prerogatiues of faith only in regard wherof it beares the name of iustifying faith but all ancient and modern Pastors and Doctours of the Roman Church assert that good workes exercised in and by diuine grace doe bring vnto iustification of life and that they are in order to merit causes of euerlasting saluation as wicked workes in order to demerit are causes of perpetuall damnation Protestants commonly teach that the sacrifice of Mass wherin Catholick Priests offer the body and blood of Christ for the liuing and dead is a blasphemous tale and a daÌ„gerous deuise Protestants coÌ„monly teach that confirmation Penance Order Extream-vnction and Matrimony want requisits necessary to an Euangelicall Sacrament Protestants commonly teach that the doctrines of Purgatory Indulgences religious veneration of holy Reliks pertaining vnto and inuocation of Saints are idle fancies and trifles crept into the Church without warrantable authority of scripture testimony Protestants commonly teach sundry other doctrines as foundamentall requisits to their religion clean contrary to the faith of the Roman Church as is manifestly demonstrated in the Characters concerning the outward Sacrifice of Masse Confirmation Penance Order Extrem-vnction Matrimony Purgatory Indulgences and Adoration From the premises is inferred that the Protestant Reformation cannot borrow of the Roman Church visible existence together with continuall succession of Pastors vnto perpetuating that Church in foundamentall Articles of faith vnto excusing from schism Howeuer it cannot be denyed but that Protestants can shew clearly that the whole body of doctrines foundamentall to Protestanism hath been asserted by sundry learned men that liu'd in sundry ages respectiuely long before their reformation began namly Simon Magus taught that faith alone was an expedient sufficient vnto saluation as witnesseth S. Irenaeus and rejected good works as vnnecessary therto as doth attest Clemens Romanus Manichaeus despised the Sacrifice of Masse spoiling Christs Church of all outward sacrifice as witnesses S. Austin Nouatus impugned the Sacraments of Confirmation Eucharist Extrem-vnction and Matrimony as S. Cyprian affirmeth Vigilantius detested the inuocation of Saints and the veneration of their Reliques and likewise single life of Priests as S. Hierom relateth Iulian the Apostat had in detestation the cross of Christ and demolished his statue as Eusebius writeth Aerius condemned prayers and sacrifices offered for the souls departed as S. Austin and S. Epiphanius auerre But that which is exacted of the Protestants is to shew from the first age for 1500. yeares a setled company of Christians and the place country town or village where they liued that taught and preached the whole body of their foundamentall doctrines it is not enough to produce the example of such as at different tymes and in different places agreed with them in two or three of their Articles for that is not sufficient vnto constituting a society of true belieuers because so Turkes and Iewes might be lifted for Protestants these agreeing with them as to sundry Articles namely they deny the Popes supremacy transubstantiation inuocation of Saints and the sacrifice of the Masse Again the fore named sectaries themselues were destitute of visible existence and perpetuall succession and consequently could not deriue either of both vnto the Protestant Church Besides Simon Magus Manichaeus Nouatus Vigilantius c. bear the infamous brand of being condemned Hereticks before the ProtestaÌ„ts reformation begun Howeuer some Protestants there be that endeuour to proue their visible existeÌ„ce in a long line of succession from the Albigenses but vnaduisedly first because this seed of sectaries knowes not to deriue the Genealogy of their own Religion down from the Apostles which is the question in debate wherin satisfaction is expected secondly the Albigenses are condemned Hereticks that taught doctrine impious and blasphemous for example they asserted a good and an euill God denyed originall sin reiected baptism and impugned the resurrection of bodyes By the premises plainly appeareth that Mark Antony de Dominis Bishop of Spalatto his distinction between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith carrieth nothing of weight with it t' is like a specious building that wantes a good foundation to support it And truly it is as impossible an enterprise to proue the visible existence and perpetuall succession of Protestant Pastours from the Roman Church as it is for Caluinists to shew that the true Church of God laid hid for sundry ages inuisible without perishing which is impossible also for the markes of a liu'd Church are professing of faith preaching of the diuine word instructing of the illiterate and administring of the Sacraments which functions can noe more be executed in a Church that is inuisible then in a Church that is perished FINIS Laus Deo eiusque Matri Sanctissimae omnibus Sanctis Omnia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae subiecta sunt