Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
scripture_n apostle_n church_n set_v 2,434 5 5.2643 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A10907 An answer to Mr. Fisher the Iesuite, his fiue propositions concerning Luther. By Mr. Rogers, that worthy Oxford diuine. VVith some passages also of the said Mr. Rogers with the said Mr. Fisher. Hereunto is annexed Mr. VV.C. his dialogue of the said argument, wherein is discouered Fishers folly Rogers, Henry, ca. 1585-1658.; Crashaw, William, 1572-1626. aut 1623 (1623) STC 21177; ESTC S116093 13,598 35

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

faith But the Protestant faith hath beene so maintained by such Authors Ergo The Protestant faith hath been maintained in all ages The Names of such as professed the faith of the Protestants in all ages since the incarnation of Christ In euery centure of yeares which is called saculum an age I will name some writers whose workes are extant Ab anno 1. ad 100. In the first centure Christ himselfe and his Apostles and Euangelists Ab 100 ad 100. In the second age Saint Iohn the Euangelist who died either Anno 100 or 101 to him we adde Ignatius and Polycarpus who though they liued in part of the first age and part of the second age they are alwayes reckoned Fathers of that age in which they dyed to these I adde Iustin Martyr Iraenaeus Ab ●●● ad 3●0 Tertullian Clemens Alexandrinus Origen Cyprian Lac●antius Ab 300. ad 400 Athanasius Cyrillus Hierosolymitanus Ambrosius Gregorius Mystenus Hieronymus Ruffinus Chrysostomus Ab 400. ad 500. Augustinus Cyrillus Alexandrinus Theodoretus Vincentius ●●riuensis Socrate● Zozomen Chrysologus Ab 500. ad 600 Bulgentius ●u●grius Gregorius primus Ab 70● ad ●00 Beda Damascenus Alcu●nus Thus hauing gon halfe the way I conclude with this Argument The Protestants saith is plainely expressed in the Canonicall Scripture and comprised in the Apostles Creede All these Fathers did professe that faith which is contained in the holy Canonicall Scripture and comprised in the Apostles Creede Ergo All these did professe the Protestants faith As I admonished Mr. Fisher to distinguish betweene Affirmation and Negation so I do these men and that faith is Affirmation not Negation for no man beleeueth which he denieth Secondly in point of faith I like Mr. Fe. rule They that are in the affirmatiue must proue now all that we affirme they affirme as one God three Persons all the Creede so that we neede not proue what our aduersaries doe confesse But in those points in variance betweene vs they are to proue because they are affirmatiue we negatiue as vnwritten Traditions Latin Seruice inuocation of Saints c. The Protestants faith being that which is contained in the Scriptures receiued fo● vndoubtedly Canonicall in the first 400. yeares which is summarily comprised in the Apostles Creede is receiued by all the Orthodox Fathers But those Fathers aboue named be all Orthodox Ergo The Maior is manifest the Minor I will proue out of their owne Authors concerning all sauing Tertullian in whom I must distinguish the times for first he was Orthodox though after an Heretike Hauing gone thus far at this time I vndertake for the rest and do require the like from the Romanists viz. That they will shew me the Names of such as taught the now saith of the Church of Rome in all ages and let them set me down the Names as I haue done And for instances in points of Romane faith in all ages I require these men to shew me the Names of those who in the 1. 2. 3. centure of yeares did preach or professe vnwritten traditions to be the rule of faith 2 that the vulgar translation is authenticall 3 that there are 7 Sacraments properly so called and no more 4 that the Bookes of the Machabes are Canonicall 5 transubstantiation 6 Inuocation of Saints 7 worshipping of Images c. This rule is proposed by them which though it be no necessarie consequence of faith yet it bindeth them that propose it to make good in particular out of their owne position thus I argue That is the true Church whose faith hath had visible professors in all ages The Romish faith had not visible professors in all ages Ergo The Romane Church is not a true Church An other Argument The true faith hath the testimonies of Vniuesalitie Antiquitie and Consent But the Romish faith as farre as they differ from the Protestant faith which they do in all the points aboue alledged hath not testimonies of 1. Vniuersalitie 2. Antiquitie 3. And Consent Ergo The Romish faith is not a true faith Let the Romanists answer these two Arguments in those particular points aboue written and I will be of their Church An Admonition to the Reader I Do not so meane that those Fathers by me named haue expressely set downe euery point of our faith in their seuerall writings neither can the Church of Rome doe it for theirs But being Orthodox right beleeuing Fathers they did consequently maintaine the Scriptures Apostles Creede Some passages had between Master Rogers and Master Fisher the Iesuite as followeth Fisher It being granted that there must be a visible Church in all ages of which all sorts must learne faith necessarie to saluation Rogers The perpetuall visibilitie of the Church I acknowledge But I pray you set me downe what a visible Church is and what you meane by those wordes which you put of another letter who you meane by all sorts whether the Children who die before they come to yeares of discretion doe learne this faith or dying before they come to learne it be not after Baptisme parts of the visible Church Secondly What you meane by learne whether an actuall explicite knowledge or an habituall only implicite knowledge Thirdly What points of faith you hold necessary to saluation The question propounded by M. Fisher at the intreaty of a Gentleman who desired satisfaction was Fisher Whether the Protestant Church was visible in all ages especially in the ages before Luther and whether the names of the professors thereof may be shewed in all ages out of good Authors Rogers A Church professing the same faith which the Protestants now doth was visible in all ages and I doe vndertake to proue it out of good Authors Fisher Mr. Fisher vndertooke to defend the negatiue part so as it did belong to his aduersaries to proue the affirmatiue M. Fisher explicated the meaning of his question to be First That his aduersaries should set down Names of men in all ages which they thought to be Protestants Secondly That they should shew out of good Authors proofe that they were Protestants Thirdly That they should defend them to hold nothing contrary to the Doctrin of the Protestants contained in the 39 Articles vnto which all English Ministers are sworne Rogers To the Second First I will show the Names of such as maintained our now faith in all ages and bring good proofe To the Third First It is no preiudice to our faith if the same Authors doe differ from vs in other opini●ns not concerning faith as long as they maintain our faith Secondly The Church of Rome cannot produce Fathers in all ages who doe not contradict the Councell of Trent in some Doctrines established in the said Councell Fisher Mr. Fisher offered me a like proportion to name and proue and defend professors of Romane religion holding nothing contrarie to the Doctrine defined in the Councell of Trent Rogers You must expresse whether you haue all things defined in that