remission of Synns they explicate of not imputation only not acknowledging any inward renouation by inherent iustice and the infused gifts of God after which manner the Catholikes do hold that sinnes are forgiuen By these it is manifest how great a difference there is in the vnderstanding of the Creed Seing therfore that there is but only one truth and this in our Consultation we haue shewed to be among Catholikes it necessarily followeth â—â— one God Creator of all thinges because his Alcoran doth teach him so which he thinketh to be written by the spirits of God his faith albeit he belieue that which is true relyeth vpon a false and deceytfull reason by the force whereof he is moued to belieue many false and blasphemous thinges as that there are not three Persons in the B. Trinity and that Christ is not God and that Christ is inferiour to Mahomet and that Circumcision the like are still to be kept That faith therfore by reason of the foundation is both deceitfull and hurtfull the same hapneth vnto alheretikes the which being supposed I vrge the argument in this manner That faith which relieth vpon a false foundation albeit it belieueth somethings which are true cannot be sufficient to saluation but the faith of all the sects of this tyme relieth vpon a false foundation it cannot be therefore sufficient for saluation The first proposition is manifest in it selfe for how can that which is deceitfull vncertayne be the â—oundation of our eternall 〈…〉 How can the true Religion whereâ—â— we please God be grounded in a false deceitfull faith Truly it is no lesse repugnant to reason then if thou shouldest say that truth is grounded vpon lyes wisdome vpon error and vertue vpon folly The second proposition The faith of all sectaries dependeth vpon a false ground to wit that all Sects are grounded vpon a false and deceitful foundation I proue in this manner for eyther they belieue their opinions for the authority of their Apostles Luther Caluin Melancthon Zwinglius c. whom they iudge to be endewed with the spirit of God or because euery one of them in their owne priuate iudgement do beleeue those things to be coÌ„teyned in holy Scripture or lastly because their owne priuate spirit doth inwardly testify vnto them that those things are true or that this is the meaning of holy Scripture for whatsoeuer the sects of these tymes do belieue they are moued thereunto by one of these three reasons and they appoint one of them to be the foundation or reason of their beliefe but these foundations and reasons be altogeather false and deceitfull As for the first reason to wit the authority of Luther Caluin and the rest who first inuented these new Religions that it is deceitfull is many fest because we see by experience that both they might and haue byn often deceyued for they haue reuoked many things corrected many things and in many things haue they contradicted themselues as hath byn declared in our Consultation of Religion in the 9. Consideration and the sixt Reason Hence it commeth to passe that few now adayes will rely vpon their authority because they say they were men and therefore subiect to error wherfore their followers also do leaue them at their owne pleasure when they thinke they haue found any thing fitter for their purpose their authority therfore is deceitfull vncertayne euen by the iudgement of their owne schollers and followers Neyther is the other to wit the priuate iudgment whereby they expound the holy Scripture lesse deceitful for many false thinges by that priuate iudgement seeme to be true and many things which before seemed true are afterward iudged false From hence ariseth so great variety and inconstancy in many of them concerning matters of faith because indeed mans iudgement is weake especially in the mysteries of our fayth and the vnderstanding of holy Scripture the which far exceedeth the reach of mans wisdome and reason Many do answere that they do not rely vpon their iudgment in matters of faith but vpon the holy Scriptures which cannot erre Whether all sectaries do rely vpon the Scripture wherin how miserably they are deceiued by this appeareth because almost all the sects do say that they rely vpoÌ„ holy Scripture wheras notwithstanding they differ among themselues in most of the matters one teaching contrary vnto another the which could by no meanes come to passe if they did not rest vpon their owne iudgments but vpon the lawfull and common vnderstanding of the holy Scripture for the holy Scripture is no where contrary vnto it selfe neyther doth it any where disagree from it selfe that therefore they so greatly iarre disagree among themselues is caused by that they make a sense to the holy Scripture according to their owne priuate iudgment the which is diuersly framed by them according to the diuersity of iudgments and vnderstanding among them they rely therfore vpon the holy Scripture not as it is interpreted by the Catholike Church the holy Fathers but as they in their priuate iudgment do interprete it for the vertue and force of the holy Scripture doth not only consist in the bare words but in the sense and meaning therof but the priuate iudgment inuenteth this sense and ioyneth it to the words of the Scripture as lyfe vnto the body the whole reason of their fayth therefore is their priuate iudgmeÌ„t the which how deceitfull oftentymes it is may easily be declared by the disagreement of so many sects For it is all one whether thou saist that thou reliest vpon Scripture as it is interpreted by thy proper iudgment or that thou reliest vpon thy owne iudgment precisely in it selfe Finally the third reason whereupon many now adayes do rely is most deceitfull and skornfull of all a manifest signe wherof is that among the Anabaptists who aboue all others are guyded by the instinct of the spirit there is the greatest variety of sects and disagrement of faith the which could not be but that the spirit whereupon they rely and by whome they are gouerned is deceitfull and variable The same also is to be seene among Caluinists and Lutherans and amongst their sects and diuers factions for their owne opinion is certayne and euident vnto euery one of them by the testimony of their owne priuate iudgment the which inwardly teacheth euery one of them and affoardeth the testimony of truth vnto euery one of them whereby it is manifest that this spirit is not the holy Ghost the spirit of truth who cannot teach contraryes or be opposite vnto it selfe but it is a wicked spirit the spirit of error who is a lyar from the begining and the father of lyes who worketh in the children of incredulity of whome the Apostle saith Because they haue not receiued the charity of truth 2. Thess 6. he will therefore send them the operation of error that they may belieue in lyes And in another place 2. Tim. 4. In
the last dayes there shall some depart from their saith attending to the spirits of error and doctrines of the diuell For euery heresy is the doctrine of the Diuell And S. Iohn saith 1. Ioan. 4. Do not belieue euery spirit but try their spirits whether they be of God or not For many false Prophets are gone out into the world This therefore is the spirit which beareth rule in the harts of heretiks whose testimony operation they feele inwardly engrafted in their harts and yet they thinke it to be the worke of the holy Ghost who so blindeth their mind and fansies that they iudge light to be darknesse and darknesse light that they think the most cleare truth of the Catholike faith to be an error and most filthy errors to be the cleare truth And truly if they were not wholy blinded bewitched they might easily perceiue that spirit whome they feele inwardly not to be the spirit of God or at the least they might begin to doubt therof seing that all sects among whome there is so great dissention variety of opinions do all equally feele boast of and follow that testimony of this spirit and rely vpon it in the confirmation of their most contrary opinions but this hapneth by the iust iudgment of God for as the Iewes who would not receiue Christ were permitted to be blinded by the diuell as it is manifest by the Apost 2. ad Thes 2. so heretiks because they haue forsaken the Catholik fayth the which is no lesse a fault then that of the Iewes are deliuered vnto him that he may as it were bewitch their minds and driue them into all kind of error But if any will attentiuely consider he shall easily preceyue a more potent operation of the diuell and bewitching of mindes in our Heretiks The diuell doth sooner bewitch Heretiks then Iewes then eyther in Iewes or Mahometans and that for two reasons First because the Iews agree in the same faith neither is there any variety of sects among them among the Mahomets there are only two sects and there is no great difference betwixt thē But among heretiks of these tymes there are many sects some arising by the increase of new opinions who condemne one another of heresy and all these are risen within the space of 90. yeares the which is a manifest signe that the diuell meruailously possesseth inwardly the hartes of these men troubling their fansies peruerting their imaginations and iudgments that they cannot remayne or be quiet any where Secondly because the common sort of people among the Iewes and Turkes do not rely vpon their owne iudgment or vpon the testimony and instinct of the priuate spirit but vpon the iudgment of their doctors or which is all one vpon their owne Scripture as it is interpreted vnto them by the doctors of their Religion they haue therfore the rule of their faith and ground of their beliefe conformable as it were to reason that is to say the common consent of their predecessors or the Scripture explicated vnto them by the consent of the doctors of their Religion But most of the heretikes of these tymes do not respect their Superiors and Apostles from whom they first receiued this new Ghospell but they forsake them as men subiect to error and they rely wholy vpon their owne iudgment or vpon the testimony of the priuat spirit or which is al one vpon the Scripture only vnderstood after the sense of their owne iudgment priuate spirit the which is an euident sign that Sathan doth so effectually worke in them bewitch their myndes that not only euery one feygneth vnto himselfe new heresies and opinions but also that he placeth the foundation of his beliefe rule of faith in himself in his owne inward sense and iudgement for euery one thinketh himself to be taught by our Lord and indued with the Magistery of the spirit albeit they be women yong girles therfore to be free from error but al the holy Fathers to haue byn men subiect to error The same they iudge of their Apostles and Ministers But what greater bewitching or deceiuing of people can there be then this Hence it commeth to passe that they haue no certaine and established opinions amongst them neither can they set downe or frame any body of doctrine and religion but they must wander vp and downe in vncertaintyes as the priuate spirit leadeth them neyther can there any disputation be made with them cōcerning their opinions seing that they do not defend any one opinion they being by reason of the ignorance of their predecessors altogeather vnlearned But of this spirit of folly madnesse we haue written more at large in our Consultation in the 9. Consideration the 11. Reason By these it is manifestly concluded that all the ground and foundation of faith wherupon the sects of our tymes relye is false and vncertaine and therfore their faith which relyeth theron is vnprofitable and auayleth nothing to saluation The 8. Reason Eightly if euery one who doth acknowledge Christ may be saued in his owne faith Why is there so great disagreement among religions Why do they excommunicate condemne one another of heresy Why do the Lutherans refuse to acknowledg the Caluinists for their brethren and in their publike sermons and books do call them wicked blasphemous persons Why do the chiefe of the Caluinists among whome Theodore Beza the Father of them all as it were their Pope next after Caluin handle the Lutherans in like manner why do the Anabaptists call those only of their owne sect to be the faithfull Christians and account all others as Infidels Wherby it is euident that this new opinion of doctrine is not only cōtrary to Catholike religion but to all other sects also who haue in them any zeale of piety and religion and to be banished as Atheisme only The 9. Reason Ninthly that any man be saued it sufficeth not to keepe only one two or three commandements but it is necessary to keep all according to those words of Christ Matth. 19. Matth 19. If thou wilt enter into life keep the commandements As if any be an adulterer or thiefe albeit he keep the other commandments he may not be saued as the holy Scripture often teacheth In like manner therfore it is not sufficient to saluation to beleeue two three or foure articles but it is necessary to belieue all those things which God hath reuealed and set downe to vs in his Church to be belieued for faith is no lesse necessary to saluation then obediēce of the commādments of the law of God neither should faith be lesse perfect then the obedience and keeping of the law of God As therfore obedience must extend it selfe to all the commandments so must faith extend it selfe to all things which are reuealed the which may be confirmed by the words of S. Iames in the 2. Iac. 2. Chap. VVhosoeuer hath kept the whole
acknowledging of one God I add further Then in vayne was Christ made man in vayne did he worke so many Miracles that so he might be acknowledged and belieued to be the Mossias Sauiour of the world in vaine was he crucified and dyed For none of all these thinges was necessary to mans saluation it being sufficient to send preachers about the world to perswade men the beliefe of one God After this manner reasoneth the Apostle Gal. 2. If iustice be by the Law then in vayne saith he is Christ dead which is as much to say if Iustice can be obtayned by the knowledg of one God and obseruation of the Law in vayne was Christ crucifyed because then the death of Christ had not byn necessary for our saluation The 2. Reason Besides Rom. 3. Apoc. â— 7. Act. 4. hence it must necessarily follow that the whole Scripture is false since that it telleth vs how Christ is our Sauiour Mediatour and Redeemer and propoundeth him vnto vs as a Propitiatour by â—aith in his bloud by whose Sacrifice â—e are reconciled vnto God by his bloud our sinnes are washed away and with whose faith we are iustified Nâ—â—ther is there any other name vnder hâ—â—â—en giuen vnto men in which they â—â—ght to be saued Thus speaketh the 〈◊〉 Scripture and all this must needes be friuolous and false if euery man may be saued in his owne Religion But some may perhaps obiect that Christ is indeed our Redeemer and that all our good commeth from him yet his faith notwithstanding is not absolutely necessary For it is sufficient that we belieue that all our good commeth and proceedeth from the bountifull goodnesse of God vnto vs neyther is it needful for vs to know by what meanes it is bestowed vpon vs. But this not only repugneth to the holy Scripture but also it is against the reason of the holy Scripture because the sayd holy Scripture doth euidently teach vs that Christs redemption is not applied vnto vs but by fayth and therfore all such as are destitute of the fayth of Christ are voyd of their iustification and remayning still guiltie of sinne are the children of wrath and in danger of eternall damnation It repugneth to reason Why Christian saith is necessary to saluation because to the end that we may become partakers of any great and vnaccustomed benefit all reason requireth that we acknowledge the benefit and our be â—â—â—â—ctor and that we honour him as it be cometh vs with all thankes-giuing for â—oth the condition of the benefit and of our benefactor doth require of vs this gratefulnesse of mind Seing therfore that the benefit of our redemption is so great and vnaccustomed and he who bestowed it vpon vs so great and famous as also the meanes wherby he bestowed it vpon vs so strange and meruaylous it is requisit we should acknowledge all these things least we should liue and dye vngratefull toward so great a benefactor and least insteed of blessing thanking him after the manner of the Iewes we curse and blaspheme him It is therfore an absurd thing to esteme those who do not beleeue in Christ to be partakers of eternall saluation prepared for vs by Christ The which also by this may be confirmed because none can be saued who doth not know God and the benefit of his creation for otherwise all Idolators might be saued neither therfore can he be saued who doth not know the benefit of his redemption because the benefit of our redemption is farre greater and more admirable and doth more appertayne to the Glory of God and of Christ our Redeemer and requireth also of vs greater honour seruice and thankes giuing Neyther is it sufficient for vs to know in generall that all good thinges come vnto vs from God for this is not sufficient for the honor and gratitude which is dew vnto him but we must also know what and how great the benefit is as also by what manner way and meanes he bestowed it vpon vs that is to say that he hath deliuered vs from sinne and euerlasting death and that he hath opened vnto vs the way to eternall life that after a most admirable manner to wit by ioyning our nature vnto his by suffering therein death for vs. For this especially commendeth his charity mercy and iustice this also exacteth at our hands all duery prayse and thankes-giuing these therefore are most necessarily to be knowne to saluation The 3. Reason If euery one may be saued in his owne fayth then therfore that fayth is sufficient to saluation which is not a gift of God but an humane perswasion The ground of faith among â—e Iewes Turkes is false conceyued by our private iudgement relying vpon humane authority built vpon a deceitfull foundation For the Turkes although they belieue one Goâ— to be the Creatour of heauen and earth and to be the rewarder of both good and euill workes their faith notwithstanding is not of the holy Ghost but of their owne priuate iudgment or rather of the Diuel for they do not belieue so because God hath reuealed it vnto men by any true Prophet but because Mahomet whome they thinke to be the Prophet of God his instrument to teach mortall men hath so set it down in his Alcoran Albeit therfore that which they belieue be true yet because the ground of their beliefe and the whole reason therof is fâ—lse and pestilent to wit that Mahomet is a Prophet of God the faith it selfe whereby they belieue is deceytfull and the foundation therof whereupon it is grounded is hurtfull to saluation necessarily inclining and forcing the mind to cast it selfe into all the pâ—stiferous errours of that sect How therfore caÌ„ that faith be called sufficient for them vnto saluation or that they can be saued by that faith How can that which is vncertayne deceitfull pestiferous be made the foundatioÌ„ of our instice before God or of eternall saluation In like manner albeit the Iewes do belieue the same or rather more thinges agreable vnto truth yet the faith wherby they do belieue them is deceytfull and voyde of the spirit of God For the whole reason or cause of their beliefe is because the Rabbyns and Doctors of their Synagogue do so interpret the holy Scriptures vnto them For they are the rule of their beliefe or which is all one the holy Scripture as it is subiect to their interpretation But this whole reason of their beliefe is deceytfull and no lesse hurtful and dangerous then that of the Turkes for it is no lesse hurtefull to belieue that their Rabbyns interpreting the holy Scriptures are indued with the spirit of God then to belieue that Mahomet is the Prophet of God neither are they drawne into lesser absurdityes by the force of that principle How therfore can that faith be the foundation or ground of saluation The 4. Reason Finally this opinion maketh no difference betwixt Turcisme Iudaisme and Christianisme
things truly had byn done in vayne foolishly and wrongfully if in these sects eternall saluation might haue byn obteined the which seing no wise man can say we must of necessity confesse that those heresies are the plagues of soules that saluation can by no meanes consist with them The 2. Reason Secondly because it condemneth all antiquity of error who hath alwayes iudged that an heretike cannot be saued and therfore it hath opposed 〈◊〉 selfe so vehemently against them and hath alwayes very diligently confuted them The 3. Reason Thirdly because it condemneth the Apostle himselfe who in his third to Titus commandeth vs in this sort Tit. 3. Eschew an heretike after one or two admonitions knowing certaynly that he which is such a one is ouerthrown and sinneth being condemned by his owne proper iudgment Why doth he command him to be esehewed if his error be not a hindrance to saluation why doth he say that he is ouerthrowne condemned 2 Tim. 2. In like manner in his 2. Tim 2. Their speach sayth he creepeth as a canker Euen as therefore the canker is a disease which killeth a mans body vnlesse it be cut away so is an Heretike vnto a company of Christians and Catholikes But some peraduenture will obiect and say that none is to be accounted an heretike but he which reiecteth Christ or denyeth some thing belonging vnto the Creed But this is absurdly vnwisely spoken for so he should not be an heretike who should take away both the old and new Testament and should say that those things are eyther feygnâ—d or written by the spirit only of a man and as the writings of prophane authors subiect to many errors he were not an heretike who should deny hell or the eternity of the paynes therof or should affirme that all the diuells should once besaued seing that there is no mention made of these things in the Apostles Creed he should not be an heretike who should forbid marriage and who should fay that marriages were ordeyned by the Diuell who also should affirme that som kind of flesh is of it owne nature vncleane all whome notwithstanding the Apostle iudgeth to be heretikes 1. Tim. 4. He were not an heretike who should say that there are two persons in Christ whom notwithstanding S. Iohn calleth an heretike and Antichrist Epist. 1. c. 4. He were not an heretike who should deny Baptisme and all other Sacraments And finally none of those of whome we haue spoken before were to be accounted Heretikes the which is contrary to all antiquity and all the Doctors who haue liued in these ten or twelue ages The 4. Reason Fourthly this opinion doth make all the foresayd heresyes and sects equall with the Catholike faith and Religion affirming that we may aswell be saued in them as in it The Catholike Religion therfore shall be no better then Arianisme Pelagianisme Nestorianisme Eurichianisme and other false Religions the whith both in it selfe is most absurd and nothing els but to induce a new Atheisme For to affirme all Religions to be good and that it little importeth the worke of our Saluation what Religion we professe is to make no account of any Religion for if there be any Religion it cannot be but one as there is but one Truth one Iustice one Faith one happines one Lord and God and one Man Iesus Christ mediator of God and man The 5. Reason Fifthly it is a skornefull thing to say that it is sufficient for euery one to belieue the Creed according to their owne sense and vnderstanding therof seing there is but one only truth the which if we do not attayne we belieue that which is false but a false faith auayleth nothing to saluation It is therfore all one whether thou belieuest the Creed after such a manner or after no manner at all one therfore may be saued albeit he doth not absolutely belieue many articles The same also may be said of the holy Scriptures For if it be sufficient to belieue the holy Scriptures vnderstood in their owne sense seing that this sense may often tymes be erroneous it will also suffice albeit thou doest not belieue them at all for a false faith can be no more needfull to saluation then no faith at all that is to say whereby one doth absolutely belieue nothing at all Yf thou doest say that the Creed must be belieued in a true sense then thou condemnest all the Sects of this tyme whereof there is none which belieueth all the articles of the Creed in the same sense with Catholikes or which doth not differ one from another in the explication of the Creed Wherfore seing that there is but oÌ„ly one Truth it necessarily followeth that all Religions sauing one doe erre from the truth therefore are not sufficient to saluation But it is euident The disagrement of fectaries in the sense of the Creed that they differ much in the vnderstanding of the Creed for that Article And in Iesus Christ his only Sonne the Arians Tritheitans and many Caluinistes affirming the Sonne lesser then the Father doe other wise explicate then the Lutherans and Catholikes do who hold God the Sonne to be equall and consubstantiall with his Father The article of Christs descending into hell the Caluinists do otherwise vnderstand who do thinke that Christ suffered there the torments of the damned soules and that he doubted of his saluation and that he was affrayd least he should be wholy consumed by euerlasting death otherwise Catholikes and Lutherans hold who say that such aÌ„ exposition is not the sense of that Article but a blasphemy of Caluin The article of Christs ascending into heauen is otherwise vnderstood by the Lutherans and Vbiquitarists who hold Christes body to be present euery where and in all places as his diuinity is preseÌ„t euery where otherwise the Caluinists and Catholiks hold who do not doubt to affirme but that by this exposition the whole Creed is ouerthrowne and that Christes Incarnation Natiuity Passion death ascending to heauen and his comming to Iudgmente is therby quite taken away The article of iudging the quicke and the dead the Catholikes do otherwise expound who hold that God shall so iudge vs that he will reward our good workes with heauen and punish our euill deeds with hell otherwise the Caluinists and Lutherans who deny all reward to good workes and that God only in his diuine iudgement will principally esteeme reward a speciall fayth only The aricle of the Holy Ghost the Catholikes and Lutherans do otherwise vnderstand then the Arians and many Caluinists The article of the Church the Lutherans and Caluinists do vnderstand of the inuisible congregation of those which are predestinate the Catholikes do vnderstand it of the visible company of Catholiks wherein many are predestinate many are reprobate The article of Communion of Saynts the Lutherans and Caluinists do so extenuate that they take away almost all the communion holden by Catholiks The article of
A CONSVLTATION WHAT FAITH AND RELIGâ—â—â— is best to be imbraced WRITTEN IN LATIN By the R. Father Leonard Lessius Professour in Diuinity of the Society of IESVS AND Translated into English by W. I. IHS Permissu Superiorum M.DC.XVIII TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE THE LORD MAIOR TO THE RIGHT WORSHIPFVLL THE ALDERMEN AND TO THE RIGHT WORTHY CITTIZENS OF LONDON The Translatour wisheth all Health and Happines Temporall and Eternall RIGHT HONORABLE RIGHT WORSHIPFVLL AND RIGHT WORTHY I Was pâ—rswaded to present you with this Treatise traÌ„slated by 〈◊〉 into our mother tongue that hath appeared far better 〈◊〉 in â—â—owâ—yde it was first inuested only through the loue and respect I beare to your so we deserming persons whose speciall endeauors amidst your other sorâ—ous imployments in that famous Citty should be and I hope is the attayning of such a traffike that may more redound to the profit of your Soules then your temporall Estates since you know well that a sure and solid foundation of true Religion worketh Eternall Saluation and the contrary eternall woe and misery though otherwise one were neuer so fortunate in all worldly prosperity The worke it selfe is but of some few houres reading and the Author I hope will not be distastfull vnto yow in respect of his person though otherwise of a different Profession habit And though I doubt not but that many of your haue already seene other learned Bookes of like subiect yet because this affoardeth so great variety of forcible Motiues both singularly chosen and most aptly expressed to settle mens Consciences in so waighty an affayre as this is I haue therfore thought good to present it to your View though in a more humble and far lesse polished stile then so profitable a subiect deserueth And heerunto I was the more encouraged by vnderstanding the great fruite and profit which many haue all ready and do dayly reape by a diligent perusall of this Booke in other languages hoping for no lesse in our owne then it hath produced in the Latin French and Dutch especially in men so zealous in that Profession which hath by in these later tymes preached vnto you Which zeale of yours would no doubâ— be more feruent if Gods Grace by other mothâ—es proposed should open your eyes to see the cleernes of the Catholike Verity Neither should it offend you that your Consciences hauing byn setled these 60. yeares last past in the Faith that was then proposed vnto you now a new reuiew of matters belonging to Religion should be offered For synce the Scripture doth premonish vs that Heresies must of necessity be and false Teachers would come to disturbe the peace and vnity of the Church of which sort as is apparent by her contrary doctrines this our vnfortunate Age hath byn most fertile it is doublesse no disgrace or signe of leuity or inconstancy by a diligent and iudicious examen to try which of all these diuers spirits is of God and which is that Catholike Church so often commended vnto vs in the Scriptures as nothing more plainely and seriously In which important search the Reading of this little but golden Treatise will by Gods grace affoard such light to discerne Truth from Falshood and such meanes to find out the true gate of Catholike faith which only leadeth to saluation as may satisfy the most Iudicious especially if they reade with that humblenes of spirit as they ought to do who desyre to know the Truth In reading therfore consider attentiuely euery Passage ponder the waight and substance of ech Reason not posting the same ouer as many do transpotted with curiosity to read all new Bookes that come forth and I doubt not you will receaue aboundant satisfaction Read then most worthy Cittizens the ensuing Consultation with an indifferent and vnpartiall eye that you may enrich your soules with the treasure of true knowledg doctrine which leadeth to eternall Life and Happines Wherof I humbly beseech his diuine Maiesty to make you partakers to whom I haue heerewith dedicated both my selfe and seruice to remayne Your seruant euer in Christ Iesus W. I. This 30 of Septemb. 1618. THE TABLE OF THE CONTENTS of the ensuing Consultation THE Preface pag. 1. The I. Consideration Of the desire of Perfection wherunto Christian Religion leadeth pag. 8. The II. Consideration That Christian Religion excludeth liberty of sinning pag. 11. The III. Consideration Drawne froÌ„ the Sanctity of the followers of true Religion pag. 2â— The IIII. Consideration From the miracles wrought by the imbracers of Catholike Religion pag. 36. The V. Consideration From the Conuersion of Nations by the imbracers of Catholike Religion pag. 48. The VI. Consideration From the Name Catholike and from the thing it selfe signed or marked with this Name pag. 55. The VII Consideration From Succession pag. 59. The VIII Consideration From the consent of the ancient Fathers and Doctours of the Church and from the decision of controuersies without which there is no sodality or fellowship pag. 65. The IX Consideration From diuers causes and reasons for which these new doctrines are to be suspected and shunned pag. 74. The I. Reason Deduced from Nouelty pag. 75. The II. Reason Taken from the defect of Succession pag. 87. The III. Reason From the defect of their Mission pag. 9â— The IIII. Reason From the want of Miracles pag. 106. The V. Reason From the conditions of their liues and manners pag. 116. The VI. Reason from their errors and inconstancy in Doctrine pag. 125. The VII Reason Taken from the fraudes and deceipts which the Sectaryes commonly vse pag. 135. The VIII Reason Drawne from the ouerthrow of good Workes pag. 153. The IX Reason Deduced from the liberty of life which they yield vnto pag. 158. The X. Reason That they renew old Heresies pag. 166. The XI Reason From want of a Rule of Fayth pag. 171. The XII Reason Drawne from Absurdity pag. 181. The X. Consideration And conclusion of this Consultation pag. 189. An Appendix of the Author Whether euery one may be saued in his owne Fayth and Religion pag. 214. A CONSVLTATION WHAT FAITH AND RELIGION IS TO be imbraced GREAT is the variety of Religion in this our age and great is the contention about the truth therof Many in this point do continually wauer nor can they determine any certainty passing from one Religion to another as it were from house to house for trialls sake thereby to find tranquility of mind Others through an inconsiderate boldnes do imbrace any Religion which by chance they light vpon without either examining or vnder standing the same who when they are demanded why they preferre that Religion before others they haue no other answere but that it seemes better to them or els which commonly all do oragge of because they follow the very pure word of God This busines notwithstanding is most worthy of great deliberation and discussion seeing that heerin consisteth the very center of our saluation Euerlasting saluation or damnation is
faith eyther for guilt or payne what should let him to commit neuer so grâ—euous or emormous wickednes What should he feare Hell or Purgatory Neyther for by liuely faith alone no syn shal be imputed to any man although it be neuer so grieuous and filthy What then Shall he feare the Diuine wrath or the subtraction of heauenly Grace No for that God doth not impute the same vnto him and for the satisfaction that Christ made he cannot be offended with him Doth he feare temporall satisfaction or Confession Neyther For that these things are taken away as superstitions What then doth this man more feare then any Atheist Or how doth he not open as wyde a gate to all wickednes impurity as the Atheist What Atheisme teacheth the Scripture witnesseth when she fayth The foole said in hic hart Psal 13. there is no God they are corrupt and are made abhominable in all their endeauours There is not one that doth good there is not so much as one And this doth Atheisme teach for so much as it taketh away the feare of Diuine punishment wherby men are held as with a bridle from synning But these Religions do no lesse take a way the feare of heauenly reueng and chastisement when as they teach that nosyn shal be imputed eyther for offence or payne nor any man punished therfore Moreouer I say that by these Religions this wholsome feare of God is sooner taken a way then by Atheisme For few Atheists do certainly belieue that there is not any God at al but many doubt it and feare the contrary and so they be not without feare of punishment of him They take away all feare of God foure manner of wayes that may in many things represse them But these Religions do for certaine without all doubt teach that synnes are not imputed to the faithfull and this they commaund to be most firmely belieued and therfore they leaue no feare but do shake of all suspition imaginatioÌ„ of punishment whatsoeuer so as they giue a far greater scope to all wickednes then Atheisme doth Neyther do they this by one manner of way only but by a fourefold First For that they teach that through saith synnes are not imputed vnto vs be they neuey so many or neuer so heynow wherof we haue spoken inough before Secondly For that they say that all those who haue true faith are predestinated Calu. l. 3. c. 2. §. 6.7.11.12.15.16 38. and that they ought to belieue the same most assuredly And if all the followers of these Sectes be predestinated and that they are bound to belieue the same most firmely wherfore then should they be sollicitous eyther to liue well or to shun the workes of the flesh which the Apostle recounteth For neyther can they doubt of their saluation or that they shall go to hell because Gods predestination is potent and immutable and those who are so predestinated cannot possibly perish Neyther can they feare the paynes of Purgatory which they beleeue not nor yet can they feare punishments in this life when as synnes are not imputed to them by God Thirdly For that they take away the liberty of Freewill and do teach Luth. in Assert art 36. l. 1. cap. 16. §. 8. that all things happen by an ineuitable necessity and that a man caÌ„not make his works better or worse For if there be no liberty there is properly no sinne like as a lyon when he demoureth a man although he committeth euill yet sinneth not because he doth it not freely but by the vehement instigation of nature nor is it in his power to moderate this his instigation Noe man shall be then worthy of punishment because that which is done by force of necessity deserueth no punishment Wherefore there shal be no hell nor any punishment at all after this life For that it should be a great and intollerable cruelty to damne a man to euerlasting torments for those things which by no meanes he could auoid Wherfore then should they feare to follow their harts desire or do any thing that may please their appetite Fourthly For that they teach all mens workes Luth. supra Cal. l. 1. cap. 17. § 5. cap. 18. §. 1. as well good as bad to haue bin preordained of God from all eternity and to that end the wills of men are by him inclined incited forced and determined to performe the same For if God do worke in vs as well bad as good there is no reason why we should endeauour to auoid euill or feare the punishment therof For that God is not the reuenger of that wherof he is the Author nor can he punish that which he will haue done in vs and causeth vs to do For that this should be more then Tyrannicall cruelty from which God is knowne to be fare off and free Here by then it is as cleare as the funne that these Religions by these foure wayes now declared do take froÌ„ the minds of meÌ„ all feare of God do giue as large a scope to all wickednes as euer any Atheisme in the world and that the more perniciously because the are not exercised in the open view and shew of impiety but vnder the colour forsooth of diuine religion and honour to wit vnder the faire titles of only faith satiffaction of Christ liberty of the new Ghospell diuine prouidence and predestination Vnder these shaddows thus couertly hid is swallowed so much venome that it wholy poysoneth the mindes and maners of men Who then that hath but the least dramme of an vpright iudgment that will thinke such Religions to come from God III. CONSIDERATION Drawne froÌ„ the Sanctity of the followers of true Religion THAT Religion is to be preferred wherin very many men haue byn famous for sanctity of life For it cannot be that a naughty religion should lead a man to sanctity or that true sanctity should abide with a naughty religion But Catholike religion hath had very many in her Church in all ages who by common confession and wittnes of all the Christian world were most holy men Amongst whome to omit innumerable others were S. Antâ—ny the great S. Hilarion S. Gregory Thaumaturgus S. Nicolas Bishop of Myra S. Athanasius S. Gregory Nazianzen S. Basill S. Simeon Stelites S. Cipryan S. Hilary S. Martin S. Ambrose S. Hierome S. Augustine S. Benet S. Gregory the Great S. Vedastus S. AmaÌ„dus S. VVinock S. Bertin S. Romwald S. VVillebrord S. Boniface S. Bruno S. Bernard S. Romuald S. Nortbert S. Dominicke S. Francis S. Themas of Aquine S. Bonauenture S. Francis à Paula and many more in our age That all these men were followers of the Catholike religion there can be not doubt aswell for that they adhering to the Roman Church did professe the faith therof wonderfully propagated the same as also for that most of theÌ„ were Monkes vowed religiou men nay all monasticall institutions professions had their begining by
them That they were most holy men it is the common consent of all Christian people for so many ages past that liued in their daies Neither was there euer made any doubt therof And this the heretikes themselues do also confesse of diuers of them and specially of S. Bernard S. Dominick and S. Francis For it were a great impudency to deny or call into doubt that which the consent of the whole world auerreth If these men therfore were Saintes and Catholiks as all the world doth hold them to haue byn it followeth necessarily that the Catholike Roman religion which they held imbraced is the true religion and proceedeth from the Holy Ghost First for that it is impossible that a false religion should lead to true sanctity for that religioÌ„ is the foundatioÌ„ of sanctity That heauenly edifice caÌ„not be built vpoÌ„ vanities nor vpon pernicious sacrilegious falsities as is euery falsity in religion It cannot be that a false religion should withdraw the mind froÌ„ earthly things and so fixe it vpon heauenly that being kindled with diuine loue and feruor should force the same to vndergo so great labours paines for procuring the health of her neighbours soules Not. withstanding the reâ—igion which these men imbraced did performe in them al these things and consequently it cannot be that their religion was false Secondly for that without true religion Hebr. 11. it is impossible to please God But by the consent of all these men pleased God and were his great friends and familiars Therfore their religion was the true For how could they please God who is verity it selfe by a false religion Thirdly if their religion were not true then was it from the Diuell for that he is a liar from the begining and the Father of lyes who by his lying and deceytes doth euer seeke to corrupt the true religion thereby to destroy soules If it came from the Diuell how could it then lead them to sanctity and make them enemies to the Diuell 2. Cor. â— and friends to God For what society is there betwene light and darkenes and what agreement with Christ and Belial Fourthly It is altogeather incredible that God should permit men so innocent so contemning themselues and worldly affaires so studious of his diuine glory and ardent louers of him to be deceiued for so many ages in a matter of so great moment to witt in the busines of religion and foundation of all piety Who is he that will thinke so impiously of Gods diuine goodnes They pretermitted nothing on their behalfe whereby then might please God and aduance his glory taking vpon them the greatest paines labours for the obtaining therof and wholy implying and coÌ„secrating their liues vnto him How caÌ„ it be that his diuine goodnes that true Light which enlightemeth euery man that comes into this world should not reueale the truth and his light to so worthy seruants and louers of him but should leaue them sticking fast in their blind and pestiferous errors Then is that false which our Lord so ofteÌ„ repeating promised to wit Aske and it shal be giuen vnto you seeke and you shall find Matth 7. Luc. 11. knocke and it shal be opened vnto you For euery one that asketh receaueth and he that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it is opened For that S. Francis S. Dominick S. Bernard S. Benet and the like lightes and wonders of the world did all their life tyme aske seeke and knocke that they might obtaine of our Lord things necessary for their health to know and fullfill his will perfectâ—ly in all things and yet notwithstanding obtayned nothing heerin False also shall that be which our Sauiour saith If yow then being naught know how to giue good giâ—â—es to your children how much more will your Father from heauen giue a good spirit to them that aske for that these men did dayly and carnestly aske this spirit and yet obtayned it not For that a good spirit can neuer be without a good Religion I omit many other things which might be brought for confirmation heerof But if it be blasphemy to say that diuine promises be false then is it necessary to confesse that these men did receiue the true faith and Religion-Wherfore seing that they imbraced the Catholike Religion and were most addicted to the Roman Church detesting and hating all other faith and Religion that was contrary to this it cannot be doubted but that the Catholike and Roman is the only true and heauenly inspired Religion And all Religions besides are false and inuented by the Diuell Finally if their Religion were not the true but rather some of the Aduersaryes the true Religion then is it necessary to confesse all the forsaid men whome the whole world hath held for Saintes not to haue byn not only holy men and friends to God but to haue byn impious and enemyes to him and so damned and adiugded to euerlasting punishments For without true Religion it is impossible to please God Neyther can it be said that they were to be excused by ignorance for that ignorance doth not excuse except in certayne secondary cases which by reason of some positiue precept are necessary but in no case doth it excuse in any fundamentall and chiefehead For otherwise any man may obtayne saluation without any knowledg of God or Christ at al which is repugnant to al Scripture But if these men erred as some of our Aduersaryes do pretend that they did then erred they in the chiefe heads First because they acknowledged not a speciall faith wherby only we are iustified and made partaker of the redemption and iustice of Christ and sinne is not imputed vnto vs as the authors of other Religions do teach Therfore they remained in sinne being depriued of the participation of the Iustice of Christ consequently were childreÌ„ of Hell Secondly because according to their judgment they were out of the true Church of Christ out of which by consent of all there is no saluation did adhere to the whore of Babylon for so do they call the Roman Church and were the chiefe ministers instrumeÌ„ts of Antichrist Thirdly because they were Idolatours adoring a creature for their Creatour to wit bread and wyne insteed of Christin the Eucharist worshipping Saintes their Images c. These thinges may not be excused by any ignorance whatsoeuer And therfore all these were wicked men and adiudged to hell torments But how improbable and incredible are all these things and against the coÌ„mon consent of all Christian men that euer were And on the contrary side in other Religions there were neuer any of famous sanctity nor can they name so much as one For that their very first Authors were giuen to temporall commodities and were followers of pleasures hauing nothing singular in their liues aboue the common sort of people but rather giuen to greater vices and wickednes But of this point we shall speake more heereafter
the palsey in a moment quicken dry and benummed members and the like which do exceed all force of nature Neyther could any Magitian euer do the same by any help or art of the Diuell and yet notwithstanding very many and innumerable such like did our Saintes worke and that by only touching or a few prayers or the signe of the Crosse and sometymes also by a commaund only Thirdly because those miracles that be wrought by the Diuell do eyther continue but for a small eyme as being decoyts and delusions only of the eyes such as nagitians are wont to do or if they do continue they are wrought by naturall causes so do not exceed their naturall force and power Besides such false miracles are for the most part not only vnprofitable to men but hurtfull also and wicked as for example to make fire descend from heauen to make statua ' speake and the like which Antichrist his false prophets shall do in the last dayes as out of the Apocalyps is gathered Apoc. 13. neyther do these false miracles profit any to the amendment of life But the miracles of Saintes haue a perpetuall and solid operation and are very profitable to men styrring them vp to the feare of God and the amendment of their liues Fourthly New miracles were neuer approued in the Catholike Church without great and diligent examination therof before made for that the witnesses are examined and that for the most part vnder their Oaths the fact it selfe iâ— narrowly looked into whether it may be wrought by the force of Nature or power of the Diuell all circumstances are considered by what meanes order what occasion what tyme place to what end before whome and vpon whome the miracle is wrought And oftentymes there want not those who would willingly exaggerate the matter or els make it doubtfull and suspected if they could and therfore they leaue nothing vntryed or discussed So as it is impossible that the deceyt if any be can longly hidden besides it doth belong to the diuine prouidence of God not to permit men to be so miserably deluded especially after so great diligence vsed to search out the truth of the matter Fifthly Yf the miracles of the Catholick Church be wrought by the Diuell to retayne men in their false Religion why doth he not the like then in other Religions to wit among the Turkes Arians Anabaptistes Libertines and the like Why doth he leaue to worke miracles amongst these and maketh famous only Catholike Religion therewith Is it for that perhaps she is more grateful or pleasing vnto him then all the rest but he ought not to neglect others also from whome he receyueth so large and ample increase he is delighted with variety of false worship that he may accomodate himselfe to the inclinations and affections of all men Therfore seing that only Catholike Religion hath myracles and false Religion hath none it is an euident token that the miracles of the Catholike Church are not wrought by the Diuell Finally what colour of reason can there be to say that these miracles should be feigned or wrought by the Diuell Is it because they could not be otherwise done But God is omnipotent and he hath wrought many the like by his Apostles as out of Scripture is manifest Or is it because they be repugnant to Scripture But our Lord hath plainly promised this grace of working miracles and curing when he said Ioan. 14. Verily verily I say vnto you be that belieueth in me the workes that I do he also shall do and greater then these shall he do because I go to my Father and whatsoeuer you shall aske in my name that will I do that the Father may be glorified in the sonne By which wordes he insinuateth that the grace of working miracles should alwaies remaine in the Church and that not the Apostles alone but many Apostolicall holy men also should from time to time worke miracles so as we see this promise of our Lord fulfilled when Holy men do miracles Or is it then because there is no witnes of these miracles But besides the witnes of most faithfull wryters we haue the testimony and consent of the people we haue in many of them the testimonies of Bishops or Magistrates after most diligent examination made of the thing it selfe and deposition of sworne witnesses Besides that very many of these miracles haue bin publikely done in the presence of many people there are no ancient histories extant besides those that are conteined in holy scripture that haue so many and worthy witnesses for their truth as these of miracles haue To these may be adioyned the great miracles that are done in euery age yea almost euery yeare in diuers places by Saintes now raigning with Christ but specially by the most Blessed Virgin which in those places where they are wrought are manifest to all men and may be seene and felt of all and which are also confirmed by the publicke testimonyes of sworne wittnesses after diligent discussion and examination made But say our aduersaries Caluin Praef. in Instit True miracles do confirme the Ghospel Marc. vltimo But these do ouerthrow the Ghospell and set vp Idolatry to wit worship of reliques and Images inuocation of Saintes Masse and the like and therfore they be wrought by the Diuell But this is a plaine sophisme which is called Petitio Principij for that that is heere taken as granted for true which should be first proued and wherof the whole controuersy dependeth For it is supposed for certaine and vndoubted that Catholike religion is false and therupon is consequently gathered that the miracles wherby it is confirmed are false and meere illusions of the Diuell In this very manner did the Scribes Pharisies suppose the doctrine of Christ to be false and contradictory to that of Moyses and therehence gathered that his miracles were false and that he himselfe cast out Diuells in Beelzebub the chiefe of Diueils Matth. 22. So also did the Pagans calumniare the miracles of auncient Martyrs saying they were done by magical artes and the same did the Arians Eunomians Vigilantians of the miracles of Catholikes as wittnesseth Victor Vticensis lib. 2. de persecut VVandal and S. Ambrose serm de â—S Geruasio Protas Hierom. contr Vigilant But we on the contrary side by the euident truth of miracles which may be cleerly knowne seene perceaued of al men do gather the verity of Catholik religion wherof the controuersy now is For that we neuer yet read of miracles wrought in confirmation of false doctrine such as many Saintes haue done in confirmation of true We neuer read that dead were raised to life by heretikes the blind made to see the lame straightened the palsy euered Diuells cast out of men Such miracles as these were neuer wrought by Luther Caluin or any of their followers Indeed Luther sometime did attempt to cast out a Diuell from a feminine
disciple of his but he was in danger to haue byn strangled himself by that diuel Cochlaeus in actis Lutheri en 1523. as witnesseth Fredericus Staphilus who was present at the act And at another time he would haue raysed to life one that was drowned in the riuer of Alba but in vayne In like manner Caluin attempted to raise one to life who by his perswasioÌ„ feigned himselfe dead but with that successe that of aliue man he became dead indeed for that by the iust iudgment of God when as Caluin came to raise him he was found without life The whole story wherof with all particulers is at large recounted by M. Hierome Bolsecke in vita Caluini cap. 23. Wherfore seing neither true nor feigned miracles do succeed with them they endeauour to take quite away from the Catholike Church this most strong rocke and firmament of miracles which altogeather conuinceth the vnderstanding of man but with no shew of probability at all as we haue shewed As those therfore who pondering and weighing well the miracles of our Sauiour and his Apostles with a quiet and humble mynd setting aside all hatred other euill affections could not doubt but that their doctrine proceeded from God euen so now they that without hatred passioÌ„ of mynd consider well of the miracles that haue byn wrought in the Catholike Church by holy men in all ages both aliue and dead cannot doubt but that their Doctrine and Religion proceedeth from God and that the Church wherunto they adhere is the true Church of God V. CONSIDERATION From the Conuersion of Nations by the imbracers of Catholicke Religion THAT Religion is esteemed to be the true and consequently to be imbraced wherunto alwayes Nations haue byn conuerted For that our Lord hath often promised in Scripture this conuersion of Nations Psal 1. 21. Ose 1. matth marc Luc. vltimo to the true faith and worship of God which promise must be fulfilled But the Religion wherunto Nations in all ages haue byn and now in this our age also are conuerted is the Catholike and Roman Religion Ergo there can be no doubt but that this is the true Religion of Christ Now then that Religion wherunto these nations haue alwayes being and are conuerted is the Catholike and Roman Religion is most manifest by that which hath byn done aswell in this our age as in former before For that in this our age there haue byn infinite and dayly still are conuerted in the East Indies in Iapone and in the vast Kingdome of China besides in many Ilands of the Indian seas All these passe from their Gentility to the Catholike Religion are vnited to the Roman Church and this by Religious mens indeauours sent thither by authority from the Pope In the last or fourtenth Age one only S. Vincent surnamed Ferrerius of the order of S. Dominicke conuerted to the Catholike faith fiue and twenty thousand partly Iewes and partly Saracens as testifieth S. Antoninus a famous Writer of that age 3. p. Histor tit 23. cap. 8. § 4. In the 13. Age were conuerted very many to the Catholik faith in-the Kingdome of Tartary by two Friars of S. Dominickes order being sent thither from the Pope the Emperour of Tartary himselfe whome they cal the Great Cam desiring the same as wryteth Paulus Venetus whose help and endeauour the said Emperour vsed in effecting of this busines In the 12. Age the people of Nor why were conuerted vnto the RomaÌ„ Faith by * This Adrian was an Englishman and called Nicolas Break-speare before he was asluÌ„pted to the Apostolik Sea Adrian the fourth before he was Pope as writeth Platina in the life of Pope Alexander the fourth In the 11. Age were the Hungarians for the most part conuerted and Bishops ordayned and appointed there by the Pope of Rome at the request of their King StepheÌ„ after wards a Saint that was newly conuerted to the said Roman faith as wryte the Centuriators of Magdeburge Cent. 11. cap. 2. In the 10. Age were many prouinces conuerted to the Roman faith by the endeauours of Henry the first Emperour Adalbert and Methodius Archbishops of Bohemia and Morauia as testify the Centuriators aboue mentioned cent 10. cap. 2. In the 9. Age were the VVandalls Bulgarians Sclauonians Polonians with those of Denmarke and Morauia conuerted to the faith and vnited to the Roman Church Centur. 9. cap. 2. In the 8. Age was conuerted a great part of Germany to the Roman faith by S. Boniface sent thither for that purpose from Pope Gregory the second Cent. 8. cap. 2. In the 7. Age were conuerted those of Franconia or Franke-County by S. Kilian sent thither from the Pope of Rome also Cent. 7. cap. 2. In the 6. Age were the Englishmen conuerted to the Roman faith by Monkes sent thither for that purpose from S. Gregory the Great Cent. 6. cap. 2. Finally those of Brabant Flaunders Holland Frizeland VVestphalia France and other adioyning Nations by whome were they conuerted Were they not conuerted by disciples of the Roman Church to wit S. Seruatius S. Eloy S. Rumwold S. Amandus S. Vedastus S. Leuin S. Remigius S. VVillebrord S. Swibert S. VVulfrane and others who all were most addicted to the Roman Church By which it is manifest that all Nations which haue byn conuerted from Paganisme or Iudaisme to Christ for these thousand yeares last past were conuerted to the Catholike Roman faith and vnited and incorporated to the Roman Church This is also confirmed besides other tokens to haue byn the Roman faith and Religion by Priests by altars by worship of holy Reliques Images by pilgrimages by InuocatioÌ„ of Saintes by Monasteryes by Monkes by Obedience to the Pope and by very many other things proper to Catholike Religian which were in vse among all Nations after their Couuersion vntill of â—ake they were take away and abolished in some places by these new vpstart Religions What man is there that maturely considering these things can any way doubt but that Catholike Religion is the true For that in her he seeth fullfilled Gods diuine promise of the coÌ„uersion of Nations To her do fly so many people so many remote Nations so many most porent Kingdomes forsaking their Idolatry abandoning the impurity of life reiecting the multitude of wiues forgetting their barbarous sauage manners banishing all former liberty of life and as it were to become tame and tractable vnder the yoke of Christ sweetly to tast of the feare of God to comforme themselues to all modesty of life and last of al to be inflamed with the contempt of temporall things and loue of celestiall How is it possible that that Religion should be false and impious which doth worke such wonderfull mutation in the harts of barbarous people To conclude how can it possible be tâ—â—t the Diuine Frouidence should permital these Nations so many yeares to be deceyued when as they haue forsaken their Idolatry so hartily imbraced verity and
Author then was it secret therfore cannot be the religiō of Christ which is a wayes apparent manifest And whatsoeuer in this discourse hath byn said and proued concerning Lutheran religion yow must vnderstand to haue byn said and proued also of Caluinisme and Anabaptisme for that the selfe same nouelty and reasons belong to all three but that for perspicuityes sake and not often to repeat with tediousnes all three names we haue only nominated one Therfore do I conclude with the words of S. Hierome Hier. Dial. contra Lucifer in fine who writeth thus That I way set thee downe briefly and playnely any opinion Thou must saith hee remayne in that Church which was founded by the Apostles and continueth vntil this very day And if by chance thou shouldest he are those that be called Christians to be named of some other and net of Iesus Christ to u it of the Marcionites Valentiniās Montanistes c. know thou certainly that that is not the Church of Christ but the Synagogue of Antichrist for that because they were institued afterward they do demonstrate themselnes to be those whome the Apostle foretould c. Nor let them flatter themselues if out of certaine places of Scripture they do seemete affirme that with they say for that the Diuell did also alleagde Scripture for his purpose and the force of Scripture doth not consist in reading but in vnderstanding So S. Hierome Nouelty therfore is a signe of heresy fortould by the Apostle denomination is a signe of nouelty and the vsurping of Scripture is common to the Diuell himselfe and all heresyes The II. Reason Taken from the defect of Succession ANOTHER reason why these religions are not to be allowed of is The want of succession for that they want an orderly and continuall Succession of Ministers in the Church from the Apostles which succession is necessary that any Religion or Church should be deemed Apostolicall for without the same it cannot be continued with the Apostolike So as the Ancient Fathers for the most part teach that they who say they haue the true Church of Christ with them must bring forth the succession of their Bishops and reduce the same vpwards to some one of the Apostles by an orderly continuation which if they cannot do it is an easy matter to conuince them that the true Church of Christ is not with them For so Optatus Mileuitanus in his second booke against Parmenian when he would conuince the Donatistes that they had not the true Church with them said Shew forth the origen or beginning of your sea yow that wildaime the Holy Church to your selues And Tertullian in his prescriptions againg heretiks saith Let heretikes shew forth the origen of their Churches let them recount the order of their Bishops succeeding from the beginning that he who was the first should haue some Apostle or Apostolike man for his Author and predecessour c. The same argument do the rest of the Fathers commonly vse as (a) lib 3. cap ◠Irenaeus (b) hoeresi 27. Epiphanius (c) cont Lucifer Hieronymus S. (d) cap. 4. cont Epist Fundam Augustine and others Now it is well knowne that neyther Lutherans Caluinistes nor Ana baptistes can with any the least colour do the same For to whome I pray you did Luther who for the most part was the Author and first parent of these new religions succeed Whose Chayre and authority did he occupy who before him was the prelate of the Luther an religion as also before Caluin and Zwinglius who was their predeceslour And if none can be assigned it is cleere that they want that succession which the Ancient Holy Fathers do require that any Church should be ioined with that of the Apostles Againe Want of Ordination they do not only want succession of Chayre and authority but euen the ordination of degrees descending from the Apostles For that there was alwayes requisite a double power in the Ministers of the Church both of them by an orderly continuation deriued from the Apostles as before we haue shewed in the 7. Consideration to wit Power of Order by which Sacrifice is offered and Sacraments are made to sanctify the faithfull and Power of Iurisdiction by which the authority of gouerning and feeding the Church with the word of God is giuen c. But these new religions can reduce neither of them to the Apostles Not the power of Iurisdiction because they want succession as before we haue said nor yet the Power of Ordinatiō or Order for who ordained Luther or Caluin a Bishop of their Church And if they say that order is not needfull they do contradict all antiquity and the perpetuall vse of the Church For neuer yet was there Bishop in the Church so as he had authority to exercise all Bishoply functions but that he was ordained by some other Bishop to whome by the Constitution of the Apostles themselues must be adioined two other bishops as is expressely commaunded in the first Canon of the Apostles fourth of the Nicene Councel as also insinuated by S. Paul writing to Timothy a Bishop 1. Tim. 4. and warning him thus Do not neglect the grace which is in thee which grace is giuen thee by prophesy with imposition of the hands of Priesthood that is to say of those Bishops who togeather with the Bishop that doth ordaine do lay their hands vpon him that is ordained as the Ancient Fathers do expound it By which it is cleere and euident that the Lutherans and Caluinists haue neither of these forsaid powers from the Apostles nor can they deriue the same from the Apostles and consequently in that they do not descend from them they haue not the true religion and Church with them For that the true Church according to both powers ought to be deriued and to haue continued with them from the Apostles as we haue shewed before seing that all power spirituall ought to be deriued from Christ through the Apostles and their successours by a continuall and orderly succession and communication to other ministers of the Church as the corporall life of man is deriued by certaine meanes through a continuall succession from our first parent Adam to the last For euen as in the old Testament there were no priests except those that descended from the Tribe of Leui thorough Aaron so in the new there are no priests or Bishops except those that descend in degree of Order and power of Iurisdiction from Christ the chiefe Priest through the Apostles and their successours And therfore as the Sinagogue could not be without priests descending by a continuall succession from Aaron so the Church of Christ cannot be without Priests or Bishops descending by the same continuall succession from the Apostles and their successours But the Congregation of Lutherans and Caluinistes had neuer any such ministers had neuer any Bishops-lawfully ordayned amongst them descending in power of Iurisdiction from the
Ethnickes Nor that this worship is in that manner done to Images as though there were any excellency in theÌ„ but so as the same doth passe to the first pattern therof to wit to the Saints themselues raigning with Christ in heauen For that the externall signe of adoration Which is made before an Image is the worshiping of the first patterne or prototype therof As for example to errect a Statua or Image to a King and to do reuerence therunto now this reuerence is done to the Image materially only but the honor it selfe redoundeth to the King whome the Image representeth That this honour which is thus done to Saints is not the worship proper vnto God is manifest because we do not worship any Saint as supreme Lord Author of things but only as a friend of him who is supreme Lord. For that we do so highly respect God that we thinke those whome he hath so highly exalted in glory to be worthy also of some honour Which thing truely doth not any way redound to the iniury but to the honor of God euen as it redoundeth to the honor of a Prince when we honour his Nobles Courtiers for the respect we beare vnto the Prince to wit because they be his domesticall seruants friends c. And this I haue heere spoken because that many simple people are beguiled and misled about this point Secondly they say that Papists do adore bread as God and therfore they be Artolatrae which is as much to say as Bread-worshippers by which name Caluin oftentymes calleth Catholikes But in this also they vse deceit For they know well inough that Catholikes do not belieue that in the Eucharist there remayneth bread but that there is present truly really and substantially the body of Christ togeather with his soule and diuinity and so do not adore bread but the whole body of Christ there present Thirdly they affirme that Papists do not put their trust in the merits of Christ but in their owne and the merits of Saints Fourthly they say that Papists do teach that men be not iustified through the faith of Christ but by their owne merits and the like which are nothing els indeed but mere impostures and deceytes inuented to defame the Catholike doctrine I could produce more then an hundred of like articles falsely imputed eyther to the whole Church or to Catholike Doctors therof And now who will say that in such men as these be there is the spirit of Christ or that they do proceed sincerely in this busines and go about to establish the Truth Moreouer these fellowes do not only impute vnto Catholikes these and such like absurdityes of opinions They obiect falâ—e crimes to Catholiks but they lay to their charge also false crimes especially to such men whome they most feare will withstand their wicked endeauours to wit Murders Treasons against Princes and diuers kinds of such like villany Good God! How many libels and pamphlets haue byn set out these yeares past by the Caluinists and Lutherans do dayly at this day come abroard wherin they accuse Religions men innocent God wot froÌ„ such crimes of most outragious and filthly wickednes But these wily deceyts are easily discouered For eyther the innocency of these men is wittnessed by the publike letters of Magistrates and the others falsity made manifest or els their accusations are cleerly refuted by the manner of their relation the circunstances theÌ„selues For in some of their Accusations there haue byn noted aboue 50. most manifest vntruthes In others 12.15.20 c. so blynd is that their feruent hatred that they care not with what probability they charge their Aduersaryes so they may hope to hurt them therby But this hurt they do is but for a little while for after that the impudency of their calumniations is once discouered it redoundeth to the great comendation of those who were accused and shame vnto them that were the plotters and abbetters therof And finally for confirmation of their absurdityes Their corruptioÌ„ of Authorityes they vse egregious fraudes and deceyts eyther by adding taking away or altering somthing in the allegations of Scriptures Fathers or els by omitting the plaine words and producing those that seeme obscure therby to make them seeme to fauour their Doctrine For Luther to establish his opinioÌ„ of Iustification by only faith cyting the words of the Apostle to the Rom. 3. Arbitramur hominem iustificari per fidem we do thinke that man is iustified through faith he addeth of his owne the word solam Epist ad amicum devoce SOLA only And when he was demaunded why he did so he made answore thus Situus Papista c. If thy Papisticall friend be froward and hard to please concerning the word only presently tell him that a Papist and an Asse is one and the same thing Sic vole sic iubeâ— sit pro ratione voluntas I will haue it so I comaund it so let my will be a reason For we will not be schollers vnto Papists but their maisters And we will this once glory in our pride against such like asses a little after I pray thee giue no other answere to these asses concerning the word only but tell them that Luther will haue it so that he is Doctor of all Doctors in the Popedome c. Behould the modesty of this Prophet in excusing that fraud The same Luther in the second Epistle of S. Peter translating this sentence Quapropter fratres c. wherfore brethren labour the more that by good workes yow may make sure your vocatioÌ„ election leaueth quite out the words per bonaopera by good works because they were plainely against his Doctrine who taught that good works nothing auailed to faluatioÌ„ In the 75. Psalme 12. Verse where it is sayd Vow and render vnto your Lord God c. Luther maketh therupon this glosse in the margent contayning a threefold fraud and deceyt Quòd pro Deo vero illum habere velitis quemadmodum requirit primum praceptum nolite vouere Sanctis vel alia vota Because yow will haue him for your God as the first Commandement doth require therfore do ye not vow vnto Saintes nor make ye any other vowes In the 31. of Prouerbes where it is said Mulierem fortem quis inueniet who is he that shall find a constant Woman Luther vpon these words putteth in the margent a Loue-song in rithme to this sense Nothing is more amiable on earth then the loue of a woman to him that hath the fortune to obtaine it 1. Corinth 9. where it is sayd Numquid non habemus potestatem mulierem sororem circuÌ„ducendi Haue we not power to lead about a woman-sister Luther addeth heer unto of his owne in vxorem for our wife as though the Apostles lead wiues about with them for coniugall vse Zwinglius in place of those words Hoc est corpus meum This is my body against the truth
by vertue and power of Gods decree And this againe was in tymes past an heresy of Simon (d) VinceÌ„t Lirin Magus and of (e) Eusebius l. 5. c. 20. Florinus 3. Both teach that good works be not necessary to saluation and that fayth is ynough But this was an heresy of the same Simon (f) Iren. l. 1. c. 20â— Magus and of (g) Aug. haer 54. the Eunomians about the yeare of Christ 360. 4. Both also teach that syns though neuer so many and great do not hurt him who hath fayth for that the malice of them is not imputed to him who beleeueth And this was also in tymes past an heresy of the (h) Aug. haer 54. Eunomians and of Basilides and Carpocrates as witnesseth Irenaeus l. 1. c. 23. 24. 5. Caluin denyeth the reall presence of Christs body in the Eucharist But this was againe an heresy of Berengarius about the yeare of our Lord 1051. Where it is to be noted first though some priuately before Berengarius doubted of that matter and moued the question about it yet none was so hardy as to professe it in publike as testifieth Hugh of Langres and Adelman of Bressia in their epistles to Berengarius and Paschasius in his booke of the words of the Institution of this Sacrament In so much as this was the constant and vniforme doctrine of the Church not opposed against by any arch-heretike vntill the tyme of Berengarius Secondly that Berengarius his opinion was whiles he yetlyued condemned in fiue Councells and that Berengarius himselfe thrise abiured his opinion and in conclusion died very penitent in the Catholike fayth He being dead the same heresy lay buried vp welneere two hundred yeares vntill the tyme of the Lollards who brought it to light againe as is gathered out of Trithemius in his Chronicle about the yeare 1315. After this againe VVicliffe held the same as appeareth by his third article After his death againe there was a deep silence of that matter for the space of an hundred yeares vntill Swinglius renewed it and Caluin and some others after him Whereby it euidently appeareth that this opinion was euer in the Church held for a manifest heresy therfore eyther the Church hath euer erred in a principall article of fayth and so consequently it was neuer Christs Church or that opinion which abrogateth and disclaymeth from the Reall presence of Christs body is an heresy indeed 6. Both take away all traditions and would haue all things to be comprehended in Scriptures alone The same was the heresy of the Arians as is recorded by S. Augustine also of Nestorius l. 1. contra Maxim c. 2. vlt. Dioscorus and Eutiches as is declared in the seauenth Synod Act. 1. 7. Both deny the Sacraments of Penance and of Confirmation The Nouatians taught the same opinion long ago as witnesse S. Cyprian l. 4. epist 2. l. 3. baer fabularum and S. Theodoret 8. Both teach that the Church consisteth of good alone and that the Church in former tymes visible perished notwithstanding for many ages that in this tyme it only remayneth in their congregations The very like was the heresy of the Donatists as testifieth S. Augustine l. de vnit Eccl. c. 12. 9. Both of them teach that prayer is not to be made for the dead that 〈◊〉 fast of Lent or any other stable fasts be not to be keep but euery one is then to fast when it shall to him seeme good The Aerians taught the very same in former ages if we beleeue Epiphamus haer 75. and S. Augustine l. dehaer c. 33. 10. Both deny the veneration of holy Reliques of Christs and Saints Images and call it Idolatry Vigilantius did no lesse many ages past as witnesseth S. Hierome The same did the Image breakers as testify Zoneras Cedrenus and Nicephorus touching them who made war against Images By these it is more then manifest that the chiefest opinions whereof Lutheranisme and Caluinisme consist be ancient heresyes long since condemned by the Church and that the same were alwayes held in the Church for heresyes The same may we easily exemplify and declare touching the rest Vide Bellar de notis Eccl. c. 9. Coccius de signis Eccl. l. 8. art 3. Wherehence it followeth that these Religions be nothing but the very sincke of heresyes of old longe ago put to silence and now in these latter dayes brought to light againe The XI Reason From the want of a Rule of Faith THESE new Religions haue no certaine rule of Faith to follow therfore they are not to be receyued For the principall heads of Religion must be determined certaine and withall immutable And that they haue not any certaine rule of beliefe whereby it may be resolued what is necessary to be beleeued and what not is euident First for that they admit neyther the traditions of the Church nor the authority of generall Councells nor the iudgment of the ancient Doctors of the Church and of those who flourished and liued before these our Controuersies Luther reiecteth all traditions in c. l. 4. c. 8. §. 6.7 8 in Antid ad 4. fesâ— Conc. Trident 1. ad Galatas as doth Caluin also l. 4. Instit and they teach that nothing is to be beleeued nothing to be receyued an holy Scripture Luther so contemneth Generall Councells which haue hitherto had most great authority in Gods Church for they be as it were the Parlaments of Princes In art 115 sequentib Peers in Christs Kingdome as he will haue the definitions therof subiect to the iudgment and censure of euery priuate person And he further sayth that it is a mad thing that the Councells will conclude what is to be beleeued And in the same place he teacheth that what is to be beleeued what not is to be left to the iudgment of euery spirituall man Caluin insinuateth no lesse l. 1. c. 7. § 1.2 4. when he sayth that it is not for the Church to iudge what books be Canonicall but that appertayneth to the inward spirit alone Finally as touching the Fathers Luther careth not for a thousand Augustines l. contra Regem Augiae a thousand Cyprians Caluin also in very many places contemneth them and affirmeth that they erred Wherefore none of all these is vnto them a rule of fayth But say they The Scripture it selfe is vnto vs a rule of fayth it caÌ„not erre But it is an easy matter â—o shew that this rule serueth not the turne First because we by this rule cannot iudge of the Scripture it selfe and so the rule it selfe will remayne vnto vs vncertain which yet should haue the greatest certitude of all For by the Scripture it cannot come to be knowne for certaine that such a book is truly Scripture is not Apocripall nor composed by some deceiptfull person that this or that sentence is not peruerted northrust in Finally that nothing is added or taken
away that maketh to the substance of doctrine All this cannot to be known by Scripture but proued only by certaine humane weake coniectures if you take away the traditions of the Church and so the whole foundatiō of our fayth shall rely vpon vncertaine coniectures Moreouer the vertue and efficacy of the Scripture consisteth not in the sound of the words but in the sense meaning which is the life and soule of the Scripture But there may be a thousand controuersies about the sense which cannot in any sort be decided by the Scripture it selfe if you take a way Traditions and the exposition of the Fathers as experience teacheth For about the sense of these words Hoc est Corpus meum and of many more there is most eager disputation betwene the Lutherans and Caluinists c. If you say with Caluin that the iudgment touching the Scriptures and the vnderstanding of them belongeth to an inward spirit this is nothing but the dictamen of an internall spirit that is for the priuate iudgment of euery particular person to set down the first rule how to beleeue For euery one may say that he hath the spirit and by the inspiration therof can iudge and determine that this part or booke is holy Scripture and not that that this is the sense not that So a◠Lutheran out of his spirit giueth iudgment In prologonou◠Testamer ti that S. Iames Epistle is a strawy Epistle and the Apocalyps of S. Iohn of doubtfull authority But the Caluinist out of his soiri◠iudgeth the one and the other to be the word of God So Luther out of his spirit iudgeth that this false opinion is to be abolished that there be foure Gospells for that S. Iohns Gospell is but one faire true and principall and to be far preferred before the other three In like manner S. Paules and S. Peters epistles do sar go beyond sayth be the three Gospells of Mathew Marke and Luke He would willingly haue reiected them because they plainely proue establish the merit and necessity of good works and the obseruation of the commaundements and do recommend chastity and pouerty But when he durst not cleane reiect them he would extennate their authority and insinuate that they were not written with the spirit of God In like maner Caluin out of his own sense iudgeth that these words Hoc est Corpus meum haue this meaning This breed is the figure of my body and Luther will haue it This bread is truly my body I omit other thing without nūber by which it appeareth that euery ones priuate iudgment is proposed for arule of beleefe or which is the same that the Scripture it selfe is expounded and interpreted according to euery ones priuate iudgment Secondly that is not any fit rule of beliefe that is a like accommodated to contrary doctrines but the scripture is accommodated to contrary Religions and doctrines for as much as all the Sects of this time though they do in an hostile manner dissent and contend in very many and those the most inportant heads and grounds do neuertheles make this rule to serue their turne and doe vse it for the mantayning of their opinions and heresyes For the Lutherans say they rely vpon Scripture the Caluinists affirme the same the Anabaptists also are nothing behind them in auerring that the Scriptures be for them And no meruaile because euery one of them taketh and interpreteh the Scripture not conforme to the comon vnderstanding of the Church or the common exposition of the Fathers as do the Catholikes but according to the sense of euery priuate spirit in which sort it may bee easilie accommodated to all heresies Whence it is euident that this rule so taken serueth not the turne whiles all is reduced to the iudgment of euery ones priuate spirit Thirdly if there were some iudge who in euery Controuerly wherein he were to giue sentence should so doe it as it could not be certainly vnderstood for whether party he pronounced the sentence but both partyes should contend that the matter were adiudged and determined on their side and that the sentence of the Iudge was expresly plainly pronounced for them such an one in the opinion of all men could not be thought a competent Iudge sith no matter in cōtrouersie could bee determined or ended by sentence giuen by him For after sentence there would bee as greata contention about the sentence it selfe whether of them it might seeme to fauour as there had been before about the right that ech party had And such a Iudge is Holy Scripture if you take away the Churches interpretation and declaration and the exposition of the holy Fathers for as much as the sentence therof is euer such as it cannot bee euident to both parties whether of them it fauoureth whiles the one and the other doth stifly maintaine that it is most plaine that it holdeth and standeth for them And hence it is that controuersies bee neuer ended and therefore it is not onely a vaine but also a ridiculous thing to appoint the Scripture alone for Iudge For in euery controuersy there ought such a Iudge to be designed who may so giue sentence as it may be manifest to all and most of all to those parties on whose behalf the cause is adiuged otherwise such a controuersy can neuer be ended Wherfore those who make the Scripture alone the Iudge of matters in question do therin plainely manifest that they admit not any iudge at all by whome the cause may be determined besids their priuate iudgment alone For they do as if Titus and Caius hauing a suite at Law would not haue any other Iudge in the matter but Iustinian his Code together with the Pandects without hauing any thing to do with the interpretation of Doctors and Titus producing for his owne right some law should by it maintayne that the cause was manifestly adiudged for him And Caius againe should deny it who by citing an other law for himselfe should say that it was cleare that that law fauoured made for him which Titus would in lake manner deny and so they should both depart without any decision of the cause or controuersy in hand would it not be a matter worthy of laughter and all would say that neyther of them desired the determination or decision of the cause And that neyther admitted other Iudge then his owne iudgment In the very like manner in this that they wil not haue any other Iudge then Scripture and euery one reserueth the interpretatiō thereof to his owne spirit they plainely shew that they haue no will that the cause should be decided or defined by any lawfull way nor to admit any Iudg but their owne iudgment Fourthly how very insufficient this rule of beliefe is experience it selfe plainely teacheth For we see that there is not any end of controuersies among them euen about the greatest matter of fayth sith at this very tyme the Lutherans Caluinists
and Anabaptists are at bitter wars one with another about many points of fayth and do impeach one the other of heresy The Lutherans do dissent both among themselues in many things and from Luther himselfe â—heir Father and Apostle in so much as at this tyme there be reckoned thirty one principal Sects of Lutherans different in name and disagreing in many points of doctrine The Caluinists be at variance among themselues especially in the Article touching the head of the Church For a great part of them giueth that power to the secular Prince though she be a woman and these be called Protestants Others of them hold the same for impiety and blasphemy and those they call Puritaus The Anabaptists differ among themselues in very many things so as of them there be numbred 14. diuers Sects distinct both in names and in points of doctrine Finally it is now come to this that where euery one followeth this rule of Scripture alone and relyeth vpon it there be almost as many heresyes as there be heretiks For the greater part of them especially the more simple affirme that they little regard or care what Luther or Caluin taught sith they cleaue fast to the holy Scriptures and recur to the word of God in which there cannot be any errour and so they thinke themselues very secure And euery one vnderstandeth the Scripture according to his own capacity and sense Wherhence it followeth that where they thinke they haue the Scripture for an infallible rule of their beliefe insteed of Scripture they haue and follow their owne imagination For whatsoeuer they imagine to be signified meant by the words of scrip ture they take for the true fense of Scripture and so lookehow many diuers imaginations of men there be so many rules there be of beliefe But whence is it that to euery one his owne imagination should seeme the most true verity and the very fense of Scripture It procedeth partly of a certaine exceeding selfe-pleasing lone and estimation For he who maketh any great reckoning of himselfe easily perswadeth himselfe that all his owne innentions and conceipts of mind be great and extraordinary partly by working of the Diuell who doth in wardly pernert mensphanfyes so as what they apprehend they forth with for euery most light and idle poore reason thinke to be most cuident truth For whiles men wearied with the auncient Religion loathing it do auerse the truth longe to heare nouâ—lt yes they are by Gods iust iudgment suffered to be begnyled by the Diuell Whereupon whiles he worke the inwardly in their senses they thinke themselues to haue recevued the light of Gods spirit and vnto it they referre all iudgment touching matters of fayth Hence it is that to euery sect almost to euery priuate man their owne apprehension seemeth to be the pure word of God neyther care they for all the reasons that are brought to the contrary The Apostle insinuateth no lesse when he sayth 2. Thes 2. For that they haue not receyued the Charity of truth that they might be saued therefore God will send them the operation of errour that they may belieue lying He shall send not by way of commaund but by giuing more power to the Diuell for the deceyuing of them who haue contemned the truth or ancient Religion and the thrusting of them into a thousand errors But the most of them especially the simple say God will not permit them to be deluded who search the truth with an humble hart for the hath promised that he will giue a good spirit to them who aske him And this do I for I make my petition to God that he would please to illuminate me open vnto me the true sense of the Scriptures and I cease not continually to search them This is a great deceipt of the Diuell For how do they with an humble hart search out the truth who contemne makeno esteeme of the iudgment of the Doctors of the Church of the interpretation and exposition of the holy Fathers and of the definitions of Generall Councells who refuse to vse the way appointed and shewed by God and require vnnecessary reuelations For from them they might vnderstand the truth and exempt themselues from all errour but they haue not a will to submit themselues vnto them thinking that they may by their owne industry their owne wit and priuate spirit with a more facility and certainity find the truth out of the bare naked Scriptures As though the holy Fathers Doctors and Prelats of the Church did eyther not search the Scritures or wanted the spirit of God and sound iudgment so as it passed their skil to ariue to the true vnderstanding therof What greater pride can there be thought then that a priuare person and comonly an Idiot ignorant of all antiquity and good literature should prefer himselfe before so great authority and holynes and so great a number of Doctors And therfore they must not thinke thatso longe as they be of that mind they shall obtaâ—ne any thing at our Lords hands because they aske both yll and prowdly but that they shall rather be deceyued by the spirit of pryde and of lying whereunto they are by Gods iust iudgment for so great a cryme delyuered This is that spirit whereof all heretiks though they be neuer so different in Doctrine haue their part and vaunt themselues and of which euery one thinketh the truth to be reuealed vnto him which certes he that is not blinde may casily obserue and see because Gods spirit reucaleth not contraryes Moreouer the holy Scripâ—ure no where remitteth priuate men in doubts of fayth to the fearch of the Scriptures but to the Church and to them who be the Prelats of the Church So in Deuâ—eronomy c. 17. in matters of doubt they are remitted to the Priests who haue charge and rule for the tyme whome he that shal refuse to obay is sentenced to dy Therfore hath God appointed pastors doctors in his Church therfore would he haue it conspicuous to the whole world to be the pillar and firmament of truth that all might with case make their recourse vnto it and most securely repose vpon the determination of it There is not giuen to all the spirit of vnderstanding the Scriptures as is plaine by testimony of the Apostle 1. Cor. 12. 1. Ioan. 4. 2. Cor. 11. We are not to giue credit to euery spirit but the spirits are to be tryed if they be of God Wherfore though your spirit suggest vnto you something you are not therefore secure for you are not sure that it is of God For it is certaine that infinite numbers haue been and are deceyued cuery heretike vaunteth himselfe of this spirit The Angell of Sathan oftentymes transfigureth himselfe into an Angell of light Wherefore by what hath been said it is most euident that a priuate spirit cannot possibly carry it selfe for the rule of beliefe The XII Reason Drawne from Absurdity
the most certaine and only way to life euerlasting and none there is who strayeth out of it that is not most assured to runne into euerlasting perdition It is a Doctrine of Atheisme that euery one may be saued in his owne religion But as there is one God one Christ one truth one certitude one iustice so there is one fayth and one religion and one Church or Congregation of God and Christ out of which there can be no Saluation Let them take heede that they spoyle not themselues of so great a good eyther out of a curiosity of reading or hearing or by an improuident and vncircumspect conuersation with heretiks or out of a desire of pleasing and contenting some or for feare of some hurt in temporall life also or out of an hope of commodity and gaine or for desire of honors or for any other cause What profiteth it a man if he gayne the whole world and suffer the detryment of his soule or what exchaunge shall a man giue for his soule But he that sustayneth hurt in his religion cannot but hurt his soule withall and therefore let him not be afraid to expose all for the retayning of it the loosing and forgoing whereof is the losse of life euerlasting withall Vnhappy be those soules and vnworthy a Christian name that make but a little reckouing of the ouerthrow of the Catholike religion so they may themselues enioy temporall peace for the gathering and keeping of the poore things and trifles of this life This madnes and light estceme of so great a good will cost them deare when this short time moment of life shall be once past and they shall vpon the suddaine be brought to that eternity that neuer endeth Many seducers haue come into the world many do vnder a sheeps skyn and vnder a faire flattering shew of Gods word hide and conceale their woluish fury to the vtter ruine of Christs sheep Our Lord admonished vs more theÌ„ once to take heed of them the Apostles inculcated no lesse as did the holy Fathers also He Eccl. 13. Eccl. 3. that shall touch pitch shall be defiled of it he that loueth daÌ„ger shal perish therein The times were neuer more trecherous to mans saluation then now they be the deuill was neuer more frequent in bewitching and deceiuing men were neuer more easily caried away with the spirit of incoÌ„stancy the operatioÌ„ working of errour neuer of more force finally mens minds neuer more fouly blinded then now all these do worthily seize vpoÌ„ their minds who do make a light esteeme of that noble and great gift of the Catholike and Orthodoxe Religion prefer their temporall and externall goods before it Wherefore let them who make a reckoning of their owne saluation conserue this beauenly gemme and keep it with all diligence for that of it proceedeth life And because it is a supernaturall gift which can neyther be obtayned nor kept and held without Gods help whiles so many and so great daungers and enemyes beset vs on all sides they mustimplore and craue help at Gods hands incessantly to that end both for themselues their children and their family and seeke to appease God by almes and other offices of piety For good is prayer with fasting almes Tob. 12. and better then to lay vp treasures of gold Let them lead a life correspondent to their religion let them quench their thirst of terrene things with the expectation of the celestiall and euerlasting goods euer mindâ—ull of that saying of the Apostle 1. Timoth. 6. They that will become rich fall into temptation and into the snares of the Diuell many vnprofitable and hurtfull desires which drowne a man into destruction and perdition For the roote of all euill is desire which some coueting haue strared from the fayth and thrust themselues into many sorrowes With these helps they may walke on in safety amidst the daungers of these tymes conserue and maintayne vnstayned the gift of the true and only Religion and by it with facility and case purchase life euerlasting to which God of his infinite mercy bring vs all Amen FINIS AN APPENDIX TO THE FORMER CONSVLTATION WHETHER Euery One may be saued in his owne Fayth and Religion WRITTEN By the same Leonard Lessius of the Society of IESVS Permissu Superiorum M.DC.XVIII THE PREFACE WEe haue before in the Preface of our Consultation set downe and briefely confuted a certaine grosse error which holdeth it inough for our saluatioÌ„ to belieue in Christ and that he died for our sinnes But because it is much spread and hath sunke deeply into the minds of many I was requested to treate of the matter more at large and therefore now I will deuide it into two seuerall Questions bringing arguments for eyther part The first Question shal be VVhether it be sufficient for saluation to belieue in God and do no man iniury which is as much to say as Whether euery man may be saued in his owne Faith which he professeth if therin he endeauour to liue honestly The second Question VVhether it be sufficieÌ„t to saluatioÌ„ to belieue in Christ that he dyed for our sinnes although we belieue not many other articles of faith THE I. QVESTION CONCERNING the first Question many in these tymes do hold are of opinion that euery man may be saued in his owne religion The ground of ouâ— Aduersaries opinions their principall reasoÌ„ wherwith they are moued to this is because it seemeth vnto them incredible that al Iewes and Turkes many of whom do deuoutly worship God and deale iustly with their neyghbours should perish for all eternity only because they haue not belieued in Christ especially since for want of this beliefe they seeme not to deserue much blame they being from their infancy trayned vp in a religion different from Christianity For why say they should God who would all men to be saued so strayten the way vnto heauen why should those miserable souls who according to their capacity do their best to please him do wrong to no man and do lead a iust and honest life be condemned to eternall payne for the ignorance of that thing wherein they were neuer sufficiently instructed The I. Reason But this opinion of theirs The same refuâ—ed by foure Reasons although in naturall reason it may seeme to carry some colour of truth and equity yet considering those thinges which are reuealed vnto vs in holy Scriptures it is a meere Paradox For if euery Turke and Iew may be saued in their beliefe then iuvaine haue the Apostles and holy Fathers so much laboured in preaching planting of the Christian faith In vaine so many Martyres by all manner kind of torments haue shed their bloud and spent their life in the confession therof For they might haue abstayned from this doctrine profession without any preiudice to their saluation and haue rested contented with the Iewes in the profession and