publikely expounded whereas in the meane time the Bible lieth neglected or little regarded wherein wee may see the notable worke of the Diuell and his malice toward the Church of God for the Schooles of the Prophets are the fountaines of learning Now when as Sathan by this meanes doth steale away from them the study of the Bible and in stead thereof foisteth in corrupt humane writings hereby hee poisons the fountaines to the danger of infecting the whole Church And as this is common in the places of Poperie so likewise some fault is this way committed among vs that be Protestants for many in their priuate studies take little paines in the booke of God but apply themselues wholly to the writings of mē as Counsels Fathers Schoole-men and other Expositors and in the handling of the Scripture they glory more to proue a point of doctrine by multiplicitie of humane testimonies then by the written word But the truth is thus to doe is to preferre the handmaide before the Mistris and as for the opening expounding of Scripture by other Writers it is no such point of deepe learning a man of ordinary capacity and diligence may easily deliuer what others haue done before him But to open the Scripture soundly and purely as it ought to be is of another nature then these mē take it and hereto the sound study of the Text itselfe will proue the best helpe as they will confesse who haue tried most of all And though the best mens works be but base stuffe to the pure word of God yet the writings of holy mē must not be contemned but must be read and regarded in their place for our furnishing and enabling to the study of the Scriptures and for the helping of our knowledge and iudgement in the word of God they that hold or practice the contrary knowe not what helpes they be and what light they yeeld to many dark places of Scripture But stil aboue and beyond before and after all the word of God must be eaten vp of vs and studied with all diligence Secondly in that the Author of this Epistle noteth their particular sentence and by consequence gathereth this meditation out of it that they sought a Country Hereby all men are taught to exercise themselues in hearing and reading all the places of the Bible euen the Histories of men therein and out of the words to gather godly meditations So Paul saith to the Colossians Let the word of God dwel plentiously in you Coloss. 3.16 The Prophet Dauid also noteth it for the property of a good man to meditate in the Law of God day and night And the practice of the blessed virgine Mary is registred as an example for vs to followe that she kept all the sayings of Christ in her heart But pitty it is to see how reading in the word of God is laid aside for it is so little practiced that men now-adaies will not be at charge to buy a Bible for bookes of Statutes men will not onely haue them in their houses but at their fingers ends but Bible they haue none and if they haue it lieth on the deske or table and they reade it not and if sometime they reade yet they neuer meditate thereon as wee are taught in this place Further whereas the holy Ghost reasoneth thus vpon these examples Abraham Isaac and Iacob were strangers and Pilgrimes therefore they sought a Country Herein hee teacheth vs this speciall point to wit that a doctrine though it be not expressed in plaine words in the Bible yet being gathered thence by right and iust consequence is no lesse to be beleeued and receiued then that which is plainly expressed and therefore they are farre to blame which mislike these tearmes in Diuinitie person nature sacrament consubstantiall trinitie c. because they are not expressed in the word But they may with good conscience and much profit be retained because though not literally yet in sense and meaning they are contained in the Scripture and may by iust consequence be gathered thence And wee denie not transubstantion because the word is not in the Scripture but because the matter is not there nor can by necessary consequence be deriued from it but rather the contrary Againe many refuse these doctrines the proceeding of the holy Ghost from the sonne and the baptizing of children because they are not expressed in the Scripture But hence we answer that though they be not expresly set downe in so many wordes yet by iust consequence they may be soundly gathered out of Scripture and therefore are true doctrines no lesse to be beleeued then that which is plainly expressed And thus much of the first part of the reason And if they had beene mindfull of that Countrey whence they came they had leisure to haue returned But now they desire a better that is an heauenly Wherefore God is not ashamed of them to be called their God For he hath prepared for them a Citie Here the holy Ghost proueth the second part of the former argument by 2. reasons the first is contained in the 15. verse and the beginning of the 16. It is taken from the distinction of Countries and may be framed thus They either sought an earthly Country or an heauēly Country But not an earthly Therfore they sought an heauenly Country The first part of this reason is cleare of it selfe The second part is in the 15. verse from whence followeth the conclusion in the beginning of the 16. verse To come to the first part in these words And if they had beene mindefull of the countrey c. That is if they had regarded or thought vpon Mesopotamia or Caldea from whence they came and where they were borne with any desire to haue enioyed the profits or pleasure therof they had leisure enough to haue returned backe thither by reason of the length of their daies which they liued in the Land whither God called them Here obserue two points First that they are not mindefull of or as the word imports they remember not the countrey from whence they came but when God gaue them commandement to depart thence and not to returne to Mesopotamia againe after this commandement giuen they came forth and did forget their owne countrey Whence we learne that howsoeuer vsually Forgetfulnesse be a vice yet some kinde of forgetfulnesse is a notable vertue namely to forget the things that displease God and which hee would not haue vs to thinke vpon Psal. 45.9 The Church is commanded to forget her own people and her fathers house That is her owne will and desires shee must neuer thinke thereof nor of any other thing whereby God is displeased vnlesse it be with dislike This condemneth the practice of many aged persons in these daies who delight themselues among the yonger sort to tell of the bad practices of their youth in wantonnesse contentions and breaking Gods commandements But in so doing they sinne grieuously for a man must not
not Christ or knowing him acknowledge him not their onely Sauiour or acknowledging him doe not truely beleeue in him with such a faith as purifieth their hearts are nothing else but as the Fathers called them splendida peccata gilded and glittering drosse and beautifull deformities And how-euer this seemes harsh yet it must needes bee true seeing without faith it is impossible to please God And here also the vanity of some Popish Writers appeares who presumptuously make some Philosophers Saints whereas they should first haue shewed that they beleeued in Christ and then wee would beleeue and teach it as willingly as they but else if they had had all the learning and all the morall vertues in the world this must stand for a truth Without faith it is impossible to please God Lastly here wee learne that the word of God registred in the holy Scriptures doth containe in it sufficient direction for all the actions and duties of a mans life for without faith no man can please God And if no man then no mans actions can please God which are not of faith for whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Romanes Chapter 14. verse 23. If therefore mens actions must proceede from faith then consequently must they haue their ground warrant from the word for faith and the word are relatiues and the one dependes vpon the other No faith no word to bind no word no faith to beleeue But all actions that please God must bee done in faith therefore all actions that please God haue some ground and direction in the word of God without which word of God there can be no faith And this is true not onely in holy actions but euen in the common actions of mens liues and lawfull callings This is a principle which we must firmely beleeue and receiue And beside this argument here It is also proued by the euident testimonies of the holy Ghost S. Paul to Timothie All Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach improue correct and instruct in righteousnesse that the man of God may be absolute and made perfect vnto all good workes How can the sufficiencie of Scripture be more sufficiently in words expressed Againe Euery creature and ordinance of God is good c. For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer Now if the Scripture make a Christian perfect in all good workes how can it be but it giues him sufficient directions for all his workes And if euery action be sanctified by the word how can that be but the word hath warranty and direction for euery action and duty which may fall out in the course of a Christian life And vpon these grounds wee haue good reason to be resolued of this truth But now if any man aske how this can be for the Scriptures were written long agoe and the stories are of particular men nations and times and the Commaundements are knowne to be but tenne how then can the Scriptures yeeld sufficient directions for euery mans particular actions I answer the Scripture giues directions for all actions 2. wayes Either by Rules or by Examples Rules are of two sorts Generall or particular Particular rules for particular callings are many for Kings they must reade Gods booke and not haue many wiues nor gather too much siluer and gold They must be wise and learned and kisse the sonne of God Christ Iesus and many other for Ministers they must be apt to teach watching sober not young schollers and many other and so consequently the most of the callings that are in the common wealth haue their particular directions in plaine rules Generall rules are first the tenne Commaundements which are directions for all sorts and callings of men in all times what to be done what not to be done in all actions towards God and men and besides in the new Testament there are some fewe rules which are generall directions for all men in all ages As Whatsoeuer you would that men should doe to you doe you the same vnto them Againe Whether you eate or drinke or whatsoeuer you doe doe all to the glory of God Againe Let all things be done to edification and without offence of thy brother Againe Let all your workes be done in loue Lastly Let no man seeke his owne alone but euery man anothers wealth Now there is no action in the world nor any duty to be done of a Christian maÌ„ be he a publike or priuate person be it a publike or a priuate action be it towards God or man but if he haue not a particular direction yet it falls within the compasse of some of these rules and by the tenour of some of these hee may frame his worke in such manner as shall be pleasing to God and comfortable to himselfe Secondly besides rules there are Examples which are speciall directions and they are either of God or good men Extraordinarie examples of God namely such as hee did in extraordinarie times or vpon extraordinarie occasions they concerne vs not for these hee did by the power and prerogatiue of the Godhead as bidding of Abraham sacrifice his sonne bidding the Israelites spoile the Egyptians and such like But the ordinarie workes of Gods wisedome in his creatures of his iustice towards sinners of his mercie towards his children of his care and prouidence towards all are excellent rules of direction for vs. Hence wee haue these rules Be ye holy for I am holy Be ye mercifull as your Father in heauen is mercifull Luke 6.36 So for the actions of Christ who was God and man the miraculous actions of his power which argued his Godâ—ead as his walking vpon the water and such like are no directions for vs. Nor againe his actions and workes â—lone as hee was Mediator as his fasting fourtie dayes his passion and his merits these are no directions for vs to do the like But as the first giue vs instruction So these procure vs iustification But the third sort of his actions done by him as a man or as a Iew borne they are both our instruction and imitation and they are good directions for our actions as his obedience his zeale his patience his humility and all other vertues Concerning all which he saith himselfe to vs Learne of me for I am humble and lowely And againe when he had washed his Apostles feete he bad them learne of him to loue one another For saith he I haue giuen you example that you should do euen as I haue done to you These his examples are rules of direction to all men in the like case Now as for the examples of men as the examples of wicked men are euery way to be eschewed so good mens are to be followed for whatsoeuer is written is written for our learning Rom. 15.4 And for them we are to know that their examples or actions contrary to the word are therefore to be auoided
world yea and the first of all that had this true faith as the onely meanes of his saluation For as for Adam he afore his fall had not this faith neither should it haue saued him but when the first meanes failed him then came this faith as the second and more effectuall meanes of his saluation But Abell was neuer in possibility to be saued by any thing but by this faith And therefore Abels faith hath the first place of commendation and that in this verse Abels faith is here commended for three things 1. In that hee offred by it a greater sacrifice then Cain 2. By it he obtained testimonie with God 3. By it dead Abell yet speaketh The 1. effect of Abels faith is thus set down by the H. Ghost By faith Abel offred vnto God a greater sacrifice then Cain The ordinary Exposition of those words is this that Cain and Abell comming to offer there was no difference in the matter of their sacrifice but onely in the manner of offring in that Abell offred by faith and so did not Cain This Exposition though it be good yet it fits not the scope of this place nor the fourth of Gen. The right sense therefore seemes to be this Abell hauing faith this faith moued him to testifie his thankfull heart to God This hee did by offring vnto God the best and costliest sacrifice that he could namely the first fruites and fattest of his sheepe Whereas vnbeleeuing Cain hauing no loue to testifie vnto God brought onely of the fruite of his ground not of the best as Abel did but whatsoeuer cam first to hand This being the true meaning of the whole let vs come to the particular points laid down in this effect and they are three 1. That Cain and Abell offred that is serued God 2. That they offred Sacrifices 3. That Abell offred a better then Cain The first point containes their seruice in generall the second their seruice in particular the third the difference of their seruice wherein especially will appeare the excellencie of Abels faith First Abell and Cain the two first brethren in the world offered sacrifice to the true God How learned they this for they had no Scripture it was penned many yeeres after namely by Moses first of all I answer When their Parents Adam and Eue had fallen God gaue them of his infinite goodnesse a couenant of grace that the seede of the woman should breake the serpents head Genes 3.15 Wee doubt not but our first Parents receiued this couenant and beleeued the promise and this their faith taught them how to worship the true God aright You wil say thus Adam Eue learned of God but how came this to Cain Abell I answer When they had beene thus instructed of God Adam as a faithfull seruant of God taught the same religion and deliuered the same doctrine to his children and by it they were taught what to whom and in what manner to offer sacrifice And thus they did it neither by Scripture nor reuelation nor their own inuention but by the instruction of their Parents Hence let all Parents learne a lesson of Adam the first parent that was in the world namely to procure the good of their children he nourtered his children excellently 1. He prouided for them til they came to age 2. Then he left them not but appointed them their callings For one was a husbandman and the other a Shepheard 3. Not thus onely but he taught them to worship the true God both in their callings in the practice of religion and therefore he taught them to offer sacrifice in way of thankfulnesse vnto God all this did Adam So must thou do with the children which God hath giuen thee 1. Prouide for them carefully till they be of age take â—eed they miscarie not any way for want of things needfull 2. So bring them vp as that they may be apt to liue in some godly calling whereby to serue God and to doe good in his Church and that calling thou must appoint him according to the fitnesse of his gifts Adam appointed them not both one calling but diuerse callings according to the diuersity of their gifts and thou must see it be a lawfull and honest calling for so are both these Then 3. the greatest matter of all these teach them religion and the true manner of fearing worshipping God that as by the two first thy child may liue well in this world so by this he may be made an heire of the kingdome of heauen Adam was the first father father of vs all let all then follow him in this practice if we follow him in one follow him in both Diuerse wil be as careful for their bodies for their callings as Adam was but how few are as carefull to teach them religion for the prefermeÌ„t of their soules to life eternall But parents must haue care of both these else they shal answer for their child at the day of iudgemeÌ„t though he perish in his own sin yet his bloud wil God require at the Fathers hands For God made him a father in his room and he discharged not the duty of a father vnto their child Secondly in that Cain offered as well as Abell Hence we learne diuerse instructions 1. It is a common opinion that if a man walke duly and truly in his calling doing no man harme but giuing euery man his owne and so doe all his life long God will receiue him and saue his soule but the truth is this If men do thus it is good and commendable and they must be exhorted to continue but if they stand vpon this for saluation they cast away their soules For mark here Cain was a man that walkt in an honest calling and more then that he tooke paines laboured in it which all men doe not which haue honest callings And more then all these when Abell offred hee came and worshipped God also and hee did outwardly in such sort as no man could blame him but onely God that saw his heart And for all this yet is he a wicked Cain and that is all that the word of God giues him 1. Iohn 3.12 Then it is manifest that to walke in a mans calling iustly and vprightly doing no man harme wil not serue the turne Cain did it and yet was cursed wee must then goe further then Cain else wee shall goe with Cain to the place where he is Reason not with thy selfe I worke hard and follow my calling I hurt no man thus could Cain reason and yet but cursed Cain Thou must then beside these get that that Cain did not Learne in thy conscience to see and feele thy sinne to be grieued for it so as thou maist say My sicknesse my pouerty my crosses grieue me but nothing so much as my owne sinnes these trouble me aboue all this griefe swalloweth vp all the rest And there is another thing which I seeke aboue all not
gold siluer or promotion but reconciliation with my God and his fauour in Iesus Christ If thou hast these two then thou goest beyond Cain then shalt thou stand before God with Abell and be accepted Remember these two humiliation for sinne and desire of reconciliation these two is the summe of religion If thou hast these thou art blessed with Abell if not cursed with Cain howsoeuer thou liuest in the world If thou say Cain kill'd his brother and so would not I doe for all the world I will do no man hurt in body or goods This will not serue for it is said that God had no respect to Cain afore he kill'd his brother euen when he offred his sacrifice and therefore this duty is most necessary and there is no shifting it off 2. Cain offred as well as Abell yea Cain offred afore Abell as it is manifest in Genesis 4.3 And yet Abels sacrifice was better when it came to the proofe and was accepted not Cains which came first Hence we learn that a man may be more forward then many other in many outward duties of religion and yet not be accepted of God Another may be not so forward to the duty and yet when hee comes be better accepted Whence comes this what is forwardnesse in good duties a fault Nothing lesse but hence it is he that outwardly is most forward may come in hypocrisie without faith the want whereof makes his forwardnesse nothing worth Many such haue we in our Church great frequenters of places and exercises of religion and yet they come but as Cain did or it may be in worse intents Thy forwardnesse is to be commended but take this with thee also Care not so much to be first at the SermoÌ„ or to be there oftner theÌ„ other as to goe with true faith repentance a heart hungâ—ing for grace if not boast not in thy forwardnes Cain offred afore Abell yet not accepted so there may com an Abell after thee bring faith with him be accepted wheÌ„ thou with thy hypocriticall forwardnes shalt be reiected as Cain was Thirdly did Cain offer as wel as Abel Hence we learn that the Church militant is a mixt coÌ„pounded coÌ„pany of men not of one sort but true beleeuers hypocrites mingled together as here in the very infancy of the Church here was a Cain worshipping in shew as wel as Abell that worshipped in truth So was it in the infancy so in her perpetual growth so shal it be in the last age of the church the good shal neuer be quite separated froÌ„ the bad vntil Christ himself do it at the last iudgement Goates shall alwaies be mingled amongst the sheepe till Christ the great shepheard do separate them himselfe Math. 25.34 And he that imagineth a perfect separation till then imagineth a fancy in his braine and such a Church as cannot be found vpon the earth This being so let no man therfore be afraid to ioyne himself to the visible Church neither let any that are in it go out of it because the bad are mingled with the good for so it hath been alwaies euer wil be he then that wil go out of a Church because there be hypocrites in it must go out of the world for such a Church is not fouÌ„d but triuÌ„phant in heaueÌ„ Fourthly 〈◊〉 that Cain Abel offred hence we learne that the Church of God which truly professeth his name hath been euer since the beginning of the world For this Church was in the houshold of AdaÌ„ wheÌ„ there was no more but it in the world for sacrifice to God is a sign of the Church yea beside the sacrifice they had a place appointed where Adam his family came together to worship God For so much Cain intimateth Gen. 4.14 16. Cain went out from the presence of the Lord that is not onely out of his fauour protection but from the place of his solemne seruice where he wonted to manifest his special presence to his childreÌ„ seruing him and therfore Cain as being excomunicate complaines verse 14 because he must leaue it Thus the Church hath been froÌ„ the beginning therfore is truly call'd Catholike The Papists abuse this place notoriously for whereas the Church hath been so antient they argue therfore it is aboue the Scripture yea that we could not know it to be Scripture but by the antient testimonie of the Church We must know the Scripture is two wayes to be considered 1. As it was written penned by holy men and so it is later then the Church for Moses was the first penman of Scripture but secondly as it is the word of God the substance sense and truth therof is much more antient theÌ„ the Church yea without the word of God there can be no Church For without faith is no Church because the Church is a coÌ„pany of beleeuers and without the word it is no faith therfore no word no faith no faith no Church So then the Scripture was afore the Church but penned after Thus we see that Cain and Abell offered Now secondly what offred they sacrifices Sacrifices were vsed in the worship of God for two ends 1. When a sacrifice was offred especially of beasts when a man saw the bloud of the beasts poured out it put him in mind of his own sins and the desert of them taught him to say thus Eue as this creature is here slain his bloud distils drops away so my sins deserue that my bloud should be sâ—â—ed and my soule be drenched in hell for euer This creature can die but one death for it sinneth not but my sins deserue both the 1. and 2. death Secondly sacrifices serued to put theâ—â— in minde of the Messias to come and the slaying of the beasts shewed them how the Messias should shed his bloud giue his life for the â—irâ—s of the people These are the 2. principal ends of sacrifices for these 2. ends did Cain Abel offer Cain in hypocrisie and for fashion sake Abell in truth conscience and sinceritie As it was in the old sacrifices so is it in our Sacraments of the new Testament whereof the sacrifices were all types 1. In baptisme sprinkling of the water serues to shewe vs how filthily we are defiled with our owne sinnes 2. It signifies the sprinkling of the bloud of Christ vpon the heart of a sinner for his sanctification from sinne 2. In the supper the breaking of the bread signifies 1. how we should be broken in humiliation for our sinne and the pouring out of the wine how our bloud and life should be shed and poured out for our sinnes if wee had that that we deserue And secondly they represent vnto vs how the body of Christ was broken his bloud poured out for our sinnes which he was content to suffer vnder the wrath of his Father for our sakes so that we see both the sacrifices and
he proues it out of the old Testament so also did the Apostles and Christ himselfe all their doctrine Let this teach all men to giue due reuerence to the holy Scriptures let teachers alledge them let hearers receiue them farre aboue all humane testimonies seeing the holy Ghost himself vouchsafeth to confirme his owne words by the authority thereof Secondly hauing laide this ground the holy Ghost frames his argument to proue that Henoch was taken away by faith and it consisteth of many degrees of euidence For before he was taken away he was reported of that he had pleased God But without faith it is impossible to please God The degrees of the argument are these 1. God himselfe tooke Henoch away 2. Before he was taken away he pleased God 3. But without faith no man can please God Therefore Henoch by faith was taken away The first degree That Henoch was taken away and was not found any more in this world hath beene sufficiently spoken of already The second degree is that afore hee was taken away hee pleased God which is not barely affirmed but it is further added that hee was reported of or he receiued testimonie that he pleased God Now this report or testimonie is taken out of the storie of Genesis where it is affirmed of Enoch that hee walked with God which walking with God is an assured testimonie that hee pleased God for as the Prophet Amos saith Can two walke together vnlesse they be agreed therefore in as much as Henoch walked with God it is proofe sufficient that hee pleased God and because hee pleased God therefore God tooke him away So that here are two distinct points in this second degree First that Henoch pleased God Secondly that there is a report or a testimonie giuen of him that hee did please God In the first let vs obserue three speciall points of instruction First in that Henoch before hee was taken away pleased God let vs learne that whosoeuer lookes to haue his soule translated into heauen at his death and both body soule at the resurrection must before hand in this life learne to please God they must seeke to please God not when the time of the translation is come but before as here it is saide Henoch did If any man demaund How shall I please God My answere is this Adam pleased GOD by keeping the Lawe but now that is past that power is lost wee must nowe please God by direction from the Gospell namely by faith in Christ and true repentance together with a holy life which must necessarilie accompanie true faith and repentance thus God is pleased And this must we not deferre till our death but doe it in our liues nor can we looke to be inheritours of the kingdome of glory as now Henoch is vnlesse before hand wee be in the kingdome of grace by pleasing God as Henoch did It is lamentable to see men not care for saluation til death and then they begin to please God but alas God will not be so pleased They begin to learne how to please God when they haue so long displeased him as there is then feare they can neuer please him but that man liueth and dieth with comfort of whom it may be said as here of Henoch before hee was taken away hee pleased God Againe whereas hee came not in heauen till hee pleased God this discouers the madnesse of sinfull men who will looke for heauen and yet will leaue no sinne but flatter themselues therein But let all impenitent men here take knowledge that they come not in heauen till they please God let them therefore cease pleasing themselues and their corruptions by liuing in sinne and learne to please God by a holy life And further In this point marke how nothing brought Henoch to heauen but his pleasing of God Hee was rich for hee was one of the greatest on the earth hee was royallie descended for hee was the seauenth from Adam in the blessed line hee was learned for hee had the sixe first Patriarkes to teach him sixe such Tutors as neuer man had and it is likely hee had a comely strong and actiue body But see all these brought him not to heauen no he pleased God and was therefore taken away Let this teach vs not to rest in wealth beauty strength honour humane learning nor all these put together without the feare of God for some of them may please thy selfe and some may please other men but God must bee pleased afore thou come in heauen if thou wert as good as Henoch Therefore vnto all thy outward blessings adde this To please God by faith and repentance Then as thy pleasing of men may make thee happy in this world so thy pleasing of God shall translate thee from earth to heauen Thus wee see Henoch before hee was translated pleased God Secondly as hee pleased God and else could not haue beene translated so it is added hee was so reported of or there was such a testimonie of him That proofe or testimonie is here concealed but it is recorded in the storie of Genesis where it is said Henoch walked with God which as we heard before was an assured testimonie that God was well pleased with him But what is this hee walked with God how can a man â—e saide to walke with God The meaning is That Henoch liued a godly righteous and innocent life in this world â—or to liue in holinesse and righteousnesse is to walke with God And further his heart was possessed of two perswasions or resolutions which were the inducements drawing him to this holy life First that hee was alwayes in Gods presence and that God is alwayes readie to dispose of all thinges to his good Againe that God did see trie and discerne all his wordes and deedes yea his cogitations and thoughts and the whole course of his life These were the holy resolutions of Henoch and these made him lead a holy life This lesson is worth learning and this example worthy to be followed of vs all our dutie is with Henoch to walke with God in this life if wee purpose to liue with God in heauen and wee walke with God by leading holy and vnblameable liues in holinesse towards God and righteousnesse towards man But if wee thinke this hard to doe wee must labour to be resolued on these grounds First that God and his prouidence is euer present with vs to dispose of vs alwaies to his glory and of all other things to our good Secondly that as wee are in Gods presence so God seeth vs and all our thoughts words and workes bâ—rgaines and dealings and will iudge them all When these two perswasions possesse our hearts it cannot be but wee shall liue godly and feare to offend God for as a childe is dutifull and obedient in his Fathers presence so when a man is perswaded he is in Gods presence it cannot but make him dutifull When a man is perswaded that God seeth him
because they be contrary as Noahs drunkennesse Lots Incest Dauids Adultery and many other his infirmities and such like Such as are directly agreeable with the word of God are to be embraced and receiued as directions for our liues not for their owne sake but because they are agreeable to the word But as for such as are neither commaunded nor forbidden and being done were neither allowed nor disallowed these being done by godly men and such who for their faith were approued of God and against which no exception can be taken in the word they be as rules and directions for vs in the like cases Now there is no action that can fall out in the life of a Christian man for which he hath not out of the Scripture either a rule generall or particular or else some example to follow which is as good as a rule vnto him And thus wee see how the Scripture affoords directions for all our actions In the demonstration whereof we haue stoode the longer because it is a principle of great moment The vse hereof is double First we must therefore in all the actions of our liues and callings take consultation with the word of God and for our direction therein wee must search for either generall or particular rules or at least for examples of godly meÌ„ in like cases And without the warrant and direction of some of these wee are by no meanes to enter into any thing or to do any work If we doe then we cannot cleare our selues from sinne in so doing for we sinne because we please not God in doing that action we please not God because we haue no faith for the doing of it we haue no faith because we haue no warrant nor ground in the word for it Therefore what-euer a man presumeth to do without some warrant in the word for his direction he sinneth in so doing Secondly â—ere Ministers must learne their duty for if no action can possibly please God that is done without faith nor can be done in faith without warrant from the word then must they be Gods mouth vnto the people to be able to tell them what is lawfull what is vnlawfull by the word that so their people may performe their actions in faith and consequently please God Now hauing laid downe this Rule because it is a principle of so great moment the holy Ghost in the next words proceedes to the proofe of it For he that commeth to God must beleeue that God is and that he is a rewarder of them that seeke him These words are a proofe of the former rule and the reason stands thus He that commeth to God must needes beleeue But He that pleaseth God commeth to God Therefore Hee that pleaseth God must needes beleeue and so without faith it is impossible to please God He that commeth to God To come to God in the Scriptures but especially in this Example is to labour to haue fellowship with God in Christ as is manifest in three places more In the fourth Chapter wee are bid to goe boldly to the throne of grace and in the seauenth Christ is said to be able perfectly to saue thâ—m that come vnto God by him And in the tenth we are called to draw neere with a true heart in assurance of faith Out of all which places it appeares that to come to God is to haue fellowship with God by Christ. And the reason why that phrase is so often vsed to the Hebrewes is for that many of them hauing receiued the profession of Christ afterward forsooke him againe and fell from his religion and by renouncing Christ fell away from God Therefore hee exhorteth them to take heede least there be in any of them an euill heart and vnfaithfull to depart from the liuing God Chap. 3.12 Now by the contrary Iâ— to renounce Christ be to fall or goe away from God then we may gather that to come to God is to cleaue to Christ and to God by Christ. So then the meaning is He that will haue any fellowship with God in Christ He must beleeue What must He beleeue Two things 1. That God is 2. That he is a rewarder of them that seeke him He must first beleeue that God is That is not so much that there is a God for that wee are taught by the very light of Nature But that this God whom in Christ he labours to know and come neere is the true and onely God This is a notable point in Christian religion to beleeue that God is God indeede not a fiction a shadow or imaginarie God but God indeede For it is the scope of the first commaundement that God gaue mankinde If any man obiect There is no man that knowes God but confesseth God to be God no man was so mad as euer to thinke otherwise I answer to beleeue the true God to be God indeede is a matter of great difficulty For though a man by nature thinke there is a God yet doe we not by nature thinke the true God to be God Nay by nature euery man is an Atheist and denieth in his heart the true God to be God and doth impugne the first commaundement aboue all other And this may truly and safely be affirmed of all men that euer came of Adam Christ alone excepted that by nature they are Atheists and it may be proued thus By nature though wee know and beleeue there is a God yet the corruption of our nature is such as wee frame and faine him to ourselues to be such a one as we please for we denie in our hearts his power his presence and his iustice But to take away these three from him is to denie the true God to be God indeede First men by nature denie Gods presence For men would be ashamed to doe many things in the presence of any man euen the basest in the world which when they are out of mens sights and yet in Gods presence they commit carelesly and boldly I speake not of naturall actions which are lawfull yet in many wherof there is none so great shame as men naturally refuse to doe them before others But I meane sinfull actions which not for any naturall vnseemelinesse but euen for their foulenesse and vglinesse because they are haynous sinnes men would feare to doe if any man were present Seeing then men feare not nor shame not to doe them though they be in Gods presence It followeth that therefore they naturally imagine that God is not present for if they were so perswaded they would not commit them though they esteemed God no better then a man Secondly men by nature denie Gods power thus When a man offendes a Magistrate by breaking any law which may deserue death or some great punishment hee is sore afraide and all his care is how hee may escape his punishing hand But let a man offend God neuer so much by breaking carelesly all his holy commaundements he neuer feares at all nor trembles
For he being a righteous man in that wicked age wherein all the world weltred in wickednesse and walking before God in great holinesse when no man cared for religion hee had this speciall fauour from God that when hee purposed to destroy the world for their sinne hee first of all reuealed to righteous Noah that purpose of his So that these words haue reference to the reuelation which Noah had from God in the 6. of Genesis For this message came not from God by any Prophet for wee know none in those euill dayes except Noah himselfe but either by the Ministerie of an Angell or else by immediate reuelation from God himselfe and this fauour he receiued from God not for any cause in the world but because he was a holy and righteous man From hence wee may learne diuers excellent instructions First whereas God maketh choise of Noah to reueale vnto him his counsell and his iudgements to come wee learne that this is a prerogatiue which God bestoweth on such as feare him he reuealeth his counsels to them in a speciall manner whether they be purposes of Iudgements vpon his enemies or of mercies vnto his Church Thus dealt he with Abraham Gen. 18.19 Shall I saith God hide from Abraham the thing that I will doe which thing was the destruction of Sodome and her sisters And so when the Sodomites liued in wanton carelesnesse and put farre from them the euill day then Abraham knew from God their destruction was at hand And as in that for is it generally true in all his great workes that the Lord God will doe nothing but he reueales his secrets to his seruants the Prophets Amos 3.7 Now this is not a prerogatiue of Prophets alone or of such as were extraordinary men as Abraham was but the secrets of the Lord are amongst such as feare him Psalme 25.14 All that feare the holy name of God are Gods friends and of his Counsaile and therefore not Abraham onely is called the friend of God Iames 2.23 But of all true beleeuers saith Christ Iohn 15.14.15 You are my friends If you doe what I commaund you henceforth I call you not seruants but friends for the seruant knoweth not what his Maister doth but all things that I haue heard of my Father haue I made knowne vnto you As if he had said I will communicate and impart my secrets vnto you as one friend doth vnto another as farre as shall be fit for you to know And the Apostle saith 1. Corinth 2.15 A faithfull and a holy man discerneth into the deepe counsailes of God which are reuealed vnto them as much as concerneth their saluations and sometimes more as here vnto Noah who was fore-warned of God of things then not seene This prerogatiue of Gods children is to be vnderstoode with some cautions First that this is more proper to Prophets and holy Ministers of God then to ordinary Christians Secondly that it was more ordinary in the old testament then now in the dayes of the Gospell If any obiect Then the state of the Church afore Christ was better then it is now vnder Christ I answere Not so for first we are recompenced by hauing the Scriptures perfect and complete which they had not and by hauing the substance of their shadowes and the performance of their promises in which respects our state is farre more excellent then theirs And secondly for this particular I answere they indeede had more ordinarie reuelation of matters personall and priuate and not directly touching saluation but of such things as are generall and doe necessarily concerne saluation wee in the time of the new Testament haue more euident demonstration and more full reuelation then they had afore Christ. For exsample particular mercies to some faithfull men or particular iudgements on Gods enemies whether particular men or whole kingdomes were after reuealed to godly men in those dayes as here to Noah but saluation by the Messias and the manner how the Messias should saue his Church is more fully and plainly reuealed now then in those dayes Out of which consideration ariseth the third caution which is that reuelations of Gods will to be expected now vnder the Gospell are ordinarily nothing else but these the true meaning of Scripture a discerning of true Scripture from forged of true Sacraments from supposed of true doctrine from false of true Pastors from false Prophets These such like as farre forth as they are necessary to saluation all true and faithfull beleeuers which out of an humbled heart by deuoute prayer doe seeke it at Gods hand are sure to haue reuealed vnto them from God But as for other purposes of God of personall and particular matters or what shall be his blessings or what his iudgements to these and these men families Cities or Kingdomes or when or how he will change States or translate kingdomes Or by what extraordinarie meanes hee will haue his Gospell propagated or a declining Church or State vpholden these we are not to expect nor easily to belieue any that shall say such things are reuealed vnto them And yet wee tye not the Lord in such straite bonds but that hee may sometime extraordinarily reueale his purpose therein to some his selected seruants yet prouided that that reuelation be examined and allowed of the Church But as for such things as concerne immediatly the saluation of our soules Gods spirit doth most comfortably reueale them vnto vs in our prayers in his word and in his Sacraments of all which it is most true that the secrets of God are amongst them that feare him The vse of this doctrine is double for instruction and for exhortation For our instruction here we learne how to answere the Church of Rome they aske vs how doe wee know true religion from erroneous or true Scripture or Sacraments from forged We answere first by it selfe by sight and sense of the excellencie thereof as we know gold from brasse or siluer from lead But what if the brasse or tinne be gilded ouer I then answere secondly wee can know gold from brasse and siluer from tinne by the sound and smell and hardnesse to endure and by the operation so there is a spirituall sound of the Scriptures in the eares of a Christian a spiritual comfort and taste in true religion a spirituall operation in holy mens hearts of the true Sacraments But what if false Prophets come in sheepes cloathing and by lying wonders seeme to giue the same sound taste smell vertue and operation vnto their forgeries or at least chalenge it and say that theirs is true I answere lastly Then we know true Religion true Scripture true Sacraments true Prophets true Doctrines from false by a holy and supernaturall reuelation from Gods spirit which by euident and powerfull demonstration assureth vs what is true and what is false for the substance of saluation And this spirit is giuen to all that in true humility doe seeke it in holy prayer and in a
beleeueth against all the world and is commended to all ages for this faith It is therefore but a vaine flourish of the Papists to presse vs so much with their multitudes and vniuersality and consent and vnity and succession cōtinuance For all this is worth nothing as long as they first proue not that that doctrine or opinion which these multitudes hold hath his ground from Gods word till then all the other is vanity For it is better with Noah to haue Gods plaine word of his side then to beleeue otherwise with all the world which was here deceiued condemned when Noah alone beleeued Gods word and was saued And thus we see who were condemned the world To end this point one question may not vnprofitably be here moued Whether was all the world that is all the men in that world condemned or no The words seeme to imply that all but Noah were and yet it may seeme strange that of so many Millions none should repent but he and if they repented why were they not saued I answere The world of that wicked age was condemned two wayes First with a corporall destruction and so they were all condemned without exception No high houses no hilles no deuises of man could saue them For the waters rose 15. cubits aboue the tops of the highest mountaines vnder heauen Gen. 7.20 And so though till then diuers of them liued by flying to the hilles yet that being their last refuge and being thus taken from them then all flesh perished that moued vpon the earth and euery man and euery thing that drew the breath of life For so saith the Story Genesis 7.21.22 And it is but vaine to imagine that any of them could be saued vpon that Arke for first it was so made with a ridge in the top as is most probably thought that no man could stand vpon it much lesse make any stay in that violent tossing by tempests Againe if they could yet could they not haue liued so long for want of foode the waters being almost a yeere vpon the earth And thus it is most certaine they all without exception were destroyed with bodily destruction But secondly they were condemned to an eternall destruction in hell and therefore S. Peter 1.3.18 saith Their spirits are now in prison who were disobedient in the dayes of Noah Now all the question is whether were they all condemned or no. I answere For ought that we certainly knowe out of the scripture they were all condemned Yet in the iudgement of charity wee are not so to thinke and the rather because there are many probable coniectures that some of them repented For howsoeuer many of them beleeued not Noah iudging that he spake of his owne head yet it is more then likely that when they saw it begin to raine extraordinarily at least when they saw themselues driuen to the tops of the hilles and there looked hourely for death that then diuers of the posterity of Henoch and Methusalem and Lamech were ashamed of their former vnbeliefe and then turned to God in faith and in repentance And doubtlesse that is the onely or the principall cause why God brought the floud in fourty dayes which he could haue done in foure houres that so men might haue time to repent Genesis 7. But it will be saide If any repented why then were they not saued I answer because they repented not in time when they were called by Noahs preaching Repentance is neuer too late to saue the soule from hell but it may be too late to saue the body from a temporal iudgement And this I take it is that that wee may safely hold for it seemes too hard to condemne all the posterity of Methusalem Henoch Lamech and other holy Patriarks who as the Text saith begat sonnes and daughters and to thinke that none of them repented when they saw the floud come indeede as Noah had said It cannot be but they heard their Fathers preach and why might not that preaching worke vpon their hearts when the Iudgement came though afore it did not But why then did not God record in the Scripture neither their repentance nor saluation but hath left it so doubtfull I answere for the very same for which he would not record Adams nor Salomons All for this cause that he might teach all men to the worlds end what a fearefull thing it is to disobay his commandement as Adam did or to defer repentance when they are called by Gods word as these men did Therefore to feare vs from the like though afterwards they repented it pleased God not to record it but to leaue it doubtfull This question being thus discussed yeelds vs two strong motiues to repentance First for if we repent not betime our state then is fearefull and doubtfull though not desperate as wee see here the saluation euen of Methushelas children is doubtfull for they repented not when they were called but deferred it till the iudgement came So if we deferre our repentance till our deaths there is great question of our saluation but let vs repent when wee are called by Gods word and then it is out of question then there is no doubt of our saluation Secondly if we repent betime we shall escape the temporall Iudgement which God sends vpon the world for sinne If not but deferre repentance till the Iudgement come we may then by it saue our soules but our bodies shall perish in the vniuersall Iudgement If the children of Henoch and Methushelah which were neere a-kinne vnto Noah had repented at Noahs preaching they had beene saued with Noah they did not But when the floud came indeede then doubtlesse they beleeued with Noah and wished themselues in the Arke with him but it was too late they saued their soules but were drowned with the rest So assuredly when God threatneth any Iudgement on our Church or Nation they that beleeue and repent betime shall escape it But they that will liue in wantonnesse with the world and not repent till God begin to strike If then they doe when the floud is come though saluation cannot be denied to repentance whensoeuer yet let them assure themselues they shall beare their part with the world in the punishment as they did partake with them in their sinnes Let then these two considerations moue vs all to turne to God by timely repentance then shall we be sure to escape both the eternall and temporall Iudgement and not be condemned as here this world of the vngodly was And thus we see who were condemned The world The second point is whereby were they condemned the Text saith onely by which hee condemned c. Whereupon some would vnderstand faith and reade it thus by which faith he condemned the world Which though it be true for the faith of holy men condemnes the vnbeleeuing and misbeleeuing world yet is it not proper in this place where the Arke is described by the vses of it which are two whereof this is
the world so the same word of God which beleeued and obayed by godly men is their saluation disobayed and refused by vngodly men shall be their condemnation And thus much for the two ends why Noah prepared the Arke consequently of the second effect of Noahs faith It followeth And was made heire of the righteousnesse which iâ— by faith Here is the third and last effect whereby the excellencie of Noahs faith is commended It made him an heire and that not of the world for so he was besides but of that that the world could not yeeld of righteousnesse and that of the best of all euen of that righteosnesse which is by faith These words haue relation to that testimonie which God gaue of Noah in Genesis 6.9 Noah was a iust and vpright man and walked with God Now that which is spoken there more generally is here particularly opened and vnfolded he was iust or righteous how hee was righteous by the righteousnesse of faith so that these words are a commentarie vnto the other But because that that is here affirmed of Noah is a most glorious thing his faith made him an heire that is made him that was heire of all the earth a better heire therefore these words are to be well waighed For their full opening three points are to be considered 1. What is the righteousnesse here spoken of 2. Why it is called the righteousnesse of faith or by faith 3. How Noah was made Heire of it by his faith For the first That righteousnesse by which Noah and all holy men are to stand righteous before God is not a righteousnesse of any nature but such a one as is appointed of God for that purpose That wee may knowe it the more distinctly wee must examine the seuerall kindes thereof Righteousnesse is of two sorts Created Vncreated Vncreated is that which is in God and hath no beginning nor ending no meanes nor measure Of this speaketh the Prophet Psalm 119.137 Righteous art thou O Lord. This cannot make any man righteous for two reasons First for the Godhead and it are all one It is in God essentially A man is one thing and his righteousnesse is another But God and his righteousnesse are all one And therefore it is as impossible for any man to haue this righteousnes as it is to be God Secondly it is infinite and mans soule a finite creature and therefore not capable of any thing that is infinite and consequently not of the vnmeasurable righteousnes which is in the godhead Therefore this we must leaue vnto God as proper to the Deitie Created righteousnesse is that which God frameth in the reasonable creature Men and Angels Of Angels we are not to speake though theirs and man 's differd not much in nature at their creations Created righteousnesse of man is of 2. sorts Legall or Euangelicall Legall righteousnesse is that which the Morall law prescribeth Euangelicall that which the Gospell hath reuealed Of legall righteousnesse I finde there are three sorts spoken of 1. One that is a perfect righteousnesse 2. One that is a ciuill righteousnesse 3. One that is an inward righteousnesse Perfect righteousnesse Legall is the perfect fulfilling of the law in a mans owne selfe And by this shall no man liuing be iustified before God for no man since the fall of Adam is able perfectly to fulfill the Law If any can then shall he be righteous by it but none did nor euer can therefore no man shall stand righteous by perfect legall righteousnesse in himselfe Some will obiect But a regenerate man may for he is restored by grace therefore though by Adams fall a man is disabled yet by regeneration hee is inabled to fulfill the law perfectly I answere It were so if they were perfectly sanctified in their regeneration but they are sanctified but in part and it is not perfect vntill death Obiect 1. Thess. 5.23 We are sanctified throughout spirit soule and body If all those what then remaines vnsanctified therefore our sanctification is perfect I answere It is perfect in parts but not in measure nor degree As a childe is a perfect man in all the parts of a man but not in the quantitie of anie part So a childe of God is perfectly sanctified in all parts but not in the measure of any part vntill flesh and mortality and corruption haue an end Secondly some may obiect The virgine Mary sinned not I answere so teacheth indeede the Church of Rome that she neuer sinned that her life was free from sinne â—ctuall and her conception from sinne originall But so taught neither the Scripture nor Gods Church but contrariwise it is more then manifest shee was a sinner For first she confesseth her soule reioiced in God her Sauiour but if she were no sinner she stoode in neede of no Sauiour Againe she died but if she had not sinned she should in Iustice not haue died For death entred by sinne and where no sinne is there death is not due Thus no man can be righteous by the perfect righteousnesse of the law in himselfe Secondly there is a ciuill righteousnesse and that is when a man in his outward actions is conformable to the law especially to the Commaundements of the second Table For example hee is free from the outward actions of murther adultery or theeuery and such like or he can refraine his anger and ouercome his passions that they shall not break out into open violence to the view of the world and for the first Table he comes to the Church professeth religion All this is a ciuill righteousnesse and by this can no man be iustified nor made righteous For first it is not a perfect but a most imperfect righteousnesse and therefore cannot iustifie It is so imperfect that it is as good as none at all in Gods sight for it is but an outward and constrained and dissembled obedience and wants the inward and true obedience of the heart and soule Secondly it cannot make a man righteous for wicked men haue it which are vnrighteous and cannot be saued Haman hated Mordecay in his heart yea his heart boyled in malice against him yet the Story saith That neuerthelesse he refrained himselfe till he came home Ester 5.10 And therefore Christ saith that except our righteousnesse exceede the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisies we cannot enter into the kingdome of heauen Math. 5.20 Now what was theirs but an outward ciuill righteousnesse whereby they kept the law onely in outward actions as appeareth in that Christ afterward in the same Chapter expounding the law doth reduce it to the inward which is to his full and proper sense So then yet wee haue not found that righteousnesse which may make a man righteous Thirdly there is a righteousnesse called the inward righteousnesse of a Christian man which is this A man hauing repented and his sinnes being forgiuen hee is by the holy Ghost sanctified inwardly in his soule and all the parts powers of
it This sanctification is called inward righteousnesse Now the Church of Rome saith A man may be iustified by this But it is not so as appeares by these reasons First this righteousnesse is in this life imperfect and that is proued by the Apostle where he saith VVee doe here knowe but in part 1. Corinth 13.12 Therefore our vnderstanding is but in part regenerate and as it so consequently all other parts or powers of our soule are but in part regenerate and in them all we are partly spirit and partly flesh Galath 5.17 Therefore if our sanctification be imperfect it cannot iustifie vs. Againe this righteousnesse is mingled with sinne and vnrighteousnesse and from this mixture comes the combat betwixt the flesh and the Spirit spoken of Galath 8.17 For these two are contrary one to the other If it be mingled with sinne then it cannot make vs righteous no nor the works of grace that come from it though God in mercy reward them And though as S. Iames saith They iustifie our faith and make vs iust before men Iames 2.21 Yet can they not iustifie vs before Gods Iustice nor at the barre of the last Iudgement will they passe for payment S. Paul saith 1. Corinth 4.4 I know nothing by my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified that is I haue so walked in my calling since I was an Apostle and Minister of the Gospell as I am not priuie nor guilty to my selfe of any negligence therein If he dare not stand to that to be iustified by iâ— who dare take hold when he refuseth Againe no man can doe any perfect good workes vnlesse hee be perfectly iust For how can perfection come out of imperfection But no man can be perfectly iust in this sinfull body as is proued in the first reason therfore his works here in this life cannot be such as may make him righteous But it may be obiected Though our workes haue some defects in them yet Gods mercy accepts them for righteous and iust and therefore they may iustifie vs. I answere As Gods mercy accepts them so must his Iustice be satisfied also but they being imperfect cannot satisfie his Iustice for Gods infinite Iustice requires perfect satisfaction But as for our best workes as they are done by vs weigh them in the balance of Gods Iustice and they are so light as they deserue damnation yet in Gods mercy in Christ their defects are couered and they are reputed good workes and are rewarded but we incroach vpon Gods mercy and abuse his Iustice if therefore wee imagine they should deserue Gods mercy or be able to iustifie vs in his sight Thus then seeing Legall righteousnesse faileth vs let vs come to Euangelicall Euangelicall righteousnesse is that that is reuealed in the Gospell and should neuer haue beene reuealed if that of the Law could haue saued vs. But when it not by defect in it but default in our selues could not then God in mercy affordeth vs another in the Gospell Euangelicall righteousnesse is that that is in Christ Iesus his it is that must make a man righteous before God But this Christ was an extraordinary person consisting of two natures Godhead Manhood And accordingly hee hath a double righteousnesse in his holy person First as he is God he hath in his nature the righteousnesse of God and that is vncreated and infinite and therefore incommunicable and so none is nor can be righteous by it Secondly there is in Christ a righteousnesse of his humanity and this though it be finite and created yet is it beyond measure in comparison of the righteousnesse of man or Angell So saith S. Iohn 3. God giueth not him the Spirit by measure This righteousnesse of Christ as man or Mediator consisteth in two things 1. In the purity of his nature 2. In the perfection of his obedience The first branch of our Mediators righteousnesse is the holinesse of his humanity which was perfectly sanctified in his conception by the powerfull operation of the Godhead and this was done at the first instant of his conception in the virgins wombe From this purity of nature proceeded his obedience which was as perfect as his nature was pure and so pure a nature made a plaine way to perfect obedience And therefore as his conception was free from sinne originall so was his whole life from the least sinne actuall Now the Mediators obedience was double Actiue Passiue And both these he performed in his owne person His Passiue obedience was his passion or suffering of whatsoeuer the Iustice of God had inflicted on man for sinne whether for soule or body The Actiue obedience of the Mediators person was his perfect fulfilling of the morall Law in all duties to God or man in thought word or deede and all this for vs in our steade and on our behalfe And here is true righteousnesse for where the nature of anie person is perfectly pure and the obedience perfect the righteousnesse of that person is perfect And I saye all this was done by him for vs hee suffered all that wee should haue suffered and suffered not hee did that which wee should haue done and did not And this is that righteousnesse by which a sinner is made righteous before God For seeing legall cannot it is this that must And now wee haue found that righteousnesse by which Noah and all holy men were made and counted righteous namely that that is resident in the holy person of Iesus Christ the Mediator And yet this is aboue and beyond all reason that one should be iustified by anothers righteousnesse and the doctrine though it be of God and grounded neuer so strongly on Gods word yet hath it enemies and is mightily oppugned by the Church of Rome Therefore let vs first proue it and then answere the obiections to the contrarie Wee proue it thus First from plaine Scripture 1. Corinth 3.24 Hee that knew no sinne was made sinne for vs that we might be made the righteousnesse of God in him What can be said plainer he was made sinne for vs and wee righteousnesse by him Therefore as Christ was no sinner in his owne person but our sinnes were laid vpon him and so he was made a sinner by our sins so though we be not righteous in our owne persons yet hauing â—hrists righteousnesse imputed to vs we are made righteous by his righteousnesse Againe the righteousnesse that must saue vs must be the righteousnesse of man and God as in the aforenamed place it is said that wee might be made the righteousnesse of God in Christ. But no mans owne righteousnesse can make him the righteousnesse of God nor can Gods righteousnesse be the righteousnesse of man therefore it remaineth that onely Christ being both God and man hath in him that righteousnesse which may make a man the righteousnesse of God Thirdly the Scripture saith Christ is the end of the Law to all that beleeue Rom. 10.3 The end of the Law that is not the taker away
or abrogater of the law but the fulfiller of it as the abrogater of the Ceremonial so the fulfiller of the Morall law If he fulfilled the Law for whom was it not for himself For as the Messiah was not slain for himself Dan. 9.26 so he obayed not the Law for himselfe For whom then for all that beleeue Therefore Christ doing it for them they fulfill the Law in Christ and so Christ by doing and they by beleeuing in him that doth it doe fulfill the Law Now if it be not amisse to say We doe in Christ fulfill the law No more is it to say Wee are made righteous by Christes righteousnesse though it be his and not ours but onely by faith Let vs then see in the second place what the Church of Rome obiect against it They first obiect thus As a man cannot be wise by another mans wisedome nor rich by another mans riches nor strong by another mans strength So can he not be righteous by another mans righteousnesse I answer The comparison is not alike For one man hath no propriety in another mans wisedome strength or riches but we haue a right and proprietie in Christes righteousnesse Againe the wisedome of one man cannot be the wisedom of another because they are two persons fully and equally distinct but it is not so betwixt Christ and a sinner for euery beleeuer is spiritually and yet truly and really conioyned to Christ and they make one mysticall body Christ being the head and euery true beleeuer being a member of that body and therefore that which is his righteousnesse may be also truly ours His because it is in him and ours because we are knit to him For by reason of this mysticall vnion betwixt him and vs all blessings of saluation in him as in the head are diffused into vs as his members or branches yet are as properly still in him as is the braine in the head of a man And thus though in sense and reason this cannot be yet by faith and Gods spirit the righteousnesse of Christ is made ours Secondly they obiect If this be so then God iustifieth wicked men but God will not doe so it is against the nature of his holinesse and Iustice. And againe hee that iustifieth the wicked is abhominable to God Prou. 17.15 therefore God will not doe so himselfe We answere The ground is good but the collection is vntrue God will not iustifie a wicked man that is true but that therefore a man cannot be iustified by Christs righteousnesse is false For God doth not iustifie him that lieth rotting in his former sinnes and weltring in his olde corruption but him that beleeueth in Christ and repenteth of his sinnes And that man in his faith is iustified and in his repentance sanctified and so he is made a new man yea as S. Paul saith He that is in Christ is a new creature 2. Corinth 5.17 For as it is in the first conuersion God turneth nor saueth no man against his will but first makes him willing by his owne work alone and then conuerteth and saueth him with his owne free will working together with Gods grace So is it in the work of Iustification God iustifieth no wicked man but makes him first iust and righteous in and by Christ and then accounts him so But then will some say the sinner hath no righteousnesse but that of Christs and that is in Christ and not in himselfe therefore he hath none in his owne person how then can he be any thing but a wicked man still I answer that is not true that is first affirmed The beleeuing sinner hath more righteousnes then that that is in Christ. That which iustifieth him is in Christes person But the sinner when he is iustified is also sanctified by the mighty work of Gods grace and so he is made a holy man and doth good and holy workes because he is in Christ though his sanctification be imperfect To this end saith S. Peter Acts 15.9 Faith purifieth a mans heart for it is impossible a man should beleeue and so be iustified but hee must also be sanctified in his heart and life Thus a sinner is iustified by Christs righteousnesse inherent in Christ himselfe and sanctified by Christs righteousnes diffused from Christ into the sinner And therfore his Iustificatiō is perfect because that that iustifieth him is still in Christ but his sanctification imperfect because that that sanctifieth vs is in our selues the one imputed to vs the other infused and inherent Againe I answere that if we take it in the sense of Scripture It is true that God iustifieth a wicked man For S. Paul saith Rom. 4. To him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted to him for righteousnesse See God iustifieth the vngodly but how euen as we heard before not him that is vngodly after but afore he be iustified him that by nature and in himselfe is vngodly God iustifieth by working in him faith and repentance by which of an vngodly man he is made a man iustified and sanctified Their last obiection is If a sinner be righteous by Christs righteousnesse then Christ is a sinner by his sinnes for ther is the same reason of both But Christ is no sinner but the holy of holiest and S. Paul saith He knew no sinne 1. Cor. 5. and himself for himselfe chalengeth his enemies Which of you can reproue me of sinne If then our sins cannot make him a sinner no more can his righteousnesse make vs righteous I answer Here we graunt all if they speake the words of the Scripture in the sense of the Scripture for Christ was a true and reputed sinner in the sight of Gods Iustice as hee that becomes surety for another is a debter in his roome or as he that vndertakes for a man body for body must answer for him his owne body for his so in all reason and iustice Christ though hee had no sinnes of his owne yet being our surety and vndertaking for vs and standing in our steade our sinnes are iustly accounted his And as for these places many more like they are all vnderstood of personall sins from all which and the least contagion thereof he was perfectly free And therefore the same place that saith He knew no sin that is in for his owne person knew not what sinne was saith also that for vs in our stead he was made euen sin it selfe that we might be made the righteousnesse of God in him Thus Christ in himselfe more righteous then all men Angels In our steade is a reputed sinner and by the same reason we most vnrighteous in our selues are clothed with Christs righteousnesse and thereby are reputed righteous And as Christ though no sinner in himselfe by being a sinner in our steade and hauing our sinnes imputed vnto him became subiect to the wrath of God and bare it euen to death it self So we though not
not onely beleeues and obayeth but as God promised so he went to it and tooke possession and died in this faith that God would performe his promise and that his posteritie should inherite it all as afterward indeede they did euen from Moses to Christ. If it be asked how this could be the answere is that Abraham knew that God was King of Kings and had the world and Kingdomes of the world in his hand and disposition and therfore assured himselfe that hee could bring to passe what hee had promised and make good his word notwithstanding all such impediments to the contrarie And as hee beleeued it came to passe his posterity came to it entred as conquerers vpon this gift of God and by the power of God so amazed all these Kings and their people as some submitted as the Gibeonits and they that did not were all slaine and their Countries conquered as we may reade at large in the booke of Ioshua all the Stories whereof are briefly comprehended by Dauid in fewe words where he saith We haue heard with our eares our Fathers haue tolde vs how thou O Lord droue out the heathen with thy hand and planted them in how thou destroyed the people and made them grow Psal. 44.1.2 Out of which we learne two instructions First that the change of States and alteration of Kingdomes or common-wealths are in Gods hand and that he can turne them one way or other as it pleaseth him To this purpose saith Dauid in the fore-named Psalme verse the fourth They inherited not the land by their owne sword neither did their owne arme saue them but thy right hand and thy arme and the light of thy countenance because thou didst fauour them This must teach vs to pray earnestly in our daily prayers for the good estate of this Kingdome wherein we liue and of that worthy Prince and Queene vnder whose gouernment wee haue beene so long and so liberally blessed For the welfare and prosperity the certainty and security of it and her is not in our policie might munition ships not in the strength of our nauie nor in the power of our armour nor in the chiualrie of our people nor in the wisedome of our Councell though for all these we are a people honoured of our friends and feared of our enemies But in the mighty hand of our God who as Daniel saith beareth rule ouer the Kingdomes of the earth and giueth them to whomsoeuer he will Dan. 4.22 Seeing therefore the King of heauen in the giuer and establisher the remouer and changer of Kingdomes of the earth let vs assure our selues that the prayers of Elisha are the Horses and Chariots of Israell 2. Kinges 13.14 And surely if Elisha for his prayer was acknowledged by the King himself to be his Father then doubtlesse the godly Ministers and such other in our Church as pray daily for the peace of our Ierusalem are worthy to be accounted good children of our Church and worthy members of our State Secondly here we learne what is the ruine of Kingdomes and ouerthrow of estates namely sinne and vngodlinesse This is most apparant in the present example For why did God take this land from the Cananites and giue it to Abraham and his seede the Stories of the olde Testament answere nothing but sinne In Deuteronomie Moses chargeth the Israelites that they doe not after the abhominations of the heathen Cananites For saith he because of their abhominable sinnes God did cast them out before you Deut. 18.9.12 And why did not God instantly giue it to Abraham to inherite after the promise euen because the wickednesse of these Amorites was not then full Gen. 15.16 that is their sinnes were not then ripe For we must know that though God be the absolute and soueraigne Lord of all Kingdomes and may dispose them as hee will yet he rather exerciseth his Iustice then his power and neuer ouerturneth any State but vpon cause of their apparant sinfulnesse Nor can the Amorites or Cananites pleade herein any hard measure For the same God dealt afterward in the same Iustice with his owne people giuing the Kingdome of Iudah to the Chaldeans and Israel to the Assyrians and the cause is laid downe most memorably in the Storie When the Israelites sinned against the Lord their God and walked after the fashions of the heathen whom the Lord had cast out before them and did secretly things that were wicked and made Images and serued Idols and though God warned them by his Prophets yet would they not obay but hardned their neckes and so finally left all the commandements of God then the Lord was exceeding wroth with Israel and cast them also out of his sight 2. Kings 17. from the seauenth verse to the 19. Thus sinne is able to ouerturne Kingdomes be they Cananites Israelites or whosoeuer Let this teach vs all to looke to our liues make conscience of all sin especially great capitall crying sins for the sinnes of a people are wormes and Cankers eating out the life and strength of a coÌ„mon-wealth And let our State and gouernment learne here to look to the reformation of our people especially for great sinnes For open profanenesse or vncleanenesse or oppressions or iniustice or extortions or cruelties and exactions all these or any of these sinnes raigning in a State are able to ouerturne the best established Kingdome on the earth and will at last doe power and policie what they can make the land spewe out her inhabitants and in the meane time let the wily wits of men iudge as they list it will proue true that the sinfull and profane man is the worst and the godly and conscionable man the best friend to a State and best subiect in a Kingdome Thus much for the second point in Abrahams obedience namely the end of it The third and last point is the manner of his obedience which followeth in these words And he went out not knowing whither he went The manner of this his leauing his Country in mans reason would seeme strange nay the world will condemne it for plaine foolishnesse for a man to leaue a certainty for an vncertainty But it may here be doubted how the Apostle can here say that he knew not whither he went seeing these words are not in the Storie of the olde Testament doth not that practice allow traditions beside Scripture I answer first We refuse no traditions which are agreeable to the Scripture and analogie of faith but such as are agreeable to one of these wee receiue them though not as Scripture Secondly if the Apostles in the new Testament doe adde any thing in any Story which is not in the olde as S. Paul doth the manner of the Sorcerers of Egypt Iannes and Iamâ—res 2. Timoth. 3.8 that circumstance by them so added is to be holden as Scripture and no tradition because they hauing the same spirit of God which the Writers of the olde Testament had haue inserted it
beleeuers that haue bin in the world Let this teach vs whē we see our own sins how hideous monstrous they be yet not to despaire And whē we see other men liue in extream dissolutenes yet not to iudge of them before the time but euen then with hope and comfort remember that God who quickneth the dead and calleth things that are not as though they were And in that hope let vs perswade our selues that he may quicken our dead hearts and reuiue vs by his grace And therefore in that hope let vs raise vp our selues to vse all holy meanes of Gods Word Sacraments and Prayer which if we carefully and continually doe wee shall see wonders wrought in vs that as they saide of Paul This man preacheth the faith which afore he destroyed and therefore glorified God for him Galath 1.22.23 So shall men say of vs This man hates the profanenesse that afore he liued in and loues the religion that afore hee mocked Such miracles will the Lord worke in vs if with faith and diligence wee vse the holy meanes that so all that see vs shall Glorifie GOD for vs. Thus wee see generally how great the issue and posterity of Sarah was But it is more particularly inlarged by two comparisons As many as the starres in the skie or as the sands by the sea shore which are innumerable His comparisons are two One taken from the heauens as many as the starres in the skie The other from the earth as the sands in the Sea And these two are vsed by the holy Ghost being things of incredible number to expresse the multitude of the Israelites that came all from Sarah Not but that other things also are of as great number as the drops of water dust of the earth hairs of mens heads c but these two are most common and prouerbiall phrases whereby to expresse a multitude And againe the starres of the skie are rather named then any other because God himself in the beginning pleased to vse it to Abraham when he had neuer a childe Gen. 15.8 God caried Abraham forth in the night and bad him count the starres if he could and said so shall thy seede be And Moses afterwards vseth the same comparison Deut. 10.22 Our Fathers went downe into Egypt 70. persons and now the Lord hath made vs as the starres of the skie in multitude Now because all men are not Astronomers as Abraham and Moses were and that ignorant men might say they can perceiue no such matter in the starres Therefore hee vseth another comparison which euery Country-man may discerne how innumerable they be namely the sands of the Sea-shore And least any should say I dwell in the mid-land Country and neuer saw the sea sand and am ignorant and so cannot iudge of the starres therefore to put him out of doubt the holy Ghost assures him in the end of the verse that they are both innumerable that is not in themselues or to God but in regard of man and mans skill vnable to be counted Concerning these two comparisons let vs obserue the manner or the phrase of speech in them vsed Secondly the matter in them intended For the first wee are to knowe that the speech is not proper but figuratiue For properly they were not as manie as the starres or as the sands neither are the starres or sands innumerable but it is a figure called by the Rhetoricians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is an excesse of finenesse of speech or an excessiue elegancie And as it is ordinarie in all Writers and euen in common speech so it is not refused by the holy Ghost but vsed both heere and in the two forenamed places and the like also of the same nature but in other phrases in other places as Saint Iohn 21.25 I suppose saith hee if all the sayings and doings of Christ were written the world could not containe the bookes that would be written Meaning they would be exceeding many and more then would be needefull for saluation And Deuteronomie 9. verse 1. Moses saith That the Cities of the Canaanites were great and walled vp to heauen Meaning that they were very high and so high as was possible for Cities walles to be and as was impossible to haue beene scaled in all mennes reason had not GOD fought for them These and such like are common in the Scripture and seeing wee allowe that libertie to all Writers and to our selues in common speeche no reason to denie it to the Scripture which was written for all mens vnderstanding and therfore in such phrases as are vsuall and ordinarie with all men And the like liberty is heere taken also in another figure as many as the sands by the shore of the sea the word properly signifieth and soundeth the lippe of the Sea Now the sea hath no lippe but it is a speech taken or borrowed from man or beast who haue lippes and the sea shore resembleth a lippe For looke what a lippe is to them the shores are to the sea as the two lippes doe inclose the mouth so the two shores on both sides doe inclose the Sea which lieth as in a mouth betwixt them From hence we may learne profitable instructions First that therefore Rhetoricke is a warrantable good and lawfull Art and it ariseth thus That which the holy Ghost practiceth must needes be not onely not euill but good and warrantable But the holy Ghost vseth and practiceth Rhetoricke heere and in many places else of the Scripture Therefore it is a good and lawfull Arte. The proposition is vndoubted the assumption is cleare both by these places and almost the whole body of the Scripture many of Saint Pauls Epistles many of Christes owne Sermons Saint Iohns Gospell many of the Prophets especially Esayah haue as much and as elegant Rhetoricke in them as any VVriters in the vvorlde and beside all other vertue and Diuine power in them doe euen for figures and ornaments of Arte match any Oratours that haue vvritten in the Greekes or Latines Nor would it bee anie hard taske to vndertake to prooue and illustrate euery approued rule of Rhetorick out of some part of Scripture Now if it be lawfull to practice the rules of Rhetorick then is it lawfull also to collect those rules together to pen them and to make an Art of them They therefore that holding the contrary doe say or teach or write it is vnlawfull goe against the streame and common practice of the Scripture and rules of common reason Secondly heere it is apparant that in preaching Gods word it is lawfull and warrātable for a Minister to vse Rhetoricke and eloquence And the reason is good for that which the holy Ghost vseth in penning of the Scripture the same may Gods Ministers vse also in preaching the same They therefore that denie that liberty to Ministers are too rough and rugged and pull out of the hand of the Ministers one of his weapons out of the wings of the
Scripture one of her feathers Yet we must know that all or any kinde of eloquence is not permitted to a Christian Minister For S. Paul saith 1. Cor. 2.13 Wee speake the words of God not in the words which mans wisedome teacheth but which the holy Ghost teacheth coÌ„paring spirituall things with spirituall things So that there is a holy a sanctified a spirituall eloquence an eloquence fit for spirituall things and that eloquence must be vsed As the Israelites might marie the Midianite women whom they had taken in warre but not til they had purified them Numb 31.18.19 And more plainly and particularly Deut. 21.11.12.13 Moses explaneth what that purifying is And thou shalt bring her home into thine house and shee shall shaue her head and pare her nailes and put off the garment shee was taken in and then thou maist marie her So humane eloquence must be brought home to diuinitie and be pared and shaued with spirituall wisedome and then may lawfully and profitably be vsed For our more speciall direction heerein these cautions may be obserued First the more naturall it is and the lesse affected the more commendable is it in the doer and more profitable to the hearer Secondly it must be graue sober and modest remembring the height and holinesse of the place a man stands in and of the worke he doth Therefore it must not consist in telling strange tales or vsing such gestures or words manner or matter as may moue laughing and smiling in the Auditors There may be wit in such doing but it can hardly be the sanctified and spirituall eloquence which S. Paul there speakes of Thirdly it must be such as may be a helpe and not a hinderance to the vnderstanding of Gods word for it is a damosell to Diuinitie but not her Mistresse Gods word therefore must not bow and bende to her much lesse be wrung and wrested to her but she to Gods word It must in a word be such as may most liuely purely plainly and significantly expresse the meaning of Gods word Therefore a man must endeuour that all his speech be in one language at least in such as his hearers vnderstand for else if he speake the body of his speech in one and peece out the members in other which the people vnderstand not hee may indeede in his owne spirit speake mysteries but to the hearer he speaketh parables And to his owne vnderstanding he may preach well but the hearer is not edified as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 14.2.17 Therefore let not eloquence be a hinderance to the vnderstanding of the hearers which GOD hath ordained to be a helpe and furtherance And with these or such like qualifications eloquence may be vsed with good warrant and much profit And for cautions or qualifications heerein hardly can any man set-downe better rules then euery mans conscience will vnto himselfe Thirdly inasmuch as the holy Ghost here and else-where vseth so much Rhetoricke Diuines may learne where the fountaine of Christian eloquence is namely in the Scriptures of the olde and new Testament Which being compiâ—ed by the wisdome of God wee are to assure our selues they containe in them true wisdome of all sorts Precepts of Rhetorick I confesse are to be learned out of other books which purposely doe â—each them but the practice of those rules in examples can be no where better than in Moses the Prophets and the Euangelists And this must needes follow vpon that that hath already beene granted For if we yield that Rhetoricke is good and lawfull and practiced in the scripture then it must needs followe that it is there practiced in the best manner for shall the Diuinitie there taught be the soundest the Historie there reported the truest the conclusions of Philosophie Astronomy Geometrie Arithmeticke Cosmographie and Physicke there deliuered the surest the Musicke there practiced the exactest the Logycke there practiced the sharpest the Lawes there enacted the iustest and shall not the Rhetoricke there practiced bee the purest Surely if Moses had written a booke of his owne as he was a meere man and as he was Moses brought vp in Egypt or Paul writ a booke as hee was a Pharisie and Doctor of the Law they would both haue beene full of all excellent learning for Paul was brought vp at the foote of Gamaliel Acts 22.3 And Moses was exceedingly learned in all the learning of the Egyptians and mighty in word and deed Acts 7.22 Shall they then bee the Secretaries of the most high God the fountaine of wisdome and learning and shall not their bookes bee filled with the most excellent learning in all kinds Doubtlesse who euer searcheth it shall finde it to be so Seeing therefore Eloquence is lawfull and that Preachers may lawfully vse it let them also knowe where to haue it let them study Gods Bookes and there they shall finde not onely Diuinitie but knowledge and learning of all sorts and that most exquisite and as excellent patternes and presidents of Eloquence as are to bee found in any Authors in the world And let them if they would preach with spirituall power and eloquence looke how Moses the Prophets our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles preached for to follow them is the true way Thus wee see the manner here vsed by the holy Ghost in these two comparisons to describe the greatnesse of this her posteritie Now the matter in them contained is that here is the performance of one of the greatest promises made to Abraham The promise is Genes 22.17 I will surely blesse thee and greatly multiply thy seede as the starres in the heauen and as the sands by the sea shoare There is the promise and beholde here the performance in the very same wordes and that most true and effectuall For at the time when the holy Ghost wrote these words the Israelites were multiplied to many millions yea to a number past number So that here we learne God is true in all his promises bee they neuer so great or wonderfull If hee speake the word if the promise passe him it is sure Heauen and earth shall rather passe away than any one piece of his promise shall faile The vse is to teach vs first to beleeue God when hee promiseth what-euer it bee for hee is worthy to bee beleeued who neuer failed to performe what he promised He promised these Millions to Abraham when hee had but one childe nay when he had neuer a one Genes 15.8 And Abraham beleeued Such a faith was excellent indeede and deserues eternall commendation as here it hath Let vs be children of this faithfull Abraham and the rather seeing wee see the performance which he sawe not Wee thinke it a disgrace if wee bee not beleeued especially if wee doe vse to keepe our word Let vs then knowe thereby what dishonour it is to the Lord not to beleeue him which neuer failed in the performance to any creature Secondly we must here learn of God to be true and faithfull in our
steward ouer them for the good disposing of them to the glory of God and the good of his Church alwaies remembring this rule of the Prophet Dauid Psal. 62.10 If riches increase set not thy heart on them He saith not If riches increase refuse thē but set not thy heart on them and thus much of these Questions Now this practice of the Patriarchs is as necessarie for vs in these dayes as euer it was for the cause why we profit little after much hearing of Gods word is this we haue not behaued our selues like Pilgrimes and strangers in this world but the cares of the things of this life haue choaked it vp Math. 13 2◠that it could take no ground nor roote in our hearts when we haue heard the word wee remember it not because our hearts and the affections thereof are set on the pleasures and commodities of the worlde Wee therefore must shake off this filthy sinne and learne to behaue our selues like Pilgrimes and strangers not intangling our selues with the things of this life but vsing them as though we vsed them not so as they be no hinderance to the growth of Gods graces in vs. For they that say such things declare plainly that they seeke a Country In the former verse was set downe the constancie of Abraham Sarah Isaac and Iacob in the faith Now in the 14.15 and 16. verses the holy Ghost proceedeth to amplifie and inlarge the commendation of their perseuerance in the faith for the scope of all these verses is to proue that all these particularly were constant in the faith vnto the end The proofe is made by one substantiall reason the summe whereof is this Abraham Sarah Isaac and Iacob sought for their Country which was heauen and therefore they were constant in the true faith But some may thinke that this reason is not substantiall for men may seeke for heauen that neuer had true sauing faith As Balaam desired that his end might be like the end of the righteous Numb 23.10 wherewith no doubt he desired the state of the righteous after this life I answere that this desire of Balaams was not grounded vpon any constant perswasion nor settled resolution but vpon some sodaine motion Secondly though he desired to die the death of the righteous yet he would not liue the life of the righteous hee had no delight to walke in the way to come to that end which they walked in without which no man ordinarily can come to it Yet further some will say Many shall seeke as our Sauiour Christ saith to enter in at the straite gate of the kingdome of heauen and shall not be able Luke 13.24 Therefore to seeke for heauen is no sufficient argument of true faith Answer True indeede many shall seeke to come to heauen and shall not be able to enter because they seek when the dore of mercy is shut and when the day of grace is past for there is a time of grace wherein the Lord will be found Now if men seeke him not in this time though they seeke him neuer so long after yet they shall not finde him But the seeking of these Patriarchs was a sound and constant seeking and so a notable fruite of their true faith For 1. they sought a heauenly Country 2. they sought it in due time not for a brunt but through the whole course of their liues 3. they went the right way denying themselues and their estate in this life as being strangers vpon earth and they were willing to forsake all things in this world to attaine heauen esteeming it as their true dwelling place and their eternall rest Now more particularly the holy Ghost diuideth this reason into two parts handleth the same seuerally 1. he proueth that they sought a Country in this verse and 2. that this Country which they sought was heauen it selfe verse 15.16 For the first part that they sought a Country is thus proued They which say they are Pilgrimes and strangers they shew plainly that they seeke a Country But Abraham Isaac and Iacob saide of themselues that they were Pilgrimes and Strangers Therefore they shew plainly that they seeke a Country The first part of this reason is euident in it selfe for hee that saith hee is a Pilgrime and a stranger in any place sheweth plainly that hee is forth 〈◊〉 his owne Countrey and therefore seeketh one The second part of the reason is assumed from their confession in the end of the former verse and confessed that they were Pilgrimes and strangers on the earth from whence the conclusion is laid downe in this 14. verse that therefore these Patriarchs sought a Country In this reason obserue first that the Author of this Epistle had diligently read the History of Abraham Sarah Isaac and Iacob penned by Moses in the booke of Genesis and in reading had obserued that which they particularly confessed of themselues in many places of that booke namely that they were Pilgrimes and strangers yea also hee gathered from their confession this most heauenly meditation that therefore they were not in their owne Country but sought another These three thinges then the Author of this Epistle vsed about the holy Scriptures Reading meditation and obseruation Whence we learne that all Gods Ministers and those which prepare themselues to the worke of the Ministerie are diligently to reade and study the holy Scriptures and to meditate therein No doubt the Author of this Epistle was an Apostle and had most notable giftes by vertue of his calling and yet hee bestowed paines in viewing the particular words of Abraham Isaac and Iacob recorded by Moses in the booke of Genesis Daniell also was an extraordinarie Prophet yet as wee may reade Daniel 9.2 hee studied with admirable diligence the prophecies of Ieremie and Ezekiel And Timothie though he were a Disciple Acts 16.1 and well learned yet Paul chargeth him to giue attendance to reading to exhortation and to doctrine 1. Timothie 4.13 And Ezekiel is commaunded to eate the role and to fill his belly with it Ezekiel 3.3 And Saint Iohn likewise is commaunded to eate vp the little booke Reuelations 10.9.10 which thing he did all which strongly inforce the former duty shewing that Gods seruant in the Ministerie must as it were eate vp Gods booke that in iudgement and vnderstanding he may digest as farre as is possible the deepe things of God and the hardest places of the Scripture here must he lay his foundation and hither haue recourse frō all other writing whatsoeuer in any matter of doubt This direction is most necessary for the Schooles of the Prophets and for all Gods Ministers and yet notwithstanding the contrary practice beareth sway in the world For in the Popish Vniuersities most of their diuines apply themselues to study the bookes of certaine schoole-men and the Expositors or Commenters thereupon These are applied day and night though they be both many and large and full of needlesse quiddities and oftentimes they be also
hee worshipped vpon the ende of his staffe Yet further there may be a question moued about the words for if wee reade the Historie in Genesis it is there saide that Iacob worshipped towards the end or toppe of his bed Genesis 47. Now there is great difference betweene these two To worshippe on the toppe of his staffe and on the toppe of his bed How therfore can they stand together Ans. They may stand wel together and be both true for when Iacob was about to giue vp the Ghost and was ready to die hee raised vp himselfe vpon his pillowe towards the beds head and thereon rested his body Now because his body was weake and feeble hee staide himselfe also vpon his staffe and thus comparing the places together we see there is no repugnancie in them Againe this wee must knowe that the same sentence of Scripture may be diuersly read in diuers places of Scripture without any impeachment to the truth certainty or perfection of Scripture for when the holy Ghost speaketh the same thing often yet in different tearmes as in this place the diuersity of wordes doth enlarge or open the sense and meaning but no way corrupt or depraue the same And thus much for the words Now to come to the fact it self in Iacobs worship three circumstances are to be considered 1. The occasion 2. The time 3. The manner of it The occasion of Iacobs worship heere spoken of as we may reade Genesis 47 was this when the time drew neere that Iacob must die hee called for his sonne Ioseph and chargeth him deepely That hee should not burie him in Egypt when hee was dead but that hee should carie him thence and burie him in the buriall of his Fathers Ioseph consents vnto his Fathers request and yet Iacob for certaintie makes him to sweare that hee shall doe so and Ioseph sware vnto him Now vpon this issue that Iacob had with Ioseph the Text saith That Israell worshipped towards the beds â—ead that is hee praised GOD and gaue thankes vnto him for this benefite that hee should be buried with his Fathers Abraham and Isaac And yet this benefite did not so much concerne himselfe as his children for the carying of his bones thither was to be a token and pledge and a certaine assurance vnto them that the Land of Canaan should be theirs and that God would bring them thither againe In this circumstance obserue a notable dutie belonging vnto Fathers and Masters of families they must in their life time haue care of their posteritie and vse all meanes to helpe them and benefite them in the faith not onely while they are aliue but also after they are dead after the example of this holy Patriarch and when they haue obtained this benefite for them they must be glad in their hearts and reioyce and thereupon take occasion to praise the Lord as Iacob did in this place 2. Circumstance The manner how hee worshipped Which is set downe in these words on the end of his staffe This circumstance is worth the marking for good Iacob by reason of the weakenesse of his body and olde age was not able to come forth of his bed and kneele downe or prostrate himselfe but raiseth himselfe vp vpon his pillowe towards his beds head and by reason of feeblenesse being not yet able to sit vpright he doth leane and beare himselfe vpon his staffe Heere wee learne that wee must not onely worship GOD with our soules and hearts but with our bodies also for GOD hath created both and therefore will be worshipped in both 1. Corinthians 6. verse 20. Olde Iacob might haue excused himselfe that by reason of the weakenesse of his body hee was not able to adore GOD with any bodily reuerence but yet wee see hee leanes vpon his staffe and so making supply to his bodily weakenesse adoreth GOD with his bodie Question In what kinde of gesture then must we worship God with our bodies Answere The word of GOD doth not prescribe any by way of limitation For sometimes our Sauiour Christ prayed kneeling Luke chapter 21. verse 41 sometimes groueling Matthew chapter 26. verse 59 sometime standing Iohn chapter 11. verse 41 as also did the Apostles And the Scripture approoueth the Publican who stoode a-farre off and prayed Luke chapter 18. verse 13. Elias also 1. Kings chapter 18. verse 42 is saide to pray with his head betweene his legges so that wee haue no certaine forme prescribed vs onely this wee must vse that gesture which may best set forth and declare our humble heart and holy affection vnto God Here then is confuted an opinioÌ„ of those which thinke that a man may worship God with his heart yet worship images with his body that he may bee present at idolatrous worship yet keep his heart vnto God But Iacobs behauiour in this place doth both confute and condemne them for he thought his body as due to God as his soule and therefore worshipped God with both 3. Circumstance The time when hee worshipped God thus namely when he was dying euen then he worshipped God In this circumstance we may note diuers things First here behold the bad practice of the world for many men when they are dying now-adaies are so farre from following Iacobs example in worshipping and praising God that then they are faine to call for men to teach them how they should worship God hauing spent the former part of their life carelesly in regard of their soules following worldly profits and pleasures neuer thinking of their duty to God till they die But what a fearefull course is this that men should thus brutishly goe on from day to day not knowing how to worship God Well all such as loue their owne soules and would be like to godly Iacob or as our Sauiour Christ said to Nathaniel would be true Israelites Ioh. 1.47 the naturall sonnes of old Israel indeede they must haue care so to liue in this world that they may worship God when they die therfore they must not deferre but learne betime the knowledge and feare of God that when death comes they may bee able to shewe forth and practice the same It is a lamentable thing to coÌ„sider how the diuel bewitcheth mens hearts so as they liue in the world as though they should neuer goe out of it neuer caring for religion till the day of death come vpon theÌ„ then it is too late to learne But this is to followe Esau and not Iacob who is therefore condemned by the holy Ghost 2 Againe in this that Iacob worshipped God at his death we learne this That as men liue so they die for the most part Iacob was brought vp in Gods worship therein liued all his life long and looke as hee liued so he died for when he died hee worshipped God resting his body on the end of his staffe This same truth is verefied now and shal be for euer let a man worship God through the course of
in regard of his profession and religion for mocking is persecution Gal. 4.29 with Gen. 21.9 And that reproach which is cast vpon a Christian is cast vpon Christ and Christ takes it as done vnto himselfe the persecutor wounds Christ Iesus through the sides of a poore Christian which is a feareful thing For in so doing he sets himselfe against the Lord Iesus he kickes against the prickes and if he so continue hee must needes looke for some fearefull ende for who hath euer beene fierce against the Lord and hath prospered Iob. 9.4 Wherefore if any of vs be guiltie of any sinne in this kind let vs repent for vnlesse wee turne our condemnation will be remedilesse Againe the afflictions of the Israelites are here said to be their sufferings for Christ where note that though Christ his comming were then afarre off yet the Israelites then knewe of Christ for else they could not suffer for him This confuteth those which holde that euery man may be saued by his owne religion whatsoeuer it be if hee liue ciuilly and vprightly therein Their reason is taken from the Iewes who they say had onely the knowledge of outward ceremonies and so were saued But that opinion is here disprooued for the Iewes knew Christ and professed him or else they would neuer suffer for him and therefore they were saued by him and not by their obedience to outward ceremonies And thus much of the reason which mooued Moses to make such a choyce as hee did Now in the ende of the verse is added a reason why Moses was of this strange iudgement to think the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt namely because he had respect to the recompence of reward That is he often set his eie to behold and his heart to consider how God had made a promise of life euerlasting after this life vnto all those that obeyed him and trusted in him in this life for the enioying whereof hee preferred that estate wherein he might liue in the feare of God though it were a state of reproach before all other whatsoeuer Where wee see what it is that will bring a man to esteeme affliction with the feare of God better than the treasures pleasures of an earthly kingdome namely as we set the bodily eie to behold the affliction so we must lift vp the eye of the minde of faith to behold the recompence of reward that is the state of glory in heauen prepared for Gods children Thus did the Christian Hebrewes in the primitiue Church Hebrewes 10.37 They suffered with ioy the spoiling of their goods A very hard thing but yet most true for it is the word of GOD And the reason is rendred They knew in themselues how that they had in heauen a better and more enduring substance And our Sauiour Christ endured the Crosse and despised the shame for the ioy that was set before him Hebrewes 12.1 that is in consideration of that ioy in glory whereto hee should be aduanced himselfe and bring all his members This we must make vse of for if wee will liue godly in Christ Iesus wee must suffer affliction This flesh and bloud will not yeeld vnto and therefore to perswade vs to suffer with ioy we must with Moses haue respect to the recompence of reward Wee must say thus to our soules The day will come wherein wee shall haue euerlasting life in the Kingdome of heauen if wee now serue and feare him Shall wee not then for his sake be content to suffer a short affliction seeing the greatest of them are not woorthie of the glorie that shall bee reuealed Romanes chapter 8. verse 18. Question But why doth the holy Ghost call euerlasting life a reward Answere It is not so called because Moses did procure it and deserue it at Gods hand by the dignitie of his workes in suffering for sure no man can merit any thing at Gods hands The case is plaine For Christ as hee is man consider his manhoode a-part from his Godhead could not merit any thing at Gods hands for he that would merit of God by any worke must doe three things 1. He must doe the worke of himselfe and by himselfe for if hee doe it by another the other meriteth and must haue the reward and praise of the worke Secondly hee must doe it of meere good will and not of dutie for that which is of duty cannot merit because a man is bound to doe it 3. The worke done to merit must be of that price and dignity that it may be proportionable to life euerlasting which is the reward Now though Christ as he is man be aboue all men all Angels in grace and dignity yet consider his manhoode a-part from his Godhead and hee could not doe a worke with these three properties For first the workes done of the manhoode were not done of it selfe but from that fulnesse of the spirit wherewith hee was endued Secondly Christ as man is a creature and so considered his workes are of duty to the Creator and so cannot merit Thirdly Christs workes as man simply considered are finite and so could not merit infinite glory Question How then did Christ merit at Gods hands Answere Partly by meanes of Gods promise made in the Law which was this Doe this and thou shalt liue but properly and chiefely because hee was not a meere man onely but withall true and very God for because his obedience both in his life and death though performed in his manhoode was the obedience of him that was God and man euen from the infinite excellencie of the person whose it is it becomes meritorious In his manhood hee obayed the Law and suffered for our sinnes but the dignity thereof came from his Godhead for hee that did these workes for vs was both God and man Now if Christ considered as man onely cannot merit then much lesse can any other man merite at Gods hands And therefore Moses though hee were a worthy man yet because hee was but a man and a sinnefull man also he could not by any worke deserue life euerlasting at Gods hands But life euerlasting is called a reward in the Scripture because it is the free gift of God promised by GOD to his children in Christ for this end to allure and drawe them on in obedience And it must not seeme strange that wee say a reward is a free gift for so it may be as we shall see by comparing two places of Scripture together to wit Matthew 5.44 with Luke 6.32 For whereas Mathew saith If you loue them that loue you what reward haue you Saint Luke repeating the same thing saith What thanke haue you or as the word signifies what fauour or free gift haue you Secondly there may be another cause rendred why life euerlasting is called a reward to wit not in regard of the worke done but in regard of the worker considered in Christ for Christes merit makes life euerlasting to be a
kill a man not presently but a weeke or a moneth or a quarter of a yeare after as appeares by the confession of those that haue giuen themselues to studie and practice such hurtful deuises And it is worth the marking that the principall inuentors and practicers of such hurtfull inuentions haue been of the Romish religion The second circumstance to be obserued is the Time of this exploite It was not on any of the first sixe daies but on the seuenth and that after they had that day compassed the citie about seuen times then when the Priests blew the trumpets and all the people showted as Iosuah bade them the walles of Iericho fell downe for this was the time which God had appointed for this exploit The reason why God appointed seuen daies and seuen times cōpassing on the seuenth day is not reuealed vnto vs in the word of God and therefore wee may not curiously prie into it nor yet as some doe hence gather that seuen is a perfect number But from the consideration of the very time wherein the walles fell downe wee may learne this that if we would haue God to accomplish his promises vnto vs we must waite for that time season which he hath appointed we must not thinke that God wil accomplish them when we appoint But we must beleeue Gods promise and also waite his good leisure and then will it come to passe The Israelites compassed about Iericho one day and the walles neuer stirre yea they doe so sixe daies together and sixe times more on the seuenth day yet they stand fast The reason is Because Gods appointed time was not yet come But on the seuenth day when they had compassed them about the seuenth time all the people gaue vp the showt then they fel down because that was the particular set time wherein God would accomplish his promise Further whereas they compasse about the walles seuen daies together it must needes be that they went about them on the Sabbaoth day for that was one of the seuen Now here a doubt ariseth for this was a seruile worke vpon the Sabbaoth contrary to Gods commandement which inioyned so strict a rest vpon the Sabbaoth day that they might not kindle a fire thereon how then could they lawfully compasse the city on the Sabbaoth day Answ. All Gods commandements in the morall lawe must be vnderstood with this exception Thou shalt doe thus and thus vnlesse I the Lord command thee otherwise for God is an absolute Lord and so aboue the Lawe and therefore may lawfully commaund that which the Lawe forbiddeth In the second commandement he saith Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any grauen image c. And yet Moses by Gods speciall appointment set vp a brasen serpent which was a figure of Christ. Vpon such a speciall command Abraham lawfully offers to kill Isaac the Israelites at their departure spoyle and robbe the Egyptians and Iosuah with the people here compasse the walles of Iericho on the Sabbaoth day Rahabs Faith VERSE 31. By faith Rahab the harlot perished not with them which obeyed not when shee had receiued the Spies peaceably IN this verse the holy Ghost proceedes further in declaring the power of faith and for this ende commends vnto vs the faith of Rahab The words contain the summe and abbridgement of the second and sixt chapters of Iosua the meaning of them is plaine The points herein to be considered are three 1. The person beleeuing to wit Rahab 2. The reward of her faith giuen by Iosuah Shee perished not but was preserued in the destruction of Iericho 3. The testimonie of her faith so called by Saint Iames chapter 2. verse 25 and set down in the end of this verse When shee had receiued the spies peaceably For the person Rahab was a woman of Canaan dwelling in Iericho as wee may reade Iosuah 2 there shee liued and had her abode shee was no Israelite but a forrainer in regard of her birth and a Stranger from GODs Church How then comes it to passe that she is commended for her faith and here put into the Catalogue of these renowned beleeuers Why are not the rest of the Cananites preferred to this honour as well as shee Answere Wee must knowe this that from the beginning of the world to the time of Christes ascension the Church of God was small sometime shut vp in some fewe families as from the floud to the giuing of the Law and after limited to a small Kingdom and people in the Land of Canaan where the Lords people dwelt During which time all other Nations and people of the world besides this little company were no people of God but strangers from the couenant of promise and as Pau◠saith Without God in the world And howsoeuer Gods Church was thus shut vp as it were in a corner yet now and then it pleased God to reach out his mercifull hand to some of the heathen calling them into his Church and receiuing them into his couenant and they are called in the newe testament Proselytes In Abrahams family his bond-men and seruants were circumcised and made members of the Church of GOD. And in Moses dayes Iethro Moses father in Law a Priest of Midian obtained this at Gods hands to be ioyned vnto Gods Church and so was Ruth the Moabite Ruth 1.16 and Naaman the Assyrian 2. Kings 5.17 and as some think Nabuchadonozer Daniel 4.3 but that is not so certaine And so was the Eunuch of Ethiopia Candaces the Queene of Ethiopias chiefe gouernour Acts 8.27 Now as God in mercy dealt with these so did he in like mercy call Rahab the harlot aboue all the people of Iericho for they trusted to their strong walls and therefore died but Rahab beleeued that the God of Israell was the true God and so had mercy shewed vnto her Now after the time of Christes ascension God dealt more bountifully with the world for he sent the light of his Gospell into all Nations and as the Scripture saith their sound went through all the earth and their words to the ends of the world Rom. 10.18 The consideration of this limited estate of the Church of God for so long a time serues to discouer vnto vs the errour of those that maintaine and hold vniuersall calling of all and euery man to the state of grace and saluation but if that were so then in former ages the Gentiles would haue beleeued whereas we see that before the ascension of Christ the Church of God was but a small remnant among the people of the Iewes onely and not one of tenne thousand beleeued among the Gentiles Now if all men had beene effectually called then all would haue receiued the promise of the Gospell but many Nations in former ages neuer heard of Christ and therefore there was neuer in all ages a generall effectuall calling of all men Obiect Paul saith God reconciled the world vnto himselfe by Christ 2. Cor. 5.19 and if that
therefore the Lord forbade A bastard to enter into the congregation of the Lord to beare any office vnto the tenth generation Deuteronomie chapter 23. verse 2 So ignominious is this kinde of birth by the iudgement of Gods spirit vnto that party on whom it falls For this sinne of fornication doth not onely hurt the persons committing it but euen staines the children base borne to the tenth generation Yet howsoeuer Iephte was base borne and so suffered for it great reproach heere wee see hee is commended vnto vs for his faith among the most worthy beleeuers that euer were Indeede besides Iephte wee shall not finde the like example in Scripture Yet in Iephte wee may see that howsoeuer it be a reproachfull thing to be borne of fornication yet that doth not hinder but the party so borne may come to true faith and so to the fauour of God and to life euerlasting Such persons as are base borne vpon viewe of that reproach which the Scripture fasteneth vpon them might take occasion to thinke miserably of themselues even that God had reiected them but this example serues to shewe that it hindereth not but that they may come into the fauour of God and by faith get honor of God to countervaile that discredit which they haue by their base birth Further whereas wee commonly say that such as are base borne are wicked persons here wee see the contrary in Iephte and therefore wee must not for this cause condemne any for wicked or vngodly Indeed the Lord hath branded this estate with reproach that men should shun the sinne of fornication the more Againe whereas Iephte is here commended for his faith we may probably gather that their opinion is not true who hold that Iephte sacrificed killed his owne daughter For beeing commended here for his faith certain it is he had knowledge in Gods will and word and therefore we must not thinke but that he knewe God would neuer accept of such a vowe by the performance whereof hee should commit wilfull and most vnnaturall murder This his faith shewes that it was not his intent to kill the first person that met him out of his house for by the light of nature hee might know that God would neuer accept thereof and therefore it is not like he so made his vow for this faith and such a vow cannot stand together But some will say the text is plaine Iudg. 11.31 that He vowed to offer for a burnt offering the thing that cam out of the doores of his house to meet him when he came home Ans. It is so indeed in some translations It shall be the Lords And I wil offer it c. But the words in the originall may as well bee translated thus It shall bee the Lords or I will offer it c. And this later translation is more sutable to the circumstances of the place for this was Iephtes meaning that whatsoeuer met him first he would dedicate it to God if it were a thing that might bee sacrificed then his purpose was to offer it vnto the Lord in sacrifice Quest. But if he did not kill her why did he then so lament for her Ans. Because by his vowe he was to dedicate her to God and so shee was to liue a Nazarite all her life long which must needs be a very bitter thing to him who had no childe but her it beeing so great a reproach and in some sort a curse in those daies to want issue I speake not here how well or ill Iephte did in making her a Nazarite But this may no way bee admitted That beleeuing and godly Iephte should aduisedly kill his owne daughter Vndoubtedly hee could not thinke that God would bee pleased with such an abhominable sacrifice Thus much for these persons the rest I passe ouer because this story is plaine and large in Scripture The Faith of the Iudges and Dauid VERSE 33 34 35. Which thâ—ough faith subdued Kingdoms wrought righteousnesse obtained the promises stopped the mouthes of Lions Quenched the violence of fire escaped the edge of the sword of weake were made strong waxed valiant in battell turned to flight the Armies of the Aliants The women receiued their dead raised to life IN these wordes the Apostle propounds vnto vs ten seueral fruits of faith the nine first whereof are the particular actions of the parties spoken of in the former verse and they are here related for the commendation of their faith The first is Subduing of Kingdomes which serues chiefly for the commendation of the faith of the foure Iudges there named and of Dauid For as wee may read in the bookes of Iudges and of Samuel all these subdued Kingdoms as the Canaanites Iudg. 4. the Midianites Iudg. 6. the Philistims Iudg. 15. and 16. 2. Sam. 8.1 the Ammonites Iudg. 11. Moabites Aramites 2. Sam. 8.2.6 Now how did they ouercome and subdue them The Text saith by faith which wee must not not thus vnderstand as though onely by the very acte of faith they subdued kingdoms But the meaning of the holy Ghost is that they beleeued the promises which God made vnto them of deliuering these kingdomes into their hands and according to their faith God accomplished his promises vnto them and so they subdued Kingdomes by faith In this worke of faith we may learne two things first that it is lawfull for Christians in the newe Testament to make warre for that which may be done in faith is lawfull for Gods seruants but warre may bee made in faith for these seruants of God subdue kingdomes in warre and that by faith and therefore it is lawfull for Christians vpon iust cause to make warre The Anabaptists of Germany say It is not lawfull for a Christian vnder the Gospel to carry a weapon or to make warre But this one place of scripture if there were no moe is alone sufficient to prooue the lawfulnesse of warre vnder the Gospel if it be vsed according to Gods will word When the Souldiers came to Iohn Baptist and asked him What they should doe hee bids them not leaue off their calling but this Do violence to no man neither accuse any falsly and be content with your wages Luk. 3.14 And our Sauiour Christ reporteth of a Centurion which was captaine of a Band when he came to haue his sonne healed that hee had not found such faith in Israel And hee was not a Centurion onely afore he beleeued but euen afterward when Christ commended his faith yet did he not dislike his calling The like may be said of Cornelius Act. 10. All which shew plainely that vpon iust causes Christians may lawfully make warre Ob. 1. But to defend their opinioÌ„ they obiect som places of scripture as Mat. 5.39 Resist not euill saith Christ therefore say they a man may not wear a weapon nor vse a sword lest those make him to resist and so to breake this commandement of Christ. Ans. That place must bee vnderstood of
gathered it out of the Stories and Records of men which howsoeuer they bee not now extant yet in his dayes in the Primitiue Church were extant knowen and approoued Neither must this seeme strange vnto vs for the spirit of God in the olde Testament speaking of men hath oftentimes reference and relation therein to humane Writings as this phrase The rest of the actes of such and such are they not written in the bookes of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iuda and Israell so often vsed in the bookes of Kings and Chronicles doth euidently declare Nowe those bookes of Chronicles were not parcelles of holy Scripture but ciuill or ecclesiasticall Stories like to our bookes of Martyrs and Chronicles 2. Timothie chapter 3. verse 8 Saint Paul saith Iannes and Iambres resisted Moses Nowe in the booke of Exodus wee shall not finde the Sorcerers that withstoode Moses once named And Saint Iude maketh mention of a Prophecie of Enoch Iude verse 14 which in all the olde Testament is not recorded and it is like that Moses was the first Penne-manne of holie Scripture Whence then had these Apostles these things Answere No doubt the holy Ghost might reueale such things vnto them though they had beene vnknowen in those times but it is more probable that the Apostles had them out of some Iewish Writers or records then extant and approued among the Iewes So Paul preaching to the Athenians alledgeth the saying of Aratus an Athenian Poet For wee are his generation And to the Corinthians he propoundeth a sentence of Menander Euill words corrupt good manners 1. Cor. 15. And to Titus hee alledgeth Epimenides a Cretian Poet The Cretians are alwaies liers euill beasts slowe bellies Titus 1.12 Now whereas the spirit of God taketh these sentences out of the writings of men we may learne that to read the writings of men is not vnlawfull but a thing of good vse to the seruāts of God But wheras som would hence proue that their authority may be alledged ordinarily at euery mans pleasure in the publique ministerie it hath no ground in these places For first the Apostles were so guided by the holy Ghost in their publique Ministerie that they could not erre but no Ministers at this day haue such a priuiledge Secondly the Apostles alledging or recording the sayings of men in their Sermons or Writings did thereby sanctifie them and make them to become a part of holy Scripture This no ordinarie Minister can doe but let him alledge a humane testimonie tenne thousand times yet still it remaines humane and is not Gods word Thirdly they that would warrant their practice in alledging humane testimonies in their Sermons by the Apostles ought to follow the Apostles in their manner of allegations Now the Apostles were so sparing heerein that in many bookes wee shall not finde one for there are onely three in all the new Testament Againe the Apostles did it without ostentation for the names of the Authors are concealed whence they tooke their testimonies And lastly the Apostles did it vpon weighty cause and iust occasion to wit when they were perswaded in conscience that those testimonies would conuince the consciences of their hearer in those things for which they alledged them Now how farre many differ from the Apostles in their allegations let the world iudge Yet before wee come to speake of these examples of faith in particular there are sundry generall points to be handled In the three former verses the spirit of GOD hath sette downe the prosperous successe of beleeuers through faith But heere hee comes to acquaint vs with a different estate of other beleeuers vnder greeuous persecutions and torments euen vnto most cruell and bitter kindes of death From this which the Apostle heere obserueth wee may take a view of the state of Gods Church and people heere in this world For GOD vouchsafeth peace and prosperous successe to some as a iust reward of faith and obedience but others must want the comfort of outward peace and welfare and vndergoe most greeuous trials and persecutions Looke as there is a continuall interchange betweene day and night and the one doth constantly follow the other so as it is one while day and an other while night so is it with the Church of God and with true beleeuers in this world somtime they haue peace and prosperity and this continueth not alway but another while they are in trouble miserie and persecution To make this point more plaine because it is of some importance wee may beholde the truth of it in the Church of GOD from the beginning Adams familie was GODs Church and therein was first notable peace but when GOD accepted Abels sacrifice and refused Cains then persecution began and Cain slew his brother Abell Abraham is called the Father of the faithfull and his family in those daies was the true Church of God wherin we may notably see this changeable estate for Gods calls him out of Charran to dwell in the land of Canaan Exod. 12.1 10. But within a while the family was so great in the Land that hee was faine to goe downe into Egypt to soiourne there And there the Lord blessed him exceedingly and inriched him so greatly that he became a mighty Prince able to encounter with the Kings of those nations in battell after his returne to Canaan Exod. 14. The Israelites Gods chosen people were 400. yeare in bondage in Egypt but at the appointed time God gaue them a glorious deliuerance and yet they were tried in the wildernes 40. yeares after which time they were plāted safely in the fruitfull Land of Canaan a Land that flowed with milke and hony And there also the Church of God was in this case sometime in prosperitie and otherwhiles in aduersity for when it was ruled by Iudges as in that booke appeares for ten twenty thirty or fourty yeares together the Israelites for their sinnes were in subiection bondage to the nations about them as the Moabites the Philistims the Ammonites c. Yet then when they cried to God he sent them some mighty iudge to deliuer them for so long time againe This was the interchangeable estate of the Church all the time of the Iudges And afterward when it was gouerned by Kings it was in the same case for one while God gaue them good Kings who would aduance religion and maintaine and cherish the Priests and Prophets of God and for their time the Church prospered But otherwhiles for their sinnes God would send them wicked Princes which persecuted the Prophets and the godly in the Land This is plaine in the bookes of the Kings and Chronicles After the raign of good king Iosias cam the captiuity into Babylō 70 years expired the Lord by K. Cyrus returned thē againe After their returne they were one while in peace and another while in distresse as we may see in the bookes of Ezra and Nehemias but aboue all other that persecution of Antiochus Epiphanes was