supreme and generall of which we now speake should be able to compose all questionable matters The Scripture cannot determine this important point on our beliefe Whether the Ghospell of S. Iohn the Epistles of S. Paul or any other volume of holy Writ be the Canon of Scripture or no. If in these weightiest causes it is needfull to recurre to another Tribunall in matters of lesse moment wholy as needfull 9. The Iudge of Controuersyes ought to be so cleare and facile as all both learned and vnlearned might haue accesse vnto it easily vnderstand it the Scriptures are hard darke hidden Hidden not only to the illiterate Aug l 12. Confess c 14. Ambroseepist 44. and vulgar sort but to the great and deepest Clarkes Hidden to S. August who crieth out O the wonderfull depth of thy speaches c. O the wonderfull depth HiddeÌ„ to S. Ambrose calling it A sea contayning most profound senses the depth of Propheticall riddles Hidden to Clemens Alexandrinus to which Clemens Alex l. 6. strom Psal 13. Orig. hom 11. in Exo. Iraen l. 2. cap 47. Russiaus l. 11. List c. 9. Apoc. 5. v. â—â— Ezeeh. 2. v. 9. 2. Petâ—â—â—â—t v. 16. he elegantly applieth those words of the psaâ—me Darke is the water in the clouds of the ayre Hidden to Origen to Irenaus to S. Basill to S. Gregory Nazianzen who being both rarely accomplished in al humane literature after 13. yeares study heerin would not aduenture as Russinus testiâ—yeth to interpret the same but according to the rule and vniforme consent of their forefathers They knew it was that hidden and concealed booke which S. Iohn describeth to be clasped with seauen seales which Ezechiel tearmeth the enrolled volume written within and without They knew S. Peter auouched certayne thinges hard to vnderstand in the Epistles of S. Paul which the vnlearned deprane as other Scriptures to their owne perdition If certayne things in his Epistles how many in other bookes How many in the whole Scripture Notwithstanding our illuminated Adâ—ersaries VVhitak cont l. q. 3. cap. 3. Aug. l. 2. de doctrin Christ c. 6. epist â—â—9 de side oper c. 15. 16. Ambrâ—s epist 44. Hier. ep Vincent Liriâ—â— c. 2. to whome the holy Ghost hath disclosed all his heauenly secrets find no such difficulty no prouerbe in it Yet to smooth the Fathers speaches they answere That the mysteries therein treated are darke and obscure the discourse easy the text cleare the sentence plaine But S. Augustine as deeply enlightned as any of them affirmeth The stile manner of enduing to be hard the discourse places hard The sentences saith S. Ambrose hard The text sayth S. Hierome hath a shell to be broken before we can tast the sweetnes of the kernell The Hebrew phrase hard the Tropes and figures hard Hard and difficult by reason of sundry and manisold senses it begetteth For which cause alone Vincentius Lirinensis necessarily requireth some other Iudge demaunding in his Golden Treatise against the prophane nouelties of Heresies why to the Canon of Scripture which is perfect and of it selfe sufficient inough for all thinges it behoueth to adde the authority and explication of the Church Because sayth he all take not holy Scripture by reason of her depth in one and the self same sense but her speaches some interprete one way some another In so much as there may seeme to be puked out as many senses as men For Nonatus doth expound one way and Sabellius another way otherwise Donatus otherwise Arâ—â—s Eunomius Macedonius otherwise Photinus Apollinaris c. Therefore very necessary it is for Tertul. in praescript the manifold turnings and by-wayes of errours that the line of Propheticall and Apostolicall interpretation be leuelled according to the square of Ecclesiastic all and Catholike sense or vnderstanding Because Tertullian sayth The sense adulterated is a like perilous as the stile corrupted Yea much more perilous in that it may be more easily wrested more variously turned more hardly espyed But to proceed 10. The Iudge of Controuersyes ought so to determine and deliuer his mind in all ambiguous cases as the partyes in strife may euidently know when they heare his censure whether they be cast or quit condemned or assoyled in respect of his verdict But neither Scripture or the holy Ghost as he speaketh by Scripture is euer able to pronounce such sentence Or if it can as Gretser a famous Grets act colloq Ratisbon sess 2. fol. 110. writer of the Society of Iesus pithily vrged in the coÌ„ference at Ratisbone let it now speake and pronounce vs guilty Heere sayth he we Catholikes and Protestants both appeale to the high Tribunall of Scripture heere we stand in the sight of the sacred Bible in the presence of the holy Ghost If he be Iudge as he precisely speaketh by Scripture alone let it giue sentence let it say Thou Iames Gretser are cast in thy cause Thou * This was the name of the Heretike Respondent Hailbronner hast gotten the victory And I will presently yield vnto you But if it cannot execute this iudiciall act if by reading hearing or perusing his sentence we cannot perceaue whome he condemneth how can it challenge the high prerogaâ—iue and doome of Iudgment Which argument he confirmed with another a like inuincible as the former For wheras Grets in Act colloq Ratisbon sâ—ss to sol 120. Protestants mantaine that the voice of God as vttered in Scripture giueth plaine sentence of condemnation against heresyes and errours thus he disputeth on the contrary side No guilty persons repaire to that Iudge by whome they are euidently sufficiently condemned But all Heretikes are guilty persons yet boldly appeale to the sentence of holy Scripture Therefore the Scripture 〈◊〉 that Iudge by whom they are euidently sufficiently 〈◊〉 What reply could Hunnine the Aug. l. 2. cont Max. Aug. orat in ps 10. Mat. 15. v. 11. Responâ—â—â—â— make to this Not any Vnlesse which S. Augustine obiected against Maximinus the Arian By talking much and nothing to the purpose he might be counted able to answere who was not able to hold his 〈◊〉 11. In sine the Scripture though in it selfe most holy yetby reason of her sublimity depth and variety of senses hath bin partly through the weaknes partly through the malice pride and presumption of men the roote of strifes the spring of debates the occasion of many detestable and blasphemous errours rather then the stay attonement or subuersion of them Wherupon S. Augustine compareth Scripture to a cloud which often tymes out of the same words raineth showres of snares to the wicked showres of fortillty fruitfulites in the Lust. As he exemplifieth in that sentence of S. Mattheu which our ProtestaÌ„ts abuse to the liberty of their diet and breach of Ecclesiasticall fast Not that which entreth the mouth defileth a man but that which proceedeth out of the mouth The Sinneâ— sayth he heareth this and he
as they ought to do which ignorance of theirs partly proceedeth from the weaknes of our Vnderstanding partly from the depth and sublimity of the misteryes proposed partly also from the vnsearchablenes of Gods wayes and secrecy of his vnacquainted motions of which Iob sayd If God come vnto me I shall not see him and if he depart away from me I shall not vnderstand it Wherfore Iob. 9. â—â— Field lib. 4. cap. 7. seeing No man as M. Field doth witnes proueth a thing doubtfull by that which is as much doubted of as it selfe No man can be assured of the true sense and signification of Scripture by the internal working of God in his hart which is as much to be doubted of and alike hard to be discerned as the very sense it selfe and meaning of the Scripture 23. Secondly we are counsailed Not to belieue euery 2â— Ioâ— 4. â— spirit but to proue the spirits if they be of God But if the spirits must be brought to the touch-stone of triall if they must be approued and iudged by some other well knowne vndoubted authority they are not themselues the triall and Iudge of our differences Nay suppose we were assured of the inspiration assured of the holy Ghost speaking in our harts yet that speach is inuisible that motion inuisible that iudgement inuisible it cannot heare the causes examine the arguments or pronounce any desinitiue VVhitaâ—â—â— adu Stâ—pl l. 2. â— 6. sentence at all by which the contentious may be silenced the innocent acquited the guilty condemned The testimony of the spirit sayth Whitaker being priuate and secret is vnfit to teach or refell others if vnfit to teach vnfit to refell then wholy vnfit wholy vnable to cleare doubts decide Controuersyes or end the quarrells of the paâ—tyes in strife 24. Thirdly The rule and guide of our beliefe ought to haue some neere affinity and connexion with that which it guideth The measure as the Philosophers teach must be alwayes proportionable to the thing measured But the inward inspiration hath no such affinity and proportion with our Catholike fayth because that is secret this publique that particuler this vniuersall that meerly interiour and working only in the hart this exteriour Hooker of Ecclesi Policy lib. 1. sect 14. lib. 2. sect 8. lib. 3. sect 8. pag. 149. 147. lib. 2. sect 7 pag. 116. VVhitak aduers Staplet lib. 2. c. 4. pag. 330. p. 29â— ZaÌ„cb in his confess cap. 1. Brent in prolegom Kemnit in exam Conc. Tri. Aug. l. con ep FuxdaÌ„ c. 5 de vtil cre â—en c. 14. also and professed by the word of mouth In so much as that cannot possibly be a competent rule or proportionable measure to mete or square out the misteryes of our sayth Fourthly M. Hooker a Protestant of no smal account constaÌ„tly auoucheth with whoÌ„ M. Whitak other sectaryes heerin agree that the outward letter sealed with the inward witnesse of the spirit is not a sufficient warrant for euery particuler man to iudg and approue the Scripture to be Canonicall the ghospel itself to be the ghospell of Christ but the authority of gods Church as he acknowledgeth is necessarily required therunto Therefore neither are they sufficient to iudge of the sense or meaning of the Scripture for that saith S. Augustin which we obey and belieue testifying this book to be the Ghospell the same must we belieue witnessing this to be the sense of the Ghospel because it were no lesse then madnes to repaire to the Catholike Church for the approbation of Gods word run to her rebells for the sense of his word to her publick censure for that their priuat iudgment for this yea a meer madnes to thinke that euery Sectary should be indued with a diuine spirit to interpret holy writ and that the whole Church of Christ all her pastours and doctors ioyntly vnited should be depriued of the same 25. Fyfthly The ordinary way by which God instructeth vs in matters of belief is by publik preaching Fayth saith S. Paul is by hearing it is to be receaued from the lipps of the preists from the mouth of Saints Ad Rom. 10. vers 17. Malae 2 Luc. 1. Ad Ephes 4. from the pastors and teachers whome Christ hath appoynted in his Church and not from priuate reading of Scripture ioyned with the secret inspiration For that noble man of Aethiopia the Eunuch disigeÌ„tly perused the oracles of God and wanted not without doubt the inward operation of the holy Ghost being so religious as he had bin on pilgrimage at Hierusalem to adore and Act. 8. v. 30. 3â— so deuout as he read the Scriptures riding in his chariot yet when S. Philip asked him Trowest thou that thou vnderstandest the things that thou readest he said And how can I vnlesse some man shew me Therfore besides the outward reading inward working a publike interpreter and expoundeâ— is necessary for the true vnderstanding of holy writ 26. Sixthly The standing to the Iudgment of the hidden Spirit is the very roote of dissention and fountaine of discord in the vain chalengers and boasters therof it affoardeth euery sectary his priuate weights his particuler forge to coyne and allow what doctrine he pleaseth it licenseth the members to controle their heads the schollers to contradict and chang their masters Tertul. de praescript cap. 420 principles which Tertullian reproueth in the Heretiks of his dayes saying That hath bin lawfull to the Valentinians which was lawfull for Valentinus that to the Marcionites which to Marcion of their own accord to alter and innouate their belief Of their owne accord he sayth because the teaching of the holy Ghost is vniforme and the same he could not be author of such chops and changes of such schismes diuisions And yet they al pretended as our Ghospellers August tract 4â— in Ioanâ— Laâ—â—h ep ad Antwerp tom 2. Germ. Ieâ— fol. 10â— do his heauenly illumination There are innumerable sayth S. Augustine who do not only boast that they are Videntes or Prophets but will seeme to be illuminated or enlightned by Christ but are Heretikes And Luther the ring-leader of Protestants conformably writeth There is no Asse in this tyme so soâ—rish and blockish but will haue the dreames of his owne head and his opinion accepted for the instinct of the Holy Ghost and himselfe esteemed as a Prophet Whence it commeth as he immediatly before complayneth That there be as many sects Osiand in confut Script Melancth contra ipsum edit l. cont Nicticor Aug. ep 222. ad CoÌ„sent and Religions among vs as there be men That such variances arise betweene the professours of the same Religion as Osiander a Protestant telleth vs That among the Confessionists only there were twenty different opinions concerning the formall cause of iustification and that euery one is affirmed to be deduced and proued out of the word of God by the holy Ghost surely as they imagined secretly
touching Christ so high so inexplicable so farre aboue the reach of the Iews were not necessary if not for euery particuler member yet for the saluation of the body of the Church 8. Moreouer to draw to some particuler issue First to belieue the Scriptures themselues the Ghospell of S. Iohn the Epstls of S. Paul al the books of holy Writ is necessary to saluation which notwithstanding we only know as S. Augustine teacheth by the Tradition of the Church Secondly to belieue imbrace the true sense of Scripture is necessarie to saluation which as S. Ambrose S. Ambser 25. 34. Iero Epist ad Mar. Cyp. lib. 1. Epist 12. Ierome S. Cyprian accord we are vndoubtedly taught by the Traditions of the Church Thirdly to beleeue the baptisme of Infants Fourthly the pepetuall virginity of our Blessed Lady Fistly the procession of the holy Ghost from the Father and the Son Sixtly The celebration of the Feast of Easter vpon a Sunday Seauenthly the Father to be vnbegotten Eightly the Sonne to be consubstantiall is necessary to saluation and yet where do we learne them but from the Traditions of the Church For although the substance of some of these points be Rein. c. 2. diuis 2. p. 51. 52. darkly insinuated in Holy Writ as M. Reynolds answereth to the latter instances and others reply to the former yet the precise termes and cleare explication the Aug. Ep. 174 â—â—n Max. Ari subuersion of errour and light of our profession we read not expressed as S. Augustine argueth in the diuine Scriptures 9. Lastly to be able to conuince heretikes is necessary to the saluation of the Church yet Tertullian and Vincentius Field l. citato Euseb l. 5. histor Lirinensis with whom D. Field also closeth herein shew that they cannot be refuted but by Tradition By which the same Tertullian repressed the Marcionists Irenaeus the Valentinians S. Cyprian the Nouatians Epiphanius the Apostolikes S. Hierome the Heluidians S. Augustine the Donatists and S. Athanasius which other Doctours of his Epiphani haer â—1 Beza con Trinitar Vvhitgift cont Cart. Barlow in the conference p. 10 13. p. 68. Beza epist Theol 8â— p. 334. 335. tyme the Arians Yea the Sectaries themselues at this day to refell their Aduersaries runne to the supply of vnwritten Traditions Beza against the Trinitaries Whitgift against Cartwight our Protestant ministers in the conference before the Kings Maiesty against the Puritans where by Tradition they proue Confirmation Absolution the signe of the Crosse in Baptisme and the like Beza addeth that without the tearmes of Essence Person Nature Property c. borrowed from men the blasphemous Arian Nestorian and Eutichian heresies cannot sufficiently be reproued In fine all you who professe the exact following of the written word against the same written word imbrace the Tradition and practise of the Church The word of God commaundeth vs to abstaine from bloud and strangled meates which all Christians obserued fot some hundred yeares togeather you contrary to the word of God contrary to the primitiue Church Act. 15. v. 20. Exod. 31. v. 17. Iere. 17. v. 24. Field l. 4. cap. 20. presume to feed on these forbidden meates only warranted by our Tradition The word of God commaundeth Saturday to be the Saboath-day of our Lord and to be kept holy as an euerlasting couenant you without any precept of Scripture to vse D. Fields owne words chaunge it into Sunday only authorized by our Tradition 10. Diuers English Puritans oppose against this point that the obseruation of Sunday is proued out of Scripture Act. â—0 vers 7. Out of the acts of the Apostles where it is said In the first of the Saboath when we were assembled to breake bread out of the first to the Corinthians In the Saboath let euery one of you put apart with himselfe out the Apocalips I was in spirit â— Cor. 16. v. 2. in the Dominicall day Haue they not spon a faire thrid in quoting these places If we should produce no better for Purgatory prayer for the dead inuocation of Saints the like they might haue good cause indeed to laugh Apoc. cap. â— v. 10. vs to scorne for where is it written that these were festiuall dayes in which those meetings were kept Or where is it ordayned they should be alwayes hereafter obserued Or which is the summe of all where is it decreed that the obseruation of our Lords day or of the first of the Saboath should abrogate abolish the sanctifying of the Saboath which God coÌ„manded euerlastingly to be kept Not one of these is expressed in the written word Notwithstanding such stuffe as this others bring to proue the Baptisme of infants also out of Scripture to wit Circumcision was ministred to infants but Baptisme succedeth in the place of Circumcision therefore Baptisme ought to be ministred vnto them Sure a subtile kind of reasoning Calu. l. 4. instis c. 16. §. 16. §. 6. 7. by which it followeth that women ought not to be baptized nor children neyther before nor after the eight day But women sayth Caluin are of the sanctified seed of Israel they are comprehended in the couenant made to Abraham They are so And are now in the new law conteyned therein as much as they were in the old How chaunceth it then they may not in these dayes be made heires of Gods promise without the Sacrament of Baptisme as well as in those without the seale of Circumcision if you haue no better auctority for baptizing female infants then the abrogated precept of Circumcision which neuer could oblige their sexe at all 11. M. Field wisely coÌ„sidering the force of these replyes Field l. 4. cap. 20. weake oppositions of his fellow-Ghospellers leauing them coÌ„plyeth with vs so far in this point as if the dregs of their foule ingredients had not filled his Pen he might haue beene graced with the name of a Catholike writer We admit sayth he first the bookes of Scripture Canonicall as deliuered by Tradition secondly the chiefe heads of Christian doctrine contained in the Creed thirdly the forme of Christian dostrine and distinct explication of many thinges somewhat obscurely contained in Scripture c. fourthly the continued practise of such thinges as are not expressed in Scripture fifthly such obseruations as are not particulerly commanded in Scripture Among these and the former he reckoneth the fast of Lent the Baptisme of Infants and Obseruation of our Lords day he addeth also some few leaues after That many other thinges there are which the Apostles doubtles deliuered by Tradition Such is the force of truth as is often breaketh forth out of the mouths of her enemyes 12. Well then if the sense and explication of many obscure places of Scripture if these chiefe heads and articles of our beliefe if diuers practices obseruations and sundry other things not decreed in Scripture are to be learned by Tradition euen by the testimony of
Traditions Both false depositions both wrongfully imposed crimes A wrongfull crime it is that we traduce the Scriptures as vnperfect We graunt with Vincentius Lyrinensis Vincen. Lyâ—â—nen cap. 2. that the Canon of Scripture is perfect a perfect light and lanterne to our feet a perfect rule and direction of sayth if as he noteth the line of Propheticall and Apostolical interpretation be leuelled according to the square of the Ecclesiastical and Catholike sense As great a wrong that we cleaue to humane and vncertaine Traditions We anker on such as are diuine certaine and infallible authentically warranted by the rules himselfe approueth to descend from Christ or the Church his holy and vndoubted Spouse 17. A like wrongfull crime M. Sparkes fastneth vpon Sparks p. 82. 83. vs when he sayth That we preferre the authority of the Church the wife before Christ the husband that we make the written word of God inferiour in authority to the Church and to haue his Canonicall credit from thence Sure you are as Salomon censureth a guilfull witnesse who furnish your cause Prouerb cap. 14. Testis fidelis non mentitur Profert mendaciâ—â— dolosus testis Io. 4 3. Reg. 3. with such shamefull lyes When many belieued in Christ induced by the speach of the Samaritan woman was her authority prefeâ—â—ed before Christ When King Salomon decreed the infant for which the two harlots contended to belong to her whose bowells were moued at the sentence of his death did he make her therby the mother of the child or declare her to be the mother who was the mother indeed So when we imbrace Gods written word by the externall approbation and testimony of the Church answerable to that of S. Augustine Ego Euangelio non crederem c. I would not belieue the Ghospell vnles the authority of the Church moued me thereunto we extoll not the Aug con ep Fund cap. 5. voice of the Spouse before the voyce of Christ. Nor the Church when it defyneth any booke to be Canonicall Scripture doth giue it thereby diuine and Canonicall credit Bils part 4. pag â—81 Rem cont 1. pag. 619 6â—9 Field l. 4 Stapleton cont 5. de poâ— Eccles quaest â— but commaundeth that to be receaued by others as Canonicall which hath in itselfe Canonicall authority 18. Lastly our Aduersaryes arme themselues with the weapons of the Fathers and M. Bilson marshalleth six togeather in a rancke S. Athanasius S. Chrysostome S. Cyrill S. Ambrose S. Augustine and Vincentius who conformably mantaine the sufficiency of Scripture in all necessary points of fayth Many other to the like purpose are alleadged by M. Reynolds and M. Field To all which I answere First that the Scripture is taught to containe all things necessary to saluation as the vniuersal ground Cyril l. 12. c. vltimo Chrys ho. 3. in 2. Thes 2. Vincent aduersus prophan hae nouit c. 2. Bafil ep 80 Cyril de rect fide ad Regi Hieron in Psal 86. Aug. l 3. con lit Petil Tert. lib. cont haer Athan. l. cont Gent. Aug. l. 2. cap. 9. Rein in his conf c. 2. diuis 2. Aug. l. 10. de Gen. ad lit c. 23. Bils 4. par p. 582. 583. Field in appen 2. p. §. 8. Aug. l. 4. c. 24. Dio. l. Eâ—c bier c. vlt. Orig. in 12. Leuit. bom 8. in cap. 6. epist ad Rom. seed or roote from which whatsoeuer we belieue may either mediately or immediatly be gatheted as S. Cyril and S. Chrysostome auouch Secondly as it teacheth and directeth vs to the authority of the Church and doctrine of her Pastours by which euery point is of may be particulerly and clearely explained Thus Vincentius and others are to be interpreted Thirdly it is affirmed to containe all thinges and that nothing besides the Scripture is to be admitted to wit no priuate customes or particuler Traditions not agreeable or repugnant to the writen word as S. Basil S. Cyrill S. Hierome S. Augustines meaning is in his booke against Petilian Fourthly the Fathers often acknowledge the sufficiency of Scripture to conclude euen in plaine and expresse wordes certaine maine principles of our fayth as that God created all thinges of nothing of which Tertullian against Hermogenes That Christ is the true God That Idolls are not God of which Athanasius writeth Or they teach it clearely comprehends the chiefe articles of our Creed and ten Commandments of which S. Augustine only speaketh in his booke of Christian doctrine so often quoted by M. Reynolds 19. Besides which many other things are necessary to be imbraced as by Fathers Reason and Scripture I haue already conuinced and therfore will close vp my whole discourse with one or two sentences of S. Augustine and Origen S. Augustine sayth The custome of the Church in baptizing Infants is not at all to be belieued vnles it were an Apostolicall Tradition M. Bilson and M. Field haue no other shift to trauerse the euidence of this place then by accusing it of some secret corruption But what was he corrupted also in his booke of Baptisme against the Donatists where he repeateth it againe Was Dionysius was Origen corrupted too who sayth The Church receaued a Tradition from the Apostles to minister Baptisme also to Infants Was this other passage of S. Augustine corrupted likewise Aug. de Bap. con Donat. l. 5â— c. 23. It is an article of faith to belieue this Baptisme to be valide Orig. in c. 3. ad Tit. teste Pamphilo in Apol. prâ— Orig. of the validity of Baptisme ministred by Heretikes The Apostles commanded nothing hereof yet the custome which was opposed herein against Cyprian is to bebelieued to proceed from their Tradition euen as many things be which the whole Church holdeth and are therfore well belieued to be commanded of the Apostles although they be not written I may then conclude with Origen He is an Heretike who professeth himself to beleiue in Christ yet belieueth otherwise of the truth of Christian fayth then the definition of Ecclesiastic all Tradition containeth 20. Notwithstanding to reproue our Aduersaries and satisfy all indifferent Readers that we fly not to the succour of Traditions for want of proofes out of holy writ I will vphold the right of our cause in euery ensuing Controuersy as I promised in my Preface by the irreprouable testimonies of Gods written word THE THIRD CONTROVERSY WHEREIN The Reall Presence is maintayned against D. Bilson and D. Sparkes CHAP. I. AS the vnspeakable riches of Gods infinite loue in no mystery of our fayth appeareth more bountâ—full then in the true and reall Fresence of Christs sacred Body conteyned in the holy Eucharist so the vnsatiable malice of our deadly enemy no where more hatefully bewrayeth it selfe then in seeking to abolish this most blessed dreadfull and admirable Sacrament For besids the Armenians Messalians Grecians and Aquarians Althons de Cast l. 9. adu haer v Eucharist Aug. de haer Epiph haer 26. whose errours
humane iudgment more then of any other mystery of our redemption to which notwithstanding they are equally vnknowne 6. Further you teach M. Abbot that by ordinary fayth euery man is made priuy to his election and yet that no See Abbot cap. 3 and VVhitak vt infra man can be certaine of his fayth vnles he be sure he be one of the elect For true fayth in your fancyes is only graunted to the elect but by fayth to know election and by election fayth is to wheele about without end of knowing and neuer come to the full point of knowledg It is to run the circle you reprehend in others Notwithstanding what entrance I pray doe you make which is primò cogniâ—um the first knowne in this circled round Do you first ascend into the Counsails of God there see your names written in the booke of life and from thence discouer the beames of your beliefe or first see your true beliefe and thereby mount vnto the knowledge of your election A question which much perplexeth the learned Protestants For Whitaker clymeth the former way and VVhiâ—â—k l. 8. aduers Duraeum fol. 620. by assurance of election receaueth the certificate of saluation and beliefe saying Whosoeuer do certainely know themselues to be elect and predestinate they are certaine of the remission of â—heir sinnes and of their saluation c. Therfore the Protestant must first know that he is enrolled in the number of Calu. l. 3. instit c. 24. § 4. reproueth VVhitakâ—â—â— answere His Maiesty with the Bishops at Hampton Court reproue the same f. 29. 30. the predestinate before he can know that he is incorporated by remission of sinnes wrought by Fayth in the coÌ„gregation of the faythfull which clyming of Whitakers Caluin condemneth as a dangerous tentation and peruerse desire of seeking to know election out of the way I call iâ— seeking out of â—he way sayth he when a wreâ—ched man enterpriseâ—h to breake into the hidden secrets of the wisedome of God and to pierce euen to the highest Eternity to vnderstand what is determined of himselfe at the iudgment seate of God for then he throweth himself headlong to be swallowed vp in the depth of the vâ—measurable deuouring piâ— then he wrappeth himselfe with iâ—â—â—merable snares such as he cannot wind out of then he ouerwhelmeth hâ—mselfe with the bottomles gulfe of blind darcknesse 7. Therefore Caluin and M. Abbot compasse about Calu. l. 3. instit c. 24. §. 4. 5 6. Abbot cap. 3. sect 12. fol. â—â—7 the second way and by ordinary fayth trauaile to ascend into the bosome of Gods secrets and assure themselues of their election but this is already refuted by S. Paul S. Augustine and S. Bernard that God by fayth reuealeth other mysteryes but sealeth vp this and reserueth it still vnknowne concealeth it to himselfe as a depth vnsearchable Likewise your speciall fayth is nothing els but an assured affiance of your hart which certifyeth you of the remission of your sinnes of your adoption in Christ of your election and predestination But as the obiect according Aug. 4. de Gen. ad lit cap. 32. to S. Augustine goeth before the knowledge thereof so your predestination mouing you to beleeue precedeth euen in respect of you the affiance of your hart by which you belieue Howbeit if you ignorantly suppose that true fayth is knowne by it selfe and leadeth you to the obiect of election which thereby is knowne although it be a foolery vnworthy to be refuted yet I shall cast so much tyme away by and by as to disproue that foolery August de dono perse l. 2. c. 22. Chrys ho. 11 in â— 3. ad Philip. 1. Cor. 10. v 12. Ibidem c. 9. Greg. ep â—8â— quae est l. 6. ad Gâ—â—g Cubiâ—ul Aug. Bernar ser 2. in octau Pen. ser 1. in Sept. Hier. l. 2. cont Pâ—lâ— 8. My custome is after the authorityes of holy Scriptures to alleadge by themselues the testimonyes of Fathers but now besides those I haue heere interlaced shall add heereafter I will content my selfe with these few First with S. Augustine Serue our Lord with feare and reioyce to him with trembling because of euerlasting life which God not lying hath promised to the children of promise c. No man can be secure vntil this life be finished Then with S. Chrysostome Of resurrection we cannot be confident and secure to which purpose he bringeâ—h in S. Paul speaking thus I acknowledge my selfe to haue beleeued in Christ in the power of his resurrection that I haue byâ— mâ—de partaker of his sufferings conformable to his deaâ—h notwithstanding after all these things I am noâ— secure In proofe whereof he alleadgeth these two sentences He that seemeth to stand let him looke he do not fall and I feare so S. Chrysostome readeth least whilest I haue preached to others I become a reprobate my selfe With him S. Gregory S. Bernard and S. Hierome agree who excellently corroborate and confirme the same Moreouer S. Hierome sayth I contaminated with the filth of all kind of sins Hier. ep ad Florent citatur ep 5. in Gloss Hieron in vita â—ius day and night expect with trembling to render the Last farthing the tyme in which it shal be sayd to me Hierome come forth So S. Hilarion and the rest of the Saints stood in feare and dread not presuming to challenge the security of Protestants against which I also wage warre by the strength of reasons THE SECOND CHAPTER WHEREIN The former Presumption is refuted by Reason and whatsoeuer the Aduersary obiecteth against vs is remoued FIRST al Sectaries teach that nothing is to be beleeued as an article of fayth VVhitak l. 8. aduer Duraeum fol. 618. 619. Abbot c. 3. sect 2. f. 262. 263. 264. 265. loan 3. v. 15. Mar. 1. v. 15. Mar. 16. v. 15. 16. but what is either coÌ„teyned in Scripture or by manifest deduction is gathered from thence But where is it written in Scripture that Richard Field Doctour of Diuinity or Robert Abbot Titulary Bishop of Salisbury haue their sins remitted shall infallibly be saued Whitaker Abbot make answere that in these generall propositioÌ„s Whosoeuer beleeueth shall be saued repent and belieue the Ghospell and yee shal be saued is inuolued Richard Field belieue thou shalt be saued Robert Abbot repent and beleeue and thou shalt be saued Therefore although the Scripture nameth not any in particuler yet it affoardeâ—h euery one a sufficient warrant that by his repenting and beleeuing he shal be saued But this warrant is conditionall as M. Abbot there confesseth and this condition is if he rightly repent if he righly belieue which Abbot ibiâ—â—â— are acts depending of Gods grace and his freewill no way comprehended in that generall assurance nor by any infallible meanes deduced from thence therefore his certainty still wauereth in respect of these conditionall workes For although it be so that a man may
assured Hier. in c. 6. ad Gal. August tract â— 8. in epist Ioan. in psal 4. Leo hom 2. defest Pas Greg. 34. in Euang. Dionys de diuin nom cap. 7. Aug. in psal 88. Hilar. in c. â— Matt. Cypr. con Demâ—â— Aug. serm 28. de verb. Dom. Bernard serm 59. in Cant. de Euang. Septâ—â—g Pan. ser 3. ser 5 de dediâ— Eccl. Conc. Trid. sess â— â— 9. of our Christian fayth whereof S. Denis writeth or of Christs perpetuall raigne in the empire of his Church of which S. Augustine affirmeth That no man ought to preach that with trepidiation and feare of which he ought not to doubt or of the article of our Resurrection and Gods future kingdome of which S. Hilary The kingdome of heauen which our Lord professed to be in himselfe his will is that it be hoped for without any doubtfullnes c. 13. Lastly the Fathers often inculcate the infallible certainty of Gods help and concurrence on his part of his general promises of the merits of Christ of the power of the Sacraments c. and in this sense they bid vs rest assured of saluation So S. Cyprian when he sayth There is with vs a strength of hope and stedfastnes of fayth c. a soule alwayes secure of God to be our God S. Augustine To presume of Christs grace is not arrogancy but Fayth S. Bernard I know whome I haue beleeued and I am certaine or sure because he hath adopted me in great loue because he is true in his promises c. Yet this withstandeth not but that we may doubt and feare least there be some lets and impediments for want of disposition on our side which the thrice venerable Councell of Trent hath enacted in these wordes As no pious man ought to doubt of the mercy of God of the merits of Christ of the vertue and efficacy of the Sacraments so euery one whilest he considereth himselfe and his owne proper infirmity and indisposition may tremble and feare whether he be in grace or no. The soundnes of this distinction in mistructing our owne weaknes and imbecility only not the goodnes and bonity of God is worthy to be marked for thereon dependeth the whole decision of this our debate and the ignorance or inconsideration Stapleton l. 9. de â—â—â—stifiâ— c. â—â— thereof in our Aduersaryes is well obserued by M. Doctour Staplâ—ton to be the very roote and seminary of all their heresyes touching this point God giue them grace to see and humility to acknowledge it before it be too late THE XXIII CONTROVERSY DECLARETH That true Fayth or Iustice once had may be lost against D. Whitaker D. Fulke and D. Abbot CHAP. I. ANOTHER licentious or Iouinian Paradoxe which bolstreth the former presumption or vayne security of our Sectaryes is that their liuely fayth grace and righteousnes once had can neuer be extinguished or taken Fulke in c 11. ad Rom. sect 2. VVhitak in his answer to the 8. reason of M. Camp f. 236. from them He that is once the child of God and beleeueth aright is sure to continue still in his fauour whatsoeuer villanyes he after commit For he that standeth sayth Fulke by the grace of God whereof he is assured by a liuely fayth cannot fall Whitaker Fayth is either perpetuall or els it is none at al either it perseueres to the last breath or els that which is esteemed for fayth is but some fancy M. Abbot Where there is true repentance fayth iustification knowledg Abbot c. sect 10. f. 322. VVhitak contro 2. q. 5. p. 236. Fulk in c. 3. 1. Ioan. sect 5. 1. Tim. 1. v. 19. 1. Tim. 4. v. 1. 1. Tim. 6. v. 10. Apoc. c. 2. v. 4. 2. Tim. 2. v. 17. 18. Act. 8. v. 1â— VVhitak in his answere to the 1. 8. reason of M. Campian l. 8. aduers Duraeum Abbot c. 3. Fulke in c. 1. ad Tim. sect 2. Act. 8. v. 13. of God there infallibly followeth perseuerance to the end Henâ—â— they inferre That sinnes are not hurtfull to him that doth belieue that King Dauid was the sonne of God when he committed adultery But if no man can loose the fayth and consequently with them the iustification and charity he once truely inioyed what meane these words of holy Write 2. Hauing fayth and a good conscience which certaine repelling haue made shipwracke about the fayth In the last tymes certaine shall depart from the fayth The roote of all euill is couetousnes which certaine desiring haue erred from the fayth I haue against thee a few thinges both because thou hast left thy first Charity Their speach spreadeth as a canker of whome is Hymenaeus and Philetus who haue erred from the truth And of Symon Magus it is written Symon also himselfe beleeued who after notwithstanding became an Arch-heretike a reprobate and miserably perished D. Whitaker D. Abbot Fulke and their fellowes reply That neither Symon Mâ—gus nor any of the rest who fell from their fayth did euer truely beleeue with a liuely fayth but only with a fruitles dead and counterfeit Thus our Protestants The Apostles the Euangelists otherwise To whome shall I giue credit To S. Luke to S. Paul or to Fulke to Whitaker to Abbot S. Luke sayth That Symon Magus also belieued and cleaued to Philippe he matcheth him with the rest who did truly belieue and expsicateth the fruit of his true beliefe that he was astonished with admiration S. Paul blamed certaine who departed from their fayth erred from the fayth made shipwracke about the fayth which he would neuer haue done if they had only forsaken a counterfeit fayth or els shew vs any one place in the whole corpes of holy Scripture where men are commended or recorded by the holy Ghost to haue beleeued the preaching of the word with a fruitles counterfeit or reprehended for departing from a fruitles fayth And to put the matter out of doubt S. Paul againe hath these wordes It is impossible for them that were once Hebr. 6. v. 4. illuminated haue tasted also the heauenly guift and were made partaker of the holy Ghost haue moreouer tasted the good word of God and the powers of the world to come and are fallen to be renewed againe to pennance I cannot stand to exaggerate the Fulke in c. 6. ad Heb. sect 3. Calu. in idem cap. heynous glosle which Fulke and Caluin heretically frame vpon these wordes more hatefull and enormous then the impiety of the Nouatians who misconstruing the afore passage taught it impossible for them that reuolat after Baptisme into a deadly and notorions cryme to be after receaued by pennance into the lap of the Church But Fulke and his Sectaryes more cruel then they barbarously Ezech. 18. v. 21. Ezech. 33. v. 15. Ioel. 2. v. 32. Isa 55. v. 7. Ambr. l. 2. de poenit c. 4. Hier. ep ad Ocean Aug. l. 1. retract c. 19. maintaine that he who wholy falleth from his fayth
AN ANTIDOTE OR TREATISE OF THIRTY CONTROVERSIES VVith a large Discourse of the Church IN WHICH The soueraigne truth of Catholike doctrine is faythfully deliuered against the pestiferous writinges of all English Sectaryes AND In particuler against D. WHITAKER D. FVLKE D. RIYNOLDS D. BILSON D. ROBERT ABBOT D. SPARKES and D. FIELD the chiefe vpholders some of Protestancy some of Puritanisme some of both Deuided into three Partes By S. N. Doctour of Diuinity THE FIRST PART Deut. 32. vers 30. How should one be able to pursue a thousand and two put tenthousand to flight Is it not therefore because their God hath sold them and our Lord hath inclosed and made them thrall Permissu Superiorum M. DC XXII THE principall maintainers of Protestancy of whome I spake in the former page are D. BILSON and D. FIELD THE pillars of Puritanisme are D. REYNOLDS and D. SPARKES who were chosen Proctours for the Preâ—isian faction in the Conference before his Maiesty at Hampton-Court THE abbettours of both are D. WHITAKER D. FVLKE and D. ROBERT ABBOT who sometimes defend the articles of the one sometymes of the other TO THE RIGHT WORTHY STVDENTS OF THE TWO FAMOVS VNIVERSITIES OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE ARISTOTLE in penning his Morall Instructions of Arist. l. r. Eth. cap. 1. Philosophy thought all his endeauours well bestowed if he might profit as he saith any one thereby much more if Townes and Citties How happy then may I thinke my labours imployed if by these small paines I may rightly instruct some few of You not in Morall Vertues but in Diuine and Heauenly Verities not in Precepts of Manners only but in Articles of Faith in Mysteries of true Beliefe on which I will not say the ciuil Nurture or gay Deportment of the outward man but the inward Carriage Grace of the Holy Ghost the life of your Soules the loue of God and hope of all eternity dependeth By instructing You I shall cleere the beames which giue light to thousands I shall purifie the Waters and purge the Fountaine of which many must drinke You are the Seedes you are the Lights of the Kingdome you are the Mines whose treasures are to be dispensed riches of learning hereafter deriued to the whole body of the Realme Wherfore least you should both beguile others and be your selues deceiued with counterfeite drosse in lieu of true and perfect mettall I haue opened vnto you these veines of Gold with which if you couet to enrich your soules two things I request at your hands The one is not to frame an ouerweening conceit or beare too partiall Affection to the men of your own side the other to peruse this Treatise with an indifferent and single eye and with a greedy zeale of imbracing Truth from whose mouth soeuer 2. You are not I hope of Agesicles the Lacedemonian his mind who taking great pleasure to heare smooth eloqueÌ„t discourses would not intertaine Philophanes Plutarch in his Laconike Apophtheg the famous RhetoriciaÌ„ being a straÌ„ger vnto him because as Plutarch reporteth he would be Scholler only to them whose sonne he was that is he would learne of them alone amongst whom he was borne Much lesse can I thinke you bewitched with Philostorgius the Eunomian his folly who was so besotted of his Maister Eunomius as he admired his very naturall defects set the glosse of vertue on them For his faltering tongue as Nicephorus writeth he vainely Niceph. l. 12. c. 29. commended as the Key of Eloquence his flow words he prized as precious Margarites the spots and blemishes of his leaprous face what did he account them but the rarest markes and ornaments of beauty If any of you shold be infected with these bastardly humors if you would heare none but those in whose bosomes ye haue beene bred or be so farre enamoured of your first Teachers wits as to loue their errours applaud their forgeries praise the beauty of their deformed writings little hope should I haue to gaine your soules But if yee be as I trust ye are louers of truth enemies of falshood desirous of your owne saluatioÌ„ then here you may discouer that Euangelical Pearle which Maâ—â— 13. vers 4â— he that findeth selleth all that he hath to buy so rare a Iewell 3. I know the subtilty of Sathan and snare of Heretikes hath euer beene as the Rom. 16. v. 18. 2. Petr. 2. v. 3. Apostle saith By sweet speaches and benedictions to seduce the hearts of Innocents By faigned words to make merchandize of You. Their chiefest proiect and principall study is with meretricious and painted eloquence to intertaine their followers and whilest they fill their eares with delight to instill into their soules most poysoned doctrine But a great * The saying of Demosthenes mentioned by S. Aug. con Crescon Gram. l. 2. cap. 1. 1. Cor. 2. v. 1. 4. 5. ver 13. Oratour can tell you That the riches of Greece consist not in words And the Apostle pronounceth Not in loftinesse sublimity of speach not in the perswasible words of humaine wisedome are the Mysteries of Christ but in the power of God and Doctrine of the spirit Be not therefore be not I beseech you inueagled with the smooth tongue or filed stile of your flourishing Sect-maisters but coÌ„sider the matter weigh the reasons examine the proofes they alledge and you shall find such silly arguments Aug. l. 5. confes c. 2. such slender stuffe as S. Augustine espied in the eloquent and lofty discourses of Faustus Manichaeus and the rest of his crew when not regarding as he saith what gallant dish or vessell of speach but what food of knowledge he propounded vnto him not harkening to the sound of words but to the pith of matter Albeit they bragged much and promised nothing more then Truth Truth yet he discouered as he witnesseth No truth amongst Ibid. l. 3. c. 9. them nothing but Lies Vanities and vile Superstitions 4. The like shall you discerne in the Ghospellers of our time For although they vaunt of the word of God vaunt of Scriptures and Scriptures only seeme to follow Ambr. in c. 3. ep ad Titum yet because as S. Ambrose teacheth By the word of the law they impugne the law framing their priuate sense and construction to couÌ„tenance the peruersity of their minds by the authority of the law it is more then euident they follow not the Oracles of God but rather the Fancies of their owne braine the suggestion of Sathan For by peruerse interpretation as S. Hierome testifieth of â—â—ier l. â— in â— 1. ep ad Galat. the Ghospell of Christ is made the Ghospel of man or which is worse the Ghospell of the Diuell And Martiall the Poët speaketh to this purpose Quem recitas meus est â— Fidentine libellus Sed malè cùm recitas incipit esse tuus The Booke thou doest recite o Fidentine is mine Reciting it amisse it groweth to be thine 5. Secondly they
Proueth Inuocation of Saints to be lawfull against D. Reynolds D. Field and D. Fulke pag. 255. The 14. Controuersy Establisheth the lawfull worship of Images against D. Bilson and D. Reynoldes pag. 276. The 15. Controuersy Maintaineth Purgatory and Prayer for the dead against D. Field and D. Fulke pag. 296. The 2. Chapter VVherin Prayer for the dead is defended against the foresayd Doctours M. Feild and M. Fulke pag. 316. THE FIRST BOOKE THE FIRST CONTROVERSY DECLARETH That neither the Holy Scripture by it selfe nor by any meanes the Protestants do assigne can be Iudge of Controuersyes AGAINST Doctour VVhitaker Doctour Reynolds and all other Protestants CHAP. I. THe extreme miserable refuge of al guilty persons who either mistrust the equity of their cause or feare the weaknes of their owne defence hath euer been to decline the barre of indifferent tryall and cleaue to the succour of some such Tribunall as will not or cannot giue sentence against them This was the wonted fraud of all ancient Heretikes this was the retraite of the Iran l. 3. cont haer Tertul l. 8. depraescrip Basil l. de Spir. sanct cap. 27. Aug. l. 1. cont Max. VVbitak coÌ„t 1. q. 5. c. 8. Reyn. in bis coÌ„f c. 2. diuis 2. p. 45. c. 8. diuis 1. p. 396. c. Bezainan noui Test 1556. in c. 10. Matth. in c. 22. Luc. Iran l. 1. c. 10. 20. 29. Aug. l. 32. con Faust c. 19. 21. Philast c. 36. Euseb l. 4. hist c. 29. Epiph. haer 30. Valentinians Eunomians Marcionists and the like This was the voice of Maximinus the Arian Bishop as S. Augustin reporteth writing against him And this is now the common cry of M. Whitaker M. Reynolds and their fellow-Sectaryes who will not stand to the generall arbitrement of Fathers Doctours Councells Historyes or former Churches not to the prescription of tymes presidents or approued customes not to any roll record or monument of antiquity They only appeale in all matters of Controuersy to the sole and silent maiesty of Gods sacred Stile and that for two chiefe and principall causes The one is to cloke couer their new deuises vnder the mysteryes of holy Writ The other with a cunning and guilefull sleight to auoyd indeed all manner of triall not to admit any Iudge at all For as long as they reserue in themselues this singular power to construe and expound Gods word as they list to receaue or reiect what Scriptures they please let vs produce any euidence against theÌ„ neuer so cleare they wil either cloud it with some colourable answere or wrest it to another sense or charge it with corruption as Beza doth in the Greeke text in many places or vtterly discard it as no Canonicall write as Heretikes vsually do such Oracles of God as condemnâ— their errours 2. Alleadge for example the old Testament against the Marcionists against the Manichees the new the Acts of the Apostles against Tatian Cerinthus against the Ebionites the Epistles of S. Paul they peremptorily deny these books of Scripture Pose Faustus the Manichee with these Ad Rom. 1. v. 3. Aug. l. â—0 con Paust c. 2. 2. Iac. 24. Cent. 2. c. 4. col 17. words of the Apostle to the Romans The sonne of God was borne of the seed of Dauid according to the flesh his reply saith S. Augustine is the booke is forged it is not Paules Proue against the Centurists out of S. Iames That by workes a man is iustisyed not by fayth alone they discredit the authority of his Epistle saying It is an adulterous and bastard Epistle Alleadge in like manner against M. Whitaker Intercession of Saints out of the vision of Iudas Machabeus concerning Onias he answereth His dreame of Onias I let passe as VVhitak in resp ad Ration c. Camp VVhitak ibidem Cyp. l. 3. ep 9. Ambr. l. 4. de side cap. 4. Aug. l. ad Oros Clem. Alex c. 7. strom VVhitak de sa Scrip. cont 1. q. 1. cap. 14. Orig. l. 2. de princ c. 1. Dionys Areop do Cal. hier â— 2. Cyp. ep â— 55. Aug. de doct Christ l. 2. c. 8. de ciut Dei l. 18. c. 36. a dreame As though God had not often reuealed to Ioseph diuers of his Prophets many thinges in their sleep Vrge him out of Ecclesiasticus with the liberty of Free-will he answereth That place of Ecclesiasticus I little regard neither will I belieue the liberty of Free-will albeit he affirme it an hundred tymes Then S. Cyprian S. Ambrose S. Augustine Clemens Alexandrinus were of light beliefe who credited this worke as the reuealed write Presse him at length with prayer for the dead out of the bookes of the Machabees he still replyeth I discouer in them a human Spirit a human wit a human confession all thinges human Then Origen Dionysius S. Cyprian S. Augustine were much deceaued who descryed in them the character stile and spirit of the Holy Ghost 3. But graunt our Aduersaryes admitted all those bookes of holy Writ the Church approueth or that they would be tryed by them we both imbrace yet I say the Scripture alone cannot be Iụdge or Vmpire between vs. Which that I may more strongly euince proceed more smoothly without rubb or incombrance in so waighty a question before I come to the period or full point of our variance I will briefly premise some certaine positions of our consent and agreement We accord then with Protestants 1. That the Scriptures are a diuine and infallible rule of faith yet not the sole and only rule as they affirme 2. We graunt with them that nothing is to be belieued The state of the question explained Deutr. 17. v. 9. contrary and repugnant to those oracles of God no traditions reuelations or interpretations whatsoeuer 3. We teach that the vniuersall iudgment and generall definitions of the Church are alwayes leueled and directed according to the inerrable prescript of holy Writ Therefore at her Oecumenicall Consistoryes she placeth They shal teach theâ— according to the law the Bible in some high eminent and honourable seat as the chiefe and speciall guide of her counsayles decrees 4. We yield that the letter of Scripture or to vse their phrase of speach that God speaking by that letter may improperly be tearmed the voice of our supreme Iudge in such manner as I shall explicate heereafter But our maine difference and dispute is whether it be such a voice and sentence of his as when any doubt or CoÌ„trouersy ariseth about the meaning of his word it may without any further externall and open declaration for of inward Inspirations in the Chapter ensuing giue a finall euident certaine and irresistable decision of all such doubts controuersyes to euery humble diligent skillfull and pious Reader and conferrer of places Our Aduersaryes say it is we say it is not proposing our arguments in this manner 4. The Scripture is the written word or outward rule by which
senteÌ„ce is or ought to be guided therfore not the Iudge himselfe that pronounceth sentence For in all Courts Common-wealths or publique Tribunals besides the written Law or outward euidence by which verdict is giuen some speaking-Iudge or other Magistrate is requisite who as the liuely rule or square of Iustice to vse Aristotles words ought to expound and deliuer the true meaning of the law so much more in the Church of God which is a Kingdom a Citty a Campe well ordred Arist l. 5. Etb. l. 4. Polit. Plat. l. de repub de lege Read Philo Iud. l. de legat ad CaiuÌ„ prope finem the like must needs be graunted especially seeing Plato writeth That good Gouernours are more to be regarded accounted of then good lawes because a good law without a good Iudge which may execute it is a dead law but a good Iudge without a written law is both to himselfe and others a liuely law The reason heereof is manifest because it belongeth to the Iudge who may decide and end debates 1. To heare vnderstand and compare togeather the arguments of the parties in strife 2. By explayning the true sense and meaning of the law to deliuer a definitiue sentence agreable therunto 3. To compell and inforce the contentious to accept and obey his censure But this neyther Scripture nor any written law can performe Therefore some other intelligent authenticall publike Arbiter is likewise necessary 5. M. Whitaker our Protestant-writer and Hunnius a Lutheran Doctor both agree That the holy Ghost as speaking VVhitak cont 1. q. 5. cap. 8. Hunnius in act Col. Ratis sâ—sâ— 9. in Scripture or the voice of God as vttered therin is this publike and soueraygne Iudge Very vainely very idly The voyce of God as speaking in Scripture is no way distinguished from the Scripture no more then the commaundement of the King promulgated in his law is any way different from the law Therfore as besides the King speaking in his law eyther himselfe speaking in a more liuely manner or some other Iudge is requisite to satisfy the doubts which arise of the law so besids the holy Ghost speaking precisely by Scripture eyther himselfe speaking in a more distinct and publicke fashion or some other infallible Iudge is necessary to end the controuersies which arise Hunnius ibidem Reyn. c. 2. diuis 2. p. 63. 64. out of Scripture Hunnius addeth That the Scripture it selfe or the voyce of God deliuered by learned Ministers and expounders of the word By them sayth Reynoldes who haue in vnder Christ committed vnto them is at least a sufficient and competent Iudge As vainely as idly as before 6. For who are they to whom Christ hath giuen this commissioÌ„ of Iudgmet They are as M Reynolds subnecteth Reyn. loâ—o citato of two sorts The one priuate the other publike Priuate all the faythfull and Spirituall Publike the assemblies of Pastours and Elders Of these I reason thus Eyther he alloweth both or one of these sortes supreme soueraigne infallible authority to decide debates and expound the word without further appeale and so admitteth another Iudge besids Scripture or he assigneth them not the Soueraignty of Iudgment as himselfe and all other Protestants define but the ministery of interpreting the written will and sentence of the Iudge And so maketh the Church a maymed wauoring imperfect Common-wealth without any iudiciall visible and publike Tribunall without any profitable meanes of setling peace in tyme of discord For seeing these Ministers neyther in priuate nor publike are as they confesse so assisted alwayes by the holy Ghost but that they may being men subiect to errour sometymes propound their owne dreames insteed of Gods vndoubted truthes who shall determine whether the voyce of Christ or sentence of our Iudge be truly deliuered by them or no a Rein. c. 2. diuis â— pag. 64. The written will or letter of Scripture It cannot speake or declare her Iudgment b VVhitaker cont 5. q. 5. c. 9. 13. The diligent Reader and conferrer of places He may both read conferre amisse c Hunn in act Col. Ratis ses 9 The pious Magistrate and executioner of Iustice May not he both execute and commaund an errour d Sutclif in his answere to the sixth c. of his Suruey A Generall Councell proceding according to Gods word And who shall iudge when it proceedeth according to his word The parties who contend and stand in debate Then they must be plaintiffs and Iudges both And whilest ech of them swayeth on his owne side what end of strife What decision of truth Such as Lawyers such as Attournyes make in behalf of their clients who would neuer end their Plea vnlesse some vmpire were appointed to arbitrate the cause Now to go forward 7. The Iudge of Controuersyes ought to be infallible because it must breed a certaine and infallible assurance as M. Whitaker agreeth with vs in doubts of VVhitak cont 1 q. 5. cap. 8. â— 3. c. 11. fayth but albeit the Scriptures be so in themselues yet in respect of vs they are fallible they may be erroneously printed corruptly translated falsly suborned not well expounded not rightly vnderstood And although the voice and doctrine of the Church may be somety me fallible in respect of vs as one obiected against this argument An obiectioÌ„ made against the Church solued because a particular pastour may deliuer vnto the people his own phantasies for the Churches decrees he may perswade them and they may giue credit vnto him that his priuat assertions are the generall and Catholike doctrines that they were taught by the auncient church and that many miracles haue bin wrought in confirmatioÌ„ of them yet here is a notable disparity between this and that fallibility for this proceedeth not from the repaire to our iudge either true or so taken but from a falsifier and wrong relatour of the iudges sentence that immediatly commeth from appealing to their true reputed iudge This happeneth to the ignorant only or Catecumens who begin to belieue to others the Catholike tenent in necessary poynts is so generally known as they cannot be deluded That to the learned also and most expect in matters of religion for such they are who often misconster wrongfully expound the holy scriptures This may easily be discouered and auoided by conference with other pastours by perusing the Churches decrees or hearing the oracle of her voice which can manifestly explaine herself and disproue those forged relations That can hardly be espied more hardly be auoyded because priuat interpreters by conferring reasoning and disputing the case without submission to the Church are often tymes more confirmed strengthned in their erroneous expositions neither can the Scripture open her own meaning and condemne their false constructions Our danger therfore of being deceaned is litle or nothing to be feared their 's very pernicious and irremediable 8. The Iudge of Controuersies
stirreth vp his appâ—â—â—â— to rauenous gluttony the Iust man heareth this and he is sensed from * Note that Catbolikes abstaine not from meat of any superstition as the Iewes Manichees but for the chastisment of concupisâ—â—ce or exercise of vertue Aug. hom 8. tract 18. in Ioan. the superstition of discerning 〈◊〉 And in another place S. Augustine writeth Neither haue heresies or certaine doctrines 〈◊〉 the mind strong from other hâ—â—d then from good Scriptures not well vnderstood To specifie some particulers 12. a Aug. contra aduers lig et Prophet l. 1. 2. c. 4. Ioan 10. Marcian despised Moyses the Prophets their liues and writings what pretended he Scripture How many soeuer haue come before me are theeues and robbers The b Guido dâ— error ib a Armen Ephes 4. ver 11. Armenians taught we should all rise in the day of Iudgment in the state of mankind and that the femal sexe of women should be wholy extinct What ground had they Scripture Vntill we all meete in a perfect man What was cited by the c Iraen l. 2. cap. 14. Tertul. lib. de anima cap 35. Matth. 5. Carpocratians contending the soule of man to be vnited to the body to perpetrate sinne and not to be diuorced from it vntill it achieue all kind of wickednes Scripture Thou shalt not depart from thence vntill thou defray the last farthing The d Aug. tract 34. in Ioan. Ioan. 8. Manichees affirmed our Sauiour Christ to be this materiall sinne which compasseth the earth and affoardeth light to our corporall eyes What colour had they Scripture I am the light of the world By Scripture the e Alphonsus de Castr. 110 aduer haer verbo Occidere Exod. 20. Waldenses taught that no maÌ„ could be put to death no not by the lawfull authoritie of a Iudge Thou shall not kill By Scripture the f August tract 53. in Ioan. Ioan. 12. v. 25. Mat. 16. v. 25 Luth. con Art Louanien Thes 27. l. de Caena dom To. 2 Ger. fol. 17. 4. VVhitak in his answere to Campians 8. reason pag. 259. Vincent Lyr. c. 35. Genna in catalogo Eccl. Scri. Circumcellians held that euery Christian might not only murther his fellow but lay violent hands also on himself He that hateth his soule in this life preserueth it to euerlasting life And not to be ouer tedions in a matter perspicuous by Scripture Luther excommunicateth all Sacramentaries as arrant Heretikes and already damned to the pit of hell By the same Scripture our Protestants make both Lutherans and Sacramentaries faithfull Christians and if they once beleeue sure of saluation What hath Scripture bene in this sort the origine of these foule Contradictions horrible Blasphemies and a thousand more and yet must it be the soueraigne and only meanes to end and suppresse them When they who are silenced by it make greatest shew and ostentation of it When you shall see sayth Vincentius Heretikes so abound with Scripture as they fly through all the volumes of the holy Law through Moyses the bookes of the Kings the Psalmes and Prophets c. Read the workes of Paulus Samosatenus Priscillian Eunomius c. You shall not find a page which is not coloured painted with the sentences of old and new Testament Nestorius to support his priuat heresy gloried as Gennadius reporteth in the euideÌ„ce of threescore testimonies which he produced 13. Arius likewise boasted of the patronage of Scripture yea of the collation of places our Sectaries chiesest refuge And when the Prelates of the first Councell of Nice proued the Essentiall Equality of the Sonne of God with his Father which he denied out of those words of S. Iohn I and my Father am all one he answered They were all one in the vnity of wlll and affection not in the vnity Io. ca. 10 vers 30. of nature and essence which by Conference of places he bolstered in this manner Christ prayed for his disciples Ioh. 17. v. 21. that they might be one with him as he and his Father were one But he demaunded not neither was it possible for them to be one in substance with God the Father Therfore the Sonne himself was not the same in substance but only in will loue and obedience as he desired his Disciples to be In so much as the Fathers could neuer haue vanquished that wicked heresie if they had not beaten it downe by the authority of the Church more then by testimony of Scripture as appeareth by S. Athanasius a chiefe Atha ep decres con Arian haer impugner of that impious heresy 14. Yet because our new Ghospellers build the tower of their Babell will climbe to the knowledge of all heauenly truth by this collation of places and diligent recourse to the originall fountaines let them tell me when the Reader doubteth of any particular passage of Scripture how the Collatour knoweth by what other sentence that ought to be interpreted The darke and obscure places as Whitaker and Reynolds instruct vs are to VVhitak contro 1. q. 5. ca. 23. Rein. c. 1. diuis 2. p. 60. be lightned by the plaine and perspicuous Graunt it be so How shall I be certaine whether the hard place I doubt of ought to be explained by the cleare and euident text I choose to that purpose or by some other What certaine rule set you downe I may not erre in my choyce Eutiches doubted of the meaning of those words Verbum caro factum The word was made flesh which you suppose I Ioan. 1. v. 14. See Suarez in 3 p. d. 7. ses 2. fol. 132. Ioan 2. v. 9. 1. 10. 3. v. 9. Aug l. de haer ad Quoduult haer 82. doubt not a point requisite to be beleeued And by reason of the propinquity and alliance of speach he expounded them by those of S. Iohn Aquam vinum factum The water was made wine and fell into his detestable blasphemie that the Deity of God was changed into the flesh of man as the water was turned and conuerted into wine Iouinian doubted of the intelligence of an hard saying he read in the first epistle of S. Iohn to wit He that is borne of God doth not sinne Where by the connexion of the text by the conference of other places he framed this desperate and hatefull exposition That a Christian once regenerated and purified by the water of Baptisme cannot after receaue any tainture of sin or offend God any more althogh he would neuer so faine A thousand such errours in matters of importance necessary to saluation haue enemies sucked out of the cleare brooks of holy writ by the deceauable search weighing of places 15. I might vrge That the sentences which are plaine and open to some seeme darke and obscure to others What text more cleare then that of S. Matthew Mat. 26 Mark 14. Luc. â—2 1. Cor. 11. This is my Body repeated againe by S. Marke recorded by
S. Luke confirmed by S. Paul And yet our Sacramentaries reiecting the agrement approbation of them al endeauour to interpret it by far more hard hidden passages Others do not only misconster but vtterly deny most apparent places vndeniable testimonyes For is there any thing more often inculcated or more largly amplifyed by the Prophets then the glory of the Messias and benefites we were to receaue by the comming of Christ Is there any thing more euidently expressed by the EuaÌ„gelists then his genealogy his natiuity his humane pedegree from the line of Dauid Yet Faustus the Manichee had his eyes darkned as S. Augustine testifyeth with presumptuous arrogancy that he sayd Searching the Scrippures Aug. lib. 16. con Paust cap. 2. 14. lib. 12. c. 2. lib. 2. cap. 2. I find there no Prophesyes of Christ The Prophets fortel nothing of him the Ghospell mentioneth not his temporall birth or procreation from man Howbeit sayth S. Augustine he euery where auoucheth himselfe the sonne of man But as Faustus was thus blinded and would not see a mistery so cleare what if Protestants be blinded in an article of Faith no lesse cleare and perspicuous We found not in Scripture the predictions of Christ neither do they discerne the Aug. ep 165. ad Donat Church of Christ as plainely described as Christ himself For in the Scriptures sayth S. Augustine we learne Christ in the Scriptures we learne the Church And then How doe we belieue we haue receaued out of the diuin writings Christ manifest Aug. epist 48 ad vinâ—eÌ„t Rogat â— vnles we haae also receaued from thence the Church manifest Truly we haue receaued it so manifest as all Nations see it all nations flocke vnto it all reuerence and obey it by the direction of Scripture only they see it not who would be ignoraÌ„t of nothing by their search of Scripture They see not I say the Catholike vniuersall Church visibly dispersed thoughout all the world lineally descended from the Apostles infallibly assisted by the spirit of God c. often recommended in holy Write vnto vs. 16. Secondly I might alleadge the copiousnes of Gods sacred word how some one 〈…〉 is often tymes so fruitfully impregned that as it is deliuered by the diuine Math. 7. v. 18. Interpreters of many true litterall senses so it is brought forth by priuate expositors with the vntimely birth of sundry heresyes Let that sole text of S. Matthew serue for an example A good â—ee cannot yeild euill fruits c. For by this a Hier. l. 2. aduers Iouin Iouinian vnderpropped his fornamed fancy That a good and iust man could not produce the fruits of sinne The Pelagians b Aug. l. 2. de nup. concup cap. 26. from thence concluded That the good sacred tree of Marriage that the pure and faithfull married couple cannot â—ngender euill Children infected with the contagiou of originall sin Others c Aug. l. 1. de grat Christ c. 18 of that crew by the force of the same wordes and those that follow Nor an euill tree yeild good fruits peruersly inferred That the good tree of Free-will might of it selfe without Gods grace procreate the fruits of goods works as the euill tree blossometh the fruits of euill Others d Aug. l. 3. cont lit Petil. capâ—â— 44. either Pelagians or Donatists picked from thence That a good Priest could not minister wrongfully the Sacrament of Baptisme nor an euill Priest rightly Out of the same clause e Hier. â—â— coÌ„ment ad hunc loc Aug. in disp 2. cont Fortunat the Manichees strained their impious dotage That some men were good by nature could not be euill some euill by nature and could not be good From whence also the Caluinists gathered two pernicious heresyes The * See both these obiections proposed answered in the 21. 27. Controuersy one That man being an euill tree hath no freewill to be conuerted to God ayded by his grace nor to cooperate thereunto before he be iustifyed The other That as the fruits do only declare the goodnes of the tree and do not make it good or bad so the vertuous and pious workes of the iust are meere signes and remonstrances but no true causes of their inherent iustice If this short heauenly saying through the rashnes of willfulmen hath bred so many false constructiours alâ— which notwithstanding were bolstened with other the like misapplyed passages how can Protestants presume to ayme aright at the marke of Truth in all questions controuerâ—ed by this vncertaine rule of expounding Scripture by Scripture alone 17. Thirdly I might produce the diuersity not only of the literall but of the literall and figuratiue speaches and demand of our Aduersaryes how the Collatours should discerne the one from the other when the words should be literally when figuratiuely vnderstood Origen was more skillfull in tongues more diligent in reading more wise in obseruing the course and connexion Basil hom 3. in Hex stâ—â— in Gonesim of Scripture then euer any Protestantâ— and yet S. Basil noteth him of grosse ouersight in imagining figures and Allegoryes in the first of Genesis in lieu of the letter â—estorius on the contrary side was dazelled with the letter instead of the figure in that speach of S. Iohn Dissolue Ioan. 2. v. 19. yee this Temple and after three dayes I will rayse it againe Whereby he contended that the Sonne of God only dwelled in Christ as in his Temple Marcions stroue for Rom. 5. v. 20. Ioan. 1. v. 14. Philip. 2. v. 7. Haeb. 4. v. 15. Rom. 8. v. 3. Matth. 3. v. â—â— the pure letter where S. Paul writeth The law hath entred that sinne may abound Munichaeus dreamed of a figure where S. Iohn sayd The word is made flesh that is as he proued by conference of sundry places in the habit likenes and similitude of flesh The Iacobits were illuded with the grossnes of the letter when they baptized or rather seared with burning yrons their sect-mates in their foreheads because it is written in the 3. of S. Matthew He shall baptize you in the Holy Ghost and fire Eutychius the Patriarcke of Constantinople was beguiled with the inanity of a figure when impugning the corporall resurrection of our flesh he expounded of a subtile spirituall and ethereall body that which S. Paul spake of a true naturall 18. And the matter is the harder not to be mistaken heerein because some tyme in the selfe same sentence one and the selfe same word ought here properly there metaphorically be expounded as learned Maldonate wisely obserueth Mald. in eum loc Matth. 8. v. 22. Ioan. 3. v. 13. in that saying of Christ Let the dead bury their dead or not to depart from the chiefest articles of fayth of which I haue hitherto spokeÌ„ The like is shewed in S. Iohn No man hath ascended into heauen but he that descended from heauen the Sonne of man who is
Church are certain publik notes and known signes by which the spouse of Christ is euidently marked and discribed vnto vs. Then it is true that we also acknowledg a supernaturall help or inward working of the holy ghost to belieue the Catholik Church and all the articles she proposeth yet in a farre different manner from that which our sectaries pretend for we require the interiour working to moue our will and eleuate our vnderstanding to belieue the mysteries already reuealed our sectaries require it to reueale the very mysteries which are to be belieued we to receaue the expositions of Scripture publikly and vniformily made by the diuine interpreters they priuatly to expound and particularly to interpret the scriptures themselues We haue moreouer prudentiall motiues or arguments of credibility prudently to induce vs to those acts of faith they haue no such arguments but of the contrary side many reasons to distrust their priuat spirits We besides the inward vnction and outward letter haue the safe-conduct of a common publike and inerrable directour they haue no other publik and outward guide then the bare letter subiect to a thousand false constructions Ours is the spirit of peace and vnion vniting vs all in the same belief theirs of strife and dissention making them infinitely to vary in poynts of faith Ours of submission theirs of presumption Ours inclineth vs to obey and humbly imbrace theirs proudly to iudge and peremptorily to conrroule the true preachers doctrine So that the heauenly inspiration which we allow hath not any linke of affinity with their priuate spirit THE SECOND CHAPTER WHEREIN All that which D. Reynolds D. Sparkes and M. Whitaker deuise to bolster their former Position is refuted BECAVSE so many windinges crosse-wayes occur in this wild desert of scanning words vnfolding texts and searching originall fountaynes our Aduersaries striue to assigne some lines to lead vs aright in this maze of difficulties D. Reynolds and D. Sparkes prescribe not only search but deligent Rein c. 2. diuis 2. p. 60. 62. Sparks pa. 246. c. Ioan. 5. v. 36. Mart. 7. v. 7. Iac. 1. v. 5. search and earnest prayer to God Of the one it is sayd Search the scriptures c. and they shall be opened vnto you Of the other If any of you want Wisdome let him aske it of God c. and it shall be giuen him Soueraygne helpes I graunt but no assured rules For how many haue troden these pathes who wandered and miserably perished amongst the briars of errour Pelagius Photinus Eunomius prayed earnestly and most diligently searched the Canon of Scripture who vented notwithstanding infamous heresies 2. M. Reynolds replyeth that the fault of these and others â—rring must be Not in conferring places most diligently but not in conferring them dâ—ligently inough In not praying as they Rein. c. 2. diuis 2. p. 60. p 45 1. Ioan c. 5. v. 14. Rom. c. 12. v. 13. should and searching as they ought in the spirit of fayth and modesty But you that carpe so often at the Schoolemens Quiddiâ—es what meane you now by this nice distinction betweene most diligently diligently inough Or what degree of diligence attribute you to that which is inough aboue the superlatiue exactnes of that which is most Further what do you vnderstand by searching as they ought in the spirit of Faith and modesty Doe you thinke it necessary the Collatour should belieue the thing he searcheth before he beginneth to search To what end then doth he search And what shall he do who belieneth not or doubteth of the matter But not to demure in these deep subtiltyes or meere fooleryes rather who can tell I beseech you when he prayeth in fayth and modesty as he should When he vseth diligeÌ„ce inough in searching as he ought Or how can others be warranted who they be that performe these thinges Is not this as hidden as intricate as inscrutable as the truth of Gods word for which we labour I thinke you suppose S. Iraeneus S. Cyprian S Ambrose S. Chrysostom S. Hierome S. Augustine prayed to God weighed his word in fayth modesty as they ought By what meanes then swarued they so farre from the true sense of Scripture as to be spotted with so many The Centurie writers Cen. 2. 4. 5. wennes and warts as you call them of superstitious Popery to wit the Sacrifice of the Masse Inuocation of Saints Free-will Merit Purgatory Prayer for the dead c You will answere againe They fayled in their prayers slacked of their diligence when out of the pure fountaines of holy Write they deriued these Romish dregs Well let it be they failed at least your late reformers Luther Caluin Beza c. failed not They prayed in fayth and modesty they marked they examined Scripture as they ought How commeth it then to passe they haue not obtained so much wisedome from God as to agree in their exposition How do they who follow the right rules of interpreting Scripture vary so infinitly as to dissent in aboue 80. seuerall expositions of these foure wordes This is my body which Claudius de Xainctes reckoneth Xainct repet 1. cap. vltimo vp besides innumerable other most irreconciliable iarres 3. I know not with what brasen face or steeled conscience D. Field and M. Sparkes depose That these their diuisions are imaginary and meerly accidentall not in points fundamentall Field in his appendix 1. par pag. 23. 24. Sparkes in his answere to M. Iohn Albins not in matters necessary to saluation Wheras they differ in number of Sacraments nature of the Church essentiall manner of her gouernement in the article of Christs descension into hell of his Passion Mediation of his equality with his Father our regeneration by Baptisme Iustification by fayth as I shall by Gods grace discouer heereafter And if these be not fundamentall points what points will you make fundamentall Or if your diligence your prayer with other helpes may mislead you in these why not in others Why define you not what articles they be in which yee are freed from errour Are you all priuiledged not to faile in fundamentall points can no man tell nor your selues accord in what points your priuiledge consisteth 4. For answere O thou Protestant are they fundamentall points which make men forfait their saluatioÌ„ which carry millions of millions to eternall flames Then whosoeuer BroughtoÌ„ vbâ— supra imbraceth your English translation of the Bible differeth as I haue proued from his owne companions in pointes fundamentall Are they fundamentall pointes which are necessary to be belieued And All points necessary to be belieued as M. Whitaker strayneth out of S. Augustines VVhitak c. 1 q. 4. c. 4 pa 29â— wordes so cleare in Scripture as they cannot be mistaken You square among your selues in pointes fundamentall some assigning these some others to be essentiall capital and necessary to be belieued Nay you vary in so plaine and perspicuous points
as you cannot mistake them by your owne diuision subuert your owne assertion Are they fundamentall points which vndermine the foundation and shake the ground-worke of true Religion TheÌ„ Caluin his pupills dissent from their Grandâ—â—res in fundamentall Hunâ—ius in his booke intituled Caluinus Iudaizans Luth cont art Louan thes 27. points by the censure of Hunnius a Protestant writer who brandeth him with Arianisme Iudaisme and the like Are they fundamentall points which whosoeuer defendeth is estranged from God ranged amongst heretikes and banished the company of men Then all Sacramentaryes whome Luther for their Tropicall construction of the wordes of the Sacrament seriously censureth as Heretikes and aliens from the Church of God All Lutheranes Caluin lib. 4. instit c. â—7 whome Caluin attacheth of the Eutichian heresy for auouching the immensity of Christs body answerable to his Deity All English Puritans whome their fellow-Protestants excommunicate by their Canons cassiere their Canon 4. 6. 7. c. Society are among themselues dismembred in fundamentall points Loe the peace of our new Ghospellers Loe their agreement in pointes fundamentall Loe the markes they obserue in expounding Scripture which beare them headlong on these rockes of dissention 5. M. Whitaker therfore propoundeth a surer ankerhold to stay them in these stormes The direction to wit of the holy Ghost the supreme interpreter of his sacred will which Vvhitaker â—â—â—t 1. q. 3. c. â—â— q. 5. cap. 3. whosoeuer followeth cannot but escape the danger of shipwracke Who if he vnderstood by this direction the infallible assistance of that diuine spirit as he guideth the head or gouerneth the whole body of the Church we willingly subscribe vnto it But his meaning is farre otherwise He meaneth heerby the priuate motion of the holy Ghost as he secretly inspireth euery particuler faythfull man commonly called the priuate spirit of which all Protestants vaunt so much and against which the Prophets and Apostles generally exclaime Ezechiel cryeth out Woe be to Ezech. 13. v. â— 2. Pet. â— v. 20 the foolish Prophets who follow their owne spirit S. Peter sayth No Prophesy of Scripture is made by priuate interpretation And although you reply that the spirit you arrogate is not priuate not the spirit of man but the spirit of God which is publike and diuine yet seeing you do not assigne any VVhitak cont 1. q. 5. cap. 4. publike person whome this spirit infallibly assisteth but ascribe it to euery particuler and priuate man it can be no other then that priuate spirit so frequently reiected in holy Write 6. For tell me M. Whitaker what is this spirit of Vvhitaker cont 1. q. 5. c. â— prope finem Ibid. quaest 3. c. 1â— cont 1. q. 2. c. 3. which you bragge An inward perswasion you say of Truth From whome From the holy Ghost Where In the secret closet of the belieuers hart When When he heareth or readeth the word of God Is this all Is not this a priuate and vncertaine spirit subiect to a thousand phantastical illusions There commeth Montanus with his minion Maximilla ther commeth Marcion there commeth Valentinus euery one chalengeth the prerogatiue of his spirit and spirit as he pretendeth of God The first his prophesy the second Tertul. de praescript cap. 4â— the visions of his Paraclet the third the dreames of his Aeâ—nes Were they not illuded by the wicked spirit And may not Protestants be deceaued as well as these Their perswasion is priuate it may be mistrusted their spirit hidden it cannot be proued 7. M. Whitaker yeildeth That it cannot be proued or demonstrated Vvhitaker cont 1. q. 5. c. 3. propâ— finem to others but it may be a sufficient warrant to them that haue it of the true sense of Scripture it openeth vnto them Against both which I dispute First if it cannot be manifested or proued to others then in respect of them they haue no certaine ground to belieue the Ghospell of the Protestants rather then the prophesy of Montanus the visions of the Marcionists Againe if it cannot be manifested or proued to others and no true interpretation can be made without it no meanes haue Protestants to teach to preach to assure their Brethren or perswade any others Vvhitaker cont 1. q. 3. c. 11. q. 5. c. 10. Reyn. in his conf c. 2. diuiâ— 2. the light of their Ghospell Which if you do not perspicuously see I will set before you a glasse to view it in by a collection or two gathered out of M. Whitaker 8. He granteth and D. Reynolds heerein accordeth with him that neither recourse to places so often mentioned nor suruey of Originals nor coÌ„sideration of words phrase and stile are auailable to ayme aright at the marke of Truth vnlesse the holy Ghost leuell and direct vnto it vnlesse he go before with his torch of light He Vvhitaker cont â— q. 5. cap. 10. graunteth moreouer that no inspired minister can demonstrate to others the holy Ghost with his lincke to haue enlightned his hart It resteth therfore by this own Logike that no Minister can giue assurance of the doctrine he preacheth and consequently no fayth can be taught no beliefe receaued from the mouth of our Ghospellers It resteth that no Iudge can be amongst them no vmpier of controuersies no Pastour no preacher able to conuert soules plant fayth end debates which necessarily requireth infallible assurance to conuince the hearers of the truth deliuered 9. Secondly I shew that this inward spirit can neuer be a warrant sufficient in the search of Scripture to guid them that inioy it For eyther it guideth them somtyme fallibly or allwayes infallibly Say sometyme fallibly It is neuer to be credited vnlesse you prescribe some rule to know when it faileth when not and this prescription you make eyther by some deceauable or vndeceauable spirit and so we are as farre to seeke as we were at the beginning Say alwayes infallibly Whatsoeuer you expound speake or write by the instruction of this spirit ought to be imbraced as Canonicall Scripture as the heauenly writings or Oracles of God and sith you often vary from your selues and contradict one the other you prophane the Diuine oracles with horrible contradictions Besides if the spirit of euery faithfull belieuer be a safe conduct to lead him to the vnderstanding of Scripture to what end are the doctours interpreters of Gods word To what end did S. Paul say to one by the spirit is giuen the grace of working miracles to another Prophesy 1. Cor. 12. v. 9. 10. Ad Haeb. â—3 v. 17. to another discerning of spirits c. Why did he restraine to some which is extended to all To what end were people commaunded to obey their Prelats To what end was it pronounced He that heareth you heareth me c. And He that heareth not the Church let him be to thee like an Ethnike and publican To what end were these
and made for his purpose Or if they already belieued as others mantain then nothing doubting of the truth he preached they searched only for their confort and confirmation to nourish and strengthen their beliefe to arme themselues the better against the assaults of the enemy Both which are allowable vpon these supposal neither are warrantable for the faithfull to iudge and censure their Pastours doctrine 18. To the second and third instance I answere S. Iohn wrote to those that had receaued the fayth and needed not another maister to teach them a new doctrine contrary thereunto Isay prophesied of them that were to receaue it and both as S. Augustine commenteth speak of the inward vnction of Gods grace and inspiration of Aug. tract 3. in ep 1. Ioan. l. de gra Christi c. 13 14. the Holy Ghost which togeather with the outward preaching sweetly moueth strengtheneth and confirmeth the faythfull not to examine iudge or try but humbly to belieue and ioyfully to imbrace the message of truth deliuered vnto them Shall I repeate S. Augustines wordes Shall I propound the question he maketh to S. Iohn vpon occasion of this speach wherein he excellently refuâ—eth this obiection of Protestants Thou saâ—est Tract 3. vbi supra quoth he his vnction teacheth you of all thinges why then didst thou write that Epistle Why didst thou teach them Why didst thou instruct See heere my Brethren a great mistery the noâ—se of our words passe vnto the eares the Maister is within c. Outward instructions are helps and admonitions he hath his chaire in heauen who teacheth the hart Christ teacheth his inspiration teacheth where his inspiration and vnction is not in vaine is the sound of words without 19. Besides if we read that place of Isay All shall be taught of God as our Aduersaryes presse the Greeke I answere Cyril in 〈◊〉 loâ—â—â— againe with S. Cyril That it is a Prophesy of Christs comming to teach Christians in his owne person who before taught the Iewes by the mouth of his Prophets If we read All shal be docible of God as Maldonate more faithfully Maldonat in cap. 6. Ioan. gathered out of the Hebrew and Chaldean word it was spoken as he notably proueth by the testimony of Leontius Ammonius and S. Iohn Chrysostome for that God of himselfe is most ready to instruct and the Euangelical Law more fit to be infused into the hart by the vnction of the holy Ghost then to be vttered by wordes or imprinted in bookes 20. Lastly M. Whitaker M. Reynolds and their adherents VVhitaker 1. cont q. 5. Cap. 8. Reyn. c. 8. diuis 1. Basil Epist 80. Tul. l. 3 de leg Aug de nup. coÌ„ cup. â— 2. c. 33. Opt. l. 5. cont Parmen Aug. coÌ„c 2. in Psal 35. obiect sundry Fathers allowing the sufficiency of Scripture to end disputes to whose authorities I shall answere in my next discourse Now I reply to the testimonyes of S. Basil S. Augustine and Optatus S. Basil summoneth his Aduersaryes to the arbitrement of holy Writ in a thing most clearely reuealed concerning the Trinity in which case he may call the Scripture arbiter or Iudge as the Lawyers sometimes tearme the ciuil law or Iustinian the compiler of them Vmpier and Iudge And as Tully calleth The Law a dumbe Magistrate and the Magistrate a liuely Law After which sort S. Augustine sayth Let Christ iudge let the Apostles iudge c. Optatus likewise in the question of Rebaptization prouoked the Donatists to the Iudgement of Gods written word because there were most euident testimonyes thereof and because the Donatists would admit no indifferent tryall by any lawfull sentence but still appealed as S. Augustine witnesseth froÌ„ one another from Melchiades the Pope to the assembly of Bishops from the Bishops to the Emperour from the Emperour to others disclayming from all by whome they were vanquished Secondly I answere That these and many other Fathers ofteÌ„ referre themselues to the vmpiershippe of Scripture for that it is the silent and outward law by which the voyce of our speaking Iudge ought and alwayes is vttered and pronounced and for that it directeth vs to the Church the true soueraigne and liuely Iudge of all debats 21. Thus we are so farre from derogating from the prerogatiue of holy writ as we graunt it is A perfect light and lanterne to our feete The entire rule and square of fayth The supreme and absolute Iudge of Controuersies Thus we graunt it is the Mine of truth the fountain of life the sea of wisdom the Armary of the holy Ghost It is the promptuary of God fully stored with all spirituall treasures yet such as are to be dispensed by the Opta l. 5. con Parm. Stewards of his house It is as Optatus noteth The will and Testament of Christ yet to be interpreted by those his executours whom he appointed to expound his mind and dispose of his legacy It is the booke of heauen signed with seauen seales as Origen sayth but not to be opened Orig. hom 12. in Exo. by any but by the Lion of the Tribe of Iuda or them to whoÌ„ he giueth commission It is as another auerreth The light of the world not to be hidden vnder the bushell of any priuate or phantasticall braine but to be placed on the candlesticke of Gods Church to giue light vnto all her obedient children Esay 35. vers â— 22. After this manner the repaire to Scripture is a plaine easy generall and certaine high-way In which fooles cannot erre or step awry whereas the search our Sectaries applaud is as you see hidden darke variable vnconstant not publike not vniuersall It hath byn the path of Heretiks to damnable errours It is a field to theÌ„selues of interminable strifes and it may be to all that follow it as well a trayne to drawe them vnto the wiles of perdition as a line to guid them to the port of blisse to the true knowledg of God as shall more amply appeare by the Chapter ensuing THE SECOND CONTROVERSY THAT All things necessary to Saluation are not contained in Scripture AGAINST D. Reynolds D. Bilson D. Field CHAP. I. ARIGHT wise and laudable endeauour it hath beene amongst the learned of all ages rather to imprint their chiefest points of doctrin in the minds Casar l. 6. de Bello Gallico â—lut in vita Numae And in his first oratioÌ„ of the fort or vertues of Alexan. and memories of well disposed auditours then engraue them in curious tables or blaze them with the pennes of industrious writers So we read that our ancient Druides renowned for learning throughout all the world neuer coÌ„mitted anything to the casualty of writing but entrusted all the riches of their knowledg to the treasurie of their disciples harts Pithagoras Socrates and many other famous philosophers are deseruedly praysed and commended for the like What doe I speake of men God himself long taught and instructed
so great a maister in Israel why blame you vs for approuing what your selues allow Why appeale you to Scripture alone and yet subscribe to such and so many points of fayth not comprised in Scripture Or if these Traditions be necessary to be imbraced what meane you M. Field to renounce others as ancient as behoofull as warrantable as these euen by the rules your selfe prescribe which are Field l. 4. cap. 19. pa. 242 Iran lib. 4. c. 32. â—ulke in his confut of Purgat p. 362. 303. 393. August tract 84. in Ioan. Chrys bo 21. in act Concil Nicen. 2. Damas lib. 4. c. 17. Hiero. con Vigil c. 2. Middlâ—ton Papis pag. â—34 Bils part 2. pag 265. Rom. 10. 17. Basil de spir Sanct. c. 27. Chris ho. 4. in â— Thes 5. Aug. Ep. 119 86. Field l. 4. cap. 20. Rein. conclus 1. pag. â—17 The authority and custome of the Church Consent of Fathers or testimony of an Apostolicall Church By these Irenaeus alloweth the new oblation of Christs body and bloud as a Tradition from the Apostles Why reiect you this Tertullian S. Cyprian S. Chrysostome S. Hierome S. Augustine approue as M. Fulke your great Golias granteth the Sacrifice and prayer for the dead as an Apostolicall traditioÌ„ Why disproue it you S. Augustiue S. Chrysostome admit a memory or Inuocation of Saints in the selfe same sacrifice Three hundred Fathers of the second Councell of Nice defend with S. Iohn Damascen the adoration of Images as a Tradition from the Apostles S. Hierome by the custome of the Church and consent of Fathers D. Fields rules for true Traditions mantaineth against Vigilantius the religious worship of holy Reliques By the same Tradition of the Church and consent of the Fathers M. Middleton auerreth vowes of Chastity to be obserued What meane you to make no reckoning of these Are you only priuiledged to admit or discard what Traditions you please to countenance or deface whatsoeuer you list But an ill cause without cosenage cannot be vpholden I acknowledge the shifts of pouerty and falshood 13. Against these vnanswerable grounds M. Bilson opposeth in this weake and impertinent manner Fayth is by hearing and hearing by the word of God therefore S. Paul alloweth not matters of faith vnwritten How often shall I repeate inculcate a truth that the word of God is partly written partly vnwritten and this as S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Augustine affirme is as worthy to be credited as the other Which speach albeit M. Whitaker noteth in S Chrysostome as inconsiderate and vnworthy so great a Father yet M. Field approueth it and reason perswadeth it vnles you belieue that letters figured with inke and paper add awe of reuerence to Gods hidden verityes M. Reynolds obiecteth out of S. Iohn These thinges are written that yee may belieue that Iesus is Christ the Sonne of God and that belieuing you may haue life in his name Heereupon M. Reynolds inferreth Ioan. 20. v. vlt. that S. Iohns Ghospell alone is sufficient to faith and saluation What may not be proued where such illations go currant S. Iohn speaketh of signes and miracles M. Reynoldes extendeth himselfe to many other matters S. Iohn writeth there of one principall point of fayth he concludeth all necessary to saluation S. Iohn disputing against Cerinthus who denyed the diuinity of Christ affirmeth that he hath written sufficient to proue that Christ is the sonne of God M. Reynoldes arguing against vs forceth him to say that he hath written inough concerning that and all other necessary articles of our beliefe Againe if S. Iohns Ghospell alone haue sufficient to saluation needlesse are the rest of the Euangelists the Epistles of S. Paul of S. Peter of S. Iude the Reuelations of S. Iohn wholy needlesse If S. Iohns Ghospell alone haue sufficient the Natiuity and birth of Christ his Circumcision Apparition the Institution of our Lords supper and many other thinges of which S. Iohn writeth nothing are not necessary to saluation Which to confesse is vtterly to subuert all Christian Religion to deny is plainely to ouerthwart M. Reynoldes assertion Rein. con â— 1. p. 618 â— 619. 2. Cor. 3. 16. 14. Secondly he alleadgeth out of S. Paul That all Scripture inspired by God is profitable to teach argue c. That the man of God may be perfect instructed to euery good worke Our Aduersaryes boast much of the pregnancy of this place and yet if it made any thing in their behalfe it would conuince that all and euery Scripture euery Epistle euery Chapter euery sentence which is some Scripture were The Greek hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Latin Omnis Al or euery auailable to these foresayd effects Which they perceauing resolue rather to abuse the word of God then loose the force of their argument when insteed of all or euery Scripture they most fraudulently translate the whole Scripture contrary both to the Greeke and Latin text But no deceite will serue to betray the truth The whole Scripture was not finished when S. Paul wrote that Epistle the Ghospell of S. Iohn which by it selfe alone as M. Reynolds auerreth â— sufficient to saluation the Apocalips and other bookes of Scripture were wanting at that tyme he could Rein. loc citat not then speake of the whole Scripture before the whole was extant or if he meant of the whole that was written it maketh nothing against vs. For S. Paul speaketh of the profitablenes of Scripture to instruct argue c. and not of 1. Tim. 4. v. 8. the sufficiency thereof Many thinges are profitable to promote vs to perfection which are not sufficient to atchieue the same Piety as S. Paul writeth is profitable to all thinges yet not alone sufficient nor only profitable You cannot deny but that rayne is profitable for the fruits of the earth yet without the labour of men fertility of soile heate of the sunne not sufficient to make them increase So as when M. Reynolds disgraceth this as a mincing distinction he discrediteth not vs but S. Paul for mincing in this manner 15. Fourthly others obiect That Christ reprehendeth the Traditions of men S. Paul condemneth them and S. Peter exempteth all Christians from them They mistake Christ Mat. 15. v. 9. Colos 2. v. 22. only reprehendeth the fond and friuolous Pharisaicall traditions or deprauations of the law called Deuteroses Of which also S. Peter speaketh or of the superstitious errours of the Gentils from which we are redeemed by the bloud of Christ S. Paul forewarneth vs of the vaine Sophismes 1. Pet. 1. â— 18. and fallacyes of the Philosophers which impaireth not the authority of our soueraigne and holy Traditions deriued from the Apostles and their successours inspired by the holy Ghost 16. Yet M. Field will needs endite vs of two hainous faults 1. That we charge the Scriptures with imperfection 2. Field l. 4. c. 15. That therfore we rely vpon humane interpretations and vncertaine
Figura ergo est It is therefore a figure It is a Sacrament because albeit the same body be really eaten the same bloud really drunke yet in a mystery in a figure in a Sacrament after a sweet spirituall and vnbloudy manner 16. Nay S. Augustine as our Sacramentaries contend saith What doest thou prepare thy teeth and belly Beleeue and thou hast eaten True he writeth there of the spirituall eating of Christ the bread of life by faith beleefe onely he had not begun to discourse of the Sacrament or Sacramentall eating At least after say they he speaketh of the Sacrament yet vseth these wordes He that feedeâ—h wiâ—h Aug. tra 2â— in Io. the hart not he that grindeth with the tooth True not he that grindeth only can partake the fruit of this Sacrament he that feedeth with hart without corporall eating may benefit himself but he that corporally eateth without faith can receaue no profit at all They vrge againe that S. Aug. tra 59. 2â— in Ioan. Augustine sayth The Apostles eat the bread our Lord Iudas the bread of our Lord. And in another place he denyeth The wicked to eate the body of Christ. Most true He denyeth theÌ„ to eate the bread our Lord or to feed of his body because they are not incorporated in his mysticall body Or because they do it not fruitfully by grace to the benefit Psalm â—â— Augu. de Bapt cont Donatist l. 9. â— 8. con Pulgent c. 6. cont lit Petil. l. 2. c. 20. c. 55. Biâ—s 4. pâ— pag. 772. 773. 774. 776. of their soules as King Dauid sayth The wicked shall not rise in Iudgment Because they shall not rise to saluation but to damnation Otherwise S. Augustine graunteth that Iudas did and the wicked do truely eaâ—e the body of Christ in his booke of Baptisme against the Donatists against Fulgentius and against the letters of Petilian 17. In summe many Fathers obiected by M. Bilson exhort vs to eate the Sacrament by fayth to cleanse our soules prepare our harts they call it spirituall food the bread of the mind and not of the belly no bodily but ghostly meat the proper nourishment of the spirit All most true for a liuely fayth a cleane soule a pure hart are necessarily required in the worthy receauer and the purer he approacheth the more plenty he receaueth of Gods heauenly graces Then it is stiled spirituall food ghostly meate the bread of the mind the proper nourishment of the spirit because the spirituall repast and refection Cyr. Alex l. 10. in Ioan. c. 13. of our mind the perfect vigour and increase of spirit is the chiefe and most soueraigne effect of this diuine banquet Neuertheles it excludeth not as S. Cyrill noteth but presupposeth the corporall from which as from the fountaine and sea of grace the spirituall is deriued Our Aduersaryes reply The Fathers exclude it by certaine negatiue tearmes which they vse calling it No bodily but Ghostly meate the bread of the mind and not of the belly They call it so indeed and speake in the Scriptures phrase euen as Almighty God spake when he sayd I will mercy and not sacrifice yet thereby he neither excluded Ose 6. v. 6. Matth. 9. v. 13. nor forbad sacrifice which himselfe prescribed exacted and commanded but only preferred mercy as an act of charity more acceptable vnto him So the Fathers by the like words exclude not the bodily but preferre the ghostly as the dayntiest food of our soules Or they deny it to be any bodily sustenance as bodily is commonly taken for that which is opposite to ghostly This is not so this is both bodily and ghostly both spirituall corporall meate this relisheth the mouth and cheereth the hart quickneth the body and refresheth the soule Therefore it is not a meere corporall but a spiritual dainty because it hath a spirituall manner of being is seasoned with spirituall qualityes affoardeth all spirituall comfort and is principally ordained to our spirituall nourishment For the flesh as Tertullian writeth is fed Tertul. l. de resurr carnis with the body and bloud of Christ that the soule may be fattened with God 18. And if Protestants would be as ready to defend as they are to cauill at the former sayinges they might learne by the like speaches which the Apostle vseth how to explaine the Fathers wordes for as they call the body of Christ in the Sacrament spiritual so he the body which 1. Cor. 15. v. 44. shall rise in the later day It is sowen a naturall body it shal ryse a spirituall body as they account it a barbarous and sauage thing to eate the flesh and drinke the bloud of Ibid. v. 50. Christ so he a thing impossible that flesh and bloud can possesse the kingdome of God as S. Augustine sayth Not that Ibid. v. 37. body which you see shall you eate c. so he not the body that shall be dost thou sow Which place togeather with the former Eutichius vrged against the corporall resurrection of our flesh with no lesse colourable pretense then Sectaryes do the precedent sayings against the bodily presence of Christ in the Sacrament But as they are constrained vnles they deny that article of our fayth with S. Gregory and other of our Deuines to construe S. Pauls meaning Greg. lib. 4. in lob c. 32. 33. that the body which ryseth shall be both spirituall and corporall spirituall by reason of the glorious dowryes it shall receaue and corporall in respect of the true and tractable substance it shall still retaine That flesh and bloud according to humane misery and corruption cannot possesse the Kingdome of God but according to immortality and corruption that not the body which is sowed shall rise but another another in quality the same in substance another in perfection of glory the same in property and condition of nature another in powerfull vertue the same in corporall verity another in manner and forme the same in realty and essence of being Apply the like constructions to the fornamed sentences written against the reall presence and you shall rightly expound those learned writers and soundly answere your owne obiections 19. To conclude when these new-fangled teachers with no euidence of Scripture or sentence of Father can disproue the truth of our doctrine they fall to their accustomed Pulk in c. 6. Io. sect 13. Bils 4 par pag. 791. Ambr. l. 30 de Spirit sanct c. 12. Aug. in Pâ—al 24. in 1. Cor. Bils 4. par p. 710. c. rayling They tearme vs Capharnaites Vbiquitaries Idolaters c. whereas we detest the inhumane grosse imagination of the Capharnaites condemne the Vbiquity or euery where being of Christ adore not with diuine honor as M. Bilson is pleased to impose vpon vs the elements of bread and wine but we adore to vse S. Ambrose words the flesh of Christ in the mysteries That flesh which â—ce man eateth as S. Augustine
Euch. Saâ— lib. 3. c. 5. tops of mountaines Rabi Achilas There shal be substantiall Bread in the earth in the heads of Mountaines And Rabbi Ionathas The Cake of Bread shal be made a sacrifice on the heades of Priests which are in the Church A plaine description of our sacred Host which vnder the formes of bread our Priests reuerently lift aboue their heades to shew vnto the people 15. Malachy also most plainly prophesyeth of this vnspotted sacrifice saying From the rysing of the sunne euen to the setting my name is great amongst Gentils In euery place there is sacrifyced and offered vnto my name a cleane Oblation This testimony so cleare M. Reynoldes and M. Bilson hide and ouercast with the misty construction of spirituall sacrifices which cloud Cardinall Allen our famous Country-man with many reasons vnanswerable and authorityes of Fathers irrefragable strongly repâ—â—â—â—th and dissolueth wholy First because spirituall sacrifices are many this one Secondly they succeeded not the offerings of the old Law this doth Thirdly they common to the Iewes this proper to the Gentils Fourthly they are named in Scripture with addition or limitation as the Sacrifice of Prayse of Iustice of Contrition c. this without any abridging tearme is sayd to be sacrifyced to be offered in true and proper sense as the Hebrew word in that place manifestly proueth where insteed of Oblatio it is Minchah which alwayes signifyeth a proper Sacrifice or guift of homage and is neuer taken in Scripture for an improper Oblation such as prayers and other spirituall good deeds are Fifthly they euen our best and purest works in the erroneous perswasion of our Aduersaryes are soule and defiled in the sight of God tainted with the corruption of our sinnefull Natures this so faire as the Prophet honoureth it with the Epitheâ—e of A cleane Oblation so pleasing to God as he glorifyeth in it aboue all the Hosts and Holocausts of the Leuiticall Law 16. M. Reynolds albeit he ouerflorish the former reasons Reyn. c. 8. diuis 4. p. 527. with some shew of answer yet heere in this last he sticketh so pittifully grauelled as one while he auoucheth our best deeds not to be vncleane things but vnperfectâ—y cleane defiled with the staynes of vncleanes uillingly yet weakly done lesse perfect not absolutly vnpersect And in the page notwithstanding immediatly before he granteth them so faulty as they transgresse the Commandements of God so muddy as they make vs guilty of the whole breach of the law What Reyn. Ibid. 526. strang Paradoxes What positions be these Who did euer heare of a worke in it selfe vncleane taught to be stayned with the remnant of vncleanes A dy wholy black said to be coloured with the spots of blacknesse For of what vncleanes do we speake but of that spirituall vncleanes which is displeasing vnto God Wherefore if the spots with which our holiest actions are infected be not veniall as your selues say but mortall and deadly crimes if they be such deepe transgressions As they make vs guilty of the whole breach of the law They are not weakly but wickedly done not imperfectly fayre but absolutely soule not partly festered but wholly cankered with the contagion of sinne worthy to be hated vnworthy to be practised farre vnworthy M. Reynolds to betoken that cleane Oblation which cannot receiue the least taint of Chrys in com Ps 95. Eus de demons l. 1. c. 9. prop. fin c. 6. circa medium Calu. l. de ver Eccles refor â—irca medium habetur ille liber inter eius tract theo Iren. Athan Ambros Augu. Arnobius proue out of Scripture the Sacrifice of the Masse as Caluin confesseth See Baron in Annal. an Christi 44 nu 28. Bed l. 4. bist c. 14. Abdias in bist eius Philact ex lit Praesb Acha. S. Athan S. Basil S. Chrysost in their litur Cyp Ep ... extat haec S. Cornel. Ep. com 1. â—ibl Sanct. Conc. Vas 2. cap. 3. Plin. l. 3 c 4. Ptol. lib. 2. cap. 10. In eodem Concil Vasens 2. c. 4. corruption not from it selfe not from the impurity of the vngracious Minister Such is the diuine dreadfull most holy Sacrifice of the Masse to which only the Prophet alludeth as the Fathersteach 17. S. Chrysostome citing these wordes of Malachy saith Behold how excellently how perspicuously he hath set forth describeth the Mysticall Table which is the vnbloudy Host Eusebius alleadging the same place addeth We sacrifice after a new mammer according to the new Testament a pure Host for which he declareth there a new law to be ueedfull Altars to be erected not in Iury only but in euery Country S. Irenaeus I need not produce because Caluin the chiefe Patriarke and piller of Protestancy acknowledgeth him to expound this passage of the Sacrifice of the Masse as S. Athanasius S. Ambrose S. Augustine Arnobius likewise doe according to him the former of Melchisedech by his words you may gesse of his intemperate spirit therefore I heer insert them It is vsuall with these knaues so the foule-mouthed Runnegate miscalleth our Catholike writers to scrape togeather whatsoeuer is vnsound or corrupted in the Fathers c. Wherefore when they obiect the place of Malachie to be expounded of the Sacrifice of the Masse by Irenaeus the oblation of Melchisedech to be so handled by Athanasius Ambrose Augustine Arnobius it is briefly answered those selfe same writers otherwhere also interprete the bread to be the body of Christ but so ridiculously that both reason and truth maketh me dissent If this be to refute not confirme our doctrine let the Reader iudge when such and so many substantial witnesses some within the 3. some within the 4. all within the 5. hundred yeares after Christ are confessed by one of the chiefest Protosectaries of our time to mantain in two fundameÌ„tal points the same which we defend with whom the Apostles themselues and Pastours of the Church in all ages haue agreed 18. For did not S. Peter as the ancient authenticall tradition deliuereth say Masse as Naples Did not he and S. Paul both appeering to an holy man of our Country command Masses to be sayd in the feast of S. Oswald our vertuous King as venerable Bede reporteth Was not S. Mathew barbarously slaine Sacrificing at the Altar Did not S. Andrew say Masse S. Iames did not he write a Liâ—urgy or Masse S. Athanasius S. Basil S. Chrysostome did they not compose the like Did not the Priests in S. Cyprians tyme say Masse in prison Doth not Cornelius Bishop of Rome complaine the presecution was so cruell in his tyme aboue 254. yeares after Chist that they could not say Masses neyther in publike nor in the priuate grottes caues vnder groud Was it not decreed in the second prouinciall Councell of Vase a towne in France wherof Plinie and Ptolemy make mention celebrated the yeare of our Lord 444. that Kyrie eleison should be sayd at Masse in the Churches of France as
him so he freely and sufficiently satisfyed for al but effectually for such as by penall afflictions by mercy and truth redeeme their iniquity Fulke against pur p. 45. 49. c. Calu. vbi supra Ezeth 18. v. 21. 22. Esay 38. v. 18. 44. v. 22. Micb. 7. v. 19. Psal 3â— v. â— 2. after regeneration willfully incurred In the second ranke are mustered the senteÌ„ces of holy Writ which meÌ„tion no memory but a cleane abolishment of sinne thorough true repentance as by Ezechiel If the wicked do pennance c. I will not remember his iniquityes By Isay Micheas King Dauid where God is sayd to cast our sinnes behind his backe To disperse them like a cloud To sinke them into the bottom of the Sea To hide them To couer them Not to impute them I answere these places are spoken 1. Of most true and perfect contrition which freeth both from the fault and punishment 2. Of imperfect with pennance and Satisfaction which Ezechiel seemed to insinuate saying If the wicked do pennance c. 3. They are vnderstood of the vtter abolishment of the fault and freedome from eternall paine in respect of which God is truly sayd To blot our Ezech. 18. v. 21. sinnes out of his mind to disperse them like a cloud to cast them into the sea to hide them to couer them and not to impute them as S. Augustine elegantly interpreteth the wordes of King August in Psal 3â— Dauid If God couer our sinnes he will not see them if he will not see them he will not punish them to wit with euerlasting punishment nor with temporall if we redeeme them with condigne satisfaction 21. Therefore he that pronounced by the mouth of Ezech. 18. v. 22. Num. 14. vers 34. Esay 38. v. 17. Eccles c. 5. vers 5. Haeb. â— v. 3 1. Ioan. c. â— vers 2. Prouerb c. 1â— v. 6. Ezechiel he would not remember our iniquityes threatned reuenge in his owne person to some he had forgiuen saying Scietis vltionem meam Yee shall feele the rod of my reuengement He who promised by the Prophet Isay To cast our faults behind his backe commanded vs by the mouth of Salomon Of pardoned sinne be not without feare He who by himselfe purged our offences he who sayd he was the propitiation for sinne auouched also By mercy and truth iniquity is redâ—emed So that both cooperate to satisfy for our trespasses the Passion of Christ and our workes of Pennâ—nce his Passion freely plentifully independantly of our merit or Satisfaction cancelleth the fault eternity of punishment our works sanctifyed in his bloud partly concurre by his ordinance to expiate the remaines of temporall chastisement Matth. 2â— Luc. 7. v. 48. 50. Luc. 18. v. 15. Luc. â—â— Ioan 8 v. 11. M. Fulke against purg p. 43 85. 22. In the last place are sorted the examples of Scripture of Peter Mary Magdalen the Publican the thiefe vpon the Crosse and the Adulterous woman whose sinnes were forgiuen without Satisfaction To which they adioyne the authorityes of S. Ambrose and S. Iohn Chrysostome confirming the same I answere 1. To the instances out of Gods word priuate examples are no presidents for publike rules 2. What the maister sometyme doth by prerogatiue of his person the seruant may not vsurpe as the priuiledge of his law 3. I say the teares of Peter the contrition of Magdalen the humility of the Publican the admirable confession of the theese the shame and confusion the adulterous woman endured with the inward sorrow of her hart might be sufficient satisfactions for their enormous crimes albeit the Scripture doth not in plaine termes expresse it As S. Ambrose affirmed of S. Peter when he sayd His teares I read his Satisfaction I read Amb. l. 10. in cap. 12. Lucae Lâ—chrimae veniam non postulant sed merentur not howbeit his teares were both a confession and singular satisfaction which craue not according to him but deserue and merit pardon Or S. Ambrose taketh Satisfaction in that place for the excuse and defence of his fault which S. Peter vsed not but would rather as he affirmeth condemne his sinne that he might be iustifyed by confessing then aggrauate it by denying S. Chrysostome accordingly vseth that word in his Homilyes vpon Genesis Where he likewise graunteth no Amb. ibid. Chrys ho. 10. in Gen. hom de Beato Philogonio satisfaction necessary for the recouery of Gods friendship although he after require it for recompence of the wrong committed against him in the course of his Iustice 32. Two other darke sentences M. Fulke scrapeth out of him the one out of his homilyes vpon the Epistle to the Romans Vbi venia ibi nulla est poena where there is forgiuenes there is no punishment In which place S. Chrysostome speaketh of the forgiuenes giuen to a Iew in Baptisme M. Fulke against purg p. 43. S. Chrysost Hom 8. in Epist ad Rom. who passing from the wrath of the law to the grace of Christ had full remission of all both fault punishment Another out of the booke he wrote of sorrow and compunction God requireth not the burden of shirts of haire nor to be shut vp in the straites of a little cell neither doth he command vs to sit in obscure and darke caues this only it is which he exacteth that we alwayes remember and recount our sinnes Where S. Chrysostome only reproueth the negligence of such dainty S. Chrys de compunct cordis l. 1. sinners as omit the behoofull bewayling and lamenting of their sinnes Quasi quidam intoler abilis labor sit As though it were a thing intollerable And thereupon discourseth that God commandeth not as necessary any such rigorous or insupportable satisfaction as they imagined Not to betake themselues to the strait mourning of Monks not to the inclosures of Anchorets not to be shut vp in caues dungeons which seuere pennances although many voluntarily and laudably vndergo yet God exacteth them not as necessary but he only requireth sorrowfull bewayling and some moderate satisfaction or due chastisement of our sinnes as that Golden Mouth often teacheth other where with whome S. Augustine so punctually agreeth Chrys hom 2. de lapsu primi hom in orat de beato Philogo hom 10. in Matth. Aug. in Psal 50. as I will only recite his wordes for a finall conclusion of this matter If he be iust whome thou inuokest he reuengeth sinnes If he be iust thou canst not depriue thy Lord God of his Iustice Implore his mercy but consider his Iustice His mercy inclineth to pardon the sinner his iustice to punish the sinne What then When thou seekest mercy shall sinne remaine vnpunished Let Dauid answere let the lapsed answere let them answere with Dauid that they may deserue mercy as Dauid did and say Not so O Lord my sinne shall not be vnpunished c. Therefore I will not that thou punish me because I punish my
these hauty speaches in Leo and I thinke that the Mistery of iniquity so wrought through his ambitious adaduancing Peter that of the Egges which he cherished two of the most venemous Cockatrices were bred that euer poysoned the Church of Christ The one the Popes Supremacy c. The other the worshiping of Saints 31. What sayth he of Saint Hierome Hierome to Reyn. c. 4. diuis 3. fol. 134. Hieron ad Aug. ep 11. inter ep Aug. Reyn. c. 4. diuis 1. fol. 133. Rein. c. 4. diuis 1. fol. 116. 117. mayntaine his quarrell agaynst Augustine wrote of affection more what he fancied then of discretion what be thought And when we Catholikes alleadge that sentence of his Paul not had security of preaching the Ghospell vnlesse it had beene approued by the sentence of Peter c. Mayster Reynolds answereth That we discouer the nakednesse of the Fathers c. And prayse the beauty of their blemishes and thinke them best clad when they are naked most Thus of Saint Hierome What of Saint Chrysostome That which Peter might haue done as Chrysostome supposeth would infer a greater Primacy then Peter had if it were true but the Scripture sayth it not The Fathers write some thinges 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by way of prayse and commendation c. Wherein if their words should be rigorously sifted Reyn. c. 4. diuis 3. fol. 132. cap. 4. diuis 2. fol. 123. Ibid. c. 7. diuis 9. fo 285. Bern. l. 2. de Conside the truth is somtymes ouerlashed Of Maximus of Isidore of Theodoret what Father Maximus did dote Isidore ouershot himselfe by slip of memory Theodoret serued his owne cause 32. Is Saint Gregory then Is Saint Bernard of more credit with him Gregory quoth he was somewhat troubled Gregory had a louing affection to Rome Will you giue me leaue to thinke of him as Christ of Peter That he knew not what he sayd That worthy passage is cited out of Saint Bernard vvriting of Eugenius Thou art the Prince of Bishops thou the Heyre of the Apostles Thou art for Primacy Reyn. c. 6. Diuis 4. fol. 226. Abel for gouernement Noe for Patriarch-ship Abraham for order Melchisedech for dignity Aaron for authority Moyses for Iudgement Samuel for power Peter for vnction Christ. Mayster Reynoldes answereth Your men esteeme this place of Bernard very highly and make a feast of it I maruell they are not ashamed to alleadge it For to call the Pope heyre of Saint Peter it were a great excesse of speach much greater to call him heyre of the Apostles But to call him Christ that is so great that any modest man who were Bernardes friend would rather lay his cloake vpon it then discouer it much lesse make boast of it Was euer heard a more audacious fellow who durst open his mouth agaynst heauen it it selfe and disgrace the vvritinges of so many Saints 33. And who art thou O Reynoldes that I should belieue thee before those Cyprians those Chrysostomes those Gregoryes those Bernardes whome thou reprouest Who art thou that I shold rather iudge the greatest faults in them then the least spot or blemish in thee Shall I deeme Leo ambitious Hierome naked Gregory troubled Cyprian to haue varyed from the word of God and only Reynoldes to haue vnderstood it aright Can any man be perswaded that Chrysostome ouerlashed Maximus doted Isidore ouershot himselfe Theodoret serued his own cause and Iohn Reynoldes spake sincerly that Bernards shame deserued a cloake and Reynoldes beauty was worthy to be displayed Can a man thinke so many godly Popes miscaryed with affection all Ecclesiasticall Hystories wide and only Reynoldes to hit the marke Truly he were eyther sottishly peruerse or frowardly blind whosoeuer would seeme so partiall on his side whosoeuer I say vpon the slanderous deposition of such a faythlesse witnesse should depriue the Pope of his soueraygne dignity ouer the whole Church which God and his Saintes haue imparted vnto him The end of the second Booke THE THIRD BOOKE THE TWELVTH CONTROVERSY FREETH The true worshippe of Saints of their Shrines and Reliques from Idolatry Agaynst D. Bilson D. Reynoldes and D. Fulke CHAP. 1. THE Prince of darknesse our professed enemy as he alwayes enuyed the glory of God and repined at the felicity and happynesse of man so he euer sought to impayre the honour of the one deface the dignity preheminence of the other To this end he leuied See Irae l. 1. c. 22. ler. in Catal Epip baer 68. his infernall forces first agaynst the Diuine Maiesty it selfe agaynst the first person in Trinity stying vp Simon Magus Basilides and others to deny the first article of our Creed That God the Father created beauen and earth Then agaynst the second person he banded Ebion Chrinthus Arius who robbed our Sauiour Christ of his Diuinity and Equality with his Father Agaynst the third he armed Concil 2. Constant cont Mac. Ambr. l. 1. de fide c. 1. 2. c. Macedonius who impiously impugned the Diuinity of the holy Ghost Agaynst them all iointly Sebellius who wickedly gainsayed the distinction of the Persons But when this diabolicall battery could no way preuayle he mounted his Ordinance agaynst the blessed Angels and Saintes of God He suggested Eustachius in the yeare of Basil in orat con Sabellium our Lord 300. Eunomius and Vigilantius about the same tyme to fight agaynst the honour the vniuersall Church exibited vnto the happy soules which raygne in heauen whose poyson Wicklisse after swallowed vp and is now disgorged by M. Caluin M. Bilson M. Reynoldes M. Fulke Calu. l. 1. Inst c. 11. §. 11. Bils 4. p. pag. 157. 561. 571. Rey. de ldol Rom. Eccl. 1. l. c. 8. Fulke in c. 14. Act. sect 2. in c. 19. Apoc. sect 4. Rey. ibid. c. 6. 8. and all moderne Protestants chiefly vpon this fond perswasion That there be only two sorts of honours Ciuill and Dixine the one proper to God the other peculiar to mortall men And seeing the seruants of God already departed cannot be reuerenced with Ciuill honour because they are absent nor with Diuine for feare of Idolatry no true worship but only as M. Reynoldes yieldeth an honest commemoration or decem burialt can belong vnto them This is the maine ground of M. Caluin of M. Fulke of whosoeuer which being once razed the Rampier of their defence and Fortresse of their folly is wholy ouerthrowne 2. First then I will deduce out of the cause it selfe and off-spring from whence honour ariseth out of Scriptures reasons vndeniable another kind of worship besides Ciuill and Godly which without danger of Idolatry may be allotted to Saintes Albeit Aristotle sayth Adoration and honour is in him that honoureth yet it hath for Etb 9. c. 2. his marke and obiect the excellency of the person worshipped in testimony whereof this signe of reuerence is submissiuely exhibited And therefore as there be three sortes of
God alloweth to Parents and Magistrates c. some part of his corporall but in no wise of his spirituall honour O mighty ruler and moderator of all hearts who ouer-reachest the wicked in their wiliest and deepest plots how hast thou eyther caught our enemyes in the enormity of that haynous sacriledge they haue long vainly laboured to fasten on vs or suffered them to be enwrapped in such snares of absurdity as they cannot possible finde meanes of escape Esay prophesieth God is so iealous of his honour Esay 42. that he will not resigne any iote therof to other My glory to other I will not giue Not any iote of his spirituall no nor of his corporall or externall homage as M. Bilson a little before contrary to himselfe agreeth with me Both Bil. 4. par pag. 553. which he strictly prohibited in the first precept of the decalogue to be surrendred to any but himselfe alone The internall when he proclaymed Thou shalt haue no other Exod. 20. v. 3. 5. Gods but me the Exteriour where it followeth Thou shal not bow downe and adore Whosoeuer then affoardeth to man the outward obeysance of knees hands or eyes which is proper to God which God sayth M. Bilson requireth of vs as his due he disrobeth him of some part of his Bils 4. par pag. 577. Gen. 33. Gen. 23. ◠Reg. 20. right commiteth with his Creatures most foule Idolatry Whereby it must needes ensue that Iacob was an Idolater to vse his owne examples when he bowed himselfe to Esau Abraham an Idolater when he adored the people of Heth. Dauid and Idolater when he fell down before Ionathas Yea it followeth that all Children are Idolaters who bow to their Parents all subiects Idolaters who bend their knees to their Soueraygnes and the Protestants themselues Idolaters when they vse such submission to the Magistrates Counsellers or Officers of his Maiestyes Court. 7. Which supposing M. Bilsons ground I euince in this manner The submission and outward reuerence which Children doe to their Parents subiects to their Prince is eyther the externall and diuine worship of Latria which is proper and peculiar to God or some other Ciuil far inferiour obeysance if inferiour God exacteth it not as his due it is not the corporall and outward homage which is proper to him If it be the diuine worship of Latria Latria is outwardly giuen and addressed to M. Bilson by his doctrine maintayneth Idolatry creatures a sacrilegious and idolatrous honour is giuen vnto them Moreouer giue me leaue to aske you M. Bilson vvhether this externall reuerence of bovving or kneeling to Princes vvhich you tearme Gods outvvard honour be conformable to the invvard reuerence and submission of the minde or not Yield it is and the invvard or spirituall honour due to God vvhich you so often deny is as vvell exhibited vnto creatures as his corporall and externall Say it is not conformable but eyther inferiour or none at all If inferiour you flatter or dissemble with your Prince making outvvardly shew of farre greater homage then you invvardly performe or acknovvledge in your heart if none at all your adoration is a meere derision or playne mockery as Gabriell Gabriel Vas tom 1. in 3. par Diui Tho. disp 108. cap. 9. Vasques and all Deuiues generally teach Better had it beene for him to haue imbraced our Catholike doctrine and to haue taught vvith vs that the outvvard action of bovving kneeling c. is common to euery kinde of vvorship and only limited to this or that by the inward affection and submission of the mynde It is accounted Ciuill honour vvhen it is done to Ciuill and humane Religious vvhen to holy and supernaturall Diuine vvhen it is exhibited to infinite and increated excellency To vvhich purpose if any shall dravv M. Bilsons meaning hovv contrary soeuer his vvordes doe seeme I vvill passe him ouer vvith this milde censure of S. Augustine Sententiam Aug l. 3 de ciuit Dei cap. 1. teneat linguam corrigat Let him hold his opinion and correct his language or change his phrase of vvriting But because he so often and so seriously inculcateth the bovving of the knee vvhich is done to Parents and Magistrats to be parts of Gods honour to be his bodily his corporall honour to be that honour which God requireth of vs as his due And hereupon inferreth because Pictures haue not this Diuine honour therefore they haue none at all I should betray the truth I haue hitherto supported if I charged him vvith lesse then the cryme of I dolatry vvhosoeuer shall yield such homage to men 8. Neyther can M. Bilson free himselfe from that fault by the graunt of Gods allovvance For God cannot as he fancyeth allow those that present his goodnesse and glory in Bilsō ibid. pag. 577. blessing and iudging as Parents and Magistrates some part of his corporall honour He cannot allovv to any ciuill dignity or humane excellency hovv great soeuer the external peculiar vvorship vvhich is due to himselfe vvithout he allovv the transgression of his Lavv vsurpation of his right debasement of his vvorships impiety in them that impart and sacriledge in those that admit such homage And therefore as M. Bilson follovving the former sense runneth into the Labyrinth out of vvhich by cleauing to his vvordes he can neuer vvind himselfe So imbracing the latter may wel deserue that saying of the Prophet Incidit in foueam quam fecit He hath fallen into the pit Psalm 7. of Idolatry he digged for others To proceed 9. The vvord of God doth likevvise authorize this ◠Reg. 18. Dan. 2. middle kind of adoration of vvhich I speake Abias as the Scripture mentioneth adored Elias Nabuchodonosor Daniel But vvhat honour vvas this Not Diuine For Abdias Dan. ◠a vertuous and holy Prince vvould neuer haue giuen that to Elias Neyther did Nabuchodonosor as his ovvne vvordes beare vvitnesse thinke Daniel a God or consequently vvorship him vvith godly honour Not Ciuill Because it is most ridiculous to say that such great Personages should ciuilly adore these priuate men so far inferiour to them in Ciuill dignity Most fond that Nabuchodonosor for Ciuill curtesy should prostrate himselfe at the feet of his Captiue It vvas therefore an holy and Religious vvorship vvhich for the holinesse and sanctity of their liues for the excellency of their supernaturall gifts was worthily exhibited vnto them Such was the worship which Saul did to the soule of Samuel the children 1. Reg. 28. 4. Reg. 2. Iosu 5. of the Prophets to Elizaeus Iosue to the Angell and which the Angell commanded him also to performe to the earth where you cannot say that eyther he worshiped the Angell with Godly or the earth with Ciuill honour For he did not adore the Angell vntill he knew him by his owne report to be the minister of God And what ciuility was it to put off his shooes in honour of the earth Or what
S. Peter and S. Paul at Winchester Neither would he euer after weare any Crowne during his life A rare heroicall act and worthy such a King 17. As rare was that of Commenus the Emperour who hauing slaine and put to flight an huge army of the Scythians with a small company of his owne men by the intercession and prayer of our Blessed Lady after the CoÌ„quest a day of triumph being ordained when he should Nicetat in vita Io. Comnem haue ascended his triumphant Chariot gorgeously furnished for so great a solemnity he placed therin a beautiful Image of the Queene of heauen and carrying himselfe a Crosse in his hand marched before royally accompanyed with all hâ—s Nobles Thus causing the picture to be drawne with foure choice and milke-white horses he gaue her in her Image the whole honour of the triumph Our Blessed Ladies picture caryed in Triumph by whose happy fauour he gained the victory Which that gracious Empresse so benignely accepted as she made him after owner of sundry victoryes and worthy of many triumphes For these vtilityes therefore picturs are made for these they are kept for these they are hanged on Altars depainted in Churches or publikely carryed in some Processions 18. But the honour we do vnto Images may scandalize perchance the harts of the simple prone therunto by their owne weakenes and pricked forward by the instigation of our Aduersaries not weighing the nature of Ioseph l. 1â— c. 8. antiq Dan. 2. 4. Reg. 4. the worship or euidence we produce for the maintenance therof To begin therfore with an argument vnanswerable All holy thinges deserue to be honoured Pictures are holy thinges Therfore Pictures deserue to be honoured The Psal 98. Exo. 3. v. 5. Maiorproposition that all holy thinges ought to be honoured is apparent because holines is a certaine excellency â—o vvhich honour is due We see in all Common-vvealthes both Heathen and Christian holy Persons for their Exo. 12 v. 16. sanctity alwayes reuerenced For which Alexander the Great adored Iaddus the high Priest Nabuchodonozor Daniel the Sunamite Elizaeus Yea not only men endued with reason but inanimate and senseles Creatures for this prerogatiue of holinesse are deseruedly worshipped as King Dauid exhorteth saying Adore yee his footstoole because it is holy Our Lord sayd to Moyses Put off thy shooes from thy feet because the place where thou standest is holy earth Againe he sayd vnto him The first day shal be holy and solemn and the seauenth with the like festiuity venerable For this the Tabernacle the Altar the Propitiatory the Breads of Proposition and all Holyes are honoured by the law of God The difficulty then remayneth to shew some holines in Pictures for which they may challenge the dignity of honour 12. Albeit this word Holy is commonly taken in Scripture for that which is pure sacred and immaculate of it selfe in which sense Almighty God alone is essentially holy He is the supreme holynes or Holy of all Holyes as Daniel stileth him The Angels and Saints are pure and Dan 9. 14. vnspotted but by grace only and participation of his holines it is often notwithstanding more largely extended for that which is consecrated vnto God or hath any speciall reference or relation vnto him In respect wherof the Temple is tearmed in Scripture Holy the vestment Psal 78. Exod. 28. Isa 62. Exod. 3. of Aaron the people the earth Holy c. And in this acception of the word the Pictures of Christ and of his Saints be truely counted esteemed holy both in that they are dedicated to the worship of a most holy God as all thinges are entitled Royall which neerely appertain to the Royall Maiesty of a King and also for that they carry a remarkable respect or relation to him or some of his chiefest friends much honoured by him And wheras this diuine reference or dedication ennobleth them aboue the degree of prophane and common things it giueth them that excellency and preheminence to which an holy and regardfull reuerence belongeth as the examples already specifyed conuince For to the earth where God appeared what other cause of adoration can Bils 4. par Trident. sess 25. Nicenum â— art 2. 8. Syn. act 3. Leoâ—t de ador cru l. 5. Apol. coâ—t Iud. refertur in 7. Syn. â—ct 4. you ascribe Any natiue quality Any inherent holynes of which it was incapable No No other which M. Bilson is forced to confesse then the awfull respect of God or his Angels presence If then the earth if the Temple if solemne dayes if the name Iehoua amongst the Iewes the name Iesus amongst Christians if the sacred Bible without danger of I do latry may be religiously reuerenced for this holy representation or signification only why may not Images for the same respect accordingly deserue the same honour and reuerence conformable to the decree not only of the Tridentine and second Nicen but of the eight generall Councel of Constantinople where it is so defined and of Leontius the Bishop of Cyprus vrging the Iewes aboue a thousand yeares agoe as I may now the Protestants saying Thou adorest the volume of the Law worshiping not the nature of inke or parchmeÌ„t but the wordes of God contained therein so I adoring the Image of Ath. ser 4. cont Arri. q. 16. ad Antio Dama l. 4 ort fid 17. Euthy p. 2. c. 20. Basi in Iul. cited in Nic. Con. 2 Chry. in Liturgia Iero. in vit Paulae Amb. orat de obi Theodos l. de incar Domini Sacram. c. 7. Aug. l. 3. de Tricap 10. Lact. in Car. pass Domi. Sedul lib. 5. carm Pass Bils 4. par pag. 547. Magdeburg Cent. 4. cap. 10. col 1080. line 50. item Cent. 8. c. 10. col 850. Bale in his Pageant of Popes fol. 33. Item Bale pag. 24. 27. Simondes on the Reâ—â—ela p. 17. fine Bils 4. par p. 561 577. 578. Christ neither the wood or colours do I honour God forbid but the inanimate character which when I imbrace I seeme to take hold and adore euen Christ himselfe S. Athanasius S. Iohn Damascen and Euthymius establish the same with almost the same wordes S. Basil sayth The historyes of the Images of Martyrs I honour and publikely adore S. Chrysostome The Priest boweth his head to the Image of Christ. S. Hierome speaking of S. Paula She adored prostrate before the Crosse as though she beheld our Lord hanging before her eyes S. Ambrose S. Augustine Lactant us Sedulius I let passe I will not vse in a matter not doubtfull testimonyes not necessary 20. The greater is M. Bilsons fault the fault of M. Reynoldes the greater who desame the worshipping of Images as a nouelty first decreed in the 2. Councel of Nice 780. yeares after Christ Too yong sayth M. Bilson to be Catholike Whereas all these ancient Fathers S. Iohn Damascen and Euthymius only excepted liued long before that generall Councel sundry
of Christ that euery Ibid. pag. 304. 2. ad Cor. cap. 5. Fulke in c. 5. 2. ad Cor sect 1. Matth. 12. S. Chrys in c. 15. 1. ad Cor. ho. 14. Fulke â—-Purg pag. 251. Iob. cap. 1. 4. Reg. 19. Chrys in Ep. ad Philip hom 3. Fulke ibid. p. 236. 237. one may receaue the proper thinges of his body c. M. Fulke answereth Augustine holding that errour without authority of Scripture that prayers were profitable to the dead is driuen to inuent a distinction how they may seeme to stand with this text not be contrary to the Scriptures S. Gregory and Venerable Bede conuinceth prayers for the Dead out of the place of S. Matthew cited aboue M. Fulke Gregory and Bede sought not the true meaning of Christ in this Scripture but the confirmation of their plausible errours S. Chrysostome produceth two seuerall places in confirmation thereof one out of Iob the other out of the booke of Kings M. Fulke to the former replyeth I deny not but that Chrysostome doth alleadge this example of Iob sacrificing for his children for prayers to profit the dead c. Those good men in that declyning state of the Church to superstition c. are driuen to such simple shifts to vphould their plausible errours as it is great pitty to see To the later Chrysostome alleadgeth Scripture but he applyeth it madly and yet he often applyeth it to the same purpose Then cyting the text out of the booke of Kings which S. Chrysostome bringeth he bemoaneth him in this sort Alas good man what manner of reason is this So he O Chrysostome ô Augustine ô Gregorie haue your prayers watchings trauels industry al your naturall tallents and supernaturall guifts in searching the true sense of Scripture beene so meanly imployed as they deserue to be controlled pittyed bemoaned now by the new Ghospellers new Apostles new Peters new Pauls of this our vnhappy age 21. But to pursue this matter against my Aduersaryes could a more shrewd Inditement be drawne to conuict M. Fulke of desperate audacity then this which is Idem in his confut of Purg. pag. 362. c. 303. 393. taken out of his owne wordes In challenging to himselfe the supreme Censour-ship of iudging reiecting and condemning Fathers Scriptures Traditions or whatsoeuer els doth distast his humour Or could a more indifferent Iury be impanelled to giue verdict of M. Fields hypocrisy then these his owne fellow-sectaryes who would neuer haue darkened the foresayd lights of the Church had they taught the same kind of Commemorating the dead which M. Field mentioneth and all Protestants defend For that would Sparkes haue renounced S. Augustine Spark p. 371. 372. Fulke in his confut of Purg. p. 349. in cap. 5. 1. ad Cor. sect 1. Calu. l. 3. Inst cap. 5. §. 10. Zuing. tom 1. Epicheresis de Can. Missae fol. 185. Field in oppend 1. par pag. 13. and deliuer of him He was greatly carryed by the sway and opinions of the multitude He went further then either he had warrant for out of the Canonicall Scriptures or out of any vnforged and vncounterfeited president Of that would M. Fulke haue sayd Augustine blindly defended it Augustine held it without authority of Scripture Of that would M. Caluin write The old Fathers wanted both commandment of God and authenticall example They were carryed away into errour euen as vnaduised lightnes of beliefe is wont to rob mens wits of Iudgement Of that would Zuinglius affirme If it be so as Augustine and Chrysostome say I do not thinke the Apostles for any other cause then to yield to their infirmity permitted some to pray for the Dead Would the fornamed and many other Protestants reprehend the Fathers disgrace the Apostles resist the current of all Antiquity for countenancing a point of Protestants profession No M. Field no man of sense can thinke your men so senslesse as to condemne in their Predecessours which themselues vphold 22. Neither can it be defended that this Prayer for the Dead reproued by your Ghospellers in the ancient Fathers was made by them as you seeke another way to escape Either for the mititagion of the paines of men in hell or for the admittance of the Iust into the Heauenly Pallace and presence of God out of some wrong conceit that no iudgment passed on them vntill the generall day of Resurrection For both these were particuler fancies of priuate men as you M. Field your selfe seem to auoch and it is euident to all that are Field in appen 1. part fol. 4. 12. 13. 16. Bulling Decad. 4. serm â—0 Fulke in his confut of Purg. p. 78. 310. acquainted with antiquity But the ancient Commemoration of the Dead reprehended by our new Reformers was generally receaued by all the Fathers It was as Bullinger writeth obserued in the vniuersall Church It was as M. Fulke sayth the common errour in S. Augustines and S. Ambroses dayes The preuailing custome as * Hospin in hist Sacra p. 167. Vrbanus Regius in 1. par operum in loc Commun c. 18. de Missae negotio f. 7â— Fulke in his answer to a counterfeit Cathol p. 44 Aug. l. 21. de ciu Dei c. 23. 24. de cura pro mort c. 1. another testifyeth in the tyme of S. Cyril The vniuersall obseruation as Vrbanus Rhegius reporteth and ancient custome of the whole Catholike Church Againe this is affirmed by the Fathers to be a Tradition of the Apostles which those errours neuer were 23. For gainesaying this as vnprofitable for the Dead Aerius was condemned as M. Fulke witnesseth yet neuer any was censured by the Church for deniall of those To mantaine this S. Augustine and others distinguish three sorts of men departed and make the middle only as I specifyed aboue partakers of benefit To allow those no such distinction is necessary for none are so euill whose paines may not be mitigated none so good whose ioyes may not be increased or felicity hastned Lastly this is confessed by our * Fulke in his confut of Purgat in the places before cited Kemnitius 3. p. exam pag. 93. 107. Vrbanus Regius part 1. operum in loc Commun cap. Casaubon in the answere to the epist of Card. Peron to the 3. instance fol. 33. in English Aduersaryes to haue beene defended by S. Dionyse S. Gregory Nazianzen S. Basil S. Athanasius S. Cyril S. Gregory Nissen S. Epiphanius S. Chrysostome S. Hierome S. Ambrose S. Augustine and many more who neuer dreamed but some of them stoutly impugned the former errours of which M. Field could not be ignorant 24. Therefore as I cannot but iudge him both a deep dissembler and deceitfull iugler in seeking these grosse and palpable euasions so I truely honour his Maiestyes plaine and sincere dealing who freely protesteth That it was a very ancient custome in the publike prayers of the Church to make commemoration of the deceased to desire of God rest for their soules
themselues haue also arriued The third is perpetually without intermission withall the forces and powers of our soule to be actually carryed away with the supernaturall streames of loue This only is proper to the Saints in heauen and not axacted by God of any mortall creature besieged with the infirmityes of flesh and bloud in respect of this our iustice on earth yea the iustice and perfection of S. Paul is tearmed vnperfect it is an image or shaddow of vertues it may be sometymes touched with the spots of vncleanes and therfore of this Philip. 3. v. 12. 1. Ioan. 1. v. 5. only the Apostle auouched Not that now I haue receaued or now am perfect yet in regard of the former two degrees he arriued to perfection and was already perfect euen by the phrase of holy Scripture which speaking of the first degree sayth He that keepeth his word in him in very deed the Charity of God is perfected Of the second it is also written If Matth. 19. v. 21. thou wilt be perfect go sell the things that thou hast and come and follow me By these degrees therefore of perfection all the obiections may be easily warded which our aduersaryes bring either out of Scriptures or Fathers as when they affirme our Iustice to be imperfect defiled with the touch of impurity they speake of the first degree soyled with the dust of wordly cares and too often distayned with veniall defaults When they exhort vs to greater perfection that is not to the common of all the iust but to that singuler of the mortifyed and feruent persons finally when they teach that we can neuer be perfect in this life it is true in the last acceptation of the word according to the third degree heer specifyed Which triple diuision of perfection keepeth the aduersary at such a bay as he knoweth not whither to turne him how to escape or what to mutter against it THE XXVII CONTROVERSY WHEREIN Our good workes are acquitted from the spottes of sinne against Doctour Whitaker Doctour Fulke and Doctour Abbot CHAP. I. THIS calumniation is euery where so rife and frequent amongst Protestant writers as M. Abbot in his defence c. 4. sect 44. 45. 46. VVhitak in his an swere to the â— reason of M. Camp f. 250. in the translation whereunto is added in brief marginal notes the summâ— c. Abbot spendeth many Sections to attach his owne paynes and endeauours iustly all other mens good workes wrongfully yea perniciously with the guilty stayne of sinne and M. Whitaker vndertaking the patronage and approbation of that drunken sentence of Luthers All good actions be sinnes if God be seuere in iudgement they are damnable sinnes If he be fauourable they â—e but small ones auoweth Luther sayd this and he sayd it truly for in euery action of a man though neuer so excellent there is some fault which may wholy marre the action and make it odious to God if that which is done be weighed in the ballance of diuine iustice 2. But if Luther sayd truly then as Duraeus most pithily argueth against M. Whitaker the Apostle S. Paul sayd not truly If thou take a wife thou sinnest not theÌ„ S. Peter sayd not truly Doing these things you shall not sinne at any time VVhitak ibid. fol. 251. 1. Cor. 7. v. 28. 2. 2. Pet. 1. vers 10. 1. Ioan. 3. v. 8. 1 Ioan. â— v. 9. 1. Cor. 3. v. â—1 Matth. 6. v. 22. Luc. 11. v. 36. August l. 2. qq Euang c. 15. Maldon in c. 11. Luc. Matth. 5. v. 17. S. Iohn sayd not truly For this appeared the sonne of God that he might dissolue the workes of the Diuell If there be no worke which is not diuellish and sinnefull he sayd not truly Euery one that is borne of God committeth not sinne Neyther did S. Paul wel to compare good workes to siluer gould and pretious stones nor did the Prophets and Apostles well to exhort vs to good workes Christ did not well as Cardinall Bellarmin prosecuteth the argumeÌ„t saying If the eye be simple thy whole body shal be lightsome and If then thy whole body be lightsome hauing no part of darknes it shal be lightsome wholy and as a bright candle it shall lighten thee Where by the eye S. Augustine and others vnderstand the intention of maÌ„ By the whole body Maldonate expoundeth all his facultyes by the whole absolutely of which it is also sayd the whole shal be lightsome he interpreteth all his human actions which proceed froÌ„ the powers faculties of the soule All these sayth Christ flowing from the iust and leuelled by a right intention to a good end and obiect are so bright as they inlighten the whole man so pure and vnspotted as they haue no part of darknes no blemish of sinne to destaine them For which cause he calleth them in another place light So let your light shine before men c. Matth. 5. v. 17. 3. Lastly if Luther sayd truely God himselfe sayd not truly writing of Iob In all these things Iob sinned not with his lips neyther spake he any foolish thing against God And in the next Chapter he calleth him A right man fearing God Iob. c. 1. v. 22. Iob. 2. v. 3. departing from euill and retaining innocency Whereby it is euident that Iob in all his troubles committed no sinne neyther in thought word nor deed not in word because he sinned not with his lips not in deed because he departed from euill not in thought because he still retayned innocency in his hart And if we follow the Hebrew Text all this may be gathered out of the former words of the first Chapter For the Hebrew addeth not with his lips but without restriction absolutely readeth Iob sinned not or as our Protestants translate In all this did not Iob sinne Which Origen and the Grecians according to Pineda reférre to his Origen in his commeÌ„tary vpon Iob. Pineda in â—um loc Nihil peccauit Iob coram Domino Psal 16. v. 3. Psal 7. v. 9. 1. Tim. â— v. 17. 18. Matt. 5. v. 17. cogitations to wit that he entertayned no euill thought or cogitation against God but iudged wel of his goodnes and the 70. Interpreters subscribe hereunto who read in all these things which hapned vnto him Ioâ— sinned not at all in the sight of our Lord. The like King Dauid affirmed of himselfe Thou o Lord hast tryed me in fire and there was no iniquity found in me Therefore albeit he otherwise offended yet at that tyme he was cleane from sinne as also when he sayd Iudge me o Lord according to my iustice and according to my innocency Moreouer some workes of the iust are pronounced by the holy Ghost to be good God giueth vs all things abundantly to enioy to do well to become rich in good workes That they may see your good workes and glorify your Father which is in heauen And yet they could not be good nor commendable in
sinne ayded by God S. Augustine which he strengthneth by the authority of S. Ambrose affirming him truly to impugne them who say à man cannot be without sinne in this life And in the same booke Sinne may be auoyded but by his helpe who cannot be deceaued Thus Origen affirmeth that holy Iob and his children were pure and spotles from the fault of transgression in so much as the Magdeburgian Protestants reprehend him for it saying Naughtily doth he attribute so much innocency to Iobs children as Adam and Eue had in Paradise naughtily also doth he ascribe vnto Iob that he was naked and deuoyd of sinne of impietyes of all vnlawfulnes Likewise that he neyther sinned in his cogitations nor in the conferences of his soule or affayres of his hart Besides in Lactantius they taxe this sentence of his If any one be purified from all spot of sinne let him not thinke he may abstayne from the worke of largition or giuing almes because he hath no sinnes to wash away And in the same booke I proceed with their owne words vnfittingly doth he say That one may be acceptable vnto God and be free from all blemish let him alwayes implore the mercy of our Lord c. In Theodoret they reproue and place among his errours that he affirmed Paul therefore not to be hurt of the viper because he was without sinne In S. Hierome they distast this Our soule as long as it abydeth in her infancy wanteth sinn So that Origen Lactantius Theodoret and S. Hierome are by our Aduersaries owne confession wholy with vs in this point of fayth 2. Notwithstanding against these auncient Fathers Isa 64. v. 6. they oppose on their side the Ancient of Dayes euen God himselfe speaking by the Prophet Isay All we are become as one vncleane and all our iustices as the cloath of a menstrued woman Therefore vnles we thinke our selues better then Abbot c. 4. sect 3. Orig. ad Rom. c. 3. Hier. in Isa c. 64. Aug soliâ—o c 28. Bernar. ser 1. in fest omn. sanct de verb. Isa ser 5. in dedic Eccles ser 5. Aluarez à Medina in eum loc our forefathers all good workes say they are stayned with iniquity which M. Abbot contenaunceth with the like sayings of Origen S. Hierome S. Augustine and S. Bernard I answere first with S. Hierome vpon that place of Isay that there he deploreth the desolation and captiuity of the Iewes in behalfe of those sinners for whose offences they were so miserably afflicted and in their person vttereth those wordes not in his owne Or in respect of the iust and holy men that then flourished amongst them Secondly I answere that the Prophet speaketh not there as Aluarez à Medina well noteth of all the workes of the foresayd offendours in generall but of their sacrifices Holocaustes Kalends and other externall solemnities by which they falsly deemed themselues cleane and sanctified in the sight of God these their iustices he pronounced to be like a menstruous defiled cloath because they consisted only in the pompe of outward ceremony without the sincerity of inward worship after which manner God sayd by the mouth of the same Prophet Offer sacrifice no Isa c. 1. v. 13. 14. more in vayne Incense is abhomination vnto me the new Moone and the Sabaoth and other festiuities I will not abyde your assemblies are wicked my soule hateth your Kalends your solemnities Thirdly I answere that al our iustices al our pious workes albeit good and holy considered by themselues yet compared and paralelled with the vnmatchable purity and holynes of God are truly termed vncleane and defiled according to the accustomed phrase of holy Scripture which calleth thinges in themselues great in comparison of him litle or nothing All nations as if they were not so are Isa 40. v. 17. they before him and they are reputed of him as nothing Thinges in themselues fayre and glittering foule and vncleane contemplated by him Beholde the Moone also doth not shine Iob. 25. v. 5. 6. the stars are not cleane in his sight how much more maÌ„ rottenesse the sonne of a man a worme Things most white and beautifull filthy and loathsome matched with him If I be wasbed as it were with snow waters and my hands shall shine as immaculate yet shalt thou dippe me in filth and my garments shall abhorre me that is as S. Gregory commenteth Although I be Greg. l. 9. mor. c. 19. filled with the groanes of heauenly compunction although I be exercised by the study of vpright operation yet in thy cleanesse I see I am not cleane 3. For this cause the Royall Prophet how innocent Psal 141. soeuer might cry out and say Enter not o Lord into iudgment with thy seruant because no liuing creature shall be iustifyed in thy sight which sentence Abbot vrging against vs exaggerateth Abbot c. 4. sect 47. fol. 590. thus Dauid sayth it a Prophet sayth it a man after Gods owne hart sayth it And what if a Saint in heauen what if a Cherubim should say it might he not truly say it measuring his righteousnes with the infinite sanctity and holines Greg in c. 4. Iob. Hilar. Hieron Arnobius Euthi in eundem psal Aug l. adu Orosium c. 10. Aug. l. de perfect iustie Hier. ep ad Ctesiphou Greg. in eun psal Aug. in eun psal Iob. 4. v. 28. Caietan Eugub Vatablus in eun loc Symmach of God For as S. Gregory writeth Human iustice compared with diuine is iniustice because a lanterne in darkenes is seene to giue light but placed in the sunne beames it is obscured and darkned And thus S. Hilary S. Hierome Arnobius and Euthimius expound that place of the Psalme neyther doth S. Augustine dissent froÌ„ them saying By whose participation they are iust by comparison with him they are not iust Another exposition is of the same S. Augustine S. Hierome and S. Gregory vpon that Psalme that the Prophet vttered the former speach in respect of veniall sinnes with which the most iust and holy men are often infected and which God strictly examineth and seuerely punisheth The third interpretation is of S. Augustine also vpon this Psalme That no man can be iustifyed of himselfe before the face of God but the iustice he hath he receaueth from him So Caietan Eugubinus and Vatalbus expound those wordes of Iob In his Angells he found prauity or as Symmachus readeth vanity because they of themselues had no goodnes no verity no essence or being but participated all from the soueraygne bounty of God According to these three last expositions we satisfy al the ambiguous and obscure sayings our aduersaries oppose against vs euen that of S. Bernard which they vainly boast to be vnanswerable Shall not our iustice if it be strictly Bern in fest omn. sanct sâ—r 1. Abbot e. 4. sect 3. fol. 393. Bern ser 5. de verb. Isa Aug. l. 9. confess c. 13. Idem
my whole hart I in al my hart will search thy commmandments Howbeit he busied also Iudith â— 17. 2. Reg. 5. v. 1â— himselfe in the affayres of the common wealth and was often distracted with temporall cares And the priestes and people prayed God with al their hart although they were sometyme interrupted with other cogitations All Israell is sayd 4. Reg. 23. v. 25. to follow Absalom with al their hart albeyt they managed some other affayres no doubt and affected some other thing besides him Of Iosias God himselfe witnesseth There was no king before him like to him that returned to our Lord in all his hart and in all his soule and in all his power according to the law of Moyses neyther after him did there arise the like to him 6. In fine Protestantes obserue the precept of Faith by which they are likewise commaunded to beleeue withall their hart Yf thou beleeue with all thy hart thou maiest Act. 8. v. 3â— notwithstanding they giue humane credit to many other authentical histories or probable reportes without hinderance thereof so they may accomplish the commandment of louing God with all the powers of their soule when this loue ouerswayeth the loue of all other thinges when they make him the principall obiect of their hart and summe of their desires when they neyther imbrace nor execute any thing oppofite or disagreable with his frendiship which diuers haue and euery one may by the prerogatiue of Grace atteyne vnto Thirdly S. Paul professeth I can all thinges in him that strengthneth me therfore he could by the strenght of grace fulfil the commaundments or els you derogate both from the authority of the Apostle who affirmeth it and from the power of grace by vertue whereof he many accomplish whatsoeuer Moreouer Philip. 4. v. 13. God maketh this promise vnto vs I will put my spirit in the middest of you and I will make that you walke in my preceptes and keepe my iudgements and doe them Christ testifieth the performance I haue manifested thy name to the men whome thou Ezech. 36. v. 27. gauest me c. and they haue kept thy word Yet notwithstanding the possibility S. Paul speaketh of notwithstanding the promise of God the Father notwithstanding the accomplishment the Sonne mentioneth do they breath vpon Ioh. 17. v. 6 the earth and vaunt of Christianity who depose against them that neuer any fulfilled the law That it is not possible for man to accomplish it 7. Thus much for the mayntenance of our doctrine Now to the obiections of aduersaries First they vrge out S. Paul Cursed be euery one that abideth not in all things that be Gal. 3. v. 10. written in the booke of the law to do them But no man can obserue euery iote of the law without some litle or veniall default therefore he is obnoxious to that damnable curse Iac. 2. v. 10. For whosoeuer shall keep the whole law and offendeth but in one is made guiltie of all Truly they haue framed an excellent Argument to proue themselues accursed who freely confesse they cannot keep any one precept of the law much lesse the whole But we to whome the coÌ„mandments by Gods Hier. Ep. ad Pâ—efiph 1. Iob. 3. v. 6. 9. grace are possible according to S. Hierome we who by the seed of God dwelling in vs do not sinne but arriue to the full accomplishment of the law and of all thinges written and conteyned therein we I say are free from that malediction for veniall sinnes do not in that sense breake or violate the law neyther doth S. Paul pronounce that curse of them as appeareth by the playne text of Deuteronomy whence he reciteth those words but of mortal and deadly crimes of Idolatry incest murder c. which are indeed grieuous breaches traÌ„nsgressions of the Law Therfore Deuâ— 17â— v. 26. he that obserueth the rest and coÌ„mitteth any one of those is liable to the curse of the law he is made guilty as S. Iames witnesseth of the whole not that he who stealeth should be guilty of adultery or he who is an adulterer is therein a murderer or that he who traÌ„sgresseth one coÌ„maundement shal be as seuerely punished tormented in hell as if he had brokeÌ„ al but the sense is that he who offeÌ„deth in one eyther incurreth the wrath and indignation of God the vniuersal authour enacter of them al or caÌ„ haue no more Aug. ep 26 hope of obtayning saluatioÌ„ then if he were guilty of al or that he sinneth as S. Augustine interpreteth against the general great coÌ„mandment of loue Charity the summe the band the plenitude and perfection of them all for the breaking of the band is the dissoluing of the whole 8. I answere agayne that S. Pauls argument here alleadged inferreth the possibility of keeping the law for which we dispute he reasoneth to this effect Whosoeuer wil be iustified by the workes of the law must fullfill the whole taske of the law But without faith in Christ no man can by the force of nature vndergo or do the whole taske of the Law Therfore without faith through the strength of nature no man can be iustified by the workes of the law Hence he inferreth Christ hath deliuereth vs froÌ„ the eurse of the law he doth not meane as Protestants falsify him that he hath discharged vs from the obseruation of the law as from a thing vnpossible but that he inspireth fayth and affordeth grace from the Storehouse of of his merites whereby we may keepe the law and so eschewthe malediction or curse of transgression which the delinquentes incurre 9. Secondly it is opposed Now therefore why tempt you God to put a yoake vpon the neckes of the disciples which neyther our Fathers nor we haue beene able to beare I answere that S. Act. 15. v. 10. Peter there calleth not the obseruation of the decalogue but the ceremoniall law of the Iewes a yoake insupportable because it was very hard and difficult as S. Thomas S. Thom. in 2. dist 28. q. 1. at 4. ad 3. Lyran. in bunolocuÌ„ Rab. Moy. 3. duct dub cap. 56. 57. Abulen in c. 1. Ruth q. 24. Ios 11. v. 15. and Lyranus note to be fulfilled For all their precepts were as Rabby Moyses and Abulensis recount them 600. or there about amongst which were 218. that were affirmatiue and 365. negatiue commandements then the obligation of them was strictly and punctually to be obserued the transgression capitall and punished with all seuerity yet King Dauid Zachary Elizabeth Moyses Iosue c. fulfilled them for of Iosue the Scripture giueth testimony He accomplished all thinges he omitted not of all the commandementes not so much as one worde which our Lord had commanded Moyses Now Christ hath exempted vs from that combersome yoke from that Burthen as S. Augustine calleth it of innumerable Ceremonies yet not which Libertines pretend from the * Aug.