and Christ himselfe are mocked From this discourse of Discipline besides the nature of it appears 1. The weight of it binding to wrath or loosing from it retaining or remitting sins opening the kingdome of heaven to the penitent or shutting it against the impenitent casting out of the commonion of the faithfull cutting off from the body of Christ delivering over to Satan or readmission into the communion of the faithfull reimplanting into the body of Christ rescue from their subjection to Satan and so as all this done here upon earth where rightly administred is confirmed in heaven 2. The necessity of it 1. Standing upon so cleare a precept and institution of Christ therefore being a Gospel ordinance unchangeable 2. Being so maine a part of the visible kingdome of Christ as Mediator 3. From the ends of it for reclaiming and gaining of offending brethren from deterring others from the like offences for purging out that old leaven which might infect the whole lump for vindicating the honour of Christ and the holy profession of the Gospel and for preventing the wrath of God which might justly fall upon the Church if they should suffer his Covenant and the Seale thereof to be prophaned by notorious and obstinate offenders CHAP. IV. The third Instruction To the people of the Church it belongs by divine right to chuse their Officers THat Christ hath appointed Officers in his Church for the administration of the Word Sacraments and Discipline we need not prove The confirmation of this Proposition that the choyce of Officers is the peoples right makes not a little for the due setling the Church For this I shall do three things 1. Point to the Scriptures teaching this truth 2. Adde some reasons according to Scripture 3. Give in the testimonies first of the Primitive then of the reformed Churches 1. For the Scriptures Acts 1.15 with 23. The Disciples go as farre as is possible for man to have an hand in chusing an Apostle who must have his commission immediately from God they appoint two and give forth lots Acts 6.3 4 5. The whole multitude chuse their Deacons and present them to the Apostles for Ordination Acts 14.23 It is said of Paul and Barnabas when they had ordained Elders to the Churches the word translated ordained signifies solemnely to appoint to office upon the peoples vote or choyce or suffrage So Stephen in his Treasure of the Greek tongue renders it to make or create by suffrage See Calvin and Beza afterwards 2. For reasons 1. The Officers are given for the good of the Church Ephes 4 11 12. therefore she may in a certaine and ordinary way procure them which yet in many cases she cannot do if she have not right to chuse them 2. They are given to the Church 1 Cor. 3.21 22. therefore she hath a right to call them to her selfe If she depended upon either Magistrate or Patron or any other for a right to call her Officers they were then rather given to them on whom she should so depend then to her 3. Otherwise the Church sc the company of Beseevers should be in a worse condition then any Society as to the setling of her selfe in her best state no people without rulers over them and Officers for their good but may settle such among themselves as the experience of all Common-wealths shews 4. In this choyce of the faithfull is laid the foundation of greater love betwixt the people and their Officers and so the ministry of the Officers becomes more fruitfull 5. The faithful are to hear the true Teachers to shun the false to try the spirits which imports 1. Morall ability for chusing 2. A right of chusing or applying themselves to the true Ministers add to these Christian practise and experience what faithfull soule makes any scruple of leaving a faithlesse and unedifying Minister at home to go abroad for enjoying a faithfull and edifying ministry which yet might not be allowed if Christians had not a right to chuse their own Officers 3. For testimonies 1. Of the ancient Church Cyprian who lived a great light of the Church about 240 yeares more or lesse after Christ is plentifull herein As in the Scripture testimonies it appears so in those times according to the Scriptures and so in the reformed Churches Ordination of Officers succeeded their Election Hence Cyprian to the Presbyters Deacons and all the people in the Ordination of ministers Most dear brethren we are alwayes wont to advise with you and to weigh the manners and merits of every one by Common Counsel Epist 33. according to Pamelius Edition at the beginning Cyprian to the people to avoid the faction of Felicissimus and five Presbyters siding with him speaking of them Epist 40. They mindfull of their conspiracy against my Episcopacy Episcopacy distinct from Presbytery had then place in the Church though of a far purer stamp then our Prelacy nay against your suffrage or Election by vote and the judgement of God renew their old opposition c. he justifies his own standing by the peoples choice of him to the same purpose upon the occasion he speaks Epist 55. Cyprian to Antonianus a brother about Cornelius chosen Bishop of Rome by the people and the ministery And Novatian seeking to make himselfe Bishop Cornelius is thus justified that he was made Bishop by the judgement of God and Christ by the Testimony of almost all the ministery by the vote or suffrage of the people then present c. Here was the ministers testimony but the choice the peoples Epist 52. the same Cornelius he justifies against Novatian and that with the concurrent judgement of a councel assembled upon the same ground the suffrage of the ministry and people Epist 67. Cyprian to the ministry of Spaine Cyprian with his fellow-Bishops assembled praiseth the ministry and people of Spaine that they had by lawful Election placed Sabinus and Felix in stead of Basilides and Martial lapsed Bishops we have here most pregnant testimonies and proofes of the peoples right in chusing They when they had met together read letters out of Spaine desiring their advice where in answer Cyprian with the rest of the Bishops first urging of how great 〈◊〉 it is that the minister or Bishop be holy he thus speaks further Wherefore it behoves that with full diligence and sincere tryall they be chosen to the ministery who are such as God may heare their Prayers Neither let the people flatter themselves as though they might be free from guilt communicating with a sinful minister or Bishop and affording their consent to the unjust and unlawfull Episcopacy or ministery of him that is set over them A little after Therefore the people obeying the Lords Commandments and fearing God ought to separate themselves from a sinful Church ruler neither mixe themselves at the sacrifices of a sacrilegious Priest forasmuch as they have the greatest power either of chusing the worthy Priests that was the language of those times for Bishops
distinct from and above Presbyters is manifest in this instance of the Church of Alexandria where till Heraclas and Dionysius a Bishop was no other but one of the Presbyters by the choice and consent of the rest set in an higher degree 2. Another pretence from antiquity is the Catalogues of Bishops succeeding each other in such and such Churches Answ How doth it appeare that these Bishops had peculiar Ordination and above Presbyters there is as formall a Catalogue given in of the Bishops of Alexandria as of any other Church succeeding Mark the Evangelist in this order 1. Anianus 2. Abilius 3. Cerdo 4. Primus 5. Justus 6. Eumenes 7. Marcus 8. Celadion 9. Agrippas or Agrippinus 10. Julianus 11. Demetrius 12. Heraclas 13. Dionysius Whereas yet we have it cleare from Ierome that Heraclas was the first who had distinct Ordination and Office above a Presbyter 3. Pretence from antiquity such testimonies as are given to the honour and power of Bishops by the Ancients and here above all Ignatius helps at every turne Answ 1. Forasmuch as five of his Epistles are granted by diverse advocates of Episcopacy to be such as do evidently betray no little forgery who shall assure us that those seven by them avouched in all things genuine are so indeed what more unlikely then that they should escape tampering by the same hands 2. Those seven most stood upon are by very learned men amongst others Salmasius judged in the very testimonies very spurious and that not from blasse but upon good grounds 1. The arrogance of some of them take that for one in his Epistle to the Trallians What is the Bishop but he that is strongly possest of all Principality and Authority beyond all as much as is possible for men to be possest being made an imitatour according to Power of Christ who is God He that can find here an Apostolicall spirit breathing surely hath little acquaintance with the Apostles writings saith Salmasius and indeed how unlike to that of the Apostle is it 1 Cor. 3.5 Who then is Paul and who is Apollo but ministers by whom you beleeved c. This was Pauls way to take up schisme how contrary to this Ignatius here for the Prevention of it 2 Of the falsenesse of some that in the same Epistle Reverence the Bishop as Christ as the blessed Apostles commanded you Where is this command That in his Epistle to the Smyrnians Let that be accounted a firme Eucharist which is by the Bishop administred or by him to whom he shall have committed it it is not lawfull without the Bishop either to baptize or to offer c. Hath not the Holy Ghost committed preaching and baptisme and administration of the Supper joyntly to every Presbyter this sounds ill in every care except of Papist or Prelate the Church of Alexandria had no true baptisme for about two hundred and sixty years if this be true doctrine as for the Reformed Churches they are in the same case 3. The idolatrous strayne of some take that in the same Epistle In the Church is nothing greater then the Bishop consecrate to God for the salvation of the whole world 4. The impertinencie of some take that in his Epistle to the Philadelphians Let the Princes obey the Emperour the Souldiers the Princes the Deacons the Presbyters those High-Priests the Presbyters and the Deacons and the rest of the Clergy and who are they I wonder and what part of the Clergy is the Deacon with all the People and the Souldiers and the Princes and the Emperour let them obey the Bishop Setting aside other flawes what impertinencie is here to enjoyne the Princes and the Emperour to obey the Bishop when there were not at this time nor many years after any Emperour or Princes Christian These are some few gleanings more of the like stamp there to be found that not without reason it is by the learned conjectured that about the beginning or middle of the second Century was this forged Author surreptitiously brought into the Church about which time this kinde of Episcopacy soaring above Presbytery began 3. How little our prelates and their party regard his writings only they plead them to serve their own turne is manifest that we hear so little from them of subjection to the Presbyters and Deacons which Ignatius urgeth so much in his Epistle to the Trallians It is necessary that ye do nothing without the Bishop but that ye be in subjection likewise to the Presbytery as to the Apostles of Jesus Christ And ye ought by all means to please the Deacons being of the mysteries of Jesus Christ The Presbyters are the great Councell of God and the Chain of the Apostles of Jesus Christ In his Epistle to those in Tarsus Let the Presbyter be subject to the Bishop the Deacons to the Presbyters the People to the Presbyters and the Deacons they that keep this good order my soul for theirs Much more to the same purpose up and down in him where Salmasius conjectures this spurious Author was about the midst or towards the beginning of the second century whilst the Presbytery yet retaind much of its authority Now what do our Prelates and their party here For Presbyters they allow them no rule by way of jurisdiction for Deacons they have first changed their office and then ordered it so as it is never long standing being only a degree to Presbytery And indeed here this Ignatius seemes to ascribe that office and power to Deacons which the scripture takes no notice of which hath appointed them to the service of tables not to preach and rule in the Church as Jerome argues and this furthers discovers that this is no true Ignatius 4. Conclude from Jerome that before schisme fell out in the Churches and that long after the Apostles times the Church was governed only by Presbyters that the Bishop above the Presbyters was brought into some Churches sooner into others later according as schisme gave the occasion that it was about 260 years ere this change was made in the Church of Alexandria that wheresoever it was made it stands not upon divine authority but upon Church Custome and this by Scripture strongly proved therefore these testimonies of Ignatius or whatsoever the like so farre as they plead for Episcopacy above Presbytery cannot stand either with the truth of the Scripture or the practice of the first and purest Churches We returne to Jerome his Epistle to Evagrius That which next follows concernes not the matter in hand but is against the superiority of the Bishop of Rome and against a perverse custome in Rome that a Presbyter was ordained upon the testimony of a Deacon that which concernes the present question followes in these words Presbyter and Bishop one is the name of age the other of dignity whence to Titus and Timothy the Apostle speaks of the Ordination of the Bishop and Deacon concerning the Presbyters he is altogether silent because in the Bishop the Presbyter
Prophanation of the name of God as giving no apparant hopes of repentance let us hear the judgement of some the most approved and excellent Expositors Calvin upon the place thus This Confession was a Testimony of repentance that men may rightly offer themselves to baptisme the Confession of sins is required of them otherwise the whole action was nothing else but an idle toying furthermore it is to be observed that who are here spoken of were persons come to years who we know are not to be admitted promiscuously of the Church nor by baptisme to be entred into the body of Christ till they have first been tryed The same Calvin upon Acts 19.18 having witnessed of those there spoken of that they did indeed testify that they were throughly affected with the serious fear of God who did of their own accord confesse the crimes of their former life least by their dissembling they should inwardly nourish the wrath of God he addes concerning those who came to Johns baptisme that by the Confession of their sins they made profession that they were not feignedly entred into repentance Beza upon the same place viz. Matth. 3.6 thus They are said by the Jewes to confesse their sinnes who acknowledge themselves all manner of wayes to be sinners and seek for pardon from the mercy of God as Dan. 9.3 c. Hence it appeares saith he that John admitted none to his Baptisme but such as gave testimony that they seriously embraced the doctrine of the free remission of sinnes and such a like publique confession was required of the Catechumens in the ancient Church called by the name of Exomologesis Piscator in his observations upon Matth. 3. v. 6 8 10. speaks thus Baptisme is not to be applyed to any of yeares till he have first made confession of his sinnes and of his faith in Christ and further promise of an holy life all these did John require saith he of those that came to be baptized of him for the first it is cleare verse 6. for the second it is manifest out of the words of Paul Acts 19.4 where he saith John baptized with the baptisme of repentance saying to the people that they should beleeve upon him who was to come after John himselfe that is Christ Jesus Compare Acts 8.16 For the third it is evident from verse 8.10 of this third of Matth which is particularly declared and applyed to divers kinds of life Luke 3.10 c. Thus we see these excellent men judicious and sincere in their generation gather'd no such shuffing conclusions from the history of Johns baptism recorded in Scripture as many of ours are wont to gather who plead the numbers recorded by John as an argument that he did and we may receive into Church society all comers for further discovery here let us look into another Scripture concerning John and those received by him together with the judgements of those excellent and true hearted Divines upon the place the text of Scripture is Matth. 11.12 and it shewes how they were affected at least apparently who came in so great numbers to be baptized of John compare it with Luke 16.16 Piscator here It shewes the effect of Johns Doctrine to wit that many embraced that Doctrine with great zeale and so took the Kingdome of heaven as it were by force Beza The Kingdome of heaven suffereth violence They break into it as it were by a certaine force for this treasure of our heavenly father lies open as it were to all earnestly by every one to be laid hold upon which he might seeme formerly to have hid as it is unfolded Rom. 16.25 26. which compared with this text now in hand we are given to understand both how entrance into the Kingdome of heaven is offered us to wit by the preaching of the Gospel and how offerd it is received by us truly by force made upon our selves for beleeving and by the persevering heat of zeal Take it by force Beza againe They snatch it to themselves or they storme it a Metaphor taken from Tents or from some Castle which is stormed by enemies breaking into it So that fervent force of the spirit is signified by which the faithfull being transported are carried with earnest desire and endeavour unto eternal life Cabvin 1. There is no doubt but Christ commends the majesty of the Gospel upon this ground that it was sought after with the servent desire and endeavour of many for as God had raised up John to be the Horald of the kingdome of his Son so he put the efficacy of the spirit into his Doctrine that it should pierce into the hearts of men and should kindle that their heat he addes from these words of Christ we learne what is the true nature and manner of faith verily that men do not coldly and overly agree to God when he speakes to them but that with an ardent affection they aspire after him and do as it were by a violent endeavour break through Bucer The violent take it by force that is they who are so enflamed with desire of the kingdome that they cast life and all things behinde their backs so they may be made partakers of the Gospel and citizens of the kingdome of heaven then he refers this place to Luke 7.28 29. ads this people and these Publicans who neglecting all things received with greatest zeale the word of God first by John then by Christ and his disciples justifying God that is as well by free confession of their sins as with most earnest nor lesse acceptable embracing of offered grace both acknowledging and proclaiming God just and the justifier are those violent ones which make force upon the kingdome of heaven and by force take it and doth not a man seem to take that by force for which he runs the hazard of life by these we are taught that the treasure of the Gospel befals not any but those who have sought it with most 〈◊〉 desire and even love to hazard and lose al things for it Thus Bucer hence we see how in the judgement of these worthy lights in the Church Johns hearers were affected when by him received 2. For the Apostles and those received by them Acts 2.41 to the end Acts 4.32 33 34 35. Acts 8.36 37. read the places see Calvin likewise upon Acts 5.13 where he thus shewes of how pure a constitution the visible Church then was having observed it one fruit of the Miracle that unbelievers affrighted with so remarkable a judgement upon Ananias and Saphira durst not contemne the Apostles c. He addes though Luke ascribes not this onely to the Miracles but rather comprehends all things together which might make for the encreasing the dignity of the Church for so were all things ordered as that a certaine divine majesty shined among them for they differed no otherwise from others then Angels do from men for there is in holy discipline and the sincere observation of godlinesse a secret kinde of
majesty which awes even the wicked whether they will or not but we are at this day strangers to it nay by our prophane libertie of living wickedly we render our selves together with the Gospel contemptible Thus much for the fifth Argument 6. From expresse Command of the Churches separation from the openly wicked 2 Cor. 6.17 with the former verses Object The wicked here are heathen and profest Infidels Answ 1. The Apostle urgeth in his expostulation v. 14 15 16. such a repugnancy in the Churches Communion with those wicked ones as betwixt light and darknesse righteousnesse and unrighteousnesse Christ and Belial that the Church then may answer that part of the comparison which belongs to her be those wicked ones who they will she must consist of a righteous people 2. If the Church must separate from them because darknesse unrighteousnesse c. then from those who are such in life whatsoever in word they professe being as evill in Scripture account as such heathen and termed infidels or unbeleeving Tit. 1.15 16. worse then profest Infidels 1 Tim. 5.8 and those who have a forme of Godlines and therefore in word professe the true God at the least but deny the power of it guilty of open wickednesse are to be turned from 2 Tim. 3.5 3. Otherwise manifest Prophanation of the name of God with a palpable lye 1 John 1.6 7. should entitle to the great honour of Church-Communion the great Priviledges thereto belonging and the visible Church should be no Temple refusing the unclean but a common Inne for all Commers a Cage of unclean birds a Sty for swine 4. Many most abominable hereticks may in word professe the true God to whom yet it is granted generally that Church-Communion is to be denied Adde Ishmael Esau c. profest the true God yet they were not of the Church 7. From the doctrine of discipline Mat. 18.15 c 1. The visible Church is a brotherhood If thy brother sinne c. and this brotherhood founded in Christ John 20.17 but doth Christ owne as brethren God as children any but such as are in some degree sanctified apparantly so that they may be apparantly owned 2. The duties by our Saviour required in the exercise of discipline from any Church member indefinitely cannot be expected from any other both here admonishing in the three degrees with aime at gaining a brother c. 1 Cor. 5.2 It is required of the Church that they be mourners when any proves scandalous among them to the Church of which the people are a maine part is the power of Christ committed for casting out and delivering up to Satan v. 4 5. in case of neglect hereof the whole lump is leavened viz. the whole Congregation is under guilt neglect here is a sin tending to the dischurching of Churches Rev. 2.14.20 c. with all scandalous of the Church familiar society is to be refused by every Church-member v. 9.10 〈◊〉 such severity herein is required as cannot be exercised towards all scandalous with whom we must needs have commerce in this world v. 11. the scandalous within the Church when any prove such are by the Church to be judged v. 12. and put away v. 13. the end of all is to humble shame and recover the fallen sinner Now how can these things be expected from the Church if wicked Persons shall be allowed the matter of the Church Can they deliver to Satan that are themselves delivered to him c. have they share in the power of Christ who are themselves under the power of Satan what is there in a company of wicked Persons to humble and shame a wicked Person how shall they act in any of their duties depending upon discipline who have no Principles for it 2 Thes 3.6 If he that walks inordinately having been formerly received must be withdrawne from then such a one not yet received is not to be received and generally forasmuch as scandalous when in are to be cast out not in they are to be left out They who confine all Church-power to the officers alone will here take offence that in following this Argument we allow a share of that power to the people to that we shall speak more fully and purposely hereafter in due place 8. From the Testimonies given to the Churches in most of the Epistles especially about the beginning as Rom. 1.8 c. 15. v. 14. 1 Cor. 1.4 to 10. Phil. 1.3 to 9. 1 Thes 1.2 to the end 2 Thes 1.3 to 8. read the places so of those seven Asian Churches some very pure as Smyrna and Philadelphia so as no fault found with them others as Ephesus Pergamus and Thyatira a very faire Testimony of them both what they had beene and what in part they were though not a little lapsed but both against them and the other two most corrupt Sardis and Laodicea their dischurching is severely threatned except they shall returne to a purer state Object The Apostle gives a faire Testimony to the Church of Corinth yet were there many great enormities among them Answ 1. His Testimony is to the Church generally but with exception of such as walke disorderly in the Church as appears in that 2. He requires the Church to proceed in way of discipline against such so as in case they persevere in their evill Course to cut them off from the Communion of Saints whence 3. it appears that in their admission they were not discovered such whence that which may hence be gathered is that a Church rightly constitute is not presently upon her degenerating in many of her members to be forsaken but they so degenerating to be cut off 4. The retaining of such in the Church involved the whole Church in guilt and threatned wrath 1 Cor. 5.6 and c. 11.30 so Rev. 2.14 15 16 20. c. whence we may lay down this Conclusion such persons are not the true matter of the Church the retaining of whom in the Church makes evidently for her destruction but such are the openly wicked foul hereticks 5. However the Church of Corinth was by her false Teachers first staggered out of the way in something of doctrine and thence grew remisse in discipline for a time yet it appears by their speedy and sound repentance 2 Cor. 7. that they were generally and habitually a very holy people 9. From the practise of the primitive Churches after the Apostles times in two things it appears how choice the matter of the Church then was 1. The 〈◊〉 all of their Catechumens when any formerly heathen wrought upon by the preaching of the Gospel professed their embracing of the Christian Religion renouncing their former folse worship and desired the Church to take them into her care for their spirituall state the Church accordingly took them into her care for instruction and edifying but did not receive them into her fellowship any further then to heare the word till they gave a good account both of their Christian knowledge and Christian
had for ordaining some among them to be their Ministers it were not worth the having but withall it being impossible to be had the call and confirmation of the Church is sufficient as Beza pleads for the first Reformers in Acts 14.23 But further for clearing this scruple we lay down CHAP. VIII The sixth Instruction That Bishops in office above Presbyters are no Church-officers of divine institution it is pleaded by Jerome from Scripture and the highest Gospel-antiquity THere is a Divine Bishop one and the same with a Presbyter or a Pastor or Teacher of a Congregation and Elder labouring in the Word and Doctrine there is an humane Bishop one that pleads his office to be above the Presbyters or Pastors office and two things he challengeth above the Presbyter 1. Power of Ordination 2. Power of Jurisdiction Jerome a learned Father famous about 390 yeeres after Christ in his Epistle to Evagrius and in his Commentary upon the Epistle to Titus speaks clearly to this question both from Scripture and from the first Gospel antiquity I have therefore thought fit to translate that Epistle and thence to observe his Arguments from Scripture as likewise what he produceth from antiquity that we might at once give double light to this question knowing well that where antiquity is used against the Scripture it is nothing worth but whereit stands fair with the Scripture it may be a secondary confirmation of the true meaning of Scripture to the impartial enquiter after truth and an argument fully in force against the adversary pretending antiquity for his Error This Epistle is directed against a certaine person who would have a Deacon to be above a Presbyter against whom thus Jerome We read in Isaiah the fool will speak folly I hear of one who hath broken forth into so great folly that he would prefer Deacons before Presbyters that is before Bishops For when the Apostle teacheth clearly that Presbyters are the same with Bishops who may endure that the servant of tables and widowes should lift up himselfe swollen above them by whose prayers the body and blood of Christ is consecrate Seekest thou authority Heare the Testimony Paul and Timothy Phil. 1. the Servants of Jesus Christ to all the Saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons Acts 20. Wilt thou another example In the Acts of the Apostles thus Paul writes to the Ministers Sacerdotes of one Church Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over which the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops for it is the same word here that every otherwhere is translated Bishops that yee might rule the Church of the Lord so he reads it which he hath purchased with his owne blood And that no man may contentiously wrangle that there were many Bishops in one Church hear yet another testimony by which it is most manifestly proved Tit. 1. that a Bishop and Presbyter are one and the same For this end I left thee in Creet that thou mightest redresse the things that were wanting that thou mighest appoint Presbyters in every City as I have also commanded thee If any man be without blame the husband of one wife have faithful children 1 Tim. 4. not accused of riot or disobedient for it behooves a Bishop to be without blame as the Steward of God And to Timothy Neglect not the grace which is in thee which was given thee by prophecy with the laying on of hands of the Presbytery But Peter likewise in his first Epistle saith 1 Pet. 5. The Elders or Presbyters which are among you I intreat who am your fellow-Elder and a witnesse of the suffrings of Christ and also a partaker of glory to come which is to be revealed that yee rule the flock of Christ and oversee it not of necessity but willingly according to God which in the Greek is more significantly exprest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Bishoping that is overseeing them from whence the name of Bishop is drawne Do the testimonies of these so great men seem small to thee let the Gospel-trumpet sound the Son of thunder whom Jesus loved so much who drunk the flowing streams of doctrine out of his Saviours breast The Presbyter to the elect Lady and to her children whom I love in the truth And in another Epistle The Presbyter to the wel-beloved Caius whom I love in the truth Hitherto Ierome Here we have both clearly affirmed and strongly confirmed that a Bishop in office above a Presbyter is no where to be found in Scripture but Bishop and Presbyter are two names of one and the same office so that whatsoever belongs to any Bishop by vertue of his office the same belongs to every Presbyter as he is a Presbyter For clearing both his affirmation and confirmation we must observe that in his time the custome of the Church had obtained that some were single Presbyters others so Presbyters as withall Bishops challenging above single Presbyters the Power of Ordination at the least themselves likewise ordained not by single Presbyters as they called them but by Bishops and it is pleaded by the Advocates of Episcopacy at this day that the Apostles before their death ordained severall Bishops in office above Presbyters as formerly we laid down over the Churches in severall cities and these Bishops in continuall succession ordained others neither can a Bishop be ordained by Presbyters nor a presbyter without a Bishop at least ordinarily Against this Jerome pleads taxing the great errour of them that would preferre a Deacon to a Presbyter That it is all one to preferre him to a Bishop for according to Scripture the one is neither greater nor lesse then the other neither is there any such distinction of single Presbyter from the Bishop but they are one and the same and this he saith the Apostle teacheth clearly and having affirmed this he proves it by many Arguments 1. From the granted operation belonging to the Presbyters office as such and therefore to every Presbyter which is to consecrate the body and bloud of Christ Where is the highest officiall operation there is the highest office but in the hands of every Presbyter is the highest officiall operation for we may not thinke that either imposition of hands in Ordination or passing sentence in excommunication are acts of higher nature then consecrating the elements in the Supper and this belongs to every Presbyter by vertue of his office therefore in the hands of every Presbyter is the highest office The like Argument we have 1 Tim. 5.17 Those acts which are most worthy of honour are the highest but such is labouring in the word and doctrine belonging to every minister of the word compared with ruling challenged by the Bishop 2. Argument from the two first testimonies Phil. 1.1 and Acts 20. Of Bishops above Presbyters there is but one belongs to a city But here are many to one city to Philippi to Ephesus and these were one and the same
with Presbyters The denyall of the Proposition he accounts contentious wrangling whence this discourse proceeds clear 3. Argument from the same testimonies The name of Bishop is equally given to all the Elders Phil. 1. All the ministers saluted by that name for what reason can be imagined supposing Bishops and Elders distinct why he should salute only the Bishops and Deacons and leave out all the other ministers Acts 20. the same who are called Elders v. 17. are Bishops v. 28. The same Argument Tit. 1.5 with the seventh 4. Argument from the last testimonie Where the names are used indifferently one for another and the selfe same qualifications for office subjoyned to each name there the selfe same office is set out under each name But so it is here The Apostle enjoyning Titus to appoint Elders if any be blamelesse c. v. 5 He gives the reason v. 7. for a Bishop must be blamelesse c. If Bishop and Presbyter be not one and the same the Apostle had not reasoned at all might it not be replyed it is true a Bishop must be blamelesse c. but every Presbyter is not a Bishop Here we may take notice of the miserable shifts of the Jesuits and with them our Prelates The names say they were then common but the office distinct Answ 1. Because the names were common and that perpetually therefore the father here according to all reason in the world argues the office one and the same 2. Not only the names are common but the qualifications for office are here one and the same under those names The selfe same office is set forth their glosse here doth yet further betray the nakednes of their evasion A Presbyter say they is comprehened in a Bishop for every Bishop is a Presbyter though withal he bemore as every Captaine is a Souldier and therefore the names are common Answ 1. Where Persons different in peculiar Calling or Commission do yet agree in one common denomination it cannot be said they are one and the same No man faith though every Captaine be a Souldier that a Captaine and a Souldier are one and the same but here Jerome expresseth according to the Scripture that Bishop and Presbyter are one and the same 2. In such a difference of Persons the lesse may be affirmed indefinitely or universally of the greater but not the greater of the lesse it is true every Captain is a Souldier but it is not true that every Souldier is a Captaine but here the Bishop is affirmed of the Elder Acts 20.17 with 28. and Tit. 1.5 with v. 7. Their second shift is as miserable for this hold is so weak they are forced to quit it That in the Apostles times the office of Bishop and Presbyter was distinct but both at one time conferred upon the same Persons Answ 1. This is to be wise above what is written no such thing any where hinted 2. The highest operations are ascribed to the Elders as such to feed to labour in the word and doctrine therefore the Bishops office could not be above theirs 3. How miserably then had Jerome argued What folly is this saith he that any man should preferre Deacons before Presbyters speaking of the Presbyters of his time when the custome of the Church had obtained that Bishops were above Presbyters that is before Bishops and thence carries on his dispute that according to divine institution there is no difference Now if this Jesuitical Allegation was true the Answer was ready they had in the Apostles time the office of Presbyter and Bishop both though distinct yet in one Person as now they are distinct in several Persons therefore Presbyters now are not by divine institution equall to them the truth is it is one office which was then in one Person undivided is now divided and so shared into severall Persons 5. Argument From 1 Tim. 4.14 If that which is challenged peculiarly to Bishops belong to the Presbyters as such then their office is not distinct but so it is that which is challenged c. Nothing more peculiarly challenged then Ordination yet is that here by Jerome pleaded for the Presbyters in this very question wherin he is pleading the equality of or identity rather of Bishops and Presbyters The same we may argue from Act. 13.1 c. The separating of Barnabas and Saul to their Ministery among the Gentiles by imposition of hands cannot well be conceived belonging to any other then to those to whom it belongs to set a part by like imposition of hands the ordinary Ministers of the word at least not to any inferiour to those But Paul and Barnabas were separate to their Ministery not by Bishops above Presbyters but by Prophets and Teachers who were Presbyters Object The greater cannot be Ordained by the lesse Paul Ordained Timothy Answ This imposition of hands is of like nature with Ordination at the least the Presbyters concurred with Paul 6. Argument From 1 Pet. 5.1.2 The Greek word saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 over-seeing or taking the over-sight is more significant whence the name of a Bishop is drawn The Argument is thus Whatsoever operations belong to the Bishop by his Office the same belong to the Presbyter by his therefore they are not distinct Officers but one and the same The former part is proved thus All that belongs to the Bishops office is comprehended in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies to performe the part of a Bishop from whence the very name of Bishop is derived but whatsoever is comprehended in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 belongs to the Presbyters by expresse testimony here they must act the part of Bishops which were they not the same with Bishops would be to usurpe Therefore if not onely Ordination but Jurisdiction belongs to Bishops the same by as authentique Commission belongs to Presbyters or Pastors and Teachers of severall Congregations Hence as formerly for Ordination so for Jurisdiction we may observe that it is to be performed without Bishops distinct from and above Presbyters 1 Cor. 5. per totum there were then no Bishops in Corinth Object The Apostle there excommunicated vers 3. I have judged already c. Answ 1. Some as Beza for one hold excommunication prevented by publique rebuke and repentance thereupon 2 Cor. 2.6 the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rendred punishment signifies rebuke 2. The Apostles judgement was a judgement of doctrinall determination appointing them what to do in case publike rebuke or admonition should not reclaime him not of juridicall execution The Church was to be gathered in the name and with the power of Christ to deliver c. 3. Had not this Church the same power with those Churches Rev. 2 But they were to proceed by the Apostles direction blamed that they had suffered such and such as the Nicolatians Jezabel c. The Apostle himselfe not formally executing 1 Tim. 5.17 All Church rule is distributed among the Elders or Presbyters therefore