all things spoken and written against the Doctrine of your moderne Priestes If you vouchsafe to reade our writings you commonly giue no more fauourable Censure of them then Iulian the Empetour gaue of the ancient Fathers bookes who thus said of them Soâ—â—◠〈…〉 I read I vnderstood I condemned And we might iustly answere you as Basil and other Learned Byshops answered him Thou hast reade but not vnderstood 〈…〉 for if thou hadst vnderstood thou wouldest not haue condemned Some of you are like those men whereof the Apostle Iude spake who condemne those things which they knowe not Ibid. Others of you knowe and vnderstand more Iude. 10. yet reiect all things as erroneous and hereticall which you knowe to be contradictorie to the positions of your popish priests Yea many of you be such vnequall iudges that although you canot but approue almost all points in the booke yet if there bee but one only thing which you distaste you presently condemne all the rest for it And take it to be as a leafe of Coloquyntis which marreth a whole messe of pottage and as a dead Flye that spoyleth a whole boxe of oyntment In regard whereof I may iustly feare your sharpe and bitter censures of these my Sermons now put foorth to open sight I can expect no more indifferencie and fauour at your hands theÌ„ others my betters haue formerly found NotwithstaÌ„ding as often heretofore I haue laboured by many meanes to giue you satisfaction in your doubtes and demandes both by priuate conference with diuers of the Layetie by seuerall answeres made to the writings of the learned on your side and also by open disputations with your priests as some of you cannot denie if you would testifie truth So would I now giue you full contentment if any reasonable thing will content you for all such exceptions which I thinke you wil take against these Sermons Whereas the learned on your side doe charge vs that in our sermons and writings we interpret the Scriptures according to our owne fancies and priuate conceits and not according to the vniforme sense giuen by the Fathers and the common exposition of the Church and thervpon would perswade you not to heare or reade or belieue any thing which wee proue by the scriptures I will make it apparant that in those points of controuersy touched in these sermons and confirmed by seuerall texts of scripture I haue the consent of the ancient Fathers and also of manie of your owne late wryters Cardinall Bellarmine acknowledgeth that before the Pelagian heresie arose the Fathers did not exactly handle the question of Praedestination by grace Degra lib. arbur libâ—â— cap. 11. initâ—o but onely when occasion was offered did briefly set down their opinions And that Chrysost did not plainly preach preueÌ„ting grace because at that time they were not risen vp Ibid. lib. 6. cap. 6. which denyed it As if the Fathers did speake and write plainely fully of those poynts onely which were controuerted and impugned in those dayes Now it is certaine that few of those poyntes which I mentioned were called into question in their dayes There were many controuersies de co quod creditur non de co quo creditur as the M. of Sentences Lumb sent lib. 3. dâ—st 23. c. out of Augustine distinguisheth of the things to bee beleeued or of the obiect of faith yet not of the habite of faith or of the gift or qualitie whereby wee beleeue And therefore the trueth is not to be gain-sayed though we could not produce very pregnant and plentifull testimonies out of their writings touching the nature and kindes of faith Nowithstanding they haue not left themselues without witnes in that they do vpon occasions declare their iudgements therein which serue to confirme the trueth on our side These testimonies of theirs and the testimonies of your owne Doctors I did forbeare to recite in the Pulpit or write in the copie of the Sermons that so I might auoyde tediousnes Yet hauing diligently perused them and hoping that they would be of force with some that duly consider them I thought good to set them apart by themselues and to adde them as a postcript after all SECT II. WHereas I taught that the word of God is the spirituall seede which must bee sowne in our heartes to make vs fruitfull in all good workes And that Preachers ought to teach and people ought to heare and receiue nothing but the word and did limit the word to the word written I know it crosseth the doctrine of some in your Church and therefore may perhaps be misliked by you First your countrey-man Doctor Stapleton Promptuar in Dominica sexagesim writing a Postill for the instruction of Popish Preachers could not finde in all this Parable any poynt to bee obserued against vs but onely this that the word is the seed And will haue To the same effect the Rhemists not the worde written but the worde preached to be the seede Yea he maketh two words of God the one written write Aâ—â—ot on 1. 〈◊〉 2 1◠〈◊〉 2. the other preached and therby would confute vs who hold that nothing is the word of God but that which is written in the Scriptures of the Olde and New Testaments But theâ—in that great Doctor declared himselfe neither to know what the Scripture is nor what true preaching is noâ— what we hold to be the word of God â—ast what is the Scripture or written word of God It is not the letters and â—illables that be written in bookes but rather the true sense and meaning of them 〈…〉 1. â—â—româ— sayd Nâ— putemus in verbâ—â— scripturatrum esse euangelium sed in sensiâ— Let vs not thinke the Gospel consisteth in the Scriptures but in the meanne Non in 〈…〉 in medvlla non in sermonum folus sâ—d in radice rationis Not in the outward 〈…〉 but in the marrow not in the◠〈◊〉 of beech 〈…〉 4 〈◊〉 4. but in the roote of reason Cardinall Bellarmine woulde haue vs mark that there be two thinges in the Scripture the words written and the sense in them included the wordes are as the sheath the sense is the sword of the spirit As it is a rule among Lawyers that not the bare wordes but the meaning of the wordes is the Law So is it a rule among all Diuines that not the bare words but the true meaning of the words is the Scripture And the reason is Quicquid in duâ—â—â—o sermine neque ad morum honestatem neque ad sideâ— veritatem proprie referrâ— potest â—iguratum esse cognoseas De Doctr. chr lib. 3. cap. 10. Sixt. Biâ—â— other lib. 3. 〈◊〉 Bellar. deverlo Dâ—t lib. 3. cap. 3. because the very words taken properly after their naturall and Grammaticall signification may sometime breede error and then they are not to bee taken properly but figuratiuely According as Augustine well taught That whatsoeuer in the word of
accâ—pistis before angels comming from heaueÌ„ As also that Paul doth not say if they preach contrary things or if they subuert the whole Gospell but if they preach but euen a little beside the Gospell which ye haue recâ—â—â—ed let them be accursed Thomas Aquinas their Angelicall Doctor Quam illud quod conâ—inetur in euangâ—l 〈◊〉 apostolâ—s in sacra scripturaam â—â—ite vel expresse Thom. in Gal. 1. professedly expouÌ„ding that place doth write that nothing is to be preached but that which is conteyned in the Gospells and in the Epistles and in the holy scripture implâ—â—â—ely or expresly Will they say that their Traditions are conteyned in the scriptures either expresly or by way of implication or consequent then are they not vnwritten verities as they tearme them A second answere of the Cardinall is this that the Apostle by Praeter vnderstood Contra. And therefore did not forbid new doctrines and precepts which were besides those that were deliuered but onely doctrines and precepts contrarie to the former Yet will not this serue his turne For in matters of faith and religion prâ—ter and contra are both alike Whatsoeuer is taught as necessarie to saluation if it be besides the scripture must be condemned as well as that which is contrarie to the Scriptures The reason is because the Scriptures conteyne all thinges which Ministers are to teach as necessary to saluation And therefore Paul told Timothie 2. Tim. 3.15.10.17 that they were able to make him wise vnto saluation And were profitable to teach to improue to correct and to instruct in righteousnesse Two of which respect mens mindes what they are to know and â—â—â—eeue as the trueth and what they are to reiect as errors Two of them respect their maners what sinnes they are to auoyde what dutâ—es they are to performe Is there any things needfull to bee taught the people but these things And because the Cardinall answereth that the Scriptures are profitable for all these things but not sufficient Consider the wordes of the Apostle following where hee declareth the end of this profitablenes namely Verse 17 that the man of God may be absolute bâ—ing made perfect to all good works By the man of God he meaneth the Minister of the Gospell That tytle had he in his former Epistle giuen vnto Timothie 1. Tim. 6.11 And Lyra saith 1. Tim. 6.11 Homo dei 1. ad diuinum officium ordinatus qualis estu Lyra in 2. Tim. 3. the man of God was one ordeyned to the diuine office such a one as Timothie was If then the Scripture being profitable for those foure vses will thereby make a Minister of the Gospell absolute and perfect for each good worke belonging vnto him he is not to teach any things ouer and besides the Scripture Theophylact thus writeth on the former place In Gal. 1. Hee doth not inferre if they onely preach contrary things but if they preach that which is beside that which we haue preached that is if they shall adde any thing that is but a very little more they are subiect to the curse And indeed it may seeme strange that the Papists are so earnest to haue vnwritteÌ„ traditions as wel preached as written truthes seeing the things written are more cettaine more excellent and necessary and require a long time to bee all taught and learned They are more certaine because all men are more certainely assured that the Scriptures the doctrines conteyned in them bee the word of God then that vnwritten traditions be his worde De verbo Dei lib 1. cap. 2. Bellarmine confesseth that nothing is better knowne nothing more certaine then the sacred Scriptures which bee conteyned in the writings of the Prophets Apostles that he must needes be most foolish who denyeth that they are to be beleeued And produceth 5. inuincible and infallible proofes that they are the very word of God De verbo Dei noÌ„script lib. 4. cap. 5. WheÌ„ he commeth to speake of traditions he alleadgeth no such proofes but onely goeth about to prooue by 4. places of Scripture which haue bene long agoe answered that there are some traditions though neyther he nor any of his fellowes can tell what they are nor can make a perfit Catalogue of them so vncertain are they Indeede hee deliuereth fine rules De vero Dei noâ— srâ—pt liâ— 4. cap. 9. Ibib. lib. 4. cap. 2. whereby true traditions may bee discerned from false and counterfait traditions yet those rules are grounded on the authoritie of men and do not infallibly proue them to bee the word of God Yea he teacheth that al traditions haue not the like authoritie some haue diuine authoritie some haue Apostolical some ecclesiastical And therfore all of them cannot haue the same authority with the written word which himselfe before proued to haue diuine authoritie And how do they know any thing to bee a tradition but by humane writings and histories which as the Cardinall confesseth De effect suram lib. 2. cap. 25. sine can breede but humane beleefe wherein may be falshood Neither are they so necessarie and profitable as the Scripture It is able â—o make a man wife to saluation It iâ—â— the seede of regeneration It is the foode of our soules It is the sword of the spirit to defend vs from the Diâ—â—ell In bringeth vs to faith and saluation as before I proued Can such profite bee reaped from traditions Did eueâ— any approued authour ascribe such â—â—â—tue and efficacy to them Did â—uer any Christian obteyne these benefites by them Moreouer the thinges taught in the Scripture are not easily learned Augustine wrote that the profunditie of the Scripture is so great Epâ—st 3. that hee might hee might dayly prosâ—â—â—e in them if from the beginning of his childhood to his crooked old age be should with greatest leisure chiâ—fesâ— studie and better wit endeuour himself to learne them onely The Papists will not gain-say this seeing they hold the Scripture to be very obscure Pambo confessed that in 19. Socrat. hist. lib. 4. c. 18. yeeres hee had not learned to practise one lesson taught him out of Psal 39. to refraine his tongue from euill How many yeeres then may our people requiâ—e to learne the meaning and the practise of al things written in the Olde and New Testament I would therefore wish our Popish Priestes and people first to learne how to vnderstand and practise all thinges that bee written and when they haue learned all those then to begin with traditions It is no wisedome to contend much and busie themselues greatly about traditions before they haue learned and practised all things written which be farre more certaine more necessarie and profitable If they would take this course I am assured that there is not any one of them though he liued to be as old as Methuselah that would euer trouble eyther himselfe or vs with traditions Si rusticus â—redat suo epiâ—copo
deest vsurpo milâ—â— ex vâ—seribus domini quoniam miseric or dia effluunt In cantic serm 61. medio But that Came was not of the members of Christ nor had any thing to do with the mâ—rit of Christ that he might presume the same to be his he would haue called that his owne which was Christs as the member doth that which is the heades Thereby teaching that the true beleeuer being a member of Christ doeth call that his owne which is Christs and doth without sinne presume that the merit of Christ is his in particular And therefore in the next words he saith thus of himselfe Whatsoeuer is wanting vnto me from my selfe I boldly take it vnto me out of the bowels of the Lord Iesus because they flow out with mercy Let vs descend to the Popish writers we may finde many of them to iumpe with vs herein Ferâ—s was commended by Sixtus Senâ—nsis to be (13) Biblioth sanct lib. 4. in Iohan Ferus p. 265.14 Non enim semper sides est quod nos fidem dicimus fidem nos dicimus assentire ys quae diuinâ—s scripturis produntur quae ecclesia credenda proponit ComeÌ„t in Mat. 8. lib. 2. a man excellently learned in the diuine Scriptures whose equall in the office of preaching the Gospell the Catholicke Churches of the Germaines haue not in this our time Yet doeth hee in many places condemne the Popish description of faith and approue ours (14) Secundum scripturaâ— fides non aliud est nisi fiducia miserecordiae diuine promissae in Christâ— ibid. Non apprehenditur manu corporis sed manu cordis quae est fides Ferus in Ioh. 3.16 That is not alwayes faith whith we call faith we call it faith to assent to those things which be deliuered in the diuine histories and which the Church propoundeth to be belieued The Scripture speaketh farre otherwise of Faith For according to the Scriptures faith is nothing else but a confidâ—ce of Gods mercy promised in Christ And he bringeth Abrahams example for proofe thereof And of this faith saith hee mâ—ntion is made in the Gospell where it is sayd Hee that beleeueth in the Sonne of God shall not bee condemned The faith which the Scripture commendeth is no other thing then to trust to the fâ—â—e mercy of God this is the true faith whereby the iust man liueth this alone is it which God requirâ—th 〈◊〉 An example of this faith we haue in the Centurion for we do not read that he rehearsed the Articles of faith but that he came to Christ with great trust These wordes make so much for vs that Sixtus Senensis (15) Bibliothec sanct lib. 6. annot 43. sayd of them that hee seemeth to allude to the error of them who teach that iustifying faith is nothing else but an assurance of Gods mercy forgiuing our sinnes through Christ And Dominicus Soto tooke vpon him to confute him in that poynt but Michael Medina defended him against Soto And else-where he speaketh as fully for vs (16) Sed est certa firmâ— staâ—â—li fiducia Christum omniâ—g 〈◊〉 is bona complecti cisque toto corde tota anima totâ—que viribus inhaerere In Ioh. 6.29 To belieue in Christ saith hee is not to know his works for Sathan knoweth this neyther is it to remember or thinke with himselfe that Christ hath suffered and risen againe for euen vngodly men remember these things and thinke of them and yet are made nothing better But it is with certaine sure and stedfast trust to take hold of Christ and all his benefits and to sticke to them with all the heart all the soule and all the strength Pighius in his booke of controuersies dedicated to the Pope Paulâ—s 3. doth teach that although Faith as it is vsually taken by ecclesiasticall writers bee that habite of the minde whereby we do certainly and without any doubting assent to those things which for our saluation are reuealed of God to his Church (17) Hâ—â—e fideâ— rationis mentsque assâ—â—siâ— quo pâ—rfeâ—tasides dâ—â—i possit adtuncta esse debâ—t eâ—â—â—m animâ— cerâ—a quaedâ—m firmaque fiduâ—ta qua Dei verbo veritatiâ— itain nititur it a fidit fidelis anima vt absque vlla haesitatione quicquia illudsit velut si manibus teneret certum habeat c. Controuers 2. de fidet Iustificat fol. 40.41 in 80. Paris 1542. Yet vnto this faith assent of reason and the minde that it may be called a perfect faith there ought also to be adioyned a certaine sure and firme trust of the heart whereby the belieuing soule doth so stay vpon trust to the worde and truth of God that without all doubting whatsoeuer it is he hath it as sure as if he held it in his handes And hee further addeth that this is the Faith and not that assent of reason which the Lord euery where required of them whome hee vouchsafed to heale Of that he spake when he saide Daughter be of comfort thy Faith hath made thee whole And this is the same Faith which maketh prayer effectuall which Christ and Iames require in them that pray Didacus Stella (18) Enarratan Luc. 5. Imò etiamsi peteret illa dimitti si non confideret certissi ne crederet illa sibi aâ—mittenda â—unquam dimitterentur hauing distinguished of faith that there is one to belieâ—e whatsoeuer is to be belieued called a Theological vertue another is a Confidence by which we belieâ—e that the Lorde will giue whatsoeuer we aske He saith that without this faith 1. this Confidence our sinnes cannot be forgiuen For although a man belieue all thinges contained in holy Scriptures to be true and all things which the Church belieueth yet if he shuld not trust and most certainly belieue that they shall be forgiuen him they should neuer be forgiuen him And saint Iames saith Let him aske in faith nothing doubting To the like purpose doth he afterward distinguish of faith describe the later kinde saying (19) Fides dupliciter accipitur Vno modo pro habitu credendi secundum quam assentimur veritatibus sacrae scripturae c. Alia est fides quae considentia vocatur qua petit aliquis a Deo confidenter sperans credens certissime se consequuturum a Domino id quod postulat quae fides necessarià est â—â—anti alias nihil vnquam impetrabit Enarratan Luc. 7. Faith is taken two wayes One way for the habite of belieuing according to which we doe assent to the trueths of the Scripture And this is the Faith without which it is impossible to please God And this is one of the three Theologicall vertues 1. Cor. 13. And by this faith a belieuer differeth from an Infidell There is another faith which is called a Confidence whereby a man asketh of God confidently hoping and belieuing most certainly that he shall obtaine of the Lord that which he asketh Which faith is needefull for him that prayeth otherwise
hee shall neuer obtaine any thing If this be the faith requited of them that pray aright it is the faith of all Gods Saints and of them which are iustified for they pray often and are heard And if this man write truely then those who teach and haue no other faith then an assent to the truth of things reuealed can neuer obtaine pardon of their sinnes nor haue their petitions graunted Tollet taught (20) Hoc in loco non accâ—pâ—â—ur fides proment is assenâ—u sed pro voluntatis fidâ—câ—â— vt recie Euthymius quae signâ—sir at â—o frequens est in scripturis In Luc. 12. anâ—oâ— 52. and that out of Euthymues that Faith in many places of scripture is takeÌ„ Not for the assens of the minde but for the assuraÌ„ce of the will Iâ—nsentus also writeth the same (21) Proâ—de reâ—issime vt apparet dicâ—tur namine fideâ— in euangeliâ—s cum eâ— trâ—buitur aut falus aut consecutâ—â— ommum quae volumus complecti vtrumque assentum illum â—orâ—â—â— ia credendis de Deo aâ— Christo fidâ—â—â—m ex â—â—â—es boâ—â—tate conceptam c. Concord Euang cap. 32. Therâ—â—â—â—â—â—â—st rightly as appeare that may be saide a 〈◊〉 by thâ— name of Faith in the Gospells whâ— saluation or the obtaining of those things which wee desire is ascribed vnto it both these are comprehended both that firme assent in things to be belieued concerning God and Christ and also a Confidence conceyned from his goodnesse c. For these two doe so clâ—auc together that neyther can there be any Confidence without Credulitie neyther can Credulitie without Confidence obtayne any thing of God And to the same effect afterward thus (22) Haec duo nempe credulâ—tas fiduciasimul videntur includi in nomine sides cum subditur diâ—â—sse dominâ—Ì„ secundum fidein vestram siaâ— vobis vt sit sensâ—s sicut creditis me posse vos sanare ob hoc confiditis mâ— curatur is vos ita fiat vobis Concord Euang. cap. 35. These two to wit Credulity and Confidence seeme to be included together in the name Faith when it is set downe that the Lord said According to your Faith be it vnto you That the meaning may be As ye belieue that I can heale you and for this doe trust that I will heale you So be it vnto you If then by the testimonie of these Authors Faith bee often so taken in the Scriptures And if this be the only Faith whereby we obtaine such things at the handes of God Why should wee be condemned as Hereticks for teaching such a faith Ought not we to haue such a faith in Christ for the saluation of our soules that those men had in him for the curing of their bodyes Though Stapleton denie this speciall Confidence yet hee acknowledgeth (23) propter haue fidem vtramque internam externam sanitatem dedit Promptuar domini 18. post pentecost that for one and the same faith Christ gaue them both outward inward health Paulus Burgensis saith that Abraham by the Faith which was imputed to him for Righteousnes did not onely belieue that he should be the Father of many Nations but rather that he his seed should obtaine euerlasting life in heauen In Genes 15. Addit 2. The Diuines of Colone taught that (24) Per fidem verbi Dei operantis in nobis veram contritionem penitentiam est iustificaâ—â—er tanquaÌ„ per causam quaÌ„dam praeparatiuam dispositiuam Persidemautem qua absque dubitatione firmiter confidemus nobis peccata nostra propter Christum esse dimissa instisicamur tanquam per causam susceptiuam Antididag Coloniens de instificat hom fol. 21. through the faith of the word of God working in vs true Contrition and Repentance and other works of preuenting grace we are iustified as by a certaine cause preparing and disposing vs. But through the Faith whereby without doubting we doe firmely trust our sinnes are forgiuen vs through Christ wee are iustified as by a cause receiuing it And also adde further that the (25) Non quomodo extranos in ipso est sed sicut quando â—adâ—â—n nobis dumtamen fide apprehenditur ad iustitiâ—â—n importatur ibid. Righteousnes of Christ is the cause of our Iustification not as it is out of vs in him but as and when the same is imputed vnto vs for Righteousnes yet so that it be apprehended by faith Cassander who was so highly esteemed for learning and wisedome that two Romane Emperors Ferdinand and Maximilian 2. sent to him for his aduise howe to compound the controuersies in religion approueth their opinion saith that (26) Consiâ—tat art 4. Booke was greatly commended of all the Learnedst diuines through Italy France as a Booke that excellently relateth the summe of the Ancients opinion touching religion out of whose writings the booke is as it were confirmed And with great approbation citeth these words out of it (27) Fatemur verum esse ad iustificationem hominis omnino requiri vt homo certo credas non tantum generaliter quòd propter Christum vere paenitentibus remittantur peccata sed quòd ipsi homini remissa sint propter christum per fidem ibid. Wee confesse it to be true that it is altogether required for the iustifying of a man that a man doe certainly belieue not onely generally that for Christ sinnes be forgiuen to them that be truely penitent but also that they be forgiuen to the man himselfe for Christ by faith Hee also alledgeth out of the Ratisbone booke these words (28) Vocamus fâ—â—m viuam motum â—paritus sanâ—â—â— quo vere poratentis â—riguntur ad Denum vere apprehendunt miserecordiam in Christ to premissâ—m vt â—am vere sentiant quod remissionem peccatorum reconeâ—liationem proptâ—r mâ—ritum christi gratuata Dei bonitate acceperunt c. Ibid. We calâ— a liuely faith a motion of the holy Ghost whereby they who truely repent are lifted vp to God and doe truely apprehend mercie promised in Christ that now they truely perceiue that they haue through the fieâ— goodnes of God receiued remission of sinnes and reconciliation for the merits of Christ and doe crye Abba Father And therevpon hee inferreth that rightly agreeabâ—y to the scriptures it is saide that this is the nature of a Iustifying Faith that it perceiue that feeling of Gods fauour which the holy Ghost worketh in vs. And further addeth that to obtaine Iustification (29) Adâ—â—â—tificationem consequendam requiritur talis fides 〈…〉 exâ—â—â—plo Aâ—raâ—â— ad promissionem Dei non 〈◊〉 per disâ—â—dentiam sed praeter spem in spem credat 〈◊〉 credenti in â—â—m qui siscitat Iesum a mortuis in putaturtim â—anc sidem ad iustificationem peccata nâ—n imputaturim Cassâ—nda ibid. p 13. Such a Faith is required whereby a man after the example of Abraham doth not doubt of the promise of God through distrust but aboue hope belieueth
de ratione vere fidei choritatis est permaneniâ—a constantia c. Apud Sext. Senens biblioth lib. 6. annot 214. According to Christian veritie faith he onely that is to be iudged a true faith which hath the efficacy of obtayning saluation According to that Hee that beleeueth in mee hath eternal life And afterward he addeth That true faith indeede doth consist with true loue but that onely is called true loue by a moral truth which hath perseuerance and continuance And that the Scripture neuer called the faith of them who beleeue for a time to be true saith And that those who are damned neuer had true faith And in conclusion he asked Soto whether he is to be called faithfull or a friend who should be ioyned vnto him for an houre by frieÌ„dship and faith which if he will not say because continuance and constancie is of the nature and being of true faith and charitie then cannot such offenders be called true beleeuers in Christ Cardinall Bellarmine holdeth against some who then liued that Christ did not onely (31) Orauit dominus paulo post pro perseuerantia ommum apostolorum imo etiam omnium electoruÌ„ Ioh. 17. Pâ—ter sancte serua eos in nomine tuo quos dedisti mihi De Rom. Pontif. lib. 4. cap. 3. sect altera expositio pray that Peter might continue in faith and in the fauour of God vnto the end but that he also prayed a little after for the perseuerance of all the Apostles yea also of all the elect Ioh. 17. Holy Father keepe them in thy Name whom thou hast giuen me How then can the faith of any of the elect fayle Shall wee thinke that Christs prayer was not heard Doth not he elsewhere acknowledge that the Father heard him alwaies Was his prayer ectuall against the losse of grace and faith by sinne and not against the losse of them by Infidelitie Then was his prayer heard but in part How can they prooue that difference SECT XIIII IN prosecuting this point I produced Peter for an example who though he denyed his Maister with an oath vâ—t still kept faith in his heart And lest any should thinke that this â—â—s a speciall priuiledge in Peter I sâ—ewed that (1) Ioh. 17.20 Christ prayed for others as wel as for him Now if there bee any who imagine that Christ prayed for them after a different maner and to another end let them remember what I alleadged before out of Augustine touching Christ praier for all the elect namelie (2) De Corrept grat cap. 12. That Christ praying for them that their Faith might not fayle without doubt it shall not fayle vnto the end and therefore shall continue vnto the end neyther shall the end of this life find it otherwise then remayning But because that (3) De Iustificat lib. 3. cap. â—4 Bellarmine and others doe teach that Peter did quite loose his faith and the righteousnes thereof I will let you see the testimonies of all sorts of writers to the contrary Tertullian (4) Sed cur petrum ob vigorem fides Aduers Marcion lib. 4. said his name was changed and he was called Peter for the strength of his faith but he ill deserued that name and Christ erred in giuing him a name not agreeable to his nature if hee quite lost his faith Againe hee speaking of Christs prayer for him thus saith of those words That thy faith might not fayle (5) Ne deficeret fides tua id est ne tantum diabolo permitteretur vt fides periclitaretur quo ostenditur vtrumque apud Deum esse concussionem fidei protectionem cuÌ„ vtrumque ab co petitur Et vtique filius Dei protectionâ— fidei habet insua potestate c. De fuga in persecut that is that so much might not be permitted to the Diuel that his faith might be endangered Whereby it is shewed that both are with God both the shaking of faith and the protection seeing both are asked of him The shaking is from the Diuel the protection is from the Sonne And surely the Son of God hath the protection of faith in his owne power which hee asked of his Father of whom hee receiueth all power in heauen and earth If his faith was not endangered by the diuel but protected and kept safe by God through the prayer of his Son how can any truely say that hee lost his faith Hillary (6) Comment in Psal 52 4. taught as is testifyed by (7) Biblioth sanct lib. 5. annot 181. Sixtus Sâ—nensis that Peter in denying his Maister lost not the firmenesse of his faith because although through the tâ—embling of hiâ— flâ—sh which he could not brydle his tongue buâ—si forth into the deniall of Christ yet a firme faith of confessing Christ vnto Martyrdome did not depart from his heart I might also vige that which not onely he (8) In Math. can 20. See Six Senâ—ns biblioth lib. 6. annot 160. elsewhere but likewise Ambrose (9) Comment in Luc. 22. lib. 10. together with him hath written in excuse of Peters denyall That he denyed him not to be God but denyed that he was only a man Though (10) See Sixt Sâ—nensbiblioth li. 6 annot 160. Hâ—â—rony in Math. 26. Theophylact. in Luc. 22. lerorac Theophylact do confute them because so to excuse the Apostle were to make his Maister a lyar who told him before that hee should that night denie him thrice Yet doth (11) In Luc. 22.32 in Math. 26.75 quanquam possumus Hilarium Ambrosium ab errore benigna interpretatione liberare Mâ—ldonatus excuse them both And thereby they plainely declared that they were farre from thinking that hee lost his faith Augustine alleadged the prayer of Christ for Peters faith against the Pelagians who held that man could not continue in grace and in faith vnlesse mans free will did concurre with Gods grace Dare thou say that Christ praying for Peter that his faith might not faile that it should haue failed (12) An andebis dicere etiamrogante christo ne deficeret fides petri defecturam fâ—isse fi petrus eam dâ—fiâ—ere voluisset c. Sed quia praeparatur voluntas a domino ideo pro illo non possit esse inanis oratio quando rogauit ergo ne fides eius deficeret quid aliud rogauit nisi vt haberet in fide liberrimam fortissimam inuictissimaÌ„ perseverantissimam voluntatem De corrept grat cap. 8. if Peter would haue had it to faile that is if hee would not haue had it to continue vnto the ende As if Peter any way willed any other thing then Christ prayed for him that he might will But because the will is prepared of the Lord therefore his prayer for him could not be in vaine Therfore when he prayed that his Faith might not faile what else asked he but that hee might haue in faith a most free a most strong a
Gospells sake And therefore seeke for patience at all seasons that so in the time of persecution and in the time of peace you may continue constant in the profession and practise of Gods word 2. Moreouer this their bringing forth of fruite is amplified by the measure of it which was great in all yet not alike in all All were fruitfull yet there was great difference and varietie in the qualitie of their fruite some brought forth lesse some more Though this be not here noted in this Euangelist Math. 13.8.23 yet is it mentioned by the other two Euangelists Mar. 4.8.20 and that both in the propounding of the parable and in the exposition of it They say some brought forth thirtie fold some sixtie fold some an hundred fold So much did each seede multiplie and encrease Wherein Christ speaketh according to the qualitie of the best ground in Iudea The whole land was very fertile as the scripture teacheth It was a land that flowed with milke and hony and therefore would yeeld great encrease of corne The worst of it was as good as the best of our ground and therefore the best must needes be exceeding fruitfull The ground of other lands haue yeelded great encrease When Isaacke sowed corne in Gerar he receiued an hundred measures for one that he sowed Genes 26.12 Forraine writers record that Byzazâ— in Africa Plin. Hist lib. 18.10 for one bushel of seede yeelded an 150. of encrease That the countrey of the Euhesperites yeeldeth an hundred fold Herodot in Melpom lib. 4. pag. 125. The countrey of the Cynopeans three hundreth fold And the land of Babylon in some parts hath bene so fruitfull Etan Clio. lâ— 1. p. 35. that it neuer yeelded lesse then two hundred fold sometime three hundred fold Now â—he land of Canaan especially in some parts and in a seasonable yeare was not inferiour to them and therefore would yeeld great encrease yet not all alike some parts of it was more fertile then other and so brought forth greater store of fruit Thereby doth Christ set forth the diuersitie of fruitfulnes in his hearers All good hearers yeeld plentie of fruit yet some more some lesse The word worketh powerfully in them all yet more powerfully and effectually in some then in others So fruitfull is the seede of the word that of a few graines there springeth an admirable encrease of all vertues A plentifull store of all graces in the heart many heauenly meditatioâ—s holy thoughts and godly motions in the minde all sorts of good words in the mouth and all manner of good workes in the life yet all good hearers haue not all these in the same qualitie and number In some they more abound in others lesse And therefore as before you sawe some difference betwixt bad hearers so here you may behold some varietie and difference among good hearers For one doth much exceede another in the multitude and encrease of fruites according to the measure of Gods grace giuen to euery one The Rhemistes teach Annot. on Math. 13.8 sect 1. that this difference of Fruites is the difference of merits in this life and rewards for them in the next life See postscript Sect. 15. according to the diuersitie of states As that the hundred fold agreeth to virgins professed threescore fold to religious widowes thirtie fold to the maried And hence would many popish writers proue the excellencie and dignitie of single life aboue widow-hood and mariage Answ But therein they manifestly declare that they neither vnderstand the sâ—â—pe of the parable nor the meaning of Christs exposition 1. For first it is apparant that Christ spake it not of receiuing fruits or rewards but of bearing and bringing forth the fruits of obedience Though these be so linked together as the one sort doth certainely follow the other yet doe they much differ The one sort of fruits are our deeds performed by vs vnto God the other sort are Gods rewards which hee in mercy bestoweth on vs and which we receiue from him The one sort are the fruits of grace here brought-forth for a time on the earth the other are the fruits of glory receiued and enioyed in heauen for euermore Of the former kind Christ speaketh For it was not his purpose to shew the difference betwixt men in heauen but a difference betwixt good hearers in bringing forth the fruits of the word on the earth Euen as before he noted a difference betwixt bad hearers not as they shall be hereafter in hell but as they are now liuing in the world how then can his words proue any merit of workes or difference of merits in the next life 2. Christ in this parable spake not of any outward estates or different degrees of men in the world but onely of diuers sorts of hearers People of all estates and conditions did then heare him and afterward heare the Apostles and doe now heare vs. Now Christ teacheth that of what state or condition soeuer they be whether single persons or maried or widowes they shall beare fruites according to the manner of their hearing and according to the inward disposition of their hearts And therefore a maried person hearing in a better manner and receiuing the word with a better heart then a virgine then a widowe shall bring forth more fruites of the word and receiue more benefite by his hearing 3. Againe God will neither respect nor reward any for their outward estates and conditions but for the right vse of them and for their good cariage and godly behauiour in them And therefore Augustine said In psal 75. Meâ—or est marit at a humalâ—s quam virgo superbâ— An humble maried woman is better then a proud virgin And Cyrill compared virgins which had chastitie of body without puritie of minde In lâ—â—â—t lib. 2. in fine without grace in the heart and obedience in their liues vnto those fiue foolish virgins that had lampes without oyle and were not suffered to enter into the bridegromes wedding chamber And Augustine preferred maried martyrs before chaste virgins De virginit cap. 45. But to leaue them with their absurd collection and to come to the doctrine here entended by Christ we are here taught that many may heare the word of God together and all be profitable hearers and all be saued by their hearing yet all doe not profit alike nor bring forth the same fruites of obedience in their liues but some fewer some more according as their hearts are prepared and according as it pleaseth the Lord to bestowe his graces Yea though they all heare one and the same man and the same sermons and one heare as often as another yet may one be more plentifull in the fruites of the word then is another All furrowes of the same land doe not bring forth an equall number of eares and all eares of the same furrowe doe not beare an equall number of graines but some more some lesse as it
God cannot properly be referred neyther to the honestie of maners nor to the tructh of faith must be knowne to be figuratiue Moreouer the ancient Fathers long agoe the Schoolemen of late time and the Popish writers at this day do teach that there be diâ—ers senses of Scripture And although all of them preferre the hystoricall and litterall sense yet Sixâ—â—s Senensis and Bellarmine doe make it double eyther proper and simple according to the first and naturall signification of the words or metaphoricall and figuratiue when the wordes are translated from their naturall signification to another and that there bee so many kindes of this sense as there bee kindes of figures Now what is preaching but expounding of Scripture and deliuering the true sense of it As appeareth by the practise of Ezra Nehe. 8.8 and the Leuites who reade the Lawe of God distinctly and then gaue the sense and caused the people to vnderstand what was read Those then who in their Sermons deliuer the true sense of the word written according to those seuerall kindes of expositions must needes deliuer the worde of GOD cuen the selfe same worde that is written Againe not onely the things expresly set downe in the Scriptures but likewise such thinges as by sound and necessarie consequence bee collected thence are taken for written truthes and not vnwritten traditions Aeonsus Viruestus a Popish Bishop and a bitter enemie to Luther Adners Luther doginat philippi c. 9. p. 147. acknowledgeth so much For hee saith That things may bee conteyned in the Scripture eyther formally and expresly or materially being drawâ—â— by a necessary collection from the contents And this he saith is called Virtualis continentâ—a To denie this saith hee is not Christian wisedome but Iewish superstition And then teacheth that wee are as much bound to giue assent to those thinges that be materially conteyned and drawne thence by a lawfull collection as to those that be formerly and expresly conteyned Bellarmine cannot deny but that Scoties taught De Eucharist lib. 3. c. 23 there was not any expresse place of Scripture to proue Transubstantiation without the declaration expositioÌ„ of the Church Neyther dare the Cardinall reiect that assertion but saith Quia colligitur ex scriptura diuina that Transubstantiation belongeth to the Catholicke faith because it is collected out of the diuine Scripture In his iudgement then that is a written trueth which is collected from the Scripture as well as that which is expressely set downe in the Scripture If therefore Preachers deliuer no other doctrines in their Sermons if they confute and condemne no other errors if they teach no other duties if they reproue no other sinnes if they minister no other consolations and if they vrge no other exhortations then they haue warrant in the written worde of God eyther by expresse testimonies or by necessary collections the worde which they preach is the very same in kind in nature and substance with the word written And so there is not one word written and another word preached as the Doctor woulde beare men in hand but one and the same word diuersly vsed So absurd is this his obseruation so voyde of reason so destitute of proofe and so discrepant from the doctrine of his owne Church that it may well bee thought that rather malice against vs then any warrant from the text caused him to set it downe And heere behold how farre malice doth carry your teachers euen to forsake their owne companions and to ouerthrow the coÌ„mon and receiued doctrine of their owne Church that so they may crosse and condemne vs. And to conclude with him hee that will regard what be writeth in the latter end of his obseruation may easilie perceiue how hee ouerthroweth his owne note obserued in the beginning For he produceth the Apostle Peter as an indifferent witnes in this case who saith that the Worde of God endureth for euer and this is the worde which is preached among you whose testimonie doth euidently prooue that the worde written and the worde preached then by the Apostles and other Ecclesiasticall persons was the very same worde For it is apparant by that verse which hee alleadged that the worde of God which endureth for euer and the worde which then was preached were one and the selfe same worde Now what was the word that endureth for euer was it not the worde written If anie will denye this let him reade the former verse in Peter and compare that verse and this Isaiah 40.6.7.8 with the wordes of the prophet Isaiah and hee shall finde it to be the worde written by the Prophet So as Peter maketh the worde written by the prophet and preached by the Apostles to bee the same Againe this great Doctor saith * Immutabile est in natura substancia sua etâ—i propagatione explicatione variâ— the Word is the Seede because it is vnchangeable in it owne nature and substance though diuers in explication and proueth it out of Basil and Vincentius Lyrenensis who make that agreemeÌ„t betweene the word written and the word preached that they are both one in substaÌ„ce for they preached nothing but what was written yet the word writteÌ„ was made fruitfull by preaching SECT III. BVt to leaue the Docter and his obseruation It may be some others will acknowledge contrarie to his minde that whosoeuer preacheth nothing but such doctrines as are either expresly taught or necessarily gathered from the scriptures preacheth nothing but the written word And yet will likewise contradict me because they hold that there is another word of God besides the written word Bellarmine (1) De verho Dei nonscript lib. 4. c. 1. saith there is verbis Dei scriptrÌ„ verbum Dei non scriptum A word of God written namely the bookes of the old and new Testaments And a word of God not written namely the traditions of the Church which be not written in the scriptures Gregory de Valentia (2) Refutat falsar causar Herbrand cap. 1. holdeth it for a most certaine thing that the word of God is not onely conteyned in written letters as it pleaseth him to tearme the scriptures in way of disgrace but is also put in the voyce of the Church and there doth sound Coster the Iesuite speaketh more plainely and peremptorily (3) Et anteÌ„ scriptura ecclesiae catholicae consensies concors omnium Christianorum per tot uÌ„ terrarum orbem doctrina Huius scripturae praestantia multis partibus super scripturas quas nobis in membranis Apostoli reliquerunt Encherid cap. 1. So also saith Hosius Quod ecclesia docet expressum Dei verbum est De expresso Dei verbo fol. 119. in 106. That the consent of the Catholike Church and the consonant doctrine of all Christians throughout the world is the scripture And in many points excelleth the scriptures which the Apostles haue left vs in parchments And this he maketh the first and
(21) Euseb â—yst libâ— â— c. 2â— Epiphan hâ—resâ— 51. Hâ—ron Catâ—loâ—â—â—riptâ—r in loâ—â—â— most Authors 〈…〉 that when Iohn pereceyued how other Euangelists wrote onely the things of one yeare euen the yeare after Iohns imprisonment 〈…〉 1. 〈◊〉 5. cap 8. hee approued those and in his Gospell added the things done and taught in the former yeares And because some Heretickes denyed the God-head of CHRIST Sixt Senens Biblioth lib. 1. in Ioh vp 18. lib. 7. haerâ—sis 5. p. 583. he considering that other Euangelistes did at large describe his Humanitie but spake little of his God-head did in his Gospell write such thinges as proued him to be GOD. And added those Sermons which the rest had omitted And therevppon Sixtus Senensis (22) Exomnibus simul coniunctis cosonantissima ac perfectissima salutis nostrae hystoria resulâ—â—t lib. 7. haresis 5. saide against the Alogan Heretickes That from them all ioyned togetherâ— there ariseth a most Consonant and most perfect Hystorie of our saluation It is then to be examined whether the Euangelistes haue written that Christ taught any traditions receyued from men If they write no such matter it is certaine that hee taught none at all Let our Aduersaires runne thorough the whole Newe-Testament and they shall not bee able to finde any one of theyr Traditions recorded by the Euangelistes as a doctrine taught by Christ Seeing then Christ taught no traditions why should wee presume to teach any must wee not receiue from him the matter of our Doctrine and imitate him in the manner of teaching Saide not Ambrose well (23) Nos nona omnia quae Christus non docuit iurè damnamus quia fidelibus via est Christus Si igitur Christus non docuit quod docemus etiam nos id detestabile iudicamus De virginib li. 3. that wee doe iustly condemne all newe things which Christ hath not taught because Christ is the way to Belieuers If therefore Christ haue not taught that which wee teach euen we doe iudge it to be detestable 2. Againe the Apostle Paul was a painefull Sower and did sowe all the worde of God And therefore could (25) Act. 20 26. protest to his hearers that hee had kept nothing backe from them but had shewed them all the counsell of God Now what word taught he Did hee teach traditions and mans ordinances Did he not teach oâ—ly writteÌ„ truths Did he (26) Acts. 17.2 not proue his doctrine by the scriptures Did he not in his apologie before Festus (27) Act. 26 22. auouch that hee taught none other things then those which the Prophetes and Moses did say should come And how could the (28) Acts 17.10.11 Bereans haue examiâ—â—d his doctrine by the Scriptures if hee had deliuered anie thing not taught in the Scriptures Yea Saint Paul was so fâ—rre from preaching any other Doctrine then that which was wirtten (29) Galath 1.8.9 that hee denounced him to be accuâ—sed whether hee were man or Angell that should teach otherwise I knowe Bellarmine would elude that place by two seuerall answeres yet all in vaine First (30) De ver bo Des non script lib. 4. cap 10. he saith that the Apostle speaketh not onely of the word written but of euery word whether it be written oâ—â—t be by tradition But besidâ—â— that hee beggâ—th the question be hath the wordes of the Text and the testimonies of the â—athers and of 〈◊〉 Popish writers against him For the Apostle speaketh of that wâ—â—de which hee and the rest of the Apoâ—â—â—â— preached and therefore he saith If was or 〈◊〉 Angell preach otherwise then that which wee haue preached And what worde hee preached I haue proued before not any traditions but the written word If it be true which Ireneus and Niâ—â—phâ—râ—s doe write Iren. li. 3. c. 1. Niâ—eph hist lib. 2. c. 34. that what the Apostles preached at first was afterward by the will of God set downe in the scripturâ—s it must be acknowledged that they preached no traditions seeing we can finde no traditions penned by theÌ„ in their Epistles And though they had bene traditious when they were preached yet they ceased to be traditions when once they were written by them Againe the Fathers restraine the words of the Apostle to the scriptures as if he were accuâ—sed that would preach any thing not coÌ„tained in them Vobis annâ—ciâ—â—erit preterqu quod inscripturâ—â—â—â—galâ—bus euangâ—licis accepiâ—tis anathâ—na sit Augustine is most plaine therein Whether concerning Christ or concerning his Church or any other thing that pertâ—ineth to our â—aith or life I will not say â—fâ—râ—e for we are not to be compared to him who 〈◊〉 weâ— but euen as he going forward added If â—n Angell from heauen shall preach vnto you besides that which ye haue receiued in the scriptures of the lawe and the Gospell let him be accursed Basill likewise teacheth Cont. lit Petilian lib. 3. cap. 6. that hearers who be skilfull in the scriptures ought to examine those things which bee deliuered of their teachers Sum. morea sum 72. cap. 1. And to receiue those things which be agreeable to the scriptures and to reiect those that be not And produceth this testimonie of the Apostle to proue it which had bene an impertinent proofe if the Apostle had spoken as well of a word not written as of a word written The Cardinall mentioneth both these testimonies Bellarm. de verbo dei non script lib. 4.10 and would auoyd them by saying that they doe not of purpose expound this place but doe proue by this place that it is not lawfull to auouch any thing contrary to the scriptures Yet caÌ„not he deny but that they doe alleadge this place of the Apostle And I hope he will not say but that they doe deliuer the true sense of it and doe alleadge it according to the true meaning of the Apostle Doth the Cardinall thinke that such learned fathers would giue one sense of it when purposely they expound it and another sense when they alleadged it to prooue a point which they haue in haÌ„d This were to wrest the scripture to make it serue their present turne I hope he will not so iudge of such reuerend men And to say that they onely proue thence that it is not lawful to auouch any thing contrary to scripture is to alter and inuert their words Doth not Augustine say Praeterquam quod accepistis besides that which you haue receiued but of that afterward And if by that place they proue that nothing must be taught contrary to the scriptures then must they not hold with the Cardinall that the Apostle speaketh of each word as well written as not written but onely of the written word And so the Cardinall maketh them to confute him In Galal 1. Chrysostome purposely expounding the place saith Paul preferreth the scriptures Si vel paulum euangeli zauerint praeter euangelium quod